Plan Review Details - Project Z22100020
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22100020
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 01-13-2023 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 01-13-2023 Time 15:07 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-13 15:07:44APPLICANT DID NOT PROPOSE ANY ART ON SITE PLAN.
 APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGED ON APPLICATION #18 THAT THEY
 UNDERSTOOD THE REQUIREMENT FOR PAYMENT TO THE CITY???S
 PUBLIC ART PROGRAM.
 A PASS ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONDITIONAL ON THE BASIS
 THAT THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED OPTION #2 CONTRIBUTION
 INTO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT AT .75% OF THE 1%
 REQUIREMENT.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 11-10-2022 Time 12:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-10-2022 Time 12:56 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-10 13:06:39DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.7 FT NAVD.
 THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 4. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON LEVEL 4, 5 AND 6 ARE TOO
 FAR FROM THE ELEVATOR LOBBY. THEY SHOULD BE THE CLOSEST
 PARKING SPACES TO THE ELEVATOR LOBBY. PER SECTION 208.3
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 5. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. NO VAN ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ???VAN ACCESSIBLE??? AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 6. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 8. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 9. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 10. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE CAFE. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED
 TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN,
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 11. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 12. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 13. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 14. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 15. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-23-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-23-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 11-22-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-22 15:20:05PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT
 COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098
 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE SHEETS FOR PROPOSED UTILITY,
 PAVING, ETC. MODIFICATIONS.
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-25-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 10-25-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-25 11:52:45COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE SHEETS FOR PROPOSED UTILITY,
 PAVING, ETC. MODIFICATIONS.
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-14-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-14-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-14-2023 Time 13:13 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-14 13:13:413RD REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
 PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-04-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-04-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-04-2023 Time 15:34 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-04 15:35:482ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
 PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-27-2022 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-27 10:50:39THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE.
  
 TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING
 REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING
 CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM.
  
 A FDC SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE MAIN ENTRY AREA WITH THE
 OTHER LOCATED ON AUSTRALIAN AVE BY THE ACCESS TO THE
 LOBBY AREA.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14, 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS
 SHALL BE LOCATED NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE
 NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER
 SUPPLY.
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
  
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
  
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
  
 7D. THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE CONFIGURATION DOES NOT
 PROVIDE SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ENSURE A PROPER FIRE LANE
 HIEGHT, WIDTH NOR TURN AROUND RADIUS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSION DETAILS AND FIRE TRUCK
 AUTOTURN.
  
 COORDINATE AND REVIEW PROPOSED ACCESS WITH THE OFFICE
 OF THE FIRE MARSHAL.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC???S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC???S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE
 STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 A EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER WAS NOT SPECFICALY LOCATED
 ON THE FLOOR PLAN.
  
 THE LOCATION SHOULD BE LOCATED ON AN EXTERIOR WALL AND
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS BELOW:
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
  
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
  
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
  
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING
 INTERFERENCE ON FREQUENCIES ASSIGNED TO THE
 JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING
 MANAGER/OWNER SHALL SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT
 INSTALLATIONS THAT DEGRADE THE
 PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
  
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION
 OF SUCCESSFUL ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT
 SHALL BE ISSUED FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER
 THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 07-14-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 07-14-2023 Time 10:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 07-14-2023 Time 10:32 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-14 10:33:40FROM: KEVIE DEFRANC, SENIOR PLANNER 561-822-1449
 PROJECT: 1545 CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z22100020
 JULY 14, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION IN AN ARBORISTS
 REPORT RATING THE CONDITION FOR EACH OF THE TREES AND
 PALMS ON SITE AND ADD THE CONDITION IN A COLUMN ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION LIST. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
 SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF CONDITION RATINGS OF GOOD, FAIR, OR
 POOR. ALL DATA ON EACH TREE MUST BE PROVIDED WITH
 ACCURATE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR EACH TREE. RELOCATION
 ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT THIS IS NOT AN
 ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE DATA NEEDED FOR THE TREES ON
 SITE.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE REPORT WILL BE
 SUBMITTED LATER.
 4/19/2023 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT HAS NOT BEEN
 PROVIDED.
 5/25/23 ARBORIST REPORT NEEDS TO EXPLAIN THE RATINGS OF
 EACH NATIVE TREE PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL THAT IS NOT IN
 GOOD CONDITION. ALL NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION MUST
 BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED OR THE ARBORIST REPORT MUST
 PROVIDE WHY THESE TREES CANNOT BE RELOCATED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND NARRATIVE FOR
 INSTALLATION OF TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS FOR THE TREES
 TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION. THERE WILL BE AN EXTREME
 LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY TO PROTECT THE REMAINING TREES
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING AND POSSIBLE FILL
 FROM ANY ELEVATION DIFFERENCE FOR THE FINISHED FLOOR
 LEVEL.
 1/13/23 PROVIDE NARRATIVE FOR HOW TREES WILL BE
 PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHEET LP-1 SHOWS A DEFICIT IN TREE CANOPY
 MITIGATION. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS IF PAYMENT IN LIEU IS
 CHOSEN.
 1/13/23 CURRENT VALUE OF CATEGORY 1 TREE PROVIDING 300
 SQ FT OF CREDIT FOR MITIGATION IS $500.00
  
 4. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? GROUNDCOVER SHOWN HAS NO NATIVE SPECIES, SO DESIGN
 OPTION (3)(D) CANNOT BE TAKEN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ALIGN THE
 COLUMNS FOR FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 6. SATISFIED. FILL IN NON-NATIVE COLUMN FOR
 BOUGAINVILLEA AND CAT PALM.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 AND THE PLAN TO SHOW THE 15 FOOT REQUIRED BUFFER ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT AS A SEPARATE
 LINE ON THE CHART. SEE COMMENT #10.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED
 LATER.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 16-21:
  
 10. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. REQUIRES A BUFFER WITH A MINIMUM
 AVERAGE WIDTH OF 15 FEET.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED WHEN FINAL PLANS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM
 OF 33 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, ALL SHRUB AND HEDGE
 MATERIAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES UPON PLANTING.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
 1/13/23 THIS IS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 4/19/23 SHOW LOCATION OF SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION
 SYSTEM.
 5/25/23 MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE
 NOTE REFERRING TO THE LATEST RESOLUTION (16-21) AND THE
 CORRECT SECTION (7).
  
 15. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST
 50 PERCENT OF THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO
 SOIL CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 05-25-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 05-25-2023 Time 09:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 05-25-2023 Time 09:13 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-25 09:14:29FROM: KEVIE DEFRANC, SENIOR PLANNER 561-822-1449
 PROJECT: 1545 CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z22100020
 MAY 25, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION IN AN
 ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION FOR EACH OF THE
 TREES AND PALMS ON SITE AND ADD THE CONDITION IN A
 COLUMN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST. ANSI A 300 (PART
 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF CONDITION RATINGS OF
 GOOD, FAIR, OR POOR. ALL DATA ON EACH TREE MUST BE
 PROVIDED WITH ACCURATE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR EACH TREE.
 RELOCATION ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT THIS IS
 NOT AN ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE DATA NEEDED FOR THE
 TREES ON SITE.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE REPORT WILL BE
 SUBMITTED LATER.
 4/19/2023 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT HAS NOT BEEN
 PROVIDED.
 5/25/23 ARBORIST REPORT NEEDS TO EXPLAIN THE RATINGS OF
 EACH NATIVE TREE PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL THAT IS NOT IN
 GOOD CONDITION. ALL NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION MUST
 BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED OR THE ARBORIST REPORT MUST
 PROVIDE WHY THESE TREES CANNOT BE RELOCATED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND NARRATIVE FOR
 INSTALLATION OF TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS FOR THE TREES
 TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION. THERE WILL BE AN EXTREME
 LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY TO PROTECT THE REMAINING TREES
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING AND POSSIBLE FILL
 FROM ANY ELEVATION DIFFERENCE FOR THE FINISHED FLOOR
 LEVEL.
 1/13/23 PROVIDE NARRATIVE FOR HOW TREES WILL BE
 PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHEET LP-1 SHOWS A DEFICIT IN TREE CANOPY
 MITIGATION. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS IF PAYMENT IN LIEU IS
 CHOSEN.
 1/13/23 CURRENT VALUE OF CATEGORY 1 TREE PROVIDING 300
 SQ FT OF CREDIT FOR MITIGATION IS $500.00
  
 4. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? GROUNDCOVER SHOWN HAS NO NATIVE SPECIES, SO DESIGN
 OPTION (3)(D) CANNOT BE TAKEN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ALIGN THE
 COLUMNS FOR FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 6. SATISFIED. FILL IN NON-NATIVE COLUMN FOR
 BOUGAINVILLEA AND CAT PALM.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 AND THE PLAN TO SHOW THE 15 FOOT REQUIRED BUFFER ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT AS A SEPARATE
 LINE ON THE CHART. SEE COMMENT #10.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED
 LATER.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 16-21:
  
 10. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. REQUIRES A BUFFER WITH A MINIMUM
 AVERAGE WIDTH OF 15 FEET.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM
 THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED WHEN FINAL PLANS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM
 OF 33 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, ALL SHRUB AND HEDGE
 MATERIAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES UPON PLANTING.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP
 EQUIPMENT AND SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET
 CONDITION #11 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM
 LAKES.
 1/13/23 THIS IS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 4/19/23 SHOW LOCATION OF SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION
 SYSTEM.
 5/25/23 MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE
 NOTE REFERRING TO THE LATEST RESOLUTION (16-21) AND THE
 CORRECT SECTION (7).
  
 15. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST
 50 PERCENT OF THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO
 SOIL CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-19-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 04-19-2023 Time 09:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 04-19-2023 Time 09:36 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-19 09:37:25FROM: KEVIE DEFRANC, SENIOR PLANNER 561-822-1449
 PROJECT: 1545 CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z22100020
 APRIL 19, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION IN AN
 ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION FOR EACH OF THE
 TREES AND PALMS ON SITE AND ADD THE CONDITION IN A
 COLUMN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST. ANSI A 300 (PART
 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF CONDITION RATINGS OF
 GOOD, FAIR, OR POOR. ALL DATA ON EACH TREE MUST BE
 PROVIDED WITH ACCURATE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR EACH TREE.
 RELOCATION ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT THIS IS
 NOT AN ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE DATA NEEDED FOR THE
 TREES ON SITE.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE REPORT WILL BE
 SUBMITTED LATER.
 4/19/2023 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT HAS NOT BEEN
 PROVIDED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND NARRATIVE FOR
 INSTALLATION OF TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS FOR THE TREES
 TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION. THERE WILL BE AN EXTREME
 LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY TO PROTECT THE REMAINING TREES
 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING AND POSSIBLE FILL
 FROM ANY ELEVATION DIFFERENCE FOR THE FINISHED FLOOR
 LEVEL.
 1/13/23 PROVIDE NARRATIVE FOR HOW TREES WILL BE
 PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHEET LP-1 SHOWS A DEFICIT IN TREE CANOPY
 MITIGATION. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS IF PAYMENT IN LIEU IS
 CHOSEN.
 1/13/23 CURRENT VALUE OF CATEGORY 1 TREE PROVIDING 300
 SQ FT OF CREDIT FOR MITIGATION IS $500.00
  
 4. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? GROUNDCOVER SHOWN HAS NO NATIVE SPECIES, SO DESIGN
 OPTION (3)(D) CANNOT BE TAKEN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ALIGN THE
 COLUMNS FOR FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 6. SATISFIED. FILL IN NON-NATIVE COLUMN FOR
 BOUGAINVILLEA AND CAT PALM.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 AND THE PLAN TO SHOW THE 15 FOOT REQUIRED BUFFER ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT AS A SEPARATE
 LINE ON THE CHART. SEE COMMENT #10.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED
 LATER.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 16-21:
  
 10. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. REQUIRES A BUFFER WITH A MINIMUM
 AVERAGE WIDTH OF 15 FEET.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED WHEN FINAL PLANS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM
 OF 33 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, ALL SHRUB AND HEDGE
 MATERIAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES UPON PLANTING.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP
 EQUIPMENT AND SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET
 CONDITION #11 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM
 LAKES.
 1/13/23 THIS IS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 4/19/23 SHOW LOCATION OF SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION
 SYSTEM.
  
 15. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST
 50 PERCENT OF THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO
 SOIL CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-13-2023 Time 16:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-13-2023 Time 16:58 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-13 16:58:58FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1545 CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z22100020
 JANUARY 13, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION IN AN ARBORISTS
 REPORT RATING THE CONDITION FOR EACH OF THE TREES AND
 PALMS ON SITE AND ADD THE CONDITION IN A COLUMN ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION LIST. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
 SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF CONDITION RATINGS OF GOOD, FAIR, OR
 POOR. ALL DATA ON EACH TREE MUST BE PROVIDED WITH
 ACCURATE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR EACH TREE. RELOCATION
 ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT THIS IS NOT AN
 ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE DATA NEEDED FOR THE TREES ON
 SITE.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE REPORT WILL BE
 SUBMITTED LATER.
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND NARRATIVE
 FOR INSTALLATION OF TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS FOR THE
 TREES TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION. THERE WILL BE AN
 EXTREME LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY TO PROTECT THE REMAINING
 TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING AND POSSIBLE
 FILL FROM ANY ELEVATION DIFFERENCE FOR THE FINISHED
 FLOOR LEVEL.
 1/13/23 PROVIDE NARRATIVE FOR HOW TREES WILL BE
 PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 3. NOT SATISFIED. SHEET LP-1 SHOWS A DEFICIT IN TREE
 CANOPY MITIGATION. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS IF PAYMENT IN
 LIEU IS CHOSEN.
 1/13/23 CURRENT VALUE OF CATEGORY 1 TREE PROVIDING 300
 SQ FT OF CREDIT FOR MITIGATION IS $500.00
 4. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? GROUNDCOVER SHOWN HAS NO NATIVE SPECIES, SO DESIGN
 OPTION (3)(D) CANNOT BE TAKEN.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ALIGN THE
 COLUMNS FOR FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT
 TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 6. SATISFIED. FILL IN NON-NATIVE COLUMN FOR
 BOUGAINVILLEA AND CAT PALM.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 AND THE PLAN TO SHOW THE 15 FOOT REQUIRED BUFFER ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT AS A SEPARATE
 LINE ON THE CHART. SEE COMMENT #10.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE
 LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY
 CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
 1/13/23 APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED
 LATER.
 RESOLUTION NO. 16-21:
  
 10. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, THE WEST PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG AUSTRALIAN AVE. REQUIRES A BUFFER WITH A MINIMUM
 AVERAGE WIDTH OF 15 FEET.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED WHEN FINAL PLANS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM
 OF 33 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, ALL SHRUB AND HEDGE
 MATERIAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES UPON PLANTING.
  
 14. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
 1/13/23 THIS IS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 15. SATISFIED. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST
 50 PERCENT OF THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO
 SOIL CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-07-2022 Time 16:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-07-2022 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-07 16:33:15FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1545 CENTREPARK CPD RESIDENTIAL Z22100020
 OCTOBER 7, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE INFORMATION WITH THE ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
 THE CONDITION FOR EACH OF THE TREES AND PALMS ON SITE
 AND ADD THE CONDITION IN A COLUMN ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF CONDITION RATINGS OF GOOD, FAIR, OR POOR.
 RELOCATION ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
 2. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND NARRATIVE FOR INSTALLATION OF
 TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS FOR THE TREES TO REMAIN DURING
 CONSTRUCTION. THERE WILL BE AN EXTREME LEVEL OF
 DIFFICULTY TO PROTECT THE REMAINING TREES DURING
 CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING AND POSSIBLE FILL FROM ANY
 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE FOR THE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL.
 3. SHEET LP-1 SHOWS A DEFICIT IN TREE CANOPY
 MITIGATION. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS IF PAYMENT IN LIEU IS
 CHOSEN.
 4. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS
 CHART TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? GROUNDCOVER SHOWN HAS NO NATIVE SPECIES, SO DESIGN
 OPTION (3)(D) CANNOT BE TAKEN.
  
 5. REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO ALIGN THE COLUMNS FOR
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS AND FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL
 FOR EACH SPECIES FOR CLARITY.
  
 6. FILL IN NON-NATIVE COLUMN FOR BOUGAINVILLEA AND CAT
 PALM.
  
 7. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART AND THE
 PLAN TO SHOW THE 15 FOOT REQUIRED BUFFER ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT AS A SEPARATE
 LINE ON THE CHART. SEE COMMENT #10.
  
 8. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 9. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 16-21
  
 10. PER EXHIBIT F, THE WEST PROPERTY LINE ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVE. REQUIRES A BUFFER WITH A MINIMUM
 AVERAGE WIDTH OF 15 FEET.
  
 11. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND
 IRRIGATION PROPOSED WHEN FINAL PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED
 AND APPROVED.
  
 12. PER EXHIBIT F, PLANT MATERIAL, A MINIMUM OF 33
 PERCENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NATIVE TO
 SOUTHERN FLORIDA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION.
  
 13. PER EXHIBIT F, ALL SHRUB AND HEDGE MATERIAL SHALL
 BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES UPON PLANTING.
  
 14. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND SOURCE FOR THE
 IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11 REQUIRING USE
 OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
 15. VERIFY CONDITION #12 IS MET FOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
 FOR NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDING AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF
 THE TREES BEING NATIVE SPECIES ADAPTED TO SOIL
 CONDITIONS ON SITE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 3 Status P Date 04-04-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 04-04-2023 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 04-04-2023 Time 15:49 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-04 15:53:50CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS FOLLOWS:
  
 GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION
 SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 RESPONSE: COMMENT NOTED. GATE VALVES WILL NOT BE PLACED
 IN CURB OR SIDEWALK. PROFILE VIEW OF
 DOMESTIC AND FIRE WATER MAIN CONNECTION WILL BE
 INCLUDED ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS SUBMITTED FOR
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW
  
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES
 INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 RESPONSE: CONSTRUCTION PLANS WILL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BASED
 ON ASBUILT INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY, SURVEY,
 GIS INFORMATION, AND POT HOLING FOR DRY
 UTILITIES.
  
 PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER AND
 STORM LINES PER CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE INCLUDE FIBER
 OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 RESPONSE: PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER,
 STORM, DRY UTILITY, ETC. WILL BE PROVIDED
 ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS WHEN SUBMITTED FOR FORMAL
 ENGINEERING REVIEW.
  
 CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER
 THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY ROW.
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. NOTE WILL BE SHOWN ON
 CONSTRUCTION PLANS SUBMITTED FOR FORMAL
 ENGINEERING REVIEW.
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT
 THERE WILL BE NO INCOMING COMMENTS FOR THE ENGINEERING
 SUBMITTAL
  
 RICKY ELIZONDO
 [email protected]
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 01-06-2023 Time 12:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 01-06-2023 Time 12:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-06 12:21:16PLEASE ADDRESS COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 12-05-2022 Time 14:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 12-05-2022 Time 14:10 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-05 14:14:41O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
 INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION
 OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). CLARIFY IF STORMWATER
 CONNECTION TO CITY INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING PROPOSED;
 CCTV WOULD BE REQUIRED IF SO.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O CALL OUT GRAVITY SEWER WITHIN PROPERTY AS PRIVATE
 O PROVIDE DATA SHOWING HOW CITY'S SEWER SYSTEM IS
 IMPACTED BY NEW INSTALLATIONS
 O PROVIDE DATA RELATING TO THE PROPOSED PRIVATE LIFT
 STATION CAPABILITIES (PROJECT IS WITHIN LIFT STATION 11
 LIMITS)
 O PROVIDE SIZE AND MATERIAL OF PROPOSED FORCE MAIN
 CONNECTION
 O ELABORATE ON MEANS OF TIE-IN TO EXISTING FORCE MAIN
 O DENOTE POINTS OF SERVICE FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER
 O PROVIDE PROJECT FACT SHEET
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-14-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 03-14-2023 Time 09:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-14 09:29:01AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, CORRECT CALLOUT
 LABEL AND LEADER LINE FOR RPPA.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 12-27-2022 Time 08:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-27 08:48:52PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -FDC PIPING SHOULD BE CONNECTED TO FIRELINE PIPE RATHER
 THAN DOMESTIC PLUMBING.
 -NOTE 11 ON CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT SEEM TO APPLY SINCE
 GREASE TRAP HAS BEEN ADDED. PLEASE REFER TO RESPONSE
 LETTER FOR CLARIFICATION.
 -AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, REMINDER TO
 FOLLOWUP ON REVIEW COMMENTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, AND 13
 FROM DEC2022 RESPONSE LETTER.
 -THERE IS A MONUMENT SIGN PROPOSED IN UTILITY EASEMENT.
 IF THERE ARE EXISTING UTILITIES AT THAT LOCATION, SIGN
 MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
 -RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT IS LIKELY CONNECTED TO EXISTING
 FIRELINE WATER SERVICE AND SHOULD REMAIN PRIVATELY
 OWNED AND DOWNSTREAM OF A DCDA.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-06-2022 Time 09:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-06 09:10:06PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC
 ON ENGINEERING PLAN.
 -UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM INDICATES THERE IS AN EXISTING
 6 INCH FIRELINE.
 -RELOCATE PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY CORNER TO THE SOUTHWEST
 SO THAT CRANE TRUCK CAN ACCESS IT BETTER FROM SIDEWALK
 AND CANAL DRIVEWAY.
 -SHOW CONTINUATION OF PRIVATE FORCE MAIN TO WHERE IT
 CONNECTS TO CITY SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE.
 -IS THE EXISTING 2 INCH FORCE MAIN SUFFICIENTLY SIZED?
 -ADD PIPE MATERIAL TYPE TO LABEL OF 2 INCH FORCE MAIN.
 -ADD SIZE TO LABEL OF SANITARY SEWER LATERAL.
 -ADD NOTE TO WATER PLAN THAT WATER METERS SIZED 3 INCH
 OR LARGER NEED BE INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND.
 -WATER PLAN NOTE 10 NOTED NO GREASE TRAPS PROPOSED
 BECAUSE OF NO FOOD OR BEVERAGE SERVICE, BUT
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TALKED ABOUT A CAF??. PLEASE
 ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY GREASE TRAPS NEEDED.
 -WATER PLAN SHOWS EXISTING WELL, BUT HISTORIC PICTURES
 SHOW PIPE RUNNING TO CANAL. PLEASE VERIFY IF IRRIGATION
 SYSTEM GETTING WATER FROM A WELL, CANAL WATER, OR BOTH.
 -SHOW AND LABEL FRANCHISE UTILITIES ON ENGINEERING
 PLANS. HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW AT LEAST CABLE LOCATE
 MARKER IN AREA.
 -LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOW TREES IN 10 FOOT UTILITY
 EASEMENT. THOSE MAY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING AND FUTURE
 UTILITIES.
 -ADD VISUAL SCALE MEASUREMENT ICON TO WATER PLAN BLOWUP
 DETAIL.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 04-18-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-18-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-18-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-18 12:00:14NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC WORKS.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-20-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 01-20-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-20 16:03:591- PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE
 (I.E. CONTAINER TYPE, SIZE, QTY, STAGING AREA, ETC.).
 2- THE STAGING AREA FOR THE SANITATION CONTAINERS SHALL
 HAVE MINIMIUM HEIGHT CLEARANCE OF 22 FT. OTHERWISE,
 GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE ROLLED BY THE CURBSIDE FOR
 SERVICE, WHICH THE EXACT STAGING LOCATION HAS TO BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-07-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-07 10:17:53PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. CONTAINER
 TYPE, SIZE, QTY, STAGING AREA, ETC.)
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE
 VEHICLE*S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS
 FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 3- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS
  
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-10-2023 Time 18:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-10-2023 Time 18:12 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-10 18:11:42CONDITION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TO BE MINIMUM 2 FEET ABOVE
 THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR THE SITE AS SHOWN ON THE
 LATEST FEMA FIRMS.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-13-2022 Time 09:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-13-2022 Time 09:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-13 09:08:34THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PORTION OF PROPOSED FORCE MAIN APPEARS TO BE MISSING
 ON THE CONCEPTUAL PAVING, DRAINAGE, WATER AND
 WASTEWATER PLAN.
  
 2. PROVIDE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.
  
 3. PORTION OF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL
 FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA) WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION
 (BFE) OF 12.7 FT NAVD. STRUCTURES WITHIN A SFHA ARE TO
 HAVE A MINIMUM TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BFE.
  
 4. AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH
 COUNTY. ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHINTHE R/W TO BE APPROVED
 BY THE COUNTY.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-24-2023 Time 06:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-08-2022 Time 08:36 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-08 08:40:191. WILL HEIGHT OF BUILDING OVER ROUNDABOUT BE
 SUFFICIENT FOR EMERGENCY AND SANITATION VEHICLES?
 2. LANDSCAPING IN 10' UE WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL OF ALL
 UTILITIES OR REQUEST TO BE ABANDONED.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-15 10:50:40TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD HAVE BEEN
 SCHEDULED. PLEASE DO SO.
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY BASED ON
 MORE RECENT OR EXISTING COUNTS, AS THE 2018 COUNTS ARE
 OUTDATED, AS RECOMMENDED IN THE ANALYSIS AS WELL
 3) SATISFIED. AN AERIAL SATELLITE MAP SHOWCASING
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH RESPECT TO NEIGHBORING AREA
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 4) SATISFIED. SHOULD TABLE 1 THROUGH 3 MAIN CAPTIONS BE
 TOTAL MAXIMUM DRI OR MAXIMUM VESTED TRIP GENERATION?
 5) SATISFIED. BELOW EACH TABLE PLEASE PROVIDE
 REFERENCES FOR EACH PARAMETER (I.E. RATE/EQUATION,
 INTERNALIZATION AND PASS-BY PERCENTAGES)
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION
 TABLE(S) SPECIFIC TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (I.E.
 ONLY TRIPS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT).
 TABLE 7-9 SHOW AGGREGATE OF EXISTING/APPROVED AND
 CURRENTLY PROPOSED, MAIN CAPTION SHOULD BE CORRECTED
 ACCORDINGLY (E.G. APPROVED/BUILT PLUS PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENTS)
 7) SATISFIED. TABLE 10 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED, AS VESTED
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFER TO THE TOTAL MAXIMUM DRI,
 WHILE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFER TO
 EXISTING/APPROVED AND CURRENTLY PROPOSED. PLEASE
 CORRECT
 8) SATISFIED. IN TABLE 10. DO DRIVEWAY TRIPS REFER TO
 TOTAL TRIPS MINUS INTERNALIZATION? (I.E. PASS-BY TRIPS
 ARE NOT DEDUCTED). IF SO, PLEASE INSERT A FOOTNOTE
 SPECIFYING THAT.
 9) SATISFIED. SYNCHRO OUTPUTS AND LOS SUMMARY TABLES
 SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS: EXISTING,
 FUTURE NO-BUILD AND FUTURE BUILD XXX (INSERT BUILD-OUT
 YEAR AND APPLY GROWTH FACTORS ACCORDINGLY). RESULTS FOR
 EACH SCENARIO SHOULD BE SUMMARIZED AND COMPARED IN A
 TABLE. CURRENT SYNCHRO OUTPUTS INDICATE 2022 BUILD-OUT
 YEAR, IS THAT EXISTING OR AN OUTDATED BUILD-OUT
 ANALYSIS?
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS PERTAINING THE
 CENTREPARK DRI EXTENT AND TRIP ALLOCATION.
 SPECIFICALLY: MAP SHOWCASING THE EXTENT OF THE DRI AND
 EACH OF THE SITES; A COMPREHENSIVE SPREADSHEET/TABLE
 SHOWCASING MAXIMUM ALLOWED SF/ROOMS/DU ALLOCATION FOR
 LAND-USE TYPE VERSUS EXISTING-BUILT,
 APPROVED-IN-CONSTRUCTION, PLANNED-PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS
 AND LEFT OVER BALANCES, FOR EACH SITES AND OVERALL
 11) SATISFIED. THE TPS LETTER WAS ISSUED WITH AN
 ANTICIPATED BUILD-OUT YEAR IN 2024, WHILE THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY ASSUMES BUILD-OUT IN 2026. PLEASE EXPLAIN AND, IF
 NEEDED, REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY OR PROVIDE AN UPDATED
 TPS LETTER. PROVIDE THE UPDATED TPS LETTER, ONCE
 RECEIVED
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE EXPLANATION OR HISTORICAL
 REFERENCE WITH RESPECT TO THE CHANGE IN MAXIMUM PARCEL
 AND DRI OVERALL ALLOCATIONS, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B.
 WHAT METHODOLOGY OR REASONING WAS APPLIED TO
 REDUCE/INCREASE ORIGINAL DRI ALLOCATIONS?
 13) SATISFIED. THE ORIGINAL INTERNALIZATION CALCULATION
 TABLE IS DATED 2005. BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE IN OVERALL
 DRI ALLOCATION, LAND USE TYPE, AND THE USE OF THE
 LATEST ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES IN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY, IT WOULD BE LOGICAL AND
 NECESSARY TO RE-CALCULATE INTERNALIZATION PARAMETERS
 AND RATES BASED ON LATEST DRI ALLOCATION AND ITE/COUNTY
 RATES AND METHODOLOGY. PLEASE DO SO AND PROVIDE THE
 WORKING SPREADSHEET AS PART OF NEXT RESUBMISSION
 SITE COMMENTS
 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN
 FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE SIDEWALK AREA
 ALONG S AUSTRALIAN AVE AND OLD OKEECHOBEE RD FRONTING
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 15) SATISFIED. IN THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN,
 PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB
 CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. THERE ARE MISSING FEATURES ALONG OLD
 OKEECHOBEE ROAD, PLEASE PROVIDE SIDEWALK AND TRAVEL
 LANE DETAILS ALONG CENTREPARK DR N TILL THE
 INTERSECTION WITH CENTREPARK DR E.
 16) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 SITE PLAN CAN BE SEPARATE OR INTEGRATED IN THE
 HORIZONTAL CONTROL ONE. SEVERAL MISSING ITEMS, PLEASE
 REVISE AND COMPLETE
 17) SATISFIED. ALL TRANSPORTATION RELATED ITEMS (I.E.
 PARKING STALL, DRIVE AISLES, RAMP) WITHIN THE GARAGE
 PLANS NEED TO BE PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED (I.E.
 LENGTH, WIDTH, SLOPE PERCENTAGES)
 18) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
 THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
 A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? PLEASE APPLY AND SHOWCASE SUCH
 REQUIREMENT IN THE GARAGE PLANS
 19) SATISFIED. TURN-AROUND SPACES SHOULD BE PROVIDED,
 AND CLEARLY MARKED AS SUCH AT EACH DEAD-END(S) OF THE
 GARAGE. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
 20) SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOADING ZONE(S) ARE NOT CLEARLY
 DEPICTED NOR DIMENSIONED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 PLEASE REVISE AND PROVIDE CODE REFERENCE TO MINIMUM
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED DIMENSIONS.
 21) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS
 22) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 23) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 24) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 25) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR CURB
 26) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AND/OR PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN
 27) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 28) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING
 ANY EXISTING OR PLANNED BICYCLE FACILITY?
 29) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 86-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-25-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-25-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 01-25-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-25 18:44:551) SATISFIED. A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD HAVE BEEN
 SCHEDULED. PLEASE DO SO.
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY BASED ON
 MORE RECENT OR EXISTING COUNTS, AS THE 2018 COUNTS ARE
 OUTDATED, AS RECOMMENDED IN THE ANALYSIS AS WELL
 3) SATISFIED. AN AERIAL SATELLITE MAP SHOWCASING
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH RESPECT TO NEIGHBORING AREA
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 4) SATISFIED. SHOULD TABLE 1 THROUGH 3 MAIN CAPTIONS BE
 TOTAL MAXIMUM DRI OR MAXIMUM VESTED TRIP GENERATION?
 5) SATISFIED. BELOW EACH TABLE PLEASE PROVIDE
 REFERENCES FOR EACH PARAMETER (I.E. RATE/EQUATION,
 INTERNALIZATION AND PASS-BY PERCENTAGES)
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION
 TABLE(S) SPECIFIC TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (I.E.
 ONLY TRIPS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT).
 TABLE 7-9 SHOW AGGREGATE OF EXISTING/APPROVED AND
 CURRENTLY PROPOSED, MAIN CAPTION SHOULD BE CORRECTED
 ACCORDINGLY (E.G. APPROVED/BUILT PLUS PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENTS)
 7) SATISFIED. TABLE 10 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED, AS VESTED
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFER TO THE TOTAL MAXIMUM DRI,
 WHILE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFER TO
 EXISTING/APPROVED AND CURRENTLY PROPOSED. PLEASE
 CORRECT
 8) SATISFIED. IN TABLE 10. DO DRIVEWAY TRIPS REFER TO
 TOTAL TRIPS MINUS INTERNALIZATION? (I.E. PASS-BY TRIPS
 ARE NOT DEDUCTED). IF SO, PLEASE INSERT A FOOTNOTE
 SPECIFYING THAT.
 9) SATISFIED. SYNCHRO OUTPUTS AND LOS SUMMARY TABLES
 SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS: EXISTING,
 FUTURE NO-BUILD AND FUTURE BUILD XXX (INSERT BUILD-OUT
 YEAR AND APPLY GROWTH FACTORS ACCORDINGLY). RESULTS FOR
 EACH SCENARIO SHOULD BE SUMMARIZED AND COMPARED IN A
 TABLE. CURRENT SYNCHRO OUTPUTS INDICATE 2022 BUILD-OUT
 YEAR, IS THAT EXISTING OR AN OUTDATED BUILD-OUT
 ANALYSIS?
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS PERTAINING THE
 CENTREPARK DRI EXTENT AND TRIP ALLOCATION.
 SPECIFICALLY: MAP SHOWCASING THE EXTENT OF THE DRI AND
 EACH OF THE SITES; A COMPREHENSIVE SPREADSHEET/TABLE
 SHOWCASING MAXIMUM ALLOWED SF/ROOMS/DU ALLOCATION FOR
 LAND-USE TYPE VERSUS EXISTING-BUILT,
 APPROVED-IN-CONSTRUCTION, PLANNED-PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS
 AND LEFT OVER BALANCES, FOR EACH SITES AND OVERALL
 11) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE TPS LETTER WAS ISSUED
 WITH AN ANTICIPATED BUILD-OUT YEAR IN 2024, WHILE THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY ASSUMES BUILD-OUT IN 2026. PLEASE EXPLAIN
 AND, IF NEEDED, REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY OR PROVIDE AN
 UPDATED TPS LETTER. PROVIDE THE UPDATED TPS LETTER,
 ONCE RECEIVED
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE EXPLANATION OR HISTORICAL
 REFERENCE WITH RESPECT TO THE CHANGE IN MAXIMUM PARCEL
 AND DRI OVERALL ALLOCATIONS, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B.
 WHAT METHODOLOGY OR REASONING WAS APPLIED TO
 REDUCE/INCREASE ORIGINAL DRI ALLOCATIONS?
 13) SATISFIED. THE ORIGINAL INTERNALIZATION CALCULATION
 TABLE IS DATED 2005. BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE IN OVERALL
 DRI ALLOCATION, LAND USE TYPE, AND THE USE OF THE
 LATEST ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES IN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY, IT WOULD BE LOGICAL AND
 NECESSARY TO RE-CALCULATE INTERNALIZATION PARAMETERS
 AND RATES BASED ON LATEST DRI ALLOCATION AND ITE/COUNTY
 RATES AND METHODOLOGY. PLEASE DO SO AND PROVIDE THE
 WORKING SPREADSHEET AS PART OF NEXT RESUBMISSION
 SITE COMMENTS
 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. PROVIDE DETAILS OF
 THE SIDEWALK AREA ALONG S AUSTRALIAN AVE AND OLD
 OKEECHOBEE RD FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE
 PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G.
 DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS,
 ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THERE ARE MISSING FEATURES ALONG
 OLD OKEECHOBEE ROAD, PLEASE PROVIDE SIDEWALK AND TRAVEL
 LANE DETAILS ALONG CENTREPARK DR N TILL THE
 INTERSECTION WITH CENTREPARK DR E.
 16) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. SUCH SITE PLAN CAN BE SEPARATE OR INTEGRATED IN
 THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL ONE. SEVERAL MISSING ITEMS,
 PLEASE REVISE AND COMPLETE
 17) SATISFIED. ALL TRANSPORTATION RELATED ITEMS (I.E.
 PARKING STALL, DRIVE AISLES, RAMP) WITHIN THE GARAGE
 PLANS NEED TO BE PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED (I.E.
 LENGTH, WIDTH, SLOPE PERCENTAGES)
 18) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
 THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
 A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? PLEASE APPLY AND SHOWCASE SUCH
 REQUIREMENT IN THE GARAGE PLANS
 19) SATISFIED. TURN-AROUND SPACES SHOULD BE PROVIDED,
 AND CLEARLY MARKED AS SUCH AT EACH DEAD-END(S) OF THE
 GARAGE. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
 20) SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOADING ZONE(S) ARE NOT CLEARLY
 DEPICTED NOR DIMENSIONED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 PLEASE REVISE AND PROVIDE CODE REFERENCE TO MINIMUM
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED DIMENSIONS.
 21) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS
 22) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 23) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 24) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 25) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR CURB
 26) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AND/OR PARKING
 MANAGEMENT PLAN
 27) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 28) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING
 ANY EXISTING OR PLANNED BICYCLE FACILITY?
 29) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 86-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-11-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-11-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-11 20:50:52 
 TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED.
 PLEASE DO SO.
 2) PROVIDE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY BASED ON MORE
 RECENT OR EXISTING COUNTS, AS THE 2018 COUNTS ARE
 OUTDATED, AS RECOMMENDED IN THE ANALYSIS AS WELL
 3) AN AERIAL SATELLITE MAP SHOWCASING PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH RESPECT TO NEIGHBORING AREA SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 4) SHOULD TABLE 1 THROUGH 3 MAIN CAPTIONS BE TOTAL
 MAXIMUM DRI OR MAXIMUM VESTED TRIP GENERATION?
 5) BELOW EACH TABLE PLEASE PROVIDE REFERENCES FOR EACH
 PARAMETER (I.E. RATE/EQUATION, INTERNALIZATION AND
 PASS-BY PERCENTAGES)
 6) PROVIDE TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION TABLE(S)
 SPECIFIC TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (I.E. ONLY TRIPS
 GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT). TABLE 7-9 SHOW
 AGGREGATE OF EXISTING/APPROVED AND CURRENTLY PROPOSED,
 MAIN CAPTION SHOULD BE CORRECTED ACCORDINGLY (E.G.
 APPROVED/BUILT PLUS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS)
 7) TABLE 10 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED, AS VESTED
 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFER TO THE TOTAL MAXIMUM DRI,
 WHILE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFER TO
 EXISTING/APPROVED AND CURRENTLY PROPOSED. PLEASE
 CORRECT
 8) IN TABLE 10. DO DRIVEWAY TRIPS REFER TO TOTAL TRIPS
 MINUS INTERNALIZATION? (I.E. PASS-BY TRIPS ARE NOT
 DEDUCTED). IF SO, PLEASE INSERT A FOOTNOTE SPECIFYING
 THAT.
 9) SYNCHRO OUTPUTS AND LOS SUMMARY TABLES SHOULD
 INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS: EXISTING, FUTURE
 NO-BUILD AND FUTURE BUILD XXX (INSERT BUILD-OUT YEAR
 AND APPLY GROWTH FACTORS ACCORDINGLY). RESULTS FOR EACH
 SCENARIO SHOULD BE SUMMARIZED AND COMPARED IN A TABLE.
 CURRENT SYNCHRO OUTPUTS INDICATE 2022 BUILD-OUT YEAR,
 IS THAT EXISTING OR AN OUTDATED BUILD-OUT ANALYSIS?
 10) PROVIDE MORE DETAILS PERTAINING THE CENTREPARK DRI
 EXTENT AND TRIP ALLOCATION. SPECIFICALLY: MAP
 SHOWCASING THE EXTENT OF THE DRI AND EACH OF THE SITES;
 A COMPREHENSIVE SPREADSHEET/TABLE SHOWCASING MAXIMUM
 ALLOWED SF/ROOMS/DU ALLOCATION FOR LAND-USE TYPE VERSUS
 EXISTING-BUILT, APPROVED-IN-CONSTRUCTION,
 PLANNED-PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND LEFT OVER BALANCES,
 FOR EACH SITES AND OVERALL
 11) THE TPS LETTER WAS ISSUED WITH AN ANTICIPATED
 BUILD-OUT YEAR IN 2024, WHILE THE TRAFFIC STUDY ASSUMES
 BUILD-OUT IN 2026. PLEASE EXPLAIN AND, IF NEEDED,
 REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY OR PROVIDE AN UPDATED TPS
 LETTER
 12) PROVIDE EXPLANATION OR HISTORICAL REFERENCE WITH
 RESPECT TO THE CHANGE IN MAXIMUM PARCEL AND DRI OVERALL
 ALLOCATIONS, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B. WHAT METHODOLOGY OR
 REASONING WAS APPLIED TO REDUCE/INCREASE ORIGINAL DRI
 ALLOCATIONS?
 13) THE ORIGINAL INTERNALIZATION CALCULATION TABLE IS
 DATED 2005. BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE IN OVERALL DRI
 ALLOCATION, LAND USE TYPE, AND THE USE OF THE LATEST
 ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES IN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 TRAFFIC STUDY, IT WOULD BE LOGICAL AND NECESSARY TO
 RE-CALCULATE INTERNALIZATION PARAMETERS AND RATES BASED
 ON LATEST DRI ALLOCATION AND ITE/COUNTY RATES AND
 METHODOLOGY. PLEASE DO SO AND PROVIDE THE WORKING
 SPREADSHEET AS PART OF NEXT RESUBMISSION
 SITE COMMENTS
 14) PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED
 15) IN THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 16) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 SITE PLAN CAN BE SEPARATE OR INTEGRATED IN THE
 HORIZONTAL CONTROL ONE
 17) ALL TRANSPORTATION RELATED ITEMS (I.E. PARKING
 STALL, DRIVE AISLES, RAMP) WITHIN THE GARAGE PLANS NEED
 TO BE PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED (I.E. LENGTH,
 WIDTH, SLOPE PERCENTAGES)
 18) PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN THOSE CASES
 WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
 FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
 STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? PLEASE APPLY AND SHOWCASE SUCH
 REQUIREMENT IN THE GARAGE PLANS
 19) TURN-AROUND SPACES SHOULD BE PROVIDED, AND CLEARLY
 MARKED AS SUCH AT EACH DEAD-END(S) OF THE GARAGE.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
 20) PROPOSED LOADING ZONE(S) ARE NOT CLEARLY DEPICTED
 NOR DIMENSIONED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE
 REVISE AND PROVIDE CODE REFERENCE TO MINIMUM REQUIRED
 AND PROVIDED DIMENSIONS.
 21) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS
 22) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
 EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
 CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
 ETC.)
 23) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 24) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 25) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR CURB
 26) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A
 THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AND/OR PARKING MANAGEMENT
 PLAN
 27) ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 28) IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING ANY EXISTING
 OR PLANNED BICYCLE FACILITY?
 29) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 07-14-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 07-14-2023 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 07-14-2023 Time 10:35 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-14 10:36:277/14/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT,
 STORM DRAINAGE, AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES.
 [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE WARRANTY
 DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE ADDRESS
 REQUEST FORM. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
 L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
 WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP/POSTED. [SATISFIED SUBJECT
 TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE
 PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS REFERENCING THE CURRENT PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CENTREPARK COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING
 CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 THE EXISTING LOT AREA, PROPOSED USES(S), AND PROPOSED
 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE EITHER SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE
 PLANS (OVERALL SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE
 PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & 2 PLAN SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) OR REMOVE/DO
 NOT PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 &
 2 PLAN SHEETS) IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKET. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH (SIDE)
 PROPERTY LINE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1
 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON THE PRELIMINARY
 SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 7. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENT PER RESOLUTION NO.
 16-21. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CORRECT INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR
 THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE PER SECTION 94-486
 OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 (ZLDR). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 9. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-486 OF THE ZLDR FOR THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED
 MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 10. BASED ON REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 9 AND 10 ABOVE AND
 PER SUBSECTIONS 94-485(O) AND (Q) OF THE ZLDR, PLEASE
 REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED NUMBER OF HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES AND
 BICYCLE PARKING. [SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PROPOSED HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACE ON
 LEVEL 1. [SATISFIED]
 13. PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDR PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND
 SIZE OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIZE ON THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 16. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
 REQUIREMENT PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(2)(E)(2) OF THE
 ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
 WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES,
 METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS,
 TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR
 DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]
 21. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE IS AN
 INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE AND
 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1), THEREFORE,
 PLEASE CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED
 TO 20% IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) ACCORDING TO
 SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR SETBACK TO
 FIVE (5) FEET IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
 TABLE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1)
 ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED,
 ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 25. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, PLEASE SUBMIT/PROVIDE
 SIGNED LETTERS FROM THE CENTREPARK PROPERTY OWNER???S
 ASSOCIATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY
 STATING THAT THEY REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 M. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSES
 TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION 94-207.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 26. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 2., PLEASE
 SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISED
 PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE
 SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [WITHDRAWN]
 28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 10., PLEASE
 CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 INDICATED ON THE SITE TABULAR DATA. [SATISFIED]
 29. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SUM
 TOTAL AREA ALLOWANCE PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(3)(B) OF
 THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR DUMPSTERS.
 [SATISFIED]
 31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 24., PLEASE
 REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED ACCORDING TO THE
 PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE
 SUBMIT/PROVIDE THE SIGNED LETTER FROM THE CENTREPARK
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY STATING THAT THEY
 REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 33. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT G., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE UPDATED TPS LETTER WITH THE CORRECT SQUARE
 FOOTAGE. [SATISFIED]
 34. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
 THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ILLUMINATION PER SUBSECTION
 94-207(D)(8) OF THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRIC PROPOSAL, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 05-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 05-24-2023 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 05-24-2023 Time 10:38 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-24 10:39:255/24/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT,
 STORM DRAINAGE, AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES.
 [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE WARRANTY
 DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE ADDRESS
 REQUEST FORM. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [NOT SATISFIED]
 L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
 WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP/POSTED. [SATISFIED SUBJECT
 TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE
 PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS REFERENCING THE CURRENT PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CENTREPARK COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING
 CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 THE EXISTING LOT AREA, PROPOSED USES(S), AND PROPOSED
 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE EITHER SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE
 PLANS (OVERALL SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE
 PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & 2 PLAN SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) OR REMOVE/DO
 NOT PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 &
 2 PLAN SHEETS) IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKET. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH (SIDE)
 PROPERTY LINE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1
 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON THE PRELIMINARY
 SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 7. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENT PER RESOLUTION NO.
 16-21. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CORRECT INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR
 THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE PER SECTION 94-486
 OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 (ZLDR). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 9. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-486 OF THE ZLDR FOR THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED
 MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 10. BASED ON REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 9 AND 10 ABOVE AND
 PER SUBSECTIONS 94-485(O) AND (Q) OF THE ZLDR, PLEASE
 REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED NUMBER OF HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES AND
 BICYCLE PARKING. [SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PROPOSED HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACE ON
 LEVEL 1. [SATISFIED]
 13. PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDR PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND
 SIZE OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIZE ON THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 16. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
 REQUIREMENT PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(2)(E)(2) OF THE
 ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
 WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES,
 METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS,
 TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR
 DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]
 21. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE IS AN
 INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE AND
 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1), THEREFORE,
 PLEASE CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED
 TO 20% IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) ACCORDING TO
 SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR SETBACK TO
 FIVE (5) FEET IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
 TABLE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1)
 ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED,
 ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 25. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, PLEASE SUBMIT/PROVIDE
 SIGNED LETTERS FROM THE CENTREPARK PROPERTY OWNER???S
 ASSOCIATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY
 STATING THAT THEY REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 M. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSES
 TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION 94-207.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 26. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 2., PLEASE
 SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISED
 PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE
 SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [WITHDRAWN]
 28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 10., PLEASE
 CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 INDICATED ON THE SITE TABULAR DATA. [SATISFIED]
 29. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SUM
 TOTAL AREA ALLOWANCE PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(3)(B) OF
 THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR DUMPSTERS.
 [SATISFIED]
 31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 24., PLEASE
 REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED ACCORDING TO THE
 PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE
 SUBMIT/PROVIDE THE SIGNED LETTER FROM THE CENTREPARK
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY STATING THAT THEY
 REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 33. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT G., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE UPDATED TPS LETTER WITH THE CORRECT SQUARE
 FOOTAGE. [SATISFIED]
 34. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
 THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ILLUMINATION PER SUBSECTION
 94-207(D)(8) OF THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRIC PROPOSAL, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-31-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 03-31-2023 Time 16:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 03-31-2023 Time 16:43 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-31 16:45:523/31/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT,
 STORM DRAINAGE, AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES.
 [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [PARTIALLY
 SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE WARRANTY
 DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE ADDRESS
 REQUEST FORM. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
 L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
 WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP/POSTED. [SATISFIED SUBJECT
 TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE
 PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS REFERENCING THE CURRENT PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CENTREPARK COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING
 CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 THE EXISTING LOT AREA, PROPOSED USES(S), AND PROPOSED
 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE EITHER SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE
 PLANS (OVERALL SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE
 PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & 2 PLAN SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) OR REMOVE/DO
 NOT PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 &
 2 PLAN SHEETS) IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKET. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH (SIDE)
 PROPERTY LINE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1
 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON THE PRELIMINARY
 SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 7. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENT PER RESOLUTION NO.
 16-21. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CORRECT INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR
 THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE PER SECTION 94-486
 OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 (ZLDR). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 9. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-486 OF THE ZLDR FOR THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED
 MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 10. BASED ON REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 9 AND 10 ABOVE AND
 PER SUBSECTIONS 94-485(O) AND (Q) OF THE ZLDR, PLEASE
 REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED NUMBER OF HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES AND
 BICYCLE PARKING. [SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PROPOSED HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACE ON
 LEVEL 1. [SATISFIED]
 13. PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDR PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND
 SIZE OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIZE ON THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 16. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
 REQUIREMENT PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(2)(E)(2) OF THE
 ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
 WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES,
 METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS,
 TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR
 DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]
 21. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE IS AN
 INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE AND
 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1), THEREFORE,
 PLEASE CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED
 TO 20% IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) ACCORDING TO
 SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR SETBACK TO
 FIVE (5) FEET IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
 TABLE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1)
 ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED,
 ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 25. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, PLEASE SUBMIT/PROVIDE
 SIGNED LETTERS FROM THE CENTREPARK PROPERTY OWNER???S
 ASSOCIATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY
 STATING THAT THEY REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 M. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSES
 TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION 94-207.
 [NOT SATISFIED]
 26. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 2., PLEASE
 SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISED
 PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE
 SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [WITHDRAWN]
 28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 10., PLEASE
 CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 INDICATED ON THE SITE TABULAR DATA. [SATISFIED]
 29. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SUM
 TOTAL AREA ALLOWANCE PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(3)(B) OF
 THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED]
 30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR DUMPSTERS.
 [SATISFIED]
 31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 24., PLEASE
 REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED ACCORDING TO THE
 PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE
 SUBMIT/PROVIDE THE SIGNED LETTER FROM THE CENTREPARK
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY STATING THAT THEY
 REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 33. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT G., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE UPDATED TPS LETTER WITH THE CORRECT SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
 34. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
 THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ILLUMINATION PER SUBSECTION
 94-207(D)(8) OF THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRIC PROPOSAL, ACCORDINGLY.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 01-13-2023 Time 16:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 01-13-2023 Time 16:30 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-13 16:30:431/13/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT,
 STORM DRAINAGE, AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES.
 [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT
 SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE WARRANTY
 DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE ADDRESS
 REQUEST FORM. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [NOT SATISFIED]
 L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
 WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP/POSTED. [SATISFIED SUBJECT
 TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE
 PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS REFERENCING THE CURRENT PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CENTREPARK COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING
 CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 THE EXISTING LOT AREA, PROPOSED USES(S), AND PROPOSED
 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE EITHER SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE
 PLANS (OVERALL SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE
 PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & 2 PLAN SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) OR REMOVE/DO
 NOT PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 &
 2 PLAN SHEETS) IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKET. [PARTIALLY
 SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH (SIDE)
 PROPERTY LINE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1
 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON THE PRELIMINARY
 SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [SATISFIED]
 7. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENT PER RESOLUTION NO.
 16-21. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CORRECT INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR
 THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE PER SECTION 94-486
 OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 (ZLDR). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 9. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-486 OF THE ZLDR FOR THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED
 MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 10. BASED ON REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 9 AND 10 ABOVE AND
 PER SUBSECTIONS 94-485(O) AND (Q) OF THE ZLDR, PLEASE
 REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED NUMBER OF HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES AND
 BICYCLE PARKING. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PROPOSED HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACE ON
 LEVEL 1. [SATISFIED]
 13. PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDR PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND
 SIZE OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIZE ON THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 16. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
 REQUIREMENT PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(2)(E)(2) OF THE
 ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
 WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED]
 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES,
 METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS,
 TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED]
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR
 DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 21. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE IS AN
 INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE AND
 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1), THEREFORE,
 PLEASE CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED
 TO 20% IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) ACCORDING TO
 SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [NOT SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR SETBACK TO
 FIVE (5) FEET IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
 TABLE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1)
 ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED,
 ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED]
 25. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, PLEASE SUBMIT/PROVIDE
 SIGNED LETTERS FROM THE CENTREPARK PROPERTY OWNER???S
 ASSOCIATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY
 STATING THAT THEY REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 M. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSES
 TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION 94-207.
 26. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 2., PLEASE
 SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISED
 PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT.
 27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE
 SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1).
 28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 10., PLEASE
 CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 INDICATED ON THE SITE TABULAR DATA.
 29. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SUM
 TOTAL AREA ALLOWANCE PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(3)(B) OF
 THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR DUMPSTERS.
 31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 24., PLEASE
 REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED ACCORDING TO THE
 PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT.
 32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE
 SUBMIT/PROVIDE THE SIGNED LETTER FROM THE CENTREPARK
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY STATING THAT THEY
 REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 11-14-2022 Time 09:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 11-14-2022 Time 09:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-14 09:51:0411/14/22 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM THE CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT,
 STORM DRAINAGE, AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES.
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT.
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE WARRANTY
 DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE ADDRESS
 REQUEST FORM.
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW.
 K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
 WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP/POSTED.
  
 REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS REFERENCING THE CURRENT PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CENTREPARK COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21.
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND
 REVISED PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING
 CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 THE EXISTING LOT AREA, PROPOSED USES(S), AND PROPOSED
 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT.
 3. PLEASE EITHER SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE
 PLANS (OVERALL SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE
 PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & 2 PLAN SHEETS) TO MATCH THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) OR REMOVE/DO
 NOT PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE
 PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 &
 2 PLAN SHEETS) IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKET.
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH (SIDE)
 PROPERTY LINE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1
 OF 1).
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE WIDTH
 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON THE PRELIMINARY
 SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1).
 7. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENT PER RESOLUTION NO.
 16-21. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 8. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CORRECT INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR
 THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE PER SECTION 94-486
 OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 (ZLDR). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 9. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-486 OF THE ZLDR FOR THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED
 MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 10. BASED ON REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 9 AND 10 ABOVE AND
 PER SUBSECTIONS 94-485(O) AND (Q) OF THE ZLDR, PLEASE
 REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED NUMBER OF HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES AND
 BICYCLE PARKING.
 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PROPOSED HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACE ON
 LEVEL 1.
 13. PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDR PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND
 SIZE OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIZE ON THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 16. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
 REQUIREMENT PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(2)(E)(2) OF THE
 ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
 WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION
 OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES,
 METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS,
 TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR
 DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS.
 21. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE IS AN
 INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE AND
 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1), THEREFORE,
 PLEASE CORRECT ACCORDINGLY.
 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED
 TO 20% IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE
 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) ACCORDING TO
 SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR.
 23. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR SETBACK TO
 FIVE (5) FEET IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
 TABLE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1)
 ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR.
 24. PLEASE REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 25. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, PLEASE SUBMIT/PROVIDE
 SIGNED LETTERS FROM THE CENTREPARK PROPERTY OWNER???S
 ASSOCIATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY
 STATING THAT THEY REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved