Plan Review Details - Project Z22120027
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22120027
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-11-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-11-2023 Time 19:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-11-2023 Time 19:22 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-11 19:25:28DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. INTERIOR DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN
 ASBESTOS SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS
 ABATEMENT REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT
 PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561)
 837-5963, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 4. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-27-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-27-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-28-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-28-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 12-28-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-28 09:08:21Z22120027 - ROXY'S ROOFTOP, 309-313 CLEMATIS INIT
 REVIEW
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLANS.
 O INDICATE IMPACT TO EXISTING DEMANDS. SUBMIT COMPLETED
 LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING
 (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK)
 AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC
 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-16-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 02-16-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 02-16-2023 Time 16:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-16 16:21:36FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
 PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-16-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-04-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-04-2023 Time 14:31 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-04 14:35:48THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS IS REQUIRED FOR ENTRY DOOR
 LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR FD 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED PER
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF
 EGRESS.
  
 12A. ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE
 FIGHTER???S EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 CONTACT WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH
 COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
 [email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
 ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-15-2023 Time 14:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-15-2023 Time 14:53 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-15 14:53:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 313 CLEMATIS Z22120027
 MARCH 15, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE PROVIDED PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE TERRACE AREA FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT. TABLE
 IV-6 SHOWS TERRACE AS REQUIRED IN CWD-CD DISTRICT.
 FIGURE IV-30 SHOWS THE LOCATION SPECIFIED FOR THE
 TERRACE. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TERRACE AREA
 PROVIDED ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND OVERHEAD COVER
 AREA. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS AND CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THE TERRACE ARE MET.
 2/14/23 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
 ??? CLEARLY DELINEATE THE PERIMETER OF THE DESIGNATED
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE THAT IS BEING PROVIDED AND SHOW THE
 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THAT SPACE.
 ??? REQUIREMENT FOR VEGETATED ARE MUST BE BASED ON
 PROVIDED AREA, NOT ON REQUIRED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST BE
 SHOWN AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
 94-443(G).
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 5. SATISFIED. TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS NEED TO BE
 SPECIFIC TO THE PLANTERS PROPOSED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS. DETAILS FOR PLANTER CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT FOUND
 IN THE PLANS.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-14-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-14-2023 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-14-2023 Time 10:25 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-14 10:25:45FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 313 CLEMATIS Z22120027
 FEBRUARY 14, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
 PROVIDED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TERRACE AREA FOR THE ZONING
 DISTRICT. TABLE IV-6 SHOWS TERRACE AS REQUIRED IN
 CWD-CD DISTRICT. FIGURE IV-30 SHOWS THE LOCATION
 SPECIFIED FOR THE TERRACE. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR
 THE TERRACE AREA PROVIDED ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS
 AND OVERHEAD COVER AREA. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE HOW THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE TERRACE ARE MET.
 2/14/23 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
 ??? CLEARLY DELINEATE THE PERIMETER OF THE DESIGNATED
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE THAT IS BEING PROVIDED AND SHOW THE
 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THAT SPACE.
 ??? REQUIREMENT FOR VEGETATED ARE MUST BE BASED ON
 PROVIDED AREA, NOT ON REQUIRED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST BE
 SHOWN AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
 94-443(G).
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 5. SATISFIED. TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS NEED TO BE
 SPECIFIC TO THE PLANTERS PROPOSED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS. DETAILS FOR PLANTER CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT FOUND
 IN THE PLANS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-10-2023 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-10-2023 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-10 14:02:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: TRANSIT VILLAGE Z22120027
 JANUARY 10, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE PROVIDED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 TERRACE AREA FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT. TABLE IV-6 SHOWS
 TERRACE AS REQUIRED IN CWD-CD DISTRICT. FIGURE IV-30
 SHOWS THE LOCATION SPECIFIED FOR THE TERRACE. SHOW HOW
 THE STANDARDS FOR THE TERRACE AREA PROVIDED ARE MET FOR
 VEGETATED AREAS AND OVERHEAD COVER AREA. LANDSCAPE
 PLANS MUST MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CLEARLY
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TERRACE ARE
 MET.
  
 2. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST BE SHOWN AND
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G).
  
 4. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
 5. TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS NEED TO BE SPECIFIC TO THE
 PLANTERS PROPOSED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. DETAILS
 FOR PLANTER CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT FOUND IN THE PLANS.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-07-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 02-07-2023 Time 09:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 02-07-2023 Time 09:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-26 10:28:59CONDTION OF APPROVAL:
 1- THE GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE TO
 BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY`S SANITATION COLLECTION
 VEHICLES.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 01-09-2023 Time 12:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 01-09-2023 Time 12:44 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-09 12:52:08- PLEASE PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS IN
 ORDER TO COMPARE THE EXISTING DEMANDS TO NEW DEMANDS
 BASED ON THE PROPOSED EXPANSION.
 --PLEASE NOTE THAT PIPE RESIZING IS A POSSIBILITY BASED
 ON NEW DEMAND NEEDS
 -PLEASE PROVIDE PGD/UTILITY PLANS
  
 RICKY ELIZONDO
 [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-30-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 01-30-2023 Time 07:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 01-06-2023 Time 11:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-06 11:58:50PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -DO 309 AND 313 CLEMATIS CURRENTLY HAVE GREASE TRAPS?
 -ARE THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES SUFFICIENT
 FOR ANY INCREASED DEMAND?
 -BOTH PROPERTIES HAVE EXISTING FIRELINE WATER SERVICES.
 THE FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AT 313 CLEMATIS IS
 DAMAGED AND NEEDS REPAIR IN ORDER TO USE IT.
 -THE WATER SERVICES FOR 313 CLEMATIS DO NOT HAVE ACTIVE
 USAGE BILLING ACCOUNTS SETUP YET WITH UTILITY BILLING
 IN ORDER TO USE THEM.
 -ALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE OUT OF COMPLIANCE FOR
 BACKFLOW TESTING.
 -VERIFY IF FIRE SYSTEMS WILL HAVE ANY ADDED CHEMICALS
 OR ANY AUXILIARY WATER SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS.
 -COULD NOT FIND CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN IN SUBMITTAL
 PACKAGE. ADD IF MAKING ANY CHANGES TO WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICES.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 04-26-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-26-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-26-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-26 10:40:27CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
 THE GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT-LOAD TYPE TO BE
 COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY`S SANITATION COLLECTION
 VEHICLES.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-30-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-30-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 01-30-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-30 14:51:56PLEASE PROVIDE LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO
 REFLECT THE SOLID WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE
 SIZE, TYPE AND QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E.
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 SANITATION SERVICE.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-09-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 01-09-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-09 10:31:57 
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
 CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A
 FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE
 STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO THE LATEST REVISION OF THE
 GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDO
 CUMENT/3690/637629060422100000)
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE
 VEHICLE???S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS
 FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 5- THE STAGING AREA WHERE THE GARBAGE CONTAINERS ARE
 SERVICED SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM HEIGHT CLEARANCE OF 22
 FT.
 6- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
 GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
 TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
 NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
 7- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 8- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAILS AND
 MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
 9- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
 10- THE ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY. PLEASE
 COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING THE PREFERED
 DIRECTIONALITY. ALSO REACH OUT TO EVERY AFFECTED PARCEL
 OWNER FOR NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL PURPOSES.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-22-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-22-2023 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-22-2023 Time 12:00 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-22 12:00:52CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. ALL POOL DISCHARGE MUST BE DECHLORINATED PRIOR TO
 ENTERING THE CITY'S STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NO POOL
 DISCHARGE MAY ENTER THE CITY'S SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM.
  
 2. NEW AND EXISTING ROOF DRAIN LEADERS ARE TO BE
 DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY.
 NO OPEN CONNECTIONS TO THE ALLEY SURFACE.
  
 3. ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY (ALLEY,
 CLEMATIS ST) WILL REQUIRE AN ENGINEERING PERMIT.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-12-2023 Time 09:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-12-2023 Time 09:34 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-12 09:32:50THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. NO ENGINEEREING PLANS PROVIDED.
  
 2. ANY POOL DISCHARGE MUST BE DECHLORINATED PRIOR TO
 ENTERING THE CITY'S STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NO POOL
 DISCHARGE MAY ENTER THE CITY???S SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM.
  
 3. CONNECT ROOF DRAIN LEADERS DIRECTLY TO THE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY.
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-12-2023 Time 11:57 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-12 12:01:341. SURVEYS NEED TO CALL OUT PROPERTY CORNERS AS
 FOUND/SET OR AT BUILDING CORNER.
 2. ANY AERIAL ENCROACHMENTS EXISTING OR PROPOSED NEED
 TO HAVE AN AERIAL ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT.
 3. COMPACTOR IN REAR OF 313 NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 03-06-2023 Time 13:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-06 13:15:04PASS, TRAFFIC COMMENTS #2, #15, #16, #17, AND #18 TO BE
 SATISFIED PRIOR TO ROW PERMIT ISSUANCE.
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
  
 TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS
 FURTHER TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND PARKING
 ANALYSES
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 RECEIVED - WILL REQUIRE WITH ROW PERMIT
 [email protected]
 3) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE
 ENCOURAGED
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE
 PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION
 RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES,
 PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY,
 GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER &
 DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY
 LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED
 T-1.0.
 5) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. NOTE:
 EVEN THOUGH NO CHANGES TO ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK
 GEOMETRIES ARE PROPOSED, BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN
 MOVEMENTS MAY BE IMPACTED OR COULD BE IMPROVED. THUS,
 THE NECESSITY OF A SITE PLAN SHOWCASING THE SIDEWALK
 AND ROADWAY AREAS
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION ONE. NOTE:
 EVEN THOUGH NO CHANGES TO ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK
 GEOMETRIES ARE PROPOSED, BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN
 MOVEMENTS MAY BE IMPACTED OR COULD BE IMPROVED. THUS,
 THE NECESSITY OF A SITE PLAN SHOWCASING EXISTING
 SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE SIDEWALK AND
 ROADWAY AREAS
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET.
 8) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
 PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
 OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
 IF ANY
 11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 12) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS OR TRANSIT STOPS BEING
 IMPACTED?
 14) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN
 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY?
 15) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 86-246 FOR DETAILS WILL REQUIRE WITH ROW PERMIT
 [email protected]
 16) THE PROPOSED ACCESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
 THROUGH OLIVE MAY NOT BE FEASIBLE NOR SAFE FOR EXIT
 PURPOSES, DUE TO THE PROPOSED BACK-OUT MANEUVER OF THE
 TRUCKS. THUS, PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE MOT THAT HAS
 TRUCKS ENTERING FROM OLIVE AND EXITING ON DIXIE; SUCH
 PLAN WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE CASE UNSAFE TRAFFIC
 OPERATIONS ARE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL REQUIRE
 WITH ROW PERMIT [email protected]
 17) COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT, AND COPY
 ENGINEERING IN THE CORRESPONDENCE, WITH RESPECT TO THE
 IMPACTED PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE 300 BLOCK. PROVIDE A
 NARRATIVE PERTAINING THE USE OF SUCH STALLS IN THE CASE
 THEY ARE BAGGED WILL REQUIRE WITH ROW PERMIT
 [email protected]
 18) COORDINATE AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE ON HOW LOCAL
 BUSINESSES VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE BLOCK WILL BE
 HANDLED, SUCH AS JIMMY JOHN DELIVERY DRIVERS OR ANY
 OTHER ENTITY/OPERATIONS BEING SIGNIFICANTLY AND
 NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY THE ROAD CLOSURE WILL REQUIRE
 WITH ROW PERMIT [email protected]
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-22-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-22-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 02-22-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-22 20:57:50TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS
 FURTHER TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND PARKING
 ANALYSES
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 RECEIVED
 3) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE
 ENCOURAGED
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE
 PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION
 RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES,
 PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY,
 GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER &
 DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY
 LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED
 T-1.0.
 5) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. NOTE:
 EVEN THOUGH NO CHANGES TO ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK
 GEOMETRIES ARE PROPOSED, BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN
 MOVEMENTS MAY BE IMPACTED OR COULD BE IMPROVED. THUS,
 THE NECESSITY OF A SITE PLAN SHOWCASING THE SIDEWALK
 AND ROADWAY AREAS
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION ONE. NOTE:
 EVEN THOUGH NO CHANGES TO ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK
 GEOMETRIES ARE PROPOSED, BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN
 MOVEMENTS MAY BE IMPACTED OR COULD BE IMPROVED. THUS,
 THE NECESSITY OF A SITE PLAN SHOWCASING EXISTING
 SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE SIDEWALK AND
 ROADWAY AREAS
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET.
 8) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
 PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
 OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
 IF ANY
 11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 12) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS OR TRANSIT STOPS BEING
 IMPACTED?
 14) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN
 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY?
 15) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 86-246 FOR DETAILS
 16) THE PROPOSED ACCESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
 THROUGH OLIVE MAY NOT BE FEASIBLE NOR SAFE FOR EXIT
 PURPOSES, DUE TO THE PROPOSED BACK-OUT MANEUVER OF THE
 TRUCKS. THUS, PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE MOT PLAN THAT HAS
 TRUCKS ENTERING FROM OLIVE AND EXITING ON DIXIE; SUCH
 PLAN WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE CASE UNSAFE TRAFFIC
 OPERATIONS ARE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION
 17) COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT, AND COPY
 ENGINEERING IN THE CORRESPONDENCE, WITH RESPECT TO THE
 IMPACTED PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE 300 BLOCK. PROVIDE A
 NARRATIVE PERTAINING THE USE OF SUCH STALLS IN THE CASE
 THEY ARE BAGGED
 18) COORDINATE AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE ON HOW LOCAL
 BUSINESSES VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE BLOCK WILL BE
 HANDLED, SUCH AS JIMMY JOHN DELIVERY DRIVERS OR ANY
 OTHER ENTITY/OPERATIONS BEING SIGNIFICANTLY AND
 NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY THE ROAD CLOSURE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-12-2023 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 01-12-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-12 12:56:20TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS FURTHER
 TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND PARKING ANALYSISES
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 3) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE
 ENCOURAGED
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0
 5) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
 DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
 PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION ONE
 7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
 PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET.
 8) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 9) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 10) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
 TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
 STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
 11) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 12) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A
 THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY MEETING
 13) ARE THERE ANY BUS OR TRANSIT STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 14) IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN EXISTING
 BICYCLE FACILITY?
 15) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 07-13-2023 Time 10:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 07-13-2023 Time 10:44 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-13 10:45:42SITE PLAN IS SUBJECT TO APPROVALS, CONDITIONS, AND
 PLANS PRESENTED TO THE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE UNDER
 CASE NO. 22-24.
  
 THIS APPROVAL IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THE TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY, A REVISED TPS LETTER WILL NEED TO BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY, AN AERIAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE
 FINALIZED.
  
 3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THEIR BUILDING PERMIT: THIS
 DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT,
 HOWEVER THE 1% IS MINIMAL. THEY DO NEED TO COMPLETE AN
 ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION, SELECT OPTION#2
 CONTRIBUTION INTO THE ART FUND, WHICH MUST BE
 COMPLETED, AND PAID BEFORE, OR AT TIME OF BUILDING
 PERMIT FEES.
  
 4. THE GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT-LOAD TYPE TO
 BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY???S SANITATION COLLECTION
 VEHICLES.
  
 5. ALL POOL DISCHARGE MIST BE DECHLORINATED PRIOR TO
 ENTERING THE CITY???S STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NO
 POOL DISCHARGE MAY ENTER THE CITY???S SANITARY SYSTEM.
  
 6. NEW AND EXISTING ROOF DRAIN LEADERS ARE TO BE
 DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY.
 NO OPEN CONNECTIONS TO THE ALLEY SURFACE.
  
 7. ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY (ALLEY,
 CLEMATIS ST.) WILL REQUIRE AN ENGINEERING PERMIT.
  
 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
  
 9. THE APPLICANT WILL COORDINATE WITH THE PARKING
 DEPARTMENT AND WILL COPY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN
 THE CORRESPONDENCE, WITH THE RESPECT TO THE IMPACTED
 PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE 300 BLOCK.
  
 10. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE
 PROJECT.
  
 11. ANY REQUIRED EASEMENTS (I.E. DRAINAGE, UTILITIES,
 PUBLIC ACCESS, OUTFALL, ETC.) SHALL BE PROVIDED VIA
 PLAT OR SEPARATE LEGAL INSTRUMENT.
  
 12. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 13. UPON APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, THE
 DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY A CONSTRUCTION
 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER
 86 ??? ARTICLE IV ??? DIVISION 1 ??? SEC. 86-245 OF THE
 CITY???S CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 14. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL INCLUDED IN THE DAC
 FINAL ORDER FOR FSPR 22-24 APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE ON
 MAY 10, 2023, ARE PART OF THIS SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 03-24-2023 Time 16:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 03-24-2023 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-24 16:35:13ZONING AND PLANNING
 PROJECT: ROXYS RENOVATION AND EXPANSION (Z22120027)
 DATE: MARCH 24, 2023
 CONTACT: CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT
 561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS
  
 1. TPS LETTER RECEIVED. PLEASE NOTE, IF PROPOSED SQ.FT.
 CHANGES, THE LETTER WILL NEED TO BE REVISED AND
 SUBMITTED AGAIN.
  
 2. PROJECT DATA SHEET SQ.FT. DIFFERS FROM SP-1 TABLE.
 PLEASE REVISE.
  
 3. ENGINEERING PLANS/DOCUMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF
 THAT OTHER DEPARTMENTS ARE OK WITH PLANS NOT SUBMITTED
 EVEN IF THERE IS A NEW STRUCTURE GOING IN TO SUPPORT
 THE POOL AND A NEW FLOOR AND ROOF ARE BEING ADDED TO
 313 CLEMATIS ST.
  
 4. SIGNED AERIAL EASEMENTS WILL BE A CONDITION OF
 APPROVAL PRIOR C.O.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PUBLIC UTILITIES WRITTEN CONFIRMATION.
  
 6. SATISFIED. LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PUBLIC OUTREACH/ LETTERS OF SUPPORT.
  
 8. ACKNOWLEDGED. PUBLIC NOTICE, APPLICANT'S RESPONSE:
 THE MOT PLAN WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE
  
  
  
 1. JUSTIFICATION LETTER:
  
 A. SATISFIED.
  
 B. SATISFIED. PLEASE MAKE SURE SQ.FT. MATCHES TABLE IN
 SHEETS.
  
 C. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED BONA FIDE
 RESTAURANTS MEET THE CRITERIA ON THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 6, SEC. 6-1.
  
 D. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REPEATED COMMENT, NOTE THAT
 THERE ARE SENTENCES THAT ARE NOT FULLY FLESHED, SEE
 RESPONSE TO STANDARD REVIEW (A); "...WHICH IS BOUND TO
 THE EAST BY" AND ON VARIANCE REQUEST #3, RESPONSE TO
 VARIANCE STANDARD (A) "...ENCLOSING THE DUMPSTER AND
 PROVIDING A...". PLEASE CAREFULLY REVISE. AND, ON (A)
 RESPONSE, PLEASE ALSO DESCRIBE HOW THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT IS DESIGN IN CONSIDERATION TO NEIGHBORING
 PROPERTIES TO THE WEST, NORTH AND SOUTH, AND HOW IT IS
 IN LINE WITH THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLEMATIS
 WATERFRONT DISTRICT.
  
 NOT SATISFIED. JUSTIFICATION LETTER, SPECIAL REVIEW
 STANDARD (C), DOES NOT PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER HOW THE
 ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ARE CONSISTENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE
 DEVELOPMENT, NOT ONLY FOR MASS, BULK AND PROPORTION,
 BUT ALSO THE INCORPORATION OF FENESTRATION, FACADE
 MATERIALS, OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS USE IN THE
 DESIGN.
  
 ON SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARD (D) PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER
 HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO ALLOWS VISUAL INTERACTION
 WITH THE FLOORS ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL FRONTING
 CLEMATIS ST AND THE ALLEY.
  
 E. SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE AS PER SEC. 94-38, 'A
 VARIANCE SHALL NOT BE GRANTED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF
 NONCONFORMITIES IN THE ZONING DISTRICTS OR ADJOINING
 DISTRICTS.' THIS VARIANCE SHOULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED BY
 "MATCHING" OTHER NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES.
  
 F. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON RESPONSE J), VARIANCE
 STANDARDS, PLEASE NOTE THE ACTUAL DEPARTURE FROM THE
 DIMENSIONAL OR NUMERICAL REQUIREMENTS AND MAKE SURE
 THAT IN DRAWINGS IS CLEARLY SHOWN AS THE MIN SETBACK
 LINES AND THE ACTUAL SETBACK LINE OF THE BUILDING.
  
  
  
 2. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS:
  
 A. NOT SATISFIED. STREET-LEVEL THREE-DIMENSIONAL
 RENDERINGS: THERE ARE 3 LETTER-SIZE SHEETS WITH RENDERS
 IN THE SUBMITTAL THAT HAVE NO DRAWING SHEET FORMAT,
 DESCRIPTION, TITLE, ETC. IN ADDITION, THESE RENDERS DO
 NOT SHOW THE EXISTING AWNINGS ON 309 CLEMATIS, THE
 BALCONY ON THE 2ND FLOOR ON 313 CLEMATIS ST BUILDING,
 THE EXISTING SHADE STREET TREES AND SIDEWALK
 CONFIGURATION, AND THE PROPOSED CONTINUOUS PLANTER WITH
 FICUS VEGETATION ON THE TERRACE/ROOF LEVEL FRONTING
 CLEMATIS ST. PLEASE SUBMIT PROPER DRAWING SHEETS OF
 RENDERS AS PART OF YOUR ARCHITECTURAL SET OF PLANS.
 NOTE, EACH DRAWING SHEET WILL BE CALL OUT IN THE SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL PLAN LETTER, SO DRAWINGS SHEETS ARE
 REQUIRED.
  
 B. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. COMBINED ARCHITECTURAL PLAN
 SHEETS.
  
 ON SHEET A-301, PLEASE CLARIFY THE INTENTION TO SHOW
 ALL LABELS AND DIMENSIONS AND WHY FURNITURE WAS
 EXCLUDED AS WELL AS THE SET OF STAIRS ON THE FRONT OF
 THE 313 CLEMATIS BUILDING.
  
 ON SHEETS A-302, A-303, A-304, AND A-305, MULTIPLE
 DOTTED LINES ARE SHOWN ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND
 SIDES, AS WELL AS SOME LABELS SUCH AS 50', CO, GT ON
 THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY THE INTENTION
 OF SHOWING THEM AND ADD PROPER LABELS OR A LEGEND TO
 IDENTIFY EACH OR CLEAN THE DRAWINGS SO IT PROVIDES
 ACCURATE INFORMATION. IT IS IMPORTANT TO SHOW CLEARLY
 PROPERTY LINE, WHERE THE BALCONIES OR BUILDING
 STRUCTURE END AND DIMENSIONS ON HOW THEY PROJECT ONTO
 THE ROW. NOTE, HATCH USED IN SIDEWALK IS SHOWING ON
 BALCONY FLOORS. SCALE IS NOT ACCURATE ON DRAWINGS.
 PLEASE REVISE DRAWINGS.
  
 ON SHEET A-303, PLEASE ADD A LEGEND TO EXPLAIN ANGULAR
 STRIPED HATCH SHOWN ON THE 309 CLEMATIS BUILDING, WHAT
 IS IT SHOWING? SAME HATCH IS USED ON SHEET A-302 TO
 IDENTIFY EXISTING FLOOR, IS THAT CORRECT FOR BOTH
 SHEETS?
  
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHICH DRAWINGS YOU ARE SHOWING THE
 SETBACK LINES TO EXPLAIN HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 MEETS THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 C. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE COMMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING
 SECTIONS RELATED TO SHEET A-103.
  
 D. NOT SATISFIED. DIAGRAM SHEETS.
  
 I. FLOOR RATIO AREA (FAR): THE FAR, IS THE RATIO OF THE
 GROSS BUILDING AREA (GBA) TO THE TOTAL LOT AREA, PLEASE
 SEC. 94-109, DEFINITION OF GBA AND REVISE SHEET A-102.
 YOU CAN EXCLUDE SOME AREAS SUCH AS MECHANICAL AND
 ELECTRICAL SPACES. IF SQ.FT. WILL BE REVISED SO ARE
 THESE DIAGRAMS TO SHOW ACCURATE NUMBERS.
  
 MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: ON SHEET A-103 TABLE, SHOWS
 MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT ON GROUND FLOOR OF 88% AND ON
 SHEET SP-1 GROUND FLOOR MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT OF 93%.
 2ND FLOOR FOOTPRINT IS NOT PROVIDED ON SP-1 AND ON
 SHEET A-103 2ND FLOOR IS EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED.
 ON SP-1, VIP/5TH FLOOR THERE IS A 6% PROPOSED FOOTPRINT
 AND ON SHEET A-103 IS 5%. PLEASE REVISE AND MAKE SURE
 PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 IN ADDITION, EVEN THOUGH THE 2ND FLOOR BUILDING
 FOOTPRINT SHOWS THAT SQ. FT. HAS DECREASED FROM THE
 EXISTING SQ.FT WHICH REDUCES ITS NONCONFORMITY (PER
 SEC. 94-515.- NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE), THE NEW
 FOOTPRINT CONFIGURATION IS CAUSING ANOTHER
 NONCONFORMITY BY ADDING SQUARE FOOTAGE WITHIN THE REAR
 SETBACK WHICH IS DECREASING ITS COMPLIANCE WITH
 REGULATIONS AND IT IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE ADDRESS
 THIS ISSUE.
  
 ON SHEET A-103, 3RD FLOOR FOOTPRINT, PLEASE ADD TO YOUR
 FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS THE AREA COVERED BY THE POOL.
  
  
 II. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY WHICH DRAWINGS SHOW
 SETBACK LINES. SP-1 DOES NOT SHOW MIN AND REQUIRED
 SETBACK LINES.
  
 IN REGARDS TO THE REAR SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST: THE
 REAR SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS NOT MET AT ANY LEVEL OF THE
 313 CLEMATIS ST BUILDING AS BUILDING STRUCTURES, SUCH
 AS STAIRS, TRASH ROOM, COLUMN, AND RESTROOMS ARE WITHIN
 THE SETBACK. NOTE THAT AS PER SEC. 94-109, SETBACK
 DEFINITION, NO UPPER-LEVEL SETBACK SHALL BE SMALLER
 THAN THE MINIMUM GROUND FLOOR SETBACK OR CONDITIONAL
 SETBACK IF REQUIRED. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE
 313 CLEMATIS ST BUILDING SHOWS ON ROOF DECK LEVEL THAT
 THERE IS NO SETBACK AND THEREFORE IS SMALLER THAN THE
 BELOW LEVELS. PLEASE REVISE DESIGN TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT AS THIS IS NOT A VARIANCE THAT CAN BE
 GRANTED. IN ADDITION, ON THE 309 CLEMATIS ST BUILDING,
 NEW STRUCTURES (BATHROOMS) HAS BEEN ADDED WITHIN THE
 SETBACK, WHICH THE DESIGN WILL NEED TO BE REVISED OR A
 VARIANCE WITH JUSTIFICATION WILL NEED TO BE ADDED.
  
 PLEASE NOTE, SETBACKS NUMBERS SHOWING ON SHEETS SP-1
 AND A-103 ARE NOT CONSISTENT. ON SP-1, TABLE IV-26
 SHOWS AS 0 FEET PROPOSED, ON THE SAME SHEET IN THE
 VARIANCE TABLE SHOWS VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR 4 FEET AND
 8 INCHES, AND ON SHEET A-103 SHOWS A PROVIDED SETBACK
 OF +/-4 FEET. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT.
  
  
 III. SATISFIED. MAX. HEIGHT REQUIREMENT.
  
 IV. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THE 20% AREA OF OPEN SPACE IS COVERED AS
 THERE IS A MAXIMUM OF 30% OVERHEAD COVER REQUIREMENT.
 NOTE AS THIS AREA IS ON THE REAR SETBACK, IF DESIGN
 CHANGES, OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WILL NEED TO
 BE REVISED.
  
 NOT SATISFIED - ACTIVE USE: AS PREVIOUSLY COMMENTED,
 SECTION 94-109 NOTES THAT ACTIVE USE IS MEASURE AS THE
 PERCENTAGE OF THE 'BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE', ON SHEET
 A-101, THERE IS NO DIMENSION PROVIDED OF THE 'BUILDABLE
 LOT FRONTAGE' AND THE DIMENSIONS OF ACTIVE USE TO SHOW
 HOW THE PROJECT IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 PARTIALLY SATISFIED - TRANSPARENCY. AS PREVIOUSLY
 COMMENTED, PLEASE SEE SEC. 94-109, TRANSPARENCY
 DEFINITION TO SEE HOW TO CALCULATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR
 THE GROUND FLOOR. THE REQUIREMENT IS TAKEN FROM THE
 'STOREFRONT FACADE AREA' WHICH WILL BE THE STOREFRONT
 WIDTH BY THE STOREFRONT HEIGHT OF THE GROUND FLOOR, ON
 SHEET A-104, TABLE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT MATCHING THE
 DRAWING.
  
 SATISFIED. MINIMUM ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR AND THE 2ND STORY IS MEET.
  
  
 E. CALCULATIONS TABLES AND DIAGRAMS OF THE FOLLOWING:
  
 I. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. USE CALCULATIONS, ON SHEET
 SP-1, PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS THE 'OTHER COMMERCIAL' SQ
 FT ON THE ROOFTOP. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PRESENTED AND THAT THEY
 MATCH THE PROJECT FACT SHEET AND ANYTHING MENTIONED ON
 THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER.
  
 II. NOT SATISFIED. FENESTRATION AND OTHER FACADE
 ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS PER SEC. 94-109, TABLEIV-4.
 SHEET A-104, TABLE 'FACADE ARTICULATION' SHOWS ONLY
 REQUIREMENTS BUT DOES NOT SHOW WHAT IS PROPOSED. FOR
 EXAMPLE, FENESTRATION, THERE IS A 15% OF THE FACADE
 AREA AS A REQUIREMENT, BUT THE TABLE OR DRAWING DO NOT
 SHOW DIMENSIONS TO SEE AREA OF THE FACADE AND WHAT IS
 BEING COUNTED TOWARDS THE FENESTRATION PERCENTAGE. IN
 ADDITION, PLEASE ADD LABELS TO ELEVATIONS DESCRIBING
 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, SUCH AS PILASTERS, EYEBROWS,
 ETC. AND ANY FACADE MATERIALS, SUCH AS STUCCO.
  
 III. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PROJECTIONS ENCROACHING THE
 ROW. SECTION SHOWN ON SHEET A-105 IS NOT REFERENCED ON
 FLOOR PANS. THERE IS NO DIMENSION SHOWING FROM BUILDING
 FACADE TO THE END OF THE PROJECTION ON THE ROOF DECK
 FLOOR. AND, FLOOR PLANS DO NOT SHOW DIMENSIONS SHOWING
 HOW THE BALCONIES PROJECT OVER THE PROPERTY LINES. AS
 MENTIONED BEFORE, WITH ALL LINES IN THE FRONT OF THE
 BUILDING IS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND WHERE THE PROPERTY
 LINES IS AND WHERE THE BUILDING STRUCTURE ENDS.
  
 IV. OPEN SPACE, SEE COMMENT 2. ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS(D)(IV).
  
  
 V. SATISFIED. AS THE PROJECT'S SCALE AND CHARACTER ARE
 IN LINE WITH OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE BLOCK OR IN FRONT
 OF THE BUILDING, SHEET A-401.
  
  
 3. SITE PLAN:
  
 A. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SP-1 AND FLOOR PLANS SHOULD
 ONLY SHOW WHAT WILL REMAIN AND IS PROPOSED, THERE IS NO
 NEED TO ADD "(TO REMAIN)" ON LABELS. IN ADDITION,
 PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL ROOMS ON EACH FLOOR HAVE LABELS,
 SUCH AS KITCHEN, TRASH ROOM, MECHANICAL ROOM, OFFICE,
 KITCHEN, ETC. AND, ALL DATA INFO SHOULD MATCH DIAGRAMS
 SHEETS TABLES, AS WELL AS PROJECT FACT SHEET AND
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER.
  
 PLEASE NOTE, THE CONFIGURATION OF THE INTERIOR IS
 DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND WITH THE USE OF GRAYS AND
 OVERLAPPING LINES OF WHAT IT SEEMS TO BE WALLS AS WELL
 AS THICKNESS OF PROPERTY LINE.
  
 B. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE, DECREASE THE THICKNESS
 OF LINE OF THE PROPERTY LINE, IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE
 WALLS OR ENTRANCES. NOTE, THE COLUMN ON THE REAR
 SETBACK IS ALSO MISSING ON THIS SHEET, AND TRASH
 ROOM/DUMPSTER IS SHOWING IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION
 COMPARE TO FLOOR PLAN. ALSO NOTE, THERE ARE SOME LABELS
 FROM WHAT I THINK IS THE SURVEY, SUCH AS WPP, HC, BOL,
 GT, CO, THAT NEED TO BE EXPLAIN WITH A LEGEND OR IF
 THOSE ARE NOT STRUCTURED TO REMAIN, PLEASE REMOVE.
  
 4. LANDSCAPE PLANS, SEE COMMENT 2. ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS(D)(IV). LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOULD MATCH
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND RENDERS.
  
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, AND SCREENING
 OF ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES, OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS, AND
 GARBAGE COMPACTOR OR OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN SITE
 OR ADJACENT TO THE SITE. PLEASE SHOW HOW GARBAGE WILL
 BE MANAGED INSIDE THE PROPERTY.
  
 SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT MATCH WHERE TRASH
 RECEPTABLES/DUMPSTERS ARE LOCATED COMPARE WITH SHEET
 A-301.
  
 REAR ELEVATION SHEET A-406 SHOWS THAT POOL EQUIPMENT IS
 OPEN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 6. SECTIONS. THERE IS NO REFERENCE ON FLOOR PLANS THE
 SECTIONS ON SHEETS A-501 TO A-507 SHOWING SECTIONS.
 SHEET A-407 SEEMS TO BE A SECTION AND NOT AN ELEVATION
 ALSO NOT REFERENCE IN ANY FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE REVISE
 DRAWINGS.
  
 7. AS SHOWN ON ELEVATION SHEET A-104, GUARDRAIL AND
 VEGETATED PLANTERS ON THE ROOF DECK FOR BOTH BUILDINGS
 ARE THE SAME AND CONTINUOUS PLEASE REVISE SHEETS AS
 SHEET A-404 DOES NOT MATCH A-407, A-504 AND A-507.
 HEIGHT ALSO IS NOT DIMENSION AND IT APPEARS THAT IS NOT
 MATCHING IN SOME SECTIONS.
  
  
 OTHER COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT
 SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A
 REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH
 COMMENTS. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
 WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE APPLICATION AS
 WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF
 THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT MAY REQUEST A
 30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION REQUEST IS
 PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED APPLICATIONS
 SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH
 COMMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED
 TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER
 COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF
 ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE
 APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 LASTLY, YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
 ADDITIONAL COST. AS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
 TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE, WHICH IS $300.
  
 --END OF COMMENTS--
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 02-10-2023 Time 17:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 02-10-2023 Time 17:47 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-10 17:47:33ZONING AND PLANNING
 PROJECT: ROXY'S RENOVATION AND EXPANSION (Z22120027)
 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2023
 CONTACT: CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT
 561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS BASED ON 01.26.23
 RESUBMITTAL:
  
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER BY THE PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION 561-684-4030.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
 WAS SUBMITTED TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION
 ON DECEMBER 8, 2022; THE RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED ON
 JANUARY 17TH AND IS INCLUDED IN THIS RESUBMITTAL
  
 Z 02.10.23 - SATISFIED
  
  
 2. ON PROJECT FAST SHEET, REVISE THE TABLE ZONING AND
 FUTURE LAND USE AND EXISTING USES, FROM CURRENT ZONING,
 SUBJECT AREA NORTH ???CWD-CD??? TO THE CORRECT
 'CWD-10'.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED, THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED
  
 Z 02.10.23 - SATISFIED. IN ADDITION, PLEASE PROVIDE
 BREAKDOWN OF OFFICE SQ.FT. ON THE PROJECT DATA SHEET.
  
  
 3. PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLANS/DOCUMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE: NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED TO ANY PAVING,
 GRADING, DRAINAGE, STREETS OR SIDEWALKS, OR ANY OTHER
 AREA THAT REQUIRE NEW ENGINEERING. SEE SHEET P-001 FOR
 LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS FOR THE RENOVATED AREAS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PENDING FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS IF COMMENT
 HAS BEEN SATISFIED.
  
  
 4. PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR ANY AERIAL EASEMENTS FOR 309
 CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY AND IF A NEW AERIAL EASEMENT IS
 NEEDED FOR 313 CLEMATIS ST.
  
 RESPONSE: ALL CHANGES PROPOSED ARE WITHIN THE CURRENT
 AERIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS.
  
 Z 02.10.23. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE AERIAL
 EASEMENT AGREEMENT.
  
  
 5. PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE
 TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION
 SERVICES.
  
 RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION WAS SENT TO ALL
 UTILITY DEPARTMENTS AND THE RESPONSES HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED. WE WOULD REQUEST THAT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION BE
 A CONDITION OF FINAL APPROVAL.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
 CONFIRMATION THAT PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT,
 STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES.
  
  
 6. PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES.
  
 RESPONSE: REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION WAS SENT TO ALL
 UTILITY DEPARTMENTS AND THE RESPONSES HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED. WE WOULD REQUEST THAT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION BE
 A CONDITION OF FINAL APPROVAL.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM
 ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR
 OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR
 SERVICES.
  
  
 7. PLEASE SHARE ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH THAT HAS BEEN DONE
 FOR THE PROJECT.
  
 RESPONSE: LETTERS OF SUPPORT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY
 SEVERAL BUSINESSES ON CLEMATIS STREET AND HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TO THE RESUBMITTAL
 ANY NEW PUBLIC OUTREACH DOCUMENTATION.
  
  
 8. PER SEC. 94-39 (J)(4) AND SEC. 94-54 (B)(3), THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO MEET PROCEDURES OF
 NOTICES OF PUBLIC MEETINGS. AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING
 DIRECTOR, THE NOTICE WILL NEED TO INCLUDE THE EXPECTED
 60-DAY CLOSURE OF CLEMATIS STREET BETWEEN SOUTH OLIVE
 AVE AND S DIXIE HWY. WHILE THE PROJECT IS IN
 CONSTRUCTION TO INFORM NEIGHBORS.
  
 RESPONSE: THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD REQUIRE THE
 CLOSURE OF CLEMATIS STREET, BETWEEN S. DIXIE HIGHWAY
 AND S. OLIVE AVE FOR 90 DAYS, THE PROPOSED STREET
 CLOSURE. A MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) AND PEDESTRIAN
 MOT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE CLOSURE,
 DETOUR AND INFORMATION SHARED WITH NEIGHBORS REGARDING
 THE PENDING/REQUIRED STREET CLOSURE AND ROW PERMIT. THE
 PROPERTY OWNER LIST AND RADIUS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED WITH
 THIS SUBMITTAL.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-39 (J)(4),
 WRITTEN NOTICE, INCLUDING THE 90 DAYS CLOSURE, SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY MAIL AT LEAST 14 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE DAC
 PUBLIC HEARING TO ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS, ALL
 AFFECTED NEIGHBORHOOD AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS AND
 ALL PERSONS WHO OWN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET OF
 THE PROPERTY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED ACTION.
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE MOT AND PEDESTRIAN MOT WILL BE
 INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE. ONCE THE PROJECT IS PASSED BY
 ALL DEPARTMENTS CONTACT CLAUDIA IBAVEN TO CHECK ON
 DEADLINES FOR THE DAC MEETING.
  
  
 1. JUSTIFICATION LETTER:
  
 A. AS DESCRIBED ON THE LETTER "PROPERTIES ARE DESIGNED
 TO FUNCTION AS ONE COHESIVE PROPERTY", PLEASE CLARIFY
 IF BOTH PROPERTIES ARE ONLY CONNECTED VIA THE ROOFTOP
 AND NOT ON THE GROUND FLOOR OR 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; PLEASE SEE REVISED
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER
  
 B. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL USE
 OF THE 313 CLEMATIS ST. PROPERTY. IF THE INTENTION IS
 TO ACTIVATE THE VACANT BUILDING, PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER
 WHAT TYPE OF USE THE GROUND FLOOR, SECOND FLOOR, AND
 THIRD FLOOR WILL HAVE. IS THE GROUND FLOOR A NEW
 RESTAURANT OR A BAR? ARE 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR OFFICES?
 WILL THE ROOFTOP BE PART OF THE EXISTING BAR/PUB? WILL
 BOTH PROPERTIES FUNCTION AS ONE BUSINESS OR SEPARATE
 BUSINESSES?
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; PLEASE SEE REVISED
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER PAGE 1. THE FIRST FLOOR IS
 PROPOSED AS A RESTAURANT, THE SECOND FLOOR AS OFFICE
 AND THE THIRD FLOOR DOES NOT HAVE A PROPOSED USE AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - SATISFIED.
  
  
 C. NOTE, IF NEW SPACES WILL BE 'ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
 ESTABLISHMENTS', PLEASE REVIEW WPB CODE OF ORDINANCES
 CHAPTER 6- ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND ADDRESS HOW THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET THE CITY CODE.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; THE NEW SPACES ARE PROPOSED AS
 BONA FIDE RESTAURANT SPACES THAT WILL NOT QUALIFY AS
 'ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS'
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THE PROPOSED BONA
 FIDE RESTAURANTS MEET THE CRITERIA ON THE CITY'S CODE
 OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 6, SEC. 6-1, SUCH AS, FULL
 KITCHEN FACILITIES, CUSTOMER SERVICE AREA WITH TABLES,
 CHAIRS AND COUNTERS, AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF SEATS OR
 CHAIRS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE OCCUPANT
 LOAD OF THE RESTAURANT, TO NAME A FEW. FEEL FREE TO
 PROVIDE ANY DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE AT THE MOMENT FOR
 OUR RECORDS.
  
 D. PLEASE REVISE SECTION 'REQUEST 1: SITE PLAN REVIEW',
 THERE ARE SOME RESPONSES THAT ARE DESCRIBING A
 DIFFERENT PROJECT AND SOME SENTENCES ARE INCOMPLETE.
 PER SEC. 94-54 (B), THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO
 SPECIAL REVIEW BY DAC AS IT IS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF
 THE CLEMATIS WATERFRONT CONSERVATION DISTRICT (CWD-CD).
 PLEASE RESPONSE ON THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER HOW THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL
 REVIEW. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE STANDARDS PLEASE
 CHECK SEC. 94-54 (B)(2).
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; PLEASE SEE REVISED
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE ON YOUR
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER YOU ARE REFERENCING SEC. 94-207,
 WHICH IS A SECTION FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
 DISTRICT NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVISE
 YOUR JUSTIFICATION LETTER.
  
 AS THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A SPECIAL REVIEW BY DAC,
 YOUR JUSTIFICATION LETTER ONLY NEEDS TO ADDRESS HOW THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL
 REVIEW AND ANY VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE REMOVE OTHER
 NOT APPLICABLE STANDARDS.
  
 AS A REPEATED COMMENT, NOTE THAT THERE ARE SENTENCES
 THAT ARE NOT COMPLETE, FOR EXAMPLE SEE ON YOUR RESPONSE
 TO SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS, A. 'WHICH IS BOUND TO THE
 EAST...'. PLEASE CAREFULLY REVISE.
  
 ON SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS (A) RESPONSE, PLEASE ALSO
 DESCRIBE HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS DESIGN IN
 CONSIDERATION TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES TO THE WEST,
 NORTH AND SOUTH, AND HOW IT IS IN LINE WITH THE OVERALL
 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLEMATIS WATERFRONT DISTRICT.
  
 PLEASE NOTE, PRIOR TO DAC REVIEW, THE APPLICANT WILL
 NEED TO PROVIDE STREET-LEVEL THREE-DIMENSIONAL
 RENDERINGS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALL
 BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT SITES, PUBLIC SPACES AND STREETS
 TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE NEW BUILDING RELATES TO THE
 SURROUNDING AREA. RENDERINGS WILL NEED TO MATCH THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND DRAWINGS IN APPLICATION, AS
 WELL AS EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SITE.
  
 ON SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARD (C) PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER
 HOW THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ARE CONSISTENT ACROSS
 THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT, NOT ONLY FOR MASS, BULK AND
 PROPORTION, BUT ALSO THE INCORPORATION OF FENESTRATION,
 FACADE MATERIALS, OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS USE
 IN THE DESIGN.
  
 ON SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARD (D) PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER
 HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO ALLOWS VISUAL INTERACTION
 WITH THE FLOORS ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL.
  
 E. ON RESPONSE E), VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE CLARIFY
 WHAT ARE "VERTICAL PROJECTIONS", IS THERE A PORTION OF
 THE BUILDING/FACADE WALL ON THE 3RD FLOOR OF 313
 CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY MEETING THE SETBACK? AND EXPLAIN
 FURTHER WHY THE ADDITION OF THE ONE FLOOR IS THE
 "MINIMUM AMOUNT NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT".
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; PLEASE SEE REVISED
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER. THE VERTICAL PROJECTION REFERRED
 TO IS THE 4TH FLOOR DINING DECK, WHICH IS LOCATED
 'BEHIND' (NORTH) OF THE ELEVATOR SHAFT LOCATION.
  
 F. ON RESPONSE J), VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE EXPLAIN
 FURTHER THE MEANING OF 'DIMENSIONAL CHALLENGE'.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED; PLEASE SEE REVISED
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PLEASE NOTE, AS THE VARIANCE IS DRIVEN BY
 THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SITE AND THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT IS MOSTLY A RENOVATION AND EXPANSION,
 PLEASE PROVIDE DRAWINGS THAT CLEARLY SHOW ALL THE FLOOR
 PLANS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT, HIGHLIGHTING IN DIFFERENT COLOR THE NEW
 AREAS (SQ.FT.) ADDED. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THERE IS ANY
 OTHER VARIANCE REQUESTED.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PLEASE CLARIFY IF YOU MEET THE MAX.
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT ON THE 3RD FLOOR. SEE MORE IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS COMMENTS.
  
  
  
 2.ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS:
  
 A. PLEASE PROVIDE RENDERINGS.
  
 RESPONSE: RENDERINGS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED WITH THIS
 RESUBMITTAL. NOTE THAT THESE ARE FOR MASSING PURPOSES,
 AS LANDSCAPE DETAILS MAY NOT NECESSARILY MATCH THE
 DETAILS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, PRIOR TO
 DAC REVIEW, THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 STREET-LEVEL THREE-DIMENSIONAL RENDERINGS FOR THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALL BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT
 SITES, PUBLIC SPACES AND STREETS TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE
 NEW BUILDING RELATES TO THE SURROUNDING AREA.
 RENDERINGS WILL NEED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
 INCLUDING LANDSCAPING, FACADE MATERIALS, AS WELL AS
 EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. DRAWINGS OF RENDERINGS
 WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
  
 B. PLEASE INCLUDE BOTH PROPERTIES FLOOR PLANS (GROUND
 FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR) INTO ONE DRAWING TO ILLUSTRATE
 THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE AND HOW THEY PHYSICALLY CONNECT
 OR NOT AS YOU DO A-102. FOR EXAMPLE, COMBINING A-201
 WITH A-301 TO SHOW GROUND FLOORS OF BOTH PROPERTIES,
 AND THEIR RELATION TO THE SURROUNDING AREAS SUCH AS
 SIDEWALK, ADJACENT BUILDINGS, PROPERTY LINE, ALLEY,
 ETC. THIS WILL ALSO HELP ILLUSTRATE CLEARLY PEDESTRIAN
 CIRCULATION AND EGRESS/INGRESS ON BOTH PROPERTIES.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS
 OF ALL FLOORS. THE ONLY CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO
 PROPERTIES IS VIA THE ROOFTOP. NO CONNECTIONS ARE
 AVAILABLE OR PROPOSED ON THE GROUND FLOOR, SECOND FLOOR
 OR THIRD FLOOR.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. ONLY LIFE SAFETY PLANS WERE
 COMBINED. FROM A-201 TO A- 304, FLOOR PLANS ARE SHOWN
 FOR EACH PROPERTY. PLEASE ADD TO GROUND FLOOR PLANS THE
 SIDEWALK AND ALLEY AREAS AS SHOWN ON PSP-1 TO
 ILLUSTRATE THE INGRESS/EGRESS AND RELATION TO THE SITE.
 PLEASE ADD SCALE TO SHEETS.
  
  
 C. AS THIS IS A RENOVATION, PLEASE CLEARLY
 DIFFERENTIATE WHAT IS EXISTING AND WHAT IS NEW OR
 CHANGING IN EVERY FLOOR PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, A-101 TABLE
 SHOWS THAT ON THE GROUND FLOOR THERE WILL BE 85 SQ.FT.
 ADDED BUT THERE IS NO SHEET OR DIAGRAM THAT ILLUSTRATES
 THE AREA THAT IS ADDED.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. NO CHANGES WERE MADE FROM
 PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL ON FLOOR PLANS. AS MENTIONED BEFORE,
 AS THE VARIANCE IS DRIVEN BY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF
 THE SITE AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS MOSTLY A
 RENOVATION AND EXPANSION, PLEASE PROVIDE DRAWINGS THAT
 CLEARLY SHOW ALL THE FLOOR PLANS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
 AND HIGHLIGHTING IN DIFFERENT COLOR THE NEW AREAS
 (SQ.FT.).
  
 D. SEPARATE DIAGRAM SHEETS ARE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
 REGULATIONS. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DATA TABLE FOR
 SOME REGULATIONS THAT THE PROJECT NEEDS TO MEET, BUT
 DIAGRAMS ARE NEEDED TO ILLUSTRATE WHAT IS BEING
 INCLUDED/EXCLUDED FROM CALCULATIONS. FOR EXAMPLE:
  
 I. A-101 SHOWS TABLE WITH AREA CALCULATIONS BUT ONLY
 SHOWS THE 313 CLEMATIS ST. PROPERTY FLOOR PLAN, AND IT
 DOES NOT HIGHLIGHT THE AREA ON THE FLOOR PLAN THAT IS
 INCLUDED FOR FAR AND GBA CALCULATIONS.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: ON
 PSP-1, PLEASE ADD REQUIRED AND PROPOSED MAX. BUILDING
 FOOTPRINT FOR GROUND TO 2 (32???) FLOORS AND 3 TO 5
 (68???). ALSO REFERENCE SHEET WHERE YOU ARE SHOWING, ON
 THE FLOOR PLANS, THE AREAS YOU ARE CONSIDERING FOR YOU
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW TO MEASURE
 FOOTPRINT, PLEASE SEE SEC. 94-109. SINCE A 3RD FLOOR
 WILL BE ADDED TO 313 CLEMATIS, IT WILL NEED TO MEET THE
 MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT PERCENTAGE OF 70%. NOTE, AS
 PER SECTION 94-54 (D)(4)(E), AN INCREASE IN MAX.
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS A VARIANCE THAT DAC CAN???T
 AUTHORIZE, SO PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS ON HOW YOU
 MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 II. ON DIAGRAMS AND DRAWINGS PLEASE ADD APPROPRIATE
 DRAWING ELEMENTS SUCH AS PROPERTY LINES, SETBACK LINES,
 AND DIMENSIONS TO SEE HOW EACH THE PROJECT IS MEETING
 (OR NOT) THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. NOTE, THE SETBACK
 DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB AND THE
 NEAREST BUILDING SURFACE. PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109,
 'SETBACK' DEFINITION FOR MORE INFORMATION.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. SETBACKS: ON PSP-1, PLEASE
 REFERENCE THE SHEET WHERE YOU ARE SHOWING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE SETBACKS REQUIREMENTS. THE
 SHEET(S) SHOULD SHOW SIDEWALK AND CURBS IN ALL FLOORS
 SO IT IS CLEAR WHERE THE SETBACK LINES FALL IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT AND THAT DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF
 THE CURB. ADD THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB
 TO MINIMUM/MAX SETBACK AND THE 56' CONDITIONAL SETBACKS
 LINES. IN ADDITION, ADD DIMENSIONS OF SETBACK LINE AND
 THE BUILDING FACADE.
  
  
 III. INCLUDE ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS, VERTICAL DIMENSIONS
 TO CLEARLY SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS HEIGHT
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109, 'HEIGHT'
 DEFINITION AND FIGURE IV-13 FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW
 IS MEASURED. ON ELEVATIONS, ALSO ADD SETBACK LINES
 (FRONT, SIDE, AND REAR SETBACKS) TO SHOW HOW THE
 PROJECT MEETS REQUIREMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE: OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT IS ILLUSTRATED ON
 A-403.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON PSP-1 SHEET,
 PLEASE REFERENCE THE SHEET YOU ARE SHOWING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. ON A-403,
 ONLY 309 ELEVATION IS SHOWING, PLEASE MAKE SURE TO SHOW
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH INCLUDE BOTH
 PROPERTIES, OR REFERENCE 2 SHEETS FOR EACH PROPERTY.
 ALSO, ON ELEVATIONS SHEETS, PLEASE SHOW THE MAX HEIGHT
 DIMENSION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DIMENSION, AS WELL
 AS DIMENSIONS FOR EACH FLOOR.
  
  
 IV.AS PER SEC. 94-122, TABLE IV-26, THERE IS A REQUIRED
 MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE, MINIMUM
 TRANSPARENCY, MINIMUM LINER DEPTH, PLEASE SHOW ON
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, TABLE CALCULATIONS, AND
 DIAGRAMS SHEETS HOW THE PROJECT MEETS REGULATIONS.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. OPEN SPACE: ON PSP-1 SHEET,
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQ.FT YOU ARE PROVIDING OF THE
 REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, 20% TERRACE WITHIN THE
 SETBACK ATOP 2ND STORY (32'). REFERENCE SHEET LP-1 ON
 TABLE. ON LP-1 SHEET, HIGHLIGHT IN A DIFFERENT COLOR
 THE AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED AS YOUR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
 ON THE SAME SHEET, SHOW IN THE TABLE AND ON THE FLOOR
 PLANS THE AREAS OF THE VEGETATED AND OVERHEAD COVER
 PERCENTAGES AS REQUIRED IN SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-7.
  
 ACTIVE USE: THE REQUIRED ACTIVE USE FOR CLEMATIS ST. IS
 ON THE GROUND FLOOR 80% AND ON THE 2ND STORY IS 60%,
 PLEASE REVISE TABLE ON PSP-1 SHEET. REFERENCE SHEET
 WHERE YOU SHOW THE DIMENSIONS ON THE FLOOR PLANS YOU
 ARE INCLUDING IN YOUR CALCULATIONS. AS PER SECTION
 94-109, ACTIVE USE IS MEASURE AS THE PERCENTAGE OF THE
 'BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE', PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION
 ON THE PLAN, AS WELL AS THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED
 ACTIVE USES ON GROUND FLOOR AND 2ND FLOOR.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS SHEETS TO SHOW
 HOW THE MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY FOR ACTIVE USES ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR IS MET. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW TO
 MEASURE TRANSPARENCY SEE SEC. 94-109.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS SHEETS TO SHOW
 HOW MINIMUM ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH FOR THE GROUND FLOOR
 AND THE 2ND STORY IS MEET. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW
 TO MEASURE TRANSPARENCY SEE SEC. 94-109.
  
  
 E. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW
 WITH CALCULATIONS TABLES AND DIAGRAMS HOW YOU ARE
 MEETING THE FOLLOWING:
  
 I. SEC. 94-105 & SEC. 94-106, USE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR
 GENERAL USES WITH SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INFORMATION ON THE
 'ZONING TABLE' ON A-101 SHEET SHOULD MATCH AND BE
 INCLUDED IN THE PSP-1 TABULAR DATA. ON PSP-1, LINES
 'EXISTING' AND 'PROPOSE USE' SHOW 'PUB', PLEASE REVISE.
 IN ADDITION, PROVIDE SQ. FT. FOR OFFICE, AND FOR OTHER
 COMMERCIAL.
  
 II. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CHANGING THE FACADE OF
 313 CLEMATIS ST., PLEASE SHOW HOW IT MEETS THE SEC.
 94-109, TABLE IV-4.- FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS
 AND SHEET DIAGRAMS ON HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 MEETS TRANSPARENCY AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS PER
 SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-4.
  
 III. FOR NEW BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT ENCROACH OVER THE
 ROW, PLEASE SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS SEC. 94-109,
 TABLE IV-5.- PROJECTION STANDARDS. FEEL FREE TO USE
 SECTIONS THAT CAN CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE WITH DIMENSIONS
 HOW PROJECTIONS STANDARDS ARE MET.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. SHEET A-402 SHOWS A 6'
 BALCONY ENCROACHMENT ON THE SIDEWALK, PLEASE PROVIDE A
 SECTION SHEET THAT SHOWS ENCROACHMENT AND REVIEW
 STANDARDS TO SEE IF MEETS THE CODE. SHEETS A- 407, 504,
 505, 507 SHOW ROOF BALCONY ENCROACHMENT, BUT THE SIZE
 AND DESIGN ARE DIFFERENT ON SHEETS, PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF ANY DECORATIVE COLUMNS, BALCONY
 BRACKETS, DECORATIVE STONE BANDS ARE BELOW OR WITHIN
 THE MAX HORIZONTAL ENCROACHMENT OF 2 FT. PLEASE CLARIFY
 IF YOU ARE NOT ADDING ANY AWNINGS OR SIGNS ON THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. IF SO, PLEASE SHOW HOW THEY MEET
 REGULATIONS.
  
  
 IV. AS MENTIONED BEFORE, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS
 REQUIRED, ON LANDSCAPE PLANS, 'OPEN SPACE' NEEDS TO BE
 DEFINED AS THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THE PROPERTY.
 PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-7 OPEN SPACE
 STANDARDS AND REVISE PLANS, TABLE CALCULATIONS, AND
 CREATE DIAGRAMS TO SHOW HOW IT MEETS THE STANDARDS.
 MORE COMMENTS ON 4. LANDSCAPE PLANS COMMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED LANDSCAPE PLANS LP-1
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. ON PSP-1 SHEET, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE SQ.FT. YOU ARE PROVIDING OF THE REQUIRED
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, 20% TERRACE WITHIN THE SETBACK ATOP
 2ND STORY (32'). REFERENCE SHEET LP-1. ON LP-1 SHEET,
 HIGHLIGHTED IN A DIFFERENT COLOR THE AREA THAT IS
 DESIGNATED AS YOUR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. ON THE SAME
 SHEET, SHOW IN THE TABLE AND ON THE FLOOR PLANS THE
 AREAS OF THE VEGETATED AND OVERHEAD COVER PERCENTAGES
 AS REQUIRED IN SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-7.
  
  
 V. AS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS IN THE CLEMATIS
 WATERFRONT DISTRICT, CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ON AN
 ELEVATION DRAWING EXPLAIN FURTHER OR SHOW WITH PHOTOS
 OR DIAGRAMS HOW THE PROJECT'S SCALE AND CHARACTER ARE
 IN LINE WITH OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE BLOCK OR IN FRONT
 OF THE BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY IF
 SHEET A-401 IS WHAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO.
  
  
 3.SITE PLANS:
  
 A. PLEASE NOTE, THE DATA TABLE CAN BE ITS OWN SHEET. IN
 ADDITION, THE TABLE NEEDS TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED
 SECTIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY (SOME
 SECTIONS ARE MENTIONED ABOVE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWING COMMENTS). THE TABLE ALSO NEEDS TO CLEARLY SHOW
 REQUIREMENTS PER CODE AND WHAT IS PROPOSED.
  
 RESPONSE: THE PDR TABLE HAS BEEN REVISED ON SP-1
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REVIEW ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS COMMENTS AND REVISE TABLE AND PSP-1 SHEET.
  
 B. SITE PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE AND ADJACENT AREAS THAT WILL
 BE DIRECTLY IMPACTED OR CONNECTED BY AND TO THE
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST IN
 THE DMP APPLICATION AND ADD MISSING ITEMS, SUCH AS:
  
 I. VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN RELATION WITH
 THE SURROUNDING AREA.
  
 RESPONSE: THIS WAS PROVIDED ON SP-1. SEE SHEET SP-1 FOR
 VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN RELATION WITH THE
 SURROUNDING AREA
  
 II. LOCATION OF PROPERTY LINE, ROW, ALLEY, SIDEWALKS,
 PROPOSED/EXISTING EASEMENTS, ETC.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED SP-1 FOR PROPERTY LINE, ROW,
 ALLEY AND SIDEWALK DETAILS. SEE
  
 III. LOCATION, HEIGHT AND SIZE OF SIGNS, LIGHT
 FIXTURES, BIKE RACKS, FIRE HYDRANTS, TREES, LANDSCAPE
 AREAS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES EXISTING OR PROPOSED.
  
  RESPONSE: SEE REVISED SP-1
  
 IV. MEANS OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO AND FROM THE SITE,
 LOCATION AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES AND
 GARBAGE COMPACTORS ON THE ALLEY THAT SERVE THE
 BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE SHEET A-101 FOR THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS FOR BOTH PROPERTIES; SEE REVISED SURVEY FOR THE
 LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER.
  
 V. THE DELINEATION OF EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 IN FRONT OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED SP-1. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 3 ON
 STREET PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SITE THAT. NO
 CHANGES ARE PROPOSED TO THE NUMBER, LOCATION OR LAYOUT
 OF THOSE SPACES
  
 VI. LANDSCAPED AREAS EXISTING OR PROPOSED
  
 RESPONSE: SHEET LP-1 HAS BEEN REVISED TO IDENTIFY THE
 EXISTING STREET LANDSCAPING. NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED TO
 ANY STREETSCAPE FEATURES, INCLUDING TREES. ALL
 LANDSCAPING PROPOSED IS LOCATED IN THE ROOFTOP LEVEL.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. ON SHEET PSP-1, SHOW GROUND
 FLOOR PLAN, INSTEAD OF 3RD AND 4THFLOORS, TO SHOW HOW
 THE DEVELOPMENT IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE
 SURROUNDING AREAS, HOW PEDESTRIANS WILL ACCESS THE
 SITE, WHERE TRASH WILL BE STORE AND COLLECTED FROM.
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO USE COLORS TO SHOW CLEARLY STREETS,
 LANDSCAPE AREAS, FLOORS, ETC. IN ADDITION, PLEASE CLEAN
 UP THE DRAWING AS THERE ARE SOME LINES THAT LOOK LIKE
 WALLS, OR MULTIPLE LINES THAT LOOK LIKE PROPERTY LINES.
 ADD MIN AND MAX SETBACK LINES IN RED.
  
  
  
 4. LANDSCAPE PLANS:
  
 A. AS PER SEC. 94-122, TABLE IV-26, THERE IS A REQUIRED
 MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE OF "20% TERRACE WITHIN
 SETBACK ATOP 2ND STORY (32')". PROVIDE A DIAGRAM TO
 SHOW THE AREA YOU ARE CONSIDERING AS THE REQUIRED 20%
 TERRACE. REVIEW SEC. 94-109 'TERRACE' DEFINITION AND
 TABLE IV-6 IF YOU NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION. IN
 ADDITION, REVISE TABLE CALCULATIONS AND CREATE DIAGRAMS
 TO SHOW HOW REQUIREMENTS IN TABLE IV-7 ARE MET FOR
 'VEGETATED' AREA AND 'OVERHEAD COVER' AREA.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. ON PSP-1 SHEET, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE SQ.FT YOU ARE PROVIDING OF THE REQUIRED
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, 20% TERRACE WITHIN THE SETBACK ATOP
 2ND STORY (32'). REFERENCE SHEET LP-1. ON LP-1 SHEET,
 HIGHLIGHTED IN A DIFFERENT COLOR THE AREA THAT IS
 DESIGNATED AS YOUR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. ON THE SAME
 SHEET, SHOW IN THE TABLE AND ON THE FLOOR PLANS THE
 AREAS OF THE VEGETATED AND OVERHEAD COVER PERCENTAGES
 AS REQUIRED IN SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-7.
  
 B. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND
 CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE ARE MET.
  
 RESPONSE: THE PLANS HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO MATCH. SHEET
 LP-1 HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE AREA.
 THE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP [TERRACE] AREA IS 85% AND IS
 INCLUDED ON THE SP-1 TABULAR CHART.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - NOT SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT ABOVE.
  
 C. PLEASE REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKLIST IN THE DMP
 APPLICATION TO MAKE SURE ALL ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN
 PLANS, SUCH AS:
  
 I. LOCATIONS OF ROW, PROPERTY LINES, ADJACENT STREETS,
 ALLEY AND ACCESS WAYS, EXISTING AND PROPOSED SETBACKS
 IN ALL SIDES OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE.
  
 RESPONSE: SEE REVISED LANDSCAPE PLANS
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD SETBACK
 MIN AND MAX LINES IN RED. REMOVE ANY OTHER LINES THAT
 MAY APPEAR AS PROPERTY LINES OR WALLS.
  
  
 II. LOCATION OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED TREES, SHRUBS,
 GROUND COVERS, ETC. AND IDENTIFY WITH LABELS TREES ON
 SIDEWALKS.
  
 RESPONSE: THIS HAS BEEN UPDATED ON SP-1
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL
 SHEETS ARE CONSISTENT IN DESIGN.
  
 III. LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE
 RECEPTACLES, OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS, AND GARBAGE
 COMPACTOR OR OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN SITE OR
 ADJACENT TO THE SITE. PLEASE SHOW HOW GARBAGE WILL BE
 MANAGED INSIDE THE PROPERTY.
  
 RESPONSE: AN INTERNAL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN ADDED
 TO THE GROUND FLOOR OF 313 CLEMATIS. THIS DUMPSTER IS
 AN 8 YARD ROLLING DUMPSTER AND IS SUFFICIENT TO MEET
 THE NEEDS OF THE BUSINESS. SEE SHEET A-201 FOR DETAILS.
  
 Z 02.10.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY IF
 DUMPSTER IS SCREENED AS PER SEC. 94-315.
  
 IV. THE DELINEATION OF EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING
 SPACES IN FRONT OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY.
  
 RESPONSE: THIS HAS BEEN ADDED TO SP-1
  
 Z 02.10.23 - SATISFIED.
  
 5. SURVEY PLANS: AN UPDATED SURVEY WOULD NEED TO BE
 SUBMITTED IF THE SURVEY SUBMITTED ON 12.13.2022 DOES
 NOT REFLECT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR BOTH
 PROPERTIES.
  
 RESPONSE: AN UPDATED SURVEY HAS BEEN PROVIDED
  
 Z 02.10.23 - SATISFIED.
  
  
 6. OTHER COMMENTS:
  
 PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT
 SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A
 REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH
 COMMENTS. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
 WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE APPLICATION AS
 WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF
 THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT MAY REQUEST A
 30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION REQUEST IS
 PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED APPLICATIONS
 SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH
 COMMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED
 TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER
 COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF
 ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE
 APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 LASTLY, YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
 ADDITIONAL COST. AS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
 TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE, WHICH IS $300.
  
  
 --END OF COMMENTS--
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-11-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By cibaven Date 01-11-2023 Time 14:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cibaven Date 01-11-2023 Time 14:52 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-11 14:51:55ZONING AND PLANNING
 PROJECT: ROXY'S RENOVATION AND EXPANSION Z22120027
 CONTACT CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT
 561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
 - PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER BY THE PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION 561-684-4030.
 - ON PROJECT FAST SHEET, REVISE THE TABLE ZONING AND
 FUTURE LAND USE AND EXISTING USES, FROM CURRENT ZONING,
 SUBJECT AREA NORTH 'CWD-CD' TO THE CORRECT 'CWD-10'.
 - PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLANS/DOCUMENTS.
 - PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR ANY AERIAL EASEMENTS FOR 309
 CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY AND IF A NEW AERIAL EASEMENT IS
 NEEDED FOR 313 CLEMATIS ST.
 - PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE
 TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION
 SERVICES.
 - PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES.
 - PLEASE SHARE ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH THAT HAS BEEN DONE
 FOR THE PROJECT.
 - PER SEC. 94-39 (J)(4) AND SEC. 94-54 (B)(3), THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO MEET PROCEDURES OF
 NOTICES OF PUBLIC MEETINGS. AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING
 DIRECTOR, THE NOTICE WILL NEED TO INCLUDE THE EXPECTED
 60-DAY CLOSURE OF CLEMATIS STREET BETWEEN SOUTH OLIVE
 AVE AND S DIXIE HWY WHILE THE PROJECT IS IN
 CONSTRUCTION TO INFORM NEIGHBORS.
 - THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE CITY OF WPB'S ART LIFE
 ASSESSMENT. PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN
 PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR AT 561-822-1521 OR VIA EMAIL
 AT [email protected].
  
  
 1.- JUSTIFICATION LETTER:
  
 - AS DESCRIBED ON THE LETTER "PROPERTIES ARE DESIGNED
 TO FUNCTION AS ONE COHESIVE PROPERTY", PLEASE CLARIFY
 IF BOTH PROPERTIES ARE ONLY CONNECTED VIA THE ROOFTOP
 AND NOT ON THE GROUND FLOOR OR 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR.
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL USE
 OF THE 313 CLEMATIS ST. PROPERTY. IF THE INTENTION IS
 TO ACTIVATE THE VACANT BUILDING, PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER
 WHAT TYPE OF USE THE GROUND FLOOR, SECOND FLOOR, AND
 THIRD FLOOR WILL HAVE. IS THE GROUND FLOOR A NEW
 RESTAURANT OR A BAR? ARE 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR OFFICES?
 WILL THE ROOFTOP BE PART OF THE EXISTING BAR/PUB? WILL
 BOTH PROPERTIES FUNCTION AS ONE BUSINESS OR SEPARATE
 BUSINESSES?
  
 NOTE, IF NEW SPACES WILL BE 'ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
 ESTABLISHMENTS', PLEASE REVIEW WPB CODE OF ORDINANCES,
 CHAPTER 6- ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND ADDRESS HOW THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET THE CITY CODE.
  
 - PLEASE REVISE SECTION 'REQUEST 1: SITE PLAN REVIEW',
 THERE ARE SOME RESPONSES THAT ARE DESCRIBING A
 DIFFERENT PROJECT AND SOME SENTENCES ARE INCOMPLETE.
 PER SEC. 94-54 (B), THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO
 SPECIAL REVIEW BY DAC AS IT IS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF
 THE CLEMATIS WATERFRONT CONSERVATION DISTRICT (CWD-CD).
 PLEASE RESPONSE ON THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER HOW THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL
 REVIEW. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE STANDARDS PLEASE
 CHECK SEC. 94-54 (B)(2).
  
 - ON RESPONSE E), VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE CLARIFY
 WHAT ARE "VERTICAL PROJECTIONS", IS THERE A PORTION OF
 THE BUILDING/FACADE WALL ON THE 3RD FLOOR OF 313
 CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY MEETING THE SETBACK? AND EXPLAIN
 FURTHER WHY THE ADDITION OF THE ONE FLOOR IS THE
 "MINIMUM AMOUNT NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT".
  
 - ON RESPONSE J), VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE EXPLAIN
 FURTHER THE MEANING OF 'DIMENSIONAL CHALLENGE'.
  
  
 2.- ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS:
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RENDERINGS.
  
 - PLEASE INCLUDE BOTH PROPERTIES FLOOR PLANS (GROUND
 FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR) INTO ONE DRAWING TO ILLUSTRATE
 THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE AND HOW THEY PHYSICALLY CONNECT
 OR NOT AS YOU DO A-102. FOR EXAMPLE, COMBINING A-201
 WITH A-301 TO SHOW GROUND FLOORS OF BOTH PROPERTIES,
 AND THEIR RELATION TO THE SURROUNDING AREAS SUCH AS
 SIDEWALK, ADJACENT BUILDINGS, PROPERTY LINE, ALLEY,
 ETC. THIS WILL ALSO HELP ILLUSTRATE CLEARLY PEDESTRIAN
 CIRCULATION AND EGRESS/INGRESS ON BOTH PROPERTIES.
  
 - AS THIS IS A RENOVATION, PLEASE CLEARLY DIFFERENTIATE
 WHAT IS EXISTING AND WHAT IS NEW OR CHANGING IN EVERY
 FLOOR PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, A-101 TABLE SHOWS THAT ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR THERE WILL BE 85 SQ.FT. ADDED BUT THERE IS
 NO SHEET OR DIAGRAM THAT ILLUSTRATES THE AREA THAT IS
 ADDED.
  
 - SEPARATE DIAGRAM SHEETS ARE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
 REGULATIONS. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DATA TABLE FOR
 SOME REGULATIONS THAT THE PROJECT NEEDS TO MEET, BUT
 DIAGRAMS ARE NEEDED TO ILLUSTRATE WHAT IS BEING
 INCLUDED/EXCLUDED FROM CALCULATIONS. FOR EXAMPLE:
  
 O A-101 SHOWS TABLE WITH AREA CALCULATIONS BUT ONLY
 SHOWS THE 313 CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY FLOOR PLAN, AND IT
 DOES NOT HIGHLIGHT THE AREA ON THE FLOOR PLAN THAT IS
 INCLUDED FOR FAR AND GBA CALCULATIONS.
 O ON DIAGRAMS AND DRAWINGS PLEASE ADD APPROPRIATE
 DRAWING ELEMENTS SUCH AS PROPERTY LINES, SETBACK LINES,
 AND DIMENSIONS TO SEE HOW EACH THE PROJECT IS MEETING
 (OR NOT) THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. NOTE, THE SETBACK
 DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB AND THE
 NEAREST BUILDING SURFACE. PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109,
 'SETBACK' DEFINITION FOR MORE INFORMATION.
 O INCLUDE ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS, VERTICAL DIMENSIONS TO
 CLEARLY SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109, 'HEIGHT' DEFINITION AND
 FIGURE IV-13 FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW IS MEASURED.
 ON ELEVATIONS, ALSO ADD SETBACK LINES (FRONT, SIDE, AND
 REAR SETBACKS) TO SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS
 REQUIREMENTS.
 O AS PER SEC. 94-122, TABLE IV-26, THERE IS A REQUIRED
 MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE, MINIMUM
 TRANSPARENCY, MINIMUM LINER DEPTH, PLEASE SHOW ON
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, TABLE CALCULATIONS, AND
 DIAGRAMS SHEETS HOW THE PROJECT MEETS REGULATIONS.
  
 - PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW
 WITH CALCULATIONS TABLES AND DIAGRAMS HOW YOU ARE
 MEETING THE FOLLOWING:
  
 O SEC. 94-105 & SEC. 94-106, USE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR
 GENERAL USES WITH SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.
 O THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CHANGING THE FACADE OF
 313 CLEMATIS ST, PLEASE SHOW HOW IT MEETS THE SEC.
 94-109, TABLE IV-4.- FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.
 O FOR NEW BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT ENCROACH OVER THE ROW,
 PLEASE SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS SEC. 94-109, TABLE
 IV-5.- PROJECTION STANDARDS. FEEL FREE TO USE SECTIONS
 THAT CAN CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE WITH DIMENSIONS HOW
 PROJECTIONS STANDARDS ARE MET.
 O AS MENTIONED BEFORE, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED,
 ON LANDSCAPE PLANS, 'OPEN SPACE' NEEDS TO BE DEFINED AS
 THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THE PROPERTY. PLEASE REVIEW
 SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-7 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS AND REVISE
 PLANS, TABLE CALCULATIONS, AND CREATE DIAGRAMS TO SHOW
 HOW IT MEETS THE STANDARDS. MORE COMMENTS ON 4.
 LANDSCAPE PLANS COMMENTS.
 O AS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS IN THE CLEMATIS
 WATERFRONT DISTRICT, CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ON AN
 ELEVATION DRAWING EXPLAIN FURTHER OR SHOW WITH PHOTOS
 OR DIAGRAMS HOW THE PROJECT'S SCALE AND CHARACTER ARE
 IN LINE WITH OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE BLOCK OR IN FRONT
 OF THE BUILDING.
  
  
 3.- SITE PLANS:
  
 - PLEASE NOTE, THE DATA TABLE CAN BE ITS OWN SHEET. IN
 ADDITION, THE TABLE NEEDS TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED
 SECTIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY (SOME
 SECTIONS ARE MENTIONED ABOVE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWING COMMENTS). THE TABLE ALSO NEEDS TO CLEARLY SHOW
 REQUIREMENTS PER CODE AND WHAT IS PROPOSED.
  
 - SITE PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE AND ADJACENT AREAS THAT WILL
 BE DIRECTLY IMPACTED OR CONNECTED BY AND TO THE
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST IN
 THE DMP APPLICATION AND ADD MISSING ITEMS, SUCH AS:
 O VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN RELATION WITH
 THE SURROUNDING AREA.
 O LOCATION OF PROPERTY LINE, ROW, ALLEY, SIDEWALKS,
 PROPOSED/EXISTING EASEMENTS, ETC.
 O LOCATION, HEIGHT AND SIZE OF SIGNS, LIGHT FIXTURES,
 BIKE RACKS, FIRE HYDRANTS, TREES, LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES EXISTING OR PROPOSED.
 O MEANS OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO AND FROM THE SITE.
 O LOCATION AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES AND
 GARBAGE COMPACTORS ON THE ALLEY THAT SERVE THE
 BUILDING.
 O THE DELINEATION OF EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 IN FRONT OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY.
 O LANDSCAPED AREAS EXISTING OR PROPOSED
  
  
 4.- LANDSCAPE PLANS:
  
 - AS PER SEC. 94-122, TABLE IV-26, THERE IS A REQUIRED
 MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE OF "20% TERRACE WITHIN
 SETBACK ATOP 2ND STORY (32')". PROVIDE A DIAGRAM TO
 SHOW THE AREA YOU ARE CONSIDERING AS THE REQUIRED 20%
 TERRACE. REVIEW SEC. 94-109 'TERRACE' DEFINITION AND
 TABLE IV-6 IF YOU NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION. IN
 ADDITION, REVISE TABLE CALCULATIONS AND CREATE DIAGRAMS
 TO SHOW HOW REQUIREMENTS IN TABLE IV-7 ARE MET FOR
 'VEGETATED' AREA AND 'OVERHEAD COVER' AREA.
  
 - LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND
 CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE ARE MET.
  
 - PLEASE REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKLIST IN THE DMP
 APPLICATION TO MAKE SURE ALL ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN
 PLANS, SUCH AS:
 O LOCATIONS OF ROW, PROPERTY LINES, ADJACENT STREETS,
 ALLEY AND ACCESS WAYS, EXISTING AND PROPOSED SETBACKS
 IN ALL SIDES OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE.
 O LOCATION OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED TREES, SHRUBS,
 GROUND COVERS, ETC. AND IDENTIFY WITH LABELS TREES ON
 SIDEWALKS.
 O LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE
 RECEPTACLES, OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS, AND GARBAGE
 COMPACTOR OR OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN SITE OR
 ADJACENT TO THE SITE. PLEASE SHOW HOW GARBAGE WILL BE
 MANAGED INSIDE THE PROPERTY.
 O THE DELINEATION OF EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 IN FRONT OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY
  
  
 5.- SURVEY PLANS:
 AN UPDATED SURVEY WOULD NEED TO BE SUBMITTED IF THE
 SURVEY SUBMITTED ON 12.13.2022 DOES NOT REFLECT THE
 EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR BOTH PROPERTIES.
  
  
 6.- OTHER COMMENTS:
  
 PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT
 SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A
 REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE MEETING
 SCHEDULED ON 1/12/2023. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED
 SUBMITTALS WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE
 APPLICATION AS WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE
 EXPIRATION OF THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT
 MAY REQUEST A 30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION
 REQUEST IS PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED
 APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE
 DATE OF SUCH COMMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED
 TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER
 COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF
 ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE
 APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 --END OF COMMENTS---
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved