Plan Review Details - Project Z23060031
Plan Review Stops For Project Z23060031
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-11-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 07-11-2023 Time 17:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-11 17:21:28PUBLIC ART IDENTIFIED IN LANDSCAPE PLANS - MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED ALL PLANS
2023-07-11 17:19:54 
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-12-2023 Time 20:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 07-12-2023 Time 20:58 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-12 21:06:30DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING DATA
 TABLE CORRECTLY STATES THAT 4 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED, BUT THE LEVEL B1 PLAN, SHEET
 A-004.11 DOES NOT SHOW ANY OF THE PARKING SPACES
 LABELED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE SHOW THAT VAN
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ???VAN ACCESSIBLE??? AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF ANY OF THE RETAIL SPACES WILL
 BE RESTAURANTS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE REQUIRED.
 FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND
 LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. GENERATOR EXHAUST. FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 01, SHEET
 TE-A-005.01 SHOWS THE GENERATOR ROMS CLOSE TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE GENERATOR EXHAUST
 TERMINATES BEYONED THE EXTERIOR WALL FACE AND MUST BE
 AT LEAST ANOTHER 10 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A
 CONSTRUCTION PARKING PLAN TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 07-12-2023 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 07-12-2023 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-12 10:38:01COMMENTS FROM LINDA M. QUINONES- CINTRON, PROJECT
 COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES AT [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL
 SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O CALL OUT MATERIAL ON SANITARY LINES
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICKY ELIZONDO, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1101 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-07-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-07-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-07-2023 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-07 11:39:33THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLIANT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR
 THESE STRUCTURES.
  
 TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING
 REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING
 CONSTRUCTED.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR EACH HIGH RISE HAVE TWO SEPARATE
 FDC LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
  
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
  
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR EACH STRUCTURE.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC???S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC???S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE
 STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
  
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
  
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 DO NOT SUBMIT FOR A BDA PERMIT UNTIL TESTING OF SIGNALS
 IS COMPLETED AND REVIEWED BY THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE
 MARSHAL AND PBC PUBLIC RADIO MANAGER.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT KEN DECKER, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 101 SECTION 9.13.
  
 16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER
 THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 07-13-2023 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 07-13-2023 Time 11:49 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-13 11:56:10-MANHOLE WILL REQUIRE REHABBING
 -LATERLAS LARGER THAN 6" WILL REQUIRE CONNECTION TO A
 MANHOLE WITH A CLEANOUT OF CORRESPONDING SIZE ALONG THE
 R/W
 -UTILITY CROSSING INFO MISSING
 -SHOW ALL LATERALS/SERVICES ALONGSIDE PROJECT LIMITS.
 -PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO AVOID TAPPING THE 20" MAIN FOR
 THE HYDRANT
 -PROVIDE DIMENSIONS BETWEEN TAPS AND ADHERE TO GN
 SECTION OF STANDARD DETAILS FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
 SEPARATION
 -CCTV OF GRAVITY MAIN REQUIRED BOTH PRIOR AND AFTER
 CONSTRUCTION
 -DENOTE BACKFLOW TYPES BY USE
 -PROVIDE DEMAND CALCS AND LOS TO DETERMINE SUFFICIENT
 FLOW FROM EXISTING PIPE
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING VALVES AND APPURTENENCES
 -5 FOOT RADIAL CLEARANCE REQUIRED FOR METER BOXES AND
 CLEANOUTS
 -PROVIDE PROFILES FOR ALL CONNECTIONS FROM POINT OF
 CONNECTION TO POINT OF SERVICE
 -DENOTE THE DOWNSTREAM LIFT STATION THAT THE PROJECT
 AREA SERVES
 -EXISTING LATERALS/SERVICES NOT TO BE USED MUST BE
 REMOVED AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 07-10-2023 Time 16:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-10 16:41:31PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -THE LARGE DIAMETER WATER SERVICE PIPES NEEDS TO BE
 DUCTILE IRON INSTEAD OF PVC. PLEASE UPDATE CALLOUTS.
 -WATER METER VAULTS MAY NOT BE COVERED WITH
 WUNDERCOVERS. REMOVE THAT LANGUAGE FROM PLANS. THE TOP
 OF METER VAULTS MUST BE LEVEL WITH THE SURROUNDING
 GRADE AND VISIBLE TO UTILITY EMPLOYEES.
 -WPB GIS SHOWED WATER MAIN ON GARDENIA ST. 8 INCH SIZE,
 BUT UTILITY PLAN SHOWS 12 INCH SIZE. PLEASE VERIFY AND
 UPDATE PLAN AS NEEDED.
 -THERE IS A LINE GOING THROUGH WESTERN WATER METER
 VAULT ON THE UTILITY PLANS. PLEASE LABEL WHAT IT IS AND
 IF THERE IS A LOCATION CONFLICT THEN DISTANCE FROM EACH
 OTHER.
 -PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO RECORD BACKFLOW
 COVENANT AS A CONDITION OF WATER SERVICE.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES AND
 WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
 -FOR THE 8 INCH FIRE SERVICES, ADD WORDING ON THE
 LABELS DESCRIBING WHICH PORTIONS OF PROPERTY THEY SERVE
 (SIMILAR TO DESCRIPTION PROVIDED ON 6 INCH WATER
 METERS).
 -METER VAULT DIMENSIONS SAY 4 X 6, BUT ACTUAL METER
 VAULT MAY BE LARGER. IT WOULD BE REVIEWED AND
 DETERMINED DURING ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
 -ADJUST 6 INCH MJ GATE VALVE DOWNSTREAM OF EASTERN
 WATER METER VAULT SO THAT IT IS NOT OVER OR UNDER THE
 NEARBY CROSSING PIPE.
 -THE 6 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MUST BE RP TYPE. ADD RP
 TYPE TO LABELS.
 -VERTICAL ORIENTATION OF BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WOULD ONLY
 BE ALLOWED IF THEY ARE USC APPROVED FOR THAT
 ORIENTATION WITH THE EXACT MAKE, MODEL, AND SIZE. SOME
 TYPES OFF BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY BE OFFSET AND NOT
 COMPLETELY VERTICAL.
 -PLEASE REVIEW THE EAST MOST 6 INCH TAP AND WATER
 SERVICE LINE. IT CONVERGES INTO THE PLUMBING FOR ONE OF
 THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES AND ALSO DOES NOT SHOW A
 WATER METER. THAT DESIGN IS NOT ALLOWED AND NEEDS
 REVISION.
 -ADD TYPE OF BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO THE 8 INCH BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY LABELS. DCDA MAY ONLY BE USED INSTEAD OF RPDA
 IF PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM DOES NOT HAVE ADDED CHEMICALS OR
 AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLY. ADD VERIFICATION IN RESPONSE.
 -UTILITY PLANS SHOW WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOME BIG FPL VAULT
 AT THE EAST SIDE OF GARDENIA ST. IT IS TOO CLOSE TO
 WATER MAIN, AND IS ALSO PROPOSED IN SIDEWALK,
 LANDSCAPING, AND STREET WHICH MAY INTERFERE WITH
 DRAINAGE AND BE A TRIP HAZARD.
 -PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM AND PLUMBING MUST COMPLY WITH WPB
 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS. NOTIFY
 FIRE AND MEP DESIGNERS OF THAT AND HAVE THEM
 INCORPORATE THE WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS INTO
 THEIR PLANS. IN ADDITION, FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 NEED TO HAVE OSY VALVES, BE LEAD-FREE & USC APPROVED,
 AND HAVE DUCTILE IRON PIPE ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE.
 LASTLY, VERTICAL BACKFLOW INSTALLATIONS ARE NONSTANDARD
 AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND VERIFICATION OF
 FIRE AND MEP PLANS.
 -THE SURVEY SHOWS MANY DIFFERENT TYPES OF EASEMENTS.
 WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ALL OF THEM?
 -VERIFY REQUIRED CLEARANCE AREAS AROUND FIRE HYDRANTS
 AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAIL P-8 IS MAINTAINED
 ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT LIGHT POLES, BIKE RACKS, TREES,
 AND BUSHES.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-10 14:49:50PLEASE PROIVDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- SERVICABILITY LETTER FROM THE APPROVED HAULER FOR
 THE SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICE BASED ON THE PROPOSED
 SITEL PLAN AND AUTOTURN.
  
 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-13-2023 Time 12:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-13-2023 Time 12:10 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-13 12:09:32THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE
 SECTION 78-9 IS NGVD1929. THE NAVD1988 VERTICAL DATUM
 MAY BE USED IF THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988
 AND NGVD1929 IS PROVIDED. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND
 LIST THE CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 EVERY PLAN SHEET WITH
 ELEVATION INFORMATION. NOTE SURVEY DATA NOTE #3 ON
 SHEET C-110 LISTS NGVD1929 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM OF
 ELEVATIONS.
  
 2. SHEET C-300
 A. LABEL THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE LOCATED WITHIN THE
 STOP BAR FOR EAST BOUND HIBISCUS STREET AT THE FEC
 CROSSING.
 B. ADJUST LEADER ARROW FOR THE NOTE 'EXIST. 30" RCP
 STORM TO REMAIN', LOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF THE AERIAL
 WALKWAY HATCHING AND POINTING TO THE BACK OF CURB.
  
 3. SHEET C-400
 A. IS RXR STRIPING NEEDED FOR THE EB LEFT TURN LANE ON
 HIBISCUS?
 B. PROPOSED FLUSH PARKING MIDBLOCK ON THE EAST SIDE OF
 S. ROSEMARY AVE IS LOCATED AT MARKED PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING. CAN THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING REMAIN AND THE
 PARKING SPACES MOVED TO THE OTHER TWO PARKING AREAS
 NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING?
 C. SHOW AND LABEL THE NORTH R/W OF GARDENIA STREET.
 LABEL THE SOUTH R/W OF HIBISCUS ST AND THE WEST R/W OF
 S. ROSEMARY AVE.
  
  
 4. RCP PIPE TO BE USED WITHIN THE CITY R/W.
  
 5. VERIFY EXISTING MANHOLE SOUTHEAST OF STRUCTURE D-23
 IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE PIPE COMING FROM D-23.
  
 6. VERIFY THE EXISTING MANHOLE TO THE NORTH OF
 STRUCTURE D-19 IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE PIPE COMING FROM
 D-19 PLUS THE EXISTING PIPE FROM THE CATCH BASIN SOUTH
 OF THE MANHOLE.
  
 7. JUSTIFY 18-INCH DIAMETER OUTFALL PIPES FROM THE
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 8. REMOVE EXTRA LINEWORK SHOWN ON CITY DETAIL ST-6 ON
 SHEET C-511.
  
 9. LABEL ALL OF THE STREETS ON ALL PLAN VIEWS.
  
 10. THERE MAY BE INSUFFICIENT HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE TO
 INSTALL SANITARY MANHOLES MH-01, MH-02 AND MH-03
 BETWEEN THE EXISTING 12-INCH WATER MAIN AND THE 30-INCH
 STORM PIPE/EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
  
 11. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER
 SYSTEM.
  
 12. LABEL DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURES AND PROVIDE
 DETAILS OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
  
 13. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH SYSTEMS.
  
 14. HOW ARE THE ACO SLOT DRAINS AND AREA DRAINS
 CONNECTED TO THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
  
 15. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING AT EACH
 PROPERTY LINE. SHOW GRADE BREAKS, FLOW ARROWS, ETC.
 LABEL AND DIMENSION SURFACE FEATURES (CURB AND GUTTER,
 SIDEWALK, BUILDING, LANDSCAPE STRIPS, ETC.). PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM R/W TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT, BACK OF CURB,
 BACK OF SIDEWALK, FACE OF BUILDING.
  
 16. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION AT EACH DRIVEWAY. SHOW GRADE
 BREAKS, FLOW ARROWS, ETC. LABEL AND DIMENSION SURFACE
 FEATURES (CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK, BUILDING,
 LANDSCAPE STRIPS, ETC.). PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM R/W TO
 EDGE OF PAVEMENT, BACK OF GUTTER, BACK OF SIDEWALK,
 FACE OF BUILDING.
  
 17. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR GARDENIA ST, HIBISCUS
 ST. AND S. ROSEMARY AVE.
  
 18. MOVE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OUT OF THE RIGHT OF
 WAY.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. MODIFY THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT AND PROVIDE A COPY OF
 THE SFWMD ERP AND NPDES NOI BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 2. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 3. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-11-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-11-2023 Time 08:05 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-11 09:27:161. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. NEED MORE DETAIL OF FPL PROPOSED VAULT IN NE CORNER
 AND CONNECTIONS OF THE MULTIPLE 4" CONDUITS. VAULT MAY
 NEED TO BE RELOCATED INSIDE PROPERTY.
 3. SECTION OF STORMWATER IN FEC RIGHT-OF-WAY MAY NEED
 TO BE ABANDONED.
 FURTHER REVIEW WILL BE FORTHCOMING AFTER 7/20 MEETING
 WITH RELATED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-17-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-17-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 07-17-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-17 23:54:37TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
 2) PAGE 18, BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, CORRECT
 FUTURE BUILD-OUT YEAR FROM 2025 TO 2026
 3) PLEASE PROVIDE DRI TOTAL AND CONVERTED TRIPS WORKING
 FILE. SPECIFICALLY: PROVIDE AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET
 SHOWCASING TOTAL NUMBER OF VESTED TRIPS/SQUARE FOOTAGE
 ALLOWED PER LANDUSE TYPE, AND CURRENT BALANCE. THIS IS
 A SIGNIFICANT ITEM FOR TRIP GENERATION VERIFICATION AND
 VALIDATION PURPOSES
 4) A MORE ROBUST AND COMPREHENSIVE VALET OPERATIONAL
 ANALYSIS, INCLUSIVE OF PROPER GRAPHICS DEPICTING
 VEHICLE PATHS BETWEEN VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AND GARAGE
 PARKING STALLS MUST BE PROVIDED. THE SITE CIRCULATION
 AND CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT SHEETS WOULD BE A GREAT
 STARTING POINT AND SHOULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS DOCUMENT. VALET LOCATIONS SHOULD
 BE IDEALLY DESIGNATED EITHER PICK-UP OR DROP-OFF ONLY,
 DEPENDING ON VALET ROUTES, SO TO MINIMIZE CONGESTION.
 LASTLY, THE U-TURN VALET MANEUVER DEPICTED IN THE SITE
 CIRCULATION SHEET FOR THE HIBISCUS LOCATION SHOULD BE
 AVOIDED/FORBIDDEN, OR AT THE VERY MINIMUM AUTOTURN
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED TO PROVE SAFETY AND
 FEASIBILITY OF SUCH MOVEMENT
 5) IN THE CASE VALET SERVICE IS OFFERED TO ANY PATRONS
 OF NEIGHBORING RETAIL AND RESTAURANT FACILITIES, THEN
 HISTORICAL DATA MUST BE PROVIDED TO CORROBORATE
 FEASIBILITY AND OPERABILITY OF THE PROPOSED VALET
 LOCATIONS. AS CURRENT ANALYSIS SEEMS TO SIGNIFICANTLY
 UNDERESTIMATE POTENTIAL DEMAND. MOREOVER, GIVEN
 RECURRING LOCAL EVENTS ENTAILING ROAD CLOSURES (I.E.
 ROSEMARY AVE WEEKEND CLOSURE BETWEEN OKEECHOBEE AND
 HIBISCUS), ANALYSIS SHOULD PROVIDE CONTINGENCY AND
 ALTERNATIVE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
 6) PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
 MEASURES WOULD NEED REFINEMENT AND FINALIZATION. A TDM
 AGREEMENT, SUCH AS THE ONE DRAFTED FOR THE 360 ROSEMARY
 DEVELOPMENT, SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH PLANNING AND
 ENGINEERING SERVICES
 7) TROLLEY SERVICE HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED AND IN THE
 MIDST OF BEING REPLACED BY NEWER SERVICE VEHICLES AND
 ROUTES; PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
 AUTHORITY AND CITY MOBILITY MANAGER FOR LATEST
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE REVISE TRANSIT ASSUMPTIONS IN THE
 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ACCORDINGLY
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS
 8) TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN COMMENTS: ROSEMARY VALET
 LOCATION NOT CALLED OUT/MARKED, SEVERAL DIMENSIONS
 MISSING (E.G. ROADWAY, CROSSWALK, SINGLE TRAVEL LANE),
 UTILIZE A MUCH LIGHTER GRAY COLOR FOR PAVEMENT TEXTURED
 PATTERNS, REMOVE REDUNDANT OR OBVIOUS CALLOUTS (E.G.
 PROPERTY LINE, CROSSWALK, PAVER), REMOVE SETBACK LINES,
 REMOVE ELEVATION DATA
 9) EXTRA INFORMATION AND DETAILS PERTAINING SIGNAGE AND
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE HORIZONTAL
 CONTROL PLAN. THERE IS NO CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN AND THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL
 PLAN; APPLICANT COULD MAKE BETTER USE OF EACH
 10) PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE SIDEWALK AREA FRONTING
 THE 575 ROSEMARY DEVELOPMENT. BASED ON THE SUBMITTED
 PLANS, IT SEEMS THAT NO PARKING STALLS NOR TRANSIT STOP
 ARE PRESENT
 11) WHAT IS THE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER WITH THE
 HARDSCAPE PLAN DEPICTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK DETAILS?
 12) GIVEN THE HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC WITHIN AND NEARBY
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, SIDEWALK WIDTHS SHOULD BE
 MORE THAN THE MINIMUM 8-FEET REQUIREMENT, AT THE VERY
 LEAST 10-FEET ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ON HIBISCUS AND
 ROSEMARY, UNOBSTRUCTED (METERS, PLANTERS AND LIGHT
 POLES SHOULD BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND TAKEN INTO
 ACCOUNT). PORTIONS OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG GARDENIA ARE
 NOT COMPLIANT (5-FEET), PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 8-FEET AND REMOVE PARKING STALLS IF NECESSARY
 13) AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHEET T-110 AND 111. DRAWING IS
 NOT CLEAN, ESPECIALLY NEARBY THE DRIVEWAY. PLEASE
 REMOVE ANY ITEMS, LAYERS, ELEMENTS NOT PERTINENT TO THE
 ANALYSIS (E.G. ELEVATION, PROPERTY, EASEMENT, AND
 SETBACK LINES), WHILE CLEARLY DEPICTING BUILDING WALLS
 AND FEATURES THAT MAY ENCROACH WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
 ENVELOPE. WHAT IS THE MERIT OF THE DELIVERY PLAN?
 14) PAVEMENT MARKINGS NEARBY AND ALONG THE THREE LANES
 SECTION OF THE ROAD WEST OF THE QUADRILLE AND HIBISCUS
 INTERSECTION NEED TO BE MORE DETAILED, SO TO REDUCE
 VEHICULAR CONFLICTS AND PROVIDE SAFER AND OPTIMAL
 CIRCULATION TO/FROM THE ABUTTING GARAGE DRIVEWAYS
 15) ON HIBISCUS, DUE TO THE CURBLESS ROAD
 CONFIGURATION, PLEASE REDUCE THE NUMBER OF
 OPENINGS/CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AREAS AND
 VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANES BY MEANS OF PLANTERS/LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS OR OTHER STREET FURNITURES/ELEMENTS (E.G.
 BENCH, ARTWORK, BARRIER, ETC.). AT THE SAME TIME,
 PROVIDE A WIDER MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK THAN THE ONE
 PROPOSED
 16) PROVIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALKS ON ROSEMARY AND
 GARDENIA
 17) GIVEN THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
 PLEASE IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT). NOTE: THOSE ARE GENERAL MICROMOBILITY
 AREAS AND MAY NOT BE DEDICATED TO EXISTING
 MICROMOBILITY MODES (I.E. BRIGHT BIKES)
 18) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER
 CONTAINING SUCH INFORMATION
 19) LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPOSED VALET
 OPERATIONS ON HIBISCUS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO OPTIMAL
 CIRCULATION NOR A SAFE TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT GIVEN
 THE SLANTED ALIGNMENT AND ITS VICINITY TO A VEHICULAR
 BOTTLENECK/LANE-REDUCTION AREA. MOREOVER, THE CURBSIDE
 MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOWCASES VEHICLE PATH ENCROACHMENT
 WITH THE OPPOSITE TRAVEL LANE WHEN DEPARTING FROM VALET
 STAND. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING AND/OR ESTABLISHING
 VALET OPERATIONS ON GARDENIA, AS WELL AS INTERNALIZING
 VALET OPERATIONS, ESPECIALLY PICK-UPS, IN THE GARAGE
 20) ON-STREET VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF LOCATION SHOULD BE
 A MINIMUM OF 12-FEET WIDE, FOR SAFETY PURPOSES
 21) BASED ON THE COORDINATION WITH DDA AND CITY
 MOBILITY MANAGER, INCLUDE EXISTING AND PLANNED TRANSIT
 ROUTES IN THE CIRCULATION MAP, AS WELL AS DEPICTING AND
 MAKING PROVISION FOR TRANSIT STOP LOCATIONS. PLEASE
 KEEP THE REVIEWER COPIED IN EACH CORRESPONDENCE ON THE
 MATTER.
 22) PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF EXISTING METERED STALLS THAT
 ARE BEING REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
 23) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET
 NUMBER CONTAINING SUCH INFORMATION
 24) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 25) ARE THERE ANY TRANSIT STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 26) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS
 27) PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1) - IN THOSE CASES
 WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
 FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
 STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET - PLEASE REVIEW ALL PROPOSED GARAGE
 STALLS AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY, IF NEEDED
 28) SHEET TE-A-005.02. DIRECTIONAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON
 THE EAST SIDE OF THE GARAGE DRIVE AISLE ARE INCORRECT,
 PLEASE REVISE
 29) PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK TURN-AROUND SPACES AT EACH
 DEAD END OF THE GARAGE, ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT TO
 LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE IN THE WEST TOWER
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-05-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-05-2023 Time 17:54 Rev Time 16.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-05-2023 Time 17:54 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-05 17:55:15CASE NO. PB 950RRRRRR
 ROSEMARY EAST SUBAREA REDEVELOPMENT
 550 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
 (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. IF THE RESUBMITTAL IS AFTER THE CITY???S
 EPL SYSTEM GOES LIVE, THE RESUBMITTAL WILL BE FULLY
 ELECTRONIC. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS
 THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON THURSDAY,
 AUGUST 10, 2023, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 OCTOBER 17, 2023 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 13,
 2023), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
 THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) A PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS LETTER IS REQUIRED.
  
 2) THE OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUESTED AS PART OF THIS
 DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE AVAILABLE OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE CITYPLACE DRI. YOU MUST
 PROVIDE A CONVERSION TABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS IN ORDINANCE NO. 5038-23.
  
 A. THE 138,744 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SUPPORT AREAS
 MUST BE ASSIGNED TO EITHER OFFICE OR RETAIL IN THE DRI
 CONVERSION TABLE. THE DRI IS BASED ON THE GROSS SQUARE
 FOOTAGE OF BUILDINGS.
 B. THE DRI CONVERSION TABLE SHALL ONLY INCLUDE RETAIL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS BEING CONVERTED. THE 63,890
 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL DOES NOT NEED TO BE CONVERTED
 SINCE THE EXISTING RETAIL ON C BLOCK IS 64.538 SQUARE
 FEET.
 C. THE BANKED 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE ON THE
 RESTORATION HARDWARE PARCEL DOES NOT NEED TO BE
 CONVERTED SINCE IT IS BEING SHIFTED TO THIS BUILDING
  
 3) YOU MAY NOT CLAIM SUBAREA REQUIRED ELEMENTS AS
 INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER(S),
 SPECIFICALLY THE REQUIRED PLAZA AT ROSEMARY/HIBISCUS
 AND THE PEDESTRIAN PASSAGE OR MEETING THE MINIMUM EV
 PARKING REQUIREMENT (27 SPACES). THE PROVISION OF EXTRA
 SPACES MAY BE CLAIMED. ADDITIONALLY, THE WAIVER
 INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS STATES THAT THE PROJECT
 CREATES 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE. THIS IS
 AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE NOT LISTED ON THE OPEN SPACE
 DETAILS. PLEASE CLARIFY
  
 4) WAIVER 1 IS NOT APPLICABLE. THE PODIUM SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS IS BELOW 5 STORIES AND 70 FEET. THE 6TH STORY
 BEGINS AT 68 FEET, SO IT IS PART OF THE TOWER. THERE
 MAY BE WAIVERS NEEDED THE TOWER REQUIREMENTS FOR LEVEL
 6.
  
 5) THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS THAT THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WILL GENERATE 3,593 MORE DAILY VEHICLE
 TRIPS THAN THE CURRENT USE OF C BLOCK. THE REQUIRES
 THAT YOU PROVIDE A CONTRIBUTION FOR TROLLEY OPERATIONS,
 PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICE OR A PARTNERSHIP WITH OTHER
 MODES OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT
 OF THESE ADDITIONAL VEHICLE TRIPS ON THE DOWNTOWN
 ROADWAY NETWORK.
  
 6) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE BUILDING MUST BE BUILT TO A
 MINIMUM LEED SILVER, OR EQUIVALENT RATING SYSTEM.
  
 7) THERE ARE COMMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS, THAT
 ONCE ADDRESSED MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR
 REQUIRED WAIVERS. STAFF HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED WITH
 SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION TO SUPPORT ANY WAIVERS OR
 POSSIBLE WAIVERS AT THIS TIME.
  
 ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS
  
 8) THE HEIGHTS NEED TO BE SHOWN MEETING THE DOWNTOWN
 HEIGHT MEASURE REQUIREMENTS, "HEIGHT IS CALCULATED FROM
 THE AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDEWALK".
 THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY INSTANCE
 WHERE THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS AT 21 FEET, WHICH IS WHERE
 THE BASE HEIGHT IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
 ONCE THE HEIGHT IS ACCURATELY SHOWN, STAFF WILL
 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SUBAREA REQUIREMENTS.
 NOTE: THE BASE HEIGHT IS SHOWN DIFFERENTLY ON DIFFERENT
 DRAWINGS. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT CONDITIONS.
  
 9) PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW FLOOR PLATES THAT ARE THE SAME
 HAVE DIFFERING AMOUNT OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
 10) THE STAIRWELLS TO THE GARAGE LEVELS ARE NOT
 ENTRANCE LOBBIES AND MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING
 THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 11) SINCE THE PASSAGEWAY IS NOT SHOWN CONTINUING
 THROUGH TO HIBISCUS STREET, IT MAY NOT BE COUNTED
 TOWARD MEETING THE HIBISCUS STREET ACTIVE USE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 12) THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MAY ONLY BE COUNTED AS ACTIVE
 USE ON THE GROUND LEVEL WHERE IT EXISTS, NOT ON LEVELS
 2 THROUGH 5.
  
 13) THE LEVEL 1 TRANSPARENCY IS MEASURED ONLY BETWEEN
 GRADE AND 10 FEET IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE
 TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS.
  
 14) PROVIDE A TABLE THAT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THAT THE
 HORIZONTAL PROJECTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. THIS SHALL
 INCLUDE THE TYPE, THE REQUIRED DIMENSIONS AND
 VERIFICATION THAT 50% OF THE FRONTAGE IS PROVIDED.
  
 15) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE HEIGHT FROM GRADE
 AND THE EXTENSION FROM THE BUILDING FOR THE CANOPIES
 AND ANY AWNINGS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THEY
 COMPLY WITH THE HORIZONTAL ENCROACHMENT STANDARDS.
  
 WEST TOWER:
  
 16) THE PODIUM MAXIMUM SETBACK LINE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 A. A PORTION OF THE PODIUM (NORTH END) EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM 49-FOOT SETBACK FROM SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE.
 B. PORTIONS OF THE PODIUM EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 48-FOOT
 SETBACK FROM GARDENIA STREET.
  
 17) PROVIDE A DIMENSION LINE THAT VERIFIES THE WEST
 TOWER ARCADE IS A MINIMUM 12 FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 18) THE BANDING THAT IS AT EACH FLOOR IS AN
 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION TO VERIFY
 THAT THIS BAND DOES NOT ENCROACH THE REQUIRED SETBACK
 BY MORE THAN TWO (2) FEET.
  
 19) THE PLANAR BREAK DRAWINGS FOR LEVELS 3 AND 4 DO NOT
 SHOW A PLANAR BREAK DEPTH OF THREE (3) FEET. THE
 DECORATIVE COLUMNS ARE THREE (3) FEET IN DEPTH AT THEIR
 DEEPEST LOCATION, BUT THE WALL ONLY RECESSES
 APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) FOOT.
  
 EAST TOWER:
  
 20) THE PODIUM MAXIMUM SETBACK LINE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 A. PORTIONS OF THE PODIUM EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SETBACKS
 FROM HIBISCUS STREET AND GARDENIA STREET.
  
 21) THE EAST TOWER BUILDING FOOTPRINT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS
 INCORRECTLY PROVIDED. IT MUST LIST THE SIZE OF THE
 FOOTPRINT AT THE 60-FOOT HEIGHT, NOT THE STORY ABOVE 60
 FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS EXCEEDED, WHICH
 WOULD REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A WAIVER.
  
 22) THE BUILDING ELEMENTS ON EAST TOWER LEVEL 6, SUCH
 AS THE STAIRS AND ELEVATOR MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 23) PROVIDE THE ENLARGED ELEVATIONS FOR THE GARAGE AREA
 WITHOUT THE LANDSCAPE.
  
 24) PLEASE DESCRIBE HOW THE FACADE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE GARAGE COMPLIES WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 25) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE ONE (1) FOOT SQUARE
 OPENINGS PROPOSED FOR THE GARAGE WILL KEEP THE VEHICLES
 AND THE STACKERS FROM BEING SEEN FORM OUTSIDE OF THE
 GARAGE, ESPECIALLY AT NIGHT.
  
 26) THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT REFLECT THE LANDSCAPE SCREEN
 ON LEVELS 4 AND 5.
  
 27) LEVEL 6 SHOWS PARKING ON THE PODIUM ROOFTOP. LEVEL
 7 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE A COVER OVER THE PARKING.
 PROVIDE DETAILS ON THIS COVER. PLEASE NOTE THAT IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-111(Q), THIS COVER MAY NOT
 EXCEED 30 PERCENT OF THE PARKING GARAGE ROOF DECK.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE ELEVATOR AND STAIR ROOFS NEED TO BE
 SHOWN ON LEVEL 7.
  
 28) THE TOWER BEGINS AT THE FIXED HEIGHT OF 60 FEET
 WHICH REQUIRES THAT A MAXIMUM OF 65% OF BUILDING B MAY
 BE LOCATED AT THE MINIMUM SETBACK ALONG THE HIBISCUS OR
 GARDENIA STREET FRONTAGES WITH THE REMAINING 35% OF THE
 BUILDING SETBACK AT LEAST 50 FEET. PLEASE PROVIDE
 VERIFICATION OF THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 PARKING
  
 29) IN ORDER TO UTILIZE A PARKING RATIO OF 1.75 PARKING
 SPACES PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE, VALET
 OPERATIONS AND RIDESHARE PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF SHALL BE
 PROVIDED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF NEW BUILDINGS OR
 WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO ELIMINATE
 DISRUPTION TO THE PUBLIC CIRCULATION SYSTEM. THE PLANS
 DO NOT SHOW THIS REQUIREMENT BEING MET, SO AN
 ALTERNATIVE MORE COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM FOR OPERATIONS,
 WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE USE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF
 WAY, AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, COULD BE
 DEVELOPED FOR THE ROSEMARY SQUARE CORE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED. THIS WAS NOT DONE.
  
 A. THE OPERATIONS PLAN MAY INCLUDE THE REQUIRED FREIGHT
 DELIVERY PLAN THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED.
 B. THE OPERATIONS PLAN MAY THE CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN
 THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED.
  
 30) THE DATA TABLE STATES THAT 1,333 PARKING SPACES ARE
 REQUIRED FOR THE TWO BUILDINGS (125 FOR RETAIL AND
 1,208 FOR OFFICE) WITH 41 EXCESS PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED. THE PARKING BREAKDOWN SHOWS THAT THE MAJORITY
 OF THESE PARKING SPACES (1,046) ARE PROPOSED TO BE
 ACCOMMODATED THROUGH THE USE OF STACKERS, MANY OF THEM
 IN A TANDEM CONFIGURATION. THE USE OF STACKERS REQUIRES
 THAT COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT IS PRESENT DURING THE HOURS
 OF OPERATION OF THE GARAGE AND THE USE OF TANDEM SPACES
 REQUIRES A VALET ATTENDANT DURING THE HOURS OF
 OPERATION OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE A DETAILED PLAN OF HOW
 THIS GARAGE WILL FUNCTION THAT COMPLIES WITH COMMENT
 #29.
  
 31) THE VALET OPERATION PLAN THAT IS INCLUDED WITH THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY STATES THAT THERE WILL BE 12 VEHICLES
 UTILIZING THE HIBISCUS STREET DROP OFF DURING AM AND PM
 PEAK AND THAT ONLY TWO ATTENDANTS ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE
 EXPLAIN HOW THE 1,000 STACKER SPACES, MANY OF THEM
 TANDEM WITH SOME TRIPLE DEEP, THAT REQUIRE ATTENDANTS
 WILL FUNCTION SO THAT THERE IS NO BACK-UP INTO HIBISCUS
 STREET. THE VALET OPERATION PLAN DOES NOT SEE TO TAKE
 INTO ACCOUNT THE USE OF STACKERS.
  
 32 THE PROPOSED SITE CIRCULATION PLAN DOES NOT MATCH
 WHAT IS DESCRIBED IN THE VALET OPERATION PLAN BOTH IN
 ROUTES AND HOW THE PICK-UP SPACES ARE USED. STAFF IS
 NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE CIRCULATION PLAN AS
 PROPOSED.
  
 33) HOW IS THE ATTENDANT PARKING SEGREGATED FROM THE
 NON-ATTENDANT PARKING? IF IT IS JUST STRIPING ON THE
 GROUND, THEN THE END OF EVERY DEAD-END AISLE NEEDS TO
 HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE. IF A PHYSICAL BARRIER IS USED
 FOR ATTENDANT SPACES, THEN ANY DEAD-END AISLES THAT ARE
 CREATED NEED TO HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE BARRIER.
  
 34) PROVIDE THE DEPTH AND WIDTH FOR ALL OF THE PARKING
 ROWS, INCLUDING THE STACKER AND TANDEM ROWS.
  
 35) THERE ARE MULTIPLE PARKING SPACES THAT DO NOT HAVE
 THE MINIMUM 24-FOOT AISLE WIDTH PROVIDED. THIS IS NOT
 PERMITTED.
  
 36) THERE ARE MULTIPLE PARKING SPACES THAT DO NOT HAVE
 THE CLEAR 8.5-FOOT WIDTH TO BACK UP OUT OF THE SPACE.
  
 37) THERE ARE DEAD-END AISLES THAT DO NOT HAVE THE
 TURN-AROUND SPACE OR THE BACK-UP AREA.
  
 38) THERE ARE ADA PARKING SPACES ON LEVEL B1 THAT ARE
 NOT THE CLOSEST TO ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES OR HAVE AN
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE WALKING BEHIND
 OTHER CARS. THE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ROUTE FOR THESE
 SPACES DOES NOT SEEM TO BE FEASIBLE.
  
 39) PROVIDE THE STACKER DETAILS.
  
 40) STACKERS MAY NOT BE USED FOR EV.
  
 41) PROVIDE THE ANGLE PARKING SPACE DETAIL.
  
 42) 80 EV SPACES REQUIRE THAT 4 ADA PARKING SPACES HAVE
 EV ACCESS. STAFF WAS ONLY ABLE TO LOCATE 2 ADA PARKING
 SPACES THAT HAVE EV ACCESS.
  
 43) THE BOLLARD SHOWN IN THE EV PARKING SPACE DETAIL
 MAKES THE SPACE NOT MEET THE 18-FOOT DEPTH MINIMUM.
  
 44) THE WHEEL STOPS ARE PLACED INCORRECTLY. THE CITY
 REQUIRES TWO (2) FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE WHEEL STOP
 TO THE END OF THE SPACE.
  
 45) PROVIDE THE PARKING SPACE COUNTS FOR EACH PARKING
 ROW, AND PREFERABLE FOR EACH SPACE.
  
 46) MARK ALL OF THE NON-STACKER AND TANDEM SPOTS THAT
 WILL BE USED FOR VALET.
  
 47) PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE VEHICLES USED IN THE
 LOADING TURNING PLAN. NOTE: DRAWING 04 SHOWS THE TRUCK
 HITTING THE SUPPORT COLUMN, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
  
 48) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE BICYCLE RACK AREAS ON
 THE PLANS AND ON A DETAIL SHEET.
  
 49) PROVIDE A BLOW UP, WITH DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE
 ROOM ON THE PLANS. THE SPECIFIC MODEL SPECIFIED ON THE
 DETAIL SHALL BE USED.
  
 50) PROVIDE THE MOBILITY STATION DIMENSIONS ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 51) ALL THREE PROPOSED CURB CUTS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 25
 FEET PERMITTED DOWNTOWN. WAIVER REQUIRED.
  
 52) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE DRIVEWAYS MAINTAIN
 THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION.
  
 53) STAFF IS UNABLE TO FOLLOW THE PARKING FLOW BETWEEN
 FLOORS IN THE WEST TOWER. EACH FLOOR HAS A MISSING
 SECTION.
  
 54) THE LEVEL 2 TO LEVEL 3 PARKING RAMP WITH PARKING
 EXCEEDS THE CODE PERMITTED SIX (6) PERCENT SLOPE.
  
 55) THE SLOPES OF THE LEVEL 4 PARKING RAMPS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED.
  
 56) THE SUBAREA REQUIRES THE PROVISION OF AT LEAST ONE
 CAR SHARE STATION WITHIN A PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE PORTION
 OF THE PARKING FOR THE NEW BUILDING. STAFF WAS UNABLE
 TO LOCATE THE CAR SHARE STATION.
  
 57) THE SUBAREA REQUIRES THAT TWO PARKING SPACES ARE
 DESIGNATED FOR CARPOOL AND VANPOOL USE. STAFF WAS
 UNABLE TO LOCATE THESE SPACES.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 58) PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWING THE STREET TREE AND EASTERN
 BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 59) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS
 SHADE CANOPY OVER THE SIDEWALK, WITH LARGER SHADE TREES
 PLANTED AT 30-FOOT INTERVALS AND SMALLER SHADE TREES
 PLANTED CLOSER TOGETHER.
  
 A. THE ALEXANDER PALM CLUSTERS AS SHOWN AT GENERALLY
 30-FOOT INTERVALS DO NOT MEET THE CONTINUOUS SHADE
 CANOPY STANDARD.
 B. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LOCATIONS THAT TREES ARE SPACED
 MORE THEN 30 FEET APART, WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW FOR THE
 CONTINUOUS SHADE CANOPY. NO JUSTIFICATION HAS BEEN
 PRESENTED FOR STAFF TO SUPPORT THESE MULTIPLE GAPS IN
 EXCESS OF 30 FEET.
 C. THE GARDENIA STREET FRONTAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN THE 17
 TREES REQUIRED BY CODE (500 LINEAR FEET/30).
  
 60) COCONUT PALMS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE USED AS
 STREET TREES.
  
 61) STREET TREES IN THE DOWNTOWN ARE REQUIRED TO BE A
 MINIMUM OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT, WITH A MINIMUM EIGHT (8)
 FEET OF CLEAR TRUNK. THE LIVE OAKS MAY NOT BE SPECIFIED
 AT 18-20 FEET.
  
 62) IF ALEXANDER PALMS CONTINUE TO BE USED AS STREET
 TREES, THEY MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 20 IN HEIGHT.
  
 63) THE ORANGE GEIGER TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE
 REQUIREMENT OF 12 FEET AT INSTALL.
  
 64) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT
 STRUCTURAL SOIL IS USED FOR THE STREET TREES, TO
 INCLUDE UNDER ADJACENT PAVED AREAS, OR THAT AS AN
 ALTERNATIVE A SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SOIL CELL SYSTEM IS
 USED.
  
 65) GOOGLE STREET VIEW SHOWS A FIBER OPTIC MARKER ALONG
 THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE WITH THE FEC RR.
 IF ANY PORTION OF THE FIBER OPTIC CABLE IS LOCATED ON
 THE C BLOCK PARCEL, IT WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED OFF
 THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE LANDSCAPE
 SO THAT ANY FUTURE MAINTENANCE REQUIRED OF THE FIBER
 OPTIC LINE WILL NOT AFFECT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 MATERIALS.
  
 66) THE EIGHT (8) FOOT SIDEWALK DIMENSION HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED FOR MOST OF THE SITE; HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT
 PROVIDED AT THE PINCH POINTS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE SITE AND ALONG ROSEMARY BETWEEN THE COLUMNS AND THE
 LANDSCAPE BEDS TO VERIFY THESE LOCATIONS PROVIDE THE
 FULL SIDEWALK WIDTH. THERE IS A LOCATION AT THE
 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE (ALONG ROSEMARY) THAT THE
 PAVER SIDEWALK TAPERS AND MERGES WITH THE PAVER SEATING
 AREA. THIS AREA MUST BE MAINTAINED WITH A MINIMUM
 EIGHT-FOOT CLEAR AREA AT ALL TIMES. NO STREET FURNITURE
 MAY BE LOCATED HERE IN THE FUTURE.
  
 67) OPEN SPACE MUST BE OPEN TO THE SKY UNLESS IT IS
 COVERED MEETING THE OVERHEAD COVER DEFINITION. ARCADES
 OR COLONNADES ARE NOT ALLOWED AS OVERHEAD COVER, SO
 THIS AREA OF THE CLAIMED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS NOT
 PERMITTED TO BE COUNTED EITHER AS MEETING THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF THE OVERHEAD COVER. THERE IS AN
 ADDITIONAL OVERHANG AT LEVEL 3 THAT IS BEING PROPOSED
 AS OVERHEAD COVER. WHILE NO DIMENSION IS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS, IT APPEARS TO BE AN ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE THAT
 IS TWO (2) FEET IN DEPTH, WHICH IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO
 PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM THE SUN OR RAIN AS REQUIRED BY
 THE OVERHEAD COVER DEFINITION. CURRENTLY, THE PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET.
  
 68) PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO
 BUILDING MECHANICAL SPACES, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICE AREAS,
 TRASH PICK-UP, LOADING OR UNLOADING AREAS, ETC. THE
 EAST TOWER LEVEL 1 PLAN SHOWS THE ELECTRIC ROOM AND THE
 FCC IN THE CENTER OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE VERIFY THAT
 THESE ROOMS MAY BE LOCATED IN THIS LOCATION AND WILL
 NOT BE REQUIRED TO BE PUSHED TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE
 BUILDING AGAINST THE TWO OPEN SPACES.
  
 69) PROVIDE A TABLE VERIFYING THE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE
 WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BASED ON THE TREE CANOPY
 STANDARDS LISTED IN TABLE IV-8.
  
 70) EACH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA MUST STAND ALONE
 MEETING THE OPEN SPACE STANDARDS. THE OVERHEAD COVER
 FOR LEVEL 19 WEST AND LEVELS 21 AND 23 EAST EXCEED THE
 MAXIMUM 30% PERMITTED.
  
 71) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE FOLLOWING WILL BE
 ACHIEVED:
  
 A. THE GROUND LEVEL PLAZA MUST INCLUDE SHADE TREES
 INSTALLED USING A SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM.
 B. THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE PLAZA MUST HAVE A SYSTEM
 TO RETAIN STORMWATER ONSITE. THE USE OF A PERVIOUS
 PAVER SYSTEM OR RAIN GARDEN DESIGN IS ENCOURAGED;
 HOWEVER, ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS ARE PERMITTED.
 C. THE ROOFTOP RAINWATER IS TO BE CAPTURED AND RETAINED
 ONSITE. THE USE OF THE CAPTURED RAINWATER FOR
 IRRIGATION AND OTHER NON-POTABLE USES IS ENCOURAGED;
 HOWEVER, AT A MINIMUM, ONSITE GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION
 IS REQUIRED.
  
 72) THE RENDERINGS OF THE BUILDINGS SHOW A GREEN WALL
 ON LEVELS 4 AND 5 INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED ACTIVE USE.
 PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED GREEN WALLS. THIS SHALL
 BE REFLECTED ON ALL THE PLANS.
  
 LIGHTING
  
 73) THE CUT SHEET SHOWS THE PROPOSED OLLVIO GRANDE LED
 PLAZA LIGHTS, BUT THESE FIXTURES TO NOT MATCH THE
 FIXTURES THAT ARE IN THE EXISTING HIMMEL PLAZA AROUND
 THE SPLASH PAD. ALL THE LIGHTS IN THE PLAZA/OPEN SPACE
 AREAS SHALL BE CONSISTENT IN HEIGHT AND FIXTURE TYPE.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE ARB ARBOR FIXTURES ARE NOT
 CONSISTENTLY USED IN THE PLAZAS/OPEN SPACES.
  
 74) THE PLAZA LIGHT LOCATIONS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 75) THERE ARE A FEW LOCATIONS WHERE THE BASE PLAN USED
 FOR THE LIGHTING PLAN DIFFERS FROM THE LANDSCAPE AND
 HARDSCAPE PLANS. THE LIGHTING PLAN MUST USE THE LATEST
 BASE PLAN.
  
 76) THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHERE LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN
 DIRECT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES. THE LIGHTS MUST BE
 CLEARLY SHOWN TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF TEN-FOOT SEPARATION
 FROM OAK TREES.
  
 77) THE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN REQUIRE
 THAT ALL BUILDINGS PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY
 NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING
 ENTRANCES, ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS, AT A MINIMUM
 OF 0.6 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE
 CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THERE ARE A FEW
 INSTANCES IN THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE PLAZA/OPEN
 SPACE AND THE PASSAGEWAY THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 0.6 FOOTCANDLES.
  
 DRI REQUIRED ITEMS
  
 78) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED
 BY THE CITYPLACE DRI.
  
 WATER CONSERVATION
 10. THE PROJECT SHALL UTILIZE WATER CONSERVING DEVICES
 AND METHODS THAT, AT A MINIMUM, MEET THE CRITERIA
 OUTLINED IN THE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN OF THE PUBLIC
 WATER SUPPLY PERMIT ISSUED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH UTILITIES DEPARTMENT BY THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER
 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. WATER CONSERVING TECHNIQUES FOR
 LANDSCAPING SHALL BE ENCOURAGED.
 11. ALL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SHALL USE WATER-SAVING
 PLUMBING FIXTURES, AND OTHER WATER CONSERVING DEVICES
 AS SPECIFIED IN THE WATER CONSERVATION ACT, SECTION
 553.14, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO REDUCE WATER USE.
  
 ENERGY CONSERVATION
 14. IN THE FINAL SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN PLANS, EACH
 INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPER SHALL: 1) INCORPORATE THOSE ENERGY
 MEASURES IDENTIFIED ON PAGE 25-6 OF THE APPLICATION FOR
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL; 2) COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA
 THERMAL EFFICIENCY CODE PART VII, CHAPTER 553, FLORIDA
 STATUTES; AND 3) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE,
 INCORPORATE MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN THE TREASURE COAST
 REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL'S REGIONAL ENERGY PLAN DATED
 MAY 1979.
 15. EACH DEVELOPER SHALL USE THEIR BEST EFFORTS TO
 INCORPORATE EACH OF THE 17 ENERGY SAVING METHODS
 OUTLINED ON PAGES 51 AND 52 IN THE ENERGY SECTION
 DISCUSSION OF THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING
 COUNCIL'S ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR DOWNTOWN UPTOWN
 (ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT D), EXCEPT FOR METHODS 15 AND 17.
 THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO COMMIT TO THE
 DETAILED ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES UNTIL THE
 FEASIBILITY HAS BEEN FULLY EVALUATED, AS AGREED TO BY
 THE CITY AND DEVELOPER.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved