 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z22080030
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z22080030 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-07 16:48:20 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE | | | IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 3. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 4. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-04-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-04-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-04-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-11-04 18:58:08 | Z22080030 - NORTHWOOD PARKING LOT - 412 20TH ST | | | 11.04.22 REVIEW | | | PREVIOUS UNADDRESSED COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES AT | | | 561-494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | GENERAL: | | | O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP | | | B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL | | | L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97 | | | B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, | | | ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU | | | BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL | | | O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS | | | DATA. | | | O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL STORM SEWERS. | | | O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL STORM LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. | | | O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY | | | TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. CLARIFY IF IRRIGATION IS PROPOSED. | | | O IF CONNECTION TO CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM IS PROPOSED, | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING STORMWATER | | | INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION | | | OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). | | | O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN | | | OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-25-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-25-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-25-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-25 10:28:42 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected] | | | GENERAL: | | | O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP | | | B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL | | | L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97 | | | B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, | | | ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU | | | BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL | | | O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS | | | DATA. | | | O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL STORM SEWERS. | | | O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL STORM LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. | | | O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY | | | TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. CLARIFY IF IRRIGATION IS PROPOSED. | | | O IF CONNECTION TO CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM IS PROPOSED, | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING STORMWATER | | | INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION | | | OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). | | | O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN | | | OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER. | | | | | | FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW: | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES | | | NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. | | | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: | | | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS | | | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF | | | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; | | | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE | | | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A | | | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). | | | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF | | | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION | | | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF | | | WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE | | | BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE | | | 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR | | | PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS. | | | | | | QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS: | | | O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH | | | CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF | | | BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT | | | 561-822-2262 OR [email protected] | | | O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected] | | | O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-30-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-30-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-30-2022 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-11-30 11:10:33 | 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-29 15:10:26 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-01-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-01-2023 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-01-2023 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-01 10:42:34 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2025 N DIXIE PARKING Z22080030 | | | MARCH 1, 2023 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THIS APPLICATION IS BEING REVIEWED FOR | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-273. 54 PARKING LOTS AS | | | PRINCIPAL OR OFF SITE ACCESSORY USES AND THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE. STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE | | | APPLICATION MOVES FORWARD AND IF AN APPLICATION FOR | | | SITE PLAN REVIEW IS SUBMITTED. | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDES THE LOT TO THE EAST, SO | | | INDICATE IF THE SITE PLAN WILL INCLUDE THIS LOT. | | | A SEPARATE SITE PLAN APPLICATION WILL BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE EXISTING TREE TABULAR CHART | | | ON SHEET TD-1 TO SHOW THE MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR | | | REMOVALS. MITIGATION REQUIRED CHART IS REDUNDANT. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING | | | CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE | | | SABAL PALM #4 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO SHOW THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER AND CHANGE TO 2 | | | TREES REQUIRED. DRIVEWAYS CANNOT BE DEDUCTED. | | | SOUTH BUFFER HAS BEEN CORRECTED, BUT NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE IS 188 FT REQUIRING 7 TREES. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. WALL HEIGHTS MAY BE LIMITED, THIS IS | | | ADDRESSED UNDER THE ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE PLAN SHOWS 5 REGULAR PARKING SPACES, | | | 6 PARALLEL SPACES AND 4 TANDEM SPACES. SECTION | | | 94-443(C) MAY APPLY FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WITH THE REQUIRED TREE AS THE TOTAL | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES EXCEEDS 12. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. THE PROPERTY LINE FOR THE ADJACENT PARCEL | | | REQUIRES A LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | A VARIANCE HAS BEEN REQUESTED. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/2/22: | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE NOT CATEGORY 1 SHADE | | | TREES, SO CALCULATION IN LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART | | | IS NOT CORRECT. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THERE ARE ONLY 9 PARKING SPACES SHOWN, SO | | | IF CORRECT THE PARKING SPACE NUMBER ON SHEET LP-3 | | | SHOWING 11. | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. GUMBO LIMBO SPREADS HORIZONTALLY, SO | | | MAY NOT BE THE BEST CHOICE FOR THE WEST BUFFER. GREEN | | | BUTTONWOOD OR PIGEON PLUM MAY BE MORE UPRIGHT TO AVOID | | | SPREADING ACROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY CHART | | | FOR THE FOLLOWING: | | | ??? POINTS CANNOT BE TAKEN IN OPTION 3 BECAUSE THERE IS | | | NO DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUND COVER ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | ??? POINTS CANNOT BE TAKEN IN OPTION 7 BECAUSE SOD ARE | | | IS GREATER THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/1/23: | | | 12. CORRECT SHEET TD-1 TO SHOW THE MANGO TREE AS | | | REMAINING AS INDICATED IN THE JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-02-2022 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-02-2022 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-02 16:17:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2025 N DIXIE PARKING Z22080030 | | | DECEMBER 2, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THIS APPLICATION IS BEING | | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-273. 54 PARKING | | | LOTS AS PRINCIPAL OR OFF SITE ACCESSORY USES AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE CODE. STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE APPLICATION MOVES FORWARD AND IF AN APPLICATION FOR | | | SITE PLAN REVIEW IS SUBMITTED. | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDES THE LOT TO THE EAST, SO | | | INDICATE IF THE SITE PLAN WILL INCLUDE THIS LOT. | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE EXISTING TREE TABULAR CHART | | | ON SHEET TD-1 TO SHOW THE MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR | | | REMOVALS. MITIGATION REQUIRED CHART IS REDUNDANT. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING | | | CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE | | | SABAL PALM #4 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS | | | IN THE LANDSCAPE CHART TO SHOW THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER AND CHANGE TO 2 | | | TREES REQUIRED. DRIVEWAYS CANNOT BE DEDUCTED. | | | SOUTH BUFFER HAS BEEN CORRECTED, BUT NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE IS 188 FT REQUIRING 7 TREES. | | | | | | 5. ONGOING. WALL HEIGHTS MAY BE LIMITED, THIS IS | | | ADDRESSED UNDER THE ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE PLAN SHOWS 5 REGULAR PARKING SPACES, | | | 6 PARALLEL SPACES AND 4 TANDEM SPACES. SECTION | | | 94-443(C) MAY APPLY FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WITH THE REQUIRED TREE AS THE TOTAL | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES EXCEEDS 12. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. THE PROPERTY LINE FOR THE ADJACENT PARCEL | | | REQUIRES A LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | A VARIANCE HAS BEEN REQUESTED. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/2/22: | | | 8. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE NOT CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES, SO | | | CALCULATION IN LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART IS NOT | | | CORRECT. | | | | | | 9. THERE ARE ONLY 9 PARKING SPACES SHOWN, SO IF CORRECT | | | THE PARKING SPACE NUMBER ON SHEET LP-3 SHOWING 11. | | | | | | 10. GUMBO LIMBO SPREADS HORIZONTALLY, SO MAY NOT BE THE | | | BEST CHOICE FOR THE WEST BUFFER. GREEN BUTTONWOOD OR | | | PIGEON PLUM MAY BE MORE UPRIGHT TO AVOID SPREADING | | | ACROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 11. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY CHART FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ??? POINTS CANNOT BE TAKEN IN OPTION 3 BECAUSE THERE IS | | | NO DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUND COVER ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | ??? POINTS CANNOT BE TAKEN IN OPTION 7 BECAUSE SOD ARE | | | IS GREATER THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-08 09:53:19 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2025 N DIXIE PARKING Z22080030 | | | SEPTEMBER 7, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS APPLICATION IS BEING REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE | | | WITH SECTION 94-273. 54 PARKING LOTS AS PRINCIPAL OR | | | OFF SITE ACCESSORY USES AND THE LANDSCAPE CODE. STAFF | | | MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE APPLICATION MOVES | | | FORWARD AND IF AN APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW IS | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. CORRECT THE EXISTING TREE TABULAR CHART ON SHEET | | | TD-1 TO SHOW THE MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR REMOVALS. | | | MITIGATION REQUIRED CHART IS REDUNDANT. | | | | | | 3. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A | | | 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY | | | RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND | | | RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE SABAL PALM #4 | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 4. CORRECT THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | CHART TO SHOW THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE | | | FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER AND CHANGE TO 2 TREES REQUIRED. | | | DRIVEWAYS CANNOT BE DEDUCTED. | | | | | | 5. WALL HEIGHTS MAY BE LIMITED, THIS IS ADDRESSED UNDER | | | THE ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 6. THE PLAN SHOWS 5 REGULAR PARKING SPACES, 6 PARALLEL | | | SPACES AND 4 TANDEM SPACES. SECTION 94-443(C) MAY APPLY | | | FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WITH | | | THE REQUIRED TREE AS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES | | | EXCEEDS 12. | | | | | | 7. THE PROPERTY LINE FOR THE ADJACENT PARCEL REQUIRES A | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mtechnow |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
12:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
12:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
12-12-2022 |
Time |
09:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-12 09:17:20 | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING: | | | -MANY OF THE RESPONSES IN RESPONSE LETTER SAID CIVIL | | | PLANS FORTHCOMING. PLEASE INCLUDE UPDATED CIVIL PLANS | | | IN NEXT RESUBMITTAL. | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | MARK HURLEY [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
13:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-07 13:17:56 | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING: | | | -SURVEY GENERAL NOTE SAYS THAT NO SEARCH OF PUBLIC | | | RECORD HAS BEEN MADE. WHEN WILL SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORD | | | BE CONDUCTED? | | | -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL REMOVAL OF | | | EXISTING UNUSED DRIVEWAY APPROACH NEAR NORTHEAST AREA | | | OF PROPERTY. | | | -SOME OF THE WORDS FROM CALLOUTS ON CIVIL PLANS ARE | | | GOING OFF THE SHEET AND UNREADABLE. | | | -ON PLANS SHOW FULL WIDTH OF ALLEYS AND STREETS AT THE | | | NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF PROPERTY ALONG WITH OPPOSITE | | | CURBS. | | | -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW A DRIVEWAY APPROACH AND LARGE | | | ROLLING GATE AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF EXISTING BUILDING | | | ADJACENT DIXIE. SHOW AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. | | | -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICE. | | | WILL ANY EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES BE | | | SUFFICIENT? | | | -WILL FOOD SERVICE BE OFFERED? | | | -ADD DATUM STATEMENT AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO CIVIL | | | PLANS. | | | -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW DO NOT ENTER SIGN AT DIXIE | | | PREVENTING ENTRANCE INTO ALLEY. WILL THAT REMAIN? | | | -SHOW AND LABEL IRRIGATION METER BOX AND BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLY NEAR NORTH PROPERTY LINE. ALSO ADD UTILITY | | | EASEMENT AROUND METER BOX IF ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND | | | NONE CURRENTLY EXIST. | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | MARK HURLEY [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-21-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-21-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-21-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-11-21 09:00:08 | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT, IN CASE OF PROPOSING | | | ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN THE CITY'S RIGHT OF WAY, | | | THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF THE CAN (S) SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND | | | THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND COLOR APPROVED BY | | | THE PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING MAINTENANCE IS | | | RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE CAN(S). | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-31-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-31-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-31-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-31 12:03:52 | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO | | | THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W | | | PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000 | | | 00) | | | 2- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE | | | VEHICLE'S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS | | | FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - DUAL AXLES | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | 3- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN | | | THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF | | | THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND | | | COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING | | | MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE | | | CAN(S). | | | 4- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA | | | STATUES [553.5041 F.S.]. | | | 5- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION. | | | 6- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED | | | DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
13:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-08 13:34:24 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE | | | CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE | | | CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION | | | IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL REFERENCE AND DATUM | | | CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON EACH ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET | | | WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. N. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT TO APPROVE | | | ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W | | | | | | 3. REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS AND DROP CURBS | | | WITHIN THE 20TH ST. R/W. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE SWALES ON THE NORTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE | | | PADEL COURTS TO COLLECT AND INFILTRATE STORMWATER | | | RUNOFF. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE SECTION THROUGH DRIVEWAY FROM SOUTH R/W OF | | | ALLEY TO 5 FEET PAST THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY. | | | SHOW AND LABEL SURFACE FEATURES, GRADE BREAKS, SURFACE | | | SLOPE DIRECTIONS, R/W LINES, DIMENSIONS, ETC. | | | | | | 6. IT APPEARS THE CURB IN THE ALLEY WILL NEED ADJUSTED | | | OR THE DRIVEWAY APRON EXTENDED TO THE EXISTING CURB. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH | | | THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE | | | START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-06-2022 |
Time |
14:23 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-06 15:14:58 | 1. SEE MAINTENANCE MAP IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 137 | | | FOR ADDITIONAL R/W TAKEN FOR DIXIE HWY. | | | 2. NO QUEUE FOR GATES AT ALLEY. | | | 3. DUMPSTER DOORS CANNOT OPEN INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
12-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-01 00:27:20 | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PROVIDE TRIP | | | GENERATION REFERENCE (I.E. COUNTY TABLE OR ITE LAND USE | | | PAGE WITH ADOPTED RATES) AND LATEST SITE MAP IN THE | | | APPENDIX. UPDATED TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS NOT PROVIDED IN | | | THE LATEST RESUBMISSION. INSIGNIFICANT DOES NOT HAVE | | | ANY MERIT FOR THIS COMMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACTUAL | | | REFERENCE ITE TRIP GENERATION PAGES AND/OR COUNTY TRIP | | | GENERATION TABLE. LATEST SITE PLAN WAS NOT PROVIDED IN | | | LATEST REVISION. LASTLY, STUDY STILL MENTIONS A FULL | | | ACCESS DRIVEWAY ON HOGAN, WHILE LATEST SITE PLAN | | | SHOWCASES A ONE WAY DRIVEWAY WITH ENTRANCE FROM HOGAN | | | AND EXIT TO 20TH ST | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE | | | VALET SERVICE | | | 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC | | | SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING | | | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, | | | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, | | | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, | | | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) | | | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD | | | BE NAMED T-1.0 | | | 5) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE | | | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, | | | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT | | | MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE | | | SITE. SUCH PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW | | | AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) | | | 7) SATISFIED. IF PERTINENT, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS | | | FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN | | | AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE | | | DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND | | | DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A | | | SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS | | | ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE | | | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0) | | | 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND | | | SPECS SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION | | | FEATURES (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT | | | MARKING, SIGNAL, ADA STALL, BIKE RACK, ETC.) | | | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF THE | | | REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING/RACKS | | | 10) SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING STALL IS | | | EXCESSIVELY HIGHER THAN THE REQUIRED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN | | | EXPLANATION | | | 11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE ADA STALL IS MISSING THE 5 | | | FEET SIDE BUFFER. IS THE ACCESS AISLE FLUSH WITH THE | | | STALL? OTHERWISE A RAMP WOULD BE REQUIRED | | | 12) SATISFIED. EXTEND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SOUTH OF | | | THE PROPERTY SO TO CONNECT TO THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN | | | GATE | | | 13) SATISFIED. HAS THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT BEEN PERMITTED AND UNDER | | | CONSTRUCTION? | | | 14) EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE IS 7-FEET WIDE. SUCH | | | WIDTH MUST BE KEPT THROUGHOUT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | FRONTAGE, PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-08 12:07:39 | | | | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PROVIDE TRIP GENERATION | | | REFERENCE (I.E. COUNTY TABLE OR ITE LAND USE PAGE WITH | | | ADOPTED RATES) AND LATEST SITE MAP IN THE APPENDIX | | | 3) PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE VALET SERVICE | | | 4) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE | | | GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED | | | FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING | | | STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES, | | | CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY | | | SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED | | | AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0 | | | 5) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB | | | DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, | | | PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS | | | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN. | | | INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH | | | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE | | | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) | | | 7) IF PERTINENT, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND | | | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT | | | COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH | | | PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE | | | TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY | | | (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0) | | | 8) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR | | | EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. | | | CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL, | | | ADA STALL, BIKE RACK, ETC.) | | | 9) PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED BICYCLE | | | PARKING/RACKS | | | 10) THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING STALL IS EXCESSIVELY | | | HIGHER THAN THE REQUIRED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION | | | 11) THE ADA STALL IS MISSING THE 5 FEET SIDE BUFFER | | | 12) EXTEND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY | | | SO TO CONNECT TO THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN GATE | | | 13) HAS THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED PARKING LOT BEEN PERMITTED AND UNDER | | | CONSTRUCTION? | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-22-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
02-22-2023 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
02-22-2023 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-22 12:15:56 | 2/22/23 ??? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, AND | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS | | | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSE | | | TO THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54). [SATISFIED] | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES FROM ALL ANGLES OF THE | | | SUBJECT PROPERTY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | J. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND OBJECTION FROM | | | THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | K. PLEASE SUBMIT AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | L. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | M. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. [SATISFIED] | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. THE BUILDING ENVELOPE/FOOTPRINT OF THE ???EXISTING | | | ONE STORY STRUCTURE??? PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO AN | | | ???EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB??? IS GREATER IN | | | SIZE ON THE SURVEY AND PLANS THAN THE ???3,465 SQUARE | | | FEET??? INDICATED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. | | | THEREFORE, PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANS, JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT, AND OTHER SUBMITTED MATERIALS | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486, THE | | | MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED USE IS AS REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | ADMINISTRATOR. THEREFORE, OBTAIN CONFIRMATION FROM THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE REQUIRED | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND PLEASE REVISE THE | | | DIFFERENT PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND OTHER | | | SUBMITTED MATERIALS | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] | | | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, BY | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED | | | PARKING SPACES ENTIRELY ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 4. THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING DIMENSIONAL | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(N), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 5. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY THE PROPOSED VALET | | | PARKING OPERATIONS. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q), | | | PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED | | | BICYCLE PARKING ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | 7. THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | | | FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR | | | SUBSECTION 94-304(B)(2), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, AND RELOCATE | | | THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FURTHER SOUTH CLOSER TO | | | THE HOGANS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE HOGANS STREET ON THE SURVEY | | | AND PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REMOVAL OF | | | THE EXISTING CURB CUTS/DRIVE ACCESSES ALONG 20TH STREET | | | ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF | | | VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), | | | LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-611, THE | | | SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070 IS A DOUBLE | | | FRONTAGE LOT. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] | | | 13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(7), A LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT LEAST FIVE | | | FEET WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES, | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT | | | SATISFIED ??? BUT WAIVER REQUESTED IS ACKNOWLEDGED] | | | 14. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT OF FIVE (5) FEET AND IS CLOSER THAN THE MINIMUM | | | SIX (6) INCHES DISTANCE REQUIREMENT ALONG THE SIDE LOT | | | LINE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(14), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 15. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACKS EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES | | | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(B)(1), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT | | | SATISFIED] | | | 16. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE | | | RESIDENTIAL FRONT PROPERTY LINES EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-443(A)(1), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 17. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES | | | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 18. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS | | | REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT | | | SATISFIED] | | | 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HOURS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED ???EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB??? USE. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE THE OWNERSHIP PROVISIONS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES ACCORDING THE ZLDR | | | SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54)(B)(15). [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 22. PLEASE SHADE/GRAY-OUT THE ADJACENT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010010 AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN (SHEET TD-1) ON ALL THE OTHER PLANS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED | | | NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA ON | | | THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE VISIBILITY | | | TRIANGLE AREAS/DIMENSIONS AND | | | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED WALLS | | | OUTSIDE OF THESE AREAS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS ACCORDING | | | TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E). [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED WALL HEIGHT | | | INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS. [SATISFIED] | | | 26. PLEASE CONFIRM IF YOU ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE | | | FROM THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(B)(1) FOR THE PROPOSED | | | WALLS (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070) ALONG 20TH STREET AND HOGANS STREET. | | | IF SO, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETED VARIANCE APPLICATION | | | FOR THE SUBJECT REQUEST. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 27. PLEASE CONFIRM IF YOU ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE | | | FROM THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(A)(1) FOR THE PROPOSED | | | WALLS (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070) ALONG 20TH STREET AND HOGANS STREET. | | | IF SO, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETED VARIANCE APPLICATION | | | FOR THE SUBJECT REQUEST. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-30-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
11-30-2022 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
11-30-2022 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-11-30 10:54:30 | 11/30/22 ??? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, AND | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS | | | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSE | | | TO THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54). [SATISFIED] | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES FROM ALL ANGLES OF THE | | | SUBJECT PROPERTY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | J. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND OBJECTION FROM | | | THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | K. PLEASE SUBMIT AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | L. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | M. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. THE BUILDING ENVELOPE/FOOTPRINT OF THE ???EXISTING | | | ONE STORY STRUCTURE??? PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO AN | | | ???EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB??? IS GREATER IN | | | SIZE ON THE SURVEY AND PLANS THAN THE ???3,465 SQUARE | | | FEET??? INDICATED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. | | | THEREFORE, PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANS, JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT, AND OTHER SUBMITTED MATERIALS | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486, THE | | | MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED USE IS AS REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | ADMINISTRATOR. THEREFORE, OBTAIN CONFIRMATION FROM THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE REQUIRED | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND PLEASE REVISE THE | | | DIFFERENT PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND OTHER | | | SUBMITTED MATERIALS | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] | | | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, BY | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED | | | PARKING SPACES ENTIRELY ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 4. THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING DIMENSIONAL | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(N), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 5. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY THE PROPOSED VALET | | | PARKING OPERATIONS. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q), | | | PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED | | | BICYCLE PARKING ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | 7. THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | | | FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR | | | SUBSECTION 94-304(B)(2), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, AND RELOCATE | | | THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FURTHER SOUTH CLOSER TO | | | THE HOGANS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE HOGANS STREET ON THE SURVEY | | | AND PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REMOVAL OF | | | THE EXISTING CURB CUTS/DRIVE ACCESSES ALONG 20TH STREET | | | ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF | | | VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), | | | LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-611, THE | | | SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070 IS A DOUBLE | | | FRONTAGE LOT. | | | 13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(7), A LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT LEAST FIVE | | | FEET WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES, | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT | | | SATISFIED ??? BUT WAIVER REQUESTED IS ACKNOWLEDGED] | | | 14. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT OF FIVE (5) FEET AND IS CLOSER THAN THE MINIMUM | | | SIX (6) INCHES DISTANCE REQUIREMENT ALONG THE SIDE LOT | | | LINE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(14), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 15. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACKS EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES | | | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(B)(1), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT | | | SATISFIED] | | | 16. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE | | | RESIDENTIAL FRONT PROPERTY LINES EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-443(A)(1), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, | | | ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 17. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES | | | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 18. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS | | | REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT | | | SATISFIED] | | | 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HOURS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED ???EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB??? USE. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE THE OWNERSHIP PROVISIONS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES ACCORDING THE ZLDR | | | SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54)(B)(15). [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 22. PLEASE SHADE/GRAY-OUT THE ADJACENT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010010 AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN (SHEET TD-1) ON ALL THE OTHER PLANS. | | | 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED | | | NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA ON | | | THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING IS LOCATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010. | | | 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE VISIBILITY | | | TRIANGLE AREAS/DIMENSIONS AND | | | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED WALLS | | | OUTSIDE OF THESE AREAS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS ACCORDING | | | TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E). | | | 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED WALL HEIGHT | | | INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS. | | | 26. PLEASE CONFIRM IF YOU ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE | | | FROM THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(B)(1) FOR THE PROPOSED | | | WALLS (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070) ALONG 20TH STREET AND HOGANS STREET. | | | IF SO, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETED VARIANCE APPLICATION | | | FOR THE SUBJECT REQUEST. | | | 27. PLEASE CONFIRM IF YOU ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE | | | FROM THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(A)(1) FOR THE PROPOSED | | | WALLS (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070) ALONG 20TH STREET AND HOGANS STREET. | | | IF SO, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETED VARIANCE APPLICATION | | | FOR THE SUBJECT REQUEST. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
11:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
11:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-07 11:05:36 | 9/7/22 ? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. | | | G. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, AND | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS | | | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES. | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSE | | | TO THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54). | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES FROM ALL ANGLES OF THE | | | SUBJECT PROPERTY. | | | J. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND OBJECTION FROM | | | THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS. | | | K. PLEASE SUBMIT AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION. | | | L. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. | | | M. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. THE BUILDING ENVELOPE/FOOTPRINT OF THE ?EXISTING ONE | | | STORY STRUCTURE? PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO AN | | | ?EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB? IS GREATER IN SIZE ON | | | THE SURVEY AND PLANS THAN THE ?3,465 SQUARE FEET? | | | INDICATED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THEREFORE, | | | PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND | | | OTHER SUBMITTED MATERIALS | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486, THE | | | MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED USE IS AS REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | ADMINISTRATOR. THEREFORE, OBTAIN CONFIRMATION FROM THE | | | PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE REQUIRED | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND PLEASE REVISE THE | | | DIFFERENT PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND OTHER | | | SUBMITTED MATERIALS | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, BY | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED | | | PARKING SPACES ENTIRELY ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER | | | 74434316150010070. | | | 4. THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING DIMENSIONAL | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(N), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 5. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY THE PROPOSED VALET | | | PARKING OPERATIONS. | | | 6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q), | | | PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED | | | BICYCLE PARKING ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 7. THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | | | FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR | | | SUBSECTION 94-304(B)(2), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, AND RELOCATE | | | THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FURTHER SOUTH CLOSER TO | | | THE HOGANS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE HOGANS STREET ON THE SURVEY | | | AND PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REMOVAL OF | | | THE EXISTING CURB CUTS/DRIVE ACCESSES ALONG 20TH STREET | | | ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF | | | VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), | | | LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. | | | 12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-611, THE | | | SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070 IS A DOUBLE | | | FRONTAGE LOT. | | | 13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(7), A LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT LEAST FIVE | | | FEET WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES, | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 14. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT OF FIVE (5) FEET AND IS CLOSER THAN THE MINIMUM | | | SIX (6) INCHES DISTANCE REQUIREMENT ALONG THE SIDE LOT | | | LINE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(14), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 15. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACKS EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES | | | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(B)(1), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 16. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE | | | RESIDENTIAL FRONT PROPERTY LINES EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION | | | 94-443(A)(1), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 17. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) WITHIN THE REQUIRED | | | FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES | | | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 18. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT | | | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS | | | REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E), | | | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE | | | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HOURS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED ?EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB? USE. | | | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE THE OWNERSHIP PROVISIONS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES ACCORDING THE ZLDR | | | SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54)(B)(15). | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |