Plan Review Details - Project Z22090015
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22090015
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 05-24-2023 Time 12:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 05-24-2023 Time 13:05 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-24 13:05:25THE REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT IDENTIFY A PLACE
 HOLDER FOR PUBLIC ART AS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL.
 OPTION 2 - CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART IS HIGHLY
 ENCOURAGED DUE TO SPACE LIMITATIONS TO MEET THE
 LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
  
 CONTACT [email protected] FOR AN ART ASSESSMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 10-11-2022 Time 13:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 10-11-2022 Time 13:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-11 13:57:23PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:
  
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER
 $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS
 PER CITY ORDINANCE.
  
 OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE
 VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS.
  
 FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC ART NEEDS TO BE
 IDENTIFIED ON ALL THE SITE PLANS.
  
 OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF
 ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT
 TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
  
 FOR EITHER OPTION A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT
 APPLICATION ALONG WITH EITHER THE ESCROW OF THE 1% OR
 IF CHOSEN OPTION 2 CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART
 FUND IS REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &
 CULTURE AT [email protected] WITH FURTHER QUESTIONS.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-12-2022 Time 21:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-12-2022 Time 21:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-12 21:15:43DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PROJECT DATA,
 SHEET A1.00, SHOWS 174 PARKING SPACES BUT DOES NOT SHOW
 ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. GROUND FLOOOR PLAN,
 SHEET A3.01, SHOWS 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WHIC
 MEETS THE MINIMUM NUMBER REQUIRED BY FAIR HOUSING ACT.
  
 3. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF ANY IF THE RETAIL SPACES WILL
 BE RESTAURANT USE A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-23-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 05-23-2023 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 05-23-2023 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-27-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-27-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-27 11:56:56WAITING ON PROVISION OF CCTV AND REPORTS.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-13-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 07:19:15Z22090015 ??? 120 S DIXIE - 12.13.22 RESUB
  
 COMMENT FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT, NOT SHOWN IN RESPONSE LETTER DATED
 12.09.22: PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
 INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION
 OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). CLARIFY IF STORMWATER
 CONNECTION TO CITY INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING PROPOSED;
 CCTV WOULD BE REQUIRED IF SO.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 09-26-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 09-26-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-26 13:19:44COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
 INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION
 OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). CLARIFY IF STORMWATER
 CONNECTION TO CITY INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING PROPOSED;
 CCTV WOULD BE REQUIRED IF SO.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-29-2022 Time 14:07 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-29 14:18:02THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 7A. THERE WERE NO INDICATIONS FOR THE LOCATION OF ANY
 FDC.
  
 PLEASE COORDINATE THE LOCATION(S) WITH THE OFFICE OF
 THE FIRE MARSHAL.
  
 PER NFPA 14
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
  
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7C. THERE WERE NO INDICATIONS FOR THE LOCATION OF THE
 FIRE DDCV.
  
 THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED
 WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC???S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC???S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE
 STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. FIRE COMMAND CENTER/ROOM
  
 THE FCC LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE. IF POSSIBLE, CAN A
 INTERIOR ACCESS DOOR BE PROVIDED AT THE LOBBY AREA
 WALL? PLEASE COORIDINATE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE
 MARSHAL.
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
  
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
  
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
  
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER
 THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-16-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 06-02-2023 Time 13:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 06-02-2023 Time 13:41 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-16 13:41:3710/05/2022
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND
 TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL PROPOSED REMOVALS.
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF
 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES
 LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW
 THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE. MAKE THE FOLLOWING
 CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST SHEET L-:
 TREES #1, #4, AND #23 ARE 20 FEET OR ABOVE IN CANOPY
 DIAMETER, SO MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE
 CALCULATED FOR MITIGATION DUE. TREE#4, 21, 22, 23, AND
 24 ARE CATEGORY 2 (150 SQ FT EACH EXCEPT #23 AT 314SQ
 FT) TREE #9 IS CATEGORY 1 (300 SQ FT) ARECA PALMS DO
 NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION. (#5, 7, 12, AND 16 NO
 MITIGATION DUE) #24 DISPOSITION CORRECT TO REMOVE WITH
 ADJUSTMENTS, TOTAL MITIGATION WAS 7587 SQ FT. ADJUST
 LIST OF PROVIDED MITIGATION FROM THE PLANT LIST TO
 IDENTIFY EACH SPECIES AND THE CANOPY CREDIT ASSIGNED TO
 IT. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR NOTE #4 REGARDING
 OFFSITE TREES IN PROXIMITY TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE, AS
 THERE ARE NO TREES IN THIS AREA.
 RESPONSE: REVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ADDRESS THIS
 COMMENT. REFER TO SHEET L-100.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 D. ALL STREETSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION,
 RENOVATION OR ADDITION WITH A CONSTRUCTION COST EQUAL
 OR ABOVE 50% OF THE PROPERTY'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE AS
 INDICATED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S
 OFFICE. EXISTING STREET TREES AND SIDEWALK FOR THIS
 PROJECT ARE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE
 REQUIRED NEW STREET TREES, SIDEWALK, PLANTING BEDS AND
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
 RESPONSE: EXISTING TREES AND SIDEWALK ALONG S DIXIE HWY
 HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH NEW LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE.
 REFER TO SHEET L-200 AND L-300. LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL
 SOIL OUTLINE HAS BEEN ADDED TO SHEET L-300 AND NOTES ON
 SHEET L-252
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SOIL
 REQUIRED ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE, SPECIFICALLY UNDERNEATH
 THE SIDEWALK.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE ON STREET PARKING SHOWN ON
 S DIXIE ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHIN
 THE EXISTING SETBACK FROM THE CURB. STREETSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET WITHIN THIS AREA. IF THERE IS
 NOT SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO PROVIDE THE PLANTING BED, TREE
 GRATES MAY BE USED IF REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL
 WIDTH.
 THE REQUIRED PLANTING BED WIDTH OF 4 FEET CANNOT BE
 ACHIEVED ALONG S DIXIE, SO PARTIAL TREE GRATES MAY BE
 USED TO PROVIDE SPACE FOR THE TREE TO BE PLACED
 ADEQUATELY AWAY FROM THE CURB.
 RESPONSE: ON STREET PARKING HAS BEEN REMOVED AND TREE
 GRATES HAVE BEEN ADDED REFER TO SHEET L-300.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
 REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
 OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND
 SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94- 113D.2. CODE
 SECTION REFERENCE HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED. SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINE MEASUREMENT OF 245 FEET LENGTH REQUIRES 9
 STREET TREES.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-200 AND L-201 FOR THE STREET
 TREE REVISION.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] TREE SPACING ALONG DATURA STREET
 NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED, TREES ON EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY
 ARE SPACED FURTHER THAN 30 FT. PLEASE ADJUST.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 AREAS FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT IN THE SITE AND
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE
 AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION
 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN
 SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPE THEN
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT TYPE ARE MET.
 PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART
 ON SHEET L-201. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS SHEET
 A0.03: SHEET A0.03 MUST SHOW HOW THE REQUIRED PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE OF 9,810 SQ FT IS PROVIDED BY SHOWING THE
 PERIMETER OF EACH AREA AND THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 EACH SPACE. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS IDENTIFIED, SO AREA
 PROVIDED MUST BE SHOWN IN, 30% VEGETATED AREA SHOWN,
 AND 20% TREE CANOPY SHOWN. PASEO-PASSAGE IS NOT AN OPEN
 SPACE TYPE. SHOW THE AREA AND ASSIGN AN ALLOWED OPEN
 SPACE TYPE AND SHOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED AREA
 AND TREE CANOPY ARE MET.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-203.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO SECTION
 94-443(D) FROM THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART AS THIS IS
 NOT APPLICABLE IN THE DMP. REMOVE
 THE SECTION FROM THE CHART ON SHEET L-201 AND REPLACE
 WITH REQUIREMENTS FROM SECTION 94-113 FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE AND SECTION 94-109 FOR THE OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO UPDATED CHART ON SHEET L-201.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [NOT SATISFIED] WHAT IS THE REFERENCE TO NATURAL GRASS
 AREAS? WHERE IS THIS REQUIREMENT FROM? TABLE STATES
 REQUIREMENT IS 1,515 AND NONE IS PROVIDED? PLEASE
 CLARIFY THIS REQUIREMENT. LIKELY NOT A DMP REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE TYPES REQUIRING TREE CANOPY MUST SHOW THE
 TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON
 TABLE IV-8 AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL. TOTALS FOR TREE
 CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE ARE SHOWN ON SHEET A0.03, BUT THE
 BREAKDOWN OF HOW THAT IS ACHIEVED IS NOT INCLUDED. THIS
 NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SHEET L-210
 RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-100 FOR TOTAL CANOPY CREDIT
 PROVIDED.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 8. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
 ROAD OR STREET.
 RESPONSE: NOTED. THERE IS NO ARTIFICIAL TURF IN THE
 GROUND FLOOR.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 9. ONGOING. EXPLAIN IF THE EXISTING FPL TRANSMISSION
 LINES WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY IN PLACE OR BE
 RELOCATED.
 RESPONSE: TRANSMISSION LINES WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY
 IN PLACE.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
 OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING. FIRELINE FROM DATURA ST
 APPEARS TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH STREET TREE. ADJUST TO
 AVOID CONFLICT. WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ARE NOT SHOWN
 ON LANDSCAPE PLANS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.
 RESPONSE: LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO AVOID
 UTILITY LINES.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [NOT SATISFIED] APPEARS THAT STREET LIGHTS CONFLICT
 WITH TREES AND THEIR CANOPIES ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 PLEASE ADJUST. APPEARS THAT SOME WATER MAINS INTERSECT
 WITH STREET TREE LOCATIONS.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
 INCLUDE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT, AND
 SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA PROVIDED
 FOR REFERENCE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN SPACE
 TYPE REQUIREMENTS.
 RESPONSE: A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE
 AREA HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON SHEET L-201.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ADDED BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PLANT MATERIAL ADDED
 COUNT AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS THAT ARE DROUGHT
 TOLERANT OR NATIVE THEN SHOW ONE PERCENTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLANTING DESIGN HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO MEET THE
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SHEET
 L-201.
  
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR
 ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE
 THAT ALL EQUIPMENT
 WILL BE SCREENED. WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ARE NOT
 SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO GENERAL NOTE #6 ON SHEET L-200. IN
 ADDITION, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS HAVE BEEN ADDED
 AROUND THE ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES TO PROVIDE A SCREEN.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] FDC VALVE ON DATURA FRONTAGE/WALL
 OF LIVE/WORK UNIT IS EXPOSED ON SOUTHERN SIDE, PLEASE
 INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL HEDGE OR LANDSCAPING TO SCREEN
 VALVES FROM RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/4/23:
 14. PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES AS
 REQUIRED IN 94-113(2). STAFF CAN PROVIDE THE TYPICAL
 INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ON REQUEST.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-252 AND L-300.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [NOT SATISFIED] ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED
 ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE, SPECIFICALLY UNDERNEATH THE
 SIDEWALK.
  
 15. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-202.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 16. PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET L-200 DOES NOT MATCH THE
 PLANT LIST SHOWN ON SHEET L-201. CRAPE MYRTLE AND
 BRIDAL VEIL TREES ARE NOT CONSISTENT.
 RESPONSE: PLANT SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN MATCHED.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 17. REMOVE EXISTING TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN FROM THE
 PLANT LIST ON SHEET L-201, AS NO TREES OR PALMS ARE TO
 REMAIN.
 RESPONSE: ALL TREES ARE REPRESENTED AS ???TO BE
 REMOVED??? ON SHEET L-100.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [SATISFIED]
  
 18. THE SIGHT TRIANGLE SHOWN ON SHEET L-200 IS NOT
 CONSISTENT WITH THE DOWNTOWN REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM
 THE BACK OF CURB PER SECTION 94-113 (C). REVISE TO MEET
 REQUIREMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE STREET TREES CAN BE
 PLANTED WITHIN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE, AS THERE WILL BE NO
 CANOPY LOWER THAN 8 FEET, SO TREES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED
 TO THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM SPACING ALONG DATURA ST.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-200 AND L-300 FOR UPDATED
 SIGHT TRIANGLES.
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [NOT SATISFIED] TRIANGLES SHOULD BE STARTING FROM BACK
 OF CURB, PLANS SHOW TRIANGLE STARTING FROM INTERIOR TO
 THE SITE. PLEASE ADJUST.
  
 19. RENDERINGS MUST BE CORRECTED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
 RESPONSE: REFER TO REVISED RENDERINGS ON SHEETS A600,
 A601, A602, A603, A604.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [CONDITIONED]
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [CONDITIONED]
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
 THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER:
 [CONDITIONED]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-04-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-04-2023 Time 14:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-04-2023 Time 14:19 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-04 14:20:04FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 120 S DIXIE HWY Z22090015
 JANUARY 4, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND
 TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL PROPOSED REMOVALS.
 TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF
 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES
 LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW
 THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE.
 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST SHEET L-:
 ??? TREES #1, #4, AND #23 ARE 20 FEET OR ABOVE IN
 CANOPY DIAMETER, SO MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATED FOR MITIGATION DUE.
 ??? TREE#4, 21, 22, 23, AND 24 ARE CATEGORY 2 (150 SQ
 FT EACH EXCEPT #23 AT 314SQ FT))
 ??? TREE #9 IS CATEGORY 1 (300 SQ FT)
 ??? ARECA PALMS DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION. (#5, 7, 12,
 AND 16 NO MITIGATION DUE)
 ??? #24 DISPOSITION CORRECT TO REMOVE
 ??? WITH ADJUSTMENTS, TOTAL MITIGATION WAS 7587 SQ FT.
 ??? ADJUST LIST OF PROVIDED MITIGATION FROM THE PLANT
 LIST TO IDENTIFY EACH SPECIES AND THE CANOPY CREDIT
 ASSIGNED TO IT.
 ??? PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR NOTE #4 REGARDING
 OFFSITE TREES IN PROXIMITY TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE, AS
 THERE ARE NO TREES IN THIS AREA.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 D. ALL STREETSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION,
 RENOVATION OR ADDITION WITH A CONSTRUCTION COST EQUAL
 OR ABOVE 50% OF THE PROPERTY'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE AS
 INDICATED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S
 OFFICE. EXISTING STREET TREES AND SIDEWALK FOR THIS
 PROJECT ARE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE
 REQUIRED NEW STREET TREES, SIDEWALK, PLANTING BEDS AND
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE ON STREET PARKING SHOWN ON
 S DIXIE ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHIN
 THE EXISTING SETBACK FROM THE CURB. STREETSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET WITHIN THIS AREA. IF THERE IS
 NOT SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO PROVIDE THE PLANTING BED, TREE
 GRATES MAY BE USED IF REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL
 WIDTH.
  
 THE REQUIRED PLANTING BED WIDTH OF 4 FEET CANNOT BE
 ACHIEVED ALONG S DIXIE, SO PARTIAL TREE GRATES MAY BE
 USED TO PROVIDE SPACE FOR THE TREE TO BE PLACED
 ADEQUATELY AWAY FROM THE CURB.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
 REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
 OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND
 SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113D.2.
 CODE SECTION REFERENCE HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED. SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINE MEASUREMENT OF 245 FEET LENGTH REQUIRES 9
 STREET TREES.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 AREAS FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT IN THE SITE AND
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE
 AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION
 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN
 SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPE THEN
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT TYPE ARE MET.
 PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART
 ON SHEET L-201.
 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS SHEET A0.03:
 ??? SHEET A0.03 MUST SHOW HOW THE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE OF 9,810 SQ FT IS PROVIDED BY SHOWING THE
 PERIMETER OF EACH AREA AND THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 EACH SPACE.
 ??? ROOFTOP GARDEN IS IDENTIFIED, SO AREA PROVIDED MUST
 BE SHOWN IN , 30% VEGETATED AREA SHOWN, AND 20% TREE
 CANOPY SHOWN.
 ??? PASEO-PASSAGE IS NOT AN OPEN SPACE TYPE. SHOW THE
 AREA AND ASSIGN AN ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE AND SHOW THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY ARE
 MET.
  
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO SECTION
 94-443(D) FROM THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART AS THIS IS
 NOT APPLICABLE IN THE DMP.
 REMOVE THE SECTION FROM THE CHART ON SHEET L-201 AND
 REPLACE WITH REQUIREMENTS FROM SECTION 94-113 FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE AND SECTION 94-109 FOR THE OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE TYPES REQUIRING TREE CANOPY MUST SHOW THE
 TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON
 TABLE IV-8 AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL.
 TOTALS FOR TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE ARE SHOWN ON
 SHEET A0.03, BUT THE BREAKDOWN OF HOW THAT IS ACHIEVED
 IS NOT INCLUDED. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SHEET L-210
  
 8. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
 ROAD OR STREET.
  
  
 9. ONGOING. EXPLAIN IF THE EXISTING FPL TRANSMISSION
 LINES WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY IN PLACE OR BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
 OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 FIRELINE FROM DATURA ST APPEARS TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 STREET TREE. ADJUST TO AVOID CONFLICT. WATER METER AND
 BACKFLOW ARE NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS AS SHOWN ON
 CIVIL PLANS.
  
  
 11. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
 INCLUDE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT,
 AND SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA
 PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN
 SPACE TYPE REQUIREMENTS.
  
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ADDED BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PLANT MATERIAL ADDED COUNT AND THE
 TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS THAT ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT OR
 NATIVE THEN SHOW ONE PERCENTAGE.
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR
 ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE
 THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ARE NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE
 PLANS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/4/23:
 14. PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES AS
 REQUIRED IN 94-113(2). STAFF CAN PROVIDE THE TYPICAL
 INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ON REQUEST.
  
 15. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
  
 16. PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET L-200 DOES NOT MATCH THE
 PLANT LIST SHOWN ON SHEET L-201. CRAPE MYRTLE AND
 BRIDAL VEIL TREES ARE NOT CONSISTENT.
  
 17. REMOVE EXISTING TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN FROM THE
 PLANT LIST ON SHEET L-201, AS NO TREES OR PALMS ARE TO
 REMAIN.
  
 18. THE SIGHT TRIANGLE SHOWN ON SHEET L-200 IS NOT
 CONSISTENT WITH THE DOWNTOWN REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM
 THE BACK OF CURB PER SECTION 94-113 (C). REVISE TO MEET
 REQUIREMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE STREET TREES CAN BE
 PLANTED WITHIN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE, AS THERE WILL BE NO
 CANOPY LOWER THAN 8 FEET, SO TREES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED
 TO THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM SPACING ALONG DATURA ST.
  
 19. RENDERINGS MUST BE CORRECTED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
 THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-05-2022 Time 11:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-05-2022 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 11:24:43FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 120 S DIXIE HWY Z22090015
 OCTOBER 4, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION
 DUE FOR ALL PROPOSED REMOVALS. TREES PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE
 SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY
 MITIGATION DUE.
  
 2. PER SECTION 94-113 D. ALL STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR
 ADDITION WITH A CONSTRUCTION COST EQUAL OR ABOVE 50% OF
 THE PROPERTY'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE AS INDICATED BY THE
 PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE. EXISTING
 STREET TREES AND SIDEWALK FOR THIS PROJECT ARE TO BE
 REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE REQUIRED NEW STREET
 TREES, SIDEWALK, PLANTING BEDS AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 3. THE ON STREET PARKING SHOWN ON S DIXIE ADJACENT TO
 THE PROJECT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHIN THE EXISTING SETBACK
 FROM THE CURB. STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET
 WITHIN THIS AREA. IF THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO
 PROVIDE THE PLANTING BED, TREE GRATES MAY BE USED IF
 REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH.
  
 4. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
 MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
 EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED
 PER SECTION 94-113D.2.
  
  
 5. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR THE ZONING
 DISTRICT IN THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
 IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE
 IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE
 STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR
 VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON
 TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST
 MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 OPEN SPACE TYPE THEN DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THAT TYPE ARE MET. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE
 CODE REQUIREMENT CHART ON SHEET L-201.
  
 6. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO SECTION 94-443(D) FROM THE
 CODE REQUIREMENT CHART AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE IN THE
 DMP.
  
  
  
 7. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPES
 REQUIRING TREE CANOPY MUST SHOW THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON TABLE IV-8 AND PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL.
  
 8. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
 ROAD OR STREET.
  
  
 9. EXPLAIN IF THE EXISTING FPL TRANSMISSION LINES
 WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY IN PLACE OR BE RELOCATED.
  
 10. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF
 BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO
 RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 11. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO INCLUDE ALL
 PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT,
 AND SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA
 PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN
 SPACE TYPE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 12. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND
 DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ADDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
  
  
 13. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT
 WILL BE SCREENED.
  
  
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
 THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-23-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 06-23-2023 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 06-23-2023 Time 16:14 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-23 16:17:20-8" CLEANOUT REQUIRED FOR 8" LATERAL
 -NO UTILITY EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED ON-SITE
 MANHOLE, WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED
 -SHOW FULL EXTENTS OF SEWER RUN IN ALLEY
 -WATER MAIN CONFIGURATION IN ALLEY DOES NOT MATCH CITY
 RECORDS
 -CORED MANHOLE WILL REQUIRE REHABBING
 -PROFILES REQUIRED FOR ALL CONNECTIIONS FROM POINT OF
 CONNECTION TO POINT OF SERVICE
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status   Date 01-04-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 01-04-2023 Time 13:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 01-04-2023 Time 13:16 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-04 13:15:39-ADDRESS COMMENTS FROM LAST REVIEW NOTING EVIDENCE OF
 EXISTING MAIN THAT HAS A PROPOSED TAP
 -PLEASE READ THROUGH GIVEN CHECKLIST TO ADDRESS
 STANDARD COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FULFILLED, I.E.:
 -5 PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 -6 SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 -10 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO AND PIPE RUN REPORT OF EXISTING
 GRAVITY INFRASTRUCTURES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 (MANHOLE TO MANHOLE)
 -11 ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION
 TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY
 MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD
 DETAIL GC-8.
 -PROVIDE PROFILE AND VERTICAL CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER,
 SEWER AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 STANDARD DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 SHOW EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON THE PROFILE TO
 EASILY DENOTE UTILITY CROSSINGS. THE PROFILE SHOULD
 SHOW PROPOSED PIPE FROM TIE-IN AT THE MAIN TO POINT OF
 SERVICE.
 -SHOW STATIONING AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN PROPOSED UTILITIES AND EXISTING UTILITIES
 AND/OR BASELINE.
 -LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 -SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS
 TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY
 WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES
 WITHIN EASEMENT.
 - SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY
 AND STORM SEWERS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 10-13-2022 Time 10:51 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-13 10:59:21-VERIFY THE EXTENT OF THE WM IN THE ALLEY. VERIFY
 SIZE/TYPE OF MAIN. PER GIS/AS-BUILTS THIS IS SHOWN AS A
 PRIVATE FIRE LINE.
 -WILL MOST LIKELY NEED TO RESISE THE WATER CONNECTION
 ON THE NORTH SIDE.
 -PLEASE REFER THE CHECKLIST FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL
 GUIDLINES.
  
 CONTACT MICHAEL TECHNOW [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 4 Status F Date 06-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 06-09-2023 Time 16:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-09 16:49:40PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING
 AND UTILITIES. IT DOES ALSO NOT SHOW UPDATED UTILITY
 LOCATIONS. IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE, PROVIDE COPY OF
 LANDSCAPING PLANS WITH UPDATED UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN.
 ENSURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND
 UTILITIES. (THIS WAS A PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT THAT IS
 STILL NOT RESOLVED. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER WILL NEED TO
 REFERENCE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS.)
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-05-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 04-05-2023 Time 07:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-05 07:09:55PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS, FDC,
 UTILITY EASEMENT, AND CLEANOUTS WERE ADDED, BUT CANNOT
 FIND IN ENGINEERING PLAN SET. ADD TO NEXT RESUBMITTAL.
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS7
 AND WS5 WAS ADDED, BUT CANNOT FIND IN ENGINEERING PLAN
 SET. ADD TO NEXT RESUBMITTAL.
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID ENGINEERING PLANS UPDATED TO SHOW
 SOUTHEAST DRIVEWAYS ARE BEING REMOVED. PLEASE SHOW THAT
 MORE CLEARLY ON DEMOLITION AND PGD PLAN SHEETS.
 -ADD WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS2 TO ENGINEERING
 PLAN SET.
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING
 AND UTILITIES. IT DOES ALSO NOT SHOW UPDATED UTILITY
 LOCATIONS. IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE, PROVIDE COPY OF
 LANDSCAPING PLANS WITH UPDATED UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN.
 ENSURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND
 UTILITIES.
 -NOTIFY FIRE SYSTEM PLAN DESIGNER THAT FIRE SYSTEM NEAR
 FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MUST COMPLY WITH WPB
 ENGINEERING WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS5. THEY
 NEED TO INCLUDE COPY OF THAT DETAIL IN THEIR PLAN SET
 AND ENSURE NO GALVANIZED PIPE IS USED UPSTREAM OF
 FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW A
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION BUT LANDSCAPING PLANS DO NOT.
 PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLAN SETS ACCURATELY SHOW ANY
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATIONS.
 -ON SHEET C2.2, CALLOUT LOCATION OF FIRELINE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 12-13-2022 Time 07:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 07:58:47PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 FOLLOWUP COMMENTS:
 4. SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS
 ON WATER PLAN. RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A301,
 THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING FIRE HYDARNT WAS INCLUDED.
 NOT SATISIFED ??? INCLUDE UPDATE TO WATER PLAN (CIVIL
 SET) IN RESUBMITTAL.
 5. LARGE METER APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED IN MIDDLE OF
 WALKING PATH BLOCKING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. COMPARE
 HARDSCAPE PLAN L300 TO SHEET C2.2. RESPONSE: WILL
 RESOLVE THIS ISSUE AFTER COORDINATION WITH LANDSCAPE
 ARCHITECT.
 NOT SATISIFED ??? RESOLVE IN RESUBMITTAL.
 8. LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES APPEAR TO NOT HAVE
 SUFFICIENT SEPARATION DISTANCE. SUBMIT SEPARATE
 LANDSCAPING PLAN SHEET THAT SHOWS DISTANCE BETWEEN
 UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPING (TREES AND BUSHES). RESPONSE:
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 9. SURVEY SHOWS OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE RUNNING ACROSS
 LOT 13. WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE?
 RESPONSE: CURRENTLY CONFIRMING LOCATION.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? REMINDER TO RESPOND IN RESUBMITTAL.
 11. SHOW EXISTING SEWER LATERAL FOR HISTORIC BUILDING
 ON WASTEWATER PLAN. RESPONSE: CURRENTLY CONFIRMING
 LOCATION.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? INCLUDE UPDATE TO WASTEWATER PLAN IN
 RESUBMITTAL.
 13. DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS EXCESSIVELY FAR FROM
 METER AND PROPERTY LINE. RELOCATE CLOSER TO METER AND
 PROPERTY LINE. RESPONSE: NOTED.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? THIS REVIEW COMMENT NEEDS CORRECTIVE
 ACTION OTHER THAN JUST RECOGNITION.
 14. SAN MH1 HAS SW INV BUT APPEARS TO BE SE. RESPONSE:
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? NO RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 15. SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED CLEANOUTS ON
 C2.2. RESPONSE: NOTED.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? THIS REVIEW COMMENT NEEDS CORRECTIVE
 ACTION OTHER THAN JUST RECOGNITION.
 16. WILL SEWER LATERAL AND PLUMBING PIPE WORK ALRIGHT
 WITH THE BASEMENT LEVELS? RESPONSE: MEP TO CONFIRM.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? PROVIDE MEP CONFIRMATION IN
 RESUBMITTAL.
 18. ADD STANDARD DETAILS WS5 AND WS7 TO ENGINEERING
 PLAN SET. RESPONSE: NOTED.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? WS5 AND WS7 NOT ADDED.
 19. ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO SHEET
 C2.2. RESPONSE: NOTED.
 NOT SATISFIED ??? WATER AND SEWER DEMAND WERE NOT
 ADDED.
 20. IF FDC ARE NEEDED OR REQUIRED, SHOW ON SHEET C2.2.
 RESPONSE: NOTED.
 NOT SATIFIED ??? FDC NOT SHOWN ON C2.2, BUT SEE FDC IN
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 21. SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PADS.
 RESPONSE: CURRENTLY CONFIRMING LOCATION.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? SHOW ON CIVIL PLAN RESUBMITTAL.
 23. THERE ARE LARGE UTILITY POLES AND OVERHEAD WIRES
 RUNNING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE. HOW FAR IS BUILDING
 STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM THOSE? RESPONSE: CURRENTLY
 CONFIRMING LOCATION.
 NOT SATISIFIED ??? REMINDER TO INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL.
 24. SHOW AND LABEL REMOVAL OF EXISTING SOUTHEAST
 DRIVEWAYS. RESPONSE: NOTED.
 NOT SATISFIED ??? NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON CIVIL PLANS.
 27. SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS. DID
 NOT SEE ONE FOR DOMESTIC WATER METER. RESPONSE: NOTED.
 WILL SHOW ONCE LOCATION IS CONFIRMED
 NEW REVIEW COMMENTS:
 -WPB GIS IS SHOWING EXISTING 6 INCH FIRELINE FOR 324
 DATURA ST. NEARBY PROPOSED FIRELINE ON SAME WATER MAIN.
 SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING FIRELINE ON WATER PLAN (CIVIL).
 -IS EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING AT 321 DATURA (LOT 16)
 PROPOSED TO BE DEMOLISHED?
 -CALLOUT MINIMUM 18 INCH HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE
 BETWEEN SAN MH1 AND POTABLE PLUMBING PIPE.
 -L200 SHOWS TREE TOO CLOSE TO 3 INCH METERED WATER
 SERVICE. THERE ALSO APPEARS TO BE TREE ON TOP OF SAN
 MH1. IN ADDITION, THERE IS A TREE PROPOSED ON TOP OF
 PROPOSED FIRELINE WATER SERVICE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN TREES AND
 UTILITIES.
 -VERIFY NO AUXILIARY WATER SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS WILL
 BE CONNECTED TO PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM.
 -FIRE SYSTEM DESIGN INSIDE BUILDING MUST MEET
 REQUIREMENTS OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENTS. REFER TO SD WS5 AND CAN CONTACT
 [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 10-04-2022 Time 16:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-04 16:35:52PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -CANNOT LOCATE PROJECT NARRATIVE AND JUSTIFICATION
 LETTER IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. PLEASE ADD.
 -SITE PLANS SHOWED BASEMENT LEVELS. DO FERGUSON R TANK
 SYSTEMS SHOWN ON C2.1 TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT?
 -ONE OF THE WATER MAINS ON C2.2 IS NOT LABELED WITH
 PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE.
 -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS ON
 WATER PLAN.
 -LARGE METER APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED IN MIDDLE OF
 WALKING PATH BLOCKING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. COMPARE
 HARDSCAPE PLAN L300 TO SHEET C2.2.
 -GARDEN AREA DESIGN NEAR NORTHEAST CORNER OF HISTORIC
 BUILDING DOES NOT SEEM CONSISTENT BETWEEN EACH PLAN SET
 AND AMONG DIFFERENT SHEETS. PLEASE MAKE SURE GENERAL
 LAYOUT IS THE SAME.
 -L300 LAYOUT ON EAST SIDE OF HISTORIC BUILDING DOES NOT
 LOOK SIMILAR TO RENDERINGS A602 AND A603.
 -LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES APPEAR TO NOT HAVE
 SUFFICIENT SEPARATION DISTANCE. SUBMIT SEPARATE
 LANDSCAPING PLAN SHEET THAT SHOWS DISTANCE BETWEEN
 UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPING (TREES AND BUSHES).
 -SURVEY SHOWS OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE RUNNING ACROSS LOT
 13. WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE?
 -ARE ANY CHANGES PROPOSED TO HISTORIC BUILDING?
 -SHOW EXISTING SEWER LATERAL FOR HISTORIC BUILDING ON
 WASTEWATER PLAN.
 -PROPERTY OWNER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RECORD BACKFLOW
 COVENANT.
 -DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS EXCESSIVELY FAR FROM
 METER AND PROPERTY LINE. RELOCATE CLOSER TO METER AND
 PROPERTY LINE.
 -SAN MH1 HAS SW INV BUT APPEARS TO BE SE.
 -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED CLEANOUTS ON
 C2.2.
 -WILL SEWER LATERAL AND PLUMBING PIPE WORK ALRIGHT WITH
 THE BASEMENT LEVELS?
 -ALLEY IS LABELED ASPHALT ON CIVIL PLANS BUT SURVEY
 SHOWS PAVERS. THAT AREA HAD A STREETSCAPE PROJECT
 WITHIN LAST SEVERAL YEARS.
 -ADD STANDARD DETAILS WS5 AND WS7 TO ENGINEERING PLAN
 SET.
 -ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO SHEET C2.2.
 -IF FDC ARE NEEDED OR REQUIRED, SHOW ON SHEET C2.2.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PADS.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ANY OUTSIDE GREASE TRAPS.
 -THERE ARE LARGE UTILITY POLES AND OVERHEAD WIRES
 RUNNING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE. HOW FAR IS BUILDING
 STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM THOSE?
 -SHOW AND LABEL REMOVAL OF EXISTING SOUTHEAST
 DRIVEWAYS.
 -SURVEY NOT SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED.
 -SURVEY NOTE 1 SAYS THAT NO SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORD HAS
 BEEN MADE AND THERE MAY BE EASEMENTS. VERIFY IF THERE
 ARE ANY EXISTING EASEMENTS ON SITE.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS. DID NOT
 SEE ONE FOR DOMESTIC WATER METER.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-23 11:10:46NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-27-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-27-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-27 11:42:03NO FUTHER COMMENTS.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-14-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-14 15:56:12PLEASE IDENTIFY A STAGING AREA TO ROLL OUT THE GARBAGE
 CONTAINERS, SINCE THE DESIGNATED LOCATION, LOADING
 ZONE, DOES NOT MEET OUR MINIMUM OPERATIONAL HEIGHT
 CLEARANCE OF 21 FT.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 13:40:36PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
 CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE
 VEHICLE'S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS
 FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS
 5- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
 GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
 TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
 NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
 6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 7- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 8- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
 9- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-12-2022 Time 23:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-12-2022 Time 23:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-12 23:56:55THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE WET SEASON WATER TABLE ELEVATION.
  
 2. PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE STORAGE CHAMBERS AND/OR
 TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS.
  
 3. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS.
 SHOW GRADE BREAKS, EXISTING SURFACES IF NOT BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. LABEL THE NAME
 OF THE R/W, R/W LINE, DISTANCES FROM R/W TO BACK OF
 CURB, TO FACE OF BUILDING, TO MAJOR GRADE BREAKS, ETC.,
 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.
  
 A. FROM THE CENTERLINE OF DATURA ST. TO 5 FEET PAST THE
 HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 B. FROM THE CENTERLINE OF DATURA ST. TO THE RESIDENTIAL
 LOBBY DOOR OPENING.
  
 C. FROM NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY TO THE CENTERLINE OF
 THE DRIVE AISLE ON THE GROUND FLOOR.
  
  
 4. REPLACE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS AND DROP CURB
 ALONG DATURA ST.
  
 5. PROVIDE FULL HEIGHT TYPE D CURB ALONG THE DATURA ST.
 FRONTAGE AND REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITHIN THE R/W.
  
 6. LABEL ALL UTILITIES (SIZE, MATERIAL).
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-15-2023 Time 07:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-15 08:03:001. A SEPARATE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 EXISTING BUILDING ENCROACHMENT.
 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION DOES NOT APPEAR TO LESS OUT THE
 EAST 5' OF LOT 11. APPLICANT NEEDS TO DETERMINE
 OWNERSHIP.
 3. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED WITH MINOR SUBDIVISION
 APPLICATION THRU PLANNING.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-11-2022 Time 10:31 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-11 10:50:141. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. BUILDING ENCROACHMENT WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
 3. SUGGEST MOVING WATER METER ASSEMBLY FROM ALLEY TO
 DATURA.
 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SURVEY HAS THE EAST 23.02' OF
 THE W 1/2 OF LOT 16 INCLUDED IN PARCEL 4 BUT LESSES AND
 EXCEPTS IT OUT AT THE END.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 06-21-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-21-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-21-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-21 23:59:37TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
 NOTE: THIS SHOULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT FROM THE
 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE ANALYSIS
 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE VALID TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS
 MISSING IN LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REMOVE THE TREE
 CANOPY GRAPHICS. IT IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED TO SETUP A
 MEETING WITH TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TO CLARIFY CITY
 EXPECTATIONS ON THIS ITEM. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED IN
 LATEST RESUBMISSION
 7) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. THIS CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 PLAN. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED IN LATEST RESUBMISSION
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK VEHICLES
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY VEHICULAR GATES PROPOSED
 WITHIN 20-FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK?
 14) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 15) SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK ON DATURA IS 10-FEET
 WIDE, THAT MEASUREMENT SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT
 EXCEEDED
 16) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(Q)(2):
 NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE
 RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER
 TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS
 TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 SLOPE PERCENTAGES FOR EACH RAMP AND CONFORM TO CODE
 PERTAINING THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION
 17) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE
 CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A
 WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EACH
 PARKING STALL ADJACENT TO A WALL OR OBSTRUCTIONS
 18) NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS PERTAINING
 STACKER OPERATIONS. WHO WILL BE USING/ACCESSING THEM
 AND HOW ARE OPERATIONS CONDUCTED AND MONITORED. NO
 RESPONSE PROVIDED IN LATEST RESUBMISSION
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-14-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-14-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-14-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-14 16:52:23TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
 NOTE: THIS SHOULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT FROM THE
 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE ANALYSIS
 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE VALID TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS
 MISSING IN LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REMOVE TREE
 CANOPY GRAPHICS. IT IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED TO SETUP A
 MEETING WITH TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TO CLARIFY CITY
 EXPECTATIONS ON THIS ITEM.
 7) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. THIS CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 PLAN
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK VEHICLES
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY VEHICULAR GATES PROPOSED
 WITHIN 20-FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK?
 14) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 15) SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK ON DATURA IS 10-FEET
 WIDE, THAT MEASUREMENT SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT
 EXCEEDED
 16) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(Q)(2):
 NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE
 RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER
 TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS
 TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 SLOPE PERCENTAGES FOR EACH RAMP AND CONFORM TO CODE
 PERTAINING THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION
 17) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE
 CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A
 WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EACH
 PARKING STALL ADJACENT TO A WALL OR OBSTRUCTIONS
 18) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS PERTAINING STACKER
 OPERATIONS. WHO WILL BE USING/ACCESSING THEM AND HOW
 ARE OPERATIONS CONDUCTED AND MONITORED
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-15 10:40:32TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
 NOTE: THIS SHOULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT FROM THE
 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE ANALYSIS
 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE VALID TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES
 SITE COMMENTS
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS
 MISSING IN LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REMOVE TREE
 CANOPY GRAPHICS
 7) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. THIS CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
 PLAN
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK VEHICLES
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
 SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
 SIGNAL, ETC.)
 11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY VEHICULAR GATES PROPOSED
 WITHIN 20-FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK?
 14) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO,
 PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY
 MEETING
 15) SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK ON DATURA IS 10-FEET
 WIDE, THAT MEASUREMENT SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT
 EXCEEDED
 16) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(Q)(2):
 NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE
 RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER
 TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS
 TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 SLOPE PERCENTAGES FOR EACH RAMP AND CONFORM TO CODE
 PERTAINING THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION
 17) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE
 CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A
 WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EACH
 PARKING STALL ADJACENT TO A WALL OR OBSTRUCTIONS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-13 04:06:28TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 2) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. NOTE: THIS
 SHOULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT FROM THE TRAFFIC IMPACT
 STATEMENT
 3) PROVIDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE ANALYSIS
 4) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 5) PROVIDE VALID TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
 MEASURES
 SITE COMMENTS
 6) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE
 GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED
 7) IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 8) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE
 9) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK VEHICLES
 10) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
 EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
 CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
 ETC.)
 11) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT)
 12) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 13) ARE THERE ANY VEHICULAR GATES PROPOSED WITHIN
 20-FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK?
 14) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE AN
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE ANALYSIS SHOULD BE
 DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY MEETING
 15) EXISTING SIDEWALK ON DATURA IS 10-FEET WIDE, THAT
 MEASUREMENT SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT EXCEEDED
 16) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(Q)(2): NON-PARKING RAMPS
 SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE RAMP IS GREATER
 THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SHALL BE
 REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS TEN PERCENT FOR
 NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES. PLEASE PROVIDE SLOPE
 PERCENTAGES FOR EACH RAMP AND CONFORM TO CODE
 PERTAINING THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION
 17) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE CASES
 WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
 FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
 STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EACH
 PARKING STALL ADJACENT TO A WALL OR OBSTRUCTIONS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 07-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 07-10-2023 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 06-16-2023 Time 13:44 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-16 13:46:4006/07/2023
  
 1. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 TABLE ON SHEET A1.00 STILL APPEARS TO HAVE
 DISCREPANCIES:
 RESIDENTIAL PARKING MIN: 1SPACE/UNIT & 1SPACE/20UNIT
 FOR GUEST 87
 REGULAR UNITS = 87 SPACES + 5 SPACES FOR GUEST = 92
 REQUIRED SPACES RESPONSE: REGULAR UNITS = 65 SPACES + 4
 GUEST = 69 REQUIRED SPACES
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING DATA
 AND UNIT COUNT DATA.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? 69 SPACES; FOR 65
 UNITS AND 4 GUESTS
  
 72 MICRO UNITS PROPOSED
 DOES NOT REQUIRE PARKING MAX. PERMITTED: 0.5
 SPACES/UNIT + 1SPACE/20UNIT
 FOR GUEST
 RESPONSE: 94 MICROUNITS DOES NOT REQUIRE PARKING.
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING DATA
 AND UNIT COUNT DATA.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? NO SPACES
 PROVIDED FOR MICROUNITS
  
 LIVE/WORK PARKING MIN: 2 SPACES/1000SF
 4,464 SF OF LIVE/WORK ON GROUND FLOOR (6 UNITS AT 744
 EACH PER SHEET A3.01)
 = 10 SPACES
 92 RES/GUEST + 10 LIVE/WORK = 102 REQUIRED PARKING
 SPOTS NOT 130
 69 RES/GUEST +10 LIVE/WORK = 79 REQUIRED PARKING SPOTS
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING
 DATA.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? 6,678 SF OF
 LIVEWORK ACCORDING TO A1.00 AND A0.04, REQUIRES A
 MINIMUM OF 13 SPACES; ONLY PROVIDING 10. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE ADDITIONAL 3 SPACES.
  
 RESPONSE: 5814 SF OF LIVE/WORK = 12 PARKING SPACES
  
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A1.00 FOR REVISED PARKING
 CALCULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 HOWEVER, NOW THAT THE HISTORIC BUILDING AND ITS USES
 ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT SITE, PLEASE PROVIDE
 USE/SQUAREFOOTAGE BREAKDOWN OF INTERIOR TENANTS, SO
 THAT THESE USES CAN BE APPROPRIATELY PARKED.
  
 5,750+5,778 SF = 11,528 SF OF POTENTIAL RETAIL OR
 OFFICE USES THAT NEED PARKING.
 RESPONSE: RETAIL / OFFICES PARKING = 23 P.S FOR A TOTAL
 OF 102 P.S IN THE BUILDING.
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? CLARIFY
 THE USE WITHIN THE HISTORIC BUILDING. IF SF IS ALL
 RETAIL/COMMERCIAL USE IT CAN BE PARKED AT A MINIMUM OF
 2 SPACES/1000SF. THEN THE PROPOSED 23 SPACES IS
 SUFFICIENT.
 IF SF IS ALL OFFICE USES IT CAN BE PARKED AT A MINIMUM
 OF 2.5 SPACES/1000SF. WOULD REQUIRE 29 SPACES.
  
 RESPONSE: HISTORIC BUILDING IS RETAIL/COMMERCIAL SO WE
 WILL HAVE 23 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED .
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A1.00 FOR REVISED PARKING
 CALCULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE 8 GUEST SPACES, 12 LIVE/WORK SPACES,
 AND 23 COMMERCIAL SPACES CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN IN
 TABLE.
 RESPONSE: PARKING HAVE BEEN REVISED PLEASE REFER TO
 SHEET A.100 THE BUILDING HAS 4 GUEST SPACES, 10
 LIVE/WORKSPACES, 23 COMMERCIAL/OFFICES SPACES AND 65
 RESIDENTIAL SPACES FOR A TOTAL OF 102 P.S.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? MINIMUM
 REQUIRED PARKING IS 105 SPACES IF HISTORIC BUILDING IS
 ALL RETAIL/COMMERCIAL.
  
 MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING IS 111 SPACES IF HISTORIC
 BUILDING IS ALL OFFICE.
  
 RESPONSE: HISTORIC BUILDING IS RETAIL/COMMERCIAL SO WE
 WILL HAVE 104 PARKING SPACES IN TOTAL.
  
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A1.00 FOR REVISED PARKING
 CALCULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF YOU ARE PROVIDING PARKING FOR ANY OF
 THE MICRO-UNITS.
 BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED.
 - 1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES (SHALL BE
 WITHIN SECURED/COVERED ROOM).
 MICRO-UNITS DOES NOT REQUIRED PARKING 7 BIKE SPACES
 REQUIRED PROVIDED ON BASEMENT.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A1.00 SHOWING REQUIRED
 BIKE SPACES.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? 57 BIKE SPACES; 7
 BIKE SPACES FOR REQ. PARKING, 3 SPACES FOR FRONTAGE, 47
 SPACES FOR 94 MICRO UNITS.
  
 - 1 BIKE SPACE PER 100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A1.00 SHOWING
 REQUIRED BIKE SPACES CALCULATION.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED
  
 - WITH INCLUSION OF MICRO-UNITS ALSO NEED 0.5 BIKE
 SPACES PER MICRO-UNIT. RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO
 REVISED SHEET A.100 SHOWING BIKE SPACES CALCULATION. 47
 BIKE SPACES NEEDED FOR MICRONUNITS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED
  
 - A BIKESHARING STATION IS ALSO REQUIRED ONSITE, PLEASE
 CONTACT COLBY REESE 305-733-9650 [email protected] FOR
 DIMENSIONS OF THE CITY???S BRIGHTBIKE STATIONS.
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A3.00 BIKE RACK HAS
 BEEN LOCATED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? PLEASE
 PROVIDE CORRESPONDENCE WITH CITY BIKESHARE OPERATOR OR
 BRIGHTBIKE REP. COLBY REESE 305-733-9650
 [email protected].
 A STATION MAY BE REQUIRED ALONG PROJECT FRONTAGE OR
 ALONG ROW. PROPOSED LOCATION ON A3.00 IS WITHIN
 BASEMENT. PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN 500 FT. OF TWO
 SEPARATE STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY, REQUIREMENT MAY BE
 WAIVED.
  
 UPDATE: 5.31.23 PER DISCUSSION BETWEEN APPLICANT AND
 COLBY, STATION IS NOT REQUIRED. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 PLEASE REMOVE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION FROM PLANS.
  
 RESPONSE:MICRO-MOBILITY STATION HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM
 PLANS.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 AND A2.00
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
  
 - A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL PROVIDE
 ON-SITE CAR- SHARE STATIONS ON A RATIO OF ONE PER EVERY
 13 UNITS. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS MAY BE
 REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CAR-
 SHARE STATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED BASED ON CURRENT SYSTEM
 DEMANDS, BUT A MINIMUM OF ONE CAR-SHARE STATION SHALL
 BE PROVIDED. THE REMAINDER OF THE SPACES SHALL BE
 RESERVED FOR FUTURE SERVICE EXPANSION.
 8 CAR STATION PROVIDED.PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET
 A3.00 FOR CAR-SHARE STATION LOCATION.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? PLEASE LABEL
 OR INDICATE WHICH SPACES ARE FOR CAR-SHARE, A3.00 DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO HIGHLIGHT THESE SPACES.
  
 RESPONSE: CAR SHARE SPACES ARE LABELED.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.00
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
  
 - A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE PER UNIT PER MONTH TO SUPPORT
 THE OPERATION OF THE CITY'S TROLLEY
 SYSTEM, AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
 COMMISSION FROM TIME TO TIME.
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. PLEASE ADVISE TO THE AMOUNTS,
 PROCESS AND TIMING AS REQUIRED PER THE CITY
 REGULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? PER RESOLUTION
 NO. 211-17 ??????A TROLLEY FEE OF $10.00 PER UNIT PER
 MONTH, FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, AT THE RATE
 ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION 211-17 OR AS AMENDED BY THE
 CITY COMMISSION. THE FIRST PAYMENT SHALL BE COMPLETED
 AT THE TIME OF PROJECT CO.???
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
  
 2. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 WITHIN CWD 10-12 DISTRICT, THE PODIUM GOES UP TO LEVEL
 5. SUBMITTED PLANS ARE ONLY SHOWING PLANAR BREAKS FOR
 GROUND FLOOR. SIMILAR TO SHEET A0.5.5 PLEASE SHOW
 PLANER BREAKS FOR FLOORS 2-5 ALONG THE DATURA FRONTAGE.
 PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS AND AREA SHADED TO COUNT
 ONLY THE PORTIONS WHERE THE PRIMARY FACE OR PLANE OF
 THE BUILDING IS
 INTERRUPTED BY A 3 FT. + PROJECTION OR RECESSED AREA.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE DEPTH OF THE RECESS
 OR PROJECTION AS WELL. SHEET A0.5.6
 AND A0.5.7 IS NOT NEEDED OR CALCULATIONS DO NOT NEED TO
 BE PROVIDED; AS PLANAR BREAKS ARE ONLY FOR BUILDING
 FRONTAGES LONGER THAN 150 FT. AND ON STREETS; IN THIS
 CASE ONLY THE DATURA FRONTAGE. BECAUSE THE HISTORIC
 BUILDING ALONG DIXIE ALREADY PROVIDES A BREAK IN THE
 MASS AND IS ONLY 141-3 IN WIDTH.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.5.6 SHOWING PLANAR
 BREAKS FOR FLOORS 2-5 ALONG THE DATURA FRONTAGE.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TYPICALLY
 ENTRYWAYS AND BALCONY PROJECTIONS OR RECESSED AREAS
 WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARD PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS. STAFF
 ENCOURAGES ALTERNATIVE PLANAR BREAK PROPOSAL FOR FLOORS
 1-5 (PODIUM), PERHAPS WITHIN THE VERTICAL ELEMENTS
 BETWEEN BALCONIES. HOWEVER, STAFF IS AMENABLE TO
 INTERPRETING BALCONY AS PLANAR BREAK UNDER THE
 CONDITION THAT GLASS OR TRANSPARENT RAILING MATERIALS
 ARE UTILIZED, AS IS SHOWN IN THE RENDERS. CONDITION OF
 DAC OR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 RESPONSE: PLANAR BREAK PROPOSAL WAS APPLIED TO
 ELEVATION AS DISCUSSED WITH CHRIS KIMMERLY FROM THE
 CITY. PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEETS A4.02, A4.03
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] STAFF TO CONDITION AS PART OF
 DAC APPROVAL AND/OR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 3. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 PLEASE REVISE SHEET A0.03 AND L-203 MINOR TEXT
 CORRECTION, OVERHEAD
 COVER IS NOT REQUIRED, IT IS JUST PERMITTED UP TO A
 MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE
 OF THE SPACE. WITHIN THE ROOFTOP GARDEN CALCULATIONS
 IT???S NOTED
  
 ???REQUIRED 30%???. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON GROUND FLOOR
 (GARDEN) IS NOT NEEDED AS THE REQUIREMENT IS MET WITH
 ROOFTOP GARDEN. ALSO IF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS LOCATED
 ON GROUND FLOOR, IT MUST BE DESIGNED TO MEET PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS AND BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE
 PUBLIC. RECOMMEND REMOVING REFERENCE TO GROUND FLOOR
 PRIVATE SPACE. SATISFIED REQUIREMENT WITH ROOFTOP
 SPACE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.03 FOR REVISED NOTE
 AND GROUND FLOOR REFERENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED
  
 4. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 5. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 6. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SITE
 VISIBILITY CAN BE ADJUSTED TO BE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
 INTERSECTION WITH THE DRIVEWAY.
 SEE SEC. 94-305 FOR MORE INFORMATION OR REFER TO FIGURE
 X-1.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.00 FOR
 UPDATED SITE VISIBILITY.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? SHOULD BE TWO
 SEPARATE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. THE TIP OF TRIANGLE
 SHOULD BEGIN AT THE BACK OF CURB. TRIANGLE THEN EXTENDS
 20 FEET SOUTHWARD (FOLLOWING THE DRIVEWAY) AND 20 FEET
 EAST OR WEST ENCOMPASSING THE LANDSCAPE ADJACENT TO THE
 DRIVEWAY APRON AND ROW . STAFF CAN PROVIDE DIAGRAM FOR
 REFERENCE.
  
  
 RESPONSE: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES HAS BEEN APPLIED TO
 PLAN
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 7. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 [REPEAT COMMENT]: PLEASE NOTE FAR CALCULATIONS ARE THE
 SAME AS GBA. PER SECTION 94-109. GROSS BUILDING AREA
 MEANS THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING, INCLUDING
 AIR- CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,
 ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP, SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND
 LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA
 DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING
 AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES, PORCHES AND BALCONIES;
 MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SPACES; AND TRASH ROOMS.
 STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES
 THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR
 CIRCULATION SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED. GROSS BUILDING AREA
 REQUIREMENTS:
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.04 FOR REVISED FAR
 CALCULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 1 BASEMENT: ALL ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
 PLEASE CLARIFY ARE THE BIKE STORAGE SPACES ENCLOSED
 WITHIN FENCING OR SOLID WALLS/ROOMS? IF ENCLOSED WITH
 WALLS, NEEDS TO COUNT TOWARD FAR.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 2 GROUND LEVEL: BOH ROOM
 ADJACENT TO OR LEFT OF THE MAILROOM CAN BE EXCLUDED
 FROM FAR CALC. THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM SHOULD BE INCLUDED
 WITHIN FAR CALC. STAIRWELL AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER
 OF PROPERTY SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 4 2ND RESIDENTIAL LEVEL:
 STAIRWELL AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY SHOULD
 BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 5 3RD ??? 12TH RESIDENTIAL
 LEVEL: FAR CROSSHATCH LAYER APPEARS TO BE MISSING OR
 UNDER THE OTHERS, ONLY SHOWN ON CORRIDORS AND
 ELEVATORS, PLEASE REVISE. ALSO NOTE TO INCLUDE
 STAIRWELL AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY WITHIN
 FAR CALC.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 6 ROOF LEVEL: ALL ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
  
 RESPONSE: DIAGRAMS HAVE BEEN REVISED ACCORDING TO
 COMMENTS PLEASE REFER TO REVISED A0.04
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 4 2ND RESIDENTIAL LEVEL ???
 THE BATHROOM ON THE OUTDOOR TERRACE SHALL BE INCLUDED
 WITHIN THE FAR CALCULATIONS.
  
 1. ANY PORTION OF THE PARKING AREA WHICH EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM PARKING RATIO SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
 CALCULATIONS OF GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
 STALLS AND ALL ASSOCIATED CIRCULATION AREAS. RESPONSE:
 NOTED. PLEASE REVIEW GROSS BUIDING AREA CALCULATION.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.0.04.
  
 2. PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE SHALL NOT BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REVIEW GROSS BUIDLING AREA
 CALCULATION, PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE IS NOT BEIGN
 INCLUDE PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.0.04.
  
 3. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
 OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REVIEW GROSS BUILDING AREA
 CALCULATION, AREA IS
 MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.0.04.
  
 YOUR FAR CALCULATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE BOTH ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS. DATA TABLE AND FIGURES ON A0.04 APPEAR
 TO HAVE DISCREPANCIES IN CALCULATIONS. IT IS STILL
 UNCLEAR TO STAFF WHAT SPACES ARE COUNTING TOWARD TOTAL
 FAR AND WHAT IS BEING OMITTED; DUE TO BEING A
 MECHANICAL/ELECTRIC ROOM, OR PARKING. STAFF
 RECOMMENDATION IS TO SIMPLIFY THE CALCULATIONS TABLE
 INTO A SINGLE ONE RATHER THAN SPLITTING INTO TWO
 COMPONENTS.
 STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS A SIMPLE TWO-TONED GRAPHIC FOR
 FAR ON SHEET
 A0.04. BLANK OR WHITE SPACE = AREAS NOT COUNTED TOWARD
 FAR TOTAL RED
 OR SOME OTHER COLOR = SPACE THAT IS COUNTED TOWARD FAR
 TOTAL
 RESPONSE: ELEVATORS AND STAIRWELLS ARE INCLUDED; CHART
 HAS BEEN UPDATED AND FAR IS SHOWING JUST ONE COLOR
 HATCH AS REQUESTED. PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.004
 FOR REVISED CALCULATIONS.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED, SEE COMMENTS
 UNDER #7.
  
 RESPONSE: DIAGRAMS HAVE BEEN REVISED ACCORDING TO
 COMMENTS PLEASE REFER TO REVISED A0.04
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 4 2ND RESIDENTIAL LEVEL ???
 THE BATHROOM ON THE OUTDOOR TERRACE SHALL BE INCLUDED
 WITHIN THE FAR CALCULATIONS.
  
  
 8. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 9. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 PREVIOUS 12.09.22 SUBMITTAL HAD SETBACKS ALONG DATURA
 MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE ON-STREET PARKING.
 WITHIN THIS 3.24.23 SUBMITTAL THE SETBACK IS BEING
 MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB, HOWEVER, THE
 PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE IS THE INTERIOR CURB LINE
 OF THE ON- STREET PARKING. PLEASE ADJUST. SHEET A3.01
 IS SHOWING TWO DIFFERENT
 SETBACKS ON THE DATURA FRONTAGE. SEE SEC. 94-109
 SETBACK DEFINITION FOR MORE INFORMATION.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A2.00 AND A3.01
 FOR REVISED SETBACK DIMENSION.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. SETBACKS ARE
 SHOW FROM PROPERTY LINE, THIS IS INCORRECT. SETBACKS
 ARE MEASURED IN DOWNTOWN FROM BACK OF CURB. PLEASE NOTE
 THIS IS FROM YOUR PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE, IN
 THIS INSTANCE THE CURB LINE FROM THE ON-STREET PARKING.
 A 16FT. SETBACK WOULD INCLUDE, THE MINIMUM 4 FT.
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER, MINIMUM 8FT. SIDEWALK AND THEN 4 FEET
 OF EXTRA SPACE.
  
 RESPONSE: SETBACK HAS BEEN CHANGED AND MESUARED FROM
 BACK OF CURB AS REQUESTED.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED
  
 SETBACKS ARE NOW SHOWN FROM CORRECT BACK OF CURB
 LOCATION. SETBACK SHOWN AT 20FT.
  
 THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK IS 16 FT.; PLEASE SHOW
 THIS MINIMUM REQUIRED LINE ON SITE PLAN, GROUND FLOOR,
 AND ELEVATIONS SHEETS.
  
 10. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] HISTORIC BUILDING
 LEGAL NONCONFORMING, DOES NOT NEED TO MEET TRANSPARENCY
 REQUIREMENTS. RESPONSE: NOTED. PLEASE REFER TO REVISED
 SHEET.
  
 11. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESTRICTIVE
 COVENANT AND RECORDED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE A CONDITION
 OF APPROVAL
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. PLEASE CONFIRM THE
 APPLICABILITY OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, THE VALET
 OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND THE PROJECT IS NOW
 100% SELF-PARK.
  
 12. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 13. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 14. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 15. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 FROM 1.19.23 COMMENTS
 1. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESPONSE:
 ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 2. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 ON SHEET A3.01 AND OTHERS THE BIKE RACKS ARE SHOWN
 PARALLEL TO SIDEWALK, IS THE 8FT. CLEAR PATH MAINTAINED
 WITH THE BIKES IN THIS POSITION? SHEET A0.6.2 SHOWS
 UTILIZATION OF???INVERTED U??? RACKS, WITH THESE RACKS
 THE BIKES ARE TYPICALLY PERPENDICULAR TO SIDEWALK AS IT
 IS EASIER TO ACCESS FOR USERS. SPACES CAN BE PARALLEL
 BUT RECOMMEND PLACING THEM ON A SEPARATE PAD WITHIN
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER OR ANOTHER DEDICATED SPACE, AS THIS
 MAINTAINS THE 8FT. CLEARANCE ON SIDEWALK. MICROMOBILITY
 STATION AND STREETLIGHTS STILL APPEAR TO OVERLAP STREET
 TREE LOCATIONS.
 RESPONSE: 8FT CLEARANCE ON SIDEWALK IS MAINTAINED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. L-100 PLANS SHOW
 BIKE RACKS IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL
 STREETLIGHTS, STREETSCAPE FURNISHINGS, BIKE RACKS,
 TREES, ETC. WITHIN LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND SITE PLAN OR
 GROUND FLOOR PLAN.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 AND L-100
 SIDEWALK CLEARANCE IS MANTAINED.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] NOT SATISFIED.
 L-100 SIDEWALK STILL SHOW BIKE RACKS LOCATED WITHIN
 MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK, PLEASE ADJUST. A BIKE SHARE STATION
 IS ALSO SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE DRIVEWAY, THIS
 REQUIREMENT WAS REMOVED.
  
 STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON SITE PLAN A2.00,
 GROUND FLOOR PLAN A3.01, OR LANDSCAPE PLAN L-200. WHERE
 ARE THE BIKE RACKS AND STREET LIGHTS ILLUSTRATED?
  
 3. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 STREET TREE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY ALONG DATURA
 STREET ARE NOT SPACED 30FT. APART. THERE IS THE WIDTH
 OF THE DRIVEWAY AND THE MICROMOBILITY STATION
 INTERRUPTING THE TREE CONTINUITY. PLEASE ???
 RECONFIGURE TREES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY OR A
 VARIANCE MUST BE REQUESTED AS IT DOES NOT MEET CODE
 PROVISION OF SEC. 94-113(D.)(2.)
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 AND
 INFORMATION PROVIDED
 BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, STREET TREES CANNOT BE PLACED
 WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY SIGTH DISTANCE TRIANGLES, THIS IS
 WHY THE STREET TREES ARE NOT 30??? APART.
 MICROMOBILITY STATION HAS BEEN RELOCATED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. SITE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES ARE DRAWN FROM THE PROPERTY LINE OUTWARD, SEE
 COMMENT #6. PLEASE NOTE LANDSCAPING CAN BE WITHIN THE
 SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SO LONG AS AN AREA BETWEEN
 18IN. AND 8FT. IS KEPT CLEAR. PLEASE REFERENCE SECTION
 94-305(E.)
  
 RESPONSE: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES HAS BEEN APPLIED TO
 PLAN
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
  
  
 4. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 ON THE NORTH EASTERN CORNER OF PROJECT, THE STAIRWELL
 ENCROACHES INTO THE SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST TO BE
 OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED 5FT. SETBACK. ALSO PLEASE REMOVE
 PLANTERS WITHIN 5 FT. SETBACK, SHOULD BE HEDGES PLANTED
 AT 2-3 FOOT INTERVALS AND SHADE TREES EVERY 30 FT.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01, STAIR
 HAS BEEN MOVED TO COMPLY WITH SETBACK.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE A3.02
 STILL SHOWS GRAPHIC ERROR WITH STAIR IN SETBACK.
 RESPONSE: GRAPHIC ERROR HAS BEEN CORRECTED.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.02
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 5. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 PER SEC. 94-113(F.)(1.) A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS
 NEEDED WITH SHRUBS PLANTED AT 2 OR 3 FT. INTERVALS AS
 WELL AS SHADE TREES PLANTED AT 30 FT. INTERVALS.
 SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT SHOW SHADE TREES. PLEASE REMOVE
 PLANTERS AND ENCROACHING STAIRWELL.
 RESPONSE: PLANTER HAVE BEEN REMOVED, SHRUBS ADDED AND
 STAIR HAVE BEEN MOVED. PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET
 A3.00 AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. SHEET A3.01.
  
 ZONING COMMENTS 4.24.23:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE SIDEWALK AND CLEARPATH WIDTH FOR BOTH
 DATURA AND S. DIXIE FRONTAGES. 8FT. CLEAR PATH REQUIRED
 ON DATURA STREET FRONTAGE, SOUTH DIXIE HWY FRONTAGE TO
 MAINTAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK WIDTH OR INCREASE COMPLIANCE
 WITH REQUIRED 8FT. ALSO PROVIDE WIDTH OF LANDSCAPE
 STRIP ALONG DATURA AND S DIXIE FRONTAGE. MICRO-MOBILITY
 STATION CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 STRIP ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A2.00 AND A3.01
 SHOWING DIMENTIONS OF SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE STRIP OR
 DATURA AND S. DIXIE FRONTAGES, MICROBOLITY STATION HAS
 BEEN MOVED.
 ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY OR CURBCUT WHERE IT
 INTERSECTS WITH THE PROPERTY LINE, DIMENSION CANNOT
 EXCEED 25FT.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A3.01 SHOWING DIMENTION
 OF DRIVEWAY.
 ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 3. ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS, PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT OF
 ROOFTOP ELEMENTS (TRELLIS, DECORATIVE ELEMENTS, ETC.),
 EACH ELEMENT MUST MEET THE PROJECTION STANDARDS OF SEC.
 94-109 TABLE IV-5.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEETS A4.00, A4.02,
 A4.03, A4.04 SHOWING HEIGHTS OF ROOFTOP ELEMENTS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 4. PER SEC. 94-112 ALLEYS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY:
 INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. ALL PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENTS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 50,000
 GROSS SQUARE FEET SHALL HAVE ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 SERVICE CONNECTIONS, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE AND
 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SERVICE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND.
 RESPONSE: NOTED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 5. PLEASE WALLMOUNT FDC IF LOCATED ALONG DATURA
 FRONTAGE, AND PROVIDE SOME LANDSCAPING OR SCREENING SO
 LONG AS ACCESS IS NOT HINDERED.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01, SHOWING
 FDC AND A PROTECTION LANDSCAPE SCREEN.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 6. ON THE NORTH EASTERN CORNER OF PROJECT, THE
 STAIRWELL ENCROACHES INTO THE SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST TO
 BE OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED 5FT. SETBACK. RESPONSE: PLEASE
 REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01, STAIR HAS BEEN MOVED TO
 COMPLY WITH SETBACK.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE A3.02
 STILL SHOWS GRAPHIC ERROR WITH STAIR IN SETBACK.
 RESPONSE: GRAPHIC ERROR HAS BEEN CORRECTED.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.02
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 7. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND BUILDING BASE
 PLANTING ON THE REAR SURFACE PARKING DOES NOT SEEM
 VIABLE AS IT IS UNDER THE AMENITY DECK/ROOF, THESE
 AREAS WILL NOT HAVE DIRECT SUNLIGHT OR OPEN-AIR ACCESS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 PLANTERS
 HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES CONTRIBUTION OR ART LOCATION ON
 SITE MUST BE IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO TAKING THE SITE PLAN
 TO DAC.
 RESPONSE: CONTRIBUTION WILL BE DISCUSSED WITH
 OWNERSHIP/LAND USE LAWYER.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. DISCUSSION HAD WITH
 SYBILLE AND APPLICANT, NEW LOCATION PROPOSED WHERE
 MICROMOBILITY STATION IS SHOWN ON CURRENT PLAN SET.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFERR TO SHEET A6.09 SHOWING THE
 PROPOSED ART IN PUBLIC SPACE LOCATION.
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED.
  
 9. LANDSCAPE PLANS CONFLICT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS,
 TREE LOCATIONS APPEAR TO DIFFER OR INTERFERE WITH SITE
 ELEMENTS. BE SURE TO SHOW ON BOTH THE LANDSCAPE AND
 ARCHITECTURE PLANS THE LOCATION OF ANY STREETSCAPE
 ELEMENT (BIKERACK, LIGHTS, STREET TREES, FURNITURE,
 METERS/VAULTS, PLANTERS, ETC.)
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 LANDSCAPE
 AND ARCHITECTURE PLANS ARE COORDINATED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. DOES NOT APPEAR
 TO BE ADDRESSED. LIGHT POLES OVERLAP STREET TREE
 CANOPY. BIKE RACKS ONLY SHOWN ON L-100 AND APPEAR TO BE
 IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK. SEE COMMENT #2 FROM 04.24.23.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 LANDSCAPE
 AND ARCHITECTURE PLANS ARE COORDINATED.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED
 L-100 SIDEWALK STILL SHOW BIKE RACKS LOCATED WITHIN
 MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK, PLEASE ADJUST. A BIKE SHARE STATION
 IS ALSO SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE DRIVEWAY, THIS
 REQUIREMENT WAS REMOVED.
  
 STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON SITE PLAN A2.00,
 GROUND FLOOR PLAN A3.01, OR LANDSCAPE PLAN L-200. WHERE
 ARE THE BIKE RACKS AND STREET LIGHTS ILLUSTRATED?
  
  
 10. PLEASE LIST AND IDENTIFY ANY ZONING VARIANCES THAT
 ARE REQUESTED.
 RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED AS
 PART OF THIS PROJECT.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. IT IS UNDERSTOOD
 THAT THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO PROCEED WITHOUT ANY
 VARIANCES, HOWEVER THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT REVISIONS
 NECESSARY, AS SOME UNSATISFIED COMMENTS WOULD WARRANT A
 VARIANCE.
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
 THERE ARE MANY OUTSTANDING ZONING COMMENTS POSSIBLY DUE
 TO MISINTERPRETATION OR CONFUSION WITH CODE ELEMENTS
 AND/OR SITE CHANGES FROM THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL HAS
 OUTLINED OR CAUSED NEW COMMENTS. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO
 SUGGEST AN IN-PERSON MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT/DESIGN
 TEAM TO CLARIFY THE REMAINING ZONING COMMENTS SO THAT
 THE NEXT SUBMITTAL MORE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSES COMMENTS
 AND IS OKAYED FOR THE NEXT STEP IN THE DESIGN PROCESS
 (DAC APPROVAL).
 RESPONSE: NOTED.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] REPEAT COMMENT. STAFF SUGGESTS
 MEETING TO CLARIFY NEXT SUBMITTAL.
  
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED
  
  
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS 5.23.23:
  
 1. CLOUDED VERSION OF PLANS DOES NOT MATCH UNCLOUDED
 VERSION, EXAMPLE BEING A3.00 BASEMENT PARKING, CLOUDED
 VERSION SHOWS LIFTS WHEREAS UNCLOUDED SHOWS CARSHARE.
 BE SURE THAT ALL PLANS ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE, AND
 CIVIL ARE CONSISTENT.
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] SATISFIED. ONLY CLOUDED SET
 RESUBMITTED.
  
  
  
 2. SETBACKS MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB, NOT PROPERTY
 LINE, PLEASE SEE COMMENT #9 FROM 4.24.23.
 RESPONSE: SETBACK HAS BEEN CHANGED AND MESUARED FROM
 BACK OF CURB AS REQUESTED.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED
  
 SETBACKS ARE NOW SHOWN FROM CORRECT BACK OF CURB
 LOCATION. SETBACK SHOWN AT 20FT.
  
 THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK IS 16 FT.; PLEASE SHOW
 THIS MINIMUM REQUIRED LINE ON SITE PLAN, GROUND FLOOR,
 AND ELEVATIONS SHEETS.
  
  
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR SITE. PLEASE
 REFERENCE SEC. 94-113(B.)
 EXTERIOR LIGHTING. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING EVERY NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE
 BUILDING ENTRANCES, ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS, AT A
 MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE
 OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS
 MEASUREMENT SHALL INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC
 AND PRIVATE SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE
 PROHIBITED.
  
 RESPONSE: WILL BE PROVIDED
 [ZONING REVIEW 6.13.23] NOT SATISFIED.
  
 WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL LETTER.
  
  
 *** [6.16.23] STAFF TO FOLLOW UP WITH APPLICANT - MAY
 CONDITION SEVERAL ITEMS FOR DAC ***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 05-31-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 05-31-2023 Time 17:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 05-31-2023 Time 17:03 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-31 17:04:0804/24/2023
  
 1. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 TABLE ON SHEET A1.00 STILL APPEARS TO HAVE
 DISCREPANCIES:
 RESIDENTIAL PARKING MIN: 1SPACE/UNIT & 1SPACE/20UNIT
 FOR GUEST 87 REGULAR UNITS = 87 SPACES + 5 SPACES FOR
 GUEST = 92 REQUIRED SPACES RESPONSE: REGULAR UNITS = 65
 SPACES + 4 GUEST = 69 REQUIRED SPACES
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING DATA
 AND UNIT COUNT DATA.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? 69 SPACES; FOR 65
 UNITS AND 4 GUESTS
  
 72 MICRO UNITS PROPOSED
 DOES NOT REQUIRE PARKING MAX. PERMITTED: 0.5
 SPACES/UNIT + 1SPACE/20UNIT FOR GUEST
 RESPONSE: 94 MICROUNITS DOES NOT REQUIRE PARKING.
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING DATA
 AND UNIT COUNT DATA.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? NO SPACES
 PROVIDED FOR MICROUNITS
  
 LIVE/WORK PARKING MIN: 2 SPACES/1000SF
 4,464 SF OF LIVE/WORK ON GROUND FLOOR (6 UNITS AT 744
 EACH PER SHEET A3.01)
 = 10 SPACES
 92 RES/GUEST + 10 LIVE/WORK = 102 REQUIRED PARKING
 SPOTS NOT 130
  
 RESPONSE: 69 RES/GUEST +10 LIVE/WORK = 79 REQUIRED
 PARKING SPOTS PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.100 FOR
 REVISED PARKING DATA.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? 6,678 SF OF
 LIVEWORK ACCORDING TO A1.00 AND A0.04, REQUIRES A
 MINIMUM OF 13 SPACES; ONLY PROVIDING 10. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE ADDITIONAL 3 SPACES.
  
  
 HOWEVER, NOW THAT THE HISTORIC BUILDING AND ITS USES
 ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT SITE, PLEASE PROVIDE
 USE/SQUAREFOOTAGE BREAKDOWN OF INTERIOR TENANTS, SO
 THAT THESE USES CAN BE APPROPRIATELY PARKED.
  
 5,750+5,778 SF = 11,528 SF OF POTENTIAL RETAIL OR
 OFFICE USES THAT NEED PARKING.
 RESPONSE: RETAIL / OFFICES PARKING = 23 P.S FOR A TOTAL
 OF 102 P.S IN THE BUILDING.
 PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A.100 FOR REVISED PARKING
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? CLARIFY
 THE USE WITHIN THE HISTORIC BUILDING.
 IF SF IS ALL RETAIL/COMMERCIAL USE IT CAN BE PARKED AT
 A MINIMUM OF 2 SPACES/1000SF. THEN THE PROPOSED 23
 SPACES IS SUFFICIENT.
 IF SF IS ALL OFFICE USES IT CAN BE PARKED AT A MINIMUM
 OF 2.5 SPACES/1000SF. WOULD REQUIRE 29 SPACES.
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE 8 GUEST SPACES, 12 LIVE/WORK SPACES,
 AND 23 COMMERCIAL SPACES CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN IN
 TABLE.
 RESPONSE: PARKING HAVE BEEN REVISED PLEASE REFER TO
 SHEET A.100
 THE BUILDING HAS 4 GUEST SPACES, 10 LIVE/WORKSPACES, 23
 COMMERCIAL/OFFICES SPACES AND 65 RESIDENTIAL SPACES FOR
 A TOTAL OF 102 P.S.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? MINIMUM
 REQUIRED PARKING IS 105 SPACES IF HISTORIC BUILDING IS
 ALL RETAIL/COMMERCIAL.
  
 MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING IS 111 SPACES IF HISTORIC
 BUILDING IS ALL OFFICE.
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF YOU ARE PROVIDING PARKING FOR ANY OF
 THE MICRO-UNITS. BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED.
 - 1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES (SHALL BE
 WITHIN SECURED/COVERED ROOM).
 RESPONSE: MICRO-UNITS DOES NOT REQUIRED PARKING 7 BIKE
 SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED ON BASEMENT.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A1.00 SHOWING REQUIRED
 BIKE SPACES.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? 57 BIKE SPACES; 7
 BIKE SPACES FOR REQ. PARKING, 3 SPACES FOR FRONTAGE, 47
 SPACES FOR 94 MICRO UNITS.
  
 - 1 BIKE SPACE PER 100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A1.00 SHOWING
 REQUIRED BIKE SPACES CALCULATION.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED
  
 - WITH INCLUSION OF MICRO-UNITS ALSO NEED 0.5 BIKE
 SPACES PER MICRO-UNIT. RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO
 REVISED SHEET A.100 SHOWING BIKE SPACES CALCULATION. 47
 BIKE SPACES NEEDED FOR MICRONUNITS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED
  
 - A BIKESHARING STATION IS ALSO REQUIRED ONSITE, PLEASE
 CONTACT COLBY REESE 305-733-9650 [email protected] FOR
 DIMENSIONS OF THE CITY???S BRIGHTBIKE STATIONS.
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A3.00 BIKE RACK HAS
 BEEN LOCATED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? PLEASE
 PROVIDE CORRESPONDENCE WITH CITY BIKESHARE OPERATOR OR
 BRIGHTBIKE REP. COLBY REESE 305-733-9650
 [email protected].
 A STATION MAY BE REQUIRED ALONG PROJECT FRONTAGE OR
 ALONG ROW. PROPOSED LOCATION ON A3.00 IS WITHIN
 BASEMENT. PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN 500 FT. OF TWO
 SEPARATE STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY, REQUIREMENT MAY BE
 WAIVED.
  
 UPDATE: 5.31.23 PER DISCUSSION BETWEEN APPLICANT AND
 COLBY, STATION IS NOT REQUIRED. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 PLEASE REMOVE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION FROM PLANS.
  
  
 - A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL PROVIDE
 ON-SITE CAR- SHARE STATIONS ON A RATIO OF ONE PER EVERY
 13 UNITS. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS MAY BE
 REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CAR- SHARE
 STATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED BASED ON CURRENT SYSTEM
 DEMANDS, BUT A MINIMUM OF ONE CAR-SHARE STATION SHALL
 BE PROVIDED. THE REMAINDER OF THE SPACES SHALL BE
 RESERVED FOR FUTURE SERVICE EXPANSION.
  
 RESPONSE: 8 CAR STATION PROVIDED.PLEASE REFER TO
 REVISED SHEET A3.00 FOR CAR-SHARE STATION LOCATION.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? PLEASE LABEL
 OR INDICATE WHICH SPACES ARE FOR CAR-SHARE, A3.00 DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO HIGHLIGHT THESE SPACES.
  
 - A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE PER UNIT PER MONTH TO SUPPORT
 THE OPERATION OF THE CITY'S TROLLEY SYSTEM, AS
 ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION FROM
 TIME TO TIME.
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. PLEASE ADVISE TO THE AMOUNTS,
 PROCESS AND TIMING AS REQUIRED PER THE CITY
 REGULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED ??? PER RESOLUTION
 NO. 211-17 ??????A TROLLEY FEE OF $10.00 PER UNIT PER
 MONTH, FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, AT THE RATE
 ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION 211-17 OR AS AMENDED BY THE
 CITY COMMISSION. THE FIRST PAYMENT SHALL BE COMPLETED
 AT THE TIME OF PROJECT CO.???
  
  
 2. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 WITHIN CWD 10-12 DISTRICT, THE PODIUM GOES UP TO LEVEL
 5. SUBMITTED PLANS ARE ONLY SHOWING PLANAR BREAKS FOR
 GROUND FLOOR. SIMILAR TO SHEET A0.5.5 PLEASE SHOW
 PLANER BREAKS FOR FLOORS 2-5 ALONG THE DATURA FRONTAGE.
 PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS AND AREA SHADED TO COUNT
 ONLY THE PORTIONS WHERE THE PRIMARY FACE OR PLANE OF
 THE BUILDING IS INTERRUPTED BY A 3 FT. + PROJECTION OR
 RECESSED AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 DEPTH OF THE RECESS OR PROJECTION AS WELL. SHEET A0.5.6
 AND A0.5.7 IS NOT NEEDED OR CALCULATIONS DO NOT NEED TO
 BE PROVIDED; AS PLANAR BREAKS ARE ONLY FOR BUILDING
 FRONTAGES LONGER THAN 150 FT. AND ON STREETS; IN THIS
 CASE ONLY THE DATURA FRONTAGE. BECAUSE THE HISTORIC
 BUILDING ALONG DIXIE ALREADY PROVIDES A BREAK IN THE
 MASS AND IS ONLY 141-3 IN WIDTH.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.5.6 SHOWING PLANAR
 BREAKS FOR FLOORS 2-5 ALONG THE DATURA FRONTAGE.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TYPICALLY
 ENTRYWAYS AND BALCONY PROJECTIONS OR RECESSED AREAS
 WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARD PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS. STAFF
 ENCOURAGES ALTERNATIVE PLANAR BREAK PROPOSAL FOR FLOORS
 1-5 (PODIUM), PERHAPS WITHIN THE VERTICAL ELEMENTS
 BETWEEN BALCONIES. HOWEVER, STAFF IS AMENABLE TO
 INTERPRETING BALCONY AS PLANAR BREAK UNDER THE
 CONDITION THAT GLASS OR TRANSPARENT RAILING MATERIALS
 ARE UTILIZED, AS IS SHOWN IN THE RENDERS. CONDITION OF
 DAC OR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 3. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 PLEASE REVISE SHEET A0.03 AND L-203 MINOR TEXT
 CORRECTION, OVERHEAD COVER IS NOT REQUIRED, IT IS JUST
 PERMITTED UP TO A MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF THE SPACE.
 WITHIN THE ROOFTOP GARDEN CALCULATIONS IT???S NOTED
 ???REQUIRED 30%???. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON GROUND FLOOR
 (GARDEN) IS NOT NEEDED AS THE REQUIREMENT IS MET WITH
 ROOFTOP GARDEN. ALSO IF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS LOCATED
 ON GROUND FLOOR, IT MUST BE DESIGNED TO MEET PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS AND BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE
 PUBLIC. RECOMMEND REMOVING REFERENCE TO GROUND FLOOR
 PRIVATE SPACE. SATISFIED REQUIREMENT WITH ROOFTOP
 SPACE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.03 FOR REVISED NOTE
 AND GROUND FLOOR REFERENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED
  
 4. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 5. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 6. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SITE
 VISIBILITY CAN BE ADJUSTED TO BE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
 INTERSECTION WITH THE DRIVEWAY. SEE SEC. 94-305 FOR
 MORE INFORMATION OR REFER TO FIGURE X-1.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.00 FOR
 UPDATED SITE VISIBILITY.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED ??? SHOULD BE TWO
 SEPARATE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. THE TIP OF TRIANGLE
 SHOULD BEGIN AT THE BACK OF CURB. TRIANGLE THEN EXTENDS
 20 FEET SOUTHWARD (FOLLOWING THE DRIVEWAY) AND 20 FEET
 EAST OR WEST ENCOMPASSING THE LANDSCAPE ADJACENT TO THE
 DRIVEWAY APRON AND ROW . STAFF CAN PROVIDE DIAGRAM FOR
 REFERENCE.
 7. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 [REPEAT COMMENT]: PLEASE NOTE FAR CALCULATIONS ARE THE
 SAME AS GBA. PER SECTION 94-109. GROSS BUILDING AREA
 MEANS THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING, INCLUDING
 AIR- CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,
 ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP, SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND
 LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA
 DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES,
 PORCHES AND BALCONIES; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
 SPACES; AND TRASH ROOMS. STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS
 AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL
 VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR CIRCULATION SHALL NOT BE
 INCLUDED. GROSS BUILDING AREA REQUIREMENTS:
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.04 FOR REVISED FAR
 CALCULATIONS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 1 BASEMENT: ALL ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
 PLEASE CLARIFY ARE THE BIKE STORAGE SPACES ENCLOSED
 WITHIN FENCING OR SOLID WALLS/ROOMS? IF ENCLOSED WITH
 WALLS, NEEDS TO COUNT TOWARD FAR.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 2 GROUND LEVEL: BOH ROOM
 ADJACENT TO OR LEFT OF THE MAILROOM CAN BE EXCLUDED
 FROM FAR CALC. THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM SHOULD BE INCLUDED
 WITHIN FAR CALC. STAIRWELL AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER
 OF PROPERTY SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 4 2ND RESIDENTIAL LEVEL:
 STAIRWELL AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY SHOULD
 BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 5 3RD ??? 12TH RESIDENTIAL
 LEVEL: FAR CROSSHATCH LAYER APPEARS TO BE MISSING OR
 UNDER THE OTHERS, ONLY SHOWN ON CORRIDORS AND
 ELEVATORS, PLEASE REVISE. ALSO NOTE TO INCLUDE
 STAIRWELL AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY WITHIN
 FAR CALC.
  
 ON SHEET A0.04 ??? DIAGRAM 6 ROOF LEVEL: ALL ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN FAR CALC.
  
 1. ANY PORTION OF THE PARKING AREA WHICH EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM PARKING RATIO SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
 CALCULATIONS OF GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
 STALLS AND ALL ASSOCIATED CIRCULATION AREAS. RESPONSE:
 NOTED. PLEASE REVIEW GROSS BUIDING AREA CALCULATION.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.0.04.
  
 2. PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE SHALL NOT BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REVIEW GROSS BUIDLING AREA
 CALCULATION, PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE IS NOT BEIGN
 INCLUDE
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.0.04.
  
 3. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
 OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REVIEW GROSS BUILDING AREA
 CALCULATION, AREA IS MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE FACE OF
 EXTERIOR WALLS
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.0.04.
  
 YOUR FAR CALCULATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE BOTH ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS. DATA TABLE AND FIGURES ON A0.04 APPEAR
 TO HAVE DISCREPANCIES IN CALCULATIONS. IT IS STILL
 UNCLEAR TO STAFF WHAT SPACES ARE COUNTING TOWARD TOTAL
 FAR AND WHAT IS BEING OMITTED; DUE TO BEING A
 MECHANICAL/ELECTRIC ROOM, OR PARKING. STAFF
 RECOMMENDATION IS TO SIMPLIFY THE CALCULATIONS TABLE
 INTO A SINGLE ONE RATHER THAN SPLITTING INTO TWO
 COMPONENTS.
 STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS A SIMPLE TWO-TONED GRAPHIC FOR
 FAR ON SHEET A0.04. BLANK OR WHITE SPACE = AREAS NOT
 COUNTED TOWARD FAR TOTAL RED OR SOME OTHER COLOR =
 SPACE THAT IS COUNTED TOWARD FAR TOTAL
 RESPONSE: ELEVATORS AND STAIRWELLS ARE INCLUDED; CHART
 HAS BEEN UPDATED AND FAR IS SHOWING JUST ONE COLOR
 HATCH AS REQUESTED.
 PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A.004 FOR REVISED
 CALCULATIONS.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED, SEE COMMENTS
 UNDER #7.
  
  
 8. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 9. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
  
 PREVIOUS 12.09.22 SUBMITTAL HAD SETBACKS ALONG DATURA
 MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE ON-STREET PARKING.
 WITHIN THIS 3.24.23 SUBMITTAL THE SETBACK IS BEING
 MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB, HOWEVER, THE
 PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE IS THE INTERIOR CURB LINE
 OF THE ON- STREET PARKING. PLEASE ADJUST. SHEET A3.01
 IS SHOWING TWO DIFFERENT SETBACKS ON THE DATURA
 FRONTAGE. SEE SEC. 94-109 SETBACK DEFINITION FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A2.00 AND A3.01
 FOR REVISED SETBACK DIMENSION.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. SETBACKS ARE
 SHOW FROM PROPERTY LINE, THIS IS INCORRECT. SETBACKS
 ARE MEASURED IN DOWNTOWN FROM BACK OF CURB. PLEASE NOTE
 THIS IS FROM YOUR PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE, IN
 THIS INSTANCE THE CURB LINE FROM THE ON-STREET PARKING.
 A 16FT. SETBACK WOULD INCLUDE, THE MINIMUM 4 FT.
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER, MINIMUM 8FT. SIDEWALK AND THEN 4 FEET
 OF EXTRA SPACE.
  
 10. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] HISTORIC BUILDING
  LEGAL NONCONFORMING, DOES NOT NEED TO MEET
 TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS. RESPONSE: NOTED. PLEASE
 REFER TO REVISED SHEET.
  
 11. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESTRICTIVE
 COVENANT AND RECORDED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE A CONDITION
 OF APPROVAL
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. PLEASE CONFIRM THE
 APPLICABILITY OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, THE VALET
 OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND THE PROJECT IS NOW
 100% SELF-PARK.
  
 12. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 13. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 14. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 15. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 FROM 1.19.23 COMMENTS
 1. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 2. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 ON SHEET A3.01 AND OTHERS THE BIKE RACKS ARE SHOWN
 PARALLEL TO SIDEWALK, IS THE 8FT. CLEAR PATH MAINTAINED
 WITH THE BIKES IN THIS POSITION? SHEET A0.6.2 SHOWS
 UTILIZATION OF???INVERTED U??? RACKS, WITH THESE RACKS
 THE BIKES ARE TYPICALLY PERPENDICULAR TO SIDEWALK AS IT
 IS EASIER TO ACCESS FOR USERS. SPACES CAN BE PARALLEL
 BUT RECOMMEND PLACING THEM ON A SEPARATE PAD WITHIN
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER OR ANOTHER DEDICATED SPACE, AS THIS
 MAINTAINS THE 8FT. CLEARANCE ON SIDEWALK. MICROMOBILITY
 STATION AND STREETLIGHTS STILL APPEAR TO OVERLAP STREET
 TREE LOCATIONS.
 RESPONSE: 8FT CLEARANCE ON SIDEWALK IS MAINTAINED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. L-100 PLANS SHOW
 BIKE RACKS IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL
 STREETLIGHTS, STREETSCAPE FURNISHINGS, BIKE RACKS,
 TREES, ETC. WITHIN LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND SITE PLAN OR
 GROUND FLOOR PLAN.
  
 3. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 STREET TREE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY ALONG DATURA
 STREET ARE NOT SPACED 30FT. APART. THERE IS THE WIDTH
 OF THE DRIVEWAY AND THE MICROMOBILITY STATION
 INTERRUPTING THE TREE CONTINUITY. PLEASE
  
 RECONFIGURE TREES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY OR A
 VARIANCE MUST BE REQUESTED AS IT DOES NOT MEET CODE
 PROVISION OF SEC. 94-113(D.)(2.) RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER
 TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, STREET TREES CANNOT BE PLACED
 WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY SIGTH DISTANCE TRIANGLES, THIS IS
 WHY THE STREET TREES ARE NOT 30??? APART.
 MICROMOBILITY STATION HAS BEEN RELOCATED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. SITE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES ARE DRAWN FROM THE PROPERTY LINE OUTWARD, SEE
 COMMENT #6. PLEASE NOTE LANDSCAPING CAN BE WITHIN THE
 SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SO LONG AS AN AREA BETWEEN
 18IN. AND 8FT. IS KEPT CLEAR. PLEASE REFERENCE SECTION
 94-305(E.)
  
  
 4. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 ON THE NORTH EASTERN CORNER OF PROJECT, THE STAIRWELL
 ENCROACHES INTO THE SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST TO BE
 OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED 5FT. SETBACK. ALSO PLEASE REMOVE
 PLANTERS WITHIN 5 FT. SETBACK, SHOULD BE HEDGES PLANTED
 AT 2-3 FOOT INTERVALS AND SHADE TREES EVERY 30 FT.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01, STAIR
 HAS BEEN MOVED TO COMPLY WITH SETBACK.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE A3.02
 STILL SHOWS GRAPHIC ERROR WITH STAIR IN SETBACK.
  
 5. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 PER SEC. 94-113(F.)(1.) A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS
 NEEDED WITH SHRUBS PLANTED AT 2 OR 3 FT. INTERVALS AS
 WELL AS SHADE TREES PLANTED AT 30 FT. INTERVALS.
 SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT SHOW SHADE TREES. PLEASE REMOVE
 PLANTERS AND ENCROACHING STAIRWELL.
 RESPONSE: PLANTER HAVE BEEN REMOVED, SHRUBS ADDED AND
 STAIR HAVE BEEN MOVED. PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET
 A3.00 AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. SHEET A3.01.
  
 ZONING COMMENTS 4.24.23:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE SIDEWALK AND CLEARPATH WIDTH FOR BOTH
 DATURA AND
 S. DIXIE FRONTAGES. 8FT. CLEAR PATH REQUIRED ON DATURA
 STREET FRONTAGE, SOUTH DIXIE HWY FRONTAGE TO MAINTAIN
 EXISTING SIDEWALK WIDTH OR INCREASE COMPLIANCE WITH
 REQUIRED 8FT. ALSO PROVIDE WIDTH OF LANDSCAPE STRIP
 ALONG DATURA AND S DIXIE FRONTAGE. MICRO-MOBILITY
 STATION CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 STRIP ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A2.00 AND A3.01
 SHOWING DIMENTIONS OF SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE STRIP OR
 DATURA AND S. DIXIE FRONTAGES, MICROBOLITY STATION HAS
 BEEN MOVED.
 ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY OR CURBCUT WHERE IT
 INTERSECTS WITH THE PROPERTY LINE, DIMENSION CANNOT
 EXCEED 25FT.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A3.01 SHOWING DIMENTION
 OF DRIVEWAY.
 ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 3. ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS, PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT OF
 ROOFTOP ELEMENTS (TRELLIS, DECORATIVE ELEMENTS, ETC.),
 EACH ELEMENT MUST MEET THE PROJECTION STANDARDS OF SEC.
 94-109 TABLE IV-5.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEETS A4.00, A4.02,
 A4.03, A4.04 SHOWING HEIGHTS OF ROOFTOP ELEMENTS.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 4. PER SEC. 94-112 ALLEYS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY:
 INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. ALL PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENTS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 50,000 GROSS
 SQUARE FEET SHALL HAVE ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE
 CONNECTIONS,
  
 INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE AND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION
 SERVICE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND.
 RESPONSE: NOTED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 5. PLEASE WALLMOUNT FDC IF LOCATED ALONG DATURA
 FRONTAGE, AND PROVIDE SOME LANDSCAPING OR SCREENING SO
 LONG AS ACCESS IS NOT HINDERED.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01, SHOWING
 FDC AND A PROTECTION LANDSCAPE SCREEN.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 6. ON THE NORTH EASTERN CORNER OF PROJECT, THE
 STAIRWELL ENCROACHES INTO THE SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST TO
 BE OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED 5FT. SETBACK. RESPONSE: PLEASE
 REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01, STAIR HAS BEEN MOVED TO
 COMPLY WITH SETBACK.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE A3.02
 STILL SHOWS GRAPHIC ERROR WITH STAIR IN SETBACK.
  
 7. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND BUILDING BASE
 PLANTING ON THE REAR SURFACE PARKING DOES NOT SEEM
 VIABLE AS IT IS UNDER THE AMENITY DECK/ROOF, THESE
 AREAS WILL NOT HAVE DIRECT SUNLIGHT OR OPEN-AIR ACCESS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 PLANTERS
 HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED.
  
 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES CONTRIBUTION OR ART LOCATION ON
 SITE MUST BE IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO TAKING THE SITE PLAN
 TO DAC.
 RESPONSE: CONTRIBUTION WILL BE DISCUSSED WITH
 OWNERSHIP/LAND USE LAWYER.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] SATISFIED. DISCUSSION HAD WITH
 SYBILLE AND APPLICANT, NEW LOCATION PROPOSED WHERE
 MICROMOBILITY STATION IS SHOWN ON CURRENT PLAN SET.
  
 9. LANDSCAPE PLANS CONFLICT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS,
 TREE LOCATIONS APPEAR TO DIFFER OR INTERFERE WITH SITE
 ELEMENTS. BE SURE TO SHOW ON BOTH THE LANDSCAPE AND
 ARCHITECTURE PLANS THE LOCATION OF ANY STREETSCAPE
 ELEMENT (BIKERACK, LIGHTS, STREET TREES, FURNITURE,
 METERS/VAULTS, PLANTERS, ETC.)
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO REVISED SHEET A3.01 LANDSCAPE
 AND ARCHITECTURE PLANS ARE COORDINATED.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. DOES NOT APPEAR
 TO BE ADDRESSED. LIGHT POLES OVERLAP STREET TREE
 CANOPY. BIKE RACKS ONLY SHOWN ON L-100 AND APPEAR TO BE
 IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK. SEE COMMENT #2 FROM 04.24.23.
  
 10. PLEASE LIST AND IDENTIFY ANY ZONING VARIANCES THAT
 ARE REQUESTED.
 RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED AS
 PART OF THIS PROJECT.
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] NOT SATISFIED. IT IS UNDERSTOOD
 THAT THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO PROCEED WITHOUT ANY
 VARIANCES, HOWEVER THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT REVISIONS
 NECESSARY, AS SOME UNSATISFIED COMMENTS WOULD WARRANT A
 VARIANCE.
  
 THERE ARE MANY OUTSTANDING ZONING COMMENTS POSSIBLY DUE
 TO MISINTERPRETATION OR CONFUSION WITH CODE ELEMENTS
 AND/OR SITE CHANGES FROM THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL HAS
 OUTLINED OR CAUSED NEW COMMENTS. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO
 SUGGEST AN IN-PERSON MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT/DESIGN
 TEAM TO CLARIFY THE REMAINING ZONING COMMENTS SO THAT
 THE NEXT SUBMITTAL MORE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSES COMMENTS
 AND IS OKAYED FOR THE NEXT STEP IN THE DESIGN PROCESS
 (DAC APPROVAL).
 RESPONSE: NOTED.
  
 [ZONING REVIEW 5.23.23] REPEAT COMMENT. STAFF SUGGESTS
 MEETING TO CLARIFY NEXT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
  
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS 5.23.23:
  
 1. CLOUDED VERSION OF PLANS DOES NOT MATCH UNCLOUDED
 VERSION, EXAMPLE BEING A3.00 BASEMENT PARKING, CLOUDED
 VERSION SHOWS LIFTS WHEREAS UNCLOUDED SHOWS CARSHARE.
 BE SURE THAT ALL PLANS ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE, AND
 CIVIL ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 2. SETBACKS MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB, NOT PROPERTY
 LINE, PLEASE SEE COMMENT #9 FROM 4.24.23.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR SITE. PLEASE
 REFERENCE SEC. 94-113(B.)
 EXTERIOR LIGHTING. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING EVERY NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE
 BUILDING ENTRANCES, ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS, AT A
 MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE
 OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS
 MEASUREMENT SHALL INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC
 AND PRIVATE SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE
 PROHIBITED.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 04-24-2023 Time 17:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 04-24-2023 Time 17:36 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-24 17:42:161. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 TABLE ON SHEET A1.00 STILL APPEARS TO HAVE
 DISCREPANCIES:
 RESIDENTIAL PARKING MIN: 1SPACE/UNIT & 1SPACE/20UNIT
 FOR GUEST
 87 REGULAR UNITS = 87 SPACES + 5 SPACES FOR GUEST = 92
 REQUIRED SPACES
 72 MICRO UNITS PROPOSED ??? DOES NOT REQUIRE PARKING
 MAX. PERMITTED: 0.5 SPACES/UNIT + 1SPACE/20UNIT FOR
 GUEST
 LIVE/WORK PARKING MIN: 2 SPACES/1000SF
 4,464 SF OF LIVE/WORK ON GROUND FLOOR (6 UNITS AT 744
 EACH PER SHEET A3.01) = 10 SPACES
 92 RES/GUEST + 10 LIVE/WORK = 102 REQUIRED PARKING
 SPOTS NOT 130
 HOWEVER, NOW THAT THE HISTORIC BUILDING AND ITS USES
 ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT SITE, PLEASE PROVIDE
 USE/SQUAREFOOTAGE BREAKDOWN OF INTERIOR TENANTS, SO
 THAT THESE USES CAN BE APPROPRIATELY PARKED.
 5,750+5,778 SF = 11,528 SF OF POTENTIAL RETAIL OR
 OFFICE USES THAT NEED PARKING.
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE 8 GUEST SPACES, 12 LIVE/WORK SPACES,
 AND 23 COMMERCIAL SPACES CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN IN
 TABLE.
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF YOU ARE PROVIDING PARKING FOR ANY OF
 THE MICRO-UNITS.
 BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED.
 - 1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES (SHALL BE
 WITHIN SECURED/COVERED ROOM).
 - 1 BIKE SPACE PER 100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE.
 - WITH INCLUSION OF MICRO-UNITS ALSO NEED 0.5 BIKE
 SPACES PER MICRO-UNIT.
  
 - A BIKESHARING STATION IS ALSO REQUIRED ONSITE, PLEASE
 CONTACT COLBY REESE 305-733-9650 [email protected] FOR
 DIMENSIONS OF THE CITY???S BRIGHTBIKE STATIONS.
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 - A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL PROVIDE
 ON-SITE CAR-SHARE STATIONS ON A RATIO OF ONE PER EVERY
 13 UNITS. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS MAY BE
 REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CAR-SHARE
 STATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED BASED ON CURRENT SYSTEM
 DEMANDS, BUT A MINIMUM OF ONE CAR-SHARE STATION SHALL
 BE PROVIDED. THE REMAINDER OF THE SPACES SHALL BE
 RESERVED FOR FUTURE SERVICE EXPANSION.
 - A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE PER UNIT PER MONTH TO SUPPORT
 THE OPERATION OF THE CITY'S TROLLEY SYSTEM, AS
 ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION FROM
 TIME TO TIME.
  
 2. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 WITHIN CWD 10-12 DISTRICT, THE PODIUM GOES UP TO LEVEL
 5. SUBMITTED PLANS ARE ONLY SHOWING PLANAR BREAKS FOR
 GROUND FLOOR. SIMILAR TO SHEET A0.5.5 PLEASE SHOW
 PLANER BREAKS FOR FLOORS 2-5 ALONG THE DATURA FRONTAGE.
 PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS AND AREA SHADED TO COUNT
 ONLY THE PORTIONS WHERE THE PRIMARY FACE OR PLANE OF
 THE BUILDING IS INTERRUPTED BY A 3 FT. + PROJECTION OR
 RECESSED AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 DEPTH OF THE RECESS OR PROJECTION AS WELL.
 SHEET A0.5.6 AND A0.5.7 IS NOT NEEDED OR CALCULATIONS
 DO NOT NEED TO BE PROVIDED; AS PLANAR BREAKS ARE ONLY
 FOR BUILDING FRONTAGES LONGER THAN 150 FT. AND ON
 STREETS; IN THIS CASE ONLY THE DATURA FRONTAGE. BECAUSE
 THE HISTORIC BUILDING ALONG DIXIE ALREADY PROVIDES A
 BREAK IN THE MASS AND IS ONLY 141???-3??? IN WIDTH.
  
 3. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 PLEASE REVISE SHEET A0.03 AND L-203
 MINOR TEXT CORRECTION, OVERHEAD COVER IS NOT REQUIRED,
 IT IS JUST PERMITTED UP TO A MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF THE
 SPACE. WITHIN THE ROOFTOP GARDEN CALCULATIONS IT???S
 NOTED ???REQUIRED 30%???.
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON GROUND FLOOR (GARDEN) IS NOT
 NEEDED AS THE REQUIREMENT IS MET WITH ROOFTOP GARDEN.
 ALSO IF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS LOCATED ON GROUND FLOOR,
 IT MUST BE DESIGNED TO MEET PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS AND BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. RECOMMEND
 REMOVING REFERENCE TO GROUND FLOOR PRIVATE SPACE.
 SATISFIED REQUIREMENT WITH ROOFTOP SPACE.
  
 4. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 5. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 6. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SITE
 VISIBILITY CAN BE ADJUSTED TO BE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
 INTERSECTION WITH THE DRIVEWAY. SEE SEC. 94-305 FOR
 MORE INFORMATION OR REFER TO FIGURE X-1.
  
 7. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 [REPEAT COMMENT]: PLEASE NOTE FAR CALCULATIONS ARE THE
 SAME AS GBA. PER SECTION 94-109. GROSS BUILDING AREA
 MEANS THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING, INCLUDING
 AIR- CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,
 ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP, SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND
 LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA
 DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES,
 PORCHES AND BALCONIES; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
 SPACES; AND TRASH ROOMS. STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS
 AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL
 VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR CIRCULATION SHALL NOT BE
 INCLUDED. GROSS BUILDING AREA REQUIREMENTS:
 1. ANY PORTION OF THE PARKING AREA WHICH EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM PARKING RATIO SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
 CALCULATIONS OF GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
 STALLS AND ALL ASSOCIATED CIRCULATION AREAS.
 2. PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE SHALL NOT BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 3. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
 OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS.
  
 YOUR FAR CALCULATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE BOTH ELEVATORS
 AND STAIRWELLS.
 DATA TABLE AND FIGURES ON A0.04 APPEAR TO HAVE
 DISCREPANCIES IN CALCULATIONS. IT IS STILL UNCLEAR TO
 STAFF WHAT SPACES ARE COUNTING TOWARD TOTAL FAR AND
 WHAT IS BEING OMITTED; DUE TO BEING A
 MECHANICAL/ELECTRIC ROOM, OR PARKING.
 STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO SIMPLIFY THE CALCULATIONS
 TABLE INTO A SINGLE ONE RATHER THAN SPLITTING INTO TWO
 COMPONENTS.
 STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS A SIMPLE TWO-TONED GRAPHIC FOR
 FAR ON SHEET A0.04.
 BLANK OR WHITE SPACE = AREAS NOT COUNTED TOWARD FAR
 TOTAL
 RED OR SOME OTHER COLOR = SPACE THAT IS COUNTED TOWARD
 FAR TOTAL
  
 8. ZONING REVIEW 4.20.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 9. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 PREVIOUS 12.09.22 SUBMITTAL HAD SETBACKS ALONG DATURA
 MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE ON-STREET PARKING.
  
 WITHIN THIS 3.24.23 SUBMITTAL THE SETBACK IS BEING
 MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB, HOWEVER, THE
 PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE IS THE INTERIOR CURB LINE
 OF THE ON-STREET PARKING. PLEASE ADJUST.
 SHEET A3.01 IS SHOWING TWO DIFFERENT SETBACKS ON THE
 DATURA FRONTAGE.
 SEE SEC. 94-109 SETBACK DEFINITION FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
  
 10. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] HISTORIC BUILDING
 LEGAL NONCONFORMING, DOES NOT NEED TO MEET TRANSPARENCY
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 11. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED] RESTRICTIVE
 COVENANT AND RECORDED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE A CONDITION
 OF APPROVAL
  
 12. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 13. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 14. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 15. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 FROM 1.19.23 COMMENTS
 1. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [SATISFIED]
  
 2. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 ON SHEET A3.01 AND OTHERS THE BIKE RACKS ARE SHOWN
 PARALLEL TO SIDEWALK, IS THE 8FT. CLEAR PATH MAINTAINED
 WITH THE BIKES IN THIS POSITION? SHEET A0.6.2 SHOWS
 UTILIZATION OF???INVERTED U??? RACKS, WITH THESE RACKS
 THE BIKES ARE TYPICALLY PERPENDICULAR TO SIDEWALK AS IT
 IS EASIER TO ACCESS FOR USERS. SPACES CAN BE PARALLEL
 BUT RECOMMEND PLACING THEM ON A SEPARATE PAD WITHIN
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER OR ANOTHER DEDICATED SPACE, AS THIS
 MAINTAINS THE 8FT. CLEARANCE ON SIDEWALK.
 MICROMOBILITY STATION AND STREETLIGHTS STILL APPEAR TO
 OVERLAP STREET TREE LOCATIONS.
  
 3. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 STREET TREE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY ALONG DATURA
 STREET ARE NOT SPACED 30FT. APART. THERE IS THE WIDTH
 OF THE DRIVEWAY AND THE MICROMOBILITY STATION
 INTERRUPTING THE TREE CONTINUITY. PLEASE RECONFIGURE
 TREES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY OR A VARIANCE MUST
 BE REQUESTED AS IT DOES NOT MEET CODE PROVISION OF SEC.
 94-113(D.)(2.)
  
 4. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED] ON THE NORTH
 EASTERN CORNER OF PROJECT, THE STAIRWELL ENCROACHES
 INTO THE SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST TO BE OUTSIDE OF
 REQUIRED 5FT. SETBACK. ALSO PLEASE REMOVE PLANTERS
 WITHIN 5 FT. SETBACK, SHOULD BE HEDGES PLANTED AT 2-3
 FOOT INTERVALS AND SHADE TREES EVERY 30 FT.
  
 5. ZONING REVIEW 4.24.23 [NOT SATISFIED]
 PER SEC. 94-113(F.)(1.) A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS
 NEEDED WITH SHRUBS PLANTED AT 2 OR 3 FT. INTERVALS AS
 WELL AS SHADE TREES PLANTED AT 30 FT. INTERVALS.
 SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT SHOW SHADE TREES. PLEASE REMOVE
 PLANTERS AND ENCROACHING STAIRWELL.
  
 ZONING COMMENTS 4.24.23:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE SIDEWALK AND CLEARPATH WIDTH FOR BOTH
 DATURA AND S. DIXIE FRONTAGES. 8FT. CLEAR PATH REQUIRED
 ON DATURA STREET FRONTAGE, SOUTH DIXIE HWY FRONTAGE TO
 MAINTAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK WIDTH OR INCREASE COMPLIANCE
 WITH REQUIRED 8FT. ALSO PROVIDE WIDTH OF LANDSCAPE
 STRIP ALONG DATURA AND S DIXIE FRONTAGE. MICRO-MOBILITY
 STATION CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 STRIP ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY OR CURBCUT WHERE IT
 INTERSECTS WITH THE PROPERTY LINE, DIMENSION CANNOT
 EXCEED 25FT.
 3. ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS, PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT OF
 ROOFTOP ELEMENTS (TRELLIS, DECORATIVE ELEMENTS, ETC.),
 EACH ELEMENT MUST MEET THE PROJECTION STANDARDS OF SEC.
 94-109 TABLE IV-5.
 4. PER SEC. 94-112 ALLEYS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY:
 INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. ALL PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENTS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 50,000 GROSS
 SQUARE FEET SHALL HAVE ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE
 CONNECTIONS, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE AND ELECTRIC
 DISTRIBUTION SERVICE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND.
 5. PLEASE WALLMOUNT FDC IF LOCATED ALONG DATURA
 FRONTAGE, AND PROVIDE SOME LANDSCAPING OR SCREENING SO
 LONG AS ACCESS IS NOT HINDERED.
 6. ON THE NORTH EASTERN CORNER OF PROJECT, THE
 STAIRWELL ENCROACHES INTO THE SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST TO
 BE OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED 5FT. SETBACK.
 7. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND BUILDING BASE
 PLANTING ON THE REAR SURFACE PARKING DOES NOT SEEM
 VIABLE AS IT IS UNDER THE AMENITY DECK/ROOF, THESE
 AREAS WILL NOT HAVE DIRECT SUNLIGHT OR OPEN-AIR ACCESS.
 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES CONTRIBUTION OR ART LOCATION ON
 SITE MUST BE IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO TAKING THE SITE PLAN
 TO DAC.
 9. LANDSCAPE PLANS CONFLICT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS,
 TREE LOCATIONS APPEAR TO DIFFER OR INTERFERE WITH SITE
 ELEMENTS. BE SURE TO SHOW ON BOTH THE LANDSCAPE AND
 ARCHITECTURE PLANS THE LOCATION OF ANY STREETSCAPE
 ELEMENT (BIKERACK, LIGHTS, STREET TREES, FURNITURE,
 METERS/VAULTS, PLANTERS, ETC.)
 10. PLEASE LIST AND IDENTIFY ANY ZONING VARIANCES THAT
 ARE REQUESTED.
  
  
 THERE ARE MANY OUTSTANDING ZONING COMMENTS POSSIBLY DUE
 TO MISINTERPRETATION OR CONFUSION WITH CODE ELEMENTS
 AND/OR SITE CHANGES FROM THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL HAS
 OUTLINED OR CAUSED NEW COMMENTS. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO
 SUGGEST AN IN-PERSON MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT/DESIGN
 TEAM TO CLARIFY THE REMAINING ZONING COMMENTS SO THAT
 THE NEXT SUBMITTAL MORE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSES COMMENTS
 AND IS OKAYED FOR THE NEXT STEP IN THE DESIGN PROCESS
 (DAC APPROVAL).
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 [email protected] 561-822-1426
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 01-24-2023 Time 11:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 01-24-2023 Time 11:41 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-24 11:41:56DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 (561) 822-1426
 [email protected]
  
 1.) BICYCLE PARKING NOT INCLUDED, PLEASE PROVIDE BIKE
 SPACES MEETING THE REQUIRED STANDARDS:
 A. 1 BIKE SPACE PER 15 PARKING SPACES? 12 SPACES WITHIN
 BUILDING
 B. 1 BIKE SPACE PER 100 FT. OF FRONTAGE? 3 SPACE ALONG
 ROW/EXTERIOR
 BIKE RACKS ARE SHOWN ON DATURA FRONTAGE, PLEASE PROVIDE
 DETAILS AS TO THE SPACING BETWEEN RACKS AND THE TYPE OF
 RACKS USE TO SECURE THE BIKES. PLEASE DETAIL THE
 INTERNAL BIKE STORAGE ROOM FOR RESIDENTS, INCLUDE
 DIMENSIONS, SPACING DETAILS, AND METHODS OF SECURING
 BIKES.
 RESPONSE: PLASE REFER TO SHEET A 1.00, , PROJECT DATA
 WAS UPDATED TO SHOW THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTS IN THE PROJECT, SHEET
 A0.6.2 INCLUDES DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE RACKS PROPOSED
 IN THE PROJECT AND SHEET A3.01 SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE
 RESIDENTS BICYCLE STORAGE AND STREET RACKS.
  
 ZONING 1/19/23: [NOT SATISFIED] SHEET A100 DATA TABLE
 IS INCORRECTLY LABELED FOR THE PARKING SECTION. ZONING
 IS CWD-10 (CWD 10-12 INCENTIVE DISTRICT).
  
 PARKING IS REQUIRED WITHIN THIS SUBDISTRICT AT THE
 FOLLOWING RATIOS:
  
 RESIDENTIAL ??? MIN. 1 SPACE PER UNIT PLUS 1 SPACE PER
 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING. MAX. IS 2 SPACES PER UNIT
 PLUS 1 SPACE PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING.
  
 RETAIL/COMMERCIAL/RESTAURANT ??? MIN. IS 2 SPACES PER
 1,000 SF. MAX. 4 SPACES PER 1,000 SF. FLOORS 3-12
 PROVIDE 140 UNITS, PARKING CALCULATION ONLY SPECIFIES
 95 SPACES PROVIDED, DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM.
  
 NOTE BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED, 1 SPACE PER 100
 LINEAR FEET (LOCATION WITHIN ROW)
  
 PLEASE REVISE DATA TABLE TO CORRECTLY REFLECT REQUIRED
 AND PROVIDED PARKING.
  
 2. NO FACADE ARTICULATION SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE TO
 STANDARDS, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON FENESTRATION,
 TRANSPARENCY, PLANAR BREAKS, ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS,
 ETC. PLEASE REFERENCE SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-4 FOR FACADE
 ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE ILLUSTRATIONS
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE AND TABULAR CALCULATIONS SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEETS A0.5.1 TO SHEET A0.5.8
 GRAPHIC AND TABULAR INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED TO SHOW
 CODE COMPLIANCE WITH FENESTRATION, TRANSPARENCY AND
 PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMETS.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 ACTIVE USE CALCULATIONS AND TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS
 FOR THE 120 S DIXIE BUILDING (HISTORICALLY ELIGIBLE
 STRUCTURE) AS PART OF SHEET A0.5.3 AND A0.5.8.
  
 ON SHEET A0.5.5, A0.5.6, AND A0.5.7, THE TOWER PLANAR
 BREAK DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT, PLEASE REMOVE.
  
 REGARDING THE GROUND-PODIUM PLANAR BREAK (FLOORS 1-5)
 PLEASE ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS AND AREA SHADED IN SHEET
 A0.5.6 TO COUNT ONLY THE PORTIONS WHERE THE PRIMARY
 FACE OR PLANE OF THE BUILDING IS INTERRUPTED BY A 3 FT.
 + PROJECTION OR RECESSED AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 DIMENSION OF THE DEPTH OF THE RECESS OR PROJECTION AS
 WELL.
  
 REQUIREMENTS APPEAR TO BE MET, THE GRAPHIC
 REPRESENTATION OR TOTAL CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT.
  
 3. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IS 25% OF LOT AREA,
 REQUIRING 9,788SF. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THIS SPACE IS
 PROVIDED ON THE PLANS, IS THE TERRACE MEETING THIS
 REQUIREMENT? PLEASE BE SURE TO LABEL AND INCLUDE THE
 PERMITTED PRIVATE OPEN SPACES PER SEC. 94-109 TABLE
 IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7. PROPERLY LABEL THE TYPE OF PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE PROVIDED AND BE SURE TO DETAIL HOW THE
 REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEETS A0.03, PRIVATE OPENS
 SPACE CALCULATION DIAGRAM WAS ADDED.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE PROVIDE ON SHEET
 A0.03 THE CALCULATION AND BREAKDOWN OF THE PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED:
  
 I.E. REQUIRED 25% LOT AREA = 9810SF, 30% VEGETATED =
 2,943, MAX. 30% OVERHEAD COVER, AND TREE CANOPY 20%.
 THEN PROVIDE THE ACTUAL COUNT PROVIDED FOR EACH.
  
 4. SHEET A2.00, DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT CURRENT
 STREETSCAPE CONDITIONS ALONG S. DIXIE HIGHWAY, THERE
 ARE TWO EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG THE
 WESTERN SIDE OF THE ROAD.
 RESPONSE: SITE PLAN WAS UPDATED TO REFLECT CURRENT
 STREETSCAPE CONDITIONS ALONG S. DIXIE HIGHWAY
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 5. SHEET A2.00 ILLUSTRATES A PROPOSED ON-STREET DROP
 OFF, STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE INCLUSION OF THIS
 ON-STREET DROP-OFF AS THERE IS NOT ADEQUATE SPACE TO
 PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING AND AN
 8FT. CLEAR SIDEWALK.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A200 AND A301, STREET
 DROP OFF WAS REMOVED FROM DIXIE HWY.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 6. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES FROM THE
 DRIVEWAY ACCESS, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO VERIFY THERE ARE
 NO OBSTRUCTIONS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A301, VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES WERE ADDED TO THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND NOTE
 INDICATING HEIGHT OF THE PLANTERS AND GLASS HANDRAIL
 PROPOSED ON THE EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 NOTE: SITE VISIBILITY CAN BE ADJUSTED TO BE FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE INTERSECTION WITH THE DRIVEWAY. SEE SEC.
 94-305 FOR MORE INFORMATION OR REFER TO FIGURE X-1.
  
 7. PLEASE INCLUDE AN FAR DIAGRAM, ILLUSTRATING WHICH
 ROOMS ARE COUNTED TOWARD FAR AND THOSE THAT ARE NOT.
 PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE A TABULAR BREAKDOWN OF THESE SPACES
 AND FAR CALCULATIONS. SHEET A0.04 SEEMS TO PROVIDE SOME
 DETAIL BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT IS OR ISN???T
 COUNTED. THE COLOR COORDINATION IS NOT CLEAR. PLEASE
 NOTE FAR CALCULATIONS ARE THE SAME AS GBA. PER SECTION
 94-109. GROSS BUILDING AREA MEANS THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA
 OF A BUILDING, INCLUDING AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY
 ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES, ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP,
 SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR
 AREAS, AND EXTERNAL UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE
 GROSS BUILDING AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS;
 UNENCLOSED COLONNADES, PORCHES AND BALCONIES;
 MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SPACES; AND TRASH ROOMS.
 STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES
 THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR
 CIRCULATION SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED. GROSS BUILDING AREA
 REQUIREMENTS:
  
 1. ANY PORTION OF THE PARKING AREA WHICH EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM PARKING RATIO SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
 CALCULATIONS OF GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
 STALLS AND ALL ASSOCIATED CIRCULATION AREAS.
 2. PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE SHALL NOT BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 3. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
 OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEETS A0.04.2 INFORMATION
 RELATED TO FAR CALCULATIONS WAS INCLUDED.
  
 ZONING 1/19/23: [NOT SATISFIED] FAR CALCULATION DOES
 INCLUDE ELEVATOR WELLS AND STAIRCASES. FAR CALCULATION
 IS BASED UPON THE STANDARDS WITHIN THE DEFINITION FOR
 GROSS BUILDING AREA ??? SEC. 94-109. PLEASE REVISE
 CALCULATIONS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FAR FOR THE HISTORICALLY ELIGIBLE
 STRUCTURE AS WELL, THIS BUILDING COUNTS TOWARDS THE
 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT CALCULATION FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT
 SITE/LOT. PLEASE BE SURE THIS GROSS BUILDING AREA AND
 FAR IS INCLUDED ON SHEET A100.
  
 8. BECAUSE THE PROJECT IS SEEKING TO UTILIZE TDRS AND
 THE HEIGHT/FAR INCENTIVE, PER SECTION. 94-131 ELIGIBLE
 HISTORIC STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN THE SUBJECT SITE ARE
 PRESERVED ACCORDING TO THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR
 STANDARDS, AND INTEGRATED AS PART OF THE NEW
 DEVELOPMENT IN A MANNER WHICH MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY
 OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE. AS SUCH, PLEASE INCLUDE
 PLANS, DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, AND ANY
 IMPROVEMENTS/RENOVATIONS TO THE DATURA STATION
 BUILDING.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEETS A0.7.1 A NEW SHEET WAS
 INCLUDED DESCRIBING THE SCOPE OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
 HISTORINC BUILDING.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 9. PLEASE OVERLAY AND PROVIDE SETBACK LINES ON SITE
 PLANS, FLOOR PLANS, AND ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
 RESPONSE: ALL DRAWINGS WERE UPDATED TO SHOW PROPERTY
 LINE AND SETBACKS IN BOTH FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
 DRAWINGS
 ZONING 1/19/23: [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SETBACKS SHOWN ON
 DRAWINGS, HOWEVER GROUND FLOOR SETBACK ALONG DATURA
 INCORRECTLY MEASURED. SETBACK IS FROM THE BACK OF THE
 CURB. PLANS SHOW FROM INSIDE ON-STREET PARKING. SHEET
 A2.00, SHEET A3.01, SHEET A4.02, SHEET A4.03,
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS AND TABULAR
 CALCULATIONS, PLEASE NOTE PER SEC. 94-109: ACTIVE USE
 MEANS A USE WITHIN AN ENCLOSED BUILDING DESIGNED FOR
 HUMAN OCCUPATION WITH A DIRECT VIEW TO ADJACENT STREETS
 OR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS:
 1. ACTIVE USES ARE REGULATED AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE
 BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE. IN THOSE CASES WHERE PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE IS PROVIDED ALONG THE FRONTAGE LINE, THE
 OPEN SPACE MAY BE COUNTED AS ACTIVE USE AS LONG AS
 ACTIVE USES ARE PROVIDED ON THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE
 BUILDING ADJOINING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
  
 RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES NOT INTENDED TO ATTRACT
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO COUNT AS
 THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT IN THE GROUND FLOOR
 ALONG PRIMARYPEDESTRIAN STREETS, UNLESS OPEN TO THE
 GENERAL PUBLIC. SUCH AMENITIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT
 LIMITED TO GYMS, MOVIE ROOMS, AND YOGA ROOMS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.5.8 GRAPHIC AND
 TABULAR INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED TO SHOW CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PLEASE INCLUDE
 THE HISTORIC BUILDING WITHIN THE ACTIVE USE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE DATURA ST. FRONTAGE AND PROVIDE
 THE S DIXIE HWY ACTIVE USE CALCULATIONS AS WELL. PLEASE
 CLARIFY WITHIN THE TABULAR DATA THE LINEAR LENGTH OF
 ACTIVE FRONTAGE AND THE PERCENTAGE, CURRENTLY ONLY
 SHOWS THE TRANSPARENCY AND PERCENTAGE.
  
 11. DUE TO THE INCLUSION OF STACKERS, PER SEC. 94-111
 (K.): MECHANICAL AND AUTOMATED PARKING. PARKING
 STRUCTURES WITH MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL PROVIDE A
 COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT DURING THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE
 FACILITY. SUCH OPERATION SHALL BE ENFORCED THROUGH A
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
 ALL RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED
 TO BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
 RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE STACKERS.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A300, STACKERS WERE
 REMOVED FROM THE PARKING GARAGE AND NO COMMERCIAL
 ATTENDANT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND RECORDED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE
 A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE PARKING STRIPING AND DIMENSION
 DETAIL PER FIGURE XV-2 IN SECTION 94-485
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET A0.6.0, A300, A301,
 PARKING SPACE DETAIL WAS ADDED TO SHOW PARKING SPACES
 DIMS AND STRIPING DETAIL AS PER SEC.94-485, FIG. XV-2
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 13. FOR RESIDENTIAL USES, TANDEM PARKING, IF PROVIDED,
 MAY COUNT AS TWO SPACES, PROVIDED BOTH SPACES ARE
 DEDICATED TO THE SAME RESIDENTIAL UNIT, AND A
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS RECORDED ON CITY APPROVED
 FORMS, AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
 RESPONSE: NOTED
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 14. ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW THE PARKING RAMPS AT 16%.
 PARKING RAMP MAXIMUM SLOPE. MAXIMUM SLOPES FOR PARKING
 RAMPS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AND
 SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX PERCENT. NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL
 NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14
 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE
 PREFERRED STANDARD IS TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP
 SLOPES.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEETS A300, A301, A500, A
 501, NOTES INDICATING THE RAMP BREAK AT THE BEGINNING
 AND THE END OF THE RAMP WERE INCLUDED (RAMP TRANSITION
 ??)
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
  
 15. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SPACE.
 RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEETS A300, A301, A500 AND
 A501, A NOTE INDICATING THE RAMP TRANSITIONS AT THE
 BEGINNING AND END PORTION WAS INCLUDED.
 ZONING 1/19/23: [SATISFIED]
  
 ZONING 1.19.23 ??? NEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE HISTORICALLY ELIGIBLE STRUCTURE FRONTING DIXIE
 MUST BE INCLUDED WITHIN ALL BUILDING REQUIREMENT AND
 SITE CALCULATIONS. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: FAR,
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT, LOT COVERAGE, GROSS BUILDING AREA,
 AND PARKING CALCULATIONS. BE SURE TO UPDATE ALL
 ACCOMPANYING SHEETS AND DATA TABLES.
  
 2. ON SHEET A2.00 PLEASE ADDRESS GRAPHIC ISSUES WITH
 MICROMOBILITY AND BIKE RACKS LOCATED WITHIN TREES,
 PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THE SQUARE ITEMS ARE BETWEEN THE
 TREES AND WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE STRIP (ARE THESE
 TREEGRATES OR CONCRETE PADS FOR THE BIKES?)
  
 3. STREETSCAPE ALONG DATURA STREET DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 MEET THE MAXIMUM SPACING OF TREES PER SEC.
 94-113(D.)(2.) MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 30 FT. ON CENTER.
 TREES ON EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY APPEAR TO EXCEED 30
 FT.
  
 4. ON SHEET A2.00 AND A3.01, PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE
 SURFACE PARKING ON THE GROUND LEVEL WORKS? IT APPEARS
 THAT THERE ARE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS OR POSTS WITHIN THE
 5??? REAR SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE
 OVERHEAD TRELLIS STRUCTURE.
  
 5. PER SEC. 94-113(F.) SURFACE PARKING LOTS. ALL
 OFF-STREET SURFACE PARKING LOTS SHALL MEET THE
 FOLLOWING LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS:
  
 A) SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPE BUFFER. SURFACE PARKING LOTS
 SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM GROUND FLOOR SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS AS PROVIDED IN THE SUBDISTRICT BUILDING
 REQUIREMENTS TABLE. A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL
 BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO THE GROUND FLOOR SETBACK TO
 VISUALLY SCREEN PARKING AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 SHALL BE COMPRISED OF A HEDGE PLANTED AT TWO-FOOT TO
 THREE-FOOT INTERVALS AND MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 OF 36 INCHES AT MATURITY. SHADE TREES SHALL BE PLANTED
 AT 30-FOOT INTERVALS. A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED MEETING THESE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SURFACE LOT. SURFACE
 PARKING AREAS LOCATED BEHIND BUILDINGS ARE EXEMPT FROM
 THE FRONT SETBACK LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 B) TERMINAL ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND DIVIDER
 MEDIANS. ALL OTHER PARKING AREA LANDSCAPING SHALL MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER XIV.
  
 PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO PROVIDE THE 5??? LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER FOR PARKING.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 10-13-2022 Time 12:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 10-13-2022 Time 12:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-13 12:15:591. BICYCLE PARKING NOT INCLUDED, PLEASE PROVIDE BIKE
 SPACES MEETING THE REQUIRED STANDARDS:
 A. 1 BIKE SPACE PER 15 PARKING SPACES ??? 12 SPACES
 WITHIN BUILDING
 B. 1 BIKE SPACE PER 100 FT. OF FRONTAGE ??? 3 SPACE
 ALONG ROW/EXTERIOR
  
 BIKE RACKS ARE SHOWN ON DATURA FRONTAGE, PLEASE PROVIDE
 DETAILS AS TO THE SPACING BETWEEN RACKS AND THE TYPE OF
 RACKS USE TO SECURE THE BIKES. PLEASE DETAIL THE
 INTERNAL BIKE STORAGE ROOM FOR RESIDENTS, INCLUDE
 DIMENSIONS, SPACING DETAILS, AND METHODS OF SECURING
 BIKES.
  
 2. NO FA??ADE ARTICULATION SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE TO
 STANDARDS, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON FENESTRATION,
 TRANSPARENCY, PLANAR BREAKS, ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS,
 ETC. PLEASE REFERENCE SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-4 FOR
 FA??ADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE
 ILLUSTRATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE AND TABULAR
 CALCULATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE.
  
 3. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IS 25% OF LOT AREA,
 REQUIRING 9,788SF. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THIS SPACE IS
 PROVIDED ON THE PLANS, IS THE TERRACE MEETING THIS
 REQUIREMENT? PLEASE BE SURE TO LABEL AND INCLUDE THE
 PERMITTED PRIVATE OPEN SPACES PER SEC. 94-109 TABLE
 IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7. PROPERLY LABEL THE TYPE OF PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE PROVIDED AND BE SURE TO DETAIL HOW THE
 REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
  
 4. SHEET A2.00, DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT CURRENT
 STREETSCAPE CONDITIONS ALONG S. DIXIE HIGHWAY, THERE
 ARE TWO EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG THE
 WESTERN SIDE OF THE ROAD.
  
 5. SHEET A2.00 ILLUSTRATES A PROPOSED ON-STREET DROP
 OFF, STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE INCLUSION OF THIS
 ON-STREET DROP-OFF AS THERE IS NOT ADEQUATE SPACE TO
 PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING AND AN
 8FT. CLEAR SIDEWALK.
  
 6. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES FROM THE
 DRIVEWAY ACCESS, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO VERIFY THERE ARE
 NO OBSTRUCTIONS.
  
 7. PLEASE INCLUDE AN FAR DIAGRAM, ILLUSTRATING WHICH
 ROOMS ARE COUNTED TOWARD FAR AND THOSE THAT ARE NOT.
 PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE A TABULAR BREAKDOWN OF THESE SPACES
 AND FAR CALCULATIONS. SHEET A0.04 SEEMS TO PROVIDE SOME
 DETAIL BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT IS OR ISN???T
 COUNTED. THE COLOR COORDINATION IS NOT CLEAR.
 PLEASE NOTE FAR CALCULATIONS ARE THE SAME AS GBA. PER
 SECTION 94-109.
 GROSS BUILDING AREA MEANS THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF A
 BUILDING, INCLUDING AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED
 STORAGE SPACES, ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP, SUCH AS
 BATHROOMS AND LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND
 EXTERNAL UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE GROSS
 BUILDING AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS;
 UNENCLOSED COLONNADES, PORCHES AND BALCONIES;
 MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SPACES; AND TRASH ROOMS.
 STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES
 THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR
 CIRCULATION SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED.
 GROSS BUILDING AREA REQUIREMENTS:
  
 1. ANY PORTION OF THE PARKING AREA WHICH EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM PARKING RATIO SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
 CALCULATIONS OF GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
 STALLS AND ALL ASSOCIATED CIRCULATION AREAS.
 2. PARKING LOCATED BELOW GRADE SHALL NOT BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 3. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
 OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS.
  
  
 8. BECAUSE THE PROJECT IS SEEKING TO UTILIZE TDRS AND
 THE HEIGHT/FAR INCENTIVE, PER SECTION. 94-131 ELIGIBLE
 HISTORIC STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN THE SUBJECT SITE ARE
 PRESERVED ACCORDING TO THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR
 STANDARDS, AND INTEGRATED AS PART OF THE NEW
 DEVELOPMENT IN A MANNER WHICH MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY
 OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE.
 AS SUCH, PLEASE INCLUDE PLANS, DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, AND
 ANY IMPROVEMENTS/RENOVATIONS TO THE DATURA STATION
 BUILDING.
  
 9. PLEASE OVERLAY AND PROVIDE SETBACK LINES ON SITE
 PLANS, FLOOR PLANS, AND ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS AND TABULAR
 CALCULATIONS, PLEASE NOTE PER SEC. 94-109:
 ACTIVE USE MEANS A USE WITHIN AN ENCLOSED BUILDING
 DESIGNED FOR HUMAN OCCUPATION WITH A DIRECT VIEW TO
 ADJACENT STREETS OR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
 ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS:
 1. ACTIVE USES ARE REGULATED AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE
 BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE. IN THOSE CASES WHERE PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE IS PROVIDED ALONG THE FRONTAGE LINE, THE
 OPEN SPACE MAY BE COUNTED AS ACTIVE USE AS LONG AS
 ACTIVE USES ARE PROVIDED ON THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE
 BUILDING ADJOINING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
  
 RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES NOT INTENDED TO ATTRACT
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TOCOUNT AS
 THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT IN THE GROUND FLOOR
 ALONG PRIMARYPEDESTRIAN STREETS, UNLESS OPEN TO THE
 GENERAL PUBLIC. SUCH AMENITIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE
 NOTLIMITED TO GYMS, MOVIE ROOMS, AND YOGA ROOMS.
  
 11. DUE TO THE INCLUSION OF STACKERS, PER SEC. 94-111
 (K.): MECHANICAL AND AUTOMATED PARKING. PARKING
 STRUCTURES WITH MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL PROVIDE A
 COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT DURING THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE
 FACILITY. SUCH OPERATION SHALL BE ENFORCED THROUGH A
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
 ALL RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED
 TO BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
 RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE STACKERS.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE PARKING STRIPING AND DIMENSION
 DETAIL PER FIGURE XV-2 IN SECTION 94-485
  
 13. FOR RESIDENTIAL USES, TANDEM PARKING, IF PROVIDED,
 MAY COUNT AS TWO SPACES, PROVIDED BOTH SPACES ARE
 DEDICATED TO THE SAME RESIDENTIAL UNIT, AND A
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS RECORDED ON CITY APPROVED
 FORMS, AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 14. ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW THE PARKING RAMPS AT 16%.
 PARKING RAMP MAXIMUM SLOPE. MAXIMUM SLOPES FOR PARKING
 RAMPS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AND
 SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX PERCENT. NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL
 NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14
 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE
 PREFERRED STANDARD IS TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP
 SLOPES.
  
 PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SPACE.
  
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 822-1426 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved