City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z22050022

Plan Review Stops For Project Z22050022

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	10-21-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	swelter			Date	10-21-2022	Time	11:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	swelter			Date	10-21-2022	Time	11:39	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-21 11:39:26	OPTION 1 SELECTED ART ON SITE
	SENT MEETING REQUEST TO MEREDITH LEIGH ON 10.21 TO
	DISCUSS PUBLIC ART PROCESS AND REQUIREMENTS
	[email protected]

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-28-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	06-28-2022	Time	15:16	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	scwelter			Date	06-28-2022	Time	15:28	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-28 15:28:30	DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
	CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND
	CULTURE AT [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	10-26-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	10-26-2022	Time	13:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	10-26-2022	Time	13:32	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-26 13:35:42	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER AND REVISED PLANS ADDRESS THE
	COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW.

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	09-07-2022	Time	15:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	09-07-2022	Time	15:27	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-07 15:48:57	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	4. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE ADDITION
	OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN RESPONSE TO THE
	PREVIOUS REVIEW IS NOTED. NOW, LEVEL 4, 5, AND 6 PLANS
	EACH SHOW THE EASTERNMOST ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT
	THE END OF A DEAD END DRIVE AISLE AND IN A LOCATION
	THAT WOULD REQUIRE THE USER TO PASS BEHIND THE PARKED
	VEHICLES OF OTHER DRIVERS AND ALONG THE DRIVE LANE IN
	ORDER TO GET TO THE CORRIDOR/ELEVATOR, UNLIKE LEVEL 3.
	IT IS NOT SAFE FOR USERS TO TRAVERSE ALONG THE DRIVE
	LANE OR BEHIND THE PARKED VEHICLE OF OTHER USERS. PER
	SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST
	POSSIBLE SAFE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO
	AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	5. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	6. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
	VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
	IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	8. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	9. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	10. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. THE GROCERY STORE MAY REQUIRE A
	GREASE INTERCEPTOR. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED
	TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN,
	CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
	DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	11. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	12. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	13. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	14. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	07-13-2022	Time	21:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	07-13-2022	Time	21:08	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-13 21:24:19	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
	LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
	APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
	WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	4. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. LEVEL 2, 3, 4,
	5, AND 6 PLANS EACH SHOW BETWEEN 151 TO 182 PARKING
	SPACES YET THEY EACH SHOW ONLY 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES WHEN FAIR HOUSING ACT WOULD REQUIRE A 4
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES FOR ANY PARKING AREA WITH
	BETWEEN 150 TO 200 PARKING SPACES. THE MINIMUM NUMBER
	OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH FAIR HOUSING ACT AND SECTION 208.2 OF
	FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	5. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. LEVEL 3, 4,
	5, AND 6 PLANS EACH SHOW THE 2 EASTERNMOST ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES WITH NO ACCESSS AISLE TO PREVENT THE
	USER FROM HAVING TO TRAVERSE BEHIND SOMEONE ELSE'S
	PARKED CAR TO GET TO THE ELEVATOR. PER SECTION 208.3 OF
	FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
	ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE SAFE ROUTE
	OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
	ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
	COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	6. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	7. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
	VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
	IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	8. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	9. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	10. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
	DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
	OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
	GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
	GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
	SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
	USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	11. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. THE GROCERY STORE MAY REQUIRE A
	GREASE INTERCEPTOR. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED
	TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN,
	CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
	DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	12. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	13. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	14. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	15. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	11-22-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	RROSSANO			Date	11-22-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	11-22-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-11-22 15:50:20	COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
	ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
	(CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). PREVIOUS COMMENT.
	WILL PASS ENG ONCE CCTV HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-04-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	10-04-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	10-04-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-04 14:27:04	PREVIOUS COMMENT FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT
	COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098
	[email protected]

	PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
	(PROVISION IS A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-23-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	08-23-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	08-23-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-23 14:25:22	PROVIDE CCTV OF SANITARY AND STORM AS PREVIOUSLY
	REQUESTED. IT IS A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-07-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	07-07-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By	rrossano			Date	07-07-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-07 13:05:58	COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
	ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
	GENERAL:
	O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
	INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
	(Z-XXXXXXXX).
	O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
	BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
	B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
	L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
	B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
	B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
	FOUND HERE:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
	MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
	C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
	ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
	CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
	SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
	SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
	BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
	O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
	ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
	SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
	O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
	DATA.

	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
	O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
	SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
	TO THEM.
	O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
	EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
	PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
	STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTION.
	O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
	OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
	METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
	PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
	INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
	O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
	NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.

	WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
	O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL.
	O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
	O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE
	(CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
	O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER.
	O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
	O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
	TRAPS (IF ANY).
	O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.

	FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
	NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
	- AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
	- 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
	THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
	DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
	- 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
	STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
	MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
	- THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
	CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
	THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
	SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
	WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
	APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
	SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
	SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
	LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
	ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
	LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
	PARCELS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
	BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
	50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
	PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
	PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	11-22-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	11-22-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	11-22-2022	Time	14:42	Sent To

Notes

2022-11-22 15:05:54	3RD REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
	PROJECT DATED 11/18/22, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN
	ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	08-29-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	08-29-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	08-29-2022	Time	14:02	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-29 14:03:18	2ND REVIEW RESPONSE

	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
	PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
	APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	07-01-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	07-01-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	07-01-2022	Time	15:48	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-01 15:56:07	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
	PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
	APPLICABLE.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED.

	SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
	REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
	PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
	LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE
	SYSTEM.

	7A. PER NFPA 14

	6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
	NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
	HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.

	THE FDC LOCATION ALONG GARDINA IS ACCEPTABLE HOWEVER
	THERE IS NO FIRE HYDRANT INDICATED WITHIN 100' OF IT.
	PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE DETAILS.

	THERE IS A EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ALONG FERN ST. IT IS
	RECOMMENDED FOR THE 2ND FDC THAT A FDC BE LOCATED
	WITHIN 100' OF THIS FIRE HYDRANT.

	7B. PER NFPA 1
	18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
	18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
	THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
	BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
	APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	SECTION 18.4.

	PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
	FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
	POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
	APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
	CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
	AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
	SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
	AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
	PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.

	FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
	PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?

	7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
	COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
	ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
	PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.

	8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
	REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
	ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDING 6 OR MORE STORIES.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

	PLEASE SEE 7A & 7B NOTES.

	12. COMMAND ROOM

	THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
	CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
	THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
	11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
	DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
	BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
	FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
	HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
	HOUR.

	11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
	10 FT (3050 MM).

	11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
	COMMAND CENTER.
	(1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
	(2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
	FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
	EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
	(4) WORK TABLE.
	(5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
	FOR THE BUILDING.
	11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
	OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
	COMMAND CENTER.
	(1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
	CONTROL UNIT.
	(2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
	(3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
	OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
	(4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
	SYSTEMS.
	(5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
	SIMULTANEOUSLY
	(6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
	PANELS
	(7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
	(8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
	TRANSFER FEATURES.
	(10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
	BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
	(11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL

	NFPA 101

	11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
	11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
	IN A
	LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
	11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
	FOLLOWING:
	(1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
	(2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
	SERVICE
	PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
	OF THIS
	CODE
	(3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
	PANELS
	(4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
	(5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
	(6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
	PROVIDED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
	(7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
	(8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
	SYSTEM
	(10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE
	PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
	11.8.8


	13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.

	NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
	SYSTEMS.
	24.9.1 GENERAL.
	24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
	CAPABLE
	OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
	FREQUENCIES
	ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
	INSTALLED
	WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
	AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
	SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
	DEGRADE
	THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
	PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
	24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
	FOR
	APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
	SUCCESSFUL
	ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
	FOR THE
	PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
	BY
	THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
	STRENGTH OF THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH
	FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE
	NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE
	AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE
	MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL
	AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM
	2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
	PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
	SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
	561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
	DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.


	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.
	ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
	PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
	101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
	EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:

	THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
	INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
	STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
	RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
	RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
	INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
	APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
	MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
	SYSTEM.

	ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
	INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.

	16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-07-2022	Time	17:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-07-2022	Time	17:24	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-07 17:24:43	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 401 S DIXIE Z22050022
	DECEMBER 7, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5 AND 6) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT
	ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS
	ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.
	9/7/22: ARBORIST REPORT WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.
	10/21/22 ARBORIST REPORT WAS LOCATED. NATIVE TREES OR
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION NEED TO BE INDICATED AS
	RELOCATE OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED WHAT WOULD
	PREVENT RELOCATION. THESE WOULD BE INDICATED AS SUBJECT
	TO FINDING LOCATIONS ON CITY PROPERTY. IF LOCATIONS
	CANNOT BE FOUND, MITIGATION TABLE SHOWS ENOUGH
	MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED.


	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	??? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
	CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE. CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM STAFF.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE DUE AFTER REVISION.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPARISON TO THE PREVIOUSLY
	APPROVED TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY TREES
	OR PALMS THAT WERE ON THAT PLAN THAT ARE NOT ON THE NEW
	PLAN.
	9/7/22: COULD NOT LOCATE COMPARISON.
	??? SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT RELOCATION OF THE
	LIVE OAK TREE IN THE QUADRILLE RIGHT OF WAY. IN THE
	PREVIOUS APPROVAL, IT WAS TO REMAIN AS ONE OF THE
	REQUIRED STREET TREES.

	3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS FOR QBD-10 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF
	OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN
	SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF
	OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY
	SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	9/7/22: IN THE OPEN SPACE CHART ON SHEET L-2 AND L-3,
	SEPARATE EACH OPEN SPACE AND SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS
	ARE MET INDIVIDUALLY. SHOW CANOPY CREDIT PER TABLE IV-8
	FOR THE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN SPACE
	PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF TREE
	CANOPY.
	TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS UNDER DEFINITION OF TREE
	CANOPY IN SECTION 94-109, REQUIRES TREES SHALL BE
	PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ANTICIPATED SHADE COVERAGE OCCURS
	WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PERIMETER. ADJUST THE TREES
	WITHIN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
	10/21/22:
	??? PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OF 11,461 SQ FT DOES NOT MEET THE
	REQUIRED 11,497 SQ FT REQUIRED.
	12/7/22 11,621 IS CORRECT, SHOW 5% PLUS ALLEY SQUARE
	FOOTAGE.

	??? GARDEN PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THE VEGETATED AREA
	REQUIREMENT.
	12/7/22 IF 6,784 PROVIDED 50% VEGETATED AREA IS 3,392.
	??? GARDEN COURTYARD DOES NOT MEET THE VEGETATED AREA
	REQUIREMENT.
	12/7/22 COURTYARD IS SEMI PRIVATE CATEGORY THAT IS
	SHOWN.
	??? PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE SEPARATED FOR LEVEL 7
	AND LEVEL 9 AND EACH ONE IDENTIFIED AS ROOFTOP GARDEN
	AND TERRACE. THEN REQUIREMENTS SHOWN BASED ON EACH
	PROVIDED SPACE.
	12/7/22 LABEL 7TH LEVEL AS ROOFTOP GARDEN. IF 9TH LEVEL
	IS TERRACE, ONLY 20% VEGETATED AREA IS REQUIRED. IF
	ROOFTOP GARDEN, 7520 SQ FT WOULD REQUIRE 2,256 SQ FT
	VEGETATED AREA AND 1506 SQ FT TREE CANOPY.
	??? THE OPEN SPACE WEST OF THE HISTORIC BUILDING IS
	INDICATED TO BE SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO REPLACE THE
	ALLEY ABANDONMENT REPLACEMENT. THIS MUST BE LABELED AS
	SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND A TYPE SPECIFIED. THE ONLY
	SEMI PUBLIC OPTION FOR QGD IS COURTYARD. SHOW THIS AS
	THE TYPE AND SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COURTYARD
	ARE MET.
	12/7/22 LABEL AS COURTYARD.

	4. SATISFIED. LEVEL 7 OPEN SPACE TYPE IS NOT IDENTIFIED
	ON SHEET L-2. ROOFTOP GARDEN.

	5. SATISFIED. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE LOCATED IN
	THE SETBACK. STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED MEETING THE
	REQUIREMENTS ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGE.
	9/7/22: OPEN SPACE PERIMETER, VEGETATED AREA AND TREES
	ARE SHOWN OUTSIDE THE SETBACK AS PART OF THE PUBLIC
	OPEN SPACE ALONG QUADRILLE.


	6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
	TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
	THEREOF FOR THE STREETSCAPE LENGTH FOR DIXIE HIGHWAY,
	FERN STREET, QUADRILLE BLVD. AND GARDENIA STREET, AND
	SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.
	MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET, AND ONLY SHADE TREES WILL
	QUALIFY AS STREET TREES. PALMS MAY BE ADDED BUT WILL
	NOT COUNT TOWARD STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS. PLANTING
	STRIPS MINIMUM 4 FEET IN WIDTH MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
	STREETSCAPE.
	9/7/22: STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERIMETER
	AREAS OF THE PROJECT INCLUDING THE HISTORIC BUILDING.
	ADJUST THE LINEAR MEASUREMENTS TO MATCH THE SURVEY FOR
	THE PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO EACH STREET. TREES MUST
	BE PLACED ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND THE CONTINUOUS
	PLANTING STRIPS INDICATED ALONG ALL CURBS UNLESS
	OPENINGS ARE NEEDED ADJACENT TO ON STREET PARKING.
	EXISTING STREET TREES IN BIOSWALE PITS ALONG FERN ST.
	SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
	DRIVEWAYS.
	10/21/22:
	??? FERN ST CALCULATION IS 14 TREES REQUIRED FOR 394
	FT, PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL TREE.
	??? GARDENIA ST CALCULATION IS 14 TREES REQUIRED FOR
	396 FT, CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER ON PLAN.
	??? TREES MUST BE PUSHED CLOSER TO THE CORNER AT FERN
	AND QUADRILLE AND PLANTING STRIPS EXTENDED ALONG THE
	CURB.
	??? MISSING TREE TO BE ADDED WEST OF THE FERN ST GARAGE
	ENTRANCE, MICROMOBILITY STATION DOES NOT PRECLUDE TREE
	AND PLANTING STRIP.
	??? ENTRANCE AREA ON FERN MUST MEET THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM
	SPACING BETWEEN TREES.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS AT FERN AND DIXIE TOWARD THE
	CORNER.
	??? FIRST STREET TREE TO BE CLOSER TO FERN ST ON DIXIE.
	??? PLANTING STRIP IS REQUIRED ALONG ALL AREAS ON
	DIXIE, ONLY GAPS TO BE LEFT ADJACENT TO ON STREET
	PARKING.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS AT GARDENIA AND DIXIE TOWARD
	THE CORNER.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DOCK
	DRIVEWAY.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS AT GARDENIA AND QUADRILLE
	TOWARD THE CORNER.
	??? FILL IN PLANTING STRIP GAP AT MIDPOINT OF
	QUADRILLE.
	??? EXISTING STREET TREES IN BIOSWALE PITS ALONG FERN
	ST. SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT CONFLICTING WITH
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS.

	7. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS AND
	TYPICAL TO MATCH THE CITY APPROVED TYPICAL.
	9/7/22: ONCE ALL STREET TREES ARE SHOWN AS REQUIRED,
	SHOW STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS FOR ALL TREES.
	10/21/22: ADJUSTMENTS TO STREET TREES WILL CHANGE
	LOCATIONS, UPDATE PLAN.

	8. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON
	QUADRILLE BLVD. IS FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO
	REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY.
	9/7/22: LETTER NOT PROVIDED.
	10/21/22: LOCATED FDOT PRELIMINARY LETTER. RIGHT TURN
	LANE NEED MUST BE RESOLVED AS IT WILL AFFECT THE
	REQUIRED STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. PROPOSED
	LANDSCAPING AND TREES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS REVIEWED.

	9. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
	THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
	ROAD OR STREET.

	10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
	LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	9/7/22: BACKFLOWS, WATER METERS AND FDC CONNECTIONS
	MUST BE SHOWN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. THE
	LOCATIONS OF THE EXFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE LINES ARE
	TOO CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AREAS.

	11. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CORNER SIGHT TRIANGLES TO
	REFLECT THE DMP REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB
	NOT THE PROPERTY LINE.
	9/7/22: NOT CORRECTED, DETAIL MISSING FROM CORNER OF
	FERN AND DIXIE.
	10/21/22: TRIANGLE AT FERN AND QUADRILLE DOES NOT MATCH
	UP WITH CURBLINE.

	12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH
	OPEN SPACE AREA LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	13. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR FLORIDA NATIVE TO THE
	PLANT LIST SO THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.

	14. SATISFIED. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FOOT
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. STREET TREE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET
	HEIGHT.

	15. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	9/7/16: NUMBER WAS INDICATED BUT DOES NOT MEET THE
	REQUIREMENT. PERCENTAGE MUST BE SHOWN.
	10/21/22: CORRECT PERCENTAGE 1362 / 1795 = 76%

	16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
	9/7/22: NOTE WAS ADDED BUT LOCATIONS MUST BE
	COORDINATED WITH LANDSCAPING.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/7/22:

	17. SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS UNDER
	DEFINITION OF TREE CANOPY IN SECTION 94-109, REQUIRES
	TREES SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ANTICIPATED SHADE
	COVERAGE OCCURS WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PERIMETER. ADJUST
	THE TREES WITHIN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT.

	18. SATISFIED. REMOVE BIKE RACK DETAIL FROM LANDSCAPE
	PLANS SHEET L-3 AND PLACE IN SITE PLAN DETAILS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/8/22:
	19. PLANTING STRIPS MINIMUM 4 FEET IN WIDTH MUST BE
	PROVIDED FOR ALL STREETSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113(D)(3).
	THE 8 FOOT MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH AND THE 4 FOOT
	MINIMUM PLANTING BEDS ARE BASED ON THE MINIMUM 12 FOOT
	SETBACK. THERE ARE AREAS ALONG GARDENIA THAT THERE ARE
	PLANTING BEDS LESS THAN THE 4 FEET AND THE SIDEWALK
	EXCEEDING THE 8 FOOT MINIMUM. THE CIVIL PLANS DO NOT
	MATCH FOR THE CROSS SECTION. ALL PLANTING BEDS THAT
	FALL BELOW THE 4 FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH MUST BE CLEARLY
	INDICATED ON THE LANDSCAPE, CIVIL AND SITE PLAN TO
	CLARIFY FOR STAFF REVIEW WHAT AND WHERE THE CODE IS NOT
	MET. ZONING COMMENTS ADDRESS THE SETBACK ISSUE THAT MAY
	CHANGE SOME OF THE MEASUREMENTS. THE CODE ALLOWS TREE
	GRATES TO BE USED TO OVERLAP THE SIDEWALK WIDTH
	REQUIREMENT AND THE STREET TREE REQUIREMENT, BUT THIS
	IS NOT PREFERRED. IF THE PLANTING BED WIDTH IS BELOW
	THE 4 FOOT WIDTH, A VARIANCE MAY BE REQUESTED AND
	DEPENDING ON THE DETAILS, MAY BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF IN
	ORDER TO AVOID THE USE OF THE TREE GRATES.



	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR THE FDOT PERMITTING
	FOR THE LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION AND HARDSCAPE WITHIN
	THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AS APPROVED BY THE CITY.

	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-21-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	10-21-2022	Time	16:30	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	10-21-2022	Time	16:30	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-21 16:30:57	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 401 S DIXIE Z22050022
	OCTOBER 21, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
	NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE
	PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5 AND
	6) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF
	GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN
	ARBORISTS REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
	POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE
	LIVE OAKS, SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL
	PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.
	9/7/22: ARBORIST REPORT WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.
	10/21/22 ARBORIST REPORT WAS LOCATED. NATIVE TREES OR
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION NEED TO BE INDICATED AS
	RELOCATE OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED WHAT WOULD
	PREVENT RELOCATION. THESE WOULD BE INDICATED AS SUBJECT
	TO FINDING LOCATIONS ON CITY PROPERTY. IF LOCATIONS
	CANNOT BE FOUND, MITIGATION TABLE SHOWS ENOUGH
	MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED.


	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	??? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
	CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE. CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM STAFF.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE DUE AFTER REVISION.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPARISON TO THE PREVIOUSLY
	APPROVED TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY TREES
	OR PALMS THAT WERE ON THAT PLAN THAT ARE NOT ON THE NEW
	PLAN.
	9/7/22: COULD NOT LOCATE COMPARISON.
	??? SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT RELOCATION OF THE
	LIVE OAK TREE IN THE QUADRILLE RIGHT OF WAY. IN THE
	PREVIOUS APPROVAL, IT WAS TO REMAIN AS ONE OF THE
	REQUIRED STREET TREES.

	3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS FOR QBD-10 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF
	OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN
	SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF
	OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY
	SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	9/7/22: IN THE OPEN SPACE CHART ON SHEET L-2 AND L-3,
	SEPARATE EACH OPEN SPACE AND SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS
	ARE MET INDIVIDUALLY. SHOW CANOPY CREDIT PER TABLE IV-8
	FOR THE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN SPACE
	PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF TREE
	CANOPY.
	TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS UNDER DEFINITION OF TREE
	CANOPY IN SECTION 94-109, REQUIRES TREES SHALL BE
	PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ANTICIPATED SHADE COVERAGE OCCURS
	WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PERIMETER. ADJUST THE TREES
	WITHIN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
	10/21/22:
	??? PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OF 11,461 SQ FT DOES NOT MEET THE
	REQUIRED 11,497 SQ FT REQUIRED.
	??? GARDEN PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THE VEGETATED AREA
	REQUIREMENT.
	??? GARDEN COURTYARD DOES NOT MEET THE VEGETATED AREA
	REQUIREMENT.
	??? PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE SEPARATED FOR LEVEL 7
	AND LEVEL 9 AND EACH ONE IDENTIFIED AS ROOFTOP GARDEN
	AND TERRACE. THEN REQUIREMENTS SHOWN BASED ON EACH
	PROVIDED SPACE.
	??? THE OPEN SPACE WEST OF THE HISTORIC BUILDING IS
	INDICATED TO BE SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO REPLACE THE
	ALLEY ABANDONMENT REPLACEMENT. THIS MUST BE LABELED AS
	SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND A TYPE SPECIFIED. THE ONLY
	SEMI PUBLIC OPTION FOR QGD IS COURTYARD. SHOW THIS AS
	THE TYPE AND SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COURTYARD
	ARE MET.


	4. SATISFIED. LEVEL 7 OPEN SPACE TYPE IS NOT IDENTIFIED
	ON SHEET L-2. ROOFTOP GARDEN.

	5. SATISFIED. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE LOCATED IN
	THE SETBACK. STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED MEETING THE
	REQUIREMENTS ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGE.
	9/7/22: OPEN SPACE PERIMETER, VEGETATED AREA AND TREES
	ARE SHOWN OUTSIDE THE SETBACK AS PART OF THE PUBLIC
	OPEN SPACE ALONG QUADRILLE.


	6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
	REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
	OR PORTION THEREOF FOR THE STREETSCAPE LENGTH FOR DIXIE
	HIGHWAY, FERN STREET, QUADRILLE BLVD. AND GARDENIA
	STREET, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113
	AND 94-116. MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET, AND ONLY SHADE
	TREES WILL QUALIFY AS STREET TREES. PALMS MAY BE ADDED
	BUT WILL NOT COUNT TOWARD STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS.
	PLANTING STRIPS MINIMUM 4 FEET IN WIDTH MUST BE
	PROVIDED FOR ALL STREETSCAPE.
	9/7/22: STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERIMETER
	AREAS OF THE PROJECT INCLUDING THE HISTORIC BUILDING.
	ADJUST THE LINEAR MEASUREMENTS TO MATCH THE SURVEY FOR
	THE PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO EACH STREET. TREES MUST
	BE PLACED ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND THE CONTINUOUS
	PLANTING STRIPS INDICATED ALONG ALL CURBS UNLESS
	OPENINGS ARE NEEDED ADJACENT TO ON STREET PARKING.
	EXISTING STREET TREES IN BIOSWALE PITS ALONG FERN ST.
	SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
	DRIVEWAYS.
	10/21/22:
	??? FERN ST CALCULATION IS 14 TREES REQUIRED FOR 394
	FT, PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL TREE.
	??? GARDENIA ST CALCULATION IS 14 TREES REQUIRED FOR
	396 FT, CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER ON PLAN.
	??? TREES MUST BE PUSHED CLOSER TO THE CORNER AT FERN
	AND QUADRILLE AND PLANTING STRIPS EXTENDED ALONG THE
	CURB.
	??? MISSING TREE TO BE ADDED WEST OF THE FERN ST GARAGE
	ENTRANCE, MICROMOBILITY STATION DOES NOT PRECLUDE TREE
	AND PLANTING STRIP.
	??? ENTRANCE AREA ON FERN MUST MEET THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM
	SPACING BETWEEN TREES.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS AT FERN AND DIXIE TOWARD THE
	CORNER.
	??? FIRST STREET TREE TO BE CLOSER TO FERN ST ON DIXIE.
	??? PLANTING STRIP IS REQUIRED ALONG ALL AREAS ON
	DIXIE, ONLY GAPS TO BE LEFT ADJACENT TO ON STREET
	PARKING.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS AT GARDENIA AND DIXIE TOWARD
	THE CORNER.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DOCK
	DRIVEWAY.
	??? EXTEND PLANTING STRIPS AT GARDENIA AND QUADRILLE
	TOWARD THE CORNER.
	??? FILL IN PLANTING STRIP GAP AT MIDPOINT OF
	QUADRILLE.
	??? EXISTING STREET TREES IN BIOSWALE PITS ALONG FERN
	ST. SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT CONFLICTING WITH
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS.

	7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MODIFY THE STRUCTURAL SOIL
	LOCATIONS AND TYPICAL TO MATCH THE CITY APPROVED
	TYPICAL.
	9/7/22: ONCE ALL STREET TREES ARE SHOWN AS REQUIRED,
	SHOW STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS FOR ALL TREES.
	10/21/22: ADJUSTMENTS TO STREET TREES WILL CHANGE
	LOCATIONS, UPDATE PLAN.

	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON QUADRILLE
	BLVD. IS FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND
	PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY
	STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	9/7/22: LETTER NOT PROVIDED.
	10/21/22: LOCATED FDOT PRELIMINARY LETTER. RIGHT TURN
	LANE NEED MUST BE RESOLVED AS IT WILL AFFECT THE
	REQUIRED STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. PROPOSED
	LANDSCAPING AND TREES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS REVIEWED.

	9. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
	THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
	ROAD OR STREET.

	10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
	LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	9/7/22: BACKFLOWS, WATER METERS AND FDC CONNECTIONS
	MUST BE SHOWN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. THE
	LOCATIONS OF THE EXFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE LINES ARE
	TOO CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AREAS.

	11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CORNER SIGHT
	TRIANGLES TO REFLECT THE DMP REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM
	BACK OF CURB NOT THE PROPERTY LINE.
	9/7/22: NOT CORRECTED, DETAIL MISSING FROM CORNER OF
	FERN AND DIXIE.
	10/21/22: TRIANGLE AT FERN AND QUADRILLE DOES NOT MATCH
	UP WITH CURBLINE.

	12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH
	OPEN SPACE AREA LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	13. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR FLORIDA NATIVE TO THE
	PLANT LIST SO THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.

	14. SATISFIED. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FOOT
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. STREET TREE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET
	HEIGHT.

	15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
	94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
	PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	9/7/16: NUMBER WAS INDICATED BUT DOES NOT MEET THE
	REQUIREMENT. PERCENTAGE MUST BE SHOWN.
	10/21/22: CORRECT PERCENTAGE 1362 / 1795 = 76%

	16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND
	MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
	9/7/22: NOTE WAS ADDED BUT LOCATIONS MUST BE
	COORDINATED WITH LANDSCAPING.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/7/22:

	17. SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS UNDER
	DEFINITION OF TREE CANOPY IN SECTION 94-109, REQUIRES
	TREES SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ANTICIPATED SHADE
	COVERAGE OCCURS WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PERIMETER. ADJUST
	THE TREES WITHIN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT.

	18. SATISFIED. REMOVE BIKE RACK DETAIL FROM LANDSCAPE
	PLANS SHEET L-3 AND PLACE IN SITE PLAN DETAILS.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	09-07-2022	Time	13:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	09-07-2022	Time	13:35	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-07 13:36:27	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 401 S DIXIE Z22050022
	SEPTEMBER 7, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5 AND 6) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT
	ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS
	ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.
	9/7/22: ARBORIST REPORT WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL.

	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	? NOT SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH
	A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE. CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM STAFF.
	? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION
	SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AFTER REVISION.
	? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPARISON TO THE PREVIOUSLY
	APPROVED TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY TREES
	OR PALMS THAT WERE ON THAT PLAN THAT ARE NOT ON THE NEW
	PLAN.
	9/7/22: COULD NOT LOCATE COMPARISON.
	? SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT RELOCATION OF THE
	LIVE OAK TREE IN THE QUADRILLE RIGHT OF WAY. IN THE
	PREVIOUS APPROVAL, IT WAS TO REMAIN AS ONE OF THE
	REQUIRED STREET TREES.

	3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	AREAS FOR QBD-10 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF
	OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN
	SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF
	OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY
	SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	9/7/22: IN THE OPEN SPACE CHART ON SHEET L-2 AND L-3,
	SEPARATE EACH OPEN SPACE AND SHOW HOW THE REQUIREMENTS
	ARE MET INDIVIDUALLY. SHOW CANOPY CREDIT PER TABLE IV-8
	FOR THE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN SPACE
	PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF TREE
	CANOPY.
	TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS UNDER DEFINITION OF TREE
	CANOPY IN SECTION 94-109, REQUIRES TREES SHALL BE
	PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ANTICIPATED SHADE COVERAGE OCCURS
	WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PERIMETER. ADJUST THE TREES
	WITHIN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.


	4. SATISFIED. LEVEL 7 OPEN SPACE TYPE IS NOT IDENTIFIED
	ON SHEET L-2. ROOFTOP GARDEN.

	5. NOT SATISFIED. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE LOCATED
	IN THE SETBACK. STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED MEETING
	THE REQUIREMENTS ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGE.
	9/7/22: OPEN SPACE PERIMETER, VEGETATED AREA AND TREES
	ARE SHOWN OUTSIDE THE SETBACK AS PART OF THE PUBLIC
	OPEN SPACE ALONG QUADRILLE.


	6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
	REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
	OR PORTION THEREOF FOR THE STREETSCAPE LENGTH FOR DIXIE
	HIGHWAY, FERN STREET, QUADRILLE BLVD. AND GARDENIA
	STREET, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113
	AND 94-116. MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET, AND ONLY SHADE
	TREES WILL QUALIFY AS STREET TREES. PALMS MAY BE ADDED
	BUT WILL NOT COUNT TOWARD STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS.
	PLANTING STRIPS MINIMUM 4 FEET IN WIDTH MUST BE
	PROVIDED FOR ALL STREETSCAPE.
	9/7/22: STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERIMETER
	AREAS OF THE PROJECT INCLUDING THE HISTORIC BUILDING.
	ADJUST THE LINEAR MEASUREMENTS TO MATCH THE SURVEY FOR
	THE PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO EACH STREET. TREES MUST
	BE PLACED ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND THE CONTINUOUS
	PLANTING STRIPS INDICATED ALONG ALL CURBS UNLESS
	OPENINGS ARE NEEDED ADJACENT TO ON STREET PARKING.
	EXISTING STREET TREES IN BIOSWALE PITS ALONG FERN ST.
	SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
	DRIVEWAYS.

	7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MODIFY THE STRUCTURAL SOIL
	LOCATIONS AND TYPICAL TO MATCH THE CITY APPROVED
	TYPICAL.
	9/7/22: ONCE ALL STREET TREES ARE SHOWN AS REQUIRED,
	SHOW STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS FOR ALL TREES.

	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON QUADRILLE
	BLVD. IS FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND
	PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY
	STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	9/7/22: LETTER NOT PROVIDED.

	9. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
	THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
	ROAD OR STREET.

	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
	OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.
	9/7/22: BACKFLOWS, WATER METERS AND FDC CONNECTIONS
	MUST BE SHOWN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. THE
	LOCATIONS OF THE EXFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE LINES ARE
	TOO CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE AREAS.

	11. NOT SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CORNER SIGHT TRIANGLES
	TO REFLECT THE DMP REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM BACK OF
	CURB NOT THE PROPERTY LINE.
	9/7/22: NOT CORRECTED, DETAIL MISSING FROM CORNER OF
	FERN AND DIXIE.

	12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH
	OPEN SPACE AREA LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	13. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR FLORIDA NATIVE TO THE
	PLANT LIST SO THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.

	14. SATISFIED. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FOOT
	HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. STREET TREE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET
	HEIGHT.

	15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
	94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
	PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.
	9/7/16: NUMBER WAS INDICATED BUT DOES NOT MEET THE
	REQUIREMENT. PERCENTAGE MUST BE SHOWN.

	16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR
	ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
	9/7/22: NOTE WAS ADDED BUT LOCATIONS MUST BE
	COORDINATED WITH LANDSCAPING.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/7/22:

	17. TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS UNDER DEFINITION OF TREE
	CANOPY IN SECTION 94-109, REQUIRES TREES SHALL BE
	PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ANTICIPATED SHADE COVERAGE OCCURS
	WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE PERIMETER. ADJUST THE TREES
	WITHIN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

	18. REMOVE BIKE RACK DETAIL FROM LANDSCAPE PLANS SHEET
	L-3 AND PLACE IN SITE PLAN DETAILS.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	07-13-2022	Time	14:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	07-13-2022	Time	14:54	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-13 14:54:50	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 401 S DIXIE Z22050022
	JULY 13, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
	RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5 AND 6) STANDARDS SPECIFY
	EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
	POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
	THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS, SABAL PALMS,
	FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE
	INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE
	NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.

	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	? ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY
	DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER.
	TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS
	SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE. CATEGORY LIST
	IS AVAILABLE FROM STAFF.
	? PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AFTER
	REVISION.
	? PROVIDE A COMPARISON TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY TREES OR PALMS THAT
	WERE ON THAT PLAN THAT ARE NOT ON THE NEW PLAN.
	? STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT RELOCATION OF THE LIVE OAK
	TREE IN THE QUADRILLE RIGHT OF WAY. IN THE PREVIOUS
	APPROVAL, IT WAS TO REMAIN AS ONE OF THE REQUIRED
	STREET TREES.

	3. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
	PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR QBD-10 ZONING
	DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY
	TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW
	THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR
	VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON
	TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE REQUIRED OPEN
	SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED, IDENTIFIED AS TO THE
	TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE SHOWN FOR THAT
	OPEN SPACE TYPE.

	4. LEVEL 7 OPEN SPACE TYPE IS NOT IDENTIFIED ON SHEET
	L-2. ROOFTOP GARDEN.

	5. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE SETBACK.
	STREET TREES MUST BE PROVIDED MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
	ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGE


	6. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
	MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR
	THE STREETSCAPE LENGTH FOR DIXIE HIGHWAY, FERN STREET,
	QUADRILLE BLVD. AND GARDENIA STREET, AND SHOW THE
	NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116. MAXIMUM
	SPACING IS 30 FEET, AND ONLY SHADE TREES WILL QUALIFY
	AS STREET TREES. PALMS MAY BE ADDED BUT WILL NOT COUNT
	TOWARD STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS. PLANTING STRIPS
	MINIMUM 4 FEET IN WIDTH MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
	STREETSCAPE.

	7. MODIFY THE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS AND TYPICAL TO
	MATCH THE CITY APPROVED TYPICAL.

	8. THE RIGHT OF WAY ON QUADRILLE BLVD. IS FDOT RIGHT OF
	WAY AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT.
	PROVIDE PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED
	WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	9. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS
	THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A
	ROAD OR STREET.

	10. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
	DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF
	BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO
	RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND
	LANDSCAPING.

	11. CORRECT THE CORNER SIGHT TRIANGLES TO REFLECT THE
	DMP REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB NOT THE
	PROPERTY LINE.

	12. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE
	AREA LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	13. ADD A COLUMN FOR FLORIDA NATIVE TO THE PLANT LIST
	SO THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.

	14. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FOOT HEIGHT
	REQUIREMENT. STREET TREE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET HEIGHT.

	15. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
	SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
	ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
	SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
	SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
	WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
	LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
	PLANT LIST.

	16. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
	VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND
	RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE
	THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	relizond			Date	12-05-2022	Time	15:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	relizond			Date	12-05-2022	Time	15:28	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-05 15:31:55	-PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	-?? SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	-?? PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	- PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	- GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	-?? PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
	TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPE SIZE AND
	MATERIAL LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	- PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	-PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG
	ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE WHERE CONNECTION IS PROPOSED
	(CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
	-CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	- WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	- CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	-PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	-ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY???S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER. (PROJECT FALLS WITHIN LIMITS OF LIFT
	STATION 40)
	-PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	-PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
	- EXISTING MANHOLES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO HAVE NEW
	CONNECTIONS WILL NEED TO BE REHABBED

Review Stop	PU		PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	2	Status	Date				Cont ID
Sent By			Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow		Date	10-17-2022	Time	13:57	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date				Cont ID
Sent By				Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	09-08-2022	Time	12:03	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 12:10:05	-CALL TO CUT AND CAP EXISTING WATER AND SANITARY
	SERVICES AT THE MAIN.
	-ADD NOTE TO REHAB AND REPLACE EXISTING SANITARY
	SERVICES ARE REQUIRED.
	-SEE RICK ROSSANO'S LIST OF STANDARD COMMENTS FOR ENG
	PLAN SUBMITTAL. INCLUDE LOS CALCS, FIRE FLOW CALCS,
	PROFILE ETC.
	-CONCEPTUALLY THE PLANS ARE APPROVED.

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	12-05-2022	Time	10:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-12-05 10:33:21	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR THE IRRIGATION AND COOLING
	TOWER MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. IF NEED
	ASSISTANCE FINDING LOCATION CAN EMAIL [email protected]
	-WATER SERVICE DESIGNS ARE NONSTANDARD AND MAY NEED
	REVISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	SUBMITTAL.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	10-05-2022	Time	12:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-10-05 12:32:32	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-C301 CALLS FOR 6 INCH DCDA BUT THERE IS 8 INCH POINT
	OF SERVICE VALVE AND 8 INCH PIPE. NOT SURE IF 6 INCH
	SIZE IS INTENTIONAL, BUT IT WOULD BE BILLED AS 8 INCH
	FIRELINE.
	-C301 RESIDENTIAL SERVICE ENLARGEMENT LOOKS TO HAVE THE
	WORDS ABOVE GROUND BLOCKED SO THAT IT IS UNREADABLE
	BELOW USC APPROVED ONLY. PLEASE SHOW ABOVE GROUND
	WORDING CLEARLY.
	-AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL, DESIGN OF WATER
	SERVICES MAY NEED REVISION OR ADJUSTMENT UPON FURTHER
	REVIEW.
	-ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN GARDENIA MAY NOT BE SHOWN.
	PLEASE VERIFY AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	-THE FOOTPRINT OF THE 6 INCH DOMESTIC METER BUILD IS
	LIKELY MUCH LARGER THAN SHOWN ON C301.
	-HISTORIC PICTURES OF SOUTHEAST AREA OF EXISTING 3
	STORY BUILDING SHOW DOORS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED BIKE
	RACKS. ENSURE THAT BIKE RACKS WILL NOT BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
	TRAFFIC FROM FUNCTIONAL DOORWAYS.
	-SHEET C300 EAST SIDE OF BUILDING. DOOR SHOULD NOT OPEN
	INTO RIGHT OF WAY. THIS IS A REPEAT COMMENT THAT STILL
	HAS NOT BEEN RESOLVED THOUGH IT HAS BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED
	IN RESPONSE LETTERS. VINCE NOEL HAS ALSO PROVIDED
	SIMILAR REVIEW COMMENTS ABOUT IT.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-04-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	09-04-2022	Time	10:23	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-09-04 10:23:17	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
	-SOME OF THE RESPONSES IN MOST RECENT RESPONSE LETTER
	DID NOT SEEM TO CORRELATE TO THE REVIEW COMMENTS OR
	PLANS. PLEASE PROOF RESPONSE LETTER IN NEXT
	RESUBMITTAL.
	-PLEASE ADD REVISION DATES ON CIVIL PLAN SHEETS.
	-SHEET C300 EAST SIDE OF BUILDING. DOOR SHOULD NOT OPEN
	INTO RIGHT OF WAY.
	-IF NEED A SEPARATE DEDICATED METERED IRRIGATION WATER
	SERVICE THEN SHOW AND LABEL ON PLANS. IF IRRIGATION
	RUNS OFF PROPOSED LARGE DOMESTIC METER THAT IS FINE
	ALSO. COULD NOT DETERMINE WHICH WAY WAS PLANNED BASED
	ON PRIOR RESPONSE.
	-WATER METERS MAY NOT BE INSIDE BUILDINGS OR IN
	DRIVEWAYS. SHOULD ALSO NOT BE IN VEHICLE TRAFFIC.
	PROPOSED LOCATIONS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS SHOWN ON CIVIL
	PLANS. MAY NEED TO RELOCATE WATER SERVICE OR CHANGE
	ANOTHER ASPECT OF PLANS. 6 INCH METER SHOULD ALSO BE
	WITHIN 15 FEET OF CRANE TRUCK ACCESS.
	-ADD ABOVE-GROUND WORDING TO LABELS OF PROPOSED 6 INCH
	AND 3 INCH METERS. SHOULD REFERENCE STANDARD DETAIL WS3
	REV SEP2019. ADD WS3 TO CIVIL PLAN SET.
	-3 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOCATION MAY CONFLICT WITH
	SEMI TRUCK TRAFFIC AND PRODUCT UNLOADING AS SHOWN ON
	A1.01.
	-PROPERTY OWNER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RECORD BACKFLOW
	COVENANT AS A CONDITION OF WATER SERVICE.
	-3 INCH WATER METERS ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE 4 INCH
	SERVICE LINES PER WPB STANDARD DETAILS.
	-ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY
	PLAN.
	-MAY HAVE TO CUT AND CAP UTILITIES FURTHER THAN SHOWN
	ON PLANS. WILL REVIEW FURTHER AT ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	-REFUGE AREA IN NORTHERN DRIVEWAY IS NOT CONSISTENT
	BETWEEN PLAN SETS. UPDATE PLANS TO MATCH BASIC DESIGN
	AND AREA. ALSO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE REFUGE
	AREA. IS IT PAINTED, RAISED, AND ADA COMPLIANT?
	-VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM WILL NOT HAVE AN AUXILIARY
	WATER SUPPLY SUCH AS A WELL.
	-SHOW AND LABEL ALL PROPOSED GREASE TRAPS ON UTILITY
	PLAN.
	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY [email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	07-13-2022	Time	09:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-07-13 09:25:26	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:

	-VERIFY SEMI TRUCKS CAN ENTER GARDENIA FROM QUADRILLE
	AND EXIT GARDENIA ONTO DIXIE SAFELY.

	-THERE ARE SOME EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS NEAR THE
	WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM?

	-ON UTILITY PLAN, SHOW ALL EXISTING WATER AND SEWER
	SERVICES AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.

	-BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES SHOULD ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NOT
	IN RIGHT OF WAY.

	-PAVEMENT RESTORATION MAY BE NEEDED ON GARDENIA, FERN,
	AND DIXIE DUE TO PROPOSED UTILITY WORK IN ROAD. THERE
	MAY ALSO BE WATER SERVICES NEEDING REMOVAL IN THOSE
	AREAS.

	-THERE SEEMS TO BE AN EXISTING FIRELINE BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLY NEAR THE NORTHWEST AREA OF PROPERTY. PLEASE
	ACCOUNT FOR IT IN PLANS.

	-METERS OVER 2 INCH SIZE NEED BE ABOVE GROUND. ADD
	ABOVE GROUND WORDING ON LABELS OF UTILITY PLAN.

	-DEMO PLAN SHOWS LARGE EXISTING VAULT IN FRONT OF 415
	S. DIXIE. WHAT TYPE OF UTILITY IS IT AND WHAT WILL
	HAPPEN TO IT?

	-ON C102 TRUCK TURN PLAN, PLEASE SHOW CURBING AND
	PARKING SPACES ON SOUTH SIDE OF GARDENIA FROM QUADRILLE
	TO DIXIE.

	-THERE ARE MANY EXISTING CITY PARKING SPOTS AND A BIKE
	PATH ON SOUTH SIDE OF FERN ST. WILL ANY OF THOSE BE
	AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT?

	-3 INCH METER REQUIRES 4 INCH TAP AND SERVICE LINE PER
	WPB STANDARD DETAILS.

	-SHOW UTILITY EASEMENT AROUND METERED WATER SERVICE ON
	PRIVATE PROPERTY. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD NOT BE IN
	UTILITY EASEMENT.

	-ON UTILITY PLAN, LEADER LINE FOR FPL DUCT BANK DOES
	NOT APPEAR POINTED CORRECTLY.

	-SEVERAL POSSIBLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN DUCT BANK IN ROW
	AND OTHER UTILITIES.

	-CONSIDER PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON DOMESTIC
	WATER SERVICES TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING
	BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.

	-FOOTPRINT OF METERS AND BACKFLOWS MAY BE LARGER THAN
	SHOWN ON UTILITY PLAN.

	-SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES FOR NORTHEAST 3 STORY BUILDING
	ON CIVIL PLANS.

	-C300 UTILITY NOTE 4, WATER SERVICE LINES OVER 2 INCH
	SIZE NEED BE DIP.

	-IS SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE NEEDED?

	-ON CIVIL PLANS 401 S. DIXIE IS NOT SEPARATED FROM REST
	OF BLOCK WITH PROPERTY LINES. WILL ENTIRE BLOCK BE ONE
	PROPERTY?

	--FIRELINE BACKFLOW NEED BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, OUT OF
	RIGHT OF WAY, AND MUST COMPLY WITH ALL NFPA RULES
	REGARDING LOCATION.

	-ADD NOTE TO UTILITY PLAN: LINESTOPS OR INSERTION
	VALVES MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY CITY WPB OR EOR
	TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES TO CUSTOMERS.

	-ADD WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS 4 AND 4.1 TO CIVIL
	PLAN SET

	-ADD STANDARD DETAIL GS-5 TO CIVIL PLAN SET

	-ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY
	PLAN.

	-LABEL S. QUADRILLE BLVD ON CIVIL PLANS.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	11-30-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	11-30-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	11-30-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-11-30 13:54:33	NO FURTHER COMMENTS.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-19-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	10-19-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	10-19-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-19 15:44:45	1-PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN EXHIBIT WITH DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE???S WHEEL PATH IDENTIFIED WITH
	DIFFERENT COLORS FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE FOR THE
	RECYCLING DUMPSTERS AND THE RESIDENTIAL/RETAIL TRASH
	CONTAINERS, USING A FRONT LOADER TRUCK SPECS BELOW:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
	2- IDENTIFY STAGING AREA WHERE THE RETAIL/RESIDENTIAL
	COMPACTOR CONTAINERS ARE ROLLED OUT FOR SERVICE.
	3- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
	GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
	TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
	NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
	4- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	5- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	6- SIGNAGE PLAN. ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY
	WITH THE LATEST CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAILS AND MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. LATEST EDITION.
	7- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING , SIGNING AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED
	DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-29-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-29-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	08-29-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-29 15:05:04
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
	2- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
	RECYCLING CONTAINERS.
	3- HEIGHT CLEARANCE FOR STAGING ARTEA/SERVICE POINT
	WHERE THE GARBAGE CONTAINERS (COMPACTORS, DUMPSTERS)
	GET SERVICED.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-12-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-12-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	07-12-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-12 12:56:05
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
	QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E.DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT
	WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
	3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE`S
	WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
	TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
	4- CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF
	SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER, ETC.)
	5- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
	RECYCLING CONTAINERS
	6- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
	GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
	TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
	NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.
	7- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	8- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	9- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE
	M.U.T.C.D.LATEST EDITION.
	10- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING
	CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-15-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	12-15-2022	Time	09:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	12-15-2022	Time	09:40	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-15 09:38:34	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	12/8/22 PPRC RESUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS
	ARE EXCLUDED.

	3. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CONTROL STRUCTURES FOR THE
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE.
	THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
	EXFILTRATION SYSTEMS.

	4. [SATISFIED] INDICATE HOW THE SURFACE DRAINAGE ON
	FERN STREET WILL BE ACCOMMODATED WITH THE NEW CURBING.

	6. [SATISFIED - PROVIDE DIMENSIONS BETWEEN BUILDING
	FACE/PROPERTY LINE AND BETWEEN BACK OF CURB/PROPERTY
	LINE; LABEL R/W LINE; SHOW AND DIMENSION LANDSCAPE
	STRIPS.] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF BUILDING
	TO THE CENTERLINE OF EACH STREET. SHOW SURFACE
	FEATURES, GRADE BREAKS, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES, MAXIMUM
	CROSS SLOPE PERCENTAGES, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION,
	RIGHT OF WAY LINE, DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO R/W,
	OFFSETS FROM R/W TO BUILDING FACE, ETC.

	7. [SATISFIED - PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR THE S. DIXIE
	HWY DRIVEWAY] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR EACH DRIVEWAY
	FROM NEAREST INSIDE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO FIVE FEET
	BEYOND THE HIGH POINT IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE. SHOW
	SURFACE FEATURES, SLOPES, BREAK POINTS, ETC.

	8. [NOT SATISFIED - INCLUDE IN THE NEXT RESPONSE WHAT
	LID FACILITIES WERE CONSIDERED AND WHY THEY ARE NOT
	BEING INCORPORATED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
	DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

	9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE FINISHED FLOOR
	ELEVATIONS.

	10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED GRADES ON THE
	PAVING AND GRADING PLAN.

	11. [SATISFIED - TRIM HATCHING AT WEST END OF GARDENIA
	ST, EXTEND HATCHING TO EXISTING CURB LINE AT EAST END
	OF GARDENIA ST AND TRIM HATCHING AT EAST CURB OF S.
	DIXIE HWY.] SHOW MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS FOR TRENCHING
	WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.

	12. [SATISFIED - SHOW PROPOSED ADA MATS. NOTE PAVEMENT
	MODIFICATIONS (INCLUDING MILL AND OVERLAY) ADJACENT TO
	CURB RAMPS WILL REQUIRE THE CURB RAMP TO BE BROUGHT UP
	TO CURRENT ADA STANDARDS.] SHOW THE LOCATION FOR ADA
	TRUNCATED DOME MATS.

	15. [SATISFIED - SEE NEW COMMENT BELOW] IT APPEARS
	THERE IS SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED ON LOT 1. DOES THE
	PROPERTY OWNER APPROVE OF THIS AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
	ON LOT 1.

	NEW COMMENTS (10/4/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	16. [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURES NEED TO BE
	LOCATED OUT OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	17. [SATISFIED] THE PROPOSED BULBOUT AND DRIVEWAYS ON
	FERN ST. WILL INTERRUPT THE GUTTER FLOW ALONG THE
	PARKING SPACES. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALONG THE ROAD WILL
	NEED TO BE EXTENDED TO BEFORE THE START OF THE BULBOUT
	(IF FERN ST. SLOPES FROM WEST TO EAST).

	18. [NOT SATISFIED ??? STAFF WILL WAIT FOR REPLAT
	PARCEL LAYOUT] LOT 1 BLOCK 20 EXTENDS TO THE ALLEY. THE
	UTILITY PLAN SHOWS PARKING AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
	AND SANITARY SEWER MAINS NORTH OF THE ALLEY ON THE LOT
	1 BLOCK 20 PARCEL. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE
	PARCEL OWNER APPROVES OF THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ON
	THE PARCEL.

	19. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? ADDITIONAL GRADES MAY BE
	NEEDED ALONG FERN ST.] PROVIDE EXISTING GRADES ALONG
	THE CENTERLINE, EDGES OF PAVEMENT, TOP OF CURB AND BACK
	OF SIDEWALK FOR ALL OF THE STREETS ADJACENT TO THE
	DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADJACENT TO THE LOT 1, BLOCK 20
	PARCEL (401 S. DIXIE HWY).

	20. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS
	FOR ALL SANITARY SEWER AND STORM WATER STRUCTURES
	ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE IMMEDIATE
	STRUCTURES UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THESE STRUCTURES.

	21. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL ALL UTILITIES (SIZE,
	MATERIAL, USE) WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND WITH THE
	PROJECT LIMITS.

	22. [NOT SATISFIED] PROPOSED ALLEY ABANDONMENT IS
	395.07 FEET LONG. THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ACROSS THE
	ALLEY SHOULD BE THE NORTH EXTENSION OF THE EAST
	PROPERTY LINE THAT IS SOUTH OF THE ALLEY (OR SOUTH
	EXTENSION OF THE R/W LINE ESTABLISHED BY FDOT???S DIXIE
	HWY MAINTENANCE MAP FOR THE PARCEL NORTH OF THE ALLEY).
	THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ACROSS THE
	ALLEY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE BOUNDARY SURVEY???S EAST
	PROPERTY LINE THAT IS NORTH OF THE ALLEY.

	23. [SATISFIED ??? WILL BECOME CONDITION OF SITE PLAN
	APPROVAL] S. QUADRILLE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ALL
	IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE S. QUADRILLE BLVD R/W ARE TO
	RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM FDOT. PROVIDE THIS APPROVAL WITH
	THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	24. [SATISFIED] REMOVE OR LABEL THE CLEAR SITE
	TRIANGLES ON THE PGD PLAN.

	25. [SATISFIED] INSTALL SPECIAL TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER
	ON S. DIXIE HWY. CALLOUT ON THE PGD PLAN AND CROSS
	SECTION B-B. PROVIDE A DETAIL.

	26. [SATISFIED PENDING REVIEW OF DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
	DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] THERE APPEARS TO
	BE MULTIPLE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. WATER QUALITY
	TREATMENT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED BASED ON THE
	TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA TO EACH SYSTEM.
	POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF VOLUME CANNOT EXCEED
	PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF VOLUME. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
	WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	27. [SATISFIED] STAMPED ASPHALT THAT IS DISTURBED BY
	THE PROJECT WILL NEED TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED.

	28. [SATISFIED] SHOW LIMITS OF SIDEWALK REMOVAL ON THE
	DEMOLITION PLAN.

	29. [SATISFIED] THE CURB ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF
	GARDENIA MAY BE PART OF THE SIDEWALK AS THICKENED EDGE
	SIDEWALK. REPLACE WITH TYPE D CURB.

	NEW COMMENT (12/8/22 SUBMTTIAL]
	30. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS,
	SPECIFICALLY INDICATING HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED
	AND WHERE THE INFORMATION MAY BE FPUND.


	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-25-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	10-25-2022	Time	11:50	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	10-25-2022	Time	11:53	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-25 11:52:57	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	10/4/2022 RESUBMITTAL:

	1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
	NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
	LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
	PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM
	CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.

	2. [SATISFIED] MOVE THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT ON THE
	EROSION CONTROL PLAN OUT OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? SEE NEW COMMENT BELOW]
	PROVIDE CONTROL STRUCTURES FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH
	SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. THE CITY DOES NOT
	ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION SYSTEMS.

	4. [NOT SATISFIED - SEE NEW COMMENT BELOW] INDICATE HOW
	THE SURFACE DRAINAGE ON FERN STREET WILL BE
	ACCOMMODATED WITH THE NEW CURBING.

	5. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN WHAT IS DEPICTED BY THE HATCHING
	ENCROACHING INTO THE FERN STREET R/W AT THE RESIDENTIAL
	USER BUILDING ENTRY/EXIT.

	6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? PROVIDE DIMENSIONS BETWEEN
	BUILDING FACE/PROPERTY LINE AND BETWEEN BACK OF
	CURB/PROPERTY LINE; LABEL R/W LINE; SHOW AND DIMENSION
	LANDSCAPE STRIPS.] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF
	BUILDING TO THE CENTERLINE OF EACH STREET. SHOW SURFACE
	FEATURES, GRADE BREAKS, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES, MAXIMUM
	CROSS SLOPE PERCENTAGES, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION,
	RIGHT OF WAY LINE, DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO R/W,
	OFFSETS FROM R/W TO BUILDING FACE, ETC.

	7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR
	THE S. DIXIE HWY DRIVEWAY] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR
	EACH DRIVEWAY FROM NEAREST INSIDE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE
	TO FIVE FEET BEYOND THE HIGH POINT IN THE INTERIOR OF
	THE SITE. SHOW SURFACE FEATURES, SLOPES, BREAK POINTS,
	ETC.

	8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? INCLUDE IN THE NEXT
	RESPONSE WHAT LID FACILITIES WERE CONSIDERED AND WHY
	THEY ARE NOT BEING INCORPORATED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT
	DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

	9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE FINISHED FLOOR
	ELEVATIONS.

	10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED GRADES ON THE
	PAVING AND GRADING PLAN.

	11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? TRIM HATCHING AT WEST END
	OF GARDENIA ST, EXTEND HATCHING TO EXISTING CURB LINE
	AT EAST END OF GARDENIA ST AND TRIM HATCHING AT EAST
	CURB OF S. DIXIE HWY.] SHOW MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS FOR
	TRENCHING WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.

	12. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? SHOW PROPOSED ADA MATS.
	NOTE PAVEMENT MODIFICATIONS (INCLUDING MILL AND
	OVERLAY) ADJACENT TO CURB RAMPS WILL REQUIRE THE CURB
	RAMP TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CURRENT ADA STANDARDS.] SHOW
	THE LOCATION FOR ADA TRUNCATED DOME MATS.

	13. [SATISFIED] SHOW DROP CURBS AT SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS
	TO DRIVEWAYS.

	14. [SATISFIED ??? PREVIOUS VERSION OF SHEET A0.09
	SHOWED LABELS FOR 2BR, 1BR AND S NORTH OF THE NORTH
	PROPERTY LINE] ON SHEET A0.09 IT APPEARS THE BUILDING
	ENCROACHES THE FERN STREET R/W ON SECTION 3, LEVELS 3-6
	PODIUM FLOOR PLAN.

	15. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SEE NEW COMMENT BELOW] IT
	APPEARS THERE IS SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED ON LOT 1. DOES
	THE PROPERTY OWNER APPROVE OF THIS AND OTHER
	IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 1.

	NEW COMMENTS (10/4/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	16. DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURES NEED TO BE LOCATED OUT
	OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	17. THE PROPOSED BULBOUT AND DRIVEWAYS ON FERN ST. WILL
	INTERRUPT THE GUTTER FLOW ALONG THE PARKING SPACES. THE
	DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALONG THE ROAD WILL NEED TO BE EXTENDED
	TO BEFORE THE START OF THE BULBOUT (IF FERN ST. SLOPES
	FROM WEST TO EAST).

	18. LOT 1 BLOCK 20 EXTENDS TO THE ALLEY. THE UTILITY
	PLAN SHOWS PARKING AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AND
	SANITARY SEWER MAINS NORTH OF THE ALLEY ON THE LOT 1
	BLOCK 20 PARCEL. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PARCEL
	OWNER APPROVES OF THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ON THE
	PARCEL.

	19. PROVIDE EXISTING GRADES ALONG THE CENTERLINE, EDGES
	OF PAVEMENT, TOP OF CURB AND BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR ALL
	OF THE STREETS ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING
	ADJACENT TO THE LOT 1, BLOCK 20 PARCEL (401 S. DIXIE
	HWY).

	20. PROVIDE INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS FOR ALL SANITARY
	SEWER AND STORM WATER STRUCTURES ADJACENT TO THE
	DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE IMMEDIATE STRUCTURES UPSTREAM
	AND DOWNSTREAM OF THESE STRUCTURES.

	21. LABEL ALL UTILITIES (SIZE, MATERIAL, USE) WITHIN
	THE RIGHT OF WAY AND WITH THE PROJECT LIMITS.

	22. PROPOSED ALLEY ABANDONMENT IS 395.07 FEET LONG. THE
	EAST PROPERTY LINE ACROSS THE ALLEY SHOULD BE THE NORTH
	EXTENSION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE THAT IS SOUTH OF
	THE ALLEY (OR SOUTH EXTENSION OF THE R/W LINE
	ESTABLISHED BY FDOT???S DIXIE HWY MAINTENANCE MAP FOR
	THE PARCEL NORTH OF THE ALLEY). THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW
	THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ACROSS THE ALLEY AS AN EXTENSION
	OF THE BOUNDARY SURVEY???S EAST PROPERTY LINE THAT IS
	NORTH OF THE ALLEY.

	23. S. QUADRILLE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ALL
	IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE S. QUADRILLE BLVD R/W ARE TO
	RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM FDOT. PROVIDE THIS APPROVAL WITH
	THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	24. REMOVE OR LABEL THE CLEAR SITE TRIANGLES ON THE PGD
	PLAN.

	25. INSTALL SPECIAL TYPE ???F??? CURB AND GUTTER ON S.
	DIXIE HWY. CALLOUT ON THE PGD PLAN AND CROSS SECTION
	B-B. PROVIDE A DETAIL.

	26. THERE APPEARS TO BE MULTIPLE ONSITE DRAINAGE
	SYSTEMS. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT WILL NEED TO BE
	PROVIDED BASED ON THE TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA TO EACH
	SYSTEM. POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF VOLUME CANNOT EXCEED
	PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF VOLUME. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
	WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	27. STAMPED ASPHALT THAT IS DISTURBED BY THE PROJECT
	WILL NEED TO BE RE-ESTABLISHED.

	28. SHOW LIMITS OF SIDEWALK REMOVAL ON THE DEMOLITION
	PLAN.

	29. THE CURB ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA MAY BE
	PART OF THE SIDEWALK AS THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK.
	REPLACE WITH TYPE D CURB.


	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-14-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	07-14-2022	Time	12:46	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	07-14-2022	Time	12:49	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-14 12:49:30	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES.
	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:

	1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
	CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
	CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
	IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION TO
	NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.

	2. MOVE THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT ON THE EROSION CONTROL
	PLAN OUT OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	3. PROVIDE CONTROL STRUCTURES FOR THE EXFILTRATION
	TRENCH SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. THE CITY DOES
	NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION
	SYSTEMS.

	4. INDICATE HOW THE SURFACE DRAINAGE ON FERN STREET
	WILL BE ACCOMMODATED WITH THE NEW CURBING.

	5. EXPLAIN WHAT IS DEPICTED BY THE HATCHING ENCROACHING
	INTO THE FERN STREET R/W AT THE RESIDENTIAL USER
	BUILDING ENTRY/EXIT.

	6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF BUILDING TO THE
	CENTERLINE OF EACH STREET. SHOW SURFACE FEATURES, GRADE
	BREAKS, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES, MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE
	PERCENTAGES, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION, RIGHT OF WAY
	LINE, DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO R/W, OFFSETS FROM
	R/W TO BUILDING FACE, ETC.

	7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR EACH DRIVEWAY FROM NEAREST
	INSIDE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO FIVE FEET BEYOND THE HIGH
	POINT IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE. SHOW SURFACE
	FEATURES, SLOPES, BREAK POINTS, ETC.

	8. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

	9. PROVIDE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS.

	10. PROVIDE PROPOSED GRADES ON THE PAVING AND GRADING
	PLAN.

	11. SHOW MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS FOR TRENCHING WITHIN
	THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.

	12. SHOW THE LOCATION FOR ADA TRUNCATED DOME MATS.

	13. SHOW DROP CURBS AT SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS TO
	DRIVEWAYS.

	14. ON SHEET A0.09 IT APPEARS THE BUILDING ENCROACHES
	THE FERN STREET R/W ON SECTION 3, LEVELS 3-6 PODIUM
	FLOOR PLAN.

	15. IT APPEARS THERE IS SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED ON LOT
	1. DOES THE PROPERTY OWNER APPROVE OF THIS AND OTHER
	IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 1.


	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
	CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
	THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
	CONSTRUCTION.

	3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	11-28-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	11-28-2022	Time	10:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-11-28 10:56:00

1. NO RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS/CONDITIONS.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	10-05-2022	Time	11:00	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-10-05 11:11:50	ADDITIONAL REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE FOLLOWING
	INFORMATION IS RECEIVED:

	1. MAINTENANCE MAP ISSUE IS RESOLVED.
	2. ADJOINING ELEVATIONS AND FFE ARE PROVIDED.
	3. EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE IS
	ESTABLISHED.
	4. POINT OF SERVICE FOR SANITARY SHOULD BE A NEW
	MANHOLE AT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	09-06-2022	Time	12:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-09-06 13:24:50	1. ORIGINAL COMMENTS 1 AND 2 ARE NOT FULLY ANSWERED.
	HAVE ONLY SPOKEN WITH HARVEY OYER CONCERNING
	MAINTENANCE MAP AREAS.
	2. SOME COMMENTS HAD NO RESPONSE OR WERE JUST
	ACKNOWLEDGED BUT NOT CORRECTED.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-05-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	07-05-2022	Time	12:58	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-07-05 13:35:35	1. SURVEY, PLANS AND ACREAGE NEED TO BE REVISED TO
	REFLECT PREVIOUS ACQUISITION BY CITY AND FDOT
	MAINTENANCE MAPS. AREAS ARE NOT CLAIMED BUT ARE VESTED
	IN THE CITY PER STATE STATUTE 95.361.
	2. EXPLAIN HOW EXISTING BUILDING IS TO RETAIN OWNERSHIP
	WHEN PROPERTY IS RE-PLATTED(REQUIRED). WILL THIS BE A
	SEPARATE PARCEL?
	3. FDOT APPROVAL OF ENTRANCE AND PERMIT FOR UTILITIES
	WILL BE REQUIRED.
	4. FPL CONDUIT WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE R/W PERMIT.
	CABINET PME-9 NEEDS TO BE OUTSIDE OF MAINTENANCE R/W.
	5. METERS AND BACKFLOWS OFF OF DIXIE NEED TO BE OUTSIDE
	OF R/W.
	6. EXISTING SERVICES TO BE CUT BACK TO MAIN.
	7. SHOW ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPE PLANS.
	8. NEED EXISTING ELEVATIONS ON ALL ROADWAYS AND
	PROPOSED F.F. ELEVATIONS.
	9. DOORWAYS CANNOT OPEN INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AREAS
	PROPOSED FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENTS.


	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WILL BE FORTHCOMING AFTER REVISED
	SUBMITTAL.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-08-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	12-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 12:52:02	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE
	RECEIVED
	2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADDRESS THE FDOT
	REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY. PROVIDE A
	SPECIFIC PARAGRAPH AND/OR FURTHER NARRATIVE ADDRESSING
	FDOT COMMENT PERTAINING THE EVALUATION OF A NORTHBOUND
	RIGHT TURN LANE AT THE QUADRILLE & FERN INTERSECTION.
	PLEASE INSERT A SPECIFIC PARAGRAPH IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
	ADDRESSING THIS ITEM AND PROVIDE FDOT FINAL OPINION IN
	THE APPENDIX
	3) FERN/QUADRILLE, FERN/DIXIE, LAKEVIEW/QUADRILLE
	VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEETS IN THE APPENDIX. PLEASE
	EXPLAIN THE NEGATIVE NUMBERS FOR THE RT PROJECT TRAFFIC
	4) PLEASE PROVIDE REASONING PERTAINING THE RTOR
	REDUCTION PARAMETER AND ITS VALUE. PLEASE REMOVE IT
	WHEN IT DOES NOT APPLY (E.G. WESTBOUND RT AT FERN AND
	DIXIE)
	5) UNLESS THE SAME VOLUMES ARE PRODUCED, PLEASE USE THE
	LATEST COUNTY INTERNAL CAPTURE SPREADSHEET, AND PROVIDE
	THE ACTUAL SPREADSHEET (NOT A PDF PRINTOUT) AS PART OF
	THE TRAFFIC REVIEW SUBMISSION MATERIAL
	6) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY RT VOLUMES ARE OMITTED IN SYNCHRO
	TIMINGS ANALYSIS OUTPUT
	7) FERN/QUADRILLE SYNCHRO TIMINGS AND HCM, PLEASE
	EXPLAIN HOW FOR CERTAIN MOVEMENTS THE DELAY DECREASES
	WHEN COMPARING EXISTING VS FUTURE SCENARIOS, GIVEN THE
	SAME SIGNAL TIMING PLAN, BUT HIGHER VOLUMES IN THE
	LATTER
	8) WAS SYNCHRO TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION FEATURE
	UTILIZED IN THE ANALYSIS? IF YES, PLEASE SPECIFY AND
	ELABORATE IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
	9) PLEASE PROVIDE SYNCHRO NETWORK FILES AS PART OF THE
	TRAFFIC REVIEW SUBMISSION MATERIAL
	10) PLEASE INSERT PAGE NUMBERS FOR EACH PAGE OF THE
	TRAFFIC STUDY, INCLUDING APPENDIX ONES FOR EASE OF
	REFERENCE
	11) PAGE 9. THE 45 AND 90 PEAK-HOUR VEHICLES ARE FOR
	THE EASTBOUND RIGHT-TURN MOVEMENT, NOT THE LEFT ONE. A
	DECELERATION/STORAGE LANE IS WARRANTED. PLEASE UPDATE
	THE SITE PLAN(S) TO ACCOMMODATE SUCH FEATURE
	SITE COMMENTS
	12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
	MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
	SITE. C-101 IS MISSING SEVERAL STOP BARS AND
	CORRESPONDING SIGNS, ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ARE NOT
	MARKED, LOT LINES AND DRAINAGE POINTS CAN BE OMITTED
	13) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN
	ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE FILE THAN THE TRANSPORTATION
	SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOWCASE BOTH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND
	WHEEL PATHS IN DIFFERENT COLORS. PLEASE PROVIDE A COLOR
	LEGEND IN SHEET C-102 THROUGH C-104
	14) PLEASE REMOVE THE WB-67 NORTH SERVICE BAY. BASED ON
	C-102, IT SEEMS THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY CAN BE
	REDUCED, IF ONLY THE WB-67 SOUTH BAY WERE TO BE USED
	15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN
	EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM
	8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION
	READINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V / 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE SHOWCASE AND
	CLEARLY MARK THIS ITEM IN THE C-101 SITE PLAN
	16) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
	INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
	17) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN,
	PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER
	OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED,
	IF ANY
	18) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED?
	IF SO, CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK
	DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
	IS NOT SUFFICIENT, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESPONSE
	19) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED OR
	CONTEMPLATED IN THE FUTURE?
	20) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASONING
	OR NECESSITY OF TWO EXIT LANES AT THE FERN ST DRIVEWAY.
	A VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE EXCESSIVE
	WIDTH. PLEASE INSERT DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT
	MARKINGS ACCORDINGLY.
	21) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE
	PARKING AREA ON DIXIE. PLEASE DESIGNATE SUCH STALL AS
	TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL LOADING/UNLOADING, DELIVERY AND
	SHARE DRIVING ONLY.
	22) NOT SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED SERVICE DRIVEWAY
	SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED WIDTH OF
	24-FEET. A VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED
	23) NOT APPLICABLE/DISREGARD. PER CITY CODE
	94-312(2)(A): ???THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO SERVE A
	SITE SHALL BE KEPT AT A MINIMUM AND SHALL BE EVALUATED
	ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS???. FOR SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL
	PURPOSES, ACCESS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED FROM THE LOWEST
	FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THUS, THE DRIVEWAY UNTO S DIXIE
	HIGHWAY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED, AS BOTH FERN ST AND
	GARDENIA ST CAN ACCOMMODATE ANY ACCESS NEEDS, WHILE THE
	PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS WOULD BE TOO DISRUPTIVE TO VEHICULAR
	AND PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS ALONG DIXIE. FURTHER
	DISCUSSION WILL BE PERFORMED BASED ON THE UPDATED
	DRIVEWAY DESIGN.
	24) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE GARAGE RAMPS SLOPES.
	ARE THE SLOPES FOR THE ENTRY AND EXIT RAMPS DIFFERENT,
	AS SHOWN IN A1.03?
	25) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK/CALLOUT THE
	TURNAROUND SPACES AT THE GARAGE DEAD-ENDS. UNLESS
	AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PROVING FEASIBILITY IS PROVIDED, THE
	TURNAROUND SPACES IN A.103 (BY THE WESTERN HANDICAP
	STALL) AND THE ONES IN A 1.04, A1.06, A1.07 ARE NOT
	PROPER. NOTE: A PARKING STALL SIZE & CONFIGURATION
	SPACE SHOULD BE DEDICATED AND MARKED FOR TURNAROUND
	PURPOSES
	26) BIKE LANES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN ST ARE
	ENCROACHING THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. PLEASE RE-DESIGN
	ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DIMENSION THE SEPARATION
	BETWEEN BIKE LANES AND PARKING STALLS; AS THERE IS
	CURRENTLY A 2-FEET SEPARATION BUFFER
	27) NOT APPLICABLE/DISREGARD. CONSIDER SHIFTING THE
	BIKE LANES AND REMOVING THE ON-STREET PARKING ON THE
	EAST LEG OF THE FERN/QUADRILLE INTERSECTION ALONG THE
	SOUTHERN SIDE OF FERN ST, SO TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF A
	WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE
	28) PLEASE PROVIDE A DEDICATED TRAFFIC FOLDER/DOCUMENT
	CONTAINING ALL RELATED ITEMS IN FUTURE RESUBMISSIONS,
	INCLUSIVE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FILES (I.E. FDOT
	LETTER)
	29) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
	REFER TO CITY CODE SEC 86-246 FOR DETAILS. THIS COMMENT
	COULD BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, AND MUST BE SATISFIED
	BEFORE ENGINEERING PERMITTING IS ISSUED

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-25-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	10-25-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	10-25-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-25 22:18:06	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE
	RECEIVED
	2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADDRESS THE FDOT
	REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY. PROVIDE A
	SPECIFIC PARAGRAPH AND/OR FURTHER NARRATIVE ADDRESSING
	FDOT COMMENT PERTAINING THE EVALUATION OF A NORTHBOUND
	RIGHT TURN LANE AT THE QUADRILLE & FERN INTERSECTION
	3) FERN/QUADRILLE, FERN/DIXIE, LAKEVIEW/QUADRILLE
	VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEETS IN THE APPENDIX. PLEASE
	EXPLAIN THE NEGATIVE NUMBERS FOR THE RT PROJECT TRAFFIC
	4) PLEASE PROVIDE REASONING PERTAINING THE RTOR
	REDUCTION PARAMETER AND ITS VALUE. PLEASE REMOVE IT
	WHEN IT DOES NOT APPLY (E.G. WESTBOUND RT AT FERN AND
	DIXIE)
	5) UNLESS THE SAME VOLUMES ARE PRODUCED, PLEASE USE THE
	LATEST COUNTY INTERNAL CAPTURE SPREADSHEET, AND PROVIDE
	IT AS PART OF THE TRAFFIC REVIEW SUBMISSION MATERIAL
	6) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY RT VOLUMES ARE OMITTED IN SYNCHRO
	TIMINGS ANALYSIS OUTPUT
	7) FERN/QUADRILLE SYNCHRO TIMINGS AND HCM, PLEASE
	EXPLAIN HOW FOR CERTAIN MOVEMENTS THE DELAY DECREASES
	WHEN COMPARING EXISTING VS FUTURE SCENARIOS, GIVEN THE
	SAME SIGNAL TIMING PLAN, BUT HIGHER VOLUMES IN THE
	LATTER
	8) WAS SYNCHRO TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION FEATURE
	UTILIZED IN THE ANALYSIS? IF YES, PLEASE SPECIFY AND
	ELABORATE IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
	9) PLEASE PROVIDE SYNCHRO NETWORK FILES AS PART OF THE
	TRAFFIC REVIEW SUBMISSION MATERIAL
	10 PLEASE INSERT PAGE NUMBERS FOR EACH PAGE OF THE
	TRAFFIC STUDY, INCLUDING APPENDIX ONES FOR EASE OF
	REFERENCE
	SITE COMMENTS
	11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
	MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE
	SITE. C-101 IS MISSING SEVERAL STOP BARS AND
	CORRESPONDING SIGNS, ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ARE NOT
	MARKED,
	12) NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IN
	A SEPARATE FILE THAN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN.
	PLEASE SHOWCASE BOTH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND WHEEL PATHS
	IN DIFFERENT COLORS. C-102 AND C-103 DRAWINGS ARE NOT
	PROPER
	13) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN
	EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM
	8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION
	READINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V / 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS
	FEATURE IN THE T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. PLEASE CLEARLY
	MARK THE AREA AND PROVIDE INDICATION OF ITS LOCATION
	WITHIN THE DRAWING IN THE COMMENT RESPONSE.
	14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
	INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
	15) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN
	PLAN, PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE
	NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR
	RELOCATED, IF ANY. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESPONSE,
	THERE ARE FOUR STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT, AND INCLUDE A TABLE AS REQUESTED
	16) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED?
	IF SO, CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK
	DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
	IS NOT SUFFICIENT, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESPONSE.
	17) NOT SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED OR
	CONTEMPLATED IN THE FUTURE? PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE
	RESPONSE. IF THERE IS A POSSIBILITY FOR VALET
	OPERATIONS IN THE FUTURE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL
	ANALYSIS; OTHERWISE A CONDITION THAT VALET OPERATIONS
	ARE NOT ALLOWED AT ANY TIME, UNLESS COMPLETELY WITHIN
	THE PROPERTY WILL BE IMPOSED
	18) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASONING
	OR NECESSITY OF TWO EXIT LANES AT THE FERN ST DRIVEWAY.
	A VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED.
	19) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE
	PARKING AREA ON DIXIE. PLEASE DESIGNATE SUCH STALL AS
	TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL LOADING/UNLOADING, DELIVERY AND
	SHARE DRIVING ONLY.
	20) NOT SATISFIED. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH
	IS 24 FEET. THE GARDENIA AND FERN ST DRIVEWAYS WARRANT
	A VARIANCE REQUEST
	21) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE 94-312(2)(A):
	???THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO SERVE A SITE SHALL BE
	KEPT AT A MINIMUM AND SHALL BE EVALUATED ON A CASE BY
	CASE BASIS???. FOR SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL PURPOSES,
	ACCESS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL
	CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT. THUS, THE DRIVEWAY UNTO S DIXIE HIGHWAY
	SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED, AS BOTH FERN ST AND GARDENIA ST
	CAN ACCOMMODATE ANY ACCESS NEEDS, WHILE THE PROPOSED
	DRIVEWAYS WOULD BE TOO DISRUPTIVE TO VEHICULAR AND
	PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS ALONG DIXIE.FURTHER DISCUSSION
	WILL BE PERFORMED BASED ON THE UPDATED DRIVEWAY DESIGN.
	22) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE GARAGE RAMPS SLOPES
	23) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK/CALLOUT THE
	TURNAROUND SPACES AT THE GARAGE DEAD-ENDS
	24) BIKE LANES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN ST ARE
	ENCROACHING THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. PLEASE RE-DESIGN
	ACCORDINGLY
	25) CONSIDER SHIFTING THE BIKE LANES AND REMOVING THE
	ON-STREET PARKING ON THE EAST LEG OF THE FERN/QUADRILLE
	INTERSECTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF FERN ST, SO TO
	ALLOW INSTALLATION OF A WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE
	LANE
	26) PROVIDE A DEDICATED TRAFFIC FOLDER/ZIP-FILE
	CONTAINING ALL RELATED ITEMS IN FUTURE RESUBMISSIONS,
	INCLUSIVE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FILES (I.E. FDOT
	LETTER)
	27) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE
	REFER TO CITY CODE SEC 86-246 FOR DETAILS. THIS COMMENT
	COULD BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, AND MUST BE SATISFIED
	BEFORE ENGINEERING PERMITTING IS ISSUED

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	09-08-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	09-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 09:59:45
	1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) ADDRESS THE FDOT REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS IN THE
	TRAFFIC STUDY
	3) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN.
	INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE
	4) PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE FILE
	THAN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	5) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
	MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
	PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE
	FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO
	THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V /
	10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS FEATURE IN THE
	T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN
	6) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
	AND BICYCLE ONES
	7) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A
	TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED
	STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY
	8) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY
	SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE
	BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
	9) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED OR CONTEMPLATED IN THE
	FUTURE?
	10) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASONING OR NECESSITY OF TWO
	EXIT LANES AT THE FERN ST DRIVEWAY
	11) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA ON DIXIE
	12) THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 24 FEET. THE
	GARDENIA ST DRIVEWAY WOULD WARRANT A VARIANCE REQUEST
	13) PER CITY CODE 94-312(2)(A): ?THE NUMBER OF ACCESS
	POINTS TO SERVE A SITE SHALL BE KEPT AT A MINIMUM AND
	SHALL BE EVALUATED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS?. FOR SAFETY
	AND OPERATIONAL PURPOSES, ACCESS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED
	FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING
	FRONTAGE ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THUS, THE
	DRIVEWAY UNTO S DIXIE HIGHWAY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED, AS
	BOTH FERN ST AND GARDENIA ST CAN ACCOMMODATE ANY ACCESS
	NEEDS, WHILE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS WOULD BE TOO
	DISRUPTIVE TO VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS ALONG
	DIXIE
	14) PROVIDE GARAGE RAMPS SLOPES
	15) CLEARLY MARK/CALLOUT THE TURNAROUND SPACES AT THE
	GARAGE DEAD-ENDS

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-08-2022	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	07-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-08 13:39:47	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED WITH THE
	CITY'S TRANSPORTATION GROUP
	3) PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY INCLUSIVE OF THE
	RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

	SITE COMMENTS
	4) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN SHOWCASING ALL
	TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING AISLES,
	PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY, GATES,
	SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND
	DIMENSIONED.
	5) IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
	BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, AND
	PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
	SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
	SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
	DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
	FILE/DRAWING FOR EACH VEHICLE PARKING MANEUVERS.
	ANALYSIS PRESENTED IN A1.01 IS NOT PROPER NOR
	ACCEPTABLE
	7) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
	MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
	PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE SPECIFICS
	ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
	TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V
	10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
	SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
	8) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
	AND BICYCLE ONES. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
	SHEET NAME/NUMBER
	9) PER CITY CODE 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO ALL
	RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY
	HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT. THUS, THE DRIVEWAY UNTO S
	DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL NOT BE ALLOWED, AS BOTH FERN ST AND
	GARDENIA ST CAN ACCOMMODATE ANY ACCESS NEEDS
	10) EXPLAIN THE REASONING OR NECESSITY OF TWO EXIT
	LANES AND ONE ENTRY LANE AT THE FERN ST DRIVEWAY.
	MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25 FEET
	11) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA ON DIXIE
	12) PROVIDE GARAGE RAMPS SLOPES
	13) CLEARLY MARK/CALLOUT THE TURNAROUND SPACES AT THE
	GARAGE DEAD-ENDS
	14) COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT THE REMOVAL OF
	METERED SPACES

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	12-08-2022	Time	13:25	Rev Time	8.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	12-07-2022	Time	15:23	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 13:26:18	CASE NO. FSPR 22-08
	RESIDENCES OF PALM BEACH WEST
	401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	(3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG AND
	.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON
	THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF
	INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	RESUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. STAFF WILL REVIEW
	THE APPLICATION AND IF SUFFICIENT WILL SCHEDULE YOU FOR
	THE NEXT AVAILABLE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE MEETING.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT RESUBMITTALS MAY BE SCHEDULED FOR AN
	ADDITIONAL PPRC MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 8, 2023), THE
	PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS
	WERE NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL
	BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF
	THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($500).

	1) THE RESUBMITTAL FEE FOR THE CURRENT SUBMITTAL WAS
	NOT PROVIDED. PRIOR TO ANY FUTURE ACTION ON THIS
	SUBMITTAL, THE PREVIOUS $500 RESUBMITTAL FEE PLUS THE
	NEW RESUBMITTAL FEE IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. TOTAL
	- $1,000.

	2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS PROPERTY ALONG FERN
	STREET AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY THAT WERE ACQUIRED BY
	MAINTENANCE MAPS BY THE CITY AND FDOT, RESPECTIVELY.
	THIS PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE OVERALL
	PROPERTY CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE, INCLUDING FAR AND
	OPEN SPACE. ALL DATA TABLES AND PLANS NEED TO BE
	UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.

	3) APPENDIX A OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND TABLE X-1 CONTAINED IN SECTION
	94-305.D OR THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
	ARE THE LIST OF REQUIRED THOROUGHFARE RIGHT-OF-WAY
	SETBACKS. THE TABLES REQUIRE A ROADWAY SETBACK OF 100
	FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN
	ADDITION TO THE SETBACKS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING
	DISTRICT. A PORTION OF THE BUILDING ALONG QUADRILLE
	BOULEVARD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
	AND ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REQUIREMENT.
	REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE LANGUAGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE
	PLAN OR THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
	WERE A SCRIVENER'S ERROR, THE LANGUAGE IS IN BOTH
	DOCUMENTS. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE OPTIONS ARE 1) AMEND THE
	DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR 2) THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (AND
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) NEEDS TO BE
	AMENDED.

	4) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING
	ADDITIONAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS. STAFF HAS LISTED
	INCONSISTENCIES BELOW. ALL ELEVATIONS MUST SHOW
	CONSISTENT, ACCURATE CONDITIONS. STAFF WAS UNABLE TO
	PERFORM A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW DUE TO THE INCONSISTENT
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS.

	A. SHEET A2.01 - NORTH ELEVATION - DOES NOT CORRECTLY
	DEPICT THE QUADRILLE PROPERTY AND SETBACK LINES WHEN
	COMPARED TO THE SITE PLAN AND THE SHEET A2.06 ??? NORTH
	ELEVATION.
	B. SHEET A2.01 SHOWS THE 401 S. DIXIE BUILDING AS 43
	FEET TALL WHILE SHEET A2.06 SHOWS THE BUILDING AS 33
	FEET TALL.
	C. SHEET A2.01 AND SHEETS A2.06&07 SHOW THE ORIENTATION
	OF THE WOOD FINISH IN OPPOSING ORIENTATION (HORIZONTAL
	VS. VERTICAL).
	D. SHEET A2.08 SHOWS DIFFERING WIDTHS FOR THE PLANAR
	BREAKS AS COMPARED TO THE FLOOR PLAN AND PLANAR BREAK
	PLAN.
	E. SHEET A2.02 AND SHEET A2.08 - SOUTH ELEVATIONS DO
	NOT SHOW THE SAME SETBACK AND PROPERTY LINE CONDITIONS.
	SHEET A2.02 DOES NOT SHOW THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE
	IN THE SAME LOCATION.
	F. SHEET A2.03 AND SHEET A2.10 SHOW 401 S. DIXIE AT
	DIFFERENT SETBACKS FROM FERN STREET.
	G. SHEET A2.03 SHOWS THE 401 S. DIXIE BUILDING AS 43
	FEET TALL WHILE SHEET A2.10 SHOWS THE BUILDING AS 33
	FEET TALL.
	H. SHEET A2.03 AND SHEETS A2.10&12 SHOW THE ORIENTATION
	OF THE WOOD FINISH IN OPPOSING ORIENTATION (HORIZONTAL
	VS. VERTICAL).
	I. SHEET A2.12 SHOWS THE BUILDING ENCROACHING THE
	REQUIRED FERN STREET SETBACK, WHICH DOES NOT MATCH THE
	SITE PLAN.

	5) THE PROJECT IS REQUESTING NUMEROUS VARIANCES FROM
	THE DMP REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT PROVIDING ADEQUATE
	JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE THEM.
	THE NEW PORTION OF THE PROJECT OCCUPIES ALMOST THE
	ENTIRETY OF A CITY BLOCK AFTER THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
	ALLEY, SO THE REQUESTS ARE VARIANCES OF CONVENIENCE AND
	DO NOT FOSTER A DESIRABLE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
	SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IN THE DMP. **** STAFF WILL
	AWAIT THE UPDATED VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION SUBSEQUENT TO
	THE PPRC COMMENTS BEING SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED.

	6) CONDITION: VERIFICATION THAT THE 3-FOOT FPL UTILITY
	EASEMENT IS ABANDONED WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
	ZONING APPROVING THE BUILDING PERMIT.

	7) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TPS
	LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING; HOWEVER, IT
	DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE PROJECT. THE TPS LETTER
	INCORRECTLY LISTS 400 DWELLING UNITS INSTEAD OF 413 AND
	GENERAL RETAIL OF 28,184 SF INSTEAD OF 29,121 SF AS
	PROPOSED IN THE NEW BUILDING. ADDITIONALLY, THE 410 S.
	DIXIE BUILDING IS PART OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
	PROJECT SO IT MUST BE INCLUDED IN BOTH THE EXISTING USE
	AND THE PROPOSED USE LINE ITEMS. THE TPS LETTER WAS
	BASED ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY WHICH INCLUDED THE INCORRECT
	UNIT COUNT AND NEW SF AS WELL AS DID NOT INCLUDE THE
	410 S. DIXIE SQUARE FOOTAGE.

	8) THE TRAFFIC STUDY INACCURATELY STATES THE SIDEWALKS
	ALONG GARDENIA AND S. DIXIE ARE 12 FEET IN WIDTH. THEY
	ARE LESS THAN 9 FEET IN WIDTH.

	10) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE EITHER VERIFICATION THAT
	THE PROPOSED TOWER IS NOT WITHIN THE FLIGHT PATH, OR A
	LETTER FROM THE FAA OF NO OBJECTION/APPROVAL OF THE
	HEIGHT.

	9) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
	FDOT PRE-APPLICATION LETTER. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF
	THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT INCLUDES THE INTERSECTION OF
	QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND FERN STREET AND THE NEED (OF NO
	NEED) FOR A NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE THAT WAS
	PROVIDED TO FDOT AS WELL AS THE FDOT RESPONSE TO THE
	TRAFFIC STUDY. THE FDOT RESPONSE STATING NO TURN LANE
	IS REQUIRED MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING
	THE APPLICATION FOR DAC SINCE IF A TURN LANE IS
	REQUIRED, THEN THE PLANS NEED TO CHANGE. **** THE
	RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS NO
	NEED FOR A TURN LANE. THE TRAFFIC STUDY STATES NO TURN
	LANES ARE REQUIRED AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS SILENT ON A NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE AT
	QUADRILLE AND FERN.

	INCENTIVES

	10) CONDITION: PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF ANY BUILDING
	PERMITS, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE VERIFICATION TO
	THE PLANNING DIVISION THAT THE TDRS FOR THE FULL
	PROJECT HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED.

	11) UPDATED COMMENT: THIS PROJECT IS UTILIZING TDRS AND
	CONTAINS MORE THAT 25% OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN
	RESIDENTIAL USE. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE PROJECT
	COMPLIES WITH SECTION 94-134 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
	HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM. THE LOCATION OF THE INCOME
	RESTRICTED UNITS HAS A DIRECT CORRELATION TO THE
	VARIANCES THAT THIS PROJECT WILL BE SEEKING. FOR
	EXAMPLE, IF THERE ARE UNITS IN THE BUILDING,
	CONDITIONAL SETBACKS FOR PARKING USES ARE WAIVED.

	14) UPDATED COMMENT: AS PART OF RECEIVING THE TDRS AND
	FOLLOWING THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN HOUSING INCENTIVE
	PROGRAM, THE BUILDING THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC
	DESIGNATION LOCATED AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS
	REQUIRED TO BE INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IN A
	MANNER WHICH MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC
	STRUCTURE. WHILE THE RESUBMITTAL CHANGES HAVE BROUGHT
	THE BUILDING CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE, THE CITY'S HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER HAS REVIEWED THE RESUBMITTAL AND
	STILL DOES NOT FIND THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING IS
	INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS NOT A
	REQUIREMENT FOR WHICH A VARIANCE IS PERMITTED.

	A. IN THE LAST DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND
	STAFF, THE CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER STATED
	THAT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TRANSITION
	BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS, THE PORTION OF THE NEW
	BUILDING THAT EXTENDS EAST PAST THE PLANE OF THE 401 S.
	DIXIE BUILDING IS NOT TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE 401
	S. DIXIE BUILDING. SHEET A2.01 REFLECTS THIS
	INTEGRATION BY SHOWING THE PORTION OF THE NEW BUILDING
	AT THE SAME HEIGHT AS 401 S. DIXIE. HOWEVER, AS
	PREVIOUSLY STATED THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE
	PROVIDED ELEVATIONS AS TO HOW TALL THE 401 S. DIXIE
	BUILDING IS WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED WITH THE CORRECTION
	GOVERNING HOW THIS COMMENT IS ADDRESSED. THE
	RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS SHOWN ON SHEET A2.06
	IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO MEET THE INTEGRATION REQUIREMENT.
	B. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING SHEET A2.10 ??? EAST
	ELEVATION ??? THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE IN
	FRONT OF THE BUILDING. THE CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION
	PLANNER NOTED THAT NOW THAT STAFF HAS THE EAST
	ELEVATION TO REVIEW, THERE ARE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS
	THAT MUST BE ADDED TO CARRY OVER THE ARCHITECTURAL
	RHYTHM FROM THE 401 S. DIXIE BUILDING. THE CORNICE
	LINES THAT IS ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR ON THE 401 S.
	DIXIE BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED ON THE NEW BUILDING
	ACROSS THE MECHANICAL MEZZANINE LEVEL AND ALL THE
	LOUVERS SHALL BE BROUGHT DOWN TO THE MECHANICAL
	MEZZANINE LEVEL TO SIMULATE THE WINDOW PATTERN ON THE
	401 S. DIXIE BUILDING.
	C. CONDITION: THE BUILDING AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
	SHALL BE PAINTED A COMPATIBLE COLOR TO THE NEW
	BUILDING.

	ZONING COMPLIANCE

	15) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROJECT IS SHOWN AS
	CREATING A NEW INTERIOR PARCEL LINE BETWEEN THE
	EXISTING 401 SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING AND THE NEW BUILDING
	(ONLY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN). THE QGD 10-25 REQUIRES A
	20-FOOT SETBACK ABOVE THE 8TH STORY (104 FEET) FROM THE
	INTERIOR PARCEL LINE. THIS DOES NOT OCCUR ON EITHER
	PORTION OF THE NEW BUILDING THAT IS ABOVE THIS HEIGHT.
	STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THIS SETBACK VARIANCE.
	**** THE DIMENSION LINES FROM THE 401 S. DIXIE BUILDING
	TO THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE WERE PROVIDED; HOWEVER,
	THE DIMENSION FROM THE NEW PROPERTY LINE TO THE GARAGE
	ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 401 S. DIXIE WAS NOT. THE 20-FOOT
	INTERIOR SETBACK IS MET ON THE WEST OF THE 401 S. DIXIE
	BUILDING (38+ FEET).

	16) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT
	THE PROPOSED ZERO SETBACK FROM THE INTERIOR PROPERTY
	LINES COMPLIES WITH NFPA REQUIREMENTS. **** THE
	ARCHITECT SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE
	DEMONSTRATING THAT THE EXISTING 401 S DIXIE BUILDING
	WITH ITS EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS AND OTHER NFPA
	REQUIREMENTS CAN BE LOCATED FIVE FEET FROM THE PROPOSED
	PROPERTY LINE AND THE NEW BUILDING WITH ITS OPENINGS
	CAN BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE
	PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE.

	17) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A
	SETBACK FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY LESS THAN THE REQUIRED
	27 FEET FOR THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6 AND THE 66 FEET
	FOR LEVEL 9 OF THE TOWER. **** THIS WAS NOT AMENDED ON
	THE CURRENT RESUBMITTAL; HOWEVER, STAFF IS AWAITING THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS BASED ON THE OCTOBER 12, 2022 MEETING
	TO RE-EVALUATE THIS COMMENT.

	18) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A
	SETBACK FROM GARDENIA LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 27 FEET
	FOR THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6. **** THIS WAS NOT
	AMENDED ON THE CURRENT RESUBMITTAL; HOWEVER, STAFF IS
	AWAITING THE RESUBMITTED PLANS BASED ON THE OCTOBER 12,
	2022 MEETING TO RE-EVALUATE THIS COMMENT.

	19) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CIVIL CROSS SECTIONS SHOW THE
	FOLLOWING ISSUES:

	A. SECTION A-A DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE LOCATION
	OF THE CROSS SECTION. THE PLAN VIEW SHOWS THE CROSS
	SECTION THROUGH THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACE WHILE THE
	SECTION VIEW SHOWS IT FROM THE TRAVEL LANE. BOTH
	DRAWINGS MUST SHOW THE SAME LOCATION.
	B. SECTION B-B SHOWS THE BUILDING NOT MEETING THE
	REQUIRED 12-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB.
	ADDITIONALLY, IT SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE STRIP NOT MEETING
	THE 4-FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH AND OVERSTATES THE SIDEWALK
	WIDTH. NOTE: THESE DIMENSIONS DO NOT MEET WHAT IS SHOWN
	ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLANS.
	C. SECTION C-C SHOWS THE BUILDING NOT MEETING THE
	REQUIRED 12-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB.
	ADDITIONALLY, IT SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE STRIP NOT MEETING
	THE 4-FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH AND OVERSTATES THE SIDEWALK
	WIDTH. NOTE: THESE DIMENSIONS DO NOT MEET WHAT IS SHOWN
	ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLANS.
	D. SECTION C-C OVERSTATES THE SIDEWALK WIDTH. NOTE:
	THESE DIMENSIONS DO NOT MEET WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLANS.

	20) UPDATED COMMENT: LEVEL 6 (THIS WAS A TYPO AS LEVEL
	3 IN LAST ROUND OF COMMENTS) IS SHOWN EXCEEDING THE
	PERMITTED MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT. AN INCREASE IN
	THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS NOT PERMITTED AS A VARIANCE,
	SO THE FOOTPRINT AREA MUST BE REDUCED. (NOTE: SITE
	AREAS NOT UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED
	ROW, SO ALL VALUES WILL CHANGE) **** LEVEL 1 WILL ALSO
	NOT COMPLY WITH THE ROW AREA REMOVED.

	21) UPDATED COMMENT: THE TABLES WITH THE ACTIVE USE
	DIAGRAMS ARE INCORRECT. NOTE: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO
	SUPPORT WAIVERS FOR GROUND FLOOR OR LINER ACTIVE USES.

	A. THE UPDATED FERN STREET FRONTAGE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE
	USE DIAGRAM AND TABLE SHOW MORE AREA AS ACTIVE USE THAN
	ACTUALLY OCCURS. THE PREVIOUS PLAN SHOWED THIS
	CORRECTLY. THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE IS NOT MET IN EITHER
	CASE
	B. SOUTH DIXIE GROUND FLOOR DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED ACTIVE USE.
	C. THE TABLE STATES THAT GARDENIA STREET GROUND FLOOR
	MEETS THE MINIMUM 30% ACTIVE USE; HOWEVER, THE TABLE
	SHOWS THAT 118 FEET 6 INCHES ARE REQUIRED, YET ONLY 113
	FEET 10 INCHES ARE PROVIDED. THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE IS
	NOT MET.
	D. THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE IS NOT MET ON THE 2ND AND 3RD
	LEVELS FOR QUADRILLE OR SOUTH DIXIE.
	E. THE 401 S. DIXIE BUILDING PARCEL IS ONLY 3 STORIES
	SO THAT FRONTAGE IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE LEVEL 4 AND
	5 ACTIVE USE CALCULATIONS FOR FERN AND SOUTH DIXIE.
	FERN APPEARS THAT IT STILL MAY MEET THE MINIMUM 60
	PERCENT. SOUTH DIXIE HAS ZERO ACTIVE USE.

	22) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THE DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE
	GARDENIA FRONTAGE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
	PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO
	SUPPORT BUILDING DESIGNS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE THE
	REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS. **** 20% PLANAR BREAK IS
	REQUIRED.

	A. GARDENIA GROUND FLOOR - THE PLANAR BREAK DIAGRAM
	INCORRECTLY DEPICTS THE BUILDING FRONTAGE THAT IS USED
	TO DETERMINE THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS. THE PLANAR
	BREAK IS BASED ON THE PROVIDED BUILDING FRONTAGE
	(387.17 FEET) NOT THE BUILDABLE FRONTAGE AS LISTED.
	**** THE DRAWING INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE BUILDING
	EXTENDING TOO FAR TO THE WEST.
	B. THE TWO INSETS, GENERALLY 7 FEET IN WIDTH, DO NOT
	MEET THE MINIMUM 3-FOOT PLANAR BREAK DEPTH AND MAY NOT
	BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT
	ON ANY FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE THAT HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS
	DO NOT QUALIFY AS PLANAR BREAK DEPTH.
	C. PROVIDE THE DEPTH DIMENSION FROM THE EASTERN STAIRS
	ALONG GARDENIA TO THE MAIN BUILDING FACADE SO STAFF CAN
	VERIFY THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE 3-FOOT DEPTH MINIMUM.
	STAFF HAS SCALED THE DRAWINGS AND IT SEEMS TO BE AT
	LEAST 3 FEET IN DEPTH.
	D. GARDENIA GROUND FLOOR - 77.43 FEET REQUIRED; 63.33
	FEET PROVIDED. 14.1 FEET SHY
	E. GARDENIA GROUND FLOORS - 78.83 FEET REQUIRED; 70.75
	FEET PROVIDED. 8.1 FEET SHY
	F. SOUTH DIXIE DOES NOT MEET THE PLANAR BREAK
	REQUIREMENTS.

	23) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE CANOPY HEIGHT FROM
	GRADE.

	STREETSCAPE

	24) INADEQUATE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT
	THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
	94-113. - LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THIS
	INCLUDES:

	A. UPDATED COMMENT: EXTERIOR LIGHTING - NOT PROVIDED TO
	BACK OF CURB. **** THIS NEEDS TO BE FOR THE ENTIRE
	SITE, INCLUDING 401 SOUTH DIXIE, AND COMPLY WITH THE
	REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113.B.
	I. THE STREETLIGHTS DO NOT MEET THE CITY STANDARD FOR
	HEIGHT OR STYLE. **** STREET LIGHTING STILL UNDER
	REVIEW.

	25) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TYPE OF
	BICYCLE RACK PROPOSED. THE PLANS DO NOT MEET THE
	MINIMUM DIMENSIONS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PROVIDED
	INSTALLATION DETAIL. THE PLANS MUST SHOW THE CORRECT
	DIMENSIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORIENTATION OF THE
	BICYCLE RACKS DOES NOT PERMIT CONVENIENT PARKING OF THE
	BICYCLES. **** A BICYCLE LOCATION MARK UP PLAN WILL BE
	PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER.

	A. THERE ARE THREE CITY INSTALLED BICYCLE RACKS THAT
	EXIST ALONG FERN STREET IN FRONT OF THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING THAT NO LONGER APPEAR ON THE PLANS. THESE
	SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED AND COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE
	STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT.
	B. THE TWO RACKS SHOWN AT GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE ARE
	NOT LOCATED ADJACENT TO A BUILDING ENTRANCE. THESE (IF
	MEETING THE REQUIRED NUMBERS) SHALL BE PLACED CLOSER TO
	A BUILDING ENTRANCE.
	C. THE TWO RACKS AT THE CORNER OF GARDENIA AND
	QUADRILLE SHALL BE RELOCATED TO AN AREA ALONG QUADRILLE
	THAT IS VISIBLE FROM THE ENTRANCE TO THE RETAIL.

	26) CONDITION: MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED
	FOR ALL LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	IRRIGATION.

	DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE

	27) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE QUADRILLE
	GARDEN DISTRICT IS FOR PROJECTS TO HAVE A HIGH
	PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING AND TREE CANOPY. THE PROJECT
	AS PRESENTED DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET EITHER ONE OF
	THESE STANDARDS. **** THE OPEN SPACE TABLES SHOW THAT
	THE VEGETATION MINIMUMS ARE NOT MET, WHICH DIRECTLY
	CONTRADICTS THE DISTRICT DESIGN INTENT. STAFF WILL NOT
	SUPPORT A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE OPEN SPACE VEGETATED
	AREA MINIMUMS. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENT.

	PARKING

	28) BASED ON THE CHANGES DISCUSSED AT THE OCTOBER 12,
	2022 MEETING AND NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, STAFF WILL NOT
	BE PERFORMING A FULL PARKING REVIEW UNTIL THE UPDATED
	PLANS ARE SUBMITTED.

	29) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
	REMOVES ALL OF THE CURRENT SURFACE PARKING FOR THE 401
	SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING (NOTE - PART OF THE REQUIRED
	PARKING WAS ALREADY SOLD OFF, CREATING A PARKING
	DEFICIENCY, WHICH VIOLATES THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS). PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE WITH
	A BREAKDOWN OF THE USES WITHIN THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING AND THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.

	30) CONDITION: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMIT THAT
	REMOVES PARKING FOR THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING, A
	PARKING PLAN THAT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THAT THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED PARKING FOR 401 SOUTH DIXIE IS PROVIDED MUST
	BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION.
	THE PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE
	REGULATIONS.

	31) THANK YOU FOR INCLUDING EV CHARGING SPACES. PLEASE
	REMEMBER THAT ADA SPACES WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT
	1:25 WITH EV CAPABILITY.

	32) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE DEAD END PARKING ROWS ON
	MULTIPLE LEVELS, WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A
	TURNAROUND SPACE OR IF ALL SPACES ON THAT LEVEL ARE
	ASSIGNED PARKING. **** THE RESPONSE STATES THAT ALL
	DEAD END ROWS HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE. THIS DOES NOT
	OCCUR ON ANY OF THE PARKING LEVELS WITH DEAD END
	PARKING ROWS. THE PROVIDED TURN AROUND SPACES AS SHOWN
	DO NOT ACTUALLY FUNCTION TO TURN AROUND. A PARKING
	SPACE SIZED AREA THAT CAN BE USED TO PULL IN IS
	REQUIRED.

	33) REPEAT COMMENT: ONE EXISTING METERED ON-STREET
	PARKING SPACES ON FERN STREET IS SHOWN AS BEING
	REMOVED. YOU NEED TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM THE THE
	CITY'S PARKING ADMINISTRATOR OF HIS APPROVAL TO
	PERMANENTLY REMOVE THE PARKING SPACE AND ANY
	CONDITIONS, INCLUDING FEE, THAT ARE REQUIRED PRIOR
	SCHEDULING A HEARING BEFORE THE DAC. **** PLEASE NOTE
	THAT THE RESPONSE INCORRECTLY STATES THAT THERE ARE
	THREE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ON SOUTH DIXIE. THE
	PLANS CORRECTLY SHOW THE TWO SPACES.

	34) UPDATED COMMENT: THE FERN AND GARDENIA DRIVEWAY
	OPENING DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT CURB
	CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT
	BE WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE
	STREET AT THE CURB.

	A. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE TRUCK MANEUVERING MAY
	REQUIRE AN OPENING GREATER THAN 25 FEET; HOWEVER, STAFF
	IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE REDUCED OPENING WIDTH.
	B. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A WAIVER TO THE
	MAIN BUILDING ENTRY DRIVE WHICH IS SHOWN AROUND 40 FEET
	ON FERN STREET. FERN STREET IS CLASSIFIED AS A PRIMARY
	PEDESTRIAN STREET. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WIDTH DOES NOT
	PROMOTE A FAVORABLE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.

	35) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE
	ROOMS SHOWN IN THE PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A LARGER
	SCALE; HOWEVER, NOT ALL DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED WITHIN
	THE ROOMS.

	36) CONDITION: THE BUILD OUT OF THE RETAIL AREA
	REQUIRES THE PROVISION OF A SHOWER AND CHANGING
	FACILITY.

	37) CONDITION: TRAFFIC CONTROL AIDES ARE REQUIRED AT
	THE BOTTOM OF THE FERN STREET RAMP AND THE SOUTH DIXIE
	EXIT TO STOP TRAFFIC PRIOR TO THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
	LOCATIONS AND AT THE SOUTH DIXIE ENTRANCE TO WARN
	DRIVERS TO SLOW WHEN ENTERING THE GARAGE DUE TO THE TWO
	PARKING SPACES THAT BACK AT THE ENTRANCE.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	10-25-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	10-25-2022	Time	10:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-17-2022	Time	11:01	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-26 10:45:21	CASE NO. FSPR 22-08 2ND RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
	RESIDENCES OF PALM BEACH WEST
	401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	(3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG AND
	.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON
	THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF
	INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	RESUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. STAFF WILL REVIEW
	THE APPLICATION AND IF SUFFICIENT WILL SCHEDULE YOU FOR
	THE NEXT AVAILABLE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE MEETING.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT RESUBMITTALS MAY BE SCHEDULED FOR AN
	ADDITIONAL PPRC MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 26, 2022), THE
	PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS
	WERE NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL
	BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF
	THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($500).

	1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS PROPERTY ALONG FERN
	STREET AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY THAT WERE ACQUIRED BY
	MAINTENANCE MAPS BY THE CITY AND FDOT, RESPECTIVELY.
	THIS PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE OVERALL
	PROPERTY CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE, INCLUDING FAR AND
	OPEN SPACE. ALL DATA TABLES AND PLANS NEED TO BE
	UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.

	2) APPENDIX A OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND TABLE X-1 CONTAINED IN SECTION
	94-305.D OR THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
	ARE THE LIST OF REQUIRED THOROUGHFARE RIGHT-OF-WAY
	SETBACKS. THE TABLES REQUIRE A ROADWAY SETBACK OF 100
	FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN
	ADDITION TO THE SETBACKS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING
	DISTRICT. A PORTION OF THE BUILDING ALONG QUADRILLE
	BOULEVARD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
	AND ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REQUIREMENT.
	REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE LANGUAGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE
	PLAN OR THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
	WERE A SCRIVENER'S ERROR, THE LANGUAGE IS IN BOTH
	DOCUMENTS. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE OPTIONS ARE 1) AMEND THE
	DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR 2) THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (AND
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) NEED TO BE
	AMENDED.

	3) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ELEVATIONS MUST ACCURATELY SHOW
	THE BUILDING FEATURES THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
	SHEETS, TO INCLUDE DIMENSIONS (EX. GARAGE OPENINGS,
	FACADE WIDTHS, ETC.). FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NO DOORS
	SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE HARD LINE (NOT JUST COLOR) ELEVATIONS. **** THE
	GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT MATCH THE FLOOR
	PLAN. DOORS ARE EITHER NOT SHOWN OR THEY ARE IN THE
	WRONG LOCATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE SUPPORT COLUMN
	SEPARATING THE IN AND OUT LANES AT THE FERN STREET
	GARAGE ENTRANCE ARE NOT SHOWN.

	4) THE PROJECT IS REQUESTING NUMEROUS VARIANCES FROM
	THE DMP REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT PROVIDING ADEQUATE
	JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE THEM.
	THE NEW PORTION OF THE PROJECT OCCUPIES ALMOST THE
	ENTIRETY OF A CITY BLOCK AFTER THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
	ALLEY, SO THE REQUESTS ARE VARIANCES OF CONVENIENCE AND
	DO NOT FOSTER A DESIRABLE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
	SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IN THE DMP. **** STAFF WILL
	AWAIT THE UPDATED VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION SUBSEQUENT TO
	THE PPRC COMMENTS BEING SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED.

	5) CONDITION: VERIFICATION THAT THE 3-FOOT FPL UTILITY
	EASEMENT IS ABANDONED WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
	ZONING APPROVING THE BUILDING PERMIT.

	6) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR DESCRIBING HOW THE
	TRASH WILL BE SERVICED. WHILE THE TURNING DIAGRAM FOR
	THE COMPACTOR PICK UP WAS PROVIDED, NO TURNING DIAGRAMS
	WERE PROVIDED FOR THE OTHER FACILITIES.

	7) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE TPS LETTER FROM PALM
	BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING.

	8) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE EITHER VERIFICATION THAT THE
	PROPOSED TOWER IS NOT WITHIN THE FLIGHT PATH, OR A
	LETTER FROM THE FAA OF NO OBJECTION/APPROVAL OF THE
	HEIGHT.

	9) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE UPDATED SCAD APPROVAL
	FOR THE INCREASED UNIT COUNT.

	10) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FDOT
	PRE-APPLICATION LETTER. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE
	TRAFFIC STUDY THAT INCLUDES THE INTERSECTION OF
	QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND FERN STREET AND THE NEED FOR A
	NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE THAT WAS PROVIDED TO FDOT AS
	WELL AS THE FDOT RESPONSE TO THE TRAFFIC STUDY. THE
	FDOT RESPONSE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING THE
	APPLICATION FOR DAC SINCE IF A TURN LANE IS REQUIRED,
	THEN THE PLANS NEED TO CHANGE.

	11) THE BUILDING IS SHOWN EXTENDING PAST THE PROPERTY
	LINE ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
	PLANS, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. ONLY CERTAIN HORIZONTAL
	ENCROACHMENTS ARE PERMITTED.

	INCENTIVES

	12) CONDITION: PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF ANY BUILDING
	PERMITS, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE VERIFICATION TO
	THE PLANNING DIVISION THAT THE TDRS FOR THE FULL
	PROJECT HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED.

	13) REPEAT COMMENT: THIS PROJECT IS UTILIZING TDRS AND
	CONTAINS MORE THAT 25% OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN
	RESIDENTIAL USE. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE PROJECT
	COMPLIES WITH SECTION 94-134 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
	HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM.

	14) UPDATED COMMENT: AS PART OF RECEIVING THE TDRS AND
	FOLLOWING THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN HOUSING INCENTIVE
	PROGRAM, THE BUILDING THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC
	DESIGNATION LOCATED AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS
	REQUIRED TO BE INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IN A
	MANNER WHICH MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC
	STRUCTURE. WHILE THE RESUBMITTAL CHANGES HAVE BROUGHT
	THE BUILDING CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE, THE CITY'S HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER HAS REVIEWED THE RESUBMITTAL AND
	STILL DOES NOT FIND THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING IS
	INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS NOT A
	REQUIREMENT FOR WHICH A VARIANCE IS PERMITTED.

	A. THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM AND STAFF MET ON OCTOBER 12,
	2022 TO DISCUSS THE RECENT SUBMITTAL AND THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER PROVIDED WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO
	PROVIDE THE TRANSITION BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS. THIS
	SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE RESUBMITTAL AS THE CURRENT PLANS
	DO NOT COMPLY.
	B. AS STATED IN A PREVIOUS COMMENT, THE ELEVATION
	DRAWING DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. ONLY ONE DOOR
	(STAIRWAY EXIT) IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, WHILE
	MULTIPLE DOORS, WHICH WOULD COMPLY WITH THE INTEGRATION
	REQUIREMENT, ARE SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION.
	C. CONDITION: THE BUILDING AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
	SHALL BE PAINTED A COMPATIBLE COLOR TO THE NEW
	BUILDING.

	ZONING COMPLIANCE

	15) UPDATED COMMENT: PLEASE CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING FOR
	FAR (NOTE: SITE AREAS NOT UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE
	PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED ROW, SO ALL VALUES WILL CHANGE):

	A. THE MEZZANINE LEVEL STAIR AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
	COUNTED TOWARD THE FAR REQUIREMENT.
	B. THERE IS A DOOR TO ACCESS THE CORRIDOR FROM THE
	TOWNHOMES ON LEVELS 4 AND 6, WHICH WILL REQUIRE THE
	CORRIDOR AREA TO BE COUNTED AS FAR.

	16) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROJECT IS SHOWN AS CREATING A
	NEW INTERIOR PARCEL LINE BETWEEN THE EXISTING 401 SOUTH
	DIXIE BUILDING AND THE NEW BUILDING. THE QGD 10-25
	REQUIRES A 20-FOOT SETBACK ABOVE THE 8TH STORY (104
	FEET) FROM THE INTERIOR PARCEL LINE. THIS DOES NOT
	OCCUR ON EITHER PORTION OF THE NEW BUILDING THAT IS
	ABOVE THIS HEIGHT. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT
	THIS SETBACK VARIANCE.

	17) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
	PROPOSED ZERO SETBACK FROM THE INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES
	COMPLIES WITH NFPA REQUIREMENTS. **** THIS NEEDS TO BE
	VERIFIED AT TIME OF SITE PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
	THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE BUILT AS PROPOSED.

	18) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A
	SETBACK FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY LESS THAN THE REQUIRED
	27 FEET FOR THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6 AND THE 66 FEET
	FOR LEVEL 9 OF THE TOWER. **** THIS WAS NOT AMENDED ON
	THE CURRENT RESUBMITTAL; HOWEVER, STAFF IS AWAITING THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS BASED ON THE OCTOBER 12, 2022 MEETING
	TO RE-EVALUATE THIS COMMENT.

	19) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A
	SETBACK FROM GARDENIA LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 27 FEET
	FOR THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6. **** THIS WAS NOT
	AMENDED ON THE CURRENT RESUBMITTAL; HOWEVER, STAFF IS
	AWAITING THE RESUBMITTED PLANS BASED ON THE OCTOBER 12,
	2022 MEETING TO RE-EVALUATE THIS COMMENT.

	20) UPDATED COMMENT: THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TABLES, AND
	DIAGRAMS DO NOT SHOW THE LEVEL 8 AND 9 AMENITY AREAS.
	LEVEL 3 IS SHOWN EXCEEDING THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT. AN INCREASE IN THE BUILDING
	FOOTPRINT IS NOT PERMITTED AS A VARIANCE, SO THE
	FOOTPRINT AREA MUST BE REDUCED. (NOTE: SITE AREAS NOT
	UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED ROW, SO ALL
	VALUES WILL CHANGE) **** LEVEL 1 WILL ALSO NOT COMPLY
	WITH THE ROW AREA REMOVED.

	21) UPDATED COMMENT: THE TABLES WITH THE ACTIVE USE
	DIAGRAMS ARE INCORRECT. NOTE: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO
	SUPPORT WAIVERS FOR GROUND FLOOR OR LINER ACTIVE USES.

	A. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IS MISLABELED AS PRIMARY
	PEDESTRIAN ON THE TABLE. IT IS AN AVENUE, WHICH
	REQUIRES 60% ACTIVE USES AS IS CORRECTLY LISTED.
	B. STAFF WILL REVIEW THE ACTIVE USE PERCENTAGES UPON
	RESUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS.

	22) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE GARDENIA
	FRONTAGE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM PLANAR BREAK
	REQUIREMENTS. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT BUILDING
	DESIGNS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS.
	**** 20% PLANAR BREAK IS REQUIRED.

	A. GARDENIA GROUND FLOOR - THE PLANAR BREAK DIAGRAM
	INCORRECTLY DEPICTS THE BUILDING FRONTAGE THAT IS USED
	TO DETERMINE THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS. THE PLANAR
	BREAK IS BASED ON THE PROVIDED BUILDING FRONTAGE
	(387.17 FEET) NOT THE BUILDABLE FRONTAGE AS LISTED.
	B. THE TWO INSETS, GENERALLY 7 FEET IN WIDTH, DO NOT
	MEET THE MINIMUM 3-FOOT PLANAR BREAK DEPTH AND MAY NOT
	BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT
	ON ANY FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE THAT HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS
	DO NOT QUALIFY AS PLANAR BREAK DEPTH.
	C. PROVIDE THE DEPTH DIMENSION FROM THE EASTERN STAIRS
	ALONG GARDENIA TO THE MAIN BUILDING FA??ADE SO STAFF
	CAN VERIFY THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE 3-FOOT DEPTH
	MINIMUM. STAFF HAS SCALED THE DRAWINGS AND IT SEEMS TO
	BE AT LEAST 3 FEET IN DEPTH.
	D. GARDENIA GROUND FLOOR - 77.43 FEET REQUIRED; 63.33
	FEET PROVIDED. 14.1 FEET SHY
	E. GARDENIA GROUND FLOORS - 78.83 FEET REQUIRED; 70.75
	FEET PROVIDED. 8.1 FEET SHY

	23) UPDATED COMMENT: FACADES LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 3
	FEET FROM A SIDE LOT LINE AND NOT ABUTTING AN ADJACENT
	BUILDING SHALL INCORPORATE A PLANAR BREAK OR MULTIPLE
	PLANAR BREAKS A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES IN DEPTH. THE
	CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF ALL PLANAR BREAKS SHALL
	BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5% OF THE FACADE WIDTH.
	INFORMATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED
	ON THE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES THE DIMENSION TO THE NEW
	INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE 401 SOUTH
	DIXIE BUILDING AS WELL AS THE DEPTH AND LENGTH OF THE
	PLANAR BREAKS. PLEASE NOTE THAT HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS
	DO NOT QUALIFY AS PLANAR BREAK DEPTH. TABLE IV-4 DOES
	NOT SPECIFY A MINIMUM TOWER LENGTH WHERE PLANAR BREAKS
	ARE REQUIRED. THE 150-FOOT LENGTH CITED IN THE RESPONSE
	ONLY APPLIES TO THE GROUND FLOOR AND PODIUM.

	24) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS
	SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE DEPTHS;
	HOWEVER, THEY NEED TO BE LABELED AS TO WHAT THEY ARE SO
	THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE
	ALLOWANCES. **** ACKNOWLEDGED IS NOT AN ADEQUATE
	RESPONSE.

	A. AT THE GROUND FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS THAT
	HAVE A MINIMUM CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF
	THE BUILDING FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS IS NOT
	SHOWN ON ANY ELEVATION, TABLE OR PLAN VIEW.
	B. PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THE ENTRY CANOPY WAS REMOVED. IT
	IS UNCLEAR ON THE PLANS. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON
	ITS HEIGHT FROM GRADE.

	25) THE SETBACK ALONG GARDENIA STREET DOES NOT MEET THE
	MINIMUM 12 FEET REQUIRED FROM THE BACK OF CURB. THE
	ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SHOWS THE 12-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE
	FRONT OF THE CURB AND THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE SETBACK
	AT 11.2 FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB.

	26) THE PORTION OF THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING NORTH
	OF THE UTILITY VAULT ROOM ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
	DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FEET REQUIRED FROM THE
	BACK OF CURB. THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SHOWS THE 12-FOOT
	DIMENSION FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB TO THE INSIDE WALL
	AND THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE 12-FOOT DIMENSION FROM THE
	FACE OF THE CURB TO THE EXTERIOR WALL. NEITHER MEETS
	THE MINIMUM SETBACK.

	STREETSCAPE

	27) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TRANSFORMERS AND SWITCH
	CABINETS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS
	ADJACENT TO SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY ARE NOT PERMITTED.
	THESE ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN YOUR STREETSCAPE AREA.
	NOTE: THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
	**** NOTE: THERE IS AN UNUSED AREA ADJACENT TO THE
	TRASH ROOM IN THE PARKING AREA THAT SHOULD BE USED FOR
	AN ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR THESE ITEMS.

	28) INADEQUATE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT
	THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
	94-113. - LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THIS
	INCLUDES:

	A. REPEAT COMMENT: EXTERIOR LIGHTING - NOT PROVIDED TO
	BACK OF CURB. **** THIS NEEDS TO BE FOR THE ENTIRE
	SITE, INCLUDING 401 SOUTH DIXIE, AND COMPLY WITH THE
	REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113.B.
	B. REPEAT COMMENT: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
	REQUIREMENTS - NOT PROVIDED FOR DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.
	C. UPDATED COMMENT: STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	I. THE STREETLIGHTS DO NOT MEET THE CITY STANDARD FOR
	HEIGHT OR STYLE.
	II. NO CROSS SECTIONS PROVIDE TO VERIFY THAT THE
	SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS ARE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS
	(CROSS SECTION LOCATION TAGS WERE NOT PROVIDED FOR
	STAFF TO VERIFY WHERE THE CROSS SECTION IS).
	III. THE STREET TREES ALONG FERN STREET EXCEED THE
	MAXIMUM SPACING OF 30 FEET ON CENTER. STAFF WILL NOT
	SUPPORT A VARIANCE TO THIS REQUIREMENT. THE AREAS ON
	EITHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE AND THE BULB OUT
	BY THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION FAIL TO MEET THIS
	STANDARD.

	29) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
	BICYCLE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEW BUILDING; HOWEVER, THE
	TABLE DID NOT INCLUDE THE REQUIRED STREETSCAPE BICYCLE
	REQUIREMENTS AND HOW THIS IS COMPLIED WITH.

	30) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TYPE OF
	BICYCLE RACK PROPOSED. THE PLANS DO NOT MEET THE
	MINIMUM DIMENSIONS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PROVIDED
	INSTALLATION DETAIL. THE PLANS MUST SHOW THE CORRECT
	DIMENSIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORIENTATION OF THE
	BICYCLE RACKS DOES NOT PERMIT CONVENIENT PARKING OF THE
	BICYCLES.

	A. THERE ARE THREE CITY INSTALLED BICYCLE RACKS THAT
	EXIST ALONG FERN STREET IN FRONT OF THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING THAT NO LONGER APPEAR ON THE PLANS. THESE
	SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED AND COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE
	STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENT.
	B. THE TWO RACKS SHOWN AT GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE ARE
	NOT LOCATED ADJACENT TO A BUILDING ENTRANCE. THESE (IF
	MEETING THE REQUIRED NUMBERS) SHALL BE PLACED CLOSER TO
	A BUILDING ENTRANCE.
	C. THE TWO RACKS SHOWN IN FRONT OF 401 SOUTH DIXIE ARE
	LOCATED DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF A BUILDING ENTRANCE AND
	NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
	D. THE TWO RACKS AT THE CORNER OF GARDENIA AND
	QUADRILLE SHALL BE RELOCATED TO AN AREA ALONG QUADRILLE
	THAT IS VISIBLE FROM THE ENTRANCE TO THE RETAIL.

	31) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THE EXISTING BICYCLE LANE
	ALONG FERN STREET. THE DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE TWO NEW
	BULB OUTS ON EITHER OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE GARAGE
	BLOCK THE BICYCLE LANE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.

	32) CONDITION: MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED
	FOR ALL LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	IRRIGATION.

	DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE

	33) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE QUADRILLE
	GARDEN DISTRICT IS FOR PROJECTS TO HAVE A HIGH
	PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING AND TREE CANOPY. THE PROJECT
	AS PRESENTED DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET EITHER ONE OF
	THESE STANDARDS. **** THE OPEN SPACE TABLES SHOW THAT
	THE VEGETATION MINIMUMS ARE NOT MET, WHICH DIRECTLY
	CONTRADICTS THE DISTRICT DESIGN INTENT. STAFF WILL NOT
	SUPPORT A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE OPEN SPACE VEGETATED
	AREA MINIMUMS.

	34) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED LOADING AREA ENTRANCE
	ALONG GARDENIA IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE PROPOSED
	LOBBY ENTRANCE OF THE APPROVED AC MARRIOT HOTEL. THE
	PROPOSED DESIGN PRESENTS A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO AN
	APPROVED NEIGHBORING PROJECT. THE RESPONSE STATES THAT
	THE ELEVATION IN THIS AREA IS STILL BEING WORKED ON.

	PARKING

	35) BASED ON THE CHANGES DISCUSSED AT THE OCTOBER 12,
	2022 MEETING AND NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, STAFF WILL NOT
	BE PERFORMING A FULL PARKING REVIEW UNTIL THE UPDATED
	PLANS ARE SUBMITTED.

	36) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
	REMOVES ALL OF THE CURRENT SURFACE PARKING FOR THE 401
	SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING (NOTE - PART OF THE REQUIRED
	PARKING WAS ALREADY SOLD OFF, CREATING A PARKING
	DEFICIENCY, WHICH VIOLATES THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS). PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE WITH
	A BREAKDOWN OF THE USES WITHIN THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING AND THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.

	37) CONDITION: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMIT THAT
	REMOVES PARKING FOR THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING, A
	PARKING PLAN THAT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THAT THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED PARKING FOR 401 SOUTH DIXIE IS PROVIDED MUST
	BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION.
	THE PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE
	REGULATIONS.

	38) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLES NEED TO PROVIDE
	LINE ITEMS FOR TANDEM AND COMPACT SPACES.

	39) PLEASE PROVIDE THE ANGLE FOR THE PARKING SPACES ON
	THE LEVEL 1 GARAGE SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE
	AISLE WIDTHS MEET CODE MINIMUMS.

	40) FOR RESIDENTIAL USES, TANDEM PARKING MAY COUNT AS
	TWO SPACES, PROVIDED BOTH SPACES ARE DEDICATED TO THE
	SAME RESIDENTIAL UNIT, AND A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS
	RECORDED ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND RECORDED IN THE
	PUBLIC RECORDS. THE TANDEM SPACES ARE NOT PERMITTED TO
	BE COMBINED WITH GUEST SPACES. PLEASE NOTE, IF CODE
	COMPLIANT TANDEM SPACES ARE PROVIDED, THEY MAY NOT
	INCLUDE WHEEL STOPS BETWEEN THE SPACES.

	41) PLEASE CONSIDER INCLUDING EV CHARGING SPACES FOR
	ALL THE USER GROUPS. THIS SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE PREWIRING
	THE GARAGE AND INCLUDING EXTRA AREA FOR PANELS IN THE
	ELECTRIC ROOM FOR FUTURE EV INSTALLATIONS.

	42) THE PARKING SPACE DETAIL FOR REGULAR PARKING
	INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE STRIPES AS BLUE, NOT WHITE.
	PLEASE CORRECT.

	43) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR MARKING THE GUEST
	PARKING ON THE PLANS. HOW DO GUESTS ACCESS THE GUEST
	SPACES BEHIND THE GATE?

	44) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE DEAD END PARKING ROWS ON
	MULTIPLE LEVELS, WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A
	TURNAROUND SPACE OR IF ALL SPACES ON THAT LEVEL ARE
	ASSIGNED PARKING. **** THE RESPONSE STATES THAT ALL
	DEAD END ROWS HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE. THIS DOES NOT
	OCCUR ON ANY OF THE PARKING LEVELS WITH DEAD END
	PARKING ROWS.

	45) UPDATED COMMENT: ONE EXISTING METERED ON-STREET
	PARKING SPACES ON FERN STREET IS SHOWN AS BEING
	REMOVED. YOU NEED TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM THE THE
	CITY'S PARKING ADMINISTRATOR OF HIS APPROVAL TO
	PERMANENTLY REMOVE THE PARKING SPACE AND ANY
	CONDITIONS, INCLUDING FEE, THAT ARE REQUIRED PRIOR
	SCHEDULING A HEARING BEFORE THE DAC. **** PLEASE NOTE
	THAT THE RESPONSE INCORRECTLY STATES THAT THERE ARE
	THREE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ON SOUTH DIXIE. THE
	PLANS CORRECTLY SHOW THE TWO SPACES.

	46) UPDATED COMMENT: THE RESPONSE STATES THAT THE
	ON-STREET AREA IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
	ENTRANCE WILL BE A RESIDENTIAL DROP OFF; HOWEVER, THE
	RESPONSE TO THE PREVIOUS COMMENT STATES THAT THERE WILL
	BE FIVE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, WHICH IS ALSO SHOWN ON
	THE PLANS. BOTH CANNOT OCCUR. THE SPACES WILL EITHER BE
	METERED PARKING SPACES OR THE CITY'S PARKING
	ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL OF THEIR REMOVAL, WITH ANY
	CONDITIONS, MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
	HEARING BEFORE THE DAC.

	47) REPEAT COMMENT: NONE OF THE DRIVEWAY OPENING COMPLY
	WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES,
	EXITS, AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS
	MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB.

	A. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE TRUCK MANEUVERING MAY
	REQUIRE AN OPENING GREATER THAN 25 FEET; HOWEVER, STAFF
	IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE REDUCED OPENING WIDTH.
	B. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A WAIVER TO THE
	MAIN BUILDING ENTRY DRIVE WHICH IS SHOWN AROUND 40 FEET
	ON FERN STREET. FERN STREET IS CLASSIFIED AS A PRIMARY
	PEDESTRIAN STREET. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WIDTH DOES NOT
	PROMOTE A FAVORABLE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.

	48) REPEAT COMMENT: A PORTION OF THE ENTRANCE RAMP IS
	GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT SLOPE, WHICH REQUIRES A
	BREAK-OVER TRANSITION. **** THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WITH
	THESE PLANS SO THAT VERIFICATION IS PROVIDED THAT THE
	PLANS CONTINUE TO MEET CODE WHEN THE BREAK-OVER
	TRANSITION IS PROVIDED.

	49) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BICYCLE ROOMS SHOWN IN THE
	PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A LARGER SCALE WITH
	DIMENSIONS AND THE SPECIFIC RACK SYSTEM THAT IS
	PROPOSED.

	50) CONDITION: THE BUILD OUT OF THE RETAIL AREA
	REQUIRES THE PROVISION OF A SHOWER AND CHANGING
	FACILITY.

	51) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TRUCK TURN PLANS MUST NOT ONLY
	SHOW THE AC MARRIOT CHANGES TO THE GARDENIA
	RIGHT-OF-WAY BUT ALSO A SHEET THAT SHOWS THE TURNING
	MOVEMENTS FOR THE EXISTING GARDENIA RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE
	PLAN FOR THE FUTURE CONFIGURATION OF GARDENIA SHOWS THE
	TRUCKS CLIPPING THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, WHICH DOES
	NOT FUNCTION IF CARS ARE PARKED IN THE SPACES.

	52) SHOW TRAFFIC CONTROL AIDES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
	FERN STREET RAMP AND THE SOUTH DIXIE EXIT TO STOP
	TRAFFIC PRIOR TO THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING LOCATIONS AND
	AT THE SOUTH DIXIE ENTRANCE TO WARN DRIVERS TO SLOW
	WHEN ENTERING THE GARAGE DUE TO THE TWO PARKING SPACES
	THAT BACK AT THE ENTRANCE.

	OPEN SPACE

	53) THE RESPONSE STATES THAT THE OPEN SPACE TABLES WILL
	BE UPDATED IN THE NEXT SUBMITTAL. AS SUCH STAFF DID NOT
	SPEND TIME REVIEWING THE CURRENT TABLES TO VERIFY
	COMPLIANCE.

	54) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSION
	(ELEVATION TAGS) OF ALL FEATURES ABOVE LEVEL 9 IN A
	PLAN VIEW.

	55) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TABLES ON
	SHEETS A0.01 AND A0.09 SHOW DIFFERENT VALUES. (NOTE:
	SITE AREAS NOT UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE PREVIOUSLY
	DEDICATED ROW, SO ALL VALUES WILL CHANGE) ALL TABLES
	NEED TO SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	09-08-2022	Time	13:38	Rev Time	4.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	09-08-2022	Time	08:32	Sent To

Notes

2022-09-08 13:39:06	CASE NO. FSPR 22-08 1ST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
	RESIDENCES OF PALM BEACH WEST
	401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	(3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG AND
	.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON
	THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF
	INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
	THE NOVEMBER 9, 2022 DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE MEETING.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT RESUBMITTALS MAY BE SCHEDULED FOR AN
	ADDITIONAL PPRC MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY NOVEMBER 8,
	2022), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
	THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
	ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS
	WERE NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL
	BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF
	THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($400).

	1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS PROPERTY ALONG FERN
	STREET AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY THAT WERE ACQUIRED BY
	MAINTENANCE MAPS BY THE CITY AND FDOT, RESPECTIVELY.
	THIS PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE OVERALL
	PROPERTY CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE, INCLUDING FAR AND
	OPEN SPACE. ALL DATA TABLES AND PLANS NEED TO BE
	UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.

	2) REPEAT COMMENT: APPENDIX A OF THE TRANSPORTATION
	ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND TABLE X-1
	CONTAINED IN SECTION 94-305.D OR THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE THE LIST OF REQUIRED
	THOROUGHFARE RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACKS. THE TABLES REQUIRE
	A ROADWAY SETBACK OF 100 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF
	QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN ADDITION TO THE SETBACKS
	REQUIRED BY THE ZONING DISTRICT. A PORTION OF THE
	BUILDING ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATION REQUIREMENT. **** REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE
	LANGUAGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE ZONING AND
	LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WERE A SCRIVENER'S ERROR,
	THE LANGUAGE IS IN BOTH DOCUMENTS. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT
	CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE OPTIONS ARE
	1) AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR 2) THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (AND
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) NEED TO BE
	AMENDED.

	3) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ELEVATIONS MUST ACCURATELY SHOW
	THE BUILDING FEATURES THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
	SHEETS, TO INCLUDE DIMENSIONS (EX. GARAGE OPENINGS,
	FACADE WIDTHS, ETC.). FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NO DOORS
	SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE HARD LINE (NOT JUST COLOR) ELEVATIONS. THE
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS (EITHER SET) SHALL CALL OUT THE
	MATERIALS BEING USED ON THE BUILDING. THIS WILL
	FACILITATE THE HISTORIC COMPATIBILITY REVIEW.

	4) THE PROJECT IS REQUESTING NUMEROUS VARIANCES FROM
	THE DMP REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT PROVIDING ADEQUATE
	JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE THEM.
	THE NEW PORTION OF THE PROJECT OCCUPIES ALMOST THE
	ENTIRETY OF A CITY BLOCK AFTER THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
	ALLEY, SO THE REQUESTS ARE VARIANCES OF CONVENIENCE AND
	DO NOT FOSTER A DESIRABLE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
	SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IN THE DMP. **** STAFF WILL
	AWAIT THE UPDATED VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION SUBSEQUENT TO
	THE PPRC COMMENTS BEING SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED.

	5) CONDITION: VERIFICATION THAT THE 3-FOOT FPL UTILITY
	EASEMENT IS ABANDONED WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
	ZONING APPROVING THE BUILDING PERMIT.

	6) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ONLY DUMPSTERS FOR THE PROJECT
	ARE SHOWN IN THE LOADING DOCK AREA. ARE THESE THREE
	DUMPSTERS FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT? PROVIDE HOW THEY WILL
	BE SERVICED, TO INCLUDE TURNING DIAGRAMS TO SHOW HOW
	THEY ARE PICKED UP.

	7) WHILE THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE TCEA, IT STILL
	REQUIRES A TPS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
	ENGINEERING.

	8) PROVIDE EITHER VERIFICATION THAT THE PROPOSED TOWER
	IS NOT WITHIN THE FLIGHT PATH, OR A LETTER FROM THE FAA
	OF NO OBJECTION/APPROVAL OF THE HEIGHT.

	9) PROVIDE THE UPDATED SCAD APPROVAL FOR THE INCREASED
	UNIT COUNT.

	10) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FDOT PRE-APPLICATION
	LETTER. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT
	INCLUDES THE INTERSECTION OF QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND
	FERN STREET AND THE NEED FOR A NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN
	LANE THAT WAS PROVIDED TO FDOT AS WELL AS THE FDOT
	RESPONSE TO THE TRAFFIC STUDY. THE FDOT RESPONSE IS
	REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING THE APPLICATION FOR
	DAC SINCE IF A TURN LANE IS REQUIRED, THEN THE PLANS
	NEED TO CHANGE.

	INCENTIVES

	11) CONDITION: PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF ANY BUILDING
	PERMITS, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE VERIFICATION TO
	THE PLANNING DIVISION THAT THE TDRS FOR THE FULL
	PROJECT HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED.

	12) REPEAT COMMENT: THIS PROJECT IS UTILIZING TDRS AND
	CONTAINS MORE THAT 25% OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN
	RESIDENTIAL USE. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE PROJECT
	COMPLIES WITH SECTION 94-134 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
	HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM.

	13) UPDATED COMMENT: AS PART OF RECEIVING THE TDRS AND
	FOLLOWING THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN HOUSING INCENTIVE
	PROGRAM, THE BUILDING THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC
	DESIGNATION LOCATED AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS
	REQUIRED TO BE INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IN A
	MANNER WHICH MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC
	STRUCTURE. WHILE THE RESUBMITTAL CHANGES HAVE BROUGHT
	THE BUILDING CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE, THE CITY'S HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER HAS REVIEWED THE RESUBMITTAL AND
	STILL DOES NOT FIND THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING IS
	INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS NOT A
	REQUIREMENT FOR WHICH A VARIANCE IS PERMITTED.

	A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE SCALE OF THE NEW BUILDING DOES
	NOT PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE TRANSITION WHERE IT IS ADJACENT
	TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A
	CONTEXTUAL SETBACK RELATIONSHIP WITH THE 401 BUILDING
	ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, THE PROPOSED BUILDING SHOULD
	BE PULLED BACK TO INTEGRATE AND ALIGN WITH THE 401
	BUILDING'S FACADE.
	B. THE SLATS AND LOUVERS THAT ARE SHOWN ALONG THE
	FA?ADE OF THE NEW BUILDING ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
	AND ON THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDES FACING THE 401 SOUTH
	DIXIE HIGHWAY BUILDING SHALL BE VERTICALLY ORIENTED TO
	MIMIC THE HISTORICAL LOUVERS THAT WERE IN THE 401 SOUTH
	DIXIE HIGHWAY BUILDING.
	C. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE RHYTHM OF PUNCHED OPENINGS
	ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, THE GROUND FLOOR MECHANICAL
	ROOM DOORS (UTILITY VAULT AND DAS ROOM) SHALL BE
	ORIENTED TO SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND SHALL BE CLEAR
	GLAZED.
	D. THE BUILDING AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SHALL BE
	PAINTED A COMPATIBLE COLOR TO THE NEW BUILDING.

	ZONING COMPLIANCE

	14) PLEASE CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING FOR FAR (NOTE: SITE
	AREAS NOT UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED
	ROW, SO ALL VALUES WILL CHANGE):

	A. REPEAT COMMENT: WHAT OCCURS IN THE BOH SPACE ON THE
	MEZZANINE LEVEL AND WHY IS NO SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN FOR
	THIS AREA?
	B. PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE CORRIDORS THAT ARE NOT
	BEING SHOWN AS COUNTED TOWARD FAR ARE NATURALLY
	VENTILATED.
	C. WHAT IS THE ENCLOSED AREA IN THE NORTHEAST PORTION
	OF LEVEL 6 BETWEEN THE TWO ADA SPACES. PROVIDE THE
	SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THIS AREA AS PART OF THE FAR IF IT
	IS ENCLOSED SPACE.

	15) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROJECT IS SHOWN AS CREATING A
	NEW INTERIOR PARCEL LINE BETWEEN THE EXISTING 401 SOUTH
	DIXIE BUILDING AND THE NEW BUILDING. THE QGD 10-25
	REQUIRES A 20-FOOT SETBACK ABOVE THE 8TH STORY (104
	FEET) FROM THE INTERIOR PARCEL LINE. THIS DOES NOT
	OCCUR ON EITHER PORTION OF THE NEW BUILDING THAT IS
	ABOVE THIS HEIGHT. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT
	THIS SETBACK VARIANCE

	16) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
	PROPOSED ZERO SETBACK FROM THE INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES
	COMPLIES WITH NFPA REQUIREMENTS. **** THIS NEEDS TO BE
	VERIFIED AT TIME OF SITE PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
	THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE BUILT AS PROPOSED.

	17) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A
	SETBACK FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY LESS THAN THE REQUIRED
	27 FEET FOR THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6 AND THE 66 FEET
	FOR LEVEL 9 OF THE TOWER.

	18) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A
	SETBACK FROM GARDENIA LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 27 FEET
	FOR THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6.

	19) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TABLES SHOW
	DIFFERING VALUES FOR THE PROVIDED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
	LEVELS 2, 3, 7 AND 25 0N SHEETS A0.01 AND A0.07.
	ADDITIONALLY, IT APPEARS THAT THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	FOOTPRINT IS NOT INCLUDED ON ANY OF THE TABLES. STAFF
	CANNOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITHOUT ACCURATE INFORMATION.
	(NOTE: SITE AREAS NOT UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE PREVIOUSLY
	DEDICATED ROW, SO ALL VALUES WILL CHANGE):

	20) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS ARE
	INCORRECT. NOTE: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT
	WAIVERS FOR GROUND FLOOR OR LINER ACTIVE USES.

	A. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 80% GROUND
	FLOOR ACTIVE USE, NOT 60% AS LISTED.
	B. SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 60% GROUND
	FLOOR ACTIVE USE, NOT 80% AS LISTED.

	21) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE GARDENIA
	FRONTAGE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM PLANAR BREAK
	REQUIREMENTS. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT BUILDING
	DESIGNS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS.
	**** 20% PLANAR BREAK IS REQUIRED.

	22) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
	HORIZONTAL OFFSET FROM THE WALL FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL
	TREATMENT OF THE INTERNAL TOWER LOT LINES. PLEASE
	PROVIDE THE VERTICAL LENGTH OF THE WALL AND THE BREAK
	SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PLANAR BREAK IS AT LEAST
	5% OF THE FACADE WIDTH.

	23) UPDATED COMMENT: THERE ARE HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS
	SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE DEPTHS;
	HOWEVER, THEY NEED TO BE LABELED AS TO WHAT THEY ARE SO
	THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE
	ALLOWANCES.

	A. AT THE GROUND FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS THAT
	HAVE A MINIMUM CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF
	THE BUILDING FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS IS NOT
	SHOWN ON ANY ELEVATION.
	B. WHILE DIMENSIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED, THE CANOPY AT
	THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENTRY SCALES TO EXCEED THE
	20-FOOT MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL PROJECTION. NO INFORMATION
	WAS PROVIDED ON ITS HEIGHT FROM GRADE.

	24) UPDATED COMMENT: NEITHER THE UPPER ROOF LEVEL PLAN
	NOR CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS SHOW THE HEIGHT OF THE
	ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.
	ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED TO BE SCREENED
	TO ITS FULL HEIGHT..

	STREETSCAPE

	25) REPEAT COMMENT: SINCE THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE 401
	SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING, THE STREETSCAPE ADJACENT TO THIS
	BUILDING MUST BE INCLUDED. ANY AREAS WHERE THERE ARE
	CURRENT DEFICIENCIES MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE CURRENT DMP REQUIREMENTS. **** NOT ALL
	ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, NOR ARE THE PLANS SHOWN
	COMPLAINT WITH CURRENT REQUIREMENTS.

	26) THE TRANSFORMERS AND SWITCH CABINETS SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS ADJACENT TO SOUTH DIXIE
	HIGHWAY ARE NOT PERMITTED. THESE ARE NOT PERMITTED
	WITHIN YOUR STREETSCAPE AREA. NOTE: THIS IS NOT SHOWN
	ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.

	27) INADEQUATE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT
	THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
	94-113. - LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THIS
	INCLUDES:

	A. REPEAT COMMENT: EXTERIOR LIGHTING - NOT PROVIDED TO
	BACK OF CURB.
	B. REPEAT COMMENT: SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
	REQUIREMENTS - NOT PROVIDED FOR DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.
	C. UPDATED COMMENT: STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. -
	STREETLIGHTS AND STREET FURNITURE NOT SHOWN, NO
	IMPROVEMENT TO THE EXISTING PALM TRAN STOP SHOWN, NO
	BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (WHAT IS SHOWN DOES NOT MEET
	CODE), NO CROSS SECTIONS PROVIDE TO VERIFY THAT THE
	SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS ARE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS
	(CROSS SECTION LOCATION TAGS WERE NOT PROVIDED FOR
	STAFF TO VERIFY WHERE THE CROSS SECTION IS).

	28) CONDITION: MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED
	FOR ALL LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	IRRIGATION.

	DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE

	29) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE QUADRILLE
	GARDEN DISTRICT IS FOR PROJECTS TO HAVE A HIGH
	PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING AND TREE CANOPY. THE PROJECT
	AS PRESENTED DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET EITHER ONE OF
	THESE STANDARDS. ADDITIONALLY, GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
	IS ENCOURAGED AS ACTIVE USE LINERS. THIS INCORPORATION
	OF ADDITIONAL GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL WOULD ALLEVIATE
	THE NEED FOR THE VARIANCES THAT THE CURRENT PLAN
	REQUIRES.

	30) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PROPOSED LOADING AREA ENTRANCE
	ALONG GARDENIA IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE PROPOSED
	LOBBY ENTRANCE OF THE APPROVED AC MARRIOT HOTEL. THE
	PROPOSED DESIGN PRESENTS A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO AN
	APPROVED NEIGHBORING PROJECT. **** THE RESPONSE
	MENTIONS OVERHEAD COVER AND FA?ADE TREATMENT AT THIS
	AREA, NEITHER OF WHICH ARE CLEARLY DEPICTED ON THE
	COLOR ELEVATIONS.

	PARKING

	31) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
	REMOVES ALL OF THE CURRENT SURFACE PARKING FOR THE 401
	SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING (NOTE - PART OF THE REQUIRED
	PARKING WAS ALREADY SOLD OFF, CREATING A PARKING
	DEFICIENCY, WHICH VIOLATES THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS). PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE WITH
	A BREAKDOWN OF THE USES WITHIN THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING AND THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.
	PROVIDE HOW THESE PARKING SPACES WILL BE ACCOMMODATED
	WITHIN THE NEW PROJECT'S PARKING GARAGES. THIS SHALL
	INCLUDE SHOWING A CODE COMPLIANT ADA ROUTE TO THE
	BUILDING FROM THE REQUIRED ADA PARKING SPACES. **** THE
	REQUIRED PARKING TABLE IS NOT PROVIDED AND THE ADA
	ROUTE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH STANDARDS - SEE BUILDING
	COMMENTS. PROVIDE THE LENGTH OF THE ANGLED ADA PARKING
	SPACES ON THE AISLE SIDE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE
	MINIMUM LENGTH OF 18 FEET.

	32) REPEAT COMMENT: WHERE WILL THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR
	40 1 SOUTH DIXIE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
	PROJECT? **** ACKNOWLEDGED IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE
	RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT.

	33) REPEAT COMMENT: NO PARKING TABLES WERE PROVIDED FOR
	THE NEW BUILDING. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO ENUMERATE
	THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING FOR THE VARIOUS USER
	GROUPS, TO INCLUDE THE ADA AND TANDEM SPACES. STAFF IS
	UNABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE PROVIDED PARKING COMPLIES
	WITH THE MINIMUM/MAXIMUM DMP REQUIREMENTS.

	34) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE
	PARKING ROWS AND SPACES WITHIN THE GARAGE. **** PARKING
	SPACE DEPTH NOT PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN WALL.

	35) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE ADA ROUTE FOR THE ADA
	PARKING SPACES TO THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES. IT APPEARS
	THAT A NUMBER OF THE SPACES MAY NOT BE THE CLOSEST
	PARKING SPACES TO THE ENTRY POINTS AND THAT THERE ARE
	SPACES THAT REQUIRE USERS TO WALK BEHIND OTHER CARS TO
	GET TO ENTRANCES. **** SEE BUILDING COMMENT.

	36) PLEASE CONSIDER INCLUDING EV CHARGING SPACES FOR
	ALL THE USER GROUPS. THIS SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE PREWIRING
	THE GARAGE AND INCLUDING EXTRA AREA FOR PANELS IN THE
	ELECTRIC ROOM FOR FUTURE EV INSTALLATIONS. **** SEE
	BUILDING COMMENT REGARDING EV FOR ADA SPACES.

	37) REMOVE THE PARKING STACK DETAIL FROM THE PLANS
	SINCE THEY WILL NOT BE USED.

	38) REPEAT COMMENT: THE GUEST PARKING IS REQUIRED TO BE
	CLEARLY MARKED ON THE PLANS.

	39) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE DEAD END PARKING ROWS ON
	MULTIPLE LEVELS, WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A TURN
	AROUND SPACE OR IF ALL SPACES ON THAT LEVEL ARE
	ASSIGNED PARKING.

	40) UPDATED COMMENT: THERE ARE CURRENTLY METERED
	ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ON FERN STREET. PLEASE
	DELINEATE HOW MANY ARE TO REMAIN. YOU WILL NEED TO
	CONTACT THE CITY'S PARKING ADMINISTRATOR AND PROVIDE
	HIS APPROVAL TO PERMANENTLY REMOVE THE PARKING SPACES.
	THIS NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR SCHEDULING A HEARING
	BEFORE THE DAC.

	41) UPDATED COMMENT: PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT IS PLANNED TO
	OCCUR IN THE ON-STREET AREA IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL
	BUILDING ENTRANCE. **** IN THE CURRENT ON-STREET
	PARKING AREA.

	42) UPDATED COMMENT: NONE OF THE DRIVEWAY OPENING
	COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT CURB CUTS, PARKING
	ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN
	25 FEET AS MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB.

	A. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE TRUCK MANEUVERING MAY
	REQUIRE AN OPENING GREATER THAN 25 FEET; HOWEVER, STAFF
	IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE REDUCED OPENING WIDTH.
	B. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A WAIVER TO THE
	MAIN BUILDING ENTRY DRIVE WHICH IS SHOWN AROUND 40 FEET
	ON FERN STREET. FERN STREET IS CLASSIFIED AS A PRIMARY
	PEDESTRIAN STREET. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WIDTH DOES NOT
	PROMOTE A FAVORABLE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.

	43) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY
	THAT NOT LESS THAN 20 LINEAR FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
	CAR QUEUING, SHALL OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE LOT, AND SHALL
	NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A PUBLIC
	SIDEWALK. **** THIS IS AT THE SOUTH DIXIE ENTRANCE
	WHERE CARS ARE BACKING INTO THE TRAVEL LANE.

	44) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
	PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRANCES FACING A STREET FRONTAGE
	TREAT THE INTERIOR PORTION OF THE GARAGE ENTRY TO A
	DEPTH OF AT LEAST 20 FEET FROM THE BUILDING FACADE.
	TREATMENT MAY INCLUDE, BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO,
	STUCCO OR PLASTER, FINISHED AND PAINTED COMPARABLE TO A
	HABITABLE SPACE. ALL MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND
	PLUMBING SYSTEMS SHALL BE COVERED OR SCREENED. **** NOT
	PROVIDED AT THE SOUTH DIXIE GARAGE ENTRANCE/EXIT.

	45) REPEAT COMMENT: A PORTION OF THE ENTRANCE RAMP IS
	GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT SLOPE, WHICH REQUIRES A
	BREAK-OVER TRANSITION. **** THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN WITH
	THESE PLANS SO THAT VERIFICATION IS PROVIDED THAT THE
	PLANS CONTINUE TO MEET CODE WHEN THE BREAK-OVER
	TRANSITION IS PROVIDED.

	46) REPEAT COMMENT: NO BICYCLE PARKING TABLE SHOWING
	PROPOSED AND REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IS PROVIDED. THIS
	SHALL INCLUDE BREAK DOWNS FOR THE COMMERCIAL AND
	RESIDENTIAL USERS.

	47) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BICYCLE ROOMS SHOWN IN THE
	PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A LARGER SCALE WITH
	DIMENSIONS AND THE SPECIFIC RACK SYSTEM THAT IS
	PROPOSED.

	48) REPEAT COMMENT: THE STREETSCAPE BICYCLE PARKING
	SHALL BE DIMENSIONED ON THE PLANS AS WELL AS SHOWN ON A
	DIMENSIONED BICYCLE DETAIL, WHICH INCLUDES THE SPECIFIC
	RACK USED.

	49) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINS
	MORE THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, SO A
	SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED. ****
	EITHER A SHARED FACILITY IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS THAT
	WILL GO TO DAC, OR A CONDITION WILL BE ADDED THAT AT
	THE TIME OF THE BUILD OUT OF THE RETAIL AREA (GROCERY
	STORE) THE FACILITY WILL BE PROVIDED.

	50) UPDATED COMMENT: THE TRUCK TURN PLANS MUST SHOW THE
	FULL EXTENT OF THE GARDENIA RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS SHALL
	INCLUDE ONE DRAWING SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITION WITH
	THE LOCATION OF THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND
	SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND ONE SHOWING THE PROPOSED
	AC MARRIOT CHANGES TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE TURN PLANS
	MUST VERIFY THAT THAT PROPOSED TRUCK MOVEMENTS DO NOT
	CONFLICT EXISTING OR PROPOSED CHANGES TO GARDENIA. ****
	THE TURN PLAN FOR THE EXISTING STREET CONFIGURATION OF
	GARDENIA STREET. THE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE CONFIGURATION
	OF GARDENIA SHOWS THE TRUCKS DRIVING THROUGH THE
	PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, WHICH DOES NOT FUNCTION IF
	CARS ARE PARKED IN THE SPACES.

	OPEN SPACE

	51) REPEAT COMMENT: SINCE THE PROJECT CONTAINS MORE
	THAN 80,000 SQUARE FEET OF AREA, THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
	IS REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING
	ENTRANCE AND CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE SINGLE OPEN SPACE.
	THE PROPOSED BIFURCATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT MEET
	THIS REQUIREMENT. **** STAFF DOES NOT CURRENTLY SUPPORT
	THE BIFURCATING OF THE OPEN SPACE, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE
	EASTERN AREA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ANY OF THE OPEN SPACE
	CLASSIFICATIONS. THIS DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AN ITEM THAT
	CAN GET A VARIANCE.

	52) REPEAT COMMENT: PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL NOT BE
	LOCATED ADJOINING CURB CUTS, DRIVEWAYS, OR PARKING
	ACCESS RAMPS, EXCEPT OUTDOOR PASSENGER DROP-OFF AREAS.
	THE PROPOSED GARDEN COURTYARD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	THESE REQUIREMENTS.

	53) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE TABULAR INFORMATION TO
	SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MEETS THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE IV-7 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS BASED
	ON THE OPEN SPACE TYPE. VISUALLY, IT DOES NOT APPEAR
	THE STANDARDS ARE MET. **** THE TWO SEPARATE GROUND
	LEVEL OPEN SPACES MAY NOT BE COMBINED ON THE TABLE. IF
	THEY CAN BE SPLIT, EACH NEEDS TO STAND ON ITS OWN FOR
	THE REQUIREMENTS. EACH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA NEEDS TO
	STAND ON ITS OWN AS WELL.

	54) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE SITE
	PLAN CONFLICT ON WHAT IS SHOWN FOR THE LEVEL 9 ROOFTOP
	AMENITY AREA. ONCE THE FINAL PROPOSAL IS SHOWN ON ALL
	PLANS, STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. PROVIDE
	THE HEIGHT DIMENSION OF ALL FEATURES ABOVE LEVEL 9 IN A
	PLAN VIEW.

	55) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TABLES ON
	SHEETS A0.01 AND A0.09 SHOW DIFFERENT VALUES. (NOTE:
	SITE AREAS NOT UPDATED TO EXCLUDE THE PREVIOUSLY
	DEDICATED ROW, SO ALL VALUES WILL CHANGE) ALL TABLES
	NEED TO SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE TABLES LIST LESS OPEN SPACE THAN IS
	PROVIDED.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	07-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	07-07-2022	Time	17:32	Rev Time	20.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	07-07-2022	Time	17:32	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-07 17:32:46	CASE NO. FSPR 22-08
	RESIDENCES OF PALM BEACH WEST
	401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	(3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG AND
	.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON
	THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF
	INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	JULY 29, 2022, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
	SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 14,
	2022), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
	THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
	ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($400).

	1) THE SURVEY SHOWS PROPERTY ALONG FERN STREET AND
	SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY THAT WERE ACQUIRED BY MAINTENANCE
	MAPS BY THE CITY AND FDOT, RESPECTIVELY. THIS PROPERTY
	NEEDS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE OVERALL PROPERTY
	CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE, INCLUDING FAR AND OPEN
	SPACE. ALL DATA TABLES AND PLANS NEED TO BE UPDATED
	ACCORDINGLY.

	2) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE AND CIVIL
	PLANS. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE
	CONDITIONS. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WILL BE SUPPLIED WHEN
	ALL PLANS MATCH.

	3) APPENDIX A OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND TABLE X-1 CONTAINED IN SECTION
	94-305.D OR THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
	ARE THE LIST OF REQUIRED THOROUGHFARE RIGHT-OF-WAY
	SETBACKS. THE TABLES REQUIRE A ROADWAY SETBACK OF 100
	FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IN
	ADDITION TO THE SETBACKS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING
	DISTRICT. A PORTION OF THE BUILDING ALONG QUADRILLE
	BOULEVARD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
	AND ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REQUIREMENT.

	4) THE ELEVATIONS MUST ACCURATELY SHOW THE BUILDING
	FEATURES THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS, TO INCLUDE
	DIMENSIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NO DOORS SHOWN
	ANYWHERE ON THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
	SOME OF THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS ARE MISLABELED AS TO
	WHICH ELEVATION THEY REPRESENT.

	5) THE PROJECT IS REQUESTING NUMEROUS VARIANCES FROM
	THE DMP REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT PROVIDING ADEQUATE
	JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE THEM.
	THE NEW PORTION OF THE PROJECT OCCUPIES ALMOST THE
	ENTIRETY OF A CITY BLOCK AFTER THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
	ALLEY, SO THE REQUESTS ARE VARIANCES OF CONVENIENCE AND
	DO NOT FOSTER A DESIRABLE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
	SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IN THE DMP.

	6) VERIFICATION THAT THE 3-FOOT FPL UTILITY EASEMENT IS
	ABANDONED WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ZONING
	APPROVING THE BUILDING PERMIT.

	7) THERE ARE LINES ON THE SITE PLANS THAT DO NOT MATCH
	ACROSS THE VARIOUS SHEETS. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW
	CONSISTENT CONDITIONS.

	8) WHERE WILL THE TRASH AND RECYCLING FOR THE 401 SOUTH
	DIXIE BUILDING BE LOCATED AFTER THE NEW BUILDING IS
	CONSTRUCTED.

	INCENTIVES

	9) PLEASE PROVIDE AN ACCOUNTING OF THE TDR SQUARE
	FOOTAGE NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT:

	A. WHERE HAVE THEY/ARE THEY COMING FROM?
	B. WHEN DO YOU EXPECT TO ACQUIRE ANY TDRS THAT ARE NOT
	CURRENTLY IN YOUR POSSESSION?

	10) THIS PROJECT IS UTILIZING TDRS AND CONTAINS MORE
	THAT 25% OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN RESIDENTIAL USE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH SECTION
	94-134 DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM.

	11) AS PART OF RECEIVING THE TDRS AND FOLLOWING THE
	DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM, THE
	BUILDING THAT IS ELEGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION
	LOCATED AT 401 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS REQUIRED TO BE
	INTEGRATED INTO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IN A MANNER WHICH
	MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE. THE
	CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER HAS REVIEWED THE
	APPLICATION AND DOES NOT AGREE THAT THE CURRENT DESIGN
	MEETS THE REQUIREMENT.

	A. THERE IS NO ARCHITECTURAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
	401 BUILDING AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING.
	B. THE SCALE OF THE NEW BUILDING DOES NOT PROVIDE AN
	ADEQUATE TRANSITION WHERE IT IS ADJACENT TO THE
	EXISTING BUILDING.
	C. THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THERE IS A BLANK WALL THAT
	SEPARATES THE PARKING RAMP AND THE GRADE LEVEL PARKING
	AREA FROM THE INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE ARE NOT
	ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE 401 BUILDING. STAFF
	SUGGESTS INCORPORATING GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USES FACING
	THE 401 BUILDING.
	D. THE FENESTRATION ON THE UPPER LEVELS OF THE NEW
	BUILDING, WHERE THEY OVERLOOK THE EXISTING BUILDING,
	SHOULD BE INCLUDED AND DESIGNED WITH AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	TO THE 401 BUILDING'S FENESTRATION.
	E. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A CONTEXTUAL SETBACK
	RELATIONSHIP WITH THE 401 BUILDING ALONG SOUTH DIXIE
	HIGHWAY, THE PROPOSED BUILDING SHOULD BE PULLED BACK TO
	ALIGN WITH THE 401 BUILDING'S FACADE.

	ZONING COMPLIANCE

	12) BUILDING HEIGHT IS CALCULATED FROM THE AVERAGE
	ELEVATION OF THE ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE TOP OF
	THE HIGHEST STORY. PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSION MEETING
	THIS REQUIREMENT. THE CURRENT ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW
	THE HEIGHT MEASUREMENT BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE
	GROUND FLOOR. STAFF WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SIDEWALK
	GRADE ON THE PLANS.

	13) THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW PALM TREES ON LEVEL 25.
	NO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LEVEL 25 IS PROVIDED AND THE
	LEVEL 25 FLOOR PLAN FAILS TO SHOW ANY LANDSCAPE. ALL
	PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE CONDITIONS.

	14) PLEASE CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING FOR FAR:

	A. WHAT OCCURS IN THE GROCER EQUIPMENT SPACE ON THE
	MEZZANINE AND WHY IS NO SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN FOR THIS
	AREA?
	B. WHAT OCCURS IN THE BOH SPACE ON THE MEZZANINE LEVEL
	AND WHY IS NO SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN FOR THIS AREA?
	C. THE STORAGE AREA SHOWN ON LEVEL 2 MUST BE COUNTED AS
	PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA FOR FAR. PROVIDE THE
	SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THIS AREA.
	D. THE CORRIDOR FROM THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO THE
	ELEVATORS ON THE WEST SIDE OF LEVELS 2, 4 AND 6 MUST BE
	COUNTED AS PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA FOR FAR.
	D. THE STORAGE AREA SHOWN ON LEVELS 3 THOROUGH 6 MUST
	BE COUNTED AS PART OF THE GROSS BUILDING AREA FOR FAR.
	PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THIS AREA.
	E. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE FAR DIAGRAMS SHOW SQUARE
	FOOTAGE FOR THE SHADED AREA OF EACH LEVEL, WHICH
	EXCLUDES THE MECHANICAL AREAS, AND THEN FURTHER DEDUCTS
	MECHANICAL AREA IN THE TABLE.
	F. THE FAR TABLES ON SHEETS A0.01 AND A0.06 SHOW
	DIFFERENT VALUES. ALL TABLES NEED TO SHOW CONSISTENT,
	ACCURATE INFORMATION.

	15) THE PROJECT IS SHOWN AS CREATING A NEW INTERIOR
	PARCEL LINE BETWEEN THE EXISTING 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING AND THE NEW BUILDING. THE QGD 10-25 REQUIRES A
	20-FOOT SETBACK ABOVE THE 8TH STORY (104 FEET) FROM THE
	INTERIOR PARCEL LINE. THIS DOES NOT OCCUR ON EITHER
	PORTION OF THE NEW BUILDING THAT IS ABOVE THIS HEIGHT.
	STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THIS SETBACK VARIANCE

	16) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE PROPOSED ZERO SETBACK
	FROM THE INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES COMPLIES WITH NFPA
	REQUIREMENTS.

	17) STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A SETBACK FROM
	SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 27 FEET FOR
	THE PARKING USES ON LEVEL 6 AND THE 66 FEET FOR LEVEL 9
	OF THE TOWER.

	18) STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A SETBACK FROM
	GARDENIA LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 27 FEET FOR THE PARKING
	USES ON LEVEL 6.

	19) THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TABLES SHOW DIFFERING VALUES
	FOR THE PROVIDED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LEVELS ON SHEETS
	A0.01 AND A0.07. ADDITIONALLY, IT APPEARS THAT THE 401
	SOUTH DIXIE FOOTPRINT IS NOT INCLUDED ON ANY OF THE
	TABLES. STAFF CANNOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITHOUT ACCURATE
	INFORMATION.

	20) THE TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH FIGURE IV-33. STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY
	THE VALUES STATED ON THE TABLES. THE FENESTRATION
	REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE IV-4 SHALL BE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATED
	AS PART OF THE TRANSPARENCY VERIFICATION.

	21) THE ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS DO NOT ACCURATELY DIMENSION
	THE ACTIVE USE AREAS. ONCE THE DIAGRAMS ARE UPDATED,
	STAFF WILL REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE. NOTE: STAFF IS NOT
	PREPARED TO SUPPORT WAIVERS FOR GROUND FLOOR OR LINER
	ACTIVE USES.

	A. THE ESCALATOR, ELEVATORS, STAIRS AND FIRE CONTROL
	ROOM ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD, FERN, SOUTH DIXIE
	HIGHWAY AND GARDENIA THAT ARE ALONG THE EXTERIOR WALL
	OF THE BUILDING MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE
	ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT.
	B. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS MAY ONLY COUNT TO MEETING
	THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT IF IT SEPARATES THE ACTIVE
	USE FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS EXCLUDES A SLIGHT
	PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST FERN FRONTAGE AND THE GARDEN
	COURTYARD.
	C. THE AREA BETWEEN THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING AND
	THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE INCLUDES NOT ACTIVE USES AND
	MAY NOT BE COUNTED. NOTE: THE AREA DOES NOT QUALIFY AS
	OPEN SPACE.
	D. THE TABLES FOR THE ACTIVE USE LINERS ARE MISLABELED.
	E. THE CART CORRAL, ESCALATOR, ELEVATOR, STAIRS AND
	MECHANICAL ROOMS ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD, SOUTH DIXIE
	HIGHWAY AND GARDENIA THAT ARE ALONG THE EXTERIOR WALL
	OF THE BUILDING MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE
	ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIREMENT FOR THE 2 TO 5 STORIES.
	F. THE ACTIVE USE DEPTH DIAGRAM INCLUDES ELEVATORS, THE
	MECHANICAL ROOM, PARKING GARAGE, EXTERIOR AREAS OF THE
	BUILDING, THE CART CORRAL, AND THE FIRE CONTROL ROOM,
	NONE OF WHICH ARE PERMITTED IN THE DEPTH.

	22) THE DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE GARDENIA FRONTAGE DOES
	NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS.
	STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT BUILDING DESIGNS THAT
	DO NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS.

	23) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THE SIDE LOT
	LINE TOWER PLANAR BREAK COMPLIANCE.

	24) THERE ARE HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS SHOWN ON THE
	PLANS; HOWEVER, MANY ARE NOT LABELED AS TO WHAT THEY
	ARE NOR DO THEY INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS SO THAT STAFF
	CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE ALLOWANCES.

	A. AT THE GROUND FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS THAT
	HAVE A MINIMUM CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF
	THE BUILDING FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS IS NOT
	SHOWN ON ANY ELEVATION.
	B. WHILE DIMENSIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED, THE CANOPY AT
	THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENTRY SCALES TO EXCEED THE
	20-FOOT MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL PROJECTION. NO INFORMATION
	WAS PROVIDED ON ITS HEIGHT FROM GRADE.
	C. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON THE BALCONIES.

	25) COMPLIANCE WITH THE VERTICAL PROJECTION ALLOWANCES
	WAS NOT PROVIDED.

	26) PROVIDE THE UPPER ROOF LEVEL PLAN AS WELL AS CROSS
	SECTION DRAWINGS TO VERIFY THAT THE FULL HEIGHT OF ANY
	ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED BY THE
	PROPOSED PARAPETS.

	STREETSCAPE

	27) SINCE THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING, THE STREETSCAPE ADJACENT TO THIS BUILDING
	MUST BE INCLUDED. ANY AREAS WHERE THERE ARE CURRENT
	DEFICIENCIES MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	CURRENT DMP REQUIREMENTS.

	28) INADEQUATE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT
	THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
	94-113. - LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THIS
	INCLUDES:

	A. EXTERIOR LIGHTING - NOT PROVIDED TO BACK OF CURB.
	B. SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS - NOT PROVIDED
	FOR DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.
	C. STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. - MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTHS
	NOT PROVIDED, STREETLIGHTS AND STREET FURNITURE NOT
	SHOWN, NO IMPROVEMENT TO THE EXISTING PALM TRAN STOP
	SHOWN, NO BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED, NO CROSS SECTIONS
	PROVIDE TO VERIFY THAT THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS ARE
	MAINTAINED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS.

	29) MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL
	LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	IRRIGATION.

	DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE

	30) THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE QUADRILLE GARDEN DISTRICT
	IS FOR PROJECTS TO HAVE A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF
	LANDSCAPING AND TREE CANOPY. THE PROJECT AS PRESENTED
	DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET EITHER ONE OF THESE STANDARDS.
	ADDITIONALLY, GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL IS ENCOURAGED AS
	ACTIVE USE LINERS. THIS INCORPORATION OF ADDITIONAL
	GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL WOULD ALLEVIATE THE NEED FOR
	THE VARIANCES THAT THE CURRENT PLAN REQUIRES.

	31) THE AMENITY TOWER ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY DOES
	NOT MATCH IN ELEVATION AND PLAN. ADDITIONAL DETAIL IS
	REQUIRED.

	32) THE PROPOSED LOADING AREA ENTRANCE ALONG GARDENIA
	IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE PROPOSED LOBBY ENTRANCE OF
	THE APPROVED AC MARRIOT HOTEL. THE PROPOSED DESIGN
	PRESENTS A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO AN APPROVED NEIGHBORING
	PROJECT.

	PARKING

	33) THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REMOVES ALL OF THE
	CURRENT SURFACE PARKING FOR THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	BUILDING (NOTE - PART OF THE REQUIRED PARKING WAS
	ALREADY SOLD OFF, CREATING A PARKING DEFICIENCY, WHICH
	VIOLATES THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS).
	PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE WITH A BREAKDOWN OF THE USES
	WITHIN THE 401 SOUTH DIXIE BUILDING AND THE REQUIRED
	NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. PROVIDE HOW THESE PARKING
	SPACES WILL BE ACCOMMODATED WITHIN THE NEW PROJECT?S
	PARKING GARAGES. THIS SHALL INCLUDE SHOWING A CODE
	COMPLIANT ADA ROUTE TO THE BUILDING FROM THE REQUIRED
	ADA PARKING SPACES.

	34) WHERE WILL THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR 401 SOUTH DIXIE
	DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT?

	35) NO PARKING TABLES WERE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW
	BUILDING. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO ENUMERATE THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING FOR THE VARIOUS USER
	GROUPS, TO INCLUDE THE ADA AND TANDEM SPACES. STAFF IS
	UNABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE PROVIDED PARKING COMPLIES
	WITH THE MINIMUM/MAXIMUM DMP REQUIREMENTS.

	36) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING ROWS AND
	SPACES WITHIN THE GARAGE.

	37) PROVIDE THE ADA ROUTE FOR THE ADA PARKING SPACES TO
	THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES. IT APPEARS THAT A NUMBER OF
	THE SPACES MAY NOT BE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE
	ENTRY POINTS AND THAT THERE ARE SPACES THAT REQUIRE
	USERS TO WALK BEHIND OTHER CARS TO GET TO ENTRANCES.

	38) PLEASE CONSIDER INCLUDING EV CHARGING SPACES FOR
	ALL THE USER GROUPS. THIS SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE PREWIRING
	THE GARAGE AND INCLUDING EXTRA AREA FOR PANELS IN THE
	ELECTRIC ROOM FOR FUTURE EV INSTALLATIONS.

	39) THE PLANS INCLUDE A PARKING STACK DETAIL. WHERE IS
	THIS PLANNED FOR USE? PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED HEIGHT OF THE STACK IS 11.5 FEET, YET ONLY A
	PORTION OF LEVEL 6 IS SHOWN EXCEEDING 10 FEET IN
	HEIGHT. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PARKING STRUCTURES WITH
	MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL PROVIDE A COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT
	DURING THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE FACILITY. SUCH
	OPERATION SHALL BE ENFORCED THROUGH A RESTRICTIVE
	COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS. ALL
	RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO
	BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND
	RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.

	40) THE GUEST PARKING IS REQUIRED TO BE CLEARLY MARKED
	ON THE PLANS.

	41) THERE ARE DEAD END PARKING ROWS ON MULTIPLE LEVELS,
	WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A TURN AROUND SPACE OR
	IF ALL SPACES ON THAT LEVEL ARE ASSIGNED PARKING.

	42) THERE ARE CURRENTLY METERED ON-STREET PARKING
	SPACES ON FERN STREET. PLEASE DELINEATE HOW MANY ARE TO
	REMAIN. YOU WILL NEED TO CONTACT THE CITY?S PARKING
	ADMINISTRATOR AND PROVIDE HIS APPROVAL TO PERMANENTLY
	REMOVE THE PARKING SPACES.

	43) PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT IS PLANNED TO OCCUR IN THE
	ON-STREET AREA IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
	ENTRANCE.

	44) NONE OF THE DRIVEWAY OPENING COMPLY WITH THE
	REQUIREMENT THAT CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS,
	AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS
	MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB.

	A. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE TRUCK MANEUVERING MAY
	REQUIRE AN OPENING GREATER THAN 25 FEET; HOWEVER, THE
	OPENING IN EXCESS OF 70 FEET AT THE SIDEWALK AND 100
	FEET AT THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT IS EXCESSIVE AND STAFF IS
	NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A WAIVER TO THIS OPENING SIZE.
	PLEASE CONSIDER AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN, POSSIBLY SIMILAR
	TO 360 SOUTH ROSEMARY WHERE THE TRUCKS PULL THROUGH THE
	BUILDING.
	B. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A WAIVER TO THE
	MAIN BUILDING ENTRY DRIVE WHICH EXCEEDS 43 FEET ON FERN
	STREET. FERN STREET IS CLASSIFIED AS A PRIMARY
	PEDESTRIAN STREET. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WIDTH DOES NOT
	PROMOTE A FAVORABLE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.
	C. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A WAIVER FOR TWO
	DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, BOTH
	EXCEEDING 25 FEET AT THE CURB LINE, TO PROVIDE ONE-WAY
	TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF A PARKING FACILITY. THE INTERIOR
	OF THE GARAGE COULD BE REDESIGNED TO PROVIDE ONLY ONE
	CODE COMPLIANT DRIVE ONTO SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. BETTER
	YET, IF THE PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM PARKING
	REQUIREMENTS, THIS PARKING AREA SHOULD BE ELIMINATED.

	45) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY THAT NOT LESS THAN
	20 LINEAR FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CAR QUEUING, SHALL
	OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE LOT, AND SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH
	PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A PUBLIC SIDEWALK.

	46) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE PARKING STRUCTURE
	ENTRANCES FACING A STREET FRONTAGE TREAT THE INTERIOR
	PORTION OF THE GARAGE ENTRY TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 20
	FEET FROM THE BUILDING FACADE. TREATMENT MAY INCLUDE,
	BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO, STUCCO OR PLASTER,
	FINISHED AND PAINTED COMPARABLE TO A HABITABLE SPACE.
	ALL MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS SHALL
	BE COVERED OR SCREENED.

	47) THE ARROWS FOR THE GARAGE RAMPS PROVIDE CONFLICTS.
	THESE NEED TO BE DESIGNATED CORRECTLY.

	48) A PORTION OF THE ENTRANCE RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14
	PERCENT SLOPE, WHICH REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION.

	49) PARKING RAMPS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE VISIBLE TO
	PUBLIC AREAS. PROVIDE HOW THE SIDE OF THE EXIT RAMP
	WILL NOT BE VISIBLE TO THE GARDEN COURTYARD. THE STAFF
	PREFERRED OPTION IS AN ACTIVE USE LINER.

	50) NO BICYCLE PARKING TABLE SHOWING PROPOSED AND
	REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IS PROVIDED. THIS SHALL
	INCLUDE BREAK DOWNS FOR THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
	USERS.

	51) THE BICYCLE ROOMS SHOWN IN THE PLANS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED AT A LARGER SCALE WITH DIMENSIONS AND THE
	SPECIFIC RACK SYSTEM THAT IS PROPOSED.

	52) THE STREETSCAPE BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
	DIMENSIONED ON THE PLANS AS WILL AS SHOWN ON A
	DIMENSIONED BICYCLE DETAIL, WHICH INCLUDES THE SPECIFIC
	RACK USED.

	53) THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINS MORE THAN 50,000
	SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, SO A SHOWER AND
	CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED.

	54) THE TRUCK TURN PLANS MUST SHOW THE FULL EXTENT OF
	THE GARDENIA RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ONE
	DRAWING SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITION WITH THE
	LOCATION OF THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND SIDEWALK
	ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND ONE SHOWING THE PROPOSED AC
	MARRIOT CHANGES TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE TURN PLANS
	MUST VERIFY THAT THAT PROPOSED TRUCK MOVEMENTS DO NOT
	CONFLICT EXISTING OR PROPOSED CHANGES TO GARDENIA.

	OPEN SPACE

	55) THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS ON SHEET A0.09 DO NOT
	ACCURATELY HIGHLIGHT THE AREA THAT IS PERMITTED TO BE
	COUNTED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. THE AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN
	THE REQUIRED 16-FOOT SETBACK ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE
	COUNTED AS OPEN SPACE. PLEASE UPDATE THE DRAWINGS AND
	CALCULATIONS ACCORDINGLY.

	56) SINCE THE PROJECT CONTAINS MORE THAN 80,000 SQUARE
	FEET OF AREA, THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED TO BE
	PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE AND
	CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE SINGLE OPEN SPACE. THE PROPOSED
	BIFURCATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT.

	57) PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ADJOINING
	CURB CUTS, DRIVEWAYS, OR PARKING ACCESS RAMPS, EXCEPT
	OUTDOOR PASSENGER DROP-OFF AREAS. THE PROPOSED GARDEN
	COURTYARD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS.

	58) PROVIDE THE TABULAR INFORMATION TO SHOW HOW THE
	PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
	TABLE IV-7 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS BASED ON THE OPEN SPACE
	TYPE. VISUALLY, IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE STANDARDS ARE
	MET.

	59) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE SITE PLAN CONFLICT ON
	WHAT IS SHOWN FOR THE LEVEL 9 ROOFTOP AMENITY AREA.
	ONCE THE FINAL PROPOSAL IS SHOWN ON ALL PLANS, STAFF
	CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH CODE.

	60) THE OPEN SPACE TABLES ON SHEETS A0.01 AND A0.09
	SHOW DIFFERENT VALUES. ALL TABLES NEED TO SHOW
	CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION. THE TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.01 CLAIMS A 15% PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REDUCTION;
	HOWEVER, NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON HOW THE PROJECT
	COMPLIES WITH THE DMP HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE REDUCTION IS ONLY PERMITTED FOR OPEN
	SPACE THAT IS LOCATED IN ONE LOCATION, NOT TWO AS
	SHOWN.