Plan Review Details - Project Z22100019
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22100019
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By afowlkes Date 11-07-2022 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-10-2022 Time 12:42 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-10 12:44:39DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 4. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 5. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrosasno Date 02-03-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 02-03-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-25-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 10-25-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-01 11:21:05GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-27-2022 Time 10:07 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-27 10:12:01THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC, IF
 APPLICABLE, SHALL BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND
 CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. IF APPLICABLE, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR
 FIRE ALARM PER THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE.
 FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE
 MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. IF APPLICABLE, THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV
 AND FIRE LINE LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED
 WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By asangele Date 05-15-2023 Time 10:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By asangele Date 05-15-2023 Time 10:07 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-15 10:13:23FROM:SMITH AMISIAL =LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562
 PROJECT: 4801 S DIXIE Z22100019
 MAY 15,2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING IS $127,532.00
 PER THE PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROJECTED COST OF
 THE CHANGES FOR THE BUILDING ARE EXPECTED TO EXCEED
 $64,000.00, EXCEEDING 50% OF THE VALUE. PER SECTION
 94-441(C)(2), THIS REQUIRES THE ENTIRE SITE BE BROUGHT
 INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 REVISE PLANS TO SHOW LANDSCAPING MEETING THE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION
 PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFYING THE EXISTING
 TREES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE TWO FICUS TREES NEED TO BE
 EVALUATED FOR HEALTH AND STRUCTURE. CONSTRUCTION IN
 CLOSE PROXIMITY MAY NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEM AND THE
 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL RISK SHOULD BE ASSESSED.
 FICUS TREE #2 (REFERRED IN ARBORIST REPORT AS #466) IS
 NOT IN GOOD CONDITION PER THE ARBORISTS REPORT AND
 CONSTRUCTION AROUND THE ROOT SYSTEM COULD SIGNIFICANTLY
 INCREASE RISK OF FAILURE. FICUS TREE #1 (REFERRED IN
 ARBORIST REPORT AS #465) IS IN REASONABLY HEALTHY AND
 BALANCED CONDITION, BUT THE LOCATION OF THE PAVED AREA
 PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WILL REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT
 PORTION OF THE EXISTING ROOT SYSTEM AND MAY INCREASE
 THE RISK OF FAILURE.
  
 NEW FEED BACK REGARDING ITEM 3
 THE ARBORIST REPORT PROVIDED ONLY PROVIDES THE CURRENT
 HEALTH AND STRUCTURE REPORT OF THE TWO FICUS TREES 466
 AND 465. TREE 466???S CONDITION IS QUESTIONABLE TO
 PRESERVE AS IS PER THE ARBORIST REPORT. LANDSCAPE PLANS
 PROVIDED PROPOSE CUTTING THE ROOTS BACK AND INSTALLING
 A ROOT BARRIER WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE TWO
 FICUS TREES. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT THAT
 SHOWS HOW MUCH OF THE ROOT STRUCTURE WILL BE CUT BACK
 AND THE SURVIVABILITY AND VIABILITY OF THE TWO TREES TO
 REMAIN IN THEIR LOCATION AFTER THE ROOT CUTBACK AND
 ROOT BARRIERS ARE IN PLACE AND THE PLAN OF ACTION FOR
 SUCH. THE ARBORIST REPORT MUCH ADDRESS THE RISK OF
 FAILURE, IF ANY, AND MITIGATION PROCEDURES/PLANS FOR
 THE REMOVAL OF PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING ROOT SYSTEM. A
 LETTER STATING THE OWNERS CONSENT TO REPLACE THE TREES
 IF THEY FAIL WILL NOT SUFFICE TO KEEP THE TREES IN THE
 LOCATIONS AS PROPOSED IN LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL
 THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH
 PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE
 TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST
 BE USED.
 EAST AND WEST BUFFER CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS MUST
 BE INCLUDED.
  
 NEW FEED BACK REGARDING ITEM 5
 THE EAST BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS CAN BE
 PROVIDED WITH THE SIDEWALK THERE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 REQUIRED INFORMATION.
  
  
 6. NO LONGER ACCRUBLE THE SPLIT ZONING FOR THE SITE
 CREATES CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 REQUIREMENTS BEING DIFFERENT FOR EACH ZONING CATEGORY.
 NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING
 REQUIRES A WALL PER SECTION 94-443(A). THIS COULD BE
 RESOLVED BY REZONING.
 WEST BUFFER CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AND BUFFER
 PROVIDED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE SECOND BUILDING. THE
 PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING.
 THE PARKING IS BEING RECONFIGURED FROM THE EXISTING SO
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
  
 9. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE NUMBER REQUIRED AND THE
 PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE MUST BE SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
 THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE LINE WITH ROOT BARRIER WILL
 REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE
 TWO EXISTING FICUS TREES, WOULD BE BETTER IF LOCATED
 AWAY FROM THE TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 12. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL
 IS REQUIRED ALONG ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINES. THE SPLIT ZONING CAUSES A CONFLICT IF ANY OF THE
 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL USE IS NOT BUFFERED FROM THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE PARKING AREA ENCROACHES INTO THE
 SF 14 ZONING.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. ADONIDIA PALMS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF
 8 FEET CT.
 THE REPLY IN COMMENTS IS INCORRECTLY REFERRING TO
 SPACING.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-27-2023 Time 14:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-27-2023 Time 14:27 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-27 14:28:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 4801 S DIXIE Z22100019
 FEBRUARY 27, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING IS $127,532.00
 PER THE PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROJECTED COST OF
 THE CHANGES FOR THE BUILDING ARE EXPECTED TO EXCEED
 $64,000.00, EXCEEDING 50% OF THE VALUE. PER SECTION
 94-441(C)(2), THIS REQUIRES THE ENTIRE SITE BE BROUGHT
 INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 REVISE PLANS TO SHOW LANDSCAPING MEETING THE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION
 PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFYING THE EXISTING
 TREES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE TWO FICUS TREES NEED TO BE
 EVALUATED FOR HEALTH AND STRUCTURE. CONSTRUCTION IN
 CLOSE PROXIMITY MAY NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEM AND THE
 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL RISK SHOULD BE ASSESSED.
 FICUS TREE #2 (REFERRED IN ARBORIST REPORT AS #466) IS
 NOT IN GOOD CONDITION PER THE ARBORISTS REPORT AND
 CONSTRUCTION AROUND THE ROOT SYSTEM COULD SIGNIFICANTLY
 INCREASE RISK OF FAILURE. FICUS TREE #1 (REFERRED IN
 ARBORIST REPORT AS #465) IS IN REASONABLY HEALTHY AND
 BALANCED CONDITION, BUT THE LOCATION OF THE PAVED AREA
 PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WILL REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT
 PORTION OF THE EXISTING ROOT SYSTEM AND MAY INCREASE
 THE RISK OF FAILURE.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL
 THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH
 PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE
 TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST
 BE USED.
 EAST AND WEST BUFFER CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS MUST
 BE INCLUDED.
  
  
 6. WITHDRAWN. THE SPLIT ZONING FOR THE SITE CREATES
 CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BEING
 DIFFERENT FOR EACH ZONING CATEGORY. NON RESIDENTIAL
 ZONING ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIRES A WALL
 PER SECTION 94-443(A). THIS COULD BE RESOLVED BY
 REZONING.
 WEST BUFFER CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AND BUFFER
 PROVIDED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE SECOND BUILDING. THE
 PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING.
 THE PARKING IS BEING RECONFIGURED FROM THE EXISTING SO
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
  
 9. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE NUMBER REQUIRED AND THE
 PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
  
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY
 LINES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE MUST BE SHOWN
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
 THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE LINE WITH ROOT BARRIER WILL
 REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE
 TWO EXISTING FICUS TREES, WOULD BE BETTER IF LOCATED
 AWAY FROM THE TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 12. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL
 IS REQUIRED ALONG ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINES. THE SPLIT ZONING CAUSES A CONFLICT IF ANY OF THE
 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL USE IS NOT BUFFERED FROM THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE PARKING AREA ENCROACHES INTO THE
 SF 14 ZONING.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. ADONIDIA PALMS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF
 8 FEET CT.
 THE REPLY IN COMMENTS IS INCORRECTLY REFERRING TO
 SPACING.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-07-2022 Time 11:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-07-2022 Time 11:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-07 11:36:52FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 4801 S DIXIE Z22100019
 OCTOBER 4, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING IS $127,532.00 PER THE PBC
 PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROJECTED COST OF THE CHANGES
 FOR THE BUILDING ARE EXPECTED TO EXCEED $64,000.00,
 EXCEEDING 50% OF THE VALUE. PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2),
 THIS REQUIRES THE ENTIRE SITE BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. REVISE
 PLANS TO SHOW LANDSCAPING MEETING THE CODE REQUIREMENTS
 PROPOSED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
  
 2. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFYING THE EXISTING
 TREES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE.
  
 3. THE TWO FICUS TREES NEED TO BE EVALUATED FOR HEALTH
 AND STRUCTURE. CONSTRUCTION IN CLOSE PROXIMITY MAY
 NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEM AND THE EXISTING AND POTENTIAL
 RISK SHOULD BE ASSESSED.
  
 4. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE SITE
 BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B.
 PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN SPACE BASED ON
 THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 5. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE
 THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE
 PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. THE SPLIT ZONING FOR THE SITE CREATES CONFLICTS WITH
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BEING DIFFERENT FOR
 EACH ZONING CATEGORY. NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING ADJACENT
 TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIRES A WALL PER SECTION
 94-443(A). THIS COULD BE RESOLVED BY REZONING.
  
 7. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE SECOND BUILDING. THE PLAN
 MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
  
 8. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT
 LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF
 PARKING.
 THE PARKING IS BEING RECONFIGURED FROM THE EXISTING SO
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
  
 9. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE NUMBER REQUIRED AND THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
  
 10. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES INCLUDING
 WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 11. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT WILL
 LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE
 GUIDELINES.
  
 12. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL
 IS REQUIRED ALONG ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINES. THE SPLIT ZONING CAUSES A CONFLICT IF ANY OF THE
 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL USE IS NOT BUFFERED FROM THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE PARKING AREA ENCROACHES INTO THE
 SF 14 ZONING.
  
 13. ADONIDIA PALMS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET CT.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-05-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 05-05-2023 Time 16:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 05-05-2023 Time 16:44 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-05 16:47:14NO COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING
 AS ALL PROPOSED CONNECTIONS ARE TO EXISTING SERVICES
 WHO'S CLEANOUT/METER IS LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 CONFIRMATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS FOR BOTH WATER AND
 SEWER MAINS WOULD BE HELPFUL.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 02-06-2023 Time 08:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-06-2022 Time 08:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-06 08:08:22PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -ON ENGINEERING PLANS, SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 METERED WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, SEWER
 CLEANOUTS, SANITARY SEWER MAINS, BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES,
 AND WATER MAINS ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY.
 -WILL THE SEPARATE EXISTING 560 S.F. SOUTHWEST BUILDING
 ALSO BE PART OF THE RESTAURANT WHERE FOOD IS PREPARED
 AND CUSTOMERS CAN DINE? IF NOT, WHAT WILL IT BE USED
 FOR?
 -SHOW ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GREASE TRAPS THAT ARE
 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF BUILDING.
 -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW NO PARKING SIGNS AT DIXIE
 SIDEWALK.
 -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW LIGHT POLE, UTILITY BOXES, AND
 VALVE BOX NEAR SOUTH DRIVEWAY. SHOW AND LABEL ON PLANS.
 -ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO ENGINEERING
 PLAN.
 -WILL ANY OF THE BUILDINGS HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS?
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-07-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-07-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 02-07-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-07 08:40:29NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-07-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-07 08:21:54PLEASE CHANGE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ORIENTATION SUCH
 THAT THE GATE OPENING IS AT 45 DEG. TO THE NW DIRECTION
 ALLOWING EASIER ACCESS TO THE DUMPSTERS FOR THE REFUSE
 COLLECTION VEHICLE.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-20454
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-08-2023 Time 10:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-08-2023 Time 10:37 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-08 10:37:36THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 4/17/2023 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
 DELETED.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] IF DUMPSTER DRIVEWAY CAN REMAIN, REPLACE
 TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER WITH DROP CURB ACROSS THE
 DRIVEWAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SHOW THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS/CHANGES WITHIN THE PARK PARCEL TO
 ACCOMMODATE THIS PROJECT.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL UTILITIES (SIZE,
 MATERIAL) ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. SHOW ON THE GRADING
 AND DRAINAGE PLAN.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE TREES AND THE EXISTING CATCH
 BASIN BETWEEN THE PARK'S DRIVEWAY AND THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] THERE APPEAR TO BE A UTILITY GATE VALVE
 BOX AND A LIGHT POLE IN THE SIDEWALK THAT ARE NOT SHOWN
 ON THE SURVEY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: VALVE IS NOT SHOWN.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (2/3/2023 SUBMITTAL)
  
 12. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW THE PLACEMENT OF THE TRENCH
 DRAIN ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY AT THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. IT
 IS SHOWN AT A HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT: THE FLOODING WILL NOT GET HIGHER
 THAN ELEVATION 15.0 FT NAVD BEFORE OVERFLOWING TO
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES. IF WATER IS FLOWING OUT OF THE
 TRENCH DRAIN, THEN THE BUILDING WILL LIKELY BE FLOODED
 BECAUSE THE FFE IS LOWER THAN THE ELEVATION OF THE
 TRENCH DRAIN.
  
 13. [SATISFIED] DRIVEWAY APRON TO BE CONCRETE WITHIN
 THE S. DIXIE RIGHT OF WAY UNLESS FDOT APPROVES ASPHALT.
  
 14. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING
 DRIVEWAYS AND DROP CURB WITH TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER AND
 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT MAX. 2% CROSS SLOPE.
  
 15. [SATISFIED ??? EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE LIGHT
 POLE UNLESS THE POLE AND HAND HOLES CAN BE LOCATED
 WITHIN THE 10-FT EASEMENT.] SHOW WHERE THE LIGHT POLE
 NORTH OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY (AND WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY) WILL BE LOCATED. TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE
 TREE CANOPY.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] CONSTRUCTING THE DRIVEWAY AND TRENCHING
 THE WATER SERVICE LINE SO CLOSE TO THE EXISTING TREES
 MAY LEAVE THE TREES UNSTABLE AFTER THE ROOTS ARE
 PRUNED..
  
 17. [SATISFIED] REVIEW STRIPING CALLOUTS IN THE PARKING
 LOT, IN PARTICULAR THE STOP BAR AND DOUBLE YELLOW
 STRIPING.
  
 18. [SATISFIED ??? EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE
 PORTION OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE OF THE 10-FT UTILITY
 EASEMENT.] SECTION A - SHOW THE PROPOSED BACK OF WALK
 AT THE EXISTING GRADE AND CREATE A DRIVEWAY TRANSITION
 BETWEEN THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK AND THE BACK OF VALLEY
 GUTTER. SEE FDOT STANDARD PLAN #522-003.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-23-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-23-2023 Time 09:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-23-2023 Time 09:13 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-23 09:13:05THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 2/3/2023 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER
 CITY CODE IS NGVD1929. THE NAVD1988 VERTICAL DATUM MAY
 BE USED IF THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND
 NGVD1929 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION
 ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLAN.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] S. DIXIE HIGHWAY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT.
 ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W ARE TO BE APPROVED BY
 FDOT.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] REMOVE THE CURB CROSSING THE SIDEWALK ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY APRON.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AT THE DRIVEWAY
 FROM THE CENTERLINE OF S. DIXIE TO THE FIVE FEET INTO
 THE EXISTING PARKING LOT. SHOW BREAKPOINTS, R/W,
 GUTTERS, WIDTH OF ADA PORTION OF SIDEWALK, GENERAL
 SURFACE SLOPES.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE ARROWS ON THE CONCEPTUAL
 ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWING STOMWATER RUNOFF FLOW
 DIRECTION.
  
 6. [NOT SATISFIED] IF DUMPSTER DRIVEWAY CAN REMAIN,
 REPLACE TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER WITH DROP CURB ACROSS
 THE DRIVEWAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SHOW THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS/CHANGES WITHIN THE PARK PARCEL TO
 ACCOMMODATE THIS PROJECT.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL UTILITIES
 (SIZE, MATERIAL) ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. SHOW ON THE
 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN.
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW THE TREES AND THE
 EXISTING CATCH BASIN BETWEEN THE PARK'S DRIVEWAY AND
 THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE.
  
 9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THERE APPEAR TO BE A UTILITY
 GATE VALVE BOX AND A LIGHT POLE IN THE SIDEWALK THAT
 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: VALVE
 IS NOT SHOWN.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] SHOW WHEEL STOPS FOR THE PARKING SPACES
 FACING THE BUILDING.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS (2/3/2023 SUBMITTAL)
  
 12. REVIEW THE PLACEMENT OF THE TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS THE
 DRIVEWAY AT THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. IT IS SHOWN AT A HIGH
 POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION.
  
 13. DRIVEWAY APRON TO BE CONCRETE WITHIN THE S. DIXIE
 RIGHT OF WAY UNLESS FDOT APPROVES ASPHALT.
  
 14. SHOW THE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS AND
 DROP CURB WITH TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE
 SIDEWALK AT MAX. 2% CROSS SLOPE.
  
 15. SHOW WHERE THE LIGHT POLE NORTH OF THE EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY (AND WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY) WILL BE
 LOCATED. TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE TREE CANOPY.
  
 16. CONSTRUCTING THE DRIVEWAY AND TRENCHING THE WATER
 SERVICE LINE SO CLOSE TO THE EXISTING TREES MAY LEAVE
 THE TREES UNSTABLE AFTER THE ROOTS ARE PRUNED..
  
 17. REVIEW STRIPING CALLOUTS IN THE PARKING LOT, IN
 PARTICULAR THE STOP BAR AND DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING.
  
 18. SECTION A - SHOW THE PROPOSED BACK OF WALK AT THE
 EXISTING GRADE AND CREATE A DRIVEWAY TRANSITION BETWEEN
 THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK AND THE BACK OF VALLEY GUTTER.
 SEE FDOT STANDARD PLAN #522-003.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-13-2022 Time 09:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-13-2022 Time 09:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-13 09:05:17THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS
 NGVD1929. THE NAVD1988 VERTICAL DATUM MAY BE USED IF
 THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE
 SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLAN.
  
 2. S. DIXIE HIGHWAY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ALL
 IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W ARE TO BE APPROVED BY FDOT.
  
 3. REMOVE THE PROPOSED CURB CROSSING THE SIDEWALK ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY APRON.
  
 4. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AT THE DRIVEWAY FROM THE
 CENTERLINE OF S. DIXIE TO FIVE FEET INTO THE EXISTING
 PARKING LOT. SHOW BREAKPOINTS, R/W, GUTTERS, WIDTH OF
 ADA PORTION OF SIDEWALK, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES.
  
 5. PROVIDE ARROWS ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN
 SHOWING STOMWATER RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION.
  
 6. IF DUMPSTER DRIVEWAY CAN REMAIN, REPLACE TYPE 'F'
 CURB AND GUTTER WITH DROP CURB ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 7. SHOW AND LABEL UTILITIES (SIZE, MATERIAL) ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 8. SHOW THE TREES AND THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN BETWEEN
 THE PARK'S DRIVEWAY AND THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE
 SITE.
  
 9. THERE APPEAR TO BE A UTILITY GATE VALVE BOX AND A
 LIGHT POLE IN THE SIDEWALK THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE
 SURVEY.
  
 10. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. SHOW WHEEL STOPS FOR THE PARKING SPACES FACING THE
 BUILDING.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-08-2023 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-08 10:18:45PASSED BUT HAVE APPLICANT CORRECT THE DB ON MAP FROM
 DEED BOOK 68 TO 680 AND PROVIDE SIGNED COPY.
 ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK AND
 STREET LIGHTING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-15-2023 Time 07:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-15 07:13:431. SURVEY REFLECTS A DIFFERENT DATE OF THE TITLE
 COMMITMENT THAN THE ONE PROVIDED.
 2. THERE ARE EASEMENTS ON THE JUNE 16TH, 2021
 COMMITMENT THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY, SPECIFICALLY
 EASEMENT TO CITY IN DB 680, P 93
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-01-2022 Time 10:51 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-01 11:09:591. PROVIDE COPY OF TITLE POLICY REFERENCED ON SURVEY.
 ADDITIONAL 10' OF R/W MAY HAVE BEEN GIVEN PER
 RESOLUTION 2-15-44.
 2. FDOT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR DIXIE HWY.
 IMPROVEMENTS.
 3. AS PROPERTY WILL NOW BE A RESTAURANT, NEED
 ADDITIONAL WATER AND SEWER FLOW DEMANDS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-08-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-08-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-08 11:41:33APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
 1) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER
 TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 BELOW ARE THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS:
  
 TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PLEASE REVISE
 ATTACHMENT 3, DRIVEWAY VOLUMES, TO SHOWCASE THE ACTUAL
 NUMBER OF FUTURE TRIPS ENTERING/EXITING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT (DO NOT APPLY EXISTING/PREVIOUS OR PASS-BY
 TRIPS DISCOUNT). ALSO REVISE THE TABLE IN SP-1 WITH
 SUCH VALUES.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN
 FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS MISSING AND SEVERAL
 UNRELATED ITEMS SHOWN. PLEASE CLEAN UP, DIMENSION
 PROPERLY AND CREATE A SPECIFIC DRAWING, SUGGESTED NAME:
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN OR INSERT SUCH ELEMENTS IN THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL
 SITE PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE.
 4) WAIVED BY ADMIN ??? ANGELLA JONES. PROVIDE AUTOTURN
 ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES
 DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH
 VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY
 DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DOCUMENT/SHEET NAME/NUMBER
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE DRIVE AISLE DIMENSION. IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
 7) SATISFIED. INSTALL A STOP BAR AND SIGN AT THE
 DRIVEWAY EXIT LANE ON DIXIE
 8) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR CURB
 9) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE
 A VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. NOTE: LIFTS CANNOT BE
 OPERATED BY RESTAURANT CUSTOMERS
 10) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 11) TO BE SATISFIED AT PERMITS. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION
 MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR
 DETAILS.
 12) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAYS MODIFICATION AND RESTRIPING
 ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY WOULD NEED FDOT D4 REVIEW AND
 APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CORRESPONDING LETTERS OF
 APPROVAL
 13) SATISFIED. THE VERY LAST CAR LIFT ON THE WESTERN
 SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE END-CURB,
 PLEASE RELOCATE OR REMOVE IT ACCORDINGLY
 14) SATISFIED. CLEARLY DESIGNATE AND MARK WITH CHEVRON
 STRIPES THE TURN-AROUND SPACE AT THE END OF THE PARKING
 LOT. PLEASE CALL OUT THE SPACE IN THE TRANSPORTATION
 SITE PLAN
 15) WAIVED BY ADMIN ??? ANGELLA JONES. THE DUMPSTER IS
 BEING ACCESSED/SERVICED THROUGH ANOTHER PROPERTY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE OWNER CONSENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-20-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-20-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-20 20:47:11TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PLEASE REVISE
 ATTACHMENT 3, DRIVEWAY VOLUMES, TO SHOWCASE THE ACTUAL
 NUMBER OF FUTURE TRIPS ENTERING/EXITING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT (DO NOT APPLY EXISTING/PREVIOUS OR PASS-BY
 TRIPS DISCOUNT). ALSO REVISE THE TABLE IN SP-1 WITH
 SUCH VALUES.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS
 MISSING AND SEVERAL UNRELATED ITEMS SHOWN. PLEASE CLEAN
 UP, DIMENSION PROPERLY AND CREATE A SPECIFIC DRAWING,
 SUGGESTED NAME: TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN OR INSERT SUCH ELEMENTS IN THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL
 SITE PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE.
 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING
 THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DOCUMENT/SHEET NAME/NUMBER
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE DRIVE AISLE DIMENSION. IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
 7) SATISFIED. INSTALL A STOP BAR AND SIGN AT THE
 DRIVEWAY EXIT LANE ON DIXIE
 8) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR CURB
 9) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE
 A VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. NOTE: LIFTS CANNOT BE
 OPERATED BY RESTAURANT CUSTOMERS
 10) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 11) TO BE SATISFIED AT PERMITS. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION
 MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR
 DETAILS.
 12) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAYS MODIFICATION AND RESTRIPING
 ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY WOULD NEED FDOT D4 REVIEW AND
 APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CORRESPONDING LETTERS OF
 APPROVAL
 13) SATISFIED. THE VERY LAST CAR LIFT ON THE WESTERN
 SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE END-CURB,
 PLEASE RELOCATE OR REMOVE IT ACCORDINGLY
 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLEARLY DESIGNATE AND MARK
 WITH CHEVRON STRIPES THE TURN-AROUND SPACE AT THE END
 OF THE PARKING LOT. PLEASE CALL OUT THE SPACE IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
 15) NOT SATISFIED. THE DUMPSTER IS BEING
 ACCESSED/SERVICED THROUGH ANOTHER PROPERTY. PLEASE
 PROVIDE OWNER CONSENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-11-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-11-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-11 18:40:44TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PLEASE REVISE ATTACHMENT 3,
 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES, TO SHOWCASE THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF
 FUTURE TRIPS ENTERING/EXITING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 (DO NOT APPLY EXISTING/PREVIOUS OR PASS-BY TRIPS
 DISCOUNT). ALSO REVISE THE TABLE IN SP-1 WITH SUCH
 VALUES.
 2) PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED
 3) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN OR
 INSERT SUCH ELEMENTS IN THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE.
 4) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS
 5) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 6) PROVIDE DRIVE AISLE DIMENSION
 7) INSTALL A STOP BAR AND SIGN AT THE DRIVEWAY EXIT
 LANE ON DIXIE
 8) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR CURB
 9) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. NOTE: LIFTS CANNOT BE OPERATED BY
 RESTAURANT CUSTOMERS
 10) ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 11) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS.
 12) DRIVEWAYS MODIFICATION AND RESTRIPING ALONG DIXIE
 HIGHWAY WOULD NEED FDOT D4 REVIEW AND APPROVAL. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE CORRESPONDING LETTERS OF APPROVAL
 13) THE VERY LAST CAR LIFT ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE
 PARKING LOT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE END-CURB, PLEASE
 RELOCATE OR REMOVE IT ACCORDINGLY
 14) CLEARLY DESIGNATE AND MARK WITH CHEVRON STRIPES THE
 TURN-AROUND SPACE AT THE END OF THE PARKING LOT
 15) THE DUMPSTER IS BEING ACCESSED/SERVICED THROUGH
 ANOTHER PROPERTY. PLEASE PROVIDE OWNER CONSENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-08-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By asangele Date 05-08-2023 Time 08:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By asangele Date 05-08-2023 Time 08:39 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-08 08:39:30MAY 8 2023
  
  
 APPROVAL WITH CONDITION
  
 REZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT GETS
 COMPLETED AND APPROVED
  
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED
 (REZONING APPLICATION CURRENTLY IN PROCESS)
 STAFF WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY THIS IS NOT BEING REZONED
 AS THE SITE DESIGN SEEMS TO BE LIMITED DUE TO THE
 SINGLE FAMILY ZONING LOCATED ON THE REAR OF THE
 PROPERTY. NOTE THAT TO THE SF14 ZONING DESIGNATION TO
 THE REAR. NOTE THAT TH FLU. FOR THIS SITE IS COMMERICAL
 /COMMERCIAL EAST.
  
 2. SATISFIED
 (PLANS WERE REVISED COMMENT NO LONGER APPLIES)
 THE WIDTH OF THE EXPANSION ON THE FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT
 MATCH WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED
 (COMMENT NO LONGER ACUABLE DUE TO THE REZONING
 APPLICATION CURRENTLY IN PROCESS)
 THERE IS NO LOADING SPACE DESIGNATED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 ADDITION COMMENT REGARDING THE LOADING SPACE
 THE LOADING SPACE WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE LOCATED IN
 THE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 4. SATISFIED
 WHAT IS THE LINE EXTENDING FROM BUILDING B?
  
 5. SATISFIED
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE THE MONUMENT SIGN DIMENTIONS.
  
 6. SATISFIED
 SINCE YOU ARE ALTERING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING
 AREA, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ALL THE DIMENTIONS
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY CODE.
  
 6A. SATISFIED
 (PLANS WERE REVISED COMMENT NO LONGER APPLIES)
 PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE 3 PARKING SPACES WEST OF
 THE ADA SPACES, AS THEY APPEAR LONGER THAN THE 4 TO THE
 EAST OF THEM.
  
 6B. SATISFIED
 PROVIDE ALL THE PARKING DIMENSION FOR THE PARKING
 SPACES OCCUPYING BY THE CAR LIFT.
  
 6C SATISFIED
 NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THEDRIVE AISLE AS
 TWO- WAY DIRECTION MOVEMENT REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 24
 FEET WIDE DRIVE AISLE.
  
 7. SATISFIED
 STAFF NEED A GREATER IN DEPTH EXPLANATION HOW THE CAR
 LIFTS WORK AND HOW THEY WILL OPERATE. WITH THE TWO
 LIFTS BEING LOCATED BACK TO BACK FROM ONE ANOTHER AND
 THE FDOT LETTER STATING "VALET OPERATION NOT PROPOSED"
  
 7A PARTIALLY SATISFIELD
 (WITH THE REZONING APPLICATION CURRENTLY IN PROCESS)
 THE CAR LIFT IS REQUIRED TO BE PROPERLY SCREENED PLEASE
 SHOW HOW YOU ARE PLANNING ON SCREENING THE LIFT.
  
 8. SATISFIED
 PROVIDE THE DIMENTIONS FOR THE CAR LIFT
  
 8A SATISFIED
 WILL THIS INTERFERE WITH ANY WHEEL STOPS ON THE PARKING
 BELOW?
  
 8B. SATISFIED
 IS THE 5FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUFFICENT TO ENCURE THE
 RAISED CARS ARE LOCATED A SAFE DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE
 ADJACENT BUILDING? PLEASE PROVIDE A RANGE OF HOW FAR
 THE CARS WILL ENROACH INTO THIS SETBACKS/LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER.
  
 9. SATISFIELD
 (PLANS NO LONGER SHOW LIFT LOCATED IN THE SINGLE FAMILY
 ZONING DISTRICT)
 THE PROPOSED PARKING LIFTS EXTEND INTO THE SF14 PORTION
 OF THIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS CONSIDERED TO BE OFF SITE
 PARKING. IT WAS STAFFS UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL NEW
 PARKING FACILTIES WOULD BE CONTAINED WITHIN THW NC
 PROTION OF THIS PROPERTY. NOTE THAT PLACING NEW OFF
 SITE PARKING FACILITES WOULD REQUIRED A CLASS B SPECIAL
 USE PERMIT.
  
 10. SATISFIELD
 THERE IS A PORTION OF CONCRETE BETWEEN THE TWO ADA
 SPACES THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE STRIPED AS
 REQUIRED BY CODE. PLEASE SHOW THAT THESE PARKING SPACES
 ARE STRIPED APPROPRIATELY.
  
 11. STATIFED
 ARE YOU PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE ON STREET PARKING
 AREAS? STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXISTING ON STREET
 PARKING DOES NOT MEET CODE PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ALONG DIXIE HWY.
  
 11A. STATIFIED
 (NO ALTERNATIONS ARE GOING TO BE MADE AT THIS TIME
 REGARDING THE ON STREET PARKING.)
 IF PROPOSING AN ALTERATION OF THE ON STREET PARKING
 AREA, PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT
 CERTIFYING THE ON-STREET PARKING.
  
 12. STATIFIED
 PROVIDE AN ACCESS DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT
 CERTIFING THE CHANGES YOU ARE MAKING TO THE ACCESS
 POINT ALONG DIXIE HWY.
  
  
  
 ALEXIS SANGELEER
 PLANNER
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-30-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By asangele Date 03-30-2023 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By asangele Date 03-30-2023 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-30 17:28:39FAILED
 3/30/2023
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED
 STAFF WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY THIS IS NOT BEING REZONED
 AS THE SITE DESIGN SEEMS TO BE LIMITED DUE TO THE
 SINGLE FAMILY ZONING LOCATED ON THE REAR OF THE
 PROPERTY. NOTE THAT TO THE SF14 ZONING DESIGNATION TO
 THE REAR. NOTE THAT TH FLU. FOR THIS SITE IS COMMERICAL
 /COMMERCIAL EAST.
  
 2. SATISFIED
 (PLANS WERE REVISED COMMENT NO LONGER APPLIES)
 THE WIDTH OF THE EXPANSION ON THE FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT
 MATCH WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED
 THERE IS NO LOADING SPACE DESIGNATED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 ADDITION COMMENT REGARDING THE LOADING SPACE
 THE LOADING SPACE WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE LOCATED IN
 THE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 4. SATISFIED
 WHAT IS THE LINE EXTENDING FROM BUILDING B?
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE THE MONUMENT SIGN DIMENTIONS.
  
 6. SATISFIED
 SINCE YOU ARE ALTERING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING
 AREA, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ALL THE DIMENTIONS
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY CODE.
  
 6A. SATISFIED
 (PLANS WERE REVISED COMMENT NO LONGER APPLIES)
 PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE 3 PARKING SPACES WEST OF
 THE ADA SPACES, AS THEY APPEAR LONGER THAN THE 4 TO THE
 EAST OF THEM.
  
 6B. NOT SATISFIED
 PROVIDE ALL THE PARKING DIMENSION FOR THE PARKING
 SPACES OCCUPYING BY THE CAR LIFT.
  
 6C SATISFIED
 NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THEDRIVE AISLE AS
 TWO- WAY DIRECTION MOVEMENT REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 24
 FEET WIDE DRIVE AISLE.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED
 STAFF NEED A GREATER IN DEPTH EXPLANATION HOW THE CAR
 LIFTS WORK AND HOW THEY WILL OPERATE. WITH THE TWO
 LIFTS BEING LOCATED BACK TO BACK FROM ONE ANOTHER AND
 THE FDOT LETTER STATING "VALET OPERATION NOT PROPOSED"
  
 7A NEW COMMENT
 THE CAR LIFT IS REQUIRED TO BE PROPERLY SCREENED PLEASE
 SHOW HOW YOU ARE PLANNING ON SCREENING THE LIFT.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED
 PROVIDE THE DIMENTIONS FOR THE CAR LIFT
  
 8A NOT SATISFIED
 WILL THIS INTERFERE WITH ANY WHEEL STOPS ON THE PARKING
 BELOW?
  
 8B. NOT SATISFIED
 IS THE 5FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUFFICENT TO ENCURE THE
 RAISED CARS ARE LOCATED A SAFE DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE
 ADJACENT BUILDING? PLEASE PROVIDE A RANGE OF HOW FAR
 THE CARS WILL ENROACH INTO THIS SETBACKS/LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER.
  
 9. SATISFIELD
 (PLANS NO LONGER SHOW LIFT LOCATED IN THE SINGLE FAMILY
 ZONING DISTRICT)
 THE PROPOSED PARKING LIFTS EXTEND INTO THE SF14 PORTION
 OF THIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS CONSIDERED TO BE OFF SITE
 PARKING. IT WAS STAFFS UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL NEW
 PARKING FACILTIES WOULD BE CONTAINED WITHIN THW NC
 PROTION OF THIS PROPERTY. NOTE THAT PLACING NEW OFF
 SITE PARKING FACILITES WOULD REQUIRED A CLASS B SPECIAL
 USE PERMIT.
  
 10. SATISFIELD
 THERE IS A PORTION OF CONCRETE BETWEEN THE TWO ADA
 SPACES THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE STRIPED AS
 REQUIRED BY CODE. PLEASE SHOW THAT THESE PARKING SPACES
 ARE STRIPED APPROPRIATELY.
  
 11.NOT STATIFED
 ARE YOU PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE ON STREET PARKING
 AREAS? STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXISTING ON STREET
 PARKING DOES NOT MEET CODE PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ALONG DIXIE HWY.
  
 11A. STATIFIED
 (NO ALTERNATIONS ARE GOING TO BE MADE AT THIS TIME
 REGARDING THE ON STREET PARKING.)
 IF PROPOSING AN ALTERATION OF THE ON STREET PARKING
 AREA, PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT
 CERTIFYING THE ON-STREET PARKING.
  
 12. STATIFIED
 PROVIDE AN ACCESS DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT
 CERTIFING THE CHANGES YOU ARE MAKING TO THE ACCESS
 POINT ALONG DIXIE HWY.
  
  
  
 ALEXIS SANGELEER
 PLANNER
 [email protected]
  
  
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A MINMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF
 FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUMBITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/
 PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONA;
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE ITF THE PLANNING DIVSION HAS NOT RECEIVED
 A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS/REVIEW COMMENTS WITHIN
 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING/COMMENTS
 ISSUANCE BY (MAY 30,2023 ) THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY
 NOTIFY THE APPLICATNTHAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED
 WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRED A NEW
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOSLYISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSES, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($1000).
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By afowlkes Date 11-07-2022 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By afowlkes Date 11-07-2022 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-07 15:09:17CASE NO. 22-11 (Z22100019):
 CASE NAME AUSTIN REPUBLIC
 ADDRESS 4801 S DIXIE HWY
  
 - CONTACT ALEXANDER FOWLKES @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 1. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY THIS IS NOT BEING
 REZONED AS THE SITE DESIGN SEEMS TO BE VERY LIMITED DUE
 TO THE SF14 ZONING DESIGNATION TO THE REAR. NOTE THAT
 THE FLU FOR THIS SITE IS COMMERCIAL/ COMMERCIAL EAST
 2. THE WIDTH OF THE EXPANSION ON THE FLOOR PLAN DOES
 NOT MATCH WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN.
 3. THERE IS NO LOADING SPACE DESIGNATED ON THE SITE
 PLAN
 4. WHAT IS THE LINE EXTENDING FROM BUILDING B? ASSUMING
 IT IS A FENCE, PLEASE LABEL IT AND INCLUDE THE HEIGHT
 MEASUREMENT
 5. SIGNAGE CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING PERMITTING, BUT THE
 SIGN DETAILS STATE THAT A MAX OF THREE SIGNS ARE
 ALLOWED ON THE MONUMENT SIGN, ONE FOR EACH BUSINESS.
 THIS ISN???T NECESSARILY CORRECT AS THE DETERMINING
 FACTOR FOR ALLOWED SIGNAGE FOR LOW FREESTANDING SIGNS
 IS STREET FRONTAGE.
 6. BECAUSE YOU ARE ALTERING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PARKING AREA, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ALL THE
 DIMENSIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH CITY CODE.
 6A. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE 3 PARKING SPACES
 WEST OF THE ADA SPACES, AS THEY APPEAR LONGER THAN THE
 4 TO THE EAST OF THEM.
 6B. SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING SPACES OCCUPIED
 BY THE CAR LIFTS
 6C. NEED TO INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DRIVE AISLE
 AS TWO-WAY DIRECTION MOVEMENT REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 24
 FEET WIDE DRIVE AISLE
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A THOROUGH EXPLANATION OF HOW THE CAR
 LIFTS WORK AND HOW THEY WILL BE OPERATED.
 8. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE CAR LIFTS
 8A. WILL THIS INTERFERE WITH THE ANY WHEEL STOPS ON THE
 PARKING BELOW?
 8B. IS THE 5 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE
 THE RAISED CARS ARE LOCATED A SAFE DISTANCE AWAY FROM
 THE ADJACENT BUILDING? PLEASE PROVIDE A RANGE OF HOW
 FAR THE CARS WILL ENCROACH INTO THIS SETBACK/LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER.
 9. THE PROPOSED PARKING LIFTS EXTEND INTO THE SF14
 PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS CONSIDERED TO BE
 OFF-SITE PARKING. IT WAS STAFFS UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL
 NEW PARKING FACILITIES WOULD BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE NC
 PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY. NOTE THAT PLACING NEW
 OFF-SITE PARKING FACILITIES WOULD REQUIRE A CLASS B
 SPECIAL USE PERMIT
 10. THERE IS A PORTION OF CONCRETE BETWEEN THE TWO ADA
 SPACES THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE STRIPED AS
 REQUIRED BY CODE. PLEASE SHOW THAT THESE PARKING SPACES
 ARE STRIPED APPROPRIATELY.
 11. ARE YOU PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE ON-STREET PARKING
 AREAS? STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXISTING ON STREET
 PARKING DOES NOT MEET CODE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ALONG DIXIE HWY
 11A. IF PROPOSING AN ALTERATION OF THE ON STREET
 PARKING AREAS, PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM
 FDOT CERTIFYING THE ON-STREET PARKING
 12. PROVIDE AN ACCESS DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT
 CERTIFYING THE CHANGES YOU ARE MAKING TO THE ACCESS
 POINT ALONG DIXIE HWY
  
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF
 FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS/REVIEW
 COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC
 MEETING/COMMENT ISSUANCE (BY 01/10/23), THE PLANNING
 DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE
 A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($1000).
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved