Plan Review Details - Project Z22080016
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22080016
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 08-25-2022 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 08-25-2022 Time 16:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-23-2022 Time 13:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-07-2022 Time 13:12 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-07 13:17:29DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEET PSP-1,
 SITE PLAN, DOES NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 IN THE SOUTH-WEST PARKING LOT ADJACENT TO THE
 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. 1 IN 25 OF THOSE PARKING SPACES MUST
 BE ACCESSIBLE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE
 LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM
 ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN
 OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-06-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 06-06-2023 Time 09:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 06-06-2023 Time 09:44 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-03-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-03-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-03-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-03 14:12:50Z22080016 - 807 N FLAGLER - DEV. AMENDMENT 12.22.22
 RESUB
 STORM CCTV AND REPORT TO BE PROVIDED AS A CONDITION OF
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL. PLEASE SEND TO [email protected] AND
 CC [email protected]
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-23-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 08-23-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-23 13:43:47COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY IN PUB. UTIL CUSTOMER
 SERVICE REGARDING PLACEMENT OF WATER METERS.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
 INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
 (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-29-2022 Time 12:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-29 12:03:17FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
 PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-09-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 06-09-2023 Time 16:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 06-09-2023 Time 16:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-09 16:19:34ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNING.
  
 RAY'S PREVIOUS COMMENTS APPEAR TO BE ADDRESSED WITHIN
 THE RESUBMITTAL.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-27-2023 Time 16:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-27-2023 Time 16:23 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-27 16:24:17FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: ROSARIAN ACADEMY PD AMENDMENT Z22080016
 JANUARY 26, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE COLUMNS ON THE PLANT LIST FOR
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE ON ALL PLANT LISTS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PARKING AREA SOUTHWEST CORNER, SYMBOLS
 SHOW 6 GUMBO LIMBO AND 2 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES IN THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, BUT THE LABELS NEED TO BE
 CORRECTED TO IDENTIFY THE TREES ACCURATELY. THIS IS
 NEEDED TO VERIFY AT LEAST 75% OF THE REQUIRED TREES ARE
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. THERE IS AN EXISTING CRAPE MYRTLE STREET
 TREE AND A MISSING STREET TREE ON THE SECTION NORTH OF
 7TH ST. THE STREETSCAPE NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS DOES NOT
 SHOW THE EXISTING STREET TREES OR PARKING SPACES.
 INDICATE IF THIS IS BEING RECONFIGURED, THEN NEW
 STREETSCAPE MUST BE INSTALLED TO MEET THE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-113.
  
 4. FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DROP OFF AREA ON THE
 EAST SIDE OF THE CAMPUS CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON SHEET
 LP-2 :
  
 ??? NEW PARKING CREATED WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA MUST
 PROVIDE THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED
 SHADE TREE. THERE SHOULD BE 4 TERMINAL ISLAND TREES
 IDENTIFIED. AT LEAST 75% OF THE REQUIRED TREES MUST BE
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 ??? TAG FOR SP IS NOT CORRECT, DOES NOT MATCH SYMBOL LI
 FOR THE TREE NORTH OF THE 3 ADA SPACES.
 ??? TRANSPLANTED PALM SYMBOLS (8) ARE NOT TAGGED TO
 IDENTIFY THEM.
 ??? PLAN SHOULD SHOW FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TRANSPLANTED
 TREES AND PALMS, TAGS NEED TO BE CLEAR ON RELOCATED
 TREES AND PALMS, PREFERABLY THE IDENTIFYING NUMBER FROM
 THE INVENTORY.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
 SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
 REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
 FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 THERE ARE LIVE OAKS AND ROYAL PALMS PROPOSED FOR
 REMOVAL.
  
 6. SATISFIED. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND TREE INVENTORY LIST:
 ??? INDICATE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED IN THE COLUMN IN
 THE CHART FOR ANY PROPOSED REMOVALS.
 ??? CORRECT THE CATEGORY FOR #148 TO 3.
 ??? PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION REQUIRED IN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
 ??? REMOVE TREE SUMMARY REFERRING TO PBC.
  
 7. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. INDICATE IF THE NEW MULTI-PURPOSE
 FIELD WILL BE ARTIFICIAL TURF. LOCATION MUST BE SHOWN
 ON THE PLANS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COMMISSION PER
 94-451 (A)(1) AND (B). PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON ALL
 MINIMUM MATERIAL STANDARDS IN SECTION 94-451(E).
 THIS NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN AND ADDED TO
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IF IT IS TO BE ARTIFICIAL
 TURF WITH THIS PETITION APPROVED BY CITY COMMISSION.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE BORDERS OF THE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE BORDERS
 OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-02-2022 Time 12:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-02-2022 Time 12:59 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-02 13:00:40FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: ROSARIAN ACADEMY PD AMENDMENT Z22080016
 SEPTEMBER 1, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
  
 1. PROVIDE COLUMNS ON THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE AND
 DROUGHT TOLERANCE ON ALL PLANT LISTS.
  
 2. PARKING AREA SOUTHWEST CORNER, SYMBOLS SHOW 6 GUMBO
 LIMBO AND 2 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES IN THE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, BUT THE LABELS NEED TO BE CORRECTED
 TO IDENTIFY THE TREES ACCURATELY. THIS IS NEEDED TO
 VERIFY AT LEAST 75% OF THE REQUIRED TREES ARE CATEGORY
 1 SHADE TREES.
  
 3. THERE IS AN EXISTING CRAPE MYRTLE STREET TREE AND A
 MISSING STREET TREE ON THE SECTION NORTH OF 7TH ST. THE
 STREETSCAPE NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS DOES NOT SHOW THE
 EXISTING STREET TREES OR PARKING SPACES. INDICATE IF
 THIS IS BEING RECONFIGURED, THEN NEW STREETSCAPE MUST
 BE INSTALLED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-113.
  
 4. FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DROP OFF AREA ON THE
 EAST SIDE OF THE CAMPUS CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON SHEET
 LP-2 :
  
 ? NEW PARKING CREATED WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA MUST
 PROVIDE THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED
 SHADE TREE. THERE SHOULD BE 4 TERMINAL ISLAND TREES
 IDENTIFIED. AT LEAST 75% OF THE REQUIRED TREES MUST BE
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 ? TAG FOR SP IS NOT CORRECT, DOES NOT MATCH SYMBOL LI
 FOR THE TREE NORTH OF THE 3 ADA SPACES.
 ? TRANSPLANTED PALM SYMBOLS (8) ARE NOT TAGGED TO
 IDENTIFY THEM.
 ? PLAN SHOULD SHOW FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TRANSPLANTED
 TREES AND PALMS, TAGS NEED TO BE CLEAR ON RELOCATED
 TREES AND PALMS, PREFERABLY THE IDENTIFYING NUMBER FROM
 THE INVENTORY.
  
 5. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
 THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. THERE ARE LIVE
 OAKS AND ROYAL PALMS PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL.
  
 6. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN AND TREE INVENTORY LIST:
 ? INDICATE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED IN THE COLUMN IN THE
 CHART FOR ANY PROPOSED REMOVALS.
 ? CORRECT THE CATEGORY FOR #148 TO 3.
 ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION REQUIRED IN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
 ? REMOVE TREE SUMMARY REFERRING TO PBC.
  
 7. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 8. INDICATE IF THE NEW MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD WILL BE
 ARTIFICIAL TURF. LOCATION MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO
 BE APPROVED BY CITY COMMISSION PER 94-451 (A)(1) AND
 (B). PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON ALL MINIMUM MATERIAL
 STANDARDS IN SECTION 94-451(E).
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE BORDERS OF THE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE BORDERS
 OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-16-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By relizond Date 06-16-2023 Time 11:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By relizond Date 06-16-2023 Time 11:16 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-16 11:21:16-PROVIDE CCTV OF ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN
 FRONTING PROJECT LIMITS BEFORE AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
 -REHABILITATE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE, LATERALS,
 AND MANHOLES AS NEEDED PER PROVIDED CCTV (MANHOLE
 CORING WILL REQUIRE REHAB AS WELL)
 -PROVIDE TYPICAL ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS SHOWING
 PLACEMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND NEW UTILITIES (BOTH
 CITY-MAINTAINED AND DRY UTILITIES) CALL OUT HORIZONTAL
 SEPARATION, DEPTH/MIN COVER, ETC.
 -REFER TO THE CITY???S STANDARD DETAILS FOR PLACEMENT
 OF DDCA AND CITY???S POINT OF SERVICE (POS) WHICH
 REQUIRES A SECOND VALVE AT R/W
 -CALL OUT SAMPLE POINTS
 -SET UP ALL PLAN SHEETS TO PRINT TO SCALE ON 11X17
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES/METER BOXES/VALVES
 VAULTS, AND SANITARY SEWER LATERALS AND THE MAINS THEY
 ARE CONNECTED TO WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.
 -ADD NOTE TO PLANS THAT EXISTING PRESSURE PIPE (WM/FM)
 NEEDS TO REMAIN ACTIVE UNTIL FDOH APPROVAL FOR TIE-IN
 IS RECEIVED. THE PROPOSED PRESSURE PIPE CANNOT BE IN
 THE SAME ALIGNMENT AS EXISTING. SEE DETAIL P-6 FOR
 DOUBLE VALVE OR PHYSICAL GAP AT THE SOURCE OF SUPPLY
 FOR CONSTRUCTION WATER. (ADDITIONAL VALVES WILL BE
 REQUIRED TO KEEP NEW PRESSURE PIPE AND EXISTING
 PRESSURE PIPE PRESSURIZED IN PREPARATION FOR TIE-IN)
 -WHEREVER POSSIBLE, INSTALL UTILITIES 5 FEET OR MORE
 FROM THE CURB LINE
 -PROVIDE PROFILES FOR ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING
 CITY-MAINTAINED UTILITIES FROM THE POINT OF CONNECTION
 TO THE POINT OF SERVICE.
 -PROVIDE A BLOW-UP DETAIL FOR ALL CONNECTION POINTS TO
 CITY-MAINTAINED UTILITIES.
 -ON PROFILE VIEW, SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UTILITIES (CITY-MAINTAINED AND DRY UTILITIES), CALL OUT
 UTILITY TYPE, DIMENSIONS, PIPER MATERIAL, AND VERTICAL
 CLEARANCE OD TO OD AT EACH UTILITY CROSSING.
 -SINGLE WATER TAPS SERVING DOMESTIC, FIRE LINE,
 IRRIGATION, AND FIRE HYDRANT PRESENTS ISSUES FOR FUTURE
 MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS/REPLACEMENTS ETC. AS SHUTDOWN WILL
 DISRUPT SERVICE. IF FEASIBLE, CALL FOR MULTIPLE TAPS.
 -CONFORM TO SAMPLING/TESTING PROCEDURES AS MENTIONED IN
 AWWA???S C651 4.10 FOR CONNECTIONS GREATER THAN ONE
 PIPE LENGTH. (18 FT)
 -EXISTING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES CURRENTLY SERVING
 THE PROPERTY, IF NOT USED, NEED TO BE CUT AND CAP AT
 MAIN. REMOVAL IS REQUIRED IF LARGER THAN 2??? IN
 DIAMETER, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE RIGHT-OF-WAY???S
 GOVERNING AGENCY.
 -ADHERE TO GENERAL NOTES SECTION OF CITY???S STANDARD
 DETAILS FOR GUIDANCE ON VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL
 SEPARATION OF UTILITIES.
 -PROVIDE LOS CALCULATIONS, AS WELL AS CHANGE IN DEMAND
 BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS ON
 PLANS.
 -ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING THE LIFT STATION THAT THE
 PROJECT IS UPSTREAM FROM.
 -NEW TAP FOR PROPOSED WATER RECOMMENDED AS TO MINIMIZE
 LENGTH OF PIPE REQUIRING CITY MAINTENANCE
 -CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON PLANS FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER
 DO NOT MATCH EXISTING CONFIGURATION PER CITY RECORDS
 -NEW SEWER MAIN MUST BE INSTALLED IN R/W
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 09-07-2022 Time 17:01 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-07 17:18:34-CALL OUT FOR EXISITNG SANITARY LATERALS THAT WILL NOT
 BE USED TO BE CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN.
 -IF THE WATER LINES ON SITE ARE PRIVATE, CALL OUT AS
 "PRIVATE" AND SHOW LOCATION OF POINT OF SERVICE.
 -THE "CONCEPTUAL" PLANS ARE APPROVED.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 06-13-2023 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-13 16:34:41PROPOSED WATER UTILITY DESIGN LOOKS PROBLEMATIC. WILL
 LIKELY NEED TO REVISE DURING ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 SUBMITTAL (E23040047).
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 01-13-2023 Time 10:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-13 10:56:22PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -PROPOSED METER AND BACKFLOW LOCATION ARE NOT
 SATISFACTORY. SEE RESPONSE LETTER WITH PRIOR COMMENTS
 FOR GUIDANCE.
 -ON ENGINEERING PLAN, SHOW GUY WIRE ANCHORS FOR UTILITY
 POLE NEAR THE FIRE HYDRANT.
 -AT LEAST TWO METERED WATER SERVICES FOR THE BUILDINGS
 TO BE DEMOLISHED ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON PLANS.
 SHOW AND LABEL.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-06-2022 Time 14:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-06 14:04:52PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -ON SITE PLAN, PLEASE CALLOUT OR ADD LEGEND SHOWING
 WHAT THE DIFFERENT COLORED LINES MEAN.
 -ON SITE PLAN, THERE IS A SMALL GREY OUTLINED AREA
 ADJACENT TO WEST DRIVEWAY EXIT. IT SAYS 804 N OLIVE TO
 BE PRESERVED. PLEASE DESCRIBE MORE WHAT THAT MEANS AND
 IF THERE WILL BE ANYTHING THERE OTHER THAN SIDEWALK.
 -IS A NEW BUILDING BEING CONSTRUCTED, OR JUST
 RENOVATION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING? IF NEW BUILDING IS
 BEING CONSTRUCTED, PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON SITE PLAN.
 -PROPOSED PARKING LOT DESIGN DOES NOT MATCH AMONG THE
 DIFFERENT PLAN SETS. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLAN SETS
 HAVE THE SAME BASIC LAYOUT.
 -ON CIVIL PLANS, SHOW ALL LARGE UTILITY POLES IN OLIVE
 RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO WEST PROPERTY LINE AND ENSURE
 NO CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.
 -ENGINEERING PLAN NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW DEMO OF
 THE OTHER DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON OLIVE AND INSTALLATION
 OF PARKING SPOTS WITH CURBING.
 -RELOCATE LARGE METER AND BACKFLOW ADJACENT TO WEST
 PROPERTY LINE AND OLIVE. ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO
 LABEL.
 -THERE IS A CALLOUT FOR DCDA TO BE RELOCATED, BUT NOT
 AWARE OF A FIRELINE AT THAT LOCATION. VERIFY IF THERE
 IS FIRE SERVICE THERE, OR IF IT IS JUST A REGULAR
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES FOR
 THE BUILDINGS BEING DEMOLISHED ALONG WITH WHAT IS
 HAPPENING TO THEM.
 -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING STORMWATER AND SANITARY SEWER
 UTILITIES ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
 -ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS UTILITY POLE IN PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. UTILITY POLE THAT CONNECTS INSIDE
 PROPERTY IS NOT SHOWING.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PADS.
 -CIVIL PLAN SHOW SCHOOL PARKING BUILDING TO THE
 NORTHWEST, BUT NOT SHOWING ON OTHER PLAN SETS.
 -SURVEY IS NOT SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED.
 -SHOW AND LABEL PIPING FROM WATER METER TO AND
 INCLUDING WATER MAIN.
 -PLANS SEEM TO PROPOSE TREES AND UTILITIES IN SAME
 LOCATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE LANDSCAPING PLAN
 SHEET THAT SHOWS TREES, BUSHES, AND UTILITIES. MAKE
 SURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND
 UTILITIES.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-25-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-25-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-25 08:57:19CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 2- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 3- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAILS AND
 MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
 4- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-08-2022 Time 12:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-08-2022 Time 12:52 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-08 12:52:07THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO NOT MATCH.
  
 2. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA. THE PROPOSED
 PARKING LOT IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE WILL
 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL.
  
 3. FLOW ATTENUATION MAY BE NEEDED IF NEED AREAS ARE
 BEING ADDED TO THE TRUNKLINE SYSTEM RUNNING THROUGH THE
 SCHOOL.
  
 4. ANY DISPLACED DEPRESSED SURFACE STORMWATER STORAGE
 AREAS (SUCH AS SOUTH OF THE BASKETBALL COURT) WILL NEED
 TO BE MITIGATED.
  
 5. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION TO
 NGVD1929 ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 6. SHOW AND LABEL (SIZE, MATERIAL) THE STORM PIPE IN
 EUCALYPTUS R/W THAT IS BEING ABANDONED.
  
 7. SHOW THE PROPOSED EASEMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED
 ABANDONED AREA OF EUCALYPTUS R/W.
  
 8. SHOW FLOW ARROWS FOR THE DRIVEWAYS TO N. FLAGLER
 DRIVE.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-06-2022 Time 10:23 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-06 10:54:081. SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ENG. PLANS.
 2. ON-SITE SANITARY IS TO BE TURNED OVER TO OWNER AS IT
 ONLY SERVES THE CAMPUS.
 3. SHOW EXISTING DRAINAGE AND WATER ON ALL PLANS ALONG
 WITH EUCALYPTUS EASEMENT.
 4. REPLAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-20-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-20-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-20 00:51:26TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) NOT SATISFIED. GIVEN THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE,
 CIRCULATION AND DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION. PROVIDE AN
 UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. LATEST RESUBMISSION DID NOT
 PROVIDE A REVISED OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER NARRATIVE AND ELABORATION
 PERTAINING THE EXPECTED QUEUES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK.
 THE LATTER IS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED DURING PICK-UP
 OPERATIONS, DUE TO PARENTAL VEHICLES ARRIVING AHEAD OF
 TIME CAUSING QUEUE SPILLBACKS AND TRAVEL LANES BLOCKAGE
 ON N FLAGLER DRIVE
 3) THE CONCLUSION IN THE REPORT IS BASED ON A TRIVIAL
 EVALUATION, INSTEAD OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES
 AND METHODOLOGIES. THUS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE
 QUEUE ANALYSIS, INCLUSIVE OF PROPERLY CALCULATED
 DISCHARGE RATES
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION
 SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.)
 PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD
 BE NAMED T-1.0. PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EXHIBIT IS
 INCOMPLETE
 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EXHIBIT IS
 INCOMPLETE
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
 SITE. THE SITE PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION
 REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR
 T-2.0). THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EXHIBIT DOES
 NOT CONTAIN THE REQUESTED INFORMATION
 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS. SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART
 OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED
 ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0). NO REVISED PLANS IN
 LATEST SUBMISSION
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND
 SPECS SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION
 FEATURES (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT
 MARKING, SIGNAL, ETC.). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME
 AND SHEET NUMBER, AS THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL
 EXHIBIT DOES NOT CONTAIN THE REQUESTED INFORMATION
 9) NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH
 THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS FEATURE IN THE
 T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. IDEALLY, ONE STATION SHOULD BE
 LOCATED ON OLIVE, WHILE THE OTHER ON FLAGLER
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. NO REVISED PLANS IN
 LATEST SUBMISSION
 11) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
 PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
 OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
 IF ANY
 12) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO,
 CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 14) SATISFIED. UNLESS THE ANGLE PARKING STALLS OF THE
 EASTERN PARKING LOT BY THE INTRACOASTAL ARE REVERSED,
 IT IS RECOMMENDED TO CHANGE DIRECTIONALITY. ENTRY
 DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE ON THE NORTH, WHILE EXIT ONE TO THE
 SOUTH
 15) SATISFIED. SOME OF THE STALLS AND DRIVE AISLE OF
 THE EASTERN PARKING LOT BY THE INTRACOASTAL ARE NOT
 CODE COMPLIANT. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 16) NOT SATISFIED. PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA FOR THE
 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO THE NORTHERN
 SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT, SO TO PROVIDE A LONGER STAKING
 DISTANCE. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY WITH THE PSP-1 SITE
 PLAN AND THE ONE SHOWN IN THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. NO
 REVISED PLANS IN LATEST SUBMISSION
 17) SATISFIED. PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA FOR THE EARLY
 CHILDHOOD SCHOOL SHOULD BE RELOCATED FURTHER SOUTH BY
 THE MIDDLE SCHOOL DROP OFF, SO TO PROVIDE A LONGER
 STAKING DISTANCE
 18) NOT SATISFIED. THE FOUR PARKING STALLS BY THE
 1-STORY GYMNASIUM SHOULD BE EITHER REMOVED, AND
 REPLACED BY A SIDEWALK SO TO PROVIDE LONGER STAKING BY
 DESIGNATING THE AREA FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD SCHOOL
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, OR CONVERTED TO ADA, AS THEY ARE THE
 CLOSEST AND SAFEST ONES TO THE ENTRANCE. THE REMOVAL OF
 SUCH STALLS WAS EXPLAINED AND AGREED UPON, AS BESIDES
 INCREASING THE QUEUE STACK, IT ALSO HELPS REDUCING
 CONFLICT POINTS AND INCREASING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
 19) NOT SATISFIED. INSTALL HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
 ACROSS 7TH AND 8TH ST AT THE INTERSECTION OF FLAGLER
 DR. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND SHOWCASE THE ITEM
 ON THE PLANS
 20) SATISFIED. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET SIDEWALK
 ALONG THE NORTHERN SIDE OF 7TH ST
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-07-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 09-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-07 20:56:33 
 1) GIVEN THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE, CIRCULATION AND
 DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION. PROVIDE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS
 2) PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN
 FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED
 AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0
 3) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
 DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
 PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 4) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. THE
 SITE PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND
 SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0)
 5) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS.
 SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE
 TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY
 (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0)
 6) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR
 EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
 CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL,
 ETC.)
 7) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
 THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS FEATURE IN THE
 T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. IDEALLY, ONE STATION SHOULD BE
 LOCATED ON OLIVE, WHILE THE OTHER ON FLAGLER
 8) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 9) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
 TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
 STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
 10) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
 SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 11) ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED?
 12) UNLESS THE ANGLE PARKING STALLS OF THE EASTERN
 PARKING LOT BY THE INTRACOASTAL ARE REVERSED, IT IS
 RECOMMENDED TO CHANGE DIRECTIONALITY. ENTRY DRIVEWAY
 SHOULD BE ON THE NORTH, WHILE EXIT ONE TO THE SOUTH
 13) SOME OF THE STALLS AND DRIVE AISLE OF THE EASTERN
 PARKING LOT BY THE INTRACOASTAL ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 14) PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA FOR THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
 SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING
 LOT, SO TO PROVIDE A LONGER STAKING DISTANCE. THERE IS
 A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PSP-1 SITE PLAN AND THE ONE
 SHOWN IN THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 15) PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA FOR THE EARLY CHILDHOOD
 SCHOOL SHOULD BE RELOCATED FURTHER SOUTH BY THE MIDDLE
 SCHOOL DROP OFF, SO TO PROVIDE A LONGER STAKING
 DISTANCE
 16) THE FOUR PARKING STALLS BY THE 1-STORY GYMNASIUM
 SHOULD BE EITHER REMOVED, AND REPLACED BY A SIDEWALK SO
 TO PROVIDE LONGER STAKING BY DESIGNATING THE AREA FOR
 EARLY CHILDHOOD SCHOOL PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, OR CONVERTED
 TO ADA, AS THEY ARE THE CLOSEST AND SAFEST ONES TO THE
 ENTRANCE
 17) INSTALL HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS ACROSS 7TH AND
 8TH ST AT THE INTERSECTION OF FLAGLER DR
 18) INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET SIDEWALK ALONG THE
 NORTHERN SIDE OF 7TH ST
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 06-09-2023 Time 16:20 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-09 16:21:57ZONING HAS NO ADDITIONAL SITE PLANNING COMMENTS,
 PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD & CITY
 COMMISSION.
  
 FINAL ZONING REVIEW RESULT AWAITING ALL OTHER PPRC
 PASSES.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 09-08-2022 Time 12:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 09-08-2022 Time 12:25 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-08 12:26:411. CIVIL PLAN AND SITE PLAN DIFFER IN OVERALL PROPOSAL;
 A. SITE PLAN SHOWS MULTI-PURPOSE TURF FIELD IN
 NORTHWEST CORNER WITH A NORTH-SOUTH ORIENTATION, THE
 PARKING LOT ON THE ABANDON PORTION OF EUCALYPTUS AND
 7TH HAS A DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION AND FEATURES LARGER
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 B. CIVIL PLAN SHOWS A 2-STORY BUILDING WITH PARKING
 STRUCTURE IN NORTHWEST CORNER, A NEW SOCCER FIELD WITH
 AN EAST-WEST ORIENTATION IS JUST BELOW THAT, AND THE
 PARKING LOT PAVING ALONG EUCALYPTUS AND 7TH CONFIGURED
 DIFFERENTLY THAN THAT OF THE SITE PLAN.
 C. PLEASE CLARIFY/IDENTIFY WHICH DESIGN OPTION THE
 PROJECT WILL GO FORWARD WITH.
  
 2. CIVIL PLAN: THE PROPOSED PARKING INGRESS/EGRESS IS
 TOO CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION OF 8TH AND OLIVE;
 REQUIRES MINIMUM 50? SEPARATION.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS,
 ELEVATIONS, OR DETAILS IN REFERENCE TO THE 804 N OLIVE
 AVE. PRESERVATION LABELED ON SHEET PSP-1. PREVIOUS
 DISCUSSION WAS TO PRESERVE THE ENTIRE BRICK FA?ADE AND
 INCORPORATE INTO AN ENTRY/DESIGN, SCREENING, OR OTHER
 ELEMENT FOR THIS FRONTAGE.
  
 4. PER REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-315, PLEASE ADEQUATELY
 SCREEN THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ALONG THE 7TH ST.
 ALLEY/PARKING ACCESS, CONSIDER RELOCATING AS PROPOSAL
 OPEN SHOWS IT OPENING OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY LINE AND INOT
 ROW.
  
 5. WITHIN THE ZONING AND SITE DATA ON PSP-1; THE
 ROSARIAN ACADEMY PROPERTIES ARE SPLIT-ZONED BETWEEN
 LD-R AND LD-5 UNDER THE CSPD. AS PART OF THIS SPLIT
 ZONING, LD-R DOES NOT PERMIT SURFACE PARKING LOTS; A
 PORTION OF THE ABANDONED ROW/ALLEY WITH PROPOSED
 PARKING ON 7TH AND OLIVE FALLS UNDER THE LDR-R ZONING
 CLASSIFICATION. PARKING LOT WILL HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED TO
 NOT INCLUDE THIS PORTION/PROPERTY OR A WAIVER MUST BE
 REQUESTED. STAFF IS NOT IN SUPPORT OF A WAIVER FOR
 ALLOWING THE SURFACE PARKING WITHOUT ADEQUATELY
 SCREENING AND INCORPORATION OF THE PRESERVED 804 OLIVE
 FA?ADE.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE CURB-CUT WIDTH ACROSS THE 7TH ST.
 PARKING ACCESS, CURB CUT IS MEASURED ALONG PROPERTY
 LINE, CANNOT EXCEED 25?.
  
 7. LANDSCAPING AND PROPOSED STRUCTURES/PLAYGROUND
 EQUIPMENT APPEARS TO IMPEDE WITH UTILITIES.
  
 8. PROPOSAL ELIMINATES ALIGNMENT WITH EUCALYPTUS;
 EXISTING CITY UTILITIES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THIS PORTION
 OF EUCALYPTUS, WILL REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH
 RESPECTIVE ENGINEERING DEPT. ON RELOCATION OF SERVICES.
  
 9. WITH THE DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURES BETWEEN
 EUCALYPTUS & 7TH ST. THE NORTH OLIVE FRONTAGE BECOMES A
 MASSIVE LOW-SCALE VOID/GAP ALONG THIS FRONTAGE;
 ESPECIALLY WITH THE INCLUSION OF SURFACE PARKING AND
 THE MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD. PLEASE CONSIDER EXPLORING
 ADDITIONAL OPTIONS TO MORE APPROPRIATELY FILL OR SCALE
 THIS FRONTAGE, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SCREENING,
 STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS/FURNITURE, OR PROVIDE A MORE
 ACTIVE FRONTAGE IN THIS AREA OF THE PROJECT.
 A.PLEASE CONSIDER PROVIDING A SECTION OR PERSPECTIVE
 DRAWING OF THE N OLIVE FRONTAGE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 CONTEXT WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES.
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE SETBACK LINES ON PSP-1.
  
 11. FENCE REQUIREMENTS: PER SEC. 94-109
 A. FENCES IN R SUBDISTRICTS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 OF FOUR FEET WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND SIX FEET
 WHEN LOCATED BEHIND THE FRONT SETBACK, EXCEPT AS
 EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN BPD-R. IN ALL OTHER SUBDISTRICTS,
 FENCES ALONG A LOT FRONTAGE SHALL BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 OF FOUR FEET AND FENCES IN REAR AND SIDE SETBACKS SHALL
 BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX FEET.
 B. FENCES ABUTTING THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR
 ENCLOSING SPORTS FIELDS MAY BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF
 EIGHT FEET.
 C. CHAIN-LINK FENCES ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE STREET
 FRONTAGE MAXIMUM SETBACK WITHIN THE URBAN CORE PLANNING
 AREA, AND SPECIAL DISTRICT PLANNING AREAS. CHAIN LINK
 FENCES WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PLANNING AREA
 ARE PERMITTED BUT SHALL BE SCREENED WITH A HEDGE WHEN
 LOCATED WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. CHAIN LINK FENCES ARE
 PERMITTED ALONG SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS. WHERE ALLOWED,
 CHAIN LINK FENCES SHALL BE VINYL-COATED, AND SHALL
 INCLUDE A TOP RAIL.
  
 - PROPOSED CHAIN-LINK FENCE EXCEEDS HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
 AND APPEARS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE MAXIMUM STREET
 FRONTAGE SETBACK. VARIANCE/WAIVER REQUEST WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE HEIGHT, AS WELL AS FOR THE FENCE
 LOCATION SHOULD IT REMAIN CHAIN-LINK WITHIN FRONTAGE
 MAXIMUM SETBACK.
  
 12. TO CLARIFY, SHEET A1.1 IS PRIMARILY AN INTERIOR
 RENOVATION WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE INTERNAL
 GROUND-LEVEL PARKING WITH NEW CLASSROOMS AND SCHOOL
 FACILITIES?
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE STREETSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS,
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE PER SEC. 94-113.
  
 14. IS THE NEW MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD ARTIFICIAL TURF?
  
 15. FOR FUTURE RESUBMITTALS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CLOUDED
 COPY OF THE CHANGED ITEMS/ADDRESSED COMMENTS.
  
 REGARDING THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO EXPAND THE PD BOUNDARY,
 STAFF WILL MAKE MINOR LANGUAGE ADJUSTMENTS OR
 CORRECTIONS AND DISCUSS FURTHER WITH APPLICANT PRIOR TO
 BRINGING FORWARD.
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 822.1426 [email protected]
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved