| Plan Review Stops For Project Z22060031 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
Time |
20:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
Time |
20:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-31 12:57:22 | 1. APPRAISAL COST IS $1800.00. PLEASE HAVE CHECK MADE | | | OUT TO ANDERSON & CARR, INC. AND DELIVERED TO THIS | | | OFFICE. | | 2022-07-13 20:41:02 | | | | THE ABOVE COMMENT WAS ENTERED BY VINCE NOEL, SURVEYING, | | | UNDER THE BUILDING REVIEW IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE SURVEY | | | REVIEW FOR THE SURVEY REVIEW COMMENTS/STATUS. NO | | | COMMENTS FROM BUILDING ON THE PROPOSED ALLEY | | | ABANDONMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-07-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-07-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-01-2022 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-01 15:43:15 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-08 09:31:06 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: ALLEY ABANDONMENT 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE | | | Z22060031 | | | DECEMBER 8, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE FINAL CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY | | | LINES FROM ABANDONMENT WILL AFFECT THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE SITE PLAN. STAFF MAY HAVE COMMENTS | | | WHEN THE FINAL CONFIGURATION IS ESTABLISHED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-13 09:54:47 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: ALLEY ABANDONMENT 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE | | | Z22060031 | | | JULY 13, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE FINAL CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY LINES FROM | | | ABANDONMENT WILL AFFECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE SITE PLAN. STAFF MAY HAVE COMMENTS WHEN THE FINAL | | | CONFIGURATION IS ESTABLISHED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-05-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
relizond |
Date |
12-05-2022 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
relizond |
Date |
12-05-2022 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-05 11:56:26 | -NO UTILITY COMMENTS FOR THIS CASE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-19-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
08-19-2022 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-19 09:58:00 | NO FURTHER REVIEW COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
07-11-2022 |
Time |
12:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-11 12:38:01 | -UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AS REQUESTED BY CITY | | | WPB. | | | | | | -THERE ARE EXISTING CITY UTILITIES IN ALLEY. APPLICANT | | | MAY NEED TO RELOCATE THOSE UTILITIES AS REQUESTED BY | | | CITY. | | | | | | -AT EAST SIDE OF ALLEY THERE IS A CITY STREET LIGHTING | | | FEED AND THERE ALSO MAY BE CITY IRRIGATION POWER | | | SUPPLY. APPLICANT WILL NEED SEPARATE APPROVAL FROM CITY | | | FOR ANY CHANGES TO THEM. | | | | | | MARK HURLEY | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-07-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-07-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-07 12:20:32 | THE STREET LIGHTING FEED ON THE EAST OF THE ALLEY MAY | | | NEED TO BE RELOCATED AT THE CITY`S DISCRETION. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-14-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-14-2022 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-14-2022 |
Time |
11:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-14 11:46:09 | DRAINAGE FLOWING TOWARD THE WEST END OF THE ALLEY TO BE | | | ABANDONED TO BE ACCOMODATED BY THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-07-2022 |
Time |
07:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-07 07:04:55 | APPRAISAL PAID FOR AND RECEIVED. EXIT ALLEY WILL BE | | | REQUIRED WHEN PROPERTY IS RE-PLATTED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-31-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-31-2022 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-31 12:58:58 | 1. COST OF APPRAISAL IS $1800.00. PLEASE PROVIDE CHECK | | | MADE OUT TO ANDERSON & CARR, INC AND DELIVER TO | | | ENGINEERING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-05-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-05-2022 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-05 12:57:34 | 1. CITY WILL OBTAIN QUOTE FOR AN APPRAISAL WHICH THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR. | | | 2. EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE RE-ROUTING OF THE | | | WATER, SEWER AND ACCESS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-05-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-05-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
01-05-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-01-05 13:36:14 | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: | | | 1) ONCE FINAL DIRECTIONALITY IS CONFIRMED. PLEASE | | | UPDATE THE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT SO TO SHOWCASE | | | CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE | | | ALLEY AND AT BOTH ITS EASTERN AND WESTERN ENDS, ON | | | BROADWAY AND THE GARAGE ENTRANCE, RESPECTIVELY | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS: | | | 1) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE | | | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS AND TWO-WAY TRAFFIC | | | OPERATIONS. UNLESS IT IS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 | | | FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN | | | BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY | | | SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC | | | WORKS | | | 2) SATISFIED. INITIATE CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC WORKS | | | AND COPY TRANSPORTATION PERTAINING THE RECOMMENDED | | | DIRECTIONALITY | | | 3) SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO THE NARROW PORTION OF THE | | | ALLEY GOING EAST-WEST, BECAUSE OF RESIDENT ACCESS TO | | | THE ALLEY THROUGH THE PATIO STEPS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF | | | 4 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | ALLEYWAY THROUGHOUT THE SITE FRONTAGE, OTHERWISE | | | INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS ALONG THE YARDS | | | 4) SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO THE WIDER PORTION OF THE | | | ALLEY GOING NORTH SOUTH, BECAUSE OF THE STAIRCASE EXIT | | | AS WELL AS THE RESIDENT ACCESS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 5 | | | FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY, | | | AS WELL AS A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND CORRESPONDING STOP | | | SIGN/BAR BY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
12-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-08 10:22:42 | 1) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE | | | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS AND TWO-WAY TRAFFIC | | | OPERATIONS. UNLESS IT IS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 | | | FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN | | | BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY | | | SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC | | | WORKS | | | 2) SATISFIED. INITIATE CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC WORKS | | | AND COPY TRANSPORTATION PERTAINING THE RECOMMENDED | | | DIRECTIONALITY | | | 3) SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO THE NARROW PORTION OF THE | | | ALLEY GOING EAST-WEST, BECAUSE OF RESIDENT ACCESS TO | | | THE ALLEY THROUGH THE PATIO STEPS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF | | | 4 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | ALLEYWAY THROUGHOUT THE SITE FRONTAGE, OTHERWISE | | | INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS ALONG THE YARDS | | | 4) SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO THE WIDER PORTION OF THE | | | ALLEY GOING NORTH SOUTH, BECAUSE OF THE STAIRCASE EXIT | | | AS WELL AS THE RESIDENT ACCESS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 5 | | | FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY, | | | AS WELL AS A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND CORRESPONDING STOP | | | SIGN/BAR BY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE | | | 5) ONCE FINAL DIRECTIONALITY IS CONFIRMED. PLEASE | | | UPDATE THE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT SO TO SHOWCASE | | | CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE | | | ALLEY AND AT BOTH ITS EASTERN AND WESTERN ENDS, ON | | | BROADWAY AND THE GARAGE ENTRANCE, RESPECTIVELY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-29-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-17-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-29 11:48:08 | 1) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE | | | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS AND TWO-WAY TRAFFIC | | | OPERATIONS. UNLESS IT IS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 | | | FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN | | | BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY | | | SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC | | | WORKS | | | 2) SATISFIED. INITIATE CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC WORKS | | | AND COPY TRANSPORTATION PERTAINING THE RECOMMENDED | | | DIRECTIONALITY | | | 3) ONCE FINAL DIRECTIONALITY IS CONFIRMED. PROVIDE A | | | SITE PLAN SHOWCASING CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT | | | MARKINGS ALONG THE ALLEY AND AT THE ENTRANCE/EXIT ON | | | BROADWAY AND 24TH ST | | | 4) WITH RESPECT TO THE NARROW PORTION OF THE ALLEY | | | GOING EAST-WEST, BECAUSE OF RESIDENT ACCESS TO THE | | | ALLEY THROUGH THE PATIO STEPS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4 | | | FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY | | | THROUGHOUT THE SITE FRONTAGE, OTHERWISE INSTALL A | | | WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS ALONG THE YARDS | | | 5) WITH RESPECT TO THE WIDER PORTION OF THE ALLEY GOING | | | NORTH SOUTH, BECAUSE OF THE STAIRCASE EXIT AS WELL AS | | | THE RESIDENT ACCESS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WIDE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY, AS WELL | | | AS A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND CORRESPONDING STOP | | | SIGN/BAR BY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2022-08-17 14:47:07 | 1) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE | | | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS AND TWO-WAY TRAFFIC | | | OPERATIONS. UNLESS IT IS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 | | | FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN | | | BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY | | | SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC | | | WORKS | | | 2) INITIATE CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND COPY | | | TRANSPORTATION PERTAINING THE RECOMMENDED | | | DIRECTIONALITY | | | 3) ONCE FINAL DIRECTIONALITY IS CONFIRMED. PROVIDE A | | | SITE PLAN SHOWCASING CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT | | | MARKINGS ALONG THE ALLEY AND AT THE ENTRANCE/EXIT ON | | | BROADWAY AND 24TH ST | | | 4) WITH RESPECT TO THE NARROW PORTION OF THE ALLEY | | | GOING EAST-WEST, BECAUSE OF RESIDENT ACCESS TO THE | | | ALLEY THROUGH THE PATIO STEPS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4 | | | FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY | | | THROUGHOUT THE SITE FRONTAGE. | | | 5) WITH RESPECT TO THE WIDER PORTION OF THE ALLEY GOING | | | NORTH SOUTH, BECAUSE OF THE STAIRCASE EXIT AS WELL AS | | | THE RESIDENT ACCESS, INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WIDE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY, AS WELL | | | AS A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND CORRESPONDING STOP | | | SIGN/BAR BY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-08 13:36:57 | THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE IN | | | VEHICULAR TRIPS AND TWO-WAY TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. UNLESS | | | IT IS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET, THE ALLEY MUST | | | BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY SHALL BE DECIDED IN | | | COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC WORKS | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-05-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
01-05-2023 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
01-05-2023 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-01-05 16:14:32 | 1/5/23 ??? PASSED | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSING OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS | | | BEEN REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION (MAJOR - PLAT/REPLAT) | | | APPLICATION. [WITHDRAWN] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. [SATISFIED | | | SUBJECT TO THIS BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE FOR | | | CITY COMMISSION MEETING] | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS SURVEYING, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION | | | 94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED PETITION THAT | | | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A PROPOSED AREA OF | | | ABANDONMENT, WHICH DOES NOT DIMINISH THE GENERAL SIZE | | | AND LOCATION OF AN OPEN SPACE SHOWN IN THE DESIGNATED | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEMS | | | REGULATING PLAN. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S CONFIRMATION LETTER | | | AND THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(2)(E), PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A REVISED MAP/DRAWING/BLUEPRINT | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING AN EXIT ALLEY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVIT | | | WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP. [SATISFIED SUBJECT TO THIS | | | BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE FOR CITY COMMISSION | | | MEETING] | | | 4. PLEASE ADDRESS LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
12-08-2022 |
Time |
10:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-08 10:49:14 | 12/8/22 ??? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSING OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS | | | BEEN REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION (MAJOR - PLAT/REPLAT) | | | APPLICATION. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS SURVEYING, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION | | | 94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED PETITION THAT | | | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A PROPOSED AREA OF | | | ABANDONMENT, WHICH DOES NOT DIMINISH THE GENERAL SIZE | | | AND LOCATION OF AN OPEN SPACE SHOWN IN THE DESIGNATED | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEMS | | | REGULATING PLAN. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S CONFIRMATION LETTER | | | AND THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(2)(E), PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A REVISED MAP/DRAWING/BLUEPRINT | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING AN EXIT ALLEY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVIT | | | WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP. | | | 4. PLEASE ADDRESS LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
09-02-2022 |
Time |
08:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
09-02-2022 |
Time |
08:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-02 08:24:44 | 9/2/22 ? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSING OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS | | | BEEN REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION (MAJOR - PLAT/REPLAT) | | | APPLICATION. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. [NOT | | | SATISFIED] | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS SURVEYING, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION | | | 94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED PETITION THAT | | | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A PROPOSED AREA OF | | | ABANDONMENT, WHICH DOES NOT DIMINISH THE GENERAL SIZE | | | AND LOCATION OF AN OPEN SPACE SHOWN IN THE DESIGNATED | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEMS | | | REGULATING PLAN. [WITHDRAWN] | | | 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S CONFIRMATION LETTER | | | AND THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(2)(E), PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A REVISED MAP/DRAWING/BLUEPRINT | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING AN EXIT ALLEY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVIT | | | WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP. | | | 4. PLEASE ADDRESS LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
07-12-2022 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
07-12-2022 |
Time |
08:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-12 08:03:10 | 7/12/22 ? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM | | | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE | | | PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSING OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS | | | BEEN REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES. | | | G. PLEASE SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION (MAJOR - PLAT/REPLAT) | | | APPLICATION. | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER | | | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS SURVEYING, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION | | | 94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED PETITION THAT | | | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A PROPOSED AREA OF | | | ABANDONMENT, WHICH DOES NOT DIMINISH THE GENERAL SIZE | | | AND LOCATION OF AN OPEN SPACE SHOWN IN THE DESIGNATED | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEMS | | | REGULATING PLAN. | | | 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S CONFIRMATION LETTER | | | AND THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(2)(E), PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A REVISED MAP/DRAWING/BLUEPRINT | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING AN EXIT ALLEY. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
