Plan Review Details - Project Z22100018
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22100018
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 01-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 01-03-2023 Time 13:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 01-03-2023 Time 13:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-01-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 02-01-2023 Time 10:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 02-01-2023 Time 10:48 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-01 10:48:42DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT
 ADDRESSED. 19 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED AND 19
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. WILL BE
 CHECKED DURING BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW AND INSPECTION.
 THE SURVEY DRAWING SHOWS 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN
 KINGS COURT LOT 4 WHICH IS UNDER THE FOOTPRINT OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING, AND THE SITE PLAN, SP-1, DOES NOT
 SHOW THEM ALL BEING REPLACED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION
 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF FOOD IS BEING PREPARED ONSITE
 FOR THE DINING ROOM A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 11-10-2022 Time 13:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-10-2022 Time 13:35 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-10 13:43:00DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE SURVEY
 DRAWING SHOWS 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN KINGS
 COURT LOT 4 WHICH IS UNDER THE FOOTPRINT OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING, AND THE SITE PLAN, SP-1, DOES NOT
 SHOW THEM ALL BEING REPLACED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION
 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF FOOD IS BEING PREPARED ONSITE
 FOR THE DINING ROOM A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-29-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 03-29-2023 Time 07:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 03-29-2023 Time 07:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-02-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-02-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-02-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-02 10:44:35PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-30-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-30-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-30 17:18:44PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-25-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 10-25-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-25 12:02:30Z22100018 -
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-27-2022 Time 11:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-27-2022 Time 11:14 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-27 11:23:25GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ANY EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ANY PROPOSED LOCATION(S) OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC
 SHALL BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE.
  
 FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE
 MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED PER
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF
 EGRESS.
  
 12A. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 CONTACT WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH
 COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
 [email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
 ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-09-2023 Time 17:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-09-2023 Time 17:06 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-13 17:07:05FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PBAU Z22100018
 MARCH 13, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE DISPOSITION INVENTORY
 MAP AS AN OVERLAY TO THE EXISTING SITE CONFIGURATION AS
 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY, NOT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SO THAT
 THE LOCATIONS MATCH THE TREE SURVEY.
 ??? SATISFIED. MOVE ALL MITIGATION INFORMATION TO THE
 TREE DISPOSITION SHEETS, SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LANDSCAPE
 SHEETS.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT BOTANICAL NAME FOR MAHOGANY IN
 THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
 CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE AS SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE INCLUDING THE PALM MITIGATION.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON
 THE PLANT LIST BY TREE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE A TOTAL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT NOTE ON L1.2 ALL CANOPY
 MITIGATION MUST BE PROVIDED ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU
 PAYMENT MADE TO THE CANOPY MITIGATION FUND.
 1/26/23 BONDING IS NOT AN OPTION BY CODE PER THE
 PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE CONDITION
 FOR EACH NATIVE TREE OR PALM PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED IN
 THE ARBORISTS REPORT AND EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL
 PER SECTION 94-448.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENED TO
 THE KAPOK TREE THAT WAS LOCATED ON THIS SITE.
 VERY SAD THAT THIS TREE WAS LOST.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE LACK OF TREE CANOPY AND THE EXTENSIVE
 PAVED AREAS IN THE DESIGN AROUND THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 IS NOTED, THE HEAT ISLAND CREATED WILL NOT BE
 PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY. THERE IS A DEFICIT OF TREE CANOPY
 REPLACEMENT.
 1/26/23 THE TREE CANOPY MITIGATION CAN BE ADDED
 ANYWHERE WITHIN THE CSPD BOUNDARY. THE ADDED TREES
 CANNOT BE REPLACEMENTS FOR TREES THAT ARE MISSING AND
 SHOULD BE REPLACED AS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON APPROVED
 PLANS OR ARE OBVIOUS REQUIRED TREES SUCH AS IN PARKING
 AREAS. A MASTER PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH TREE
 LOCATIONS, SPECIES AND SIZES INDICATED THAT WOULD BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION, AND THE PLAN
 THEN SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR THE
 BUSINESS SCHOOL PROJECT. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE TREES
 TO BE PLANTED AND THE LANDSCAPE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE
 CO FOR THE NEW BUILDING.
  
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER ALONG OLIVE NEEDS TO CONSIST
 OF TREES APPROPRIATE UNDER THE POWER LINES TO PROVIDE
 SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF PALMS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO ELIMINATE TAKING 51% IN TWICE
 IN THE SAME OPTION. SEE (3)GROUNDCOVER, (4) SHRUBS, AND
 (5) TREES.
 SOD AREA FOR OPTION #7 IS DIFFICULT TO VERIFY, SUGGEST
 DROP FROM LIST.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST
 LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING, AS THERE
 ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS SHOWN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE ONE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR
 THE BUILDING, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A REVISED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHOWING
 THE LOCATIONS AND SPECIES OF THE TREES TO MEET THE TREE
 MITIGATION REQUIRED ON SITE FOR REVIEW.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-26-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-26-2023 Time 12:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-26-2023 Time 12:39 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-26 12:40:33FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PBAU Z22100018
 JANUARY 26, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE DISPOSITION INVENTORY
 MAP AS AN OVERLAY TO THE EXISTING SITE CONFIGURATION AS
 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY, NOT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SO THAT
 THE LOCATIONS MATCH THE TREE SURVEY.
 ??? SATISFIED. MOVE ALL MITIGATION INFORMATION TO THE
 TREE DISPOSITION SHEETS, SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LANDSCAPE
 SHEETS.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT BOTANICAL NAME FOR MAHOGANY IN
 THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
 CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE AS SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE INCLUDING THE PALM MITIGATION.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON
 THE PLANT LIST BY TREE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE A TOTAL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? NOT SATISFIED. CORRECT NOTE ON L1.2 ALL CANOPY
 MITIGATION MUST BE PROVIDED ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU
 PAYMENT MADE TO THE CANOPY MITIGATION FUND.
 1/26/23 BONDING IS NOT AN OPTION BY CODE PER THE
 PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE CONDITION
 FOR EACH NATIVE TREE OR PALM PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED IN
 THE ARBORISTS REPORT AND EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL
 PER SECTION 94-448.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENED TO
 THE KAPOK TREE THAT WAS LOCATED ON THIS SITE.
 VERY SAD THAT THIS TREE WAS LOST.
  
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. THE LACK OF TREE CANOPY AND THE
 EXTENSIVE PAVED AREAS IN THE DESIGN AROUND THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING IS NOTED, THE HEAT ISLAND CREATED WILL NOT BE
 PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY. THERE IS A DEFICIT OF TREE CANOPY
 REPLACEMENT.
 1/26/23 THE TREE CANOPY MITIGATION CAN BE ADDED
 ANYWHERE WITHIN THE CSPD BOUNDARY. THE ADDED TREES
 CANNOT BE REPLACEMENTS FOR TREES THAT ARE MISSING AND
 SHOULD BE REPLACED AS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON APPROVED
 PLANS OR ARE OBVIOUS REQUIRED TREES SUCH AS IN PARKING
 AREAS. A MASTER PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH TREE
 LOCATIONS, SPECIES AND SIZES INDICATED THAT WOULD BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION, AND THE PLAN
 THEN SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR THE
 BUSINESS SCHOOL PROJECT. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE TREES
 TO BE PLANTED AND THE LANDSCAPE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE
 CO FOR THE NEW BUILDING.
  
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER ALONG OLIVE NEEDS TO CONSIST
 OF TREES APPROPRIATE UNDER THE POWER LINES TO PROVIDE
 SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF PALMS.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO ELIMINATE TAKING 51%
 IN TWICE IN THE SAME OPTION. SEE (3)GROUNDCOVER, (4)
 SHRUBS, AND (5) TREES.
 SOD AREA FOR OPTION #7 IS DIFFICULT TO VERIFY, SUGGEST
 DROP FROM LIST.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST
 LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING, AS THERE
 ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS SHOWN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE ONE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-08-2022 Time 09:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-08-2022 Time 09:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-14 09:06:28FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: PBAU Z22100017
 NOVEMBER 8, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? PROVIDE THE TREE DISPOSITION INVENTORY MAP AS AN
 OVERLAY TO THE EXISTING SITE CONFIGURATION AS SHOWN ON
 THE SURVEY, NOT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SO THAT THE
 LOCATIONS MATCH THE TREE SURVEY.
 ??? MOVE ALL MITIGATION INFORMATION TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION SHEETS, SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LANDSCAPE
 SHEETS.
 ??? CORRECT BOTANICAL NAME FOR MAHOGANY IN THE ARBORIST
 REPORT.
 ??? TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER
 OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES
 LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW
 THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE AS SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE
 INCLUDING THE PALM MITIGATION.
 ??? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT
 LIST BY TREE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE A TOTAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
 ??? CORRECT NOTE ON L1.2 ALL CANOPY MITIGATION MUST BE
 PROVIDED ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU PAYMENT MADE TO THE
 CANOPY MITIGATION FUND.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE CONDITION FOR
 EACH NATIVE TREE OR PALM PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED IN THE
 ARBORISTS REPORT AND EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL PER
 SECTION 94-448.
  
 3. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENED TO THE KAPOK
 TREE THAT WAS LOCATED ON THIS SITE.
  
 4. THE LACK OF TREE CANOPY AND THE EXTENSIVE PAVED
 AREAS IN THE DESIGN AROUND THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS
 NOTED, THE HEAT ISLAND CREATED WILL NOT BE PEDESTRIAN
 FRIENDLY. THERE IS A DEFICIT OF TREE CANOPY REPLACEMENT
  
 5. THE BUFFER ALONG OLIVE NEEDS TO CONSIST OF TREES
 APPROPRIATE UNDER THE POWER LINES TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR
 THE SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF PALMS.
  
 6. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART TO ELIMINATE TAKING 51% IN TWICE IN THE
 SAME OPTION. SEE (3)GROUNDCOVER, (4) SHRUBS, AND (5)
 TREES.
  
 7. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
 UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING, AS THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 CONFLICTS SHOWN.
  
 8. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE ONE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
 9. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 02-03-2023 Time 14:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 02-03-2023 Time 14:16 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-03 14:17:19CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
  
 PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL FROM DAN GIUST, PARKING OPERATIONS
 SUPERINTENDENT, THERE ARE 7 ON-STREE PARKING SPACES
 THAT ARE BEING ELIMINATED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED
 ABANDONMENT AT A COST $24,000.00 PER SPACE FOR A TOTAL
 OF $168,000.00.
  
 DANIEL GIUST / CPP
 PARKING OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT
  
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PARKING ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
 500 BANYAN STREET ??? WEST PALM BEACH ??? FLORIDA 33401
 P: 561.822.1494 WWW.WPB.ORG
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-05-2022 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-05-2022 Time 11:30 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-05 11:32:48PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL FROM DAN GIUST, PARKING OPERATIONS
 SUPERINTENDENT, THERE ARE 7 ON-STREE PARKING SPACES
 THAT ARE BEING ELIMINATED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED
 ABANDONMENT AT A COST $24,000.00 PER SPACE FOR A TOTAL
 OF $168,000.00.
  
 DANIEL GIUST / CPP
 PARKING OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT
  
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PARKING ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
 500 BANYAN STREET ??? WEST PALM BEACH ??? FLORIDA 33401
 P: 561.822.1494 WWW.WPB.ORG
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 04-24-2023 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 04-24-2023 Time 15:21 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-24 15:21:04-COMMENT REGARDING EXISTING MANHOLES NEEDING REHABBING
 NOT FULLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REVIEW PROPOSED PLANS AND
 REVISE
 -COMMENT REGARDING ONLY 8" LATERALS BEING ALLOWED
 CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLES NOT SATISFIED
 -CLEANOUT ON PROPOSED SANITARY LATERAL IS 4" ON A 6"
 LATERAL.
 -CALL OUTS ARE NOT CLEAR ON DETAIL ON SHEET 5-1
 -PROVIDE DEMAND CALCULATIONS FOR BOTH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED CONDITIONS
 -DOUBLE VALVING FOR NEW WATER MAIN REQUIRED AS PART OF
 TESTING/SAMPLING PER CITY STANDARD DETAIL P-6
 -PROPOSED PROFILES ARE NOT SHOWING ALL EXISTING
 CONFLICTS
 -DEMO PLANS INCORRECTLY LISTING EXISTING 8" GATE VALVE
 AND WATER MAIN ON GRUBER PLACE AS CAST IRON
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 03-13-2023 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 03-13-2023 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-13 11:43:48DEMOLITION PLAN
 -WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE LATERAL CONNECTED TO THE
 EXISTING MANHOLE TO THE WEST?
 -CALL OUY SIZES ADN MATERIAL OF LINES BEING REMOVED
 -DENOTE ALL LINES THAT ARE PRIVATE
 -SEWER "VALVES" SHOWN ARE LIKELY CLEANOUTS, PLEASE
 CONFIRM AND REVISE AS NECESSARY.
 -SHOW ALL EXISITNG UTILITY EASEMENTS
 -NO LEGEND PROVIDED
  
 UTILTY PLAN
 -REPLACE 4" WATER MAIN ON GRUBER PLACE UP TO DIXIE (TO
 EXISTING 8" DIP)
 -EXISTING SEWER MANHOLES WITH PROPOSED CONNECTIONS WILL
 REQUIRE THE MANHOLE BE REHABBED
 -RECORDS SHOW A FIRE HYDRANT ALREADY EXISTING IN THE
 PROPOSED AREA. SHOW REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT ON DEMO PLANS
 IF THAT WORK IS BEING PROPOSED
 -GIVE REASONING FOR PROPOSED MANHOLE INSTALLATION FOR
 NEW SEWER SYSTEM AS OPPOSED TO CONNECTING TO EXISTING
 MANHOLE(S)
 -ONLY 8" SEWER LATERALS ARE CALLED FOR CONNECTION TO A
 MANHOLE. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW THE PROPOSED LATERAL
 MAKING CONNECTION TO THE SEWER MAIN
 -PROVIDE PROFILES FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER MAIN
 INSTALLATIONS TO EXHIBIT CLEARANCE FOR CROSSINGS/COVER.
 -PROVIDE A POINT OF SERVICE VALVE FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE
 LINE
  
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 03-03-2023 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-03 07:37:36AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, SHOW RELOCATED
 POLES AND TRANSFORMERS ON CIVIL PLANS. POLES AND
 TRANSFORMERS SHALL BE DISTANCED AWAY FROM WPB UTILITIES
 INFRASTRUCTURE.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-04-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 01-04-2023 Time 16:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-04 16:29:51PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: SPELL OUT PUE OR ADD
 TO ABBREVIATION LIST, CHECK INVERTS OF PROPOSED
 SANITARY MANHOLE 2, REMOVE PALM BEACH COUNTY UTILITY
 STANDARD DETAILS AND REPLACE WITH WEST PALM BEACH
 UTILITIES STANDARD DETAILS, AND LOOK BACK AT REVIEW
 COMMENT NUMBER 2 AS IT DID NOT SEEM RESOLVED.
 -CITY SANITARY SEWER LATERALS ARE TYPICALLY MINIMUM 6
 INCH SIZE IN OUR SERVICE AREA.
 -SANITARY SEWER DESIGN MAY NEED TO BE REVISED AT FORMAL
 ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PER WPB STANDARD DETAIL GS3 NOTE
 2.
 -FOOTPRINT OF ABOVE-GROUND METERED WATER SERVICE MAY
 STILL BE BIGGER THAN DEPICTED.
 -REMINDER TO FOLLOWUP ON THIS: 19. SHOW AND LABEL THE
 RELOCATED POLES AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES. ALSO SHOW ANY
 TRANSFORMER PADS. RESPONSE: AWAITING INFORMATION FROM
 FPL TO PROVIDE A SCHEMATIC OF POLE AND TRANSFORMER
 LOCATIONS.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-08-2022 Time 09:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-08 09:15:28PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -ON CIVIL PLANS, LABEL EXISTING WATER MAINS WITH PIPE
 SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE. INCLUDE THAT INFO ON DEMO PLAN
 SHEET.
 -DEMO PLAN SHOWS WATER LINE RUNNING WEST FROM PROPOSED
 ABANDONED WATER MAIN. CALLOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THAT
 WATER LINE, AND VERIFY WILL NOT LEAVE ATHLETIC BUILDING
 OUT OF SERVICE.
 -UPON FURTHER REVIEW, APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO
 REMOVE EXISTING WATER SERVICES FURTHER BACK TO THE
 WATER MAIN THAN PROPOSED.
 -UPON FURTHER REVIEW, APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO
 REMOVE WATER MAINS RATHER THAN ABANDON THEM.
 -UPON FURTHER REVIEW, APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO
 REMOVE EXISTING SEWER LATERALS RATHER THAN ABANDOM
 THEM.
 -CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER
 MAIN VALVES.
 -FIRE HYDRANT APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO TREE. CHECK
 CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT ON FIRE HYDRANT STANDARD DETAIL.
 -FIRE HYDRANT TYPICALLY HAS 6 INCH PIPE.
 -ADD SIZE OF FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LABEL.
 -ADD SIZE AND RP TYPE TO LABEL OF PROPOSED DOMESTIC
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -ADD SIZE TO LABELS OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. METERS 3
 INCHES OR LARGER SHOULD BE INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND.
 -IF WATER METER WILL BE 3 INCH OR LARGER, ENSURE THAT
 THE FOOTPRINT SIZE IS MORE ACCURATELY DEPICTED ON CIVIL
 PLANS.
 -THERE SUCH NOT BE A 3 INCH WATER SERVICE. 2 INCH WATER
 METERS HAVE 2 INCH WATER SERVICE PIPE WHILE 3 AND 4
 INCH METERS HAVE 4 INCH WATER SERVICE PIPE. ALSO ADD
 PIPE MATERIAL TYPE TO LABEL.
 -UTILITY PLAN SHOWS EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND TAP IN
 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN
 TAPS.
 -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION
 BOUNDARIES ON OLIVE AVE FOR UTILITY WORK BEING DONE IN
 THE ROADWAY. REFERENCE STANDARD DETAIL GC8 NOTE 1.
 -ARE ANY METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES NEEDED?
 -ON DEMO PLAN, SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING WATER PIPE AND
 TEE FOR FIRE HYDRANT THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 -IF THERE WILL BE AN OUTDOOR GREASE TRAP THEN SHOW AND
 LABEL ON PLANS.
 -SHOW AND LABEL THE RELOCATED POLES AND OVERHEAD
 UTILITIES. ALSO SHOW ANY TRANSFORMER PADS.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-03-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 01-03-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-03 14:33:27NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-05-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 12-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-05 11:48:47 
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. DETAILS FOR SANITATION
 SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION
 LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
 THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
 PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
 00)
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE
 VEHICLE???S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS
 FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 4- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
 GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
 TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
 NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
 5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 6- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 7- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
 8- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-24-2023 Time 16:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-24-2023 Time 17:12 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-24 17:04:08CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. PDG AND UTILITY PLANS SUBMITTED FOR ENGINEERRING
 PERMIT SHALL HAVE ALL UTILITY PIPES WITHIN THE R/W
 LABELED WITH SIZE AND MATERIAL. EXISTING PIPE INVERTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER
 STRUCTURES.
  
 2. THE EOR WILL NEED TO JUSTIFY THE PIPE SIZE FOR ALL
 STORM PIPES LARGER THAN 15" AND CONNECTING TO THE
 CITY'S MS4. BASED ON THE CURRENT DESIGN, THIS WOULD
 APPLY TO THE PROPOSED 30" DIAMETER RCP PIPE BETWEEN
 CB-1 AND EX. STORM MH #8.
  
 3. PBAU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DRAIANGE
 SYSTEM PIPES AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PUBLIC R/W
 UPSTREAM OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE CB-1. A MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT MAY NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 3/24/2023 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS WERE
 REMOVED.
  
 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE
 AND MATERIAL). ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - SEE CONDITIONAL
 APPROVAL NOTE #1 ABOVE.
  
 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PARKING STRIPING DETAIL (ON
 SHEET C3.1) DOES NOT MEET CITY CODE (SECTION 94-485).
 ADD'L COMMENT - DETAIL IS MISSING THE 4" X 12"
 CONNECTOR STRIPE AT THE ENDS OF THE PARALLEL STRIPES.
 SHOW CORRECT PARKING LOT STRIPING ON THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] SHOW COMPLETE REMOVAL OF STORM PIPE
 BETWEEN STORM MH#2 AND STORM MH #4. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 MEET WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES DURING AFTER SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL TO DETERMINE THE LIMITS OF THE STORM PIPE
 REMOVAL/ABANDONMENT DUE TO THE SANITARY SEWER CROSSING.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] REMOVE STORM MH #3 AND THE PIPE BETWEEN
 STORM MH #3 AND CURB INLET #4.
  
 6. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE
 SIZES THAT WILL BE CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S STORM
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. SEE
 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL #2 ABOVE.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
 TO BE CHECKED TO SEE IF THEY ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR
 PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE CONNECTIONS. ADD'L COMMENT - EX.
 MH #8 SHOWS WEST PPE CHANGING FROM 10" TO 30". THE 30"
 PIPE TO BE VALIDATED PER COMMENT #6.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] FDOT SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER
 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG S. OLIVE AVE.
  
 13. [SATISFIED] SECTION C-C:
  A. LABEL S. OLIVE R/W
  B. LABEL THE SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER
  C. LABEL THE HEADER CURB(?) ALONG THE EDGE OF THE
 PAVER SIDEWALK. NOTE THE HEADER CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
  
 14. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D:
  A. INDICATE SUPERPAVE ASPHALT WITHIN THE R/W.
  B. LABEL THE R/W (WALLINGFORD PLACE).
  C. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR THE PAVER
 SIDEWALK.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (2/24/2023 SUBMITTAL)
 15. [SATISFIED] LIST VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH
 ELEVATION INFORMATION. INFORMATION IS MISSING ON SHEETS
 C4.2
  
 16. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE CONTROL STRUCTURE ON THE PGD
 PLAN. PROVIDE A DETAIL WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. ADD'L COMMENT: ADD
 THE WEIR ELEVATION TO THE PDG PLAN. PRB WILL BE NEEDED
 OVER THE WEST PIPE.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] INDICATE ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN IF THE
 STORM PIPE SOUTH OF CURB INLET #1 IS TO REMAIN OR BE
 REMOVED. PGD PLAN CALLS OUT 46 LF OF 24-INCH RCP.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO
 CURRENT ADA STANDARDS IF THE ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE
 CURB RAMP IS MODIFIED (INCLUDING MILLING AND
 RESURFACING). REVIEW THE CURB RAMPS ON OPPOSITE SIDES
 OF THE STREETS TO DETERMINE IF THE RAMPS CURRENTLY MEET
 ADA REQUIREMENTS. INDICATE ON SHEET C3.0, SITE
 GEOMETRY, MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN.
  
 19. [SATISFIED] SFWMD REQUIRES LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE
 CONTRACT BE IN PLACE FOR PERVIOUS PAVERS TO BE
 CONSIDERED PERVIOUS SURFACES IN THE STORMWATER
 MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. ADD'L COMMENT - PERVIOUS PAVERS NO
 LONGER PROPOSED.
  
 20 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] APPLICANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE
 FOR MAINTAINING DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM PROPOSED CB #11 TO
 THE CONNECTION TO EXISTING MH #8, INCLUDING THE STORM
 PIPES BETWEEN PROPOSED CURB INLET #9 AND PROPOSED CURB
 INLET #7. ADD'L COMMENT - REMOVE "PRIVATE" FROM THE
 STORM PIPE LABELS FOR DRAINAGE PIPES WITHIN THE RIGHT
 OF WAY. PBAU WIL NEED TO ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR PBAU TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO
 MAINTAIN THE STORM PIPE AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE R/W.
 LIMITS OF MAINTENANCE TO BE INDICATED IN THE AGREEMENT.
 SEE SITE PLAN CONNDTION #3 ABOVE.
  
 21. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A DROP OFF AREA
 SOUTH OF THE BUILDING IN THE CIRCLE DRIVE PULL UP.
 ADVISE IF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE DROP OFF AREA IS
 TO BE FLUSH WITH THE PAVEMENT FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY.
 REVISE SECTION B-B ACCORDINGLY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (3/4/2023 SUBMITAL)
 22. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ANY
 IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W WILL NEED A PERMIT FROM
 FDOT.
  
 23. PROP. MH-3 IS MIISING THE INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE
 EXISTING WEST PIPE. SHOW ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMTITAL.
  
 24. INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE SPECIAL FDOT TYPE F CURB
 AND GUTTER ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTAL. CONTACT
 REVIEWER FOR INFORMATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-13-2023 Time 17:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-13-2023 Time 17:55 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-13 17:55:18THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 2/24/2023 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE
 AND MATERIAL).
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] PARKING STRIPING DETAIL (ON SHEET
 C3.1) DOES NOT MEET CITY CODE (SECTION 94-485).
  
 3. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW COMPLETE REMOVAL OF STORM PIPE
 BETWEEN STORM MH#2 AND STORM MH #4. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 MEET WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES DURING AFTER SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL TO DETERMINE THE LIMITS OF THE STORM PIPE
 REMOVAL/ABANDONMENT DUE TO THE SANITARY SEWER CROSSING.
  
 4. [NOT SATISFIED] REMOVE STORM MH #3 AND THE PIPE
 BETWEEN STORM MH #3 AND CURB INLET #4.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE STORM PIPE
 BETWEEN CURB INLET #2 AND STORM MH #1 - TO BE REMOVED
 OR TO REMAIN?
  
 6. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE
 SIZES THAT WILL BE CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S STORM
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 7. [NOT SATISFIED] EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE
 CHECKED TO SEE IF THEY ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR PROPOSED
 DRAINAGE PIPE CONNECTIONS.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] WHERE WILL PROPOSED STORM MH #5 DRAIN
 TO? EXISTING STORM PIPE TO THE SOUTH IS SHOWN TO BE
 REMOVED.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] FDOT SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND
 GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG S. OLIVE AVE.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATION.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] REVIEW INVERTS OF SEWER AND STORM
 PIPES. THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT EAST OF PROPOSED
 CATCH BASIN #11.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] AVOID RUNNING THE STORM PIPE UNDER THE
 CIRCULAR LANDSCAPE AREA SOUTH OF THE BUILDING,
  
 13. [NOT SATISFIED] SECTION C-C:
  A. LABEL S. OLIVE R/W
  B. LABEL THE SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER
  C. LABEL THE HEADER CURB(?) ALONG THE EDGE OF THE
 PAVER SIDEWALK. NOTE THE HEADER CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
  
 14. [NOT SATISFIED] SECTION D-D:
  A. INDICATE SUPERPAVE ASPHALT WITHIN THE R/W.
  B. LABEL THE R/W (WALLINGFORD PLACE).
  C. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR THE PAVER
 SIDEWALK.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (2/24/2023 SUBMITTAL)
 15. LIST VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION
 INFORMATION. INFORMATION IS MISSING ON SHEETS C4.2
  
 16. LABEL THE CONTROL STRUCTURE ON THE PGD PLAN.
 PROVIDE A DETAIL WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
 NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 17. INDICATE ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN IF THE STORM PIPE
 SOUTH OF CURB INLET #1 IS TO REMAIN OR BE REMOVED. PGD
 PLAN CALLS OUT 46 LF OF 24-INCH RCP.
  
 18. CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CURRENT ADA
 STANDARDS IF THE ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE CURB RAMP IS
 MODIFIED (INCLUDING MILLING AND RESURFACING). REVIEW
 THE CURB RAMPS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE STREETS TO
 DETERMINE IF THE RAMPS CURRENTLY MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS.
 INDICATE ON SHEET C3.0, SITE GEOMETRY, MARKING AND
 SIGNAGE PLAN.
  
 19. SFWMD REQUIRES LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BE IN
 PLACE FOR PERVIOUS PAVERS TO BE CONSIDERED PERVIOUS
 SURFACES IN THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS.
  
 20 APPLICANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM FROM PROPOSED CB #11 TO THE CONNECTION TO
 EXISTING MH #8, INCLUDING THE STORM PIPES BETWEEN
 PROPOSED CURB INLET #9 AND PROPOSED CURB INLET #7.
  
 21. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A DROP OFF AREA SOUTH OF THE
 BUILDING IN THE CIRCLE DRIVE PULL UP. ADVISE IF THE
 SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE DROP OFF AREA IS TO BE FLUSH
 WITH THE PAVEMENT FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE SECTION
 B-B ACCORDINGLY.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-13-2022 Time 09:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-13-2022 Time 09:26 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-13 09:25:57THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE AND MATERIAL).
  
 2. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT MEET CITY CODE.
  
 3. SHOW COMPLETE REMOVAL OF STORM PIPE BETWEEN STORM
 MH#2 AND STORM MH #4.
  
 4. REMOVE STORM MH #3 AND THE PIPE BETWEEN STORM MH #3
 AND CURB INLET #4.
  
 5. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN CURB
 INLET #2 AND STORM MH #1 - TO BE REMOVED OR TO REMAIN?
  
 6. JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE SIZES THAT WILL BE
 CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 7. EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE CHECKED TO SEE IF
 THEY ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE
 CONNECTIONS.
  
 8. WHERE WILL PROPOSED STORM MH #5 DRAIN TO? EXISTING
 STORM PIPE TO THE SOUTH IS SHOWN TO BE REMOVED.
  
 9. FDOT SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE
 CONSTRUCTED ALONG S. OLIVE AVE.
  
 10. PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.
  
 11. REVIEW INVERTS OF SEWER AND STORM PIPES. THERE
 APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT EAST OF PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
 #11.
  
 12. AVOID RUNNING THE STORM PIPE UNDER THE CIRCULAR
 LANDSCAPE AREA SOUTH OF THE BUILDING,
  
 13. SECTION C-C:
  A. LABEL S. OLIVE R/W
  B. LABEL THE SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER
  C. LABEL THE HEADER CURB(?) ALONG THE EDGE OF THE
 PAVER SIDEWALK. NOTE THE HEADER CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
  
 14. SECTION D-D:
  A. INDICATE SUPERPAVE ASPHALT WITHIN THE R/W.
  B. LABEL THE R/W (WALLINGFORD PLACE).
  C. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR THE PAVER
 SIDEWALK.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT
 DEVELOPMENT IN THE DESIGN OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-01-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 02-01-2023 Time 13:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-01 13:54:31CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
 R/W.
 3. ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-08-2022 Time 10:14 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-08 10:43:381. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. AS SANITARY SERVES ONLY THE SCHOOL PROPERTY, IT WILL
 BE A PRIVATE SYSTEM. NO PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
 REQUIRED. POINT OF SERVICE SHOULD BE NEW MANHOLE JUST
 INSIDE PROPERTY AT S. OLIVE.
 3. UTILITIES MAY WANT LANDSCAPING RELOCATED FROM UE
 CROSSING ROUNDABOUT MEDIAN.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-15 10:16:49TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY.
 PER OTHER COMMENTS, THE ANALYSIS MAY NEED REVISION OR
 INCLUSION OF FURTHER ITEMS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT
 PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING THE
 AGREEMENTS FOR THE CROSS-PARKING FACILITIES NOT OWNED
 BY PBAU AND OUTSIDE OF THE CSPD; SPECIFICALLY, A
 STATEMENT OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY EACH FACILITY OWNER(S)
 THAT CONFIRMS AVAILABILITY OF EXTRA PARKING CAPACITY AT
 THEIR FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE PBAU DEMAND
 5) TO BE SATISFIED BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
 PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO
 CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS. THIS ITEM WILL BE
 INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE
 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
 (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE ENCOURAGED. TO BE FURTHER
 DISCUSSED AND/OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED, AND INCLUDED
 IN THE ANALYSIS
 SITE COMMENTS
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE
 PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION
 RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES,
 PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY,
 GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER &
 DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY
 LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED
 T-1.0. LATEST SUBMISSION PROVIDES VERY FEW OF THE
 REQUESTED ITEMS IN THIS COMMENT, ALL DIMENSIONS AND
 PROPOSED SITE FEATURES ARE MISSING
 8) SATISFIED. THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN SHOULD
 INCLUDE DIXIE HIGHWAY AND ACACIA RD AS THE WESTERN AND
 SOUTHERN BOUNDARIES, RESPECTIVELY
 9) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DETAILS
 MUST BE DRAWN, PLEASE COMPLETE THE T-1 SHEET
 ACCORDINGLY
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 ONE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC CIVIL SHEET
 NAME/NUMBER OR INCLUDE IN THE T-1.0 PLAN.
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 13) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE A SET OF OPTIONAL
 LOCATIONS, THE FINAL SELECTION COULD THEN BE PERFORMED
 AT A LATER STAGE AS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE
 THE NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR
 RELOCATED, IF ANY. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION
 SHOWCASING APPROVAL FROM PARKING DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REMOVAL OF THE SEVEN (7) ON-STREET PARKING STALLS AND
 FEES PAID, IF ANY
 16) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 17) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS
 OF THE ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE
 METHODOLOGY MEETING. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER NARRATIVE,
 IDEALLY A PARAGRAPH WITHIN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, REGARDING
 HOW THE DROP-OFF AREA VEHICULAR OPERATIONS WILL BE
 REGULATED, OPERATED AND MONITORED. A VALET OPERATIONAL
 ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED AT THIS STAGE, IF POTENTIALLY
 CONTEMPLATED IN THE FUTURE
 18) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY TRANSIT STOPS BEING
 IMPACTED?
 19) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN
 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY?
 20) SATISFIED. IS A GARAGE BEING PROPOSED?
 21) SATISFIED. HAS THE OWNER OF THE PARKING LOT EAST OF
 S OLIVE AGREED WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY FRONTING GRUBER PL?
 22) SATISFIED. HOW ARE EXISTING OPERATIONS ON KINGS CT
 BEING IMPACTED? IS ACCESS BEING PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY
 REMOVED?
 23) SATISFIED. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SHOULD BE AT THE
 MINIMUM 8-FEET WIDE THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. GIVEN THE HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC OF THE
 AREA, IT IS RECOMMENDED A MINIMUM OF 10-FEET
 UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH, ESPECIALLY ALONG S OLIVE AVE.
 PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL SIDEWALKS AND THEIR DIMENSIONS IN
 THE T1.0 PLAN OR PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 DEPICTING SUCH ITEMS
 24) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED, THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN
 DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE ALIGNED WITH CHADBOURNE CT
 25) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSWALKS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN
 DRIVEWAY
 26) SATISFIED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS ON S OLIVE
 AVE AT THE ACACIA RD INTERSECTION. THIS REQUEST WOULD
 INCREASE STUDENT/PEDESTRIAN SAFETY NEARBY THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT; NONETHELESS, DUE TO PBAU REQUEST, IT WILL
 BE DELAYED TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA
 27) SATISFIED. INSTALL A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK EITHER
 NORTH OR SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 28) SATISFIED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND
 CORRESPONDING STOP-FOR-PEDESTRIAN SIGNAGE BY THE
 WALLINGFORD PLACE AND GRUBER PLACE STREET TRANSITION,
 JUST SOUTH AND WEST OF THE TURNING PORTION,
 RESPECTIVELY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-20-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 01-20-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-20 12:36:52TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC
 STUDY. PER OTHER COMMENTS, THE ANALYSIS MAY NEED
 REVISION OR INCLUSION OF FURTHER ITEMS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT
 PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING THE
 AGREEMENTS FOR THE CROSS-PARKING FACILITIES NOT OWNED
 BY PBAU AND OUTSIDE OF THE CSPD; SPECIFICALLY, A
 STATEMENT OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY EACH FACILITY OWNER(S)
 THAT CONFIRMS AVAILABILITY OF EXTRA PARKING CAPACITY AT
 THEIR FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE PBAU DEMAND
 5) TO BE SATISFIED BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
 PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO
 CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS. THIS ITEM WILL BE
 INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE
 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
 (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE ENCOURAGED. TO BE FURTHER
 DISCUSSED AND/OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED, AND INCLUDED
 IN THE ANALYSIS
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD
 BE NAMED T-1.0. LATEST SUBMISSION PROVIDES VERY FEW OF
 THE REQUESTED ITEMS IN THIS COMMENT, ALL DIMENSIONS AND
 PROPOSED SITE FEATURES ARE MISSING
 8) SATISFIED. THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN SHOULD
 INCLUDE DIXIE HIGHWAY AND ACACIA RD AS THE WESTERN AND
 SOUTHERN BOUNDARIES, RESPECTIVELY
 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. DETAILS MUST BE DRAWN, PLEASE COMPLETE THE
 T-1 SHEET ACCORDINGLY
 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. SUCH PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE ONE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC
 CIVIL SHEET NAME/NUMBER OR INCLUDE IN THE T-1.0 PLAN.
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 13) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN
 EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM
 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION
 READINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
 SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
 PULL BOX (240V / 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE A SET
 OF OPTIONAL LOCATIONS, THE FINAL SELECTION COULD THEN
 BE PERFORMED AT A LATER STAGE AS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING
 STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE
 BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION SHOWCASING APPROVAL FROM PARKING
 DEPARTMENT FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE SEVEN (7) ON-STREET
 PARKING STALLS AND FEES PAID, IF ANY
 16) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 17) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF
 SO, PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS.
 DETAILS OF THE ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE
 METHODOLOGY MEETING. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER NARRATIVE,
 IDEALLY A PARAGRAPH WITHIN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, REGARDING
 HOW THE DROP-OFF AREA VEHICULAR OPERATIONS WILL BE
 REGULATED, OPERATED AND MONITORED. A VALET OPERATIONAL
 ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED AT THIS STAGE, IF POTENTIALLY
 CONTEMPLATED IN THE FUTURE
 18) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY TRANSIT STOPS BEING
 IMPACTED?
 19) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN
 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY?
 20) SATISFIED. IS A GARAGE BEING PROPOSED?
 21) SATISFIED. HAS THE OWNER OF THE PARKING LOT EAST OF
 S OLIVE AGREED WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY FRONTING GRUBER PL?
 22) SATISFIED. HOW ARE EXISTING OPERATIONS ON KINGS CT
 BEING IMPACTED? IS ACCESS BEING PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY
 REMOVED?
 23) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SHOULD
 BE AT THE MINIMUM 8-FEET WIDE THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. GIVEN THE HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC OF THE
 AREA, IT IS RECOMMENDED A MINIMUM OF 10-FEET
 UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH, ESPECIALLY ALONG S OLIVE AVE.
 PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL SIDEWALKS AND THEIR DIMENSIONS IN
 THE T1.0 PLAN OR PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 DEPICTING SUCH ITEMS
 24) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED, THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN
 DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE ALIGNED WITH CHADBOURNE CT
 25) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSWALKS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN
 DRIVEWAY
 26) SATISFIED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS ON S OLIVE
 AVE AT THE ACACIA RD INTERSECTION. THIS REQUEST WOULD
 INCREASE STUDENT/PEDESTRIAN SAFETY NEARBY THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT; NONETHELESS, DUE TO PBAU REQUEST, IT WILL
 BE DELAYED TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA
 27) SATISFIED. INSTALL A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK EITHER
 NORTH OR SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 28) INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND CORRESPONDING
 STOP-FOR-PEDESTRIANS SIGNAGE BY THE WALLINGFORD PLACE
 AND GRUBER PLACE STREET TRANSITION, JUST SOUTH AND WEST
 OF THE TURNING PORTION, RESPECTIVELY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-06-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 12-06-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-06 18:07:23TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SETUP A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY
 3) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 4) PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
 5) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER
 TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS
 6) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS,
 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE
 ENCOURAGED
 SITE COMMENTS
 7) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0
 8) THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE DIXIE
 HIGHWAY AND ACACIA RD AS THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN
 BOUNDARIES, RESPECTIVELY
 9) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
 DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
 PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 10) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
 PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 ONE
 11) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS
 12) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
 EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
 CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
 ETC.)
 13) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 14) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 15) PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE
 NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR
 RELOCATED, IF ANY
 16) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 17) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A
 THOROUGH VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 18) ARE THERE ANY TRANSIT STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 19) IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN EXISTING
 BICYCLE FACILITY?
 20) IS A GARAGE BEING PROPOSED?
 21) HAS THE OWNER OF THE PARKING LOT EAST OF S OLIVE
 AGREED WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY
 FRONTING GRUBER PL?
 22) HOW ARE EXISTING OPERATIONS ON KINGS CT BEING
 IMPACTED? IS ACCESS BEING PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY
 REMOVED?
 23) PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SHOULD BE AT THE MINIMUM
 8-FEET WIDE THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. GIVEN
 THE HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC OF THE AREA, IT IS
 RECOMMENDED A MINIMUM OF 10-FEET UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH,
 ESPECIALLY ALONG S OLIVE AVE
 24) IF APPROVED, THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY SHOULD
 BE ALIGNED WITH CHADBOURNE CT
 25) IF APPROVED, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS NORTH
 AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY
 26) INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS ON S OLIVE AVE AT THE
 ACACIA RD INTERSECTION
 27) INSTALL A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK EITHER NORTH OR
 SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-10-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-10-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-10 14:03:05THE PROVISIONS IN RESOLUTION NO. 17-22 SHALL REMAIN IN
 EFFECT, IN ADDITION TO THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL
 CONDITIONS:
  
 1. THE ABANDONMENT OF THE 12,596 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF
 GRUBER PLACE AS IDENTIFIED IN PLANNING BOARD CASE NO.
 1111AAA, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION PRIOR
 TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH
 THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUSINESS SCHOOL BUILDING.
  
 2. AT ANY TIME SHOULD THERE BE AN APPLICATION FOR THE
 REDEVELOPMENT OF A SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY LEASED BY THE
 UNIVERSITY TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PARKING FOR THE
 PBAU CSPD AND/OR IF CHANGES ARE MADE TO A PARKING LEASE
 AGREEMENT THAT IMPACTS THE UNIVERSITY'S PARKING
 INVENTORY, THE UNIVERSITY SHALL SUBMIT AN UPDATED
 PARKING REPORT THAT DEMONSTRATES THAT THE UNIVERSITY
 WILL CONTINUE TO MEET THE PARKING DEMAND THAT'S
 AVAILABLE TO ITS STAFF, STUDENTS AND VISITORS. THE
 STANDARDS FOR THIS PARKING REPORT SHALL BE CONSISTENT
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ANNUAL PARKING STUDY AS
 PROVIDED IN RESOLUTION NO. 277-20. THE PARKING REPORT
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION FOR REVIEW.
  
 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE
 CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUSINESS SCHOOL BUILDING, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN.
 THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE CONSISTENT
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 86-246 OF THE CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES, A
 TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -
 PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT
 FOR THE NEW BUSINESS SCHOOL BUILDING, THE APPLICANT
 SHALL SUBMIT A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH A TREE
 ALTERATION PERMIT SHOWING THE LOCATIONS AND SPECIES OF
 TREES TO MEET THE TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROJECT. ALL MITIGATION TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND PRIOR TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.).
  
 6. FINAL APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN SHALL BE
 BASED UPON SUBMITTAL OF A SEPARATE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPLICATION TO, AND REVIEWED BY, THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS.
  
 7. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (C.O.), THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE RE-PLATTED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS,
 AND THE CITY'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.
  
 8. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS APPLICATION.
  
 9. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL STREETSCAPE,
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY APPROVED WITH THIS APPLICATION. A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED AND EXECUTED
 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (C.O.).
  
 10. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 PIPES AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY UPSTREAM
 OF CONTROL STRUCTURE CB-1. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT MAY
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 03-10-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 03-10-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-10 15:51:14PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 03.10.2023
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) -
 PLEASE NOTE THE PAYMENT THAT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 ABANDONMENT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LOSS OF SEVEN
 (7) METERED PARKING SPACES.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A
 SPECIFIC DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PARKING ANALYSIS THAT
 WAS SUBMITTED IN IN AUGUST 2022, AS WELL AS THE
 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT THAT WAS PROVIDED AS PART OF
 THIS APPLICATION. SOME OF THE CONCERNS INCLUDE, BUT ARE
 NOT LIMITED TO:
  
 4.1. SATISFIED - THE PARKING ANALYSIS PROVIDED
 INDICATES THAT ADDITIONAL OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES HAVE
 BEEN OBTAINED ON A LEASED BASIS (BOTH ADDITIONAL
 LOCATIONS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL SPACES AT EXISTING
 LOCATIONS). PURSUANT TO THE PBAU DEVELOPMENT ORDER,
 COPIES OF THE NEW/UPDATED LEASES OR AGREEMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 4.2. SATISFIED - THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHOWN IN
 THE PARKING STUDY DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER OF
 SPACES SHOWN IN THE VARIOUS LOTS AS WELL AS THE NUMBERS
 IN THE MASTER PLAN DATA TABLE.
  
 4.3. SATISFIED - THE METHODOLOGY APPEARS TO HAVE
 CHANGED SOMEWHAT SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE PARKING
 STUDY REQUIREMENT.
  
 4.4. NOT SATISFIED - LEASES APPEAR TO BE EXPIRED BUT
 ARE STILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE PARKING AVAILABILITY.
  
 4.4.1. NOT SATISFIED - THE LACK OF AN VALID LEASE
 PRESENTS CONCERNS AS IT APPEARS THAT THIS PARKING
 AVAILIABILITY COULD BE WITHDRAWN FROM PBAU'S USE AT ANY
 TIME, THEREBY LEAVING THE UNIVERSITY WITH FEWER PARKING
 SPACES THAN WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THE REQUIRED STUDY,
 AND POTENTIALLY CREATING A VIOLATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT
 ORDER.
  
 4.5. NOT SATISFIED - SPACES ARE BEING LEASED FROM
 LOCATIONS THAT APPEAR TO NOT HAVE EXCESS PARKING
 AVAILABLE.
  
 4.5.1. NOT SATISFIED - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
 INDICATES THAT THESE LOCATIONS EXPERIENCE DIFFERING
 PEAK TIME, HOWEVER NO ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION WAS
 PROVIDED TO SUPPORT THIS ARGUMENT. THE NORTON WAS
 GRANTED A SUBSTANTIAL PARKING WAIVER AND EVEN UTILIZED
 THE JUSTIFICATION THAT OVERFLOW PARKING COULD BE
 ACCOMMODATED AT PBAU. IF DIFFERING PEAK TIMES IS
 UTILIZED AS A JUSTIFICATION, APPROPRIATE INFORMATION
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO SUPPORT SUCH ARGUMENT.
  
 4.6. NEW COMMENT ??? IT IS NOTED IN THE 2022 CAMPUS
 PARKING STUDY THAT SHUTTLE SERVICE WILL BE DEPLOYED IN
 THE 2022/2023 ACADEMIC YEAR; HOWEVER, NO DETAILS ARE
 PROVIDED ON THE OPERATIONS/SERVICE. SINCE SOME OF THE
 PARKING FACILITIES ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE CSPD AND
 ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN A REASONABLE WALKING DISTANCE
 (YET THESE FACILITIES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PARKING
 INVENTORY TO MEET DEMAND), IT IS IMPORTANT TO PROVIDE
 INFORMATION HOW STUDENTS WILL GET FROM THESE PARKING
 FACILITIES TO THE MAIN CAMPUS.
  
 5. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE OVERALL MASTER PLAN FAR
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. SATISFIED - GENERATOR ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. SATISFIED - IRRIGATION PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE
 LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED - ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS INDICATE
 POTENTIAL BANNER SIGNAGE ??? THE MASTER SIGN PLAN WOULD
 HAVE TO BE AMENDED.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATION POINTS ON THE
 SITE PLAN AND/OR CROSS SECTIONS WITH ELEVATIONS
 SPECIFICALLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE MAXIMUM
 ENCROACHMENT PERMITTED INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACKS.
 STEPS, STAIRS, RAMPS, ETC. THAT ARE THREE (3) FEET OR
 LESS CAN ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK UP TO TWO (2) FEET
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. STEPS, STAIRS, RAMPS, ETC. IN
 EXCESS OF THREE (3) FEET HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE
 BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE DISCUSSION
 REGARDING THE SOUTH DROP OFF AREA, THE PINCH POINT IN
 THE SIDEWALK CREATED BETWEEN THE DROP OFF AND GRUBER
 PLACE, AS WELL AS SOME OTHER AREAS THAT ARE BEING SHOWN
 AS PAVER/SIDEWALK THAT DON???T SEEM FUNCTIONAL (I.E.
 AREA WEST OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES).
  
 10.1. SATISFIED - THE LABEL FOR THE DROP-OFF AREA IS
 NOW POINTING TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
 10.2. SATISFIED - WHERE THE SIDEWALK ABUTS WALLINGFORD
 PLACE, ESPECIALLY AT THE BEND, THERE SHOULD BE SOME
 DESIGN CONSIDERATION TO ENSURE THAT VEHICLES DO NOT
 HAVE THE ABILITY TO RUN UP ONTO THE SIDEWALK,
 ESPECIALLY IF THEY MISS THE TURN.
  
 ________________________________________
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 02-24-2023 Time 12:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 02-03-2023 Time 10:12 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-24 12:51:52PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 02.03.2023
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) -
 PLEASE NOTE THE PAYMENT THAT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 ABANDONMENT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LOSS OF SEVEN
 (7) METERED PARKING SPACES.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A
 SPECIFIC DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PARKING ANALYSIS THAT
 WAS SUBMITTED IN IN AUGUST 2022, AS WELL AS THE
 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT THAT WAS PROVIDED AS PART OF
 THIS APPLICATION. SOME OF THE CONCERNS INCLUDE, BUT ARE
 NOT LIMITED TO:
  
 4.1. SATISFIED - THE PARKING ANALYSIS PROVIDED
 INDICATES THAT ADDITIONAL OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES HAVE
 BEEN OBTAINED ON A LEASED BASIS (BOTH ADDITIONAL
 LOCATIONS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL SPACES AT EXISTING
 LOCATIONS). PURSUANT TO THE PBAU DEVELOPMENT ORDER,
 COPIES OF THE NEW/UPDATED LEASES OR AGREEMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 4.2. SATISFIED - THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHOWN IN
 THE PARKING STUDY DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER OF
 SPACES SHOWN IN THE VARIOUS LOTS AS WELL AS THE NUMBERS
 IN THE MASTER PLAN DATA TABLE.
  
 4.3. SATISFIED - THE METHODOLOGY APPEARS TO HAVE
 CHANGED SOMEWHAT SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE PARKING
 STUDY REQUIREMENT.
  
 4.4. NOT SATISFIED - LEASES APPEAR TO BE EXPIRED BUT
 ARE STILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE PARKING AVAILABILITY.
  
 4.4.1. NEW COMMENT - THE LACK OF AN VALID LEASE
 PRESENTS CONCERNS AS IT APPEARS THAT THIS PARKING
 AVAILIABILITY COULD BE WITHDRAWN FROM PBAU'S USE AT ANY
 TIME, THEREBY LEAVING THE UNIVERSITY WITH FEWER PARKING
 SPACES THAN WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THE REQUIRED STUDY,
 AND POTENTIALLY CREATING A VIOLATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT
 ORDER.
  
 4.5. NOT SATISFIED - SPACES ARE BEING LEASED FROM
 LOCATIONS THAT APPEAR TO NOT HAVE EXCESS PARKING
 AVAILABLE.
  
 4.5.1. NEW COMMENT ??? THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
 INDICATES THAT THESE LOCATIONS EXPERIENCE DIFFERING
 PEAK TIME, HOWEVER NO ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION WAS
 PROVIDED TO SUPPORT THIS ARGUMENT. THE NORTON WAS
 GRANTED A SUBSTANTIAL PARKING WAIVER AND EVEN UTILIZED
 THE JUSTIFICATION THAT OVERFLOW PARKING COULD BE
 ACCOMMODATED AT PBAU. IF DIFFERING PEAK TIMES IS
 UTILIZED AS A JUSTIFICATION, APPROPRIATE INFORMATION
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO SUPPORT SUCH ARGUMENT.
  
 5. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE OVERALL MASTER PLAN FAR
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. SATISFIED - GENERATOR ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. SATISFIED - IRRIGATION PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE
 LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED - ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS INDICATE
 POTENTIAL BANNER SIGNAGE ??? THE MASTER SIGN PLAN WOULD
 HAVE TO BE AMENDED.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATION POINTS ON THE
 SITE PLAN AND/OR CROSS SECTIONS WITH ELEVATIONS
 SPECIFICALLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE MAXIMUM
 ENCROACHMENT PERMITTED INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACKS.
 STEPS, STAIRS, RAMPS, ETC. THAT ARE THREE (3) FEET OR
 LESS CAN ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK UP TO TWO (2) FEET
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. STEPS, STAIRS, RAMPS, ETC. IN
 EXCESS OF THREE (3) FEET HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE
 BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
 DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SOUTH DROP OFF AREA, THE PINCH
 POINT IN THE SIDEWALK CREATED BETWEEN THE DROP OFF AND
 GRUBER PLACE, AS WELL AS SOME OTHER AREAS THAT ARE
 BEING SHOWN AS PAVER/SIDEWALK THAT DON???T SEEM
 FUNCTIONAL (I.E. AREA WEST OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES).
  
 10.1. NEW COMMENT - THE LABEL FOR THE DROP-OFF AREA IS
 NOW POINTING TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
 10.2. NEW COMMENT - WHERE THE SIDEWALK ABUTS
 WALLINGFORD PLACE, ESPECIALLY AT THE BEND, THERE SHOULD
 BE SOME DESIGN CONSIDERATION TO ENSURE THAT VEHICLES DO
 NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO RUN UP ONTO THE SIDEWALK,
 ESPECIALLY IF THEY MISS THE TURN.
 ________________________________________
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-13-2022 Time 12:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-13-2022 Time 12:55 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 12:56:10PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 12.13.2022
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 3. PLEASE NOTE THE PAYMENT THAT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THE ABANDONMENT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LOSS OF
 SEVEN (7) METERED PARKING SPACES.
  
 4. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A SPECIFIC DISCUSSION
 REGARDING THE PARKING ANALYSIS THAT WAS SUBMITTED IN IN
 AUGUST 2022, AS WELL AS THE SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT THAT
 WAS PROVIDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION. SOME OF THE
 CONCERNS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
  
 4.1. THE PARKING ANALYSIS PROVIDED INDICATES THAT
 ADDITIONAL OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED
 ON A LEASED BASIS (BOTH ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS, AS WELL
 AS ADDITIONAL SPACES AT EXISTING LOCATIONS). PURSUANT
 TO THE PBAU DEVELOPMENT ORDER, COPIES OF THE
 NEW/UPDATED LEASES OR AGREEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 4.2. THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHOWN IN THE PARKING
 STUDY DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER OF SPACES SHOWN
 IN THE VARIOUS LOTS AS WELL AS THE NUMBERS IN THE
 MASTER PLAN DATA TABLE.
  
 4.3. THE METHODOLOGY APPEARS TO HAVE CHANGED SOMEWHAT
 SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE PARKING STUDY REQUIREMENT.
  
 4.4. LEASES APPEAR TO BE EXPIRED BUT ARE STILL BE
 UTILIZED FOR THE PARKING AVAILABILITY.
  
 4.5. SPACES ARE BEING LEASED FROM LOCATIONS THAT APPEAR
 TO NOT HAVE EXCESS PARKING AVAILABLE.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE OVERALL MASTER PLAN FAR REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. GENERATOR ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. IRRIGATION PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE/SITE
 PLAN.
  
 8. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS INDICATE POTENTIAL BANNER
 SIGNAGE ??? THE MASTER SIGN PLAN WOULD HAVE TO BE
 AMENDED.
  
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATION POINTS ON THE SITE PLAN
 AND/OR CROSS SECTIONS WITH ELEVATIONS SPECIFICALLY
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT
 PERMITTED INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACKS. STEPS, STAIRS,
 RAMPS, ETC. THAT ARE THREE (3) FEET OR LESS CAN
 ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK UP TO TWO (2) FEET FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE. STEPS, STAIRS, RAMPS, ETC. IN EXCESS OF
 THREE (3) FEET HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE DISCUSSION REGARDING THE
 SOUTH DROP OFF AREA, THE PINCH POINT IN THE SIDEWALK
 CREATED BETWEEN THE DROP OFF AND GRUBER PLACE, AS WELL
 AS SOME OTHER AREAS THAT ARE BEING SHOWN AS
 PAVER/SIDEWALK THAT DON???T SEEM FUNCTIONAL (I.E. AREA
 WEST OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES).
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC (PDF) COPIES OF ALL PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23,
 2022.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN FEBRUARY 7, 2022. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ??? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved