| Date |
Text |
| 2022-04-14 08:49:48 | E220250017 - 300 BANYAN - 301 CLEMATIS FIRST ENG |
| | SUBMITTAL |
| | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 |
| | [email protected] : |
| | |
| | 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE |
| | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF |
| | CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). |
| | 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY |
| | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. |
| | 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM |
| | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE |
| | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND |
| | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED |
| | AREAS. |
| | 5. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING |
| | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT |
| | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] |
| | 6. PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND |
| | SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, GREASE TRAPS, ETC. INCLUDING |
| | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY |
| | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND |
| | IRRIGATION METERS, BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, |
| | AND OTHER DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH |
| | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES |
| | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, |
| | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND |
| | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. GATE |
| | VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR SIDEWALK. |
| | ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE |
| | VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON |
| | PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. PLEASE |
| | SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT |
| | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, |
| | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & |
| | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | 7. PLEASE CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE |
| | ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM |
| | CITY RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 8. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS, |
| | INCLUDING THOSE PROPOSED TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY |
| | PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. |
| | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION, AND |
| | EXISTING METER AND BACKFLOW (TO BE REMOVED?). BACKFLOWS |
| | SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF |
| | EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER METERS |
| | SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO PROPERTY |
| | LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED |
| | ABOVE-GROUND ONLY. |
| | 10. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA |
| | AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE |
| | DESIGN ON ALL BACKFLOWS. |
| | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND |
| | NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. |
| | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: |
| | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS |
| | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF |
| | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; |
| | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE |
| | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A |
| | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). |
| | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF |
| | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION |
| | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL |
| | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. |
| | 12. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER |
| | AND STORM LINES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS WITHIN ROW PER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL GN-2 SERIES. |
| | 13. WHEN SUBMITTING APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW |
| | DEVICES SHOWING SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING |
| | USC APPROVED LEAD-FREE DESIGN. |
| | 14. PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE SANITARY ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE |
| | TIE-IN. |
| | 16. IF SANITARY LINES ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW |
| | ADJACENT SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES |
| | OF ADJACENT PARCELS. |
| | 17. IF WATER LINES ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW |
| | ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. |
| | 18. IF TRENCHING IN IN CITY-MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS |
| | ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION |
| | TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF |
| | WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-4. |
| | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE |
| | STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. |
| | 20. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND |
| | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER |
| | (E-XXXXXXXX). |
| | |
| | MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPER., WPB PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]: |
| | |
| | -UPDATE LABEL FOR LARGE METERS WITH WORDING: ABOVE |
| | GROUND. |
| | -SHEET C4.3: DOORS PATH SEEMS TO CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | PARALLEL 4 INCH BACKFLOWS AND RELATED PIPING; FOR 3 |
| | INCH BFP ALSO ADD SIZE OF METER; IF 3 INCH METER IS |
| | PROPOSED THEN TAP/PIPING SHOULD BE 4 INCH INSTEAD OF 3 |
| | INCH; REMOVE PRIVATE FROM LABEL OF 301 CLEMATIS |
| | PROPOSED WATER SERVICE. |
| | |
| | -CALLOUT ALL CONFLICT CROSSINGS WITH UTILITIES. ADD |
| | CROSSING TABLE IF NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL FRANCHISE UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | -IF METERED WATER SERVICE ON EAST SIDE OF 301 CLEMATIS |
| | WILL NOT BE USED, THEN SHOW REMOVAL. |
| | |
| | -LABEL OLIVE AVE ON SHEET C4.2. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER MAINS, |
| | SEWER LATERALS, WATER METERS, METER BOXES, WATER |
| | SERVICES, SEWER MAINS, MANHOLES, FORCE MAINS, AND |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES IN THE AREA OF 300 BANYAN AND 301 |
| | CLEMATIS. FOR PIPING ADD SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE TO |
| | LABEL. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING FIRELINE WATER SERVICE FOR 301 |
| | CLEMATIS ST. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED DCDA INSTALLATION FOR 301 |
| | CLEMATIS ST. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FDCS FOR 301 |
| | CLEMATIS AND 300 BANYAN. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS |
| | NEAR 301 CLEMATIS AND 300 BANYAN. |
| | |
| | -SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS. |
| | |
| | -SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER MAIN VALVES. |
| | |
| | -ADD PROFILES FOR ALL PROPOSED WATER SERVICES. |
| | |
| | -BOX FOR PROPOSED IRRIGATION METER LOOKS TO CONFLICT |
| | WITH EXFILTRATION. ALSO BOX LOOKS ROTATED DIFFERENT |
| | DIRECTION THAN EXISTING. |
| | |
| | -APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT BACKFLOW COVENANT FOR |
| | 300 BANYAN BLVD. AND 301 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | |
| | -VERTICAL MOUNT DCDA IS NONSTANDARD. ENGINEER NEEDS TO |
| | SUBMIT PROPOSED DESIGN AND VERIFY ANY SUPPORTS NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -ADD FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING WATER SERVICE FOR IRRIGATION |
| | WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE. |
| | |
| | -VERIFY THERE WILL BE NO FOOD SERVICE IN 300 BANYAN |
| | THAT WOULD REQUIRE USE OF GREASE TRAP, BUT BYPASS IT. |
| | |
| | -AT EAST SIDE OF GREASE TRAPS, THERE IS A PIPE 90. IS |
| | THAT ALRIGHT AND HOW IS IT CONSTRUCTED? |
| | |
| | -ADD SLOPE GUIDANCE TO LABELS OF SEWER LATERALS. |
| | |
| | -WATER PLAN SHOWS GAS LINE GOING THROUGH GREASE TRAP. |
| | |
| | -TWO MANHOLES IN ALLEY ARE OVERLAPPING. |
| | |
| | -INCORPORATE PRIOR GUIDANCE FROM TECHNOW: ADD NOTE THAT |
| | WATER MAIN TIE-IN IS TO PROCEED AFTER THE CONTRACTOR |
| | HAS SUBMITTED A CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN FOR |
| | PIGGING/FLUSHING TO THE CITY AND RECEIVING PBC HEALTH |
| | DEPARTMENT APPROVAL.; INSERT COWPB STANDARD DETAIL GS-7 |
| | ?DOGHOUSE MANHOLE? ON DETAIL SHEET.; THE GRAVITY SEWER |
| | IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A CASING THROUGH THE CONFLICT |
| | MANHOLE. INSERT COWPB STANDARD DETAIL P-10 FOR THE |
| | CASING AND THE FDOT CONFLICT MANHOLE STANDARD DETAIL |
| | INDEX 425-080 INTO THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH BFP AND METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. IS |
| | LOCATED SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSE TO EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | CONCERN WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT BUILDING FOOTERS AND |
| | EXCAVATION ADJACENT BUILDING. EOR SUGGESTED DIMENSIONS |
| | OF BUILDING FOOTER AND SAFETY OF EXCAVATION COULD BE |
| | CONFIRMED. PLEASE SUBMIT THOSE VERIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | -ON WATER PLAN, CALLOUT ABOUT A FIRE HYDRANT LOOKS TO |
| | BE OBSTRUCTING PLAN VIEW OF MANHOLE IN OLIVE. |
| | |
| | -SHOW AND LABEL SANITARY MANHOLE AT EAST SIDE OF OLIVE |
| | WHERE WASTEWATER FLOWS TO. ADD INVERT INFORMATION TO |
| | LABEL. |
| | |
| | -PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING |
| | SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, LARGE METERED WATER |
| | SERVICE (ABOVE-GROUND AND DETAILS), AND FIRELINE |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | -SUBMIT LATEST REVISION SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPING PLAN, |
| | AND IRRIGATION PLAN, AND CONFIRM THOSE HAVE NO CONFLICT |
| | WITH UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | -PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES ON OLIVE FOR UTILITY |
| | WORK DOES NOT MATCH DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | -COUPLE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SHADING ON PAVING PLAN IS |
| | NOT IDENTIFIED ON LEGEND. |
| | |
| | -WILL THERE BE STANDING WATER AT MH2? |
| | |
| | -DID NOT SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS CALLED OUT ON WEST SIDE OF |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | -ON PAVING PLAN CANNOT SEE STREET NAMES CLEARLY. |
| | |
| | -WILL APPLICANT MAINTAIN TRENCH DRAIN IN ALLEY? |
| | |
| | -APPROVAL LETTER STATES: ALLEYWAY SHALL BE DESIGNATED |
| | AS ONE-WAY IN THE EASTBOUND DIRECTION, AND NECESSARY |
| | SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS INSTALLED THROUGHOUT ITS |
| | EXTENSION BETWEEN DIXIE AND OLIVE. ENSURE THAT ALL |
| | SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE SHOWN ON PLANS TO |
| | SATISFY THAT REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | -ADD FLOW CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN AS DIRECTED IN |
| | WS-7. |
| | |
| | -ADVISE ON STATUS OF UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD |
| | UTILITIES. SHOW ANY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER BOXES ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | -PROVIDE SEPARATE WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS ON WATER |
| | PLANS FOR 300 BANYAN AND 301 CLEMATIS. NOT SURE IF WHAT |
| | IS CURRENTLY SHOWN IS COMBINED OR JUST FOR BANYAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | MIKE TECHNOW, PUB. UTILITIES ENGINEER, |
| | [email protected], 561-494-1047: |
| | |
| | -SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | PROVIDE SUNSHINE811 TICKET FOR NORTH OLIVE. |
| | - PROVIDE PROFILE AND VERTICAL CLEARANCES BETWEEN |
| | WATER, SEWER AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH STANDARD DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY |
| | CROSSINGS. SHOW EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON THE |
| | PROFILE. THE PROFILE SHOULD SHOW PROPOSED PIPE FROM |
| | TIE-IN AT THE MAIN TO POINT OF SERVICE. |
| | - SHOW STATIONING AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION CLEARANCE |
| | BETWEEN PROPOSED UTILITIES AND EXISTING UTILITIES |
| | AND/OR BASELINE. |
| | - ADD NOTE THAT WATER MAIN TIE-IN IS TO PROCEED AFTER |
| | THE CONTRACTOR HAS SUBMITTED A CONSTRUCTION PHASING |
| | PLAN FOR PIGGING/FLUSHING TO THE CITY AND RECEIVING PBC |
| | HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENG., |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES, [email protected] 561-494-1120 |
| | |
| | 1. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS |
| | A. PAGE 5 OF 8: TRENCH STORAGE MAY CHANGE BASED ON |
| | COMMENT 1.D BELOW. |
| | B. PAGE 6 OF 8: REVIEW RAINFALL DEPTHS. THEY APPEAR TOO |
| | LOW FOR DOWNTOWN WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | C. PAGE 7 OF 8: INDICATE WHERE THE ELEVATION 17.00 CAME |
| | FROM IN THE LAST LINE ON THE PAGE. FINISHED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION IS 12.30 FEET NAVD. |
| | D. PAGE 8 OF 8: IN EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION: |
| | I. H2 CANNOT EXTEND BELOW BOTTOM OF TRENCH |
| | II. DU CANNOT EXTEND BELOW THE HIGHER OF THE TRENCH |
| | BOTTOM ELEVATION OR WATER TABLE ELEVATION |
| | III. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE EXFILTRATION RATE |
| | (K). |
| | 2. FOR EASE OF REFERENCE, NUMBER ALL OF THE PROPOSED |
| | AND EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES. |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED CONFLICT STRUCTURES, THE TYPE OF |
| | STRUCTURE (STORM OR SANITARY) WILL BE DETERMINED BY |
| | WHICH UTILITY PIPE DOES NOT PASS THROUGH THE STRUCTURE. |
| | 3. SHOW THE EAST CONTINUATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER |
| | MAIN AT THE CONFLICT STRUCTURE IN THE INTERSECTION OF |
| | THE ALLEY AND N. OLIVE AVE. |
| | 4. INCLUDE IN THE SHEET LEGENDS ALL OF THE HATCHING |
| | STYLES SHOWN ON THE SHEET. |
| | 5. CALLOUT REPLACEMENT OF THE CURB FOR THE DRIVEWAY |
| | ACCESS ON BANYAN BLVD WITH VALLEY GU |
| | 6. MOVE THE TRENCH DRAIN AT THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE NORTH-SOUTH SIDEWALK CORRIDOR ALONG THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF N. OLIVE AVE. TRENCH GRATE TO BE ADA AND |
| | BICYCLE SAFE. |
| | 7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS. |
| | LABEL RIGHT OF WAY. PROVIDE DISTANCES FROM RIGHT OF WAY |
| | TO: CENTERLINE, BACK OF CURB, BREAK POINTS, BUILDING |
| | FACE. SHOW TYPICAL SURFACE SLOPES, SIDEWALK WIDTHS, |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS, ETC. |
| | A. DRIVEWAY CONNECTION ON BANYAN (FROM CENTERLINE OF |
| | BANYAN BLVD TO 10 FEET INSLDE BUILDING. |
| | B. FROM CENTERLINE OF BANYAN BLVD TO FACE OF BUILDING. |
| | C. FROM CENTERLINE OF N. OLIVE AVE TO FACE OF BUILDING |
| | NEAREST THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF N. OLIVE AVE. |
| | D. FROM CENTERLINE OF N. OLIVE AVE TO FACE OF BUILDING |
| | SET FURTHER FROM THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF N. OLIVE AVE. |
| | 8. SHOW ON THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN WHERE THE |
| | SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. |
| | 9. INDICATE IF THE GRADES ALONG N. OLIVE AVE ARE FOR |
| | EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TOP OF CURB, ETC. |
| | 10. DO NOT LEAVE THE 8? +/- LONG MILL AND RESURFACING |
| | GAP ON N. OLIVE AVE. |
| | 11. PROVIDE AN ENGLISH UNITS (INCHES) VERSION OF THE |
| | SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL ON SHEET C5.1. |
| | 12. ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN, LIST WHICH STRUCTURES ARE TO |
| | HAVE PRB?S INSTALLED AND WHICH PIPE INVERT WILL BE |
| | COVERED BY THE PRB. |
| | 13. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. |
| | 14. PROVIDE PROFILES OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES |
| | IN THE ALLEY FROM THE EXTENSION OF THE WEST PROPERTY |
| | LINE ACROSS THE ALLEY TO THE CONFLICT MANHOLE IN N. |
| | OLIVE AVE. INCLUDE PROPOSED GROUND GRADING PROFILES |
| | ALONG NORTH AND SOUTH ALLEY RIGHTS OF WAY AND |
| | CENTERLINE (FLOWLINE) OF ALLEY. |
| | 15. PROVIDE TO-SCALE PROFILE OF OUTFALL PIPE BETWEEN |
| | CS-1 AND EXISTING CB. SHOW BOTH DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, |
| | PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY LINE, AND EXISTING/PROPOSED |
| | UTILITIES INCLUDING THE EXISTING 10? SANITARY SEWER. |
| | DOES THE OUTFALL PIPE NEED TO BE 18? IN DIAMETER? |
| | 16. PROVIDE TO-SCALE PROFILES OF THE SEWER LATERALS |
| | CROSSING THE ALLEY. SHOW ALL UTILITY |
| | CONFLICTS,STRUCTURES, PROPERTY LINES, BENDS, GROUND |
| | PROFILE, ETC. |
| | 17. THE PROPOSED DOG HOUSE MANHOLE (MH-1) APPEARS TO BE |
| | IN HORIZONTAL CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED CONFLICT |
| | MANHOLE TO THE NORTH. |
| | 18. IS CENTERLINE STRIPING NEEDED FOR DRIVEWAY APRON TO |
| | BANYAN BLVD? |
| | 19. PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR BANYAN BLVD AND N. OLIVE |
| | AVE. IN THE MILLING AND RESURFACING AREAS. |
| | 20. INCLUDE NO LEFT TURN SIGN WITH THE ONE WAY SIGN AT |
| | THE ALLEY. |
| | 21. USE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET PROTECTION. |
| | 22. SHOW WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WILL BE LOCATED. |
| | IT SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| |
Print |