| Date |
Text |
| 2009-11-19 16:31:30 | PB 1559D - THE MODERN RPD EXPANSION |
| | FAILED |
| | REVIEWER ERIC SCHNEIDER (561) 822-1446. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF |
| | ALL REVISED PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY |
| | BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE ALL TEXT DOCUMENTS IN WORD FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY |
| | ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009, TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE DECEMBER 15, 2009 PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS |
| | WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM COMMENT DATE STATED ABOVE, THE CASE |
| | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE RESUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE THE ANGLE FOR THE NEW ANGLED PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 2) THE NEW ANGLED PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE AT A 60 |
| | DEGREE ANGLE. THE SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE ONLY |
| | 14.5 FEET DEEP (NOTE THAT THE MEASURE POINT IS THE |
| | SHORTEST SIDE). |
| | |
| | 3) 60 DEGREE ANGLED PARKING REQUIRES AN 18 FOOT WIDE |
| | DRIVE AISLE. THE 12 FOOT WIDE AISLE AS PROVIDED WOULD |
| | ONLY SERVE 30 DEGREE ANGLED PARKING. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTER LINE SETBACK TO THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE THE SET BACK TO THE WALL FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. |
| | |
| | 6) THE WEST ELEVATION IS MISLABELED. |
| | |
| | 7) CORRECT THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS BASED |
| | ON THE NEW BUILDING LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 8) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED BLOCK WALL AND A |
| | WEST ELEVATION SHOWING THE WALL IN FRONT OF THE |
| | BUILDING. STAFF HAS CONCERNS THAT THE PLACEMENT AND |
| | MATERIAL OF THE WALL DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE |
| | BUILDING ADDRESSING SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE. |
| | |
| | 9) HOW WILL ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE A/C UNITS? NO |
| | OPENING IS SHOWN IN THE WALL AND THERE IS NO ACCESS |
| | FROM THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 10) STAFF WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE INSIDE OF |
| | THE WALL WOULD BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE TO PROVIDE A |
| | VIEW FOR THE PATIENTS. IF LANDSCAPE IS PROVIDED, HOW |
| | WILL IT BE MAINTAINED? |
| | |
| | 11) THE DESIGN OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING READS |
| | AS THE REAR OF A BUILDING AND THUS DOES NOT INTERACT |
| | WITH SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE. IN ORDER TO INTEGRATE WITH |
| | SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE AND THE MANGO PROMENADE |
| | NEIGHBORHOOD, PLEASE ADD A PORCH TO THE WEST FACADE OF |
| | THE BUILDING. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT IT BE LOCATED IN |
| | FRONT OF THE ORTHO TREATMENT BAYS. THERE ARE SEVERAL |
| | OPTIONS FOR THE PORCH: |
| | |
| | A) A THREE FOOT DEEP ROOFED PORCH EXTENDING FROM THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | B) A FIVE FOOT DEEP PORCH EXTENDING FROM THE BUILDING |
| | WITH A ROOF EXTENDING THREE FEET FROM THE BUILDING. |
| | C) MOVE THE BUILDING TWO FEET EAST OR REDUCE THE WEST |
| | FOOTPRINT TWO FEET AND ADD A FIVE FOOT DEEP, ROOFED |
| | PORCH. |
| | |
| | 12) THE PORCH SHALL BE ACCESSED BY A DOOR FROM THE |
| | INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING - RECOMMEND FRENCH STYLE |
| | DOOR(S). |
| | |
| | 13) STAFF WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE PORCH HAVE STEPS TO THE |
| | GROUND THAT LEAD TO A GATE IN THE WALL TO CREATE THE |
| | INTERACTION WITH SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE. |
| | |
| | 14) IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE A MORE RESIDENTIAL APPEARANCE |
| | ON THE WEST ELEVATION STAFF SUGGESTS USING DIFFERENT |
| | ROOF SLOPES AND A RELOCATION OF THE CENTER GABLE. STAFF |
| | IS AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS OPTIONS. |
| | |
| | 15) PLEASE CLEARLY DEFINE PAVED VS. LANDSCAPE AREAS ON |
| | THE PLANS. DIFFICULT TO DISCERN AROUND THE BIKE RACK. |
| | |
| | 16) THE EASTERN PARKING ROW REQUIRES TREES IN THE |
| | TERMINAL ISLANDS. |
| | |
| | 17) SHIFT THE TREE IN THE EASTERN TERMINAL ISLAND OF |
| | THE OFF-SITE PARKING AREA TO THE NORTH. THIS WILL ALLOW |
| | ITS ROOT SYSTEM MORE SPACE AND ALIGN IT WITH THE |
| | WESTERN TERMINAL ISLAND TREE. |
| | |
| | 18) JIM WITMER OF THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | REVIEWED THE LAYOUT OF THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING AND |
| | THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING FOR FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE COMPLIANCE. HE |
| | EXPRESSED CONCERNS THAT THE CURRENT DESIGN DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH THE CODE. SOME OF HIS COMMENTS WILL AFFECT |
| | THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 19) THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT HAS NOT YET AGREED TO THE |
| | ELIMINATION OF THE DUMPSTERS. |
| |
Print |
