City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z22080023

Plan Review Stops For Project Z22080023

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-05-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	swelter			Date	01-05-2023	Time	15:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	swelter			Date	01-05-2023	Time	16:01	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-05 16:01:48	AT THIS TIME OPTION 1 OR OPTION 2 MUST BE DETERMINED AS
	STATED ON THE APPLICATION. FURTHER, BASED ON MY
	ANALYSIS OF THE SITE PLAN I RECOMMEND THAT THE
	APPLICANT CHOOSE OPTION #2. IF AGREED UPON A FORMAL
	WRITTEN STATEMENT BE PROVIDED.
	A DECISION MUST BE MADE FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
	OPTION 1 CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE ART ON SITE THAT DOES NOT
	CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AND ANY OTHER
	REGULATIONS.
	OPTION 2 A FORMAL WRITTEN STATEMENT ACKNOWLEDGING
	CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART FUND.
	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT AT [email protected] WITH
	ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	01-09-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	01-09-2023	Time	15:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	01-09-2023	Time	15:18	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-09 15:20:15	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	3. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
	REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	09-07-2022	Time	14:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	09-07-2022	Time	14:51	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-07 15:11:33	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	3. EXIT DISCHARGE FROM STAIRS. SHEET A1.01,
	GROUND/LOBBY LEVEL PLAN, SHOWS 4 OF THE 5 STAIRS
	DISCHARGING IN THE VALET FROP OFF OR LOADING AREA WITH
	NO EXTERIOR WALKWAY ACCESS TO THE STREET. PER SECTION
	1028.5 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE THE EXIT DISCHARGE
	SHALL PROVIDE DIRECT AND UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS TO A
	PUBLIC WAY.

	4. EGRESS FROM THEATER LOBBY AND CINEMA SCREEN ROOMS.
	SHEET A1.02, THEATER LEVEL PLAN, DOES NOT SHOW ACCESS
	TO AT LEAST 2 STAIRWAYS SERVING THE THEATER LOBBY AND
	HOW THE STAIRWAYS WOULD PROVIDE ACCESS TO EXIT DOORS AT
	GRADE LEVEL. ALSO, THE SECOND EXIT ROUTE FROM EACH
	CINEMA SCREEN ROOM IS NOT SHOWN WITH ACCESS TO A
	STAIRWAY. PER SECTION 1006.2 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
	AT LEAST 2 EXITS ARE REQUIRED.

	5. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO
	NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE MINIMUM
	NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	6. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO
	NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION
	208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
	OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
	ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
	COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	7. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW
	ANY VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	8. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
	VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
	IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	9. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	10. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	11. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
	DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
	OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
	GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
	GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
	SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
	USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	12. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
	REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	13. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	14. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	15. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	16. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	17. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	11-29-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	11-29-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	11-29-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-23-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	08-23-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By	rrossano			Date	08-23-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-23 14:11:44	Z22080023 - FLAMINGO & DIXIE - REZON. MIXED USE 8.22.22
	REVIEW
	COMMENTS FOR CIVIL SUBMITTAL FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR.
	PROJECT COORD., ENG. SERVICES AT 561-494-1098
	[email protected]
	GENERAL:
	O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
	INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
	(Z-XXXXXXXX).
	O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
	BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
	B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
	L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
	B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
	B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
	FOUND HERE:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
	MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
	C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
	ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
	CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
	SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
	SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
	BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
	O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
	ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
	SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
	O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
	DATA.

	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
	O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
	SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
	TO THEM.
	O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
	EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
	PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
	STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTION.
	O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
	OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
	METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
	PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
	INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
	O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
	NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.

	WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
	O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL.
	O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
	THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
	TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
	MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER.
	O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
	O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
	TRAPS (IF ANY).
	O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.

	FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
	NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
	- AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
	- 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
	THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
	DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
	- 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
	STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
	MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
	- THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
	CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
	THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
	SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
	WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
	APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
	SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
	SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
	LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
	ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
	LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
	PARCELS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
	BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
	50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
	PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
	PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-29-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	08-29-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	08-29-2022	Time	13:12	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-29 13:21:27	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
	TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
	WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
	CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
	CODES.

	6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
	OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.

	7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
	LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
	SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.

	8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL
	BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED
	WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.

	9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
	THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
	ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
	ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
	AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.

	9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
	LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
	THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
	OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
	AND ZONING OFFICE.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
	TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
	LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
	EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
	AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
	SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
	DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	12. ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE
	FIGHTER?S EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME
	A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.

	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.

	CONTACT WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH
	COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
	[email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
	ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
	INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.

	14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-13-2022	Time	16:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-13-2022	Time	16:01	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-13 16:02:33	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z22080023
	DECEMBER 13, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ON TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR
	THE PROJECT:
	??? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY ALL TREES AND PALMS.
	??? SATISFIED. REMOVE TREES AND PALMS FROM THE LIST FOR
	309 BARCELONA.
	??? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PLAN TO REFLECT THE TREE AND
	PALM INVENTORY FROM THE PREVIOUS PETITION FOR THE TREES
	AND PALMS THAT EXISTED AS RECORDED.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON ONE
	DISPOSITION CHART FOR THE SUBJECT SITE: ID NUMBER,
	SPECIES, CANOPY DIAMETER, CATEGORY, CONDITION, SQUARE
	FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, DISPOSITION, AND PROVIDE THE
	INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN.
	??? SATISFIED. FOLLOWING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
	CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-448, PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND
	TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION DUE FOR ANY PROPOSED REMOVALS.
	TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF
	20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES
	LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW
	THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CANOPY MITIGATION DUE TOTAL
	AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CHART FOR ALL REMOVALS.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE ONE CHART FOR THE CANOPY CREDITS
	BY SPECIES AND CATEGORY PROVIDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED
	PLANT LIST FOR THE SITE AND THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY.

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
	NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
	PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5)
	STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF
	GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN
	ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
	POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.
	ARBORIST REPORT WAS NOT SUBMITTED, APPLICANT STATED IT
	WILL BE SUBMITTED LATER.

	3. ONGOING. COMMENT FROM 9/30/20: SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE
	PERMIT PLAN FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING
	FOR TREES REMOVED.
	A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR
	THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED
	WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES
	REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES
	ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
	REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE
	PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN
	PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE.

	THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309
	BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT
	MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD
	MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN
	THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM
	THE CPD.

	THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP19-1785 THAT REPLACED
	PERMIT TP 17-1618 EXPIRED ON APRIL 30, 2020.THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-4 AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	SHEET TD-2 MUST BE SUBMITTED UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT
	18030706 IN ORDER FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE SATISFIED.

	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-5 NEEDS BE SUBMITTED UNDER
	PERMIT 18030706.

	9/7/22: OFFSITE LANDSCAPING CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
	THE REQUIREMENTS ON SITE. REMOVE CHARTS AND DATA FOR
	309 BARCELONA AND SUBMIT UNDER THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT
	18030706 FOLLOWING THE MITIGATION DUE FROM TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT TP 19-1785. LIVE OAK TREES IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO THIS ADDRESS MAY NOT BE
	REMOVED WITHOUT SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE CITY.

	4. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE DATA TABLE TO SHOW THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREA AS 40% OF THE SITE AND
	CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND
	SHRUBS FROM THAT FIGURE.

	5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHADE TREES ARE PREFERRED FOR
	STREET TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR
	PEDESTRIANS ON THE SIDEWALK. THIS IS MENTIONED TO
	COMPENSATE FOR THE WAIVER TO PROVIDE LESS REQUIRED
	LANDSCAPING. COCONUT PALMS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE AND
	SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH SHADE TREES.
	CLUSIA ROSEA SHAPE TENDS TO BE VERY WIDE, SO WILL BE
	DIFFICULT TO MANAGE PROVIDING CLEARANCE FOR VEHICLES
	ABOVE 13???6??? AT THE STREET EDGE. STAFF SUGGESTS A
	MORE MANAGEABLE SPECIES SUCH AS LIVE OAK OR GREEN
	BUTTONWOOD AT A LARGER SIZE THAN THE USUAL 20 FOOT
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENT TO IMPROVE THE STREETSCAPE. THE
	PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ALONG FLAMINGO SHOULD HAVE
	ADDITIONAL BULB OUT ADDED SO THERE IS NOT SUCH A LONG
	GAP IN THE STREET TREE PLACEMENT.


	6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL
	CELLS BENEATH THE PAVED AREAS ADJACENT TO TREES TO
	PROVIDE ROOT AREA FOR THE TREES ALONG THE STREETS TO
	ASSURE THEY ARE SUSTAINABLE.
	PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE
	STRUCTURAL SOIL, THE NOTE PROVIDED IS NOT SPECIFIC
	ENOUGH.

	7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
	DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND
	LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO
	PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.


	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
	CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
	BUFFER LENGTHS PER SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW
	THIS WILL BE AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
	INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
	PROVIDE A LIST FOR EACH BUFFER AS TO WHAT TREES ARE
	BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE REQUIREMENTS.

	9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING
	ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING.
	LIGHTING LOCATIONS SHOWN ALONG THE EAST BUFFER DISPLACE
	BUFFER TREES. ADJUST THE LOCATIONS OF THE LIGHTING TO
	MAINTAIN THE 30 FOOT REQUIRED SPACING FOR THE TREES.
	SABAL PALMS CAN BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT.


	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT
	BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM
	CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE,
	SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT
	COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
	CHANGE ROOT BARRIER DETAIL TO HARD PLASTIC TYPE SIMILAR
	TO DEEPROOT AND REMOVE REFERENCE TO BIO BARRIER.


	11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
	UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
	LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN
	TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT. GIVEN THE REQUEST
	FOR WAIVERS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA AND JUSTIFICATION
	PROVIDED, THESE AREAS NEED TO BE PLANNED FOR, AS SPACE
	IS LIMITED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED AFTER APPROVAL OF
	WAIVERS.
	12/13/22: ALL EQUIPMENT, GREASE TRAPS, FIRE HYDRANTS,
	AND UNDERGROUND WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES MUST BE
	SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE ARE MULTIPLE AREAS
	WHERE THE UTILITIES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID
	CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED TREES.

	12. ONGOING. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON S DIXIE HWY IS FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY
	FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE
	PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/13/22:
	13. ALL PLANTS MUST HAVE THE BOTANICAL NAME PROVIDED ON
	THE PLANT LIST.

	14. THE SEAGRAPE TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG
	THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR THE NORTH PARCEL MUST BE SHOWN
	INDIVIDUALLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW THAT THE
	SPACING REQUIREMENT IS MET. THEY CANNOT BE SHOWN AS A
	HEDGE, AS HEDGES ARE LIMITED TO 10 FEET IN HEIGHT, AND
	THIS IS NOT MEETING THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS.

	15. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND WALL MUST BE CONTINUED
	ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
	NORTH PARCEL.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	09-07-2022	Time	11:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	09-07-2022	Time	11:17	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-07 11:19:10	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z22080023
	SEPTEMBER 7, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ON TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR
	THE PROJECT:
	? IDENTIFY ALL TREES AND PALMS.
	? REMOVE TREES AND PALMS FROM THE LIST FOR 309
	BARCELONA.
	? CORRECT THE PLAN TO REFLECT THE TREE AND PALM
	INVENTORY FROM THE PREVIOUS PETITION FOR THE TREES AND
	PALMS THAT EXISTED AS RECORDED.
	? PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON ONE DISPOSITION
	CHART FOR THE SUBJECT SITE: ID NUMBER, SPECIES, CANOPY
	DIAMETER, CATEGORY, CONDITION, SQUARE FOOTAGE
	MITIGATION DUE, DISPOSITION, AND PROVIDE THE
	INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN.
	? FOLLOWING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT CODE
	SECTION 94-448, PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND TOTAL CANOPY
	MITIGATION DUE FOR ANY PROPOSED REMOVALS. TREES
	PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20
	FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
	CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS
	THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE
	CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE.
	? PROVIDE THE CANOPY MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE BOTTOM
	OF THE CHART FOR ALL REMOVALS.
	? PROVIDE ONE CHART FOR THE CANOPY CREDITS BY SPECIES
	AND CATEGORY PROVIDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST
	FOR THE SITE AND THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY.

	2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
	RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
	EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
	POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
	THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS.

	3. COMMENT FROM 9/30/20: SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN
	FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS
	FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES
	REMOVED.
	A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR
	THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED
	WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES
	REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES
	ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
	REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE
	PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN
	PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE.

	THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309
	BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT
	MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD
	MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN
	THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM
	THE CPD.

	THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP19-1785 THAT REPLACED
	PERMIT TP 17-1618 EXPIRED ON APRIL 30, 2020.THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-4 AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
	SHEET TD-2 MUST BE SUBMITTED UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT
	18030706 IN ORDER FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE SATISFIED.
	12. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON S DIXIE HWY IS FDOT RIGHT OF
	WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT.
	PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED
	WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-5 NEEDS BE SUBMITTED UNDER
	PERMIT 18030706.

	9/7/22: OFFSITE LANDSCAPING CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
	THE REQUIREMENTS ON SITE. REMOVE CHARTS AND DATA FOR
	309 BARCELONA AND SUBMIT UNDER THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT
	18030706 FOLLOWING THE MITIGATION DUE FROM TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT TP 19-1785. LIVE OAK TREES IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO THIS ADDRESS MAY NOT BE
	REMOVED WITHOUT SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE CITY.

	4. CORRECT THE DATA TABLE TO SHOW THE REQUIRED OPEN
	SPACE AREA AS 40% OF THE SITE AND CALCULATE THE
	REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FROM THAT
	FIGURE.

	5. SHADE TREES ARE PREFERRED FOR STREET TREES TO MEET
	THE INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS ON THE
	SIDEWALK. THIS IS MENTIONED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE
	WAIVER TO PROVIDE LESS REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. COCONUT
	PALMS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE AND SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH
	SHADE TREES.

	6. SHOW STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL CELLS BENEATH THE PAVED
	AREAS ADJACENT TO TREES TO PROVIDE ROOT AREA FOR THE
	TREES ALONG THE STREETS TO ASSURE THEY ARE SUSTAINABLE.

	7. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE THE
	AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS ON
	SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR
	THE WAIVER REQUESTS.


	8. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER
	TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER SECTION
	94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE AFFECTED
	THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.




	9. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.

	10. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
	INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
	WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
	FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.

	11. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
	INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., AND
	PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
	UTILITIES.
	LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN
	TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT. GIVEN THE REQUEST
	FOR WAIVERS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA AND JUSTIFICATION
	PROVIDED, THESE AREAS NEED TO BE PLANNED FOR, AS SPACE
	IS LIMITED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED AFTER APPROVAL OF
	WAIVERS.

	12. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON S DIXIE HWY IS FDOT RIGHT OF
	WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT.
	PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED
	WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-12-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	12-12-2022	Time	10:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	12-12-2022	Time	10:43	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-12 10:45:14	PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT SATISFIED. CANNOT TAP THE 20"
	TRANSMISSION WATER MAIN PER DISCUSSION WITH CONSULTANT
	AND PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL COMMENTS.

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	09-08-2022	Time	12:00	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	09-08-2022	Time	11:53	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 12:00:07	-CANNOT TAP THE 20" TRANSMISSION WM ON BARCELONA RD.
	PLEASE REVISE PROPOSED SERVICE CONNECTIONS.
	-UTILITIES IS REVIEWING THE PROPOSED REMOVAL OF THE 6"
	WM ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT FOR POTENTIAL WATER
	QUALITY ISSUES.

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	12-07-2022	Time	08:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-12-07 08:47:07	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-COULD NOT LOCATE WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS
	ON UTILITY PLANS AS INDICATED IN RESPONSE LETTER.
	PLEASE ADD.
	-RESPONSE LETTER REFERRED TO SHEET C502, BUT COULD NOT
	FIND THAT SHEET IN CIVIL PLAN SET.
	-SHEET C503 SHOWS SYMBOLS THAT LOOK LIKE STREET SIGNS
	CLOSE TO WATER SERVICES. PLEASE ADD THOSE SYMBOLS TO
	THE LEGEND AND ENSURE AT LEAST SEVERAL FEET OF
	HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN POLES AND WATER
	SERVICES.
	-ON SHEET C200 CLEARLY LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO
	EXISTING 7 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT. IF REMAINING, SHOW
	CLEARLY ON UTILITY PLANS.
	-APPLICANT MUST PAY ALL UTILITY BILLING FEES RELATED TO
	PROJECT.
	-PROPOSED GREASE TRAP LOCATION ON SHEET C500 SEEMS
	UNUSUAL BECAUSE THERE IS NOT A NEARBY SANITARY SEWER
	MAIN OR LATERAL. NOT SURE IF PLUMBING PIPE IS EXISTING
	BUILDING AND THEN RETURNING OR THERE WILL BE LONG PIPE
	DISTANCE TO LATERAL.
	-PROPOSED 20 INCH WATER MAIN TAP MAY BE REVIEWED
	FURTHER AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	-THERE APPEARS TO BE LOCATION CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES. PLEASE SHOW UTILITIES ON
	LANDSCAPING PLANS AND ENSURE THEY ARE APPROPRIATELY
	DISTANCED FROM EACH OTHER.
	-ADD STANDARD DETAIL P8 TO PLAN SET.
	-SEE NOTE 3 ON STANDARD DETAIL P8 AND REVISE FIRE
	HYDRANT LOCATIONS.
	-ENSURE LIGHTING ON PH1 AND WATER UTILITIES ARE
	APPROPRIATELY DISTANCED FROM EACH OTHER.
	-VERIFY NO AUXILIARY WATER SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS WILL
	BE CONNECTED TO PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM.
	-T2.0 SHOWS DO NOT ENTER SIGNS ON SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY OF
	BARCELONA, BUT T2.1 SHOWS MOVING TRUCK ENTERING THE
	DRIVEWAY.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-04-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	09-04-2022	Time	08:41	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-09-04 08:41:43	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-ADD COVER SHEET TO CIVIL PLANS WITH MAP OF LOCATION.
	-ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY
	PLAN SHEETS.
	-FOR CIVIL PLAN SET, ADD STANDARD DETAILS SHEET WITH
	REFERENCED STANDARD DETAILS.
	-DIXIE HWY IS FDOT ROW.
	-ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO THE LABELS OF THE PROPOSED
	6 INCH AND 4 INCH METERS.
	-SURVEY IS NOT SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED.
	-SURVEY SHOWS EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS RUNNING
	THROUGH PROPERTY, BUT THEY ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON
	CIVIL PLANS.
	-STRUCTURES MAY NOT BE BUILT ON UTILITY EASEMENTS
	WITHOUT APPROVAL OF CITY.
	-CIVIL PLANS SHOW CONFLICTS WITH UTILITY POLES AND GUY
	WIRES. ADD DEMO PLAN SHEET IF THOSE ARE BEING REMOVED,
	RELOCATED, OR UNDERGROUNDED.
	-SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PADS.
	-JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT SAID THERE ARE PROPOSED
	RESTAURANTS, BUT DID NOT SEE ANY GREASE TRAPS. SHOW AND
	LABEL ANY GREASE TRAPS WHICH ARE PROPOSED OUTSIDE OF
	BUILDING.
	-PROPOSED TAPS ON 20 INCH WATER MAIN WOULD REQUIRE
	APPROVAL OF MICHAEL TECHNOW.
	-SHEET C501. UTILITY OR LIGHT POLES APPEAR TO BE CLOSE
	TO WATER UTILITIES. PROVIDE AT LEAST SEVERAL FEET OF
	HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEM.
	-ADD A LANDSCAPING SHEET SHOWING ALL TREES, BUSHES, AND
	UTILITIES. ENSURE THERE IS ADEQUATE CLEARANCE DISTANCE
	BETWEEN PLANTS AND UTILITIES.
	-ON LANDSCAPING, CIVIL, AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, ADD
	LEGEND IDENTIFYING SYMBOLS USED.
	-THE SOUTHERN BUILDING SHOWS SOMETHING THAT LOOKS LIKE
	OUTDOOR TABLES ADJACENT THE NORTH SIDE. CIVIL PLANS
	SHOW ABOVE-GROUND WATER METER, TRAFFIC SIGN, AND LIGHT
	POLE THERE ALSO. WILL THERE BE ADEQUATE WIDTH FOR
	PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT THERE?
	-BYPASS OF 6 INCH WATER METER FOR SOUTHERN BUILDING
	CANNOT BE IN OR UNDER CURB.
	-WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR THE AREA BETWEEN THE BULBOUTS?
	ARE THEY PARKING SPOTS? SHOW OR DETAIL MORE CLEARLY ON
	PLANS.
	-SHOW TRAFFIC SIGN NEAR NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHERN
	BUILDING ON UTILITY PLANS. CALLOUT MINIMUM 18 INCH
	CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN SIGN AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
	ALSO WILL TRAFFIC SIGN CONFLICT WITH TRAFFIC GATE
	OPENING?
	-IS THE DRIVE PATH ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTHERN
	BUILDING ONE WAY? SHOW OR DETAIL MORE CLEARLY ON PLANS.
	ALSO THE NORTHEAST CURB ISLAND DOES NOT ALIGN WITH IT.
	-PAVEMENT RESTORATION LIMITS FROM UTILITY WORK ARE
	LIKELY MUCH LARGER THAN SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.
	-LIGHT POLE SHOWING IN DRIVEWAY ON SHEET C501.
	-BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR NORTH BUILDING MAY BE
	CONFLICTING WITH A WALL. CALLOUT THE OBJECT AND RESOLVE
	ANY LOCATION CONFLICTS.
	-ATTEMPT TO REPOSITION THE WATER SERVICES FOR THE NORTH
	BUILDING SUCH THAT THE FIRE SERVICE DOES NOT RUN
	UNDERNEATH TWO OTHER LARGE WATER SERVICES.
	-WATER METER BOXES MAY NOT ENCROACH INTO CURBS. WATER
	VALVE BOXES SHOULD ALSO NOT BE LOCATED IN CURBS.
	-C500. PROPOSED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES CONFLICTING WITH
	EXISTING STORM MANHOLE AND CLEANOUT AS SHOWN ON SURVEY.
	-PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY OF THE EXISTING NORTH SOUTH OR
	EAST WEST CROSSWALKS.
	-APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO REROUTE OR BUILD NEW
	WATER MAIN FOR THE ONE THAT IS PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL.
	-ADD ADJACENT PROPERTY ADDRESSES ON CIVIL PLANS.
	-SHOW AND LABEL FDC IF THEY ARE NEEDED OR REQUIRED.
	ENSURE THEY ARE ACCEPTABLE DISTANCE FROM FIRE HYDRANT.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	11-30-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	11-30-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	11-30-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-11-30 15:24:10	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. DETAILS FOR SANITATION
	SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION
	LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
	ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
	REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
	CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
	THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
	PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
	00)
	2- DESIGNATED STAGING AREA FOR THE BULK WASTE.
	3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE
	VEHICLE???S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS
	FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
	FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-26-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-26-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	08-26-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-26 15:20:58
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
	QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
	THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A
	FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE
	SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE
	STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO THE LATEST REVISION OF THE
	GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDO
	CUMENT/3690/637629060422100000)
	3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
	WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
	TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
	4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
	RECYCLING CONTAINERS
	5- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
	GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
	TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
	NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
	6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	7- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	8- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY
	WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
	9- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
	DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	01-09-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	01-09-2023	Time	13:26	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	01-09-2023	Time	13:28	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-09 13:28:10	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	11-22-2022 SUBMITTAL:

	1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL
	DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF
	NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929
	AT THE PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE
	VERTICAL REFERENCE AND DATUM CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON
	EACH ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENT: ADD REQUESTED INFORMATION TO SHEETS
	C-200, C-201, C-600, C-601, T-1.0, T-1.1, T-2.0, T-2.1,

	2. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT TO APPROVE
	ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W.

	3. [SATISFIED ??? SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BELOW]
	PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY
	AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINES TO THE BUILDING FACES. SHOW
	AND LABEL SURFACE FEATURES, GRADE BREAKS, GENERAL
	SURFACE SLOPES, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION, RIGHT OF WAY
	LINES WITH THE STREET IDENTIFIED, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT
	OF WAY TO SURFACE FEATURES. IT APPEARS FFE ARE 1 FT OR
	HIGHER THAN R/W GRADES.

	4. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR ALL
	DRIVEWAYS FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD TO 5 FEET
	PAST THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY. SHOW AND LABEL THE
	RIGHT OF WAY LINE, R/W STREET NAME, SURFACE FEATURES,
	SURFACE SLOPES, GRADE BREAKS, ETC.

	5. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST PUTTING TRENCH DRAINS AT THE
	BACK OF SIDEWALKS (AND OUTSIDE THE R/W) TO REDUCE
	TRIPPING HAZARD.

	6. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE SURFACE FLOW ARROWS ON THE
	GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS.

	7. [SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE,
	MATERIAL).

	8. [NOT SATISFIED ??? HATCHING NOT FOUND ON SHEETS
	T-1.1 (OR T-1.0)] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS THAT
	MEET CITY DETAILS.

	9. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR DISTURBED
	PAVEMENT AREAS.

	NEW COMMENTS (11/22-2022 SUBMITTAL)

	10. TWO SHEETS NUMBERED T-2.0 AND TWO SHEETS NUMBERED
	T-2.1.

	11. PROVIDE SIGN LEGEND ON SHEETS T-1.0 AND T-1.1.

	12. DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET C-200 CALLS OUT THE REMOVAL
	OF THE EXISTING FDOT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON S. DIXIE HWY
	SOUTH OF FLAMINGO DRIVE. THE CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND
	DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE STRUCTURE BEING
	REPLACED. WILL IT BE CONVERTED TO A MANHOLE TOP? HOW
	WILL SURFACE RUNOFF ON S. DIXIE HWY ENTER THE DRAINAGE
	SYSTEM?

	13. DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET C-201 CALLS OUT THE REMOVAL
	OF THE EXISTING FDOT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON S. DIXIE HWY
	SOUTH OF BARCELONA ROAD. THE CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND
	DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE STRUCTURE BEING
	REPLACED. WILL IT BE CONVERTED TO A MANHOLE TOP? HOW
	WILL SURFACE RUNOFF ON S. DIXIE HWY ENTER THE DRAINAGE
	SYSTEM?

	14. PROVIDE PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS FOR
	THE CURB AND GUTTER AND VALLEY GUTTER ON S. DIXIE
	HIGHWAY. FDOT MAY REQUIRE SPREAD CALCULATIONS TO SEE
	HOW MUCH OF THE TRAVEL MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
	RELOCATION OF THE CURB AND GUTTER AND ELIMINATION OF
	DRAINAGE STRUCTURES.

	15. PROVIDE PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS FOR
	THE CURB AND GUTTER AND VALLEY GUTTER ON FLAMINGO
	DRIVE.

	16. SOUTH CURB LINE ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IS BEING MOVED
	TOWARD THE CENTERLINE BY ~5 FEET. HOW WILL THE PROPOSED
	CURB CONNECT INTO THE EXISTING CURB LINE EAST OF THE
	PROJECT SITE?

	17 LABEL THE STREET NAMES ON THE SECTIONS ON SHEETS
	C-400 AND C-401.

	18. SECTION A-A???
	A. INDICATE WHERE THE TRAVEL LANE CONSTRUCTION WILL
	MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION.
	B. CONFIRM NONE OF THE SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE WILL EXCEED
	2 PERCENT.

	19. SECTION B-B???
	A. REVIEW THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED TRAVEL LANE
	(13 FEET FROM ROAD CENTERLINE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT
	ADJACENT TO THE VALLEY GUTTER) AND PROPOSED PARKING (11
	FEET FROM FACE OF D???CURB TO EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE ???
	INCLUDES THE VALLEY GUTTER). IN PLAN VIEW, THE PROPOSED
	EDGE OF PAVEMENT IS 13.5 FEET FROM THE ROAD CENTERLINE
	AND 10.5 FEET FROM THE FACE OF PROPOSED D-CURB.
	B. CONFIRM NONE OF THE SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE WILL EXCEED
	2 PERCENT.
	C. THE EXISTING CROWN OF ROAD APPEARS TO BE 5 FEET
	SOUTH OF THE ROAD CENTERLINE.

	20. SECTION C-C???
	A. PLAN VIEW APPEARS TO SHOW A CURB ALONG THE WEST
	SIDE OF THE TRAVEL LANE.

	21. SECTION E-E???
	A. INDICATE WHERE THE TRAVEL LANE CONSTRUCTION WILL
	MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION.
	B. THE EXISTING ROAD CROWN APPEARS TO BE APPROX.. 4
	FEET WEST OF THE ROAD CENTERLINE.

	22. SECTION F-F???
	A. INDICATE WHERE THE TRAVEL LANE CONSTRUCTION WILL
	MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION.

	23. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT, PROVIDE PLAN AND PROFILE
	SHEET OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF BARCELONA ROAD FROM THE
	CENTERLINE OF S. DIXIE HWY TO APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET
	EAST OF THE S. DIXIE HWY CENTELINE. SHOW PROFILES OF
	ALL UTILITIES WITHIN THE R/W AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE
	UTILITIES CROSSING THESE UTILITIES.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	09-08-2022	Time	13:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	09-08-2022	Time	13:04	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 13:04:51	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:


	1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
	CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
	CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
	IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL REFERENCE AND DATUM
	CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON EACH ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET
	WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.

	2. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT TO APPROVE
	ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W.

	3. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF
	WAY AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINES TO THE BUILDING FACES.
	SHOW AND LABEL SURFACE FEATURES, GRADE BREAKS, GENERAL
	SURFACE SLOPES, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION, RIGHT OF WAY
	LINES WITH THE STREET IDENTIFIED, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT
	OF WAY TO SURFACE FEATURES. IT APPEARS FFE ARE 1 FT OR
	HIGHER THAN R/W GRADES.

	4. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR ALL DRIVEWAYS FROM THE
	CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD TO 5 FEET PAST THE HIGH POINT OF
	THE DRIVEWAY. SHOW AND LABEL THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE, R/W
	STREET NAME, SURFACE FEATURES, SURFACE SLOPES, GRADE
	BREAKS, ETC.

	5. SUGGEST PUTTING TRENCH DRAINS AT THE BACK OF
	SIDEWALKS (AND OUTSIDE THE R/W) TO REDUCE TRIPPING
	HAZARD.

	6. PROVIDE SURFACE FLOW ARROWS ON THE GRADING AND
	DRAINAGE PLANS.

	7. LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE, MATERIAL).

	8. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS THAT MEET CITY
	DETAILS.

	9. PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR DISTURBED PAVEMENT AREAS.


	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
	CRITERIA INCLUDING PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION. STORMWATER
	CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
	CONSTRUCTION.

	3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	01-06-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	01-06-2023	Time	07:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2023-01-06 07:31:30	1. SURVEY DESCRIPTION DOES NOT INCLUDE 10' PLATTED
	SERVICE STREET. MAY HAVE BEEN ABANDONED PER DB 1166 P
	119. PLEASE PROVIDE COPY.
	2. PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOTED AS IN PROGRESS. WILL NEED TO
	REVIEW WHEN COMPLETED/SUBMITTED.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	09-06-2022	Time	11:41	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-09-06 11:55:43	1. SURVEY NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
	2. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. UNDERLYING EASEMENTS WILL
	NEED TO BE ABANDONED.
	3. NEED APPROVAL FROM FDOT AS TO MAINTENANCE OF
	SIDEWALK OUTSIDE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WILL BE OWNER'S
	RESPONSIBILITY.
	4. MMOA WITH FDOT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN
	DIXIE HWY. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED WITH
	CITY FOR ASSIGNMENT OF MMOA AND MAINTENANCE OF SIDE
	STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
	5. ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK OUTSIDE OF R/W ON SIDE STREETS
	TO BE MAINTAINED BY DEVELOPER.
	6. MORE DETAIL WILL BE NEED IN AREAS OF PROPOSED
	METERS/BACKFLOWS/LANDSCAPING.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-13-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-13-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	12-13-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-13 12:02:50	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. GIVEN THE CHANGE IN LAND USE
	INTENSITY AND DRIVEWAY ACCESS POINTS, PROVIDE AN
	UPDATED COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
	2) SATISFIED. A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED
	TO DISCUSS A REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY, AS THE LATEST ONE
	IS BASED ON OLD DATA COLLECTION, AS WELL AS PEDESTRIAN
	CROSSING STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS
	DIXIE HWY AT BARCELONA RD AND CORDOVA RD
	3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE
	TRAFFIC STUDIES AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS,
	TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES, ROAD
	SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND CONTRIBUTION TO FUTURE TRANSIT
	OPERATIONS MAY BE NEGOTIATED. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED
	4) PLEASE INSERT FIGURE, TABLE AND PAGE NUMBERS/LETTERS
	FOR EASE OF REFERENCE
	5) PROVIDE THE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY,
	PROPERLY DATED
	6) SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION PARAGRAPH NEEDS
	BETTER ELABORATION OR CORRECTION, AS IT DOES NOT SEEM
	TO DEPICT LATEST SITE PLAN. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE
	DRIVEWAY TYPOLOGY (I.E. PUBLIC, SERVICE, ONE-WAY,
	FULL-ACCESS) IN THE TURNING MOVEMENT FIGURE
	7) VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS NEEDS TO PROPERLY
	REFERENCE FIGURES (I.E. NUMBER/LETTER), AND LEGEND
	SHOWCASING AND DESCRIBING ALL USED COLORS (I.E. WHAT IS
	THE GREEN PATH?)
	8) PLEASE SHOWCASE VALET VEHICLES PATHS TO/FROM THE
	GARAGE SPACES
	9) PLEASE PROVIDE REALISTIC CALCULATIONS OF VALET
	DRIVING/WALKING TIMES TO/FROM THE STALLS/PODIUM
	10) CLEARLY MARK THE VALET PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF AREAS

	SITE COMMENTS
	11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION
	SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
	TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
	DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
	DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
	CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
	PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD
	BE NAMED T-1.0. MISSING SEVERAL DIMENSIONS. THIS IS A
	TRANSPORTATION REVIEW: SIDEWALK WALKABLE AREA, TRAVEL
	LANES, DRIVEWAY AISLES, CURB-TO-CURB ROADWAY DIMENSIONS
	ARE ALL IMPORTANT AND MOSTLY MISSING, WHILE SETBACK
	DISTANCES ARE SEMI-USELESS
	12) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE
	SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
	PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
	OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT. MISSING CURB DETAILS FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF
	FLAMINGO DRIVE, WEST SIDE OF DIXIE HIGHWAY, SOUTH SIDE
	OF CORDOVA RD
	13) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
	MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
	SITE. SUCH PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW
	AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0).
	TRAVEL LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING AS WELL AS
	CURB DETAILS ON THE OPPOSITE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	14) NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE ALL CORNER CLEARANCE AND
	DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES. SPECIFY IF ANY MINIMUM
	DISTANCES ARE NOT MET. IN THAT CASE, VARIANCES MAY BE
	NEEDED FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS AND ON-STREET PARKING
	STALLS. PER THE FDOT LETTER, PLEASE SHOWCASE THE
	50-FEET DISTANCE FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS
	WELL AS THE REQUESTED DRIVEWAY DISTANCES. ENGINEERING
	SERVICES WILL THEN ASSESS VARIANCES/WAIVERS
	REQUIREMENTS, IF ANY
	15) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED
	IN DIFFERENT COLORS. SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE
	ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND
	SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0). PLEASE
	ADDRESS THE COMMENT PROPERLY; REPEATING THEM: TWO
	DIFFERENT COLORS FOR VEHICLE WHEEL PATHS AND DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPE. SAMPLE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS CAN BE PROVIDED, IF
	REQUESTED, SO TO AVOID FURTHER MISUNDERSTANDINGS
	16) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS
	SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
	(E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING,
	SIGNAL, ETC.)
	17) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE
	SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING
	SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. IN THE TABLE
	SPECIFY THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED VAN ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING STALLS
	18) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN
	PLAN, PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE
	NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR
	RELOCATED, IF ANY. NO TABLE IS SHOWN IN T1.1
	19) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED?
	IF SO, CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK
	DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. THE DISTANCE
	FOR THE CORDOVA GATE IS MISSING IN SHEET A1.01, OTHER
	LOCATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR IF A GATE IS THERE OR NOT.
	PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF GATES AND THEIR LOCATION.
	20) NOT SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING
	IMPACTED? IF SO, DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM
	TRAN REGARDING THE TRANSIT STOP RELOCATION AND PROVIDE
	A BUS SHELTER. MAINTENANCE OF THE BUS SHELTER SHALL BE
	DEVELOPERS??? RESPONSIBILITY. PLEASE PROVIDE AN
	ELABORATED RESPONSE, JUST AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS
	INSUFFICIENT; IF MISSING, PLEASE PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER
	21) NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE 94-111(Q)(2):
	???NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF
	THE RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER
	TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS
	10 PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES???. PLEASE
	REVISE THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. NO 16% RAMPS ARE ALLOWED,
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS STILL SHOW SUCH VALUE. PLEASE
	REVISE, AND CLEARLY MARK/CALL-OUT THE BREAK-OVER
	TRANSITION AREAS.
	22) SATISFIED. PLEASE CLEARLY MARKED THE TURN-AROUND
	SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGES
	23) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CLEARLY MARK AND LABEL
	THE VALET PARKING SPACES. TANDEM SPACES ARE VALET ONLY,
	SEVERAL HAVE NOT BEEN MARKED AS SUCH, PLEASE REVISE
	24) SIDEWALK CROSSINGS MUST BE STRAIGHT/ALIGNED, NO
	DIAGONALS. PLEASE CORRECT THE CROSSWALKS BY FLAMINGO,
	CORDOVA AND BARCELONA DRIVEWAYS ACCORDINGLY
	25) SIGNS LEGEND MISSING IN T1.0
	26) THE SERVICE DRIVEWAYS AND DRIVE AISLE BETWEEN
	BARCELONA AND CORDOVA ARE NOT OPERATIONALLY PROPER.
	DRIVEWAYS NEED TO BE BOTH EITHER FULL-ACCESS OR ONE-WAY
	ONLY. HOW DO SERVICE VEHICLES TURN-AROUND IN SUCH TIGHT
	DRIVE AISLE OTHERWISE?
	27) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE CASES
	WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL,
	FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE
	STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
	FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
	THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
	MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EVERY STALL
	NEARBY A WALL OR AN OBSTRUCTION
	28) GIVEN THE HISTORY OF RETAIL/RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES
	AND CUSTOMERS NEGATIVELY IMPACTING RESIDENTIAL
	ON-STREET PARKING ALONG THE S DIXIE CORRIDOR, PLEASE
	PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
	29) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
	REFER TO CITY CODE SEC. 84-246 FOR DETAILS

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	09-08-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	09-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 01:00:38	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) GIVEN THE CHANGE IN LAND USE INTENSITY AND DRIVEWAY
	ACCESS POINTS, PROVIDE AN UPDATED COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED TO DISCUSS
	A REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY, AS THE LATEST ONE IS BASED ON
	OLD DATA COLLECTION, AS WELL AS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
	STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE HWY
	AT BARCELONA RD AND CORDOVA RD
	3) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE TRAFFIC STUDIES AND
	PARKING REQUIREMENTS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
	(TDM) MEASURES, ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND
	CONTRIBUTION TO FUTURE TRANSIT OPERATIONS MAY BE
	NEGOTIATED

	SITE COMMENTS
	4) PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN
	FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
	FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
	STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
	CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
	SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
	AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0
	5) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
	DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
	PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
	INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH
	PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE
	NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0)
	7) SHOWCASE ALL CORNER CLEARANCE AND DRIVEWAY
	SEPARATION DISTANCES. SPECIFY IF ANY MINIMUM DISTANCES
	ARE NOT MET. IN THAT CASE, VARIANCES MAY BE NEEDED FOR
	THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS AND ON-STREET PARKING STALLS
	8) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
	SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
	PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
	SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE
	TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY
	(E.G. T1.2, T-3.0)
	9) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
	EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
	CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
	ETC.)
	10) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
	AND BICYCLE ONES
	11) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
	TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
	STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
	12) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
	SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
	BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
	13) ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED? IF SO,
	DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN REGARDING THE
	TRANSIT STOP RELOCATION AND PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER.
	MAINTENANCE OF THE BUS SHELTER SHALL BE DEVELOPERS?
	RESPONSIBILITY
	14) PER CITY CODE 94-111(Q)(2): ?NON-PARKING RAMPS
	SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE RAMP IS GREATER
	THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION SHALL BE
	REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS 10 PERCENT FOR
	NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES?. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS
	ACCORDINGLY
	15) PLEASE CLEARLY MARKED THE TURN-AROUND SPACE AT EACH
	DEAD-END OF THE GARAGES
	16) PLEASE CLEARLY MARK AND LABEL THE VALET PARKING
	SPACES

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-27-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	llouie			Date	12-27-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	llouie			Date	12-27-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-27 14:20:45	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	1.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PREAPPLICATION
	MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT, PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CRITICAL (AND PRIOR TO THE
	FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PROJECT). DOCUMENTATION OF ANY
	PUBLIC OUTREACH (AND RESULTS/FEEDBACK FROM THESE
	MEETINGS) WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS IS REQUIRED
	AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PLANNING STAFF. [NOT
	ADDRESSED. ALTHOUGH THE COMMENT HAS BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED
	IN THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET AND THE APPLICANT
	HAS INDICATED ON-GOING OUTREACH, NO DOCUMENTATION ON
	COMMUNITY OUTREACH WAS FORMALLY SUBMITTED.]

	2.) THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR IS 1.5 (RESIDENTIAL +
	NON-RESIDENTIAL). PLEASE CHECK REVISED CALCULATIONS AND
	FAR DIAGRAM. THERE ARE SOME INCONSISTENCIES AND NOT ALL
	REQUIRED SPACES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FAR
	CALCULATIONS.

	3.) THE PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR TO FACTOR IN THE
	BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING
	DISTRICTS. PER THE ZLDRS, IF A STRUCTURE ABUTS A
	RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IN EXCESS OF 30 FT., THE
	FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED: A) 1
	FT. OF HEIGHT ABOVE 30 FT. FOR EACH 2 FT. OF SETBACK
	WHEN ABUTTING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING
	DISTRICT AND B) 1 FT. OF HEIGHT ABOVE 30 FT. FOR EACH 1
	FT OF SETBACK WHEN ABUTTING ANY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
	ZONING DISTRICT. THE BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK IS IN
	ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED
	IN ZLDR S.94-145(2). [NOT COMPLETELY ADDRESSED. CHECK
	CALCULATIONS FOR CONSISTENCY.]

	4.) ZONING DIAGRAMS MUST INCLUDE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
	CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE/CLEARLY SHOW HOW
	MUCH IS NEEDED FOR THE WAIVER REQUEST (I.E. OPEN SPACE,
	LANDSCAPE AREA ETC.). THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT
	CLEAR.

	5.) PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM CYCLE 1 RELATED TO THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED (I.E.
	INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE WRITTEN INFORMATION TO THE
	INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS; JUSTIFICATION OF
	EACH WAIVER AND MITIGATION MEASURES, BENEFITS TO THE
	PUBLIC, ETC.), AS NO REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
	WAS INCLUDED IN THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.

	6.) REQUIRED OWNER'S CONSENT FORMS HAVE NOT BEEN
	PROPERLY EXECUTED. PLEASE ADDRESS. [NOT ADDRESSED. THE
	REQUIRED EXECUTED OWNER???S CONSENT FORMS HAVE NOT BEEN
	INCLUDED IN THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.]

	7.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER
	FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS REQUIRED
	(561-684-4030). ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE TPS
	LETTER MUST MATCH THE PROJECT INFORMATION FOR
	CONSISTENCY. [NOT ADDRESSED. NO TPS LETTER PROVIDED IN
	THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.]
	INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND SHARED
	PARKING STATEMENT IS STILL INCONSISTENT WITH THE
	INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. INFORMATION MUST
	MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY.

	8.) A NEW SCAD LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
	BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. THE SCAD LETTER INCLUDED IN
	THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CONTAINS OUTDATED INFORMATION
	AND IS EXPIRED. INFORMATION IN THE SCAD LETTER MUST
	MATCH THE PROJECT INFORMATION FOR CONSISTENCY. [NOT
	ADDRESSED. NO UPDATED SCAD LETTER WAS PROVIDED IN THE
	11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.]

	9.) AN ADDRESS LIST, RADIUS MAP AND EXECUTED ADDRESS
	LIST AFFIDAVIT IS REQUIRED PER THE INSTRUCTION ON PAGE
	4 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. THIS INFORMATION
	WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. [NOT
	ADDRESSED. NOT PROVIDED.]

	10.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
	UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
	WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
	COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	(561-494-1117). [NOT ADDRESSED. NO CONFIRMATION LETTER
	WAS PROVIDED WITH THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.]

	11.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
	CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
	INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
	PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. [NOT ADDRESSED. NO
	CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM ANY PUBLIC UTILITIES WERE
	PROVIDED IN THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.]

	12.) ALL PLAN SHEETS SHALL MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. NOT
	ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH. PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS
	MATCH PRIOR TO THE RESUBMITTAL. [NOT ADDRESSED. PLANS
	WITHIN THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET SHOW INCONSISTENCIES.]

	13.) ADDRESS FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR THE CIVIL PLAN SET:
	A) TABLE OF CONTENTS DO NOT MATCH AND INCONSISTENT IN
	PAGE NUMBERING (SHEET A0.00 AND C-001). B) TABLE OF
	CONTENTS (SHEET C-001): CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN INSET A
	IS SHEET C-503 (NOT C-501). C) CHECK SPELLING FOR SOUTH
	SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (SHEET C-001).
	D) CONCEPTUAL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN (BOTH
	NORTH AND SOUTH) AND TRUCK CIRCULATION PLAN (BOTH NORTH
	AND SOUTH) HAVE DUPLICATE PAGE NUMBERING IN THE ACTUAL
	SHEETS.

	14.) THE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE CIVIL SET DO NOT
	MATCH AND ARE INCONSISTENT (SHEETA0.00 AND C-001).


	SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

	1.) ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE OVERALL SITE
	INFORMATION (SHEET A0.01): A) EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE:
	COMMERCIAL EAST (CE) B) PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE:
	COMMERCIAL EAST (CE)

	2.) DUE TO THE COMPLEX NATURE OF THE PROJECT, IT WOULD
	BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE SEPARATE BUILDING SETBACK
	DIAGRAMS. THIS WOULD HELP TO MINIMIZE/CLARIFY THE
	INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE DIAGRAMS AND MAKE IT
	EASIER/MORE CLEAR ON THE REVIEWER. THE DIAGRAMS ARE
	CLUTTERED WITH INFORMATION WHICH MAKES IT VERY
	DIFFICULT TO READ.

	3.) THE FAR DIAGRAMS DO NOT APPEAR TO CAPTURE ALL AREAS
	THAT SHOULD BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE FAR CALCULATIONS
	(SOME SPACES ARE QUESTIONABLE IN THE FAR CALCULATION).
	PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR IS 1.5
	(RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL).

	4.) BUILDING SETBACKS HAVE BEEN INCORRECTLY MEASURED.
	THE BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE
	PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING
	WALL. THERE ARE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS THAT ENCROACH
	WITHIN THE NOTED BUILDING SETBACKS. THESE ARCHITECTURAL
	PROJECTIONS ARE NOT EXEMPT AND SHALL BE COUNTED AS PART
	OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACK.

	5.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, INCLUDING BALCONIES, ETC. MAY
	NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3 FT INTO A SETBACK. SUCH
	ENCROACHMENTS HAVE BEEN INCORRECTLY MEASURED AND
	NOTATED IN THE PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
	[ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)]

	6.) THE PLANS NOTE ???EDGE OF TRELLIS??? (SHEET A1.01
	??? GROUND LEVEL) FOR BOTH BUILDINGS; HOWEVER, NO
	INFORMATION AND DETAILS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE
	PLANS. IS THIS A NOTE THAT SHOULD BE ELIMINATED FROM
	THE REVISED PLAN SET?

	7.) WALL HEIGHT INFORMATION FOR THE FLAMINGO AND
	CORDOVA BUILDINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. THE
	HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED PRIVACY WALL SHALL BE CONSISTENT
	WITH THE HEIGHT STANDARDS IN ZLDR S.94-302. THIS
	INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED IN STAFF???S PREVIOUS
	COMMENTS; HOWEVER, IT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.

	8.) MIXED USE PROJECT WITH OVER 300 PARKING SPACES
	PROVIDED SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF TWO (2) ACCESS POINTS
	ONTO EACH RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION
	ON THE FPL VAULTS WITHIN THE FLAMINGO BUILDING AND
	WHETHER OR NOT THE VAULTS WILL HAVE VEHICULAR ACCESS
	(LOCATED ALONG FLAMINGO DRIVE). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
	FLAMINGO BUILDING CURRENTLY HAS 2 ACCESS POINTS ON
	FLAMINGO DRIVE. [S.94-312]

	9.) GROUND FLOOR PLAN FOR THE CORDOVA BUILDING SHOWS
	7,624 SQ. FT. FOR THE RETAIL USE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT
	WITH THE 7,626 SQ. FT. PROVIDED IN THE ZONING DATA AND
	TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.

	10.) CHECK PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE FLAMINGO
	BUILDING (SHEET A0.01). THERE MAY BE AN ERROR IN THE
	CALCULATIONS, AS THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES ON EACH
	PARKING LEVEL DOES NOT ADD UP.

	11.) THE "ON-STREET" PARKING IN THE SITE PLAN IS
	INCORRECTLY LABELED AS "OFF STREET" PARKING. THESE
	SPACES ARE CLEARLY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY
	LINE, AND THEREFORE SHALL BE CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY.

	12.) LOCATION OF LIGHT POLES (AS PROVIDED IN THE
	PHOTOMETRIC PLAN) ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN.
	PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF THE LIGHT FIXTURES AND SETBACKS
	TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE PLANS AND
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.

	13.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ENCLOSED LOADING AREA IN THE
	FLAMINGO BUILDING (LEVEL 1). IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO
	PROVIDE A LOADING DRIVE NEXT TO AN ENCLOSED LOADING
	AREA.

	14.) THE ENCLOSED NON-AIRCONDITIONED "VESTIBULE" SHALL
	BE COUNTED TOWARDS FAR. [ZLDR 94-145(11)]


	LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS:

	1.) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL AND LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL
	BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING A
	RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	S.94-443(A). COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT HAS NOT
	BEEN FULLY MET.


	PARKING COMMENTS:

	1.) CHECK PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE REVISED
	PLANS. THERE APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE
	PARKING CALCULATIONS.

	2.) ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO PROVIDE AN
	ENCLOSED LOADING AREA NEXT TO THE UNENCLOSED LOADING
	AREA (MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED). AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM
	WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE ENCLOSED LOADING AREA (IF
	KEPT), AS THE AREA/SPACE APPEARS TO BE VERY TIGHT.

	3.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF TURNAROUND SPACES
	IN THE PARKING GARAGES WHERE NECESSARY TO ADDRESS
	ADEQUATE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION. [NOT ADDRESSED. NO
	MARKINGS/NOTATIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE PLANS.]

	4.) IS THERE ANY ON-STREET PARKING PROPOSED FOR THE
	PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION (I.E.
	LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, CALCULATIONS, ETC.). [PARTIALLY
	ADDRESSED. ON-STREET PARKING STALLS SHALL BE
	DIMENSIONED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-STREET PARKING.
	DIMENSIONS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED IN THE PLANS.]

	5.) A NOTE CLEARLY STATING THAT THE TANDEM PARKING
	SPACES WILL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND RESERVED FOR
	VALET/RESIDENTIAL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. [NOT
	ADDRESSED. NOTE STILL MISSING IN THE REVISED PLAN SET.]


	ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:

	1.) BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION INCOMPLETE IN THE
	ELEVATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE
	AND CONSISTENT WITH SEC. 94-145 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL
	DISTRICT), SEC. 94-306 (HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS AND SEC.
	94-611 (HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE). [NOT ADDRESSED TO STAFF'S
	STATISFACTION. PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS ABOVE.]

	2.) ALL SPACES WITHIN THE REVISED FLOOR PLAN SET SHALL
	BE LABELED TO DETERMINE IF THE SPACES SHALL BE COUNTED
	TOWARDS THE FAR. SOME (ENCLOSED) SPACES DO NOT HAVE
	LABELS/ARE NOT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED.


	LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS:

	1.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH THE
	11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING
	SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE
	PLANS AND THE ZLDRS: A) ALTHOUGH THERE'S A NOTE ON
	SHEETS PH1 AND PH2 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC SET STATING THAT
	THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURES WILL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 5
	FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, THE PLAN ALSO SHOWS THE
	LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, WHICH ARE CLEARLY
	WITHIN 5 FT. OF THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS
	CONFLICT. IF THE LIGHT POLES CANNOT BE LOCATED OUTSIDE
	OF THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE,
	THE APPLICANT SHALL EITHER REMOVE THE POLE FIXTURE OR
	REQUEST A WAIVER TO THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT. B) THE
	SETBACK DIMENSION OF THE LIGHT POLE TO THE PROPERTY
	LINE SHALL BE CLEARLY DEPICTED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
	C) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE PHOTOMETRIC
	SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE PROJECT SITE
	AS REQUESTED. GIVEN THE LIGHTING INFORMATION PROVIDED,
	THE PLAN SHOULD NOT HAVE AN ISSUE PROVIDING THE
	LIGHTING SPILLOVER TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.


	SIGNAGE COMMENTS:

	1.) THE PREVIOUS COMMENT ON SIGNAGE HAS NOT BEEN
	ADDRESSED (CYCLE 1 ??? 9/6/22). THE 11/22/22 RESPONSE
	TO STAFF???S COMMENTS AND WAIVER TABLE (SHEET A0.01)
	STATES THAT A WAIVER TO SIGNAGE IS BEING REQUESTED;
	HOWEVER, NO REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT HAS BEEN
	PROVIDED WITH THE 11/22/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET, AND THE
	DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC DETAILS
	ON THE SIGN WAIVER REQUEST. AT THIS TIME, THE APPLICANT
	MUST HAVE INFORMATION ON THE SPECIFIC WAIVER(S) TO
	SIGNAGE FOR THE PROJECT. THE WAIVER CANNOT BE
	GENERALIZED. IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO GENERATE A SIGN
	PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT.


	INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:

	* PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	* MAKE SURE ALL PLANS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY!

	* WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
	(4) FULL SIZE PAPER COPIES AND ONE SET IN 11 INCHES X
	17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
	DOCUMENTS. THREE (3) HARD COPY SETS SHALL BE PROVIDED
	IN FULL COLOR.

	* ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	* PLEASE NOTE YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL
	AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS
	CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	* CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
	QUESTIONS.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-06-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	llouie			Date	09-06-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By	llouie			Date	09-06-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-06 09:20:00	*** THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION
	PROVIDED IN THE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY AND AS A
	RESULT, THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROJECT ARE
	INCONSISTENT AND EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS/REQUIREMENTS OF
	THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). ADDITIONALLY, PER SEC.
	94-207(A)(1)(B), THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY OF A PROJECT
	CANNOT EXCEED THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY STANDARDS
	PROVIDED IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
	POLICY 1.1.3. ***

	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	1.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION
	MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT, PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS CRITICAL (AND PRIOR TO
	THE FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PROJECT). DOCUMENTATION OF
	ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH (AND RESULTS/FEEDBACK FROM THESE
	MEETINGS) WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS IS REQUIRED
	AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PLANNING STAFF.

	2.) THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR IS 1.5 (RESIDENTIAL +
	NON-RESIDENTIAL). BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN
	THE PLAN SET, THE PROPOSED FAR FOR THE PROJECT IS 1.62,
	WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM AND IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE
	ADJUST PROJECT TO COMPLY. [ZLDR S.94-145(8)(D)]

	3.) THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY HAS BEEN
	EXCEEDED. PER ZLDR S.94-145(9)(B), THE MAXIMUM
	ALLOWABLE DENSITY IS 32.27 DU/ACRE. THE PROPOSED
	PROJECT CURRENTLY HAS A DENSITY OF 32.7 DU/ACRE WHICH
	IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE ADDRESS.

	4.) THE PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR TO FACTOR IN THE
	BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING
	DISTRICTS. PER THE ZLDRS, IF A STRUCTURE ABUTS A
	RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IN EXCESS OF 30 FT., THE
	FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED: A) 1
	FT. OF HEIGHT ABOVE 30 FT. FOR EACH 2 FT. OF SETBACK
	WHEN ABUTTING A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING
	DISTRICT AND B) 1 FT. OF HEIGHT ABOVE 30 FT. FOR EACH 1
	FT. OF SETBACK WHEN ABUTTING ANY MULTIFAMILY
	RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE BUILDING HEIGHT
	SETBACK IS IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM SETBACK
	REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-145(2). [ZLDR
	S.94-145(6)]

	5.) PROJECT INFORMATION IS INCONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. PLEASE REVISE JUSTIFICATION
	STATEMENT TO ADDRESS ANY CORRECTIONS/INACCURACIES.

	6.) JUSTIFICATION ON THE REQUESTED WAIVERS NEED TO BE
	EXPANDED TO IDENTIFY ANY MITIGATION MEASURES AND
	BENEFITS OF EACH WAIVER REQUEST TO THE GENERAL
	PUBLIC/SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

	7.) TABLES PRESENTED WITHIN THE PLAN SET DOES NOT
	EFFECTIVELY PRESENT INFORMATION AND CAN BE IMPROVED
	AND/OR SIMPLIFIED. ALSO, DATA/CALCULATIONS PRESENTED
	ARE EITHER INCORRECT/INCOMPLETE OR DIFFICULT TO
	UNDERSTAND. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF FOR EXAMPLES ON DATA
	PRESENTATION (IF NECESSARY).

	8.) PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN HISTORIC
	DISTRICTS. THEREFORE, ALL PD ASSOCIATED ZONING
	REQUIREMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED ON THE PARCEL(S) OF THE
	PROPOSED CPD. THERE APPEARS TO BE A PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
	BUFFER ON THE PROPERTY OF 309 BARCELONA (WITHIN THE EL
	CID HISTORIC DISTRICT). THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. [ZLDR
	S.94-207(A)(2)]

	9.) REQUIRED OWNER'S CONSENT FORMS HAVE NOT BEEN
	PROPERTY EXECUTED. PLEASE ADDRESS.

	10.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
	LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS
	REQUIRED (561-684-4030). ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN
	THE TPS LETTER MUST MATCH PROJECT INFORMATION FOR
	CONSISTENCY.

	11.) INFORMATION IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY (PREPARED BY
	BRYAN G. KELLEY, P.E., OF SIMMONS AND WHITE, DATED
	8/8/2022) IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROJECT INFORMATION
	PRESENTED IN THE PLAN SET (I.E. BUILDING SQUARE
	FOOTAGE; ALSO, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY PROPOSED (59 UNITS)
	IS NOT PERMITTED AS IT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
	DENSITY). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.

	12.) INFORMATION IN THE SHARED PARKING STATEMENT
	(PREPARED BY BRYAN G. KELLEY, P.E., OF SIMMONS AND
	WHITE, DATED 8/8/2022) IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROJECT
	INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE PLAN SET (I.E. BUILDING
	SQUARE FOOTAGE; ALSO, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY PROPOSED (59
	UNITS) IS NOT PERMITTED AS IT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
	ALLOWABLE DENSITY). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.

	13.) A NEW SCAD LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
	BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. THE SCAD LETTER INCLUDED IN
	THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CONTAINS OUTDATED INFORMATION
	AND IS EXPIRED. INFORMATION IN THE SCAD LETTER MUST
	MATCH THE PROJECT INFORMATION FOR CONSISTENCY.

	14.) THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES, INCLUDING EXEMPT ITEMS
	OR EQUIPMENT, SHALL NOT EXCEED LIMITATIONS PRESCRIBED
	BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) WITHIN
	DESIGNATED FLIGHT APPROACH PATTERNS OF AIRPORTS OR
	RELATED AVIATION FACILITIES. ALTHOUGH STAFF DOES NOT
	BELIEVE THIS WILL BE AN ISSUE, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER
	FROM THE FAA INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NO
	HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION. [ZLDR S.94-306(B)]

	15.) AN ADDRESS LIST, RADIUS MAP AND EXECUTED ADDRESS
	LIST AFFIDAVIT IS REQUIRED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE
	4 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. THIS INFORMATION
	WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.

	16.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
	UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
	WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
	COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	(561-494-1117).

	17.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
	CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
	INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
	PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.

	18.) PER SEC. 94-207(B)(10)(C), THE APPLICATION SHALL
	INCLUDE THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT WHICH
	IDENTIFIES THE ANTICIPATED PROJECT START AND COMPLETION
	DATES, STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT (IF ANY), AND THE AREA AND
	LOCATION OF COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH
	STAGE. THIS INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED IN THE
	APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.

	19.) ALL PLAN SHEETS SHALL MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. NOT
	ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH. PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS
	MATCH PRIOR TO THE RESUBMITTAL.


	SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

	1) ANY PETITION FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
	ACCOMPANIED BY A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE
	DEVELOPMENT COMPRISED OF THE ELEMENTS LISTED IN SEC.
	94-207(B)(9) AND THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST ON PAGE 16/30
	OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. THE MASTER
	DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED TO SHOW THE PROJECT IN
	RELATIONSHIP TO ITS IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS AND WITH
	EXISTING STRUCTURES. IT IS ALSO CRITICAL TO INCLUDE ALL
	RELEVANT INFORMATION/DATA IN THE PLAN (I.E.
	BUILDING/STRUCTURAL SETBACKS, CRITICAL DIMENSIONS,
	BICYCLE PARKING, ZONING AND WAIVER TABULARS, ETC.).

	2.) A WAIVER TABULAR, SPECIFYING EACH WAIVER REQUESTED
	FOR THE PROJECT AND ANY PERTINENT INFORMATION (I.E.
	REFERENCE CODE SECTION, INFORMATION ON
	REQUIRED/PROPOSED, ETC.) SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN
	SET FOR REFERENCE.

	3.) THE FOLLOWING SHEETS ARE MISSING FROM THE PLAN SET
	(REFERENCE: COVER SHEET A0.00): A) OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
	(A0.04) B) BUILDING SECTION (A3.01)

	4.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE CALCULATIONS
	FOR THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS (MAXIMUM IS
	60%; PROVIDED 68%). ILLUSTRATE WITH DIAGRAMS WHERE
	NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-145(3)]

	5.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE CALCULATIONS
	FOR MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY IMPERMEABLE SURFACE
	(MAXIMUM IS 85%); NO INFORMATION ON THE PROVIDED
	IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE. ILLUSTRATE WITH DIAGRAMS
	WHERE NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
	S.94-145(4)]

	6.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE MINIMUM OPEN
	SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS. ILLUSTRATE WITH
	DIAGRAMS WHERE NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-145(5)]

	7.) PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE PROVIDE BUILDING
	SETBACKS FOR THE PROJECT. THE BUILDING SETBACK IS
	MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE WALL(S) OF THE BUILDING TO
	THE PROPERTY LINE(S). ADDITIONALLY, INCLUDE DIMENSIONS
	FOR ALL STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
	TO BALCONIES, CORNICES, BUTTERS, EAVES AND ROOF
	OVERHANG PROJECTIONS; STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS SHALL NOT
	EXTEND FARTHER THAN 33 FT. INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
	[ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)]

	8.) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOW AWNINGS. AWNINGS
	SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO ANY REQUIRED
	SETBACK OR BE SUPPORTED BY ANY MEANS OTHER THAN
	ATTACHMENT TO THE BUILDING. IF AWNINGS ARE PROPOSED,
	THE AWNING MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED/IDENTIFIED IN THE
	PLANS; THE OUTLINE FOR THE AWNING MUST HAVE DIMENSIONS
	TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. ADDITIONALLY,
	IF THE AWNING ENCROACHES BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	INTO A RIGHT-OF-WAY, ADDITIONAL APPROVALS FROM THE
	REGULATING AGENCY WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR
	S.94-305(B)(5)]

	9.) AT ANY ROAD INTERSECTIONS, VISIBILITY SHALL NOT BE
	OBSCURED BY THE CONSTRUCTION, PLACEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE
	OF A STRUCTURE WALL, SIGN, FENCE, BERM, PLANT MATERIAL,
	SHRUBS OR ANY SIMILAR ITEM BETWEEN 18 INCHES OR 8 FT.
	WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. BASED ON STAFF?S REVIEW
	OF THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, THERE ARE AWNINGS
	ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING WHICH APPEARS TO ENCROACH
	INTO THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
	CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS AND PLAN SET. [ZLDR
	S.94-305(E)]

	10.) IN NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, NO FENCE, HEDGE OR
	WALL SHALL EXCEED 8 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE REQUIRED
	SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS. FENCES/WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED
	48 INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK.
	SHOW HEIGHT (AND DETAIL, IF APPLICABLE) OF ALL WALL
	SEGMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)]

	11.) THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO A PUBLIC
	RIGHT-OF-WAY IS TWO (2). THERE APPEARS TO BE THREE (3)
	ACCESS POINTS FOR THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING ALONG
	FLAMINGO DRIVE. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-312(1)(A)]

	12.) THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
	REQUIREMENTS FOR SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS. PLEASE
	ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-312(2)]


	PARKING COMMENTS:

	1.) PARKING CALCULATIONS REQUIRE FURTHER BREAKDOWN OF
	USES (I.E. NUMBER OF SEATS, SQUARE FOOTAGES, RESERVED
	SPACES, ETC.). TO CLEARLY SHOW PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND
	HOW THEY?VE BEEN MET. ALSO, THE PARKING CALCULATIONS
	PROVIDED ARE INACCURATE AND MUST BE CORRECTED FOR
	ACCURACY (I.E. RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE; WHERE?S THE
	GALLERY?).

	2.) SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS (PREPARED BY BRYAN G.
	KELLEY, P.E., OF SIMMONS & WHITE, DATED 8/8/2022) AND
	CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-484. ADDITIONALLY, PARKING
	SPACES WHERE ARE RESERVED FOR USE BY SPECIFIED
	INDIVIDUALS OR CLASSES OF INDIVIDUALS SHALL NOT BE
	COUNTED TOWARDS MEETING THE SHARED PARKING
	REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE
	ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-484]

	3.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF TURNAROUND SPACES
	IN THE PARKING GARAGE(S) WHERE NECESSARY TO ADDRESS
	ADEQUATE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION.

	4.) PROVIDE AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING. PLEASE
	NOTE THAT CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING DIRECTLY
	ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE FOR A
	MIXED-USE PROJECT IS PROHIBITED IN ALL RESIDENTIAL AND
	NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THERE SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 10 FT. BETWEEN ACCESS DRIVES. ALSO, PLEASE
	NOTE THAT THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS THE
	AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM WHICH HAS NOT BEEN FOUND. [ZLDR
	S.94-485(J)]

	5.) ALL NECESSARY DIMENSIONS IN THE PARKING LAYOUT
	SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-485(N)(2)]

	6.) IN ADDITION TO THE PARKING LAYOUT FOR THE PROJECT,
	A PARKING STALL DETAIL IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
	REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE DETAIL
	MUST BE INCLUDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-485(N)]

	7.) ARE ANY COMPACT PARKING SPACES PROPOSED IN THE
	PROJECT? IF SO, INFORMATION ON THE COMPACT PARKING
	SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED/COMPLY WITH THE COMPACT
	PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-485(N)]

	8.) IS THERE ANY ON-STREET PARKING PROPOSED FOR THE
	PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION (I.E.
	LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, CALCULATIONS, ETC.).

	9.) THERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS
	(REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) AND SHOW LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE/CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR
	S.94-485(O)]

	10.) REQUIRED/PROPOSED LOADING SPACE
	INFORMATION/CALCULATIONS MISSING FROM THE PLAN SET.
	[ZLDR S.94-485(P)]

	11.) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT HAS
	NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. THE PLANS MUST SHOW THE
	CALCULATIONS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED), LOCATION AND
	DETAIL CONSISTENT WITH THE ZLDRS AND THE CITY?S BICYCLE
	PARKING GUIDELINES (CONTACT STAFF FOR DOCUMENT). [ZLDR
	S.94-485(Q)]

	12.) WHEEL STOPS ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR ALL TANDEM PARKING
	SPACES. TO ACCURATELY DEPICT THE FUNCTION OF THE TANDEM
	PARKING SPACES, THE WHEEL STOPS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM
	THE OUTER STALL OF THE TANDEM PARKING. ALSO, PLANS MUST
	ALSO SHOW WHICH TANDEM SPACES ARE RESERVED FOR
	RESIDENTIAL AND WHICH ARE RESERVED FOR VALET (PER
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT).

	13.) A NOTE CLEARLY STATING THAT THE TANDEM PARKING
	SPACES WILL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND RESERVED FOR
	VALET/RESIDENTIAL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS.


	ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:

	1.) BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION INCOMPLETE IN THE
	ELEVATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE
	AND CONSISTENT WITH SEC. 94-145 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL
	DISTRICT), SEC. 94-306 (HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS) AND SEC.
	94-611 (HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE).

	2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE FLOOR PLANS: A)
	PROVIDE A LEGEND THAT IDENTIFIES WHAT THE COLOR
	COORDINATION MEANS. B) NOT ALL SPACES IN THE FLOOR PLAN
	SHEETS HAVE BEEN LABELED. THIS IS CRITICAL TO DETERMINE
	IF THE SPACES SHOULD/SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR
	CALCULATIONS. C) NOTATE NON AIR-CONDITIONED SPACES. IT
	IS IMPORTANT IN VERIFYING WHETHER OR NOT SPACES SHOULD
	BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS.

	3.) IN THE FAR BUILDING AREA TABLE (SHEET A0.03), WHAT
	ARE THE NOTATIONS IN THE PARENTHESIS?

	4.) HOW MANY BEDROOMS ARE PROVIDED IN THE GROUND LEVEL
	FLATS? THE INFORMATION SHOULD BE NOTATED IN THE PLANS.


	LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS:

	1.) NO LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC PLAN/INFORMATION PROVIDED
	WITH THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. PER ZLDR
	S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITH
	A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE
	BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
	INFORMATION AND A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE; SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM POLE FIXTURE(S) (IF
	APPLICABLE) TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S) SHALL ALSO BE
	PROVIDED. PHOTOMETRIC SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY
	LINE(S) IS ALSO REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.

	2.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLANS FOR
	CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING: ALL
	OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND
	SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT, OR GLARE AWAY FROM
	ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
	RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES.


	SIGNAGE COMMENTS:

	1.) THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH THE SIGNAGE INFORMATION
	PRESENTED FOR THE PROJECT. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
	INCLUDES A WAIVER TO SIGNAGE (BUT NO SPECIFIC DETAILS);
	HOWEVER, THE PLAN SHEETS STATE: "ALL PROPOSED SIGANGE
	SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REGULATIONS OF THE
	UNDERLYING ZONING DISTRICT." PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
	CONSISTENCY. THE APPLICATION MUST CLEARLY STATE WHAT IS
	THE WAIVER TO THE SIGN CODE REQUIREMENTS, MUST INCLUDE
	SIGNAGE PROPOSAL FOR THE PROJECT (SIGN PROGRAM,
	INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, ETC.), JUSTIFICATION, MITIGATION
	MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) AND BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY
	IF A WAIVER IS BEING SOUGHT FOR SIGNAGE.


	INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:

	* PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	* WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
	(4) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
	INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
	DOCUMENTS. THREE (3) HARD COPY SETS SHALL BE PROVIDED
	IN FULL COLOR.

	* ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	* PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
	($600).

	* CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (5661) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
	QUESTIONS.


	NOTES:

	* DEDICATION, RESERVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF PROPERTY
	FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, STREETS, SCHOOLS, PARKS, MASS
	TRANSIT FACILITIES OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES MAY BE
	REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OR REQUIREMENT OF THE PLANNED
	DEVELOPMENT. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(3)]

	* ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE TELEVISION
	AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS, SHALL BE INSTALLED
	UNDERGROUND. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(5)]

	* OUTDOOR STORAGE FACILITIES ARE PROHIBITED. [ZLDR
	S.94-207(D)(9)]

	* DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND
	STORMWATER