City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z22080028

Plan Review Stops For Project Z22080028

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-25-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	08-25-2022	Time	16:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	swelter			Date	02-02-2023	Time	13:55	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-02 13:55:12
	SITE PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE APPROVAL OF ARTIST
	OR PUBLIC ART CONCEPT.
	ARTIST MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND APPROVED BEFORE BUILDING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

2022-08-25 16:21:35	PUBLIC ART IDENTIFIED ON SITE PLAN.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	09-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	09-07-2022	Time	14:30	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	09-07-2022	Time	14:30	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-07 14:34:13	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW
	A VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF
	FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
	ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED. \

	7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
	FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
	GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
	SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]


	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	01-27-2023		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	01-27-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	01-27-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-16-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	12-16-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	12-16-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-16 11:11:26	Z22080028 - 15TH AND LA KIRKSEY REZONING REVIEW
	12.16.22
	COMMENTS FOR CIVIL SUBMITTAL FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR.
	PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES AT
	561-494-1098 [email protected]
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING STORMWATER
	INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION
	OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). SANITARY CCTV WAS PROVIDED IN
	12.16.22 RESUBMITTAL; NO STORMWATER CCTV OR REPORT
	FOUND.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-23-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	08-23-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	08-23-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-23 14:03:47	Z22080028 - 15TH AND LA KIRKSEY REZONING REVIEW 8.22.22
	COMMENTS FOR CIVIL SUBMITTAL FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR.
	PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES AT
	561-494-1098 [email protected]
	GENERAL:
	O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
	INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
	(Z-XXXXXXXX).
	O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
	BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
	B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
	L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
	B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
	B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
	FOUND HERE:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
	MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
	C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
	ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
	CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
	SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
	SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
	BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
	O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
	ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
	SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
	O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
	DATA.

	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
	O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
	SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
	TO THEM.
	O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
	EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
	PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
	STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTION.
	O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
	OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
	METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
	PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
	INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
	O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
	NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.

	WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
	O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL.
	O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
	THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
	TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
	MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
	(CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
	O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER.
	O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
	O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
	TRAPS (IF ANY).
	O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.

	FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
	NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
	- AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
	- 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
	THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
	DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
	- 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
	STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
	MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
	- THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
	CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
	THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
	SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
	WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
	APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
	SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
	SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
	LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
	ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
	LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
	PARCELS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
	BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
	50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
	PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
	PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.

	QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
	O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
	CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
	BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
	561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
	O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
	DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
	O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
	SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-29-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	08-29-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	08-29-2022	Time	12:53	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-29 12:55:15	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT SITE PLAN.

	WITH THE LIMIT BUIDING INFORMATION PROVIDED, THE
	FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR
	BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
	WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
	CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
	CODES.

	6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
	OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.

	7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
	LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
	SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.

	8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL
	BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED
	WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.

	9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
	THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
	ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
	ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
	AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.

	9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
	LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
	THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
	OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
	AND ZONING OFFICE.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
	TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
	LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
	EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
	AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
	SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
	DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	12. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.

	CONTACT WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH
	COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
	[email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
	ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
	INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.

	14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	02-01-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	02-01-2023	Time	10:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	02-01-2023	Time	10:08	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-01 10:10:01	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 424 LA KIRKSEY Z22080028
	FEBRUARY 1, 2023
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.

	2. SATISFIED. SHEET L-1.1, EXISTING TREES AND PALMS TO
	REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD ANY
	MITIGATION DUE, REMOVE CREDITS FROM THE CHART AND
	PROVIDE REVISED TOTAL OF MITIGATION DUE. CONVERT ALL
	MITIGATION DUE TO SQUARE FOOTAGE.

	3. SATISFIED. SHEET L-1.1, MITIGATION CREDITS ARE NOT
	CORRECT, MUST USE THE CATEGORY LIST FOR TREE MITIGATION
	CREDITS. CATEGORY 1- 300 SQ FT CREDIT, CATEGORY - 150
	SQ FT CREDIT, CATEGORY 3- 100 SQ FT CREDIT, CATEGORY 4-
	50 SQ FT CREDIT. ANY SHORTFALL IN CANOPY CREDITS MUST
	BE CALCULATED FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU.
	MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE MITIGATION
	CHART:
	??? JACARANDA TRE#27 MITIGATION DUE IS 314 SQ FT.
	??? TOTAL SHOULD BE 14,623 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE.
	??? MITIGATION PROVIDED- SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY
	2 AT 150 SQ FT EACH.
	??? CHANGE WAX MYRTLE TO LIGUSTRUM
	??? TOTAL MITIGATION PROVIDED IS 9350 SQ FT
	??? PROVIDE PAYMENT IN LIEU AMOUNT BASED ON $500.00 PER
	300 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT.

	4. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(B)Q. SHOW TREES AND
	PALMS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE
	PROPERTY LINE.

	5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-452, IRRIGATION MUST BE
	PROVIDED FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING. THE EXISTING
	PLANTING AREAS ALONG LA KIRKSEY WERE DESIGNED AS
	BIOSWALES TO ACCEPT STORMWATER RUNOFF. STAFF RECOMMENDS
	DESIGNING TO MAINTAIN THIS INTENT. SHADE TREES ARE
	PREFERRED TO BE ADDED TO S DIXIE RIGHT OF WAY TO
	PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS.

	6. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PRELIMINARY
	APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT FOR THE LANDSCAPING IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY.

	7. SATISFIED. TAG FOR QVR/2 IS NOT INDICATING THE
	CORRECT SYMBOL ON THE PLAN. INDICATE IF THE CURRENT
	TREE CANOPY WILL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 14 FOOT CLEARANCE
	FOR TRAFFIC IF RELOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS
	OF THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE ADJACENT
	SIDEWALK OR HARDSCAPE AREAS FOR THE STREETSCAPE.

	STRUCTURAL SOIL SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN IN AREAS THAT ARE
	PAVED, ALL UNPAVED AREAS WILL BE SHOWN AS PLANTING
	SOIL.
	CORRECTED SHEETS SUBMITTED 2/2/23.


	9. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET IS REQUIRED ON
	THE EAST SIDE OF THE ACCESS ROAD FROM THE ALLEY WITH
	THE REQUIRED TREES. THIS IS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR
	THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL. PALMS OR SMALLER TREES MAY BE
	USED AGAINST THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
	SCREENING WITHOUT CAUSING MAINTENANCE ISSUES.

	10. SATISFIED. SOUTH LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ALLEY
	HAS A LARGE GAP IN THE BUFFER TREES THAT MUST BE
	CORRECTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.

	11. SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OUTSIDE
	THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT MUST MEET THE 8 FOOT WIDTH
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT. CALCULATIONS FOR THE 75% SHADE
	TREE REQUIREMENT ARE PROVIDED, BUT DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS
	SHOWN ON THE PLAN.


	12. SATISFIED. WATER LINES COMING INTO THE BUILDING
	FROM THE WEST SIDE NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE
	REQUIRED BUFFER TREES TO BE LOCATED WITHOUT CONFLICT TO
	PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USE.


	13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	14. SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED D CURBS FOR ALL
	LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS.

	15. SATISFIED. WAX MYRTLES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR TREES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
	4. STREETSCAPE IN FDOT RIGHT OF WAY MUST RECEIVE FDOT
	PERMIT APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
	OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	01-13-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	01-13-2023	Time	16:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	01-13-2023	Time	16:20	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-13 16:21:13	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 424 LA KIRKSEY Z22080028
	JANUARY 13, 2023
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.

	2. SATISFIED. SHEET L-1.1, EXISTING TREES AND PALMS TO
	REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD ANY
	MITIGATION DUE, REMOVE CREDITS FROM THE CHART AND
	PROVIDE REVISED TOTAL OF MITIGATION DUE. CONVERT ALL
	MITIGATION DUE TO SQUARE FOOTAGE.

	3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHEET L-1.1, MITIGATION CREDITS
	ARE NOT CORRECT, MUST USE THE CATEGORY LIST FOR TREE
	MITIGATION CREDITS. CATEGORY 1- 300 SQ FT CREDIT,
	CATEGORY - 150 SQ FT CREDIT, CATEGORY 3- 100 SQ FT
	CREDIT, CATEGORY 4- 50 SQ FT CREDIT. ANY SHORTFALL IN
	CANOPY CREDITS MUST BE CALCULATED FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU.
	MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE MITIGATION
	CHART:
	??? JACARANDA TRE#27 MITIGATION DUE IS 314 SQ FT.
	??? TOTAL SHOULD BE 14,623 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE.
	??? MITIGATION PROVIDED- SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY
	2 AT 150 SQ FT EACH.
	??? CHANGE WAX MYRTLE TO LIGUSTRUM
	??? TOTAL MITIGATION PROVIDED IS 9350 SQ FT
	??? PROVIDE PAYMENT IN LIEU AMOUNT BASED ON $500.00 PER
	300 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT.

	4. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(B)Q. SHOW TREES AND
	PALMS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE
	PROPERTY LINE.

	5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-452, IRRIGATION MUST BE
	PROVIDED FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING. THE EXISTING
	PLANTING AREAS ALONG LA KIRKSEY WERE DESIGNED AS
	BIOSWALES TO ACCEPT STORMWATER RUNOFF. STAFF RECOMMENDS
	DESIGNING TO MAINTAIN THIS INTENT. SHADE TREES ARE
	PREFERRED TO BE ADDED TO S DIXIE RIGHT OF WAY TO
	PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS.

	6. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PRELIMINARY
	APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT FOR THE LANDSCAPING IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY.

	7. TAG FOR QVR/2 IS NOT INDICATING THE CORRECT SYMBOL
	ON THE PLAN. INDICATE IF THE CURRENT TREE CANOPY WILL
	PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 14 FOOT CLEARANCE FOR TRAFFIC IF
	RELOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND SHOW THE
	LOCATIONS OF THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE
	ADJACENT SIDEWALK OR HARDSCAPE AREAS FOR THE
	STREETSCAPE.

	STRUCTURAL SOIL SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN IN AREAS THAT ARE
	PAVED, ALL UNPAVED AREAS WILL BE SHOWN AS PLANTING
	SOIL.


	9. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET IS REQUIRED ON
	THE EAST SIDE OF THE ACCESS ROAD FROM THE ALLEY WITH
	THE REQUIRED TREES. THIS IS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR
	THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL. PALMS OR SMALLER TREES MAY BE
	USED AGAINST THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
	SCREENING WITHOUT CAUSING MAINTENANCE ISSUES.

	10. SATISFIED. SOUTH LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ALLEY
	HAS A LARGE GAP IN THE BUFFER TREES THAT MUST BE
	CORRECTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.

	11. SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OUTSIDE
	THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT MUST MEET THE 8 FOOT WIDTH
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT. CALCULATIONS FOR THE 75% SHADE
	TREE REQUIREMENT ARE PROVIDED, BUT DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS
	SHOWN ON THE PLAN.


	12. SATISFIED. WATER LINES COMING INTO THE BUILDING
	FROM THE WEST SIDE NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE
	REQUIRED BUFFER TREES TO BE LOCATED WITHOUT CONFLICT TO
	PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USE.


	13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	14. SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED D CURBS FOR ALL
	LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS.

	15. SATISFIED. WAX MYRTLES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR TREES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
	4. STREETSCAPE IN FDOT RIGHT OF WAY MUST RECEIVE FDOT
	PERMIT APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
	OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	09-06-2022	Time	16:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	09-06-2022	Time	16:53	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-06 16:54:17	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 424 LA KIRKSEY Z22080028
	SEPTEMBER 6, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
	RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
	EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
	POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
	THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS.

	2. SHEET L-1.1, EXISTING TREES AND PALMS TO REMAIN OR
	BE RELOCATED CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD ANY MITIGATION
	DUE, REMOVE CREDITS FROM THE CHART AND PROVIDE REVISED
	TOTAL OF MITIGATION DUE. CONVERT ALL MITIGATION DUE TO
	SQUARE FOOTAGE.

	3. SHEET L-1.1, MITIGATION CREDITS ARE NOT CORRECT,
	MUST USE THE CATEGORY LIST FOR TREE MITIGATION CREDITS.
	CATEGORY 1- 300 SQ FT CREDIT, CATEGORY - 150 SQ FT
	CREDIT, CATEGORY 3- 100 SQ FT CREDIT, CATEGORY 4- 50 SQ
	FT CREDIT. ANY SHORTFALL IN CANOPY CREDITS MUST BE
	CALCULATED FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU.

	4. PER SECTION 94-442(B)Q. SHOW TREES AND PALMS ON THE
	ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE PROPERTY
	LINE.

	5. PER SECTION 94-452, IRRIGATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
	THE RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING. THE EXISTING PLANTING
	AREAS ALONG LA KIRKSEY WERE DESIGNED AS BIOSWALES TO
	ACCEPT STORMWATER RUNOFF. STAFF RECOMMENDS DESIGNING TO
	MAINTAIN THIS INTENT. SHADE TREES ARE PREFERRED TO BE
	ADDED TO S DIXIE RIGHT OF WAY TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR
	PEDESTRIANS.

	6. PROVIDE A PRELIMINARY APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT FOR
	THE LANDSCAPING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	7. TAG FOR QVR/2 IS NOT INDICATING THE CORRECT SYMBOL
	ON THE PLAN. INDICATE IF THE CURRENT TREE CANOPY WILL
	PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 14 FOOT CLEARANCE FOR TRAFFIC IF
	RELOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	8. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE
	REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK OR
	HARDSCAPE AREAS FOR THE STREETSCAPE.

	9. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET IS REQUIRED ON THE EAST
	SIDE OF THE ACCESS ROAD FROM THE ALLEY WITH THE
	REQUIRED TREES. THIS IS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR THE
	ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL. PALMS OR SMALLER TREES MAY BE
	USED AGAINST THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
	SCREENING WITHOUT CAUSING MAINTENANCE ISSUES.

	10. SOUTH LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ALLEY HAS A LARGE
	GAP IN THE BUFFER TREES THAT MUST BE CORRECTED TO MEET
	THE REQUIREMENTS.

	11. THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING
	FOOTPRINT MUST MEET THE 8 FOOT WIDTH LANDSCAPE
	REQUIREMENT. CALCULATIONS FOR THE 75% SHADE TREE
	REQUIREMENT ARE PROVIDED, BUT DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS
	SHOWN ON THE PLAN.


	12. WATER LINES COMING INTO THE BUILDING FROM THE WEST
	SIDE NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO ALLOW THE REQUIRED BUFFER
	TREES TO BE LOCATED WITHOUT CONFLICT TO PROVIDE
	PROTECTION FOR THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USE.


	13. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
	VALVES AND EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN.

	14. SHOW THE REQUIRED D CURBS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS
	ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS.

	15. WAX MYRTLES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT
	REQUIREMENT FOR TREES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	01-30-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	01-30-2023	Time	11:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	01-30-2023	Time	11:01	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	09-08-2022	Time	11:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	09-08-2022	Time	11:40	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 11:48:20	-UTILITIES IS REVIEWING THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE
	CONNECTIONS ON 15TH ST TO VERIFY THAT THERE IS ADEQUATE
	CAPACITY.
	-REVISE THE SERVICE CONNECTION POINT ON 14TH ST TO
	CONNECT TO THE EXISITING 8" WM ON DIXIE.

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	12-19-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	12-19-2022	Time	10:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-12-19 10:13:41	-LABEL FDC OR ADD SYMBOL TO LEGEND AT ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	-PROVIDE CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN EXISTING HYDRANT
	AND PROPOSED STORMWATER PIPE AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	SUBMITTAL.
	-AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, UPDATE PLANS SO
	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT IN UTILITY EASEMENTS.
	-UPON FURTHER REVIEW AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	SUBMITTAL, MAY NEED TO REMOVE EXISTING SEWER LATERALS
	AND MAY NEED TO EXPAND LIMITS OF PAVEMENT RESTORATION
	ON DIXIE.
	--AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, SHOW EXISTING
	WATER SERVICES GOING NORTH FROM WATER MAIN ON L A
	KIRKSEY.

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-02-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	09-02-2022	Time	11:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-09-02 11:40:23	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES THE FOLLOWING:
	-ADD LEGEND TO EACH ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET SHOWING
	SYMBOLS AND LINES USED THAT ARE NOT OTHERWISE LABELED.
	-SHOW UTILITY EASEMENTS ON SHEET C05. BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLIES SHOULD NOT BE IN UTILITY EASEMENTS.
	-CALLOUT THE RP BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR THE PROPOSED 1
	INCH METERED WATER SERVICES. ENSURE LABEL HAS SIZING.
	-SHOW AND LABEL SEWER LATERAL CLEANOUTS.
	-IS THE 2 INCH METER FOR IRRIGATION? IF NOT, IS A
	METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE NEEDED?
	-ON DEMO PLAN SHOW AND EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES
	AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
	-PROVIDE CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN SOUTHERN BUSH AND
	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOWN ON LANDSCAPING PLAN L2.0.
	-SHOW AND LABEL FDC ON PLANS IF ANY ARE NEEDED OR
	REQUIRED.
	-SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITY POLES, LIGHT
	POLES, AND GUY WIRES NEAR PROPERTY ON ENGINEERING PLAN
	SHEETS IF THEY WILL REMAIN.
	-LABEL THE STREETS ON DEMO PLAN.
	-ONE OF THE STORMWATER LINES ON DIXIE SHOWS IT IN CLOSE
	PROXIMITY TO WATER MAIN. IS THAT CORRECT?
	-VERIFY THERE IS NO UTILITY OR FPL EASEMENTS RUNNING
	ALONG ALLEY.
	-ON AUTOTURN EXHIBIT, PLEASE SHOW UTILITY VAC TRUCK 7
	FEET WIDE, 13 FEET HIGH, AND 36 FOOT LONG CAN
	SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATE THROUGH PROPOSED ONE WAY ALLEY
	TURN.
	-IF THERE WILL BE ANY GREASE TRAPS OUTSIDE BUILDING,
	THEN SHOW AND LABEL ON PLANS.
	-MAY HAVE TO GRANT UTILITY EASEMENT FOR PROPOSED
	SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
	-LABEL ADJACENT PROPERTY ADDRESSES ON ENGINEERING PLAN
	SHEETS.
	-SHOW EXISTING SEWER LATERALS AND LABEL WHAT IS
	HAPPENING TO THEM.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	01-31-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	01-31-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	01-31-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-31 11:57:35

NO FURTHER COMMENTS.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	01-18-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date		Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	01-18-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-18 14:20:18	PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN EXHIBIT, SHEET C-07,
	TO REFLECT:
	1- THE CORRECT SANITATION COLLECTION TRUCK (FRONT
	LOADER) WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE???S WHEEL
	PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS FOR THE
	SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
	FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
	2- REVISE S.E. TURNING RADII TO PREVENT ANY POTENTIAL
	ENCROACHMENT FOR THE SANITATION COLLECTION TRUCK.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	5461-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-25-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-25-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	08-25-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-25 11:32:42	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
	QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
	THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A
	FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE
	SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE
	STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO THE LATEST REVISION OF THE
	GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDO
	CUMENT/3690/637629060422100000)
	3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
	WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
	TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
	4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
	RECYCLING CONTAINERS
	5- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
	GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
	TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
	NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
	6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	7- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	8- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY
	WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
	9- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
	DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.



	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	09-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	09-08-2022	Time	12:58	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	09-08-2022	Time	12:59	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 12:59:10	SEE COMMENTS UNDER Z22080027.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	01-19-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	01-19-2023	Time	06:28	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2023-01-19 06:28:09	CONDITION OF REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
	SEE COMMENTS UNDER Z22080029

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	09-06-2022	Time	11:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-09-06 11:22:50	1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
	2. APPROVAL REQUIRED FROM FDOT FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND
	MANHOLES IN SIDEWALK.
	3. ALLEY WILL BE BY EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AND UTILITIES
	WITH MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION BY APPLICANT.
	4. CHECK DESCRIPTION OF LOT 17 ON SURVEY, S/B PLAT BOOK
	1 , PAGE 127.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	01-31-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	01-31-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	01-31-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-31 16:17:40	APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
	1. PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS, SHOWCASING A
	LEGEND AND MITIGATING THE HIGHLIGHTED ENCROACHMENTS
	2. PROVIDE A REVISED SITE PLAN TO ADDRESS LATEST
	TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS PERTAINING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
	MARKINGS
	REVISED TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN AND AUTOTURN DRAWINGS,
	INCLUSIVE OF DETAILED CITY COMMENTS, WERE PROVIDED TO
	JOSEPH VERDONE ON 1/31/2023 VIA EMAIL.

	PAST TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY
	2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	3) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE TRAFFIC
	ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
	MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED
	4) SATISFIED. THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR THE LUPA
	APPLICATION HAS SIGNIFICANT TRIP GENERATION DIFFERENCES
	AND RESULTS WITH RESPECT TO THE LATEST TRAFFIC STUDY.
	PLEASE CORRECT, REVISE, AND RE-SUBMIT BOTH DOCUMENTS
	FOR SAKE OF CONSISTENCY
	5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
	SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
	TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
	DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
	DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
	CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
	PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD
	BE NAMED T-1.0. PROVIDE TRAVEL LANE(S) DIMENSION FOR
	14TH AND 15TH STREETS AT THE INTERSECTION WITH DIXIE
	HWY
	6) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
	BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
	MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
	THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SEVERAL
	PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE NORTHERN SIDE OF 15TH ST
	ARE MISSING
	7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
	PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. THE
	SITE PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND
	SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0)
	8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
	TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
	WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
	COLORS. SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART
	OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED
	ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0)
	9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
	SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
	(E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
	SIGNAL, ETC.)
	10) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
	PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
	OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
	IF ANY
	11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
	CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
	FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
	12) SATISFIED. FOR SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL PURPOSES, NO
	NEW ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LANE
	AND IN THE PROXIMITY OF AN INTERSECTION SHALL BE
	ALLOWED. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY
	13) SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE PARKING TABLE,
	SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING
	STALLS, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE CITY
	CODE REFERENCE FOR THE CALCULATION
	14) SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED FULL-ACCESS DRIVEWAY ON
	15TH ST SHOULD BE EXIT-ONLY, WHILE CONVERTING THE
	PROPOSED WESTERN EXIT-ONLY DRIVEWAY TO A FULL-ACCESS
	ONE. MOREOVER, THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE 125
	FEET AWAY FROM THE INTERSECTION, PER FDOT CORNER
	CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT. PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCE IN
	THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. LATEST RESUBMISSION DOES NOT
	SHOW THE REQUIRED (AND REQUESTED) 125 FEET CORNER
	CLEARANCE DISTANCE
	15) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY
	ONLY. CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
	INSTALLED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE COORDINATE
	WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING THE DIRECTIONALITY AND
	NOTIFY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ABOUT THE FINAL DECISION.
	PLEASE DESIGNATE THE ALLEY EAST/SOUTHBOUND, AND PROVIDE
	ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT IT WILL BE RE-PAVED, PAVEMENT
	MARKED, AND SIGNED ACCORDINGLY THROUGHOUT
	16) SATISFIED. PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ON
	14TH ST MAY NOT MEET CORNER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT (125
	FEET). PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCE IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION PLAN
	17) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN SHOWCASING AN
	SUV SIZED VEHICLE TRAVERSING THE ALLEYWAY, SO TO VERIFY
	THE FEASIBILITY OF ITS RE-ALIGNMENT (I.E. TURNING
	POINT)
	18) SATISFIED. PLEASE VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND
	CONFIGURATION OF THE WESTERN LEG AT THE 15TH AND DIXIE
	HWY INTERSECTION. EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE
	SHOWING A SLIGHT KINK TO ACCOMMODATE 10-FEET TRAVEL
	LANES. PROPOSED SITE PLANS SHOW A STRAIGHTENING OF THE
	DOUBLE-YELLOW LINES, WHICH MAY NOT BE FEASIBLE DUE TO
	GEOMETRIC AND DRAINAGE CONSTRAINTS

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-07-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	09-07-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	09-07-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-07 23:34:51	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY
	2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	3) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS,
	TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE
	REQUIRED

	SITE COMMENTS
	4) PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN
	FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
	FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
	STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
	CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
	SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
	AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0
	5) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
	DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
	PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
	INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. THE
	SITE PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND
	SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0)
	7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
	SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
	PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
	SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE
	TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY
	(E.G. T1.2, T-3.0)
	8) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
	EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
	CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
	ETC.)
	9) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
	TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
	STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
	10) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
	SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
	BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
	11) FOR SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL PURPOSES, NO NEW
	ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LANE AND
	IN THE PROXIMITY OF AN INTERSECTION SHALL BE ALLOWED.
	PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY
	12) PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE PARKING TABLE, SHOWCASING
	THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING STALLS,
	INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE CITY CODE
	REFERENCE FOR THE CALCULATION
	13) THE PROPOSED FULL-ACCESS DRIVEWAY ON 15TH ST SHOULD
	BE EXIT-ONLY, WHILE CONVERTING THE PROPOSED WESTERN
	EXIT-ONLY DRIVEWAY TO A FULL-ACCESS ONE. MOREOVER, THE
	EASTERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE 125 FEET AWAY FROM THE
	INTERSECTION, PER FDOT CORNER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT.
	PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCE IN THE TRANSPORTATION
	PLAN
	14) THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY ONLY.
	CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING INSTALLED
	AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC
	WORKS PERTAINING THE DIRECTIONALITY AND NOTIFY TRAFFIC
	ENGINEERING ABOUT THE FINAL DECISION
	15) PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ON 14TH ST MAY
	NOT MEET CORNER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT (125 FEET).
	PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCE IN THE TRANSPORTATION
	PLAN

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	02-02-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	02-02-2023	Time	14:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	02-02-2023	Time	14:05	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-02 14:06:27	2/2/23 ??? FAILED


	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM PUBLIC
	UTILITIES (AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA PUBLIC
	UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING
	THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
	EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
	THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED]
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL OF
	THE ENTIRE AREA. [SATISFIED]
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS OR
	COVENANTS WHICH GOVERN THE USE, MAINTENANCE AND
	CONTINUED PROTECTION OF THE PD AND ANY OF ITS COMMON
	AREAS OR FACILITIES. [SATISFIED SUBJECT TO THIS BE
	PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION]
	I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	[NOT SATISFIED]
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER
	AFFIDAVITS WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. [SATISFIED
	SUBJECT TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR
	THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]
	L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
	WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP. [SATISFIED SUBJECT TO
	THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE
	PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]

	PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION
	94-207(B)(9)(A)(1), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NAME
	OF THE DEVELOPER ON THE ???COVER??? SHEET NUMBER A-0
	AND/OR ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	2. THE PROPOSAL DEMONSTRATED IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE (VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS REQUIREMENT)
	ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-207(B)(6), THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTION,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
	WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
	ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES, METERS,
	BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS, TRANSFORMERS, AND
	ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE ???SITE PLAN???
	SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	6. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
	OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P), THEREFORE PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED
	- HOWEVER, WAIVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED]
	7. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY/CONFIRM WHETHER THE
	PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE FOR THE PROPOSED
	SELF-STORAGE USE OR FOR ALL THE PROPOSED USES.
	[RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	8. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED
	NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE ???PARKING???
	TABLE ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	[SATISFIED]
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	BIKE LANE (TO REMAIN) ALONG LA KIRKSEY/15TH STREET ON
	THE ???BOUNDARY SURVEY??? AND ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET
	NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	10. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-207(B)(9)(A)(7), PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED
	MASS TRANSIT FACILITIES ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET
	NUMBER A-1. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE CURB
	CUTS/CONCRETE DRIVE ACCESSES REMOVED ALONG DIXIE
	HIGHWAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, SIMILAR TO
	THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET
	NUMBER C-02, ???DEMOLITION PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER C-03,
	AND ???PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLANS??? SHEET
	NUMBER C-04. [SATISFIED]
	12. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE HOW THE CITY???S SANITATION
	SERVICE TRUCKS WILL ACCESS/COLLECT THE TRASH FROM THE
	PROPOSED TRASH AREA TO THE SOUTH ON THE ???AUTOTURN
	EXHIBIT??? SHEET NUMBER C-07. [SATISFIED]
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS,
	ACCORDINGLY, TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY
	LINE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY/RESIDENTIAL
	ZONING DISTRICT. [SATISFIED]
	14. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
	REGARDING THE PROPOSED FIVE-FOOT-HIGH SECURITY/ALUMINUM
	FENCE, THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	15. PLEASE PROVIDE AN
	ILLUMINATION/LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRICS PLAN DEMONSTRATING
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-207(D)(8).
	[SATISFIED]
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-409,
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING FA??ADE SIZE, PERCENT SIGNAGE PERMITTED, AND
	PERMITTED SIGN SIZE FOR THE PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED SIGNS
	ON THE ???COLOR ELEVATIONS??? SHEET NUMBERS A-3 TO A-4.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	17. THE PROPOSED ???WEST ELEVATION??? WALL MOUNTED SIGN
	IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-402(B)(2)(7), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE ???COLOR
	ELEVATION??? SHEET NUMBER A-4, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	18. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA),
	LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS.
	[SATISFIED]
	19. PLEASE UPDATE THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE ???ALLOWED??? INFORMATION
	WITHIN THE EXISTING MF14 AND GC ZONING DISTRICTS.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	20. PLEASE UPDATE THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MAXIMUM AND PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS AND
	IMPERMEABLE SURFACE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTIONS
	94-241 AND 94-243. [SATISFIED]
	21. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS (???ALLOWED???) INFORMATION
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTIONS 94-241 AND 94-243 FOR
	THE EXISTING MF14 AND GC ZONING DISTRICTS AND ADD THE
	PROPOSED HEIGHT ???TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET???
	INFORMATION TO REFLECT THE SAME INFORMATION
	DEMONSTRATED IN THE ELEVATIONS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	22. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	PROPOSED ???FRONT (EAST SIDE)??? SETBACK TO REFLECT THE
	SAME INFORMATION DEMONSTRATED IN THE GRAPHIC/PLAN.
	[SATISFIED]
	23. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE
	THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN WHOLE NUMBERS
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(H); TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE MINIMUM
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED ???STORAGE OFFICE??? PARKING SPACES
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486; TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE TOTAL
	MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES; AND TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	???H.C. (INCLUSIVE)??? PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE
	ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O). [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	24. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???LOADING??? TABLE ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P). [SATISFIED]
	25. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE ???SITEPLAN??? SHEET NUMBER
	A-1, ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER C-02, AND
	???LANDSCAPE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER L-2.0 REGARDING THE
	SITE DATA INFORMATION, THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE,
	ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]

	ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	26. IN REFERENCE TO REQUIRED MATERIALS COMMENT F.,
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM FLORIDA
	PUBLIC UTILITIES. [SATISFIED]
	27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT PROPOSED
	EASEMENTS ON SHEET NUMBERS A-1, C-02, AND L-2.0. [NOT
	SATISFIED]
	28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 5., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE ALL ABOVE GROUND
	APPURTENANCES ON SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	29. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 11., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE CURB CUTS/CONCRETE
	DRIVE ACCESSES REMOVED ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY ON SHEET
	NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 15., PLEASE
	PROVIDE EXPLANATION/CLARIFICATION ON THE DIFFERENCE
	BETWEEN THE HORIZONTAL PL AND THE VERTICAL PL PROVIDED.
	THE VERTICAL PL IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES
	INFORMATION THAT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-207(D)(8), PRIMARILY ALONG THE SOUTH
	PROPERTY LINE, THEREFORE, REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 16., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
	PROPOSED SIGNAGE ON THE EAST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS AND
	CORRECT THE ???MAX SIGNAGE AREAS??? ON THE EAST AND
	NORTH ELEVATIONS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 19., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE
	???ALLOWED??? INFORMATION WITHIN THE EXISTING MF14
	ZONING DISTRICT ON SHEET NUMBER A-1. [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]
	33. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MAXIMUM AND PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE
	BY IMPERMEABLE SURFACE ON SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	34. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 21., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
	???ALLOWED??? INFORMATION FOR THE EXISTING MF14 ZONING
	DISTRICT AND ADD THE PROPOSED HEIGHT ???TO THE TOP OF
	THE PARAPET??? INFORMATION, TO REFLECT THE SAME
	INFORMATION DEMONSTRATED IN THE ELEVATIONS, ON SHEET
	NUMBER A-1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	35. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 23., PLEASE
	CORRECT THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE MINIMUM
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED ???STORAGE OFFICE??? PARKING SPACES
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486 AND TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE TOTAL
	MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]
	36. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE IMPERVIOUS AND PERVIOUS
	INFORMATION ON SHEET NUMBER A-1, AS REFLECTED ON SHEET
	NUMBER C-02. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	37. IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE CITY???S SENIOR
	LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI, THAT THE MINIMUM
	LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENT WITHIN THE GC PDD IS 15%.
	THE LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED EXCEEDS THAT MINIMUM
	REQUIREMENT. THEREFORE, THE WAIVER REQUEST FROM THE
	MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENT IS NOT NEEDED.

	CONDITION OF APPROVAL: (IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER CITY
	STAFF REVIEWERS??? CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL)
	1. PRIOR TO STAFF SCHEDULING THE SUBJECT CASE FOR CITY
	COMMISSION, REVISED PLANS
	IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION AND CORRECTED SITE DATA INFORMATION SHALL
	BE PROVIDED.



	KEVIE DEFRANC
	SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	01-10-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	01-10-2023	Time	10:02	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	01-10-2023	Time	10:01	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-10 10:02:04	1/10/23 ??? FAILED


	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM PUBLIC
	UTILITIES (AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA PUBLIC
	UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING
	THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
	EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
	THEIR SERVICES. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL OF
	THE ENTIRE AREA. [SATISFIED]
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS OR
	COVENANTS WHICH GOVERN THE USE, MAINTENANCE AND
	CONTINUED PROTECTION OF THE PD AND ANY OF ITS COMMON
	AREAS OR FACILITIES. [SATISFIED SUBJECT TO THIS BE
	PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION]
	I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	[NOT SATISFIED]
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER
	AFFIDAVITS WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. [SATISFIED
	SUBJECT TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR
	THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]
	L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
	WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP. [SATISFIED SUBJECT TO
	THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE
	PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS]

	PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION
	94-207(B)(9)(A)(1), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NAME
	OF THE DEVELOPER ON THE ???COVER??? SHEET NUMBER A-0
	AND/OR ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	2. THE PROPOSAL DEMONSTRATED IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE (VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS REQUIREMENT)
	ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-207(B)(6), THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTION,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
	WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
	ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES, METERS,
	BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS, TRANSFORMERS, AND
	ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE ???SITE PLAN???
	SHEET NUMBER A-1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	6. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
	OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P), THEREFORE PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED
	- HOWEVER, WAIVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGED]
	7. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY/CONFIRM WHETHER THE
	PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE FOR THE PROPOSED
	SELF-STORAGE USE OR FOR ALL THE PROPOSED USES.
	[RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	8. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED
	NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE ???PARKING???
	TABLE ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1. [NOT
	SATISFIED]
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	BIKE LANE (TO REMAIN) ALONG LA KIRKSEY/15TH STREET ON
	THE ???BOUNDARY SURVEY??? AND ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET
	NUMBER A-1. [SATISFIED]
	10. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-207(B)(9)(A)(7), PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED
	MASS TRANSIT FACILITIES ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET
	NUMBER A-1. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE CURB
	CUTS/CONCRETE DRIVE ACCESSES REMOVED ALONG DIXIE
	HIGHWAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, SIMILAR TO
	THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET
	NUMBER C-02, ???DEMOLITION PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER C-03,
	AND ???PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLANS??? SHEET
	NUMBER C-04. [NOT SATISFIED]
	12. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE HOW THE CITY???S SANITATION
	SERVICE TRUCKS WILL ACCESS/COLLECT THE TRASH FROM THE
	PROPOSED TRASH AREA TO THE SOUTH ON THE ???AUTOTURN
	EXHIBIT??? SHEET NUMBER C-07. [SATISFIED]
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS,
	ACCORDINGLY, TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY
	LINE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY/RESIDENTIAL
	ZONING DISTRICT. [SATISFIED]
	14. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
	REGARDING THE PROPOSED FIVE-FOOT-HIGH SECURITY/ALUMINUM
	FENCE, THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	15. PLEASE PROVIDE AN
	ILLUMINATION/LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRICS PLAN DEMONSTRATING
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-207(D)(8).
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-409,
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING FA??ADE SIZE, PERCENT SIGNAGE PERMITTED, AND
	PERMITTED SIGN SIZE FOR THE PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED SIGNS
	ON THE ???COLOR ELEVATIONS??? SHEET NUMBERS A-3 TO A-4.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	17. THE PROPOSED ???WEST ELEVATION??? WALL MOUNTED SIGN
	IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-402(B)(2)(7), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE ???COLOR
	ELEVATION??? SHEET NUMBER A-4, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	18. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA),
	LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS.
	[SATISFIED]
	19. PLEASE UPDATE THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE ???ALLOWED??? INFORMATION
	WITHIN THE EXISTING MF14 AND GC ZONING DISTRICTS.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	20. PLEASE UPDATE THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MAXIMUM AND PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS AND
	IMPERMEABLE SURFACE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTIONS
	94-241 AND 94-243. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	21. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS (???ALLOWED???) INFORMATION
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTIONS 94-241 AND 94-243 FOR
	THE EXISTING MF14 AND GC ZONING DISTRICTS AND ADD THE
	PROPOSED HEIGHT ???TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET???
	INFORMATION TO REFLECT THE SAME INFORMATION
	DEMONSTRATED IN THE ELEVATIONS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	22. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???SITE DATA??? ON THE ???SITE
	PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	PROPOSED ???FRONT (EAST SIDE)??? SETBACK TO REFLECT THE
	SAME INFORMATION DEMONSTRATED IN THE GRAPHIC/PLAN.
	[SATISFIED]
	23. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE
	THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN WHOLE NUMBERS
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(H); TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE MINIMUM
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED ???STORAGE OFFICE??? PARKING SPACES
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486; TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE TOTAL
	MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES; AND TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	???H.C. (INCLUSIVE)??? PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE
	ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O). [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	24. PLEASE CORRECT THE ???LOADING??? TABLE ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P). [SATISFIED]
	25. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE ???SITEPLAN??? SHEET NUMBER
	A-1, ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER C-02, AND
	???LANDSCAPE PLAN??? SHEET NUMBER L-2.0 REGARDING THE
	SITE DATA INFORMATION, THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE,
	ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]

	ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	26. IN REFERENCE TO REQUIRED MATERIALS COMMENT F.,
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM FLORIDA
	PUBLIC UTILITIES.
	27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT PROPOSED
	EASEMENTS ON SHEET NUMBERS A-1, C-02, AND L-2.0.
	28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 5., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE ALL ABOVE GROUND
	APPURTENANCES ON SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	29. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 11., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE CURB CUTS/CONCRETE
	DRIVE ACCESSES REMOVED ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY ON SHEET
	NUMBER A-1.
	30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 15., PLEASE
	PROVIDE EXPLANATION/CLARIFICATION ON THE DIFFERENCE
	BETWEEN THE HORIZONTAL PL AND THE VERTICAL PL PROVIDED.
	THE VERTICAL PL IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES
	INFORMATION THAT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-207(D)(8), PRIMARILY ALONG THE SOUTH
	PROPERTY LINE, THEREFORE, REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 16., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
	PROPOSED SIGNAGE ON THE EAST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS AND
	CORRECT THE ???MAX SIGNAGE AREAS??? ON THE EAST AND
	NORTH ELEVATIONS.
	32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 19., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE
	???ALLOWED??? INFORMATION WITHIN THE EXISTING MF14
	ZONING DISTRICT ON SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	33. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MAXIMUM AND PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE
	BY IMPERMEABLE SURFACE ON SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	34. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 21., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
	???ALLOWED??? INFORMATION FOR THE EXISTING MF14 ZONING
	DISTRICT AND ADD THE PROPOSED HEIGHT ???TO THE TOP OF
	THE PARAPET??? INFORMATION, TO REFLECT THE SAME
	INFORMATION DEMONSTRATED IN THE ELEVATIONS, ON SHEET
	NUMBER A-1.
	35. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 23., PLEASE
	CORRECT THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE MINIMUM
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED ???STORAGE OFFICE??? PARKING SPACES
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486 AND TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE TOTAL
	MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES.
	36. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE IMPERVIOUS AND PERVIOUS
	INFORMATION ON SHEET NUMBER A-1, AS REFLECTED ON SHEET
	NUMBER C-02.



	KEVIE DEFRANC
	SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	09-06-2022	Time	15:29	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	09-06-2022	Time	15:28	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-06 15:29:29	9/6/22 ? FAILED


	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM PUBLIC
	UTILITIES (AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA PUBLIC
	UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING
	THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
	EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
	THEIR SERVICES.
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL OF
	THE ENTIRE AREA.
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS OR
	COVENANTS WHICH GOVERN THE USE, MAINTENANCE AND
	CONTINUED PROTECTION OF THE PD AND ANY OF ITS COMMON
	AREAS OR FACILITIES.
	I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW.
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER
	AFFIDAVITS WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT.
	L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS
	WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP.

	REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION
	94-207(B)(9)(A)(1), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NAME
	OF THE DEVELOPER ON THE ?COVER? SHEET NUMBER A-0 AND/OR
	?SITE PLAN? SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	2. THE PROPOSAL DEMONSTRATED IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE (VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS REQUIREMENT)
	ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-207(B)(6), THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTION,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS)
	WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE
	?SITE PLAN? SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
	ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES, METERS,
	BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS, TRANSFORMERS, AND
	ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET
	NUMBER A-1.
	6. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
	OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P), THEREFORE PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	7. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY/CONFIRM WHETHER THE
	PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE FOR THE PROPOSED
	SELF-STORAGE USE OR FOR ALL THE PROPOSED USES.
	8. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED
	NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE ?PARKING? TABLE
	ON THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING
	BIKE LANE (TO REMAIN) ALONG LA KIRKSEY/15TH STREET ON
	THE ?BOUNDARY SURVEY? AND ?SITE PLAN? SHEET NUMBER A-1.
	10. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-207(B)(9)(A)(7), PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED
	MASS TRANSIT FACILITIES ON THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET NUMBER
	A-1.
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE CURB
	CUTS/CONCRETE DRIVE ACCESSES REMOVED ALONG DIXIE
	HIGHWAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, SIMILAR TO
	THE INFORMATION DISPLAYED ON THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET
	NUMBER C-02, ?DEMOLITION PLAN? SHEET NUMBER C-03, AND
	?PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLANS? SHEET NUMBER
	C-04.
	12. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE HOW THE CITY?S SANITATION
	SERVICE TRUCKS WILL ACCESS/COLLECT THE TRASH FROM THE
	PROPOSED TRASH AREA TO THE SOUTH ON THE ?AUTOTURN
	EXHIBIT? SHEET NUMBER C-07.
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS,
	ACCORDINGLY, TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY
	LINE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY/RESIDENTIAL
	ZONING DISTRICT.
	14. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
	REGARDING THE PROPOSED FIVE-FOOT-HIGH SECURITY/ALUMINUM
	FENCE, THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE, ACCORDINGLY.
	15. PLEASE PROVIDE AN
	ILLUMINATION/LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRICS PLAN DEMONSTRATING
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-207(D)(8).
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-409,
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING FA?ADE SIZE, PERCENT SIGNAGE PERMITTED, AND
	PERMITTED SIGN SIZE FOR THE PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED SIGNS
	ON THE ?COLOR ELEVATIONS? SHEET NUMBERS A-3 TO A-4.
	17. THE PROPOSED ?WEST ELEVATION? WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS
	NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-402(B)(2)(7), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE ?COLOR
	ELEVATION? SHEET NUMBER A-4, ACCORDINGLY.
	18. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA),
	LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS.
	19. PLEASE UPDATE THE ?SITE DATA? ON THE ?SITE PLAN?
	SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRESPONDING
	DATA FOR THE ?ALLOWED? INFORMATION WITHIN THE EXISTING
	MF14 AND GC ZONING DISTRICTS.
	20. PLEASE UPDATE THE ?SITE DATA? ON THE ?SITE PLAN?
	SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MAXIMUM AND
	PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS AND IMPERMEABLE
	SURFACE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTIONS 94-241 AND
	94-243.
	21. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?SITE DATA? ON THE ?SITE PLAN?
	SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MAXIMUM
	BUILDING HEIGHTS (?ALLOWED?) INFORMATION ACCORDING TO
	THE ZLDR SUBSECTIONS 94-241 AND 94-243 FOR THE EXISTING
	MF14 AND GC ZONING DISTRICTS AND ADD THE PROPOSED
	HEIGHT ?TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET? INFORMATION TO
	REFLECT THE SAME INFORMATION DEMONSTRATED IN THE
	ELEVATIONS.
	22. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?SITE DATA? ON THE ?SITE PLAN?
	SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED
	?FRONT (EAST SIDE)? SETBACK TO REFLECT THE SAME
	INFORMATION DEMONSTRATED IN THE GRAPHIC/PLAN.
	23. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PARKING? TABLE ON THE ?SITE
	PLAN? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN WHOLE NUMBERS
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(H); TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE MINIMUM
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED ?STORAGE OFFICE? PARKING SPACES
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486; TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR THE TOTAL
	MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES; AND TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF ?H.C.
	(INCLUSIVE)? PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-485(O).
	24. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?LOADING? TABLE ON THE ?SITE
	PLAN? SHEET NUMBER A-1 TO INDICATE THE MINIMUM LOADING
	SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-485(P).
	25. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE ?SITEPLAN? SHEET NUMBER
	A-1, ?SITE PLAN? SHEET NUMBER C-02, AND ?LANDSCAPE
	PLAN? SHEET NUMBER L-2.0 REGARDING THE SITE DATA
	INFORMATION, THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE, ACCORDINGLY.


	KEVIE DEFRANC
	PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449