Plan Review Details - Project Z22070008
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22070008
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 08-11-2022 Time 09:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 10-20-2022 Time 17:24 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-11 13:04:22THE PASS IS CONTINGENT ON THE COMMENTS. PLEASE SCHEDULE
 A TIME TO MEET TO DISCUSS THE PUBLIC ART IN GREATER
 DETAIL.
  
  
 THE PROJECT IDENTIFIES THE LOCATION OF PUBLIC ART
 WITHIN THE WALKWAY BETWEEN TREES, HOWEVER WITHOUT
 DIMENSIONS. THE SUGGESTED PLACEHOLDER FOR THE PUBLIC
 ART PIECE FEELS CONSTRICTED IN THIS AREA, THUS BASED ON
 SITE PLAN REVIEW IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE
 PUBLIC ART BE PLACED ACROSS THE STREET EAST ON FLAGLER
 AND NOT BETWEEN THE TREES ON THE PATHWAY.
  
 THE PLACEHOLDER FOR PUBLIC ART MUST BE SPECIFIED, AND
 REFLECTED ON ALL SITE PLANS.
  
  
 THE REQUIRED ESCROW ART DEPOSIT OF 1% OF THE OVERALL
 CONSTRUCTION COST OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
 THE CITY'S ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE
 BEFORE OR AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT.
  
2022-08-11 10:05:49PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER
 $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS
 PER CITY ORDINANCE.
 SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,
 INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR
 IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL
 CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
 OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE
 VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS.
 FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC ART NEEDS TO BE
 IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF
 ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT
 TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
 FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AN EMAIL TO [email protected]
 STATING THAT THE DEVELOPER IS CHOSEN OPTION 2 IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 FOR EITHER OPTION A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT
 APPLICATION ALONG WITH EITHER THE ESCROW OF THE 1% OR
 IF CHOSEN OPTION 2 CONTRIBUTION INTO THE PUBLIC ART
 FUND IS REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &
 CULTURE AT [email protected] WITH FURTHER QUESTIONS.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-14-2022 Time 19:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-14-2022 Time 19:29 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-14 19:48:16DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING2. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]. RESPONSE
 NOTED.
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 4. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 5. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT
 ADDRESSED
  
 6. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT
 ADDRESSED
  
 7. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
 8. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
 9. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 10. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 11. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 12. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
 DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
 OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
 GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
 GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
 USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
 RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 13. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 14. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
 RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 15. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 16. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. RESPONSE
 NOTED.
  
 17. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] RESPONSE
 NOTED.
  
 18. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected] RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 09-08-2022 Time 11:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-07-2022 Time 17:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-08 11:49:49DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING2. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]. RESPONSE
 NOTED.
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 4. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 5. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT
 ADDRESSED
  
 6. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. ON LEVEL
 1/GROUND FLOOR PLAN SHEET A-101, THE ACCESS ROUTE TO
 THE LOBBY AND ELEVATORS FROM THE PROPOSED VAN
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE IS NOT CLEAR. UNLESS THERE
 WILL BE SUFFICIENT HEADROOM TO PASS UNDER THAT SECTION
 OF THE VEHICLE RAMP, IT APPEARS THAT STANDARD PARKING
 SPACES 1-32, 1-33 AND 1-34 HAVE A SHORTER TRAVEL
 DISTANCE TO THE LOBBY AND ELEVATORS. THE VAN ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE SHALL HAVE THE SHORTEST ACCESS ROUTE. ON
 LEVEL 2 PODIUM PLAN SHEET A-102, EACH OF THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES IS LOCATED SUCH THAT THE USER WOULD HAVE
 TO PASS ALONG THE DRIVE LANE, AND/OR PASS BEHIND THE
 PARKED VEHICLE OF OTHER DRIVERS, IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE
 ELEVATORS, AND THAT IS NOT SAFE. THE SAME APPLIES TO
 LEVEL 3 PODIUM PLAN SHEET A-103, LEVEL 4 PODIUM PLAN
 SHEET A-104, LEVEL 5 PODIUM PLAN SHEET A-105 (WITH THE
 POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF SPACE 5-68). ALSO, ALL 4 OF THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON LEVEL 2 PODIUM PLAN SHEET
 A-102 ARE LABELED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE, WHEREAS THE
 PARKING TABLE SHOWS ONLY 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES ON
 LEVEL 2. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON
 THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT
 PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 7. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE). PENDING RESPONSE TO
 COMMENT # 6 ON LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
  
 8. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER
 IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED
 VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL
 ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF
 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. PENDING RESPONSE
 TO COMMENT # 6 ON LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 9. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 10. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 11. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 12. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
 DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
 OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
 GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
 GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
 USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
 RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 13. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 14. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
 RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 15. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 16. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. RESPONSE
 NOTED.
  
 17. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] RESPONSE
 NOTED.
  
 18. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected] RESPONSE NOTED.
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-11-2022 Time 11:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-11-2022 Time 11:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-11 11:36:03DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGA. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 4. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 5. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING
 INFORMATION TABLE ON PLAN SHEET G-200, ZONING DATA,
 STATES THAT 920 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. THE
 ONLY MENTION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IS A NOTE FOR
 THE EAST TOWER STATING THAT ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACE WILL BE PROVIDED PER FLOOR. THAT WILL NOT BE
 ADEQUATE. NO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAIR HOUSING
 GUIDELINES AND SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE.
  
 6. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION
 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 7. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 8. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER
 IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED
 VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL
 ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF
 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 9. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 11. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 12. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
 DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
 OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
 GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
 GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
 USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 13. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 14. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 15. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 16. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 17. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 18. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-29-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 07-27-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 07-27-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 10:28:12Z22070008 - FLAGLER & BUTLER, MIXED USE 7.26.22 SUB
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING STORMWATER
 INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE ON PINE
 ST. (CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
  
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-01-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-01-2022 Time 13:23 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 13:47:44THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR
 THESE STRUCTURES. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED
 WHEN THE BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET
 WHILE BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE
 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
 THERE SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 SEPARATE FDC'S REMOTELY
 LOCATED FOR EACH BUILDING, PREFERABLY SLONG PINE ST AND
 BUTLER ST.
  
 7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE
 STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCES ARE NOT
 INDICATED.
 7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A
 NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF
 150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE
 CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE
 MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS
 LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE
 FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED
 EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED, IN
 APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL FIRE
 DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.
  
 7C. PER NFPA 1
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV'S FIRE LINE LOCATIONS
 SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THESE STRUCTURES. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
 A COMMAND CENTER WAS NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 PLAN.
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
 FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
 NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
 AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
 MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
 AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 AT THE APPLICABLE TIME, PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM
 BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
 [email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
 ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THESE
 BUILDINGS.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 02-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-27-2023 Time 12:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-27-2023 Time 12:54 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-27 12:54:34FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1919 N FLAGLER Z22070008
 NOVEMBER 4, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND PALMS MUST BE IDENTIFIED
 ACCURATELY BY SPECIES ON THE DISPOSITION PLAN.
 THERE ARE MISIDENTIFIED SPECIES, AND IF THE TREE SURVEY
 IS INCOMPLETE, THIS MUST BE CORRECTED AND SUBMITTED.
 11/4/22 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED. A CORRECTED TREE SURVEY WILL BE REQUIRED.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ASSUMPTION THAT
 POOR QUALITY DOES NOT NEED TO BE MITIGATED.
 ??? SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
 CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY
 STAFF.
 SHOW CATEGORY AND SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 11/4/22 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED.
 ??? SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART
 FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ALL MITIGATION SHOULD BE IN ONE COLUMN. 1:1 COLUMN IS
 NOT NEEDED.
 ??? SATISFIED. CHANGE THE CONDITION RATINGS TO GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR BASED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR CALCULATIONS
 CHART, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART FROM SHEET L1-0-01 AND PLACE ON SHEET
 L5-5-01WITH THE PLANT LIST.
 ??? SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS ARE NOT
 APPLICABLE AS SHOWN. THE CREDITS ARE CALCULATED FROM
 THE CITY TREE CATEGORY LIST. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION
 CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE A TOTAL.
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE FOR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS,
 NOT TREE MITIGATION. TREE CATEGORY LIST FOR MITIGATION
 MUST BE USED.
 11/4/22: CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ
 FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT.
 USING THESE CREDITS, CORRECT THE CHART AND PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL. SHOULD BE 27,100 SQ FT. SHOWN ON SHEET L 1-0-01.
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. IF THERE ARE ANY RATED AS GOOD,
 PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON WHERE THEY WILL BE
 RELOCATED.
 INFORMATION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION IS NOT CORRECT.
 NATIVE SPECIES NEED TO BE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AND
 RATINGS SHOWN FROM THE ARBORISTS REPORT.
 10/7/22 UPDATED ARBORISTS REPORT NOT FOUND IN THE
 RESUBMITTAL. ROYAL PALMS ARE FLORIDA NATIVE SPECIES AND
 THERE ARE 3 LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED. THE TREE SPECIES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT EXISTS ON SITE.
 11/4/22: UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN
 ON THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY NATIVE TREES
 IN GOOD CONDITION.
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW THE EXACT
 AREA OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORE 1 REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA
 OF THE LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3%
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SHOWN. TRANSITION LOT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE SHOWN AND THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AND 10% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATED AND
 SHOWN.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 THE CORE1 AREA AND THE TRANSITION AREA. CALCULATIONS
 MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR
 EACH AND THE TOTAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS,
 THEN SHOW THE PROVIDED AREA. EACH AREA MUST HAVE THE
 PERIMETER CLEARLY SHOWN FOR EACH PROVIDED OPEN SPACE,
 THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE SHOWN AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THAT TYPE SHOWN AS WHAT IS REQUIRED AND WHAT IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 10/7/22 SOME PROGRESS IS SHOWN TOWARD SHOWING THE
 REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. TRANSITIONAL
 LOT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS CORRECT,
 BUT NOT CLEAR ON WHAT IS PROVIDED. THE CALCULATION FOR
 CORE 1 LOT AREA SHOULD BE 138,368 AND THE 3% PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 4,151 SQ FT.
 THE LABELING OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS NOT CORRECT,
 EACH SEPARATE AREA ON LEVEL 6 MUST BE SHOWN AND SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED, THEN IDENTIFIED AS TO TYPE, AND THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT TYPE SHOWN. VEGETATED AREA NEEDS
 TO BE SHOWN AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT SHOWN.
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GARDEN PLAZA IS INCORRECTLY
 IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE ON THE CHART.
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY MUST BE SHOWN TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE 905 SQ FT. THE
 AREA NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND CORRECTLY LABELED ON
 THE PLAN.
  
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM. THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN
 ELEMENTS INCLUDING THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30 FOOT
 INTERVALS PROVIDING SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH. AS
 SUBMITTED, MANY OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET.
 THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE
 PARKWAY MUST BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY
 WITH THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE. THE RETAINING WALL
 DIVIDES AND DISRUPTS THE FUNCTION OF THE PARKWAY.
 THE DESIGN IS STILL DIVIDED IN FUNCTION AND FURTHER
 DESIGN CORRECTIONS ARE NEEDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE
 PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES. BUFFER MUST INCLUDE A HEDGE AND TREES
 SPACED EVERY 30 FEET.
  
 6. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE PLANT LIST OF THE TREES,
 SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH REQUIRED OPEN
 SPACE AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA AND SUPPLY THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY.
 CHART IV-8 IN SECTION 94-109 CAN BE REFERENCED FOR OPEN
 SPACE TREE CANOPY CREDITS.
 THE PLANT LIST MUST BE INCLUDED ON EACH OPEN SPACE PAGE
 TO IDENTIFY THE PLANT MATERIAL AND SHOW TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SHEETS
 L5-1-03 AND L5-1-04 MUST BE COMPLETE, AND A SEPARATE
 SHEET SHOWING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED.
 10/7/22 PLANT LISTS NEED TO BE WITH THE PLAN FOR EACH
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
 PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
 CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO FINALIZE ANY RELOCATIONS.
 10/7/22 ROYAL PALMS ARE AT ISSUE AND LIVE OAK TREES ARE
 NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
 TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED.
 THE CALCULATION USES THE TOTAL PROPERTY LINE LENGTH
 FROM THE SURVEY FOR EACH STREETSCAPE SEGMENT.
 DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER OPENINGS ARE INCLUDED.
 CORRECT THE LENGTH AND RECALCULATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER
 OF STREET TREES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE
 THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET
 TREES. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 36 INCH
 DEPTH REQUIRED ON THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 20 FEET AND PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF
 GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET
 REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
 LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TAKES PRECEDENT
 OVER UTILITY LOCATIONS.
  
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
 NATIVE PERCENTAGE IS LISTED BUT MUST INCLUDE DROUGHT
 TOLERANT NON-NATIVE SPECIES IN PERCENTAGE.
 10/7/22 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE FOR THE ENTIRE PLANT
 LIST.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 SCREENING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WHEN REVISIONS ARE MADE TO
 THE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/14/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. THERE IS AN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK
 AND THE SEA WALL FOR THE 2 PARCELS EAST OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE. THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHERE THE EASEMENT IS
 AND IF IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED FOR ANY CHANGES PROPOSED
 WITH THIS PETITION. THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS ARE PART
 OF THE CITY STREETSCAPE AND MAY BE WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
 STAFF ADVISES NO CHANGES BE PROPOSED WITH THIS
 PETITION, AND THE DESIGN PROPOSED AT A LATER TIME WHEN
 THE DETAILS OF THE EASEMENTS ARE KNOWN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AN UPDATED TREE
 SURVEY, ARBORIST REPORT AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED THAT ACCURATELY IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS,
 SPECIES, CANOPY DIAMETER, CONDITION, AND DISPOSITION OF
 ALL TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE AREA TO BE DEVELOPED.
 SATISFIED.
  
 2. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 11-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-15-2022 Time 14:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-15-2022 Time 14:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-15 14:08:43FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1919 N FLAGLER Z22070008
 NOVEMBER 4, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND PALMS MUST
 BE IDENTIFIED ACCURATELY BY SPECIES ON THE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 THERE ARE MISIDENTIFIED SPECIES, AND IF THE TREE SURVEY
 IS INCOMPLETE, THIS MUST BE CORRECTED AND SUBMITTED.
 11/4/22 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED. A CORRECTED TREE SURVEY WILL BE REQUIRED.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ASSUMPTION THAT
 POOR QUALITY DOES NOT NEED TO BE MITIGATED.
 ??? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE
 SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY
 MITIGATION DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE
 FROM CITY STAFF.
 SHOW CATEGORY AND SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 11/4/22 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED.
 ??? SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART
 FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ALL MITIGATION SHOULD BE IN ONE COLUMN. 1:1 COLUMN IS
 NOT NEEDED.
 ??? SATISFIED. CHANGE THE CONDITION RATINGS TO GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR BASED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR CALCULATIONS
 CHART, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART FROM SHEET L1-0-01 AND PLACE ON SHEET
 L5-5-01WITH THE PLANT LIST.
 ??? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY CREDIT
 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE AS SHOWN. THE CREDITS
 ARE CALCULATED FROM THE CITY TREE CATEGORY LIST.
 PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST
 AND PROVIDE A TOTAL.
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE FOR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS,
 NOT TREE MITIGATION. TREE CATEGORY LIST FOR MITIGATION
 MUST BE USED.
 11/4/22: CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ
 FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT.
 USING THESE CREDITS, CORRECT THE CHART AND PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL. SHOULD BE 27,100 SQ FT. SHOWN ON SHEET L 1-0-01.
  
  
 2. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3)
 REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
 PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. IF THERE ARE ANY RATED
 AS GOOD, PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON WHERE THEY WILL BE
 RELOCATED.
 INFORMATION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION IS NOT CORRECT.
 NATIVE SPECIES NEED TO BE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AND
 RATINGS SHOWN FROM THE ARBORISTS REPORT.
 10/7/22 UPDATED ARBORISTS REPORT NOT FOUND IN THE
 RESUBMITTAL. ROYAL PALMS ARE FLORIDA NATIVE SPECIES AND
 THERE ARE 3 LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED. THE TREE SPECIES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT EXISTS ON SITE.
 11/4/22: UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN
 ON THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY NATIVE TREES
 IN GOOD CONDITION.
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW THE EXACT
 AREA OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORE 1 REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA
 OF THE LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3%
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SHOWN. TRANSITION LOT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE SHOWN AND THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AND 10% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATED AND
 SHOWN.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 THE CORE1 AREA AND THE TRANSITION AREA. CALCULATIONS
 MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR
 EACH AND THE TOTAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS,
 THEN SHOW THE PROVIDED AREA. EACH AREA MUST HAVE THE
 PERIMETER CLEARLY SHOWN FOR EACH PROVIDED OPEN SPACE,
 THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE SHOWN AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THAT TYPE SHOWN AS WHAT IS REQUIRED AND WHAT IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 10/7/22 SOME PROGRESS IS SHOWN TOWARD SHOWING THE
 REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. TRANSITIONAL
 LOT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS CORRECT,
 BUT NOT CLEAR ON WHAT IS PROVIDED. THE CALCULATION FOR
 CORE 1 LOT AREA SHOULD BE 138,368 AND THE 3% PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 4,151 SQ FT.
 THE LABELING OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS NOT CORRECT,
 EACH SEPARATE AREA ON LEVEL 6 MUST BE SHOWN AND SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED, THEN IDENTIFIED AS TO TYPE, AND THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT TYPE SHOWN. VEGETATED AREA NEEDS
 TO BE SHOWN AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT SHOWN.
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GARDEN PLAZA IS INCORRECTLY
 IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE ON THE CHART.
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY MUST BE SHOWN TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE 905 SQ FT. THE
 AREA NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND CORRECTLY LABELED ON
 THE PLAN.
  
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM. THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN
 ELEMENTS INCLUDING THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30 FOOT
 INTERVALS PROVIDING SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH. AS
 SUBMITTED, MANY OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET.
 THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE
 PARKWAY MUST BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY
 WITH THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE. THE RETAINING WALL
 DIVIDES AND DISRUPTS THE FUNCTION OF THE PARKWAY.
 THE DESIGN IS STILL DIVIDED IN FUNCTION AND FURTHER
 DESIGN CORRECTIONS ARE NEEDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE
 PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES. BUFFER MUST INCLUDE A HEDGE AND TREES
 SPACED EVERY 30 FEET.
  
 6. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE PLANT LIST OF THE TREES,
 SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH REQUIRED OPEN
 SPACE AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA AND SUPPLY THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY.
 CHART IV-8 IN SECTION 94-109 CAN BE REFERENCED FOR OPEN
 SPACE TREE CANOPY CREDITS.
 THE PLANT LIST MUST BE INCLUDED ON EACH OPEN SPACE PAGE
 TO IDENTIFY THE PLANT MATERIAL AND SHOW TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SHEETS
 L5-1-03 AND L5-1-04 MUST BE COMPLETE, AND A SEPARATE
 SHEET SHOWING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED.
 10/7/22 PLANT LISTS NEED TO BE WITH THE PLAN FOR EACH
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
 PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
 CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO FINALIZE ANY RELOCATIONS.
 10/7/22 ROYAL PALMS ARE AT ISSUE AND LIVE OAK TREES ARE
 NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
 TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED.
 THE CALCULATION USES THE TOTAL PROPERTY LINE LENGTH
 FROM THE SURVEY FOR EACH STREETSCAPE SEGMENT.
 DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER OPENINGS ARE INCLUDED.
 CORRECT THE LENGTH AND RECALCULATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER
 OF STREET TREES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE
 THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET
 TREES. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 36 INCH
 DEPTH REQUIRED ON THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 20 FEET AND PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF
 GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET
 REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
 LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TAKES PRECEDENT
 OVER UTILITY LOCATIONS.
  
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
 NATIVE PERCENTAGE IS LISTED BUT MUST INCLUDE DROUGHT
 TOLERANT NON-NATIVE SPECIES IN PERCENTAGE.
 10/7/22 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE FOR THE ENTIRE PLANT
 LIST.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 SCREENING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WHEN REVISIONS ARE MADE TO
 THE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/14/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. THERE IS AN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK
 AND THE SEA WALL FOR THE 2 PARCELS EAST OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE. THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHERE THE EASEMENT IS
 AND IF IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED FOR ANY CHANGES PROPOSED
 WITH THIS PETITION. THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS ARE PART
 OF THE CITY STREETSCAPE AND MAY BE WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
 STAFF ADVISES NO CHANGES BE PROPOSED WITH THIS
 PETITION, AND THE DESIGN PROPOSED AT A LATER TIME WHEN
 THE DETAILS OF THE EASEMENTS ARE KNOWN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AN UPDATED TREE
 SURVEY, ARBORIST REPORT AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED THAT ACCURATELY IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS,
 SPECIES, CANOPY DIAMETER, CONDITION, AND DISPOSITION OF
 ALL TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE AREA TO BE DEVELOPED.
  
 2. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-04-2022 Time 12:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-04-2022 Time 12:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-04 12:17:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1919 N FLAGLER Z22070008
 NOVEMBER 4, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND PALMS MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED ACCURATELY BY SPECIES ON THE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 THERE ARE MISIDENTIFIED SPECIES, AND IF THE TREE SURVEY
 IS INCOMPLETE, THIS MUST BE CORRECTED AND SUBMITTED.
 11/4/22 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED. A CORRECTED TREE SURVEY WILL BE REQUIRED.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ASSUMPTION THAT
 POOR QUALITY DOES NOT NEED TO BE MITIGATED.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
 WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE
 THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY
 STAFF.
 SHOW CATEGORY AND SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 11/4/22 UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED.
 ??? SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART
 FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ALL MITIGATION SHOULD BE IN ONE COLUMN. 1:1 COLUMN IS
 NOT NEEDED.
 ??? SATISFIED. CHANGE THE CONDITION RATINGS TO GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR BASED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR CALCULATIONS
 CHART, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART FROM SHEET L1-0-01 AND PLACE ON SHEET
 L5-5-01WITH THE PLANT LIST.
 ??? NOT SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS ARE
 NOT APPLICABLE AS SHOWN. THE CREDITS ARE CALCULATED
 FROM THE CITY TREE CATEGORY LIST. PROVIDE THE
 MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE
 A TOTAL.
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE FOR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS,
 NOT TREE MITIGATION. TREE CATEGORY LIST FOR MITIGATION
 MUST BE USED.
 11/4/22: CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ
 FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT.
 USING THESE CREDITS, CORRECT THE CHART AND PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL. SHOULD BE 27,100 SQ FT. SHOWN ON SHEET L 1-0-01.
  
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
 PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. IF THERE ARE ANY RATED
 AS GOOD, PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON WHERE THEY WILL BE
 RELOCATED.
 INFORMATION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION IS NOT CORRECT.
 NATIVE SPECIES NEED TO BE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AND
 RATINGS SHOWN FROM THE ARBORISTS REPORT.
 10/7/22 UPDATED ARBORISTS REPORT NOT FOUND IN THE
 RESUBMITTAL. ROYAL PALMS ARE FLORIDA NATIVE SPECIES AND
 THERE ARE 3 LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED. THE TREE SPECIES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT EXISTS ON SITE.
 11/4/22: UPDATED ARBORIST REPORT DOES NOT MATCH THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. SOME NATIVE TREES ARE NOT SHOWN
 ON THE SUBMITTED DISPOSITION PLAN, LIST OR ARBORISTS
 REPORT, SO THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE SATISFIED UNTIL THIS
 IS CORRECTED TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY NATIVE TREES
 IN GOOD CONDITION.
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW THE EXACT
 AREA OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORE 1 REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA
 OF THE LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3%
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SHOWN. TRANSITION LOT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE SHOWN AND THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AND 10% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATED AND
 SHOWN.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 THE CORE1 AREA AND THE TRANSITION AREA. CALCULATIONS
 MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR
 EACH AND THE TOTAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS,
 THEN SHOW THE PROVIDED AREA. EACH AREA MUST HAVE THE
 PERIMETER CLEARLY SHOWN FOR EACH PROVIDED OPEN SPACE,
 THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE SHOWN AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THAT TYPE SHOWN AS WHAT IS REQUIRED AND WHAT IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 10/7/22 SOME PROGRESS IS SHOWN TOWARD SHOWING THE
 REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. TRANSITIONAL
 LOT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS CORRECT,
 BUT NOT CLEAR ON WHAT IS PROVIDED. THE CALCULATION FOR
 CORE 1 LOT AREA SHOULD BE 138,368 AND THE 3% PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 4,151 SQ FT.
 THE LABELING OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS NOT CORRECT,
 EACH SEPARATE AREA ON LEVEL 6 MUST BE SHOWN AND SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED, THEN IDENTIFIED AS TO TYPE, AND THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT TYPE SHOWN. VEGETATED AREA NEEDS
 TO BE SHOWN AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT SHOWN.
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GARDEN PLAZA IS INCORRECTLY
 IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE ON THE CHART.
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY MUST BE SHOWN TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE 905 SQ FT. THE
 AREA NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND CORRECTLY LABELED ON
 THE PLAN.
  
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM. THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN
 ELEMENTS INCLUDING THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30 FOOT
 INTERVALS PROVIDING SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH. AS
 SUBMITTED, MANY OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET.
 THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE
 PARKWAY MUST BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY
 WITH THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE. THE RETAINING WALL
 DIVIDES AND DISRUPTS THE FUNCTION OF THE PARKWAY.
 THE DESIGN IS STILL DIVIDED IN FUNCTION AND FURTHER
 DESIGN CORRECTIONS ARE NEEDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE
 PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES. BUFFER MUST INCLUDE A HEDGE AND TREES
 SPACED EVERY 30 FEET.
  
 6. SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE PLANT LIST OF THE TREES,
 SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH REQUIRED OPEN
 SPACE AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA AND SUPPLY THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY.
 CHART IV-8 IN SECTION 94-109 CAN BE REFERENCED FOR OPEN
 SPACE TREE CANOPY CREDITS.
 THE PLANT LIST MUST BE INCLUDED ON EACH OPEN SPACE PAGE
 TO IDENTIFY THE PLANT MATERIAL AND SHOW TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SHEETS
 L5-1-03 AND L5-1-04 MUST BE COMPLETE, AND A SEPARATE
 SHEET SHOWING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED.
 10/7/22 PLANT LISTS NEED TO BE WITH THE PLAN FOR EACH
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
 PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
 CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO FINALIZE ANY RELOCATIONS.
 10/7/22 ROYAL PALMS ARE AT ISSUE AND LIVE OAK TREES ARE
 NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
 TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED.
 THE CALCULATION USES THE TOTAL PROPERTY LINE LENGTH
 FROM THE SURVEY FOR EACH STREETSCAPE SEGMENT.
 DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER OPENINGS ARE INCLUDED.
 CORRECT THE LENGTH AND RECALCULATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER
 OF STREET TREES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE
 THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET
 TREES. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 36 INCH
 DEPTH REQUIRED ON THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 20 FEET AND PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF
 GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET
 REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
 LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TAKES PRECEDENT
 OVER UTILITY LOCATIONS.
  
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
 NATIVE PERCENTAGE IS LISTED BUT MUST INCLUDE DROUGHT
 TOLERANT NON-NATIVE SPECIES IN PERCENTAGE.
 10/7/22 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE FOR THE ENTIRE PLANT
 LIST.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 SCREENING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WHEN REVISIONS ARE MADE TO
 THE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/14/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. THERE IS AN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK
 AND THE SEA WALL FOR THE 2 PARCELS EAST OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE. THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHERE THE EASEMENT IS
 AND IF IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED FOR ANY CHANGES PROPOSED
 WITH THIS PETITION. THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS ARE PART
 OF THE CITY STREETSCAPE AND MAY BE WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
 STAFF ADVISES NO CHANGES BE PROPOSED WITH THIS
 PETITION, AND THE DESIGN PROPOSED AT A LATER TIME WHEN
 THE DETAILS OF THE EASEMENTS ARE KNOWN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-07-2022 Time 16:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-07-2022 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-07 16:11:03FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1919 N FLAGLER Z22070008
 OCTOBER 7, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND PALMS MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED ACCURATELY BY SPECIES ON THE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 THERE ARE MISIDENTIFIED SPECIES, AND IF THE TREE SURVEY
 IS INCOMPLETE, THIS MUST BE CORRECTED AND SUBMITTED.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ASSUMPTION THAT
 POOR QUALITY DOES NOT NEED TO BE MITIGATED.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
 WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE
 THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY
 STAFF.
 SHOW CATEGORY AND SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE
 DISPOSITION CHART FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY
 AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ALL MITIGATION SHOULD BE IN ONE COLUMN. 1:1 COLUMN IS
 NOT NEEDED.
 ??? SATISFIED. CHANGE THE CONDITION RATINGS TO GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR BASED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR CALCULATIONS
 CHART, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART FROM SHEET L1-0-01 AND PLACE ON SHEET
 L5-5-01WITH THE PLANT LIST.
 ??? NOT SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS ARE
 NOT APPLICABLE AS SHOWN. THE CREDITS ARE CALCULATED
 FROM THE CITY TREE CATEGORY LIST. PROVIDE THE
 MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE
 A TOTAL.
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE FOR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS,
 NOT TREE MITIGATION. TREE CATEGORY LIST FOR MITIGATION
 MUST BE USED.
  
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
 PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. IF THERE ARE ANY RATED
 AS GOOD, PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON WHERE THEY WILL BE
 RELOCATED.
 INFORMATION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION IS NOT CORRECT.
 NATIVE SPECIES NEED TO BE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AND
 RATINGS SHOWN FROM THE ARBORISTS REPORT.
 10/7/22 UPDATED ARBORISTS REPORT NOT FOUND IN THE
 RESUBMITTAL. ROYAL PALMS ARE FLORIDA NATIVE SPECIES AND
 THERE ARE 3 LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED. THE TREE SPECIES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE
 PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT EXISTS ON SITE.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW
 THE EXACT AREA OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORE 1 REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 AREA OF THE LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3%
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SHOWN. TRANSITION LOT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE SHOWN AND THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AND 10% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATED AND
 SHOWN.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 THE CORE1 AREA AND THE TRANSITION AREA. CALCULATIONS
 MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR
 EACH AND THE TOTAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS,
 THEN SHOW THE PROVIDED AREA. EACH AREA MUST HAVE THE
 PERIMETER CLEARLY SHOWN FOR EACH PROVIDED OPEN SPACE,
 THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE SHOWN AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THAT TYPE SHOWN AS WHAT IS REQUIRED AND WHAT IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 10/7/22 SOME PROGRESS IS SHOWN TOWARD SHOWING THE
 REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. TRANSITIONAL
 LOT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS CORRECT,
 BUT NOT CLEAR ON WHAT IS PROVIDED. THE CALCULATION FOR
 CORE 1 LOT AREA SHOULD BE 138,368 AND THE 3% PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 4,151 SQ FT.
 THE LABELING OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS NOT CORRECT,
 EACH SEPARATE AREA ON LEVEL 6 MUST BE SHOWN AND SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED, THEN IDENTIFIED AS TO TYPE, AND THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT TYPE SHOWN. VEGETATED AREA NEEDS
 TO BE SHOWN AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT SHOWN.
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GARDEN PLAZA IS INCORRECTLY
 IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE ON THE CHART.
 VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY MUST BE SHOWN TO MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE 905 SQ FT. THE
 AREA NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND CORRECTLY LABELED ON
 THE PLAN.
  
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM. THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN
 ELEMENTS INCLUDING THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30 FOOT
 INTERVALS PROVIDING SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH. AS
 SUBMITTED, MANY OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET.
 THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE
 PARKWAY MUST BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY
 WITH THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE. THE RETAINING WALL
 DIVIDES AND DISRUPTS THE FUNCTION OF THE PARKWAY.
 THE DESIGN IS STILL DIVIDED IN FUNCTION AND FURTHER
 DESIGN CORRECTIONS ARE NEEDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE
 PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES. BUFFER MUST INCLUDE A HEDGE AND TREES
 SPACED EVERY 30 FEET.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE PLANT LIST OF THE
 TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA AND
 SUPPLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND
 TREE CANOPY. CHART IV-8 IN SECTION 94-109 CAN BE
 REFERENCED FOR OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY CREDITS.
 THE PLANT LIST MUST BE INCLUDED ON EACH OPEN SPACE PAGE
 TO IDENTIFY THE PLANT MATERIAL AND SHOW TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SHEETS
 L5-1-03 AND L5-1-04 MUST BE COMPLETE, AND A SEPARATE
 SHEET SHOWING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED.
 10/7/22 PLANT LISTS NEED TO BE WITH THE PLAN FOR EACH
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
  
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR
 PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE
 REQUIRED TREES.
 CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO FINALIZE ANY RELOCATIONS.
 10/7/22 ROYAL PALMS ARE AT ISSUE AND LIVE OAK TREES ARE
 NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
 TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED.
 THE CALCULATION USES THE TOTAL PROPERTY LINE LENGTH
 FROM THE SURVEY FOR EACH STREETSCAPE SEGMENT.
 DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER OPENINGS ARE INCLUDED.
 CORRECT THE LENGTH AND RECALCULATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER
 OF STREET TREES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE
 THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET
 TREES. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 36 INCH
 DEPTH REQUIRED ON THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 20 FEET AND PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF
 GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET
 REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
 LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TAKES PRECEDENT
 OVER UTILITY LOCATIONS.
  
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
 NATIVE PERCENTAGE IS LISTED BUT MUST INCLUDE DROUGHT
 TOLERANT NON-NATIVE SPECIES IN PERCENTAGE.
 10/7/22 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE FOR THE ENTIRE PLANT
 LIST.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 SCREENING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WHEN REVISIONS ARE MADE TO
 THE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/14/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. THERE IS AN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK
 AND THE SEA WALL FOR THE 2 PARCELS EAST OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE. THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHERE THE EASEMENT IS
 AND IF IT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED FOR ANY CHANGES PROPOSED
 WITH THIS PETITION. THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS ARE PART
 OF THE CITY STREETSCAPE AND MAY BE WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
 STAFF ADVISES NO CHANGES BE PROPOSED WITH THIS
 PETITION, AND THE DESIGN PROPOSED AT A LATER TIME WHEN
 THE DETAILS OF THE EASEMENTS ARE KNOWN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-15-2022 Time 11:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-15-2022 Time 11:39 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-15 11:40:07FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1919 N FLAGLER Z22070008
 SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND PALMS MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED ACCURATELY BY SPECIES ON THE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 THERE ARE MISIDENTIFIED SPECIES, AND IF THE TREE SURVEY
 IS INCOMPLETE, THIS MUST BE CORRECTED AND SUBMITTED.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ASSUMPTION THAT
 POOR QUALITY DOES NOT NEED TO BE MITIGATED.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
 WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE
 THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY
 STAFF.
 SHOW CATEGORY AND SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE
 DISPOSITION CHART FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY
 AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ALL MITIGATION SHOULD BE IN ONE COLUMN. 1:1 COLUMN IS
 NOT NEEDED.
 ??? SATISFIED. CHANGE THE CONDITION RATINGS TO GOOD,
 MODERATE, OR POOR BASED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR CALCULATIONS
 CHART, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 ??? SATISFIED. REMOVE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART FROM SHEET L1-0-01 AND PLACE ON SHEET
 L5-5-01WITH THE PLANT LIST.
 ??? NOT SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS ARE
 NOT APPLICABLE AS SHOWN. THE CREDITS ARE CALCULATED
 FROM THE CITY TREE CATEGORY LIST. PROVIDE THE
 MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE
 A TOTAL.
 CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ARE FOR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS,
 NOT TREE MITIGATION. TREE CATEGORY LIST FOR MITIGATION
 MUST BE USED.
  
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
 PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. IF THERE ARE ANY RATED
 AS GOOD, PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON WHERE THEY WILL BE
 RELOCATED.
 INFORMATION ON THE TREE DISPOSITION IS NOT CORRECT.
 NATIVE SPECIES NEED TO BE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AND
 RATINGS SHOWN FROM THE ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW
 THE EXACT AREA OF THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORE 1 REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 AREA OF THE LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3%
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SHOWN. TRANSITION LOT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE SHOWN AND THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE AND 10% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATED AND
 SHOWN.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 THE CORE1 AREA AND THE TRANSITION AREA. CALCULATIONS
 MUST BE SHOWN FOR THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR
 EACH AND THE TOTAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS,
 THEN SHOW THE PROVIDED AREA. EACH AREA MUST HAVE THE
 PERIMETER CLEARLY SHOWN FOR EACH PROVIDED OPEN SPACE,
 THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE SHOWN AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THAT TYPE SHOWN AS WHAT IS REQUIRED AND WHAT IS
 PROVIDED.
  
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE
 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER
 DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM. THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE
 DESIGN ELEMENTS INCLUDING THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30
 FOOT INTERVALS PROVIDING SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE
 PATH. AS SUBMITTED, MANY OF THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE
 NOT MET. THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND
 THE PARKWAY MUST BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY
 WITH THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE. THE RETAINING WALL
 DIVIDES AND DISRUPTS THE FUNCTION OF THE PARKWAY.
 THE DESIGN IS STILL DIVIDED IN FUNCTION AND FURTHER
 DESIGN CORRECTIONS ARE NEEDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE
 PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES. BUFFER MUST INCLUDE A HEDGE AND TREES
 SPACED EVERY 30 FEET.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE PLANT LIST OF THE
 TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREA ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA AND
 SUPPLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND
 TREE CANOPY. CHART IV-8 IN SECTION 94-109 CAN BE
 REFERENCED FOR OPEN SPACE TREE CANOPY CREDITS.
 THE PLANT LIST MUST BE INCLUDED ON EACH OPEN SPACE PAGE
 TO IDENTIFY THE PLANT MATERIAL AND SHOW TREE CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SHEETS
 L5-1-03 AND L5-1-04 MUST BE COMPLETE, AND A SEPARATE
 SHEET SHOWING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED.
  
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR
 PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE
 REQUIRED TREES.
 CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE MADE TO THE TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO FINALIZE ANY RELOCATIONS.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
 REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
 OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND
 SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED.
 THE CALCULATION USES THE TOTAL PROPERTY LINE LENGTH
 FROM THE SURVEY FOR EACH STREETSCAPE SEGMENT.
 DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER OPENINGS ARE INCLUDED.
 CORRECT THE LENGTH AND RECALCULATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER
 OF STREET TREES.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL
 FOR THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND
 PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL
 STREET TREES. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE
 CURB FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 36 INCH
 DEPTH REQUIRED ON THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL.
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 20 FEET AND PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF
 GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET
 REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
 OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TAKES PRECEDENT
 OVER UTILITY LOCATIONS.
  
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
 NATIVE PERCENTAGE IS LISTED, BUT MUST INCLUDE DROUGHT
 TOLERANT NON NATIVE SPECIES IN PERCENTAGE.
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR
 ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE
 THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
 SCREENING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WHEN REVISIONS ARE MADE TO
 THE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/14/22:
  
 14. THERE IS AN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK AND THE SEA
 WALL FOR THE 2 PARCELS EAST OF FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS
 NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHERE THE EASEMENT IS AND IF IT
 NEEDS TO BE CHANGED FOR ANY CHANGES PROPOSED WITH THIS
 PETITION. THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS ARE PART OF THE CITY
 STREETSCAPE AND MAY BE WITHIN THE EASEMENT. STAFF
 ADVISES NO CHANGES BE PROPOSED WITH THIS PETITION, AND
 THE DESIGN PROPOSED AT A LATER TIME WHEN THE DETAILS OF
 THE EASEMENTS ARE KNOWN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-09-2022 Time 17:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-09-2022 Time 17:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 17:17:36FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1919 N FLAGLER Z22070008
 AUGUST 9, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST:
 ? ALL TREES AND PALMS MUST BE IDENTIFIED ACCURATELY BY
 SPECIES ON THE DISPOSITION PLAN.
 ? REMOVE NOTE REGARDING ASSUMPTION THAT POOR QUALITY
 DOES NOT NEED TO BE MITIGATED.
 ? TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER
 OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES
 LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW
 THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS
 AVAILABLE FROM CITY STAFF.
 ? SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART FOR
 MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? CHANGE THE CONDITION RATINGS TO GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR BASED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
 ? REMOVE THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR CALCULATIONS CHART, AS
 THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 ? REMOVE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART FROM
 SHEET L1-0-01 AND PLACE ON SHEET L5-5-01WITH THE PLANT
 LIST.
 ? TREE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE AS
 SHOWN. THE CREDITS ARE CALCULATED FROM THE CITY TREE
 CATEGORY LIST. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON
 THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE A TOTAL.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. IF THERE ARE ANY RATED AS GOOD, PROVIDE ANY
 INFORMATION ON WHERE THEY WILL BE RELOCATED.
  
 3. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST SHOW THE EXACT AREA OF
 THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATED AND PROVIDE THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE. CORE 1 REQUIRES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA OF THE
 LOT IN THIS CATEGORY TO BE SHOWN AND THE 3% PRIVATE
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SHOWN. TRANSITION LOT SQUARE
 FOOTAGE MUST BE SHOWN AND THE REQUIRED 3% PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE AND 10% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATED AND SHOWN.
  
  
 4. THE PARKWAY MUST MEET THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 94-210 FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM.
 THE PARKWAY MUST HAVE ALL THE DESIGN ELEMENTS INCLUDING
 THE SHADE TREES SPACED AT 30 FOOT INTERVALS PROVIDING
 SHADE TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE PATH. AS SUBMITTED, MANY OF
 THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT MET. THE STREETSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE, AND THE PARKWAY MUST BE
 PROVIDED IN ADDITION AND IN HARMONY WITH THE REQUIRED
 STREETSCAPE. THE RETAINING WALL DIVIDES AND DISRUPTS
 THE FUNCTION OF THE PARKWAY.
  
 5. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL
 PROPERTY LINES WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES. BUFFER MUST
 INCLUDE A HEDGE AND TREES SPACED EVERY 30 FEET.
  
 6. INCLUDE THE PLANT LIST OF THE TREES, SHRUBS AND
 GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREA
 ON THE PLAN FOR THAT AREA AND SUPPLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 OF THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY. CHART IV-8 IN
 SECTION 94-109 CAN BE REFERENCED FOR OPEN SPACE TREE
 CANOPY CREDITS.
  
 7. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST
 AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
  
 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
 MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
 EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED.
  
 9. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL
 DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION FOR ALL STREET TREES. THE AREA
 MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE
 CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
  
 10. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20
 FEET AND PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF GREY WOOD TO
 ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET REQUIRED FOR
 STREET CLEARANCE.
  
 11. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF
 BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO
 RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 12. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
 13. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT
 WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 11-18-2022 Time 10:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 11-18-2022 Time 10:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 08-12-2022 Time 12:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 08-12-2022 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-12 12:25:30PROPOSSED IMPACTS TO DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM ARE UNDER
 REVIEW.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 5 Status P Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-17-2022 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-17 15:48:10PASSING STATUS IS CONDITIONAL ON RESOLUTION OF THE
 FOLLOWING ISSUES BEFORE FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 -L0.1.01 AND A0.00 SHOW TREE OVER LARGE WATER SERVICE.
 TREE TRUNKS CANNOT BE LOCATED OVER WATER SERVICES AND
 MUST HAVE SUFFICIENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE AWAY FROM
 THEM.
 -L0.1.01 AND A0.00 SHOW SQUARE OBJECT APPROX 22 FEET
 EAST OF THE NORTHEAST FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 PLEASE LABEL WHAT IT IS ON THOSE PLANS AND ALSO SHOW
 AND LABEL IT ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 -A0.00 SHOWS TREE EAST OF NORTHEAST FIRELINE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY THAT MAY BE TOO CLOSE TO THE SERVICE LINE.
 PLEASE ENSURE THERE IS SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE DISTANCE.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 4 Status F Date 10-31-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 10-31-2022 Time 12:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-31 12:52:33PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -L0.1.01 AND A0.00 SHOW TREE OVER LARGE WATER SERVICE.
 TREE TRUNKS CANNOT BE LOCATED OVER WATER SERVICES AND
 MUST HAVE SUFFICIENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE AWAY FROM
 THEM.
 -L0.1.01 AND A0.00 SHOW SQUARE OBJECT APPROX 22 FEET
 EAST OF THE NORTHEAST FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 PLEASE LABEL WHAT IT IS ON THOSE PLANS AND ALSO SHOW
 AND LABEL IT ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 -A0.00 SHOWS TREE EAST OF NORTHEAST FIRELINE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY THAT MAY BE TOO CLOSE TO THE SERVICE LINE.
 PLEASE ENSURE THERE IS SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE DISTANCE.
 -SOME OF THE CALLOUTS AND LABELING ON THE UTILITY PLANS
 NEED TO BE REVISED, SUCH AS THOSE FOR THE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY TYPES, WATER METERS, AND THE WATER SERVICE
 PIPE SIZES. CAN UPDATE NOW OR AT ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
 -WILL THE CONNECTION ROAD RUNNING FROM ALLEY TO BUTLER
 UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING HAVE SOME KIND OF ACCESS
 EASEMENT? DID NOT SEE ANY SHOWN OR LABELED ON PLANS.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 10-05-2022 Time 07:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 07:48:50PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING SEWER LATERAL AT 1900 N DIXIE
 HWY TO ENSURE THEY WILL STILL HAVE FUNCTIONING
 WASTEWATER SERVICE.
 -SHEET C1.01 SAYS 300 BUTLER SEWER LATERAL TO REMAIN,
 BUT ALSO SAYS SANITARY SEWER MAIN IS BEING REMOVED.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT PROPERTY WILL STILL HAVE FUNCTIONING
 WASTEWATER SERVICE.
 -REMINDER: SHEET C602 AND C600: LABEL SANITARY SEWER
 MAIN RUNNING NORTH AT BUTLER AND BROWARD INTERSECTION
 WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE.
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID THIS WAS CORRECTED, BUT DESIGN
 STILL LOOKS DIFFERENT: SHEET C500 DOES NOT MATCH
 HARDSCAPE PLAN L3-1-01 WITH RESPECT TO THE SIDEWALK
 DESIGN AT WEST SIDE OF FLAGLER ADJACENT TO SOUTHEAST
 CORNER OF 1923 N FLAGLER DR.
 -3 INCH AND 4 INCH WATER METERS REQUIRE DIP. ALSO 3
 INCH METER HAS 4 INCH WATER SERVICE PIPE AND TAP PER
 STANDARD DETAILS. PLEASE UPDATE C602.
 -COVER SHEET SAYS THERE IS A SHEET C630, BUT THAT SHEET
 IS MISSING FROM PLAN SET.
 -SCREENING BUSHES AROUND 3 AND 4 INCH METERS CANNOT BE
 ON TOP OF GATE VALVES BOXES OR TOO CLOSE TO THEM. MUST
 BE ABLE TO OPERATE WITH VALVE KEY. HANDLES EXTEND
 APPROX 1.5 FEET HORIZONTAL FROM VALVE BOX.
 -A000 SHOWS TREE IN SIDEWALK EAST OF N. FLAGLER DR.
 TRIED TO VERIFY ON L5101, BUT SIDEWALK IS NOT SHOWING.
 WILL THERE BE TREE IN SIDEWALK?
 -NOTE WAS ADDED ON ENGINEERING PLANS SAYING CONTRACTOR
 SHALL PLACE ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES UNDERGROUND. UPDATE
 WORDING ON THAT NOTE TO CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL
 PROPOSED DRY UTILITIES UNDERGROUND.
 -AT SOUTHWEST AREA OF BUILDING ON A101 THERE IS A ROOM
 LABELED DIESEL 230SF. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT IT IS AND
 PROVIDE SHEET REFERENCE NUMBER THAT HAS MORE
 INFORMATION ON IT.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-01-2022 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-01 15:35:08PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID FDC LOCATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN
 FINALIZED. REMINDER TO FINALIZE FDC LOCATIONS.
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID ORDERING ADDITIONAL SURVEY.
 REMINDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL SURVEY.
 -SOME PAVEMENT RESTORATION AREAS ON SHEET C600 AND C500
 STILL APPEAR TO BE MISSING FOR PROPOSED SEWER MAINS ON
 FLAGER DR. AND PINE ST. DIXIE MAY BE NEEDED ALSO.
 -EAST SIDE OF FLAGLER SHOWS BIG CONCRETE SLAB PROPOSED
 ON SHEET C500. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE
 CONCRETE SLAB AND IF ANYTHING IS GOING ON TOP OF IT. IF
 THERE IS A PLAN SHEET SHOWING PROPOSED USE, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE REFERENCE NUMBER.
 -ON SHEET C611 PLEASE REMOVE WS10 AND REPLACE WITH WS5
 REV SEP2019.
 -THERE IS A WATER MAIN PROJECT AT INTERSECTION OF
 BUTLER AND BROWARD THAT MAY HAVE STARTED ALREADY AND
 CIVIL ENGINEER SHOULD BE AWARE OF.
 -SHEET C500 DOES NOT MATCH HARDSCAPE PLAN L3-1-01 WITH
 RESPECT TO THE SIDEWALK DESIGN AT WEST SIDE OF FLAGLER
 ADJACENT TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1923 N FLAGLER DR.
 -SHEET C602 AND C600: LABEL SANITARY SEWER MAIN RUNNING
 NORTH AT BUTLER AND BROWARD INTERSECTION WITH PIPE SIZE
 AND MATERIAL TYPE. IF IT IS 10 INCH VCP, WILL
 WASTEWATER DESIGN WORK ALRIGHT?
 -SHEET C600: AT WESTERN SIDE OF PINE ST THERE IS
 CALLOUT FOR EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT. VERIFY IF IT IS
 THERE AS DO NOT SEE ON HISTORIC PICTURES OF AREA. IF
 THERE, ADD SYMBOL. IF NOT, REMOVE CALLOUT.
 -SHEETS C600 AND C602: FOR THE PROPOSED 3 INCH AND 4
 INCH METERS, THE FOOTPRINT WOULD BE MUCH LARGER THAN
 SHOWN. ALSO THE WATER SERVICE LINES AND CURBSTOPS COULD
 NOT BE 2 INCH SIZE OR PE, AND MAY NEED SPACING FURTHER
 APART.
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN L0.1.01 SHOWS LARGE UTILITY POLE AND
 TREE CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED WATER SERVICES AND METER
 BOXES. NEED APPROPRIATE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE.
 -SOME PLANS SHOW LARGE UTILITY POLE NEAR NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF NORTHWEST DRIVEWAY. PLEASE MAKE SURE IT IS
 ACCOUNTED FOR IN CIVIL PLANS.
 -UTILITIES DESIGN ON LANDSCAPING PLANS DOES NOT MATCH
 CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS. PLEASE MAKE SURE BOTH SETS OF
 PLANS MATCH BASIC UTILITIES DESIGN AND THERE ARE NO
 CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES.
 -L0.1.01 AREA 3 SAYS GARDEN CAF? SEATING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THAT AREA. IS IT JUST GRASS
 AREA THAT PEOPLE CAN SIT ON, OR WILL THERE BE TABLES
 AND CHAIRS THERE? IF A PLAN SHEET SHOWS MORE INFO ON
 IT, PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THAT REFERENCE NUMBER.
 -UTILITY WOULD PREFER THE PROPOSED 3 INCH AND 4 INCH
 METERS (NOT BACKFLOWS) CLOSER TO CURB IN THE
 LANDSCAPING AREA IF PROPER SPACING AND CLEARANCE
 DISTANCE COULD BE ACHIEVED WITH THE TREES.
 -FOR THE PROPOSED 3 INCH AND 4 INCH METERS TO THE
 NORTHEAST, ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO LABELS.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 08-06-2022 Time 10:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-06 10:51:29PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -SHEET C600: FOR THE EASTERN TWO FIRE HYDRANTS ON PINE
 ST., SHOW CONNECTIONS TO WATER MAIN AND VERIFY THEY ARE
 FUNCTIONAL. THERE MAY BE A WATER MAIN RUNNING DOWN PINE
 ST; FOR THE WESTERN FIRE HYDRANT ON PINE ST, VERIFY IT
 EXISTS. RECENT PICTURES OF AREA SHOW NO FIRE HYDRANT
 THERE; SHOW WATER MAIN CONTINUATION SOUTH AT
 INTERSECTION OF FLAGLER AND PINE; LABEL WATER MAIN ON
 BUTLER ST WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE.
 -FOR THE FIVE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLES ON WESTERN SIDE
 OF BUTLER ST, SHOW ANY PIPING CONNECTING TO THEM AND
 PROVIDE INVERT ELEVATIONS.
 -WPB GIS SHOWS SEWER MAIN FLOWING SOUTH AT SS10. AT
 SS10 SHOW SEWER MAIN RUNNING SOUTH FROM MANHOLE AND
 PROVIDE ALL THREE INVERT ELEVATIONS; PROPOSED SEWER
 MAIN ON PINE ST IS 10 INCH, BUT A FEW BLOCKS SOUTH OF
 SS10 SEWER MAIN REDUCES TO 8 INCH SIZING PER WPB GIS.
 VERIFY WASTEWATER WILL FLOW ALRIGHT.
 -SHOW AND LABEL GREASE TRAPS ON CIVIL PLANS.
 -SHEET C602: SIGN POLE OVER WATER SERVICE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE CLEARANCE DISTANCE; CALLOUT LARGE WATER METER
 AND ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND ON LABEL IF OVER 2 INCHES;
 CONSIDER DUAL OR PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 TO REDUCE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE;
 ADJUST FIRELINE POINT OF SERVICE VALVE SLIGHTLY NORTH
 INTO LANDSCAPING AND OUT OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY; LABEL
 WHAT EACH 2 INCH METER FEEDS OR ITS USE, SUCH AS
 IRRIGATION.
 -VERTICAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NONSTANDARD. BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES MUST BE USC APPROVED FOR THE ORIENTATION BY
 MAKE, MODEL, AND SIZE. THEY WOULD ALSO REQUIRE FURTHER
 ENGINEERING REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
 -PROPERTY OWNER WILL HAVE TO RECORD BACKFLOW COVENANT
 AS A CONDITION OF WATER SERVICE.
 -SHEET 601 AND 602: ADD THE DARK BLACK BOXES TO LEGEND.
 VERIFY THEY WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE CONTINUATION OF
 FIRE SERVICE PIPE.
 -SHEET 601: VERIFY AND SHOW LOCATIONS OF EXISTING SEWER
 LATERALS FOR 309 TO 325 PINE ST.
 -PROPOSED LOCATION OF SS03 APPEARS TO BE CONFLICTING
 WITH EXISTING METAL FENCE.
 -VERIFY 300 BUTLER ST. HAS AGREED TO GRANT UTILITY
 EASEMENT.
 -WPB UTILITY BILLING SHOWS EXISTING 4 INCH FIRELINE AT
 200 BUTLER. SHOW AND LABEL REMOVAL ON CIVIL PLANS.
 -ARE THE UTILITY POLES AND OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES ON
 NORTH SIDE OF ALLEY REMAINING?
 -SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES FOR UTILITY WORK
 IN PINE ST, FLAGLER DR, BUTLER, ALLEY, DIXIE HWY, AND
 300 BUTLER PARKING LOT.
 -SURVEY DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED UTILITY
 WORK.
 -COULD NOT LOCATE FDC. SHOW AND LABEL IF ANY ARE NEEDED
 OR REQUIRED. IF ADDING ANY ENSURE THAT THEY ARE
 ACCEPTABLE DISTANCES FROM FUNCTIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS.
 -ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY PLANS.
 -SURVEY SHEET 4 OF 4 SAYS LAND EAST OF FLAGLER IS
 GOVERNMENT LOT. IS IT OWNED BY CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?
 -ON CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXISTING PARKING SPOTS, BIKE LANE,
 AND MEDIAN STRIPING ON EAST SIDE OF FLAGLER DR.
 -SHEET L0101 SHOWS PROPOSED TREES CONFLICTING WITH
 UTILITIES. PROVIDE CLEARANCE DISTANCE.
 -LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCURATELY SHOWING
 LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES FROM CIVIL PLANS. FOR INSTANCE,
 THE LOCATIONS OF THE 2 INCH METERS AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES ARE DIFFERENT. ENSURE ALL SETS OF PLANS HAVE
 THE SAME LOCATIONS.
 -WHY ARE THE ELECTRIC AND WATER LINES PROPOSED RUNNING
 ACROSS FLAGLER?
 -ADD UTILITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR SMALL BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY, FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, LARGE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY, AND LARGE ABOVE GROUND METER.
 -ENSURE ANY PROPOSED OUTSIDE FPL TRANSFORMER PADS ARE
 SHOWN AND LABELED.
 -WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE 5 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENTS
 RUNNING THROUGH PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY?
 -VERIFY IF THERE WILL BE ANY AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLIES
 SUCH AS WELLS CONNECTED TO THE PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 5 Status P Date 02-16-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-16-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 02-16-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-16 11:45:16NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
  
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-15-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-15-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-15 11:58:23CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
 PRIOR TO THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL
 PROVIDE LETTER OF SERVICE AVAILABILITY FROM THE GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICE PROVIDER FOR THE TRASH AND RECYCLING
 CONTAINERS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 10:20:29PLEASE IDENTIFY THE STAGING AREA AND THE HEIGHT
 CLEARANCE FOR THE COMPACTOR CONTAINERTS TO BE SERVICED.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-02-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-02-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-02 09:26:351- PLEASE IDENTIFY THE STAGING AREA FOR HTE COMPACTOR
 CONTAINERTS TO BE SERVICED. COMPACTOR CONTAINERS
 STAGING AREAD REQUIRE A HEIGHT CLEARANCE OF 25 FT IN
 ORDER FOR A FRONT LOAD COLLECTION TRUCK BE ABLE TO
 PROVIDE THE SERVICE.
 2- COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE IN
 ORDER FOR THE CITY COLLECTION TRUCKS BE ABLE TO
 PROIVIDE THE SERVICE.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 14:35:48 
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
 CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
 3- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS
 4- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
 GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
 TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
 NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
 5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 6- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 7- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAILS AND
 MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
 8- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-21-2022 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-01-2022 Time 16:04 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-21 12:50:16THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/28/22.. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE NOT
 INCLUDED. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CONDITIONS ARE LISTED AT
 THE END.
  
  
  
 3. [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TO CONSIDER SEA
 LEVEL RISE ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND TAILWATER
 CONDITIONS. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ??? EXPLAIN HOW SEA
 LEVEL RISE WAS CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN AND DRAINAGE
 CALCULATIONS. GROUNDWATER WILL INCREASE WITH SEA LEVEL
 RISE. THE FLAP GATE WILL NOT BE NEEDED ??? THE WEIR
 SHOULD PREVENT BACKFLOW INTO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE DIAMETER OF THE OUTFALL
 PIPE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: WHAT WAS ASSUMED AS THE
 DOWNSTREAM HGL ELEVATION (AT STRUCTURE ST-31)? IF THE
 OUTFALL PIPE NEEDS TO BE 18 INCH DIAMETER, THEN THE
 EXISTING 15 INCH RCP BETWEEN ST-31 AND THE EXISTING
 MANHOLE WILL NEED TO BE UPSIZED. THE HORIZONTAL
 CLEARANCE BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED REPLACEMENT PIPE AND
 THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WILL NEED TO BE
 VERIFIED AS WELL AS THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE IS LARGE
 ENOUGH TO BE MODIFIED TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED
 REPLACEMENT PIPE. NOTE THE CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP SLAB
 MAY CONSTRICT THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY FLOW OVER THE WEIR.
  
  
 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW HOW ALLEY GRADING WILL
 TRANSITION TO EXISTING GRADE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE
 ALLEY APPEARS TO SLOPE FROM WEST TO EAST AND AT THE
 EAST END THE PROPOSED GRADES DIRECT THE WATER TO THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NEW END OF THE ALLEY. HOW WILL
 THE STORMWATER RUNOFF BE PREVENTED FROM FLOWING ONTO
 THE ADJACENT PROPERTY? 10-28-22 COMMENT: ENSURE THE
 PROPOSD SWALE BETWEEN THE ALLEY AND PINE ST WILL HAVE
 THE CAPACITY TO CONVEY THE STORMWATER RUNOFF TO PINE
 ST. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW TREES AND OTHER PLANTINGS
 IN THE SWALE AREA THAT WILL IMPEDE THE FLOW.
  
  
 15. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES IN
 THE RIGHT OF WAY (PIPE SIZE, MATERIAL, ETC.) ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: EXISTING STORM PIPE ON PINE STREET IS LABELED
 AS 48 INCH ON UTILITY PLAN AND 54 INCH RCP ON PGD PLAN.
 LABEL THE PINE STREET SEWER MAINS ON SHEET C-500.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATIONS ON THE PGD PLANS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: FFES
 WERE REMOVED ON SHEET C-500 IN THE 9/30/22 SUBMITTAL.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] INCLUDE MILL AND RESURFACE HATCHING IN
 THE SHEET LEGENDS. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS AND
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHIN THESE LIMITS. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: SHEET C-600 SHOWS PROPOSED UTILITIES CROSSING
 N. FLAGLER DRIVE BUT THERE IS NO INDICATION OF MILL AND
 RESURFACING ON SHEET C-500.
  
 21. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXISTING GRADES
 ALONG THE EP OF N. FLAGLER DRIVE, NORTH OF THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: REVIEW THE PROPOSED
 GRADING FOR THE DRIVEWAY TO N. FLAGLER DRIVE. THERE
 WILL BE A LOW POINT BETWEEN TWO HIGH POINTS ALONG THE
 EP AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (8/26/2022 SUBMITTAL)
  
  
 23. [SATISFIED] SECTION C-C
  A. MOVE SECTION ABOUT 20 FEET TO THE WEST TO FALL
 WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN THE SIDEWALKS AND
 THROUGH THE SEATWALLS.
  B. FG LINE APPEARS TO BE SHIFTED TO THE RIGHT. IF NOT
 THEN ABOUT 5 FEET OF SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE IS TOO STEEP.
  C. CONFIRM PROPOSED GRADE OF 6.01 (VS. 6.10 ON PGD
 PLAN).
  D. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 37.5 FEET.
  E. THE FLOOR OF THE BUILDING INTERIOR APPEARS TO HAVE
 10% SLOPE.
  F. SHEET A0.08 SHOWS A DOOR OPENING TO THE CAFE SPACE
 WHERE THE PGD PLAN SHOWS SPOT GRADES BETWEEN 8.03 FEET
 AND 6.34 FEET NAVD ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING. CAFE FFE
 IS 9.00 FEET NAVD.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  G. GRADES SHOWN FOR 9.4 FT SIDEWALK RESULT IN CROSS
 SLOPE STEEPER THAN 2%.
  H. LIMIT SLOPE OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO 4:1 OR FLATTER.
 INDICATED SLOPE OF 17% IS OK.
  
 24. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D
  A. NOT SHOWN ON KEY MAP.
  B. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  C. SHOW DROP CURB AT BEGINNING OF THE 14.8 FT DRIVEWAY
 APRON.
  
 25. [SATISFIED] SECTION F-F
  A. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE
 PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY LINE, CONVERT ST-29 TO A CATCH
 BASIN AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. THIS WILL ALLOW
 ST-29 TO BE SMALLER THAN 7 FEET IN DIAMETER BY
 ELIMINATING THE SOUTH PIPE CONNECTION.
  B. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 25 FEET.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  C. CONFIRM THE 8.63 FT NAVD SPOT GRADE. PGD PLAN SHOWS
 DRIVEWAY EP BETWEEN 8.62 FT AND 8.28 FT NAVD. TRIM
 BLACK LINE TO BACK OF VALLEY GUTTER.
  D. SHOW/DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF THE
 SIDEWALK/CROSSWALK THROUGH THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 27. [SATISFIED] SECTION H-H
  A. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALLS.
  B. WHY CANNOT THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK NEAREST THE R/W
 MATCH EXISTING GRADE?
  C. CREATE SWALE BEHIND EAST SITE WALL TO PREVENT
 RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO SIDEWALK.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
  D. CREATE SWALES/DEPRESSIONS IN EACH OF THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS.
  
 30. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ADDING TRENCH DRAIN ALONG
 NORTH CURB LINE WEST OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING OF THE N.
 FLAGLER DRIVEWAY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF FLOWING
 ACROSS THE SIDEWALK CROSSING. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: DUE
 TO THE CROSS SLOPE OF THE DRIVEWAY, ALL OF THE RUNOFF
 WILL FLOW ALONG THE NORTH CURB LINE OF THE DRIVEWAY.
 THE SUGGESTION IS THE ADD TRENCH DRAIN ALONG THE NORTH
 CURB LINE, WEST OF THE CROSSWALK ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY,
 TO COLLECT THE RUNOFF BEFORE IT FLOWS ACROSS THE
 CROSSWALK. A SECOND SUGGESTION IS TO HAVE A CURB CUT
 AND FLUME TO THE YARD DRAIN IN THE 17 FT WIDE LANDSCAPE
 AREA/SWALE.
  
 31. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE CONCRETE APRONS ON THE CROSS
 SECTIONS. DRIVEWAY APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY
 SHOULD BE CONCRETE.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (9/30/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 36. [SATISFIED] THE EXISTING 15-INCH CAST IRON (CAS)
 SANITARY SEWER MAIN IS NOT SHOWN GOING THROUGH
 STRUCTURE SS-EX-01. ARE PIPE INVERTS FOR SS-EX-01
 AVAILABLE?
  
 37. [SATISFIED] CHECK GRADING OF THE EAST END OF THE
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON BUTLER ST. CROSS SLOPE SHOULD NOT
 EXCEED 2%. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE SHOULD NOT EXCEED 5%.
  
 38. [SATISFIED] ON THE DEMOLITION PLANS, INDICATE WHAT
 WILL HAPPEN TO THE STREET LIGHT POLES. THERE IS A LIGHT
 POLE OPPOSITE BROWARD AVE.
  
 39. [SATISFIED] EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON NE CORNER OF
 BROWARD AVE AND BUTLER ST IS SHOWN IN THE SIDEWALK.
  
 40. [SATISFIED] INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND THE SYMBOL SOUTH
 OF THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY #1. THE SYMBOL
 CONSISTS OF A CIRCLE WITH A PLUS SIGN.
  
 CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL (12-1-2022):
  
 1. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET
 SFWMD ERP CRITERIA.
  
 2. DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE STORMWATER RUNOFF
 FROM THE ALLEY WITHOUT IMPACTS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
 AND WITHOUT THE STORMWATER RUNOFF FLOWING OVER THE
 SIDEWALK TO REACH THE CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE STREET.
  
 3. DEVELOPMENT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE YARD
 DRAIN/CURB DRAIN SYSTEM (INCLUDING MAINTAINING THE
 SIDEWALK FLAGS ADJACENT TO THE DRAINS AND THE CURB AND
 GUTTER THE PIPES ARE PENETRATING) DRAINING THE SWALE
 USED TO CONVEY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE ALLEY.
  
 4. DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE FLOW TO DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES FOR ALL CURBS AND CURBS & GUTTERS ALONG ITS
 STREET FRONTAGES.
  
 5. SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE R/W SHALL HAVE FLATTEST
 LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AS POSSIBLE AND NOT EXCEED 5
 PERCENT. CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 PERCENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-20-2022 Time 16:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-20-2022 Time 16:41 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-20 16:25:15OLARA (Z22070008) STORM #3
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 9/30/2022.. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE NOT
 INCLUDED.
  
  
 1. [SATISFIEDL] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL
 DATUM CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.
  
 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TO
 CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND
 TAILWATER CONDITIONS. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ??? EXPLAIN
 HOW SEA LEVEL RISE WAS CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN AND
 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. GROUNDWATER WILL INCREASE WITH
 SEA LEVEL RISE. THE FLAP GATE WILL NOT BE NEEDED ???
 THE WEIR SHOULD PREVENT BACKFLOW INTO THE ONSITE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 4. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE DIAMETER OF THE
 OUTFALL PIPE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: WHAT WAS ASSUMED AS
 THE DOWNSTREAM HGL ELEVATION (AT STRUCTURE ST-31)? IF
 THE OUTFALL PIPE NEEDS TO BE 18??? DIAMETER, THEN THE
 EXISTING 15??? RCP BETWEEN ST-31 AND THE EXISTING
 MANHOLE WILL NEED TO BE UPSIZED. THE HORIZONTAL
 CLEARANCE BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED REPLACEMENT PIPE AND
 THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WILL NEED TO BE
 VERIFIED AS WELL AS THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE IS LARGE
 ENOUGH TO BE MODIFIED TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED
 REPLACEMENT PIPE. NOTE THE CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP SLAB
 MAY CONSTRICT THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY FLOW OVER THE WEIR.
  
  
 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW HOW ALLEY GRADING WILL
 TRANSITION TO EXISTING GRADE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE
 ALLEY APPEARS TO SLOPE FROM WEST TO EAST AND AT THE
 EAST END THE PROPOSED GRADES DIRECT THE WATER TO THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NEW END OF THE ALLEY. HOW WILL
 THE STORMWATER RUNOFF BE PREVENTED FROM FLOWING ONTO
 THE ADJACENT PROPERTY?
  
 15. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES IN
 THE RIGHT OF WAY (PIPE SIZE, MATERIAL, ETC.) ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: STORM PIPE ON PINE STREET IS LABELED AS 48???
 AND 54??? RCP. LABEL THE PINE STREET SEWER MAINS ON
 SHEET C-500.
  
 17. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATIONS ON THE PGD PLANS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 FFE???S WERE REMOVED ON SHEET C-500 IN THE 9/30/22
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 18. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? INCLUDE MILL AND RESURFACE
 HATCHING IN THE SHEET LEGENDS.] SHOW MILL AND
 RESURFACING LIMITS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHIN THESE
 LIMITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SHEET C-600 SHOWS PROPOSED
 UTILITIES CROSSING N. FLAGLER DRIVE BUT THERE IS NO
 INDICATION OF MILL AND RESURFACING ON SHEET C-500.
  
 21. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXISTING
 GRADES ALONG THE EP OF N. FLAGLER DRIVE, NORTH OF THE
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: REVIEW THE
 PROPOSED GRADING FOR THE DRIVEWAY TO N. FLAGLER DRIVE.
 THERE WILL BE A LOW POINT BETWEEN TWO HIGH POINTS ALONG
 THE EP AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (8/26/2022 SUBMITTAL)
  
 22. [SATISFIED] SECTION A-A
  A. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.
  B. VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED.
  C. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE BACK OF
 SIDEWALK AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. ADD A CATCH
 BASIN ONTO THE 18 INCH STORM PIPE TO COLLECT RUNOFF
 WITHIN THE BUILDING.
  
 23. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SECTION C-C
  A. MOVE SECTION ABOUT 20 FEET TO THE WEST TO FALL
 WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN THE SIDEWALKS AND
 THROUGH THE SEATWALLS.
  B. FG LINE APPEARS TO BE SHIFTED TO THE RIGHT. IF NOT
 THEN ABOUT 5 FEET OF SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE IS TOO STEEP.
  C. CONFIRM PROPOSED GRADE OF 6.01 (VS. 6.10 ON PGD
 PLAN).
  D. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 37.5 FEET.
  E. THE FLOOR OF THE BUILDING INTERIOR APPEARS TO HAVE
 10% SLOPE.
  F. SHEET A0.08 SHOWS A DOOR OPENING TO THE CAF?? SPACE
 WHERE THE PGD PLAN SHOWS SPOT GRADES BETWEEN 8.03 FEET
 AND 6.34 FEET NAVD ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING. CAF?? FFE
 IS 9.00 FEET NAVD.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  G. GRADES SHOWN FOR 9.4??? SIDEWALK RESULT IN CROSS
 SLOPE STEEPER THAN 2%.
  H. LIMIT SLOPE OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO 4:1 OR FLATTER.
 INDICATED SLOPE OF 17% IS OK.
  
 24. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SECTION D-D
  A. NOT SHOWN ON KEY MAP.
  B. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  C. SHOW DROP CURB AT BEGINNING OF THE 14.8 FT DRIVEWAY
 APRON.
  
 25. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SECTION F-F
  A. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE
 PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY LINE, CONVERT ST-29 TO A CATCH
 BASIN AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. THIS WILL ALLOW
 ST-29 TO BE SMALLER THAN 7 FEET IN DIAMETER BY
 ELIMINATING THE SOUTH PIPE CONNECTION.
  B. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 25 FEET.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
  C. CONFIRM THE 8.63 FT NAVD SPOT GRADE. PGD PLAN SHOWS
 DRIVEWAY EP BETWEEN 8.62 FT AND 8.28 FT NAVD. TRIM
 BLACK LINE TO BACK OF VALLEY GUTTER.
  D. SHOW/DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF THE
 SIDEWALK/CROSSWALK THROUGH THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 26. [SATISFIED] SECTION G-G
  A. DIMENSIONS DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON SHEET
 C-400.
  B. SECTION SYMBOL ON KEY MAP SHOULD POINT TO THE WEST.
  C. WILL SIDEWALK HAVE A THICKENED EDGE? PROVIDE A
 DETAIL OF THE SIDEWALK IF SO.
  D. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALL.
  E. CREATE A SWALE OR BERM ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE TO
 PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  F. SHOW CURBING ADJACENT TO THE ISLAND AND IN-BOUND
 DRIVEWAY.
  
 27. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SECTION H-H
  A. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALLS.
  B. WHY CAN???T THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK NEAREST THE R/W
 MATCH EXISTING GRADE?
  C. CREATE SWALE BEHIND EAST SITE WALL TO PREVENT
 RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO SIDEWALK.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
  D. CREATE SWALES/DEPRESSIONS IN EACH OF THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS.
  
 28. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING 18-INCH PIPE
 CONNECTION TO TRENCH DRAIN.
  
 29. [SATISFIED] SECTION G-G SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY SLOPING
 TO THE NORTH. THE TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS N. FLAGLER
 DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO EXTEND TO NORTH CURB LINE.
  
 30. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CONSIDER ADDING TRENCH DRAIN
 ALONG NORTH CURB LINE WEST OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING OF
 THE N. FLAGLER DRIVEWAY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF
 FLOWING ACROSS THE SIDEWALK CROSSING. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: DUE TO THE CROSS SLOPE OF THE DRIVEWAY, ALL OF
 THE RUNOFF WILL FLOW ALONG THE NORTH CURB LINE OF THE
 DRIVEWAY. THE SUGGESTION IS THE ADD TRENCH DRAIN ALONG
 THE NORTH CURB LINE, WEST OF THE CROSSWALK ACROSS THE
 DRIVEWAY, TO COLLECT THE RUNOFF BEFORE IT FLOWS ACROSS
 THE CROSSWALK. A SECOND SUGGESTION IS TO HAVE A CURB
 CUT AND FLUME TO THE YARD DRAIN IN THE 17 FT WIDE
 LANDSCAPE AREA/SWALE.
  
 31. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? SHOW THE CONCRETE APRONS
 ON THE CROSS SECTIONS] DRIVEWAY APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT
 OF WAY SHOULD BE CONCRETE.
  
 32. [SATISFIED ??? CAN MH (RENUMBERED AS SS-01) GO IN
 THE SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF DRIVEWAY? DRIVEWAY EXIT WILL BE
 BLOCKED WHEN THE MH IS OPENED.] CONSIDER MOVING
 SANITARY MANHOLE SS-05 OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY AND OUT OF
 THE SIDEWALK. COORDINATE WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 33. [SATISFIED] REMOVE STRUCTURES ST-28 AND ST-34 OUT
 OF THE ALLEY R/W.
  
 34. [SATISFIED] SOUTH EDGE OF ALLEY NEEDS TO MEET
 EXISTING GRADE AT RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 35. [SATISFIED] WILL SIDEWALK AT DROPOFF AREA BE FLUSH
 WITH PAVEMENT AND/OR HAVE THICKENED EDGE?
  
 NEW COMMENTS (9/30/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 36. THE EXISTING 15-INCH CAST IRON (CAS) SANITARY SEWER
 MAIN IS NOT SHOWN GOING THROUGH STRUCTURE SS-EX-01. ARE
 PIPE INVERTS FOR SS-EX-01 AVAILABLE?
  
 37. CHECK GRADING OF THE EAST END OF THE PROPOSED
 SIDEWALK ON BUTLER ST. CROSS SLOPE SHOULD NOT EXCEED
 2%. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE SHOULD NOT EXCEED 5%.
  
 38. ON THE DEMOLITION PLANS, INDICATE WHAT WILL HAPPEN
 TO THE STREET LIGHT POLES. THERE IS A LIGHT POLE
 OPPOSITE BROWARD AVE.
  
 39. EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON NE CORNER OF BROWARD AVE
 AND BUTLER ST IS SHOWN IN THE SIDEWALK.
  
 40. INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND THE SYMBOL SOUTH OF THE
 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY #1. THE SYMBOL CONSISTS
 OF A CIRCLE WITH A PLUS SIGN.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-18-2022 Time 16:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-18 16:47:31THE FOLLOWING NOTES WERE NOT ABLE TO BE INPUT INTO
 COMMUNITY PLUS AT THE TIME OF REVIEW DUE TO THE IT
 ISSUES WITH COMMUNITY PLUS. THE COMMENTS WERE EMAILED
 TO THE CONSULTANT AND ARE BEING ADDED TO COMMUNITY PLUS
 ON 10/18/2022 AS STORM #2. STORM #3 COMMENTS WILL
 ADDRESS THE 9/30/2022 RE-SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 8/26/2022 SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED ??? REVISED SURVEY NOT INCLUDED IN
 THE SUBMITTAL] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL
 DATUM CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] MOVE THE TRENCH DRAIN OUTSIDE THE RIGHT
 OF WAY OF PINE STREET.
  
 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? EXPLAIN HOW SEA LEVEL RISE
 WAS CONSIDERED] DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TO CONSIDER SEA
 LEVEL RISE ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND TAILWATER
 CONDITIONS.
  
 4. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE DIAMETER OF THE OUTFALL
 PIPE.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] WHAT WILL BE THE CONTRIBUTING AREA TO
 THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH UNDER THE DRIVEWAY TO N.
 FLAGLER DRIVE. THE HEAD ON THE TRENCH WILL BE LIMITED
 TO THE TRENCH DRAIN RIM ELEVATION.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] DESIGN ACCESS (HEIGHT CLEARANCE) TO
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS FOR MAINTENANCE AND FUTURE
 REPLACEMENT WHEN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ARE NO
 LONGER FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK AND PARKING EASEMENTS WILL BE
 NEEDED FOR SIDEWALKS AND ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 8. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE PIPE INVERTS DO NOT MATCH PLAN
 VIEW] PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE AND SHOW THE
 WEIR ELEVATION ON THE PGD PLANS.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] BLEEDERS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS.
  
 10. [SATISFIED ??? SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED PROPERTY
 LINES AT EACH END OF THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT] SHOW THE
 LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY ABANDONMENT.
  
 11. SHOW HOW ALLEY GRADING WILL TRANSITION TO EXISTING
 GRADE.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE
 OF ROADWAY TO FACE OF BUILDING(S). LABEL STREET NAME
 AND SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 SLOPES, BREAK POINTS, AND HORIZONTAL DISTANCES FROM
 RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO SURFACE FEATURES.
  
 13.[SATISFIED] PROVIDE SECTIONS AT ALL DRIVEWAYS FROM 5
 FEET FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO 5 FEET PAST HIGH POINT OF
 DRIVEWAY (OR TRENCH DRAIN). SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND
 DISTANCE FROM R/W TO EP, BACK OF SIDEWALK, HIGH
 POINT/TRENCH DRAIN.
  
 14. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING STORM PIPE ON PINE STREET
 WEST OF AND CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE
 SOUTHEAST OF STRUCTURE ST-31.
  
 15. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES IN
 THE RIGHT OF WAY (PIPE SIZE, MATERIAL, ETC.)
  
 16. [SATISFIED] LABEL PROPOSED CURBS AND GUTTERS.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATIONS ON THE PGD PLANS.
  
 18. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? INCLUDE MILL AND RESURFACE
 HATCHING IN THE SHEET LEGENDS.] SHOW MILL AND
 RESURFACING LIMITS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHIN THESE
 LIMITS.
  
 19. [SATISFIED] WATER MAIN MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 PROPOSED STRUCTURE ST-31.
  
 20. [SATISFIED] THERE APPEARS TO BE A LOW POINT IN THE
 EP IN FRONT OF THE DRIVEWAY TO BUTLER STREET OPPOSITE
 BROWARD AVE. HOW WILL THIS AREA IN FRONT OF THE
 DRIVEWAY DRAIN?
  
 21. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXISTING GRADES
 ALONG THE EP OF N. FLAGLER DRIVE, NORTH OF THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (8/26/2022 SUBMITTAL)
  
 22. SECTION A-A
  A. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.
  B. VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED.
  C. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE BACK OF
 SIDEWALK AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. ADD A CATCH
 BASIN ONTO THE 18 INCH STORM PIPE TO COLLECT RUNOFF
 WITHIN THE BUILDING.
  
 23. SECTION C-C
  A. MOVE SECTION ABOUT 20 FEET TO THE WEST TO FALL
 WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN THE SIDEWALKS AND
 THROUGH THE SEATWALLS.
  B. FG LINE APPEARS TO BE SHIFTED TO THE RIGHT. IF NOT
 THEN ABOUT 5 FEET OF SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE IS TOO STEEP.
  C. CONFIRM PROPOSED GRADE OF 6.01 (VS. 6.10 ON PGD
 PLAN).
  D. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 37.5 FEET.
  E. THE FLOOR OF THE BUILDING INTERIOR APPEARS TO HAVE
 10% SLOPE.
  F. SHEET A0.08 SHOWS A DOOR OPENING TO THE CAF?? SPACE
 WHERE THE PGD PLAN SHOWS SPOT GRADES BETWEEN 8.03 FEET
 AND 6.34 FEET NAVD ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING. CAF?? FFE
 IS 9.00 FEET NAVD.
  
 24. SECTION D-D
  A. NOT SHOWN ON KEY MAP.
  B. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.
  
 25. SECTION F-F
  A. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE
 PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY LINE, CONVERT ST-29 TO A CATCH
 BASIN AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. THIS WILL ALLOW
 ST-29 TO BE SMALLER THAN 7 FEET IN DIAMETER BY
 ELIMINATING THE SOUTH PIPE CONNECTION.
  B. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 25 FEET.
  
 26. SECTION G-G
  A. DIMENSIONS DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON SHEET
 C-400.
  B. SECTION SYMBOL ON KEY MAP SHOULD POINT TO THE WEST.
  C. WILL SIDEWALK HAVE A THICKENED EDGE? PROVIDE A
 DETAIL OF THE SIDEWALK IF SO.
  D. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALL.
  E. CREATE A SWALE OR BERM ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE TO
 PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  F. SHOW CURBING ADJACENT TO THE ISLAND AND IN-BOUND
 DRIVEWAY.
  
 27. SECTION H-H
  A. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALLS.
  B. WHY CAN???T THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK NEAREST THE R/W
 MATCH EXISTING GRADE?
  C. CREATE SWALE BEHIND EAST SITE WALL TO PREVENT
 RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO SIDEWALK.
  
 28. PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING 18-INCH PIPE CONNECTION TO
 TRENCH DRAIN.
  
 29. SECTION G-G SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY SLOPING TO THE
 NORTH. THE TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS N. FLAGLER DRIVEWAY
 NEEDS TO EXTEND TO NORTH CURB LINE.
  
 30. CONSIDER ADDING TRENCH DRAIN ALONG NORTH CURB LINE
 WEST OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING OF THE N. FLAGLER
 DRIVEWAY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS
 THE SIDEWALK CROSSING.
  
 31. DRIVEWAY APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE
 CONCRETE.
  
 32. CONSIDER MOVING SANITARY MANHOLE SS-05 OUT OF THE
 DRIVEWAY AND OUT OF THE SIDEWALK. COORDINATE WITH THE
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
  
 33. REMOVE STRUCTURES ST-28 AND ST-34 OUT OF THE ALLEY
 R/W.
  
 34. SOUTH EDGE OF ALLEY NEEDS TO MEET EXISTING GRADE AT
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 35. WILL SIDEWALK AT DROPOFF AREA BE FLUSH WITH
 PAVEMENT AND/OR HAVE THICKENED EDGE?
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-11-2022 Time 12:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-11-2022 Time 12:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-11 12:36:429. FLAGLER ASSEMBLAGE (Z22070008)
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION TO
 NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.
  
 2. MOVE THE TRENCH DRAIN OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY OF
 PINE STREET.
  
 3. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE ON
 THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND TAILWATER CONDITIONS.
  
 4. JUSTIFY THE DIAMETER OF THE OUTFALL PIPE.
  
 5. WHAT WILL BE THE CONTRIBUTING AREA TO THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH UNDER THE DRIVEWAY TO N. FLAGLER
 DRIVE. THE HEAD ON THE TRENCH WILL BE LIMITED TO THE
 TRENCH DRAIN RIM ELEVATION.
  
 6. DESIGN ACCESS (HEIGHT CLEARANCE) TO EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH SYSTEMS FOR MAINTENANCE AND FUTURE REPLACEMENT
 WHEN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ARE NO LONGER
 FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED.
  
 7. SIDEWALK AND PARKING EASEMENTS WILL BE NEEDED FOR
 SIDEWALKS AND ON-STREET PARKING SPACES OUTSIDE THE
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 8. PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE AND SHOW THE
 WEIR ELEVATION ON THE PGD PLANS.
  
 9. BLEEDERS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH
 SYSTEMS.
  
 10. SHOW THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY ABANDONMENT.
  
 11. SHOW HOW ALLEY GRADING WILL TRANSITION TO EXISTING
 GRADE.
  
 12. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF ROADWAY
 TO FACE OF BUILDING(S). LABEL STREET NAME AND SHOW
 RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SURFACE FEATURES AND SLOPES, BREAK
 POINTS, AND HORIZONTAL DISTANCES FROM RIGHT OF WAY LINE
 TO SURFACE FEATURES.
  
 13. PROVIDE SECTIONS AT ALL DRIVEWAYS FROM 5 FEET FROM
 EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO 5 FEET PAST HIGH POINT OF DRIVEWAY
 (OR TRENCH DRAIN). SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND DISTANCE
 FROM R/W TO EP, BACK OF SIDEWALK, HIGH POINT/TRENCH
 DRAIN.
  
 14. SHOW EXISTING STORM PIPE ON PINE STREET WEST OF AND
 CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE SOUTHEAST OF
 STRUCTURE ST-31.
  
 15. LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY (PIPE
 SIZE, MATERIAL, ETC.)
  
 16. LABEL PROPOSED CURBS AND GUTTERS.
  
 17. PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ON THE
 PGD PLANS.
  
 18. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS WITHIN THESE LIMITS.
  
 19. WATER MAIN MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED
 STRUCTURE ST-31.
  
 20. THERE APPEARS TO BE A LOW POINT IN THE EP IN FRONT
 OF THE DRIVEWAY TO BUTLER STREET OPPOSITE BROWARD AVE.
 HOW WILL THIS AREA IN FRONT OF THE DRIVEWAY DRAIN?
  
 21. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXISTING GRADES ALONG THE EP OF
 N. FLAGLER DRIVE, NORTH OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-18-2022 Time 07:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-18 07:24:09PASSED WITH CONDITION THAT WHEN CMUD/NMUD/LS 23 SEWER
 ASSESSMENT STUDY IS COMPLETED THAT CHANGES TO THE
 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE REQUIRED.
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS OF REPLAT AND DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
 STILL PERTAIN.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-18-2022 Time 11:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-18 11:21:041. WHERE IS SANITARY THAT FLOWS SOUTH ON DIXIE THEN
 EAST IN ALLEY TO BE RE-ROUTED IF 8" IN ALLEY IS
 REMOVED?
 2. 8" SANITARY IS TO BE REMOVED IN ALLEY YET LATERAL TO
 300 BUTLER TO REMAIN?
 3. LABEL SS-01 AS POINT OF SERVICE AND MOVE TO JUST
 INSIDE PROPERTY. MOVE LATERALS OUT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 4. PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES NEEDS TO APPROVE
 15' HEIGHT OF BUILDING OVER ALLEY EXIT.
 5. PREVIOUS COMMENTS OF REPLAT, EASEMENTS, ETC. STILL
 PERTAIN.
 6. PUBLIC UTILITIES IS REVIEWING ANY REQUIRED
 DOWNSTREAM IMPROVEMENTS.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-09-2022 Time 08:57 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 09:53:571. PROPOSED UTILITY LAYOUT WILL NEED TO BE EVALUATED.
 2. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 3. PROPOSED EXIT FROM ALLEY UNDER BUILDING WILL REQUIRE
 AN EASEMENT.
 4. WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OVER THE PROPOSED EXIT?
 5. PROPOSED UTILITIES CROSSING FLAGLER WILL REQUIRE A
 PRIVATE UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT.
 6. EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL NEED TO BE
 ABANDONED.
 7. 5' UE IN ORB 2563 P 550 NOT SHOWN. MISSING TITLE
 INFO. FOR #200 BUTLER.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 11-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-15-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-15-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-15 23:00:51APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED
 AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING:
 1) CORRECT THE DRIVEWAY ON PINE ST, WHICH IS
 OVEREXTENDING ON THE PEDESTRIAN AREA. TO BE REDUCED AND
 PROPER SIGN AND STOP BAR INSTALLED. FURTHER SAFETY
 MEASURES SUCH AS AUDIBLE OR VISIBLE WARNING MESSAGE
 AND/OR SIGNAGE SHOULD BE CONTEMPLATED
 2) REMOVE THE PARKING STALLS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
 FLAGLER BETWEEN BUTLER AND PINE
 3) RESTRIPE THAT BLOCK SO TO ACCOMMODATE A 5-FEET WIDE
 BIKE LANE, WITH A 2-FEET DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN THE
 SOUTHBOUND DIRECTION AND A NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE
 LANE
 4) INSTALLATION OF NO-PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF
 PINE ST FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AS THE
 TWO-WAY ROADWAY IS JUST 21-FEET WIDE
 5) INSTALLATION OF EAST-DIRECTIONAL NO-PARKING SIGNS ON
 BOTH SIDES OF BUTLER ST, 35-FEET UPSTREAM FROM THE
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING/STOP BAR AT THE FLAGLER
 INTERSECTION. ALSO INSTALL 2-FEET WIDE CHEVRON-STYLE
 PAVEMENT MARKERS ALONG THE NO-PARKING ZONE CURB
 6) PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS MENTIONED IN
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 7) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN ACCORDING TO
 CITY CODE SEC. 84-246
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY,
 WITHOUT THE TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY
 ASSUMPTION/CONDITION. A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO
 DISCUSS MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF
 POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE
 IDENTIFIED OR PREDICTED
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
 3) SATISFIED. PLEASE NUMBER EACH TABLE IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 4) SATISFIED. IN THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 SUMMARY TABLES PLEASE INSERT THE RESULTS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING SCENARIOS: EXISTING, FUTURE NO-PROJECT,
 FUTURE-WITH-PROJECT
 5) SATISFIED. IN A SEPARATE TABLE SHOWCASE EACH OF THE
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS (I.E. LEFT, RIGHT, STRAIGHT) THAT
 RESULTS IN A LEVEL OF SERVICE E OR F
 6) SATISFIED. THE QUEUE ANALYSIS SEEMS TO FOCUS ON
 DROP-OFF OPERATIONS ONLY, WHILE IGNORING POTENTIAL
 INSTANCES OF CONCURRENT PICK-UP ONES, WHICH ARE
 CONDUCTED AT THE SAME LOCATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS OR
 FURTHER ELABORATE SUCH CASES
 7) SATISFIED. IN APPENDIX C, PLEASE SHOW THE VALET
 PATHS ALONG THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE GARAGE. THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY DATED 10.26.22 IS MISSING APPENDIX C MATERIAL
 8) SATISFIED. IN APPENDIX C OR SHEET A-102 CLEARLY MARK
 THE VALET STALLS. THE TRAFFIC STUDY DATED 10.26.22 IS
 MISSING APPENDIX C MATERIAL
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET
 C-400 IS A STARTING POINT.
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE ALONG PINE AND BUTLER
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ALONG PINE AND BUTLER.
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE
 ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS SUBMITTED ON 8/26 IS NOT PROPER; THE
 CITY CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE REFERENCE ANALYSIS. SHOWCASE
 MANEUVERING OF A BOX TRUCK IN AND OUT OF EACH OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING ZONES. SHEET C-901 SHOWS SEVERAL
 ENCROACHMENTS ALONG EACH OF THE DEPICTED PATHS; PLEASE
 ELABORATE ON THE VEHICLE MOVEMENT/POSITION BY THE
 GARAGE RAMP-UP LOCATION.
 13) SATISFIED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS
 POINTS/DRIVEWAYS. CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A
 MAXIMUM TOTAL OF FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 14) SATISFIED. THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER ST,
 PER CITY CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS
 POINTS ONTO EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH
 75+ UNITS IS TWO. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 15) [OVERRULED] NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE
 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A
 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST
 FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT.
 GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO ACCESS THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS (BUTLER AND PINE
 ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT WARRANTED, AS IT
 FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 16) SATISFIED. INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE
 EASTERN PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE EXISTING
 EASTERN RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF BUTLER. IN
 CASE OF THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS
 WITH STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
 AND DETAILS FOR SUCH HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING. ALSO
 INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AT
 SUCH CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET FOR SUCH SAFETY
 ENHANCEMENT
 17) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE VALET
 LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
 CORROBORATED WITH VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN
 THE QUEUE ANALYSIS PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR
 EACH PROCESSING TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE
 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK
 TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR GARAGE). THE BUTLER ST LOCATION
 WOULD NOT PROPERLY OPERATE WITH A SINGLE LANE, AS THE
 QUEUE OF DROP-OFF VEHICLES WAITING TO BE PARKED WOULD
 BLOCK THE ONES MEANT FOR PICK-UP.
 18) SATISFIED. A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE PROVIDED AT EACH
 VALET SERVICE LOCATION. PROVIDE A BY-PASS LANE AT THE
 BUTLER VALET STATION OR PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS
 SHOWCASING THE U-TURN MANEUVER DEPICTED IN THE VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 19) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED AND FEASIBLE, AND FOR SAFETY
 PURPOSES, THE BUTLER DROP-OFF LOCATION MUST BE A
 MINIMUM OF 12-FEET WIDE. EVEN IF VALET OPERATIONS HAVE
 BEEN DISCONTINUED, SUCH LOCATION SHOULD BE WIDENED FOR
 SAKE OF SAFETY DUE TO THE FREQUENCY OF EITHER DRIVERS
 OR PASSENGERS GETTING IN/OUT OF THE VEHICLES;
 OTHERWISE, PLEASE CONSIDER REMOVING OR RELOCATING SUCH
 AREA. SAME COMMENT AND REQUIREMENT APPLY TO THE PINE
 STREET DROP-OFF LOCATION
 20) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A TURN-AROUND
 SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROPOSED
 TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT PROPER, THOSE CAN BE
 CONSIDERED BACK-OUT SPACES. ONE OF THE PARKING STALLS
 NEAR THE END WALLS MUST BE DESIGNATED, AND
 CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PROVIDED.
 UNLESS AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR EACH OF THE DEAD-ENDS
 PROVING THAT A 3-POINT TURN IS FEASIBLE, THE LATEST
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND AREAS ARE NOT SATISFACTORY. SHEET
 A-102, NORTHERN-EASTERN DEAD-END, CONVERT THE PROPOSED
 TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE RIGHT OF 2-25 TO A PARKING
 STALL AND DESIGNATE 2-27 AS THE TURNAROUND AREA. APPLY
 THE SAME CONVERSION TO THE NORTH-EASTERN DEAD-END IN
 SHEET A-103 AND A-104 FOR 3-25 AND 3-27, 4-25 AND 4-27,
 RESPECTIVELY. TURN-AROUND SPACE IS MISSING IN SHEET
 A-105 FOR THE NORTH-WEST DEAD-END
 21) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED
 LOADING ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
 22) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT
 NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM. PER CITY
 CODE SECTION 94 TABLE XV-3 THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ADA
 STALLS REQUIRED IS TWENTY (20). MOREOVER, THE NUMBER OF
 ADA STALLS SHOULD HAVE A MUCH HIGHER DISTRIBUTION ON
 THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE GARAGE.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 23) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE
 HANDICAP STALLS
 24) [NOT APPLICABLE] PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES. CONVERSATION WITH CITY
 STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. CITY CODE
 FOR CMUD CORE I DOES ENCOURAGE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM.
 MOREOVER, TDM WOULD BE STRONGLY RECOMMENDED IN THE CASE
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS INTERSECTION LOS DEGRADATION
 DUE TO THE VEHICULAR VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 25) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING] ALLEY
 SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY, IF
 ANY SANITATION VEHICLES WOULD BE TRAVERSING THE ALLEY,
 AS WELL AS REACH OUT TO EVERY AFFECTED PARCEL OWNER FOR
 NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL PURPOSES.
 26) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ALLEY ON
 THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE ACTUAL WIDTH OF
 THE ALLEY SHOULD BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED, INCLUSIVE OF
 BACKYARD LOTS, DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING STALLS OF THE
 ABUTTING PARCELS
 27) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING] PROVIDE
 AND SHOWCASE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ALONG THE ALLEY. NOTE: ONE-WAY SIGNS SHOULD BE
 INSTALLED THROUGHOUT ITS EXTENT AND ACCORDING TO
 ABUTTING PARCELS TRANSPORTATION CHARACTERISTICS
 28) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA
 ALONG PINE STREET.
 29) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING]
 RESTRIPE FLAGLER TO ACCOMMODATE A 11-FEET WIDE
 NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE, BEGINNING JUST NORTH
 OF THE HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. TO
 ACCOMMODATE SUCH FEATURE, REMOVE ALL ON-STREET PARKING
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER
 BETWEEN BUTLER AND PINE, AND INSTALL A 5-FEET WIDE BIKE
 LANE WITH A 2-FEET DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN LIEU OF THE
 PARKING STALLS
 30) [OVERRULED BY ADMIN] DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER SHOULD BE
 RIGHT-OUT ONLY. LEFT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS SHOULD BE
 FORBIDDEN. INSTALL CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE, CORRECT
 DRIVEWAY GEOMETRY, EXTEND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY MEDIAN
 ISLAND AND DESIGN ITS TERMINAL TO CHANNELIZE THE
 RIGHT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS AND IMPEDE THE LEFT-TURN
 ONES
 31) SATISFIED. IF ANY DRIVEWAY GATES ARE PROPOSED,
 PLEASE SHOWCASE THE 20-FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 32) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] INSTALL
 DIRECTIONAL (EAST-POINTING) NO-PARKING SIGN 40-FEET
 UPSTREAM FROM THE BUTLER AND FLAGLER INTERSECTION
 33) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] BASED ON
 THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES, INSTALL NO-PARKING SIGNS ALONG
 THE NORTHERN SIDE OF BUTLER IN ORDER TO FACILITATE
 LARGE VEHICLES TURNING MOVEMENTS
 34) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] INSTALL
 NO-PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD ALONG THE
 SECTION OF PINE STREET FRONTING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 35) SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF
 THE SIDEWALK NEARBY THE PINE ST DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE
 REDUCED, AS IT IS UNSAFELY HINDERING PEDESTRIAN FLOW IN
 THE PROXIMITY OF THE CROSSWALK
 36) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] PROVIDE A
 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS MENTIONED IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 37) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 SEC. 84-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-05-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-05 01:33:38TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY,
 WITHOUT THE TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY
 ASSUMPTION/CONDITION. A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO
 DISCUSS MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF
 POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE
 IDENTIFIED OR PREDICTED
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
 3) SATISFIED. PLEASE NUMBER EACH TABLE IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 4) SATISFIED. IN THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 SUMMARY TABLES PLEASE INSERT THE RESULTS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING SCENARIOS: EXISTING, FUTURE NO-PROJECT,
 FUTURE-WITH-PROJECT
 5) SATISFIED. IN A SEPARATE TABLE SHOWCASE EACH OF THE
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS (I.E. LEFT, RIGHT, STRAIGHT) THAT
 RESULTS IN A LEVEL OF SERVICE E OR F
 6) SATISFIED. THE QUEUE ANALYSIS SEEMS TO FOCUS ON
 DROP-OFF OPERATIONS ONLY, WHILE IGNORING POTENTIAL
 INSTANCES OF CONCURRENT PICK-UP ONES, WHICH ARE
 CONDUCTED AT THE SAME LOCATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS OR
 FURTHER ELABORATE SUCH CASES
 7) NOT SATISFIED. IN APPENDIX C, PLEASE SHOW THE VALET
 PATHS ALONG THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE GARAGE. THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY DATED 10.26.22 IS MISSING APPENDIX MATERIAL
 8) NOT SATISFIED. IN APPENDIX C OR SHEET A-102 CLEARLY
 MARK THE VALET STALLS. THE TRAFFIC STUDY DATED 10.26.22
 IS MISSING APPENDIX MATERIAL
 SITE COMMENTS
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET
 C-400 IS A STARTING POINT.
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE ALONG PINE AND BUTLER
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ALONG PINE AND BUTLER.
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE
 ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS SUBMITTED ON 8/26 IS NOT PROPER; THE
 CITY CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE REFERENCE ANALYSIS. SHOWCASE
 MANEUVERING OF A BOX TRUCK IN AND OUT OF EACH OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING ZONES. SHEET C-901 SHOWS SEVERAL
 ENCROACHMENTS ALONG EACH OF THE DEPICTED PATHS; PLEASE
 ELABORATE ON THE VEHICLE MOVEMENT/POSITION BY THE
 GARAGE RAMP-UP LOCATION.
 13) SATISFIED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS
 POINTS/DRIVEWAYS. CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A
 MAXIMUM TOTAL OF FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 14) SATISFIED. THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER ST,
 PER CITY CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS
 POINTS ONTO EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH
 75+ UNITS IS TWO. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 15) [OVERRULED] NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE
 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A
 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST
 FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT.
 GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO ACCESS THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS (BUTLER AND PINE
 ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT WARRANTED, AS IT
 FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 16) SATISFIED. INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE
 EASTERN PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE EXISTING
 EASTERN RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF BUTLER. IN
 CASE OF THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS
 WITH STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
 AND DETAILS FOR SUCH HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING. ALSO
 INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AT
 SUCH CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET FOR SUCH SAFETY
 ENHANCEMENT
 17) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE VALET
 LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
 CORROBORATED WITH VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN
 THE QUEUE ANALYSIS PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR
 EACH PROCESSING TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE
 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK
 TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR GARAGE). THE BUTLER ST LOCATION
 WOULD NOT PROPERLY OPERATE WITH A SINGLE LANE, AS THE
 QUEUE OF DROP-OFF VEHICLES WAITING TO BE PARKED WOULD
 BLOCK THE ONES MEANT FOR PICK-UP.
 18) SATISFIED. A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE PROVIDED AT EACH
 VALET SERVICE LOCATION. PROVIDE A BY-PASS LANE AT THE
 BUTLER VALET STATION OR PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS
 SHOWCASING THE U-TURN MANEUVER DEPICTED IN THE VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 19) NOT SATISFIED. IF APPROVED AND FEASIBLE, AND FOR
 SAFETY PURPOSES, THE BUTLER DROP-OFF LOCATION MUST BE A
 MINIMUM OF 12-FEET WIDE. EVEN IF VALET OPERATIONS HAVE
 BEEN DISCONTINUED, SUCH LOCATION SHOULD BE WIDENED FOR
 SAKE OF SAFETY DUE TO THE FREQUENCY OF EITHER DRIVERS
 OR PASSENGERS GETTING IN/OUT OF THE VEHICLES;
 OTHERWISE, PLEASE CONSIDER REMOVING OR RELOCATING SUCH
 AREA. SAME COMMENT AND REQUIREMENT APPLY TO THE PINE
 STREET DROP-OFF LOCATION
 20) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A
 TURN-AROUND SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE.
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT PROPER, THOSE CAN
 BE CONSIDERED BACK-OUT SPACES. ONE OF THE PARKING
 STALLS NEAR THE END WALLS MUST BE DESIGNATED, AND
 CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PROVIDED.
 UNLESS AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR EACH OF THE DEAD-ENDS
 PROVING THAT A 3-POINT TURN IS FEASIBLE, THE LATEST
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND AREAS ARE NOT SATISFACTORY. SHEET
 A-102, NORTHERN-EASTERN DEAD-END, CONVERT THE PROPOSED
 TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE RIGHT OF 2-25 TO A PARKING
 STALL AND DESIGNATE 2-27 AS THE TURNAROUND AREA. APPLY
 THE SAME CONVERSION TO THE NORTH-EASTERN DEAD-END IN
 SHEET A-103 AND A-104 FOR 3-25 AND 3-27, 4-25 AND 4-27,
 RESPECTIVELY. TURN-AROUND SPACE IS MISSING IN SHEET
 A-105 FOR THE NORTH-WEST DEAD-END
 21) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED
 LOADING ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
 22) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT
 NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM. PER CITY
 CODE SECTION 94 TABLE XV-3 THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ADA
 STALLS REQUIRED IS TWENTY (20). MOREOVER, THE NUMBER OF
 ADA STALLS SHOULD HAVE A MUCH HIGHER DISTRIBUTION ON
 THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE GARAGE.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 23) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE
 HANDICAP STALLS
 24) [NOT APPLICABLE] PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES. CONVERSATION WITH CITY
 STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. CITY CODE
 FOR CMUD CORE I DOES ENCOURAGE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM.
 MOREOVER, TDM WOULD BE STRONGLY RECOMMENDED IN THE CASE
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS INTERSECTION LOS DEGRADATION
 DUE TO THE VEHICULAR VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 25) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING] ALLEY
 SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY, IF
 ANY SANITATION VEHICLES WOULD BE TRAVERSING THE ALLEY,
 AS WELL AS REACH OUT TO EVERY AFFECTED PARCEL OWNER FOR
 NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL PURPOSES.
 26) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ALLEY ON
 THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE ACTUAL WIDTH OF
 THE ALLEY SHOULD BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED, INCLUSIVE OF
 BACKYARD LOTS, DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING STALLS OF THE
 ABUTTING PARCELS
 27) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING] PROVIDE
 AND SHOWCASE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ALONG THE ALLEY. NOTE: ONE-WAY SIGNS SHOULD BE
 INSTALLED THROUGHOUT ITS EXTENT AND ACCORDING TO
 ABUTTING PARCELS TRANSPORTATION CHARACTERISTICS
 28) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA
 ALONG PINE STREET.
 29) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING]
 RESTRIPE FLAGLER TO ACCOMMODATE A 11-FEET WIDE
 NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE, BEGINNING JUST NORTH
 OF THE HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. TO
 ACCOMMODATE SUCH FEATURE, REMOVE ALL ON-STREET PARKING
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER
 BETWEEN BUTLER AND PINE, AND INSTALL A 5-FEET WIDE BIKE
 LANE WITH A 2-FEET DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN LIEU OF THE
 PARKING STALLS
 30) [OVERRULED BY ADMIN] DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER SHOULD BE
 RIGHT-OUT ONLY. LEFT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS SHOULD BE
 FORBIDDEN. INSTALL CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE, CORRECT
 DRIVEWAY GEOMETRY, EXTEND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY MEDIAN
 ISLAND AND DESIGN ITS TERMINAL TO CHANNELIZE THE
 RIGHT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS AND IMPEDE THE LEFT-TURN
 ONES
 31) SATISFIED. IF ANY DRIVEWAY GATES ARE PROPOSED,
 PLEASE SHOWCASE THE 20-FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 32) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] INSTALL
 DIRECTIONAL (EAST-POINTING) NO-PARKING SIGN 40-FEET
 UPSTREAM FROM THE BUTLER AND FLAGLER INTERSECTION
 33) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] BASED ON
 THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES, INSTALL NO-PARKING SIGNS ALONG
 THE NORTHERN SIDE OF BUTLER IN ORDER TO FACILITATE
 LARGE VEHICLES TURNING MOVEMENTS
 34) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] INSTALL
 NO-PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD ALONG THE
 SECTION OF PINE STREET FRONTING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 35) SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF
 THE SIDEWALK NEARBY THE PINE ST DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE
 REDUCED, AS IT IS UNSAFELY HINDERING PEDESTRIAN FLOW IN
 THE PROXIMITY OF THE CROSSWALK
 36) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] PROVIDE A
 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS MENTIONED IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 37) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 SEC. 84-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-21-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-21-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-21-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-21 02:44:58TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY,
 WITHOUT THE TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY
 ASSUMPTION/CONDITION. A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO
 DISCUSS MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF
 POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE
 IDENTIFIED OR PREDICTED
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
 3) PLEASE NUMBER EACH TABLE IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 4) IN THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLES
 PLEASE INSERT THE RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS:
 EXISTING, FUTURE NO-PROJECT, FUTURE-WITH-PROJECT
 5) IN A SEPARATE TABLE SHOWCASE EACH OF THE VEHICULAR
 MOVEMENTS (I.E. LEFT, RIGHT, STRAIGHT) THAT RESULTS IN
 A LEVEL OF SERVICE E OR F
 6) THE QUEUE ANALYSIS SEEMS TO FOCUS ON DROP-OFF
 OPERATIONS ONLY, WHILE IGNORING POTENTIAL INSTANCES OF
 CONCURRENT PICK-UP ONES, WHICH ARE CONDUCTED AT THE
 SAME LOCATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS OR FURTHER ELABORATE
 SUCH CASES
 7) IN APPENDIX C, PLEASE SHOW THE VALET PATHS ALONG THE
 SECOND FLOOR OF THE GARAGE
 8) IN APPENDIX C OR SHEET A-102 CLEARLY MARK THE VALET
 STALLS
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET
 C-400 IS A STARTING POINT.
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE ALONG PINE AND BUTLER
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ALONG PINE AND BUTLER.
 12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
 GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
 OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
 ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED.
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS SUBMITTED ON 8/26 IS
 NOT PROPER; THE CITY CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE REFERENCE
 ANALYSIS. SHOWCASE MANEUVERING OF A BOX TRUCK IN AND
 OUT OF EACH OF THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONES. SHEET C-901
 SHOWS SEVERAL ENCROACHMENTS ALONG EACH OF THE DEPICTED
 PATHS; PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE VEHICLE
 MOVEMENT/POSITION BY THE GARAGE RAMP-UP LOCATION.
 13) SATISFIED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS
 POINTS/DRIVEWAYS. CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A
 MAXIMUM TOTAL OF FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 14) SATISFIED. THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER ST,
 PER CITY CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS
 POINTS ONTO EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH
 75+ UNITS IS TWO. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 15) [OVERRULED] NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE
 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A
 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST
 FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT.
 GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO ACCESS THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS (BUTLER AND PINE
 ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT WARRANTED, AS IT
 FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 16) SATISFIED. INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE
 EASTERN PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE EXISTING
 EASTERN RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF BUTLER. IN
 CASE OF THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS
 WITH STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
 AND DETAILS FOR SUCH HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING. ALSO
 INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AT
 SUCH CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET FOR SUCH SAFETY
 ENHANCEMENT
 17) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE VALET
 LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
 CORROBORATED WITH VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN
 THE QUEUE ANALYSIS PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR
 EACH PROCESSING TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE
 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK
 TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR GARAGE). THE BUTLER ST LOCATION
 WOULD NOT PROPERLY OPERATE WITH A SINGLE LANE, AS THE
 QUEUE OF DROP-OFF VEHICLES WAITING TO BE PARKED WOULD
 BLOCK THE ONES MEANT FOR PICK-UP.
 18) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE
 PROVIDED AT EACH VALET SERVICE LOCATION. PROVIDE A
 BY-PASS LANE AT THE BUTLER VALET STATION OR PROVIDE
 AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING THE U-TURN MANEUVER
 DEPICTED IN THE VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 19) IF APPROVED AND FEASIBLE, AND FOR SAFETY PURPOSES,
 THE BUTLER DROP-OFF LOCATION MUST BE A MINIMUM OF
 15-FEET WIDE
 20) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A
 TURN-AROUND SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE.
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT PROPER, THOSE CAN
 BE CONSIDERED BACK-OUT SPACES. ONE OF THE PARKING
 STALLS NEAR THE END WALLS MUST BE DESIGNATED, AND
 CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PROVIDED.
 UNLESS AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR EACH OF THE DEAD-ENDS
 PROVING THAT A 3-POINT TURN IS FEASIBLE, THE LATEST
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND AREAS ARE NOT SATISFACTORY
 21) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED
 LOADING ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
 22) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT
 NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM. PER CITY
 CODE SECTION 94 TABLE XV-3 THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ADA
 STALLS REQUIRED IS TWENTY (20). MOREOVER, THE NUMBER OF
 ADA STALLS SHOULD HAVE A MUCH HIGHER DISTRIBUTION ON
 THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE GARAGE.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 23) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE
 HANDICAP STALLS
 24) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES. CONVERSATION WITH CITY
 STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. CITY CODE
 FOR CMUD CORE I DOES ENCOURAGE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM.
 MOREOVER, TDM WOULD BE STRONGLY RECOMMENDED IN THE CASE
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS INTERSECTION LOS DEGRADATION
 DUE TO THE VEHICULAR VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 25) ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY. PLEASE
 COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING PREFERRED
 DIRECTIONALITY, IF ANY SANITATION VEHICLES WOULD BE
 TRAVERSING THE ALLEY, AS WELL AS REACH OUT TO EVERY
 AFFECTED PARCEL OWNER FOR NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL
 PURPOSES
 26) SHOWCASE THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ALLEY ON THE
 TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE ACTUAL WIDTH OF THE
 ALLEY SHOULD BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED, INCLUSIVE OF
 BACKYARD LOTS, DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING STALLS OF THE
 ABUTTING PARCELS
 27) PROVIDE AND SHOWCASE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE ALLEY. NOTE: ONE-WAY SIGNS
 SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT ITS EXTENT AND ACCORDING
 TO ABUTTING PARCELS TRANSPORTATION CHARACTERISTICS
 28) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA ALONG PINE
 STREET
 29) RESTRIPE FLAGLER TO ACCOMMODATE A 11-FEET WIDE
 NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE, BEGINNING JUST NORTH
 OF THE HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. TO
 ACCOMMODATE SUCH FEATURE, REMOVE ALL ON-STREET PARKING
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER
 BETWEEN BUTLER AND PINE, AND INSTALL A 5-FEET WIDE BIKE
 LANE WITH A 2-FEET DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN LIEU OF THE
 PARKING STALLS
 30) DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER SHOULD BE RIGHT-OUT ONLY.
 LEFT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS SHOULD BE FORBIDDEN.
 INSTALL CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE, CORRECT DRIVEWAY
 GEOMETRY, EXTEND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY MEDIAN ISLAND
 AND DESIGN ITS TERMINAL TO CHANNELIZE THE RIGHT-TURN
 OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS AND IMPEDE THE LEFT-TURN ONES
 31) IF ANY DRIVEWAY GATES ARE PROPOSED, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 THE 20-FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE
 SIDEWALK
 32) INSTALL DIRECTIONAL (EAST-POINTING) NO-PARKING SIGN
 40-FEET UPSTREAM FROM THE BUTLER AND FLAGLER
 INTERSECTION
 33) BASED ON THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES, INSTALL NO-PARKING
 SIGNS ALONG THE NORTHERN SIDE OF BUTLER IN ORDER TO
 FACILITATE LARGE VEHICLES TURNING MOVEMENTS
 34) INSTALL NO-PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD
 ALONG THE SECTION OF PINE STREET FRONTING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 35) THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK
 NEARBY THE PINE ST DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE REDUCED, AS IT IS
 UNSAFELY HINDERING PEDESTRIAN FLOW IN THE PROXIMITY OF
 THE CROSSWALK
 36) PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS MENTIONED IN
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY. IF NOT ADDRESSED DURING PPRC REVIEW,
 THIS COMMENT WILL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, AND MUST
 BE SATISFIED BEFORE ENGINEERING PERMITTING IS ISSUED
 37) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
 REFER TO CITY CODE SEC. 84-246 FOR DETAILS. IF NOT
 ADDRESSED DURING PPRC REVIEW, THIS COMMENT WILL BE A
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL, AND MUST BE SATISFIED BEFORE
 ENGINEERING PERMITTING IS ISSUED
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-07 14:20:56 
 1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY,
 WITHOUT THE TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY
 ASSUMPTION/CONDITION. A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO
 DISCUSS MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF
 POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE
 IDENTIFIED OR PREDICTED
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 AVAILABLE
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET
 C-400 IS A STARTING POINT.
 4) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN,
 PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB
 CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE ALONG PINE AND BUTLER
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ALONG PINE AND BUTLER
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE
 ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS SUBMITTED ON 8/26 IS NOT PROPER; THE
 CITY CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE REFERENCE ANALYSIS
 7) NOT SATISFIED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS
 POINTS/DRIVEWAYS. CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A
 MAXIMUM TOTAL OF FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 8) NOT SATISFIED. THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER
 ST, PER CITY CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF
 ACCESS POINTS ONTO EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL
 DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75+ UNITS IS TWO. PLEASE REVISE
 ACCORDINGLY. CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT
 INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING.
 9) NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO
 ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY
 HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT. GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO
 ACCESS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS
 (BUTLER AND PINE ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT
 WARRANTED, AS IT FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE
 REVISE ACCORDINGLY. CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID
 NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING.
 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 TO THE EASTERN PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE
 EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF
 BUTLER. IN CASE OF THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING
 EASTERN RAMPS WITH STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE
 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS AND DETAILS FOR SUCH
 HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING. ALSO INSTALL RECTANGULAR
 RAPID-FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AT SUCH CROSSING, PROVIDE
 A DETAIL SHEET FOR SUCH SAFETY ENHANCEMENT
 11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE
 VALET LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
 CORROBORATED WITH VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN
 THE QUEUE ANALYSIS PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR
 EACH PROCESSING TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE
 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK
 TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR GARAGE). THE BUTLER ST LOCATION
 WOULD NOT PROPERLY OPERATE WITH A SINGLE LANE, AS THE
 QUEUE OF DROP-OFF VEHICLES WAITING TO BE PARKED WOULD
 BLOCK THE ONES MEANT FOR PICK-UP.
 12) NOT SATISFIED. A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE PROVIDED AT
 EACH VALET SERVICE LOCATION. PROVIDE A BY-PASS LANE AT
 THE BUTLER VALET STATION.
 13) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A
 TURN-AROUND SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE.
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT PROPER, THOSE CAN
 BE CONSIDERED BACK-OUT SPACES. ONE OF THE PARKING
 STALLS NEAR THE END WALLS MUST BE DESIGNATED, AND
 PROPER PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PROVIDED
 14) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED
 LOADING ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE
 SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING
 SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE
 DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM.
 PER CITY CODE SECTION 94 TABLE XV-3 THE MINIMUM NUMBER
 OF ADA STALLS REQUIRED IS TWENTY (2). MOREOVER, THE
 NUMBER OF ADA STALLS SHOULD HAVE A MUCH HIGHER
 DISTRIBUTION ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE FIRST LEVEL OF
 THE GARAGE. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 16) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE
 HANDICAP STALLS
 17) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES. CONVERSATION WITH CITY
 STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-11-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-11-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-11 01:49:16TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1) PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY, WITHOUT THE
 TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY ASSUMPTION/CONDITION.
 A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS MITIGATION
 MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT
 IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE IDENTIFIED OR
 PREDICTED
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
  
 SITE PLANS COMMENTS:
 3) PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN
 FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING
 STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
 CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY
 LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET C-400 IS A STARTING
 POINT.
 4) IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 5) PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD FRONTING THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL
 PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS POINTS/DRIVEWAYS.
 CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A MAXIMUM TOTAL OF
 FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 8) THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER ST, PER CITY
 CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS ONTO
 EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75+ UNITS IS
 TWO. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 9) PER CITY CODE 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO ALL
 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY
 HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT. GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO
 ACCESS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS
 (BUTLER AND PINE ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT
 WARRANTED, AS IT FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE
 REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 10) INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE EASTERN
 PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE EXISTING EASTERN
 RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF BUTLER. IN CASE OF
 THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS WITH
 STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS AND
 DETAILS FOR SUCH HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING.
 11) PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE VALET LOCATIONS AND
 OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE CORROBORATED WITH
 VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN THE QUEUE ANALYSIS
 PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR EACH PROCESSING
 TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR
 GARAGE)
 12) A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE PROVIDED AT VALET SERVICE
 LOCATION
 13) PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A TURN-AROUND SPACE AT
 EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE
 14) CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED LOADING
 ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
 15) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM
 16) CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE HANDICAP
 STALLS
 17) PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
 STRATEGIES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 02-28-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 02-28-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 02-28-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-07 09:58:32FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS
 (SEE APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED ON 02.28.2023):
  
 1.) ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL:
 A. SHEETS L0.1.01 AND A0.000 SHOW TREE OVER LARGE WATER
 SERVICE. TREE TRUNKS CANNOT BE LOCATED OVER WATER
 SERVICE AND MUST HAVE SUFFICIENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
 AWAY FROM THEM.
 B. SHEETS L0.1.01 AND A0.00 SHOW SQUARE OBJECT
 APPROXIMATELY 22 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST FIRELINE
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. PLEASE LABEL WHAT IT IS ON THOSE
 PLANS AND ALSO SHOW AND LABEL IT ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 C. SHEET A0.00 SHOWS TREE EAST OF NORTHEAST FIRELINE
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY THAT MAY BE TOO CLOSE TO THE SERVICE
 LINE. PLEASE ENSURE THERE IS SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE
 DISTANCE.
  
 2.) ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE CITY'S
 TRAFFIC ENGINEER AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL:
 A. CORRECT THE DRIVEWAY ON PINE STREET, WHICH IS
 OVEREXTENDING INTO THE PEDESTRIAN AREA. TO BE REDUCED
 AND PROPERTY SIGN AND STOP BAR INSTALLED. FURTHER
 SAFETY MEASURES SUCH AS AUDIBLE OR VISIBLE WARING
 MESSAGE AND/OR SIGNAGE SHOULD BE CONTEMPLATED.
 B. REMOVE PARKING STALLS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE, BETWEEN BUTLER STREET AND PINE STREET.
 C. RESTRIPE THAT BLOCK SO TO ACCOMMODATE A 5-FOOT WIDE
 BIKE LANE, WITH A 2-FOOT DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN THE
 SOUTHBOUND DIRECTION AND A NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE
 LANE.
 D. INSTALLATION OF NO PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF
 PINE STREET FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AS THE
 TWO-WAY ROADWAY IS JUST 21-FEET WIDE.
 E. INSTALLATION OF EAST-DIRECTIONAL NO PARKING SIGNS ON
 BOTH SIDES OF BUTLER STREET, 35-FEET UPSTREAM FROM THE
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING/STOP BAR AT THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 INTERSECTION. ALSO INSTALL 2 FEET WIDE CHEVRON-STYLE
 PAVEMENT MARKERS ALONG THE NO PARKING ZONE CURB.
 F. PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN.
 G. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN.
  
 3.) ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE CITY'S
 STORMWATER ENGINEER AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL:
 A. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
 MEET THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
 (SFWMD) ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT (ERP) CRITERIA.
 B. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ACCOMMODATE THE STORMWATER
 RUNOFF FROM THE ALLEY WITHOUT IMPACT TO ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES AND WITHOUT THE STORMWATER RUNOFF FLOWING
 OVER THE SIDEWALK TO REACH THE CURB AND GUTTER ALONG
 THE STREET.
 C. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE YARD
 DRAIN/CURB DRAIN SYSTEM (INCLUDING MAINTAINING THE
 SIDEWALK FLAGS ADJACENT TO THE DRAINS AND THE CURB AND
 GUTTER THE PIPES ARE PENETRATING) DRAINING THE SWALE
 USED TO CONVEY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE ALLEY.
 D. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE FLOW TO DRAIN
 STRUCTURES FOR ALL CURBS AND CURBS AND GUTTERS ALONG
 ITS STREET FRONTAGES.
 E. SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL HAVE
 FLATTEST LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AS POSSIBLE AND NOT EXCEED
 5 PERCENT. CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 PERCENT.
 F. SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL HAVE THE
 FLATTEST LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AS POSSIBLE AND NOT EXCEED
 5 PERCENT. CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 PERCENT.
  
 4.) TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY BUILDING HEIGHT BONUS OF
 145 FEET FOR THE PROJECT, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE
 REQUIRED TO MAKE A $3,625,000 CONTRIBUTION TO THE
 CITY'S CURRIE PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND. THE CONTRIBUTION
 TO THE CURRIE PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND SHALL BE MADE PRIOR
 TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (C.O.).
  
 5.) TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY BUILDING HEIGHT BONUS OF 20
 FEET, THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN LEED SILVER
 CERTIFICATION FROM THE LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND
 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED) OR A SIMILAR NATIONALLY
 ACCREDITED ORGANIZATION. ALL REQUIREMENTS AND
 TIMEFRAMES TO OBTAIN A LEED SILVER CERTIFICATION SHALL
 BE MET IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-215(K)(2)(VII)(D) OF
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS).
  
 6.) TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY BUILDING HEIGHT BONUS OF 30
 FEET, THE PROJECT SHALL DESIGN THE 30-FOOT WIDE FLAGLER
 DRIVE PARKWAY ALONG THE DEVELOPMENT'S FLAGLER DRIVE
 FRONTAGE AN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
 OF SEC. 94-215(M)(4) OF THE ZLDRS. A PARKWAY EASEMENT
 SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 7.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 8.) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY HARDSCAPE, LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
 APPROVED BY THIS PETITION.
  
 9.) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE HARDSCAPE,
 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 10.) A REPLAT OF THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY (C.O.).
  
 11.) THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT FOR ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL (PERMIT) AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF
 FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 12.) THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE REQUIRED THAT WHEN THE
 CITY'S CURRIE MIXED USE DISTRICT (CMUD)/ NORTHWOOD
 MIXED USE DISTRICT (NMUD)/LIFT STATION (LS) SEWER
 ASSESSMENT STUDY IS COMPLETED THAT CHANGES TO THE
 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 13.) THE PROPOSED UTILITIES CROSSING FLAGLER DRIVE
 SHALL REQUIRE A PRIVATE UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT
 PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING PERMIT FOR
 THIS DEVELOPMENT.
  
 14.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW
 CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN
 EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
 ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $500,000, ARE SUBJECT TO
 THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT PURSUANT TO SEC. 78-129 OF
 THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-03-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 11-03-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 11-03-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-03 16:14:52ALL PREVIOUS ZONING COMMENTS WITH THE TECHNICAL REVIEW
 HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN THE 10/28/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.
 CONDITIONS TO MINOR CLEAN-UP CORRECTIONS TO FOLLOW.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-21-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 10-21-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 10-21-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-21 11:13:46***THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO THE 9/30/2022
 RESUBMITTAL PACKET. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED
 PRIOR TO PLANNING BOARD (STAFF TO WORK WITH THE
 ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ADDRESS CORRECTIONS
 FOR CONSISTENCY) ***
  
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS:
  
 1.) SHEET A0-00 (OVERALL SITE PLAN):
  
 A.) PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS NEED TO
 BE CLARIFIED. PLEASE NOTE THAT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS
 ONLY REQUIRED IN THE TRANSITIONS SUB-DISTRICT AT A
 MINIMUM OF 3% OF THE OVERALL TRANSITION SUB-DISTRICT
 LOT AREA.
  
 B.) THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)
 SHALL ALIGN WITH THE CORRECTED OPEN SPACE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHEET
 L0-0-05).
  
  
 2.) SHEET A0.01 (SITE DATA AND DIAGRAMS):
  
 A.) EXPLAIN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE EAST LOT AREA
 (118,715 SQ. FT.) AND THE WEST LOT AREA (6,547 SQ.
 FT.). THE CALCULATIONS DO NOT ADD UP AT STAFF???S END.
  
 B.) THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)
 SHALL ALIGN WITH THE CORRECTED OPEN SPACE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHEET
 L0-0-05).
  
  
 3.) SHEET A0.04 (BUILDING SETBACKS):
  
 A.) THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK ALONG PINE
 STREET IS 10 FT. LEVELS 2-26 SPECIFIES A BUILDING
 SETBACK OF 7 FT. PLEASE ADDRESS. PERMITTED BALCONY
 ENCROACHMENT (ALTHOUGH IT SHOULD BE DIMENSIONED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS) SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE
 PROVIDED BUILDING SETBACKS. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
  
 4.) SHEET A0.06 (BUILDING AREAS):
  
 A.) ACCORDING TO THE ADA CALCULATIONS, 18 ADA PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED BASED ON A 2% REQUIREMENT; HOWEVER,
 PER ZLDR S. 94-485, TABLE XV-3, PROVIDING BETWEEN
 501-1,000 PARKING SPACES REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 20 + ONE
 FOR EACH 100 OVER 1,000 PARKING SPACES. THEREFORE, THE
 PROJECT FALLS SHORT 2 ADA PARKING SPACES (A MINIMUM OF
 20 ADA PARKING SPACES IS REQUIRED). (REFERENCE: TABLE
 5)
  
 B.) ADA PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED IN TABLE 3 NEEDS
 TO BE CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 C.) ADA PARKING INFORMATION PROVIDED IN TABLE 4 NEEDS
 TO BE CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY
  
 D.) IN TABLE 4, PARKING RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX FOR THE
 WEST TOWER, THE PARKING ADDS UP TO 175 PARKING SPACES;
 HOWEVER, ONLY 174 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED ACCORDING
 TO THE OTHER TABLES. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 E.) FOR COMMERCIAL LOADING CALCULATIONS, THE PROPOSED
 RETAIL CALCULATIONS (32,180 SQ. FT.) IS DIFFERENT FROM
 31,788 SQ. FT. (WHICH APPEARS TO BE THE CONSISTENT
 NUMBER THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SHEETS). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY. ALSO MAKE NOTE OF THE 60 FT. X 15 FT.
 COMMERCIAL LOADING SPACE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
  
 5.) SHEET A0.07 (OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS):
  
 A.) THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY INCENTIVE AREA CANNOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARDS THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT AND
 SHOULD BE ELIMINATED FROM THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAM.
  
 B.) THE PROPOSED CAF?? SEATING AREA IS SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AS PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SHOULD
 BE INCLUDED IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS AND
 DIAGRAM.
  
 C.) THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)
 SHALL ALIGN WITH THE CORRECTED OPEN SPACE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHEET
 L0-0-05).
  
  
 6.) SHEET A0.08 (ACTIVE USES ??? DIAGRAM):
  
 A.) DIMENSION OUT THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF THE ACTIVE USE
 LINERS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
  
 7.) SHEET A0.10 (PLANAR BREAK DIAGRAMS):
  
 A.) SHOW DEPTH DIMENSION OF PLANAR BREAK ON PINE STREET
 AT THE GROUND LEVEL. DIMENSIONS ARE STILL MISSING.
  
 B.) SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROVIDED PLANER
 BREAKS ON THE GROUND LEVEL OF PINE STREET. SOMETHING
 DOES NOT ADD UP.
  
 C.) SHOW DEPTH DIMENSIONS FOR THE PLANER BREAKS ON PINE
 STREET FROM LEVELS 2-5. DIMENSIONS ARE STILL MISSING.
  
  
 8.) SHEETS A-102 AND A-102W (LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLANS):
  
 A.) REAR TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHOW WHEEL STOPS WHICH
 ILLUSTRATES A CONFLICT WITH ACCESS FOR TANDEM PARKING.
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
  
 9.) SHEETS A-103 AND A-103W (LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLANS):
  
 A.) REAR TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHOW WHEEL STOPS WHICH
 ILLUSTRATES A CONFLICT WITH ACCESS FOR TANDEM PARKING.
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
  
 10.) SHEET A-200 (SOUTH ELEVATION):
  
 A.) SHOW TREATMENT OF THE BUILDING AT THE PODIUM LEVEL
 ON THE WEST SIDE.
  
 B.) MOVE THE DIMENSION FOR THE PODIUM (BUT KEEP THE
 DIMENSION), IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE BUILDING FA??ADE
 DETAIL ON THE WESTERN PORTION AT THE PODIUM.
  
  
 11.) SHEET A-203 (WEST ELEVATION):
  
 A.) MUST ADDRESS THE BLANK WALL WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT STANDARDS PER ZLDR S.94-209.
  
  
 12.) SHEETS A-204, 500, 501, 502 AND 600 (SIGNAGE
 NOTE):
  
 A.) AMEND SIGNAGE NOTE (NOTE IV) TO STATE THE
 FOLLOWING: "ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS." THIS IS TO AVOID ANY
 SUBMISSION OF SIGNAGE DETAILS AT THIS TIME, AS SIGNAGE
 (AS LONG AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZLDRS), CAN BE
 REVIEWED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT.
  
  
  
 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL:
  
 ** NOTE: KEY PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE
 ON-STREET PARKING ON BUTLER STREET AND MUST BE
 ADDRESSED FOR CONSISTENCY **
  
 1.) SHEET L0-0-01 (SHEET INDEX):
  
 A.) THE NUMBERING IS OFF FOR THE LANDSCAPE SHEET
 NUMBERS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
  
 2.) SHEET L0-1-01 (OVERALL SITE PLAN):
  
 A.) PLEASE NOTE THAT #1 AND #9 ??? DROP OFF, CANNOT BE
 RESERVED SOLELY FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING/USES WITHIN
 THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. STAFF SUGGESTS CHANGING THE
 NOTE TO ON-STREET PARKING.
  
 B.) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART
 HAS AN ISSUE WITH THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART LOCATION AND
 THAT IT MAY NEED TO GET MOVED (#13).
  
  
 3.) SHEET L0-0-05 (PERMIT INFORMATION):
  
 A.) LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED FOR
 ACCURACY PER LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
  
 4.) SHEETS L3-1-03, L3-1-04, L5-1-04 (ONSTREET PARKING
 ON BUTLER):
  
 A.) AMEND SHEETS TO REFLECT THE CHANGES TO REMOVE ON
 STREET DROP-OFF FOR AND REPLACE WITH ON-STREET PARKING.
 THIS CAN EASILY BE ADDRESSED BY MODIFYING THE CAD
 LAYERS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 09-12-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 09-12-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-15 11:15:29GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION
 MEETING(S) WITH THE APPLICANT, PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CRITICAL (AND PRIOR TO THE
 FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PROJECT). HAS THIS BEEN
 ACCOMPLISHED?
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. PER THE
 APPLICANT'S 8/26 RESPONSE LETTER TO PPRC COMMENTS, TWO
 MEETINGS HAVE BEEN HELD (ONE IN PERSON ON 8/3/22 AND
 ONE VIRTUALLY ON 8/3/22). STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY
 DETAILED INFORMATION (I.E. NUMBER OF ATTENDEES,
 FEEDBACK/RESULTS, SIGN-IN SHEETS, ETC.) ON THE MEETINGS
 (PARTIAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE FIRST PUBLIC
 OUTREACH). PLEASE SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION TO STAFF. ALSO,
 ARE THERE ANY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO PROVIDE FROM
 THE FIRST PUBLIC OUTREACH MEETING?]
  
  
 2.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SCHOOL DISTRICT ON THE PROCESS TO OBTAIN THE SCAD
 LETTER.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: THE SCAD LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED.
 ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT'S 8/26/22 RESPONSE LETTER,
 THE SCAD LETTER WILL BE PROVIDED DIRECTLY TO THE ZONING
 DEPARTMENT WHEN RECEIVED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT
 WILL NOT PROCEED TO THE PUBLIC HEARING STAGE UNTIL THE
 SCAD LETTER IS PROVIDED TO STAFF.]
  
  
 3.) A TPS LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY- TRAFFIC
 DIVISION IS REQUIRED.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: THE TPS LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED.
 ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT'S 8/26/22 RESPONSE LETTER,
 THE TPS LETTER WILL BE PROVIDED ONCE OBTAINED. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT PROCEED TO THE PUBLIC
 HEARING STAGE UNTIL THE TPS LETTER IS PROVIDED TO
 STAFF.]
  
  
 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. ACCORDING TO THE
 APPLICANT'S 8/26/22 RESPONSE LETTER, COORDINATION WITH
 THE UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS IS ONGOING.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT PROCEED TO THE
 PUBLIC HEARING STAGE UNTIL WRITTEN CONFIRMATION STATING
 THAT THERE IS SERVICE AVAILABILITY IS PROVIDED TO
 STAFF.]
  
  
 5.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND
 COMCAST.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED AND NO EXPLANATION
 PROVIDED IN THE 8/26/22 RESPONSE LETTER TO THE STAFF'S
 COMMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LETTERS AT YOUR
 EARLIEST CONVENIENCE.]
  
  
 6.) THE ADDRESS LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. ALTHOUGH THE 8/26/22
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE ADDRESS LIST HAS BEEN
 INCLUDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET, THE REQUIRED
 EXECUTED ADDRESS LIST AFFIDAVIT COULD NOT BE FOUND
 ANYWHERE IN THE RESUBMITTAL.]
  
  
 7.) ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: THIS COMMENT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN
 MISSED. A MINIMUM, STAFF EXPECTS TO SEE A NOTE PROVIDED
 IN THE PLANS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.]
  
  
 8.) THERE IS A DISCREPANCY IN THE UNIT TYPE
 CALCULATIONS FOR 2BR+D AND 3 BR UNITS IN THE
 RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX TABULAR AND THE PARKING
 RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX TABULAR FOR THE EAST TOWER (SHEET
 A0.06). THIS WILL ALSO IMPACT THE PARKING CALCULATIONS.
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
  
  
 FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM:
  
 1.) AS MENTIONED IN THE SITE PLAN COMMENTS, THERE
 SHOULD BE A MASTER SITE PLAN SHOWING ALL CRITICAL
 DIMENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS. THE INFORMATION TO THE
 PARKWAY SYSTEM SPEARS TO BE PIECEMEAL (ON-GOING ISSUE),
 THAT CREATES A LOT OF CONFUSION AND INCONSISTENCY.
 STAFF WILL CONTACT THE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS AND
 RESOLVE.
  
 2.) CAN THE LANDSCAPED RAISED PLANTERS INCORPORATE
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY WITHIN THE RAISED ELEVATIONS TO
 EXTEND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE
 PARKWAY? ADDITIONAL COORDINATION MAY BE REQUIRED WITH
 THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE
 ARCHITECT AND ARCHITECT.
  
 3.) IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE ART (I.E.
 SLAB, SPACE RESERVED FOR THE ART). ALSO, HAS THIS BEEN
 BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ART IN PUBLIC SPACES
 COORDINATOR?
  
 4.) ALTHOUGH THE 8/26/22 RESPONSE TO PPRC COMMENTS
 STATES THAT LIGHTING IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THIS
 PROJECT, NO LIGHTING PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AS PART OF
 THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. BASED ON THE RESPONSE, A
 LIGHTING PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED ONCE THE FINAL PLANTING
 LAYOUT IS COORDINATED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIGHTING PLAN.
 THE LIGHTING PLANS MUST INCLUDE THE LOCATION OF ALL
 FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION.
  
 5.) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE RETAINING
 WALL (I.E. HEIGHT, ETC.). AS NOTED ABOVE, IT WOULD BE
 IDEAL TO ACTIVATE THE ENTIRE AREA OF THE PARKWAY. THE
 ELEVATIONAL CHANGES SHOULD ALSO BE DEPICTED
 CONSISTENTLY THROUGHOUT THE PLANS.
  
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT:
  
 IN THE REVISED 8/29/2022 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT:
  
 1.) CONFIRM THE GROUND FLOOR RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 33,205 (PLANS INDICATE 32,180 SQ. FT.).
  
 2.) CONFIRM SIZE OF THE SITE (EMAIL SENT TO JLONG ON
 8/31/22 REQUESTING CLARIFICATION; AWAITING RESPONSE).
  
 3.) IN THE LAND USE AND ZONING TABLE: EAST ALSO
 CONTAINS CMUD-CORE I/OFFICE BUILDING (1923/1925 N.
 FLAGLER DR.)
  
 4.) CHECK RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND CORRECT NUMBERS (IF
 NECESSARY) FOR CONSISTENCY. STATEMENT SHOWS 28440 SQ.
 FT. AND PLANS INDICATE 27,415 SQ. FT.
  
 5.) BUILDING HEIGHT STATEMENT WITHIN THE
 CMUD-TRANSITION SUB-DISTRICT (172 FT.) EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT FOR THE SUB-DISTRICT (163 FT.
 PER ZLDRS).
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS MUST BE
 SHOWN ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AND THE BUILDING SETBACK
 ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THIS RANGE
 AT THE PODIUM/GROUND LEVEL. THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 SETBACK INFORMATION CANNOT BE FOUND. [ZLDR S.94-215]
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: WHAT IS THE SETBACK OF THE WALL OF THE
 GROUND LEVEL TO THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE?
 IS IT WITHIN THE 45 FT. MAXIMUM SETBACK? STAFF DID NOT
 SEE ANY DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS.]
  
  
 2.) IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE 8/17/22 MEETING BETWEEN THE
 APPLICANT'S DESIGN TEAM AND STAFF THAT THE DROP OFF
 LOCATIONS CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. IT SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON PINE
 STREET; HOWEVER, THIS IS STILL AN ISSUE ALONG BUTLER
 STREET (AND IT ALSO CREATES AN ADDITIONAL CURB CUT -
 WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF CURB CUTS
 FOR THE PROJECT). THIS CAN EASILY BE RESOLVED AND WILL
 PROVIDE FOR A BETTER DESIGN BY INCORPORATING ON-STREET
 PARKING WITH A WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG BUTLER STREET.
  
 3.) IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE 8/17/22 MEETING BETWEEN THE
 APPLICANT'S DESIGN TEAM AND STAFF THAT THE CROSSWALKS
 AT THE VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS (INTO THE PROJECT
 GARAGE) SHOULD HAVE A CHANGE OF TACTILE SURFACE TEXTURE
 TO EMPHASIZE THE CROSSWALK AND ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN
 SAFETY. THIS MUST BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND THE
 MATERIAL PROPOSED MUST BE IDENTIFIED. ALL PLANS MUST BE
 MADE CONSISTENT (NOT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT).
  
 4.) PLANS APPEAR TO INDICATE THAT THERE ARE BICYCLE
 RACKS AT THE STREET LEVEL (SEE SHEET L34-01 DETAIL);
 HOWEVER, THE LOCATION OF THESE RACKS ARE NOT PROVIDED
 IN THE SITE PLAN. ALSO, IF THESE RACKS ARE PROVIDED, A
 DETAIL THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE
 PARKING STANDARDS IS REQUIRED.
  
 5.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF IN THE PREAPPLICATION
 MEETING, IT IS IMPORTANT TO REACH OUT TO THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE IF THE EXISTING ALLEY IS
 A SERVICE ALLEY AND IF IT IS NECESSARY TO BE MAINTAINED
 AND/OR IF OTHER ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO
 MAINTAIN SERVICE WITHIN THE ALLEY (IF APPLICABLE). HAS
 THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BEEN CONTACTED PRIOR TO THE
 FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THIS APPLICATION?
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT RESOLVED. THE APPLICANT???S 8/26
 /22 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT COORDINATION WITH THE
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS ONGOING. PLANNING STAFF WILL
 REQUIRE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT STATING THAT
 CONCERNS/ISSUES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED FOR THE PROJECT TO
 PROCEED.]
  
  
 6.) ALL VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM
 WIDTH OF 24 FT. AT THE PROPERTY LINE. IT APPEARS THAT
 THIS MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN EXCEEDED.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. THE ACCESS POINT ALONG
 FLAGLER DRIVE EXCEEDS THE 24 FT. WIDTH LIMITATION AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE.]
  
  
 7.) A SITE PLAN SHEET, CONTAINING ALL REQUIRED
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST
 (REFERENCE: PAGE 16 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION) SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ALL REQUIRED ZONING
 INFORMATION AND ALL NECESSARY DIMENSIONS ILLUSTRATED IN
 THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS (NOT PIECEMEAL OVER VARIOUS
 SHEETS). ADDITIONAL SHEETS MAY BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED TO
 STAFF'S SATISFACTION. A MASTER SITE PLAN SHEET
 CONTAINING ALL THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN CHECKLIST SHALL BE PROVIDED, WITH ALL REQUIRED
 ZONING INFORMATION AND ALL NECESSARY DIMENSIONS
 ILLUSTRATED IN THE SITE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE ZLDRS AND RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROJECT WITH THE
 ABUTTING PUBLIC REALM. THE INFORMATION STILL APPEARS TO
 BE PIECEMEAL ON MULTIPLE SHEETS. STAFF IS REQUESTING A
 MEETING BETWEEN ZONING AND
  
  
 8.) LANDSCAPING STAFF AND THE ARCHITECT AND LANDSCAPE
 ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THE ELEMENTS OF THE REQUIRED SITE
 PLAN AND HOW THIS COMMENT CAN BE RESOLVED.]
  
 9.) THE BREAKDOWN OF THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS SHALL
 BE PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE SPECIFIC
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CORE I AND TRANSITION
 SUB-DISTRICTS. [SPEAK TO RAY C]
  
  
 10.) PLEASE CLARIFY/CORRECT THE OVERALL LOT SIZE OF THE
 PROJECT. THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY WITH THE
 NUMBERS.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. EMAIL SENT TO THE
 APPLICANT (JLONG) ON 8/31/22 REQUESTING VERIFICATION ON
 THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY,
 AS THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES IN THE SURVEY THAT WILL
 IMPACT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PROJECT PLANS.
 STAFF IS STILL AWAITING ON THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE.]
  
  
 11.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT. THE NUMBERS ARE INCONSISTENT
 IN THE PLAN SHEETS (I.E. 28,605 SQ. FT. VS. 28,500 SQ.
 FT.).
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE HAS ALSO CHANGED AND DO NOT MATCH INFORMATION
 PROVIDED IN THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT'S 8/26/22
 RESPONSE LETTER PROVIDES 33,205 SQ. FT. AND THE
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS SHOW 32,180 SQ. FT.
 OF COMMERCIAL. PLEASE PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE
 COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS AND ENSURE THE
 NUMBERS ARE CONSISTENT.]
  
  
 12.) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGE FACILITY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL TENANTS AND SHALL
 BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200 FT. OF
 THE BUILDING ENTRANCE FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN
 50,000 SQ. FT. IN GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS FACILITY IS
 NOT PRESENT IN THE DESIGN.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. IT IS NOTED IN THE
 8/26/22 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE SHOWER AND
 CHANGE ROOM FACILITY IS PROVIDED ON SHEET A101 (GROUND
 LEVEL) HOWEVER, THE FACILITY HAS NOT BEEN FOUND.]
  
  
 13..) THERE APPEARS TO BE RETAINING WALLS ALONG THE
 PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION (I.E. HEIGHT, LOCATION, INTERACTION WITH
 SURROUNDING PUBLIC SPACES, ETC.) AND CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE
 IN THE PLANS HOW THE WALLS WILL MAINTAIN ACTIVITY AND
 INTERACTION WITH THE PUBLIC SPACE(S). ALSO, IT APPEARS
 THE RETAINING WALL GOES INTO THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY
 WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE PARKWAY AS IT
 PROVIDES A DIVISION FROM THE USE OF PUBLIC SPACE.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE STAFF'S COMMENT REGARDING
 THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY.]
  
  
 14.) CLEARLY SHOW THE SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN PATH ALONG
 THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. PER THE CMUD REGULATIONS,
 A MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH OF 5 FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ADJACENT TO THE REQUIRED 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA
 ALONG THE STREET EDGE. TREE GRATES MAY BE PROVIDED IN
 LIEU OF LANDSCAPED AREA IF ON-STREET PARKING IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. IT IS IMPORTANT
 TO PROVIDE A MASTER SITE PLAN SHEET WITH ALL THE
 CRITICAL DIMENSIONS. SHEETS APPEAR TO BE PIECEMEAL (AN
 ONGOING ISSUE) THAT CREATES A LOT OF CONFUSION (A LONG
 WITH THE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PLAN SHEETS). THE
 MASTER SITE PLAN IS ALSO REQUIRED TO SHOW THE
 RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROJECT TO THE PUBLIC REALM. STAFF
 WILL SCHEDULE A CALL ASAP WITH THE ARCHITECT AND/OR
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS AND RESOLVE.]
  
  
 15.) ARE THERE ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ALONG THE EAST
 SIDE OF FLAGLER DRIVE AT THIS TIME?
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: A CONCRETE PAD IS NOW SHOWN WITHIN THE
 PARCEL ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF FLAGLER DRIVE. STAFF WAS
 REFERRING TO ANY LANDSCAPE OR SIDEWALK/CONNECTION
 IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE PROJECT IN THE PREVIOUS ROUND OF
 COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE NO IMMEDIATE PLANS FOR THE
 CONCRETE PAD, STAFF WOULD SUGGEST THAT THAT CONCRETE
 PAD IS REMOVED UNTIL PLANS FOR THE SPACE IS CLEAR AND
 READY TO PROCEED. ELECTRICAL SUPPORT DOES NOT REQUIRE A
 CONCRETE PAD OF THE SIZE PROPOSED.]
  
  
 16.) THERE APPEARS TO BE ISSUES WITH THE LAYERING OF
 DATA IN THE BUILDING SETBACKS SHEET (A0.04), WHICH HAS
 CREATED ERRORS/INCONSISTENCIES ((WITH OTHER PLAN
 SHEETS). PLEASE ADDRESS AND ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS
 MATCH THE DATA PROVIDED: PINE STREET IS CLASSIFIED AS A
 TERTIARY STREET. THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS 10
 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. THE SETBACK ALONG THIS
 ROADWAY APPEARS TO BE 7 FT. WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE
 MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT. OTHER SHEETS APPEAR TO
 MEET THE MINIMUM 10 FT. SETBACK.
  
  
 PARKING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLANS NEED TO DIMENSION OUT BACKOUT AREAS WITHIN
 THE PARKING GARAGE. DIMENSIONS ARE NECESSARY TO
 DETERMINE IF THERE IS ADEQUATE DEPTH FOR BACKING OUT.
  
 2.) PARKING STALL DETAIL PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS/DIMENSIONS OF THE
 ZLDRS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE NECESSARY DIMENSIONS WITHIN
 THE DETAIL TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 3.) PARKING STALL DETAIL PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET
 INDICATES THAT THERE MAY BE COMPACT PARKING SPACES FOR
 THE PROJECT. IF COMPACT PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED,
 COMPACT PARKING SPACES WILL NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN
 THE PLAN SET AND THE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPACT
 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS (I.E. THERE'S A
 LIMIT TO THE NUMBER OF COMPACT PARKING SPACES THAT CAN
 BE PROVIDED FOR A PROJECT BASED ON THE PARKING COUNT).
 [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 4.) FOR THE COMMERCIAL LOADING CALCULATIONS (SHEET
 A0.06), PLEASE NOTE THE PROVIDED 60 FT. X 15 FT.
 LOADING ZONE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL THE FEMA APPROVED
 BASE ELEVATION + THE 2 FT. REQUIRED ELEVATION PER THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT OF
 THE BUILDING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS POINT TO THE
 TOP OF THE BUILDING. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT PER
 THE CMUD REGULATIONS SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED.
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: THE FEMA ELEVATION APPEARS TO BE
 INCORRECT. PLEASE CHECK AND CORRECT THE ELEVATION FOR
 CONSISTENCY.]
  
  
 2.) PLANER BREAK CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECTLY MEASURED
 ALONG PINE STREET AT THE GROUND LEVEL. PLEASE ADDRESS
 FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 3.) DIMENSION OUT THE DEPTH OF ALL PLANAR BREAKS TO
 DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BREAKS MEET THE MINIMUM 3 FT.
 DEPTH REQUIREMENT. NO ALL PLANAR BREAKS HAVE BEEN
 DIMENSIONED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-209]
  
  
 4.) THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES/ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
 PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOP HAVE NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE
 DRAWINGS. PLEASE NOTE THAT PROJECTIONS AND
 ENCROACHMENTS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MAXIMUM
 ALLOWANCES PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-209, TABLE VII-1]
  
 [STAFF RESPONSE: THE PLAN SHOWS THE HEIGHT OF THE
 ROOFTOP ARCHITECTURAL DECORATIVE ROOF/FEATURES AND
 MECHANICAL ROOM/EQUIPMENT AT A HEIGHT OF 22.17 FT. THIS
 ELEMENT CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 15 FT. ABOVE THE
 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT OF THE SUBDISTRICT.]
  
  
 5.) CORRECTION OF THE NUMBERING OF THE NOTES REQUIRED
 ON SHEETS A-500 THROUGH A-502 AND A-600.
  
  
 6.) DIMENSION OUT THE DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN
 TOWERS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 60 FT.
 SEPARATION REQUIREMENT BETWEEN TOWERS. [ZLDR
 S.94-209(2)(J)]
  
  
 VARIANCES REQUESTED:
  
 * MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING. [ZLDR
 S.94-209]
  
 * ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIREMENT ALONG BUTLER STREET
 (SECONDARY A STREET). [ZLDR S.94-209]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM OF FOUR (4)
 PAPER COPIES (IN COLOR) AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11
 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS
 AND DOCUMENTS.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * ALL FINAL PLANS MOVING FORWARD TO THE PUBLIC HEARING
 STAGE SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED.
  
 * ALL PLAN SHEETS SHALL MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
 NOTES:
  
 * PROJECT ALSO CONTINGENT UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE ROW
 ABANDONMENT.
  
 * A REPLAT OF THE PROJECT SITE WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 * USES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PERMITTED USE TABLE
 FOR CMUD. STAFF WILL NEED TO ADDRESS CODE LANGUAGE FOR
 USES.
  
 * THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN LEED SILVER CERTIFICATION OR
 EQUIVALENT IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY 20 FT.
 HEIGHT INCENTIVE FOR THE PROJECT. THE PROJECT MUST
 ADHERE TO THE TIMEFRAMES AND DIRECTIONS SPECIFIED IN
 SEC. 94-215(K)(2)(VII) OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 * THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
 SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND ONGOING
 MAINTENANCE OF THE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THE PARKWAY
 EASEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK OF PALM BEACH
 COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT.
  
 * DETAILS ON ALLEYWAY CONNECTION WILL NEED TO BE WORKED
 OUT WITH ENGINEERING/CITY SURVEYOR.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 08-09-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 08-09-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 16:18:12GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION
 MEETING(S) WITH THE APPLICANT, PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CRITICAL (AND PRIOR TO THE
 FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PROJECT). HAS THIS BEEN
 ACCOMPLISHED?
  
 2.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION
 MEETING(S) WITH THE APPLICANT, IT IS IMPORTANT TO
 CLEARLY STATE HOW THE PROJECT INTENDS TO SPECIFICALLY
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HEIGHT INCENTIVES IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (I.E. STATEMENT ADHERING TO
 TIMELINES AS SPECIFIED, PAYMENTS FOR THE ACTUAL
 CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS OR CONTRIBUTION TO AN
 IMPROVEMENT FUND, ETC.). THIS INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN
 PROVIDED.
  
 3.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SCHOOL DISTRICT ON THE PROCESS TO OBTAIN THE SCAD
 LETTER.
  
 4.) A TPS LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY-TRAFFIC
 DIVISION IS REQUIRED.
  
 5.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES.
  
 6.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND
 COMCAST.
  
 7.) THE ADDRESS LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE.
  
 8.) A REPLAT OF THE PROJECT SITE WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 9.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL FINAL PLANS (I.E. CIVIL,
 LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL) MOVING FORWARD TO THE
 PUBLIC HEARING STAGE SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED.
  
 10.) AT LEAST TWO (2) HARDCOPY SETS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN FULL COLOR.
  
 11.) ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND PER CMUD
 REGULATIONS.
  
  
 FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM:
  
 THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING THE 30 FT. HEIGHT INCENTIVE BY
 PROVIDING THE 30 FT. WIDE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM.
 PER THE ZLDRS, THE PARKWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING
 FLAGLER DRIVE. AT THIS TIME, STAFF CANNOT SUPPORT THE
 INCENTIVE, AS THE PARKWAY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS HAVE NOT
 BEEN MET:
  
 1.) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS SHOWING THE 10 FT. WIDE CLEAR
 MEANDERING MULTI-PURPOSE PATHWAY.
  
 2.) THE MEANDERING PATH IS EXPECTED TO BE CONTINUOUS
 AND CONNECT WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES AS FUTURE
 DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. THE MEANDERING PATH SHALL EXTEND TO
 THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE ADJACENT PARCELS (IN ADDITION
 TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK CONNECTION).
  
 3.) THE PARKWAY SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH STREET
 FURNITURE. STREET FURNITURE SHALL BE PROVIDED
 CONSISTENTLY ALONG THE CORRIDOR, AS APPROVED BY THE
 CITY. THE PROPOSED PARKWAY DESIGN IN THE PLAN SET DOES
 NOT EXHIBIT ANY STREET FURNISHINGS.
  
 4.) STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ATTAIN THE
 APPROPRIATE FOOT CANDLE MEASUREMENT NECESSARY FOR SAFE
 PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR MOVEMENT. LIGHT FIXTURES/POLES
 SHALL MEET THE CITY APPROVED STANDARD. NO INFORMATION
 WAS PROVIDED ON STREETLIGHTS WITHIN THE PARKWAY.
  
 5.) THE INCENTIVE IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC
 BENEFIT WITH THE PARKWAY EXTENDING ACROSS THE ENTIRE
 FRONTAGE WITHOUT INTERRUPTIONS. THE PURPOSE IS TO
 CREATE AN ACTIVE PEDESTRIAN SPACE WITHIN THE PARKWAY.
 THE DESIGN WITH THE PROPOSED VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT ON
 FLAGLER DRIVE DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE PARKWAY
 AND SHALL BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR THE HEIGHT
 INCENTIVE.
  
 6.) IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT PER THE CMUD
 REGULATIONS, THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OR
 ASSIGNS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND
 ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF THE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THE
 PARKWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK OF
 PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST
 BUILDING PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT.
  
 7.) THE DESIGN COULD BE IMPROVED BY INCORPORATING
 GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL/RETAIL PEDESTRIAN WALK-UPS FROM
 FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 8.) SHOW BUILDING AND ROADWAY SECTION AS IT RELATES TO
 THE SPACIAL RELATIONSHIP FROM CURRIE PARK, FLAGLER
 DRIVE, PARKWAY TO THE BUILDING.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PER THE MU DISTRICT REGULATIONS, THE MAXIMUM
 HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING SHALL NOT EXCEED 250
 FEET. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO BE
 EXCEEDED. [ZLDR S.94-209]
  
 2.) THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS MUST BE
 SHOWN ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AND THE BUILDING SETBACK
 ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THIS RANGE
 AT THE PODIUM/GROUND LEVEL. THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 SETBACK INFORMATION CANNOT BE FOUND. [ZLDR S.94-215]
  
 3.) BUTLER STREET IS A SECONDARY A STREET. THERE IS A
 MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ESTABLISHED FOR
 BUTLER STREET AND THE PODIUM/GROUND FLOOR LEVEL MUST BE
 LOCATED WITHIN THIS SETBACK RANGE. PLEASE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATE (WITH DIMENSIONS) TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
 [ZLDR S.94-215]
  
 4.) PER THE MU DISTRICT REGULATIONS, ALL LEVELS OF THE
 PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY LINER
 USES ALONG PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STREETS. ACCORDING TO
 THE PLANS, THE REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET ALONG
 BUTLER STREET, WHICH IS A SECONDARY A STREET.
 INFORMATION FOR TRANSPARENCY AND ACTIVE LINER DEPTH
 WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CMUD
 DISTRICT REGULATIONS.
  
 5.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE ALLEYWAY CONNECTION WITHIN THE
 PROJECT. THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONNECTION UNDER THE
 BUILDING, WHICH DEFERS FROM THE PREAPPLICATION PLANS.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE COULD BE CHALLENGES WITH THIS
 DESIGN: A) ACCESS AND SECURITY. B) MAINTENANCE
 RESPONSIBILITY. C) ACCESS EASEMENT. D) OVERHEAD
 CLEARANCE FOR SERVICE VEHICLES.
  
 6.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF IN THE PREAPPLICATION
 MEETING, IT IS IMPORTANT TO REACH OUT TO THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE IF THE EXISTING ALLEY IS
 A SERVICE ALLEY AND IF IT IS NECESSARY TO BE MAINTAINED
 AND/OR IF OTHER ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO
 MAINTAIN SERVICE WITHIN THE ALLEY (IF APPLICABLE). HAS
 THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BEEN CONTACTED PRIOR TO THE
 FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THIS APPLICATION?
  
 7.) ALL VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM
 WIDTH OF 24 FT. AT THE PROPERTY LINE. IT APPEARS THAT
 THIS MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN EXCEEDED.
  
 8.) A SITE PLAN SHEET, CONTAINING ALL REQUIRED
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST
 (REFERENCE: PAGE 16 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION) SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ALL REQUIRED ZONING
 INFORMATION AND ALL NECESSARY DIMENSIONS ILLUSTRATED IN
 THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS (NOT PIECEMEAL OVER VARIOUS
 SHEETS). ADDITIONAL SHEETS MAY BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
  
 9.) THE BREAKDOWN OF THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS SHALL
 BE PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE SPECIFIC
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CORE I AND TRANSITION
 SUB-DISTRICTS.
  
 10.) PLEASE CLARIFY/CORRECT THE OVERALL LOT SIZE OF THE
 PROJECT. THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY WITH THE
 NUMBERS.
  
 11.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT. THE NUMBERS ARE INCONSISTENT
 IN THE PLAN SHEETS (I.E. 28,605 SQ. FT. VS. 28,500 SQ.
 FT.).
  
 12.) CHECK THE UNIT MATRIX PER TOWER CALCULATIONS WITH
 THE PARKING INFORMATION TABULAR. THERE ARE
 INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE
 TABLES.
  
 13.) A STALL PAINTING DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE DETAIL
 SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS IN ZLDR
 S.94-485.
  
 14.) LOADING ZONE CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION HAVE NOT
 BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 NECESSARY INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE LOADING REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. ALSO, PLEASE
 LABEL THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOADING ZONES
 IN THE PLAN SET.
  
 15.) THE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE
 INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 16.) CHECK PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING. THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SHEETS DO NOT MATCH
 THE PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING IN THE PARKING TABULAR.
  
 17.) A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED IN THE PLANS.
  
 18.) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGE FACILITY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL TENANTS AND SHALL
 BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200 FT. OF
 THE BUILDING ENTRANCE FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN
 50,000 SQ. FT. IN GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS FACILITY IS
 NOT PRESENT IN THE DESIGN.
  
 19.) THERE APPEARS TO BE RETAINING WALLS ALONG THE
 PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION (I.E. HEIGHT, LOCATION, INTERACTION WITH
 SURROUNDING PUBLIC SPACES, ETC.) AND CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE
 IN THE PLANS HOW THE WALLS WILL MAINTAIN ACTIVITY AND
 INTERACTION WITH THE PUBLIC SPACE(S). ALSO, IT APPEARS
 THE RETAINING WALL GOES INTO THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY
 WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE PARKWAY AS IT
 PROVIDES A DIVISION FROM THE USE OF PUBLIC SPACE.
  
 20.) CLEARLY SHOW THE SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN PATH ALONG
 THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. PER THE CMUD REGULATIONS,
 A MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH OF 5 FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ADJACENT TO THE REQUIRED 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA
 ALONG THE STREET EDGE. TREE GRATES MAY BE PROVIDED IN
 LIEU OF LANDSCAPED AREA IF ON-STREET PARKING IS
 PROVIDED.
  
 21.) ARE THERE ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ALONG THE EAST
 SIDE OF FLAGLER DRIVE AT THIS TIME?
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL THE FEMA APPROVED
 BASE ELEVATION + THE 2 FT. REQUIRED ELEVATION PER THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT OF
 THE BUILDING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS POINT TO THE
 TOP OF THE BUILDING. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT PER
 THE CMUD REGULATIONS SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED.
  
 2.) PROVIDE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATIONS. FOR BUILDING
 FRONTAGES GREATER THAN 150 FT., NO FA?ADE SHALL EXCEED
 60% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE WITHOUT PROVIDING A PLANER
 BREAK OR MULTIPLE PLANAR BREAKS WITH A MINIMUM OF 3 FT.
 IN DEPTH. THE CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF ALL
 PLANAR BREAKS SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 20% OF
 THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. [ZLDR S.94-209]
  
 3.) THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES/ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
 PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOP HAVE NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE
 DRAWINGS. PLEASE NOTE THAT PROJECTIONS AND
 ENCROACHMENTS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MAXIMUM
 ALLOWANCES PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-209, TABLE VII-1]
  
 4.) PLEASE CLARIFY/ PROVIDE NOTATIONS IN THE PLANS,
 ETC. THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ALONG THE
 WALLS OF THE PARKING GARAGE (NON-ACTIVE USE). PER THE
 MU DISTRICT STANDARDS, A COMBINATION OF TWO OR MORE
 TREATMENTS SHALL BE INTEGRATED WITH THE DESIGN OF
 ADJACENT ACTIVE USE FACADES.
  
 5..) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE
 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR USE TO DEMONSTRATE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. THERE ARE CERTAIN MATERIALS
 THAT ARE RESTRICTED PER THE FENESTRATION STANDARDS OF
 THE MU DISTRICT STANDARDS (I.E. GLAZING). PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE NOTATIONS IN THE PLANS.
  
 6.) WILL THERE BE ACCESS TO THE GROUND LEVEL
 COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK? THERE
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY DOORS THAT IMPLIES ACCESS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE/ILLUSTRATE THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
 THERE HAS TO BE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE SPACE
 WILL INTERACT WITH THE STREET.
  
 7.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL ELEVATIONS MATCH FLOOR PLANS AND
 RENDERINGS.
  
  
 SIGNAGE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) IS THERE SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT? IF NOT
 DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, A NOTE STATING THAT ALL
 SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE PLANS.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM OF FOUR (4)
 PAPER COPIES (IN COLOR) AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11
 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS
 AND DOCUMENTS.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved