 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z22080021
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z22080021 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-07 16:38:49 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY | | | LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER | | | APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE | | | WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION | | | DISTANCE. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE | | | IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 5. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-13 16:30:50 | ON ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL REMOVE ABANDONED SANITARY | | | LATERAL FROM ROW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-23-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-23-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-23-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-23 14:45:44 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected] | | | GENERAL: | | | O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP | | | B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL | | | L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97 | | | B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, | | | ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU | | | BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL | | | O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS | | | DATA. | | | | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS: | | | O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER | | | SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING | | | TO THEM. | | | O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO | | | STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT. | | | O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION | | | OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTION. | | | O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY | | | OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER | | | METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO | | | PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY. | | | O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE | | | NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | | | | WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN: | | | O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS. | | | O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE | | | STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. | | | O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND | | | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND | | | SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE | | | AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS, | | | BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO | | | BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, | | | DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, | | | ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT | | | ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES. | | | O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR | | | SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. | | | O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. | | | O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY | | | TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. | | | O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA. | | | O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE | | | (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). | | | O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL | | | BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY | | | PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET. | | | O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE | | | JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET. | | | O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT | | | STATION NUMBER. | | | O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE | | | TRAPS (IF ANY). | | | O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN | | | OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER. | | | | | | FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW: | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES | | | NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. | | | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: | | | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS | | | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF | | | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; | | | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE | | | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A | | | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). | | | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF | | | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION | | | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF | | | WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE | | | BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE | | | 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR | | | PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS. | | | | | | QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS: | | | O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH | | | CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF | | | BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT | | | 561-822-2262 OR [email protected] | | | O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected] | | | O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-17-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-17-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-17-2023 |
Time |
12:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-17 12:44:43 | 3RD REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS | | | PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-13 16:24:02 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS | | | PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
Time |
15:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-29 15:04:55 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-07-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-07-2023 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-07-2023 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-07 16:22:59 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: MINT ECO CAR WASH Z22080021 | | | MARCH 7, 2023 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPING THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE | | | SITE MAY BE NONCONFORMING TO CURRENT LANDSCAPE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. BUFFERS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL SHOULD BE | | | REVIEWED TO ASSURE THEY ARE ADEQUATELY PROVIDING | | | PROTECTION. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS WILL BE | | | ADDRESSED TO SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OVERALL | | | SITE ARE MET. MUCH INFORMATION IS NOT SUPPLIED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART THAT MUST BE INCLUDED ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SITE. STAFF WILL HAVE | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE APPLICATION MOVES FORWARD. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE EXISTING TREE TABULAR CHART | | | ON SHEET TD-1 TO SHOW THE MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR | | | REMOVALS. MITIGATION REQUIRED CHART IS REDUNDANT. | | | | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING | | | CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE LIVE | | | OAK TREE #303 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | MAGNOLIA TREES 307, 308, AND 309 ARE NATIVE SPECIES | | | INDICTED AS BEING REMOVED AND ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE | | | ARBORIST REPORT. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE | | | TREES. BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE | | | TREES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A | | | LIMITATION THAT CAN BE CITED SUCH AS OVERHEAD WIRES, | | | SHADE TREES MUST BE PROVIDED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. | | | FOXTAIL PALMS COUNT 3:1 TOWARD TREE SUBSTITUTION SO DO | | | NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE 3 BUFFER TREES. | | | | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING | | | AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4) FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT | | | CHART. REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED | | | INTERIOR LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT PLACEMENT OF THE 8 | | | FOOT WALL SET BACK 5 FEET FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE | | | WITH LANDSCAPING ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL. THIS WOULD | | | CREATE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE ISSUES WITH THE | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND SHOULD BE PROPOSED AS CLOSE TO | | | THE PROPERTY LINE AS POSSIBLE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/7/23: | | | | | | 7. EAST PROPERTY LINE LENGTH MUST BE USED AS SHOWN ON | | | THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN, DRIVEWAY MAY NOT BE | | | SUBTRACTED FROM THE MEASUREMENT. CORRECT ON CHART. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-07-2022 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-07 15:43:43 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: MINT ECO CAR WASH Z22080021 | | | SEPTEMBER 7, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. LANDSCAPING THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE SITE MAY BE | | | NONCONFORMING TO CURRENT LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | BUFFERS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL SHOULD BE REVIEWED TO | | | ASSURE THEY ARE ADEQUATELY PROVIDING PROTECTION. | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED TO | | | SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OVERALL SITE ARE MET. | | | MUCH INFORMATION IS NOT SUPPLIED ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS CHART THAT MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SITE. STAFF WILL HAVE | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE APPLICATION MOVES FORWARD. | | | | | | 2. CORRECT THE EXISTING TREE TABULAR CHART ON SHEET | | | TD-1 TO SHOW THE MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR REMOVALS. | | | MITIGATION REQUIRED CHART IS REDUNDANT. | | | | | | 3. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A | | | 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY | | | RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND | | | RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE LIVE OAK TREE #303 | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 4. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE TREES. | | | BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE TREES AS | | | DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A LIMITATION | | | THAT CAN BE CITED SUCH AS OVERHEAD WIRES, SHADE TREES | | | MUST BE PROVIDED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. FOXTAIL | | | PALMS COUNT 3:1 TOWARD TREE SUBSTITUTION SO DO NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE 3 BUFFER TREES. | | | | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE | | | CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 | | | (C)(3) AND (4) FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. PROVIDE THE | | | CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER | | | TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR | | | LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 6. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT PLACEMENT OF THE 8 FOOT WALL | | | SET BACK 5 FEET FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE WITH | | | LANDSCAPING ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL. THIS WOULD | | | CREATE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE ISSUES WITH THE | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND SHOULD BE PROPOSED AS CLOSE TO | | | THE PROPERTY LINE AS POSSIBLE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mtechnow |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
12:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
12:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-08 12:30:23 | -VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO UTILITY IMPACTS WITH THE | | | PROPOSED PLAN. | | | -PLANS WILL BE APPROVED IF NO UTILITY WORK IS PROPOSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-14-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
02-14-2023 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-14 07:28:24 | ENGINEERING PLAN MAY REQUIRE REVISION AT ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
09-06-2022 |
Time |
17:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-06 17:01:57 | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING: | | | -SURVEY FOR 301 MALVERNE IS NOT SIGNED, SEALED, AND | | | DATED. | | | -VERIFY IF THERE ARE ANY EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS AT | | | 301 MALVERNE. | | | -ON ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING WATER AND | | | SEWER SERVICE FOR 301 MALVERNE AND WHAT IS HAPPENING TO | | | IT. | | | -CANOPY IS REFERENCED ON SOME PLANS, BUT NOT SHOWN AND | | | LABELED ON SITE PLAN. | | | -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW SOUTHERN BLVD. DRIVEWAY | | | ENTRANCE BLOCKED WITH CHAIN AND SMALL SIGN SAYING ENTER | | | ON OLIVE, BUT LP1, SP1, AND TD1 SHOW TURN ARROW INTO | | | PROPERTY. WILL DRIVEWAY BE OPEN TO VEHICLE TRAFFIC? | | | -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING SEWER LATERAL AND CLEANOUT FOR | | | 316 SOUTHERN. | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | MARK HURLEY [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-21-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-21-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-21-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-22 15:14:00 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-31-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-31-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-31-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-31 12:12:11 | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO | | | THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W | | | PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000 | | | 00) | | | 2- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE | | | VEHICLE?S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS | | | FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - DUAL AXLES | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | 3- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN | | | THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF | | | THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND | | | COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING | | | MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE | | | CAN(S). | | | 4- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA | | | STATUES [553.5041 F.S.]. | | | 5- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION. | | | 6- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED | | | DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-08 13:13:26 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER Z22080019. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-08-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-08-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-08-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-05-08 11:46:47 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS | | | AND SETUP A QUEUE ANALYSIS THAT PROPERLY CAPTURES THE | | | EXISTING QUEUEING ISSUE AT THE FACILITY AND PROVIDES A | | | BASELINE TO COMPARE WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | MOREOVER, AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS OF OLIVE AND | | | SOUTHERN BLVD MAY BE NEEDED AND DATA COLLECTION SHOULD | | | BE PERFORMED DURING THE REAL PEAK HOUR AT THE FACILITY | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE | | | PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION | | | RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, | | | PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, | | | GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & | | | DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY | | | LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED | | | T-1.0 | | | 4) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE | | | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT | | | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF | | | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING | | | PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH | | | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE | | | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND | | | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT | | | COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH | | | PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE | | | TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY | | | (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0) | | | 7) SATISFIED. WILL THE DRIVEWAY ON SOUTHERN BLVD BE | | | OPEN FOR CUSTOMERS TO ENTER THE FACILITY? BASED ON THE | | | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, IT SEEMS THAT VEHICLES | | | ENTERING FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY ARE NOT ABLE | | | OR FORBIDDEN TO TURNAROUND AND ENTER THE CARWASH QUEUE. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | 8) SATISFIED. THERE IS A CONFLICT POINT BETWEEN | | | VEHICLES ENTERING FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY AND | | | THE ONES EXITING THE CAR WASH FACILITY. ASSUMING | | | ENTERING VEHICLES HAVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE ONES FROM | | | THE CAR WASH SHOULD COME TO A STOP, BEFORE HEADING | | | SOUTH. THUS, PROPER PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE (I.E. | | | STOP/YIELD) SHOULD BE INSTALLED TO REGULATE INTERNAL | | | CIRCULATION | | | 9) SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE DOES NOT | | | SEEM TO MEET THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE. A | | | VARIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED | | | 10) SATISFIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO MAKE THE PROPOSED | | | DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE AS ENTRY-ONLY, AND INSTALL ANOTHER | | | DRIVEWAY EXIT-ONLY ON MALVERNE RD | | | 11) SATISFIED. A RIGHT-TURN STORAGE/DECELERATION LANE | | | SHOULD BE INSTALLED ALONG OLIVE NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY, | | | SO TO PROVIDE EXTRA STACKING AND REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY | | | OF QUEUE SPILLBACKS | | | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS MALVERNE AT | | | THE INTERSECTION WITH OLIVE AVE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-08 11:07:32 | | | | 1) PLEASE SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS AND | | | SETUP A QUEUE ANALYSIS THAT PROPERLY CAPTURES THE | | | EXISTING QUEUEING ISSUE AT THE FACILITY AND PROVIDES A | | | BASELINE TO COMPARE WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | MOREOVER, AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS OF OLIVE AND | | | SOUTHERN BLVD MAY BE NEEDED AND DATA COLLECTION SHOULD | | | BE PERFORMED DURING THE REAL PEAK HOUR AT THE FACILITY | | | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE | | | GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED | | | FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING | | | STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES, | | | CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY | | | SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED | | | AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0 | | | 4) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB | | | DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, | | | PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS | | | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 5) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN. | | | INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH | | | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE | | | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) | | | 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR | | | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL | | | PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. | | | PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) | | | CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION | | | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, | | | T-3.0) | | | 7) WILL THE DRIVEWAY ON SOUTHERN BLVD BE OPEN FOR | | | CUSTOMERS TO ENTER THE FACILITY? BASED ON THE | | | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, IT SEEMS THAT VEHICLES | | | ENTERING FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY ARE NOT ABLE | | | OR FORBIDDEN TO TURNAROUND AND ENTER THE CARWASH QUEUE. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | 8) THERE IS A CONFLICT POINT BETWEEN VEHICLES ENTERING | | | FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY AND THE ONES EXITING | | | THE CAR WASH FACILITY. ASSUMING ENTERING VEHICLES HAVE | | | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE ONES FROM THE CAR WASH SHOULD | | | COME TO A STOP, BEFORE HEADING SOUTH. THUS, PROPER | | | PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE (I.E. STOP/YIELD) SHOULD | | | BE INSTALLED TO REGULATE INTERNAL CIRCULATION | | | 9) THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET | | | THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE. A VARIANCE MAY | | | BE REQUIRED | | | 10) IT IS RECOMMENDED TO MAKE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON | | | OLIVE AS ENTRY-ONLY, AND INSTALL ANOTHER DRIVEWAY | | | EXIT-ONLY ON MALVERNE RD | | | 11) A RIGHT-TURN STORAGE/DECELERATION LANE SHOULD BE | | | INSTALLED ALONG OLIVE NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY, SO TO | | | PROVIDE EXTRA STACKING AND REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF | | | QUEUE SPILLBACKS | | | 12) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS MALVERNE AT THE | | | INTERSECTION WITH OLIVE AVE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-31-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
03-31-2023 |
Time |
12:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-31 12:58:19 | 3/31/23 ??? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT | | | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE | | | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FROM THE FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT): | | | A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING IS NECESSARY BEFORE THE | | | APPLICANT CAN APPLY FOR A PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT. | | | THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT FDOT TO REQUEST AN ACCESS | | | PRE-APPLICATION MEETING TO COORDINATE THE PROPOSED | | | CONNECTIONS. ACCESS PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS ARE HELD | | | EVERY THURSDAY IN PERSON AND VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS. | | | PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS ARE TYPICALLY SCHEDULED TWO | | | WEEKS AFTER AN APPLICATION IS RECEIVED. A NOTIFICATION | | | EMAIL WITH THE DATE AND TIME OF PRE-APPLICATION MEETING | | | WILL BE SENT OUT EACH MONDAY FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEKS | | | PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. REQUESTS MAY BE SUBMITTED AT | | | HTTPS://ARCG.IS/1H0VT8. | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | JUSTIN STROH | | | PLANNING SPECIALIST II | | | PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT | | | FDOT - DISTRICT FOUR | | | 3400 W. COMMERCIAL BLVD. | | | FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309 | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE: (954) 777-4294 [RESPONSE PROVIDED] | | | 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE | | | TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | 3. AN APPROVED PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS LETTER SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 4. ALL OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITIES LETTERS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 5. THE CIVIL PLANS ARE SHOWING A CANOPY AT THE POINT OF | | | SALE??? THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ARE | | | COMPLIANT WITH THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 6. WHAT IS THE DASHED LINE RUNNING THROUGH THE SIDEWALK | | | ON SOUTH OLIVE (LOOKS LIKE A PROPERTY LINE)? THIS DOES | | | NOT SHOW UPON THE SURVEY, ETC. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 7. IDENTIFY VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AT ALL INTERSECTIONS | | | AND ENSURE THAT NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND 8 | | | FEET ARE LOCATED WITHIN SUCH AREA. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 8. CONFIRM THAT THE PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE ACCOUNTS FOR | | | ALL BUILDINGS, SHEDS, CANOPIES, ETC. (EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED). [SATISFIED] | | | 9. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE | | | AND OPEN SPACE TOTAL TO MORE THAN 100%. [RESPONSE | | | PROVIDED] | | | 10. DETAIL SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BIKE PARKING | | | PAD, SPACING BETWEEN THE RACKS, TYPE OF RACK, ETC. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 11. STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 12. PLEASE CLARIFY THE "INTERIOR DETAIL BAYS". IS THIS | | | BUILDING BEING CONVERTED? [RESPONSE PROVIDED] | | | 13. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED. LEVELS SHALL | | | NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY | | | LINE. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 14. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(2)(A), ACCESS POINTS ARE TO | | | HAVE A 50 FOOT CORNER CLEARANCE ONTO A NON-THOROUGHFARE | | | ROADWAY UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] | | | 15. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 16. DESIGNATION OF ON-STREET PARKING ON MALVERNE IS | | | SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY???S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | 17. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 2., | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED/SEALED SURVEY. | | | 18. PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, PRIMARILY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING CONVERSION. | | | 19. IN ORDER FOR THE SUBJECT CASE TO PROCEED THROUGH | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS, A REZONING APPROVAL AND A CLASS B | | | SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | SENIOR PLANNER ??? PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-27-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-27-2022 |
Time |
12:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-27-2022 |
Time |
12:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-27 12:05:22 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.27.2022 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z22080019 - Z22080022 - Z22080020 - | | | Z22080021 | | | CASE NO.: PB 1934 - 1934A - ZBA 3270B - ISPR 22-07 | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | PB 1934 (FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT) AND PB 1934A | | | (REZONING) | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS INCORRECTLY | | | NOTARIZED. | | | | | | 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE | | | TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED. | | | | | | 3. FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE | | | PLANNER. | | | | | | 4. FUTURE LAND USE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY | | | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC | | | OUTREACH, SUPPORT LETTERS, ETC. AS WELL AS ANY | | | INFORMATION PERTAINING TO UPCOMING EFFORTS. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION/JUSTIFICATION REGARDING | | | THE LOSS OF VERY VIABLE HOUSING UNITS, SPECIFICALLY | | | HOUSING UNITS THAT APPEAR TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE, AND | | | ARE OFTEN CONSIDERED AS THE "MISSING MIDDLE", | | | ESPECIALLY DURING A TIME WHEN THE CITY IS EXPERIENCING | | | SIGNIFICANT GROWTH AND A LACK OF SUCH HOUSING. | | | | | | THE "MISSING MIDDLE" IS OFTEN DEFINED AS HOUSING TYPES | | | THAT... | | | | | | "PROVIDE DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS, SUCH AS DUPLEXES, | | | FOURPLEXES, COTTAGE COURTS, AND MULTIPLEXES. THESE | | | HOUSE-SCALE BUILDINGS FIT SEAMLESSLY INTO EXISTING | | | RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND SUPPORT WALKABILITY, | | | LOCALLY-SERVING RETAIL, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | | | OPTIONS. THEY PROVIDE SOLUTIONS ALONG A SPECTRUM OF | | | AFFORDABILITY TO ADDRESS THE MISMATCH BETWEEN THE | | | AVAILABLE U.S. HOUSING STOCK AND SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS | | | COMBINED WITH THE GROWING DEMAND FOR WALKABILITY." | | | | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | ISPR 22-07 (INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW) AND ZBA 3270B | | | (CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT) - OTE: THE COMMENTS | | | PROVIDED BELOW ARE TECHNICAL SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | | AND IN NO WAY REPRESENT A RECOMMENDATION OF SUPPORT OR | | | DENIAL FOR THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE PERMIT. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FROM THE FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT): | | | | | | A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING IS NECESSARY BEFORE THE | | | APPLICANT CAN APPLY FOR A PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT. | | | THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT FDOT TO REQUEST AN ACCESS | | | PRE-APPLICATION MEETING TO COORDINATE THE PROPOSED | | | CONNECTIONS. ACCESS PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS ARE HELD | | | EVERY THURSDAY IN PERSON AND VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS. | | | PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS ARE TYPICALLY SCHEDULED TWO | | | WEEKS AFTER AN APPLICATION IS RECEIVED. A NOTIFICATION | | | EMAIL WITH THE DATE AND TIME OF PRE-APPLICATION MEETING | | | WILL BE SENT OUT EACH MONDAY FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEKS | | | PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. REQUESTS MAY BE SUBMITTED AT | | | HTTPS://ARCG.IS/1H0VT8. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | JUSTIN STROH | | | PLANNING SPECIALIST II | | | PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT | | | FDOT - DISTRICT FOUR | | | 3400 W. COMMERCIAL BLVD. | | | FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309 | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE: (954) 777-4294 | | | | | | 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE | | | TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED. | | | | | | 3. AN APPROVED PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS LETTER SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. ALL OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITIES LETTERS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 5. THE CIVIL PLANS ARE SHOWING A CANOPY AT THE POINT OF | | | SALE??? THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ARE | | | COMPLIANT WITH THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. WHAT IS THE DASHED LINE RUNNING THROUGH THE SIDEWALK | | | ON SOUTH OLIVE (LOOKS LIKE A PROPERTY LINE)? THIS DOES | | | NOT SHOW UPON THE SURVEY, ETC. | | | | | | 7. IDENTIFY VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AT ALL INTERSECTIONS | | | AND ENSURE THAT NO IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND 8 | | | FEET ARE LOCATED WITHIN SUCH AREA. | | | | | | 8. CONFIRM THAT THE PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE ACCOUNTS FOR | | | ALL BUILDINGS, SHEDS, CANOPIES, ETC. (EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED). | | | | | | 9. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE | | | AND OPEN SPACE TOTAL TO MORE THAN 100%. | | | | | | 10. DETAIL SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BIKE PARKING | | | PAD, SPACING BETWEEN THE RACKS, TYPE OF RACK, ETC. | | | | | | 11. STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE CLARIFY THE "INTERIOR DETAIL BAYS". IS THIS | | | BUILDING BEING CONVERTED? | | | | | | 13. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED. LEVELS SHALL | | | NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY | | | LINE. | | | | | | 14. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(2)(A), ACCESS POINTS ARE TO | | | HAVE A 50 FOOT CORNER CLEARANCE ONTO A NON-THOROUGHFARE | | | ROADWAY UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. | | | | | | 15. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 16. DESIGNATION OF ON-STREET PARKING ON MALVERNE IS | | | SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY???S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT | | | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE | | | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ??? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | | TTY: 800.955.8771 | | | E: [email protected] | | | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |