| Date |
Text |
| 2008-06-24 15:24:35 | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS |
| | JUNE 23, 2008 |
| | PLANNING BOARD CASE NOS. 1399F AND 1399G |
| | SEDONA COMMONS - 8132 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | ZONING COMMENTS |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8 ? BY 11), AND AN |
| | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL REVISED PLANS. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC |
| | COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE STATED ABOVE, THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN.ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE RESUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ORDER FOR THIS CASE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 17, 2008 PLANNING BOARD MEETING, |
| | ALL PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 |
| | P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 2008. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL FURTHER RESUBMITTALS SHALL BE |
| | ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE PROVIDED THAT |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED.SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN |
| | |
| | 1. LABEL THE TYPE OF CURB THROUGHOUT THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 2. REPEAT COMMENT - NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SIZE AND |
| | LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY EMERY FABIAN, ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR THE |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | 3. THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, ENGINEERING PLANS AND |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLANS DO NOT MATCH.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | REGULATING PLAN (SHEET SP2) |
| | |
| | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(5), FIGURE XIV-2, A |
| | VEHICLE MAY OVERHANG OVER A SIDEWALK OR LANDSCAPE AREA |
| | PROVIDED THAT THE SIDEWALK/LANDSCAPE AREA IS EXTENDED |
| | TO SEVEN (7) FEET.THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS FIVE |
| | (5) FEET SIDEWALKS AND FOUNDATION PLANTING ALONG THE |
| | BUILDING FA?ADES.THEREFORE, STAFF REQUIRES ONE OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | A. ALL SIDEWALKS AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS ALONG THE |
| | BUILDING FA?ADES SHALL BE EXTENDED BY TWO (2) FEET; OR |
| | |
| | B. ALL PARKING SPACES ALONG A SIDEWALK AND FOUNDATION |
| | PLANTING SHALL INCLUDE A WHEEL STOP TWO (2) FEET FROM |
| | THE END OF THE CURB TO THE BACK OF THE WHEEL STOP.IN |
| | THE EVENT THAT THE PARKING SPACES WILL INCLUDE A WHEEL |
| | STOP, PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PARKING SPACES WITH WHEEL |
| | STOPS, IN ADDITION TO THE PARKING DETAILS ALREADY |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 5. REPEAT COMMENT - BICYCLE PARKING LOCATION AND |
| | DETAILS SHALL BE APPROVED BY ALEX HANSEN, |
| | TRANSPORTATION PLANNER, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR THE |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | 6. REPEAT COMMENT - ALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES (EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED) SHALL HAVE THE SAME DESIGN AND MATERIALS |
| | FOR THE OBSCURING GATES.PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE GATES. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, THE NEW STORM SHUTTER ENCLOSURE AND |
| | COMMUNICATION TOWER ENCLOSURE SHALL MEET THE DESIGN |
| | STANDARDS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES AND SHALL MATCH THE |
| | EXISTING DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES IN ARCHITECTURE AND |
| | DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 7. PROVIDE PLANS AND DETAILS OF THE COMMUNICATION TOWER |
| | AND STORM SHUTTER STORAGE AREAS.PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | WALLS ENCLOSING BOTH OF THESE AREAS SHALL BE OF THE |
| | SAME HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 8. REPEAT COMMENT - SIGN DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS DO NOT |
| | MATCH. |
| | A. ACCORDING TO THE SIGN DETAILS, THE HIGH FREESTANDING |
| | SIGN ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 27 |
| | FEET IN WIDTH, WHICH WILL RESULT IN THE SIGN |
| | ENCROACHING INTO THE FOUNDATION PLANTING ALONG THE WEST |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE OF THE RETAIL BUILDING (BUILDING NO. |
| | 7).SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW THE SIGN TO BE ONLY |
| | 10 FEET IN WIDTH.SITE DETAIL SHALL MATCH THE SITE |
| | PLAN DIMENSIONS.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | B. ACCORDING TO THE SIGN DETAILS, THE HIGH FREESTANDING |
| | SIGN ALONG BENOIST FARMS ROAD WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 26 |
| | FEET IN WIDTH, WHICH WILL RESULT IN THE SIGN |
| | ENCROACHING INTO AN EXISTING LIVE OAK TREE.SITE AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW THE SIGN TO BE ONLY 10 FEET IN |
| | WIDTH.SIGN DETAIL SHALL MATCH THE SITE PLAN |
| | DIMENSIONS.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | C. WALL SIGNAGE PROGRAM DOES NOT MATCH THE WALL MOUNTED |
| | SIGNS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS IN SIZE AND SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE. |
| | D. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE |
| | NORTH BUILDING FA?ADE OF THE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING |
| | (BUILDING NO. 6) INCLUDE A FRAME/BORDER AROUND THE |
| | SIGN, AND BE CENTERED BETWEEN THE TWO (2) WINDOWS TO |
| | CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 9. THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS A PORTION OF PAVED |
| | SIDEWALK ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE WEST.CONSENT |
| | FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON THEIR PROPERTY.ADDITIONALLY, |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SIDEWALK AS SHOWN EXTENDS INTO A |
| | LIVE OAK AND COCOPLUMS PER THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | FOR BENOIST PLAZA.THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE A CONTINUOUS |
| | SIDEWALK TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AND NOT PRESENT ANY |
| | CONFLICTS WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | RETAIL BUILDING (SHEET A-2) |
| | |
| | 10. REPEAT COMMENT - STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT THE USE OF |
| | GLASS DOORS INSTEAD OF WINDOWS ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING |
| | FA?ADE OF THE RETAIL BUILDING (BUILDING NO. 7). |
| | HOWEVER, IN ORDER TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND |
| | ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT, STAFF REQUIRES THAT ONE (1) OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING BE PROVIDED: |
| | A. DOUBLE GLASS DOORS; OR |
| | B. A SINGLE GLASS DOOR WITH A WINDOWPANE ON EACH SIDE |
| | OF THE DOOR; OR |
| | C. A SINGLE GLASS DOOR WITH A WINDOWPANE THAT MATCHES |
| | THE SIZE OF THE DOOR. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT WHICHEVER METHOD IS USED, THE OPENINGS |
| | SHALL BE CENTERED IN EACH BAY. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS (CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANNER) |
| | |
| | 1. ON THIS MOST RECENT SUBMITTAL, TWO SABAL PALMS HAVE |
| | BEEN REMOVED ALONG THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE MEDICAL |
| | BUILDING RESULTING IN A LARGE BLANK WALL.PLEASE |
| | INSTALL ONE SABAL PALM IN THAT AREA. THE SIGNAGE CAN BE |
| | PLACED BETWEEN THE SABAL PALMS. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE REMOVE THE STREET LIGHT FROM THE TERMINAL |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE |
| | FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND PLACE IT IN ANOTHER LOCATION. |
| | THE PROPOSED TREE SHALL BE CENTERED IN THE ISLAND.IN |
| | ADDITION, THERE IS A PROPOSED LIGHT POLE WITHIN TEN |
| | FEET OF A PROPOSED LIVE OAK TREE ADJACENT TO THE ACCESS |
| | FROM THE WEST. THE LIGHT SHOULD NOT BE ANY CLOSER THAN |
| | FIFTEEN FEET FROM THE TREE. |
| | |
| | 3. REPEAT COMMENT - IF THERE ARE ANY LANDSCAPE |
| | DEFICIENCIES WITHIN ESTABLISHED AREAS, THE LANDSCAPING |
| | SHALL BE BROUGHT UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS.ALL |
| | EXISTING LANDSCAPING THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE SHALL |
| | MEET ALL MINIMUM STANDARDS AND WILL BE INSPECTED DURING |
| | THE LANDSCAPE FINAL.A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE |
| | PLAN.TREES INSTALLED TOO DEEP DO NOT NEED TO BE |
| | RAISED; HOWEVER THE MULCH AND SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED |
| | FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. |
| | |
| | 4. REPEAT COMMENT - PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(B)(4), |
| | AT LEAST ONE (1) SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE |
| | PLANTED IN THE REQUIRED BUFFER STRIP FOR EACH 30 LINEAR |
| | FEET OR PORTION THEREOF ALONG THE WEST PERIMETER OF THE |
| | SITE.NINETEEN TREES ARE REQUIRED AND ONLY SEVENTEEN |
| | HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.AN ADDITIONAL BUTTONWOOD TREE |
| | SHALL BE ADDED IN THE LANDSCAPE STRIP TOWARD THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING #5 AND A SECOND TREE SHALL |
| | BE ADDED ALONG THAT STRIP SOUTH OF THE DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 5. THE PROPOSED WALKWAY ALONG THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDES |
| | OF THE CELL TOWER SHALL BE MOVED FURTHER OUT FROM THE |
| | FENCE IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED HEDGE. |
| | |
| | 6. REPEAT COMMENT - THE PLACEMENT OF TREES AND OTHER |
| | LANDSCAPING SHALL TAKE THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS OF |
| | THE BUILDING FA?ADE INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN DESIGNING |
| | THE FOUNDATION PLANTING.THIS APPLIES TO THE EAST AND |
| | WEST SIDES OF THE RETAIL BUILDING.PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | THE ELEVATIONS AND FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDINGS ARE NOT |
| | CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 7. THE ASPHALT AREA PROPOSED TO BE STRIPED ON THE SOUTH |
| | SIDE BUILDINGS #2 AND 3 SHALL BE REMOVED, CURBED AND |
| | LANDSCAPED WITH AN ADDITIONAL TREE. THE COMMENT WAS NOT |
| | MADE BEFORE NOW BECAUSE ACCESS TO THE NEW DUMPSTER |
| | NEEDED TO BE LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE TRUCKS TO MANEUVER. |
| | BECAUSE THE DUMPSTER LOCATION IS NOT CHANGING, THERE IS |
| | NO NEED TO HAVE AN EXPANDED ACCESS.UNLESS PAVEMENT IS |
| | REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE CONVERTED INTO GREEN AREA. |
| | |
| | 8. A CERTIFIED ARBORIST SHALL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | CORRECTIVELY PRUNE ALL EXISTING TREES THAT WILL REMAIN |
| | OR BE RELOCATED ON SITE.PLEASE PLACE A NOTE ON THE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | POLICE DEPARTMENT (CONTACT KELLY TUCKER-CARSILLO, |
| | POLICE OFFICER) |
| | |
| | NO RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING WERE PROVIDED: |
| | |
| | 1. REPEAT COMMENT - LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH |
| | LIGHTING (TO INCLUDE LONG-TERM TREE CANOPY GROWTH). |
| | |
| | 2. REPEAT COMMENT - ATM SHALL BE VISIBLE FROM ROADWAY. |
| | |
| | 3. REPEAT COMMENT - ATM SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY ANY |
| | LANDSCAPING OR OTHER FIXED OBJECTS THAT WOULD PREVENT |
| | CLEAR VISIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 4. REPEAT COMMENT - LANDSCAPING SHOULD NOT OBSTRUCT |
| | VIEW OF WINDOWS OR WALKWAYS. |
| | |
| | 5. REPEAT COMMENT - BICYCLE SPACES SHOULD BE LOCATED IN |
| | CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE FRONT OF BUILDINGS AND NOT IN |
| | PARKING LOTS ? NO DOCUMENTATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED |
| | SHOWING THAT MS. TUCKER-CARSILLO HAS APPROVED THE NEW |
| | LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS. |
| |
Print |
