Plan Review Details - Project Z23030025
Plan Review Stops For Project Z23030025
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-29-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 03-29-2023 Time 13:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-12-2023 Time 13:11 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-29 14:02:53DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:
  
 DEVELOPER MUST INDICATE CLEARLY IN WRITING (MEMO) IF
 THEY ARE CHOOSING:
  
 OPTION 1: ART ON SITE AT 1% OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
 COSTS OR
 OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART FUND AT .75%
  
 OPTION 1 DOES REQUIRE PROPOSED ART LOCATION FOR SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL. IF DEVELOPER CHOOSES OPTION #1 IT MUST
 BE CLEARLY MARKED (PROPOSED FUTURE PUBLIC ART SITE) ON
 ALL SITE PLANS. FURTHER THE PROPOSED LOCATION MUST MEET
 THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENTS.
  
 OF NOTE ARTWORK FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ART LIFE
 ORDINANCE SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS COMPLIANCE WITH
 ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE PARKING GARAGE STRUCTURE
 DESIGN. THE SCREENING OF THE GARAGE IS A SEPERATE
 REQUIREMENT AND MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED AS MEETING THE
 PUBLIC ART REQUIRMENT.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER
 [email protected]
 561.822.1521
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 04-12-2023 Time 18:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 04-12-2023 Time 18:34 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-12 18:37:28DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
 PERMIT AT LEAST ONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE. PER SECTION
 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ???VAN ACCESSIBLE??? AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 3. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A
 CONSTRUCTION PARKING PLAN TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-22-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 06-22-2023 Time 19:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 06-22-2023 Time 19:21 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-31-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-31-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-31-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-31 11:04:12Z23030025 500 CLEARWATER, 28 STORY RES BLDG ??? 3.31.23
 1ST REVIEW
  
 COMMENTS FROM LINDA QUINONES-CINTRON, PROJ. COORD., ENG
 SERVICES, [email protected]:
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3266/
 637521981284930000
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-
 FORMS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/BACK
 FLOW-PREVENTION-AND-CROSS-CONNECTION
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PLEASE SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O RECEIVED CCTV REPORT; PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF
 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE
 ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O COMMENTS FROM RICKY ELIZONDO, PUB. UTILITIES PLANS
 EXAMINER, [email protected] , 561-494-1101:
 O COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-01-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-01-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-01-2023 Time 12:37 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-01 12:37:43FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
 PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-06-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-06-2023 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-06 10:35:42THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
  
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTERS
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDCS SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. EMERGENCY COMMUNCATION CENTER - COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 AND NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 101 SECTION 9.13.
  
 16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER
 THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-29-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 06-29-2023 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 06-29-2023 Time 16:57 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-29 17:01:12LANDSCAPE COMMENTS
  
 1.SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND PALMS
 IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED.
 ANSI 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF
 SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR
 RELOCATION. MITIGATION SHOULD BE RECALCULATED UPON
 RECEIPT OF ARBORIST REPORT.
  
 APPLICANT RESPONSE: DUE TO THE AREA CONSTRAINTS OF THE
 SITE (LIMITED SPACE TO PLANT) AND THE QUALITY OF THE
 EXISTING LANDSCAPING PROPOSED, ONLY ONE TREE IS
 PROPOSED TO BE SAVED. ALL OTHERS WILL BE REMOVED. SEE
 THE ARBORIST REPORT INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL FOR
 TREE RATINGS AND DETAILS.
  
 [NOT SATISFIED] TREE DISPOSITION CHART ON LP-1 LISTS
 TREES 1,8,9, AND 11 IN GOOD CONDITION. TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED ON SITE. THE
 TREES LISTED ON THE DISPOSITION ARE NOT NUMBERED THE
 SAME AS THE ARBORIST REPORT SO IT IS DIFFICULT TO TELL
 WHICH TREE IS WHICH AS THE REPORT CONFLICTS WITH THE
 RATINGS ON THE CHART. THE TREE RATINGS (SHOULD BE
 LISTED AS GOOF, FAIR, POOR, ETC AND NOT IN A
 PERCENTAGE) SHOULD COME FROM THE ARBORIST REPORT.
  
  
 NEW COMMENT: TREE CANOPY SIZE LISTED ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION ARE INACCURATE AND DO NOT MATCH THE TREES
 SHOWN IN THE IMAGES OF THE ARBORIST REPORT. PLEASE
 PROVIDE CORRECT TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING
 TREES. STAFF WILL SPOT CHECK IN THE FIELD TO VERIFY.
  
  
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL: ARTIFICIAL TURF CANNOT BE VIEWED
 FROM THE STREET OR ROAD. SCREENING SUBJECT TO FINAL
 INSPECTION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-26-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 04-26-2023 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 04-26-2023 Time 10:16 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-26 10:17:08PROJECT: 500 CLEARWATER PARK RD (Z23030025)
  
 LANDSCAPE COMMENTS
 1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. MITIGATION SHOULD BE RECALCULATED
 UPON RECEIPT OF ARBORIST REPORT.
 2. LOCATION OF STREET TREES ARE IN CONFLICT WITH
 DRAINAGE LINE ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, PLEASE
 REVISE. IN ADDITION, PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST
 LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 3. PLEASE CONSIDER TO A DIFFERENT GROUNDCOVER OTHER
 THAN SOD OR SHRUB PLANTING ON PLANTING BEDS/LANDSCAPE
 STRIPS ADJACENT TO THE STREET DUE TO THE REMOVAL OF
 STREET TREES.
 4. SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES SHOULD NOT BE SPACED ANY
 LESS THAN 10 FEET ON CENTER.
 5. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE GROUND FLOOR SHOULD
 BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SHOULD BE SCREENED
 APPROPRIATELY PER SEC. 94-315(A). ALL WALL MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH A SCREEN
 EQUAL TO THE HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
 6. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
 ROAD OR STREET. ARTIFICIAL TURF CANNOT BE PLACED IN
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 7. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN OR
 ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM
 VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY WHEEL STOPS, CURBS, OR OTHER
 SIMILAR DEVICES.
  
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-16 16:46:55-ENSURE THAT 36" MAIN IS SENTERED BETWEEN EXISTING
 EASEMENT. PLAN VIEW MAKES IT APPEAR AS IF MAIN IS ON
 EASTERN BIRDER OF EASEMENT.
 -CONSIDER THE DEPTH OF THE 36" MAIN WHEN MILLING AND
 RESURFACING, AS WELL AS OTHER PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION.
 AVIBRATION IMPACT STUDY MAY BE NEEDED.
 -COMMENT 6 NOT FULLY ADDRESSED. SOME CROSSING INFO
 STILL MISSING
 -COMMENT 8 NOT FULLY ADDRESSED. SHOW RELEVANT UTILITIES
 CROSSED (INCLUDING FRANCHISE UTILITIES)
 -COMMENT 15 NOT FULLY ADDRESSED, CCTV APPEARS TO SHOW
 EXISTING LATERAL ON SITE.
  
 RICKY ELIZONDO
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 04-13-2023 Time 11:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 04-13-2023 Time 11:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-13 11:38:49-PLEASE ADHERE TO DETAIL P-6 FOR PIGGING AND FLUSHING
 ASSEMBLY
 -PLEASE SUPPLY WATER AND SEWER DEMAND TABLE FOR
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS
 -DENOTE THAT PROJECT FALLS WITHIN LIFT STATION 23
 BOUNDARIES
 -SCALE PLAN VIEW SO THAT IT CAN BE PRINTED TO SCALE ON
 11X17
 -VERIFY EXISTING HYDRANT HAS ANCHOR TEE INSTALLED, ADD
 ONE IF NOT
 -CROSSING INFORMATION NEEDED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE
 PROPOSED WORK WILL BE IN CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 UTILITIES
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS
 -PROVIDE PROFILES FOR PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER LINES UP
 TO R/W LINE
 -PROVIDE AN ERP FOR THE 36" WM ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY
 -VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE WITH
 PROPOSED CONNECTION (IF MANHOLE EXISTS, IT WILL REQUIRE
 REHABBING. IF NO MANHOLE EXISTS IN LOCATION SHOWN ON
 PLANS, A DOGHOUSE MANHOLE WILL NEED TO BE PROPOSED.
 -PROVIDE CCTV OF EXISTING SEWER LINE BETWEEN THE
 NEAREST OFFSITE MANHOLE TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE
 PROJECT LOCATION.
 -CALL OUT ALL VALVES AND APPURTENANCES FOR EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UTILITIES
 -8" CLEANOUT REQUIRED FOR 8" SANITARY SEWER LATERALS
 -SOURCE SAMPLE POINT REQUIRED FOR DOMESTIC LINE PER P-6
 -EXISTING SEWER LATERAL NOT SHOWN, IT WILL NEED TO BE
 CUT AND CAP AT THE MAIN.
 -ADD LEGEND TO UTILITY PLAN
 -SPECIFY THE WORK BEING PROPOSED TO THE EXISTING 12"
 WATER MAIN
 -CALL OUT PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL FOR ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UTILITIES
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-07-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 06-07-2023 Time 15:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-07 15:59:46PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOW PLANTS OR BUSHES WHERE METERED
 WATER SERVICE AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE LOCATED.
 PLEASE RELOCATE THOSE PLANTS AND UPDATE LANDSCAPING
 PLAN.
 -ADJUST PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT BOUNDARIES AND
 RELOCATE FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SLIGHTLY EAST SO IT
 IS OUT OF UTILITY EASEMENT.
 -ON CIVIL PLANS THERE ARE SOME CIRCULAR OBJECTS NEAR
 THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. THOSE SEEM TO BE THE
 MOVEABLE PLANTERS. PLEASE LABEL THEM OR ADD TO LEGEND.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-07-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 04-07-2023 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-07 14:01:46PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL WESTERN PROPERTY LINE ON
 ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.
 -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT NEAR
 WESTERN PROPERTY LINE ON ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.
 -ADD LEGEND TO ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS. PLEASE INCLUDE
 PURPLE LETTERED SYMBOLS AND LINES ON IT.
 -ADD GRAPHIC SCALE TO BLOWUP DETAIL ON SHEET C08.
 -4 INCH WATER METER IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT NOT
 CONTAINED WITHIN A UTILITY EASEMENT.
 -VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM WILL NOT HAVE ADDED
 CHEMICALS AND WILL NOT BE CONNECTED TO AUXILIARY WATER
 SUPPLY SUCH AS A WELL.
 -LANDSCAPING APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED METERED
 WATER SERVICES AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. IN RESUBMITTAL
 PACKAGE, ADD LANDSCAPING PLAN SHEET THAT SHOWS PROPOSED
 UTILITIES AND PLANTS. ENSURE NO LOCATION CONFLICTS
 BETWEEN TREES/BUSHES AND UTILITIES.
 -A1.1 AND LP2 DO NOT SHOW SIMILAR DESIGN OF BIKE RACKS
 NEAR EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY. ENSURE PLANS MATCH AND THEN
 ADD THE BIKE RACKS TO SHEET C08.
 -UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM SHOWS EXISTING 1 INCH METERED
 IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT THE PROPERTY. SHOW ON
 ENGINEERING PLANS AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT.
 -SHOW FDC IF ANY ARE NEEDED OR REQUIRED.
 -SURVEY AND DEMO PLAN SHOW TRANSFORMER PAD NEAR
 NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY, BUT THEY ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 OTHER PLAN SHEETS. SHOW AND LABEL ON REST OF PLAN
 SHEETS IF IT WILL REMAIN.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By jbjoseph Date 06-20-2023 Time 08:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jbjoseph Date 06-20-2023 Time 08:55 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-20 08:56:33NO COMMENTS
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By jbjoseph Date 04-12-2023 Time 13:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jbjoseph Date 04-12-2023 Time 13:10 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-12 13:11:26PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
 1. LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2. INDICATE STAGING LOCATION OF BULK TRASH
  
 BRUCELY A. JOSEPH
 PW PROGRAM MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1141
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-11-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-10-2023 Time 11:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-10-2023 Time 12:32 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-10 12:31:46THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 5/26/23 SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. STAFF COULD NOT LOCATE THE NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929
 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE
 PAGE AND QUADRANT WHERE THE INFORMATION IS LOCATED.
  
 2. PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (SHEET C-04)
 A. ADJUST LEADER ARROWS TO POINT TO THE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES (#1, #6).
  
 B. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN OUTSIDES OF THE
 PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM STRUCTURE #6 AND THE EXISTING
 12-INCH WATER MAIN.
  
 C. LABEL THE WATER MAIN (SIZE, MATERIAL) AND OTHER
 UTILITIES.
  
 D. CONFIRM THE PROPSED GUTTER ALONG THE CLEARWATER PARK
 ROAD WILL HAVE MINIMUM 0.15% (PREFERABLY 0.3%)
 LONGITUDINAL SLOPE TO PREVENT STANDING WATER.
  
 3. CROSS SECTIONS (SHEET C-05)
 A. PROVIDE FLOW ARROW FOR PROPOSED PASSENGER LOADING
 ZONE IN SECTION B-B.
  
 B. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION BETWEEN THE BACK OF VALLEY
 GUTTER AND THE BACK OF THE TYPE D CURB IN SECTION B-B.
  
 4. PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS (SHEET C-07)
 A. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE - ADA COMPLIANT DETAIL
 I. LEADER LABELS CALLOUT OUT 4" DBL WHITE AND 6" DBL
 BLUE STRIPES. DOES DBL STAND FOR DOUBLE? SINGLE WHITE
 AND BLUE STRIPES MAY BE APPROPRIATE.
 II. THE ENDS OF THE STIPING SHOULD BE CONNECTED WITH
 12" LONG STRIPE AS INDICATED IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH PARKING STALL SIZES DETAIL.
  
 5. TRAFFIC FEATURES PLAN (SHEET T-1.0) - ANY SIGNAGE
 PROPOSED FOR THE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE?
  
 6. THE EXISTING STORM PIPE UNDER THE SWALE GOES FROM
 THE CATCH BASIN EAST OF STRUCTURE #5 TO THE CATCH BASIN
 IN THE DRIVEWAY SOUTH OF 500 DLEARWATER PARK DRIVE. THE
 DESIGN PLANS FOR THIS PIPE SHOW THE INVERT OF THE SOUTH
 END OF THE PIPE (NORTH INVERT IN THE DRIVEWAY CATCH
 BASIN) AS BEING 4.4 FEET BELOW THE GRATE ELEVATION AND
 THE INVERT OF THE NORTH END OF THE PIPE (SOUTH INVERT
 OF THE SWALE CATCH BASIN) AS BEING 2.73 FEET BELOW THE
 GRATE ELEVATION. THIS STORM PIPE MAY BE IN CONFLICT
 WITH THE PROPOSED SANITARY MH#2.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-12-2023 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-12-2023 Time 13:46 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-12 13:45:23THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE
 IS NGVD1929. THE NAVD1988 VERTICAL DATUM MAY BE USED IF
 THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO
 NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.
  
 2. VICINITY SKETCH MISSING ON THE SURVEY.
  
 3. PROVIDE PROPOSED GRADES OR FLOW ARROWS ON THE PGD
 PLAN. SUGGEST MOVING CATCH BASIN NO. 1 EASTWARD TO THE
 OPEN PARKING AREA OR INSTALL A TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS THE
 OPENING TO INTERCEPT SURFACE FLOW BEFORE IT ENTERS THE
 COVERED PARKING AREA.
  
 4. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTIONS AT THE DRIVEWAY AND AT THE
 ON-STREET PARKING SPACE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF
 CLEARWATER PARK ROAD TO 5 FEET BEYOND THE HIGH POINT OF
 THE DRIVEWAY. SHOW BREAK POINTS, LABEL SURFACE FEATURES
 SUCH AS GUTTERS, SIDEWALK AREAS, FACE OF BUILDING,
 RIGHT OF WAY, ETC. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM R/W TO EDGE
 OF PAVEMENT, TO FRONT OF SIDEWALK AREA, TO FACE OF
 BUILDING, TO HIGH POINT OF DRIVEWAY. PROVIDE SLOPE
 ARROWS TO SHOW HOW THE SURFACES ARE TO DRAIN.
  
 5. REPLACE THE CMP PIPE IN THE R/W WITH RCP PIPE.
  
 6. GARAGE GROUND FLOOR TO HAVE SUFFICIENT VERTICAL
 CLEARANCE TO ALLOW MAINTENANCE AND EVENTUAL REPLACEMENT
 OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEM WHEN IT NO LONGER
 FUNCTIONS AS DESIGNED.
  
 7. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
 EXFILTRATION SYSTEMS.
  
 8. IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED 8 INCH SANITARY MAIN WILL BE
 IN CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING 24 INCH STORM PIPE.
  
 9. THE FIRE HYDRANT EXTENSION MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 THE 24 INCH STORM PIPE. CONSIDER MOVING THE FH TO THE
 UTILITY EASEMENT AT THE BACK OF SIDEWALK.
  
 10. ON-STREET PARKING SPACE SHOULD BE ASPHALT INSTEAD
 OF CONCRETE.
  
 11. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS PER THE CITY???S
 PIPE TRENCH DETAIL.
  
 12. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. PRB'S
 SHOULD BE USED AT THE ENDS OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES TO
 EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE TRENCHES.
  
 13. SHEET C-06 - UPDATE REFERENCES TO FDOT STANDARD
 INDEX NUMBERS TO FDOT STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS
 A. INDEX 17355 = PLAN 700-102
 B. INDEX 17346 = PLAN 711-001
  
 14. ON PMS PLAN (SHEET C-16) , PLACE THE 24??? STOP BAR
 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DOUBLE YELLOW FOR THE TRAFFIC
 EXITING THE GARAGE.
  
 15. SHEET C-17, EROSION CONTROL PLAN:
 A. MOVE THE SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE OUT OF THE
 R/W.
 B. SHOW THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND PROTECTION
 ON ALL OF THE INLET STRUCTURES THAT CAN RECEIVE RUNOFF
 FROM THE SITE OR FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO THE
 SITE.
  
 16. SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 AVOID PLANTING TREES OVER OR NEAR THE EXISTING STORM
 PIPE AND OTHER UTILITIES. ROOT BARRIER SHOULD BE
 INSTALLED NO CLOSER THAN FIVE FEET TO THE OUTSIDE OF
 UTILITY PIPES.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP AND FDEP NPDES
 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-10-2023 Time 13:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-10 13:53:43PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
 1. APPROVAL DOES NOT CONSENT TO LANDSCAPING IN MOVEABLE
 CONTAINERS.
 2. EASEMENT CONSENT WILL BE REQUIRED BY ALL UTILITY
 CO.'S FOR PROPOSED STORMWATER IN EXISTING 10' UE.
 3. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-11-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-11-2023 Time 08:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 04-12-2023 Time 12:55 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-11 08:30:191. SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 2. LANDSCAPING IN R/W APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 DRAINAGE.
 3. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED.
 4. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE R/W.
 5. CARE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN WITH ANY DEMO/NEW
 CONSTRUCTION OVER THE EXISTING 36" WATER MAIN.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-29-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-29-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-29-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-29 06:28:12TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. A CONDITION WILL BE PLACED
 ON THIS ITEM, SPECIFICALLY: OWNER TO INSTALL A
 SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE IN THE CASE OF INCREASING
 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON CLEARWATER PARK RD OR SIGNIFICANT
 VEHICULAR CONFLICTS BY THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CAUSING
 CONGESTION AND/OR SAFETY ISSUES AS DETERMINED BY THE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. SUCH CONDITION SHALL EXPIRE
 AFTER 5-YEARS FROM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION
 SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD
 BE NAMED T-1.0. SIDEWALK WIDTHS ARE MISSING.
 4) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. SUCH PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW
 AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0).
 PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAILS PERTAINING THE PASSENGER
 LOADING ZONE, AS WELL AS A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF ITS
 PARKING POLICY, MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT, IF ANY
 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
 GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
 OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
 ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED
 IN DIFFERENT COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE
 SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF
 THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED
 ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0). ENCROACHMENT WITH CURB
 SHOWN WHEN BACKING OUT.
 7) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING
 REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE,
 SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL, ETC.). TO BE
 SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING STAGE.
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN
 EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM
 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION
 READINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
 SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
 PULL BOX (240V / 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS
 FEATURE IN THE T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOWCASE
 ITS DIMENSIONS.
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
 PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
 OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
 IF ANY
 11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 12) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 14) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN
 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY?
 15) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION
 MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR
 DETAILS. TO BE PROVIDED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING
 STAGE.
 16) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
 THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
 A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
 17) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOADING ZONE(S), IF REQUIRED,
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, NOT
 ON PUBLIC ROW. RESPONSE SEEMS INCOMPLETE; PLEASE
 PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING AN SU-30 VEHICLE
 MODEL MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected].
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-17-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-17-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-17-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-17 19:59:191) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM COUNTY (I.E. EMAIL
 CORRESPONDENCE) OR REQUEST A SPECIFIC COMMENT IN THE
 TPS LETTER ADDRESSING THE LEFT-TURN LANE REQUIREMENT
 3) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0
 4) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
 DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
 PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 5) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE
 NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0)
 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
 PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S)
 CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION
 REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2,
 T-3.0)
 7) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
 EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
 CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
 ETC.)
 8) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS FEATURE IN THE
 T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN
 9) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 10) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
 TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
 STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
 11) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 12) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A
 THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY MEETING
 13) ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 14) IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN EXISTING
 BICYCLE FACILITY?
 15) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS.
 16) PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN THOSE CASES
 WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
 FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
 STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
 17) LOADING ZONE(S), IF REQUIRED, SHOULD BE PROVIDED
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, NOT ON PUBLIC ROW
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-28-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 06-28-2023 Time 13:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 06-28-2023 Time 13:17 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-28 13:17:37ZONING AND PLANNING
 PROJECT: 500 CLEARWATER PARK RD (Z23030025)
 DATE: JUNE 28, 2023
 CONTACT: CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT
 561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS
 1. TPS LETTER WILL NEED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE
 ACCURATE NUMBER OF UNITS. NOTE, PROJECT FACT SHEET
 STATES TOTAL OF 222 UNITS VS TPS LETTER STATES 231
 UNITS.
 2. PENDING TO RECEIVED SCAD AND FAA LETTERS.
 3. PLEASE UPDATE RENDERINGS TO MATCH ACCURATE DESIGN
 INCLUDING PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.
  
  
 ZONING DIAGRAMS AND TABLES
 1. PLEASE ADD THE ENTRY/EXIT COVERED AREA OF YOUR
 PARKING TO YOUR BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS.
  
 2. PLEASE NOTE, YOUR 6TH FLOOR IS NOT EXACTLY THE SAME
 AS YOUR 3RD TO 5TH LEVELS, AS THEY INCLUDE A MECHANICAL
 AREA FRONTING THE STREET. PLEASE ADD THE 6TH LEVEL
 FLOOR PLAN ON ITS OWN TO YOUR FOOTPRINT (G-1.4 SHEET)
 AND FAR (G1-5 SHEET) DIAGRAMS. IT LOOKS LIKE THE AREAS
 ARE CORRECT ON YOUR TABLES AND CALCULATIONS, BUT BY
 PROVIDING THE DIAGRAM YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SHOW HOW THE
 6TH LEVEL MEETS IS THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 3. FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PROVIDED TO SCREEN
 NON-ACTIVE USES, FACADE ELEVATIONS NEED TO BE
 INTEGRATED WITH THE DESIGN OF ADJACENT ACTIVE USE
 FACADE AS PER SEC. 94-109, 'ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT'
 DEFINITION. THERE ARE TWO CLEAR VOLUMES
 (PARKING/NON-ACTIVE USE AND TOWER) SHOWING DIFFERENT
 DESIGN, BOTH FACADE ELEVATIONS WILL NEED TO BE BETTER
 INTEGRATED. IN ADDITION, PLEASE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
 TO BREAK THE MASSING OF BOTH VOLUMES, ESPECIALLY THE
 6TH AND 7TH FLOORS WHERE CONDITIONAL SETBACKS SHOULD
 APPLY AS THE INTENT IS TO HAVE ACTIVE USE FRONTING THE
 STREET. EXPLORE DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES FOR MATERIALS
 USED AS ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT TO HELP BREAK THE
 MASSING. AND FOR THE TOWER, EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO
 HELP BREAK THE MASSING AND REPETITION OF THE VOLUME.
  
 4. ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH ON GROUND FLOOR REQUIRED IS
 25', SP-1 SHOWS A PROVIDED DEPTH OF 54' BUT IT IS NOT
 CLEAR WHERE THAT DIMENSION CAME FROM. PLEASE REFENCE A
 PLAN WHERE THIS DIMENSION IS SHOWN. NOTE ON FLOORPLANS
 IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS LESS THAN 54'.
  
 5. SHEET G-1.6 SHOWS TABLE (WEST) TWICE AND DOES NOT
 INCLUDE NORTH FACADE. PLEASE REVISE. NOTE THE GROUND
 FLOOR FACADE FACING THE WESTSIDE DOES HAVE TRANSPARENCY
 AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS THAT YOU SHOW YOU MEET,
 AND TABLE SAYS, 'NOT APPLICABLE'. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE AREA PERCENTAGE OF THE NORTH
 ELEVATION WITH STUCCO SCORING ABSENT FROM FENESTRATION
 TO MAKE SURE IT DOES COMPLY WITH BLANK WALL
 REQUIREMENTS AS PER SEC. 94-109, 'BLANK WALL'
 DEFINITION.
  
 7. PLEASE NOT, FAUX TREATMENTS, SUCH AS THE SYNTHETIC
 GREEN WALL TREATMENT IS NOT CONSIDERED AN ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT, PLEASE REVISE ELEVATIONS AND CONSIDER ADDING
 A LIVING GREEN WALL AS DEFINED IN SEC. 94-109.
  
 8. MINOR EDIT, ON SP-1, ROW 'FOOTPRINT LENGTH',
 'MAXIMUM' DOES NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED.
  
 9. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE IS ANY VEGETATION OR
 FURNITURE PROPOSED UNDERNEATH THE 'COVERED LOGGIA'.
  
 10. MINOR EDIT, ON SP-1, TITLE 'MINIMUM ACTIVE USE' IS
 MISSING.
  
 11. MINOR EDIT, PLEASE REFERENCE THE CORRECT PLAN WHICH
 IS G-1.6 ON SP-1 SHEET IN THE TABLE, TRANSPARENCY ROW.
  
  
  
 LANDSCAPE & STREETSCAPE
  
 1. IN COORDINATION WITH THE CITY, PLEASE REEVALUATE IF
 DRAINAGE LINE, CONFLICTING WITH SHADE STREET TREES, CAN
 BE RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE PLANTING OF TREES.
  
 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED
 PLANTING BEDS/LANDSCAPE STRIPS ADJACENT TO THE STREET
 AS A DROP OFF AREA HAS BEEN PROPOSED. PLEASE REEVALUATE
 DROP-OFF AREA TO BE INCLUDED INSIDE THE PROPERTY. IN
 ADDITION, PLEASE PROPOSE ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE FOR THE
 BIKE SHARE STATION TO NOT CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPE
 TRIPS.
  
 3. THE PROPOSED ARTWORK CONFLICTS WITH THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES AND THERE IS A STOP SIGN IN THE ARTWORK AREA.
 PLEASE FIND A DIFFERENT LOCATION FOR THE ARTWORK AND
 ADD VISIBILITY TRIANGLES TO SITE PLAN. SEE SEC. 94-113
 (C) FOR MORE INFO ABOUT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES.
  
 4. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ANY METERS OR OTHER EQUIPMENT
 DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. SHEET C-08
 SHOWS GROUND METERS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER THAT ARE
 NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS OR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
 OUTDOOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREEN AS PER
 SEC. 94-315 (A) AND SHOULD NOT CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. THERE SEEMS TO BE A GATE NOTED AS 'ACCESS TO
 MONTECITO RESIDENTS', PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE IS A
 FENCE OR BARRIER ON THE PROPERTY LINE SURROUNDING THE
 SITE. IF FENCES ARE PROPOSED, PLEASE REVIEW DEFINITION
 OF FENCE ON SEC. 94-109.
  
 6. ON SHEET LP-2, DOG FENCE DETAIL DOES NOT SPECIFY THE
 TYPE OF FENCE AND HEIGHT, PLEASE ADD DETAILS, AND MAKE
 SURE MEET REQUIREMENTS ON SEC. 94-109.
  
 7. PLEASE CLARIFY IF YOU ARE PROPOSING LANDSCAPING
 ADJACENT TO THE STREET ON THE NORTH SIDE OF YOUR
 PROPERTY. SEE LP-2 SHEET.
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE, PER SEC. 94-113, THE REQUIREMENT IS TO
 ILLUMINATE ENTRANCES AND ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AT A
 MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOTCANDLES, THE SITE PLAN ???
 PHOTOMETRICS SHOWS ON THE SIDEWALK LESS THAN 0.6FC.
 PLEASE REVISE. IN ADDITION, MINOR EDIT, THIS SHEET DOES
 NOT HAVE SHEET #.
  
 9. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THE BIKE RACK ON THE FRONT OF
 THE BUILDING IS SHOWN ON GROUND FLOOR PLANS, LANDSCAPE
 PLANS, AND CIVIL PLANS. AND, THAT LOCATION ALLOWS FOR A
 BICYCLE TO BE LOCKED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE RACK. MINOR
 EDIT ON SHEET A-1.1, REVISE LABEL OF BIKE RACK SHARE
 STATION TO ONLY BIKE RACK.
  
 10. PLEASE PROPOSED SHADE TREES, AT LEAST IN 30-FOOT
 INTERVALS, ALONG THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AROUND THE
 PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY TO HELP WITH BREAKING THE
 VIEW OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE.
  
  
 PARKING
  
 1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY ON THE SP-1 SHEET A LABEL CALLS
 OUT A ???TEMPORARY TRASH PICK-UP??? ON DROP-FF AREA.
  
 2. BECAUSE THE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WAS REDUCED,
 PLEASE REVISE YOUR CAR-SHARE STATION CALCULATIONS. AS
 PER SEC. 94-106 (8)(A), A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL
 MICRO-UNITS SHALL PROVIDE ON-SITE CAR-SHARE STATIONS ON
 A RATIO OF ONE PER EVERY 13 UNITS. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
 CAR-SHARE STATIONS MAY BE REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE
 STATION PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED.
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES 106 MICRO-UNITS,
 WHICH MEANS THAT 8 CAR-SHARE STATIONS NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED. HOWEVER, CAR-SHARE STATIONS CAN BE REDUCE
 BASED ON PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR MICRO-UNITS (TOTAL
 OF 53 PARKING SPACES, 53/13=4), WHICH MEANS 4 CAR-SHARE
 STATIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. ONE BIKE-SHARE STATION IS REQUIRED ON SITE. PLANS
 SHOW THE LOCATION IS PROPOSED WHERE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING SHOULD BE, PLEASE EXPLORE AN ALTERNATIVE
 FOR LOCATION.
  
 4. PLEASE CLARIFY IF 6TH LEVEL PARKING SPACES ON THE
 SOUTHWEST AREA ARE TANDEM PARKING. IF SO, PLEASE MAKE
 SURE TO REVIEW SEC. 94-111: FOR RESIDENTIAL USES,
 TANDEM PARKING, IF PROVIDED, MAY COUNT AS TWO SPACES,
 PROVIDED BOTH SPACES ARE DEDICATED TO THE SAME
 RESIDENTIAL UNIT, AND A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS
 RECORDED ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND RECORDED IN THE
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 5. PLEASE NOTE FLOOR PLANS (SHEETS A-1.1 TO A-1.4) SHOW
 DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF STANDARD AND COMPACT SPACES AND
 ADA SPACES COMPARED TO TABLE ON SHEET G-1.3. PLEASE
 REVIEW AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
  
  
 OTHER COMMENTS
 PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT
 SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A
 REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH
 COMMENTS. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
 WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE APPLICATION AS
 WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF
 THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT MAY REQUEST A
 30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION REQUEST IS
 PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED APPLICATIONS
 SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH
 COMMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED
 TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER
 COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF
 ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE
 APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 LASTLY, YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
 ADDITIONAL COST. AS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
 TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE, WHICH IS $300.
  
 --END OF COMMENTS--
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 04-12-2023 Time 13:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 04-12-2023 Time 12:56 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-12 12:57:14ZONING AND PLANNING
 PROJECT: 500 CLEARWATER PARK RD (Z23030025)
 DATE: APRIL 12, 2023
 CONTACT: CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT
 561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS
 1. APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGED THAT TPS, SCAD, AND OTHER
 MISSING UTILITIES LETTERS WILL BE PROVIDED. SO FAR, WE
 HAVE RECEIVED, AT&T AND FPL LETTERS. (NOTE, STAFF WILL
 PROVIDE YOU WITH NEEDED SIGNATURE FOR THE SCAD LETTER).
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY DOCUMENTATION YOU MAY HAVE FOR
 THE PUBLIC OUTREACH PERFORMED ON 3/1 AND 3/10 (LETTER,
 FLYER, SIGN IN SHEET, ETC).
  
 3. THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE CITY OF WPB???S ART
 LIFE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN
 PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR AT 561-822-1521 OR VIA EMAIL
 AT [email protected].
  
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 1. NOTE, PAGE 1 MENTIONS 1 VARIANCE, BUT ON LATER PAGES
 2 VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 2. AS PER SEC. 94-38, PLEASE CLARIFY THE DEPARTURE FROM
 THE DIMENSIONAL OR NUMERICAL REQUIREMENT FOR EACH
 VARIANCE YOU ARE REQUESTING. FOR EXAMPLE, VARIANCE NO.
 1, THE REQUIRED CONDITIONAL SETBACK ABOVE 5TH (68 FEET)
 LEVEL IS 27 FEET, THE VARIANCE IS 11 FEET (27 FEET-16
 FEET) FROM THE 27 FEET CONDITIONAL SETBACK REQUIRED ON
 THE 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR.
  
 3. PLEASE NOTE, YOU WILL NEED TO RESPOND TO THE
 'CRITERIA FOR GRANTING VARIANCES' FOR EACH VARIANCE YOU
 ARE REQUESTING, PLEASE REVISE JUSTIFICATION. AND SEE
 COMMENTS RELATED TO VARIANCE NO. 2 AS IT MIGHT NOT BE
 NECESSARY TO REQUEST IT.
  
 4. PLEASE NOTE, YOU MENTIONED A DOG PARK IS PROPOSED
 WITH ARTIFICIAL TURF, BUT ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS DO NOT
 SHOW THIS AREA, AND IF FENCING IS PROPOSED, PLEASE
 REVISE DRAWINGS AND PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM THE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT THAT THE SIDE SETBACK PROVIDED COMPARE TO
 THE 15 FEET REQUIRED IS ACCEPTABLE AS PER NFPA
 STANDARDS.
  
  
  
 ZONING DIAGRAMS AND TABLES
 1. FAR CALCULATIONS ON SHEET G-1.5 AND SHEET G-1.3 ARE
 MISSING AREAS FROM THE 2ND TO 7TH FLOORS (ELEVATOR,
 LOBBY AND STAIRS COUNT TOWARDS FAR CALCULATIONS).
  
 2. PLEASE ADD YOUR BIKE STORAGE AREA ON GROUND FLOOR TO
 YOUR GBA AND FAR CALCULATIONS.
  
 3. NOTE, ON THE 7TH FLOOR, TENANT STORAGE ROOM WILL
 NEED TO COUNT TOWARDS THE GBA AND FAR CALCULATIONS.
  
 4. MINOR EDIT, ON THE TABLE ON SHEET SP-1, NUMBERS FOR
 THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE MISSING ON THE 'SECONDARY
 STREET' ROW.
  
 5. ON SHEET SP-1, OPEN SPACE SECTION NOTES SHEET LP-1,
 SHEET LP-1 IS A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND SHEET INDEX
 WHICH DOES NOT PROVIDE OPEN SPACE INFORMATION.
  
 6. PLEASE CHANGE TO A DIFFERENT COLOR THE DASHED LINE
 SHOWING THE OPEN SPACE (SHEET LP-3), IT IS DIFFICULT TO
 SEE WHAT AREA IS DESIGNATED AS OPEN SPACE. AND PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THERE IS ANY VEGETATION OR FURNITURE
 PROPOSED UNDERNEATH THE 'COVERED LOGGIA'.
  
 7. PLEASE REVISE ACTIVE USE LENGTH ON SHEET G-1.3 TABLE
 TO THE LENGTH OF YOUR LOBBY FRONTING THE STREET, WHICH
 IS 47 FEET-3 INCHES ACCORDING TO SHEET A-1.1.
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE ON SHEET G-1.3, TRANSPARENCY SHOWS AS
 LENGTH AND NOT AREA OR PERCENTAGE OF THE STOREFRONT
 FACADE AREA. AND, SHEET SP-1 SHOWS PERCENTAGE BUT
 REFERENCES SHEET A-1.1 WHICH DOES NOT SHOW THE DIAGRAM
 THAT EXPLAINS WHERE THE CALCULATIONS ARE COMING FROM.
 THE TABLE (WEST) ON SHEET A-1.1 DO NOT HAVE ANY
 TRANSPARENCY PROVIDED. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 9. THE LOBBY IS CONSIDERED ACTIVE USE-RESIDENTIAL,
 PLEASE REVISE TABLE ON SHEET SP-1. PLEASE NOTE, ON
 SHEET G-1.3, THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT SHOW. A
 SUGGESTION IS TO MERGE BOTH TABLES INTO ONE SHEET TO
 AVOID DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN TABLES.
  
 10. PLEASE NOTE, GROUND FLOOR FACADES THAT CONTAIN
 NON-ACTIVE USES WILL ALSO NEED TO PROVIDE AT LEAST 2
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS, SEE DEFINITION OF
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON SEC. 94-109, TO AVOID BLANK
 WALLS.
  
 11. SHEETS A-2.1, A-2.2, AND A-3.1 SHOW REQUIRED
 SETBACK ONLY ON 7TH LEVEL, PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW ON 6TH
 AND 7TH LEVELS.
  
  
 LANDSCAPE & STREETSCAPE
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO MEET EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING REQUIREMENT AS PER SEC. 94-113 (B).
  
 2. LOCATION OF STREET TREES ARE IN CONFLICT WITH
 DRAINAGE LINE ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, PLEASE
 REVISE. IN ADDITION, PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST
 LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
  
 3. PLANTING BEDS/LANDSCAPE STRIPS ADJACENT TO STREET
 SHALL BE PLANTED WITH SHRUBS AND/OR GROUNDCOVERS, AS
 PER SEC. 94-113 (D)(3). PLEASE REVISE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE PLANS.
 4. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW YOU MEET THE STREET LIGHT
 REQUIREMENT AS PER SEC. 94-113.
  
 5. NOTE, THERE ARE IRRIGATION AND MAINTENANCE
 REQUIREMENTS AS PER SEC. 94-113 (D)(6-7).
  
 6. FOR BICYCLE PARKING ON STREETSCAPE, PLEASE CONTACT
 CLAUDIA D. IBAVEN TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE CITY'S
 BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL
 SHOWING THE TYPE OF RACK AND RACK AREA WITH DIMENSIONS
 WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 7. CONFIGURATION OF THE DRIVEWAY'S TURN RADIUS OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT TAKE IN CONSIDERATION
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTY'S DRIVEWAY. PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW
 HOW NEIGHBORING SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAYS WILL INTEGRATE
 WITH THE PROPOSED DESIGN.
  
 8. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF
 THE SURFACE PARKING ON THE REAR GROUND FLOOR WILL ALSO
 NEED TO PROVIDE SHADE TREES IN 30-FOOT INTERVALS AS PER
 SEC. 94-113. PLEASE REVISE DRAWINGS.
  
 9. PLEASE NOTE, ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANT
 MATERIALS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS
 SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY WHEEL
 STOPS, CURBS, OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES.
  
 10. OUTDOOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREEN AS PER
 SEC. 94-315 (A). ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING,
 ON SHEET A-1.1, EQUIPMENT IS SHOWING WITH NO SCREENING
 AND NOT SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING
 HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND
 ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 11. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
 THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS.
  
 12. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
 ROAD OR STREET. ARTIFICIAL TURF CANNOT BE PLACED IN
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
  
  
 PARKING
 1. PLEASE CLARIFY IF NO GATES WILL BE INSTALLED IN
 DRIVEWAYS TO ACCESS THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
 2. PLEASE NOTE, IF GROUND FLOOR PARKING LEVEL IS
 ENCLOSED AND PART OF THE PARKING GARAGE, THEN THE REAR
 5 PARKING STALLS MAY NOT NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC.
 94-443 TERMINAL AND INTERIOR ISLANDS REQUIREMENTS
 BECAUSE THEY ARE LESS THAN 12 INTERIOR SPACES.
  
 3. AS PER SEC. 94-106 (8)(A), A PROJECT WITH
 RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL PROVIDE ON-SITE CAR-SHARE
 STATIONS ON A RATIO OF ONE PER EVERY 13 UNITS. THE
 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS MAY BE REDUCED BY
 ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE PARKING
 SPACES PROVIDED. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES 109
 MICRO-UNITS, WHICH MEANS THAT 8 CAR-SHARE STATIONS NEED
 TO BE PROVIDED. HOWEVER, CAR-SHARE STATIONS CAN BE
 REDUCE BASED ON PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR MICRO-UNITS
 (TOTAL OF 61 PARKING SPACES, 61/13=5), WHICH MEANS 3
 CAR-SHARE STATIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 4. PLEASE NOTE, THE MAX GUEST PARKING ALLOWED PER
 MICRO-UNIT PROVIDED IS 1 PER 20 UNITS WHICH IS 109/20=6
 MAX. SHEET G-1.3 SHOWS 22, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 5. NOTE MINOR EDIT, THE REQUIREMENT IS 0.5 BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES PER EVERY MICRO-UNIT, YOUR CALCULATION
 IS CORRECT, 55 BICYCLE SPACES ARE REQUIRED, BUT THE
 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUIREMENT SAYS "ONE" PER EVERY
 MICRO-UNIT, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 6. PER SEC. 94-111, ALL REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SHALL
 BE PROVIDED IN A SECURED AREA, COVERED FROM THE
 ELEMENTS, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOWS BIKE RACKS ON
 THE REAR SIDE OF THE BUILDING THAT ARE NOT SECURED FROM
 ALL ELEMENTS, PLEASE REVISE. IN ADDITION, SHEET A-1.1
 SHOWS A DIFFERENT AREA COMPARED TO SHEET LP-1 AND SP-1,
 PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL DRAWINGS ARE CONSISTENT. LAST,
 PLEASE CONTACT CLAUDIA D. IBAVEN TO PROVIDE YOU WITH
 THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. A DETAIL SHOWING
 THE TYPE OF RACK AND BICYCLE STORAGE AREA WITH
 DIMENSIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 7. A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL PROVIDE
 ONE BIKE-SHARE STATION ON-SITE. THE DRAWINGS SHOW ONE
 BICYCLE RACK LABELED AS BIKE-SHARE STATION ON SHEET
 A-1.1, PLEASE NOTE, ONE BICYCLE RACK IS REQUIRED PER
 SEC. 94-113, AND IN ADDITION, A BIKE-SHARE STATION IS
 ALSO REQUIRED.
  
 8. NOTE, A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE PER UNIT PER MONTH TO SUPPORT
 THE OPERATION OF THE CITY'S TROLLEY SYSTEM, AS
 ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION FROM
 TIME TO TIME. THIS WILL BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL.
  
 9. NOTE PER SEC. 94-111, ALL PARKING STRUCTURE
 ENTRANCES FACING A STREET FRONTAGE SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
 TREAT THE INTERIOR PORTION OF THE GARAGE ENTRY TO A
 DEPTH OF AT LEAST 20 FEET FROM THE BUILDING FACADE.
  
 10. PLEASE NOTE, AS YOU ARE PROVIDING 231 TOTAL PARKING
 SPACES, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 8 ADA SPACES PER
 SEC. 94-485.
  
 11. AS PER SEC. 94-485, IF THE TOTAL PARKING
 REQUIREMENT IS MORE THAN 100 SPACES, 30 PERCENT OF THE
 SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR SMALL CAR USE (8 FEET X 16
 FEET STALL DIMENSION). THE REQUIRED PARKING IS 129
 SPACES, WHICH MEANS THAT 30% OR 39 SPACES CAN BE
 DESIGNATED FOR SMALL CAR USE. AS OF RIGHT 79 ARE BEING
 PROPOSED AS SHOWN ON SHEET G-1.3.
  
 12. MAXIMUM SLOPES FOR PARKING RAMPS SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL NOT EXCEED
 SIX PERCENT. NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 16
 PERCENT. IF THE RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT, A
 BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED
 STANDARD IS TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES
 (SEC. 94-111). PLEASE REVISE DRAWINGS.
  
 13. PER SEC. 97-111, GUEST PARKING SHALL BE DESIGNATED
 AND PROMINENTLY MARKED ON-SITE AS "GUEST PARKING" AND
 SHALL NOT BE RESTRICTED IN ANY MANNER TO USE BY A
 SINGLE TENANT, OWNER, UNIT, OR OTHER USER.
  
  
 OTHER COMMENTS
 PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT
 SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A
 REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE MEETING
 SCHEDULED ON 4/13/2023. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED
 SUBMITTALS WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE
 APPLICATION AS WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE
 EXPIRATION OF THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT
 MAY REQUEST A 30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION
 REQUEST IS PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED
 APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE
 DATE OF SUCH COMMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED
 TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER
 COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF
 ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE
 APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 --END OF COMMENTS--
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved