| 2023-01-27 17:08:49 | SOME OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) PERMIT APPLICATION IS ILLEGIBLE UNDER REASONS FOR |
| | REMOVAL OR RELOCATION. THE OWNER OR LISTED AUTHORIZED |
| | AGENT OF THE OWNER (PERSON LISTED IN SECTION I) SIGNS |
| | THE BOTTOM AND IT MUST BE NOTARIZED. |
| | |
| | 2) APPLICATION LISTS 13 TREES FOR RELOCATION. NEW TREES |
| | BEING INSTALLED ARE NOT "RELOCATED." PLEASE CORRECT IN |
| | NEW APPLCATION. |
| | |
| | 3) REASONS FOR REMOVAL OF TREES MUST COINCIDE WITH SEC |
| | 94-448 (D) 2. |
| | |
| | SEC 94-448 (D)2. |
| | |
| | REMOVAL OF TREES AND SHRUBS. A PERMIT TO REMOVE TREES |
| | AND VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS ONE OR MORE |
| | OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: |
| | 1. A. |
| | THE TREE IS NOT A DESIGNATED HISTORIC OR SPECIMEN TREE |
| | PER SECTION 94-448(C)(1)B. |
| | 2. B. |
| | THE TREE CANNOT BE RELOCATED ON OR OFF THE SITE BECAUSE |
| | OF ITS AGE, TYPE, OR SIZE. |
| | 3. C. |
| | THE TREES OR SHRUBS CONSTITUTE AN UNREASONABLE |
| | IMPEDIMENT TO DEVELOPMENT OF A PERMITTED USE OF THE |
| | PROPERTY BY VIRTUE OF THEIR LOCATION IN A BUILDABLE |
| | AREA OR YARD AREA WHERE STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE |
| | TO BE PLACED. |
| | 4. D. |
| | THE TREES OR SHRUBS ARE DISEASED, INJURED, IN DANGER OF |
| | FALLING, TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING OR PROPOSED STRUCTURES, |
| | INTERFERE WITH EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY SERVICES, |
| | CREATE UNSAFE VISUAL CONDITIONS AFFECTING VEHICULAR |
| | TRAFFIC, CONFLICT WITH REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER ORDINANCES |
| | OF THIS CHAPTER, OR ARE A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, |
| | SAFETY, AND WELFARE. |
| | 5. E. |
| | THE TREES THAT ARE PROHIBITED TREES AS SPECIFIED IN |
| | SUBSECTION 94-445(4)I. |
| | 6. F. |
| | THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S DECISION FOR |
| | REMOVAL WILL BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST. |
| | |
| | TREES LISTED AS A THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE |
| | REQUIRE A TREE RISK ASSESSMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) PER SEC 94-448 (D) 3. NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION |
| | MUST BE PRESERVE ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ARBORIST REPORT |
| | PROVIDED LIST THE CONDITIONS IN A PERCENTAGE. THE |
| | ARBORIST MUST REVISE THE CONDTIONS UNDER THE CATEGORIES |
| | OF "GOOD, FAIR, POOR" OR PROVIDE A KEY AS TO WHERE THE |
| | PERCENTAGES FIT INTO EACH CATEGORY. |
| | |
| | 5) PLEASE PROVIDE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE |
| | PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL/RELOCATION. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN. A SEPARATE |
| | LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7) REPORT RECOMMENDS TREES TO BE REPLACED WITH PALMS |
| | DUE TO SMALL ISLANDS. CODE REQUIRES CANOPY TREES IN |
| | ISLANDS. STAFF RECOMMENDS LOT BE RESTRIPED/RECONFIGURED |
| | TO ALLOW LARGER ISLANDS FOR TREES. PER CODE, ALL |
| | ISLANDS MUST HAVE TYPE D CURBING. |
| | |
| | SMITH AMISIAL |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOS OF ALL TREES AND PHOTOS THAT |
| | ACCURATELY DEPICT THEIR DEFECTS/REASON FOR REMOVAL. |