| Date |
Text |
| 2009-12-07 19:48:47 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | |
| | CASE NO.: ZBA 3258 |
| | ADDRESS: 4801 DREHER TRAIL NORTH |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: JON SCHMIDT |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.684.6141 |
| | SCOPE OF APPLICATION: EXPANSION TO EXISTING CULTURAL |
| | FACILITY |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. AS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (ZBA) |
| | APPLICATION, FIFTEEN (15) SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2. THE PROPOSED EXPANSION SHALL GO BEFORE THE PARKS & |
| | RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PRAC) PRIOR TO THE |
| | SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA. ADDITIONALLY, A PRESENTATION |
| | SHALL BE MADE TO THE CITY COMMISSION, IN AN APPROPRIATE |
| | FORUM, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA. |
| | |
| | 3. ALL REMAINING UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | (FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, COMCAST, FLORIDA POWER & |
| | LIGHT, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES). |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THE DIFFERENT LINE STYLES ARE |
| | FOR WHAT IS PRESUMED TO BE THE LEASE BOUNDARIES. IS |
| | INTERSTATE-95 A PART OF THE LEASE? THE LINE THAT RUNS |
| | PARALLEL TO THE SOUND WALL/FENCE DOES NOT SEEM TO |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE LIMITS OF THE INTERSTATE-95 |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | WHAT AREA OF LAND IS THE SITE/LANDSCAPE DATA TABLES |
| | GENERATED FROM? |
| | |
| | 5. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE SURVEY. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE |
| | CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 6. AS DISPLAYED, LANDSCAPING IS PROPOSED TO BE |
| | INSTALLED WITHIN THE EXISTING FP&L UTILITY EASEMENTS. |
| | WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE |
| | OBTAINED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA. |
| | |
| | 7. IF THE EXISTING DIRT ROAD IS TO REMAIN, IT SHALL BE |
| | PAVED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MINIMUM |
| | STANDARDS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE EXISTING FENCE IS TO |
| | REMAIN; ITS LOCATION AND CONDITION AS PROPOSED DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO BE FUNCTIONAL AND SHALL BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 8. THERE ARE SEVERAL NEW TREES BEING PROPOSED WITHIN |
| | CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES. PLEASE |
| | VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE LOCATE AND IDENTIFY ALL ABOVE-GROUND UTILITY |
| | AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10. IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE CONFLICT BETWEEN AT |
| | LEAST ONE (1) OF THE ROYAL PALMS PROPOSED AT THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND EXISTING |
| | UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY TO |
| | ENSURE MINIMUM SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11. IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUS COMMENT, THERE ALSO |
| | APPEARS TO BE CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND |
| | UTILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE NEW ADDITION. |
| | |
| | 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED LIMITS OF THE NEW POND |
| | CONFIGURATION AND HOW THIS RELATES TO THE PROPOSED |
| | PARKING LOT. DOES THIS INFLUENCE THE DRAINAGE |
| | CAPACITY/SYSTEM? IF SO, HAVE THE NECESSARY APPROVALS |
| | BEEN OBTAINED FOR SUCH MODIFICATION? WILL THE EXISTING |
| | FENCE SIMPLY DEAD-END, OR WILL IT BE RECONFIGURED |
| | AROUND THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT? EXISTING FENCING NEEDS |
| | TO BE CLEANED UP AND FENCING THAT NO LONGER IS |
| | FUNCTIONAL SHALL BE REMOVED. ADDITIONAL DETAIL IN THIS |
| | AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ANY APPROVAL DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| | BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA. |
| | |
| | 13. SEVERAL EXISTING LIGHT POLES APPEAR TO CONFLICT |
| | WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ALONG THE NORTH AND NORTHWEST |
| | SIDES OF THE ADDITION AND EXISTING STRUCTURE. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER THESE WILL REMAIN OR IF THEY ARE |
| | BEING REMOVED/RELOCATED. |
| | |
| | 14. A PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). |
| | |
| | 15. ADDITIONAL SCREENING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 94-444(D) OF THE ZLDRS, SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE |
| | EXISTING A/C AREA. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT THAT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE NEW ADDITION. |
| | |
| | 16. THE PROPOSED FLOOR AREA OF THE NEW ADDITION, AS |
| | IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE AND PROJECT FACT |
| | SHEET, DOES NOT MATCH THAT IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE |
| | TRAFFIC STUDY AND CONCURRENCY LETTER. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 17. SUFFICIENT DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS; DIMENSIONING OF IMPROVEMENTS |
| | NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED (I.E. LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, DRIVE |
| | AISLES, PARKING ROWS, ETC.), IDENTIFY LOCATIONS OF |
| | EXTERIOR DOORWAYS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 18. PLEASE CONSIDER REDISTRIBUTING THE LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLANDS WITHIN THE PARKING LOT TO MAKE THEM EVENLY |
| | SPACED WITHIN THE PARKING ROWS. |
| | |
| | 19. THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS SOUTH OF THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING WHERE POWER POLES APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH |
| | PROPOSED LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS. |
| | |
| | 20. PLEASE CONSIDER PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING |
| | BETWEEN THE EXISTING PORTABLE ALUMINUM BUILDING AND THE |
| | PROPOSED PARKING LOT. |
| | |
| | 21. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485(O)(1) OF THE ZLDRS, |
| | PARKING LOTS CONTAINING 101 PARKING SPACES SHALL |
| | PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) DISABLED SPACES; ONLY |
| | FOUR (4) ARE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 22. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDRS, THE |
| | LOADING SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET X 50 FEET; |
| | THE SITE DATE TABLE INDICATES A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET X 55 |
| | FEET. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 23. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO FUNCTION CORRECTLY. THE LOCATION AND ANGLE |
| | MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO ENTER/EXIT THE SPACE WITHOUT |
| | CROSSING TRAFFIC AND THERE APPEARS TO BE NO CONNECTION |
| | BETWEEN THE LOADING AREA AND THE EXISTING/PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 24. THE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES |
| | SHALL BE INDENTIFIED. ONE (1) BICYCLE SPACE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE SPACES. A DETAIL OF |
| | THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL |
| | CONFORM TO THE CITY???S MINIMUM CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 25. PLEASE INDICATE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FROM |
| | THE EXISTING PARKING LOT THAT ARE BEING RECONSTRUCTED. |
| | |
| | 26. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE USE OF THE STRUCTURE, IT |
| | IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED THAT ADDITIONAL PARKING BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR BUSES. BUSES SHALL NOT BE PARKED ON GRASS |
| | AND/OR THE DIRT ROAD, AND LOADING/UNLOADING SHOULD NOT |
| | INTERFERE WITH THE NORMAL FLOW OF TRAFFIC. |
| | |
| | 27. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPING BUFFERING SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. IN ADDITION, |
| | BUFFERING SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE PROPOSED |
| | PARKING AND THE PALM BEACH ZOO PROPERTY LOCATED TO THE |
| | SOUTH. |
| | |
| | 28. PLEASE CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE EXISTING |
| | CONCRETE PAD (FORMER TENT SITE) WILL BE REMOVED. THE |
| | SITE PLAN INDICATES IS LOCATION, BUT DOES NOT IDENTIFY |
| | WHAT WILL OCCUR. THE CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES |
| | THAT IT IS TO BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 29. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY |
| | EXISTING/PROPOSED DUMPSTERS. ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES |
| | SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-444(B) |
| | OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 INCHES X |
| | 17 INCHES), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1435 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1459 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
| | |
| |
Print |
