| 2023-05-11 17:18:08 | PB 1445LL |
| | THE MARINA CMPD MAJOR AMENDMENT - SIGNAGE, LANDSCAPE, |
| | ART |
| | 4000, 4200, 4300, 4334 AND 4444 NORTH FLAGLER |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS AND THE TEXT IN WORD FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL |
| | OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT |
| | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - ONCE THE COMMENTS HAVE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | RESUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION THE CASE WILL BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JULY 11, 2023), THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THE SIGNS SHOWN ON SHEETS 1 AND |
| | 2 OF THE SIGN PLANS REPRESENT AS WELL AS WHERE ON SHEET |
| | 4 THEY WILL BE LOCATED. |
| | |
| | 2) WHY IS THE SIGN ON SHEET 3 CALLED A BUILDING |
| | ID/DIRECTIONAL SIGN? IT DOES NOT FIT THE DEFINITION OF |
| | A DIRECTIONAL SIGN. |
| | |
| | 3) REQUEST: AMEND SECTION XIII(A) OF THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFICATION |
| | SIGNS WITHIN PBA #2 TO BE REGULATED BY SECTION |
| | 94-407(3), IN ADDITION TO SECTION 94-407(1). |
| | |
| | THE REPLACEMENT OF SECTION 94-407.2 (RESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPMENT PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS) WITH |
| | SECTION 94-407.3 (IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR |
| | NONRESIDENTIAL USES) DOES NOT PERMIT ANY SIGNAGE FOR |
| | THE ICON MARINA VILLAGE, SINCE IT IS A RESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPMENT. IF THE GOAL IS TO BUILD THE SIZE SIGN |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF THE SIGN PLAN, SECTION 94-407.3 |
| | ONLY PERMITS A 20 SQUARE FOOT SIGN, NOT 48 FEET PER |
| | FACE AS LISTED IN SECTION 94-407.2. |
| | |
| | 4) REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFICATION SIGN FOR PBA #2 |
| | INCREASE IN HEIGHT FROM FOUR TO SIX FEET FOR |
| | FREESTANDING SIGNS. |
| | |
| | IF THE GOAL IS TO PERMIT A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT |
| | PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION SIGN THAT CAN BE SIX (6) FEET |
| | IN HEIGHT AS OPPOSED TO FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT, THEN |
| | YOU SHOULD BE ASKING FOR A WAIVER TO SECTION |
| | 94-407.2.F.1. |
| | |
| | 5) REQUEST: AMEND SECTION V(E) OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES |
| | TO ALLOW PBA #2'S DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFICATION SIGN TO BE |
| | LOCATED IN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | SECTION 94-402.B.1.10 OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS |
| | OFF-PREMISE SIGNS. SINCE OFF-PREMISE SIGNS ARE |
| | PROHIBITED BY THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS, THEY MAY NOT BE INCLUDED AS PERMITTED BY A |
| | DEVELOPMENT ORDER. |
| | |
| | 6) REQUEST: AMEND SECTION XIII(C) OF THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES TO ALLOW FOR A BUILDING IDENTITY SIGN AT PBA |
| | #2 THAT WILL BE VIEWABLE FROM THE PROJECT ENTRY DRIVE |
| | |
| | THE SECTION XIII SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS CLEARLY |
| | DIFFERENTIATE THE SIGNAGE PERMITTED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | AND COMMERCIAL PBAS. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE |
| | PBA #2 WITH THE COMMERCIAL PBA SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE IS |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. THERE IS |
| | INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION FOR WHY PBA #2 SHOULD BE |
| | PERMITTED TO INSTALL ALL OF THE COMMERCIAL SIGN TYPES. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 1) REQUEST: CLARIFY THAT LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS IN |
| | EXCESS OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES' MINIMUM LANDSCAPING |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE ADDITION ADDITIONAL |
| | LANDSCAPE; HOWEVER, THE ADDITION OR CHANGING OF |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY. |
| | "...IN EXCESS OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES' LANDSCAPING |
| | REQUIREMENTS, SUBJECT TO PLANNING DIVISION APPROVAL AND |
| | ANY REQUIRED PERMITS." THE PLANNING STAFF NEEDS TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL COMPLIES |
| | WITH CITY STANDARDS AND LONG-TERM VIABILITY. |
| | |
| | 2) REQUEST: ALLOW THE PROJECT TO INCORPORATE ARTWORK TO |
| | SATISFY THE CITY'S ARTLIFE PROGRAM IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | ALONG NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE, REQUIRING ALTERATIONS TO |
| | CERTAIN LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED ARTWORK IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY, SO THIS STATEMENT IS INCORRECT. STAFF HAS |
| | PERFORMED A SITE VISIT AN REQUIRES CLARIFICATION IF THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION SHOWS |
| | THE LANDSCAPE AS IT IS CURRENTLY INSTALLED AROUND THE |
| | ART AND WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR IF THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN IS A PROPOSED PLAN. UNTIL THIS IS CLARIFIED, STAFF |
| | IS NOT PREPARED TO COMMENT ON THE CHANGES SHOWN ON THE |
| | NEWLY SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLAN VERSUS THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN CURRENTLY APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 3) REQUEST: FURTHER CLARIFY THE DESIGN GUIDELINES' |
| | ORIGINAL INTENT TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING ADJUSTMENTS TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | THIS IS REDUNDANT AS IT IS ALREADY COVERED UNDER |
| | SECTION XI.H UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 4) REQUEST: ALLOW FOR THE INCORPORATION OF |
| | ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS THAT INCLUDE ARTIFICIAL |
| | PLANTINGS THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE LANDSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | SECTION 94-445.3 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS THE USE OF PLASTIC |
| | OR NONORGANIC PLANT MATERIAL. WHILE THE CODE DOES NOT |
| | LIMIT THIS TO REQUIRED LANDSCAPE, THE DESIGN GUIDELINES |
| | SPECIFY GREEN WALLS. THE TERM GREEN WALL IS UNDERSTOOD |
| | AS A VEGETATED WALL SURFACE. NONORGANIC PLANT MATERIAL |
| | MAY NOT BE USED FOR GREEN WALLS. |
| | |
| | PLASTIC PLANTS ARE NOT ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS. STAFF |
| | DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL TO DEFINE PLASTIC PLANTS |
| | AS ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS AND WILL RECOMMEND DENIAL OF |
| | THIS PORTION OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
