| Plan Review Stops For Project Z22100013 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
07-11-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
swelter |
Date |
07-11-2023 |
Time |
15:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
swelter |
Date |
07-11-2023 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
Time |
21:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
Time |
21:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-07-12 21:32:23 | NO COMMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED EXTENSION | | | OF EXISTING DOCK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lquinone |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lquinone |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-07-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-07-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-07-2023 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-07-07 14:19:11 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
relizond |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
relizond |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
07-12-2023 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-06-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jbjoseph |
Date |
07-06-2023 |
Time |
12:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jbjoseph |
Date |
07-06-2023 |
Time |
12:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-27-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-27-2023 |
Time |
17:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-27-2023 |
Time |
17:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-07-27 17:15:35 | ATTORNEY B. ELEANOR HALPERIN SUBMITTED A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING BOTH BOAT LIFTS ARE TO BE RELOCATED, | | | THE ACOE HAS A SPECIAL PERMIT EXTENSION PROVISION AND | | | THAT AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO ACOE TO | | | MODIFY PERMIT TO INCLUDE THE LATEST DOCK DESIGN PLANS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
Time |
07:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
Time |
07:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-07-13 07:44:27 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATED BOTH EXISTING | | | BOAT LIFTS WOULD BE RELOCATED TO DEEPER WATERS. THE | | | CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SHOW ONLY THE LARGER BOAT LIFT | | | BEING RELOCATED TO THE DOCK EXTENSION AND THE SMALLER | | | BOAT EXTENSION REMAINING IN ITS CURRENT LOCATION. | | | PLEASE EXPLAIN THE DISCREPANCY. | | | | | | 2. THE ACOE PERMIT THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS A TIME LIMIT | | | FOR COMPLETING THE AUTHORIZED WORK BY MARCH 27, 2023. | | | SUBMIT A VALID ACOE PERMIT PRIOR TO START OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 3. THE PLANS ATTACHED TO THE ACOE PERMIT SHOW THE DOCK | | | EXTENSION CONTINUING IN-LINE WITH THE EXISTING DOCK. | | | THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHOW THE DOCK EXTENSION BEING | | | OFFSET TO THE NORTH FROM THE EXISTING DOCK. MODIFY THE | | | ACOE PERMIT TO INCLUDE THE CURRENT DOCK EXTENSION | | | LAYOUT AND BOAT LIFT LOCATIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-10-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-10-2023 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-13-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-13-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-13-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-07-13 05:45:27 | NO COMMENTS | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-18-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vbroglia |
Date |
07-18-2023 |
Time |
12:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vbroglia |
Date |
07-18-2023 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-20-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
10-20-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
10-20-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-20 11:23:15 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE RELATED TO STAFF'S | | | SUFFICIENCY REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICATION | | | HAS BEEN DEEMED INSUFFICIENT. ALL COMMMENTS BELOW MUST | | | BE ADDRESSED FOR STAFF TO COMMENCE THE FORMAL REVIEW OF | | | THE APPLICATION: | | | | | | 1.) SITE PLAN MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE PROJECTION LINES | | | SHOWING THE PROPERTY DIVIDED INTO THIRDS AS EXTENDED | | | INTO THE WATERWAY. ALL COMPONENTS, INCLUDING THE DOCK | | | AND ALL MOORING-RELATED FACILITIES (I.E. BOATLIFTS, | | | PILINGS, ETC.) SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE ONE-THIRD | | | OF THE LOT AS EXTENDED INTO THE WATERWAY. THE SITE PLAN | | | MUST EXTRACT THIS INFORMATION FROM THE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED SURVEY AND SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED | | | DOCK AND ASSOCIATED MOORING-RELATED FACILITIES WITHIN | | | THE MIDDLE THIRD. | | | | | | 2.) AS NOTED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, THE | | | APPLICANT IS ONLY SEEKING ONE WAIVER (LENGTH OF THE | | | DOCK) IN THE CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION; | | | HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN MUST DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) TO | | | VERIFY THAT ADDITIONAL WAIVERS ARE NOT NECESSARY. THE | | | LOCATION OF THE BOATLIFTS ARE QUESTIONABLE AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | 3.) IS THERE A COMPREHENSIVE SEA GRASS STUDY AND DEPTH | | | ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE | | | EXTENSION? THE SEAGRASS AND DEPTH ARE NOTED IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AS THE REASONS FOR THE CLASS A. | | | | | | 4.) COMPLETE ENGINEERING PLANS ARE REQUIRED (NOT | | | EXCERPTS). | | | | | | 5.) PROVIDE SUPPORT LETTERS FROM THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS | | | TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH. SUPPORT FROM THE IMMEDIATE | | | NEIGHBORS INDICATING THAT THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH THE | | | PROPOSED DOCK IS CRITICAL AND HIGHLY RECOMMENDED AS A | | | PART OF THE APPLICATION SUBMISSION. | | | | | | 6.) RESPONSES TO THE WAIVER STANDARDS ARE NOT PROVIDED | | | (REFERENCE: 94-273(A)(2)) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |