Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z22090016 Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-29-2023 Cont ID   Sent By swelter Date 03-29-2023 Time 11:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By swelter Date 06-15-2023 Time 09:58 Sent To   Notes 2023-03-29 11:48:41 REMINDER THAT THE ART ASSESSMENT IS DUE TO SYBILLE   WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE EMAIL:   [email protected]       RESUBMITTAL       PROPOSED LOCATION FOR A FUTURE PUBLIC ARTWORK MEETS THE   PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR PLACES THAT ALLOW   FOR PUBLIC ACCESS AND VIEWING.   PROPOSED LOCATION MEETS THE PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT   ??? 24/7 ACCESSIBILITY TO THE PUBLIC.       OF NOTE:   *THE FUTURE ARTWORK MUST BE CREATED BY A PROFESSIONAL   ARTIST AS DEFINED IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AS AN   INDIVIDUAL RECOGNIZED BY CRITICS AND PEERS AS A   PROFESSIONAL PRACTITIONER IN THE VISUAL ARTS AS JUDGED   BY THEIR BODY OF WORK, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND,   TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, PUBLIC COMMISSIONS, EXHIBITION   RECORD, PUBLICATIONS, RECEIPT OF HONORS AND AWARDS, AND   TRAINING IN THE ARTS.   * ARTWORK MUST BE DISTINCT FROM BUILDING/PROJECT (SEE   BELOW), AND A UNIQUE PIECE OF WORK.       INELIGIBLE ARTWORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE   FOLLOWING:       DECORATIVE, ORNAMENTAL, ARCHITECTURAL OR FUNCTIONAL TO   THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.   COMMERCIAL EXPRESSION INCLUDING DESIGN ELEMENTS RELATED   TO THE VISUAL IDENTITY OF THE PROJECT, BUILDING OR   DEVELOPER SUCH AS LOGO, TRADEMARK, COLOR SCHEME, OR   THEME ETC.   REPRODUCTIONS OR MASS-PRODUCED DESIGN/ART OBJECTS     Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-02-2023 Cont ID   Sent By swelter Date 02-02-2023 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00 Received By swelter Date 02-02-2023 Time 13:43 Sent To   Notes 2023-02-02 13:43:12         PER THE ORDINANCE CONFIRMATION OF PUBLIC ART - OPTION 1   OR 2 IS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND MOVING   FORWARD TO DAC.   AS PER MY PREVIOUS NOTE THIS SITE DOES NOT HAVE THE   SPACE FOR THE INCLUSION OF ART AND THE TREATMENT OF   WALLS WILL NOT MEET THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENTS.   CONTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT IS RECOMMENDED.         Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-11-2022 Cont ID   Sent By swelter Date 10-11-2022 Time 14:07 Rev Time 0.00 Received By swelter Date 10-11-2022 Time 14:18 Sent To   Notes 2022-10-11 14:18:00 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:       TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER   $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS   PER CITY ORDINANCE.       OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE   VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS.       FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC ART NEEDS TO BE   IDENTIFIED ON ALL THE SITE PLANS.       OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF   ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT   TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.       FOR EITHER OPTION A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT   APPLICATION ALONG WITH EITHER THE ESCROW OF THE 1% OR   IF CHOSEN OPTION 2 CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART   FUND IS REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       DUE TO LACK OF PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS TO MEET   THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE   DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTE INTO THE PUBLIC ART FUND FOR THIS   PROJECT.       CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &   CULTURE AT [email protected] WITH FURTHER QUESTIONS. Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-16-2023 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 05-16-2023 Time 20:03 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 05-16-2023 Time 20:03 Sent To   Notes 2023-05-16 20:10:07 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC   VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1   IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE   REQUIREMENTS.       4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND   OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF   OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF   CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE   VERIFIED.       6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-12-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 10-12-2022 Time 22:25 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 10-12-2022 Time 22:25 Sent To   Notes 2022-10-12 22:37:08 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SITE PLAN, SHEET A1, DOES NOT   APPEAR TO SHOW AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE SIDEWALK TO   THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE   PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,   COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL   ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES.       4. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER   THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY   WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       5. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN,   SHEET A1, PARKING TABLE STATES THAT 52 PARKING SPACES   WILLL BE PROVIDED BUT ONLY 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE   REQUIRED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING   SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION   208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       6. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC   VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1   IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE   REQUIREMENTS.       7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       8. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND   OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF   OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF   CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE   VERIFIED.       9. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       10. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       11. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       12. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       13. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       14. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       15. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-01-2023 Cont ID   Sent By lquinone Date 05-01-2023 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00 Received By lquinone Date 05-01-2023 Time 14:47 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-29-2023 Cont ID   Sent By lquinone Date 03-29-2023 Time 07:27 Rev Time 0.00 Received By lquinone Date 03-29-2023 Time 07:26 Sent To   Notes 2023-03-29 07:30:02 REPEATED COMMENT:       PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE   (THIS IS A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-13-2023 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 01-13-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 01-13-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-01-13 10:56:41 Z22090016 ??? HOTEL EVERNIA EXPANSION - 1.13.23 RESUB       COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]   O PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING   SANITARY SEWER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG   ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (THIS IS A CONDITION OF SITE   PLAN APPROVAL).       QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:   O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-822-2262 OR [email protected]   O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]   O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-26-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 09-26-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 09-26-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-26 14:07:13 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]   GENERAL:   O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND   INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER   (Z-XXXXXXXX).   O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK   BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP   B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL   L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97   B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF   B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS   C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,   ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,   SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER   SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU   BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL   O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION   ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD   SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.   O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS   DATA.       BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:   O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER   SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING   TO THEM.   O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY   EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO   PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO   STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.   O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION   OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW   PREVENTION.   O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY   OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER   METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO   PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.   O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE   NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.       WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:   O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION   INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).   O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.   O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE   STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.   O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND   DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND   SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH   PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE   AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,   BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO   BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,   DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,   ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT   ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF   SANITARY SEWER LINES.   O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR   SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW.   O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL.   O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN   THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER   AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD   DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE   INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND   MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY   TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING   AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,   MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS   SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008   FOR WATER.   O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.   O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE   (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).   O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL   BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY   PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.   O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER ARE REQUIRED.   O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE   JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.   O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT   STATION NUMBER.   O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.   O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE   TRAPS (IF ANY).   O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN   OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.       FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES   NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.   - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:   - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS   THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF   DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;   - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE   STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A   MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).   - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF   CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION   THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL   SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF   WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES   ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY   LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT   PARCELS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE   BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE   50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER   CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR   PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.       QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:   O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-822-2262 OR [email protected]   O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]   O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-29-2022 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 09-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 09-29-2022 Time 15:36 Sent To   Notes 2022-09-29 15:37:11 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.   THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.   THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE   PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE   APPLICABLE.   1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.   2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.   3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.   4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.   5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.   6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)   7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED   TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE   PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.   IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC   LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE   SYSTEM.       7A. PER NFPA 14   6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.   7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE   STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED.   7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A   NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF   150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE   CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE   MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS   LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE   FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED   EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED, IN   APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL FIRE   DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.   7C. PER NFPA 1   18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.   18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.   PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.   FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?   7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.   8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS   REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,   ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY   THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.   9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.   ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.   ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.   10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.   11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.   ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC???S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND   FDC???S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE   STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER   ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.   12. COMMAND ROOM   THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,   CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN   THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:   11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE   DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL   BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.       11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED   FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER   HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1   HOUR.       11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A   MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF   10 FT (3050 MM).       11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY   COMMAND CENTER.   (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.   (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL   FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF   EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING   EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS   (4) WORK TABLE.   (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE BUILDING.   11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES   OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY   COMMAND CENTER.   (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM   CONTROL UNIT.   (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.   (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION   OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL   (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING   SYSTEMS.   (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS   SIMULTANEOUSLY   (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY   PANELS   (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS   (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND   TRANSFER FEATURES.   (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED   BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE   (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL       NFPA 101       11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.   11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED   IN A   LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.   11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE   FOLLOWING:   (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS   (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION   SERVICE   PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION   OF THIS   CODE   (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION   PANELS   (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS   (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS   (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE   PROVIDED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44   (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS   (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS   (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING   SYSTEM   (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE   PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY   11.8.8   13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.   NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.   11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.   NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT   SYSTEMS.   24.9.1 GENERAL.   24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM   CAPABLE   OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON   FREQUENCIES   ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE   INSTALLED   WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE   AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL   SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT   DEGRADE   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.   24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED   FOR   APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF   SUCCESSFUL   ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED   FOR THE   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED   BY   THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH   FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE   NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE   AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE   MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL   AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM   2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.   PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC   SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],   561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR   DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.           14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.   ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.   15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA   101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION   EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:   THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,   INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,   STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY   RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR   RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION.   THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE   APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED   MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE   SYSTEM.   ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL   INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.   16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER   THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.   17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.   18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.   PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-30-2023 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 01-30-2023 Time 16:49 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 01-30-2023 Time 16:49 Sent To   Notes 2023-01-30 16:49:36 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: EVERNIA HOTEL Z22090016   JANUARY 30, 2023   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN. PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND TOTAL   CANOPY MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL PROPOSED REMOVALS. TREES   PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20   FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS   THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE   CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE.   TREE CANOPY CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING FROM SHEET TD-1.       2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 D. ALL   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY NEW   CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR ADDITION WITH A   CONSTRUCTION COST EQUAL OR ABOVE 50% OF THE PROPERTY'S   IMPROVEMENT VALUE AS INDICATED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY   PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE. EXISTING SIDEWALK FOR THIS   PROJECT IS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE REQUIRED   NEW STREET TREES, SIDEWALK, PLANTING BEDS AND   STRUCTURAL SOIL.   1/30/23 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:   ??? THE STRIPING AND CURBED AREAS IN THE STREET NEED TO   BE MORE DETAILED. THE AREAS SHOWN WITH CURBING NEED TO   SHOW LANDSCAPING SUCH AS GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS.   ??? ENTRANCE/EXIT DESIGNED WITH THE DOUBLE LANES FROM   EVERNIA WOULD ALLOW THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE STREET TREES   TO MORE THAN 30 FEET TO ALLOW ADEQUATE CLEARANCE ON   EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY. IF THE DRIVEWAY IS   NARROWED, THE 30 FOOT SPACING CAN BE MAINTAINED.   ??? PLANTING STRIPS NEED TO BE PROVIDED ALONG THE CURB   IF THERE IS NO ADJACENT PARKING SPACE.   ??? CLUSIA STREET TREES ARE UNUSUAL FOR THE DOWNTOWN.   STAFF RECOMMENDS LIVE OAK TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING   STREETSCAPE.           3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR THE EVERNIA STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW   THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113D.2.       4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR THE   QBD-8 ZONING DISTRICT IN THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL   DRAWINGS. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY   TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW   THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR   VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON   TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST   MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   OPEN SPACE TYPE THEN DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS   OF THAT TYPE ARE MET. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE   CODE REQUIREMENT CHART ON SHEET L-201 AND LP.1.   1/30/23 MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS/CLARIFICATIONS:   ??? REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS 4988 SF, SHOW WHERE   THIS AMOUNT OF QUALIFYING SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROVIDED.   THE THREE SEPARATE AREAS A, B, AND C TOTAL MORE THAN   REQUIRED.   OPEN SPACE A, SHEET HP.1 INDICATING 3022 SQ FT INTERIOR   COURTYARD   ??? THERE IS NO TYPE 5 TREE, REMOVE REFERENCE FROM   PLAN.   ??? REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ALLOWABLE PERMEABLE AREA, THE   REFERENCE IN THE DEFINITION OF VEGETATED AREA REQUIRES   AT LEAST 80% TO BE PLANT MATERIAL AND UP TO 20%   ALTERNATIVE PERVIOUS SURFACE SUCH AS DECORATIVE ROCKS.   ??? THERE APPEARS TO BE A COVERED AREA WITHIN THE   DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THIS   NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN ON   THE PLAN AND CHART.   ??? THE PALMS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS LARGE PALMS FOR   THE TYPE 4 SHOWN IN TABLE IV-8. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED   TREE CANOPY WITH QUALIFYING TREE TYPES.   OPEN SPACE B, SHEET HP.2 INDICATING 3742 SQ FT ROOFTOP   GARDEN   ??? THERE IS NO TYPE 5 TREE, REMOVE REFERENCE FROM   PLAN.   ??? TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR ROOFTOP GARDEN IS 20%   NOT 50%, AS THIS IS NOT A TOD SUBDISTRICT.   ??? REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ALLOWABLE PERMEABLE AREA, THE   REFERENCE IN THE DEFINITION OF VEGETATED AREA REQUIRES   AT LEAST 80% TO BE PLANT MATERIAL AND UP TO 20%   ALTERNATIVE PERVIOUS SURFACE SUCH AS DECORATIVE ROCKS.   ??? THE PALMS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS LARGE PALMS FOR   THE TYPE 4 SHOWN IN TABLE IV-8. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED   TREE CANOPY WITH QUALIFYING TREE TYPES. 748.4 SQ FT   TREE CANOPY REQUIRED, THE THREE SEA GRAPES ARE TYPE 1   AT 500 SQ FT EACH, SO THE MINIMUM WOULD BE MET.   OPEN SPACE C, SHEET HP.3, INDICATING 5443 SQ FT ROOFTOP   GARDEN   ??? THERE IS NO TYPE 5 TREE, REMOVE REFERENCE FROM   PLAN.   ??? TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR ROOFTOP GARDEN IS 20%   NOT 50%, AS THIS IS NOT A TOD SUBDISTRICT.   ??? REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ALLOWABLE PERMEABLE AREA, THE   REFERENCE IN THE DEFINITION OF VEGETATED AREA REQUIRES   AT LEAST 80% TO BE PLANT MATERIAL AND UP TO 20%   ALTERNATIVE PERVIOUS SURFACE SUCH AS DECORATIVE ROCKS.   ??? THE PALMS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS LARGE PALMS FOR   THE TYPE 4 SHOWN IN TABLE IV-8. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED   TREE CANOPY WITH QUALIFYING TREE TYPES. 1088 SQ FT TREE   CANOPY REQUIRED, THE THREE SEA GRAPES ARE TYPE 1 AT 500   SQ FT EACH, AND THE TWO QUEENS CRAPE MYRTLE ARE TYPE 2   MEDIUM TREES AT 300 SQ FT EACH, SO THE MINIMUM WOULD BE   MET.                   5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT   CALCULATIONS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE LANDSCAPE   BUFFER. THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHOULD ALSO HAVE THE   BUFFER PROVIDED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH ESPECIALLY   ALONG THE BLANK WALL. LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROVIDED   ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE POSSIBLE, PROVIDE   BUFFER CALCULATIONS.           6. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET   THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.           7. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN IF THE EXISTING FPL TRANSMISSION   LINES WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY IN PLACE OR BE   RELOCATED.       8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS   OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND   PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.   WATER SERVICE AND FIRE LINES GOING INTO THE PROPERTY   NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO THE EAST TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH   THE STREET TREE.           9. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO   INCLUDE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT,   AND SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA   PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN   SPACE TYPE REQUIREMENTS.       10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE   DESIGN OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE   REQUIRED 50 POINTS.       11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE PLANT   AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST.   PLEASE ADD THE COLUMNS, IT IS EASIER FOR STAFF TO   VERIFY THE INFORMATION IF IT IS SEPARATED.       12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF   NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ADDED BASED ON THE   PLANT LIST.       13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE   THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 10-05-2022 Time 14:58 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 10-05-2022 Time 14:58 Sent To   Notes 2022-10-05 14:58:44 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: EVERNIA HOTEL Z22090016   OCTOBER 5, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.   PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION DUE   FOR ALL PROPOSED REMOVALS. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED   WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE   THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE.       2. PER SECTION 94-113 D. ALL STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS   ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR   ADDITION WITH A CONSTRUCTION COST EQUAL OR ABOVE 50% OF   THE PROPERTY'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE AS INDICATED BY THE   PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE. EXISTING   SIDEWALK FOR THIS PROJECT IS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED   WITH THE REQUIRED NEW STREET TREES, SIDEWALK, PLANTING   BEDS AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.           3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT   MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   THE EVERNIA STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER   PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113D.2.       4. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR THE QBD-8 ZONING DISTRICT   IN THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IDENTIFY THE   TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND   DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS   FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS   AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH THE   ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE OPEN SPACE   TYPE THEN DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT TYPE   ARE MET. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE CODE   REQUIREMENT CHART ON SHEET L-201 AND LP.1.       5. PROVIDE THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS FOR THE   WEST PROPERTY LINE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THE EAST PROPERTY   LINE SHOULD ALSO HAVE THE BUFFER PROVIDED ALONG THE   ENTIRE LENGTH ESPECIALLY ALONG THE BLANK WALL.   LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY   LINE WHERE POSSIBLE, PROVIDE BUFFER CALCULATIONS.           6. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.           7. EXPLAIN IF THE EXISTING FPL TRANSMISSION LINES   WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY IN PLACE OR BE RELOCATED.       8. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND   DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF   BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO   RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND   LANDSCAPING.       9. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO INCLUDE ALL PLANT   MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT,   AND SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA   PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN   SPACE TYPE REQUIREMENTS.       10. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN   OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE   REQUIRED 50 POINTS.       11. ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE   TO THE PLANT LIST.       12. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT   SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND   DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ADDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       13. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED   VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT   WILL BE SCREENED.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE   THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-15-2023 Cont ID   Sent By relizond Date 05-15-2023 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.00 Received By relizond Date 05-15-2023 Time 14:40 Sent To   Notes 2023-05-15 15:07:45 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT WILL REQUIRE BEING MET   DURING ENGINEERING REVIEW:   -COMMENT 1 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOT ADDRESSED   -COMMENT 3 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOT FULLY ADDRESSED,   PLEASE REFER TO DETAIL GS-6 FOR CLEANOUT PLACEMENT AND   EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS.   -COMMENT 6 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOT ADDRESSED   -COMMENT 9 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOT ADDRESSED   -CITY STANDARDS CALL FOR DIP INSTALLATION FOR WATER   MAIN   -DENOTE THE CITY'S POINT OF SERVICE FOR BOTH WATER AND   SEWER   -SEWER CCTV INSPECTION SHOWED THAT THE CURRENT   CONDITION OF THE PIPE MAY BE BEYOND LINING. PIPE   REPLACEMENT WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE DISCUSSED.     Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-27-2023 Cont ID   Sent By relizond Date 01-27-2023 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00 Received By relizond Date 01-27-2023 Time 14:35 Sent To   Notes 2023-01-27 14:37:02 -PLAN VIEW INCLUDING ROSEMARY AVENUE WOULD BE HELPFUL   TO DISCERN EXISTING CONDITIONS   -SEPARATE TAPS FOR WATER AND FIRE LINEWILL BE NECESSARY   PER DETAILS WS-1 AND WS-4   -CLEANOUT NEEDED ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE FOR PROPOSED   SANITARY SEWER LATERAL SERVING GREASE TRAPS   -REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL UP TO PROPERTY   LINE AND INSTALL CLEANOUT   -CCTV OF EXISTING SEWER MAIN IN ALLEY NECESSARY TO   DETERMINE IF THE MAIN WILL NEED TO BE LINED   -PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER SERVICE   LINES   -PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING INSTALLATION OF NEW WATER   MAIN BETWEEN SAPODILLA AND ROSEMARY NOT ADDRESSED   -NEED MORE INFORMATION ON TAPPING METHOD OF WATER MAIN   ON EVERNIA   -FIRE HYDRANT NEEDS ANCHOR TEE INSTALLED (8"X6") PER   DETAIL P-8       RICKY ELIZONDO [email protected] Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By mtechnow Date 10-13-2022 Time 12:01 Sent To   Notes 2022-10-13 12:10:37 -CALL FOR ABANDONED SERVICES TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT   THE MAIN.   -REVISE CALL OUT FOR PROPOSED WATER MAIN TO BE DIP.   -CALL OUT SIZE/TYPE OF EXISITNG UTILITIES.   -RECORDS SHOW THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN CONNECTION IS TO   A MAIN FROM 1925. WILL BE REQUIRED TO REPLACE MAIN   WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS, CITY WILL CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS   SHARED COST OF WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT BETWEEN ROSEMARY   AND SAPODILLA.       MICHAEL TECHNOW [email protected] Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-30-2023 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 03-30-2023 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-03-30 15:57:28 ENGINEERING PLANS WILL NEED SOME REVISIONS AT   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL. Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-18-2023 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 01-18-2023 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-01-18 14:37:18 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:   -AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, REVISE UTILITY   EASEMENT SUCH THAT BOUNDARIES ARE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY   AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT INCLUDED.   -VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM WILL NOT HAVE ADDED   CHEMICALS OR AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLY SUCH AS A WELL.   RESPECTFULLY,   MARK HURLEY [email protected] Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-30-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 09-30-2022 Time 16:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-30 16:48:21 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:   -UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM AND HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW   EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER DEDICATED FIRELINE AND DCDA   NEAR SE AREA OF EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW AND LABEL WHAT   IS HAPPENING TO THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE PIPE FROM   WATER MAIN.   -PROPOSED 8 INCH WM CANNOT BE PVC. WOULD HAVE TO BE   DIP.   -PAVEMENT RESTORATION LIMITS SHOULD EXTEND FURTHER WEST   TO ENCOMPASS REMOVED WATER SERVICES.   -ENTIRE FLAGS OF SIDEWALK WOULD NEED BE REPLACED WHERE   METER BOXES ARE BEING REMOVED. SHOW ON ENGINEERING   PLAN.   -LABEL PARKING METERS ON ENGINEERING PLAN OR ADD THE   SYMBOL TO LEGEND.   -A PARKING METER MAY BE ENCROACHING IN FIRE HYDRANT   CLEARANCE AREA.   -SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED FDC.   -SHOW PROPOSED POINT OF SERVICE VALVE FOR FIRELINE.   -ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS A LARGE UTILITY POLE IN NORTH   DRIVEWAY.   -LANDSCAPING SEEMS TO CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED UTILITIES   IN TERMS OF LOCATION. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING   PLAN SHEET SHOWING UTILITIES AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE   APPROPRIATELY DISTANCED FROM EACH OTHER.   -UPDATE SHEET LP3 TO DESCRIBE WHICH LOCATION IT IS.   -WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE LARGE EXISTING PALM TREE AT   SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY?   -ON ENGINEERING PLAN, SHOW BOTH EDGE OF NORTHERN ALLEY   PAVEMENT AND NORTHERN ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY LINE.   -SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION IN ALLEY DUE TO UTILITY   WORK.   -IF THE EXISTING ONE STORY RESIDENCE BUILDING AND   DUMPSTER AREA ARE BEING REMOVED, THEN ADD DEMO PLAN   SHEET.   -SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT FOR WATER   METERS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.   -WATER METERS 3 INCH OR LARGER NEED TO BE INSTALLED   ABOVE-GROUND.   -ENGINEERING PLANS SHOWS MOSTLY CONCRETE ALONG EAST   PROPERTY LINE, BUT LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOWS MOSTLY   LANDSCAPING AREAS.   -NORTHEAST DRIVEWAY IS MISSING DIRECTIONAL ARROWS ON   MOST PLAN SETS.   -VERIFY LOCATION OF DCDA. MAY BE CLOSER TO SIDEWALK   THAN LABELED ON ENGINEERING PLAN.   -WILL SIZE OF FIRELINE AND DCDA BE INCREASED? IF SO,   NOTATE ON PLAN.   RESPECTFULLY,   MARK HURLEY [email protected] Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-28-2023 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 04-28-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 04-28-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-04-28 14:37:20 NO FURTHER COMMENTS. Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-30-2023 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-30-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 03-30-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-03-30 12:29:25 CONDITION OF APPROVAL: ALL SANITATION GARBAGE   CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE IN ORDER TO BE   COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY`S COLLECTION TRUCK.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-02-2023 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-02-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 03-02-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-03-02 15:49:01 CONDITION OF APPROVAL:       ALL SANITATION GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD   TYPE IN ORDER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY`S   COLLECTION TRUCK.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-06-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-06-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 10-06-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-10-06 15:58:45 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND   QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)   THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.   2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE   CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).   3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE   VEHICLE???S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS   FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE   FOLLOWING SPECS:   - DUAL AXLES   - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT   - TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT   4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS   5- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE   GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE   TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND   NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.   6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN   THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF   THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC   WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND   COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING   MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE   CAN(S).   7- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE   CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA   STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].   8- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY   WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD   DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.   9- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED   DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-10-2023 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 05-10-2023 Time 09:03 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 05-10-2023 Time 09:04 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 3 Status   Date 05-10-2023 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 05-10-2023 Time 09:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By tward Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 10-13-2022 Time 00:08 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 10-13-2022 Time 00:09 Sent To   Notes 2022-10-13 00:09:11 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. SHOW AND LABEL THE 2 FEET OF LANDSCAPE OVERHANG FOR   THE GROUND FLOOR PARKING SPACES.       2. UNDERGROUND PARKING MAY PRECLUDE THE USE DRAINAGE   STRUCTURES AND EXFILTRATION TRENCH ON THE GROUND FLOOR.           THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP   CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH   THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF   CONSTRUCTION.       3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-18-2023 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 04-18-2023 Time 10:42 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-04-18 10:43:36 UNITY OF TITLE REQUIRED PRIOR TO T.C.O. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-11-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 10-11-2022 Time 13:47 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-10-11 13:53:44 1. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO SURVEY AND ENG. PLANS.   2. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED.   3. ADD PROPOSED UTILITIES TO LANDSCAPE PLAN.MAY   CONFLICT IN SE CORNER. Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-06-2023 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 06-06-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 06-06-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-06-06 18:43:59 APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:   1) ALLEY TO BE REPAVED THROUGHOUT ITS ENTIRETY FROM   SAPODILLA TO ROSEMARY. CORRESPONDING ONE-WAY SIGNS E   AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS MUST BE INSTALLED EXTENSIVELY AND   EXHAUSTIVELY   2) PROVIDE A DRAFT TDM PLAN TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED   BY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING           TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED   TRAFFIC STUDY. NOTE: THE STUDY MUST BE PRESENTED IN A   SEPARATE DOCUMENT THAN THE INSIGNIFICANT TIS. PLEASE   COMPLETE THE STUDY, INCLUSIVE OF TEST 2, AND PROVIDE   SUMMARY TABLES HIGHLIGHTING DEFICIENCIES AND/OR LEVEL   OF SERVICE DEGRADATION, IF ANY; A SITE PLAN SHOULD BE   PROVIDED. HCM ANALYSIS FOR THE EVERNIA DRIVEWAY SHOULD   BE PROVIDED TO PROVE THAT A LEFT-TURN LANE WOULD NOT BE   NECESSARY. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT COUNTY CONCURRENCY   DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY CITY CONCURRENCY, AND THE   FACT THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA   DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST FURTHER ANALYSIS   2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED   3) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION   DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES. NONE WERE PROPOSED IN   THE LATEST RESUBMISSION, EVEN THOUGH A SECTION IN THE   TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS TITLED AS SUCH.       SITE COMMENTS   4) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION   SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING   TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,   DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,   DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,   CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)   PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD   BE NAMED T1. SEVERAL TRANSPORTATION ITEMS AND   CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, PLEASE REVISE.   5) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. IN THE T1 SITE PLAN,   PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB   CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT   6) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND   PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, WHICH COULD BE A SEPARATE   DOCUMENT OR INCLUDED IN THE T1 SITE PLAN. SEVERAL   SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ESPECIALLY RELATED TO   THE ALLEY ARE MISSING   7) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS   FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN   AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE   DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND   DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. PLEASE PROVIDE A HIGHER   RESOLUTION BACKGROUND IMAGE, INSERT EXACT MEASUREMENTS   OF ALLEY WIDTH, AS THE ACTUAL DRIVABLE SURFACE IS MUCH   LESS THAN 11-FEET. ANY OBSTRUCTION, SUCH AS LIGHT POLES   AND TREES MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.   THERE ARE MAJOR ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN AT THE MOMENT.   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   9) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,   CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE   FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR EDGE OF TRAVEL LANES   10) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,   PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS   11) CONDITION. ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY,   INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY.   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING   PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS   GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS THAT WILL   TRAVERSE THE ALLEY; THUS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SAFE AND   OPTIMAL VEHICULAR OPERATIONS, PROPER MITIGATION   MEASURES, SUCH AS RE-PAVEMENT WITH AT LEAST   ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-INCH ASPHALT THICKNESS, EXTENSIVE   SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND REMOVAL OF OBSTACLES   AND OBSTRUCTIONS ARE WARRANTED. PLEASE DO SHOW THE   EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT WIDTH, BASED ON ACTUAL & CURRENT   FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS.   12) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. SHOWCASE THE ALLEYWAY AND   ALL RELATED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES THROUGHOUT ITS   ENTIRE LENGTH FROM SAPODILLA TO ROSEMARY. LATEST   TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN IS EXTREMELY DEFICIENT IN   ADDRESSING THIS COMMENT.   13) WAIVED/APPROVED BY ADMIN. THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONE   DOES NOT SEEM PROPERLY LOCATED FOR SAFE AND ATTAINABLE   VEHICULAR OPERATIONS AND MANEUVERINGS. A DEDICATED AND   MORE DETAILED (E.G. SHOWCASE EXACT ROAD CONFIGURATION,   HIGHLIGHT ANY OBSTRUCTIONS/OBSTACLES, ETC.) AUTOTURN   ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PERFORMED TO PROVE ITS FEASIBILITY       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]                 Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-19-2023 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 04-19-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 04-19-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-04-19 11:15:25 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY.   NOTE: THE STUDY MUST BE PRESENTED IN A SEPARATE   DOCUMENT THAN THE INSIGNIFICANT TIS. PLEASE COMPLETE   THE STUDY, INCLUSIVE OF TEST 2, AND PROVIDE SUMMARY   TABLES HIGHLIGHTING DEFICIENCIES AND/OR LEVEL OF   SERVICE DEGRADATION, IF ANY; A SITE PLAN SHOULD BE   PROVIDED. HCM ANALYSIS FOR THE EVERNIA DRIVEWAY SHOULD   BE PROVIDED TO PROVE THAT A LEFT-TURN LANE WOULD NOT BE   NECESSARY. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT COUNTY CONCURRENCY   DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY CITY CONCURRENCY, AND THE   FACT THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA   DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST FURTHER ANALYSIS   2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER WITH   UPDATED LAND USE INTENSITY, ONCE RECEIVED   3) APPROVED/WAIVED BY KEVIN VOLBRECHT. PROVIDE   TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES. NONE   WERE PROPOSED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION, EVEN THOUGH A   SECTION IN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS TITLED AS SUCH.   SITE COMMENTS   4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION   SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING   TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,   DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,   DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,   CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)   PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD   BE NAMED T1. ONE-WAY SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS   ALONG THE PORTION OF THE ALLEY WEST OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT ARE MISSING. INSTALL WRONG-WAY/DO-NOT-ENTER   SIGNAGE JUST WEST OF EACH DRIVEWAY ABUTTING THE ALLEY   AND AT ITS EASTERN END ON ROSEMARY AVE. LOADING ZONE   SIGNAGE IS MISSING   5) SATISFIED. IN THE T1 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE   BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT   MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF   THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT   MARKING PLAN, WHICH COULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT OR   INCLUDED IN THE T1 SITE PLAN. SEVERAL SIGNAGE AND   PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ESPECIALLY RELATED TO THE ALLEY ARE   MISSING, PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL FEATURES THROUGHOUT THE   ALLEY EXTENSION.   7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND   WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT   COLORS. PLEASE PROVIDE A HIGHER RESOLUTION BACKGROUND   IMAGE, INSERT EXACT MEASUREMENTS OF ALLEY WIDTH, AS THE   ACTUAL DRIVABLE SURFACE IS MUCH LESS THAN 11-FEET. ANY   OBSTRUCTION, SUCH AS LIGHT POLES AND TREES MUST BE   IDENTIFIED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. AUTOTURN SHOWS   ENCROACHMENTS WITH THE SIDEWALK AREA AT THE WESTERN END   OF THE ALLEY. MOREOVER, PLEASE SHOWCASE THE MANDATORY   18-INCH HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE TO VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS   (REFERENCE: HTTPS://HIGHWAYS.DOT.GOV/SAFETY/RWD/PROVIDE   -SAFE-RECOVERY/CLEAR-ZONES/CLEAR-ZONES ) FOR EACH OF   THE POLES AND TREES ALONG THE ALLEY. PLEASE DRAW AN   18-INCH RADIUS CIRCLE AROUND EACH OBSTRUCTING OBJECT   ALONG THE ALLEY; PLEASE MITIGATE ANY ENCROACHMENT   ACCORDINGLY   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   9) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,   CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE   FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR EDGE OF TRAVEL LANES   10) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,   PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS   11) NOT SATISFIED. ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY,   INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY.   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING   PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS   GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS THAT WILL   TRAVERSE THE ALLEY; THUS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SAFE AND   OPTIMAL VEHICULAR OPERATIONS, PROPER MITIGATION   MEASURES, SUCH AS RE-PAVEMENT WITH AT LEAST   ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-INCH ASPHALT THICKNESS, EXTENSIVE   SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND REMOVAL OF OBSTACLES   AND OBSTRUCTIONS ARE WARRANTED. PLEASE DO SHOW THE   EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT WIDTH, BASED ON ACTUAL & CURRENT   FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS. PER COMMENT #4   PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN THE   TRANSPORTATION PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR   THE REPAVEMENT OF THE ALLEY THROUGHOUT ITS FULL LENGTH.   THE LATEST AUTOTURN MUST BE UPDATED PER COMMENT #7   12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE ALLEYWAY AND ALL   RELATED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES THROUGHOUT ITS ENTIRE   LENGTH FROM SAPODILLA TO ROSEMARY. AT THE EASTERN END   OF THE ALLEY PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL NEARBY OBSTRUCTIONS   (I.E. LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, PROPERTY FENCE AND BUILDING   CORNER) NEED TO BE PROPERLY DEPICTED   13) NOT SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONE DOES NOT   SEEM PROPERLY LOCATED FOR SAFE AND ATTAINABLE VEHICULAR   OPERATIONS AND MANEUVERINGS. A DEDICATED AND MORE   DETAILED (E.G. SHOWCASE EXACT ROAD CONFIGURATION,   HIGHLIGHT ANY OBSTRUCTIONS/OBSTACLES, ETC.) AUTOTURN   ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PERFORMED TO PROVE ITS FEASIBILITY.   PROVIDED AUTOTURN SHOWS SEVERAL ENCROACHMENTS. PLEASE   UPDATE IT BY USING THE LATEST TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN   AS BACKGROUND       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-28-2023 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 02-28-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 02-28-2023 Time   Sent To   Notes 2023-02-28 19:55:59 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC   STUDY. NOTE: THE STUDY MUST BE PRESENTED IN A SEPARATE   DOCUMENT THAN THE INSIGNIFICANT TIS. PLEASE COMPLETE   THE STUDY, INCLUSIVE OF TEST 2, AND PROVIDE SUMMARY   TABLES HIGHLIGHTING DEFICIENCIES AND/OR LEVEL OF   SERVICE DEGRADATION, IF ANY; A SITE PLAN SHOULD BE   PROVIDED. HCM ANALYSIS FOR THE EVERNIA DRIVEWAY SHOULD   BE PROVIDED TO PROVE THAT A LEFT-TURN LANE WOULD NOT BE   NECESSARY. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT COUNTY CONCURRENCY   DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY CITY CONCURRENCY, AND THE   FACT THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA   DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST FURTHER ANALYSIS   2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED   3) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND   MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES. NONE WERE PROPOSED IN THE   LATEST RESUBMISSION, EVEN THOUGH A SECTION IN THE   TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS TITLED AS SUCH.       SITE COMMENTS   4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION   SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING   TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,   DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,   DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,   CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)   PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD   BE NAMED T1. SEVERAL TRANSPORTATION ITEMS AND   CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, PLEASE REVISE.   5) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE T1 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE   BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT   MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF   THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT   MARKING PLAN, WHICH COULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT OR   INCLUDED IN THE T1 SITE PLAN. SEVERAL SIGNAGE AND   PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ESPECIALLY RELATED TO THE ALLEY ARE   MISSING   7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND   WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT   COLORS. PLEASE PROVIDE A HIGHER RESOLUTION BACKGROUND   IMAGE, INSERT EXACT MEASUREMENTS OF ALLEY WIDTH, AS THE   ACTUAL DRIVABLE SURFACE IS MUCH LESS THAN 11-FEET. ANY   OBSTRUCTION, SUCH AS LIGHT POLES AND TREES MUST BE   IDENTIFIED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. THERE ARE MAJOR   ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN AT THE MOMENT.   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   9) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,   CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE   FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR EDGE OF TRAVEL LANES   10) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,   PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS   11) NOT SATISFIED. ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY,   INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY.   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING   PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS   GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS THAT WILL   TRAVERSE THE ALLEY; THUS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SAFE AND   OPTIMAL VEHICULAR OPERATIONS, PROPER MITIGATION   MEASURES, SUCH AS RE-PAVEMENT WITH AT LEAST   ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-INCH ASPHALT THICKNESS, EXTENSIVE   SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND REMOVAL OF OBSTACLES   AND OBSTRUCTIONS ARE WARRANTED. PLEASE DO SHOW THE   EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT WIDTH, BASED ON ACTUAL & CURRENT   FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS.   12) NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE ALLEYWAY AND ALL   RELATED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES THROUGHOUT ITS ENTIRE   LENGTH FROM SAPODILLA TO ROSEMARY. LATEST   TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN IS EXTREMELY DEFICIENT IN   ADDRESSING THIS COMMENT.   13) THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONE DOES NOT SEEM PROPERLY   LOCATED FOR SAFE AND ATTAINABLE VEHICULAR OPERATIONS   AND MANEUVERINGS. A DEDICATED AND MORE DETAILED (E.G.   SHOWCASE EXACT ROAD CONFIGURATION, HIGHLIGHT ANY   OBSTRUCTIONS/OBSTACLES, ETC.) AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOULD   BE PERFORMED TO PROVE ITS FEASIBILITY       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-13-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 10-13-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-10-13 07:48:59 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY. NOTE: THE   STUDY MUST BE PRESENTED IN A SEPARATE DOCUMENT THAN THE   INSIGNIFICANT TIS   2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED   3) PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)   MEASURES       SITE COMMENTS   4) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE   GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED   FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING   STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,   CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY   SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED   AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T1   5) IN THE T1 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB   DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,   PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS   SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, WHICH   COULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT OR INCLUDED IN THE T1 SITE   PLAN   7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR   SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL   PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS   8) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA   AND BICYCLE ONES   9) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY   SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE   BACK OF THE SIDEWALK   10) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE AN   OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS   11) ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY, INSTALL   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE   COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING PREFERRED   DIRECTIONALITY   12) SHOWCASE THE ALLEYWAY AND ALL RELATED   TRANSPORTATION FEATURES THROUGHOUT ITS ENTIRE LENGTH   FROM SAPODILLA TO ROSEMARY       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-18-2023 Cont ID   Sent By cibaven Date 04-18-2023 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00 Received By cibaven Date 04-18-2023 Time 15:58 Sent To   Notes 2023-04-18 15:59:19 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION   PROJECT: VIANA HOTEL & SPA 609 EVERNIA STREET   (Z22090016)   DATE: APRIL 18, 2023   CONTACT: CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT   561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           GENRAL COMMENTS   1. PENDING TO RECEIVED SCAD AND FAA LETTERS. ALL PUBLIC   UTILITIES LETTERS RECEIVED. TPS RECEIVED.   2. ALLEY UTILITY POLE CLOSER TO DRIVEWAY AND LOADING   ZONE WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS.   PLEASE UPDATE ANY APPROPRIATE PLANS.   3. MINOR EDIT ON THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AS THIS   DEVELOPMENT IS USING TDR???S THE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET   ARE FOR THE QBD ??? 8-12 SUBDISTRICT AND NOT QBD 8   SUBDISTRICT, PLEASE REVISE.   4. RENDERINGS NEED TO MATCH DRAWINGS, SOME PALM TREES   ARE SHOWN COMPARED TO SHADE TREES ON THE STREET   PROPOSED, STREET STRIPPING IS NOT SHOWN ON RENDERINGS,   SOME FRONT FACADE TREATMENTS ARE SHOWN ON RENDERING BUT   DO NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS, FOR EXAMPLE, A   GREEN WALL IS PROPOSED ON SHEET B7, BUT RENDERING DO   NOT SHOW IT. PLEASE REVISE RENDERINGS TO ACCURATELY   MATCH DRAWINGS. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO PLEASE PROVIDE   RENDERINGS SHOWING PRIVATE OPEN SPACES AS THEY SEEM TO   BE IMPORTANT OF THE OVERALL DESIGN CONCEPT.   5. THE TITLE OF ALL PROPERTY ON WHICH REQUIRED PARKING   AND LOADING IS PROVIDED SHALL BE UNIFIED WITH THE TITLE   OF ALL PROPERTY ON WHICH THE USES SERVED ARE LOCATED. A   CONDITION OF APPROVAL WILL BE THAT A UNITY OF TITLE IS   REQUIRED PRIOR T.C.O.   6. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WILL NEED TO BE REVISE IF   ANOTHER VARIANCE IS REQUESTED. CRITERIA FOR GRANTING   VARIANCE, SEC. 94-38 (D)(6), WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESS   FOR EACH VARIANCE.               ZONING DIAGRAMS AND CALCULATIONS   1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY ON SHEET Z-1, LEVEL MEZZANINE   THERE ARE 'PLANTING AREAS' THAT ARE EXCLUDED FROM YOUR   FAR CALCULATIONS.   2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE HEIGHT   REQUIREMENT.   3. RELATED TO PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, PLEASE REVISE THE   FOLLOWING MINOR EDITS TO SHEETS: PLEASE REFERENCE ON   SHEET A1, OTHER SHEETS LIKE B20 AND LANDSCAPE SHEETS AS   THEY PROVIDE INFORMATION RELATED TO THE REQUIREMENT.   SHEET B20 ONLY PROVIDES AREA OF OPEN SPACES AND   OVERHEAD CALCULATIONS, AND LANDSCAPE SHEETS PROVIDE   INFORMATION VEGETATION AND TREE CANOPY CALCULATIONS.   NOTE, ON LANDSCAPE PLANS YOU LABELED SPACES AS ???OPEN   SPACE A???, B, AND C, PLEASE DO THE SAME ON SHEET B20   FOR CONSISTENCY.   4. ACTIVE USE ON GROUND FLOOR 30 PERCENT REQUIREMENT,   AS YOU REDESIGNED THE SPACE IN-FRONT OF THE LOBBY AND   CREATED A BETTER CONNECTION TO THE STREET, YOU CAN   COUNT IT AS ACTIVE USE. PLEASE REMOVE THE SPACE WITH   THE RAMP BETWEEN THE SALON AND PLANTERS FROM ACTIVE USE   CALCULATIONS.   5. ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH REQUIREMENTS, PLEASE REVISE   ACCORDINGLY SINCE PLANS WILL CHANGE BASED ON COMMENT   NO. 4.   6. TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT, PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY   SINCE PLANS WILL CHANGE BASED ON COMMENT NO. 4.   7. PLEASE NOTE, SHEET B18 ONLY SHOWS FLOOR PLANS WITH   NO ELEVATION TO SHOW ANY TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS AS   APPLICANT MENTIONED IN PREVIOUS RESPONSES.   8. PLEASE NOTE, REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSPARENCY,   FENESTRATION AND FACADE ARTICULATION FOR THE HISTORIC   BUILDING WILL NOT NEED TO BE MET IF THE FACADES ARE   BEING PRESERVE. IF AN ALTERATION IS PROPOSED, THEN   FACADES WILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE   CLARIFY IF ALL FACADES ARE BEING PRESERVED, AND IF   ALTERED, PROVIDE ANY CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS ON HOW   THEY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.   9. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE GROUND FLOOR AND PODIUM   (ACTIVE USE) MEETS AT LEAST 15% OF FENESTRATION PER   SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-4.   10. PLEASE REVISE REAR SETBACK LINES SHOWN ON SHEETS   B4, B5, B6, B8 B9, B12, AND B13 SHOULD BE 5 FEET FROM   GROUND TO THE 12 FLOORS.   11. PLEASE REVISE MINOR TYPO ON SHEET A1, MAX. BUILDING   FOOTPRINT FROM "TOWER: 6 TO 12 (155FEET)" TO "TOWER:6   TO 12 (152 FEET)".   12. PLEASE REVISE DIAGRAMS AND CALCULATIONS FOR MAX.   BUILDING FOOTPRINT INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEET B19. SEE   DEFINITION OF FOOTPRINT PER SEC. 94-109, FOOTPRINT   CALCULATIONS SHALL EXCLUDE BALCONIES, AND OTHER AREAS.           ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS   1. REPEATED COMMENT, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RETAIL SQUARE   FOOTAGE IS DIFFERENT BETWEEN SHEETS. SHEET A1.2 HAS   736SF, SHEET T1, Z1, B1, B12, AND B18 HAVE 786SF. AND   NOTE, ON REVISED TPS LETTER RETAIL IS SHOWING AS 788SF.   2. REPEATED COMMENT, INFORMATION IS NEEDED ABOUT THE   GREEN WALL MATERIAL BEING USED ON THE FRONT FACADE,   ESPECIALLY IF THIS IS PROPOSED AS AN ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT, AND WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE   DRAWINGS. NOTE, RENDERINGS WILL NEED TO MATCH DRAWINGS.   3. ON SHEET B14, PLANE B, PLEASE CLARIFY WITH   CALCULATIONS IF THIS AREA IS LESS THAN 20 PERCENT OF   THE ENTIRE FACADE ELEVATION TO NOT BE CONSIDERED A   'BLANK WALL' PER DEFINITION IN SEC. 94-109. IF GREATER   THAN 20 PERCENT, FACADE ARTICULATION WILL NEED TO BE   PROVIDED.   4. PLEASE NOTE, IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT REQUIREMENT YOU ARE   SHOWING ON SHEETS B14-B17. ON SHEET B7, YOU SHOW THE   ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT THAT IS GIVEN TO FACADES   ENCLOSING PARKING SPACES (NON-ACTIVE USE). SO, SHEETS   B14-B17 SEEM TO BE SHOWING FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS   BUT SOME PERCENTAGES ARE LESS THAN 15 PERCENT WHICH DO   NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.   5. THE PLANTER WALL ON THE EAST SIDE WILL NEED TO BE   LOWERED, SEE SHEET R1 SHOWING A HIGHER WALL COMPARED TO   ELEVATION ON SHEET B14 WHERE THE WALL IS 2 FEET 8   INCHES FEET WHICH WORKS BETTER FROM THE STREET LEVEL.           PARKING   1. NOTE - PENDING CONFIRMATION FROM THE TRAFFIC   ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAT ON-STREET PARKING CAN BE   COUNTED TOWARDS REQUIRED PARKING.   2. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL WITH DIMENSIONS OF YOUR BIKE   STORAGE ROOM. AS REQUIRED PER SEC. 94-111(I), THE ROOM   WILL NEED ACCOMMODATE 4 BICYCLES. SEE THE CITY'S   BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES PAGE 4 FOR MORE INFO ABOUT   DIMENSIONS AND AREA. YOU CAN ADD DETAIL TO SHEET A1.2.   3. IN ADDITION TO THE BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED ON THE   COMMENT 2, PER SEC. 94-113(D)(9), BICYCLE PARKING FOR 2   BICYCLES IS REQUIRED ON STREET. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO   ACKNOWLEDGE THIS REQUIREMENT IN YOUR TABLES ON SHEETS   A1.2 AND A1. NOTE, BIKE RACKS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH   LANDSCAPING AREA, PLEASE REVISE.   4. SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES FACING EVERNIA STREET WILL   NEED TO BE MOVE TO THE LINE WHERE THE STREET R/W   STARTS. SEE SEC. 94-305(E), FIGURE X-1.   5. PLEASE CLARIFY IF A GATE IS PROPOSED ON THE   EXITS/ENTRANCES TO PARKING ON THE STREET LEVEL.   6. PLEASE UPDATE AUTORUN ANALYSIS BASED ON DISCUSSIONS   REGARDING THE RELOCATION OF THE UTILITY POLE BETWEEN   LOADING ZONE AND DRIVEWAY, AND ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE   SHEETS.   7. PLEASE ADD SLOPE PERCENTAGE ON ADA RAMP ACCESSING   THE SALON.           LANSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE   1. IF THE MAX. SPACING BETWEEN ON-STREET TREES IS   GREATER THAN 30 FEET, A VARIANCE WILL NEED TO BE   REQUESTED. THE TWO TREES FRAMING THE DRIVEWAY DO NOT   MEET THE REQUIREMENT, PLEASE REVISE.   2. BICYCLE RACKS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE LOT ARE IN   CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING PROPOSED, PLEASE REVISE TO   ENSURE THAT ENOUGH SPACE CAN ACCOMMODATE TWO BICYCLES   ON EACH SIDE. IF SPACE ALLOWS, BIKE RACKS CAN MOVE   CLOSER TO THE SIDEWALK SO A LANDSCAPE BUFFER CAN BE   ADDED PARALLEL TO THE STREET, BETWEEN PARKING AND BIKE   RACK TO BETTER SCREEN PARKING.   3. THE PROPOSED ON-STREET TREE IN FRONT OF THE HISTORIC   BUILDING CONFLICTS WITH THE AWNING, PLEASE REVISE.   4. PLEASE NOTE, STREET LIGHTS FIXTURES ARE NOT SHOWN ON   LANDSCAPE SHEET LP.1. PLEASE ADD TO ENSURE TREES ARE   NOT IN CONFLICT WITH PLACEMENT. NOTE, CITY STANDARD FOR   DECORATIVE STREETLAMPS IS LUMEC (S55-007).   5. ON ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS, DRIVEWAYS' APRONS AND CURB   RADIUS DO NOT MATCH LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING SHEETS,   PLEASE REVISE. ALL PLANS SHOULD BE CONSISTENT IN   DESIGN.   6. PLEASE NOTE VEGETATED AREAS, PER DEFINITION FOUND IN   SEC. 94-109, NEED TO BE OCCUPIED BY PLANT MATERIAL.   PLANT MATERIAL MEANS NATURAL GRASS, GROUND COVER,   SHRUBS, HEDGES, VINES AND TREES. YOU ARE PROPOSING   ARTIFICIAL TURF ON OPEN SPACES AREAS, THESE ARTIFICIAL   TURF AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE MIN.   PERCENTAGE REQUIRED OF VEGETATION AREA OF OPEN SPACES,   PLEASE REVISE.   7. ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREA PROPOSED MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451.           OTHER COMMENTS   1. A SIGNAGE PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO   APPROVE THE 'VIANA' SIGN.   2. PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT   SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A   REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH   COMMENTS. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED SUBMITTALS   WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE APPLICATION AS   WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF   THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT MAY REQUEST A   30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION REQUEST IS   PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED APPLICATIONS   SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH   COMMENTS.   3. WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS   NEED TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2)   PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT   OF ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE   APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE   RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS   TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS.   4. LASTLY, YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO   ADDITIONAL COST. AS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE   TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE   ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE   ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE, WHICH IS $300.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-03-2023 Cont ID   Sent By cibaven Date 02-03-2023 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00 Received By cibaven Date 02-03-2023 Time 10:17 Sent To   Notes 2023-02-03 10:04:30 ZONING AND PLANNING   PROJECT: VIANA HOTEL & SPA 609 EVERNIA STREET Z22090016   DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 2023   CONTACT: CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT   561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected].   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:   PLEASE NOTE, I AM ADDING A 'Z' ON COMMENTS MADE BY THE   ZONING DEPARTMENT AND AN 'A' ON COMMENTS MADE BY   APPLICANT. FEEL FREE TO CONTACT CLAUDIA IBAVEN VIA   EMAIL, IF YOU WOULD LIKE A WORD DOCUMENT OF THE   COMMENTS BELOW.           GENERAL COMMENTS       COMMENT 1   Z - THE PROJECT CANNOT EXCEED 79,800 SQ. FT. (MAXIMUM   FAR OF 4). THERE ARE ERRORS AND DISCREPANCIES IN THE   FAR CALCULATIONS THAT COULD EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE FAR.       A - THE PROJECT FAR IS 79,768 SF. THIS IS IDENTIFIED ON   DIAGRAMS AND CALCULATIONS ON SHEET Z-1.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON SHEET A1, PLEASE   REFERENCE SHEETS THAT ARE SHOWING DIAGRAMS AND   BREAKDOWN OF CALCULATIONS. ON SHEET Z-1, THE LOBBY   LEVEL IS SHOWING DOTTED RED LINES NOT OUTSIDE OF THE   FACE OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS, PARTICULARLY THE LOBBY AND   BATHROOM AREAS, PLEASE REVISE. AND, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO   SPLIT SHEET A1 INTO TWO SHEETS, ONE AS A SITE PLAN AND   THE OTHER AS PROJECT DATA CALCULATIONS WITH ALL TABLES.           COMMENT 2   Z - THE COUNTY TPS LETTER PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT DOES   NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SQUARE   FOOTAGE FOR THE PROJECT AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. THE   TPS LETTER SHALL BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE   CORRECT COMMERCIAL RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO AVOID   COUNTING ANY GHOST TRIPS.       A - THIS PROJECT IS IN A TCEA AND TPS APPROVAL IS NOT   REQUIRED. WE HAVE INFORMED QUAZI BARI THAT THE   DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS CHANGED SLIGHTLY IN A TCEA (SEE   EMAIL DATED DECEMBER 12, 2022).       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. A TRAFFIC LETTER PROVIDED   BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS REQUIRED   AS PART OF THE APPLICATION. THE LETTER PROVIDED DATED   ON SEPT. 26, 2022, WILL NEED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT   ACCURATELY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.           COMMENT 3   Z - PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC   UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR   WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE   COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST   PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (561)   494-1040.       A - PLEASE SEE WRITTEN REVIEW COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC   WORKS, AND WRITTEN RESPONSES TO SAID COMMENTS IN THIS   LETTER.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION   DOCUMENT WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF YOUR   APPLICATION/RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR OUR RECORDS.           COMMENT 4   Z - PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES   CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH   INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE   PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND   COMCAST.       A - SURVEY AND PLANS SUBMITTED SHOW NO ENCROACHMENTS   INTO EASEMENTS. LETTERS FROM UTILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED   AT BUILDING PERMITTING.       Z 02.02.2023 - NOT SATISFIED. AS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN   APPROVAL, LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES WILL NEED   TO BE PROVIDED IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR OUR   RECORDS.           COMMENT 5   Z- WHAT ARE THE PROVISIONS FOR THE EXISTING UTILITIES   (I.E. UTILITY POLES, ETC.)? ARE ANY IMPROVEMENTS   PROPOSED WITHIN THE ALLEY? PLEASE PROVIDE MORE   INFORMATION.       A - EXISTING UTILITIES ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS CALLED OUT.   FOR EXAMPLE, THE UTILITY POLE IN THE NORTHWEST   DRIVEWAY, AS WELL AS SEVERAL EXISTING WATER METERS,   WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS, AND PARTIAL SANITARY   CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN LABELED TO BE REMOVED. A PROPOSED   SANITARY CONNECTION TO THE GRAVITY SEWER WILL ALSO   REQUIRE PAVEMENT RESTORATION IN THE ALLEY.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. ON THE CONCEPTUAL PAVING,   DRAINAGE, WATER AND WASTEWATER PLAN SHEET IT CALLS OUT   ONE UTILITY POLE TO BE RELOCATED BUT THERE SEEMS TO BE   AT LEAST A COUPLE ON THE ALLEY, PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT   WILL HAPPEN TO THOSE AND LABEL CORRECTLY. PLEASE   CLEARLY SHOW THE EXISTING R/W LINE. NOTE, THE RADIUS OF   THE CURB-CUT OR APRON ON THE DRIVEWAYS ENCROACHES INTO   THE ALLEY, PLEASE ADJUST TO BE WITHIN PROPERTY LINE.   AND NO STAIRS, RAMPS OR OTHER STRUCTURES CAN BE WITHIN   THE MINIMUM SETBACK, PLEASE ADJUST.           COMMENT 6   Z - MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE COMMERCIAL   COMPONENT OF THE PROJECT. IS THE COMMERCIAL SPACE FOR   HOTEL GUESTS ONLY OR IS IT OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC?   PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY   COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE.       A - THE HOTEL SPA AND SALON AND RESTAURANT AND BAR ARE   AMENITIES FOR HOTEL GUESTS LIKE THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE   DEFINITIONS OF HOTEL, FULL SERVICE AND HOTEL, BOUTIQUE.   ?? 94-109, ZLDRS. PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT   SHEET A1 BASED UPON SECTION 94-111, ZLDRS AND TABLE   IV-9 (PROVIDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR HOTEL   RESTAURANT AND PUBLIC MEETING AREAS AND COMMERCIAL   USES).       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT   SPACES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC IN   GENERAL. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE CAFE IS OPEN TO THE   PUBLIC AND IF THE RESTAURANT/BAR IS ON THE GROUND FLOOR   LABEL AS 'BUFFET' AND 'BAR', AND IF THIS SPACE IS ALSO   OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.           COMMENT 7   Z - PROVIDE A LETTER ENSURING FAA COMPLIANCE (A   DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD) IN REGARD TO THE HEIGHT OF   ANY TOWERS OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THE DESIGNATED FLIGHT   PATH.       A - TO THE EXTENT ANY FAA LETTER IS REQUIRED, IT WILL   BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITTING. THE APPLICANT   NOTES THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER BUILDINGS IN   THE AREA, SO THERE WILL NOT BE ANY ISSUE WITH THE   FLIGHT PATH.       Z 02.02.2023 - NOT SATISFIED. AS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN   APPROVAL, FAA LETTER WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED IN YOUR   RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR OUR RECORDS.           COMMENT 8 - NEW COMMENT   Z 02.02.23 - PLEASE NOTE, THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO   PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW IT WILL MEET THE PUBLIC ART   REQUIREMENT PRIOR TO PRESENTING TO DAC AND FOR SITE   PLAN APPROVAL. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION PROVIDED   TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE   REQUIREMENT.                   JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT       COMMENT 1   Z - THE PROJECT WILL BE UTILIZING TDRS. PLEASE REVISE   THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO INCLUDE ANY PERTINENT   INFORMATION/HISTORY ON THE TDRS ACQUIRED FOR THE   PROJECT. IT IS IMPORTANT TO PROVIDE ALL BACKGROUND   INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT.       A - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IDENTIFIES THE TDRS   THAT HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FROM THE SEABOARD TRAIN STATION   (CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER 22-11).   Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.           COMMENT 2   Z - PROVIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PRESERVATION   OF THE EXISTING HOTEL EVERNIA AND ANY DISCUSSIONS HAD   WITH THE CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER(S).       A - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT HAS BEEN UPDATED TO   REFERENCE PRIOR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY'S HISTORIC   PRESERVATION PLANNER RELATIVE TO THE INTEGRATION OF THE   HOTEL EVERNIA STRUCTURE INTO THE PROJECT.       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.           COMMENT 3   Z - HAS THERE BEEN ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH REGARDING THE   PROPOSED PROJECT?       A - THE APPLICANT HAS SCHEDULED A MEETING WITH THE   DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ON FEBRUARY 1, 2023.       Z 02.02.23 - IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE, PLEASE   INCLUDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE MEETING HELD ON 02.01.23   AND ANY LETTERS OF SUPPORT. IN ADDITION, PLEASE NOTE   PER SEC. 94-39 (J)(4) AND SEC. 94-54 (B)(3), THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO MEET PROCEDURES OF   NOTICES OF PUBLIC MEETINGS.           COMMENT 4 - NEW COMMENT   Z 02.02.23 - AS PER SEC. 94-54 (B), ADD TO   JUSTIFICATION LETTER RESPONSE TO EACH SPECIAL REVIEW   STANDARDS. PLEASE PROVIDE ONE DOCUMENT, THE   JUSTIFICATION LETTER, THAT INCLUDES THE INFORMATION   ABOUT TDR'S, THE HISTORIC BUILDING BACKGROUND INFO, THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AND RESPONSES ON THE SPECIAL   REVIEW AND VARIANCE STANDARDS                   DIAGRAMS REQUESTED       COMMENT 1   Z - SEPARATE DIAGRAM SHEETS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING (SIMILAR TO   THE FAR DIAGRAMS) ??? REQUIRED AND PROPOSED INFORMATION   REQUESTED ON THE SHEET(S) FOR: A) BUILDING SETBACKS; B)   BUILDING FOOTPRINT (FOR LOT AREA <50,000 SQ. FT.); C)   OPEN SPACE (PRIVATE ONLY; PUBLIC NOT REQUIRED); D)   ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT E.) TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT; F)   ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH REQUIREMENT; G) FA??ADE   ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS (I.E. FENESTRATION,   HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, BLANK   WALL, ETC.).       A - ADDITIONAL DIAGRAM SHEETS ARE INCLUDED WITH THIS   RESUBMITTAL RELATIVE TO EACH ITEM NOTED.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. AS MENTIONED ABOVE,   ON SHEET A1, PLEASE REFERENCE SHEETS THAT ARE SHOWING   DIAGRAMS AND BREAKDOWN OF CALCULATIONS.       HEIGHT DIAGRAMS: PLEASE CLARIFY IF SHEET B7 YOU ARE   SHOWING THE BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSION MEETING THE   REQUIREMENT. IF SO, PLEASE REFERENCE ON A1 TABLE.   PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109 DEFINITION 'HEIGHT' ON HOW TO   MEASURE IT. ALSO SEE ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS.       OPEN SPACE: PLEASE CLARIFY, WHICH SHEET IS PROVIDING   THE BREAKDOWN OF THE 5,647SQ.FT OF OPEN SPACE PROPOSED   AND NOTED ON SHEET A1. NOTE, ADDING UP THE SQ.FT. ON   SHEETS HP.1, HP.2, HP.3 DOES NOT MATCH WITH THE   PROPOSED. MAKE SURE YOU ARE DEFINING THE TYPE OF OPEN   SPACE AS PER SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-6 AND MEETS   REQUIREMENTS ON TABLE IV-7.       PLEASE CREATE A NEW SHEET DIAGRAM OR PERHAPS REWORK   SHEET B1, TO SHOW GROUND FLOOR PLAN AND GROUND FLOOR   ELEVATION PLANS TO CLEARLY PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AND   DIMENSIONS FOR ACTIVE USE, ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH,   TRANSPARENCY, AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS. FOR MORE   INFORMATION ABOUT THESE REQUIREMENTS, SEE SEC. 94-109,   TABLE IV-4 AND SEC. 94-132, TABLE IV-46. SEE ALSO SITE   PLAN COMMENTS, COMMENT #5 & #8.           COMMENT 2   Z - ALSO NOTE THAT ACTIVE USES ARE REGULATED AS A   PERCENTAGE OF THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE (NOT THE   ACTUAL BUILDING FRONTAGE AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS).   PLEASE REFER TO REQUIREMENTS AND DIAGRAMS IN ARTICLE   IV.       A - THE ACTIVE USES ARE IDENTIFIED BASED ON THE   BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REVIEW DEFINITION OF   'ACTIVE USE' AND 'ACTIVE USE, GROUND FLOOR' ON SEC.   94-109. REVISE TABLE ON SHEET A1 TO SHOW THE REQUIRED   30% OF THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE. SHEET B1, SHOWS   AREAS HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN AS ACTIVE USE, THE ONLY AREA   THAT CAN BE DESIGNATED AS ACTIVE USE, AS PER DEFINITION   ON SEC. 94-109, IS THE 'SALON'. PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO   MEET THE CODE. ON REVISED PLANS, MAKE SURE TO ADD THE   DIMENSION OF THE 'BUILDING LOT FRONTAGE'. AND, AS   SUGGESTED ABOVE, FEEL FREE TO CREATE A NEW SHEET TO   CLEARLY SHOW HOW YOU MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVE   USE AND ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH.                       ZONING AND TABULAR COMMENTS (SHEET A1)       COMMENT 1   Z - THE ZONING DISTRICT IS QBD 8-12 STORY RECEIVING   SITE.       A - ACKNOWLEDGED.       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED. ON SHEET A1 REFLECTS THE RIGHT   DISTRICT, THANK YOU.           COMMENT 2   Z - CHECK THE PROVIDED PARKING COUNT (IT DOES NOT   APPEAR TO BE 52 PARKING SPACES AS NOTED).       A - PARKING DATA HAS BEEN EVALUATED AND UPDATED.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS SHOW 55   PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED, 5 OUT OF THOSE REQUIRED   SPACES ARE FOR MOTORCYCLES AND, ACCORDING SEC 94-111   (J), 8 MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACES MAY BE PERMITTED IN   LIEU OF 4 STANDARD PARKING SPACES, WHICH MEANS IF YOU   ARE PROVIDE 5, 2 CAN COUNT TOWARDS YOUR TOTALS. PLEASE   NOTE, PER SEC. 94-111 (F): ON-STREET PARKING, EXISTING   OR PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING SPACES MAY COUNT TOWARD   REQUIRED PARKING WHEN APPROVED BY THE CITY PARKING   ADMINISTRATOR AND THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. YOU MIGHT   WANT TO EXPLORE THIS TO HELP WITH YOUR PARKING   REQUIREMENTS.       PLEASE NOTE, ON SHEET T1, PARKING SPACES ON GROUND   LEVEL ARE 16FT IN LENGTH INSTEAD OF 18FT, PLEASE REVIEW   ALL PARKING SPACES, ITS DIMENSIONS, AND REVISE   ACCORDINGLY. IN ADDITION, AS PER SEC. 94-111 (C)(1), IF   A STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR OTHER PHYSICAL   OBSTRUCTION THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A   MINIMUM OF 1FT, PLEASE REVISE.       ADA ACCESS FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF   THE HOTEL SHOULD BE PROVIDED.           COMMENT 3   Z- INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM   BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS   INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE AS   THE BUILDING MUST LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACK   RANGE.       A - THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON SHEET A-1.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON SHEETS B1 AND B12   PARKING LEVEL, STAIRS AND RAMPS ON THE BUILDING LOT   FRONTAGE FACING THE ALLEY ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE 5FT   REAR SETBACK AREA, PLEASE REVISE AS NOT STRUCTURES CAN   BE WITHIN THE MINIMUM REAR SETBACK. IN ADDITION, PLEASE   MAKE SURE TO ADD THE MINIMUM REAR SETBACK LINE TO ALL   FLOORS. NOTE, ON SHEETS B1-6 AND B12 AND B13, YOU CAN   SHOW THE REQUIRED SETBACK LINES WITH DIMENSIONS, YOU   CAN TAKE OUT ANY OTHER DIMENSIONS LABELED AS 'SETBACKS'   SINCE THE REVIEWER WILL BE ABLE TO SEE THAT BUILDING   FACES ARE NOT WITHIN THE SETBACK LINES. AS A   SUGGESTION, YOU CAN USE A DIFFERENT COLOR FOR THE   SETBACK LINES TO DIFFERENTIATE FROM OTHER DRAWING LINES   ON SHEETS B1-12, JUST LIKE YOU SHOW ON SHEETS B12 AND   B13. LASTLY, PLEASE ADD SETBACK LINES IN ELEVATIONS.           COMMENT 4   Z - INCORRECT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR THE ALLOWABLE   AND PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT. INFORMATION PROVIDED   MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ZLDRS.       A - THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN UPDATED.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SHEET WITH   DIAGRAMS SHOWING WHERE THESE CALCULATIONS ARE COMING   FROM. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT BUILDING FOOTPRINT   PLEASE SEE SEC. 94-109. IN ADDITION, PLEASE REVISE   MINOR TYPOS 'TOWER:4 TO 5(68')' AND 'TOWER: 6 TO 12   (152')' ON SHEET A1.           COMMENT 5   Z - THE MINIMUM GROUND TO 12 (152') REQUIRED   INFORMATION FOR BUILDING SETBACKS IS INCORRECT IN THE   TABLE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.       A - THE TABLE HAS BEEN UPDATED.       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.           COMMENT 6   Z - PARKING CALCULATIONS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED) SHALL   BE BROKEN DOWN BY USE. ALSO INCLUDE PARKING   CALCULATIONS FOR COMPACT PARKING, DISABLED PARKING,   BICYCLE PARKING, LOADING ZONES, ETC.       A - THE PARKING DATA IS NOW BROKEN DOWN BY USE AND   PARKING CALCULATIONS BY TYPE (COMPACT, DISABLED,   PARKING, LOADING) IS PROVIDED IN THE PARKING TABLE AT   SHEET A-1. THE APPLICANT HAS FURTHER INCLUDED A   VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE REDUCTION TO ONE LOADING SPACE   THAT IS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.       Z 02.02.23 - SEE COMMENT #2 FOR MORE ABOUT PARKING   CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.           COMMENT 7   Z - CHECK THE PROVIDED PARKING COUNT (IT DOES NOT   APPEAR TO BE 52 PARKING SPACES AS NOTED).       A - PARKING DATA HAS BEEN EVALUATED AND UPDATED ON   SHEET B-1.       Z 02.02.23 - SEE COMMENT #2 FOR MORE ABOUT PARKING   CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.           COMMENT 8   Z - THE PLANS SHOULD REFERENCE THE TRANSFER OF   DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDRS) PROGRAM (CERTIFICATE NO.   22-11) AND HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE   WILL BE ADDED TO THE PROJECT BASED ON THE PURCHASE AND   UTILIZATION OF TDRS. IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY   AND HOW THE PROJECT CAN EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE   QBD-8 DISTRICT (BASE ZONING FOR THE PROJECT SITE)   ILLUSTRATED/NOTED IN THE PLAN.       A - A NOTE REGARDING THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER   (CERTIFICATE NO. 22-11) CONVEYING 44,895 SQUARE FEET   FROM THE SENDING SITE AT 205 S. TAMARIND AVENUE TO THE   PROJECT SITE (609, 613 & 617 EVERNIA STREET) HAS BEEN   ADDED TO THE SITE PLAN (SHEET A1).       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.           COMMENT 9   Z - THE CODE SUMMARY INFORMATION SHALL REFERENCE THE   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH (NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY).   A - THE SUMMARY INFORMATION HAS BEEN CORRECTED.   Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.                       SITE PLAN COMMENTS       COMMENT 1   Z - PER THE ZLDRS, "GROSS BUILDING AREA" MEANS THE   TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING, INCLUDING   AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,   ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP, SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND   LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL   UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FAR DIAGRAMS DO NOT   APPEAR TO BE ACCURATE. PLEASE ENSURE ALL DIAGRAMS AND   CALCULATIONS DEFINED AS THE GROSS BUILDING AREA ARE   INCLUDED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS. MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS   WHERE NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-109]       A - FAR HAS BEEN UPDATED. PLEASE SEE DIAGRAM SHEET Z-1.   Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE GENERAL COMMENTS,   COMMENT #1.       COMMENT 2   Z - PER THE ZLDRS, THE MEZZANINE SHALL BE COUNTED   TOWARD THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR. ACCORDING TO THE   PLAN, THE MEZZANINE HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR   CALCULATIONS. [ZLDR S.94-109]       A - THE MEZZANINE AREA HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN FAR   CALCULATIONS.   Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.           COMMENT 3   Z - THE BUILDING SETBACK ON EVERNIA STREET (SECONDARY   STREET) SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB (NOT   THE PROPERTY LINE AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS). THE   MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK IS 12 FT. AND THE MAXIMUM   BUILDING SETBACK IS 35 FT. THE BUILDING ALONG EVERNIA   STREET MUST BE WITHIN THIS SETBACK RANGE. ALSO, PLEASE   CLEARLY PROVIDE THE ACCURATE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE   COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-109 AND S.94-132, TABLE IV-46]       A - REVISED DIMENSIONS ARE IDENTIFIED ON FLOOR PLANS.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE ZONING AND   TABULAR COMMENTS, COMMENT #3.           COMMENT 4   Z - CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXISTING AND   DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FT. AS MEASURED   PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB. NO DIMENSIONS HAVE   BEEN PROVIDED IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE   WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-111]       A - PLEASE SEE UPDATED DIMENSIONS ON SHEET B-1 AND   CIVIL PLANS INCLUDED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL.       Z 02.02.23 - WE RECOMMEND MAKING THE DRIVEWAY ON   EVERNIA STREET ONE LINE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT ON   PEDESTRIANS AND STREETSCAPE. THIS CHANGE WILL HELP WITH   PLACEMENT OF STOP SIGN AND STREET TREES WITHOUT   EXCEEDING THE MAX SPACING BETWEEN TREES. IT COULD ALSO   PROVIDE MORE SPACE TO INCORPORATE ADA RAMP(S) TO ENTER   THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING.           COMMENT 5   Z - PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PATIO SPACE AT THE   LOBBY LEVEL. WHAT WILL THIS SPACE BE UTILIZED FOR?       A - THE PATIO SPACE IS A LOUNGE/SEATING AREA FOR THE   USE OF HOTEL GUESTS ACCESSIBLE FROM LOBBY.       Z 02.02.23 - AS THIS SPACE IS PRIVATE AND FOR THE USE   OF GUESTS, THIS OPEN SPACE CAN'T COUNT AS PUBLIC SPACE   OR ACTIVE USE. PLEASE REVIEW REGULATIONS OF ACTIVE USE   AND ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE MEETING   THE REQUIREMENTS. SEE ALSO DIAGRAMS REQUESTED, COMMENT   #2.           COMMENT 6   Z - PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED   LIVING/SHOP AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED IN THE LOBBY FLOOR   PLAN. IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THIS SPACE IS.       A - THE 'LIVING' SPACE AS PREVIOUSLY LABELED IS THE   LOBBY SPACE; ALL PLANS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED TO REFERENCE   THIS.       Z 02.02.23 - SEE DIAGRAMS REQUESTED, COMMENT #2.           COMMENT 7   Z - RETAIL AREA CALCULATIONS DO NOT ADD UP. PLEASE   ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.   A - CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN UPDATED.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY IF ONLY THE   SALON WILL BE RETAIL AND SPACE ACCESSIBLE TO THE   GENERAL PUBLIC. CLARIFY IF THE SALON IS NOT CONNECTED   TO THE SPA AND WILL NOT FUNCTION AS ONE BUSINESS. IN   ADDITION, CLARIFY IF THE 'OFFICE' ON THE GROUND FLOOR   IS PART OF THE HOTEL OR THE SALON OR THE SPA. LASTLY,   PLEASE REVISE CALCULATIONS, ON SHEET A1 RETAIL SPACE   SQ.FT. SHOWS AS 637, ON SHEET Z1 SHOWS AS 780SQ.FT. AND   ON SHEETS T1 AND B12 IT SHOWS 788SQ.FT. MAKE SURE ALL   DATA IS CONSISTENT ACROSS ALL SHEETS.           COMMENT 8   Z - WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL/PATIO LOCATED ALONG   EVERNIA STREET? IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ELEVATION OF   THE PATIO IS LOWERED TO MEET THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT   ALONG EVERNIA STREET.       A - THE PATIO WALL HEIGHT IS 42 INCHES AND INCLUDED ON   THE REVISED SITE PLAN AT SHEET A1, PARKING LEVEL/SALON   & LOBBY FLOOR PLAN AT SHEET B1, AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION   AT SHEET B7. THE PATIO IS FRONTING THE ACTIVE USE ALONG   EVERNIA STREET, AND IS LEVEL WITH THE HOTEL LOBBY, BUT   ALSO ACCESSIBLE FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE WEST END.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. AS DEFINED ON SEC. 94-109,   THE INTEND TO HAVE 'ACTIVE USE' ON THE GROUND FLOOR IS   TO ATTRACT PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND PROVIDE DIRECT   ACCESS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FROM THE SIDEWALK, THE   WALL HEIGHT IS CREATING A VISUAL AND PHYSICAL BARRIER   FOR PEDESTRIANS TO SEE ANY ACTIVITY IN THE BUILDING AND   LOT FRONTAGE AND IMPEDING DIRECT ACCESS TO THE   BUILDING. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN IN ORDER   TO MEET THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT AND DECREASE AS MUCH   AS POSSIBLE ANY NEGATIVE VISUAL AND PHYSICAL BARRIERS   FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC. SEE ALSO DIAGRAMS REQUESTED,   COMMENT #2.                       STREETSCAPE COMMENTS       COMMENT 1   Z - THE PROJECT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE STREETSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-113 OF THE ZLDRS. THE PROJECT   MUST DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM   REQUIREMENTS FOR STREETSCAPE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT   LIMITED TO STREET TREES, LIGHTING, BICYCLE PARKING,   ETC.       A - STREETSCAPE TREES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED AND CALLED OUT   ON LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PROPOSED SIDEWALKS. REFER TO   SHEET LP.1. STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN   DISPLAYED IN LANDSCAPE PLANS AND DETAIL HAS BEEN ADDED   TO LANDSCAPE DETAILS SHEET ON SHEET LP.2.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO   DIFFERENTIATE WHAT IS STRIPPING VERSUS WHAT ARE CURBED   AND RAISED AREAS. ON SHEET LP-1, ON-STREET PARKING SHOW   SOME LINES THAT SEEMS TO BE A MISTAKE, PLEASE CLEAN UP.   IN ADDITION, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY ON-STREET PARKING   SPACES WERE REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE ISLANDS OR RAISED   CURBED AREAS.       PLEASE ADD EXISTING PARKING METERS AND EXISTING AND   PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO SHEET LP1 TO MAKE SURE THEY   DO NOT CONFLICT WITH STREET TREES OR OTHER PERMANENT   FIXTURES. AS PER SEC. 94-113 (B) BUILDINGS SHALL   PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6   FOOTCANDLES. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND A   SPECIFICATION SHEET IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL. NOTE, CITY   STANDARD FOR DECORATIVE STREETLAMPS IS LUMEC (S55-007).       PER SEC. 94-113, GROUND FLOOR PARKING SHOULD BE   VISUALLY SCREENED WITH A 5FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, PLEASE   MAKE SURE YOU ARE PROVIDING THE BUFFER ON THE EVERNIA   ST BUILDING FRONTAGE. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE   COMPRISED OF A HEDGE PLANTED AT TWO-FOOT TO THREE-FOOT   INTERVALS AND MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36   INCHES AT MATURITY.       PER SEC. 94-113 (D)(9), BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE   PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF 1 SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF   STREET FRONTAGE. NOTE SHEET LP-1 AND A1 SHOW DIFFERENT   LOCATIONS OF BIKE RACKS ON THE SOUTH WEST CORNER INSIDE   THE PROPERTY, BIKE RACKS SHOULD ACCESSIBLE AND VISIBLE   TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. PLEASE CONTACT CLAUDIA IBAVEN   VIA EMAIL TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE   PARKING GUIDELINES. ONCE YOU REVIEWED THE GUIDELINES,   MAKE SURE THAT YOU PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE ARRANGEMENT   OF BIKE RACKS WITH DIMENSIONS, EQUIPMENT SPECS AS NOTED   IN THE GUIDELINES.           COMMENT 2   Z - SHOW DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THE MINIMUM   DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS WITH THE STREETSCAPE STANDARDS   OF THE ZLDRS.       A - DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO LP.1 TO SHOW THAT THE   TREES MEET MINIMUM SPACING REQUIREMENTS ON SHEET LP.1.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, STREET TREES   LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE DRIVEWAY ARE TOO CLOSE TO   MOVING TRAFFIC ENTERING AND EXITING THE PROPERTY. AS   MENTIONED BEFORE, WE RECOMMEND MAKING THE DRIVEWAY ONE   LINE TO REDUCE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS. ALSO NOTE, A STOP   SIGN IS LOCATED WEST OF THE TREE, IT SHOULD BE ADJACENT   TO THE DRIVEWAY, WHICH IS ANOTHER REASON WHY IS BEST TO   REDUCE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO ACCOMMODATE TREES AND SIGN AND   SPACING THEM WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE 30FT REQUIREMENT.   THIS COMMENT RELATES TO SHEET LP-1, IF ANY CHANGES ARE   MADE, PLEASE MAKE SURE OTHER SHEETS ARE CONSISTENT WITH   CHANGES.       ON SHEET LP-1 AND A1, PLEASE ADD DIMENSIONS ON SIDEWALK   TO SHOW HOW IT MEETS THE 8FT REQUIREMENT, AS WELL AS   DIMENSIONS SHOWING THE MINIMUM OF 4FT FOR TREE GRATES   AND BASE PLANTING FOR TREES. STAFF RECOMMENDS LIVE OAK   TREES TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING STREETSCAPE.           COMMENT 3   Z - THE APPLICANT SHOULD REFER TO/CONSIDER THE   STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT(S)   FOR CONTINUITY WHERE POSSIBLE.SHOW THE PROPOSED   DRIVEWAY/CURB CUT ALONG EVERNIA STREET MAINTAINS THE   SIDEWALK ELEVATION. [ZLDR S.94-113]       A - THE LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO COORDINATE WITH   THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, REFER TO SHEET LP.1.       Z 02.02.23 - PLEASE SEE COMMENT #2, AND STREET TREES   RECOMMENDATION IS LIVE OAKS TO ALSO MATCH ADJACENT   PROPERTY.           COMMENT 4 - NEW COMMENT   Z 02.02.23 - THE RADIUS OF THE CURB-CUT OR APRON ON THE   DRIVEWAYS ENCROACHES INTO THE ALLEY, PLEASE ADJUST TO   BE WITHING PROPERTY LINE.                       PARKING COMMENTS       COMMENT 1   Z - A PARKING ASSESSMENT AND/OR A PARKING OPERATIONS   SUMMARY FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROVIDED. THERE NEEDS   TO BE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW TRAFFIC CIRCULATION   AND PARKING WILL OPERATE FOR THE PROJECT, AS THERE ARE   CONCERNS WITH THE NUMBER OF TWO-WAY ACCESS POINTS INTO   THE PROJECT FROM THE NARROW 14 FT. WIDE ALLEY AT THE   REAR OF THE SITE.       A - PLEASE SEE THE REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARKING   MANAGEMENT PLAN AND A VALET OPERATIONS PLAN THAT LAYS   OUT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND SAFETY MEASURES TO   OPTIMIZE CAR PARKING AND LOADING OPERATIONS. PLEASE   NOTE YOU WILL NEED TO INCLUDE IN YOUR JUSTIFICATION   LETTER YOUR PLANS.           COMMENT 2   Z - CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO PROVIDE ONE-WAY   TRAFFIC FLOW IN AND OUT OF THE PROJECT FROM THE ALLEY   TO ACCOMMODATE BETTER TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, AND ALSO   NARROW THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS AT THE ALLEY.       A - BASED ON INPUT FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS, A   ONE-WAY EASTBOUND DIRECTION FOR THE ALLEY WORKS FOR   SANITATION CIRCULATION. THIS APPLICANT DOES NOT OBJECT   TO THE CITY CONVERTING THE ALLEY TO ONE-WAY AND WILL   INCLUDE 'RIGHT OUT ONLY' DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE FOR ANYONE   EXITING TO THE ALLEY.       Z 02.02.23 - PLEASE MAKE SURE NO STRUCTURES SUCH AS   STAIRS AND RAMPS ARE WITHIN THE REAR MINIMUM SETBACK   AND THE FRONT MINIMUM SETBACK.           COMMENT 3   Z - COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE NOT LISTED AS A RESTAURANT   AND/OR MEETING AREAS, SHALL UTILIZE THE PARKING   REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR COMMERCIAL USES   WHICH HAS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT OF 2 PARKING SPACES PER   1,000 SQ. FT. AND A MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT OF 4 PARKING   SPACES PER 1,000 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-111, TABLE IV-9]       A - THE HOTEL RESTAURANT AND BAR AND HOTEL SPA AND   SALON ARE AMENITIES FOR HOTEL GUESTS. PARKING FOR THESE   AREAS WAS CALCULATED BASED ON TABLE IV-9 IN ACCORDANCE   WITH SECTION 94-111(B)(1), ZLDRS.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE SITE PLAN   COMMENTS, COMMENT #7, CLARIFICATIONS MIGHT LEAD TO   REVIEW PARKING REQUIREMENTS. ALSO REVISE RETAIL SQ.FT.   CALCULATIONS AS THEY SHOW DIFFERENT IN DIFFERENT   SHEETS.           COMMENT 4   Z - ARE THERE ANY SECURITY MEASURES PROPOSED FOR ACCESS   INTO THE PARKING AREAS FOR THE PROJECT (I.E. GATES,   ETC.)?       A - CCTV TO BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREAS.   NO GATES ARE PROPOSED.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARKING   MANAGEMENT PLAN AND A VALET OPERATIONS PLAN THAT LAYS   OUT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND SAFETY MEASURES TO   OPTIMIZE CAR PARKING AND LOADING OPERATIONS. PLEASE   NOTE YOU WILL NEED TO INCLUDE IN YOUR JUSTIFICATION   LETTER YOUR PLANS.           COMMENT 5   Z - PROVIDE DIMENSIONS SHOWING GENERAL WIDTH OF PARKING   STALLS, DRIVE AISLES AND TURNAROUND SPACES WITHIN THE   PARKING LEVEL PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE   ZLDRS.       A - PLEASE SEE SHEET B-1.       Z 02.02.23 NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, ON SHEETS T1 AND   B1, PARKING SPACES ON GROUND LEVEL ARE 16FT IN LENGTH   INSTEAD OF 18FT, PLEASE REVIEW ALL PARKING SPACES, ITS   DIMENSIONS, AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY. IN ADDITION, AS PER   SEC. 94-111 (C)(1), IF A STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR   OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE   INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF 1FT, PLEASE REVISE. ALSO SEE   ZONING AND TABULAR COMMENTS, COMMENT #2.           COMMENT 6   Z - THE PARKING LEVEL PLAN IDENTIFIES 6 PARKING STALLS   NOTATED WITH A "C". PLEASE CLARIFY THE MEANING OF THESE   SPACES. IF THESE SPACES ARE COMPACT PARKING SPACES, A   STALL PAINTING DETAIL FOR COMPACT PARKING SPACES SHALL   ALSO BE PROVIDED.       A - THE 'C' WAS MEANT TO IDENTIFY COMPACT PARKING   SPACES. SHEET B-1 IDENTIFIES ???COMPACT??? PAINTING   DETAILS.       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED.           COMMENT 7   Z - TWO 10 FT. X 50 FT. LOADING ZONES ARE REQUIRED FOR   THE PROJECT. LOADING FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL   OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. ALSO INCLUDE   AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING TO DETERMINE THE   FEASIBILITY OF LOADING CIRCULATION. [ZLDR S. 94-111 AND   S.94-485(P)]       A - ONE 10' X 50' LOADING ZONE IS PROVIDED ON NORTH   SIDE ALONG ALLEYWAY; A VARIANCE REQUEST IS INCLUDED   WITH THIS SUBMITTAL SEEKING THIS APPROVAL. PLEASE SEE   THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PLAN SHEETS.       Z 02.02.23 - PLEASE ADD A NOTE TO A1, PARKING TABLE   ABOUT THE VARIANCE REQUESTED.           COMMENT 8   Z - THE PROJECT SHALL PROVIDE: A) SECURE BIKE RACKS   AND/OR STORAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE   PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, B) A MINIMUM OF   ONE SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO   BE AVAILABLE TO ALL TENANTS AND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN   THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200 FT. OF THE BUILDING   ENTRANCE, FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN 50,000 SQ. FT.   IN GROSS BUILDING AREA. [ZLDR S.94-111(I)]       A - THE BIKE RACK INFORMATION IS SHOWN ON SHEET B-1.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE   SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY IS IN THE BUILDING. ALL 4   BICYCLE PARKING SPACES CAN BE IN A BIKE STORAGE ROOM.   IN ADDITION, PLEASE CONTACT CLAUDIA IBAVEN VIA EMAIL TO   PROVIDE YOU WITH THE CITY???S BICYCLE PARKING   GUIDELINES. ONCE YOU REVIEWED THE GUIDELINES, MAKE SURE   THAT YOU PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE ARRANGEMENT OF BIKE   RACKS WITH DIMENSIONS, AND TYPE OF RACK OR PARKING   EQUIPMENT AS NOTED IN THE GUIDELINES.           COMMENT 9   Z - A DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE RACK AND/OR STORAGE SPACE   SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH   THE PLANS.       A - THE BIKE RACK INFORMATION IS SHOWN ON SHEET B-1.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. TO CLARIFY, BICYCLE PARKING   ON THE STREETSCAPE IS REQUIRED AS PER SEC. 94-113   (D)(9) AND WILL SERVE THE GENERAL PUBLIC. IN ADDITION,   BICYCLE PARKING/STORAGE IS REQUIRED PER SEC. 94-111   (I)(1) FOR BUILDING OCCUPANTS.           COMMENT 10   Z - ALL PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRANCES FACING A STREET   FRONTAGE SHALL BE REQUIRED TO TREAT THE INTERIOR   PORTION OF THE GARAGE ENTRY TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 20   FT. FROM THE BUILDING FACADE. TREATMENT MAY INCLUDE,   BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO, STUCCO OR PLASTER,   FINISHED AND PAINTED COMPARABLE TO HABITABLE SPACE.   SHOW IN PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.   [ZLDRS.94-111(Q)]       A - ACKNOWLEDGED. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CONSTRUCTION   PERMIT WILL INCLUDE THE DETAILS FOR THE INTERIOR WALLS   AT THE GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT, WHICH WILL BE FINISHED, AT   LEAST 20 FEET IN LENGTH FROM THE BUILDING FA??ADE, AND   WILL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.       Z 02.02.23 - PLEASE SEE STREETSCAPE COMMENTS, COMMENT   #1 AND REVISE PLANS TO BEST SCREEN SURFACE PARKING LOT   FROM STREET VIEW.           COMMENT 11   Z - MAXIMUM SLOPE FOR PARKING RAMPS SHALL BE IN   ACCORDANCE WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL NOT EXCEED   6%. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED SLOPE FOR THE RAMP TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-111(Q)]       A - THE SLOPE IS IDENTIFIED ON SHEET B-1 AND CIVIL   PLANS.       Z 02.02.23 NOTE, RAMPS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE MINIMUM   SETBACKS AREA, PLEASE REVISE AS NOT STRUCTURES CAN BE   WITHIN THE MINIMUM SETBACKS.                       ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS       COMMENT 1   Z - ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE   RENDERINGS AND PLANS (I.E. EAST ELEVATION RETAINING   WALL, ETC.). ALL RELEVANT DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION   SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. THE   INFORMATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS FOR   HEIGHT, STORY, VERTICAL PROJECTION, HORIZONTAL   PROJECTION, ETC. AS DEFINED IN THE ZLDRS.   [ZLDRS.94-109]       A - PLANS AND ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO BE   CONSISTENT.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD SETBACK   LINES TO ELEVATIONS.           COMMENT 2   Z - DIMENSION TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE PROPOSED   BUILDING IS MISSING. PLEASE PROVIDE TO DEMONSTRATION   CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.       A - THIS HAS BEEN ADDED ON THE ELEVATION SHEETS   (SHEETA2, A3, B7, B8, B9, B10, B14, B15, B16, AND B17.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHEET A2 AND A3, DO   NOT SHOW DIMENSIONS. PLEASE ADD DIMENSIONS TO ALL   ELEVATIONS TO SHOW HEIGHT REQUIREMENT, WHICH IS   CALCULATED FROM THE AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE ADJACENT   PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR THE CROWN OF THE ROAD IF NO SIDEWALK   EXISTS TO THE TOP OF THE HIGHEST STORY AS PER SEC.   94-109. AS THE LOT HAS A SLOPE, PLEASE PROVIDE   DIMENSIONS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ELEVATIONS. ALSO ADD   DIMENSIONS TO VERTICAL PROJECTIONS ENCROACHING THE MAX   HEIGHT, SEE MORE INFO ABOUT VERTICAL PROJECTIONS ON   SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-5.           COMMENT 3   Z - PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE FACADE   ARTICULATION OF THE BUILDING (I.E. MATERIALS, ETC.).       A - INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON BUILDING MATERIAL   NOTES ON ELEVATIONS.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE   DETAILS OF THE ???ALUMINUM PIPE SCREEN??? AND HOW   DIMENSIONS AND SPACING WILL FULLY SCREEN MECHANICAL   EQUIPMENT. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO PROVIDE PHOTOS OF   MATERIALS AND ADD TO AN ELEVATION OR RENDERING SHEET TO   FULLY SHOW FA??ADE TREATMENT.       ON SHEET B7, WALLS WHERE 'PROPOSED PUBLIC ART' IS   LOCATED, PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER. ALSO, PLEASE CLARIFY   THE MATERIAL OF THE WALL AS IT IS NOT LABELED. ON   RENDERINGS THERE SEEMS TO BE A VEGETATED WALL, PLEASE   CONFIRM IF THIS WILL BE THE FA??ADE TREATMENT AND ADD   TO ELEVATION SHEETS.           COMMENT 4   Z - WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE HOTEL ROOMS? THE PLANS MUST   CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT ALL ROOMS WITHIN THE PROPOSED   HOTEL AREA ARE A MINIMUM OF 325 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-109,   HOTEL]       A - THE PLANS HAVE BEEN UPDATED. THE MINIMUM GUEST ROOM   AREA IS 350 SF.       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AVERAGE UNIT   SIZE.           COMMENT 5   Z - COVERED STRUCTURES ON THE ROOF TOP (I.E. STORAGE   AREAS, RESTROOMS, ETC.) SHALL NOT EXCEED 30% OF THE   GROSS ROOFTOP AREA. PLEASE SHOW CALCULATIONS TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-109]       A - THE CALCULATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE CAN BE FOUND ON   SHEET B-6.       Z 02.02.23 - SEE DIAGRAMS REQUESTED, COMMENT #1. MAKE   SURE YOU ARE DEFINING THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS PER   SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-6 AND MEETS REQUIREMENTS ON TABLE   IV-7.           COMMENT 6   Z - PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ALL HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS   (I.E. BALCONIES).       A - FLOOR PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO INCLUDE ALL   DIMENSIONS AS REQUESTED.       Z 02.02.23 - SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THAT ALL   PROJECTIONS ARE NOT EXCEEDED MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL   ENCROACHMENT.           COMMENT 7   Z - THERE APPEARS TO BE BLANK WALLS ON THE FACADE OF   THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. PLEASE ADDRESS TO ENSURE   CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.       A - THIS HAS BEEN CLARIFIED. PLEASE SEE REVISED   BUILDING ELEVATIONS.       Z 02.02.23 - PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON SHEETS B14-17,   PLEASE REVISE AS THERE ARE SOME PLANES AREAS THAT   SHOULD BE THE SAME PLANE. FOR EXAMPLE, ON SHEET B14,   PLANE E AND G SHOULD BE THE SAME PLANE, AS WELL AS F,   H, M AND N, ALSO PLANES B AND J, AND PLANES L AND K.   PLEASE REVISE SHEETS AND CALCULATIONS.               SIGNAGE COMMENTS       COMMENT 1   Z - PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ANY PROPOSED SIGNAGE FOR   THE PROJECT OR INCLUDE A NOTE THAT STATES THAT ALL   SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE   SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND   DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS).       A - A NOTE HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PARKING LEVEL/SALON   & LOBBY FLOOR PLAN (SHEET B1) THAT ALL SIGNAGE PROPOSED   FOR THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH THE CITY???S ZLDRS.       Z 02.02.23 - NOT SATISFIED. ON THE MAIN FACADE YOU HAVE   THE 'VIANA' SIGN, WHICH IS CONSIDERED A BUILDING   IDENTIFY SIGN, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE HOW THIS SIGN   MEETS SIGN REGULATIONS ON SEC. 94-110. IN ADDITION,   PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE SIGN 'HOTEL EVERNIA' ON THE   EXISTING BUILDING WILL BE REMOVED OR REMAIN.               Z 02.02.23 - OTHER COMMENTS   PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT   SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A   REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SUCH   COMMENTS. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED SUBMITTALS   WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE APPLICATION AS   WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF   THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT MAY REQUEST A   30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION REQUEST IS   PERMITTED.       WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED   TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER   COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF   ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE   APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE   RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS   TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS.       LASTLY, YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO   ADDITIONAL COST. AS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE   TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE   ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE   ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE, WHICH IS $300.       --END OF COMMENTS--     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-07-2022 Cont ID   Sent By llouie Date 10-07-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By llouie Date 10-07-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-10-07 11:19:44 GENERAL COMMENTS:       1.) THE PROJECT CANNOT EXCEED 79,800 SQ. FT. (MAXIMUM   FAR OF 4). THERE ARE ERRORS AND DISCREPANCIES IN THE   FAR CALCULATIONS THAT COULD EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE FAR.       2.) THE COUNTY TPS LETTER PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT DOES   NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SQUARE   FOOTAGE FOR THE PROJECT AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. THE   TPS LETTER SHALL BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE   CORRECT COMMERCIAL RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO AVOID   COUNTING ANY GHOST TRIPS.       3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC   UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR   WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE   COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST   PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (561)   494-1040.       4.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES   CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH   INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE   PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND   COMCAST.       5) WHAT ARE THE PROVISIONS FOR THE EXISTING UTILITIES   (I.E. UTILITY POLES, ETC.)? ARE ANY IMPROVEMENTS   PROPOSED WITHIN THE ALLEY? PLEASE PROVIDE MORE   INFORMATION.       6.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE COMMERCIAL   COMPONENT OF THE PROJECT. IS THE COMMERCIAL SPACE FOR   HOTEL GUESTS ONLY OR IS IT OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC?   PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY   COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE.       7.) PROVIDE A LETTER ENSURING FAA COMPLIANCE (A   DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD) IN REGARD TO THE HEIGHT OF   ANY TOWERS OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THE DESIGNATED FLIGHT   PATH.           JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT:       1.) THE PROJECT WILL BE UTILIZING TDRS. PLEASE REVISE   THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO INCLUDE ANY PERTINENT   INFORMATION/HISTORY ON THE TDRS ACQUIRED FOR THE   PROJECT. IT IS IMPORTANT TO PROVIDE ALL BACKGROUND   INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT.       2.) PROVIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PRESERVATION   OF THE EXISTING HOTEL EVERNIA AND ANY DISCUSSIONS HAD   WITH THE CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER(S).       3.) HAS THERE BEEN ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH REGARDING THE   PROPOSED PROJECT?           DIAGRAMS REQUESTED:       1.) SEPARATE DIAGRAM SHEETS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING (SIMILAR TO   THE FAR DIAGRAMS) ??? REQUIRED AND PROPOSED INFORMATION   REQUESTED ON THE SHEET(S) FOR: A) BUILDING SETBACKS; B)   BUILDING FOOTPRINT (FOR LOT AREA <50,000 SQ. FT.); C)   OPEN SPACE (PRIVATE ONLY; PUBLIC NOT REQUIRED); D)   ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT E.) TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT; F)   ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH REQUIREMENT; G) FACADE   ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS (I.E. FENESTRATION,   HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, BLANK   WALL, ETC.).       2.) ALSO NOTE THAT ACTIVE USES ARE REGULATED AS A   PERCENTAGE OF THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE (NOT THE   ACTUAL BUILDING FRONTAGE AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS).   PLEASE REFER TO REQUIREMENTS AND DIAGRAMS IN ARTICLE   IV.           ZONING TABULAR COMMENTS (SHEET A1):       1.) THE ZONING DISTRICT IS QBD 8-12 STORY RECEIVING   SITE.       2.) CHECK THE PROVIDED PARKING COUNT (IT DOES NOT   APPEAR TO BE 52 PARKING SPACES AS NOTED).       3.) INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM   BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS   INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE AS   THE BUILDING MUST LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACK   RANGE.       4.) INCORRECT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR THE ALLOWABLE   AND PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT. INFORMATION PROVIDED   MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ZLDRS.       5.) THE MINIMUM GROUND TO 12 (152???) REQUIRED   INFORMATION FOR BUILDING SETBACKS IS INCORRECT IN THE   TABLE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.       6.) PARKING CALCULATIONS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED) SHALL   BE BROKEN DOWN BY USE. ALSO INCLUDE PARKING   CALCULATIONS FOR COMPACT PARKING, DISABLED PARKING,   BICYCLE PARKING, LOADING ZONES, ETC.       7.) CHECK THE PROVIDED PARKING COUNT (IT DOES NOT   APPEAR TO BE 52 PARKING SPACES AS NOTED).       8.) THE PLANS SHOULD REFERENCE THE TRANSFER OF   DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDRS) PROGRAM (CERTIFICATE NO.   22-11) AND HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE   WILL BE ADDED TO THE PROJECT BASED ON THE PURCHASE AND   UTILIZATION OF TDRS. IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY   AND HOW THE PROJECT CAN EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE   QBD-8 DISTRICT (BASE ZONING FOR THE PROJECT SITE)   ILLUSTRATED/NOTED IN THE PLAN.       9.) THE CODE SUMMARY INFORMATION SHALL REFERENCE THE   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH (NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY).           SITE PLAN COMMENTS:       1.) PER THE ZLDRS, "GROSS BUILDING AREA" MEANS THE   TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING, INCLUDING   AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,   ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP, SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND   LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL   UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FAR DIAGRAMS DO NOT   APPEAR TO BE ACCURATE. PLEASE ENSURE ALL DIAGRAMS AND   CALCULATIONS DEFINED AS THE GROSS BUILDING AREA ARE   INCLUDED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS. MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS   WHERE NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-109]       2.) PER THE ZLDRS, THE MEZZANINE SHALL BE COUNTED   TOWARD THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR. ACCORDING TO THE   PLAN, THE MEZZANINE HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR   CALCULATIONS. [ZLDR S.94-109]       3.) THE BUILDING SETBACK ON EVERNIA STREET (SECONDARY   STREET) SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB (NOT   THE PROPERTY LINE AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS). THE   MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK IS 12 FT. AND THE MAXIMUM   BUILDING SETBACK IS 35 FT. THE BUILDING ALONG EVERNIA   STREET MUST BE WITHIN THIS SETBACK RANGE. ALSO, PLEASE   CLEARLY PROVIDE THE ACCURATE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE   COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-109 AND S.94-132, TABLE IV-46]       4.) CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXISTING AND   DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FT. AS MEASURED   PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB. NO DIMENSIONS HAVE   BEEN PROVIDED IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE   WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-111]       5.) PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PATIO SPACE AT THE   LOBBY LEVEL. WHAT WILL THIS SPACE BE UTILIZED FOR?       6.) PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED   LIVING/SHOP AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED IN THE LOBBY FLOOR   PLAN. IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THIS SPACE IS.       7.) RETAIL AREA CALCULATIONS DO NOT ADD UP. PLEASE   ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.       8.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL/PATIO LOCATED ALONG   EVERNIA STREET? IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ELEVATION OF   THE PATIO IS LOWERED TO MEET THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT   ALONG EVERNIA STREET.           STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:       1.) THE PROJECT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE STREETSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-113 OF THE ZLDRS. THE PROJECT   MUST DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM   REQUIREMENTS FOR STREETSCAPE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT   LIMITED TO STREET TREES, LIGHTING, BICYCLE PARKING,   ETC.       2.) SHOW DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THE MINIMUM   DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS WITH THE STREETSCAPE STANDARDS   OF THE ZLDRS.       3.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD REFER TO/CONSIDER THE   STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT(S)   FOR CONTINUITY WHERE POSSIBLE.SHOW THE PROPOSED   DRIVEWAY/CURB CUT ALONG EVERNIA STREET MAINTAINS THE   SIDEWALK ELEVATION. [ZLDR S.94-113]           PARKING COMMENTS:       1.) A PARKING ASSESSMENT AND/OR A PARKING OPERATIONS   SUMMARY FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROVIDED. THERE NEEDS   TO BE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW TRAFFIC CIRCULATION   AND PARKING WILL OPERATE FOR THE PROJECT, AS THERE ARE   CONCERNS WITH THE NUMBER OF TWO-WAY ACCESS POINTS INTO   THE PROJECT FROM THE NARROW 14 FT. WIDE ALLEY AT THE   REAR OF THE SITE.       2.) CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO PROVIDE ONE-WAY   TRAFFIC FLOW IN AND OUT OF THE PROJECT FROM THE ALLEY   TO ACCOMMODATE BETTER TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, AND ALSO   NARROW THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS AT THE ALLEY.       3.) COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE NOT LISTED AS A RESTAURANT   AND/OR MEETING AREAS, SHALL UTILIZE THE PARKING   REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR COMMERCIAL USES   WHICH HAS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT OF 2 PARKING SPACES PER   1,000 SQ. FT. AND A MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT OF 4 PARKING   SPACES PER 1,000 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-111, TABLE IV-9]       4.) ARE THERE ANY SECURITY MEASURES PROPOSED FOR ACCESS   INTO THE PARKING AREAS FOR THE PROJECT (I.E. GATES,   ETC.)?       5.) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS SHOWING GENERAL WIDTH OF PARKING   STALLS, DRIVE AISLES AND TURNAROUND SPACES WITHIN THE   PARKING LEVEL PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE   ZLDRS.       6.) THE PARKING LEVEL PLAN IDENTIFIES 6 PARKING STALLS   NOTATED WITH A "C". PLEASE CLARIFY THE MEANING OF THESE   SPACES. IF THESE SPACES ARE COMPACT PARKING SPACES, A   STALL PAINTING DETAIL FOR COMPACT PARKING SPACES SHALL   ALSO BE PROVIDED.       7.) TWO 10 FT. X 50 FT. LOADING ZONES ARE REQUIRED FOR   THE PROJECT. LOADING FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL   OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. ALSO INCLUDE   AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING TO DETERMINE THE   FEASIBILITY OF LOADING CIRCULATION. [ZLDR S. 94-111 AND   S.94-485(P)]       8.) THE PROJECT SHALL PROVIDE: A) SECURE BIKE RACKS   AND/OR STORAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE   PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, B) A MINIMUM OF   ONE SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO   BE AVAILABLE TO ALL TENANTS AND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN   THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200 FT. OF THE BUILDING   ENTRANCE, FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN 50,000 SQ. FT.   IN GROSS BUILDING AREA. [ZLDR S.94-111(I)]       9.) A DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE RACK AND/OR STORAGE SPACE   SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH   THE PLANS.       10.) ALL PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRANCES FACING A STREET   FRONTAGE SHALL BE REQUIRED TO TREAT THE INTERIOR   PORTION OF THE GARAGE ENTRY TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 20   FT. FROM THE BUILDING FACADE. TREATMENT MAY INCLUDE,   BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO, STUCCO OR PLASTER,   FINISHED AND PAINTED COMPARABLE TO HABITABLE SPACE.   SHOW IN PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR   S.94-111(Q)]       11.) MAXIMUM SLOPE FOR PARKING RAMPS SHALL BE IN   ACCORDANCE WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL NOT EXCEED   6%. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED SLOPE FOR THE RAMP TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-111(Q)]           ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:       1.) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE   RENDERINGS AND PLANS (I.E. EAST ELEVATION RETAINING   WALL, ETC.). ALL RELEVANT DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION   SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. THE   INFORMATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS FOR   HEIGHT, STORY, VERTICAL PROJECTION, HORIZONTAL   PROJECTION, ETC. AS DEFINED IN THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR   S.94-109]       2.) DIMENSION TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE PROPOSED   BUILDING IS MISSING. PLEASE PROVIDE TO DEMONSTRATION   CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.       3.) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE FACADE   ARTICULATION OF THE BUILDING (I.E. MATERIALS, ETC.).       4.) WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE HOTEL ROOMS? THE PLANS MUST   CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT ALL ROOMS WITHIN THE PROPOSED   HOTEL AREA ARE A MINIMUM OF 325 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-109,   HOTEL]       5.) COVERED STRUCTURES ON THE ROOF TOP (I.E. STORAGE   AREAS, RESTROOMS, ETC.) SHALL NOT EXCEED 30% OF THE   GROSS ROOFTOP AREA. PLEASE SHOW CALCULATIONS TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-109]       6.) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ALL HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS   (I.E. BALCONIES).       7.) THERE APPEARS TO BE BLANK WALLS ON THE FACADE OF   THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. PLEASE ADDRESS TO ENSURE   CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.           SIGANGE COMMENTS:       1.) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ANY PROPOSED SIGNAGE FOR   THE PROJECT OR INCLUDE A NOTE THAT STATES THAT ALL   SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE   SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND   DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS).           INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:       * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       * ALL PLAN SHEETS IN INFORMATION PROVIDED IN   SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS SHALL MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY.   PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLANS SHEETS AND INFORMATION MATCH   PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.       * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR   (4) FULL COLORED PAPER COPIES AND A SET IN 11 INCHES X   17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND   DOCUMENTS.       * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE   ($600).       * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY   QUESTIONS.       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved