Plan Review Details - Project Z22050025
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22050025
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 06-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 06-10-2022 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-10 15:50:53THIS MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT IS NOT SUBJECT
 TO PUBLIC ART HOWEVER THE DEVELOPMENT SITE - FLAGLER
 TOWERS RESIDENTIAL WILL BE SUBJECT TO REQUIREMENT.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 09-07-2022 Time 16:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-07-2022 Time 16:01 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-07 16:01:29DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANS. THE
 FOLLOWING ARE THE SAME INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS THAT WERE
 PROVIDED WHEN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WAS PASSED:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. PROVISO/CONDITION: AS STATED IN THEIR
 PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED 9/13/2021 THE DESIGN TEAM
 HAS ADVISED THAT IT WILL SEEK ISSUANCE OF A LETTER OF
 MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL LOMR-F BY FEMA IN ORDER TO
 ADDRESS THE COMMENT REGARDING THE PROPOSED FINISHED
 FLOOR LEVEL BEING EL 9.0 FT NAVD INSTEAD OF THE EL 10.0
 FT NAVD THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION PLUS 2.0 FT FREEBOARD. CONDITION: EITHER THE
 LOMR-F MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION PRIOR
 TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE, OR THE FINISHED FLOOR
 LEVEL BEING RAISED TO EL 10.0 FT NAVD.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 06-08-2022 Time 20:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 06-08-2022 Time 20:51 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-08 20:53:05DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMMENDMENTS TO THE PLANS. THE
 FOLLOWING ARE THE SAME INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS THAT WERE
 PROVIDED WHEN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WAS PASSED:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. PROVISO/CONDITION: AS STATED IN THEIR
 PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED 9/13/2021 THE DESIGN TEAM
 HAS ADVISED THAT IT WILL SEEK ISSUANCE OF A LETTER OF
 MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL LOMR-F BY FEMA IN ORDER TO
 ADDRESS THE COMMENT REGARDING THE PROPOSED FINISHED
 FLOOR LEVEL BEING EL 9.0 FT NAVD INSTEAD OF THE EL 10.0
 FT NAVD THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION PLUS 2.0 FT FREEBOARD. CONDITION: EITHER THE
 LOMR-F MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION PRIOR
 TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE, OR THE FINISHED FLOOR
 LEVEL BEING RAISED TO EL 10.0 FT NAVD.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-23-2022 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-08-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 06-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-08 16:52:52GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING STORMWATER
 INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE WHERE TIE
 INS ARE PROPOSED.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-29-2022 Time 14:40 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-29 14:41:082ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
 PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-02-2022 Time 13:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-02-2022 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-02 13:19:52THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE
 FDC LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ONE RECOMENDED FIRE HYDRANT TO BE INSTALLED ALONG S
 FLAGLER DR.
  
 A SECOND ONE IS RECOMMENDED TO BE INSTALLED ALONG S
 OLIVE AVE.
  
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
  
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF ONE FDC PER TOWER.
  
 ONE FDC IS RECOMMENDED ALONG S FLAGLER WITHIN 100' OF
 THE FIRE HYDRANT.
  
 A SECOND RECOMMENDED FDC LOCATION CAN BE ALONG S OLIVE
 IN AN AGREED UPON LOCATION ALONG THAT EXTERIOR AREA
 WITHIN 100' OF THE RECOMMENDED SECOND FIRE HYDRANT. FOR
 CONSIDERATION PURPOSES, IT CAN BE WALL MOUNTED.
  
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
  
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
  
 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
  
 8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 A REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED FLOOR LAYOUT INDICATES
 CENTRALLY LOCATED EXIT STAIRS. THIS PROPOSED
 CONFIGURATION MAY REQUIRE A DETAILED REVIEW FOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES OF 2
 EXITS REMOTELY LOCATED FROM EACH OTHER PER NFPA 101 CH
 7, MEAND OF EGRESS.. IT APPEARS THAT A PERSON LEAVING A
 CERTAIN ROOM CAN ONLY GO IN ONE DIRECTION THAT WOULD
 VIRTUALLY QUALIFY THAT ROUTE AS A SINGLE AND ONLY EXIT.
  
  
 10A. THE LEVEL 4 AMENITY DECK INDICATES 2 EXITS FROM
 THE OPEN POOL DECK AREA. A REVIEW OF THE AMEMITY DECK
 IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE THE TOTAL OCCUPANCY LOAD CAN
 BE SERVED BY THESE TWO EXITS AND THAT THEY ARE
 SEPARATED PER NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS. ANY EXIT
 DOOR FROM THE AMENITY DECK MUST SWING IN THE PATH OF
 TRAVEL.
  
  
 10B. THE LEVEL 27 FLOOR PLAN INDICATES A SINGLE EXIT.
 THIS CONFIGURATION MAY REQUIRE A DETAILED REVIEW TO
 ENUSRE IT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101,
 CH 30 AND CH 7, INCLUDING TRAVEL DISTANCES.
  
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 SEE SIMILAR COMMENTS OF 7A ABOVE, ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS
 AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
  
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 10 FT (3050 MM).
  
 11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
 (4) WORK TABLE.
 (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
 OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
 COMMAND CENTER.
 (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
 (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
 OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
 SYSTEMS.
 (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
  
 NFPA 101
  
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
  
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
  
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
 SYSTEMS.
  
 24.9.1 GENERAL.
 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
 CAPABLE
 OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
 FREQUENCIES
 ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
 INSTALLED
 WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
 AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
 SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
 DEGRADE
 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 FOR
 APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
 SUCCESSFUL
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
 FOR THE
 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
 BY
 THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
 PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
 ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
 NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
 PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-20-2022 Time 15:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-20-2022 Time 15:51 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-20 15:52:19FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z22050025
 DECEMBER 20, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION IS PROPOSED TO BE
 RAISED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT, RESULTING
 IN A STEEPER SLOPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET
 CURB ADJACENT TO THE PARKING SPACES ALONG DIANA PLACE.
 THE 3:1 SLOPE MAY CAUSE STABILIZATION AND MAINTENANCE
 ISSUES WITH THE SOIL, MULCH AND GRASS AROUND THE TREES.
 THERE WILL BE ACCESS DIFFICULTY FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO GO
 FROM THE PARKING TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING DRAINAGE TO DEMONSTRATE THERE
 ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH THE APPROVED TREE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/28/22:
 3. SATISFIED. SPACING OF THE LIVE OAK TREES ALONG SOUTH
 FLAGLER HAS BEEN CHANGED. THIS WAS NOT CLOUDED ON THE
 PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET ON
 CENTER FOR THE STREET TREES. THE PLAN APPROVED WITH THE
 PD REZONING SHOWS THE CORRECT SPACING, A WAIVER WAS NOT
 APPROVED TO VARY FROM THE REQUIREMENT. REFERENCE SHEET
 LG 3.1 REVISED 10/29/2021.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-28-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-28-2022 Time 15:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-28-2022 Time 15:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-28 15:13:46FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z22050025
 OCTOBER 28, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION IS PROPOSED TO BE
 RAISED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT, RESULTING
 IN A STEEPER SLOPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET
 CURB ADJACENT TO THE PARKING SPACES ALONG DIANA PLACE.
 THE 3:1 SLOPE MAY CAUSE STABILIZATION AND MAINTENANCE
 ISSUES WITH THE SOIL, MULCH AND GRASS AROUND THE TREES.
 THERE WILL BE ACCESS DIFFICULTY FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO GO
 FROM THE PARKING TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING DRAINAGE TO DEMONSTRATE THERE
 ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH THE APPROVED TREE LOCATIONS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/28/22:
 3. SPACING OF THE LIVE OAK TREES ALONG SOUTH FLAGLER
 HAS BEEN CHANGED. THIS WAS NOT CLOUDED ON THE PREVIOUS
 SUBMITTAL. MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET ON CENTER FOR THE
 STREET TREES. THE PLAN APPROVED WITH THE PD REZONING
 SHOWS THE CORRECT SPACING, A WAIVER WAS NOT APPROVED TO
 VARY FROM THE REQUIREMENT. REFERENCE SHEET LG 3.1
 REVISED 10/29/2021.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-06-2022 Time 17:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-06-2022 Time 17:03 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-06 17:04:19FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z22050025
 SEPTEMBER 6, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION IS PROPOSED TO BE
 RAISED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT, RESULTING
 IN A STEEPER SLOPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET
 CURB ADJACENT TO THE PARKING SPACES ALONG DIANA PLACE.
 THE 3:1 SLOPE MAY CAUSE STABILIZATION AND MAINTENANCE
 ISSUES WITH THE SOIL, MULCH AND GRASS AROUND THE TREES.
 THERE WILL BE ACCESS DIFFICULTY FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO GO
 FROM THE PARKING TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING DRAINAGE TO DEMONSTRATE THERE
 ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH THE APPROVED TREE LOCATIONS.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-08-2022 Time 12:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-08-2022 Time 12:25 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-08 12:25:29FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z22050025
 JUNE 8, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION IS PROPOSED TO BE RAISED
 ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT, RESULTING IN A
 STEEPER SLOPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET CURB
 ADJACENT TO THE PARKING SPACES ALONG DIANA PLACE. THE
 3:1 SLOPE MAY CAUSE STABILIZATION AND MAINTENANCE
 ISSUES WITH THE SOIL, MULCH AND GRASS AROUND THE TREES.
 THERE WILL BE ACCESS DIFFICULTY FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO GO
 FROM THE PARKING TO THE SIDEWALK.
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 09-08-2022 Time 12:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 09-08-2022 Time 12:16 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 06-09-2022 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 06-09-2022 Time 11:53 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-09 11:54:35CALL OUT THE EXISTING 4? CAS AND 3? AC WM ON CURRIE
 CRESCENT. ARE THESE GOING TO BE REMOVED DURING THE
 FLAGLER FORTE DEMO? IF SO PLEASE NOTE.
  - FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE PROFILE AND
 VERTICAL CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER AND STORM
 LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL GN-2
 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. SHOW EXISTING
 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON THE PROFILE. THE PROFILE
 SHOULD SHOW PROPOSED PIPE FROM TIE-IN AT THE MAIN TO
 POINT OF SERVICE.
  - SHOW STATIONING AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN PROPOSED UTILITIES AND EXISTING UTILITIES
 AND/OR BASELINE.
  -ADD NOTE THIS IS WITHIN LS 40 SERVICE BOUNDARY.
  -ADD FIRE FLOW CALCS. PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 FLOW AS WELL.
  
 MIKE TECHNOW - [email protected]
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 06-07-2022 Time 16:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-07 16:10:08-AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: IDENTIFY GAS LINE
 NEAR PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MORE CLEARLY ON UTILITY PLAN
 SHEET C600; LABEL IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE LINE WITH
 PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE; ADD SCALE MEASUREMENT ICON
 TO WATER METER DETAIL ON SHEET C600; REVISE FIRE
 EASEMENT WORDING ON WATER METER DETAIL TO FIRE/UTILITY
 EASEMENT; LABEL FIRELINE POINT OF SERVICE VALVES;
 SUBMIT MEP PLAN (DCDA AREA) FOR REVIEW.
  
 -THERE IS A PROPOSED GREASE TRAP THAT IS HALFWAY IN A
 SIDEWALK AND IN FRONT OF A DOOR. CONSIDER RELOCATING IT
 OUT OF SIDEWALK.
  
 -PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND RECORD
 BACKFLOW COVENANT.
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-06-2022 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-06 14:24:23NO FURTHER REVIEW COMMENTS UNTIL ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-04-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-04 12:33:07CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
 1- THE GARBAGE CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE TO
 BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY`S REFUSE COLLECTOR TRUCK.
 2- IF THE STAGING AREA HEIGHT CLEARANCE, WHERE THE
 GARBAGE CONTAINERS ARE ROLLED OUT FOR SEVICE IS LESS
 THAN 22 FT, THE CONTAINERS SHALL BE STAGED BY THE
 CURBSIDE FOR SERVICVE ON THE SERVICE DAYS. THE CURBSIDE
 STAGING AREA TO BE APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-30-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 08-30-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-30 15:09:23PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH THE VEHICLE`S DYNAMIC ENVELOP
 AND THE TIRE PATH IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS.
 2- DETAILS FOR THE SANITATION CONTAINERS (I.E.
 COMPACTOR CONTAINER SIZE, QTY).
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-08-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 06-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-08 10:46:00PLEASE PROVIDE:
 1- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 2- HEIGHT CLEARANCE FOR THE LOADING DOCK DOOR AND THE
 DUMPSTER STAGING AREA, WHERE THEY GET SERVICED BY A
 FRONT LOAD COLLECTION TRUCK.
 3- CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF
 SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER)
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS
 5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 6- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 7- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D.
 LATEST EDITION.
 8- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status   Date 11-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-30-2022 Time 17:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-30-2022 Time 17:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-30-2022 Time 17:50 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-16-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-16-2022 Time 13:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-16 13:46:43PER TRACY WARD:
 COMMENTS FROM THE 8/22/22 SUBMITTAL:
 1. GRADING (9.00 FT NAVD) OF SWALE AREA ADJACENT TO
 STRUCTURE YD-21 DOES NOT MATCH SECTION I-I (9.85 FT
 NAVD). REVISE RIM ELEV. OF YD-21.
 2. CHECK SPOT GRADES (7.69, 7.77) FOR CONNECTOR
 SIDEWALK TO THE NORTHEAST OF STRUCTURE ST-3.
 3. CHECK SPOT GRADES (10.86, 10.79) OF WEST END OF
 CURVED SIDEWALK. THEY ARE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF WHAT
 SECTION I-I (AND PLAN SHEET FLOW ARROW) SHOWS THE
 SIDEWALK SHOULD BE SLOPING.
 4. FLAT SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE (11.23, 11.23) SOUTHWEST
 OF STRUCTURE YD-1. DOES THE SIDEWALK (AT LEAST THE BACK
 OF WALK) SLOPE UP TO THE NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH FROM
 THIS POINT?
 5. SHEET C-502:
 A. CHECK EAST PIPE SIZE (12 INCH RCP) FOR STRUCTURE
 S-10. DOESN'T MATCH SHEET C-501 (EXIST. 15??? RCP).
 B. LIST THE WEIR ELEVATION FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
 C. INDICATE WHICH STRUCTURES SHOULD HAVE PRBS' AND FOR
 WHICH INVERT.
 D. LABEL ST-3 (AND ANY OTHER STRUCTURES WITH WEIRS) AS
 A CONTROL STRUCTURE.
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-06-2022 Time 13:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-06-2022 Time 13:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-06 13:21:21THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. INTERNAL STORM PIPE SHOWN UNDER THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
 OF THE BUILDING.
  
 2. SHOW ALL OF THE PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 3. FLATTEN THE SLOPE OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO
 THE BACK OF CURB ALONG DIANA PLACE TO BE MORE WALKABLE
 FOR PEOPLE TO WALK TO AND FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THEIR
 PARKED CAR INSTEAD OF WALKING IN THE STREET TO GET TO
 THE END OF THE PARKING SPACES. REDUCE THE ELEVATION OF
 THE TOWNHOUSE LANDING AT THE TOP OF THE SIDEWALK
 CONNECTION BY ADDING/INCREASING THE NUMBER OF STEPS
 BETWEEN THE LANDING AND PATIO AND HAVING THE PATIO STEP
 DOWN FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE
 TOWNHOUSE. FLATTEN THE CROSS SLOPE OF THE PARALLEL
 PARKING SPACES AND ADJACENT PAVEMENT FROM 2.5% TO 2.0%.
  
 4. INCREASE THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK EAST
 OF THE FIRST TOWNHOUSE CONNECTOR SIDEWALK IN ORDER TO
 BE ABLE TO FLATTEN THE CROSS SLOPE OF THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA ADJACENT TO THE BACK OF CURB ALONG DIANA PLACE.
  
 5. LABEL ALL OF THE STREETS ON SHEETS C-500, C-600,
 C-900, C-901 AND C-902.
  
 6. CAN THE SIDEWALK AREA ADJACENT TO THE CURB RAMP TO
 S. OLIVE AVENUE AT THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE BE RAISED SUCH
 THAT WATER WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE GUTTER TO THE
 SIDEWALK AREA?
  
 7. CAN THE SWALE INVERT ELEVATION BE RAISED BETWEEN THE
 STRAIGHT AND CURVED SIDEWALKS AT THE WEST END OF DIANA
 PLACE.
  
 8. VERIFY RIM ELEVATION OF 2.27 FT NAVD FOR YARD DRAIN
 BETWEEN THE STRAIGHT AND CURVED SIDEWALKS.
  
 9. ANY CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FROM PREVIOUS
 SUBMITTALS WILL REMAIN.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-08-2022 Time 08:11 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-22-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-22 11:05:03APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
 1) PROVIDE A COMPLETE PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN
 FOR EACH OF THE GARAGE FLOORS
 2) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS FLAGLER NORTH OF DIANA PL
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE NORTHEAST
 DEAD-END
 2) SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SITE
 PLAN, SHOWCASING ALL RELATED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES
 (E.G. ROADWAY, TRAVEL LANE, SIDEWALK, VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLE, CORNER CLEARANCE, ETC) PROPERLY DIMENSIONED.
 PLEASE INCLUDE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB
 CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. IF ALREADY CREATED OR PREVIOUSLY
 SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE IT AT NEXT RESUBMISSION. SOME
 DIMENSIONS MISSING (E.G. TRAVEL LANE, ROAD WIDTH)
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. IF
 ALREADY CREATED OR PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE
 IT AT NEXT RESUBMISSION
 4) SATISFIED. SHEET A-102 PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR
 THE SOUTH-EAST PARKING AREA AT THE DEAD-END ON THE EAST
 SIDE
 5) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE GARAGE DRAWINGS
 THE LOCATION OF DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ACCORDING TO THE
 DEPICTED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MARKINGS AT EACH INTERNAL
 INTERSECTION OR AT POTENTIAL CONFLICT LOCATION(S) (I.E.
 BY THE UP-RAMP IN SHEET A-103). TO BE CONVERTED AS A
 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL TO BE FULFILLED BY ENGINEERING
 PERMITTING
 6) SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN
 ANALYSIS, SHOWCASING BOTH WHEEL PATHS AND VEHICLE
 DYNAMIC ENVELOPE IN DIFFERENT COLORS. ENGINEERING
 SERVICES CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS THAT
 MEETS THE REQUIREMENT
 7) SATISFIED. LATEST AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWS SEVERAL
 INSTANCES OF TRUCK WHEEL-PATHS RUNNING OVER THE CURB.
 PROVIDE DETAILS OF MITIGATION MEASURES (E.G. MOUNTABLE
 CURBS, REINFORCED CONCRETE, CORNER RE-DESIGN) AT EACH
 AFFECTED LOCATION
 8) SATISFIED. PER PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, IMPLEMENT A
 4-FEET WIDE BIKE LANE, PLUS 1-FOOT BUFFER ON BOTH
 SIDES, ALONG DIANA PL AND CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-30-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-30-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-30 18:20:251) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE NORTHEAST
 DEAD-END
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION
 SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING ALL RELATED TRANSPORTATION
 FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, TRAVEL LANE, SIDEWALK,
 VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER CLEARANCE, ETC) PROPERLY
 DIMENSIONED. PLEASE INCLUDE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G.
 DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS,
 ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. IF ALREADY CREATED OR PREVIOUSLY
 SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE IT AT NEXT RESUBMISSION. SOME
 DIMENSIONS MISSING (E.G. TRAVEL LANE, ROAD WIDTH)
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING
 PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. IF
 ALREADY CREATED OR PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE
 IT AT NEXT RESUBMISSION
 4) SATISFIED. SHEET A-102 PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR
 THE SOUTH-EAST PARKING AREA AT THE DEAD-END ON THE EAST
 SIDE
 5) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE GARAGE DRAWINGS
 THE LOCATION OF DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ACCORDING TO THE
 DEPICTED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MARKINGS AT EACH INTERNAL
 INTERSECTION OR AT POTENTIAL CONFLICT LOCATION(S) (I.E.
 BY THE UP-RAMP IN SHEET A-103). TO BE CONVERTED AS A
 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL TO BE FULFILLED BY ENGINEERING
 PERMITTING
 6) SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN
 ANALYSIS, SHOWCASING BOTH WHEEL PATHS AND VEHICLE
 DYNAMIC ENVELOPE IN DIFFERENT COLORS. ENGINEERING
 SERVICES CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS THAT
 MEETS THE REQUIREMENT
 7) SATISFIED. LATEST AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWS SEVERAL
 INSTANCES OF TRUCK WHEEL-PATHS RUNNING OVER THE CURB.
 PROVIDE DETAILS OF MITIGATION MEASURES (E.G. MOUNTABLE
 CURBS, REINFORCED CONCRETE, CORNER RE-DESIGN) AT EACH
 AFFECTED LOCATION
 8) PER PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, IMPLEMENT A 4-FEET WIDE
 BIKE LANE, PLUS 1-FOOT BUFFER ON BOTH SIDES, ALONG
 DIANA PL AND CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-04-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-04 16:41:431) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE NORTHEAST
 DEAD-END
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN,
 SHOWCASING ALL RELATED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G.
 ROADWAY, TRAVEL LANE, SIDEWALK, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE,
 CORNER CLEARANCE, ETC) PROPERLY DIMENSIONED. PLEASE
 INCLUDE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. IF ALREADY CREATED OR PREVIOUSLY
 SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE IT AT NEXT RESUBMISSION
 3) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. IF
 ALREADY CREATED OR PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE
 IT AT NEXT RESUBMISSION
 4) SHEET A-102 PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE
 SOUTH-EAST PARKING AREA AT THE DEAD-END ON THE EAST
 SIDE
 5) INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE GARAGE DRAWINGS THE LOCATION
 OF DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ACCORDING TO THE DEPICTED TRAFFIC
 CIRCULATION MARKINGS AT EACH INTERNAL INTERSECTION OR
 AT POTENTIAL CONFLICT LOCATION(S) (I.E. BY THE UP-RAMP
 IN SHEET A-103)
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS,
 SHOWCASING BOTH WHEEL PATHS AND VEHICLE DYNAMIC
 ENVELOPE IN DIFFERENT COLORS. ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN
 PROVIDE A SAMPLE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS THAT MEETS THE
 REQUIREMENT
 7) LATEST AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWS SEVERAL INSTANCES OF
 TRUCK WHEEL-PATHS RUNNING OVER THE CURB. PROVIDE
 DETAILS OF MITIGATION MEASURES (E.G. MOUNTABLE CURBS,
 REINFORCED CONCRETE, CORNER RE-DESIGN) AT EACH AFFECTED
 LOCATION
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-08 10:05:001) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
 INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. IF
 ALREADY SUBMITTED, PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-08-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 06-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-08 22:23:451) SHEET A-100. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE
 NORTH-EAST DEAD-END
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-17-2022 Time 17:33 Rev Time 2.50
Received By eschneid Date 11-17-2022 Time 13:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-07-2022 Time 16:47 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 09-06-2022 Time 10:53 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-07 16:48:01CASE NO. PB 1857C RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
 1315 S. FLAGLER
 FLAGLER TOWERS REVISIONS
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY NOVEMBER 8,
 2022), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
 THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) THE FOLLOWING SETBACK ENCROACHMENTS OCCUR IN
 VIOLATION OF THE WAIVERS THAT WERE GRANTED BY
 RESOLUTION NO. 310-21. AMENDING THE WAIVERS IS ONLY
 PERMITTED AS PART OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT. NOTE: YOU NEED TO REVIEW RESOLUTION NO.
 310-21 TO VERIFY THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL ENCROACHMENTS
 THAT EXCEED THE APPROVED AMOUNT.
  
 LEVEL 2 CANOPY OVER THE DOOR TO THE BICYCLE ROOM ? ONLY
 3 FEET PERMITTED.
 LEVELS 6, 8, 23 TERRACES ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST BUILDING
 ? ONLY 3 FEET PERMITTED.
 LEVELS 8, 23 TERRACES ON NORTH SIDE OF WEST BUILDING ?
 ONLY 3 FEET PERMITTED.
  
 2) RESOLUTION NO. 310-21 REQUIRES THAT EACH UNIT HAVE
 AT LEAST ONE EV PARKING SPACE. THE PROJECT HAS 109
 UNITS, SO AT LEAST 109 RESIDENTIAL PARKING SPACES ARE
 REQUIRED.
  
 3) THE FOLLOWING PARKING SPACES SHOW CHANGES FROM
 PREVIOUS PLAN AND NOW CREATE DOOR OPENING AND ACCESS
 ISSUES:
  
 181 - THE WIDENED EASTERN COLUMN ENCROACHES ON THE
 REQUIRED 8.5-FOOT SPALL WIDTH AT THE END OF THE STALL.
 CONVERT TO COMPACT SPACE.
 240 - SHIFT SPACE TO THE SOUTH AND CONVERT TO COMPACT
 SPACE TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL ROOM ALONG THE WALL AND FOR
 ACCESS TO THE SPACE.
 288 - SHIFT TO THE SOUTH TO HAVE AT LEAST A FOOT ALONG
 THE WALL. NOTE: THERE SEEMS TO BE ADEQUATE ROOM FOR A
 REGULAR PARKING SPACE HERE.
  
 4) THE ROW OF 9 CAFE/VALET SPACES IS ONLY 15 FEET 4
 INCHES IN DEPTH, WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED PARKING STALL DEPTH.
  
 5) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING UPDATED CIVIL CROSS
 SECTIONS. NOT ALL THE CROSS SECTIONS APPEAR TO
 ACCURATELY DEPICT THE HORIZONTAL SCALE ACCURATELY.
  
 SECTION I-I LISTS THE ELEVATION AT THE BUILDING WALL AS
 11 FEET AND THE DIANA PLACE SIDEWALK AT 10.80 FEET, YET
 THE SIDEWALK IS DEPICTED AT A HIGHER ELEVATION THAN THE
 GRADE AT THE WALL. THE VERTICAL RELATIONSHIP NEEDS TO
 BE ACCURATELY DEPICTED.
  
 SECTION B-B HAS THIS SAME ISSUE, BUT TO A LESSER
 DEGREE. PLEASE REVIEW.
  
 6) THE PLANS ARE SHOWING THE EASTERN PATIO AREAS AS
 BEING ELEVATED WITH A RETAINING WALL UP TO THREE FEET
 IN HEIGHT FOR THE EASTERNMOST PATIO. PLEASE REMEMBER
 THAT THE MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT IS FIVE FEET, INCLUDING
 THE RETAINING WALL HEIGHT IF THAT IS WHERE IT WILL BE
 MOUNTED. NOTE: THIS WILL ALSO APPLY TO THE DOG PARK
 AREA.
  
 7) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE ELEVATION TAG FOR THE
 TOP OF EACH PROPOSED 4-FOOT TALL GRANITE PIER ALONG THE
 NORTHERN DRIVEWAY. THE WESTERN PIER COMPLIES WITH THE
 GRANTED HEIGHT WAIVER. THE EASTERN PIER EXCEEDS THE
 WAIVER GRANTED FOR THE WALL HEIGHT. BASED ON THE
 DRIVEWAY SLOPE AND THE ELEVATION TAG INCLUDED IN
 SECTION KEY PLAN, THE TOP OF THE PIER COULD NOT EXCEED
 AT MOST 12 FEET 9 INCHES.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN
 ALONG DIANA DOES NOT MATCH THE GROUND LEVEL
 ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL PLANS.
  
 9) UPDATED COMMENT: BASED ON RECENT BUILDING DIVISION
 DETERMINATIONS, THE GUEST ADA SPACE NEEDS TO BE EV
 EQUIPPED SINCE THERE ARE NON-ADA GUEST SPACES THAT ARE
 EV EQUIPPED.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-09-2022 Time 09:49 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 06-09-2022 Time 09:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-09 09:50:32CASE NO. PB 1857C
 1315 S. FLAGLER
 FLAGLER TOWERS REVISIONS
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY AUGUST 9, 2022),
 THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
 CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF
 MORE THAN 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET TO THE EXISTING
 BUILDING, SO IN ADDITION TO THE MINOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT A SITE PLAN REVIEW IS REQUIRED.
 SINCE THIS IS IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, THE REQUEST
 REQUIRES A FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE OF $1,500.
  
 2) THE INITIAL STAFF REVIEW HAS NOT DISCOVERED ANYTHING
 THAT TRIGGERS A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT;
 HOWEVER, SOME OF THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS REQUIRE THE
 PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT STAFF WILL
 NEED TO COMPARE TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO
 DETERMINE THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES DO NOT RESULT IN
 WAIVERS OR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT
 WOULD NECESSITATE A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT.
  
 3) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE WALL FOR ALL BAY
 WINDOWS, TERRACES (BALCONIES), AWNINGS, CANOPIES, ETC.,
 THAT EXTEND FROM THE BUILDING WALL (PODIUM AND TOWERS).
 THESE DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED ON THE APPROVED PLAN
 SET, BUT IN MANY INSTANCES WERE LEFT OFF THE NEW PLANS
 FOR FEATURES THAT DID NOT CHANGE. SINCE THIS PLAN SET
 WILL REPLACE THE PREVIOUS PLANS, THE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURRENT AND PROPOSED FEATURES NEED TO BE INCLUDED. ONCE
 THE DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED, STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT
 THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
 ORDER.
  
 4) STAFF NOTED THAT THE ENTIRE DIMENSION FOR THE TOWERS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED ON SHEETS A-124, A-126 AND A-128.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE ENTIRE DIMENSION ON EACH PLANS SHEET
 SO THAT THE VERIFICATION THAT THE FOOTPRINT OF THE
 TOWERS IS STILL THE SAME AS APPROVED WITHOUT REQUIRING
 STAFF TO ADD UP THE INDIVIDUAL DIMENSIONS OR TO SCALE
 THE PLAN.
  
 5) THE APPROVED PLANS HAVE WHAT APPEAR TO BE FAUX
 WINDOWS ON THE WEST TOWER MECHANICAL PARAPET WALL (EAST
 AND WEST FACADES). THESE SHALL BE RETAINED AS THEY HELP
 TO DEFINE THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THE TOP OF THE
 BUILDING THAT WAS PRESENTED TO THE CITY COMMISSION,
 WHICH IS LOST WITH THE PROPOSED BLANK PARAPET WALL.
  
 6) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PARKING ROOMS ON A SHEET AT A
 LARGER SCALE BASED ON THE NEW BICYCLE PARKING MODEL
 PROPOSED. THE BICYCLE ROOM DETAIL SHALL INCLUDE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF THE ROOM AND THE PARKING RACKS TO MATCH
 THE MODEL SHOWN ON SHEET A-054. NOTE: THE BICYCLE ROOMS
 AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLANS DO NOT ACCURATELY SHOW THE
 RACKS.
  
 7) THE STANDARD PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET A-054
 NEEDS TO SHOW 12 INCHES BETWEEN THE PAINTED STRIPES,
 NOT 16 INCHES (THIS IS CORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE ADA
 DETAIL).
  
 8) PROVIDE THE DEPTH DIMENSION FOR ALL PARKING ROWS,
 INCLUDING THE COMPACT SPACES, AND THE DRIVE AISLES.
  
 9) YOU MUST VERIFY WITH THE BUILDING DIVISION THAT THE
 GUEST ADA SPACE DOES NOT NEED TO BE EV EQUIPPED AS
 SHOWN. SINCE THIS IS A DISTINCT USER GROUP FROM YOUR
 OTHER EV ADA SPACES, IT MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE EV
 EQUIPPED.
  
 10) PROVIDE THE CIVIL CROSS SECTIONS, TO SCALE BOTH
 HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY, ALONG THE SOUTH PART OF
 THE SITE FROM THE BUILDING FACE TO THE PARALLEL PARKING
 FOR THE WORST-CASE GRADE CHANGE SCENARIO. YOU LIST A
 MAXIMUM 4:1 SLOPE YET BASED ON THE ELEVATION TAGS
 PROVIDED THERE IS NO 4:1 SLOPE. THE MAXIMUM SLOPES YOU
 SHOW ARE AT 3:1. ADDITIONALLY, VERIFY THAT THE
 ELEVATIONS PROVIDED FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS MATCH WHAT
 IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN - IT APPEARS THAT SECTION
 G-G DOES NOT USE THE SAME ELEVATIONS IN BOTH LOCATIONS.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT RAISING THE GRADE (OR ADDING STEPS) TO
 ADDRESS THE HIGHER BASE FLOOR ELEVATION MUST OCCUR
 WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FLAGLER TOWERS RPD AND NOT
 WITHIN THE CITY'S PROPERTY, ESPECIALLY IF IT RESULTS IN
 EXTREME SLOPES ADJACENT TO THE WALKWAY OR THE PARALLEL
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 11) PROVIDE THE ELEVATION TAG FOR THE TOP OF EACH
 PROPOSED 4-FOOT TALL GRANITE PIER ALONG THE NORTHERN
 DRIVEWAY SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THEY DO NOT
 EXCEED THE GRANTED WALL HEIGHT WAIVERS WITHIN THE
 SETBACKS.
  
 12) THE GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN ALONG DIANA DOES
 NOT MATCH THE GROUND LEVEL ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL
 PLANS. IT APPEARS THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DID NOT USE
 THE GROUND FLOOR BASE, BUT RATHER A PLAN THAT SHOWS
 HIGHER UP THE BUILDING WHICH INCLUDES THE BALCONIES,
 BAY WINDOWS, ETC.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved