Plan Review Details - Project Z23020026
Plan Review Stops For Project Z23020026
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 05-24-2023 Time 13:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 05-24-2023 Time 13:30 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-24 13:30:29IDENTIFIED AREA FOR PUBLIC ART DOES NOT PROVIDE A
 FOOTPRINT.
 DIMENSIONS FOR THE ARTWORK AREA MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED.
 IDENTIFIED AREA MUST BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC.
 ARTWORK MAY NOT BE BEHIND FENCES OR GATES EVEN IF
 VISIBLE FROM THE RIGHT WAY.
 THESE ISSUES MUST BE RESOLVED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
 AND FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS.
  
 AS A REMINDER THE ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION ALONG WITH
 EVIDENCE OF ESCROW MUST BE COMPLETED AND PROVIDED AT
 TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES. FURTHER, AN ARTIST OR
 ARTISTS SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED ALONG WITH THE TYPE OF ART
 BEING CONSIDERED.
 I ANTICIPATE THAT OWNER WILL CONTACT ME AT 561.822.1521
 OR VIA EMAIL [email protected] TO DISCUSS HIS IDEAS FOR
 THE PUBLIC ART.
  
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 03-08-2023 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 03-08-2023 Time 15:47 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-08 15:47:01SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT
 APPLICANT DID NOT NOTE EITHER OPTION #1 ART ON SITE, OR
 OPTION #2 CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART FUND ON
 APPLICATION.
 OPTION #1 ??? PROPOSED AREAS MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED ON
 SITE PLAN FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 OR
 OPTION #2 ??? LETTER STATING THAT APPLICANT IS CHOOSING
 OPTION #2
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND
 CULTURE AT [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-29-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 06-29-2023 Time 16:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 06-29-2023 Time 16:30 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-29 16:31:41DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 6 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED CAFE. FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN
 BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 6. AMENITIES LEVEL, ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS MAY HAVE TO BE
 MOVED SO THAT THE DOORS SWING OPEN IN THE DIRECTION OF
 EGRESS, TOWARD THE STAIRS. SHEET A-1.2 CURRENTLY SHOWS
 THE DOORS VERY CLOSE TO THE STAIR EXIT DOOR, SUCH THAT
 REVERSING THE SWING DIECTION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 1010.1.2 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MAY REQUIRE MOVING
 THE ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS.
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A
 CONSTRUCTION PARKING PLAN TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-08-2023 Time 18:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 03-08-2023 Time 18:10 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-08 18:45:49DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 6 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM SIDEWALK. SITE PLAN, SHEET
 AS-1.0, DOES NOT SHOW A PEDESTRIAN/WHEELCHAIR
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE TWO LOBBY
 ENTRANCES THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE THE PERSON TO TRAVEL
 ALONG THE VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
 PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY
 ENTRANCES.
  
 4. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BETWEEN TOWER LOBBIES. SITE PLAN,
 SHEET AS-1.0, DOES NOT SHOW A PEDESTRIAN/WHEELCHAIR
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BETWEEN THE TWO LOBBY ENTRANCES THAT
 DOES NOT REQUIRE THE PERSON TO TRAVEL ALONG THE
 VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE
 PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
 COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY ENTRANCES WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND
 ELEMENTS WITHIN THE BUILDING OR FACILITY
  
 5. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN, SHEET
 AS-1.0, SHOWS 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES BUT NONE ARE
 DESIGNATED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE. 2 OF THE 8 SHOULD BE
 LABELED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ???VAN ACCESSIBLE??? AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 6. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED CAFE. FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN
 BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 10. AMENITIES LEVEL, ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS MAY HAVE TO
 BE MOVED SO THAT THE DOORS SWING OPEN IN THE DIRECTION
 OF EGRESS, TOWARD THE STAIRS. SHEET A-1.2 CURRENTLY
 SHOWS THE DOORS VERY CLOSE TO THE STAIR EXIT DOOR, SUCH
 THAT REVERSING THE SWING DIECTION AS REQUIRED BY
 SECTION 1010.1.2 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, MAY REQUIRE
 MOVING THE ELEVATOR LOBBY DOORS.
  
 11. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 12. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A
 CONSTRUCTION PARKING PLAN TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 13. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 14. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-23-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 05-23-2023 Time 15:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 05-23-2023 Time 15:26 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 02-27-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 02-27-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-27 14:31:32Z23020026 - CURRIE PARK 30 FL MULTI USE 2.27.23 REVIEW
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O UTILITY POINTS OF CONNECTION FOR WATER CONNECTION ARE
 OVERLAPPING WITH OTHER LINES AND ARE DIFFICULT TO READ.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-27-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-27-2023 Time 12:08 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-27 12:08:50FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
 PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 03-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-03-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-03-2023 Time 12:41 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-03 12:56:06THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE.
  
 TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING
 REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING
 CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM. THE LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 7C. PER NFPA 1
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY/AREAS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS,
 TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END
 CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS
 LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS,
 AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC???S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC???S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE
 STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
  
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 101 SECTION 9.13.
  
 16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER
 THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-26-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-26-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 06-26-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-26 16:11:17FROM: LINDA LOUIE, SENIOR PLANNER 561.822.1458 AND
 SMITH AMISIAL, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561.822.1562
 PROJECT: N FLAGLER Z23020026
 06.26.2023
 ____________________________
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS
 TO THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L-100:
  
 1.1. PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR TREES IN A
 SEPARATE COLUMN. [SATISFIED]
  
 1.2. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY
 DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER.
 TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS
 SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE IF PROPOSED TO
 BE REMOVED. [SATISFIED]
  
 1.3. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART FOR
 SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. [NOT SATISFIED ???
 PROVIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF QUEEN PALMS (50 SF EACH)
 ACCORDING TO THE CATEGORY]
  
 1.4. ADD A COLUMN AND SHOW THE CONDITION RATINGS FOR
 EACH TREE OR PALM AS GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 1.5. TREE 1767 IS NOT ON THE INVASIVE PROHIBITED LIST
 FOR THE CITY AND THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE
 MITIGATED IF REMOVED. [SATISFIED]
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW THE EXACT
 AREA OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE TO SHOW THE CODE REQUIREMENT IS MET.
 CORE 1A REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA OF THE LOT IN
 THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENT AND THE PROVIDED AREA SHOWN.
  
 2.1. DIAGRAM PROVIDED, BUT THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT
 ACCURATE; ALSO, PLEASE FOLLOW THE DMP CODE FOR REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL REQUIRED IN OPEN SPACE ( IF SILENT
 IN CMUD).
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED - SUPPLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY IF REQUIRED FOR EACH
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA.
 CHART IV-8 IN SECTION 94-109 CAN BE REFERENCED FOR OPEN
 SPACE TREE CANOPY CREDITS. NEED VEGETATED AREA CODE
 REQUIREMENT FOR OPEN SPACE.
  
 4. SATISFIED - THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM. THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN
 ELEMENTS INCLUDING THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30- FOOT
 INTERVALS PROVIDING SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH.
 SEE THE DEFINITION OF SHADE TREE IN SECTION 94-611. THE
 STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE PARKWAY
 MUST BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY WITH THE
 REQUIRED STREETSCAPE.
  
 4.1. DIAMETER FOR CANOPY TREES NOT PROVIDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED - CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED
 STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR
 PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW
 THE NUMBER PROVIDED. DRIVEWAYS ARE NOT DEDUCTED. EACH
 FRONTAGE MUST MATCH THE SURVEY MEASUREMENT.
  
 6. SATISFIED - STREET TREES MUST MEET THE DEFINITION
 FOR SHADE TREE IN SECTION 94-611 AND BE CATEGORY 1
 TREES. IF THERE IS SOME REASON THE CATEGORY 1 SPECIES
 CANNOT BE USED IN A REQUIRED LOCATION, JUSTIFICATION
 MUST BE PROVIDED FOR A SUBSTITUTION.
  
 7. NOT SATSIFIED - THE MINIMUM 5 FOOT WIDTH PLANTING
 STRIP IS REQUIRED ALONG ALL STREETSCAPE LENGTHS. WHERE
 PARALLEL PARKING IS LOCATED, GAPS CAN BE PROVIDED FOR
 ACCESS, BUT THE PLANTING STRIPS CAN BE PROVIDED BETWEEN
 THE ACCESS POINTS. TREE GRATES ARE NOT REQUIRED, AND
 THE COST AND MAINTENANCE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THEM
 AND THE EXTRA STRUCTURAL SOIL CAN BE AVOIDED BY
 PROVIDING THE PLANTING STRIPS. LESS PAVEMENT AND MORE
 PLANTING AREA IS ALSO A VISUAL IMPROVEMENT TO THE
 STREETSCAPE. NORTH PORTION OF 23RD STREET AND PORTIONS
 OF PONCE MUST HAVE THE PLANTING STRIP PROVIDED IF NOT
 ADJACENT TO PARALLEL PARKING. STREET TREES MUST BE
 CLOSER TO THE CORNERS TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS.
  
 7.1. PLANTING STRIPS AND TREE GRATES ARE NOT PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED - PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE
 THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET
 TREES. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL. TREES THAT ARE IN PAVED AREAS SHOULD
 ALSO HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL CELLS TO CREATE
 SUSTAINABLE ROOT SPACES. NEED STREET TREE PLANTING
 DETAIL.
  
 9. SATISFIED - THE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK ALONG N FLAGLER
 IS NOT NEEDED IF THE PARKWAY INCENTIVE IS USED. STREET
 TREES ARE TO BE PROVIDED AND THE LANDSCAPING CONNECTED
 TO THE PARKWAY.
  
 10. SATISFIED - SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER
 AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 11. SATISFIED - CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART FOR OPTION 3 AND 5, 51% CANNOT BE TAKEN
 TWICE IN THE SAME OPTION.
  
 12. SATISFIED - SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 13. SATISFIED - PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 14. SATISFIED - SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREE
 PLACEMENT.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 4. THE CITY OWNED PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN WILL REQUIRE A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE
 CITY. WHETHER THIS WILL BE SEPARATE OR CAN BE COMBINED
 WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL NEED
 TO BE DETERMINED THROUGH THE CITY ATTORNEY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-07-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-07-2023 Time 11:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-07-2023 Time 11:06 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-07 11:07:16FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: N FLAGLER Z23020026
 MARCH 7, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L-100:
 ??? PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR TREES IN A SEPARATE
 COLUMN.
 ??? TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER
 OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES
 LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW
 THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE IF PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 ??? SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART FOR SQUARE
 FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? ADD A COLUMN AND SHOW THE CONDITION RATINGS FOR
 EACH TREE OR PALM AS GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR.
 ??? TREE 1767 IS NOT ON THE INVASIVE PROHIBITED LIST
 FOR THE CITY AND THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE
 MITIGATED IF REMOVED.
  
 2. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW THE EXACT AREA OF THE OPEN
 SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO SHOW
 THE CODE REQUIREMENT IS MET. CORE 1A REQUIRES THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA OF THE LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE
 SHOWN AND THE 3% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT AND THE
 PROVIDED AREA SHOWN.
  
 3. SUPPLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND
 TREE CANOPY IF REQUIRED FOR EACH REQUIRED OPEN SPACE
 AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA. CHART IV-8 IN SECTION
 94-109 CAN BE REFERENCED FOR OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY
 CREDITS.
  
 4. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM.
 THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN ELEMENTS INCLUDING
 THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30 FOOT INTERVALS PROVIDING
 SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH. SEE THE DEFINITION OF
 SHADE TREE IN SECTION 94-611.THE STREETSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE PARKWAY MUST BE
 PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY WITH THE REQUIRED
 STREETSCAPE.
  
  
 5. CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES
 AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
 EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED.
 DRIVEWAYS ARE NOT DEDUCTED. EACH FRONTAGE MUST MATCH
 THE SURVEY MEASUREMENT.
  
 6. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE DEFINITION FOR SHADE TREE
 IN SECTION 94-611 AND BE CATEGORY 1 TREES. IF THERE IS
 SOME REASON THE CATEGORY 1 SPECIES CANNOT BE USED IN A
 REQUIRED LOCATION, JUSTIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR A
 SUBSTITUTION.
  
  
 7. THE MINIMUM 5 FOOT WIDTH PLANTING STRIP IS REQUIRED
 ALONG ALL STREETSCAPE LENGTHS. WHERE PARALLEL PARKING
 IS LOCATED, GAPS CAN BE PROVIDED FOR ACCESS, BUT THE
 PLANTING STRIPS CAN BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE ACCESS
 POINTS. TREE GRATES ARE NOT REQUIRED, AND THE COST AND
 MAINTENANCE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THEM AND THE EXTRA
 STRUCTURAL SOIL CAN BE AVOIDED BY PROVIDING THE
 PLANTING STRIPS. LESS PAVEMENT AND MORE PLANTING AREA
 IS ALSO A VISUAL IMPROVEMENT TO THE STREETSCAPE. NORTH
 PORTION OF 23RD STREET AND PORTIONS OF PONCE MUST HAVE
 THE PLANTING STRIP PROVIDED IF NOT ADJACENT TO PARALLEL
 PARKING. STREET TREES MUST BE CLOSER TO THE CORNERS TO
 PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS.
  
 8. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL
 DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET TREES. THE AREA
 MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE
 CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.
 TREES THAT ARE IN PAVED AREAS SHOULD ALSO HAVE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL CELLS TO CREATE SUSTAINABLE
 ROOT SPACES.
  
 9. THE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK ALONG N FLAGLER IS NOT
 NEEDED IF THE PARKWAY INCENTIVE IS USED. STREET TREES
 ARE TO BE PROVIDED AND THE LANDSCAPING CONNECTED TO THE
 PARKWAY.
  
 10. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 11. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART
 FOR OPTION 3 AND 5, 51% CANNOT BE TAKEN TWICE IN THE
 SAME OPTION.
  
 12. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
 13. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT
 WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 14. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREE PLACEMENT.
  
 15. THE CITY OWNED PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN WILL REQUIRE A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE
 CITY. WHETHER THIS WILL BE SEPARATE OR CAN BE COMBINED
 WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL NEED
 TO BE DETERMINED THROUGH THE CITY ATTORNEY.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 03-09-2023 Time 12:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 03-09-2023 Time 12:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-09 12:32:04-METHODS OF CONNECTION NOT SHOWN
 -NO POINTS OF SERVICE CALLED OUT
 -NO GATE VALVES SHOWN FOR WATER
 -NO METERS SHOWN
 -LEBEL PRIVATE SERVICES AS NECESSARY
 -CONFIGURE SEWER SO IT IS NO LONGER GOING THROUGH
 PRIVATE PROPERTY
 -MANHOLE INVERTS NOT CALLED OUT
 -EXISTING FORCE MAIN IS NOT VERY APPARANT ON PLANS
 -PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAILS OF CONNECTIONS
 -FURTHER COMMENTS TO BE MADE UPON RESUBMITTAL
  
 RICKY ELIZONDO
 [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 05-15-2023 Time 16:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-15 16:22:47PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -FDC TO THE NORTHEAST APPEARS TO BE INSTALLED
 INCORRECTLY. IT IS INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE FIRELINE
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, WHEREAS USUALLY IT IS INSTALLED
 DOWNSTREAM.
 -IN PRIOR RESPONSE LETTER, FOR: VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE
 SYSTEM WILL NOT HAVE ANY ADDED CHEMICALS OR AUXILIARY
 WATER SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS OR TANKS, RECEIVED THE
 FOLLOWING RESPONSE: COMMENT NOTED. RESPONSE WAS
 INSUFFICIENT. NEED CONFIRMATION IF PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM
 WILL HAVE ANY ADDED CHEMICALS OR AUXILIARY WATER
 SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS OR TANKS. IF NOT, DCDA TYPE IS
 FINE.
 -PROPERTY OWNER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RECORD BACKFLOW
 COVENANT AS A CONDITION OF WATER SERVICE.
 -FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION INSIDE
 BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED PIPING AND COMPONENTS UPSTREAM
 OF IT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS. ALL PIPING
 UPSTREAM OF FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NEED BE DUCTILE
 IRON PIPE, AND INSTALLATION MUST MEET REQUIREMENTS OF
 WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS5. PLEASE NOTIFY FIRE
 SYSTEM DESIGNER OF THIS REVIEW COMMENT NOW DURING PPRC
 AND WILL REVIEW FURTHER AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 SUBMITTAL.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 03-03-2023 Time 10:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-03 10:44:43PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -SURVEYS SHOW VARIOUS EXISTING EASEMENTS ON THE
 PROPERTY INCLUDING A WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EASEMENT.
 WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE EASEMENTS, AND ARE THERE
 CURRENTLY ANY WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES IN THE FIVE
 FOOT WATER AND SEWER EASEMENT?
 -COOLING TOWERS CANNOT BE FED FROM FIRELINES.
 -A1.7, A1.8, A4.1, AND Z7.0 SHOW WATER TANKS. WHAT ARE
 THEY USED FOR AND WILL THEY BE CONNECTED TO ANY OF THE
 PLUMBING OR FIRE SYSTEMS?
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON
 CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS.
 -SHOW AND LABEL WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON
 CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS.
 -DOMESTIC WATER METERS TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND,
 OUTSIDE OF BUILDING, AND ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE.
 -LABEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WITH RP TYPE AND
 SIZE.
 -WILL DOMESTIC METER BE USED FOR IRRIGATION? IF NOT, IS
 SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE NEEDED?
 -SHOW AND LABEL GREASE TRAPS AND TRANSFORMERS ON
 ENGINEERING PLANS IF THEY WILL BE OUTSIDE OF BUILDING.
 -SHOW AND LABEL FDC IF THEY ARE NEEDED OR REQUIRED.
 ENSURE THEY ACCEPTABLE DISTANCE TO FIRE HYDRANTS.
 -VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM WILL NOT HAVE ANY ADDED
 CHEMICALS OR AUXILIARY WATER SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS OR
 TANKS.
 -WATER METERS 8 INCHES AND LARGER ARE NOT STOCKED AND
 HAVE TO BE ORDERED AFTER UTILITY QUOTE IS PAID. LEAD
 TIMES MAY BE OVER 6 MONTHS FROM TIME OF PAYMENT.
 -WATER METERS 6 INCH OR LARGER NEED TO BE ACCESSIBLE
 AND REPLACEABLE BY FORD F350 CRANE TRUCK.
 -SHOW UTILITIES FROM ENGINEERING PLAN ON LANDSCAPING
 PLAN AND ENSURE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND
 LANDSCAPING.
 -NORTHEAST FIRELINE IS EXCESSIVELY LONG. BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE CLOSER TO TAP THAN BUILDING. ALSO
 ENSURE FIRELINE IS ON PROPERTY LINE AND NOT IN NORTH
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 -SHOW EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES ON DEMO PLAN.
 -ALL INSTALLED CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MUST BE
 LEAD-FREE AND USC-APPROVED (BY SIZE, MAKE, MODEL,
 ORIENTATION, VALVING, AND BYPASS).
 -MANY OF THE SURROUNDING STREETS WILL NEED PAVEMENT
 RESTORATION DUE TO UTILITY WORK.
 -C10 HAS DUPLICATE STANDARD DETAILS. PLEASE ELIMINATE
 THE DUPLICATE.
 -ADD WATER SERVICES STANDARD DETAILS WS2, WS5, WS7 TO
 ENGINEERING PLAN SET.
 -EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ACROSS FROM BROWARD AVE APPEARS
 TO BE IN MIDDLE OF PROPOSED WALKWAY.
 -SHOW AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO EXISTING UTILITY
 POLES AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY.
 -EXISTING WATER MAIN LAYOUT SHOWN ON PONCE DE LEON
 SHOWN ON C5 MAY NOT BE ACCURATE. REFERENCE WATER DESIGN
 RECORDS FROM 312 23RD ST.
  
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-09-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 03-09-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-09 11:51:08PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
 CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT FOR THE SANITATION COLLECTION
 VEHICLE.
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS
 5- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
 GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
 TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
 NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
 6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
  
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-03-2023 Time 18:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-03-2023 Time 18:04 Sent To  
Notes
2023-08-03 18:02:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 5/11/23 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - INCLUDE THE REMOVAL HATCHING
 ON ALL OF THE PLAN SHEETS.] CROSS HATCH THE UTILITIES
 THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] HATCH SIDEWALKS, CURBS, ETC. THAT WILL
 BE REMOVED OR REPLACED.
  
 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - NOT ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
 ADJUSTED TO THE NEW CURB LINE] REMOVE DRIVEWAY APRONS
 THAT WILL NOT BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT AND
 RESTORE THE CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE EDGE OF
 ROAD PAVEMENT. RELOCATE ANY DRAINAGE STRUCTURES INTO
 THE NEW CURB LINE.
  
 4 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL FM ON PONCE DE LEON AND
 EXISTING STORM PIPES WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY]. LABEL
 UTILITIES (SIZE AND MATERIAL) IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] NUMBER THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR EASE
 OF REFERENCE.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] THE MANHOLES IN THE PEDESTRIAN PATHS
 POSE A TRIPPING HAZARD. CONSIDER MOVING THE MANHOLES
 INTO THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 7. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW SYMBOLS FOR EXISTING DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES AND LIST ON THE SHEET THE RIM/GRATE
 ELEVATION AND INVERT ELEVATIONS.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] SITE IS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
 AREA. STRUCTURES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET OF
 FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE TOP AND BOTTOM TRENCH ELEVATIONS
 ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW BLEEDERS WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 11. [SATISFIED. IF NOTE #3 ON THE PAVING AND GRADING
 PLAN WAS ADDED TO ADDRESS THIS COMMENT PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THIS COMMENT RELATES TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
 RULINGS AND IS NOT RELATED TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 SO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WOULD NOT BE THE ONE TO
 ENFORCE THIS.] CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO
 CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS IF THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT
 ADJACENT TO THE RAMP IS MODIFIED IN ANY WAY. THIS
 APPLIES TO ALL CURB RAMPS, INCLUDING ONES THAT ARE ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET.
  
 12. [NOT SATISFIED] INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND ON SHEET C3
 (PDG PLAN) THE DIFFERENT HATCH PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE
 SHEET.
  
 13. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT ALL
 DRIVEWAYS, ON-STREET PARKING AREAS, MID-BLOCK FOR ALL
 STREETS. LABEL THE STREET, R/W LINE, SIDEWALKS, CURBS,
 ETC. DIMENSION THE DISTANCE FROM THE R/W LINE TO MAJOR
 SURFACE FEATURES SUCH AS BACK OF CURB, EDGE OF
 PAVEMENT, FRONT OR BACK OF SIDEWALK (PROVIDE SIDEWALK
 WIDTH), FACE OF BUILDING, HIGH POINTS IN DRIVEWAYS.
 PROVIDE ARROWS SHOWING GENERAL DIRECTION OF SURFACE
 SLOPES. LABEL THE CURB TYPES.
  
  
 14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - IDENTIFY ON THE DRAINAGE
 PLAN THE LOCATION(S) OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORMWATER
 STORAGE TANKS] WHERE WILL THE BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
 CONNECT TO?
  
 15. [SATISFIED] THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE
 INTERSECTION OF N. FLAGLER DR. AND 23RD ST DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO BE SHOWN IN THE CORRECT LOCATION.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] CAN THE SCALE OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS
 BE CHANGED TO 1-INCH EQUALS 30 FEET TO MATCH SCALE OF
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS?
  
 17. [SATISFIED - IT APPEARS THE CONTOUR LINES WERE
 REMOVED] VERTICAL PROFILE OF THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH
 SHOULD CLOSELY FOLLOW PROFILE OF N. FLAGLER DR AND THE
 CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 PERCENT CROSS SLOPE. THE
 CONTOUR LINES WILL NEED TO BE REVISED.
  
 18. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
  
 19. [SATISFIED] A CURB INLET AND PIPE WILL BE NEEDED ON
 PONCE DE LEON TO COLLECT STORMWATER WATER RUNOFF BEFORE
 23RD ST.
  
 20. [SATISFIED] STORM PIPE WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY
 SHALL BE RCP, MINIMUM 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER.
 JUSTIFICATION WILL BE NEEDED FOR ANY OUTFALL PIPE
 LARGER THAN 15-INCH.
  
 21. [SATISFIED] CREATE DEPRESSIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS TO COLLECT STORMWATER RUNOFF.
  
 22. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - CONTACT THE EOR (MCLEOD
 MCCARTHY AND ASSOC.) ABOUT GETTING THEIR LATEST PLANS]
 SHOW THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE INTERSECTION OF BROWARD AVE AND PICADILLY
 STREET.
  
 23. [SATISFIED] COORDINATE LOCATION OF TREES WITH THE
 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (5/11/2023 SUBMITTAL)
  
 24. DESIGN TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER ALONG ALL SIDES OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT AND DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER ACROSS THE
 DRIVEWAYS. BACK OF PROPOSED CURB TO MATCH THE SAME
 HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE BACK OF THE EXISTING CURB.
  
 25. WHAT WILL BE THE SLOPE OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG
 23RD STREET AT ITS NARROWEST LOCATION? IF SHOULD NOT BE
 STEEPER THAN 4:1. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR THE FRONT OF
 SIDEWALK AT THESE NARROW LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 26. THE EXISTING CURB INLET AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
 PICADILLY STREET AND BROWARD AVE WILL NEED TO BE
 RELOCATED TO THE NEW CURB LINE AND PIPED TO THE NEW
 MANHOLE STRUCTURE BEING INSTALLED BY THE BROWARD APTS.
 CONTRACTOR.
  
 27. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 PAVER DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE R/W.
  
 28. EXPLAIN/LABEL THE V-SHAPED DRIVEWAY(?) ON PICADILLY
 STREET AT THE MIDPOINT OF THE SOUTH TOWER. IF IT IS A
 DRIVEWAY, THE APRON IS TO BE CONCRETE WITHIN THE RIGHT
 OF WAY. IF A DRIVEWAY, PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION PER
 COMMENT #13 ABOVE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF OF PICADILLY
 STREET TO THE BACK OF THE ROOM (APPROX. 73 FEET FROM
 THE PROPERTY LINE).
  
 29. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED
 STORMWATER PIPES AND THE EXISTING FM ON 23RD ST. LIST
 TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS OF THE PIPES.
  
 30. HOW WILL THE STORMWATER RUNOFF ON THE DRIVEWAY TO
 N. FLAGLER DRIVE BE CAPTURED BEFORE THE R/W LINE?
  
 31. DRAINAGE DESIGN SHOULD CONSIDER THE SEA LEVEL RISE
 AFFECTS ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE.
  
 31. IT APPEARS TREES ARE PROPOSED OVER THE EXISTING GAS
 MAIN ALONG PONCE DE LEON.
  
 32. SHOW THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR THE GARAGE AND WHERE
 IT TIES INTO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-09-2023 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-09-2023 Time 15:51 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-09 15:51:00THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. CROSS HATCH THE UTILITIES THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. HATCH SIDEWALKS, CURBS, ETC. THAT WILL BE REMOVED OR
 REPLACED.
  
 3. REMOVE DRIVEWAY APRONS THAT WILL NOT BE INCORPORATED
 INTO THE DEVELOPMENT AND RESTORE THE CURB OR CURB AND
 GUTTER ALONG THE EDGE OF ROAD PAVEMENT. RELOCATE ANY
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES INTO THE NEW CURB LINE.
  
 4 LABEL UTILITIES (SIZE AND MATERIAL) IN THE RIGHT OF
 WAY.
  
 5. NUMBER THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR EASE OF
 REFERENCE.
  
 6. THE MANHOLES IN THE PEDESTRIAN PATHS POSE A TRIPPING
 HAZARD. CONSIDER MOVING THE MANHOLES INTO THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS.
  
 7. SHOW SYMBOLS FOR EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND
 LIST ON THE SHEET THE RIM/GRATE ELEVATION AND INVERT
 ELEVATIONS.
  
 8. SITE IS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA.
 STRUCTURES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET OF FREEBOARD
 ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 9. PROVIDE TOP AND BOTTOM TRENCH ELEVATIONS ON THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL.
  
 10. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES.
  
 11. CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CURRENT ADA
 REQUIREMENTS IF THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO THE
 RAMP IS MODIFIED IN ANY WAY. THIS APPLIES TO ALL CURB
 RAMPS, INCLUDING ONES THAT ARE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE STREET.
  
 12. INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND ON SHEET C3 (PDG PLAN) THE
 DIFFERENT HATCH PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE SHEET.
  
 13. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT ALL DRIVEWAYS, ON-STREET
 PARKING AREAS, MID-BLOCK FOR ALL STREETS. LABEL THE
 STREET, R/W LINE, SIDEWALKS, CURBS, ETC. DIMENSION THE
 DISTANCE FROM THE R/W LINE TO MAJOR SURFACE FEATURES
 SUCH AS BACK OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT, FRONT OR BACK
 OF SIDEWALK (PROVIDE SIDEWALK WIDTH), FACE OF BUILDING,
 HIGH POINTS IN DRIVEWAYS. PROVIDE ARROWS SHOWING
 GENERAL DIRECTION OF SURFACE SLOPES. LABEL THE CURB
 TYPES.
  
  
 14. WHERE WILL THE BUILDING ROOF DRAINS CONNECT TO?
  
 15. THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE INTERSECTION OF
 N. FLAGLER DR. AND 23RD ST DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHOWN
 IN THE CORRECT LOCATION.
  
 16. CAN THE SCALE OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS BE CHANGED
 TO 1-INCH EQUALS 30 FEET TO MATCH SCALE OF THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS?
  
 17. VERTICAL PROFILE OF THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH SHOULD
 CLOSELY FOLLOW PROFILE OF N. FLAGLER DR AND THE CROSS
 SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 PERCENT CROSS SLOPE. THE
 CONTOUR LINES WILL NEED TO BE REVISED.
  
 18. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON THE PGD PLAN.
  
 19. A CURB INLET AND PIPE WILL BE NEEDED ON PONCE DE
 LEON TO COLLECT STORMWATER WATER RUNOFF BEFORE 23RD ST.
  
 20. STORM PIPE WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE RCP,
 MINIMUM 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. JUSTIFICATION WILL BE
 NEEDED FOR ANY OUTFALL PIPE LARGER THAN 15-INCH.
  
 21. CREATE DEPRESSIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE AREAS TO
 COLLECT STORMWATER RUNOFF.
  
 22. SHOW THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SOUTHWEST
 CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF BROWARD AVE AND PICADILLY
 STREET.
  
 23. COORDINATE LOCATION OF TREES WITH THE UNDERGROUND
 UTILITIES. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-06-2023 Time 07:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-06 08:47:521. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. MULTIPLE UNITY OF TITLES
 WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED.
 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR USE OF
 CITY PROPERTY IN SE CORNER.
 3. EXISTING FPL/BELLSOUTH EASEMENTS WILL NEED TO BE
 TERMINATED OR APPROVAL FROM UTILITY IF REMAINING.
 4. BY VIRTUE OF REVERTER IN ORB 9559/475, HAS BROWARD
 AVE. REVERTED BACK TO THE CITY? MAY NEED OUR LAW DEPT.
 TO REVIEW CHAIN OF TITLE. PLEASE PROVIDE COPY OF TITLE
 POLICY AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.
 5. SURVEY SHOWS SE CORNER AS LEASED TO MARITIME MUSEUM,
 PROVIDE COPY OF SAME.
 6. UTILITY STUDY WAS FINALIZED 2 WEEKS AGO AND IS UNDER
 REVIEW WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. SANITARY/WATER LINES AND
 SERVICES MAY NEED TO BE REVISED.
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-09-2023 Time 08:10 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-09 08:32:361. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED.
 2. PLANS ARE AVAILABLE THAT DEFINE FLAGLER DRIVE IN
 THIS AREA.
 3. IN REGARDS TO WATER AND SEWER, WE MET WITH RICK
 REIKENIS AND INFORMED HIM OF THE OVERALL STUDY OF THE
 CMUD AREA THAT WILL REQUIRE POSSIBLE UPGRADES AND/OR
 EXTENSION OF UTILITIES.
 4. SUGGESTION TO REMOVE SIDEWALK ALONG FLAGLER AS
 MEANDERING WALKWAY BEING PROPOSED.
 5. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-20-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-20-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-20 01:48:47TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY
 ACCORDING TO COUNTY ARTICLE 12. NOTE: EXCEPTION FROM
 COUNTY CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO
 REQUEST FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 WITH CORRESPONDING IMPACTS, IF ANY
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION
 SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND
 DIMENSIONS IN SHEET C2.3 ARE INCOMPLETE
 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G.
 DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS,
 ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS
 IN SHEET C2.3 ARE INCOMPLETE
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. SUCH PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND
 DIMENSIONS IN SHEET C2.3 ARE INCOMPLETE, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE EACH TRAVEL LANE AND EACH ON-STREET PARKING
 STALLS, AND THEIR CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS. MOREOVER,
 PLEASE SHOWCASE EXACT PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE
 WITHIN THE GARAGE FOR THE 1ST, MIDDLE AND TOP FLOORS.
 DESIGNATE AND PROPERLY MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE AT
 EACH DEAD-END, IF ANY
 7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
 PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S)
 CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION
 REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2,
 T-3.0)
 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 9) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
 PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
 OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
 IF ANY
 10) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 11) NOT SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING. PLEASE PROVIDE A MEMO DETAILING AND
 SUMMARIZING VALET OPERATIONS, INCLUSIVE OF FIGURES
 DEPICTING VALET PODIUM LOCATION AND VEHICLE PATHS
 TO/FROM IT. THE VALET OPERATIONS PROPOSED IN THE MEMO
 WILL BE BINDING, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO ANALYZE ANY
 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHANGE/EXPANSION OF THE SERVICE. A
 SAMPLE VALET ANALYSIS CAN BE PROVIDED, IF REQUESTED.
 12) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 13) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN
 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY?
 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN.
 PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS.
 15) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
 THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
 A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
 16) THE LEFT-TURN VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS IN AND OUT OF THE
 FLAGLER DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE FORBIDDEN; SUCH DRIVEWAY
 SHOULD BE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ONLY. PLEASE INSTALL A
 TRAFFIC ISLAND AND CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE TO ENFORCE
 SUCH OPERATIONS
 17) BASED ON USE TYPE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE, TWO 10X25
 FEET LOADING ZONES ARE REQUIRED. IF ALREADY PLANNED,
 PLEASE PROPERLY DEPICT THEM AND PROVIDE DOCUMENT
 NAME/SHEET NUMBER
 18) THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN RECOMMENDS SEPARATED
 BICYCLE LANE ALONG N FLAGLER DR. PLEASE DEPICT SUCH
 BICYCLE FACILITY ACCORDINGLY. IT IS SUGGESTED TO
 COORDINATE WITH THE NEARBY CURRIE PARK REDEVELOPMENT
 PROJECT
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-13-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 03-13-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-13 19:33:35TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDING TO
 COUNTY ARTICLE 12. NOTE: EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY
 CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST
 FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH
 CORRESPONDING IMPACTS, IF ANY
 3) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED
 5) IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 PLAN
 7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
 PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S)
 CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION
 REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2,
 T-3.0)
 8) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 9) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
 TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
 STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
 10) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 11) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A
 THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY MEETING
 12) ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 13) IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN EXISTING
 BICYCLE FACILITY?
 14) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS.
 15) PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN THOSE CASES
 WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
 FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
 STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-09-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 06-09-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-09 09:44:56*** THIS REVIEW IS FOR THE 05.11.2023 RESUBMITTAL
 PACKET ***
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - THE PROPOSED PROJECT NAME IS LISTED IN
 THE APPLICATION AS "CURRIE PARK PLOT 4." IT IS ADVISED
 THAT THE NAME OF THE PROJECT BE CHANGED TO AVOID ANY
 CONFUSION WITH CURRIE PARK, WHICH IS:
  
 1.1. LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CURRIE
 MIXED USE DISTRICT (CMUD) AND
  
 1.2. THERE IS AN ACTIVE APPLICATION FOR THE CURRIE PARK
 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WITH A SIMILAR NAME.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED - A COMPLETE ADDRESS LIST OF ALL
 PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,
 WITH CLEARLY WRITTEN INFORMATION (I.E. ZIP CODES,
 ETC.), AND A COPY OF THE MAILING LABELS (FROM THE
 ADDRESS LIST) SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS IS A REQUIRED
 ELEMENT OF THE APPLICATION PACKET. THE ADDRESS LIST
 SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION APPEAR TO HAVE CRYPTIC
 INFORMATION AND NO COPY OF THE MAILING LIST WAS
 PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED - A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY -
 TRAFFIC DIVISION (561.684.4030), STATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY IS REQUIRED. THE TPS
 LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED TO STAFF PRIOR TO SCHEDULING
 THE PROJECT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING STAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED - A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY
 DETERMINATION (SCAD) LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF
 PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. THE SCAD LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO STAFF PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR
 THE PUBLIC HEARING STAGE.
  
 5. SATSIFIED - PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL
 FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561-494-1040) ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED LETTER.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PROVIDE WRITTEN LETTERS FROM
 ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR
 OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR
 SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND COMCAST.
  
 7. SATISFIED - PLEASE CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL,
 ADDRESSING COORDINATOR (561.805.6659 OR
 [email protected]), ON THE FLAGLER DRIVE ADDRESSES
 PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2175 N FLAGLER DRIVE
 SOUTH TOWER AND 2251 N FLAGLER DRIVE - NORTH TOWER). IT
 APPEARS THAT THE ADDRESSES UTILIZED HAVE NOT BEEN
 FINALIZED.
  
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE EXPLAIN/CLARIFY "THE
 PROPERTY OWNER OF THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE WILL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY
 OWNED PARCEL." ADDITIONALLY, FURTHER COORDINATION AND
 DISCUSSION SHALL BE REQUIRED ON THE MAINTENANCE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY-OWNED PARK PARCEL LOCATED AT
 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER.
  
 1.1. THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR THE
 TRIANGULAR-SHAPED CITY PARK AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE PROJECT. A CONDITION WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. SATISFIED - APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
 RESPONSES TO THE STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-55(B)(2) OF THE
 ZLDRS. THE RESPONSES TO THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL
 REVIEW HAVE NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 3. SATISFIED - THE LIST/REQUEST FOR VARIANCES WILL NEED
 TO BE AMENDED TO CAPTURE ALL THE VARIANCES/WAIVERS
 NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT. ADDITIONALLY, ANY RELATED
 DIALOGUE IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHALL BE
 REVISED TO MATCH (FOR CONSISTENCY).
  
 4. SATISFIED - THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS IDENTIFIED
 AS "PARKS/OPEN SPACE," AS IT IS A DESIGNATED FUTURE
 LINEAR PARK IN THE REGULATING PLANS FOR CMUD. THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IDENTIFIES THE PROPERTY TO THE
 NORTH AS CMUD-CORE IA. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - NOT ALL THE STATEMENTS
 PROVIDED TO THE RESPONSES IN SEC. 94-35(C) - SITE
 DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE
 ACCURATE. AS NOTED ABOVE, ADDITIONAL VARIANCE/WAIVERS
 ARE REQUIRED; INCORRECT CALCULATIONS (I.E. PARKING) ARE
 NOTED, ETC., SO NOT ALL THE STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MET OR
 ARE ACCURATE. PLEASE REVISE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 5.1. ALL PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE MUST BE
 WITHIN THE SETBACK RANGE. IF NOT, THE PROJECT DOS NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CMUD REGULATIONS (AS
 NOTED IN STANDARD A).
  
 5.2. THE PROVIDED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ARE
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE
 PLANS.
  
 5.3. ROVIDED REQUIRED MININMUM PARKING CALCULATIONS NOT
 ACCURATE IN STANDARD A. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 5.4. INFORMATION ON THE SCREENING/MASKING OF THE TRASH
 COLLECTION AREA MUST BE PROVIDED IN STANDARD C.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - A MORE IN-DEPTH EXPLANATION
 FOR EACH VARIANCE IS REQUIRED. THE STANDARDS ARE VERY
 SPECIFIC AND THE RESPONSES DO NOT EXPLAIN THE HARDSHIP
 AND IF THE REQUIREMENT CAN BE MET IN THE DESIGN AND/OR
 IF OTHER DESIGN ALTERNATIVES TO MEET CODE HAVE BEEN
 EXPLORED.
  
 6.1. SINCE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A VACANT SITE, THERE
 SHOULD BE FEW (IF ANY) HARDSHIPS WITH MEETING THE CODE.
 IF THERE IS A DESIGN HARDSHIP (TO PROVIDE A CERTAIN
 APPEARANCE) THE APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO STATE HOW THE
 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE MEETS THE INTENT OF THE CODE
 REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 DESIGN COMMENTS ON REQUESTED VARIANCES:
  
 ** FIVE (5) VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT AT THIS TIME. APPLICANT MUST CLEARLY DEFINE THE
 HARDSHIP AND WHY THE CODE REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET.
 ADDITIONALLY, HOW DOES THE PROPOSED DESIGN MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE ZLDRS IN PLACE OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE
 MUST BE EXPLAINED **
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED - THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE
 FROM SEC. 94-215(G)(1)(VI), WHICH REQUIRES GROUND FLOOR
 COMMERCIAL ACTIVE USES ALONG THE FIRST 100 FT. ON
 FLAGLER DRIVE AT 23RD STREET. AT THIS TIME, STAFF
 CANNOT SUPPORT THIS VARIANCE REQUEST:
  
 1.1. IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
 THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO JUSTIFY AND
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE ACTIVE USE GARDEN COULD MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG 23RD STREET
 AND FLAGLER DRIVE. AN EXPLANATION OF THE HARDSHIP MUST
 ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE STATEMENT. SUFFICIENT
 INFORMATION ON HOW THIS REQUEST JUSTIFIES AS ACTIVE USE
 TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE ZLDRS AND MEETS THE VARIANCE
 STANDARDS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 1.2. THE FENCE APPEARS TO CONTRADICT THE PROPOSED
 PUBLIC NATURE OF THE ACTIVE USE GARDEN. IT WAS ALSO
 DISCUSSED THAT THE OPEN SPACE FENCES WITHIN THE PROJECT
 BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS, YET THE FENCES REMAIN IN THE
 CURRENT PLANS. PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT PER SEC.
 94-215(M), ???PUBLIC OPEN SPACE??? IS DEFINED AS GROUND
 FLOOR OPEN SPACE FOR PUBLIC USE AND ACCESS ABUTTING A
 PUBLIC STREET ON AT LEAST ONE SIDE AND WITH
 UNENCUMBERED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK
 OR A RIGHT OF WAY FOR GENERAL PUBLIC USE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(1)(VI)]
  
 1.3. THE INTENT OF THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG
 23RD STREET IS TO DRAW PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY. THE OPEN
 SPACE APPEARS MORE TO BE A PASSIVE PARK, WHICH
 CONFLICTS WITH THE INTENT OF THE CMUD REGULATIONS.
  
 1.4. EXTENDING THE ACTIVE USE BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG
 23RD STREET TO MINIMIZE THE OPEN SPACE AND TO ACTIVATE
 THE STREET FRONTAGE SHOULD BE HIGHLY CONSIDERED.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A
 VARIANCE FROM SEC. 94-209(2)(J)(1)(A) OF THE ZLDRS,
 WHICH REQUIRES THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL BUILDING LENGTH
 NOT TO EXCEED 250 FT. THE REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE FOR THE
 BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG PONCE DE LEON AVENUE; HOWEVER,
 IT ALSO APPEARS THAT A VARIANCE IS NEEDED FOR THE
 FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGE:
  
 2.1. SATSIFIED - WHAT IS THE HARDSHIP? WHY CAN'T THE
 CODE REQUIREMENT BE MET?
  
 2.2. SATISFIED - INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION PROVIDED IN
 THE STATEMENT LETTER ON THE JUSTIFICATION AND HOW THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING LENGTH ALONG EACH FRONTAGE WOULD MEET
 THE INTENT OF 250 FT. BUILDING LENGTH REQUIREMENT.
  
 2.3. NOT SATISFIED - BUILDING LENGTH DIAGRAM(S) SHALL
 BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SET TO
 CLEARLY SHOW THE LENGTH OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALONG
 EACH FRONTAGE AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED.
  
  
 COMMENT(S) ON BUILDING HEIGHT:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL THE
 FEMA APPROVED BASE ELEVATION + 2 FT. REQUIRED ELEVATION
 PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS
 POINT TO THE TOP OF THE BUILDING. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
 HEIGHT PER THE CMUD REGULATIONS SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED
 (BASE HEIGHT = 111 AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT WITH INCENTIVE =
 350 FT.). THERE APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENCIES AND/OR
 LACK OF CLARITY WITH THE MEASUREMENTS PROVIDED IN THE
 ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
  
 1.1. THE 8 FT. NAVD FLOOD ELEVATION (6 FT. FEMA + 2 FT.
 BUILDING ELEVATION) IS ACCURATELY NOTED; HOWEVER, THE
 ELEVATION DRAWINGS MUST ALSO SHOW THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT MEASUREMENT/NOTATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS OF THE ZLDRS (ONLY
 SECTIONAL DRAWINGS PROVIDE BUILDING HEIGHT MEASUREMENTS
 BUT IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO CAPTURE ALL STRUCTURAL
 ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING(S)).
  
  
 FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM COMMENTS AND NOTES:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED
 FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM DOES NOT FULLY MEET THE
 DESIGN CRITERIA OF THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM.
 PLEASE ENSURE ALL THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
 PARKWAY HAVE BEEN MET PER S.94-215(M)(4) OF THE ZLDRS
 (I.E. PARKWAY WIDTH, STREET FURNISHINGS, ETC.).
  
 1.1. CONSIDER ADDING TRASH RECEPTACLES TO ENHANCE THE
 DESIGN OF THE PARKWAY EASEMENT.
  
 1.2. ALTHOUGH DETECTED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN, THE
 LIGHT FIXTURES WITHIN THE PARKWAY EASEMENT (AS WELL AS
 THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE) SHALL BE SHOWN IN THE SITE
 PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE PLANS AND TO
 ENSURE NO CONFLICT WITH THE PLACEMENT OF THE FIXTURES.
  
 2. SATISFIED - THE EXISTING SIDEWALK THAT WILL BE
 REPLACED BY THE MULTIPURPOSE PATH WITHIN THE PARKWAY
 SHALL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 THE MULTIPURPOSE PATH IS DESIGNED TO REPLACE THE
 EXISTING SIDEWALK AND THERE SHOULD NOT BE AN ADDITIONAL
 SIDEWALK. ALSO, THE STREET TREES AND THE PLANTING
 STRIPS SHALL CONNECT SEAMLESSLY ADJACENT TO THE
 PARKWAY.
  
  
 CITY-OWNED PARK (TRIANGULAR PIECE TO THE SOUTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL) COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE PRE-APPLICATION
 MEETING THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO IMPROVE THE
 CITY-OWNED PARK SPACE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE AND PICADILLY STREET. BASED ON STAFF???S REVIEW,
 THE AREA HAS ONLY BEEN IMPROVED BY A WIDE SIDEWALK THAT
 CONSUMES MOST OF THE PARK AREA WHICH IS UNACCEPTABLE.
 THOUGHT SHOULD BE MADE TO ACTIVATE AND MAKE THIS PARK
 PARCEL COHESIVE AND ATTRACTIVE WITH THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND CONNECTIVITY TO THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM.
  
  
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. SATISFIED - BUILDINGS WITH FRONTAGE ALONG 23RD
 STREET SHALL MAINTAIN A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 6 STORIES/80
 FT. AT THE PODIUM. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 PLAN APPEARS TO MEET THE HEIGHT AND PODIUM/TOWER
 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, CONSIDERATION SHOULD ALSO BE MADE
 TO HOW THE BUILDING HEIGHT AT THE PODIUM BALANCES OUT
 WITH THE LINEAR PARK (NORTH OF 23RD STREET) AND THE
 PROPOSED OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE PROJECT ALONG 23RD
 STREET AND FLAGLER DRIVE. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE
 ACTIVE USE FRONTAGE ALONG 23RD STREET IS INCREASED IN
 HEIGHT AND EXTENDED ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(1)(III)]
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 6
 STORIES/80 FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE PODIUM LEVEL
 AND ANY ADDITIONAL HEIGHT ABOVE THE PODIUM OF THE
 BUILDING SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 20 FT. FROM THE
 EDGE OF THE PODIUM FRONTING ALONG PONCE DE LEON. IT
 DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET
 (SITE PLAN SHOWS AT 12 FT. TOWER SETBACK FROM THE
 PODIUM). PLEASE ADDRESS AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 REFERENCES TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION
 OF THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-215(G)(1)(IV)]
  
 2.1. DIMENSION MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN TO
 DEMOSNTRATE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS STILL MISSING.
  
 2.2. MEASUREMENT MUST BE TAKEN FROM THE EDGE OF THE
 PODIUM TO THE TOWER. IT APPEARS THAT THE MINIMUM
 SETBACK OF 20 FT. HAS NOT BEEN MET.
  
 3. SATISFIED - GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL USE IS REQUIRED
 AS A WRAPAROUND USE FOR THE FIRST 100 FT. OF PONCE DE
 LEON AVENUE FROM 23RD STREET. ON SHEET Z-9.0, THE WRAP
 AROUND SPACE IS NOTED AS 3,000 SQ. FT. OF SEMI-PUBLIC
 WRAP AROUND SPACE. STAFF NEEDS MORE INFORMATION ON THE
 PROPOSED "SEMI-PUBLIC" USE TO DETERMINE IF IT MEETS THE
 USE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REQUIRED WRAP-AROUND ACTIVE
 USE. [ZLDR S.94-215(G)(1)(VI)]
  
 4. SATISFIED - VARIANCE REQUESTED. THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING SETBACK ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE IS NOT LOCATED
 WITHIN THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK RANGE (35 FT.
 MINIMUM AND 45 FT. MAXIMUM; PROVIDED IS A MAXIMUM 80
 FT. FOR THE SOUTH TOWER AND A 98 FT. MAXIMUM SETBACK
 FOR THE NORTH TOWER). PLEASE ADDRESS; IF THIS
 REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET, THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO
 SEEK A VARIANCE FROM THIS REQUIREMENT AND EXPLAIN THE
 HARDSHIP. [ZLDR S.94-215, TABLE VII-11]
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
 THAT CLEARLY SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED OPEN
 SPACE WITHIN THE PROJECT AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS
 (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED). A MINIMUM OF 3% OF PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE (DEFINED AS ANY OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE
 BUILDING ENVELOPE OR ON ROOFTOPS) IS REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROJECT. [ZLDR S.94-215(G)(2), TABLE VII-11]
  
 5.1. STAFF DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE PROPORION OF PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE. AS A RESULT, THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED MAY
 CHANGE.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED - CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO
 REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AT THE GROUND LEVEL.
 THE PURPOSE OF REQUIRING ONLY 3% OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 IS BASED ON THE PROXIMITY OF THE PROJECT SITE TO CURRIE
 PARK, THE LINEAR PARK (NORTH OF 23RD STREET) AND THE
 REQUIREMENT FOR THE 30 FT. WIDE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THERE
 ARE CONCERNS THAT DESIGNING ADDITIONAL AND EXCESSIVE
 OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE WILL DIMINISH
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ALONG THE BUILDING/STREET
 FRONTAGES, WHICH IS NOT THE INTENT OF THE CMUD
 REGULATIONS.
  
 6.1. A MEETING BETWEEN STAFF AND THE
 APPLICANT/ARCHITECT IS REQUESTED TO DISCUSS FURTHER.
  
 7. SATISFIED - THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE FRONTAGE ALONG
 23RD STREET AND PONCE DE LEON SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CMUD CODE. PROVIDE DIAGRAMS AND
 CALCULATIONS WHERE NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-215(G)(2),
 TABLE VII-11]
  
 8. SATISFIED - SHOW DIAGRAM THAT DEMONSTRATES
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT
 FOR GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USES (70% MINIMUM REQUIRED).
 ALTHOUGH THE CALCULATIONS FOR TRANSPARENCY HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED IN THE LINER AND TRANSPARENCY DIAGRAM (SHEET
 Z9.0) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPARENCY AND
 SUPPORTING DIMENSIONS ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE DIAGRAM.
 PLEASE ILLUSTRATE FOR CLARITY WITH COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(2), TABLE VII-11]
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED - PRIVATE OPEN SPACE LOCATED ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR AND LOCATED ALONG THE LOT FRONTAGE SHALL
 BE DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE CMUD REGULATIONS. THE PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE REUQIREMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN MET. PLEASE ADDRESS.
 [ZLDR S.94-215(M)(2) AND (3)]
  
 9.1. THE PROPOSED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AT THE GROUND
 LEVEL DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE. IF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 IS PROVIDED ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND LOCATED ALONG THE
 LOT FRONTAGE, IT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS AND IT SHALL BE
 ACCESIBLE BY THE PUBLIC [REFERENCE: S.94-215(M)(2)].
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - CALCULATIONS AND
 ILLUSTRATIONS FOR THE ROOFTOP TERRACES SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. ROOFTOP TERRACES SHALL BE DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS PROVIDED IN SEC.
 94-215(S)(1) AND SHALL BE:
  
 10.1. HARDSCAPED WITH MATERIALS, SUCH AS, BUT NOT
 LIMITED TO PATTERNED CONCRETE, PAVERS OR WOOD DECKING.
 MATERIALS MUST BE IDENTIFIED. [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 10.2. PROVIDE SHADED SEATING AREAS. [SATISFIED]
  
 10.3. A MINIMUM 15% OF THE OVERALL GROSS FLOOR AREA OF
 THE ROOFTOP TERRACE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. LANDSCAPING
 SHALL CONSIST OF TREES, SHURBS, GROUND COVER AND VINES.
 [PARTIALLY ADDRESSED ??? ROOFTOP AREAS MUST CONTAIN
 TREES IN LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS.]
  
 10.4. A MINIMUM OF A 5 FT. WIDE WALKWAY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AROUND THE SWIMMING POOL AND/OR WHIRLPOOL
 (PROVIDE DIMENSIONS). [SATISFIED]
  
 10.5. ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES SHALL NOT OCCUPY MORE
 THAN 30% OF THE GROSS ROOFTOP AREA. [NOT SATISFIED ???
 CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE INACCURATE AND NOT CLEAR.]
  
 10.6. ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE DESIGNED
 IN ANY MANNER THAT WOULD PERMIT THE CONVERSION OF SUCH
 STRUCTURES FROM NON-HABITABLE TO HABITABLE SPACE.
 [SATSIFIED]
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - WHERE A SIDEWALK OR OTHER
 WALKWAY CROSSES A PARKING LOT, STREET, OR DRIVEWAY, THE
 FOLLOWING STANDARDS SHALL APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC.
 94-209(2)(D)(2). THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FULLY
 ILLUSTRATED AND/OR NOTED IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE
 CONSISTENCY:
  
 11.1. THE INTERSECTION SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND
 LIGHTED FOR SAFETY; [SATISFIED]
  
 11.2. THE SIDEWALK/WALKWAY SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND
 REMAIN AT A CONSTANT LEVEL AT ALL INSTANCES (I.E. THERE
 SHOULD BE NO CURBING TO ILLUSTRATE THE FLUSH SIDEWALK
 LEVEL); [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 11.3. A CHANGE IN TACTILE SURFACE TEXTURE SHALL BE
 INSTALLED AT ALL STREET CROSSINGS. THESE REQUIREMENTS
 MUST BE FULLY ILLUSTRATED AND/OR NOTED IN THE PLANS TO
 DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(D)(2)] [NOT
 SATISFIED]
  
 12. NOT ADDRESSED - OPENINGS OFF ANY STREET SHALL NOT
 EXCEED TWO LANES IN WIDTH AND AT A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 24
 FT. AT THE PROPERTY LINE [S.94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(II)]
  
 12.1. THE ACCESS POINTS ON FLAGLER DRIVE AND PICADILLY
 STREET APPEAR TO EXCEED 24 FT. IN WIDTH AT THE PROPERTY
 LINE. PLEASE SHOW DIMENSION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL HAVE
 DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. CLEARLY
 SHOW IN THE PLANS THE PEDESTRIAN PATH TO DEMONSTRATE
 COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(E)(2)B)(V)]
  
 13.1. DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS MUST BE CLEARLY DEFINED
 BY WALKWAYS LEADING FROM THE GARAGE STRUCTURE AND
 CONNECTING TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY.
  
 13.2. IS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY PROVIDED ON FLAGLER
 DRIVE? IT IS LOGICAL TO HAVE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE
 GARAGE TO PICADILLY STREET AND PONCE DE LEON, GIVEN THE
 SIZE OF THE PROJECT.
  
 14. SATISFIED - THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE OF THE PROJECT
 SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO A PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE. CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
 [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(E)]
  
 15. SATSIFIED - GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
 PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE.
 PLEASE SHOW/PROVIDE NOTE WHERE MOST APPROPRIATE IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(H)]
  
 16. SATISFIED - IT APPEARS THAT A SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM
 WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOPS OF THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT. PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-309(I)
 WITH ALL OTHER APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 17. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN
 ACCESS POINTS ON PICADILLY STREET? THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 SEPARATION SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 125 FT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-312(2)]
  
 18. NOT SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE MINIMUM CORNER
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE FROM THE ACCESS POINTS/DRIVEWAYS TO
 THE STREET INTERSECTIONS? THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE
 SHALL BE MET IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR S. 94-305(E).
 PLEASE PROVIDE CORNER CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 18.1. SIGHT TRIANGLES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS
 IN ZLDR S. 94-305(E) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAYS.
  
 19. SATISFIED - THE SCALE APPEARS TO BE MISSING FROM
 THE SITE PLAN. AS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST
 (PAGE 16/31 OF THE 2023 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION), THIS
 INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 20. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED - CAN THE TRASH
 COLLECTION/MECHANICAL ROOMS ON LEVEL 1 (WHICH FRONTS ON
 PICADILLY STREET AND HAS ITS OWN SEPARATE ACCESS POINT)
 BE RELOCATED? THE PROJECT CAN BE GREATLY ENHANCED BY
 ELIMINATING THE LOADING ZONE/MECHANICAL ROOM CURB CUT
 AND ACTIVATING THE BUILDING FRONTAGE IN THIS AREA.
  
 20.1. IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SANITATION
 DEPARTMENT HAS REQUESTED ACCESS ON PICADILLY STREET
 (LEAST ACTIVE ROADWAY) FOR TRASH PICKUP. IF THE
 LOCATION OF THE TRASH COLLECTION/MECHANICAL ROOMS
 CANNOT BE RELOCATED, THE ENTRANCE AREA TO THE TRASH
 COLLECTION POINT SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE VISUAL
 IMPACT (I.E. UTILIZATION OF DECORATIVE
 SCREENING/ARCHITECTURAL TREAMENT TO MASK IMPACT OF THE
 TRASH COLLECTION POINT).
  
 20.2. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION FOR
 THE TRASH COLLECTION POINT. IT IS DIFFICULT FOR STAFF
 TO ANALYZE THE VISUAL IMPACT OF THIS POINT ALONG THE
 SOUTH ELEVATION (PICADILLY STREET).
  
 21. NOT SATISFIED - AS DISCUSSED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION
 MEETING, IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROJECT
 ACCOMMODATE AN ACTIVE USE LINER ALONG THE PROPOSED
 PARKING GARAGE, NOT ONLY TO BREAK UP THE EXTENSIVE
 BUILDING FACADE OF NON-ACTIVE USES (I.E. THE PARKING
 GARAGE), BUT TO COMPLIMENT THE EXISTING AND FUTURE
 BUILDINGS ON THE WEST SIDE OF PONCE DE LEON AVENUE.
  
 21.1. A VARIANCE FROM THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN
 REQUESTED; HOWEVER, THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 SUPPORTING THE VARIANCE IS WEAK. IF THE ACTIVE USE
 LINER REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET (BY THE DESIGN OF THE
 ARCHITECT), THEN AT MINIMUM, IT MUST BE EXPLAINED
 AND/OR ILLUSTRATED TO HOW THE INTENT OF THE CODE
 REQUIREMENT (WHICH IS TO ACTIVATE THE SPACE IS
 ADDRESSED/MET THROUGH THIS ALTERNATIVE DESIGN.
  
 22. SATISFIED - THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF THE ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES ARE INCORRECTLY LABELED. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 23. NEW COMMENT ??? THERE IS OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE THE
 AREA ALONG PICADILLY STREET WHERE THE BICYCLE RACKS ARE
 LOCATED. SINCE THERE IS NO ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING
 FROM THIS POINT (IT IS BACK OF HOUSE), AND NO ACTIVE
 USES ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE, A SMALL COHESIVE
 PEDESTRIAN AREA COULD BE ACCOMODATED TO PROVIDE SOME
 ACTIVATION TO THE STREET/BUILDING FRONTAGE.
  
 24. NEW COMMENT ??? ALL PROPOSED STRUCUTRES, INCLUDING
 HEIGHT AND SETBACK DISTANCE (WHERE APPLICABLE), SHALL
 BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS.
  
 25. NEW COMMENT - TOWER SETBACK FROM THE PODIUM LEVEL
 ALONG PONCE DE LEON MUST BE CLEARLY NOTATED IN THE
 PLANS.
  
  
 OPEN SPACE COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED - OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS
 SHOW AREAS AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THAT DO NOT QUALIFY AS
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO INCLUDE
 AREAS OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, IT MUST SHOW HOW IT
 QUALIFIES AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND MEETS THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGNATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(M)]
  
 1.1. THE PROPOSED FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE
 GARDEN AREA CANNOT BE UTILIZED TO QUALIFY AS PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE. IT WAS ADVISED BY STAFF TO REMOVE THE FENCE
 FROM THE PLANS OR PROVIDE A NATURAL BARRIER (I.E.
 LANDSCAPE HEDGE IN LIEU OF A FENCE, ETC.)
  
 1.2. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MUST HAVE UNCUMBERED ACCESS FROM
 THE PUBLIC SIDEWLAK OR RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR GENERAL PUBLIC
 USE.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON THE GROUND
 LEVEL AND LOCATED ALONG THE LOT FRONTAGE SHALL BE
 DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS, AND IT SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC
 FOR PUBLIC USE [ZLDR S.94-215(M)]:
  
 2.1. IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED GROUND LEVEL PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE IS STILL RESTRICTED AND DOES NOT PROVIDE
 UNENCOMBERED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE SIDEWALK.
  
  
 STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PAVED
 AREA AT THE CORNERS AND DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES. ADDITIONAL
 LANDSCAPING CAN BE ACCOMMODATED.
  
 1.1. THE AMOUNT OF PAVED AREA AT THE CORNERS LEADING TO
 THE CROSSWALKS CAN BE MINIMIZED TO ACCOMMODATE MORE
 LANDSCAPED AREA. ADDITIONALLY, WIDER CROSSWALKS CAN BE
 DEPICTED.
  
 1.2. A CONTINUOUS LANDSCAPE STRIP SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ALONG 23RD STREET, BETWEEN THE WALKING PATH AND THE
 ROADWAY.
  
 1.3. HOW WIDE ARE THE CROSSWALKS? PLEASE PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - A MINIMUM LANDSCAPE STRIP OF 5 FT.
 SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE STREET EDGE. PLEASE
 DIMENSION OUT TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(N)(4)(II)]
  
 2.1. THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE STREETS SHALL BE
 CONTIGUOUS UNLESS EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED OTHERWISE IN THE
 ZLDRS (I.E. DRIVEWAYS, ETC.).
  
 3. NOT SATISIFIED - TREE GRATES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5
 FT. BY 5 FT. AND MAY BE UTILIZED IN PLACE OF THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIP. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 PLANTING AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PARALLEL ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES ALONG PONCE DE LEON AVENUE DO NOT MEET
 THE MINIMUM STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(N)(4)(IV)]
  
 3.1. THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG PONCE DE LEON AND
 ADJACENT TO THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 CONTIGUOUS. ALTERNATIVELY, TREE GRATES CAN BE UTILIZED
 IN PLACE OF THE REQUIRED STRIP. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPED
 AREAS ALONG PONCE DE LEON DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 MINIMUM STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CMUD.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE
 UNOBSTRUCTED SIDEWALK SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE
 LANDSCAPED AREA. PLEASE DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK AROUND
 THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
 [ZLDR S.94-215(N)(4)(V) AND (VI)]
  
 4.1. SHOW WIDTH OF THE NARROWEST POINT OF THE SIDEWALK
 ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIACE.
 NOT ALL NARROW POINTS ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGES HAVE
 BEEN DIMENSIONED. INVERSELY, A NOTE STATING THAT THE
 CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK VARIES IN WIDTH BUT SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 5 FT. CVAN BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN.
  
 5. SATISFIED - IDENTIFY THE FIVE (5) SQUARES ADJACENT
 TO THE BUILDING FRONTAGE OF THE NORTH TOWER WITHIN THE
 PROPERTY LINE. THESE SQUARES ARE NOT LABELED IN THE
 PLAN.
  
 6. SATISFIED - NO UTILITY POLES, FIRE HYDRANTS OR ANY
 OTHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE
 PERMITTED WITHIN THE UNOBSTRUCTED AREA. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(N)(4)(VIII)]
  
 7. SATISFIED - OVERHEAD UTILITIES ARE NOT PERMITTED.
 EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED
 UNDERGROUND. [ZLDR S.94-(N)(4)(XI)]
  
 8. SATISFIED - CONSIDER INCORPORATING BICYCLE RACKS
 INTO THE STREETSCAPE AND/OR OPEN SPACE DESIGN OF THE
 PROJECT.
  
 9. SATSIFIED - PUBLIC SIDEWALKS THAT CROSS INTO PRIVATE
 PROPERTY SHALL REQUIRE A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT.
  
  
  
 PARKING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED IN
 THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (I.E. VEHICULAR
 PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT; BICYCLE PARKING
 CALCULATIONS MISSING; LOADING REQUIREMENTS).
  
 1.1. REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL USE
 IS INCORRECT AND THE PROVIDED PARKING DISTRIBUTION FOR
 THE COMMERCIAL USE DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 1.2. REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATIONS
 INCORRECT.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - FLOOR PLANS SHOWING THE
 PARKING LAYOUT, GENERAL DIMENSIONS AND TABULATIONS FOR
 EACH LEVEL OF PARKING (BOTH VEHICULAR AND BICYCLE)
 SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE
 PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE
 PLAN.
  
 2.1. GENERAL DRIVE AISLE, PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PARKING LAYOUT FLOOR PLAN TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 2.2. IS THERE SUFFICIENT ROOM BETWEEN THE END PARKING
 STALLS AND THE WALL/COLUMNS (WHERE APPLICABLE) TO
 ADEQUATELY OPEN DOORS AND EXIT THE VEHICLE?
  
 3. SATISFIED - ALTHOUGH THE PARKING STALL STRIPING
 DETAIL IS PROVIDED IN THE CIVIL PLAN SET, THE DETAIL
 SHALL ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN SET FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED - THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL
 PROVIDE SECURE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR BOTH THE
 COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT AS CALCULATED SEPARATELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-215(P). THE LOCATION AND
 BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CLEAR IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
  
 4.1. LOCATION OF SURFACE BICYCLE PARKING NEEDS TO BE
 INCLUDED NEAR THE GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL USE.
  
 4.2. IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED BICYCLE
 RACKS AND STORAGE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT. A
 MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL TENANTS AND SHALL BE
 LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING OR WITHIN 200 FT. OF THE
 BUILDING ENTRANCE.
  
 4.3. ENSURE THAT THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE RACKS DEPICTED
 IN THE PLAN MATCHES THE BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS
 FOR REQUIRED AND PROPOSED. THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME
 INCONSISTENCIES.
  
 5. SATISFIED - A DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE PARKING IS
 REQUIRED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
  
 6. NOT ADDRESSED. ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT PARKING
 CALCULATIONS, A TOTAL OF 325 PARKING SPACES WILL BE
 PROVIDED. THIS REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 9 ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES. ONLY 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES HAVE
 BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE ADDRESS AND/OR CLARIFY. [ZLDR
 S.94-485(O)]
  
 7. SATISFIED - A MINIMUM OF TWO 10 FT. BY 25 FT.
 LOADING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY SHOW THE
 LCOATION OF THE LOADING ARE AND DIMENSION OUT THE
 LOADING SPACES TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THIS
 REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-485(P)]
  
  
 SIGNAGE COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION
 PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. ANY SIGNAGE PROPOSED ON THE
 PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SEC. 94-215(R). ALL RELEVANT SIGN INFORMATION SHALL
 ALSO BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SHEET(S) TO DEMONSTRATE
 CONSISTENCY (I.E. CONTENT, LOCATION, SIGN AREA,
 DIMENSIONS, RELEVANT NOTES ON RESTRICTIONS, ETC.).
  
 1.1. THE NOTE FOR THE FREESTANDING SIGNAGE SHALL
 CLEARLY STATE THAT THE SIGN AREA IS NOT TO EXCEED 5 FT.
 IN HEIGHT WITH A MAXIMUM SIGN AREA OF 4 SQ. FT. THE
 SIGNAGE INFORMATION IS NOT CLEAR.
  
 1.2. A NOTE STATING THAT THE PROPOSED FREESTANDING
 SIGNAGE WILL NOT BE LIT IN ANY WAY SHALL BE REQUIRED
 WITH THE FREESTANDING SIGN DETAIL.
  
 2. SATISFIED - ACCORDING TO SHEET A-5.3, A FREESTANDING
 SIGN IS PROPOSED; HOWEVER, THE LOCATION OF THE
 FREESTANDING SIGN IS NOT SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN.
 LOCATION OF ANY PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN (AND ALL OTHER RELEVANT
 SHEETS I.E. LANDSCAPE PLAN, ETC.) FOR CONSISTENCY. THE
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL ALSO INCLUDE SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S), ETC.
  
 3. SATISFIED - SOME PLAN SHEETS SHOW A FREESTANDING
 SIGN WITHIN THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THIS IS
 NOT PERMITTED AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE EASEMENT
 AREA.
  
  
 REQUIRED DIAGRAMS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST
 CLEARLY PROVIDE SEPARATE DIAGRAMS AND CORRECT
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1.1. FAR (BY EACH FLOOR) [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
  
 1.2. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)
 [SATISFIED]
  
 1.3. PARKING (SHOWING THE LAYOUT AND CALCULATIONS ON
 EACH LEVEL AND CIRCULATION) [SATISFIED]
  
 1.4. BUILDING LENGTH MEASUREMENTS [S.94-209(2)(J)(1)]
 [NOT SATISFIED ??? SEPARATE DIAGRAM REQUIRED AND ALL
 BUILDING FRONTAGES MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR.]
  
 1.5. PLANAR BREAK (SHOWING DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS)
 [S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(A)] [NOT SATISFIED ??? SEPARATE
 DIAGRAM REQUIRED AND ALL BUILDING FRONTAGES MUST BE
 ACCOUNTED FOR.]
  
 1.6. TOWER PLATE SETBACKS [S.94-209(2)(J)(1)] [NOT
 SATISFIED]
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - IN THE SECTIONAL DRAWINGS, IT
 WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONAL SETBACK(S)
 FOR THE BUILDING. THIS WILL HELP CLARIFY THE PLANS AND
 DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 ZLDRS.
  
 1.1. SHOW DIMENSIONS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL
 ENCROACHMENTS. ALL ENCROACHMENTS MUST BE CONSISTENT
 WITH ZLDR S.94-209(2)(L), TABLE VII-1.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - THERE APPEARS TO BE AN ENCROACHMENT
 INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 23RD STREET, WHICH
 IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR
 BUILDING ENCROACHMENTS (REQUEST IS ONLY FOR A 5 FT.
 ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE, BUT IT APPEARS TO BE GREATER).
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO NOTE THAT
 ENCROACHMENTS INTO ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL REQUIRE THE
 APPROVAL OF THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(L), TABLE VII-1]
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - WITHOUT CLEAR AND ACCURATE
 NOTATIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS, THE BUILDING
 ELEVATIONS/SECTIONS APPEAR TO BE INACCURATE. IT IS ALSO
 IMPORTANT TO ACCURATELY SHOW THE EXISTING SIDEWALK
 LEVEL IN THE DRAWINGS (ESPECIALLY ALONG THE ACTIVE USE
 FRONTAGES) TO DEPICT THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE BUILDING
 TO THE SIDEWALK/STREETSCAPE LEVEL.
  
 3.1. THE CORRECT FLOOD ELEVATION (6 FT. FEMA + 2 FT.
 BUILDING ELEVATION = 8 FT. NAVD) HAS BEEN NOTED IN THE
 PLANS; HOWEVER, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT MEASUREMENT
 IS NOT CONSISTENT IN ALL SHEETS (I.E. 3 FT. 11 INCHES
 IN SHEET A-4.2).
  
 3.2. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT MEASUREMENT
 SHALL BE SHOWN IN ALL ELEVATION DRAWINGS (NOT JUST THE
 SECTIONALS) TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT OF 350 FT. INCLUDES ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF
 THE BUILDING (EXCLUDING THE HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS PER ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(L), TABLR VII-1).
  
 3.3. CLARIFY THE 0 FT./LEVEL 1/9.5 FT. ELEVATION. IT IS
 NOT UNDERSTOOD BY STAFF TO WHY THIS ELEVATION IS
 DEPICTED AT 0 FT.
  
 4. NOT SATSIFIED - ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR ALL NON-ACTIVE USE FACADE ELEVATIONS (I.E.
 PARKING FACADE ELEVATIONS) AND SHALL BE INTEGRATED WITH
 THE DESIGN OF THE ADJACENT ACTIVE USE FACADES.
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH A
 COMBINATION OF TWO (2) OR MORE TREATMENTS. PLEASE
 CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND
 IDENTIFY TREATMENT TECHNIQUE AND MATERIALS. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(J)]
  
 4.1. A COMBINATION OF TWO MATERIAL TREATMENTS MUST BE
 PROVIDED AND INTEGRATED (I.E. PARKING FA??ADE ??? METAL
 AND CONCRETE INTEGRATED TOGETHER AND NOT SEPARATED).
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED - EXCEPT STOREFRONTS, A MINIMUM OF 30%
 OF ALL GROUND FLOOR BUILDING FRONTAGES SHALL BE
 FENESTRATED WITH WINDOWS. PLEASE SHOW TO DEMONSTRATE
 COMPLIANCE. DIAGRAMS AND CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED.
 [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(K)
  
 6. SATISFIED - FLOOR PLANS FOR LEVELS 3-7 ARE MISSING.
 A TYPICAL CAN BE PROVIDED FOR THESE LEVELS, BUT ALL
 FLOOR PLAN LEVELS MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PACKET.
  
  
 PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE FOLLOWING NOTES SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN TO MAINTAIN
 CONSISTENCY (SHOULD THERE BE ANY CHANGES) WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-309(2)(I) OF THE ZLDRS:
  
 1.1. LIGHT POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED AN OVERALL HEIGHT OF
 17.5 FT. ABOVE GRADE. (SATISFIED)
  
 1.2. NO COBRA HEADLIGHTS ARE PERMITTED. (SATISFIED)
  
 1.3. ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE LED OR LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE.
 (SATISFIED)
  
 1.4. ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE WEATHER AND VANDAL RESISTANT
 ??? A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED (I.E. RESISTANT TO
 GRAFFITI, SHATTERING, ETC.). (NOT SATISFIED)
  
 1.5. ADDITIONALLY, ADD THIS STANDARD NOTE THE
 PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN [PER S.94-309(A)]: ALL
 OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND
 SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM
 ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. (NOT SATISFIED)
  
 1.6. A DIGITAL COPY OF THE LATEST PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROVIDED. (NOT SATISFIED)
  
 2. NEW COMMENT - THE LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS
 CONFLICT WITH THE PLACEMENT OF POLE FIXTURES WITHIN
 WALKWAYS AND DRIVE AISLES. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
  
  
 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMENT:
  
 1. NEW COMMENT - THE REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOW SHOWS
 A PLACE HOLDER FOR PUBLIC ART. COORDINATION WITH THE
 ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE IS REQUIRED
 REGARDING THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE ART AND THE
 MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR THE PLACE HOLDER. THESE ISSUES
 MUST BE RESOLVED IN THE PLANS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC
 HEARING STAGE.
  
 1.1. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS FOR THE LOCATION OF
 PUBLIC ART.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 * CHANGES TO THE PLAN SHEETS SHALL BE CARRIED
 THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY
 RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
 ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
 TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT
 OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
 NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION (HEIGHT BONUS) NOTES:
  
 1.) PER SEC. 94-215(K)(2) OF THE ZLDRS, THE DEVELOPER
 UTILIZING THIS INCENTIVE SHALL ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1.1) THE REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) FOR THE NORTHWOOD
 ROAD EXTENSION MUST BE IN PLACE AND DEDICATED BY THE
 PROPERTY OWNERS IMPACTED BY THIS EXTENSION BY NOVEMBER
 15, 2024.
  
 1.2) COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY EXTENSION
 BY NOVEMBER 15, 2026 (5 YEARS FROM THE ADOPTION DATE OF
 THE CMUD REGULATIONS; REFERENCE: ORDINANCE NO.
 4963-21).
  
  
 CONDITIONS:
  
 * THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
 SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND ONGOING
 MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUIRED PARKWAY EASEMENT. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(M)]
  
 * THE PARKWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK
 OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST
 BUILDING PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT. [ZLDR S.94-215(M)(4)]
  
 * STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 ALONG THE ENTIRE PROPERTY (AS SHOWN IN THE DEVELOPOMENT
 PLAN) SHALL BE INSTALLATED BY AND MAINTENANCE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER.
  
 * A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
 APPLICANT AND THE CITY SHALL BE EXECUTED TO MAINTAIN
 THE CITY-OWNED PARK/OPEN SPACE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROJECT.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 03-08-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 03-08-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-08 14:21:49GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED PROJECT NAME IS LISTED IN THE
 APPLICATION AS "CURRIE PARK PLOT 4." IT IS ADVISED THAT
 THE NAME OF THE PROJECT BE CHANGED TO AVOID ANY
 CONFUSION WITH CURRIE PARK, WHICH IS: 1.) LOCATED
 OUTSIDE OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CURRIE MIXED USE
 DISTRICT (CMUD) AND 2.) THERE IS AN ACTIVE APPLICATION
 FOR THE CURRIE PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WITH A
 SIMILAR NAME.
  
 2.) A COMPLETE ADDRESS LIST OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS
 WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, WITH CLEARLY
 WRITTEN INFORMATION (I.E. ZIP CODES, ETC.), AND A COPY
 OF THE MAILING LABELS (FROM THE ADDRESS LIST) SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. THIS IS A REQUIRED ELEMENT OF THE APPLICATION
 PACKET. THE ADDRESS LIST SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION
 APPEAR TO HAVE CRYPTIC INFORMATION AND NO COPY OF THE
 MAILING LIST WAS PROVIDED.
  
 3.) A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY - TRAFFIC
 DIVISION (561.684.4030), STATING THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS)
 OF THE COUNTY IS REQUIRED. THE TPS LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO STAFF PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR
 THE PUBLIC HEARING STAGE.
  
 4.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IS
 REQUIRED. THE SCAD LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED TO STAFF
 PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING
 STAGE.
  
 5.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561-494-1040) ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED LETTER.
  
 6.) PROVIDE WRITTEN LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND
 COMCAST.
  
 7.) PLEASE CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING
 COORDINATOR (561.805.6659 OR [email protected]), ON THE
 FLAGLER DRIVE ADDRESSES PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 PLAN (2175 N FLAGLER DRIVE ??? SOUTH TOWER AND 2251 N
 FLAGLER DRIVE ??? NORTH TOWER). IT APPEARS THAT THE
 ADDRESSES UTILIZED HAVE NOT BEEN FINALIZED.
  
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE EXPLAIN/CLARIFY "THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE
 REMAINDER OF THE SITE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
 MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OWNED PARCEL."
 ADDITIONALLY, FURTHER COORDINATION AND DISCUSSION SHALL
 BE REQUIRED ON THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
 CITY-OWNED PARK PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER.
  
 2.) APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED RESPONSES TO
 THE STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-55(B)(2) OF THE ZLDRS. THE
 RESPONSES TO THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL REVIEW HAVE NOT
 BEEN INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
  
 3.) THE LIST/REQUEST FOR VARIANCES WILL NEED TO BE
 AMENDED TO CAPTURE ALL THE VARIANCES/WAIVERS NECESSARY
 FOR THE PROJECT. ADDITIONALLY, ANY RELATED DIALOGUE IN
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHALL BE REVISED TO MATCH
 (FOR CONSISTENCY).
  
 4.) THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS IDENTIFIED AS
 "PARKS/OPEN SPACE," AS IT IS A DESIGNATED FUTURE LINEAR
 PARK IN THE REGULATING PLANS FOR CMUD. THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IDENTIFIES THE PROPERTY TO THE
 NORTH AS CMUD-CORE IA. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 5.) NOT ALL THE STATEMENTS PROVIDED TO THE RESPONSES IN
 SEC. 94-35(C) - SITE DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT
 STANDARDS ARE ACCURATE. AS NOTED ABOVE, ADDITIONAL
 VARIANCE/WAIVERS ARE REQUIRED; INCORRECT CALCULATIONS
 (I.E. PARKING) ARE NOTED, ETC., SO NOT ALL THE
 STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MET OR ARE INACCURATE. PLEASE
 REVISE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 6.) A MORE IN-DEPTH EXPLANATION FOR EACH VARIANCE IS
 REQUIRED. THE STANDARDS ARE VERY SPECIFIC AND THE
 RESPONSES DO NOT EXPLAIN THE HARDSHIP AND IF THE
 REQUIREMENT CAN BE MET IN THE DESIGN AND/OR IF OTHER
 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES TO MEET CODE HAVE BEEN EXPLORED.
  
  
 DESIGN COMMENTS ON REQUESTED VARIANCES:
  
 ** FOUR (4) VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT AT THIS TIME. APPLICANT MUST CLEARLY DEFINE THE
 HARDSHIP AND WHY THE CODE REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET.
 ADDITIONALLY, HOW DOES THE PROPOSED DESIGN MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE ZLDRS IN PLACE OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE
 MUST BE EXPLAINED **
  
 1.) THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE FROM SEC.
 94-215(G)(1)(VI), WHICH REQUIRES GROUND FLOOR
 COMMERCIAL ACTIVE USES ALONG THE FIRST 100 FT. ON
 FLAGLER DRIVE AT 23RD STREET. AT THIS TIME, STAFF
 CANNOT SUPPORT THIS VARIANCE REQUEST:
  
 1.1) IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
 THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO JUSTIFY AND
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE ACTIVE USE GARDEN COULD MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG 23RD STREET
 AND FLAGLER DRIVE. AN EXPLANATION OF THE HARDSHIP MUST
 ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE STATEMENT. SUFFICIENT
 INFORMATION ON HOW THIS REQUEST JUSTIFIES AS ACTIVE USE
 TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE ZLDRS AND MEETS THE VARIANCE
 STANDARDS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 1.2) THE FENCE APPEARS TO CONTRADICT THE PROPOSED
 PUBLIC NATURE OF THE ACTIVE USE GARDEN. IT WAS ALSO
 DISCUSSED THAT THE OPEN SPACE FENCES WITHIN THE PROJECT
 BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS, YET THE FENCES REMAIN IN THE
 CURRENT PLANS. PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT PER SEC.
 94-215(M), ???PUBLIC OPEN SPACE??? IS DEFINED AS GROUND
 FLOOR OPEN SPACE FOR PUBLIC USE AND ACCESS ABUTTING A
 PUBLIC STREET ON AT LEAST ONE SIDE AND WITH
 UNENCUMBERED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK
 OR A RIGHT OF WAY FOR GENERAL PUBLIC USE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(1)(VI)]
  
 1.3) THE INTENT OF THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG
 23RD STREET IS TO DRAW PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY. THE OPEN
 SPACE APPEARS MORE TO BE A PASSIVE PARK, WHICH
 CONFLICTS WITH THE INTENT OF THE CMUD REGULATIONS.
  
 1.4) EXTENDING THE ACTIVE USE BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG
 23RD STREET TO MINIMIZE THE OPEN SPACE AND TO ACTIVATE
 THE STREET FRONTAGE SHOULD BE HIGHLY CONSIDERED.
  
 2.) THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE FROM SEC.
 94-209(2)(J)(1)(A) OF THE ZLDRS, WHICH REQUIRES THE
 MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL BUILDING LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED 250
 FT. THE REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE FOR THE BUILDING FRONTAGE
 ALONG PONCE DE LEON AVENUE; HOWEVER, IT ALSO APPEARS
 THAT A VARIANCE IS NEEDED FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 FRONTAGE:
  
 2.1) WHAT IS THE HARDSHIP? WHY CAN'T THE CODE
 REQUIREMENT BE MET?
  
 2.2) INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE STATEMENT
 LETTER ON THE JUSTIFICATION AND HOW THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING LENGTH ALONG EACH FRONTAGE WOULD MEET THE
 INTENT OF 250 FT. BUILDING LENGTH REQUIREMENT.
  
 2.3) BUILDING LENGTH DIAGRAM(S) SHALL BE PROVIDED AS
 PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SET TO CLEARLY SHOW THE
 LENGTH OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALONG EACH FRONTAGE AND
 THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED.
  
  
 COMMENT(S) ON BUILDING HEIGHT:
  
 1.) CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL THE FEMA APPROVED BASE
 ELEVATION + 2 FT. REQUIRED ELEVATION PER THE CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS POINT TO THE TOP
 OF THE BUILDING. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT PER THE
 CMUD REGULATIONS SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED (BASE HEIGHT =
 111 AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT WITH INCENTIVE = 350 FT.). THERE
 APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENCIES AND/OR LACK OF CLARITY
 WITH THE MEASUREMENTS PROVIDED IN THE ELEVATION
 DRAWINGS.
  
  
 FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM COMMENTS AND NOTES:
  
 1.) THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY
 SYSTEM DOES NOT FULLY MEET THE DESIGN CRITERIA OF THE
 FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM. PLEASE ENSURE ALL THE
 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PARKWAY HAVE BEEN MET PER
 S.94-215(M)(4) OF THE ZLDRS (I.E. PARKWAY WIDTH, STREET
 FURNISHINGS, ETC.).
  
 2.) THE EXISTING SIDEWALK THAT WILL BE REPLACED BY THE
 MULTIPURPOSE PATH WITHIN THE PARKWAY SHALL BE REMOVED
 AS PART OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE MULTIPURPOSE
 PATH IS DESIGNED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING SIDEWALK AND
 THERE SHOULD NOT BE AN ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK. ALSO, THE
 STREET TREES AND THE PLANTING STRIPS SHALL CONNECT
 SEAMLESSLY ADJACENT TO THE PARKWAY.
  
 3.) THE PARKWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE
 CLERK OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
 FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(M)(4)]
  
 4.) THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
 SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND ONGOING
 MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUIRED PARKWAY EASEMENT. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(M)]
  
  
 CITY-OWNED PARK (TRIANGULAR PIECE TO THE SOUTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL) COMMENTS:
  
 1.) IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
 THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO IMPROVE THE CITY-OWNED
 PARK SPACE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF FLAGLER DRIVE AND
 PICADILLY STREET. BASED ON STAFF???S REVIEW, THE AREA
 HAS ONLY BEEN IMPROVED BY A WIDE SIDEWALK THAT CONSUMES
 MOST OF THE PARK AREA WHICH IS UNACCEPTABLE. THOUGHT
 SHOULD BE MADE TO ACTIVATE AND MAKE THIS PARK PARCEL
 COHESIVE AND ATTRACTIVE WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 AND CONNECTIVITY TO THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM.
  
  
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) BUILDINGS WITH FRONTAGE ALONG 23RD STREET SHALL
 MAINTAIN A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 6 STORIES/80 FT. AT THE
 PODIUM. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPEARS
 TO MEET THE HEIGHT AND PODIUM/TOWER SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS, CONSIDERATION SHOULD ALSO BE MADE TO HOW
 THE BUILDING HEIGHT AT THE PODIUM BALANCES OUT WITH THE
 LINEAR PARK (NORTH OF 23RD STREET) AND THE PROPOSED
 OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE PROJECT ALONG 23RD STREET AND
 FLAGLER DRIVE. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE ACTIVE USE
 FRONTAGE ALONG 23RD STREET IS INCREASED IN HEIGHT AND
 EXTENDED ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(1)(III)]
  
 2.) A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 6 STORIES/80 FT. SHALL
 BE PROVIDED AT THE PODIUM LEVEL AND ANY ADDITIONAL
 HEIGHT ABOVE THE PODIUM OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 20 FT. FROM THE EDGE OF THE PODIUM
 FRONTING ALONG PONCE DE LEON. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT
 THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET (SITE PLAN SHOWS AT 12
 FT. TOWER SETBACK FROM THE PODIUM). PLEASE ADDRESS
 AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REFERENCES TO DEMONSTRATE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION OF THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(1)(IV)]
  
 3.) GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL USE IS REQUIRED AS A
 WRAPAROUND USE FOR THE FIRST 100 FT. OF PONCE DE LEON
 AVENUE FROM 23RD STREET. ON SHEET Z-9.0, THE WRAP
 AROUND SPACE IS NOTED AS 3,000 SQ. FT. OF SEMI-PUBLIC
 WRAP AROUND SPACE. STAFF NEEDS MORE INFORMATION ON THE
 PROPOSED "SEMI-PUBLIC" USE TO DETERMINE IF IT MEETS THE
 USE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REQUIRED WRAP-AROUND ACTIVE
 USE. [ZLDR S.94-215(G)(1)(VI)]
  
 4.) THE PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE
 IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK
 RANGE (35 FT. MINIMUM AND 45 FT. MAXIMUM; PROVIDED IS A
 MAXIMUM 80 FT. FOR THE SOUTH TOWER AND A 98 FT. MAXIMUM
 SETBACK FOR THE NORTH TOWER). PLEASE ADDRESS; IF THIS
 REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET, THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO
 SEEK A VARIANCE FROM THIS REQUIREMENT AND EXPLAIN THE
 HARDSHIP. [ZLDR S.94-215, TABLE VII-11]
  
 5.) PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM THAT CLEARLY SHOWS
 THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE
 PROJECT AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED). A MINIMUM OF 3% OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 (DEFINED AS ANY OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE
 OR ON ROOFTOPS) IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(2), TABLE VII-11]
  
 6.) CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO REDUCING THE AMOUNT
 OF OPEN SPACE AT THE GROUND LEVEL. THE PURPOSE OF
 REQUIRING ONLY 3% OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS BASED ON THE
 PROXIMITY OF THE PROJECT SITE TO CURRIE PARK, THE
 LINEAR PARK (NORTH OF 23RD STREET) AND THE REQUIREMENT
 FOR THE 30 FT. WIDE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THERE ARE
 CONCERNS THAT DESIGNING ADDITIONAL AND EXCESSIVE OPEN
 SPACE WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE WILL DIMINISH PEDESTRIAN
 ACTIVITY ALONG THE BUILDING/STREET FRONTAGES, WHICH IS
 NOT THE INTENT OF THE CMUD REGULATIONS.
  
 7.) THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE FRONTAGE ALONG 23RD STREET
 IS 80%. THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE IS 261 FT.; AND
 THEREFORE, A TOTAL OF 209 FT. OF ACTIVE USE BUILDING
 FRONTAGE IS REQUIRED ALONG 23RD STREET. THIS
 REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET (ONLY 140 FT. OF ACTIVE
 USE BUILDING FRONTAGE IS PROPOSED). PLEASE ADDRESS OR
 REQUEST A VARIANCE IF THIS CANNOT BE MET AND EXPLAIN
 THE HARDSHIP. [ZLDR S.94-215(G)(2), TABLE VII-11]
  
 8.) SHOW DIAGRAM THAT DEMONSTRATES COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT FOR GROUND LEVEL
 ACTIVE USES (70% MINIMUM REQUIRED). ALTHOUGH THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR TRANSPARENCY HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE
 LINER AND TRANSPARENCY DIAGRAM (SHEET Z9.0) THE
 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPARENCY AND SUPPORTING
 DIMENSIONS ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE DIAGRAM. PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE FOR CLARITY WITH COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(G)(2), TABLE VII-11]
  
 9.) "PRIVATE OPEN SPACE" LOCATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 AND LOCATED ALONG THE LOT FRONTAGE SHALL BE DESIGNED IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THE CMUD REGULATIONS. THE "PUBLIC OPEN SPACE"
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN MET. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(M)(2) AND (3)]
  
 10.) CALCULATIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS FOR THE ROOFTOP
 TERRACES SHALL BE PROVIDED. ROOFTOP TERRACES SHALL BE
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS PROVIDED IN
 SEC. 94-215(S)(1) AND SHALL BE:
  
 10.1) HARDSCAPED WITH MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT
 LIMITED TO PATTERNED CONCRETE, PAVERS OR WOOD DECKING.
  
 10.2) PROVIDE SHADED SEATING AREAS.
  
 10.3) A MINIMUM 15% OF THE OVERALL GROSS FLOOR AREA OF
 THE ROOFTOP TERRACE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. LANDSCAPING
 SHALL CONSIST OF TREES, SHRUBS, GROUND COVER AND VINES.
  
 10.4) A MINIMUM OF A 5 FT. WIDE WALKWAY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AROUND THE SWIMMING POOL AND/OR WHIRLPOOL
 (PROVIDE DIMENSIONS).
  
 10.5) ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES SHALL NOT OCCUPY MORE
 THAN 30% OF THE GROSS ROOFTOP AREA.
  
 10.6) ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE DESIGNED
 IN ANY MANNER THAT WOULD PERMIT THE CONVERSION OF SUCH
 STRUCTURES FROM NON-HABITABLE TO HABITABLE SPACE.
  
 11.) WHERE A SIDEWALK OR OTHER WALKWAY CROSSES A
 PARKING LOT, STREET, OR DRIVEWAY, THE FOLLOWING
 STANDARDS SHALL APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC.
 94-209(2)(D)(2). THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FULLY
 ILLUSTRATED AND/OR NOTED IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE
 CONSISTENCY:
  
 11.1) THE INTERSECTION SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND
 LIGHTED FOR SAFETY;
  
 11.2) THE SIDEWALK/WALKWAY SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND
 REMAIN AT A CONSTANT LEVEL AT ALL INSTANCES;
  
 11.3) A CHANGE IN TACTILE SURFACE TEXTURE SHALL BE
 INSTALLED AT ALL STREET CROSSINGS. THESE REQUIREMENTS
 MUST BE FULLY ILLUSTRATED AND/OR NOTED IN THE PLANS TO
 DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(D)(2)]
  
 14.) OPENINGS OFF ANY STREET SHALL NOT EXCEED TWO LANES
 IN WIDTH AND AT A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 24 FT. AT THE
 PROPERTY LINE [S.94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(II)]
  
 15.) THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL HAVE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. CLEARLY SHOW IN THE PLANS
 THE PEDESTRIAN PATH TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(E)(2)B)(V)]
  
 16.) THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE OF THE PROJECT SHALL PROVIDE
 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR PUBLIC,
 SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE
 IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(E)]
  
 17.) GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE PLACED AT A
 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. PLEASE
 SHOW/PROVIDE NOTE WHERE MOST APPROPRIATE IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(H)]
  
 18.) IT APPEARS THAT A SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM WILL BE
 PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOPS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
 PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-309(I) WITH ALL
 OTHER APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 19.) WHAT IS THE DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN ACCESS
 POINTS ON PICADILLY STREET? THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 SEPARATION SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 125 FT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-312(2)]
  
 20.) WHAT IS THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE FROM
 THE ACCESS POINTS/DRIVEWAYS TO THE STREET
 INTERSECTIONS? THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE
 REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR
 S.94-312(2). PLEASE PROVIDE CORNER CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS
 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 21.) THE SCALE APPEARS TO BE MISSING FROM THE SITE
 PLAN. AS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST (PAGE
 16/31 OF THE 2023 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION), THIS
 INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 22.) CAN THE TRASH COLLECTION/MECHANICAL ROOMS ON LEVEL
 1 (WHICH FRONTS ON PICADILLY STREET AND HAS ITS OWN
 SEPARATE ACCESS POINT) BE RELOCATED? THE PROJECT CAN BE
 GREATLY ENHANCED BY ELIMINATING THE LOADING
 ZONE/MECHANICAL ROOM CURB CUT AND ACTIVATING THE
 BUILDING FRONTAGE IN THIS AREA.
  
 23.) AS DISCUSSED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING, IT IS
 HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROJECT ACCOMMODATE AN
 ACTIVE USE LINER ALONG THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE, NOT
 ONLY TO BREAK UP THE EXTENSIVE BUILDING FA??ADE OF
 NON-ACTIVE USES (I.E. THE PARKING GARAGE), BUT TO
 COMPLIMENT THE EXISTING AND FUTURE BUILDINGS ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF PONCE DE LEON AVENUE.
  
 24.) THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES
 ARE INCORRECTLY LABELED. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
  
 OPEN SPACE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS SHOW AREAS AS
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THAT DO NOT QUALIFY AS PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE. IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO INCLUDE AREAS OF
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, IT MUST SHOW HOW IT QUALIFIES AS
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 DESIGNATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
  
  
 STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PAVED AREA AT THE CORNERS AND
 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING CAN BE
 ACCOMMODATED.
  
 2.) A MINIMUM LANDSCAPE STRIP OF 5 FT. SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ALONG THE STREET EDGE. PLEASE DIMENSION OUT TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-215(N)(4)(II)]
  
 3.) TREE GRATES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. BY 5 FT.
 AND MAY BE UTILIZED IN PLACE OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 STRIP. ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, THE PROPOSED USE OF TREE
 GRATES DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL
 REQUIREMENTS. [ZLDR S.94-215(N)(4)(IV)]
  
 4.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE UNOBSTRUCTED SIDEWALK SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE LANDSCAPED AREA. PLEASE
 DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(N)(4)(V) AND (VI)]
  
 5.) IDENTIFY THE FIVE (5) SQUARES ADJACENT TO THE
 BUILDING FRONTAGE OF THE NORTH TOWER WITHIN THE
 PROPERTY LINE. THESE SQUARES ARE NOT LABELED IN THE
 PLAN.
  
 6.) NO UTILITY POLES, FIRE HYDRANTS OR ANY OTHER
 TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE PERMITTED
 WITHIN THE UNOBSTRUCTED AREA. [ZLDR
 S.94-215(N)(4)(VIII)]
  
 7.) OVERHEAD UTILITIES ARE NOT PERMITTED. EXISTING
 OVERHEAD UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.
 [ZLDR S.94-(N)(4)(XI)]
  
 8.) CONSIDER INCORPORATING BICYCLE RACKS INTO THE
 STREETSCAPE AND/OR OPEN SPACE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.
  
 9.) PUBLIC SIDEWALKS THAT CROSS INTO PRIVATE PROPERTY
 SHALL REQUIRE A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT.
  
  
 PARKING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED IN THE PARKING
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR (SHEET
 SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (I.E. VEHICULAR
 PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT; BICYCLE PARKING
 CALCULATIONS MISSING; LOADING REQUIREMENTS).
  
 2.) FLOOR PLANS SHOWING THE PARKING LAYOUT, GENERAL
 DIMENSIONS AND TABULATIONS FOR EACH LEVEL OF PARKING
 (BOTH VEHICULAR AND BICYCLE) SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART
 OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE PLANS AND CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE PLAN.
  
 3.) ALTHOUGH THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL IS
 PROVIDED IN THE CIVIL PLAN SET, THE DETAIL SHALL ALSO
 BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN SET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE SECURE
 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR BOTH THE COMMERCIAL AND
 RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS CALCULATED
 SEPARATELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC.
 94-215(P). THE LOCATION AND BICYCLE PARKING
 CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CLEAR IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
  
 5.) A DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED AS PART
 OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
  
 6.) ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT PARKING CALCULATIONS, A
 TOTAL OF 325 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. THIS
 REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 9 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. ONLY
 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE
 ADDRESS AND/OR CLARIFY. [ZLDR S.94-485(O)]
  
 7.) A MINIMUM OF TWO 10 FT. BY 25 FT. LOADING SPACES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE
 LOADING AREA AND DIMENSION OUT THE LOADING SPACES TO
 DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR
 S.94-485(P)]
  
  
 SIGNAGE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. ANY
 SIGNAGE PROPOSED ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSISTENT
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-215(R). ALL RELEVANT
 SIGN INFORMATION SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN
 SHEET(S) TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY (I.E. CONTENT,
 LOCATION, SIGN AREA, DIMENSIONS, RELEVANT NOTES ON
 RESTRICTIONS, ETC.).
  
 2.) ACCORDING TO SHEET A-5.3, A FREESTANDING SIGN IS
 PROPOSED; HOWEVER, THE LOCATION OF THE FREESTANDING
 SIGN IS NOT SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN. LOCATION OF ANY
 PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
 SITE PLAN (AND ALL OTHER RELEVANT SHEETS I.E. LANDSCAPE
 PLAN, ETC.) FOR CONSISTENCY. THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL
 ALSO INCLUDE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE(S), ETC.
  
 3.) SOME PLAN SHEETS SHOW A FREESTANDING SIGN WITHIN
 THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THIS IS NOT
 PERMITTED AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE EASEMENT AREA.
  
  
 REQUIRED DIAGRAMS:
  
 1.) THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST CLEARLY PROVIDE SEPARATE
 DIAGRAMS AND CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1.1) FAR (BY EACH FLOOR)
  
 1.2) OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)
  
 1.3) PARKING (SHOWING THE LAYOUT AND CALCULATIONS ON
 EACH LEVEL AND CIRCULATION)
  
 1.4) BUILDING LENGTH MEASUREMENTS [S.94-209(2)(J)(1)]
  
 1.5) PLANAR BREAK (SHOWING DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS)
 [S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(A)]
  
 1.6) TOWER PLATE SETBACKS [S.94-209(2)(J)(1)]
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) IN THE SECTIONAL DRAWINGS, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO
 PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONAL SETBACK(S) FOR THE BUILDING.
 THIS WILL HELP CLARIFY THE PLANS AND DEMONSTRATE
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 2.) ON SHEET A-4.1 (BUILDING SECTION), THERE APPEARS TO
 BE AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG
 23RD STREET, WHICH IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE VARIANCE
 REQUEST FOR BUILDING ENCROACHMENTS (REQUEST IS ONLY FOR
 A 5 FT. ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE, BUT IT APPEARS TO BE
 GREATER). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO NOTE
 THAT ENCROACHMENTS INTO ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL REQUIRE
 THE APPROVAL OF THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(L), TABLE VII-1]
  
 3.) WITHOUT CLEAR AND ACCURATE NOTATIONS ON THE
 ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS, THE BUILDING
 ELEVATIONS/SECTIONS APPEAR TO BE INACCURATE. IT IS ALSO
 IMPORTANT TO ACCURATELY SHOW THE EXISTING SIDEWALK
 LEVEL IN THE DRAWINGS (ESPECIALLY ALONG THE ACTIVE USE
 FRONTAGES) TO DEPICT THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE BUILDING
 TO THE SIDEWALK/STREETSCAPE LEVEL.
  
 4.) ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 NON-ACTIVE USE FA??ADE ELEVATIONS (I.E. PARKING FA??ADE
 ELEVATIONS) AND SHALL BE INTEGRATED WITH THE DESIGN OF
 THE ADJACENT ACTIVE USE FACADES. ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH A COMBINATION OF
 TWO (2) OR MORE TREATMENTS. PLEASE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE
 IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND IDENTIFY TREATMENT
 TECHNIQUE AND MATERIALS. [ZLDR S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(J)]
  
 5.) EXCEPT STOREFRONTS, A MINIMUM OF 30% OF ALL GROUND
 FLOOR BUILDING FRONTAGES SHALL BE FENESTRATED WITH
 WINDOWS. PLEASE SHOW TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(J)(1)(K)
  
 6.) LOOR PLANS FOR LEVELS 3-7 ARE MISSING. A TYPICAL
 CAN BE PROVIDED FOR THESE LEVELS, BUT ALL FLOOR PLAN
 LEVELS MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PACKET.
  
  
 PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE FOLLOWING NOTES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
 PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY
 (SHOULD THERE BE ANY CHANGES) WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SEC. 94-309(2)(I) OF THE ZLDRS:
  
 1.1) LIGHT POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED AN OVERALL HEIGHT OF
 17.5 FT. ABOVE GRADE.
  
 1.2) NO COBRA HEADLIGHTS ARE PERMITTED.
  
 1.3) ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE LED OR LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE.
  
 1.4) ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE WEATHER AND VANDAL RESISTANT
 (I.E. RESISTANT TO GRAFFITI, SHATTERING, ETC.).
  
 1.5) ADDITIONALLY, ADD THIS STANDARD NOTE THE
 PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN [PER S.94-309(A)]: ALL
 OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND
 SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM
 ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES.
  
  
 NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION (HEIGHT BONUS) NOTES:
  
 1.) PER SEC. 94-215(K)(2) OF THE ZLDRS, THE DEVELOPER
 UTILIZING THIS INCENTIVE SHALL ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1.1) THE REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) FOR THE NORTHWOOD
 ROAD EXTENSION MUST BE IN PLACE AND DEDICATED BY THE
 PROPERTY OWNERS IMPACTED BY THIS EXTENSION BY NOVEMBER
 15, 2024.
  
 1.2) COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY EXTENSION
 BY NOVEMBER 15, 2026 (5 YEARS FROM THE ADOPTION DATE OF
 THE CMUD REGULATIONS; REFERENCE: ORDINANCE NO.
 4963-21).
  
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 * CHANGES TO THE PLAN SHEETS SHALL BE CARRIED
 THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY
 RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
 ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
 TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT
 OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved