Plan Review Details - Project Z22080022
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22080022
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-07-2022 Time 12:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-08-2022 Time 13:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-08-2022 Time 13:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-06-2022 Time 13:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-08 11:11:53NO COMMENTS.
 REVIEW PROVIDED FOR Z22080021
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-19-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 05-19-2023 Time 11:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 05-19-2023 Time 11:10 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-19 11:12:275/19/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
  
 1. PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS INCORRECTLY
 NOTARIZED. [SATISFIED]
 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE
 TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED. [SATISFIED]
 3. FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE
 PLANNER. [SATISFIED]
 4. FUTURE LAND USE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY
 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC
 OUTREACH, SUPPORT LETTERS, ETC. AS WELL AS ANY
 INFORMATION PERTAINING TO UPCOMING EFFORTS. [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION/JUSTIFICATION REGARDING
 THE LOSS OF VERY VIABLE HOUSING UNITS, SPECIFICALLY
 HOUSING UNITS THAT APPEAR TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE, AND
 ARE OFTEN CONSIDERED AS THE "MISSING MIDDLE",
 ESPECIALLY DURING A TIME WHEN THE CITY IS EXPERIENCING
 SIGNIFICANT GROWTH AND A LACK OF SUCH HOUSING. THE
 "MISSING MIDDLE" IS OFTEN DEFINED AS HOUSING TYPES
 THAT..."PROVIDE DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS, SUCH AS
 DUPLEXES, FOURPLEXES, COTTAGE COURTS, AND MULTIPLEXES.
 THESE HOUSE-SCALE BUILDINGS FIT SEAMLESSLY INTO
 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND SUPPORT
 WALKABILITY, LOCALLY-SERVING RETAIL, AND PUBLIC
 TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS. THEY PROVIDE SOLUTIONS ALONG A
 SPECTRUM OF AFFORDABILITY TO ADDRESS THE MISMATCH
 BETWEEN THE AVAILABLE U.S. HOUSING STOCK AND SHIFTING
 DEMOGRAPHICS COMBINED WITH THE GROWING DEMAND FOR
 WALKABILITY." [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 7. ALL OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITIES LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. [SATISFIED SUBJECT TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR
 TO INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL]
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRM EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL
 OF THE ENTIRE AREA WITHIN THE PETITION AND A STATEMENT
 FROM THE APPLICANT AS INDICATED IN THE SECTION P. OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. [SATISFIED]
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A MARKET STUDY/ANALYSIS EVALUATING
 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE
 CITY, THE TIMING OF ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ETC. [NOT
 SATISFIED]
 10. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 2.,
 PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED/SEALED SURVEY. [SATISFIED]
 11. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 5.,
 PLEASE PROVIDE ALL THE SIGNED LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM
 THE RESIDENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EXCEL FILE (???500 FT
 SUPPORT??? SPECIFIC SHEET). [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER ??? PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 03-28-2023 Time 12:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 03-28-2023 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-28 12:36:143/28/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
  
 1. PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS INCORRECTLY
 NOTARIZED. [SATISFIED]
 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE
 TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED. [PARTIALLY
 SATISFIED]
 3. FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE
 PLANNER. [SATISFIED]
 4. FUTURE LAND USE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY
 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC
 OUTREACH, SUPPORT LETTERS, ETC. AS WELL AS ANY
 INFORMATION PERTAINING TO UPCOMING EFFORTS. [PARTIALLY
 SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION/JUSTIFICATION REGARDING
 THE LOSS OF VERY VIABLE HOUSING UNITS, SPECIFICALLY
 HOUSING UNITS THAT APPEAR TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE, AND
 ARE OFTEN CONSIDERED AS THE "MISSING MIDDLE",
 ESPECIALLY DURING A TIME WHEN THE CITY IS EXPERIENCING
 SIGNIFICANT GROWTH AND A LACK OF SUCH HOUSING. THE
 "MISSING MIDDLE" IS OFTEN DEFINED AS HOUSING TYPES
 THAT..."PROVIDE DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS, SUCH AS
 DUPLEXES, FOURPLEXES, COTTAGE COURTS, AND MULTIPLEXES.
 THESE HOUSE-SCALE BUILDINGS FIT SEAMLESSLY INTO
 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND SUPPORT
 WALKABILITY, LOCALLY-SERVING RETAIL, AND PUBLIC
 TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS. THEY PROVIDE SOLUTIONS ALONG A
 SPECTRUM OF AFFORDABILITY TO ADDRESS THE MISMATCH
 BETWEEN THE AVAILABLE U.S. HOUSING STOCK AND SHIFTING
 DEMOGRAPHICS COMBINED WITH THE GROWING DEMAND FOR
 WALKABILITY." [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 7. ALL OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITIES LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRM EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL
 OF THE ENTIRE AREA WITHIN THE PETITION AND A STATEMENT
 FROM THE APPLICANT AS INDICATED IN THE SECTION P. OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A MARKET STUDY/ANALYSIS EVALUATING
 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE
 CITY, THE TIMING OF ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ETC.
 10. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 2.,
 PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED/SEALED SURVEY.
 11. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 5.,
 PLEASE PROVIDE ALL THE SIGNED LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM
 THE RESIDENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EXCEL FILE (???500 FT
 SUPPORT??? SPECIFIC SHEET).
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER ??? PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 09-27-2022 Time 12:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 09-27-2022 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-27 12:04:08PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 09.27.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22080019 - Z22080022 - Z22080020 -
 Z22080021
 CASE NO.: PB 1934 - 1934A - ZBA 3270B - ISPR 22-07
 ________________________________________
  
 PB 1934 (FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT) AND PB 1934A
 (REZONING)
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS INCORRECTLY
 NOTARIZED.
  
 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE
 TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED.
  
 3. FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE
 PLANNER.
  
 4. FUTURE LAND USE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY
 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC
 OUTREACH, SUPPORT LETTERS, ETC. AS WELL AS ANY
 INFORMATION PERTAINING TO UPCOMING EFFORTS.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION/JUSTIFICATION REGARDING
 THE LOSS OF VERY VIABLE HOUSING UNITS, SPECIFICALLY
 HOUSING UNITS THAT APPEAR TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE, AND
 ARE OFTEN CONSIDERED AS THE "MISSING MIDDLE",
 ESPECIALLY DURING A TIME WHEN THE CITY IS EXPERIENCING
 SIGNIFICANT GROWTH AND A LACK OF SUCH HOUSING.
  
 THE "MISSING MIDDLE" IS OFTEN DEFINED AS HOUSING TYPES
 THAT...
  
 "PROVIDE DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS, SUCH AS DUPLEXES,
 FOURPLEXES, COTTAGE COURTS, AND MULTIPLEXES. THESE
 HOUSE-SCALE BUILDINGS FIT SEAMLESSLY INTO EXISTING
 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND SUPPORT WALKABILITY,
 LOCALLY-SERVING RETAIL, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
 OPTIONS. THEY PROVIDE SOLUTIONS ALONG A SPECTRUM OF
 AFFORDABILITY TO ADDRESS THE MISMATCH BETWEEN THE
 AVAILABLE U.S. HOUSING STOCK AND SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS
 COMBINED WITH THE GROWING DEMAND FOR WALKABILITY."
  
 ________________________________________
  
 ISPR 22-07 (INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW) AND ZBA 3270B
 (CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT) - OTE: THE COMMENTS
 PROVIDED BELOW ARE TECHNICAL SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
 AND IN NO WAY REPRESENT A RECOMMENDATION OF SUPPORT OR
 DENIAL FOR THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FROM THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT):
  
 A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING IS NECESSARY BEFORE THE
 APPLICANT CAN APPLY FOR A PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT.
 THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT FDOT TO REQUEST AN ACCESS
 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING TO COORDINATE THE PROPOSED
 CONNECTIONS. ACCESS PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS ARE HELD
 EVERY THURSDAY IN PERSON AND VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS.
 PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS ARE TYPICALLY SCHEDULED TWO
 WEEKS AFTER AN APPLICATION IS RECEIVED. A NOTIFICATION
 EMAIL WITH THE DATE AND TIME OF PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
 WILL BE SENT OUT EACH MONDAY FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEKS
 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. REQUESTS MAY BE SUBMITTED AT
 HTTPS://ARCG.IS/1H0VT8.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 JUSTIN STROH
 PLANNING SPECIALIST II
 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
 FDOT - DISTRICT FOUR
 3400 W. COMMERCIAL BLVD.
 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309
 [email protected]
 OFFICE: (954) 777-4294
  
 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE
 TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED.
  
 3. AN APPROVED PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 4. ALL OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITIES LETTERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 5. THE CIVIL PLANS ARE SHOWING A CANOPY AT THE POINT OF
 SALE??? THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE
 PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ARE
 COMPLIANT WITH THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
  
 6. WHAT IS THE DASHED LINE RUNNING THROUGH THE SIDEWALK
 ON SOUTH OLIVE (LOOKS LIKE A PROPERTY LINE)? THIS DOES
 NOT SHOW UPON THE SURVEY, ETC.
  
 7. IDENTIFY VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AT ALL INTERSECTIONS
 AND ENSURE THAT NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND 8
 FEET ARE LOCATED WITHIN SUCH AREA.
  
 8. CONFIRM THAT THE PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE ACCOUNTS FOR
 ALL BUILDINGS, SHEDS, CANOPIES, ETC. (EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED).
  
 9. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE
 AND OPEN SPACE TOTAL TO MORE THAN 100%.
  
 10. DETAIL SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BIKE PARKING
 PAD, SPACING BETWEEN THE RACKS, TYPE OF RACK, ETC.
  
 11. STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING.
  
 12. PLEASE CLARIFY THE "INTERIOR DETAIL BAYS". IS THIS
 BUILDING BEING CONVERTED?
  
 13. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED. LEVELS SHALL
 NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 14. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(2)(A), ACCESS POINTS ARE TO
 HAVE A 50 FOOT CORNER CLEARANCE ONTO A NON-THOROUGHFARE
 ROADWAY UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE.
  
 15. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE.
  
 16. DESIGNATION OF ON-STREET PARKING ON MALVERNE IS
 SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY???S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ??? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved