| 2022-08-09 16:22:00 | 1.) PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT |
| | ABANDONMENT. THE SURVEY PROVIDED WAS NOT SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON HOW THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT WILL ADDRESS THE STREET NETWORK |
| | CONNECTIVITY AND STREET STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-215 OF THE |
| | ZLDRS AS IT APPLIES TO THE MODIFICATION/DELETION OF THE |
| | ALLEY WITHIN CMUD. SPECIFICALLY, THE STANDARDS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: A) THE MODIFICATION/DELETION MAINTAINS |
| | CONNECTIVITY TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. B) THE |
| | MODIFICATION/DELETION ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. C) |
| | THE MODIFICATION/DELETION IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE |
| | SURROUNDING AREA. D) THE MODIFICATION/DELETION ALLOW |
| | FOR THE APPROPRIATE USE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. E) THE |
| | MODIFICATION/DELETION DOES NOT CREATE BLOCK LENGTHS |
| | THAT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED IN SEC. 94-209 (MU |
| | DISTRICT), THEREBY LIMITING WALKABILITY. F) THE |
| | MODIFICATION/DELETION COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR VACATING AND CLOSING STREETS AND ALLEYS, AS |
| | APPLICABLE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE VII, |
| | OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE PROPOSED ABANDONMENT CREATES A DEAD-END TO THE |
| | EXISTING ALLEY SYSTEM. WHAT IS THE PROPOSAL/SOLUTION TO |
| | REDIRECTING TRAFFIC WITHIN THE ALLEY? [NOTE: IT WAS |
| | THOUGHT THAT AN EARLY PRE-APPLICATION PLAN HAD A |
| | SOLUTION TO REDIRECTING ALLEY TRAFFIC SOUTH OF THE |
| | WESTERN MOST PARCEL. THIS APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN REMOVED |
| | FROM THE PLAN.] |
| | |
| | 4.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF IN THE PREAPPLICATION |
| | MEETING, IT IS IMPORTANT TO REACH OUT TO THE PUBLIC |
| | WORKS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE IF THE EXISTING ALLEY IS |
| | A SERVICE ALLEY AND IF IT IS NECESSARY TO BE MAINTAINED |
| | AND/OR OTHER ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO |
| | MAINTAIN SERVICE WITHIN THE ALLEY (IF APPLICABLE). HAS |
| | THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BEEN CONTACTED? |
| | |
| | 5.) PER SEC. 94-315, THE DELETION/MEDICATION OF THE |
| | ALLEY REQUIRES REVIEW AND A RECOMMENDATION BY THE |
| | COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA), WHO SHALL REVIEW |
| | THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION FOR COMPLIANCE. DOCUMENTATION |
| | FROM THIS AGENCY SHALL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6.) PER SEC. 94-315, THE DELETION/MODIFICATION OF THE |
| | ALLEY REQUIRES REVIEW AND A RECOMMENDATION BY THE CITY |
| | ADMINISTRATOR OR DIRECTOR IN CHARGE OF ENGINEERING WHO |
| | SHALL REVIEW FOR PROPOSED MODIFICATION FOR TRAFFIC AND |
| | SAFETY ISSUES. DOCUMENTATION FROM THIS AGENCY SHALL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7.) WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE |
| | PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSING OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS |
| | REQUIRED. THIS DOCUMENT IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 8.) WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED VACATION OR |
| | CLOSING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR |
| | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF |
| | THEIR SERVICES. THESE DOCUMENTS WERE MISSING FROM/NOT |
| | FULLY ADDRESSED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL TO STAFF?S |
| | SATISFACTION: AT&T, FPL AND FPU. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE CITY WILL REQUIRE AN APPRAISAL BY AN APPRAISER |
| | APPROVED BY THE CITY AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT. |
| | AN APPRAISAL PACKAGE INDICATING THE CITY?S REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR APPRAISALS WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE APPLICANT AFTER |
| | REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION BY THE PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW |
| | COMMITTEE (PPRC). |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS |
| | AND DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY |
| | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO |
| | ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE |
| | TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT |
| | OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | |