City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z22060030

Plan Review Stops For Project Z22060030

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	06-28-2022	Time	15:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	swelter			Date	03-29-2023	Time	13:25	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-29 13:25:41	ART ASSESSMENT RCVD. 7.17.23 OPTION

	PROPOSED LOCATION FOR A FUTURE PUBLIC ARTWORK MEETS THE
	PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR PLACES

	OF NOTE:
	*THE FUTURE ARTWORK MUST BE CREATED BY A PROFESSIONAL
	ARTIST AS DEFINED IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AS AN
	INDIVIDUAL RECOGNIZED BY CRITICS AND PEERS AS A
	PROFESSIONAL PRACTITIONER IN THE VISUAL ARTS AS JUDGED
	BY THEIR BODY OF WORK, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND,
	TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, PUBLIC COMMISSIONS, EXHIBITION
	RECORD, PUBLICATIONS, RECEIPT OF HONORS AND AWARDS, AND
	TRAINING IN THE ARTS.
	* ARTWORK MUST BE DISTINCT FROM BUILDING/PROJECT (SEE
	BELOW), AND A UNIQUE PIECE OF WORK.
	INELIGIBLE ARTWORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE
	FOLLOWING:
	DECORATIVE, ORNAMENTAL, ARCHITECTURAL OR FUNCTIONAL TO
	THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.
	COMMERCIAL EXPRESSION INCLUDING DESIGN ELEMENTS RELATED
	TO THE VISUAL IDENTITY OF THE PROJECT, BUILDING OR
	DEVELOPER SUCH AS LOGO, TRADEMARK, COLOR SCHEME, OR
	THEME ETC.
	REPRODUCTIONS OR MASS-PRODUCED DESIGN/ART OBJECTS

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	02-16-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	02-16-2023	Time	19:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	02-16-2023	Time	19:39	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-16 19:41:28	COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW MUST BE ADDRESSED BY THE
	BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	02-01-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	02-01-2023	Time	10:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	02-01-2023	Time	10:02	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-01 10:11:41	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. COMMENTS
	2 THROUGH 5 MUST BE ADDRESSED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

	2. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	3. COMMENT ADDRESSED. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED.
	WHEELCHAIR ACCESS TO POOL DECK. THE POOL DECK IS
	ACCESSED VIA STAIRS. THE ELEVATOR THE SERVES THE POOL
	DECK DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS FROM THE 1ST FLOOR. 1ST FLOOR
	PLAN, SHEET A2.0, SHOWS THAT ELEVATOR ACCESSING THE
	LOADING AREA ONLY.

	4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT NOT
	ADDRESSED. THE PARKING DATA TABLE ON SITE DATE SHEET
	A0.1 STATES THAT 9 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE
	PROVIDED, BUT THAT TABLE AND THE FLOOR PLANS SHOW ONLY
	ONE OF THOSE SPACES TO BE VAN ACCESSIBLE. AT LEAST 2
	VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. PER SECTION
	208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	5. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. COMMENT NOT
	ADDRESSED. THE FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHOWS 4 EV PARKING
	SPACES. IF ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE
	PROVIDED AT LEAST 1 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS. EITHER PROVIDE A CHARGING
	STATION AT ONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, OR
	MAKE ONE OF THE EV CHARGING STATIONS COMPLY WITH
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SIZE, ACCESS, AND SIGNAGE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	7. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF THE RETAIL SPACE IS TO BE A
	REATAURANT A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR
	INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
	PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
	BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	11. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	12. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	13. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-02-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	12-02-2022	Time	18:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	12-02-2022	Time	18:24	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-02 18:41:05	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	3. WHEELCHAIR ACCESS TO POOL DECK. THE POOL DECK IS
	ACCESSED VIA STAIRS. THE ELEVATOR THE SERVES THE POOL
	DECK DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS FROM THE 1ST FLOOR. 1ST FLOOR
	PLAN, SHEET A2.0, SHOWS THAT ELEVATOR ACCESSING THE
	LOADING AREA ONLY.

	4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING DATA
	TABLE ON SITE DATE SHEET A0.1 STATES THAT 9 ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED, BUT THAT TABLE AND THE
	FLOOR PLANS SHOW ONLY ONE OF THOSE SPACES TO BE VAN
	ACCESSIBLE. AT LEAST 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
	ARE REQUIRED. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
	ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	5. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. THE FIRST FLOOR
	PLAN SHOWS 4 EV PARKING SPACES. IF ELECTRIC VEHICLE
	(EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1 IN 25
	MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
	EITHER PROVIDE A CHARGING STATION AT ONE OF THE
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, OR MAKE ONE OF THE EV
	CHARGING STATIONS COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
	SIZE, ACCESS, AND SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS.

	6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	7. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF THE RETAIL SPACE IS TO BE A
	REATAURANT A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR
	INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
	PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
	BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	11. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	12. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	13. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	07-13-2022	Time	20:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	07-13-2022	Time	20:24	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-13 20:37:06	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN
	SHEET A1.0 SHOWS 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON LEVEL 1
	BUT THERE ARE REGULAR PARKING SPACES THAT ARE CLOSER TO
	THE BUILDING LOBBY, ELEVATORS, AND RETAIL SPACE, THAN
	THE 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE. PER SECTION 208.3
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
	OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
	ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
	COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	5. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
	VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
	IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	7. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF THE RETAIL SPACE IS TO BE A
	REATAURANT A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR
	INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
	PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
	BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	11. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	12. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	13. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	11-22-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	11-22-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	11-22-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	08-05-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	08-05-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	08-05-2020	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-07-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	07-07-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By	rrossano			Date	07-07-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-07 13:03:21	COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
	ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
	GENERAL:
	O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
	INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
	(Z-XXXXXXXX).
	O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
	BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
	B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
	L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
	B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
	B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
	FOUND HERE:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
	MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
	C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
	ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
	CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
	SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
	SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
	BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
	O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
	ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
	SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
	O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
	DATA.

	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
	O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
	SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
	TO THEM.
	O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
	EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
	PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
	STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTION.
	O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
	OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
	METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
	PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
	INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
	O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
	NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.

	WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
	O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL.
	O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
	O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
	(CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
	O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER.
	O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
	O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
	TRAPS (IF ANY).
	O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.

	FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
	NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
	- AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
	- 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
	THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
	DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
	- 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
	STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
	MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
	- THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
	CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
	THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
	SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
	WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
	APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
	SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
	SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
	LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
	ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
	LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
	PARCELS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
	BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
	50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
	PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
	PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	07-20-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	07-20-2023	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	07-20-2023	Time	15:09	Sent To

Notes

2023-07-20 15:10:34	4TH REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
	PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	02-13-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	02-13-2023	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	02-13-2023	Time	16:03	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-13 16:04:31	3RD REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
	PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	01-04-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	01-04-2023	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	01-04-2023	Time	15:38	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-04 15:38:26	2ND REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
	PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	07-01-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	07-01-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	07-01-2022	Time	15:35	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-01 15:40:54	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
	TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
	WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
	CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
	CODES.

	PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, PARKING
	STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
	OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.

	7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
	LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
	SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.

	8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL
	BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED
	WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.

	THE PROPSED LOCATIONS INDICATED ON THE CIVAL PLAN ARE
	ACCEPTABLE.

	9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
	THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
	ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
	ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
	AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.

	9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
	LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
	THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
	OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
	AND ZONING OFFICE.

	9B. . PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE
	STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED.

	PER NFPA 14
	7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A
	NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF
	150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE
	CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE
	MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY
	IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL
	DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A
	REQUIRED EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED, IN APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE
	LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
	TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
	LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
	EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
	AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
	SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
	DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	12. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.

	CONTACT WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH
	COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
	[email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
	ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
	INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.

	14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L		LANDSCAPING
Rev No	6	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	02-01-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	02-01-2023	Time	12:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	02-01-2023	Time	12:43	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-01 12:43:56	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE Z22060030
	JANUARY 31, 2023
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES IN THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE AND
	PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
	ARBORIST REPORT COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE SUBMITTAL.
	PRESERVING THE EXISTING STREET TREES IS NOT FEASIBLE
	DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. THE INTENT OF THE
	CODE IS THAT THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO BE
	REPLACED WITH TREES AND INFRASTRUCTURE MEETING CURRENT
	STANDARDS.
	12/6/22 THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE
	FOR THE FUTURE AS THEY ARE REACHING THE END OF THEIR
	SURVIVABILITY DUE TO THE COMPACTED SOIL CONDITIONS THAT
	CURRENTLY SURROUND THE PLANTING LOCATIONS. REPLACING
	WITH NEW TREES AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL
	SOIL AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED WILL
	PROVIDE SUSTAINABLE TREE CANOPY FOR THE FUTURE.

	2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY
	THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10% COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	IS REQUIRED. 10% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED AND MUST
	BE IN ONE OF THE FORMS OF PER SECTION 94-210 K. 4. THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED, IDENTIFIED
	AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE SHOWN
	FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE COVERED
	AREA.
	CONFIGURATION AND REQUIREMENTS WERE CHANGED.
	??? THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE
	ALLEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENT. SHOW THE SEPARATION ON PLANS.
	??? DESIGNATED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET
	L2 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH SHEET A0.4.
	??? FPL TRANSFORMER AREA CANNOT BE COUNTED AS PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED URBAN
	GREENWAYS SYSTEM AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING
	DISTRICT PER SECTION 94-210 L.


	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET.

	5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING THE
	COMPLETE STREETSCAPE AS REQUIRED WITH THE BUFFERS AND
	PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING
	ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE
	FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	PER SECTION 94-443 ALONG ALL REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
	BUFFERS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PROPERTY LINE ALONG
	THE ALLEY AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY
	CONNECTION ALONG THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
	??? SATISFIED. THERE IS A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	REQUIRED FOR THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY ACCESS IF IT IS
	2 WAY TRAFFIC PER 94-210(M)(3).
	??? SATISFIED. ON SHEET L1-C, CORRECT THE BUFFER
	VEGETATION CHART TO SHOW REQUIRED TREES FOR WEST BUFFER
	-ADJACENT PROPERTY TO SHOW 3 TREES REQUIRED.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES IN BUFFERS ADJACENT TO
	OTHER PROPERTIES OR VEHICULAR USE AREAS.


	8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
	MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF AND
	SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH.
	SHOW THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PLANTING STRIP IN ALL AREAS
	THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET PARKING ADJACENT TO THE CURB.
	??? SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE ALONG SPRUCE MUST
	INCLUDE THE 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTING STRIP AS THERE IS NO
	ON STREET PARKING.
	12/6/22 THE PLANTING STRIP MUST BE SHOWN AS CONTINUOUS
	WITH MINIMUM WIDTH PASS THROUGHS SHOWN FOR THE PARKING.
	??? SATISFIED. PALMS MAY BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO
	REQUIRED SHADE TREES BUT MAY NOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE
	REQUIRED SHADE TREES. SEE 94-210 (L). ADJUST PLANS
	ACCORDINGLY FOR 24TH ST AND SPRUCE GREENWAYS.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE SAME APPLIES FOR 25TH ST. STAFF DOES
	NOT SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE TREES TO REPLACE
	THEM WITH PALMS, AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF
	PROVIDING CONTINUOUS TREE CANOPY FOR PEDESTRIANS.


	9. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
	LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	SCALE OF PLANS MAY NEED TO BE INCREASED TO SHOW
	UTILITIES AND DEMONSTRATE CONFLICTS HAVE CLEARLY BEEN
	RESOLVED.
	12/6/22 THERE ARE SEVERAL CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS
	OF THE UTILITY LINES THAT ARE TOO CLOSE OR IN DIRECT
	CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES. UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE
	ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
	1/12/23 THE LOCATION OF THE WATER UTILITY LINE FROM THE
	24TH STREET SIDE IS SHOWN IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A
	PROPOSED TREE. UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE ADJUSTED TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS.

	10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST AND
	PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OF THE REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR REFERENCE.
	STREET TREES AND STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS MUST BE INCLUDED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	12/6/22 NEW STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANT
	LIST AND THE SIZES SHOWN AT THE REQUIRED 20 FEET
	HEIGHT.


	11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G).

	12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS
	INDICATED FOR ALOCASIA.


	13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
	FPL SHOWN, BUT ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE
	SHOWN AND SCREENED.
	12/6/22 NOTE IS ADDED, BUT THERE ARE CONFLICTS THAT
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AND VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN WITH
	SCREENING.

	14. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON 25TH
	AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE SUBJECT
	TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY.
	FDOT LETTER WAS SUBMITTED BUT DOES NOT MENTION
	STREETSCAPE.
	12/6/22 PROVIDE FDOT LETTER.


	15. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE
	REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL TREES
	MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES
	AND TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.
	ONGOING WITH STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	12/6/22 STREET TREES MUST BE UPDATED. STREET TREES MUST
	BE SHADE TREES.

	16. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR
	STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS
	ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14
	FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD
	BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.
	ALL NEW LOCATIONS MUST SHOW THIS INFORMATION.

	17. SATISFIED. REMOVE REFERENCE ON PLANS TO PLEACHED
	TREES, AS THIS IS PROHIBITED BY SECTION 94-448.
	REFERENCES ARE STILL SHOWN ON SHEETS L1-B AND ON THE
	PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.
	HEDGES ARE LIMITED TO 10 FEET IN HEIGHT.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/6/22:

	18. SATISFIED. 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT MET ALONG
	THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PART OF THE BUILDING ENCROACHES
	INTO THE BUFFER.

	19. SATISFIED. STRUCTURAL SOIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR
	TREES PLANTED IN PAVED AREAS INTERNAL TO THE SITE TO
	ASSURE THEY ARE SUSTAINABLE.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS1/12/23:

	20. SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY MITIGATION CALCULATIONS MUST
	BE PROVIDED ON SHEET EX-1 AS PART OF THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN. TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE
	AND TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION CREDITS
	FROM THE PLANT LIST MUST BE SHOWN.

	21. NOT SATISFIED. THE ELECTRIC SERVICE LINES PROPOSED
	ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE NEW STREET TREES. STAFF DOES
	NOT SUPPORT ADDING NEW OVERHEAD LINES TO NMUD DISTRICT,
	ALL LINES SHOULD BE UNDERGROUND.
	1/31/23 THE PROPOSED NEW OVERHEAD LINES CONFLICT WITH
	THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR SHADE TREES IN SECTION
	94-210.L.B. AND D. AS PART OF THE URBAN GREENWAY SYSTEM
	AS SHOWN IN FIGURE VII-3, THAT INCLUDES 24TH ST. AND
	SPRUCE AVE.
	PER SECTION 94-611, SHADE TREES ARE DEFINED AS A
	HARDWOOD TREE WHICH, BY VIRTUE OF ITS NATURAL SHAPE,
	PROVIDES AT MATURITY A CANOPY WITH A MINIMUM DIAMETER
	OF 25 FEET AND PROVIDES RELIEF FROM DIRECT SUNLIGHT FOR
	AT LEAST SIX MONTHS EACH YEAR. ADDITION OF THE OVERHEAD
	LINES CREATES A CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED 20 FOOT
	TREES AND STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIREMENTS OF
	F.S.163.3209.
	PER SECTION 94-210.M.3.D.VII. OVERHEAD LINES ARE NOT
	PERMITTED. THESE WOULD BE NEW OVERHEAD LINES SO THEY DO
	NOT FALL UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING LINES AND
	ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
	STAFF CANNOT SUPPORT A WAIVER TO THESE REQUIREMENTS.



	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY OR IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY, A TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
	PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
	4. STREETSCAPE IN FDOT RIGHT OF WAY MUST RECEIVE FDOT
	PERMIT APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
	OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	01-12-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	01-12-2023	Time	13:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	01-12-2023	Time	13:39	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-12 13:39:27	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE Z22060030
	JANUARY 12, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES IN THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE AND
	PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
	ARBORIST REPORT COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE SUBMITTAL.
	PRESERVING THE EXISTING STREET TREES IS NOT FEASIBLE
	DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. THE INTENT OF THE
	CODE IS THAT THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO BE
	REPLACED WITH TREES AND INFRASTRUCTURE MEETING CURRENT
	STANDARDS.
	12/6/22 THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE
	FOR THE FUTURE AS THEY ARE REACHING THE END OF THEIR
	SURVIVABILITY DUE TO THE COMPACTED SOIL CONDITIONS THAT
	CURRENTLY SURROUND THE PLANTING LOCATIONS. REPLACING
	WITH NEW TREES AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL
	SOIL AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED WILL
	PROVIDE SUSTAINABLE TREE CANOPY FOR THE FUTURE.

	2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY
	THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10% COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	IS REQUIRED. 10% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED AND MUST
	BE IN ONE OF THE FORMS OF PER SECTION 94-210 K. 4. THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED, IDENTIFIED
	AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE SHOWN
	FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE COVERED
	AREA.
	CONFIGURATION AND REQUIREMENTS WERE CHANGED.
	??? THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE
	ALLEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENT. SHOW THE SEPARATION ON PLANS.
	??? DESIGNATED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET
	L2 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH SHEET A0.4.
	??? FPL TRANSFORMER AREA CANNOT BE COUNTED AS PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED URBAN
	GREENWAYS SYSTEM AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING
	DISTRICT PER SECTION 94-210 L.


	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET.

	5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING THE
	COMPLETE STREETSCAPE AS REQUIRED WITH THE BUFFERS AND
	PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING
	ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE
	FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	PER SECTION 94-443 ALONG ALL REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
	BUFFERS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PROPERTY LINE ALONG
	THE ALLEY AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY
	CONNECTION ALONG THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
	??? SATISFIED. THERE IS A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	REQUIRED FOR THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY ACCESS IF IT IS
	2 WAY TRAFFIC PER 94-210(M)(3).
	??? SATISFIED. ON SHEET L1-C, CORRECT THE BUFFER
	VEGETATION CHART TO SHOW REQUIRED TREES FOR WEST BUFFER
	-ADJACENT PROPERTY TO SHOW 3 TREES REQUIRED.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES IN BUFFERS ADJACENT TO
	OTHER PROPERTIES OR VEHICULAR USE AREAS.


	8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
	MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF AND
	SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH.
	SHOW THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PLANTING STRIP IN ALL AREAS
	THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET PARKING ADJACENT TO THE CURB.
	??? SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE ALONG SPRUCE MUST
	INCLUDE THE 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTING STRIP AS THERE IS NO
	ON STREET PARKING.
	12/6/22 THE PLANTING STRIP MUST BE SHOWN AS CONTINUOUS
	WITH MINIMUM WIDTH PASS THROUGHS SHOWN FOR THE PARKING.
	??? SATISFIED. PALMS MAY BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO
	REQUIRED SHADE TREES BUT MAY NOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE
	REQUIRED SHADE TREES. SEE 94-210 (L). ADJUST PLANS
	ACCORDINGLY FOR 24TH ST AND SPRUCE GREENWAYS.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE SAME APPLIES FOR 25TH ST. STAFF DOES
	NOT SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE TREES TO REPLACE
	THEM WITH PALMS, AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF
	PROVIDING CONTINUOUS TREE CANOPY FOR PEDESTRIANS.


	9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
	OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	SCALE OF PLANS MAY NEED TO BE INCREASED TO SHOW
	UTILITIES AND DEMONSTRATE CONFLICTS HAVE CLEARLY BEEN
	RESOLVED.
	12/6/22 THERE ARE SEVERAL CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS
	OF THE UTILITY LINES THAT ARE TOO CLOSE OR IN DIRECT
	CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES. UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE
	ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
	1/12/23 THE LOCATION OF THE WATER UTILITY LINE FROM THE
	24TH STREET SIDE IS SHOWN IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A
	PROPOSED TREE. UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE ADJUSTED TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS.

	10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST AND
	PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OF THE REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR REFERENCE.
	STREET TREES AND STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS MUST BE INCLUDED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	12/6/22 NEW STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANT
	LIST AND THE SIZES SHOWN AT THE REQUIRED 20 FEET
	HEIGHT.


	11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G).

	12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS
	INDICATED FOR ALOCASIA.


	13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
	FPL SHOWN, BUT ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE
	SHOWN AND SCREENED.
	12/6/22 NOTE IS ADDED, BUT THERE ARE CONFLICTS THAT
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AND VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN WITH
	SCREENING.

	14. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON 25TH
	AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE SUBJECT
	TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY.
	FDOT LETTER WAS SUBMITTED BUT DOES NOT MENTION
	STREETSCAPE.
	12/6/22 PROVIDE FDOT LETTER.


	15. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE
	REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL TREES
	MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES
	AND TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.
	ONGOING WITH STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	12/6/22 STREET TREES MUST BE UPDATED. STREET TREES MUST
	BE SHADE TREES.

	16. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR
	STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS
	ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14
	FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD
	BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.
	ALL NEW LOCATIONS MUST SHOW THIS INFORMATION.

	17. SATISFIED. REMOVE REFERENCE ON PLANS TO PLEACHED
	TREES, AS THIS IS PROHIBITED BY SECTION 94-448.
	REFERENCES ARE STILL SHOWN ON SHEETS L1-B AND ON THE
	PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.
	HEDGES ARE LIMITED TO 10 FEET IN HEIGHT.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/6/22:

	18. SATISFIED. 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT MET ALONG
	THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PART OF THE BUILDING ENCROACHES
	INTO THE BUFFER.

	19. SATISFIED. STRUCTURAL SOIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR
	TREES PLANTED IN PAVED AREAS INTERNAL TO THE SITE TO
	ASSURE THEY ARE SUSTAINABLE.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS1/12/23:

	20. TREE CANOPY MITIGATION CALCULATIONS MUST BE
	PROVIDED ON SHEET EX-1 AS PART OF THE TREE DISPOSITION
	PLAN. TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND TOTAL
	TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION CREDITS FROM THE
	PLANT LIST MUST BE SHOWN.

	21. THE ELECTRIC SERVICE LINES PROPOSED ARE IN CONFLICT
	WITH THE NEW STREET TREES. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT
	ADDING NEW OVERHEAD LINES TO NMUD DISTRICT, ALL LINES
	SHOULD BE UNDERGROUND.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY OR IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY, A TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
	PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
	4. STREETSCAPE IN FDOT RIGHT OF WAY MUST RECEIVE FDOT
	PERMIT APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
	OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-06-2022	Time	15:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-06-2022	Time	15:38	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-06 15:39:00	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE Z22060030
	DECEMBER 6, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
	NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
	PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5)
	STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF
	GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN
	ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
	POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES IN THE EXISTING
	STREETSCAPE AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
	ARBORIST REPORT COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE SUBMITTAL.
	PRESERVING THE EXISTING STREET TREES IS NOT FEASIBLE
	DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. THE INTENT OF THE
	CODE IS THAT THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO BE
	REPLACED WITH TREES AND INFRASTRUCTURE MEETING CURRENT
	STANDARDS.
	12/6/22 THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE
	FOR THE FUTURE AS THEY ARE REACHING THE END OF THEIR
	SURVIVABILITY DUE TO THE COMPACTED SOIL CONDITIONS THAT
	CURRENTLY SURROUND THE PLANTING LOCATIONS. REPLACING
	WITH NEW TREES AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL
	SOIL AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED WILL
	PROVIDE SUSTAINABLE TREE CANOPY FOR THE FUTURE.


	2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY
	THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10% COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	IS REQUIRED. 10% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED AND MUST
	BE IN ONE OF THE FORMS OF PER SECTION 94-210 K. 4. THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED, IDENTIFIED
	AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE SHOWN
	FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE COVERED
	AREA.
	CONFIGURATION AND REQUIREMENTS WERE CHANGED.
	??? THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE
	ALLEY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENT. SHOW THE SEPARATION ON PLANS.
	??? DESIGNATED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET
	L2 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH SHEET A0.4.
	??? FPL TRANSFORMER AREA CANNOT BE COUNTED AS PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED URBAN
	GREENWAYS SYSTEM AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING
	DISTRICT PER SECTION 94-210 L.


	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET.

	5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING THE
	COMPLETE STREETSCAPE AS REQUIRED WITH THE BUFFERS AND
	PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING
	ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE
	FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	PER SECTION 94-443 ALONG ALL REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
	BUFFERS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PROPERTY LINE ALONG
	THE ALLEY AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY
	CONNECTION ALONG THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
	??? SATISFIED. THERE IS A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	REQUIRED FOR THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY ACCESS IF IT IS
	2 WAY TRAFFIC PER 94-210(M)(3).
	??? SATISFIED. ON SHEET L1-C, CORRECT THE BUFFER
	VEGETATION CHART TO SHOW REQUIRED TREES FOR WEST BUFFER
	-ADJACENT PROPERTY TO SHOW 3 TREES REQUIRED.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES IN BUFFERS ADJACENT TO
	OTHER PROPERTIES OR VEHICULAR USE AREAS.


	8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
	MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF AND
	SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH.
	SHOW THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PLANTING STRIP IN ALL AREAS
	THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET PARKING ADJACENT TO THE CURB.
	??? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE ALONG SPRUCE
	MUST INCLUDE THE 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTING STRIP AS THERE IS
	NO ON STREET PARKING.
	12/6/22 THE PLANTING STRIP MUST BE SHOWN AS CONTINUOUS
	WITH MINIMUM WIDTH PASS THROUGHS SHOWN FOR THE PARKING.
	??? SATISFIED. PALMS MAY BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO
	REQUIRED SHADE TREES BUT MAY NOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE
	REQUIRED SHADE TREES. SEE 94-210 (L). ADJUST PLANS
	ACCORDINGLY FOR 24TH ST AND SPRUCE GREENWAYS.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE SAME APPLIES FOR 25TH ST. STAFF DOES
	NOT SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE TREES TO REPLACE
	THEM WITH PALMS, AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF
	PROVIDING CONTINUOUS TREE CANOPY FOR PEDESTRIANS.


	9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
	OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	SCALE OF PLANS MAY NEED TO BE INCREASED TO SHOW
	UTILITIES AND DEMONSTRATE CONFLICTS HAVE CLEARLY BEEN
	RESOLVED.
	12/6/22 THERE ARE SEVERAL CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS
	OF THE UTILITY LINES THAT ARE TOO CLOSE OR IN DIRECT
	CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES. UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE
	ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICTS.

	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST
	AND PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OF THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR REFERENCE.
	STREET TREES AND STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS MUST BE INCLUDED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	12/6/22 NEW STREET TREES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANT
	LIST AND THE SIZES SHOWN AT THE REQUIRED 20 FEET
	HEIGHT.


	11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G).

	12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS
	INDICATED FOR ALOCASIA.


	13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND
	SHOW LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
	EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE
	SCREENED.
	FPL SHOWN, BUT ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE
	SHOWN AND SCREENED.
	12/6/22 NOTE IS ADDED, BUT THERE ARE CONFLICTS THAT
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AND VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN WITH
	SCREENING.

	14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON 25TH AND
	24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE SUBJECT TO
	REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY.
	FDOT LETTER WAS SUBMITTED BUT DOES NOT MENTION
	STREETSCAPE.
	12/6/22 PROVIDE FDOT LETTER.


	15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE
	MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS,
	BUT ALL TREES MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE
	SAFE SIGHTLINES AND TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS
	AND VEHICLES.
	ONGOING WITH STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	12/6/22 STREET TREES MUST BE UPDATED. STREET TREES MUST
	BE SHADE TREES.

	16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A
	DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE
	AREAS ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9
	X 14 FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT
	WOULD BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.
	ALL NEW LOCATIONS MUST SHOW THIS INFORMATION.

	17. SATISFIED. REMOVE REFERENCE ON PLANS TO PLEACHED
	TREES, AS THIS IS PROHIBITED BY SECTION 94-448.
	REFERENCES ARE STILL SHOWN ON SHEETS L1-B AND ON THE
	PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.
	HEDGES ARE LIMITED TO 10 FEET IN HEIGHT.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/6/22:

	18. 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT MET ALONG THE WEST
	PROPERTY LINE, PART OF THE BUILDING ENCROACHES INTO THE
	BUFFER.

	19. STRUCTURAL SOIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR TREES
	PLANTED IN PAVED AREAS INTERNAL TO THE SITE TO ASSURE
	THEY ARE SUSTAINABLE.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY OR IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY, A TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
	PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-29-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	08-29-2022	Time	15:50	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	08-29-2022	Time	15:50	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-29 15:51:14	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE Z22060030
	AUGUST 29, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
	NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
	PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5)
	STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF
	GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN
	ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
	POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES IN THE EXISTING
	STREETSCAPE AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
	ARBORIST REPORT COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE SUBMITTAL.
	PRESERVING THE EXISTING STREET TREES IS NOT FEASIBLE
	DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. THE INTENT OF THE
	CODE IS THAT THE EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO BE
	REPLACED WITH TREES AND INFRASTRUCTURE MEETING CURRENT
	STANDARDS.

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, AND PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE AREAS AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING
	DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10% COMMON
	PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. 10% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
	IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE IN ONE OF THE FORMS OF PER
	SECTION 94-210 K. 4. THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO
	BE QUANTIFIED, IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL
	REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE COVERED AREA.
	CONFIGURATION AND REQUIREMENTS WERE CHANGED.
	? THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ALLEY
	CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENT. SHOW THE SEPARATION ON PLANS.
	? DESIGNATED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET L2
	ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH SHEET A0.4.
	? FPL TRANSFORMER AREA CANNOT BE COUNTED AS PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED URBAN
	GREENWAYS SYSTEM AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING
	DISTRICT PER SECTION 94-210 L.


	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET.

	5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING THE
	COMPLETE STREETSCAPE AS REQUIRED WITH THE BUFFERS AND
	PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING
	ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE
	FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE
	PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443 ALONG ALL REQUIRED 5 FOOT
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PROPERTY
	LINE ALONG THE ALLEY AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED
	ALLEY CONNECTION ALONG THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
	? THERE IS A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIRED FOR THE
	EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEY ACCESS IF IT IS 2 WAY TRAFFIC
	PER 94-210(M)(3).
	? ON SHEET L1-C, CORRECT THE BUFFER VEGETATION CHART TO
	SHOW REQUIRED TREES FOR WEST BUFFER -ADJACENT PROPERTY
	TO SHOW 3 TREES REQUIRED.
	? PROVIDE HEDGES IN BUFFERS ADJACENT TO OTHER
	PROPERTIES OR VEHICULAR USE AREAS.


	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
	REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
	OR PORTION THEREOF AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR
	EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH. SHOW THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT
	PLANTING STRIP IN ALL AREAS THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET
	PARKING ADJACENT TO THE CURB.
	? THE STREETSCAPE ALONG SPRUCE MUST INCLUDE THE 5 FOOT
	WIDE PLANTING STRIP AS THERE IS NO ON STREET PARKING.
	? PALMS MAY BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO REQUIRED SHADE
	TREES BUT MAY NOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE REQUIRED SHADE
	TREES. SEE 94-210 (L). ADJUST PLANS ACCORDINGLY FOR
	24TH ST AND SPRUCE GREENWAYS. ADDITIONALLY, THE SAME
	APPLIES FOR 25TH ST. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVING
	EXISTING SHADE TREES TO REPLACE THEM WITH PALMS, AS IT
	DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING CONTINUOUS TREE
	CANOPY FOR PEDESTRIANS.


	9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER
	AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
	SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
	UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	SCALE OF PLANS MAY NEED TO BE INCREASED TO SHOW
	UTILITIES AND DEMONSTRATE CONFLICTS HAVE CLEARLY BEEN
	RESOLVED.

	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST
	AND PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OF THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR REFERENCE.
	STREET TREES AND STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS MUST BE INCLUDED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.


	11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G).

	12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
	94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
	PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS
	INDICATED FOR ALOCASIA.



	13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND
	SHOW LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
	EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE
	SCREENED.
	FPL SHOWN, BUT ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE
	SHOWN AND SCREENED.

	14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON 25TH AND
	24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE SUBJECT TO
	REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY.
	FDOT LETTER WAS SUBMITTED BUT DOES NOT MENTION
	STREETSCAPE.


	15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE
	MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS,
	BUT ALL TREES MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE
	SAFE SIGHTLINES AND TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS
	AND VEHICLES.
	ONGOING WITH STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.

	16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A
	DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE
	AREAS ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9
	X 14 FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT
	WOULD BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.
	ALL NEW LOCATIONS MUST SHOW THIS INFORMATION.

	17. NOT SATISFIED. REMOVE REFERENCE ON PLANS TO
	PLEACHED TREES, AS THIS IS PROHIBITED BY SECTION
	94-448.
	REFERENCES ARE STILL SHOWN ON SHEETS L1-B AND ON THE
	PLANT LIST ON SHEET L4.
	HEDGES ARE LIMITED TO 10 FEET IN HEIGHT.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY OR IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY, A TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
	PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-12-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	07-12-2022	Time	16:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	07-12-2022	Time	16:43	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-12 16:44:08	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 2501 SPRUCE AVE SITE Z22060030
	JULY 12, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
	RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
	EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
	POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
	THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
	TREES IN THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE AND PROVIDE A TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN.

	2. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS AS
	REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE
	OF OPEN SPACE. 10% COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS
	REQUIRED. 10% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
	IN ONE OF THE FORMS OF PER SECTION 94-210 K. 4. THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED, IDENTIFIED
	AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE SHOWN
	FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE COVERED
	AREA.

	3. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED URBAN GREENWAYS
	SYSTEM AS REQUIRED IN THE NMUD ZONING DISTRICT PER
	SECTION 94-210 L.


	4. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET.

	5. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWING THE COMPLETE
	STREETSCAPE AS REQUIRED WITH THE BUFFERS AND PRIVATE
	AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS.

	6. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
	THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
	ROAD OR STREET.

	7. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED PER SECTION
	94-443 ALONG ALL REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS FOR
	THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE ALLEY
	AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY CONNECTION
	ALONG THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.


	8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
	MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF AND
	SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH.
	SHOW THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PLANTING STRIP IN ALL AREAS
	THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET PARKING ADJACENT TO THE CURB. .

	9. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
	DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF
	BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO
	RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND
	LANDSCAPING.

	10. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE A
	SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OF THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE
	AREAS FOR REFERENCE.


	11. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
	BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G).

	12. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
	SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
	ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
	SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
	SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
	WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
	LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
	PLANT LIST.


	13. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW LOCATIONS FOR ALL
	GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT
	ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.

	14. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON 25TH AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING
	BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE
	PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.


	15. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENT
	OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL TREES MUST BE OF
	SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES AND
	TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.

	16. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL
	SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE
	STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14 FT AREA FOR EACH
	TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD BE PLANTING AREA
	AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	17. REMOVE REFERENCE ON PLANS TO PLEACHED TREES, AS
	THIS IS PROHIBITED BY SECTION 94-448.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY OR IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY, A TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT,
	PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	01-31-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	relizond			Date	01-31-2023	Time	10:08	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	relizond			Date	01-31-2023	Time	08:42	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-31 10:01:02	APPROVAL IS CONDITIONAL ON THE FOLLOWING BEING
	ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING REVIEW
	-PREVIOUS COMMENTS REGARDING CLEANOUTS NOT FULLY
	ADDRESSED. CLEANOUT SIZES HAVE NOT BEEN SPECIFIED AND
	THE PROPOSED CLEANOUT ALONG PROPERTY LINE ON SOUTHEAST
	PART OF PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE AN EASEMENT IN ITS
	CURRENT LOCATION. REFER TO CITY DETAIL GS-6 FOR FURTHER
	CLARIFICATION
	-PROFILES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL
	-EXISTING 16"X16"X8" TEE DEPICTED ON PLANS NOT SHOWN IN
	GIS. VERIFY THE EXISTING VALVE PROPOSED FOR CONNECTION,
	OR OTHER MEANS OF CONNECTION TO 16" WATER MAIN WILL
	NEED TO BE MADE.
	-PROPOSED 4" REMOVAL INCLUDES PORTION OF EXISTING 8"
	WATER MAIN, PROPOSED PLUG WOULD BE INTO EXISTING 8"
	GATE VALVE.
	-INVERTS FOR NORTH AND SOUTH STILL SHOWN ON SANITARY
	MANHOLE 1 DESPITE NO EXISTING PIPE RUNNING ALONG SPRUCE

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	01-17-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	relizond			Date	01-17-2023	Time	10:44	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	relizond			Date	01-17-2023	Time	09:39	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-17 10:44:07	-DEMOLTION SHEET DOES NOT REFLECT REMOVAL OF EXISTING
	WATER AND SEWER MAINS ON SITE
	-CLEANOUT MUST BE LOCATED CLOSE TO PROPERTY LINE TO BE
	CONSIDERED "POINT OF SERVICE" (WTH EASEMENT AS NEEDED)
	-CONFIRM EXISTENCE OF SEWER MAIN RUNNING NORTH/SOUTH ON
	SPRUCE (RECORDS DON'T SHOW RUN THAT IS SHOW ON PLANS)
	-POINTS OF SERVICE FOR WATER AND SEWER THAT ARE INSIDE
	OF PROPERTY LINE WILL REQUIRE AN EASEMENT
	-MEANS OF CONNECTION FOR SANITARY SEEWER LATERALS NEED
	TO BE SPECIFIED
	-SPECIFY SIZES OF CLEANOUTS

	RICKY ELIZONDO
	[email protected]

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	relizond			Date	12-05-2022	Time	11:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	relizond			Date	12-05-2022	Time	10:29	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-05 11:05:15	-SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	-PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. (DENOTE
	THE LEGEND)
	-PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	-DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	-PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL LOCATED IN
	THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	-PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
	TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
	MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	-SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	-PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	-PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG
	ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE WHERE CONNECTION IS PROPOSED
	(CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
	-CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	-WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	-CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
	ARE REQUIRED.
	-PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	-ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER. (AREA SERVES LS 23)
	-LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE
	-PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
	-DENOTE POINTS OF SERVICE FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER
	-EXISTING MANHOLES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO HAVE NEW
	CONNECTIONS WILL NEED TO BE REHABBED
	-NO DEMOLITION PLAN PROVIDED
	-CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE NOTE
	USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA
	-IF WATER LINES ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW
	ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-14-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	07-14-2022	Time	11:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	07-14-2022	Time	11:13	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-14 11:15:13	-NOTHING TO ADD FROM THE CONVERSATION ON 7/12.
	-PUD IS REVIEWING THE PROPOSED IMPACTS FROM MULTIPLE
	DEVELOPER PROJECTS TO ASSESS THE IMPACT FEES FOR THE
	GRAVITY SYSTEM ON 24TH ST.

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	01-27-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	01-27-2023	Time	11:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2023-01-27 11:19:28	WATER SERVICES MAY REQUIRE REVISION AT ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	01-09-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	01-09-2023	Time	16:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2023-01-09 16:47:21	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:

	-PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT "THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS
	BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE
	IS A SEWER LATERAL TO THE SOUTHEAST WHICH APPEARS TO BE
	RUNNING UNDERNEATH A TREE, BUT IT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPING PLANS. ALSO, THERE IS ARE SOME PROPOSED
	TREES OVER WATER SERVICE LINES. PLEASE SHOW UTILITIES
	ON LANDSCAPING PLANS, AND ENSURE TREES AND UTILITIES
	ARE DISTANCED FROM EACH OTHER." WAS NOT RESOLVED IN
	PLAN SETS INCLUDED WITHIN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.

	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	12-05-2022	Time	10:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-12-05 10:03:47	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-LANDSCAPING PLAN SEEMS TO HAVE DIFFERENT LAYOUT THAN
	SITE PLAN AND CIVIL PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, CHECK THE AREA
	NEAR THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION TO THE SOUTHEAST.
	PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLANS HAVE MATCHING DESIGNS.
	-THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND
	UTILITIES. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE IS A SEWER LATERAL TO THE
	SOUTHEAST WHICH APPEARS TO BE RUNNING UNDERNEATH A
	TREE, BUT IT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLANS.
	ALSO THERE IS ARE SOME PROPOSED TREES OVER WATER
	SERVICE LINES. PLEASE SHOW UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPING
	PLANS, AND ENSURE TREES AND UTILITIES ARE DISTANCED
	FROM EACH OTHER.
	-WATER SERVICE DESIGN MAY NEED REVISION UPON FURTHER
	REVIEW AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	08-13-2022	Time	09:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-08-13 09:45:47	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-REMINDER TO INCLUDE IN NEXT RESUBMITTAL:
	ON CIVIL PLANS PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW NEIGHBORING EDGES OF
	BUILDINGS ADJACENT ALLEY AND ALSO SHOW NEIGHBORING
	PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS CONNECTED TO ALLEY.
	RINKA WILL ALSO SHOW ON SITE PLAN, WILL BE COMPLETED
	UPON RECEIPT OF UPDATED SURVEY.
	-REMINDER TO INCLUDE IN NEXT RESUBMITTAL:
	IS A SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE NEEDED?
	THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN UPCOMING RESUBMITTAL
	-REMINDER TO INCLUDE IN NEXT RESUBMITTAL:
	BROADWAY MANHOLE SAYS WILL BE REMOVED BUT THERE ARE
	ADDITIONAL INVERTS. PLEASE CONFIRM IF THERE ARE OTHER
	SECTIONS OF PIPE CONNECTED AND IF REMOVAL WITH CAUSE
	PROBLEM.
	WILL CONFIRM PRIOR TO FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
	-RESPONSE LETTER SAID NEW ALLEY ACCESS IS PROPOSED AS
	PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT. SHOW AND LABEL
	ACCESS EASEMENT ON PLANS. THAT AREA WOULD ALSO REQUIRE
	A UTILITY EASEMENT FOR PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER
	UTILITIES.
	-PROVIDE LANDSCAPING SHEET THAT SHOWS UTILITIES AND
	ENSURE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPING.
	THERE APPEARS TO BE AT LEAST ONE TREE CONFLICT WITH 10
	FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT OF LARGE WATER METER AT SOUTH
	SIDE.
	-EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
	AT EAST SIDE APPEARS TO BE A CITY PARKS IRRIGATION
	METER. THERE MAY ALSO BE PARKS IRRIGATION RAIN SENSOR
	BOX APPROX. 60 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST. ANY PROPOSED
	CHANGES WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND COORDINATED WITH
	PARKS DEPT AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	-RECOMMEND DRAINAGE IN FIRE WATER ROOM IN CASE BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLIES LEAK OR DUMP WATER.
	-VERIFY NO AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLIES SUCH AS WELLS WILL
	BE CONNECTED TO FIRE SYSTEM.
	-ADD FIRELINE DCDA AND LARGE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY STANDARD
	DETAILS TO ENGINEERING PLAN SET.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY
	[email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-11-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	07-11-2022	Time	14:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date	07-11-2022	Time	13:54	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-11 14:13:27	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:

	-WHAT IS HAPPENING TO EXISTING UTILITY POLES AND
	OVERHEAD WIRES ALONG ALLEYWAY?

	-WPB GIS SAYS WATER MAIN IS TRANSITE AROUND AREA OF
	PROPOSED ELIMINATION.

	-THERE ARE EXISTING CITY UTILITIES NEAR ALLEY.
	APPLICANT MAY NEED TO RELOCATE THE UTILITIES AS
	REQUESTED BY CITY.

	-AT EAST SIDE OF ALLEY THERE IS A CITY STREET LIGHTING
	FEED AND MAY BE A POWER SUPPLY FOR CITY IRRIGATION.
	APPLICANT NEEDS SEPARATE APPROVAL FROM CITY FOR ANY
	CHANGES TO THOSE.

	-ON CIVIL PLANS PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW NEIGHBORING EDGES
	OF BUILDINGS ADJACENT ALLEY AND ALSO SHOW NEIGHBORING
	PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS CONNECTED TO ALLEY.

	-SHOW ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES AROUND AREA OF WORK
	ON CIVIL PLANS. SOME EXISTING WATER SERVICES MAY NEED
	TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CITY OR EOR.

	-IS A SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE NEEDED?

	-BROADWAY MANHOLE SAYS WILL BE REMOVED BUT THERE ARE
	ADDITIONAL INVERTS. PLEASE CONFIRM IF THERE ARE OTHER
	SECTIONS OF PIPE CONNECTED AND IF REMOVAL WITH CAUSE
	PROBLEM.

	-SHOW ALL SEWER LATERAL CLEANOUTS.

	-DOMESTIC RP BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS NOT SHOWN. SHOULD BE
	OUTSIDE OF BUILDING. CONSIDER PUTTING IT IN LINE WITH
	METER EAST WEST.

	-CONSIDER PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON DOMESTIC
	WATER SERVICE TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW
	MAINTENANCE.

	-SHOW UTILITY EASEMENT FOR DOMESTIC WATER METER AND
	SERVICE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	-TWO PARKING SPOTS AND AN EXISTING TREE LOOK TO BE
	DISTURBED BY PROPOSED ALLEY CONNECTION. PLEASE CONTACT
	CITY PLANNING AND PARKING REPRESENTATIVES TO RESOLVE.

	-PROVIDE SEPARATE LANDSCAPING PLAN SHEET SHOWING
	UTILITIES. ENSURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES
	AND UTILITIES.

	-PLEASE RELOCATE FIRELINE POINT OF SERVICE VALVE
	SLIGHTLY SOUTH IN LINE WITH THE METER VALVES.

	-PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO RECORD BACKFLOW
	COVENANT AS A CONDITION OF FIRELINE WATER SERVICE.

	-EXISTING WATER MAIN STUB AND VALVE ON 24TH ST MAY BE
	SHOWN AT WRONG LOCATION ON CIVIL PLAN. THAT MAY AFFECT
	PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.

	-APPLICANT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL CITY WPB UTILITIES
	BILLING REQUIREMENTS.

	-EAST SIDE OF ALLEY CONNECTION ON 24TH ST LOOKS TO HAVE
	A RAMP. DOES THE WEST SIDE NEED ELEVATION TRANSITION
	ALSO?

	-IS THE NEW ALLEY ACCESS PROPOSED TO BE CITY RIGHT OF
	WAY OR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT?

	-PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL PROPERTY LINES ON CIVIL
	PLANS.

	-CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS AND
	OUTSIDE GREASE TRAPS ON CIVIL PLANS.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	07-17-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-17-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	07-17-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-07-17 08:55:27	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
	1- COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE IN
	ORDER FOR THE CITY`S COLLECTION TRUCKS TO BE ABLE TO
	PROVIDE THE SERVICE.
	2- THE EXISTING ALLEY SHALL BE PAVED.
	3- THE COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE ROLLED OUT TO THE
	LOADING ZONE FOR SERVICE ON THE SERVICE DAYS BY THE
	BUILDING MAINTENANCE STAFF.
	4- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	5- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	6- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAILS AND
	MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
	7- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
	DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	12-01-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-01-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	12-01-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-01 08:48:54	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
	1- COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE IN
	ORDER FOR THE CITY`S COLLECTION TRUCKS TO BE ABLE TO
	PROVIDE THE SERVICE.
	2- THE EXISTING ALLEY SHALL BE PAVED.
	3- THE COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE ROLLED OUT TO THE
	LOADING ZONE FOR SERVICE ON THE SERVICE DAYS BY THE
	BUILDING MAINTENANCE STAFF.
	4- THE ALLEY TURNING RADIII INTO 24TH ST TO BE
	REVISITED/MODIFIED TO PREVENT ANY ENCROACHMENT OF THE
	SANITATION COLLECTION TRUCK, AS SHOWN ON THE AUTO TURN
	ANALYSIS, SHEET EX1.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	08-05-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-05-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	08-05-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-05 13:28:45	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
	1- COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE IN
	ORDER FOR THE CITY`S COLLECTION TRUCKS TO BE ABLE TO
	PROVIDE THE SERVICE.
	2- THE EXISTING ALLEY SHALL BE PAVED.
	3- THE COMPACTOR CONTAINERS SHALL BE ROLLED OUT TO THE
	LOADING ZONE FOR SERVICE ON THE SERVICE DAYS BY THE
	BUILDING MAINTENANCE STAFF.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-07-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-07-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	07-07-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-07 09:23:47
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
	QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
	THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
	3- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
	RECYCLING CONTAINERS
	4- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
	GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
	TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
	NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
	5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	6- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	7- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D.
	LATEST EDITION.
	8- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING
	CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	02-08-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	02-08-2023	Time	12:31	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	02-08-2023	Time	12:32	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-08 12:32:26	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	1/19/2023 PPRC SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS
	ARE NOT INCLUDED.

	10. [SATISFIED - EOR TO RESOLVE PRIOR TO ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AT THE
	BASE OF THE STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG 25TH STREET VS.
	THE EXISTING BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION. SOME PROPOSED
	ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE BELOW THE BOW OR MORE THAN 1
	INCH ABOVE THE BOW.

	NEW COMMENTS (8/4/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	13. [SATISFIED ??? ALL STORM PIPES WITHIN THE R/W SHOWN
	TO BE 15-INCHES] JUSTIFY ALL OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETERS
	LARGER THAN 15 INCH. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED
	WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	19. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? NEED GRADES FOR THE
	CORNERS OF THE BULBOUT CREATED FOR THE ALLEY ACCESS
	EASEMENT.] PROVIDE GRADES AROUND THE NEW ALLEY ENTRANCE
	ON 24TH ST.

	20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
	ON THE PAVING AND GRADING, THE DRAINAGE AND THE WATER
	AND WASTEWATER PLAN SHEETS. SHALL BE ADDRESSED FOR
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] LABEL (SIZE AND
	MATERIAL) EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	21. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
	AND COORDINATE THE LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY PLANS.

	NEW COMMENTS (12/21/22 SUBMITTAL):
	22. [SATISFIED] REVIEW SPOT GRADE OF 16.40 FT NAVD AT
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS GRADE IS ONE
	FOOT HIGHER THAN THE FFE. COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED AT
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	23. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] REVIEW EXISTING SPOT
	GRADES ALONG THE NORTH CURB LINE OF 24TH ST, WEST OF
	THE ALLEY DRIVEWAY. THERE IS A 2.5+ FEET DROP ACROSS
	THE PARKING SPACE (15.71 TO 13.08 FT NAVD).

	24. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY
	BULBOUT WILL INTERRUPT/BLOCK THE DRAINAGE FLOW WEST OF
	THE DRIVEWAY.

	25. [SATISFIED] SECTION A FOR THE ALLEY R/W (SHED
	SECTION) DOES NOT MATCH THE GRADING PLAN FOR THE ALLEY
	(INVERTED CROWN) OR MATCH THE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES.

	26. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] SECTION C SHOWS THE ALLEY
	PAVEMENT SLOPING TO THE RIGHT (OR NORTH). THE GRADING
	PLAN INDICATES THE ALLEY WILL SLOPE TO THE SOUTH.

	27. [SATISFIED] SECTION E - PROVIDE STEEPER CROSS SLOPE
	(0.5% MIN. ) FOR 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK TO PROMOTE
	DRAINAGE. THE SPOT GRADES WILL CREATE A 0.1% CROSS
	SLOPE. INDICATE WHAT THE 15.62 SPOT GRADE IS FOR. THESE
	COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT
	SUBMITTAL.

	28. SECTION F -
	A. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? CONFIRM THE DISTANCE IS 10
	INCHES OR 10 FEET] LABEL THE R/W LINE AND THE DISTANCE
	FROM THE BACK OF CURB.
	B. [SATISFIED] SECTION ARROWS FACING THE WRONG
	DIRECTION.
	C. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE THE BUILDING CODE REQUIRES THE
	SURFACE ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING TO SLOPE AWAY FROM THE
	BUILDING] IS THE BERM NECESSARY ALONG THE BUILDING.

	29. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] ADD THE FOLLOWING LINE
	TYPES TO THE SHEET LEGEND: H2O, ELEC, FO, SAN AND ANY
	OTHER LINETYPES THAT APPEAR ON THE PLANS. THIS CAN BE
	ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
	1. DEVELOPER TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE
	SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY EASEMENT.

	2. GRADING OF PUBLIC ALLEY IS TO BLEND IN WITH THE
	ADJOINING PROPERTIES WITHOUT ADDING ADDITIONAL RUNOFF
	TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR PREVENTING EXISTING
	RUNOFF FROM THE PROPERTIES. ANY DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE
	INSTALLED TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE THE
	RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO MAINTAIN. AVOID THE
	INSTALLATION OF RAISED CURBING, WHICH WILL NARROW THE
	AVAILABLE TRAVEL WIDTH IN THE ALLEY.

	3. CURB RAMPS TO BE RE-CONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT ADA
	STANDARDS IF THE ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE RAMP IS
	MODIFIED IN ANY WAY.

	4. ALLEY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINES TO BE SHOWN
	ON ALL OF THE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.

	5. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE
	24TH STREET RIGHT OF WAY TO BE APPROVED BY FDOT. THE
	DISRUPTION OF THE GUTTER FLOW BY THE ALLEY EASEMENT
	DRIVEWAY BULBOUT IS TO BE RECTIFIED.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	01-18-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	01-18-2023	Time	16:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	01-18-2023	Time	16:01	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-18 16:01:08	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	12/21/22 PPRC SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS
	ARE NOT INCLUDED.

	1. [SATISFIED] CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 NOT
	LISTED. 12/8/22 UPDATED COMMENT - THE SURVEY LISTS THE
	CONVERSION FACTOR AS 1.50 FT. THE CIVIL PLANS LIST THE
	CONVERSION FACTOR AS 1.522 FEET. THE CONVERSION
	EQUATION SHOULD MATCH ON THESE DOCUMENTS.

	6. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF
	BUILDING TO CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR 24TH
	STREET, 25TH STREET AND SPRUCE AVE. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY,
	OFFSET DISTANCES, SURFACE FEATURES, GENERAL SURFACE
	SLOPES WITH MAX. ALLOWED PERCENTAGES, BREAK POINTS,
	ETC.

	10. [NOT SATISFIED ??? EOR TO RESOLVE PRIOR TO
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE PROPOSED
	ELEVATIONS AT THE BASE OF THE STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG
	25TH STREET VS. THE EXISTING BACK OF SIDEWALK
	ELEVATION. SOME PROPOSED ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE BELOW
	THE BOW OR MORE THAN 1 INCH ABOVE THE BOW.

	NEW COMMENTS (8/4/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	13. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY ALL OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETERS
	LARGER THAN 15 INCH. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED
	WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.


	16. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR THE ALLEY
	ENTRANCE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF 24TH STREET TO 5 FEET
	NORTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 24TH ST. SHOW GRADE
	BREAKS, SURFACE MATERIALS, RIGHT OF WAY LINE, RIGHT OF
	WAY NAME, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO GRADE BREAKS.

	17. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND CALLOUT NEW CURBING ON 24TH
	STREET AND THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING CURBING FOR THE
	PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.

	19. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE GRADES AROUND THE NEW ALLEY
	ENTRANCE ON 24TH ST.

	20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
	ON THE PAVING AND GRADING, THE DRAINAGE AND THE WATER
	AND WASTEWATER PLAN SHEETS.] LABEL (SIZE AND MATERIAL)
	EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	21. [NOT SATISFIED - ONLY STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN, NO
	PIPING.] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND
	COORDINATE THE LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY PLANS.

	NEW COMMENTS (12/21/22 SUBMITTAL):
	22. REVIEW SPOT GRADE OF 16.40 FT NAVD AT NORTHEAST
	CORNER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS GRADE IS ONE FOOT
	HIGHER THAN THE FFE. COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED AT
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	23. REVIEW EXISTING SPOT GRADES ALONG THE NORTH CURB
	LINE OF 24TH ST, WEST OF THE ALLEY DRIVEWAY. THERE IS A
	2.5+ FEET DROP ACROSS THE PARKING SPACE (15.71 TO 13.08
	FT NAVD).

	24. PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY BULBOUT WILL
	INTERRUPT/BLOCK THE DRAINAGE FLOW WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY.

	25. SECTION A FOR THE ALLEY R/W (SHED SECTION) DOES NOT
	MATCH THE GRADING PLAN FOR THE ALLEY (INVERTED CROWN)
	OR MATCH THE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES.

	26. SECTION C SHOWS THE ALLEY PAVEMENT SLOPING TO THE
	RIGHT (OR NORTH). THE GRADING PLAN INDICATES THE ALLEY
	WILL SLOPE TO THE SOUTH.

	27. SECTION E ??? PROVIDE STEEPER CROSS SLOPE (0.5%
	MIN. ) FOR 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE. THE
	SPOT GRADES WILL CREATE A 0.1% CROSS SLOPE. INDICATE
	WHAT THE 15.62 SPOT GRADE IS FOR. THESE COMMENTS CAN BE
	ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	28. SECTION F ???
	A. LABEL THE R/W LINE AND THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF
	CURB.
	B. SECTION ARROWS FACING THE WRONG DIRECTION.
	C. IS THE BREM NECESSARY ALONG THE BUILDING.

	29. ADD THE FOLLOWING LINE TYPES TO THE SHEET LEGEND:
	H2O, ELEC, FO, SAN AND ANY OTHER LINETYPES THAT APPEAR
	ON THE PLANS. THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
	1. DEVELOPER TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE
	SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY EASEMENT.

	2. GRADING OF PUBLIC ALLEY IS TO BLEND IN WITH THE
	ADJOINING PROPERTIES WITHOUT ADDING ADDITIONAL RUNOFF
	TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES.

	3. CURB RAMPS TO MEET CURRENT ADA STANDARDS IF THE
	ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE RAMP IS MODIFIED IN ANY WAY.

	4. ALLEY EASEMENT LINES TO BE SHOWN ON ALL OF THE
	ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.

	5. 24TH STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO BE
	APPROVED BY FDOT.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	12-08-2022	Time	11:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	12-08-2022	Time	11:50	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 11:50:36	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	12/8/22 PPRC SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS
	ARE NOT INCLUDED.

	1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - CONVERSION EQUATION TO
	NGVD1929 NOT LISTED.] 12/8/22 UPDATED COMMENT ??? THE
	SURVEY LISTS THE CONVERSION FACTOR AS 1.50 FT. THE
	CIVIL PLANS LIST THE CONVERSION FACTOR AS 1.522 FEET.
	THE CONVERSION EQUATION SHOULD MATCH ON THESE
	DOCUMENTS.

	6. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF
	BUILDING TO CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR 24TH
	STREET, 25TH STREET AND SPRUCE AVE. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY,
	OFFSET DISTANCES, SURFACE FEATURES, GENERAL SURFACE
	SLOPES WITH MAX. ALLOWED PERCENTAGES, BREAK POINTS,
	ETC.

	10. [NOT SATISFIED ??? EOR TO RESOLVE PRIOR TO
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE PROPOSED
	ELEVATIONS AT THE BASE OF THE STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG
	25TH STREET VS. THE EXISTING BACK OF SIDEWALK
	ELEVATION. SOME PROPOSED ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE BELOW
	THE BOW OR MORE THAN 1 INCH ABOVE THE BOW.

	NEW COMMENTS (8/4/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	13. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY ALL OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETERS
	LARGER THAN 15 INCH. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED
	WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	14. [SATISFIED ??? SHOWN ON SECTION B-B BUT EASEMENT
	LINES WILL NEED TO BE ADDED ON THE PLAN VIEWS OF THE
	CIVIL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
	SHOW THE LIMITS OF THE ALLEY EASEMENT ON THE CIVIL
	PLANS.

	15. [SATISFIED ??? MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY TO BE
	INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPER???S AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.]
	A ADVISE WHO WILL BE MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
	WITHIN THE ALLEY EASEMENT.

	16. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR THE
	ALLEY ENTRANCE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF 24TH STREET TO 5
	FEET NORTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 24TH ST. SHOW
	GRADE BREAKS, SURFACE MATERIALS, RIGHT OF WAY LINE,
	RIGHT OF WAY NAME, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO
	GRADE BREAKS.

	17. [NOT SATISFIED ??? TO BE ADDED PRIOR TO ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL] SHOW AND CALLOUT NEW CURBING ON 24TH
	STREET AND THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING CURBING FOR THE
	PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.

	18. [SATISFIED] CAN NEW LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON EITHER
	SIDE OF ALLEY ENTRANCE BE WIDENED TOWARD THE PARKING
	SPACES?

	19. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE GRADES AROUND THE NEW ALLEY
	ENTRANCE.

	20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? LABEL ALL EXISTING
	UTILITIES ON THE PAVING AND GRADING, THE DRAINAGE AND
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER PLAN SHEETS.] LABEL (SIZE AND
	MATERIAL) EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	21. [NOT SATISFIED ??? ONLY STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN, NO
	PIPING.] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND
	COORDINATE THE LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY PLANS.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-02-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	09-02-2022	Time	14:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	09-02-2022	Time	14:55	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-02 14:55:14	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	8/4/2022 SUBMTITAL:

	1. [NOT SATISFIED ? CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 NOT
	LISTED.] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
	NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
	LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
	PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM
	REFERENCE AND CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.

	2. [SATISFIED] 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET ARE
	MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W TO
	BE APPROVED BY FDOT.

	3. [SATISFIED] ARE THE R-TANKS JUST FOR STORAGE OR DO
	THEY ALSO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT? HOW WILL THE
	TANKS EMPTY?

	4. [SATISFIED ? INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED WITH
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] COMPLETE THE MISSING
	INFORMATION INDICATED BY ?#? ON THE R-TANK DETAIL
	SHEET.

	5. [SATISFIED ? INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED WITH
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS
	WITH ELEVATIONS THROUGH THE R-TANK STORAGE AREAS,
	SHOWING BOTTOM OF TANK, TOP OF TANK, AND SURFACE GRADE.

	6. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF
	BUILDING TO CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR 24TH
	STREET, 25TH STREET AND SPRUCE AVE. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY,
	OFFSET DISTANCES, SURFACE FEATURES, GENERAL SURFACE
	SLOPES WITH MAX. ALLOWED PERCENTAGES, BREAK POINTS,
	ETC.

	7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF THE ALLEY. SHOW
	RIGHT OF WAY LINES, OFFSETS TO ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS,
	GRADE BREAKS AND DIMENSIONS, SURFACE TREATMENTS, ETC.

	8. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR PROPOSED
	?ALLEY? BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND THE ALLEY. SHOW SURFACE
	FEATURES, DIMENSIONS, SURFACE BREAK POINTS, PROPERTY
	LINES, ETC.

	9. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FFE FOR THE PARKING GARAGE.

	10. [NOT SATISFIED] CHECK THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AT
	THE BASE OF THE STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG 25TH STREET
	VS. THE EXISTING BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION. SOME
	PROPOSED ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE BELOW THE BOW OR MORE
	THAN 1 INCH ABOVE THE BOW.

	11. [SATISFIED] CLEANUP THE TEXT IN THE NORTH AREA OF
	THE RETAIL SPACE ON SHEET C2.1.

	12. [SATISFIED] EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL CALLS OUT
	HDPE PIPE BUT RCP PIPE IS SHOWN ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN
	SHEET.

	NEW COMMENTS (8/4/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	13. JUSTIFY ALL OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETERS LARGER THAN 15?.
	THIS INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	14. SHOW THE LIMITS OF THE ALLEY EASEMENT ON THE CIVIL
	PLANS.

	15. ADVISE WHO WILL BE MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
	WITHIN THE ALLEY EASEMENT.

	16. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR THE ALLLEY ENTRANCE
	FROM THE CENTERLINE OF 24TH STREET TO 5 FEET NORTH OF
	THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 24TH ST. SHOW GRADE BREAKS,
	SURFACE MATERIALS, RIGHT OF WAY LINE, RIGHT OF WAY
	NAME, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO GRADE BREAKS.

	17. SHOW AND CALLOUT NEW CURBING ON 24TH STREET AND THE
	REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING CURBING FOR THE PROPOSED ALLEY
	DRIVEWAY AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.

	18. CAN NEW LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON EITHER SIDE OF ALLEY
	ENTRANCE BE WIDENED TOWARD THE PARKING SPACES?

	19. PROVIDE GRADES AROUND THE NEW ALLEY ENTRANCE.

	20. LABEL (SIZE AND MATERIAL) EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE
	RIGHT OF WAY.

	21. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND
	COORDINATE THE LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY PLANS.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-14-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	07-14-2022	Time	11:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	07-14-2022	Time	11:36	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-14 11:36:18	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:

	1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
	CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
	CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
	IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND
	CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.

	2. 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET ARE MAINTAINED BY FDOT.
	ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W TO BE APPROVED BY FDOT.

	3. ARE THE R-TANKS JUST FOR STORAGE OR DO THEY ALSO
	PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT? HOW WILL THE TANKS
	EMPTY?

	4. COMPLETE THE MISSING INFORMATION INDICATED BY ?#? ON
	THE R-TANK DETAIL SHEET.

	5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS WITH ELEVATIONS THROUGH THE
	R-TANK STORAGE AREAS, SHOWING BOTTOM OF TANK, TOP OF
	TANK, AND SURFACE GRADE.

	6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF BUILDING TO
	CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR 24TH STREET, 25TH
	STREET AND SPRUCE AVE. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY, OFFSET
	DISTANCES, SURFACE FEATURES, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES
	WITH MAX. ALLOWED PERCENTAGES, BREAK POINTS, ETC.

	7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF THE ALLEY. SHOW RIGHT OF
	WAY LINES, OFFSETS TO ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, GRADE BREAKS
	AND DIMENSIONS, SURFACE TREATMENTS, ETC.

	8. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR PROPOSED ?ALLEY? BETWEEN
	24TH STREET AND THE ALLEY. SHOW SURFACE FEATURES,
	DIMENSIONS, SURFACE BREAK POINTS, PROPERTY LINES, ETC.

	9. PROVIDE FFE FOR THE PARKING GARAGE.

	10. CHECK THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AT THE BASE OF THE
	STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG 25TH STREET VS. THE EXISTING
	BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION. SOME PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
	APPEAR TO BE BELOW THE BOW OR MORE THAN 1 INCH ABOVE
	THE BOW.

	11. CLEANUP THE TEXT IN THE NORTH AREA OF THE RETAIL
	SPACE ON SHEET C2.1.

	12. EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL CALLS OUT HDPE PIPE BUT
	RCP PIPE IS SHOWN ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET.



	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
	CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
	THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
	CONSTRUCTION.

	3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	01-31-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	01-31-2023	Time	07:23	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2023-01-31 07:29:10	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:

	1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
	2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PRIOR TO C.O.
	3. ENG. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AFTER SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-31-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	08-31-2022	Time	12:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-08-31 12:48:09	1. AFTER DISCUSSIONS WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES, SANITARY
	SEWER WILL NEED TO BE RE-ROUTED TO DIXIE HWY.
	2, PREVIOUS ITEMS 2, 4,5 AND 6 STILL PERTAIN.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	07-05-2022	Time	11:14	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-07-05 12:07:21
	1. WATER AND SEWER WILL NEED TO BE RE-ROUTED.
	PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS HAVE BEEN HELD WITH THE
	ENGINEER OF RECORD.
	2. PLANS WILL NEED TO SHOW ALL OTHER UTILITIES AS WELL
	AS EXISTING SERVICES THAT NEED TO BE CUT BACK TO MAIN.
	3. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29.
	4. PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE A REPLAT.
	5. ADD BASELINE AND STA./OFFSET TO ENG. PLANS.
	6. RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	02-02-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	02-02-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	02-02-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-02 13:54:50	APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
	1) PROVIDE ALL MISSING SIDEWALK AND/OR WALKWAY
	DIMENSIONS, INCLUSIVE OF EFFECTIVE WALKABLE AREA,
	LANDSCAPE AND ANY OTHER FEATURE(S) THAT COULD BE
	AFFECTING PEDESTRIANS. SEVERAL ARE MISSING IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION PLAN
	2) PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT MINIMUM-WIDTH AS MENTIONED
	IN CITY CODE MEANS THAT THE SIDEWALK CAN BE WIDER THAN
	THE STANDARD. ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING AN OVERALL
	REDUCTION OF SIDEWALK WIDTH FROM EXISTING CONDITIONS TO
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. CONSIDERING THE POTENTIAL
	HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, IT WOULD BE REASONABLE TO KEEP
	A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
	WHERE POSSIBLE
	3) INSTALL SOLAR POWERED LED FLASHING STOP SIGNS ON
	24TH ST AT THE SPRUCE AVE INTERSECTION


	PAST COMMENTS:
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
	2) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	CITY???S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP
	3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
	REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL
	PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	4) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
	TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL
	BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY
	5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE
	THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS
	6) SATISFIED. ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY
	EASTBOUND. ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
	FIGURE 4 SHOWS VEHICLES EXITING THE ALLEY IN THE
	WESTBOUND DIRECTION. SHOWCASED SITE PLAN A1 DOES NOT
	MATCH LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REPLACE IT WITH T1.0
	7) SATISFIED. THE UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DOES NOT
	CONSIDER THE RESIDENTIAL VOLUMES WITH RESPECT TO TEST 1
	AND TEST 2. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
	8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN
	SHOWCASING ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY,
	DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB,
	DRIVEWAY, GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.)
	PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD
	STARTING POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE
	TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL
	THE SHEET T1.0 OR TITLE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
	SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING THROUGHOUT.
	9) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
	SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
	AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
	TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
	CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT PROPER FROM A
	GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE IS
	ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS ON
	24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS.
	ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN
	REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY:
	THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY.
	MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY
	TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE.
	PLEASE USE DIFFERENT COLORS FOR VEHICLE WHEEL-PATH AND
	ITS DYNAMIC ENVELOPE, SANITATION TRUCK SHOWS SEVERAL
	ENCROACHMENTS. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT HAVE
	DIFFERENT COLORS FOR THE DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND WHEEL
	PATHS; MOREOVER, ENCROACHMENTS ARE STILL SHOWN IN EX1
	AND EX2.
	11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
	ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
	FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE
	SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
	DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.
	SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA, PLEASE
	SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE
	12) SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN
	VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20
	FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN
	BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY
	SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC
	WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS BEEN CHOSEN.
	SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
	PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM
	TO BE AS WIDE
	13) SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES
	ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE
	INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS
	ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES.
	14) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT
	EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET
	15) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT
	EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN
	6.1 TO 6.3 %
	16) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK
	IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE
	PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE
	DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR
	OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
	THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
	A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
	THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
	FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
	THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
	MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
	17) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE
	AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL
	SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE
	SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	18) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER
	OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS
	19) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE
	BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	20) SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
	COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
	A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY
	MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	21) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST
	SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND,
	PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY
	22) SATISFIED. INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE
	ALLEY EXIT ON 24TH ST
	23) SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. REFER TO OTHER COMMENTS
	PERTAINING MISSING OR REQUESTED DIMENSIONS, MARKINGS
	AND SIGNAGE
	24) SATISFIED. THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE
	GARAGE ENTRANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 28-FEET WIDE, PLEASE
	INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SO TO PROVIDE TWO TRAVEL
	LANES, ONE STRAIGHT- ONLY ALIGNED WITH GARAGE ENTRANCE,
	THE OTHER RIGHT-TURN-ONLY FOR TURNING VEHICLES. INSTALL
	STOP BARS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. SEPARATE THE TWO
	TRAVEL LANES WITH A CHEVRON-STYLED PAVEMENT MARKED
	DIVIDING ISLAND
	25) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES
	OF THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE ENTRANCE
	26) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE T1.0 ONE-WAY
	SIGNAGE AT THE WEST END OF THE ALLEY (BOTH SIDES) AND
	AT EACH LOCATION WHERE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DRIVEWAYS
	ACCESS THE ALLEY
	27) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A
	CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
	86-246 FOR DETAILS
	28) NOT SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK WALKABLE AREA
	ALONG SPRUCE AVE IS BETWEEN 7 AND 13-FEET. PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IS REDUCING IT TO 6-FEET. PLEASE REVISE,
	CLEARLY DIMENSION, AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET
	WALKABLE AREA ACCORDINGLY. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE
	MISSING THROUGHOUT THE T1 SITE PLAN

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	01-13-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	01-13-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	01-13-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-13 18:42:59	TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
	2) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	CITY???S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP
	3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
	REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL
	PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	4) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
	TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL
	BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY
	5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE
	THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS
	6) SATISFIED. ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY
	EASTBOUND. ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
	FIGURE 4 SHOWS VEHICLES EXITING THE ALLEY IN THE
	WESTBOUND DIRECTION. SHOWCASED SITE PLAN A1 DOES NOT
	MATCH LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REPLACE IT WITH T1.0
	7) THE UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DOES NOT CONSIDER THE
	RESIDENTIAL VOLUMES WITH RESPECT TO TEST 1 AND TEST 2.
	PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.

	SITE PLAN COMMENTS
	8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN
	SHOWCASING ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY,
	DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB,
	DRIVEWAY, GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.)
	PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD
	STARTING POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE
	TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL
	THE SHEET T1.0 OR TITLE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
	SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING THROUGHOUT.
	9) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
	SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
	AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT
	PROPER FROM A GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE
	IS ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS
	ON 24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS.
	ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN
	REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY:
	THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY.
	MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY
	TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE.
	PLEASE USE DIFFERENT COLORS FOR VEHICLE WHEEL-PATH AND
	ITS DYNAMIC ENVELOPE, SANITATION TRUCK SHOWS SEVERAL
	ENCROACHMENTS. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT HAVE
	DIFFERENT COLORS FOR THE DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND WHEEL
	PATHS; MOREOVER, ENCROACHMENTS ARE STILL SHOWN IN EX1
	AND EX2.
	11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
	ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
	FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE
	SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
	DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.
	SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA, PLEASE
	SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE
	12) SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN
	VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20
	FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN
	BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY
	SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC
	WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS BEEN CHOSEN.
	SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
	PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM
	TO BE AS WIDE
	13) SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES
	ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE
	INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS
	ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES.
	14) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT
	EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET
	15) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT
	EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN
	6.1 TO 6.3 %
	16) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK
	IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE
	PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE
	DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR
	OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
	THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
	A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
	THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
	FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
	THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
	MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
	17) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE
	AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL
	SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE
	SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	18) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER
	OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS
	19) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE
	BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	20) SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
	COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
	A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY
	MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	21) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST
	SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND,
	PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY
	22) SATISFIED. INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE
	ALLEY EXIT ON 24TH ST
	23) SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. REFER TO OTHER COMMENTS
	PERTAINING MISSING OR REQUESTED DIMENSIONS, MARKINGS
	AND SIGNAGE
	24) SATISFIED. THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE
	GARAGE ENTRANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 28-FEET WIDE, PLEASE
	INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SO TO PROVIDE TWO TRAVEL
	LANES, ONE STRAIGHT- ONLY ALIGNED WITH GARAGE ENTRANCE,
	THE OTHER RIGHT-TURN-ONLY FOR TURNING VEHICLES. INSTALL
	STOP BARS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. SEPARATE THE TWO
	TRAVEL LANES WITH A CHEVRON-STYLED PAVEMENT MARKED
	DIVIDING ISLAND
	25) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES
	OF THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE ENTRANCE
	26) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE T1.0 ONE-WAY
	SIGNAGE AT THE WEST END OF THE ALLEY (BOTH SIDES) AND
	AT EACH LOCATION WHERE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DRIVEWAYS
	ACCESS THE ALLEY
	27) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A
	CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
	86-246 FOR DETAILS
	28) NOT SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK WALKABLE AREA
	ALONG SPRUCE AVE IS BETWEEN 7 AND 13-FEET. PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IS REDUCING IT TO 6-FEET. PLEASE REVISE,
	CLEARLY DIMENSION, AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET
	WALKABLE AREA ACCORDINGLY. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE
	MISSING THROUGHOUT THE T1 SITE PLAN

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-06-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-06-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	12-06-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-06 13:17:39	TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
	2) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	CITY???S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP
	3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
	REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL
	PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	4) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
	TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL
	BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY
	5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE
	THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS
	6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED
	ONE-WAY EASTBOUND. ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED
	ACCORDINGLY. FIGURE 4 SHOWS VEHICLES EXITING THE ALLEY
	IN THE WESTBOUND DIRECTION. SHOWCASED SITE PLAN A1 DOES
	NOT MATCH LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REPLACE IT WITH
	T1.0
	SITE PLAN COMMENTS
	7) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN
	SHOWCASING ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY,
	DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB,
	DRIVEWAY, GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.)
	PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD
	STARTING POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE
	TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL
	THE SHEET T1.0 OR TITLE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
	PLEASE REMOVE AUTOTURN FROM THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
	PLAN
	8) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
	SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
	AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT
	PROPER FROM A GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE
	IS ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS
	ON 24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS.
	ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN
	REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY:
	THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY.
	MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY
	TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE.
	PLEASE USE DIFFERENT COLORS FOR VEHICLE WHEEL-PATH AND
	ITS DYNAMIC ENVELOPE, SANITATION TRUCK SHOWS SEVERAL
	ENCROACHMENTS
	10) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
	ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
	FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE
	SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
	DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.
	SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA, PLEASE
	SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE
	11) SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN
	VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20
	FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN
	BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY
	SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC
	WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS BEEN CHOSEN.
	SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE TRANSPORTATION SITE
	PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM
	TO BE AS WIDE
	12) SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES
	ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE
	INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS
	ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES.
	13) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT
	EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET
	14) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT
	EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN
	6.1 TO 6.3 %
	15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK
	IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE
	PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE
	DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR
	OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN
	THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO
	A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
	THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
	FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
	THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
	MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.???
	16) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE
	AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL
	SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE
	SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	17) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER
	OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS
	18) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE
	BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	19) SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
	COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
	A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY
	MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	20) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST
	SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND,
	PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY
	21) SATISFIED. INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE
	ALLEY EXIT ON 24TH ST
	22) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED
	AND PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. REFER TO OTHER COMMENTS
	PERTAINING MISSING OR REQUESTED DIMENSIONS, MARKINGS
	AND SIGNAGE
	23) THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE
	ENTRANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 28-FEET WIDE, PLEASE INSTALL
	PAVEMENT MARKINGS SO TO PROVIDE TWO TRAVEL LANES, ONE
	STRAIGHT- ONLY ALIGNED WITH GARAGE ENTRANCE, THE OTHER
	RIGHT-TURN-ONLY FOR TURNING VEHICLES. INSTALL STOP BARS
	AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. SEPARATE THE TWO TRAVEL LANES
	WITH A CHEVRON-STYLED PAVEMENT MARKED DIVIDING ISLAND
	24) INSTALL DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE
	EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE ENTRANCE
	25) INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE T1.0 ONE-WAY SIGNAGE AT THE
	WEST END OF THE ALLEY (BOTH SIDES) AND AT EACH LOCATION
	WHERE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DRIVEWAYS ACCESS THE ALLEY
	26) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
	REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS
	27) EXISTING SIDEWALK WALKABLE AREA ALONG SPRUCE AVE IS
	BETWEEN 7 AND 13-FEET. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS REDUCING
	IT TO 6-FEET. PLEASE REVISE, CLEARLY DIMENSION, AND
	PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET WALKABLE AREA ACCORDINGLY

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-29-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-29-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	08-29-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-29 12:00:44	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
	2) NOT SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	CITY?S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP
	3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
	REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL
	PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	4) NOT SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE
	ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
	MEASURES SHALL BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED
	ACCORDINGLY
	5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE
	THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS
	6) ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY EASTBOUND.
	ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY

	SITE COMMENTS
	7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
	ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING
	AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY,
	GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY
	LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD STARTING
	POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE TRANSPORTATION
	INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
	INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL THE SHEET T1.0 OR
	TITLE IT TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
	8) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN,
	PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB
	CUTS, AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE
	ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT
	PROPER FROM A GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE
	IS ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS
	ON 24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS.
	ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN
	REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY:
	THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY.
	MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY
	TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE
	10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN
	EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM
	8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION
	READINESS. MORE SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A
	CONDUIT (2? SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH
	AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V ? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE
	PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH
	FEATURE. SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA,
	PLEASE SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE
	11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT
	INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A
	MINIMUM OF 20 FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED
	ONE-WAY BETWEEN BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
	DIRECTIONALITY SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH
	SANITATION/PUBLIC WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS
	BEEN CHOSEN. SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE
	TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN
	ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AS WIDE.
	12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR
	ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK
	MUST BE INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR
	BOLLARDS ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES.
	13) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT
	EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET
	14) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT
	EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN
	6.1 TO 6.3 %
	15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE
	PARKING DECK IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE
	MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE
	DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR
	OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ?IN THOSE
	CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A
	WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION,
	THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE
	FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF
	THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A
	MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.?
	16) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE
	AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL
	SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE
	SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	17) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER
	OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS
	18) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE
	BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	19) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
	THE COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT, A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE
	PROVIDED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF
	SUCH ZONE IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	20) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST
	SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND,
	PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY
	21) INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE ALLEY EXIT ON
	24TH ST
	22) PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PAVEMENT
	MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-08-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	07-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-08 13:34:17	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE CITY'S
	TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP
	3) AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE REVISED TO
	INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	4) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS,
	TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL
	BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY
	5) THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE
	IN VEHICULAR TRIPS

	SITE COMMENTS
	6) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN SHOWCASING ALL
	TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING AISLES,
	PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
	SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND
	DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD STARTING POINT.
	7) IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
	BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, AND
	PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	8) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
	SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
	DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT PROPER FROM A
	GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE IS
	ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS ON
	24TH ST
	9) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
	MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
	PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE SPECIFICS
	ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
	TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V
	10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
	SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.
	10) DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN VEHICULAR
	TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET, THE
	ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN BROADWAY AND
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY SHALL BE
	DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC WORKS
	11) IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED
	ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE INSTALLED OR
	12) WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT EXCEED 25
	FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET
	13) MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT EXCEED 6%.
	SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN 6.1 TO 6.3 %
	14) PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK IN SHEET
	A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE PROVIDED AT
	THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE
	15) PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE AVE IS
	DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL SHARROW
	MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE SECTION
	FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	16) IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED
	AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS
	17) CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS IN
	THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	18) BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE COMMERCIAL
	RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, A 10 X 25
	FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY MARK THE
	LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	19) THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE ALONG
	25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND, PLEASE
	MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z		ZONING
Rev No	6	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	02-08-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	02-08-2023	Time	12:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	02-08-2023	Time	12:35	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-08 12:37:12	2/8/23 ??? FAILED


	PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE
	COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
	DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
	INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
	[SATISFIED]
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
	STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SUBJECT
	PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
	I. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED
	VARIANCE. [SATISFIED]
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	[SATISFIED]

	PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING LAND USE AND
	FUTURE LAND USE IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
	???COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/CO-WORKING SPACE??? USES ACCORDING
	TO THE USES LISTED IN TABLE VII-9 (FOUND IN THE
	CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR)
	SUBSECTION 94-210(J)) IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED PER RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	EXISTING/PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A), THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A
	BUILDING SHALL BE 300 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE
	ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(A),
	A COURTYARD BUILDING TYPE IS DEFINED AS A BUILDING
	CHARACTERIZED AS HAVING A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE THAT IS
	OPEN TO THE SKY AND ENCLOSED BY HABITABLE SPACE ON AT
	LEAST THREE SIDES. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE PROPOSING A
	COURTYARD BUILDING, THEN PLEASE REFER TO FIGURES VII-7
	AND VII-8 (FOUND IN ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(F)(5)) AND
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE VII-8 (FOUND IN THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3)), THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200
	FEET FOR A COURTYARD BUILDING. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE
	PROPOSING A COURTYARD BUILDING OR ANY OTHER BUILDING
	TYPE, THEN PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM/MAXIMUM/PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	LOT DEPTH, MAXIMUM/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA,
	MINIMUM/PROPOSED LOT AREA, AND MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DENSITY CALCULATION ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PERCENTAGES OF
	LANDSCAPING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROPOSED ROOFTOP
	TERRACE ON SHEET A0.1 AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED ???EAST
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???SPRUCE AVENUE??? SETBACK (AS
	REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), A BUILDING FRONTAGE IS DEFINED AS THE
	PERCENTAGE OF A BUILDING FA??ADE THAT IS GENERALLY
	PARALLEL TO, FACING, OR ORIENTED TOWARD A STREET AND
	THAT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK AREA
	ALLOWED AND SHALL INCLUDE A PRINCIPAL BUILDING, WITH
	ACTIVE USES OR COLONNADES. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGES IN
	THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(2), STOREFRONTS SHALL BE DIRECTLY
	ACCESSIBLE FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THE
	IDENTIFIED ???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (CO-WORK SPACE)??? AND
	???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (RESIDENT FITNESS)??? DO NOT
	DEMONSTRATE DIRECT ACCESS FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN
	GREENWAY OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(5), GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
	PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. IT
	HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR
	WINDOW SILLS ARE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE 30 INCHES.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS AN IMPROVED
	OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
	THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE NOT OPEN
	TO THE SKY, SO PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(B), THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A NEW DEDICATED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN PERCENT OF
	THE LOT AREA. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(C), NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AT GRADE LEVEL. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	18. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(F), FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES ARE PERMITTED
	AROUND THE PERIMETER OF A NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, PROVIDED THE
	ENCLOSURE DOES NOT PROHIBIT PUBLIC ACCESS AND MUST BE
	CONSTRUCTED OF A DECORATIVE MATERIAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION AND HEIGHT
	OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) ON THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(G), THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER MUST
	ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR
	THE DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. [WITHDRAWN]
	20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(A), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ONLY BE
	PERMITTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(C), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ABUT
	SIDEWALK AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THEREFORE,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(4), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR
	THE PROPOSED PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACES.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	23. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(L),
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED STREET
	FURNISHINGS AND LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH STREET AND
	SPRUCE AVENUE. [SATISFIED]
	24. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	25. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
	STRIP/TREE GRATES, CURB/GUTTER, ON-STREET PARKING, AND
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	26. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(D)(2) FOR THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CROSSING THE
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	27. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	DISABLED PARKING SPACES ON THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	28. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
	???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	29. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(O)(1)(II), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE
	THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	30. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(I), THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
	SHALL BE SCREENED ALONG ALL BUILDING FA??ADES FACING A
	RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OPEN SPACE BY A LINER BUILDING
	CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE
	SPACE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THIS REQUIREMENT IS
	ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED
	FOR THE SUBJECT VARIANCE REQUEST. [SATISFIED]
	31. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING STALL DEPTHS ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	32. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(N)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED/PROPOSED GUEST PARKING ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	33. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4), THE SIGN BAND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	FIRST TWO STORIES OF THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	34. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4)(D), MURALS THAT ARE PAINTED DIRECTLY ONTO
	A FA??ADE REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO
	THE CITY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	35. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), ADA
	RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]

	ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	{I. ??? UPDATED} PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
	APPROVAL OF WAIVERS AND VARIANCES BY THE PLANNING
	BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVERS AND VARIANCES.
	[SATISFIED]
	{4. ??? UPDATED} IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A) FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
	4963-21, THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
	SHALL BE 250 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED - HOWEVER, VARIANCE REQUEST
	ACKNOWLEDGED]
	36. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE, HEIGHT, AND PERVIOUS AND
	IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS ON THE ???SITE DATA??? ON SHEET
	A0.1, ???ELEVATIONS??? SHEETS A6.0 THROUGH A8.0, AND
	???LANDSCAPE PLAN ??? SITE DATA??? SHEET L2.
	[SATISFIED]
	37. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE WHETHER THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING TYPE IS A ???LINER??? OR ???FLEX??? BUILDING
	TYPE ON SHEETS A0.1 AND L2. [SATISFIED]
	38. PLEASE CORRECT THE EXISTING LAND USE TO VACANT IN
	THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	39. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED MINIMUM LOT AREA IN
	THE ???LOT STANDARDS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1 ACCORDING
	TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3). [SATISFIED]
	40. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED REQUIRED MINIMUM AND
	PROVIDED PERVIOUS PERCENTAGES AND THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM
	IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE IN THE ???SITE LANDSCAPING???
	TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	41. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???SOUTH
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???24TH STREET??? PARKING GROUND
	SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0 AND IN THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR THE ???V3??? REQUEST) IN
	THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	42. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???WEST
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???ADJACENT PROPERTY??? RESIDENTIAL
	GROUND SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE
	???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	43. PLEASE REVISE ???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? WEST??? AND
	???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? SOUTH 01??? ON THE
	???ELEVATIONS??? SHEET A7.0 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(H)(I)(5).
	[SATISFIED]
	44. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED HEIGHTS OF
	THE DEMONSTRATED ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES AND
	MECHANICAL ROOMS AND EQUIPMENT ON THE ELEVATIONS.
	[SATISFIED]
	45. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED PARKING IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1 AND THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
	46. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING
	SPACES IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	[SATISFIED]
	47. ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, THE
	IDENTIFIED/INDICATED/DEMONSTRATED PROPOSED NUMBER OF
	GUEST PARKING SPACES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED NUMBER
	OF GUEST PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(N)(3), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	48. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
	AND THE WALKWAY/PATHWAY FROM THOSE PROPOSED PARKING
	SPACES TO THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH
	FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
	49. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES ABUTTING WALLS/COLUMNS, AT MINIMUM, ONE
	(1) FOOT WIDER ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0,
	???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A4.0. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	50. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A TURN AROUND
	SPACE BEFORE THE PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS GATE ON THE
	1ST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE ???SITE PLAN???
	SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0.
	[SATISFIED]
	51. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE BICYCLE
	PARKING FACILITIES CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USE (???FUTURE RETAIL???) ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN???
	SHEET A2.0. [SATISFIED]
	52. PLEASE PROVIDE A ZOOM-IN/BLOW-UP VISUAL OF THE
	PROPOSED BIKE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE DETAILS/DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES. [SATISFIED]
	53. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(3)(D),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED
	MINIMUM FIVE (5) FEET WIDE LANDSCAPED STRIP ON THE EAST
	SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ???PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS
	EASEMENT??? EXIT ALLEY/DRIVE ACCESS AREA. [SATISFIED]
	54. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY, IF ANY PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY.
	OTHERWISE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A FENCE/WALL
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY. [SATISFIED]
	55. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE EASTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED EXIT
	ALLEY/DRIVE/PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
	FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ON 24TH STREET TO THE PROPOSED
	PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING AND A CROSSWALK AT
	THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	56. PLEASE EXPLORE RELOCATING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
	SURROUNDING THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD AREA
	TO FRONT ALONG 24TH STREET AND RECONFIGURING THE
	PARKING GARAGE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD
	AREA. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	57. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE
	RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE ???UNIT MIX??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	58. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 25TH STREET IS NOT PERMITTED,
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	59. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(A) REGARDING THE REQUIRED
	PLANAR BREAKS ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS OF
	THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	60. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
	THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED WITHIN THE NORTHWOOD
	MIXED-USE DISTRICT (NMUD) TRANSITION SUB-DISTRICT
	ACCORDING TO ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(H)(1). HOWEVER, THE
	APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 306-22 WILL RENDER THIS
	REVIEW COMMENT WITHDRAWN. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	61. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
	THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED (WHICH
	INCLUDES THE EXISTING AND APPROVED) WITHIN THE NMUD
	ACCORDING TO POLICY 1.7.2.2 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE
	ELEMENT OF THE CITY???S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. [RESPONSE
	PROVIDED]
	62. PLEASE ADDRESS BUILDING AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW
	COMMENTS.


	KEVIE DEFRANC
	SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	01-05-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	01-05-2023	Time	16:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	01-05-2023	Time	16:05	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-05 16:06:35	1/5/23 ??? FAILED


	PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE
	COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
	DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
	INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
	[SATISFIED]
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
	STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT
	SATISFIED]
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SUBJECT
	PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
	I. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED
	VARIANCE. [SATISFIED]
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	[SATISFIED]

	PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING LAND USE AND
	FUTURE LAND USE IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
	???COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/CO-WORKING SPACE??? USES ACCORDING
	TO THE USES LISTED IN TABLE VII-9 (FOUND IN THE
	CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR)
	SUBSECTION 94-210(J)) IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED PER RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	EXISTING/PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A), THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A
	BUILDING SHALL BE 300 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE
	ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(A),
	A COURTYARD BUILDING TYPE IS DEFINED AS A BUILDING
	CHARACTERIZED AS HAVING A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE THAT IS
	OPEN TO THE SKY AND ENCLOSED BY HABITABLE SPACE ON AT
	LEAST THREE SIDES. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE PROPOSING A
	COURTYARD BUILDING, THEN PLEASE REFER TO FIGURES VII-7
	AND VII-8 (FOUND IN ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(F)(5)) AND
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE VII-8 (FOUND IN THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3)), THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200
	FEET FOR A COURTYARD BUILDING. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE
	PROPOSING A COURTYARD BUILDING OR ANY OTHER BUILDING
	TYPE, THEN PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM/MAXIMUM/PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	LOT DEPTH, MAXIMUM/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA,
	MINIMUM/PROPOSED LOT AREA, AND MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DENSITY CALCULATION ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PERCENTAGES OF
	LANDSCAPING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROPOSED ROOFTOP
	TERRACE ON SHEET A0.1 AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED ???EAST
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???SPRUCE AVENUE??? SETBACK (AS
	REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), A BUILDING FRONTAGE IS DEFINED AS THE
	PERCENTAGE OF A BUILDING FA??ADE THAT IS GENERALLY
	PARALLEL TO, FACING, OR ORIENTED TOWARD A STREET AND
	THAT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK AREA
	ALLOWED AND SHALL INCLUDE A PRINCIPAL BUILDING, WITH
	ACTIVE USES OR COLONNADES. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGES IN
	THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(2), STOREFRONTS SHALL BE DIRECTLY
	ACCESSIBLE FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THE
	IDENTIFIED ???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (CO-WORK SPACE)??? AND
	???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (RESIDENT FITNESS)??? DO NOT
	DEMONSTRATE DIRECT ACCESS FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN
	GREENWAY OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(5), GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
	PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. IT
	HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR
	WINDOW SILLS ARE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE 30 INCHES.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS AN IMPROVED
	OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
	THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE NOT OPEN
	TO THE SKY, SO PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(B), THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A NEW DEDICATED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN PERCENT OF
	THE LOT AREA. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(C), NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AT GRADE LEVEL. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	18. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(F), FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES ARE PERMITTED
	AROUND THE PERIMETER OF A NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, PROVIDED THE
	ENCLOSURE DOES NOT PROHIBIT PUBLIC ACCESS AND MUST BE
	CONSTRUCTED OF A DECORATIVE MATERIAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION AND HEIGHT
	OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) ON THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(G), THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER MUST
	ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR
	THE DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. [WITHDRAWN]
	20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(A), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ONLY BE
	PERMITTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(C), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ABUT
	SIDEWALK AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THEREFORE,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(4), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR
	THE PROPOSED PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACES.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	23. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(L),
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED STREET
	FURNISHINGS AND LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH STREET AND
	SPRUCE AVENUE. [SATISFIED]
	24. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	25. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
	STRIP/TREE GRATES, CURB/GUTTER, ON-STREET PARKING, AND
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	26. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(D)(2) FOR THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CROSSING THE
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	27. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	DISABLED PARKING SPACES ON THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	28. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
	???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	29. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(O)(1)(II), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE
	THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	30. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(I), THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
	SHALL BE SCREENED ALONG ALL BUILDING FA??ADES FACING A
	RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OPEN SPACE BY A LINER BUILDING
	CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE
	SPACE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THIS REQUIREMENT IS
	ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED
	FOR THE SUBJECT VARIANCE REQUEST. [SATISFIED]
	31. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING STALL DEPTHS ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	32. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(N)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED/PROPOSED GUEST PARKING ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	33. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4), THE SIGN BAND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	FIRST TWO STORIES OF THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	34. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4)(D), MURALS THAT ARE PAINTED DIRECTLY ONTO
	A FA??ADE REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO
	THE CITY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	35. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), ADA
	RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]

	ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	{I. ??? UPDATED} PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
	APPROVAL OF WAIVERS AND VARIANCES BY THE PLANNING
	BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVERS AND VARIANCES.
	[SATISFIED]
	{4. ??? UPDATED} IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A) FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
	4963-21, THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
	SHALL BE 250 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED - HOWEVER, VARIANCE REQUEST
	ACKNOWLEDGED]
	36. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE, HEIGHT, AND PERVIOUS AND
	IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS ON THE ???SITE DATA??? ON SHEET
	A0.1, ???ELEVATIONS??? SHEETS A6.0 THROUGH A8.0, AND
	???LANDSCAPE PLAN ??? SITE DATA??? SHEET L2.
	[SATISFIED]
	37. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE WHETHER THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING TYPE IS A ???LINER??? OR ???FLEX??? BUILDING
	TYPE ON SHEETS A0.1 AND L2. [SATISFIED]
	38. PLEASE CORRECT THE EXISTING LAND USE TO VACANT IN
	THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	39. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED MINIMUM LOT AREA IN
	THE ???LOT STANDARDS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1 ACCORDING
	TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3). [SATISFIED]
	40. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED REQUIRED MINIMUM AND
	PROVIDED PERVIOUS PERCENTAGES AND THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM
	IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE IN THE ???SITE LANDSCAPING???
	TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	41. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???SOUTH
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???24TH STREET??? PARKING GROUND
	SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0 AND IN THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR THE ???V3??? REQUEST) IN
	THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	42. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???WEST
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???ADJACENT PROPERTY??? RESIDENTIAL
	GROUND SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE
	???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	43. PLEASE REVISE ???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? WEST??? AND
	???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? SOUTH 01??? ON THE
	???ELEVATIONS??? SHEET A7.0 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(H)(I)(5).
	[SATISFIED]
	44. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED HEIGHTS OF
	THE DEMONSTRATED ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES AND
	MECHANICAL ROOMS AND EQUIPMENT ON THE ELEVATIONS.
	[SATISFIED]
	45. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED PARKING IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1 AND THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
	46. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING
	SPACES IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	[SATISFIED]
	47. ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, THE
	IDENTIFIED/INDICATED/DEMONSTRATED PROPOSED NUMBER OF
	GUEST PARKING SPACES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED NUMBER
	OF GUEST PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(N)(3), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	48. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
	AND THE WALKWAY/PATHWAY FROM THOSE PROPOSED PARKING
	SPACES TO THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH
	FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
	49. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES ABUTTING WALLS/COLUMNS, AT MINIMUM, ONE
	(1) FOOT WIDER ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0,
	???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A4.0. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	50. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A TURN AROUND
	SPACE BEFORE THE PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS GATE ON THE
	1ST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE ???SITE PLAN???
	SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0.
	[SATISFIED]
	51. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE BICYCLE
	PARKING FACILITIES CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USE (???FUTURE RETAIL???) ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN???
	SHEET A2.0. [SATISFIED]
	52. PLEASE PROVIDE A ZOOM-IN/BLOW-UP VISUAL OF THE
	PROPOSED BIKE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE DETAILS/DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES. [SATISFIED]
	53. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(3)(D),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED
	MINIMUM FIVE (5) FEET WIDE LANDSCAPED STRIP ON THE EAST
	SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ???PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS
	EASEMENT??? EXIT ALLEY/DRIVE ACCESS AREA. [SATISFIED]
	54. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY, IF ANY PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY.
	OTHERWISE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A FENCE/WALL
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY. [SATISFIED]
	55. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE EASTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED EXIT
	ALLEY/DRIVE/PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
	FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ON 24TH STREET TO THE PROPOSED
	PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING AND A CROSSWALK AT
	THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	56. PLEASE EXPLORE RELOCATING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
	SURROUNDING THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD AREA
	TO FRONT ALONG 24TH STREET AND RECONFIGURING THE
	PARKING GARAGE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD
	AREA. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	57. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE
	RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE ???UNIT MIX??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	58. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 25TH STREET IS NOT PERMITTED,
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	59. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(A) REGARDING THE REQUIRED
	PLANAR BREAKS ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS OF
	THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	60. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
	THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED WITHIN THE NORTHWOOD
	MIXED-USE DISTRICT (NMUD) TRANSITION SUB-DISTRICT
	ACCORDING TO ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(H)(1). HOWEVER, THE
	APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 306-22 WILL RENDER THIS
	REVIEW COMMENT WITHDRAWN. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	61. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
	THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED (WHICH
	INCLUDES THE EXISTING AND APPROVED) WITHIN THE NMUD
	ACCORDING TO POLICY 1.7.2.2 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE
	ELEMENT OF THE CITY???S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. [RESPONSE
	PROVIDED]


	KEVIE DEFRANC
	SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-02-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	12-02-2022	Time	14:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	12-02-2022	Time	14:33	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-02 14:34:22	12/2/22 ??? FAILED


	PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE
	COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
	DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
	INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
	[SATISFIED]
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
	STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT
	SATISFIED]
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SUBJECT
	PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
	I. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED
	VARIANCE. [SATISFIED]
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]

	PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING LAND USE AND
	FUTURE LAND USE IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
	???COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/CO-WORKING SPACE??? USES ACCORDING
	TO THE USES LISTED IN TABLE VII-9 (FOUND IN THE
	CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR)
	SUBSECTION 94-210(J)) IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED PER RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	EXISTING/PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A), THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A
	BUILDING SHALL BE 300 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE
	ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(A),
	A COURTYARD BUILDING TYPE IS DEFINED AS A BUILDING
	CHARACTERIZED AS HAVING A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE THAT IS
	OPEN TO THE SKY AND ENCLOSED BY HABITABLE SPACE ON AT
	LEAST THREE SIDES. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE PROPOSING A
	COURTYARD BUILDING, THEN PLEASE REFER TO FIGURES VII-7
	AND VII-8 (FOUND IN ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(F)(5)) AND
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE VII-8 (FOUND IN THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3)), THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200
	FEET FOR A COURTYARD BUILDING. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE
	PROPOSING A COURTYARD BUILDING OR ANY OTHER BUILDING
	TYPE, THEN PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM/MAXIMUM/PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	LOT DEPTH, MAXIMUM/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA,
	MINIMUM/PROPOSED LOT AREA, AND MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ON SHEET A0.1. [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DENSITY CALCULATION ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PERCENTAGES OF
	LANDSCAPING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROPOSED ROOFTOP
	TERRACE ON SHEET A0.1 AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED ???EAST
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???SPRUCE AVENUE??? SETBACK (AS
	REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), A BUILDING FRONTAGE IS DEFINED AS THE
	PERCENTAGE OF A BUILDING FA??ADE THAT IS GENERALLY
	PARALLEL TO, FACING, OR ORIENTED TOWARD A STREET AND
	THAT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK AREA
	ALLOWED AND SHALL INCLUDE A PRINCIPAL BUILDING, WITH
	ACTIVE USES OR COLONNADES. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGES IN
	THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(2), STOREFRONTS SHALL BE DIRECTLY
	ACCESSIBLE FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THE
	IDENTIFIED ???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (CO-WORK SPACE)??? AND
	???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (RESIDENT FITNESS)??? DO NOT
	DEMONSTRATE DIRECT ACCESS FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN
	GREENWAY OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(5), GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
	PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. IT
	HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR
	WINDOW SILLS ARE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE 30 INCHES.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS AN IMPROVED
	OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
	THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE NOT OPEN
	TO THE SKY, SO PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(B), THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A NEW DEDICATED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN PERCENT OF
	THE LOT AREA. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(C), NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AT GRADE LEVEL. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	18. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(F), FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES ARE PERMITTED
	AROUND THE PERIMETER OF A NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, PROVIDED THE
	ENCLOSURE DOES NOT PROHIBIT PUBLIC ACCESS AND MUST BE
	CONSTRUCTED OF A DECORATIVE MATERIAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION AND HEIGHT
	OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) ON THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(G), THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER MUST
	ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR
	THE DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. [WITHDRAWN]
	20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(A), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ONLY BE
	PERMITTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(C), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ABUT
	SIDEWALK AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THEREFORE,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(4), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR
	THE PROPOSED PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACES.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	23. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(L),
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED STREET
	FURNISHINGS AND LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH STREET AND
	SPRUCE AVENUE. [SATISFIED]
	24. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	25. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
	STRIP/TREE GRATES, CURB/GUTTER, ON-STREET PARKING, AND
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	26. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(D)(2) FOR THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CROSSING THE
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	27. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	DISABLED PARKING SPACES ON THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	28. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
	???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	29. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(O)(1)(II), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE
	THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	30. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(I), THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
	SHALL BE SCREENED ALONG ALL BUILDING FA??ADES FACING A
	RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OPEN SPACE BY A LINER BUILDING
	CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE
	SPACE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THIS REQUIREMENT IS
	ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED
	FOR THE SUBJECT VARIANCE REQUEST. [SATISFIED]
	31. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING STALL DEPTHS ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	32. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(N)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED/PROPOSED GUEST PARKING ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	33. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4), THE SIGN BAND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	FIRST TWO STORIES OF THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	34. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4)(D), MURALS THAT ARE PAINTED DIRECTLY ONTO
	A FA??ADE REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO
	THE CITY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	35. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), ADA
	RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]

	ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	{I. ??? UPDATED} PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
	APPROVAL OF WAIVERS AND VARIANCES BY THE PLANNING
	BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVERS AND VARIANCES.
	[SATISFIED]
	{4. ??? UPDATED} IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A) FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
	4963-21, THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
	SHALL BE 250 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED - HOWEVER, VARIANCE REQUEST
	ACKNOWLEDGED]
	36. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE, HEIGHT, AND PERVIOUS AND
	IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS ON THE ???SITE DATA??? ON SHEET
	A0.1, ???ELEVATIONS??? SHEETS A6.0 THROUGH A8.0, AND
	???LANDSCAPE PLAN ??? SITE DATA??? SHEET L2.
	[SATISFIED]
	37. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE WHETHER THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING TYPE IS A ???LINER??? OR ???FLEX??? BUILDING
	TYPE ON SHEETS A0.1 AND L2. [SATISFIED]
	38. PLEASE CORRECT THE EXISTING LAND USE TO VACANT IN
	THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	39. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED MINIMUM LOT AREA IN
	THE ???LOT STANDARDS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1 ACCORDING
	TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3). [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]
	40. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED REQUIRED MINIMUM AND
	PROVIDED PERVIOUS PERCENTAGES AND THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM
	IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE IN THE ???SITE LANDSCAPING???
	TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	41. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???SOUTH
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???24TH STREET??? PARKING GROUND
	SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0 AND IN THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR THE ???V3??? REQUEST) IN
	THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [NOT SATISFIED]
	42. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???WEST
	ELEVATION??? FROM ???ADJACENT PROPERTY??? RESIDENTIAL
	GROUND SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE
	???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [NOT SATISFIED]
	43. PLEASE REVISE ???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? WEST??? AND
	???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? SOUTH 01??? ON THE
	???ELEVATIONS??? SHEET A7.0 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(J)(1)(G)(5).
	[SATISFIED]
	44. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED HEIGHTS OF
	THE DEMONSTRATED ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES AND
	MECHANICAL ROOMS AND EQUIPMENT ON THE ELEVATIONS.
	[SATISFIED]
	45. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED PARKING IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1 AND THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
	46. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING
	SPACES IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	[SATISFIED]
	47. ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, THE
	IDENTIFIED/INDICATED/DEMONSTRATED PROPOSED NUMBER OF
	GUEST PARKING SPACES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED NUMBER
	OF GUEST PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(N)(3), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	48. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
	AND THE WALKWAY/PATHWAY FROM THOSE PROPOSED PARKING
	SPACES TO THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH
	FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
	49. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES ABUTTING WALLS/COLUMNS, AT MINIMUM, ONE
	(1) FOOT WIDER ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0,
	???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR
	PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
	A4.0. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	50. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A TURN AROUND
	SPACE BEFORE THE PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS GATE ON THE
	1ST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE ???SITE PLAN???
	SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0.
	[SATISFIED]
	51. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE BICYCLE
	PARKING FACILITIES CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USE (???FUTURE RETAIL???) ON THE
	???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN???
	SHEET A2.0. [SATISFIED]
	52. PLEASE PROVIDE A ZOOM-IN/BLOW-UP VISUAL OF THE
	PROPOSED BIKE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE DETAILS/DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES. [SATISFIED]
	53. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(3)(D),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED
	MINIMUM FIVE (5) FEET WIDE LANDSCAPED STRIP ON THE EAST
	SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ???PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS
	EASEMENT??? EXIT ALLEY/DRIVE ACCESS AREA. [SATISFIED]
	54. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY, IF ANY PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY.
	OTHERWISE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A FENCE/WALL
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY. [SATISFIED]
	55. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE EASTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED EXIT
	ALLEY/DRIVE/PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
	FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ON 24TH STREET TO THE PROPOSED
	PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING AND A CROSSWALK AT
	THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	56. PLEASE EXPLORE RELOCATING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
	SURROUNDING THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD AREA
	TO FRONT ALONG 24TH STREET AND RECONFIGURING THE
	PARKING GARAGE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD
	AREA. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	57. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE
	RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE ???UNIT MIX??? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1.
	58. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 25TH STREET IS NOT PERMITTED,
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	59. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(A) REGARDING THE REQUIRED
	PLANAR BREAKS ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS OF
	THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	60. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
	THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED WITHIN THE NORTHWOOD
	MIXED-USE DISTRICT (NMUD) TRANSITION SUB-DISTRICT
	ACCORDING TO ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(H)(1). HOWEVER, THE
	APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 306-22 WILL RENDER THIS
	REVIEW COMMENT WITHDRAWN.
	61. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
	THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED (WHICH
	INCLUDES THE EXISTING AND APPROVED) WITHIN THE NMUD
	ACCORDING TO POLICY 1.7.2.2 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE
	ELEMENT OF THE CITY???S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.


	KEVIE DEFRANC
	PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-02-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	09-02-2022	Time	08:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	09-02-2022	Time	08:18	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-02 08:20:57	9/2/22 ? FAILED


	PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE
	COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
	DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
	INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
	[SATISFIED]
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
	STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT
	SATISFIED]
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SUBJECT
	PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
	I. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED
	VARIANCE. [NOT SATISFIED]
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]

	PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING LAND USE AND
	FUTURE LAND USE IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
	?COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/CO-WORKING SPACE? USES ACCORDING TO
	THE USES LISTED IN TABLE VII-9 (FOUND IN THE CITY?S
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR)
	SUBSECTION 94-210(J)) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED PER RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	EXISTING/PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	[PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A), THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A
	BUILDING SHALL BE 300 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE
	ON SHEET A0.1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(A),
	A COURTYARD BUILDING TYPE IS DEFINED AS A BUILDING
	CHARACTERIZED AS HAVING A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE THAT IS
	OPEN TO THE SKY AND ENCLOSED BY HABITABLE SPACE ON AT
	LEAST THREE SIDES. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE PROPOSING A
	COURTYARD BUILDING, THEN PLEASE REFER TO FIGURES VII-7
	AND VII-8 (FOUND IN ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(F)(5)) AND
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE VII-8 (FOUND IN THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3)), THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200
	FEET FOR A COURTYARD BUILDING. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE
	PROPOSING A COURTYARD BUILDING OR ANY OTHER BUILDING
	TYPE, THEN PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM/MAXIMUM/PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	LOT DEPTH, MAXIMUM/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA,
	MINIMUM/PROPOSED LOT AREA, AND MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ON SHEET A0.1. [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DENSITY CALCULATION ON
	SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PERCENTAGES OF
	LANDSCAPING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROPOSED ROOFTOP
	TERRACE ON SHEET A0.1 AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
	[SATISFIED]
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED ?EAST
	ELEVATION? FROM ?SPRUCE AVENUE? SETBACK (AS REFLECTED
	ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ?SETBACKS? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	[SATISFIED]
	12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), A BUILDING FRONTAGE IS DEFINED AS THE
	PERCENTAGE OF A BUILDING FA?ADE THAT IS GENERALLY
	PARALLEL TO, FACING, OR ORIENTED TOWARD A STREET AND
	THAT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK AREA
	ALLOWED AND SHALL INCLUDE A PRINCIPAL BUILDING, WITH
	ACTIVE USES OR COLONNADES. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGES IN
	THE ?SETBACKS? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(2), STOREFRONTS SHALL BE DIRECTLY
	ACCESSIBLE FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THE
	IDENTIFIED ?NON-RES ACTIVE USE (CO-WORK SPACE)? AND
	?NON-RES ACTIVE USE (RESIDENT FITNESS)? DO NOT
	DEMONSTRATE DIRECT ACCESS FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN
	GREENWAY OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT
	SATISFIED]
	14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(5), GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
	PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. IT
	HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR
	WINDOW SILLS ARE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE 30 INCHES.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]
	15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS AN IMPROVED
	OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
	THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE NOT OPEN
	TO THE SKY, SO PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(B), THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A NEW DEDICATED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN PERCENT OF
	THE LOT AREA. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(C), NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AT GRADE LEVEL. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	18. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(F), FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES ARE PERMITTED
	AROUND THE PERIMETER OF A NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, PROVIDED THE
	ENCLOSURE DOES NOT PROHIBIT PUBLIC ACCESS AND MUST BE
	CONSTRUCTED OF A DECORATIVE MATERIAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION AND HEIGHT
	OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) ON THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(G), THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER MUST
	ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR
	THE DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. [WITHDRAWN]
	20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(A), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ONLY BE
	PERMITTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(C), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ABUT
	SIDEWALK AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THEREFORE,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(4), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR
	THE PROPOSED PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACES.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	23. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(L),
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED STREET
	FURNISHINGS AND LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH STREET AND
	SPRUCE AVENUE. [SATISFIED]
	24. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[WITHDRAWN]
	25. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
	STRIP/TREE GRATES, CURB/GUTTER, ON-STREET PARKING, AND
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	26. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(D)(2) FOR THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CROSSING THE
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	27. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	DISABLED PARKING SPACES ON THE ?PARKING? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	28. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
	?PARKING? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
	29. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(O)(1)(II), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE
	THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
	30. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(I), THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
	SHALL BE SCREENED ALONG ALL BUILDING FA?ADES FACING A
	RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OPEN SPACE BY A LINER BUILDING
	CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE
	SPACE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THIS REQUIREMENT IS
	ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED
	FOR THE SUBJECT VARIANCE REQUEST. [NOT SATISFIED]
	31. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING STALL DEPTHS ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
	32. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(N)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED/PROPOSED GUEST PARKING ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
	33. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4), THE SIGN BAND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	FIRST TWO STORIES OF THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	[SATISFIED]
	34. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4)(D), MURALS THAT ARE PAINTED DIRECTLY ONTO
	A FA?ADE REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO
	THE CITY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
	35. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), ADA
	RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [PARTIALLY
	SATISFIED]

	ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	{I. ? UPDATED} PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
	APPROVAL OF WAIVERS AND VARIANCES BY THE PLANNING
	BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVERS AND VARIANCES.
	{4. ? UPDATED} IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A) FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
	4963-21, THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
	SHALL BE 250 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	36. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE, HEIGHT, AND PERVIOUS AND
	IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS ON THE ?SITE DATA? ON SHEET
	A0.1, ?ELEVATIONS? SHEETS A6.0 THROUGH A8.0, AND
	?LANDSCAPE PLAN ? SITE DATA? SHEET L2.
	37. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE WHETHER THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING TYPE IS A ?LINER? OR ?FLEX? BUILDING TYPE ON
	SHEETS A0.1 AND L2.
	38. PLEASE CORRECT THE EXISTING LAND USE TO VACANT IN
	THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	39. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED MINIMUM LOT AREA IN
	THE ?LOT STANDARDS? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1 ACCORDING TO
	THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3).
	40. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED REQUIRED MINIMUM AND
	PROVIDED PERVIOUS PERCENTAGES AND THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM
	IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE IN THE ?SITE LANDSCAPING? TABLE
	ON SHEET A0.1.
	41. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ?SOUTH
	ELEVATION? FROM ?24TH STREET? PARKING GROUND SETBACK
	(AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0 AND IN THE JUSTIFICATION
	STATEMENT FOR THE ?V3? REQUEST) IN THE ?SETBACKS? TABLE
	ON SHEET A0.1.
	42. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ?WEST
	ELEVATION? FROM ?ADJACENT PROPERTY? RESIDENTIAL GROUND
	SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ?SETBACKS?
	TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	43. PLEASE REVISE ?BUILDING ELEVATION ? WEST? AND
	?BUILDING ELEVATION ? SOUTH 01? ON THE ?ELEVATIONS?
	SHEET A7.0 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-209(J)(1)(G)(5).
	44. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED HEIGHTS OF
	THE DEMONSTRATED ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES AND
	MECHANICAL ROOMS AND EQUIPMENT ON THE ELEVATIONS.
	45. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
	PROPOSED PARKING IN THE ?PARKING? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1
	AND THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET A1.0, ?1ST FLOOR PLAN? SHEET
	A2.0, ?2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A3.0, AND ?6TH FLOOR
	PLAN? SHEET A4.0.
	46. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING
	SPACES IN THE ?PARKING? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	47. ON THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET A1.0 AND ?1ST FLOOR PLAN?
	SHEET A2.0, THE IDENTIFIED/INDICATED/DEMONSTRATED
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING SPACES EXCEED THE
	MAXIMUM ALLOWED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING SPACES
	ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(N)(3),
	THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE, ACCORDINGLY.
	48. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
	AND THE WALKWAY/PATHWAY FROM THOSE PROPOSED PARKING
	SPACES TO THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE
	?SITE PLAN? SHEET A1.0, ?1ST FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A2.0,
	?2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A3.0, AND ?6TH FLOOR PLAN?
	SHEET A4.0.
	49. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
	PARKING SPACES ABUTTING WALLS/COLUMNS, AT MINIMUM, ONE
	(1) FOOT WIDER ON THE ?SITE PLAN? SHEET A1.0, ?1ST
	FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A2.0, ?2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN? SHEET
	A3.0, AND ?6TH FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A4.0.
	50. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A TURN AROUND
	SPACE BEFORE THE PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS GATE ON THE
	1ST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE ?SITE PLAN?
	SHEET A1.0 AND ?1ST FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A2.0.
	51. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE BICYCLE
	PARKING FACILITIES CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED
	NON-RESIDENTIAL USE (?FUTURE RETAIL?) ON THE ?SITE
	PLAN? SHEET A1.0 AND ?1ST FLOOR PLAN? SHEET A2.0.
	52. PLEASE PROVIDE A ZOOM-IN/BLOW-UP VISUAL OF THE
	PROPOSED BIKE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE DETAILS/DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES.
	53. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(3)(D),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED
	MINIMUM FIVE (5) FEET WIDE LANDSCAPED STRIP ON THE EAST
	SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ?PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS
	EASEMENT? EXIT ALLEY/DRIVE ACCESS AREA.
	54. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY, IF ANY PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY.
	OTHERWISE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A FENCE/WALL
	ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY.
	55. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
	ALONG THE EASTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED EXIT
	ALLEY/DRIVE/PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
	FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ON 24TH STREET TO THE PROPOSED
	PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING AND A CROSSWALK AT
	THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING.
	56. PLEASE EXPLORE RELOCATING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
	SURROUNDING THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ? COURTYARD AREA TO
	FRONT ALONG 24TH STREET AND RECONFIGURING THE PARKING
	GARAGE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ? COURTYARD AREA.


	KEVIE DEFRANC
	PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-12-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	kdefranc			Date	07-12-2022	Time	15:56	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	kdefranc			Date	07-12-2022	Time	15:55	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-12 15:55:50	7/12/22 ? FAILED


	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
	RESUBMITTING:
	A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
	B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
	WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
	D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
	E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
	20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
	AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.

	REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
	F. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE
	COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
	DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
	INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
	G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
	STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT.
	H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
	FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SUBJECT
	PROJECT.
	I. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED
	VARIANCE.
	J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
	COMMENTS BELOW.
	K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
	INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
	MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.

	PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
	1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING LAND USE AND
	FUTURE LAND USE IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
	?COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/CO-WORKING SPACE? USES ACCORDING TO
	THE USES LISTED IN TABLE VII-9 (FOUND IN THE CITY?S
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR)
	SUBSECTION 94-210(J)) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1.
	3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	EXISTING/PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
	4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(A), THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A
	BUILDING SHALL BE 300 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE
	ON SHEET A0.1.
	6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(A),
	A COURTYARD BUILDING TYPE IS DEFINED AS A BUILDING
	CHARACTERIZED AS HAVING A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE THAT IS
	OPEN TO THE SKY AND ENCLOSED BY HABITABLE SPACE ON AT
	LEAST THREE SIDES. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE PROPOSING A
	COURTYARD BUILDING, THEN PLEASE REFER TO FIGURES VII-7
	AND VII-8 (FOUND IN ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(F)(5)) AND
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE VII-8 (FOUND IN THE ZLDR
	SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3)), THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200
	FEET FOR A COURTYARD BUILDING. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE
	PROPOSING A COURTYARD BUILDING OR ANY OTHER BUILDING
	TYPE, THEN PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM/MAXIMUM/PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	LOT DEPTH, MAXIMUM/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA,
	MINIMUM/PROPOSED LOT AREA, AND MINIMUM/PROPOSED
	PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ON SHEET A0.1.
	9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DENSITY CALCULATION ON
	SHEET A0.1.
	10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PERCENTAGES OF
	LANDSCAPING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROPOSED ROOFTOP
	TERRACE ON SHEET A0.1 AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
	11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED ?EAST
	ELEVATION? FROM ?SPRUCE AVENUE? SETBACK (AS REFLECTED
	ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ?SETBACKS? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), A BUILDING FRONTAGE IS DEFINED AS THE
	PERCENTAGE OF A BUILDING FA?ADE THAT IS GENERALLY
	PARALLEL TO, FACING, OR ORIENTED TOWARD A STREET AND
	THAT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK AREA
	ALLOWED AND SHALL INCLUDE A PRINCIPAL BUILDING, WITH
	ACTIVE USES OR COLONNADES. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGES IN
	THE ?SETBACKS? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(2), STOREFRONTS SHALL BE DIRECTLY
	ACCESSIBLE FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THE
	IDENTIFIED ?NON-RES ACTIVE USE (CO-WORK SPACE)? AND
	?NON-RES ACTIVE USE (RESIDENT FITNESS)? DO NOT
	DEMONSTRATE DIRECT ACCESS FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN
	GREENWAY OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(J)(1)(G)(5), GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
	PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. IT
	HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR
	WINDOW SILLS ARE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE 30 INCHES.
	THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(A), OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS AN IMPROVED
	OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
	THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE NOT OPEN
	TO THE SKY, SO PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(B), THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A NEW DEDICATED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN PERCENT OF
	THE LOT AREA. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(C), NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AT GRADE LEVEL. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
	THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	18. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(F), FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES ARE PERMITTED
	AROUND THE PERIMETER OF A NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, PROVIDED THE
	ENCLOSURE DOES NOT PROHIBIT PUBLIC ACCESS AND MUST BE
	CONSTRUCTED OF A DECORATIVE MATERIAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION AND HEIGHT
	OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) ON THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS, ACCORDINGLY
	19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(1)(G), THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER MUST
	ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR
	THE DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
	20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(A), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ONLY BE
	PERMITTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(2)(C), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ABUT
	SIDEWALK AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THEREFORE,
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(K)(4), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR
	THE PROPOSED PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACES.
	23. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(L),
	PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, TO
	IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED STREET
	FURNISHINGS AND LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH STREET AND
	SPRUCE AVENUE.
	24. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	25. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(M)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
	STRIP/TREE GRATES, CURB/GUTTER, ON-STREET PARKING, AND
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	26. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(D)(2) FOR THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CROSSING THE
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	27. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	DISABLED PARKING SPACES ON THE ?PARKING? TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.1.
	28. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(O),
	PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND
	PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
	?PARKING? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
	29. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(O)(1)(II), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE
	THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	30. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(I), THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
	SHALL BE SCREENED ALONG ALL BUILDING FA?ADES FACING A
	RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OPEN SPACE BY A LINER BUILDING
	CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE
	SPACE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THIS REQUIREMENT IS
	ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
	VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED
	FOR THE SUBJECT VARIANCE REQUEST.
	31. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING STALL DEPTHS ON THE
	DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
	32. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(N)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
	REQUIRED/PROPOSED GUEST PARKING ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
	ACCORDINGLY.
	33. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4), THE SIGN BAND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	FIRST TWO STORIES OF THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE
	REVISE THE DIFFERENT
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
	34. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
	94-210(P)(4)(D), MURALS THAT ARE PAINTED DIRECTLY ONTO
	A FA?ADE REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO
	THE CITY.
	35. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
	VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), ADA
	RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS.


	KEVIE DEFRANC
	PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected]
	561-822-1449