| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-20 10:18:17 | EMAILED TO [email protected] |
| | |
| | WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION AND NEED MORE INFORMATION BEFORE WE CAN |
| | APPROVE THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION WHICH HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW |
| | FEE, WHICH IS CALCULATED ON PAGE 10 OF THE CERTIFIED |
| | COST ESTIMATE FORM. ONCE YOU SUBMIT A REVISED FORM (SEE |
| | COMMENTS 3 AND 4 BELOW), WE CAN EMAIL YOU AN INVOICE. |
| | |
| | 3. THE SUBMITTED CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM DID NOT |
| | INDICATE WHICH LINE ITEMS WOULD BE COVERED UNDER |
| | BUILDING PERMITS. TYPICALLY, A PAVING PERMIT AND |
| | UNDERGROUND FIRELINE PERMIT WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | PROJECTS OF THIS NATURE. PUTTING A "Y" IN THE GRAY |
| | COLUMN ON THE COST ESTIMATE FORM WILL LOWER THE |
| | CALCULATED ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEE. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A STORMWATER POLLUTANT PROTECTION PLAN |
| | AND INCLUDE THE QUANTITIES IN THE CERTIFIED COST |
| | ESTIMATE FORM. |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER |
| | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION |
| | YARDAGE. |
| | |
| | 6. HAS COUNTY APPROVAL BEEN RECEIVED FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OFF OF HAVERHILL ROAD? |
| | |
| | 7. ON SHEET C103 OF THE TOWER PHASE ONE PLANS, THE 12" |
| | TO 15" STORM LINE EAST OF THE POOL IS NOT SHOW. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW SHEET P100B OF BUILDING PERMIT 14120909/ |
| | 14120908 FOR THE LOCATION AND SIZE OF THE LINE. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE REVIEW THE AREA NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF |
| | THE PROPOSED BUILDING ON SHEET C107 OF THE TOWER PHASE |
| | ONE PLANS. THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL SANITARY LINE SHOWN |
| | ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THE DINING ROOM |
| | EXPANSION NEAR THE EASTERN DOUBLE DOORS WHICH IS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET C107. IT IS DIFFICULT TO DIFFERENTIATE |
| | BETWEEN THE EXISTING, PROPOSED, AND TO BE REMOVED |
| | UTILITY LINES. IT APPEARS THAT THE NOTE LEADERS POINT |
| | TO WATER LINES INSTEAD OF FIRE LINES IN A FEW |
| | LOCATIONS. IT ALSO APPEARS THAT THE FDC'S ARE NOT |
| | CONNECTED TO FIRE (OR WATER) LINES. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | APPLICANTS FOR DEMOLITION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT |
| | SHALL SUBMIT A BOND OR DEPOSIT IN AN AMOUNT COVERING |
| | THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP |
| | AND LAND STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. THE EROSION CONTROL |
| | BOND AMOUNT IS TYPICALLY THE TOTAL OF THE NPDES ITEMS |
| | LISTED ON THE CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FORM. THE LAND |
| | STABILIZATION BOND IS TYPICALLY THE COST OF SODDING OR |
| | SEEDING THE AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE |
| | BOND(S) WILL BE RELEASED UPON APPROVED INSPECTION OF |
| | TIE-BEAMS OR SIMILAR VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION. (CITY CODE |
| | SECTION 94-450) THE BONDS WILL BE DUE AT THE |
| | PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. |
| |
Print |
