Plan Review Details - Project Z22060006
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22060006
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 08-02-2022 Time 11:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 08-08-2022 Time 14:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 11:13:39DEVELOPER SUBMITTED ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION OPTION 2
 - CONTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL PASSED. 8.8.2022
  
  
 ON THE SITE PLAN, EVEN THOUGH IT IS A MINOR AMENDMENT
 AND TO SATISFY THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT, NEEDS TO
 STATE/SHOW WHERE ART WILL BE INTEGRATED OR THE
 APPLICANT MUST STATE THAT THEY WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE
 PUBLIC ART FUND. EITHER CHOICE MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] I WILL PROVIDE AN ART
 ASSESSMENT APPLICATION, AND COPY [email protected]
 FOR FURTHER QUESTIONS CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER,
 ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 03-10-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-10-2023 Time 18:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 03-10-2023 Time 18:59 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-10 18:59:23DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.7 FT NAVD.
 THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-30-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-30-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-26-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-26-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-26 08:41:05COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SENIOR PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
  
 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT: INDICATE IMPACT ON EXISTING
 ENGINEERING PROJECT E21080013. (PROVIDE SUMMARY OF
 IMPACT. ARE METER LOCATIONS CHANGING, ETC. WHAT IMPACTS
 WILL AFFECT UTILITIES?)
  
 2. COMMENTS 2-11 UNDER ENGINEERING RESPONSES WERE NOT
 ISSUED BY ME. NOT SURE WHERE THEY CAME FROM. PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By RROSSANO Date 07-20-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 07-20-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-20 12:02:32PLEASE PROVIDE SUMMARY OF IMPACT TO EXISTING
 ENGINEERING PROJECT E21080013. PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
 UPDATED ACCORDINGLY ONCE SITE PLAN REVISION IS
 APPROVED.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:29 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 15:29:48FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-13-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-07-2023 Time 15:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-07-2023 Time 15:04 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-13 15:05:12FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1415 (1885) CENTREPARK Z23010013 PB791NN
 (Z22060006 PB791LL)
 FEBRUARY 7, 2023
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. CHANGES MUST BE CLOUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO
 INDICATE WHAT IS PROPOSED WHEN COMPARED TO THE APPROVED
 PLANS.
  
 2. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART REFLECTING
 THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND A FINAL PLANT LIST AS SHOWN ON
 THE APPROVED PLANS.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON
 40 PERCENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN
 ADD THE MULTIFAMILY TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL TREES
 REQUIRED. THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON SITE.
 ONCE ANY TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS HAS
 BEEN FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL
 COUNT OF DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED. THE
 WAIVER FOR THE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT AFFECT THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TREES, FLOWERING
 TREES AND SHRUBS.
 PROVIDE A FINAL TALLY OF THE TREE COUNTS AS SHOWN IN
 THE PROJECT TREES CHART ON SHEET LP-7 OF THE APPROVED
 PLANS.
 2/7/23 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR THE ADDITION OF
 UNITS STATES THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WILL BE PLANTED
 OFF SITE, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE BREAKDOWN OF
 THE NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED AND THEIR LOCATIONS. THIS
 MUST BE CLEARLY PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED ON PARCEL 4 CANNOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARD THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS LOT. SHOW THE
 OFFSITE TREES RELATED TO THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE
 EXISTING PARKING AREA AS A SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT
 LIST. ADDRESS ALL MISSING PARKING AREA TREES IN
 TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT
 TO THAT PARCEL???S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE PROPOSED SITE
 WITHIN THIS PARKING AREA CREATES NONCONFORMING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS BY DISPLACING REQUIRED TREES.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE SEWER LINE SHOWN IN THE
 PARKING AREA OF PARCEL 4 CUTS THROUGH THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND IN CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED TREE. THIS NEEDS
 TO BE RELOCATED TO AVOID THE LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. THE WATER AND FIRE LINES HAVE BEEN
 MOVED BACK ONTO PARCEL 4 IN CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED.
 2/7/23 PLACEMENT OF WATER METER ON CIVIL PLAN SHEET IS
 IN CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING ON SHEET LP.5.
  
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LITTORAL PLANTING PLAN SHOWS
 AREAS WITH EACH SPECIES AS A GROUP. THE PROPOSED LAYERS
 OF DIFFERENT SPECIES DOES NOT WORK FOR ESTABLISHING
 PLANTINGS.
 THE LITTORAL PLANTINGS ARE REFERENCED TO BE SHOWN ON
 SHEET LP-6 BUT ARE NOT FULLY SHOWN.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM
 THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHEN APPROVAL WILL BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PLANS.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT
 AND SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION
 #11 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
 A NOTE ON SHEET LP.4 READS: ALL IRRIGATION ON THIS
 LEVEL SHALL BE PROVIDED USING POTABLE WATER. EXPLAIN
 HOW THIS IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/7/23:
  
 10. SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT MATCH CIVIL OR
 LANDSCAPE PLANS WITH THE SAME REVISION DATE. PARKING ON
 4N IS DIFFERENT. SIGN IN ENTRANCE MEDIAN IS NOT SHOWN
 ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:23 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-17 11:23:22FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1415 (1885) CENTREPARK Z22060006
 NOVEMBER 16, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. CHANGES MUST BE CLOUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS TO INDICATE WHAT IS PROPOSED WHEN COMPARED TO THE
 APPROVED PLANS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 REFLECTING THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND A FINAL PLANT LIST
 AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON
 40 PERCENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN
 ADD THE MULTIFAMILY TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL TREES
 REQUIRED. THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON SITE.
 ONCE ANY TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS HAS
 BEEN FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL
 COUNT OF DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED. THE
 WAIVER FOR THE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT AFFECT THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TREES, FLOWERING
 TREES AND SHRUBS.
 PROVIDE A FINAL TALLY OF THE TREE COUNTS AS SHOWN IN
 THE PROJECT TREES CHART ON SHEET LP-7 OF THE APPROVED
 PLANS.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED ON PARCEL 4 CANNOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARD THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS LOT. SHOW THE
 OFFSITE TREES RELATED TO THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE
 EXISTING PARKING AREA AS A SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT
 LIST. ADDRESS ALL MISSING PARKING AREA TREES IN
 TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT
 TO THAT PARCEL???S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE
 PLAN. PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE PROPOSED SITE
 WITHIN THIS PARKING AREA CREATES NONCONFORMING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS BY DISPLACING REQUIRED TREES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE SEWER LINE SHOWN IN THE PARKING AREA
 OF PARCEL 4 CUTS THROUGH THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN
 CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED TREE. THIS NEEDS TO BE
 RELOCATED TO AVOID THE LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE WATER AND FIRE LINES HAVE BEEN MOVED
 BACK ONTO PARCEL 4 IN CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING. THIS
 NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LITTORAL PLANTING
 PLAN SHOWS AREAS WITH EACH SPECIES AS A GROUP. THE
 PROPOSED LAYERS OF DIFFERENT SPECIES DOES NOT WORK FOR
 ESTABLISHING PLANTINGS.
 THE LITTORAL PLANTINGS ARE REFERENCED TO BE SHOWN ON
 SHEET LP-6 BUT ARE NOT FULLY SHOWN.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM
 THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED WHEN APPROVAL WILL BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PLANS.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-01-2022 Time 17:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-01-2022 Time 17:30 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 17:30:41FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1885 CENTREPARK Z22060006
 AUGUST 1, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. CHANGES MUST BE CLOUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO
 INDICATE WHAT IS PROPOSED WHEN COMPARED TO THE APPROVED
 PLANS.
  
 2. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART REFLECTING
 THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND A FINAL PLANT LIST AS SHOWN ON
 THE APPROVED PLANS.
  
 3. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART, CORRECT THE
 SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SHADE TREE AND
 FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON 40 PERCENT
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL TREES REQUIRED.
 THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON SITE. ONCE ANY
 TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS HAS BEEN
 FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL COUNT OF
 DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED. THE WAIVER FOR THE
 OPEN SPACE DOES NOT AFFECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS.
  
 4. TREES PROPOSED ON PARCEL 4 CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS LOT. SHOW THE OFFSITE TREES
 RELATED TO THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING
 AREA AS A SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT LIST. ADDRESS ALL
 MISSING PARKING AREA TREES IN TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT
 TO THAT PARCEL?S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE PROPOSED SITE WITHIN
 THIS PARKING AREA CREATES NONCONFORMING LANDSCAPE AREAS
 BY DISPLACING REQUIRED TREES.
  
 5. THE SEWER LINE SHOWN IN THE PARKING AREA OF PARCEL 4
 CUTS THROUGH THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN CONFLICT WITH THE
 REQUIRED TREE. THIS NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED TO AVOID THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 6. THE WATER AND FIRE LINES HAVE BEEN MOVED BACK ONTO
 PARCEL 4 IN CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING. THIS NEEDS TO BE
 RESOLVED.
  
 7. THE APPROVED LITTORAL PLANTING PLAN SHOWS AREAS WITH
 EACH SPECIES AS A GROUP. THE PROPOSED LAYERS OF
 DIFFERENT SPECIES DOES NOT WORK FOR ESTABLISHING
 PLANTINGS.
  
  
  
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND
 IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
  
 9. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND SOURCE FOR THE
 IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11 REQUIRING USE
 OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-16-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 08-16-2022 Time 13:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 08-16-2022 Time 13:33 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-16 13:35:10NO COMMENT, PER EMAIL FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT
 ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, DATED AUGUST
 16, 2022.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-18-2022 Time 14:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-18 14:22:00-CIVIL PLANS AND LANDSCAPING PLANS SEEM TO SHOW
 ABOVE-GROUND WATER METER BLOCKING A SIDEWALK. CORRECT
 IN REVISED ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID SURVEY WAS UPDATED BUT IT WAS NOT
 IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. INCLUDE COPY IN NEXT ENGINEERING
 PROJECT RESUBMITTAL.
 -MAY NEED ADDITIONAL UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 -REMINDER TO REVISE ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL AS INDICATED
 IN RESPONSE LETTER.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 07-15-2022 Time 16:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date 07-15-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-15 16:54:19PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
  
 -PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT FOR THE PROJECT: THE FORCE MAIN
 EASEMENT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS. PLEASE SHOW
 AND LABEL. MAR2022 RESPONSE: IT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR
 THE SURVEYOR TO PICK UP THE EXISTING FORCE MAIN
 EASEMENT. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED UPDATED SURVEY BACK YET
 AND WILL UPDATE OUR PLANS ONCE AVAILABLE.
 PLEASE UPDATE CIVIL PLANS TO SHOW FORCE MAIN EASEMENT.
  
 -PAGE 4 OF MINOR AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION LETTER
 MENTIONED PARKING EASEMENTS EXHIBT A PGS 10-12. COULD
 NOT LOCATE IT IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. PLEASE ADD WITH
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 -PG 6 OF MINOR AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION LETTER SHOWS
 PROPOSED GARAGE ENTRANCE FURTHER NORTH, BUT I COULD NOT
 LOCATE PLANS THAT LOOKED SIMILAR. PLEASE INDICATE IF
 GARAGE ENTRANCE LOCATION IS CHANGING AND UPDATE EITHER
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER PICTURE OR PLANS.
  
 -WOULD NEED TO UPDATE THE OPEN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 PROJECT WITH ANY CHANGES THAT ARE APPROVED.
  
 -PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT FOR THE PROJECT: PLAN SAYS THERE
 IS A CAFE, BUT CANNOT FIND GREASE TRAP. WHERE IS IT
 INSTALLED AT? MEP. FEB2022 RESPONSE: GREASE TRAP DESIGN
 IS BEING HANDLED BY THE GREASE TRAP TO BE LOCATED ON
 SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING AND LINE IS TO ROUTE BACK
 THROUGH THE BUILDING TO THE TIE-IN POINT FOR THE
 SANITARY SERVICE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING NEAR GARAGE.
 PLEASE VERIFY GREASE TRAP IS STILL GOING TO BE
 INSTALLED AND INDICATE IF IT WILL BE INSIDE BUILDING OR
 ON THE OUTSIDE. IF OUTSIDE, PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON
 PLANS.
  
 -LP.3 DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW UTILITIES. PLEASE UPDATE
 LP.3 AND VERIFY NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND
 UTILITIES.
  
 -THERE WERE TWO PRIOR ACTION ITEMS FOR THE PROJECT AS
 DESCRIBED IN BELOW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES. HAVE THEY
 BEEN COMPLETED? ALSO INDICATE IF ANY OF THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING CHANGES WOUDL CAUSE NEW ENCROACHMENTS.
  
 3. IS IT ALRIGHT FOR RETAINING WALL, SOUTHWEST CORNERS
 OF BUILDING, AND SIDEWALK TO
 BE IN 20 FOOT CANAL BUFFER AS SHOWN ON SHEET 4 AND
 SHEET 5?
 ATTACHED IS THE CANAL BUFFER SURVEY SHOWING THE
 ENCROACHMENTS AND THE LETTER
 SIGNED BY THE DECLARANT ACCEPTING THESE ENCROACHMENTS.
 DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE
 PROCESS OF BEING RECORDED.
 4. CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW 20 FOOT LAKE EASEMENT THAT
 IS SHOWN ON SURVEY. PLEASE
 SHOW AND LABEL IT ON CIVIL PLANS IF STILL THERE. IS IT
 ALRIGHT FOR RETAINING WALL
 AND NORTH CORNER OF BUILDING TO BE IN THAT EASEMENT?
 THE LAKE EASEMENT AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT WILL BE
 REPLATTED TO SO THAT THE WALL
 AND BUILDING DO NOT ENCROACH INTO THEM.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-19-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 07-19-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-19 14:23:32NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-16-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-16-2022 Time 08:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-16-2022 Time 08:28 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-21-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-21-2022 Time 07:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-21 07:11:22NO RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-10-2022 Time 10:10 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-10 10:20:481. NEED GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CITY FOR THE EXISTING 12"
 FORCE MAIN CROSSING PARCELS P AND L.
 2, WHAT IS CONTINGENCY PLAN IF CONFLICT EXISTS?
 RECOMMEND POT HOLING NOW TO DETERMINE DEPTH.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-15-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-08 02:07:001. NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE IN THE SITE PLANS THE BIKE
 LANE TRANSITION PRIOR TO THE WESTBOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE
 ON CENTREPARK BLVD. THIS COMMENT WILL BE A CONDITIONAL
 APPROVAL IF NOT SATISFIED.
 2. NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE PAVEMENT MARKINGS THAT WOULD
 SEPARATE BIKE AND TRAVEL LANES ALONG THE WESTBOUND
 RIGHT-TURN LANE. THIS COMMENT WILL BE A CONDITIONAL
 APPROVAL IF NOT SATISFIED.
 3. SATISFIED. GARAGE ENTRANCE IN THE REVISED SITE PLAN
 DOES NOT MATCH LATEST ARCHITECTURAL IMAGES
 4. SATISFIED. HOW COME THE SIZE OF THE MINIMUM PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE, AND THE VARIANCE REQUEST, INCREASES EVEN
 THOUGH THERE IS A REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS AND COMMERCIAL SPACE?
 5. DUE TO THE CHANGE OF THE GARAGE ENTRY AND LOADING
 ZONES LOCATION/CONFIGURATION, PROVIDE UPDATED GARAGE
 FLOOR PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER
 6. DUE TO THE CHANGE OF THE GARAGE ENTRY AND LOADING
 ZONES LOCATION/CONFIGURATION, PROVIDE AN UPDATED
 AUTOTURN ANALYSIS. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET
 NUMBER
 7. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE PROPOSED
 LOADING ZONES
 8. FOR EACH GARAGE FLOOR, CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION
 RAMP SLOPES, DRIVE AISLES, PARKING STALLS AND
 TURN-AROUND SPACES
 9. PROVIDE AN UPDATED PARKING TABLE. IF ALREADY
 SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER
 10. PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN. IF
 ALREADY SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET
 NUMBER
 11. PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL CONTROL SITE PLAN. IF ALREADY
 SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER
 12. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE TURN-AROUND SPACE(S)
 AT EACH DEAD-END AISLE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT(S)
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-25-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 07-25-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-25 12:10:441. SHOWCASE IN THE SITE PLANS THE BIKE LANE TRANSITION
 PRIOR TO THE WESTBOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE ON CENTREPARK
 BLVD
 2. SHOWCASE PAVEMENT MARKINGS THAT WOULD SEPARATE BIKE
 AND TRAVEL LANES ALONG THE WESTBOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE
 3. GARAGE ENTRANCE IN THE REVISED SITE PLAN DOES NOT
 MATCH LATEST ARCHITECTURAL IMAGES
 4. HOW COME THE SIZE OF THE MINIMUM PUBLIC OPEN SPACE,
 AND THE VARIANCE REQUEST, INCREASES EVEN THOUGH THERE
 IS A REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND
 COMMERCIAL SPACE?
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-20-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-20-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-20-2023 Time 15:31 Sent To  
Notes
2023-01-20 15:56:11PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.20.2023
 PROJECT NO.: Z22060006
 CASE NO.: PB 791LL
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED - THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT
 FIVE (5) BIKE RACKS ARE BEING PROPOSED ON THE EXTERIOR
 OF THE BUILDING; PLEASE IDENTIFY THEIR LOCATION AND
 ENSURE THAT PROPER CLEARANCE IS PROVIDED (AS SHOWN IN
 THE DETAIL) TO AVOID BLOCKING OF THE SIDEWALK, ETC.
  
 1.1. NOT SATISFIED - THE BIKE RACKS SHOWN ALONG
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD DO NOT APPEAR TO PROVIDE THE
 PROPER CLEARANCE (AS INDICATED IN THE DETAIL) AND WOULD
 OBSTRUCT CIRCULATION ON THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL BIKE RACK LOCATIONS PROVIDE THE PROPER
 CLEARANCE.
  
 2. SATISFIED - THE WAIVER TABLE SHOULD BE REVISED TO
 INDICATE:
 2.1. SATISFIED - REQUIRED
 2.2. SATISFIED - ORIGINALLY PROVIDED
 2.3. SATISFIED - APPROVED WAIVER
 2.4. SATISFIED - CURRENT PROPOSAL
  
 3. SATISFIED - WHY IS LOT 4N NOT SHOWING ANY PARKING
 REQUIRED IN THE ?REQUIRED (NON-SHARED) PARKING? TABLE?
  
 4. SATISFIED - REVISED TPS LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED - REVISED SCAD APPROVAL REQUIRED.
  
 6. SATISFIED - WHY ARE THERE TWO (2) SITE PLANS LABELED
 SP1? ONE IS PREPARED BY SCHMIDT NICHOLS, THE OTHER IS
 PREPARED BY MSA.
  
 6.1. SATISFIED - THERE ARE STILL TWO (2) SITE PLANS,
 BOTH ARE LABELED SP1. IT IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED THAT
 ONLY ONE SITE PLAN BE PROVIDED TO AVOID CONFLICTS,
 INCONSISTENCIES, ETC.
  
 7. SATISFIED - FLOOR PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 LEVELS TO CONFIRM UNIT COUNTS, NUMBER OF PARKING
 SPACES, ETC.
  
 7.1.. SATISFIED - NUMEROUS ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS THAT
 WERE PROVIDED ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBJECT
 PROJECT - THE SHEETS ARE IDENTIFIED AS "THE TROPIC", A
 PROJECT ON S. FEDERAL HIGHWAY IN HOLLYWOOD.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE SYNTHETIC
 TURF IS BEING CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 94-451 OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 8.1. SATISFIED - IS SYNTHETIC TURF NO LONGER PROPOSED?
 IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE LABELED ON ANY OF THE PLANS
 OTHER THAN THE SITE PLAN PREPARED BY MSA. PLEASE
 CONFIRM.
  
 9. SATISFIED - MULTIPLE PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING ARE
 EXTENDING INTO THE 20 FOOT CANAL BUFFER REQUIRED BY THE
 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21,
 ?ANY AND ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE CENTREPARK
 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
 (ORB 5430 | PG 1548) SHALL BE COMPLETED AND RECORDED IN
 THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY? PRIOR TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS
 ON SUCH REVISIONS.
  
 9.1. SATISFIED - THERE WAS NO CLEAR RESPONSE PROVIDED
 TO THIS COMMENT. YOU INDICATED "WE ALLOW PLANTING
 WITHIN THE CANAL BUFFER" HOWEVER THERE ARE PORTIONS OF
 THE BUILDING ENCROACHING INTO THE CANAL BUFFER, ETC.
  
 10. SATISFIED - THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS
 INCORRECT IN THE SITE DATA TABLE?IT APPEARS NOT TO HAVE
 BEEN UPDATED.
  
 11. SATISFIED - THE MONUMENT SIGN CANNOT EXCEED 4 FEET
 IN HEIGHT BUT SHALL OTHERWISE MEET THE PROVISIONS OF
 ARTICLE XIII OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 11.1. SATISFIED - THE SIGN DETAIL INDICATES 200 SF PER
 SIGN FACE, BUT THEN ALSO HAS A NOT ABOUT NOT EXCEEDING
 16 SF PER SIGN FACE. PER THE ZLDRS, PERMANENT
 IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ARE
 ALLOWED 48 SF PER SIGN FACE IF OVER 50 RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS. PLEASE CORRECT AND ENSURE CONSISTENCY.
  
 12. SATISFIED - IT APPEARS THAT A NUMBER OF NOTES THAT
 WERE ON THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SITE PLAN RELATING TO
 IRRIGATION, PLUMBING FIXTURES, ETC. HAS BEEN REMOVED;
 PLEASE CLARIFY WHY.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-3 NEEDS
 TO BE REVISED.
  
 13.1. NOT SATISFIED - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS STATES
 THAT WITHOUT THE ALTERNATIVES, THIS SHEET IS NO LONGER
 NEEDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT SP-3 WAS AN OVERALL SITE PLAN
 SHOWING PARKING COMPLIANCE, ETC. FOR LOT 4 NORTH AND
 LOT 4 SOUTH AS A COLLECTIVE PARCEL.
  
 14. SATISFIED - IS ALL OF THE INFORMATION ON THE
 PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-2 NOW LOCATED ON SP-1?
  
 15. SATISFIED - A LABEL FOR THE ?5? LANDSCAPE BUFFER?
 IS POINTING TO A STAIRWELL IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE GARAGE.
  
 16. SATISFIED - ADA STRIPING IS BEING SHOWN IN THE
 LOADING DOCK, GARAGE ENTRY, AND TWO (2) PARKING SPACES
 NORTH OF THE VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING.
  
 16.1. SATISFIED - STRIPING IS STILL SHOWN CONFLICTING
 WITH THE TWO (2) PARKING SPACES NORTH OF THE
 VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING.
  
 17. NOT SATISFIED - THE BUILDING OUTLINE DOES NOT MATCH
 THAT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN, SPECIFICALLY THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING.
  
 17.1. NOT SATISFIED - ARE THESE ROOF PROJECTIONS THAT
 ARE BEING SHOWN? THEY ARE NOT LABELED, DIMENSIONED,
 ETC. SEE COMMENT #20 BELOW.
  
 18. SATISFIED - IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON LOT 2 NORTH
 (LANDSCAPING, PARKING MODIFICATIONS, ETC.) ? PLEASE
 PROVIDE AN APPROVAL BY THE PROPERTY OWNER? THE
 LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON THIS PARCEL SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED
 TOWARD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 19. SATISFIED - THE COLOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED DO NOT
 MATCH THE PROPOSED BUILDING.
  
 19.1. SATISFIED - THE COLOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED WERE
 INDICATED AS EXHIBIT D WITHIN THE REPSONSE TO COMMENTS;
 THESE ARE TOO SMALL TO BE REVIEWED. PLEASE PROVIDE
 FULL-SIZE PDFS, AS DONE PREVIOUSLY.
  
 20. NOT SATISFIED - THERE APPEAR TO BE NUMEROUS
 ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH (CORNER SIDE) SETBACK.
 STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, BALCONIES, ETC. ARE ALLOWED TO
 ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK, BUT NOT BY MORE THAN THREE
 (3) FEET. PLEASE DIMENSION ALL ENCROACHMENTS AND ENSURE
 THEY DO NOT EXCEED THREE (3) FEET.
  
 21. SATISFIED - SHEET LP.2 OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 STATES THAT SHEET LP.4 SHOULD BE REFERRED TO FOR THE
 COURTYARD PLANTINGS, HOWEVER IT APPERS THAT THE
 COURTYARD IS BEING SHOWN ON SHEET LP.3. PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL REFERENCES ARE CORRECT.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 11-18-2022 Time 12:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 11-18-2022 Time 12:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-18 12:26:50PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 11.18.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22060006
 CASE NO.: PB 791LL
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 IMPORTANT: THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS PROVIDED DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO CORRESPOND EXACTLY WITH THE COMMENTS ISSUED.
 THE COMMENT NUMBERS DIFFER, THERE ARE RESPONSES TO
 COMMENTS THAT AREN'T EVEN INCLUDED IN MY 8/1/22 PLAN
 REVIEW, ETC. PLEASE CLARIFY. THE RESPONSES SHOULD
 CLEARLY MATCH THE COMMENTS ISSUED INCLUDING COMMENT
 NUMBERS.
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED - THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT
 FIVE (5) BIKE RACKS ARE BEING PROPOSED ON THE EXTERIOR
 OF THE BUILDING; PLEASE IDENTIFY THEIR LOCATION AND
 ENSURE THAT PROPER CLEARANCE IS PROVIDED (AS SHOWN IN
 THE DETAIL) TO AVOID BLOCKING OF THE SIDEWALK, ETC.
  
 1.1. NEW COMMENT - THE BIKE RACKS SHOWN ALONG
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD DO NOT APPEAR TO PROVIDE THE
 PROPER CLEARANCE (AS INDICATED IN THE DETAIL) AND WOULD
 OBSTRUCT CIRCULATION ON THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL BIKE RACK LOCATIONS PROVIDE THE PROPER
 CLEARANCE.
  
 2. SATISFIED - THE WAIVER TABLE SHOULD BE REVISED TO
 INDICATE:
 2.1. SATISFIED - REQUIRED
 2.2. SATISFIED - ORIGINALLY PROVIDED
 2.3. SATISFIED - APPROVED WAIVER
 2.4. SATISFIED - CURRENT PROPOSAL
  
 3. SATISFIED - WHY IS LOT 4N NOT SHOWING ANY PARKING
 REQUIRED IN THE ?REQUIRED (NON-SHARED) PARKING? TABLE?
  
 4. SATISFIED - REVISED TPS LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 5. SATISFIED - REVISED SCAD APPROVAL REQUIRED.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED - WHY ARE THERE TWO (2) SITE PLANS
 LABELED SP1? ONE IS PREPARED BY SCHMIDT NICHOLS, THE
 OTHER IS PREPARED BY MSA.
  
 6.1. NEW COMMENT - THERE ARE STILL TWO (2) SITE PLANS,
 BOTH ARE LABELED SP1. IT IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED THAT
 ONLY ONE SITE PLAN BE PROVIDED TO AVOID CONFLICTS,
 INCONSISTENCIES, ETC.
  
 7. NOT SATISFIED - FLOOR PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 ALL LEVELS TO CONFIRM UNIT COUNTS, NUMBER OF PARKING
 SPACES, ETC.
  
 7.1.. NEW COMMENT - NUMEROUS ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS THAT
 WERE PROVIDED ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBJECT
 PROJECT - THE SHEETS ARE IDENTIFIED AS "THE TROPIC", A
 PROJECT ON S. FEDERAL HIGHWAY IN HOLLYWOOD.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE SYNTHETIC
 TURF IS BEING CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 94-451 OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 8.1. NEW COMMENT - IS SYNTHETIC TURF NO LONGER
 PROPOSED? IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE LABELED ON ANY OF
 THE PLANS OTHER THAN THE SITE PLAN PREPARED BY MSA.
 PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED - MULTIPLE PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING
 ARE EXTENDING INTO THE 20 FOOT CANAL BUFFER REQUIRED BY
 THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21,
 ?ANY AND ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE CENTREPARK
 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
 (ORB 5430 | PG 1548) SHALL BE COMPLETED AND RECORDED IN
 THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY? PRIOR TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS
 ON SUCH REVISIONS.
  
 9.1. NEW COMMENT - THERE WAS NO CLEAR RESPONSE PROVIDED
 TO THIS COMMENT. YOU INDICATED "WE ALLOW PLANTING
 WITHIN THE CANAL BUFFER" HOWEVER THERE ARE PORTIONS OF
 THE BUILDING ENCROACHING INTO THE CANAL BUFFER, ETC.
  
 10. SATISFIED - THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS
 INCORRECT IN THE SITE DATA TABLE?IT APPEARS NOT TO HAVE
 BEEN UPDATED.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE MONUMENT SIGN CANNOT
 EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT BUT SHALL OTHERWISE MEET THE
 PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 11.1. NEW COMMENT - THE SIGN DETAIL INDICATES 200 SF
 PER SIGN FACE, BUT THEN ALSO HAS A NOT ABOUT NOT
 EXCEEDING 16 SF PER SIGN FACE. PER THE ZLDRS, PERMANENT
 IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ARE
 ALLOWED 48 SF PER SIGN FACE IF OVER 50 RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS. PLEASE CORRECT AND ENSURE CONSISTENCY.
  
 12. SATISFIED - IT APPEARS THAT A NUMBER OF NOTES THAT
 WERE ON THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SITE PLAN RELATING TO
 IRRIGATION, PLUMBING FIXTURES, ETC. HAS BEEN REMOVED;
 PLEASE CLARIFY WHY.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-3 NEEDS
 TO BE REVISED.
  
 13.1. NEW COMMENT - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS STATES
 THAT WITHOUT THE ALTERNATIVES, THIS SHEET IS NO LONGER
 NEEDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT SP-3 WAS AN OVERALL SITE PLAN
 SHOWING PARKING COMPLIANCE, ETC. FOR LOT 4 NORTH AND
 LOT 4 SOUTH AS A COLLECTIVE PARCEL.
  
 14. SATISFIED - IS ALL OF THE INFORMATION ON THE
 PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-2 NOW LOCATED ON SP-1?
  
 15. SATISFIED - A LABEL FOR THE ?5? LANDSCAPE BUFFER?
 IS POINTING TO A STAIRWELL IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE GARAGE.
  
 16. NOT SATISFIED - ADA STRIPING IS BEING SHOWN IN THE
 LOADING DOCK, GARAGE ENTRY, AND TWO (2) PARKING SPACES
 NORTH OF THE VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING.
  
 16.1. NEW COMMENT - STRIPING IS STILL SHOWN CONFLICTING
 WITH THE TWO (2) PARKING SPACES NORTH OF THE
 VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING.
  
 17. NOT SATISFIED - THE BUILDING OUTLINE DOES NOT MATCH
 THAT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN, SPECIFICALLY THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING.
  
 17.1. NEW COMMENT - ARE THESE ROOF PROJECTIONS THAT ARE
 BEING SHOWN? THEY ARE NOT LABELED, DIMENSIONED, ETC.
 SEE COMMENT #20 BELOW.
  
 18. SATISFIED - IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON LOT 2 NORTH
 (LANDSCAPING, PARKING MODIFICATIONS, ETC.) ? PLEASE
 PROVIDE AN APPROVAL BY THE PROPERTY OWNER? THE
 LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON THIS PARCEL SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED
 TOWARD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 19. NOT SATISFIED - THE COLOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED DO
 NOT MATCH THE PROPOSED BUILDING.
  
 19.1. NEW COMMENT - THE COLOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED WERE
 INDICATED AS EXHIBIT D WITHIN THE REPSONSE TO COMMENTS;
 THESE ARE TOO SMALL TO BE REVIEWED. PLEASE PROVIDE
 FULL-SIZE PDFS, AS DONE PREVIOUSLY.
  
 20. NOT SATISFIED - THERE APPEAR TO BE NUMEROUS
 ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH (CORNER SIDE) SETBACK.
 STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, BALCONIES, ETC. ARE ALLOWED TO
 ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK, BUT NOT BY MORE THAN THREE
 (3) FEET. PLEASE DIMENSION ALL ENCROACHMENTS AND ENSURE
 THEY DO NOT EXCEED THREE (3) FEET.
  
 21. NEW COMMENT - SHEET LP.2 OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 STATES THAT SHEET LP.4 SHOULD BE REFERRED TO FOR THE
 COURTYARD PLANTINGS, HOWEVER IT APPERS THAT THE
 COURTYARD IS BEING SHOWN ON SHEET LP.3. PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL REFERENCES ARE CORRECT.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 08-01-2022 Time 13:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 08-01-2022 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 13:59:04PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 08.01.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22060006
 CASE NO.: PB 791LL
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT FIVE (5) BIKE
 RACKS ARE BEING PROPOSED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE
 BUILDING; PLEASE IDENTIFY THEIR LOCATION AND ENSURE
 THAT PROPER CLEARANCE IS PROVIDED (AS SHOWN IN THE
 DETAIL) TO AVOID BLOCKING OF THE SIDEWALK, ETC.
  
 2. THE WAIVER TABLE SHOULD BE REVISED TO INDICATE:
 2.1. REQUIRED
 2.2. ORIGINALLY PROVIDED
 2.3. APPROVED WAIVER
 2.4. CURRENT PROPOSAL
  
 3. WHY IS LOT 4N NOT SHOWING ANY PARKING REQUIRED IN
 THE ?REQUIRED (NON-SHARED) PARKING? TABLE?
  
 4. REVISED TPS LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 5. REVISED SCAD APPROVAL REQUIRED.
  
 6. WHY ARE THERE TWO (2) SITE PLANS LABELED SP1? ONE IS
 PREPARED BY SCHMIDT NICHOLS, THE OTHER IS PREPARED BY
 MSA.
  
 7. FLOOR PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LEVELS TO
 CONFIRM UNIT COUNTS, NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, ETC.
  
 8. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE SYNTHETIC TURF IS BEING
 CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-451 OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 9. MULTIPLE PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING ARE EXTENDING INTO
 THE 20 FOOT CANAL BUFFER REQUIRED BY THE DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, ?ANY AND ALL
 MODIFICATIONS TO THE CENTREPARK DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (ORB 5430 | PG
 1548) SHALL BE COMPLETED AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC
 RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY? PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF
 A BUILDING PERMIT. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS ON SUCH
 REVISIONS.
  
 10. THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS INCORRECT IN
 THE SITE DATA TABLE?IT APPEARS NOT TO HAVE BEEN
 UPDATED.
  
 11. THE MONUMENT SIGN CANNOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT
 BUT SHALL OTHERWISE MEET THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIII
 OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 12. IT APPEARS THAT A NUMBER OF NOTES THAT WERE ON THE
 PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SITE PLAN RELATING TO IRRIGATION,
 PLUMBING FIXTURES, ETC. HAS BEEN REMOVED; PLEASE
 CLARIFY WHY.
  
 13. THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-3 NEEDS TO BE REVISED.
  
 14. IS ALL OF THE INFORMATION ON THE
 PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-2 NOW LOCATED ON SP-1?
  
 15. A LABEL FOR THE ?5? LANDSCAPE BUFFER? IS POINTING
 TO A STAIRWELL IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE.
  
 16. ADA STRIPING IS BEING SHOWN IN THE LOADING DOCK,
 GARAGE ENTRY, AND TWO (2) PARKING SPACES NORTH OF THE
 VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING.
  
 17. THE BUILDING OUTLINE DOES NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON
 THE FLOOR PLAN, SPECIFICALLY THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE BUILDING.
  
 18. IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON LOT 2 NORTH (LANDSCAPING,
 PARKING MODIFICATIONS, ETC.) ? PLEASE PROVIDE AN
 APPROVAL BY THE PROPERTY OWNER? THE LANDSCAPING SHOWN
 ON THIS PARCEL SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 19. THE COLOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED DO NOT MATCH THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING.
  
 20. THERE APPEAR TO BE NUMEROUS ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE
 SOUTH (CORNER SIDE) SETBACK. STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS,
 BALCONIES, ETC. ARE ALLOWED TO ENCROACH INTO THE
 SETBACK, BUT NOT BY MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET. PLEASE
 DIMENSION ALL ENCROACHMENTS AND ENSURE THEY DO NOT
 EXCEED THREE (3) FEET.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved