Plan Review Details - Project Z22090013
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22090013
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-31-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 10-11-2022 Time 13:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 10-31-2022 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-11 13:42:45 
 POTENTIAL SITE IDENTIFIED ON SITE PLAN - MEETS PUBLIC
 ART LOCATION REQUIREMENT
  
 SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT - PLACE HOLDER FOR
 PUBLIC ART SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED ON ALL SITE PLANS.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 11-07-2022 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-07-2022 Time 15:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-07 15:53:55DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. INFORMATIONAL: DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS.
 AN ASBESTOS SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS
 ABATEMENT REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT
 PALM BEACH COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561)
 837-5963, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. INFORMATIONAL: BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
 BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF
 CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN
 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. INFORMATIONAL: BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE AND OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
 BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING
 SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND OPENING
 PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 5. INFORMATIONAL: ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE
 PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR
 SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN
 OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED
 PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE
 LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED
 METHODS.
  
 6. INFORMATIONAL: SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL
 APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED
 BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND
 FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS,
 GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
 INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
 IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. INFORMATIONAL: CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY
 OWNER AND CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR
 PARKING OF CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT
 ON ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. INFORMATIONAL: PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
 PROPERTY OWNER AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE
 OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY
 THE OCCUPANTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL
 STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR
 PROPERTY.
  
 9. INFORMATIONAL: BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE
 BUILDING, AND UNIT WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM
 THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED
 BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR
 STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-12-2022 Time 20:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-12-2022 Time 20:47 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-12 20:53:50DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ???VAN ACCESSIBLE??? AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 8. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF ANY OF THE RETAIL SPACES WILL
 BE RESTAURANT USE, A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 10. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 11. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 12. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 13. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-03-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-03-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 11-03-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By RROSSANO Date 09-26-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 09-26-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-26 13:13:53COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-29-2022 Time 13:30 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-29 13:38:18THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 THE PROPOSED FDC LOCATIONS ARE ACCETPABLE.
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
  
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND VAULT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE BY
 THE CITY'S UTILITY DEPARTMENT. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THEY
 ARE AWARE AND COORDINATE ANY CORRECTIONS/CHANGES.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER???S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC???S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC???S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE
 STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THERE WAS NO CLEAR INDICATION OF THE LOCATION OF THE
 FIRE COMMAND ROOM/CENTER.
  
 THE FCC SHOULD BE LOCATED IN AN AREA ACCESSIBLE FROM AN
 EXTERIOR WALL WITH ADDITIONAL ACCESS TO THE INTERIOR,
 IF POSSIBLE.
  
 THE LOCATION SHALL BE LOCATED IN COORDINATION WITH THE
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL.
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 PER NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
  
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
  
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. AREAS OF REFUGE SHALL COMPLY WHERE APPLICABLE PER
 THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS.
  
 17. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 18. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-27-2023 Time 11:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-27-2023 Time 11:40 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-27 11:41:16FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 515 FERN ST Z22090013
 MARCH 27, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
 SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS
 REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
 FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.
 11/29/22: SABAL PALMS QUALIFYING AS GOOD CONDITION ARE
 TO BE SHOWN AS RELOCATE. #6, 11, 12, 22, AND 23.
 CORRECT #65 AND 66 TO JACARANDA.
 PER A SITE VISIT ON 11/29, IT APPEARS TREES HAVE BEEN
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT BEING ISSUED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE,
 PTYCHOSPERMA ELEGANS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS A LARGE PALM
 TOWARD TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT.
  
 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
 MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
 EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED
 PER SECTION 94-113. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? SATISFIED. THE NEW ROAD REQUIRES STREET TREE
 CALCULATIONS FOR BOTH SIDES.
 ??? SATISFIED. PALMS CAN BE ADDED TO THE STREETSCAPE
 BUT ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD THE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT.
 MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET. FERN ST DOES NOT MEET THE
 SPACING REQUIREMENTS AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE NEW ROAD
 MUST PROVIDE 10 TREES.
 11/29/22: 30 FOOT MAXIMUM SPACING OF SHADE TREES IS
 POSSIBLE ON FERN STREET.
 ??? SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST BE IN THE REQUIRED 4
 FOOT WIDTH PLANTING STRIP ADJACENT TO THE CURB ON FERN
 ST.
 11/29/22: PLANTING STRIP MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND THE
 STREET TREES.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT
 OF 20 FEET. PROVIDE SPECIES LIVE OAKS OR CATHEDRAL
 CULTIVAR INSTEAD OF HIGH RISE CULTIVAR.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION
 94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.
 THE DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET LP-6 DOES NOT MATCH CITY
 DETAIL. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL. ROOT BARRIERS WILL CUT OFF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL, SO UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED I.E.
 GAS LINE ALONG FERN.
  
 6. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ON THE PLANT LIST:
 ??? SATISFIED. JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TOPIARY AND GREEN
 ISLAND FICUS TOPIARY MUST BE MOVED FROM THE TREE LIST
 TO THE SHRUB LIST.
 ??? SATISFIED. COCONUT IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT.
 ??? SATISFIED. CLUSIA GUTTIFERA CAN BE COUNTED AS A
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT.
  
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
 UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING. DRAINAGE LINES APPEAR
 TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 PLAZA.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/29/22:
 9. SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA ALONG
 THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. PALMS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED
 TREES. LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN FOR
 THE ACCESS LAYOUT.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW THE 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE 360 ROSEMARY PROPERTY BEING
 REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SIDEWALK. THIS WOULD
 REQUIRE AMENDING THE APPROVED LANDSCAPING FOR 360
 ROSEMARY.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-29-2022 Time 16:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-29-2022 Time 16:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-29 16:37:26FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 515 FERN ST Z22090013
 NOVEMBER 29, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
 PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5)
 STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF
 GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE
 ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
 POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.
 11/29/22: SABAL PALMS QUALIFYING AS GOOD CONDITION ARE
 TO BE SHOWN AS RELOCATE. #6, 11, 12, 22, AND 23.
 CORRECT #65 AND 66 TO JACARANDA.
 PER A SITE VISIT ON 11/29, IT APPEARS TREES HAVE BEEN
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT BEING ISSUED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE,
 PTYCHOSPERMA ELEGANS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS A LARGE PALM
 TOWARD TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT.
  
 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
 MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
 EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED
 PER SECTION 94-113. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? SATISFIED. THE NEW ROAD REQUIRES STREET TREE
 CALCULATIONS FOR BOTH SIDES.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PALMS CAN BE ADDED TO THE
 STREETSCAPE BUT ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD THE SHADE TREE
 REQUIREMENT. MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET. FERN ST DOES
 NOT MEET THE SPACING REQUIREMENTS AND THE WEST SIDE OF
 THE NEW ROAD MUST PROVIDE 10 TREES.
 11/29/22: 30 FOOT MAXIMUM SPACING OF SHADE TREES IS
 POSSIBLE ON FERN STREET.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST BE IN THE
 REQUIRED 4 FOOT WIDTH PLANTING STRIP ADJACENT TO THE
 CURB ON FERN ST.
 11/29/22: PLANTING STRIP MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND THE
 STREET TREES.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT
 OF 20 FEET. PROVIDE SPECIES LIVE OAKS OR CATHEDRAL
 CULTIVAR INSTEAD OF HIGH RISE CULTIVAR.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION
 94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.
 THE DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET LP-6 DOES NOT MATCH CITY
 DETAIL. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL. ROOT BARRIERS WILL CUT OFF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL, SO UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED I.E.
 GAS LINE ALONG FERN.
  
 6. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ON THE PLANT LIST:
 ??? SATISFIED. JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TOPIARY AND GREEN
 ISLAND FICUS TOPIARY MUST BE MOVED FROM THE TREE LIST
 TO THE SHRUB LIST.
 ??? SATISFIED. COCONUT IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT.
 ??? SATISFIED. CLUSIA GUTTIFERA CAN BE COUNTED AS A
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT.
  
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
 UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING. DRAINAGE LINES APPEAR
 TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 PLAZA.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/29/22:
 9. CLARIFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA ALONG THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
 PALMS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED TREES. LANDSCAPE
 PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN FOR THE ACCESS
 LAYOUT.
  
 10. THE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE 360 ROSEMARY PROPERTY BEING REMOVED AND
 REPLACED WITH A SIDEWALK. THIS WOULD REQUIRE AMENDING
 THE APPROVED LANDSCAPING FOR 360 ROSEMARY.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-04-2022 Time 12:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-04-2022 Time 12:22 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-04 12:23:46FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 515 FERN ST Z22090013
 OCTOBER 3, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS REPORT
 RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.
 2. FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, PTYCHOSPERMA
 ELEGANS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS A LARGE PALM TOWARD TREE
 CANOPY REQUIREMENT.
  
 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
 MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
 EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED
 PER SECTION 94-113. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? THE NEW ROAD REQUIRES STREET TREE CALCULATIONS FOR
 BOTH SIDES.
 ??? PALMS CAN BE ADDED TO THE STREETSCAPE BUT ARE NOT
 COUNTED TOWARD THE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. MAXIMUM
 SPACING IS 30 FEET. FERN ST DOES NOT MEET THE SPACING
 REQUIREMENTS AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE NEW ROAD MUST
 PROVIDE 10 TREES.
 ??? STREET TREES MUST BE IN THE REQUIRED 4 FOOT WIDTH
 PLANTING STRIP ADJACENT TO THE CURB ON FERN ST.
  
 4. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20
 FEET. PROVIDE SPECIES LIVE OAKS OR CATHEDRAL CULTIVAR
 INSTEAD OF HIGH RISE CULTIVAR.
  
 5. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113 AND
 PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. THE DETAIL
 PROVIDED ON SHEET LP-6 DOES NOT MATCH CITY DETAIL. THE
 AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH
 TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL
 SOIL. ROOT BARRIERS WILL CUT OFF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL,
 SO UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED I.E. GAS LINE ALONG
 FERN.
  
 6. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ON THE PLANT LIST:
 ??? JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TOPIARY AND GREEN ISLAND FICUS
 TOPIARY MUST BE MOVED FROM THE TREE LIST TO THE SHRUB
 LIST.
 ??? COCONUT IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT.
 ??? CLUSIA GUTTIFERA CAN BE COUNTED AS A FLORIDA NATIVE
 PLANT.
  
  
  
 7. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
 LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING. DRAINAGE LINES APPEAR TO BE IN
 CONFLICT WITH TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZA.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT
 WILL BE SCREENED.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 11-14-2022 Time 17:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 11-14-2022 Time 17:21 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 10-13-2022 Time 12:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 10-13-2022 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-13 12:12:561)
 -10??? CAS WM ON EVERNIA FROM 1927, EXTEND WATERMAIN TO
 VALVE EAST OF ROSEMARY.
 -CALL TO REMOVE EXISTING 10??? WM ON DEMOLITION PLAN.
 -CORRECT CALL OUT AT BOTTOM OF SHEET C-300
 -CALL TO CUT AND CAP UNUSED SERVICES AT THE MAIN.
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES
 -SHOW UNDERGROUND FRANCHISE UTILITIES
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-14-2022 Time 11:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-14 11:40:53-BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES APPEAR TO BE MISLABELED AND NEED
 TO BE UPDATED AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
 -LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS ON CIVIL PLANS NEED TO BE
 VERIFIED AND UPDATED AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 SUBMITTAL.
 -WATER METER VAULT LOCATION MAY NEED ADJUSTMENT AT
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
 -APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN WATER METER VAULT IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 10-07-2022 Time 13:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-07 13:45:36PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -ON SHEET C300 SOME OF THE CALLOUTS ARE GOING OFF THE
 BOTTOM AND SIDE OF PAGE AND UNREADABLE. PLEASE MAKE
 READABLE.
 -DRY UTILITIES IN ALLEY MAY BE MORE NUMEROUS THAN SHOWN
 ON DEMO PLAN.
 -VERIFY THAT REMOVAL OF UTILITIES IN ALLEY WILL NOT
 NEGATIVELY AFFECT 360 ROSEMARY UTILITY SERVICE.
 -PROPOSED 10 INCH WATER MAIN CANNOT BE PVC. UPDATE TO
 DIP.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING WATER MAIN VALVES. THERE
 MAY ALSO BE A NEW GATE VALVE SEVERAL FEET WEST OF
 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE TAP.
 -PROPOSED 6 INCH WATER METER IS NOT APPROVED
 UNDERGROUND IN VAULT. LABEL ABOVE GROUND VIA STANDARD
 DETAIL WS3 REV2019.
 -10 INCH CAS WM AT WEST SIDE OF EVERNIA MAY BE NEWER
 INSTALLED DIP.
 -PROPERTY OWNER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RECORD BACKFLOW
 COVENANT AS A CONDITION OF WATER SERVICE.
 -WPB UTILITIES RECOMMENDS INSTALLING PARALLEL DOMESTIC
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING
 BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
 -ON DEMO PLAN SHOW REMOVAL OF WATER SERVICE FOR
 EXISTING BUILDING NEAR NORTHWEST AREA OF PROPERTY.
 -SUBMIT SEPARATE LANDSCAPING SHEET OF GROUND FLOOR
 SHOWING UTILITIES AND PLANTS (TREES AND BUSHES). SHEET
 SHOULD SHOW SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN
 PLANTS AND UTILITIES. SOME UTILITIES ARE SHOWN ON
 CURRENT LANDSCAPING PLANS, BUT THE LOCATIONS DO NOT
 MATCH ENGINEERING PLANS.
 -SHEET C300, LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE TALL
 UTILITY POLE AND OVERHEAD UTILITY ON FERN STREET.
 -CURRENTLY THERE IS A DO NOT ENTER SIGN AND LEFT TURN
 ARROW GOING EAST ON EVERNIA ST. WILL THAT CHANGE?
 -C902 SHOWS VEHICLE USING DRIVEWAY OF 360 ROSEMARY
 PROPERTY. IS THERE A CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT?
 ALSO IS THAT THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE OF THE SERVICE AREA?
 -WOULD NEED PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON EVERNIA DUE TO
 UTILITY WORK.
 -WILL NEW ROAD NEAR EAST PROPERTY LINE HAVE AN ACCESS
 EASEMENT?
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-21-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-21-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-21-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-21 10:41:50CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1- SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICE FOR LARGE SIZE
 CONTAINERS (I.E. FOR 8+ CUB YD COMPACTOR, OR ROLL-OFF
 CONTAINER) SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH APPROVED VENDORS LISTED AT HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GO
 VERNMENT/PUBLIC-WORKS/SANITATION/COMMERCIAL-DUMPSTERS-C
 OMPACTORS.
 2- BEFORE THE FINAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE A
 SERVICE AVAILABILITY LETTER FROM THE APPROVED HAULER
 FOR THE GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICE BASED ON THE
 PROPOSED AUTOTURN PLAN FOR THE SANITATION COLLECTION
 VEHICLE.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. PF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 12:59:56PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
 CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE
 VEHICLE'S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS
 FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS
 5- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
 GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
 TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
 NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
 6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 7- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 8- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
 9- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-12-2022 Time 23:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-12-2022 Time 23:54 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-12 23:54:24THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. LABEL ALL UTILITIES (SIZE, MATERIAL).
  
 2. REVIEW SFWMD ERP APPLICATION 140917-4 REGARDING THE
 MANHOLE SHOWN WITHIN THE RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE PIPES
 CONNECTED TO THE MANHOLE. THE DEMOLITION PLAN FOR THE
 BRIGHTLINE STATION PERMIT CALLED FOR THESE TO BE
 REMOVED.
  
 3. THERE MAY BE A STORM PIPE CONNECTED TO THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE CATCH BASIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN ST.
 WEST OF THE F.E.C. R/W.
  
 4. IDENTIFY WHERE THE BRICKSLOT TRENCH DRAINS WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED.
  
 5. EXPLAIN HOW STORM WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK
 ATTENUATION WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 6. EXPLAIN WHAT THE WEST PIPE CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE
 YD-1 IS FOR.
  
 7. IS THE SOLID HATCHING IN THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY ALONG
 THE WEST PROPERTY LINE NECESSARY? IT IS COVERING UP
 MANY UTILITY LINES IN THE ALLEY.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-11-2022 Time 08:36 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-11 10:10:071. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. IT APPEARS THAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THE
 ALLEY PROCEEDS BE USED TO FUND THE CONNECTOR ROAD AND
 THAT THE CITY COMPLETE THE ROADWAY PRIOR TO T.C.O. THIS
 WILL REQUIRE ADMIN. APPROVAL AND AGREEMENT FOR CITY TO
 CONTRUCT ROADWAY.
 3. IS CONNECTOR ROAD TO BE A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT?
 4. REMOVE PROPOSED METER ASSEMBLY OUT OF EVERNIA
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 5. SHOW PROPOSED NEW FPL POLE AT INTERSECTION OF ALLEY
 AND RAILROAD.
 6. EXISTING SANITARY IN FEC R/W TO BE REMOVED OR
 GROUTED IN PLACE.
 7. DRAINAGE MH EX-1 NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY.
 8. IS LINE BETWEEN ST-1 AND EX-3 EXISTING OR PROPOSED?
 9. ANY AERIAL ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL
 REQUIRE AN EASEMENT.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-21-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-21-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-21-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-21 17:36:36 
 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC
 STUDY. SEE VALET OPERATIONS COMMENTS.
 2) VALET QUEUE ANALYSIS NEEDS TO PROVIDE A DETAILED
 NARRATIVE AND MORE ELABORATION ON THE ASSUMED
 PARAMETERS AND HOW THEY HAVE BEEN CALCULATED. PROVIDE A
 BREAKDOWN OF THE ACTUAL TIMING FOR EACH
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OPERATION, FOR EXAMPLE: XX SECONDS TO
 RECEIVE/HAND-OVER KEYS, XX TO DRIVE VEHICLE TO/FROM THE
 GARAGE, XX FOR THE VALET TO WALK TO/FROM THE PODIUM.
 ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE VALET PARKING STALLS BEING
 LOCATED ON THE TOP FLOORS OF THE GARAGE
 3) WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED DROP-OFF LOCATION
 ON FERN ST? NOTE: BECAUSE OF THE ADJACENCY TO THE BIKE
 LANE IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED, AND EVEN IF APPROVED, A
 GENEROUS SAFETY BUFFER WOULD NEED TO BE PROVIDED
 4) WHERE ARE THE VALET PICK-UP LOCATIONS?
 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 RECEIVED
 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES. AN INITIAL SET OF MEASURES
 AND METHODOLOGIES SHOULD BE DISCUSSED BY ENGINEERING
 PERMITTING, AND FINALIZED PRIOR TO TCO
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH
 PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE
 TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY
 (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0). CURRENT ANALYSIS IS INSUFFICIENT.
 8) SHEET T-110 ??? TRUCK WHEELS AND DYNAMIC ENVELOPE
 PATHS SHOW ENCROACHMENTS BY THE FERN ST DRIVEWAY.
 PLEASE REVISE
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 10) THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING SPACES ARE LESS THAN
 REQUIRED. IS A VARIANCE OR WAIVER BEING REQUESTED?
 11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF
 SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. ALSO, ANY
 VALET OPERATIONS SHOULD BE KEPT INTERNAL TO THE
 PROPERTY, NO PICK-UP/DROP-OFF ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 VALET OPERATIONS MUST BE VALIDATED AT PPRC STAGE, AS
 THE PROPOSED SITE DESIGN MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED
 IN THE CASE CURRENT VALET PLANS ARE NOT APPROVED
 13) SATISFIED. DOES THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR EXTENSION
 COMPLY WITH FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION
 REQUIREMENTS IN TERM OF DISTANCE FROM RAILROAD TRACKS
 AND GATE ARMS?
 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
 STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. HAS PARKING
 DEPARTMENT BEEN NOTIFIED OR APPROVED THE REMOVAL?
 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE IS A LACK OF ON-STREET
 PARKING AND PICK-UP/DROP OFF ZONES IN THE AREA;
 MOREOVER, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS REMOVING SEVERAL
 STALLS ON FERN AND EVERNIA. THUS, PARKING SHOULD BE
 INSTALLED ALONG THE PROPOSED NEW ROADWAY. PLEASE
 PROVIDE CODE REFERENCE AND A DRAFT DRAWING SHOWCASING
 LIMITING SETBACKS, IF ANY
 16) BECAUSE OF THE POTENTIAL CONGESTION IN THE AREA DUE
 TO SEVERAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS UNDER REVIEW OR ALREADY
 APPROVED IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED ONE, THE CITY
 IS RECOMMENDING ONE-WAY CIRCULATION FOR THE QUADRILLE
 PLAZA DR EXTENSION, WITH A PROPENSITY FOR THE
 SOUTHBOUND DIRECTION. SUCH MODIFICATION WILL ALSO ALLOW
 ESTABLISHING PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY PARKING STALLS,
 WHICH WOULD ALLEVIATE THE ALREADY CRITICAL ON-STREET
 PARKING CONDITIONS. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS
 ACCORDINGLY
 17) TO FORBID LEFT-TURN MOVEMENTS AND PROPERLY
 CHANNELIZE THE SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC ALONG THE QUADRILLE
 PLAZA DR EXTENSION, PLEASE IMPLEMENT A TRAFFIC ISLAND
 AT THE FERN ST INTERSECTION AND REVISE THE SITE PLANS
 ACCORDINGLY
 18) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA
 ALONG FERN
 19) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE STRETCH OF ROAD
 NORTH OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN SERVICE DRIVEWAY
 20) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CIRCULATION DIAGRAM FOR LEVEL
 2
 21) SATISFIED. THE SINGLE ELECTRIC CAR PARKING ON LEVEL
 2 NEARBY THE ACCESS GATES IS NOT FEASIBLE, EITHER
 REMOVE IT OR PROVIDE A TURN-AROUND SPACE
 22) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOWCASE AND INSERT THE VALUE
 FOR EACH SLOPE ON LEVEL 1. SHEET A1.01. THE MAIN
 PARKING RAMP MAY NEED A TRANSITION DUE TO THE SLOPE
 BEING GREATER THAN 14%
 23) SATISFIED. IS THERE A SLOPE BY THE GARAGE ENTRY
 GATES ON LEVEL 2? SHEET A1.02
 24) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOW DIRECTIONAL ARROW
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS THROUGHOUT THE GARAGE FLOORS
 25) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE
 CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A
 WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
 THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EVERY STALL
 NEARBY A WALL OR OBSTRUCTION IN SHEET A1.02 TO A1.06.
 26) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8-FEET WIDE
 PEDESTRIAN WALKABLE AREA THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE 15-FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG
 EVERNIA, SO TO STAY CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN PORTION
 FRONTING THE 360 BUILDING. THIS IS CLEARLY SHOWN IN
 SHEET R0.02.
 27) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE EXISTING BICYCLE LANE
 CONFIGURATION SHOULD BE UNCHANGED. THE 2-FEET BUFFER
 BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE BIKE LANE AND THE EXISTING
 STALLS/PROPOSED NEW CURB MUST BE KEPT. SHOWCASE SUCH
 DIMENSION IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. PER COMMENT
 #3, FURTHER DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL REVISION NEEDED
 28) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INSTALL SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG
 THE NEW ROADWAY. PLEASE INSTALL THEM AT THE MID-BLOCK
 POINT AS WELL
 29) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IF FEASIBLE, PROVIDE A
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON FERN, JUST EAST OF THE QUADRILLE
 PLAZA DR EXTENSION. PLEASE SHOWCASE THE LANDING RAMPS
 ON BOTH SIDE OF THE ROAD (NOTE: THERE ARE A FIRE
 HYDRANT AND A PALM TREE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN ST,
 PLEASE MARK THEM ON THE PLAN)
 30) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK CROSSING
 ON FERN, JUST EAST OF THE SERVICE DRIVEWAY. PLEASE
 ELABORATE ON THE WARRANT JUSTIFICATION
 31) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK CROSSING
 ON THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR EXTENSION. PLEASE ELABORATE
 ON THE WARRANT JUSTIFICATION
 32) SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIRECTIONALITY FOR
 EACH OF THE SERVICE DRIVEWAYS. ARE THEY ONE-WAY OR
 TWO-WAY?
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-13 03:19:24TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 3) PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
 MEASURES
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
 PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S)
 CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION
 REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2,
 T-3.0). CURRENT ANALYSIS IS INSUFFICIENT.
 5) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 6) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 7) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. ALSO, ANY VALET OPERATIONS SHOULD
 BE KEPT INTERNAL TO THE PROPERTY, NO PICK-UP/DROP-OFF
 ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 8) DOES THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR EXTENSION COMPLY WITH
 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS IN TERM OF
 DISTANCE FROM RAILROAD TRACKS AND GATE ARMS?
 9) PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING
 REMOVED OR RELOCATED
 10) THERE IS A LACK OF ON-STREET PARKING AND
 PICK-UP/DROP OFF ZONES IN THE AREA; MOREOVER, THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS REMOVING SEVERAL STALLS ON FERN
 AND EVERNIA. THUS, PROVIDE ON-STREET METERED PARKING
 ALONG THE PROPOSED NEW ROADWAY
 11) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA ALONG FERN
 12) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE STRETCH OF ROAD NORTH OF THE
 SOUTH-WESTERN SERVICE DRIVEWAY
 13) PROVIDE A CIRCULATION DIAGRAM FOR LEVEL 2
 14) THE SINGLE ELECTRIC CAR PARKING ON LEVEL 2 NEARBY
 THE ACCESS GATES IS NOT FEASIBLE, EITHER REMOVE IT OR
 PROVIDE A TURN-AROUND SPACE
 15) SHOWCASE AND INSERT THE VALUE FOR EACH SLOPE ON
 LEVEL 1. SHEET A1.01
 16) IS THERE A SLOPE BY THE GARAGE ENTRY GATES ON LEVEL
 2? SHEET A1.02
 17) INSTALL AND SHOW DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS THROUGHOUT THE GARAGE FLOORS
 18) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE CASES
 WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
 FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
 STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
 FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
 MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EVERY STALL
 NEARBY A WALL OR OBSTRUCTION IN SHEET A1.02 TO A1.06.
 19) PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8-FEET WIDE PEDESTRIAN
 WALKABLE AREA THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 PROVIDE 15-FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG EVERNIA, SO TO STAY
 CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN PORTION FRONTING THE 360
 BUILDING. THIS IS CLEARLY SHOWN IN SHEET R0.02.
 20) THE EXISTING BICYCLE LANE CONFIGURATION SHOULD BE
 UNCHANGED. THE 2-FEET BUFFER BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE
 BIKE LANE AND THE EXISTING STALLS/PROPOSED NEW CURB
 MUST BE KEPT. SHOWCASE SUCH DIMENSION IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
 21) INSTALL SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG THE NEW ROADWAY
 22) IF FEASIBLE, PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON FERN,
 JUST EAST OF THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR EXTENSION
 23) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK CROSSING ON FERN, JUST EAST OF
 THE SERVICE DRIVEWAY
 24) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK CROSSING ON THE QUADRILLE PLAZA
 DR EXTENSION
 25) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIRECTIONALITY FOR EACH OF THE
 SERVICE DRIVEWAYS. ARE THEY ONE-WAY OR TWO-WAY?
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-29-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 03-29-2023 Time 16:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 03-29-2023 Time 16:47 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-29 16:45:15 
 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
 THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 822-1426 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 12-13-2022 Time 10:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 10:38:441. VARIANCE REQUEST FOR BUILDING FOOTPRINT LEVEL 6-7
 (MAX. 60%) PROPOSED AT 63%. PER SECTION 95-54 (D.)(4).)
 UNAUTHORIZED VARIANCES. THE DAC IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO
 GRANT VARIANCES FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: (E.) AN
 INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVE THE
 MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT ALLOWED BY THE URBAN REGULATIONS.
  
 RESPONSE: THE APPLICANT BELIEVES A VARIANCE CAN BE
 GRANTED. WE HAVE REQUESTED A MEETING TO DISCUSS.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] APPLICANT NO
 LONGER ASKING FOR FOOTPRINT VARIANCE, VARIANCE IS FROM
 SECTION 94-132(E.)(3.)(C.) FOR FUTURE ROW AREA IN
 BUILDING CALCULATIONS.
  
 2. WHAT IS THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR OFFICE SPACE
 AND RETAIL? JUSTIFICATION LETTER STATES OFFICE AT
 425,798 SF; SHEET A0.01 STATES 378,137 SF; PLEASE
 CLARIFY SO STAFF MAY VERIFY PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
 RETAIL IN JUSTIFICATION LETTER IS 9,369 SF; SHEET A0.01
 STATES 9,161 SF. PARKING COUNT WILL HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED
 TO MEET RESPECTIVE REQUIREMENTS, THE RATIOS PER USE
 PROVIDED ON A0.01 ARE CORRECT.
  
 RESPONSE: THE GROSS BUILDING AREA PER USE AND OVERALL
 FAR IS CLARIFIED ON REVISED SHEET A0.01 AND THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. SEE ALSO SHEET A0.10 BUILDING
 AREAS FOR FULL GROSS BUILDING AREA TABULAR PER USE.
  
 PER SECTION 94-111 OF THE ZONING CODE, PARAGRAPH B.2.,
 ???PARKING REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON
 NET INTERIOR AREA.??? NET INTERIOR AREA (OFFICE) OF
 378,137 SF IS CORRECT AS SHOWN IN THE PARKING TABULAR
 TABLE ON SHEET A0.01. NET INTERIOR AREA (RETAIL) OF
 9,161 SF IS CORRECT AS SHOWN IN THE PARKING TABULAR
 TABLE ON SHEET
 A0.01. SEE ALSO SHEET A0.09 NET INTERIOR AREA FOR FULL
 TABULAR AND DIAGRAMS.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] DEFICIENT 180
 SPACES FOR OFFICE USE. MIN. REQ. 946 PROVIDING 766.
 (19% REDUCTION)
  
 SEC. 94-485 - ALL SMALL CAR PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH INDIVIDUAL SIGNS STATING "SMALL CARS ONLY."
 SMALL CAR PARKING SPACES SHALL HAVE DOUBLE STRIPING ON
 EACH SIDE OF THE SPACE.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OR CALLOUTS SPECIFYING
 DEPTH OF ALL SETBACKS ON SITE PLANS, FLOOR PLANS, AND
 ELEVATIONS. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACKS SHOW.
 A. CONDITIONAL SETBACK FOR PARKING USES ABOVE THE 5TH
 FLOOR; SHEET A1.06 ONLY SHOWS EVERNIA STREET SET BACK
 (PLEASE LABEL REQUIRED 27 FT FROM BACK OF THE CURB)
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] VARIANCE
 REQUESTED.
  
 B. REQUIRED CONDITIONAL SETBACK ALONG FERN AND
 QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. IS 31 FT (PLEASE LABEL ON SHEET
 A1.06 AND A1.07)
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] VARIANCE
 REQUESTED.
  
 C. PLEASE LABEL OR PROVIDE THE FEC ROW ABUTMENT
 SETBACKS AND CONDITIONAL SETBACKS ON SHEET A0.05 AND
 A1.01 ONWARD.
  
 RESPONSE: DIMENSIONS AND CALLOUTS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO
 THE DRAWINGS AS REQUESTED.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] VARIANCE
 REQUESTED.
  
 4. SHEET A0.08 FAR
 A. LEVEL 1 FAR- FAR COUNT NEEDS TO INCLUDE STORAGE
 SPACE ADJACENT TO PARKING RAMP
 B. LEVEL 2 FAR- PORTION OF NORTHEAST STAIRWELL NOT
 SHOWN AS IT IS ON A1.02, PORTION NEEDS TO BE COUNTED IN
 FAR
 C. MINOR NOTE: SHEET A1.03 DOESN'T SHOW SOUTHERN
 ELEVATOR AS YELLOW SHADING FOR CIRCULATION
 D. LEVEL 4 FAR- PORTION OF NORTHWEST STAIRWELL NOT
 SHOWN AS IT IS ON A1.04, PORTION NEEDS TO BE COUNTED IN
 FAR
 E. PENTHOUSE FAR- ROOFTOP ON A1.26 SHOWS UNLABELED ROOM
 BELOW THE ELEVATOR OVERRUNS, PLEASE LABEL AND IF NOT
 MECHANICAL, SPACE WILL COUNT TOWARD FAR.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEETS A0.08, A1.03, AND A1.26 FOR
 REVISIONS. SEE ALSO UPDATED FAR DATA ON SHEET A0.01.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 5. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED.
 3% REQUIREMENT FOR LOTS 50,000- 80,000SF; TOTAL
 REQUIRED 2,292 SF PLUS THE ADDITIONAL 3,501 SF FROM THE
 ALLEY ABANDONMENT 1:1 REPLACEMENT. TOTAL REQUIRED 5,793
 SF. PLEASE ADJUST TABLE ON SHEET A0.06 OR LP-1 TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT NUMBER.
  
 RESPONSE: PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ON SHEETS
 LP-1, LP-2 AND A0.06 ARE CORRECT. PARCEL 1 + PARCEL 2 +
 PARCEL 3 AREAS (PER SURVEY) = 26,629 SF + 39,621 SF +
 6,656 SF = 72,906 SF X .03 = 2,187 SF. PLUS 3,501 SF
 (PARCEL 4 AT 1:1) = 5,688 SF TOTAL
 REQUIRED.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 6. WILL THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY BE A
 DEDICATED ROW? WHAT IS THE FINAL ROW WIDTH? PLEASE
 INDICATE ROW LINE ON PLANS, AS IT IMPACTS SETBACKS AND
 SITE CONFIGURATION. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED DIMENSIONS
 AND CONDITIONS OF THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. EXTENSION
 (SIDEWALK, TRAVEL LANE, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS,
 PLANTERS/LANDSCAPE BEDS, ETC.) ON SITE AND GROUND FLOOR
 PLANS, AS IS SHOWN IN CIVIL PLANS.
  
 RESPONSE: THE APPLICANT IS OPEN TO DISCUSSING WHETHER
 IT WILL BE A DEDICATED ROW OR EASEMENT. SEE SHEET A0.05
 FOR PROPOSED 60??? ROW FOR QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE. A
 16??? SETBACK LINE IS SHOWN FROM BACK OF CURB.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
 60' ROW SHALL BE A DEDICATION OR PUBLIC ACCESS
 EASEMENT.
  
 7. REMOVAL OF METERED ON-STREET PARKING WILL INCUR A
 REMOVAL FEE. PERMANENT REMOVAL FEE INCLUDED WITHIN
 RESOLUTION 191-22, $24,000 PER SPACE. PLEASE SPEAK WITH
 ED DAVIS- PARKING ADMINISTRATOR FOR ANY QUESTIONS
 REGARDING THE REMOVAL PROCESS OR FEES.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. THE PROJECT WILL REMOVE 11
 SPACES AND WORK WITH ED DAVIS AT PARKING ON THIS ISSUE.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
 REMOVAL OF PARKING TO BE DISCUSSED FURTHER WITH PARKING
 ADMIN.
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE; IN THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY
 PARKING STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING,
 OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL
 BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. WHERE THERE IS
 AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STALL, THE STALL
 WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. PLEASE SEE SHEETS A1.02 THROUGH
 A1.05 FOR ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS. LEVELS 6 AND 7 ARE
 ENTIRELY VALET PARKING AND UTILIZE FABRICATED STACKERS.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 9. HISTORIC PRESERVATION: THE 501 FERN ST. BUILDING IS
 HISTORICALLY ELIGIBLE, PER THE REQUIREMENT OF SEC.
 94-131 THE BUILDING SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
 PROJECT AS PART OF THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. IF THE NEW
 QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. ROW DOES NOT CONSUME THIS BUILDING,
 BOTH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING STAFF REQUEST
 THAT THE DESIGN ELEMENTS FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE
 501 BUILDING IS PRESERVED, REPLICATED, OR INTEGRATED
 INTO THE GROUND-FLOOR DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED 515
 BUILDING AT THIS CORNER. PARTICULARLY THE FLUTED
 COLUMN-LIKE ELEMENTS AND THE HORIZONTAL STRIATIONS OF
 THE CORNICE AND ENTRY CANOPY.
  
 RESPONSE: THE BUILDING REFERENCED IS IN THE PROPOSED
 60??? ROW AND THE BUILDING WILL BE REMOVED.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PER
 CONVERSATION WITH PLANNING & HISTORIC PRESERVATION
 STAFF, HAS THERE BEEN ANY ALTERATION OR PROPOSED
 INCLUSION OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS OR REFERENCES TO
 THE REMOVED ELIGIBLE STRUCTURE?
  
 10. PLEASE LABEL AND PROVIDE SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, AS
 WELL AS DIMENSIONS FOR PLANTERS/LANDSCAPE AREAS OR
 ELEMENTS WITHIN THE ROW ON BOTH THE GROUND FLOOR AND
 SITE PLAN A0.05 AND A0.01; APPEARS TO BE 8-12 FEET
 CLEAR, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO VERIFY THAT THE 8 FOOT CLEAR
 PATH IS MAINTAINED. CIVIL PLANS PROVIDE THESE
 DIMENSIONS.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEETS A0.05 AND A1.01 FOR
 ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK AND PLANTER LABELS AND DIMENSIONS
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 11. SHEET A0.06D FOR THE FA??ADE ARTICULATION
 COMPLIANCE MATRIX: WEST, ON THE PROVIDED FENESTRATION
 IT IS NOTED THAT FA??ADE E & G ARE MORE THAN 3 FEET
 FROM THE LOT LINE; SHOULD THIS READ AS LESS THAN 3 FT.?
  
 RESPONSE: NOTE IN MATRIX WAS IN ERROR. FACADES E AND H
 ARE NON-APPLICABLE AS THEY ARE NON-ACTIVE USE FACADES.
 THE BALANCE OF THE WEST FACADES ARE ACTIVE USES AND
 COMPLY. PLEASE SEE REVISED MATRIX, SHEET A0.06D.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 12. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE IN SCALE FOR THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING
 ROADWAY NETWORK, STAFF REQUESTS THAT TDM STRATEGIES ARE
 DISCUSSED FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 RESPONSE: SIMILAR TO 360 ROSEMARY, GIVEN THE EVOLVING
 NATURE OF TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, THE
 APPLICANT WILL WORK WITH THE CITY ON A TDM PROGRAM FOR
 THE PROJECT THAT WILL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE
 OF A TCO.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] TO BE DISCUSSED
 FURTHER WITH CITY STAFF AND APPLICANT
  
 13. ON THE SHEET A0.06E, PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECTION
 DIMENSION ON THE HORIZONTAL FEATURES.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEETS A0.06E, A0.6F, AND A0.6H
 FOR ADDED DIMENSIONS AT HORIZONTAL FEATURES.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 14. QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. EXTENSION SHOULD BE
 RIGHT-TURN-ONLY AT FERN ST. INTERSECTION, NOT ENOUGH
 QUEUING OR STACKING SPACE BEFORE THE TRAIN TRACKS.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 15. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SO THAT
 STAFF MAY VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO OBSTRUCTIONS AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS AND DRIVES.
  
 RESPONSE: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES HAVE BEEN ADDED TO
 THE DRAWINGS, AND THE PROPOSED PLANTING HAS BEEN
 ADJUSTED, SEE SHEET LP-2.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] SITE
 VISIBILITY TRIANGLES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO BE FROM THE
 INTERSECTION OF THE PROPERTY LINES AND CORNERS. SEE
 SEC. 94-305(E.) AND FIGURE X-1.
  
 VISIBILITY AT INTERSECTIONS. AT ANY ROAD INTERSECTIONS,
 VISIBILITY SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY THE CONSTRUCTION,
 PLACEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE OF A STRUCTURE WALL, SIGN,
 FENCE, BERM, PLANT MATERIAL, SHRUBS, OR ANY SIMILAR
 ITEM BETWEEN 18 INCHES OR EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT WITHIN A
 TRIANGLE BEGINNING AT THE POINT WHERE PROPERTY LINES
 MEET AT THE CORNER, THEN 20 FEET ALONG THE FRONT
 PROPERTY LINE, THENCE DIAGONALLY TO A POINT ALONG THE
 SIDE PROPERTY LINE 20 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
 AND THENCE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. IN THE EVENT THE
 CORNER OF AN INTERSECTION IS ROUNDED, THE MEASUREMENT
 SHALL BEGIN AT THE POINT THE PROPERTY LINES WOULD MEET
 WITHOUT ROUNDING. (SEE FIGURE X-1)
  
 16. MINOR NOTE: DRAWINGS ONLY PROVIDE ENTRY TO BIKE
 ROOM FROM OUTSIDE PLAZA, IS THIS INTENTIONAL?
  
 RESPONSE: YES, THIS IS INTENTIONAL, IN ORDER TO ALLOW
 ALL BUILDING OCCUPANTS TO PASS THROUGH THE LOBBY
 CONTROL AREA.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE
 CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE ENTRY INTO BUILDING FROM BIKE
 ROOM, IF THE CONCERN IS SECURITY PLEASE NOTE MANY OF
 THE INTERNAL CORRIDORS AND BACK OF HOUSE ROOMS ADJACENT
 TO LOADING OPERATION PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE INTERIOR OF
 BUILDING. THE BIKE ROOM SHOULD REFLECT A SIMILAR
 CONDITION, AS CIRCULATING USERS OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING
 DISCOURAGES BIKE USE.
  
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED AND DIMENSIONED SCHEMATIC
 FOR THE INTERNAL BIKE ROOM, SHOWING THE PROPOSED RACKS
 FROM A3.01 WITH ADEQUATE SPACING/SEPARATION WITHIN THE
 ROOM. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPACING DETAILS FOR THE
 OUTSIDE BIKE RACK AS WELL.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEET A3.01 / DETAIL 6 FOR INDOOR
 BIKE ROOM LAYOUT. DIMENSIONS FOR THE OUTSIDE BIKE RACKS
 HAVE BEEN ADDED, SEE SHEET LH-1.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 18. PER SEC. 94-111; A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND
 CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED OR BE AVAILABLE FOR
 ALL TENANTS AND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING,
 OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, FOR
 DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS
 BUILDING AREA.
 PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHERE THIS SHOWER FACILITY
 IS LOCATED.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEET A1.01. THE SHOWER IS
 INDICATED JUST WEST OF STAIR 1, ALONG THE CORRIDOR
 CONNECTING THE BUILDING LOBBY TO THE MANAGEMENT OFFICES
 AND THE LOADING AREA. THE SHOWER IS LOCATED
 APPROXIMATELY 110 FEET FROM THE MAIN BUILDING ENTRANCE.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE
 CONSIDER RELOCATING THE SHOWER FACILITY CLOSER TO THE
 STORAGE ROOM OF THE BIKES, CIRCULATION OF USERS
 DOESN???T SEEM TO MAKE MUCH SENSE, REQUIRES USERS TO GO
 AROUND BUILDING AND ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. PERHAPS WHERE
 THE STORAGE ROOM IS LOCATED IS MORE APT FOR SHOWER
 FACILITIES.
  
 19. SHEET A3.01 PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS NOT COMPLIANT
 WITH CITY STANDARD AND STRIPPING DETAIL. STANDARD
 SPACES SHOULD BE 8.5FTX18FT AND ADA SPACES ARE
 12FTX18FT WITH 5 ADA AISLE, COMPACT SPACES ARE
 TYPICALLY 8FTX16FT. PLEASE NOTE, ONLY 30% OF PARKING
 SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AS COMPACT SPACES AND SHALL BE
 INDICATED COMPACT SPACES WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE SIGNAGE
 DESIGNATING THESE SPACES AS COMPACT.
  
 RESPONSE: PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS AND STRIPING DETAILS
 AS SHOWN ON SHEET A3.01 ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-485 OF THE WEST PALM BEACH
 ZONING CODE, INCLUDING FIGURE XV-2 AND THE STALL
 PAINTING DETAIL. WE HAVE SPLIT THE STANDARD SPACE AND
 ACCESSIBLE SPACE DETAILS INTO TWO SEPARATE DETAILS FOR
 FURTHER CLARITY.
  
 21% OF PARKING SPACES SHOWN ARE INDICATED AS COMPACT
 SPACES AND WILL BE SIGNED TO SO INDICATE. PLEASE SEE
 SHEETS A1.02 THROUGH A1.07.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 20. SHEET A1.06 & A1.07 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE TANDEM
 SPACES, PLEASE NOTE PER SEC. 94-111 (E.): FOR
 COMMERCIAL USES, TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHALL BE COUNTED
 AS ONE SPACE UNLESS THERE IS A VALET ATTENDANT IN
 CHARGE OF ALL OPERATING HOURS, AND SUCH REQUIREMENT IS
 ESTABLISHED THROUGH A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT. ALL
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO
 BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
 RECORDED IN PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. ALL TANDEM SPACES WILL BE
 SERVED BY A VALET ATTENDANT DURING OPERATING HOURS. THE
 PROPERTY OWNER WILL EXECUTE A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, AS
 REQUIRED.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] CONDITION OF SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 ADDITIONALLY DUE TO THE INCLUSION OF STACKERS, PER SEC.
 94-111(K.): MECHANICAL AND AUTOMATED PARKING. PARKING
 STRUCTURES WITH MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL PROVIDE A
 COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT DURING THE OPERATIONS HOURS, AND
 SUCH OPERATION IS ESTABLISHED THROUGH A RESTRICTIVE
 COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS. ALL
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO
 BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
 RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. ALL STACKER SPACES WILL BE
 SERVED BY A VALET ATTENDANT DURING OPERATING HOURS. THE
 PROPERTY OWNER WILL EXECUTE A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, AS
 REQUIRED.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED] CONDITION OF SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 A VALET OR OPERATION ATTENDANT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 STACKERS, AS SUCH THE TANDEM SPACE IF SERVICED BY THE
 VALET OPERATIONS MAY COUNT AS 2 SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DETAILS OF THE STACKERS.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE DETAILS 7 & 9 / SHEET A3.01 FOR
 THE STACKER DETAIL.
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 21. PLEASE CLARIFY MIDDLE OF PARKING STRUCTURE ON SHEET
 A1.05, ELECTRIC SPACES APPEAR TO OVERLAP COMPACT
 SPACES, AND CONFLICT WITH THE PARKING RAMP.
  
 RESPONSE: THE AREA IN QUESTION ON SHEET A1.05 IS
 SHOWING LEVEL 4.5, BELOW, AND THUS SPACES APPEAR TO BE
 OVERLAPPING. WE HAVE MORE CLEARLY INDICATED A GUARD
 WALL AT THE EDGE OF SLAB OF LEVEL 5 ON A1.05, REVISED.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
 22. SHEET A1.01 SHOWS A CANOPY ON THE FERN ST. SIDE,
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS THAT THE CANOPY IS IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE PROJECTION STANDARDS OF SEC. 94-109 TABLE
 IV-5. REQUIRES 10FT. VERTICAL CLEARANCE, MAXIMUM
 ENCROACHMENT IN ROW OF 12FT AND MAXIMUM PROJECTION OF
 20FT.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE DETAILS 4 AND 5 ON SHEET A0.06E,
 WITH ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION.
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/2/22 ??? [SATISFIED]
  
  
 ZONING REVIEW 12/12/22 ??? NEW COMMENTS/VARIANCE LIST:
  
 1. ALONG FERN ST. FRONTAGE, STREET TREES NEED TO BE
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE CURB, MOVE TREES INTO PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE BEDS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PROPOSED DROP-OFF
 SPACE. IF REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE ACCOMODATED MAY BE
 SUBJECT TO VARIANCE.
  
 2. ALONG FERN ST. FRONTAGE, STREET TREES NEED TO MEET
 THE 30 FT. ON CENTER MEASUREMENT, PALMS DO NOT COUNT
 TOWARD TREE COUNT, NEED AT LEAST 10 ON FERN FRONTAGE.
 THE TREES WITHIN TREEGRATES ADJACENT TO THE DROP-OFF
 MUST MEET 30 FT. SPACING TOO. IF REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE
 ACCOMODATED MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIANCE.
  
 VARIANCES:
 1. CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 27??? FROM BACK OF CURB ALONG
 EVERNIA FOR LEVELS 5+ OF PARKING. REQUESTING A 12???
 REDUCTION ON LEVEL 6 & LEVEL 7.
 2. VARIANCE FROM SECTION 94-132(E.)(3.)(C.) TO COUNT
 THE PORTION OF THE SETBACK/LAND DEDICATION AREA WITHIN
 BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.
 3. VARIANCE FROM PARKING REQUIREMENTS (TABLE IV-9) FOR
 OFFICE USES. DEFICIENT 180 SPACES FOR OFFICE USE. MIN.
 REQ. 946 PROVIDING 766. (19% REDUCTION)
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 10-13-2022 Time 10:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 10-13-2022 Time 10:42 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-13 10:44:391. VARIANCE REQUEST FOR BUILDING FOOTPRINT LEVEL 6-7
 (MAX. 60%) PROPOSED 63%. PER SECTION 95-54(D.)(4.)
 UNAUTHORIZED VARIANCES. THE DAC IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO
 GRANT VARIANCES FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: (E.) AN
 INCREASE IN MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVE THE
 MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT ALLOWED BY THE URBAN REGULATIONS.
  
 2. WHAT IS THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR OFFICE SPACE
 AND RETAIL? JUSTIFICATION LETTER STATES OFFICE AT
 425,798 SF; SHEET A0.01 STATES 378,137 SF; PLEASE
 CLARIFY SO STAFF MAY VERIFY PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
 RETAIL IN JUSTIFICATION LETTER IS 9,369 SF; SHEET A0.01
 STATES 9,161 SF. PARKING COUNT WILL HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED
 TO MEET RESPECTIVE REQUIREMENTS, THE RATIOS PER USE
 PROVIDED ON A0.01 ARE CORRECT.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OR CALLOUTS SPECIFYING
 DEPTH OF ALL SETBACKS ON SITE PLANS, FLOOR PLANS, AND
 ELEVATIONS. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACKS SHOWN.
 A. CONDITIONAL SETBACK FOR PARKING USES ABOVE THE 5TH
 FLOOR; SHEET A1.06 ONLY SHOWS EVERNIA STREET SETBACK
 (PLEASE LABEL REQUIRED 27??? FROM BACK OF CURB)
 B. REQUIRED CONDITIONAL SETBACK ALONG FERN AND
 QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. IS 31??? (PLEASE LABEL ON SHEET
 A1.06 AND A1.07)
 C. PLEASE LABEL OR PROVIDE THE FEC ROW ABUTMENT
 SETBACKS AND CONDITIONAL SETBACKS ON SHEET A0.05 AND
 A1.01 ONWARD.
  
 4. SHEET A0.08 FAR
 A. LEVEL 1 FAR ??? FAR COUNT NEEDS TO INCLUDE STORAGE
 SPACE ADJACENT TO PARKING RAMP
 B. LEVEL 2 FAR ??? PORTION OF NORTHEAST STAIRWELL NOT
 SHOWN AS IT IS ON A1.02, PORTION NEEDS TO BE COUNTED IN
 FAR
 C. MINOR NOTE: SHEET A1.03 DOESN???T SHOW SOUTHERN
 ELEVATOR AS YELLOW SHADING FOR CIRCULATION
 D. LEVEL 4 FAR ??? PORTION OF NORTHWEST STAIRWELL NOT
 SHOWN AS IT IS ON A1.04, PORTION NEEDS TO BE COUNTED IN
 FAR
 E. PENTHOUSE FAR ??? ROOFTOP ON A1.26 SHOWS UNLABELED
 ROOM BELOW THE ELEVATOR OVERRUNS, PLEASE LABEL AND IF
 NOT MECHANICAL, SPACE WILL COUNT TOWARD FAR.
  
 5. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED.
 3% REQUIREMENT FOR LOTS 50,000-80,000SF; TOTAL REQUIRED
 2,292 SF. PLUS THE ADDITIONAL 3,501 SF FROM THE ALLEY
 ABANDONMENT 1:1 REPLACEMENT. TOTAL REQUIRED 5,793 SF.
 PLEASE ADJUST TABLE ON SHEET A0.06 OR LP-1 TO REFLECT
 CORRECT NUMBERS.
  
 6. WILL THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY BE A
 DEDICATED ROW? WHAT IS THE FINAL ROW WIDTH? PLEASE
 INDICATE ROW LINE ON PLANS, AS THIS IMPACTS SETBACKS
 AND SITE CONFIGURATION. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED
 DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR.
 EXTENSION (SIDEWALK, TRAVEL LANE, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS,
 PLANTERS/LANDSCAPE BEDS, ETC.) ON SITE AND GROUND FLOOR
 PLANS, AS IS SHOWN IN CIVIL PLANS.
  
 7. REMOVAL OF METERED ON-STREET PARKING WILL INCUR A
 REMOVAL FEE. PERMANENT REMOVAL FEE INCLUDED WITHIN
 RESOLUTION 191-22, $24,000 PER SPACE. PLEASE SPEAK WITH
 ED DAVIS ??? PARKING ADMINISTRATOR FOR ANY QUESTIONS
 REGARDING THE REMOVAL PROCESS OR FEES.
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE; IN THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY
 PARKING STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING,
 OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL
 BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. WHERE THERE IS
 AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STALL, THE STALL
 WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.
  
 9. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ??? THE 501 FERN ST. BUILDING
 IS HISTORICALLY ELIGIBLE, PER THE REQUIREMENT OF SEC.
 94-131 THE BUILDING SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
 PROJECT AS PART OF THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. IF THE NEW
 QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. ROW DOES NOT CONSUME THIS BUILDING,
 BOTH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING STAFF REQUEST
 THAT THE DESIGN ELEMENTS FROM THE FRONT FA??ADE OF THE
 501 BUILDING BE PRESERVED, REPLICATED, OR INTEGRATED
 INTO THE GROUND-FLOOR DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED 515
 BUILDING AT THIS CORNER. PARTICULARLY THE FLUTED
 COLUMN-LIKE ELEMENTS AND THE HORIZONTAL STRIATIONS OF
 THE CORNICE AND ENTRY CANOPY.
  
 10. PLEASE LABEL AND PROVIDE SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, AS
 WELL AS DIMENSIONS FOR PLANTERS/LANDSCAPE AREAS OR
 ELEMENTS WITHIN THE ROW ON BOTH THE GROUND FLOOR AND
 SITE PLAN A0.05 AND A1.01; APPEARS TO BE 8-12??? CLEAR,
 STAFF WOULD LIKE TO VERIFY THAT THE 8??? CLEAR PATH IS
 MAINTAINED. CIVIL PLANS PROVIDE THESE DIMENSIONS.
  
 11. SHEET A0.06D FOR THE FA??ADE ARTICULATION
 COMPLIANCE MATRIX: WEST, ON THE PROVIDED FENESTRATION
 IT IS NOTED THAT FA??ADE E, & G ARE MORE THAN 3 FT FROM
 THE LOT LINE; SHOULD THIS READ AS LESS THAN 3 FT?
  
 12. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE IN SCALE FOR THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING
 ROADWAY NETWORK, STAFF REQUESTS THAT TDM STRATEGIES ARE
 DISCUSSED FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 13. ON SHEET A0.06E, PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECTION
 DIMENSION ON THE HORIZONTAL FEATURES.
  
 14. QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. EXTENSION SHOULD BE RIGHT-TURN
 ONLY AT FERN ST. INTERSECTION, NOT ENOUGH QUEUING OR
 STACKING SPACE BEFORE THE TRAIN TRACKS.
  
 15. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SO THAT
 STAFF MAY VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO OBSTRUCTIONS AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS AND DRIVES.
  
 16. MINOR NOTE: DRAWINGS ONLY PROVIDE ENTRY TO BIKE
 ROOM FROM OUTSIDE PLAZA, IS THIS INTENTIONAL?
  
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED AND DIMENSIONED SCHEMATIC
 FOR THE INTERNAL BIKE ROOM, SHOWING THE PROPOSED RACKS
 FROM A3.01 WITH ADEQUATE SPACING/SEPARATION WITHIN THE
 ROOM. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPACING DETAILS FOR THE
 OUTSIDE BIKE RACKS AS WELL.
  
 18. PER SEC. 94-111; A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND
 CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR
 ALL TENANTS AND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING,
 OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, FOR
 DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS
 BUILDING AREA.
 PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHERE THIS SHOWER FACILITY
 IS LOCATED.
  
 19. SHEET A3.01 PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS NOT COMPLIANT
 WITH CITY STANDARD AND STRIPING DETAIL. STANDARD SPACES
 SHOULD BE 8.5???X18??? AND ADA SPACES ARE 12X???18???
 WITH 5??? ADA AISLE. COMPACT SPACES ARE TYPICALLY
 8???X16???. PLEASE NOTE, ONLY 30% OF PARKING SPACES MAY
 BE DESIGNATED AS COMPACT SPACES AND SHALL BE INDICATED
 AS SUCH ON PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE TOTAL CALCULATION.
 COMPACT SPACES WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE SIGNAGE
 DESIGNATING THESE SPACES AS COMPACT.
  
 20. SHEET A1.06 & A1.07 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE TANDEM
 SPACES, PLEASE NOTE PER SEC. 94-111 (E.): FOR
 COMMERCIAL USES, TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHALL BE COUNTED
 AS ONE SPACE UNLESS THERE IS A VALET ATTENDANT IN
 CHARGE OF THE OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING
 ALL OPERATING HOURS, AND SUCH REQUIREMENT IS
 ESTABLISHED THROUGH A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT. ALL
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO
 BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
 RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 ADDITIONALLY DUE TO THE INCLUSION OF STACKERS, PER SEC.
 94-111 (K.): MECHANICAL AND AUTOMATED PARKING. PARKING
 STRUCTURES WITH MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL PROVIDE A
 COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT DURING THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE
 FACILITY. SUCH OPERATION SHALL BE ENFORCED THROUGH A
 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
 ALL RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED
 TO BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
 RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 A VALET OR OPERATION ATTENDANT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 STACKERS, AS SUCH THE TANDEM SPACES IF SERVICED BY THE
 VALET OPERATIONS MAY COUNT AS 2 SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DETAILS OF THE STACKERS.
  
 21. PLEASE CLARIFY MIDDLE OF PARKING STRUCTURE ON SHEET
 A1.05, ELECTRIC SPACES APPEAR TO OVERLAP COMPACT
 SPACES, AND CONFLICT WITH THE PARKING RAMP.
  
 22. SHEET A1.01 SHOWS A CANOPY ON THE FERN ST. SIDE,
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS THAT THE CANOPY IS IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE PROJECTION STANDARDS OF SEC. 94-109 TABLE
 IV-5. REQUIRES 10FT. VERTICAL CLEARANCE, MAXIMUM
 ENCROACHMENT IN ROW OF 12FT. AND MAXIMUM PROJECTION OF
 20FT.
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 [email protected] 822-1426
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved