Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z22050021 Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-03-2022 Cont ID   Sent By swelter Date 10-03-2022 Time 09:37 Rev Time 0.00 Received By swelter Date 10-03-2022 Time 10:11 Sent To   Notes 2022-10-03 10:09:14 PASSED - ART ASSESSMENT COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED ON   10.3.2022 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:   PROJECT IDENTIFIES PUBLIC ART AT THE CORNER OF DIXIE   AND LAKE VIEW, AND THE SCUPLTURE IS MARKED WITHIN THE   PLANTER. THE FUTURE ARTWORK IF INSTALLED WITHIN THE   PLANTER NEEDS TO BE PLACED ON A PLINTH OR LARGE   PEDESTAL TO SEPARATE THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT FORM   LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. FURTHER, ESCROW OF THE 1% NEEDS   TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED TO SYBILLE WELTER   [email protected] BEFORE OR AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT   FEES.     Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 07-08-2022 Time 10:31 Rev Time 0.00 Received By swelter Date 07-08-2022 Time 10:51 Sent To   Notes 2022-07-08 10:48:27 1. THE ART PROVIDED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE   BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE LOCATION REQUIREMENT OF THE   PUBLIC ART ORDINANCE.   2. RENDERINGS SHOW AN ART FEATURE ON THE CORNER OF   DIXIE AND LAKEVIEW; HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT   WITH THE SITE PLAN THAT DEMONSTRATES A PLANTER.   3. IF OPTION 1 ART ON SITE IS BEING CONSIDERED, THEN   THE PLACEMENT OF THE ART MUST MEET THE LOCATION   REQUIREMENT FURTHER, RENDERING AND SITE PLAN MUST BE   CONSISTENT.   4. THE DECORATIVE GOLD LEAF ON THE WALL AT THE CORNER   OF LAKEVIEW AND DIXIE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED AS IT   APPEARS TO BE A DECORATIVE PIECE AND IN ITS CURRENT   ITERATION NOT MEET THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.   5. IF THE ART CANNOT BE ACCOMMODATED TO MEET THE PUBLIC   ART CRITERIA AND REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE   ORDINANCE THE DEVELOPER HAS THE OPTION TO CONTRIBUTE TO   THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT AT .75% (-25%) OF THE 1% TOTAL   CONSTRUCTION COSTS.   6. CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER [email protected] FOR AN ART   ASSESSMENT APPLICATION, WHICH NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO   COMPLETE SITE APPROVAL PROCESS.   7. AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES, THE EVIDENCE OF   ESCROW IF CHOOSEN OPTION 1 OR THE CONTRIBUTION INTO THE   PUBLIC ART FUND MUST BE COMPLETED.         Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2022 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 06-10-2022 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00 Received By scwelter Date 06-10-2022 Time 15:43 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-10 15:42:55 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER   $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS   PER CITY ORDINANCE.   SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,   INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR   IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL   CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN   $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.   OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE   VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR   OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF   ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT   TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.   A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS   REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &   CULTURE AT [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT   APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS.     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 06-08-2022 Time 19:58 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 06-08-2022 Time 19:58 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-08 20:04:45 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. LEVEL 3 PLAN,   SHEET A1.03, SHOWS 2 OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   IS THE NORTH-WEST CORNER OF THE PARKING GARAGE.   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHOULD BE THE CLOSEST PARKING   SPACES TO THE AREA OF THE BUILDING THAT THEY SERVE.   WHAT AREA/OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING ARE THOSE 2 SPACES   SERVING. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY   CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON   THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT   PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502   OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE       4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4   OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX   REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING   STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN   ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY   CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT   SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)       5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND   OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF   OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF   CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE   VERIFIED.       7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       8. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       10. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       11. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-23-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 09-23-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 09-23-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-23 17:36:50 PASSED WITH PROVISO: CCTV TO BE PROVIDED WEEK OF   10/24/22. Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-15-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 08-15-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 08-15-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-08-15 11:37:56 WILL PASS ENGINEERING UPON RECEIPT OF REQUESTED CITY   UTILITY CCTV. Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-07-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 07-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 07-07-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-07-07 18:29:49 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER   INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION   OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).       FOLLOW UP COMMENT:   PLEASE CLARIFY RESPONSE (?ACKNOWLEDGED.?). IS SANITARY   CCTV BEING OBTAINED AT THIS TIME?     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 06-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 06-08-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-06-08 16:40:42 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]   GENERAL:   O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND   INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER   (Z-XXXXXXXX).   O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK   BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP   B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL   L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97   B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF   B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS   C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,   ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,   SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER   SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU   BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL   O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION   ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD   SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.   O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS   DATA.       BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:   O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER   SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING   TO THEM.   O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY   EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO   PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO   STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.   O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION   OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW   PREVENTION.   O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY   OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER   METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO   PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.   O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE   NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.       WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:   O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION   INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).   O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.   O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE   STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.   O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND   DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND   SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH   PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE   AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,   BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO   BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,   DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,   ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT   ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF   SANITARY SEWER LINES.   O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR   SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW.   O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL.   O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER   AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD   DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.   O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY   TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING   AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,   MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS   SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008   FOR WATER.   O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.   O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER   INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CONDITION   OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).   O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL   BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY   PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.   O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER ARE REQUIRED.   O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE   JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.   O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT   STATION NUMBER.   O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.   O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE   TRAPS (IF ANY).   O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN   OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.       FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES   NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.   - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:   - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS   THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF   DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;   - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE   STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A   MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).   - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF   CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION   THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL   SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF   WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES   ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY   LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT   PARCELS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE   BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE   50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER   CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR   PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.               QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:   O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-822-2262 OR [email protected]   O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-02-2022 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 06-02-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 06-02-2022 Time 10:45 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-02 11:34:16 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE   PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE   APPLICABLE.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)       7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED.       SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,   REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU   PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.       IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE   FDC LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED TO SERVE THE STANDPIPE   SYSTEM.       ONE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT IS INDICATED ALONG LAKEVIEW.       A SECOND ONE IS RECOMMENDED TO BE INSTALLED ALONG   OKEECHOBEE BLVD.           7A. PER NFPA 14       6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.       ONE FDC IS INDICATED ALONG LAKEVIEW; HOWEVER IT APPEARS   TO BE LOCATED UNDER AND WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE. IT   IS RECOMMENDED TO BE RELOCATED FROM UNDER/WITHIN THE   PARKING GARAGE TO AN AGREED UPON LOCATION ALONG THAT   EXTERIOR AREA WITHIN 100' OF THE FIRE HYDRANT. FOR   CONSIDERATION PURPOSES, IT CAN BE WALL MOUNTED.       THE SECOND RECOMMENDED FDC LOCATION CAN BE ALONG   OKEECHOBEE BLVD IN AN AGREED UPON LOCATION ALONG THAT   EXTERIOR AREA WITHIN 100' OF THE RECOMMENDED SECOND   FIRE HYDRANT. FOR CONSIDERATION PURPOSES, IT CAN BE   WALL MOUNTED.           7B. PER NFPA 1       18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.   18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.       PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.       FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?       7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.       IT APPEARS THAT A FIRE DDCV IS LOCATED WITHIN THE   PARKING GARAGE AND IF APPROVED BY STAFF AT THIS   LOCATION, IT WOULD REQUIRE PROTECTION FROM ACCIDENTAL   VEHICLE CONTACT.           8. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS   REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,   ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY   THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.           9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM.       ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.       ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       A REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED FLOOR LAYOUT INDICATES   CENTRALLY LOCATED EXIT STAIRS. THIS PROPOSED   CONFIGURATION MAY REQUIRE A DETAILED REVIEW FOR   COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES OF 2   EXITS REMOTELY LOCATED FROM EACH OTHER PER NFPA 101 CH   7, MEAND OF EGRESS. IT APPEARS THAT A PERSON LEAVING A   CERTAIN ROOM CAN ONLY GO IN ONE DIRECTION THAT WOULD   VIRTUALLY QUALIFY THAT ROUTE AS A SINGLE AND ONLY EXIT.           10A. THE LEVEL 8 AMENITY DECK INDICATES A SINGLE EXIT   FROM THE OPEN POOL DECK AREA AND THE CENTRAL EXITS   STAIRS WITHIN THE CORE BUILDING. A REVIEW OF THE   AMEMITY DECK IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE THE TOTAL   OCCUPANCY LOAD CAN BE SERVED BY THESE TWO EXITS. A   THIRD EXIT STAIR MAY BE REQUIRED FROM THE OPEN POOL   AREA REMOTELY LOCATED PER NFPA 101, CH 7, MEAND OF   EGRESS.           10B. THE ROOFTOP PLAN INDICATES AN AMENITY DECK WITH   THE SAME CENTAL EXIT STAIR CONFIGURATION THAT MAY NOT   MEET THE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, CH 7   MEANS OF EGRESS.       A DETAILED REVIEW MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE.       11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       SEE SIMILAR COMMENTS OF 7A ABOVE, ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS   AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY   COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.       12. COMMAND ROOM       THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,   CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN   THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:       11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE   DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL   BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.       11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED   FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER   HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1   HOUR.       11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A   MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF   10 FT (3050 MM).       11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY   COMMAND CENTER.   (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.   (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL   FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF   EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING   EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS   (4) WORK TABLE.   (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE BUILDING.   11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES   OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY   COMMAND CENTER.   (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM   CONTROL UNIT.   (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.   (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION   OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL   (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING   SYSTEMS.   (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS   SIMULTANEOUSLY   (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY   PANELS   (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS   (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND   TRANSFER FEATURES.   (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED   BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE   (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL       NFPA 101       11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.   11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED   IN A   LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.   11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE   FOLLOWING:   (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS   (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION   SERVICE   PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION   OF THIS   CODE   (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION   PANELS   (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS   (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS   (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE   PROVIDED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44   (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS   (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS   (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING   SYSTEM   (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE   PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY   11.8.8               13. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.       NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.       11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.   NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT   SYSTEMS.       24.9.1 GENERAL.   24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM   CAPABLE   OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON   FREQUENCIES   ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE   INSTALLED   WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE   AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL   SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT   DEGRADE   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.   24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED   FOR   APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF   SUCCESSFUL   ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED   FOR THE   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED   BY   THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST   PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN   ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES   NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE   PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A   BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH   A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.   PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC   SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],   561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR   DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.           14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.       ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.           15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA   101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION   EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:       THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,   INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,   STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY   RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR   RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE   APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED   MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE   SYSTEM.       ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL   INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.       16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-29-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 09-29-2022 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 09-29-2022 Time 16:22 Sent To   Notes 2022-09-29 16:24:16 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 320 LAKEVIEW Z22050021   SEPTEMBER 29, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS, IT WAS NOT LOCATED IN   THE SUBMITTAL. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT   REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE 3 SABAL PALMS   LISTED AS GOOD CONDITION THAT MUST BE RELOCATED.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ??? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY   STAFF.   ??? SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART   FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE   TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.       3. SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR OBD 25 ZONING   DISTRICT ON SHEET LP-4 IDENTIFIES THE TYPE OF PUBLIC   OPEN SPACE AS PLAZA AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND   DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREA IS IDENTIFIED AS INTERIOR COURTYARD BUT DOES NOT   MEET THE DEFINITION. THE OPEN SPACE TYPE SHOULD BE   ROOFTOP GARDEN AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.   7/21/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:   ??? ALL CALCULATIONS FOR PLAZA REQUIREMENTS MUST BE   CALCULATED BASED ON THE PROVIDED AREA OF 2010 SQ FT.   AND THE PROVIDE SHOWN THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE   REQUIRED.   ??? VEGETATED AREA OF 503 SQ FT IS REQUIRED   ??? OVERHEAD COVER MIN IS 201 SQ FT AND MAX IS MAX IS   402 SQ FT   ??? TREE CANOPY CREDITS NEED TO BE REVISED. COCONUT   PALM DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A LARGE PALM. CALLIANDRA WOULD   BE A SMALL TREE FOR 150 SQ FT. CHANGE TO TREES THAT   WILL PROVIDE THE INTENDED SHADE.   ??? FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, DO NOT COUNT COCONUTS,   COUNT ONLY 12 EAST PALATKA HOLLY AS MEETING THE 300 SQ   FT EACH FOR TYPE 2: MEDIUM TREE FOR TOTAL 3600 SQ FT   PROVIDED AND 2819 REQUIRED.   ??? FOR ROOFTOP GARDEN, THERE APPEARS TO BE PART OF THE   DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA COVERED BY A ROOF AREA ON   THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE POOL THAT IS INCONSISTENT BETWEEN   SHEETS L-4 AND LP-4.   ??? SHEET LP-2 NEEDS TO SHOW THE OUTLINE OF THE PRIVATE   OPEN SPACE AREA.       4. SATISFIED. INCLUDE A PLANT LIST OF THE TREES, SHRUBS   AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA AND   SHOW THE CREDITS GIVEN FOR TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE   BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   SEE COMMENT #3 FOR CORRECTIONS.       5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.       6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE   NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113.       7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE   REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION   94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.   THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH   TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL   SOIL.       8. SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS SHOULD BE USED ON THE   LAKESIDE AND OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPES AND LIVE OAKS ON   THE SOUTH DIXIE SIDE. STAFF RECOMMENDS ADDING SMALLER   SHADE TREES BETWEEN THE ROYAL PALMS TO PROVIDE   ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALKS.       9. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT   OF 20 FEET AND ROYAL PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF   GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET   REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.       10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND   SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW   LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY   LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED   TREES AND LANDSCAPING.       11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/22:       13. SATISFIED. REVISE THE TREE MITIGATION PROVIDED   CHART ON SHEET TD-1 TO INCLUDE ALL PALMS AND TREES ON   THE PLANT LIST INCLUDING STREET TREES. ASSIGN THE   CATEGORY CREDIT AND PROVIDE A TOTAL.       14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM FDOT   FOR THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE.       15. SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS OR TREES AND THE REQUIRED   PLANTING STRIP SHOULD BE PLACED IN AN EXPANDED ISLAND   BETWEEN THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT LANES AND EAST OF THE   ENTRANCE ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.       THE COMMENT IS REGARDING THE PLANTING STRIP REQUIRED   ADJACENT TO THE CURB. THIS CAN BE DESIGNED TO INCLUDE   THE PLANTINGS IN THE ENTRANCE DESIGN. THE AREAS EAST   AND WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY AND A PART IN THE CENTER.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/22/22:       16. SATISFIED. THE AREA IN THE PLAZA DESIGNATED FOR AN   ART PIECES MUST BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE VEGETATED AREA.   DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF THE BASE REQUIRED, THE   VEGETATED AREA WILL LIKELY FALL BELOW THE REQUIRED   SQUARE FOOTAGE.       17. SATISFIED. THE ROYAL PALMS FOR THE STREETSCAPE MUST   MEET THE MINIMUM 20 FOOT HEIGHT OVERALL. THIS WILL   ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH TRAFFIC AT 14   FEET HEIGHT.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.           3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-23-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 08-23-2022 Time 10:11 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 08-23-2022 Time 10:11 Sent To   Notes 2022-08-23 10:12:17 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 320 LAKESIDE Z22050021   JULY 22, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS, IT WAS NOT LOCATED IN   THE SUBMITTAL. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT   REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE 3 SABAL PALMS   LISTED AS GOOD CONDITION THAT MUST BE RELOCATED.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY   STAFF.   ? SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART   FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE   TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.       3. SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR OBD 25 ZONING   DISTRICT ON SHEET LP-4 IDENTIFIES THE TYPE OF PUBLIC   OPEN SPACE AS PLAZA AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND   DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREA IS IDENTIFIED AS INTERIOR COURTYARD BUT DOES NOT   MEET THE DEFINITION. THE OPEN SPACE TYPE SHOULD BE   ROOFTOP GARDEN AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.   7/21/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:   ? ALL CALCULATIONS FOR PLAZA REQUIREMENTS MUST BE   CALCULATED BASED ON THE PROVIDED AREA OF 2010 SQ FT.   AND THE PROVIDE SHOWN THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE   REQUIRED.   ? VEGETATED AREA OF 503 SQ FT IS REQUIRED   ? OVERHEAD COVER MIN IS 201 SQ FT AND MAX IS MAX IS 402   SQ FT   ? TREE CANOPY CREDITS NEED TO BE REVISED. COCONUT PALM   DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A LARGE PALM. CALLIANDRA WOULD BE A   SMALL TREE FOR 150 SQ FT. CHANGE TO TREES THAT WILL   PROVIDE THE INTENDED SHADE.   ? FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, DO NOT COUNT COCONUTS, COUNT   ONLY 12 EAST PALATKA HOLLY AS MEETING THE 300 SQ FT   EACH FOR TYPE 2: MEDIUM TREE FOR TOTAL 3600 SQ FT   PROVIDED AND 2819 REQUIRED.   ? FOR ROOFTOP GARDEN, THERE APPEARS TO BE PART OF THE   DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA COVERED BY A ROOF AREA ON   THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE POOL THAT IS INCONSISTENT BETWEEN   SHEETS L-4 AND LP-4.   ? SHEET LP-2 NEEDS TO SHOW THE OUTLINE OF THE PRIVATE   OPEN SPACE AREA.       4. SATISFIED. INCLUDE A PLANT LIST OF THE TREES, SHRUBS   AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA AND   SHOW THE CREDITS GIVEN FOR TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE   BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   SEE COMMENT #3 FOR CORRECTIONS.       5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.       6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE   NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113.       7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE   REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION   94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.   THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH   TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL   SOIL.       8. SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS SHOULD BE USED ON THE   LAKESIDE AND OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPES AND LIVE OAKS ON   THE SOUTH DIXIE SIDE. STAFF RECOMMENDS ADDING SMALLER   SHADE TREES BETWEEN THE ROYAL PALMS TO PROVIDE   ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALKS.       9. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT   OF 20 FEET AND ROYAL PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF   GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET   REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.       10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND   SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW   LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY   LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED   TREES AND LANDSCAPING.       11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/22:       13. SATISFIED. REVISE THE TREE MITIGATION PROVIDED   CHART ON SHEET TD-1 TO INCLUDE ALL PALMS AND TREES ON   THE PLANT LIST INCLUDING STREET TREES. ASSIGN THE   CATEGORY CREDIT AND PROVIDE A TOTAL.       14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM FDOT   FOR THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE.       15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS OR TREES AND THE   REQUIRED PLANTING STRIP SHOULD BE PLACED IN AN EXPANDED   ISLAND BETWEEN THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT LANES AND EAST OF   THE ENTRANCE ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.       THE COMMENT IS REGARDING THE PLANTING STRIP REQUIRED   ADJACENT TO THE CURB. THIS CAN BE DESIGNED TO INCLUDE   THE PLANTINGS IN THE ENTRANCE DESIGN. THE AREAS EAST   AND WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY AND A PART IN THE CENTER.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/22/22:       16. THE AREA IN THE PLAZA DESIGNATED FOR AN ART PIECES   MUST BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE VEGETATED AREA. DEPENDING   ON THE SIZE OF THE BASE REQUIRED, THE VEGETATED AREA   WILL LIKELY FALL BELOW THE REQUIRED SQUARE FOOTAGE.       17. THE ROYAL PALMS FOR THE STREETSCAPE MUST MEET THE   MINIMUM 20 FOOT HEIGHT OVERALL. THIS WILL ASSURE THE   FRONDS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH TRAFFIC AT 14 FEET   HEIGHT.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.           3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.         Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-21-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 07-21-2022 Time 11:23 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 07-21-2022 Time 11:23 Sent To   Notes 2022-07-21 11:23:37 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 320 LAKESIDE Z22050021   JULY 21, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS, IT WAS NOT LOCATED IN   THE SUBMITTAL. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT   REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE 3 SABAL PALMS   LISTED AS GOOD CONDITION THAT MUST BE RELOCATED.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY   STAFF.   ? SATISFIED. SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART   FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE   TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR OBD 25   ZONING DISTRICT ON SHEET LP-4 IDENTIFIES THE TYPE OF   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AS PLAZA AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND   DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREA IS IDENTIFIED AS INTERIOR COURTYARD BUT DOES NOT   MEET THE DEFINITION. THE OPEN SPACE TYPE SHOULD BE   ROOFTOP GARDEN AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.   7/21/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:   ? ALL CALCULATIONS FOR PLAZA REQUIREMENTS MUST BE   CALCULATED BASED ON THE PROVIDED AREA OF 2010 SQ FT.   AND THE PROVIDE SHOWN THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE   REQUIRED.   ? VEGETATED AREA OF 503 SQ FT IS REQUIRED   ? OVERHEAD COVER MIN IS 201 SQ FT AND MAX IS MAX IS 402   SQ FT   ? TREE CANOPY CREDITS NEED TO BE REVISED. COCONUT PALM   DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A LARGE PALM. CALLIANDRA WOULD BE A   SMALL TREE FOR 150 SQ FT. CHANGE TO TREES THAT WILL   PROVIDE THE INTENDED SHADE.   ? FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, DO NOT COUNT COCONUTS, COUNT   ONLY 12 EAST PALATKA HOLLY AS MEETING THE 300 SQ FT   EACH FOR TYPE 2: MEDIUM TREE FOR TOTAL 3600 SQ FT   PROVIDED AND 2819 REQUIRED.   ? FOR ROOFTOP GARDEN, THERE APPEARS TO BE PART OF THE   DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AREA COVERED BY A ROOF AREA ON   THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE POOL THAT IS INCONSISTENT BETWEEN   SHEETS L-4 AND LP-4.   ? SHEET LP-2 NEEDS TO SHOW THE OUTLINE OF THE PRIVATE   OPEN SPACE AREA.       4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INCLUDE A PLANT LIST OF THE   TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN   SPACE AREA AND SHOW THE CREDITS GIVEN FOR TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   SEE COMMENT #3 FOR CORRECTIONS.       5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.       6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE   NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113.       7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE   REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION   94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.   THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH   TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL   SOIL.       8. SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS SHOULD BE USED ON THE   LAKESIDE AND OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPES AND LIVE OAKS ON   THE SOUTH DIXIE SIDE. STAFF RECOMMENDS ADDING SMALLER   SHADE TREES BETWEEN THE ROYAL PALMS TO PROVIDE   ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALKS.       9. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT   OF 20 FEET AND ROYAL PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF   GREY WOOD TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET   REQUIRED FOR STREET CLEARANCE.       10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND   SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW   LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY   LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED   TREES AND LANDSCAPING.       11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/22:       13. REVISE THE TREE MITIGATION PROVIDED CHART ON SHEET   TD-1 TO INCLUDE ALL PALMS AND TREES ON THE PLANT LIST   INCLUDING STREET TREES. ASSIGN THE CATEGORY CREDIT AND   PROVIDE A TOTAL.       14. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM FDOT FOR THE   PROPOSED STREETSCAPE.       15. ROYAL PALMS OR TREES AND THE REQUIRED PLANTING   STRIP SHOULD BE PLACED IN AN EXPANDED ISLAND BETWEEN   THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT LANES AND EAST OF THE ENTRANCE ON   OKEECHOBEE BLVD.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.           3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 06-07-2022 Time 16:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 06-07-2022 Time 16:48 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-07 16:48:24 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 320 LAKESIDE Z22050021   JUNE 7, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS REPORT   RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE   NATIVE TREES AND PALMS, IT WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE   SUBMITTAL. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED   TO BE RELOCATED. THERE ARE 3 SABAL PALMS LISTED AS GOOD   CONDITION THAT MUST BE RELOCATED.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY   DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER.   TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS   SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE. THE TREE   CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY STAFF.   ? SHOW ONE COLUMN ON THE DISPOSITION CHART FOR   MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL   SQUARE FOOTAGE.       3. THE DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR OBD 25 ZONING DISTRICT ON   SHEET LP-4 IDENTIFIES THE TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AS   PLAZA AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN   SECTION 94-109. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA IS   IDENTIFIED AS INTERIOR COURTYARD BUT DOES NOT MEET THE   DEFINITION. THE OPEN SPACE TYPE SHOULD BE ROOFTOP   GARDEN AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.       4. INCLUDE A PLANT LIST OF THE TREES, SHRUBS AND   GROUNDCOVER PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA AND SHOW   THE CREDITS GIVEN FOR TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED   ON TABLE IV-8.       5. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST   AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.       6. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT   MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED   PER SECTION 94-113.       7. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE REQUIRED   STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113 AND   PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. THE AREA   MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE   CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.       8. ROYAL PALMS SHOULD BE USED ON THE LAKESIDE AND   OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPES AND LIVE OAKS ON THE SOUTH   DIXIE SIDE. STAFF RECOMMENDS ADDING SMALLER SHADE TREES   BETWEEN THE ROYAL PALMS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR   THE SIDEWALKS.       9. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20 FEET   AND ROYAL PALMS MUST BE AT LEAST 14 FEET OF GREY WOOD   TO ASSURE THE FRONDS WILL MEET THE 13.5 FEET REQUIRED   FOR STREET CLEARANCE.       10. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND   DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF   BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO   RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND   LANDSCAPING.       11. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT   SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE   PLANT LIST.       12. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED   VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT   WILL BE SCREENED.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.           3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.         Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-11-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mtechnow Date 10-11-2022 Time 13:29 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mtechnow Date 10-11-2022 Time 13:29 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-14-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mtechnow Date 07-14-2022 Time 17:12 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mtechnow Date 07-14-2022 Time 16:52 Sent To   Notes 2022-07-14 17:00:13 -CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE AND SHOW THE UTILITY LINES   WITHIN THE PROPERTY AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.   -ON DEMO SHEET ADD NOTE TO "CUT AND CAP AT THE MAIN"   FOR ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES AND SANITARY LATERALS   TO BE ABANDONED.   - PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS ON PLAN SHEET.   CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER   FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.   -SHOW STATIONING AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION CLEARANCE   BETWEEN PROPOSED UTILITIES AND EXISTING UTILITIES   AND/OR BASELINE.     Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By mtechnow Date 06-07-2022 Time 16:40 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-07 16:42:43 -PER VINCE NOEL'S COMMENTS WILL WAIT FOR REDESIGNED   PLANS.       MIKE TECHNOW - [email protected] Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-23-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 09-23-2022 Time 16:06 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-16-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 08-16-2022 Time 15:22 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-08-16 15:22:12 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:       -NOT SATISFIED WITH RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 4   IN LETTER DATED 12AUG2022. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOCATIONS   ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE MOST CONCERNING IS THE LONG   DISTANCE FROM THE METERS, POINT OF SERVICE, AND   PROPERTY LINES. NEED DISTANCE REDUCED SUBSTANTIALLY ON   THEM.       -PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES IN RIGHT OF WAY MAY   STILL BE SMALLER THAN REQUIRED. WILL REVIEW FURTHER AT   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.       -WILL REVIEW CUT AND CAP LOCATIONS AT ENGINEERING   DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL. MAY HAVE TO CUT BACK FURTHER   THAN PROPOSED.       -AS REQUESTED IN RESPONSE FOR REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 9   IN LETTER DATED 12AUG2022, MORE INFO ABOUT DIMENSIONS   AND FOOTPRINT OF LARGE METERED WATER SERVICES CAN BE   FOUND IN WPB STANDARD DETAILS WS4, WS4.1, AND AWWA M6   MANUAL PG 49 TABLE 4 DASH 1.       -ENSURE THAT ANY LIGHT POSTS IN LT1 ARE LOCATED MINIMUM   3 FEET AWAY FROM UTILITIES SUCH AS WATER METER BOXES.       RESPECTFULLY,       MARK HURLEY   [email protected]     Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-14-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 07-14-2022 Time 11:08 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-07-14 11:08:00 -STILL COULD NOT FIND VISUAL BOUNDARIES OF PAVEMENT   RESTORATION ON THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS WHERE UTILITY   EXCAVATION IS PROPOSED. PLEASE MAKE SURE COMPLIES WITH   OVERSEEING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS.   -THERE ARE STILL MANY UNACCOUNTED FOR UTILITIES SUCH AS   METERED WATER SERVICES AND SEWER LATERALS WHERE REMOVAL   IS NOT SHOWN ON DEMO OR UTILITY PLANS. WILL LIKELY NEED   TO GO INTO DIXIE HWY FOR SOME OF THAT REMOVAL.   -COULD NOT FIND THE WORDING ABOVE GROUND ON LABELS FOR   PROPOSED 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS. PLEASE ADD TO   CIVIL PLANS. SHEET C300 SHOWS AT LEAST THREE SUCH   METERS.   -BACKFLOW LOCATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE MOST   CONCERNING IS THE LONG DISTANCE FROM THE METERS, POINTS   OF SERVICE, AND PROPERTY LINES. NEED DISTANCE REDUCED   SUBSTANTIALLY ON THEM.   -IF FIRE HYDRANT NEAR NORTH PROPERTY LINE IS NOT   EXISTING, ADD WORDING PROPOSED ON LABEL. IF PROPOSED IT   DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF NOTE 3 ON WPB   STANDARD DETAIL P8.   -320 LAKEVIEW AVE IS LISTED IN UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM   AS HAVING EXISTING 6 INCH FIRELINE. SHOW AND LABEL ON   CIVIL PLANS.   -WILL 3 X 10 FPLE IN FAR NE CORNER OF PROPERTY REMAIN?   -PLEASE ADD VISUAL GRAPHIC MEASUREMENT SCALES TO   ENLARGEMENTS ON SHEET C300.   -FOOTPRINTS OF THE 3 AND 4 INCH METERED WATER SERVICES   ARE LIKELY MUCH LARGER THAN SHOWN ON SHEET C300.   REFERENCE WPB SD WS3 FOR SOME UNDERSTANDING OF   DIMENSIONS.   -ANY PROPOSED CHANGES TO CITY WPB STREET LIGHTING OR   IRRIGATION ELECTRIC PANELS REQUIRES SEPARATE APPROVAL.   -APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE OVERHEAD   UTILITIES RUNNING FROM PROPERTY SOUTH ACROSS   OKEECHOBEE.   -ARE THE STREET LIGHTS AT NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF   PROPERTY INTENDED TO REMAIN?   -WILL THE BIKE RACKS AND STREET FURNITURE SHOWN ON LH1   PREVENT OR IMPEDE USE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS? ON   A1.01 THEY LOOK FINE SO PLEASE ALSO MAKE SURE PLAN   LOCATIONS MATCH.   -PROPOSED WATER SERVICE DESIGNS ARE NONSTANDARD AND MAY   NEED ADJUSTMENT UPON FURTHER REVIEW AT ENGINEERING   DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL. FURTHERMORE THE PROPOSED   LOCATIONS OF THE WATER SERVICES MAY CONFLICT WITH OTHER   PROJECT ELEMENTS. RECOMMEND FURTHER REFINEMENT OF WATER   SERVICES DURING PPRC TO PREVENT FUTURE PROBLEMS. CAN   CONTACT [email protected] FOR SOME ASSISTANCE OR   GUIDANCE.   -SHEETS C102 AND C103 SHOWS TRUCKS ENTERING NORTH   ENTRANCE FROM THE EAST, BUT IT WOULD SEEM THAT MOST   TRUCKS WOULD ORIGINATE FROM THE WEST NEAR I95 TRAVELING   EAST. IS THE INTENT FOR TRUCKS TO GO AROUND THE BLOCK   FIRST, AND IF SO, HOW WILL THEY KNOW TO DO THAT BEFORE   TURNING INTO SOUTHERN ENTRANCE?   -SHEET C104 REFUSE TRUCK SIDE LOOKS LIKE A SMALL CAR   WAS USED FOR DIAGRAM INSTEAD OF A LARGER REFUSE TRUCK.     Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mhurley Date 06-08-2022 Time 13:56 Rev Time 0.00 Received By mhurley Date 06-08-2022 Time 13:55 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-08 13:56:11 -VERTICAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NONSTANDARD AND   SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -WHAT IS THE CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED   EASTERN BUILDING WALLS AND EXISTING BUILDING WALLS OF   801 S. OLIVE?       -WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE EXISTING BELLSOUTH AND   INGRESS EGRESS EASEMENTS? IF THEY ARE REMAINING, VERIFY   APPLICANT HAS APPROVAL TO BUILD STRUCTURES IN THEM.       -COULD NOT FIND GREASE TRAP FOR CAF? AND RESTAURANT ON   ENGINEERING PLAN. WHERE WILL THEY BE LOCATED?       -WATER UTILITY DESIGN IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. NEED DOMESTIC   METER OUTSIDE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND CLOSE TO PROPERTY   LINE. CITY WATER MAIN SHOULD NOT TRAVERSE PROPERTY AND   BE UNDER A BUILDING.       -PAVEMENT RESTORATION OF OKEECHOBEE AND LAKEVIEW ARE   NOT SHOWN.       -SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO   THEM.       -VERIFY EXISTING SEWER MAIN SIZING IS SUFFICIENT.       -WPB GIS SAYS SOME EXISTING SEWER MAINS IN AREA ARE   OLDER. APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO IMPROVE THEM AS   ADVISED BY CITY OR ENGINEER OF RECORD.       -DOMESTIC WATER METER NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE   GROUND PER STANDARD DETAIL WS3 IF SIZED 3 INCH OR   LARGER. SHOW AND LABEL IT ON ENGINEERING PLAN.       -DOMESTIC RPZ NEEDS TO BE OUTSIDE BUILDING, AND CLOSE   TO PROPERTY LINE AND DOMESTIC WATER METER.       -ADD STANDARD DETAIL P8 TO ENGINEERING PLAN SET, AND   VERIFY PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION MEETS   REQUIREMENTS OF P8.       -CANNOT READ NUMBER UNITS ON VISUAL SCALE MEASUREMENT   ICON ON UTILITY PLAN. PLEASE MAKE READABLE.       -ADD STANDARD DETAIL WS3 TO ENGINEERING PLAN SET.       -SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENTS   INCLUDING SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS.       -JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATED: HOWEVER, THE INTERIOR   CEILING AND EXTERIOR PILASTERS CURRENTLY A PART OF THE   BUILDING AT 320 LAKEVIEW WILL BE PRESERVED AND REUSED   IN THE DESIGN OF THE GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE AS   DISCUSSED WITH FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC   PRESERVATION PLANNER. PLEASE ADD THAT NOTE TO   DEMOLITION PLAN AND SHOW WHERE THOSE ARE LOCATED.       -ENSURE THAT THE CIVIL PLANS, LANDSCAPING PLANS, AND   ARCHITECTURE PLANS MATCH WITH REGARDS TO GENERAL DESIGN   LAYOUT. THE HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS NEAR THE   PROPERTY LINES SEEM DIFFERENT.     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-26-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-26-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 09-26-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-26 15:03:42 CONDITION OF APPROVAL: THE ROLL OUT CONTAINERS SHALL BE   FRONT LOAD TYPE IN ORDER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE   CITY`S REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLES.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-01-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-01-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 09-01-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-01 10:28:40 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND   QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)   THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.   2- STAGING/LOADING AREA HEIGHT CLEARANCE SHALL BE 25 FT   OR THE CONTAINERS SHALL BE ROLLED TO TO THE CURBSIDE   FOR SERVICE; THE STAGING AREA FOR ROLLOUT CONTAINERS TO   BE DETERMINED BY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-15-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 07-15-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 07-15-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-07-15 11:21:48 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND   QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)   THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.   2- STAGING/LOADING AREA HEIGHT CLEARANCE SHALL BE 25 FT   OR THE CONTAINERS SHALL BE ROLLED TO TO THE CURBSIDE   FOR SERVICE; THE STAGING AREA FOR ROLLOUT CONTAINERS TO   BE DETERMINED BY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.   3- CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF   SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER)   4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS   5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN   THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF   THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC   WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND   COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING   MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE   CAN(S).   6- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE   CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA   STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].   7- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D.   LATEST EDITION.   ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING   CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-06-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 06-06-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 06-06-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-06-06 09:45:19 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND   QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)   THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.   2- STAGING/LOADING AREA HEIGHT CLEARANCE FOR THE   COMPACTORS` ROLL OUT CONTAINERS TO BE SERVICED BY THE   FRONT LOAD SANITATION COLLECTION TRUCK.   3-TRASH HOLDING ROOM DETAIL ALONG WITH THE TRASH   COMPACTOR(S) UNIT SPECS.   4- CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF   SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER)   5- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS   6- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE   GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE   TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND   NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.   7- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN   THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF   THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC   WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND   COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING   MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE   CAN(S).           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-04-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 09-29-2022 Time 15:58 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 10-04-2022 Time 09:34 Sent To   Notes 2022-09-29 16:00:36 CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ARE LISTED AT THE   END.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   9/23/2022 SUBMITTAL:       3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE A TRENCH DRAIN ALONG   THE WEST PROPERTY LINE TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS: LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD BE GRADED TO STORE   RUNOFF (SWALE SECTION). PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SIDEWALK   SHOULD BE GRADED TO DRAIN TO DS-04 AND DS-05. DS-04   SHOULD BE IN A DEPRESSION TO COLLECT THE RUNOFF FROM   THE OPEN SPACE AREA.       5. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE   OF RIGHTS OF WAY TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW BREAK   POINTS, DISTANCES FROM BACK OF CURB TO PROPERTY LINE,   FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING, WIDTH OF   SIDEWALK, CURB, ETC. LABEL THE RIGHT OF WAY (OKEECHOBEE   BLVD, LAKEVIEW AVE, S. DIXIE HWY). ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:   THE CROSS SECTIONS WILL SHOW HOW THE SIDEWALK AREAS AND   DRIVEWAY APRONS WILL BE GRADED TO MEET A.D.A. CRITERIA.   THE CONTOURING ON THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN APPEAR TO   RESULT IN SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2%.       6. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE EXISTING SPOT GRADES ALONG EDGES   OF PAVEMENT. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: WHERE DID THE EXISTING   SPOT GRADES COME FROM? THEY DO NOT APPEAR ON THE   SURVEY.       7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED   FLOOR ELEVATION. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FFE'S   ON THE CIVIL PLANS.       8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE   EXFILTRATION TRENCH. LABEL THE WIDTH AND ELEVATIONS OF   THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:   REQUESTED INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONTROL   STRUCTURE. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS   WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:   CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL CAN BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       10. [SATISFIED] MINIMUM DIAMETER OF STORM PIPE TO BE   INSTALLED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS 15 INCH RCP.   ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PVC PIPE FROM DS-04 SHOULD BE RCP.       NEW COMMENTS (7-5-2022 SUBMTITAL):       11. [SATISFIED] CONTOURING OF SIDEWALK APPEARS TO   RESULT IN CROSS SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2%.       12. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] REPLACE ALL DROP CURB OF   EXISTING DRIVEWAYS WITH TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER.   ADDITIONAL COMMENT: REPLACE THREE SECTIONS OF DROP CURB   ON S. DIXIE HWY AND ONE SECTION OF DROP CURB ON   OKEECHOBEE BLVD WITH TYPE F C&G. LABEL ALL NEW C & G ON   THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN.       13. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND OF THE   PAVING AND GRADING PLAN THE SPOT GRADE SYMBOLS AND   CONTOUR LINE SYMBOL. USE A DIFFERENT SYMBOL FOR   EXISTING SPOT GRADES. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SAME SYMBOLS   WERE USED FOR PROPOSED AND EXISTING SPOT GRADES.       14. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL THE DRAINAGE CONTROL   STRUCTURE.       15. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] INDICATE HOW WATER QUALITY   TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE RUNOFF FROM THE   NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE (DRAINING TO DS-04 AND   DS-05). ADDITIONAL COMMENT ??? SEE NEW COMMENT #22   BELOW.       16. [SATISFIED] ENSURE THERE IS ADEQUATE VERTICAL   CLEARANCE WITHIN THE BUILDING TO BE ABLE TO SERVICE THE   EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND TO BE   ABLE TO REPLACE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WHEN THEY ARE   NO LONGER FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED.       17. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER INCORPORATING LOW IMPACT   DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OR IN ADDITION TO   THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       18. [SATISFIED] REFERENCE FDOT STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS   INSTEAD OF FDOT STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS.       NEW COMMENTS (SINCE 7-5-22 SUBMITTAL)   19. SECTION A-A   A. SHOW SWALE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE BED.       20. SECTION B-B   A. SHOW SWALE SECTIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE BEDS.       21. SECTION C-C   A. LABEL R/W AS S. DIXIE HWY.   B. SHOW SHALLOW SWALE BETWEEN PROPERTY LINE AND   BUILDING THAT WILL DIRECT SURFACE RUNOFF TO STRUCTURES   DS-5 AND DS-6.   C. SHOW SWALE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE BED TO COLLECT   AND STORE STORMWATER RUNOFF.       22. EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS NOT LABELED BETWEEN   STRUCTURES DS-5 AND DS-6. EXPLAIN HOW THIS TRENCH WILL   BE SURCHARGED.       23. CONFIRM PIPE AND EXFILTRATION TRENCH LENGTHS   BETWEEN STRUCTURES DS-01 AND DS-02 AND BETWEEN DS-02   AND DS-03.       24. SHOW WHERE ROOF DRAINS WILL CONNECT TO THE DRAINAGE   SYSTEM.       25. THE TWO PAVER AREAS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE -   WHERE/HOW DO THEY DRAIN? THEY CANNOT FLOW TO THE EAST   PROPERTY LINE TOWARD THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.       THESE CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL WERE ADDED   10/4/22 WHEN THE PASSED STATUS WAS MADE:       - SHOW THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY AS   HAVING A DEPRESSED AREA FOR STORING STORMWATER RUNOFF   TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF FLOWING TO THE STREET.   [COMMENT #3]       - FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHALL BE LISTED ON THE   CIVIL DRAWINGS. [COMMENT #7]       - INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. LABEL   THE WIDTH, AND ELEVATIONS OF THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE   TRENCH. [COMMENT #8]       - PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. [COMMENT   #9]       - ADDITIONAL EXISTING DROP CURBS AND TRANSITIONS SHALL   BE REPLACED WITH FDOT TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER FOR 3   SECTIONS ON S. DIXIE HIGHWAY AND ONE SECTION ON   OKEECHOBEE BLVD. LABEL ALL NEW CURBING ON THE PAVING,   GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS.[COMMENT #12]       - USE DIFFERENT SYMBOLS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED SPOT   ELEVATIONS AND INCLUDE THE SYMBOLS IN THE SHEET LEGEND.   [COMMENT #13]       - ON THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS, SHOW SWALE SECTIONS   FOR STORING STORMWATER RUNOFF IN THE LANDSCAPE BED   AREAS. [COMMENTS #19 AND #20]       - LABEL S. DIXIE R/W ON SECTION C-C. SHOW SHALLOW SWALE   BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND BUILDING THAT WILL DIRECT   FLOW TO STRUCTURES DS-5 AND DS-6. [COMMENT #21]       - LABEL ALL OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND THEIR   LENGTHS AND ENSURE THE DESIGN INDICATES HOW THE   TRENCHES WILL BE SURCHARGED TO FUNCTION. [COMMENTS #22   AND #23]       - SHOW WHERE THE ROOF DRAINS WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE   ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. [COMMENT #24]       - THE TWO PAVER AREAS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE   CANNOT DRAIN ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. [COMMENT #25]           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-21-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 07-21-2022 Time 16:52 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 07-21-2022 Time 16:54 Sent To   Notes 2022-07-21 16:52:42 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   7/5/2022 SUBMITTAL:       1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS   NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS   LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE   PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM   REFERENCE AND CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET   WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.       2. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS SOUTH   DRIVEWAY TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF BEFORE CROSSING THE   SIDEWALK.       3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE A TRENCH DRAIN ALONG   THE WEST PROPERTY LINE TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS: LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD BE GRADED TO STORE   RUNOFF (SWALE SECTION). PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SIDEWALK   SHOULD BE GRADED TO DRAIN TO DS-04 AND DS-05. DS-04   SHOULD BE IN A DEPRESSION TO COLLECT THE RUNOFF FROM   THE OPEN SPACE AREA.       4. [SATISFIED] FDOT MAINTAINS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR   OKEECHOBEE BLVD., LAKEVIEW AVE. AND S. DIXIE HWY.       5. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM   CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW   BREAK POINTS, DISTANCES FROM BACK OF CURB TO PROPERTY   LINE, FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING, WIDTH OF   SIDEWALK, CURB, ETC. LABEL THE RIGHT OF WAY (OKEECHOBEE   BLVD, LAKEVIEW AVE, S. DIXIE HWY). ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:   THE CROSS SECTIONS WILL SHOW HOW THE SIDEWALK AREAS AND   DRIVEWAY APRONS WILL BE GRADED TO MEET A.D.A. CRITERIA.   THE CONTOURING ON THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN APPEAR TO   RESULT IN SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2%.       6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE EXISTING SPOT GRADES   ALONG EDGES OF PAVEMENT. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: WHERE DID   THE EXISTING SPOT GRADES COME FROM? THEY DO NOT APPEAR   ON THE SURVEY.       7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED   FLOOR ELEVATION. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? PROVIDE THE FFE'S   ON THE CIVIL PLANS.       8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE   EXFILTRATION TRENCH. LABEL THE WIDTH AND ELEVATIONS OF   THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:   REQUESTED INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONTROL   STRUCTURE. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS   WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:   CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL CAN BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       10. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] MINIMUM DIAMETER OF STORM   PIPE TO BE INSTALLED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS 15 INCH   RCP. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PVC PIPE FROM DS-04 SHOULD BE   RCP.       NEW COMMENTS:       11. CONTOURING OF SIDEWALK APPEARS TO RESULT IN CROSS   SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2%.       12. REPLACE ALL DROP CURB OF EXISTING DRIVEWAYS WITH   TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER.       13. INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND OF THE PAVING AND GRADING   PLAN THE SPOT GRADE SYMBOLS AND CONTOUR LINE SYMBOL.   USE A DIFFERENT SYMBOL FOR EXISTING SPOT GRADES.       14. SHOW AND LABEL THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE.       15. INDICATE HOW WATER QUALITY TREATMENT WILL BE   PROVIDED FOR THE RUNOFF FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF   THE SITE (DRAINING TO DS-04 AND DS-05.       16. ENSURE THERE IS ADEQUATE VERTICAL CLEARANCE WITHIN   THE BUILDING TO BE ABLE TO SERVICE THE EXFILTRATION   TRENCHES AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND TO BE ABLE TO   REPLACE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WHEN THEY ARE NO   LONGER FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED.       17. CONSIDER INCORPORATING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT   DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OR IN ADDITION TO THE   EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       18. REFERENCE FDOT STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS INSTEAD OF   FDOT STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-06-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 06-06-2022 Time 13:07 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 06-06-2022 Time 13:11 Sent To   Notes 2022-06-06 13:11:32 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE   CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE   CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION   IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND   CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION   INFORMATION.       2. PROVIDE TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO   INTERCEPT RUNOFF BEFORE CROSSING THE SIDEWALK.       3. PROVIDE A TRENCH DRAIN ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE   TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF.       4. FDOT MAINTAINS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR OKEECHOBEE   BLVD., LAKEVIEW AVE. AND S. DIXIE HWY.       5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF   WAY TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW BREAK POINTS, DISTANCES   FROM BACK OF CURB TO PROPERTY LINE, FROM PROPERTY LINE   TO FACE OF BUILDING, WIDTH OF SIDEWALK, CURB, ETC.   LABEL THE RIGHT OF WAY (OKEECHOBEE BLVD, LAKEVIEW AVE,   S. DIXIE HWY).       6. PROVIDE EXISTING SPOT GRADES ALONG EDGES OF   PAVEMENT.       7. PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.       8. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. LABEL   THE WIDTH AND ELEVATIONS OF THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE   TRENCH.       9. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. THE CITY   DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION   TRENCH SYSTEMS.       10. MINIMUM DIAMETER OF STORM PIPE TO BE INSTALLED IN   THE RIGHT OF WAY IS 15? RCP.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP   CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH   THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE   START OF CONSTRUCTION.       3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-03-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 10-03-2022 Time 11:55 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-10-03 11:57:00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:       1. MMOA WITH FDOT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CITY   PRIOR TO C.O.   2. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-01-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 06-01-2022 Time 09:40 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-06-01 09:50:42 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.   2. FDOT PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS.   3. MMOA WITH FDOT AND DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL BE   REQUIRED FOR MAINTENANCE OF PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY   IMPROVEMENTS.   4. WATER SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE RE-ENGINEERED. CITY   WILL NOT ACCEPT WATER MAIN UNDER BUILDING. SUGGEST   MASTER METER AT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.   5. SANITARY SYSTEM WILL BE PRIVATE. ADD MANHOLE AT   RIGHT-OF-WAY OF OKEECHOBEE AS THE POINT OF SERVICE. Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status P Date 10-18-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-18-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 10-18-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-10-18 13:10:39 APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:   1) PROVIDE UPDATED TRAFFIC AND VALET ANALYSES PER THE   NORTHERN DRIVEWAY CHANGE IN DIRECTIONALITY   2) CORRECT ROADWAY PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN THE   TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN   3) RE-ALIGN THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN PEDESTRIAN   CROSSWALKS TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CROSSING ROAD AT   THE OKEECHOBEE AND DIXIE INTERSECTION   4) PROVIDE THE UPDATED FDOT D4 LETTER WITH RESPECT TO   THE CHANGE IN THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY DIRECTIONALITY AND   THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY AND   DIXIE   5) DISCUSS AND REFINE TDM MEASURES       PAST COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE SENSITIVE LOCATION OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHALL BE   SCHEDULED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY   2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET   SERVICE/QUEUE ANALYSIS. SHEET A1.02 SHOWS A THIRD VALET   LOCATION, WHICH IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE ANALYSIS.   MOREOVER, VALET SPACES MUST BE IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE   PLANS, ANALYSIS MUST INCLUDE MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS,   PROCESS TIME MUST BE CALCULATED AND PROPERLY BROKEN   DOWN (I.E. ACCEPTANCE/DELIVERY PROCESSING TIME AT VALET   STAND, DRIVE UP/DOWN TIME, WALK UP/DOWN TIME). FULL   PATH FROM STAND TO PARKING STALLS MUST BE SHOWN, NOT   JUST GROUND OPERATIONS   3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED   4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT D4 ACCESS MANAGEMENT LETTER,   ONCE RECEIVED   5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE   SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING   STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING   THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME   AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. REQUEST IS   FOR A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING AND HIGHLIGHTING   TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS (E.G. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY   DETAILS, ONLY SURFACE ITEMS SUCH AS POLES AND BASINS).   ALSO, NONE OF THE CIVIL OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE   SHOWCASING PAVEMENTS MARKINGS AND LANE WIDTHS OF THE   SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK. PLEASE PROVIDE A DEDICATED   AND DETAILED TRANSPORTATION-ORIENTED SITE PLAN. SEVERAL   SIDEWALKS, LANES,   6) SATISFIED. SHEET C-102, RIGHT DRAWING. WB-40   MANEUVERING SHOWS ENCROACHMENT WITH THE INTERNAL   SIDEWALK BY THE DROP-OFF AREA. IS THAT PORTION OF THE   WALKWAY CURB LESS?   7) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.04 TO 06, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY   MARK TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN DEAD-END   8) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.07, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK   TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN DEAD-ENDS   9) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY   ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20   FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR   THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2???   SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL   PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE   DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF BICYCLE   PARKING   11) SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE THOSE   STALLS   12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS AROUND   THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS ITEM WILL BE REVIEWED   AND CLEARED ONCE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN IS   PROVIDED. CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET, BUT   CONSIDERING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   AND THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, WIDER   SIDEWALKS ARE RECOMMENDED.   13) SATISFIED. REMOVE/RELOCATE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND   INSTALLED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE AND   OKEECHOBEE OR PROVIDE A JUSTIFICATION. SUCH FEATURES   ARE SIGNIFICANTLY SPLITTING AND REDUCING THE WALKABLE   AREA   14) SATISFIED. REMOVE THE PARALLEL PARKING STALLS ON   DIXIE   15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MAKE THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON   LAKEVIEW AVE EXIT ONLY. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS   QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY   CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT   JUSTIFICATION. PER THE FDOT DOCUMENT: ???THIS LETTER   DOES NOT GUARANTEE PERMIT APPROVAL. THE PERMIT MAY BE   DENIED BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING   PLANS???. CONSIDERING THE VICINITY OF THE GARAGE RAMP   AND THE HOTEL VALET OPERATION TO THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY,   THERE ARE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF CONFLICT POINTS   NEGATIVELY AFFECTING THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION, WITH A   SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF POTENTIAL SPILLBACKS INTO   OKEECHOBEE BLVD. THE ONE-WAY EXIT ONLY IS STRONGLY   RECOMMENDED   16) SATISFIED CONSIDER MAKING THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY ON   OKEECHOBEE BLVD ENTRY ONLY. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC. ANALYSIS   QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC   ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC, IF ANY.   DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY BUILDINGS IS NOT A   SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION. PER THE FDOT DOCUMENT:   ???THIS LETTER DOES NOT GUARANTEE PERMIT APPROVAL. THE   PERMIT MAY BE DENIED BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE   SUBMITTED ENGINEERING PLANS???. IF THE NORTHERN   DRIVEWAY WERE TO BE CONFIGURED AS EXIT ONLY, THE   SOUTHERN ONE COULD BE FULL ACCESS   17) SATISFIED. HAS THE WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE   ON LAKEVIEW AVE BEEN SHORTENED BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED   NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LOCATION? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED   MEASUREMENTS OF THE STORAGE LANE ON THE SITE PLAN   18) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE FDOT LETTER AUTHORIZED THE   INSTALLATION OF BOTH THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN   DRIVEWAYS APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET FROM DIXIE AND 330   FEET FROM OLIVE. PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCES ON THE   SITE PLAN.   19) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE ALL THE DISTANCES AND FEATURES   MENTIONED OR REQUESTED IN THE FDOT LETTER   20) SATISFIED. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS ARE MISSING   21) SATISFIED. SIDEWALK WIDTHS ARE MISSING ON SEVERAL   LOCATIONS   22) SATISFIED. INTERNAL DRIVEWAYS, LANES AND WALKWAYS   MUST BE DIMENSIONED   23) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED   VISIBILITY TRIANGLES       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]             Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-22-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 08-22-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-08-22 20:54:19 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE SENSITIVE LOCATION OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHALL BE   SCHEDULED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY   2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET   SERVICE/QUEUE ANALYSIS. SHEET A1.02 SHOWS A THIRD VALET   LOCATION, WHICH IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE ANALYSIS.   MOREOVER, VALET SPACES MUST BE IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE   PLANS, ANALYSIS MUST INCLUDE MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS,   PROCESS TIME MUST BE CALCULATED AND PROPERLY BROKEN   DOWN (I.E. ACCEPTANCE/DELIVERY PROCESSING TIME AT VALET   STAND, DRIVE UP/DOWN TIME, WALK UP/DOWN TIME). FULL   PATH FROM STAND TO PARKING STALLS MUST BE SHOWN, NOT   JUST GROUND OPERATIONS   3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED   4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT D4 ACCESS MANAGEMENT LETTER,   ONCE RECEIVED       SITE COMMENTS   5) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE   BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS)   ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. REQUEST IS FOR A   CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING AND HIGHLIGHTING   TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS (E.G. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY   DETAILS, ONLY SURFACE ITEMS SUCH AS POLES AND BASINS).   ALSO, NONE OF THE CIVIL OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE   SHOWCASING PAVEMENTS MARKINGS AND LANE WIDTHS OF THE   SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK. PLEASE PROVIDE A DEDICATED   AND DETAILED TRANSPORTATION-ORIENTED SITE PLAN. SEVERAL   SIDEWALKS, LANES,   6) SATISFIED. SHEET C-102, RIGHT DRAWING. WB-40   MANEUVERING SHOWS ENCROACHMENT WITH THE INTERNAL   SIDEWALK BY THE DROP-OFF AREA. IS THAT PORTION OF THE   WALKWAY CURB LESS?   7) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.04 TO 06, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY   MARK TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN DEAD-END   8) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.07, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK   TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN DEAD-ENDS   9) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY   ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20   FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR   THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2?   SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL   PULL BOX (240V ? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE   DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF BICYCLE   PARKING   11) SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE THOSE   STALLS   12) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS   AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS ITEM WILL BE   REVIEWED AND CLEARED ONCE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC   SITE PLAN IS PROVIDED. CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 8   FEET, BUT CONSIDERING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT AND THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGH PEDESTRIAN   TRAFFIC, WIDER SIDEWALKS ARE RECOMMENDED.   13) REMOVE/RELOCATE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND INSTALLED IN   THE MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE AND OKEECHOBEE   OR PROVIDE A JUSTIFICATION. SUCH FEATURES ARE   SIGNIFICANTLY SPLITTING AND REDUCING THE WALKABLE AREA   14) SATISFIED. REMOVE THE PARALLEL PARKING STALLS ON   DIXIE   15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MAKE THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON   LAKEVIEW AVE EXIT ONLY. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS   QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY   CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT   JUSTIFICATION. PER THE FDOT DOCUMENT: ?THIS LETTER DOES   NOT GUARANTEE PERMIT APPROVAL. THE PERMIT MAY BE DENIED   BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING   PLANS?. CONSIDERING THE VICINITY OF THE GARAGE RAMP AND   THE HOTEL VALET OPERATION TO THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY,   THERE ARE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF CONFLICT POINTS   NEGATIVELY AFFECTING THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION, WITH A   SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF POTENTIAL SPILLBACKS INTO   OKEECHOBEE BLVD. THE ONE-WAY EXIT ONLY IS STRONGLY   RECOMMENDED   16) PARTIALLY SATISFIED CONSIDER MAKING THE SOUTHERN   DRIVEWAY ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD ENTRY ONLY. PROVIDE A   TRAFFIC. ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC.   PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN   TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY   BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION. PER THE   FDOT DOCUMENT: ?THIS LETTER DOES NOT GUARANTEE PERMIT   APPROVAL. THE PERMIT MAY BE DENIED BASED ON THE REVIEW   OF THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING PLANS?. IF THE NORTHERN   DRIVEWAY WERE TO BE CONFIGURED AS EXIT ONLY, THE   SOUTHERN ONE COULD BE FULL ACCESS   17) HAS THE WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE ON   LAKEVIEW AVE BEEN SHORTENED BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED   NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LOCATION? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED   MEASUREMENTS OF THE STORAGE LANE ON THE SITE PLAN   18) THE FDOT LETTER AUTHORIZED THE INSTALLATION OF BOTH   THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN DRIVEWAYS APPROXIMATELY 150   FEET FROM DIXIE AND 330 FEET FROM OLIVE. PLEASE   SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCES ON THE SITE PLAN   19) SHOWCASE ALL THE DISTANCES AND FEATURES MENTIONED   OR REQUESTED IN THE FDOT LETTER   20) PEDESTRIAN RAMPS ARE MISSING   21) SIDEWALK WIDTHS ARE MISSING ON SEVERAL LOCATIONS   22) INTERNAL DRIVEWAYS, LANES AND WALKWAYS MUST BE   DIMENSIONED   23) SHOWCASE AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED VISIBILITY   TRIANGLES       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]             Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-28-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 07-28-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-07-28 08:42:09 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE SENSITIVE LOCATION OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHALL BE   SCHEDULED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY   2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET SERVICE/QUEUE   ANALYSIS   3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE   RECEIVED   4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT D4 ACCESS   MANAGEMENT LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED       SITE COMMENTS   5) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE   BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS)   ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. REQUEST IS FOR A   CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING AND HIGHLIGHTING   TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS (E.G. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY   DETAILS, ONLY SURFACE ITEMS SUCH AS POLES AND BASINS).   ALSO, NONE OF THE CIVIL OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE   SHOWCASING PAVEMENTS MARKINGS AND LANE WIDTHS OF THE   SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK. PLEASE PROVIDE A DEDICATED   AND DETAILED TRANSPORTATION-ORIENTED SITE PLAN.   6) SATISFIED. SHEET C-102, RIGHT DRAWING. WB-40   MANEUVERING SHOWS ENCROACHMENT WITH THE INTERNAL   SIDEWALK BY THE DROP-OFF AREA. IS THAT PORTION OF THE   WALKWAY CURB LESS?   7) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.04 TO 06, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY   MARK TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN DEAD-END   8) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.07, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK   TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN DEAD-ENDS   9) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY   ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20   FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR   THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2?   SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL   PULL BOX (240V 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE   DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF BICYCLE   PARKING   11) SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE THOSE   STALLS   12) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS   AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS ITEM WILL BE   REVIEWED AND CLEARED ONCE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC   SITE PLAN IS PROVIDED.   13) SATISFIED. REMOVE THE PARALLEL PARKING STALLS ON   DIXIE   14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MAKE THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON   LAKEVIEW AVE EXIT ONLY. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS   QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY   CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT   JUSTIFICATION.   15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED CONSIDER MAKING THE SOUTHERN   DRIVEWAY ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD ENTRY ONLY. PROVIDE A   TRAFFIC. ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC.   PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN   TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY   BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 06-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 06-08-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-06-08 21:22:53 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) GIVEN THE SENSITIVE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT, A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHALL BE SCHEDULED   FOR A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY   2) PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET SERVICE/QUEUE ANALYSIS   3) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   4) PROVIDE FDOT D4 ACCESS MANAGEMENT LETTER       SITE COMMENTS   5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS   (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.   PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER   SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   6) SHEET C-102, RIGHT DRAWING. WB-40 MANEUVERING SHOWS   ENCROACHMENT WITH THE INTERNAL SIDEWALK BY THE DROP-OFF   AREA. IS THAT PORTION OF THE WALKWAY CURB LESS?   7) SHEET A1.04 TO 06, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK   TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN DEAD-END   8) SHEET A1.07, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK TURNAROUND   SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN DEAD-ENDS   9) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE   MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND   PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR THE LATTER   ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2? SCHEDULE 40 PVC)   TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V ?   10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.   10) PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF BICYCLE PARKING   11) A MINIMUM OF 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   MUST BE PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE THOSE STALLS   12) PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS AROUND THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT   13) REMOVE THE PARALLEL PARKING STALLS ON DIXIE   14) MAKE THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON LAKEVIEW AVE EXIT   ONLY   15) CONSIDER MAKING THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY ON OKEECHOBEE   BLVD ENTRY ONLY       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-30-2022 Cont ID   Sent By llouie Date 09-30-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By llouie Date 09-30-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-30 10:57:40 *** THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO THE 9/23/2022   RESUBMITTAL PACKET. ZONING HAS APPROVED ITS REVIEW WITH   THE FOLLOWING CONDITION THAT THE MINOR CORRECTIONS   BELOW ARE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO DAC (STAFF TO WORK WITH   THE ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS TO ADDRESS   CORRECTIONS FOR CONSISTENCY) ***           ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SET:       1.) SHEET A0.01 - CORRECTIONS: A) PROVIDED CONDITIONAL   SETBACK ON LEVELS 6-7: 33 FT. VS. 37'-4" (PROVIDED IN   THE BUILDING SETBACK PAGE); B) OKEECHOBEE BLVD.   TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT IS 66' (AT 50%) NOT 60'-10.5";   C) VERIFY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION AT 1,964 SQ.   FT. (DIFFERENT IN LANDSCAPE PLAN); D) PROVIDE PRIVATE   OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS.       2.) SHEET A0.07 - CORRECTIONS: SHADING TO INCLUDE WHAT   APPEARS TO BE A RESTROOM ON THE GROUND LEVEL FAR GROSS   AREA CALCULATIONS; ENSURE CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT ON   ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS - PER 9/28 EMAIL FROM SANGHO -   SQUARE FOOTAGE IS NOW 18,170 SQ. FT. (+340 SQ. FT.)       3.) SHEET A1.03 - CORRECTIONS: CORRECTIONS NEED TO BE   MADE TO THE PARKING GARAGE PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY.       4.) SHEET A1.04 - CORRECTIONS: 46 PARKING SPACES   PROVIDED - I COUNTED 41 STALLS (NOT 40) + 2 TANDEM + 3   ADA (NOT 2).               LANDSCAPE PLAN SET:       1.) PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS DO NOT MATCH   ARCHITECTURAL SET (1,964 SQ. FT. VS. 1,940 SQ. FT. ON   SHEET LP-4).       2.) SHEET L-1 (ILLUSTRATED OVERALL SITE PLAN) DOES NOT   MATCH THE DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL SET.       3.) ONE CITY PLAZA BUILDING HEIGHT AND AMENITIES DECK   (IN STORIES) IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL SET   ON SHEETS: L-2, L-3 AND L-4.                                     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-23-2022 Cont ID   Sent By llouie Date 08-23-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By llouie Date 08-23-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-08-23 08:45:41 GENERAL COMMENTS:       1.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT HOLD OUTREACH   MEETINGS WITH THE RESIDENTS OF ONE CITY PLAZA   CONDOMINIUM, AS THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE A DIRECT   IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL CONDO BUILDING.       [STAFF RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT - IN PROGRESS.   ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT?S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER   (8/12/22), THE APPLICANT IS AWARE THAT IT IS NECESSARY   TO ENGAGE WITH THE NEIGHBOR PRIOR TO THE PROJECT   PROCEEDING TO A DAC MEETING. THIS IS STILL IN PROGRESS.   ONCE THE MEETING(S) HAVE BEEN HELD, THE APPLICANT WILL   BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION/NECESSARY   CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE MEETING(S).]           2.) ALTHOUGH THE PROJECT IS WITHIN THE TRAFFIC   CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA (TCEA), A LETTER FROM THE   PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS STILL REQUIRED.   PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION   AT (561) 684-4030 FOR INFORMATION ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE   REQUIRED TRAFFIC LETTER.       [STAFF RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT - IN PROGRESS.   ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT?S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER   (8/12/22), THE APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THE COMMENT AND   HAS NOTED THAT THE TPS ANALYSIS IS CURRENTLY UNDER   REVIEW AT PALM BEACH COUNTY. THIS LETTER IS REQUIRED   PRIOR TO THE PROJECT PROCEEDING TO A DAC MEETING.]           3.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) SHALL BE REQUIRED   FOR THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS AND/OR STREETSCAPE   IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HWY, LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND   OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (FDOT CONTROLLED ROWS). THIS   PREDETERMINATION LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE   SCHEDULING OF THIS APPLICATION FOR THE DOWNTOWN ACTION   COMMITTEE (DAC) TO ENSURE THE ACCESS POINTS AND   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE FEASIBLE.       [STAFF RESPONSE: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FDOT   PREDETERMINATION LETTER; HOWEVER, THE LETTER FROM FDOT,   DATED 8/4/2022, HAS INCORRECT INFORMATION ON THE UNIT   COUNT AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR THE   PROJECT. THIS MUST BE CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY. PLEASE   CONTACT FDOT TO REVISE LETTER WITH THE CORRECT   BUILDING/UNIT CALCULATIONS. THE LETTER FROM FDOT IS   REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE PROJECT PROCEEDING TO A DAC   MEETING.]           4.) PROVIDE A LETTER ENSURING FAA COMPLIANCE (A   DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD) IN REGARD TO THE HEIGHT OF   ANY TOWERS OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THE DESIGNATED FLIGHT   PATHS.       [STAFF RESPONSE: IT WAS BROUGHT TO STAFF'S ATTENTION   THAT THE APPLICANT SHOULD OBTAIN THE FAA COMPLIANCE   LETTER. AN EMAIL TO THE APPLICANT WENT OUT ON 8/11/2022   TO INFORM THE APPLICANT OF THE LETTER REQUIREMENT.   APPLICANT IS AWARE THE PROCESS TO OBTAIN THE COMPLIANCE   LETTER IS REQUIRED. PLEASE START PROCESS AND/OR   FOLLOW-UP WITH FAA ASAP.]           5.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY   (I.E. SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, CIVIL PLANS, ETC.)       [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT FULLY ADDRESSED. THERE ARE STILL   INCONSISTENCIES IN THE PLAN SET. ANY CHANGES MADE TO   THE PLANS REQUIRES ALL PLAN SHEETS TO BE UPDATED FOR   CONSISTENCY. PLANNING STAFF WILL WORK WITH THE   ARCHITECT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IDENTIFY/ADDRESS   THESE INCONSISTENCIES.]           6.) AS DISCUSSED WITH THE ARCHITECT ON 7/19/2022, THE   PROJECT CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED/CORRECTED   THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SHEETS FOR ACCURACY. THE ARCHITECT   ACKNOWLEDGES THESE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PROJECT   NUMBERS AND WILL ADDRESS (THE ARCHITECT SHOULD ALSO   SCHEDULE A TIME TO DISCUSS THE SPECIFIC INCONSISTENCIES   WITH STAFF): A) BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS. B) FAR   CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS.       [STAFF RESPONSE: PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT CONTACT   STAFF DIRECTLY TO CLARIFY THE CALCULATIONS.]           7.) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON WHICH OPTION THE   PROJECT WILL SATISFY PER S.94-111(T)(5) OF THE ZLDRS,   SINCE THE PROJECT WILL EXCEED THE SOFT MAXIMUM (BUT AT   UNDER 50%). IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE APPLICANT WILL   COMPLY WITH THE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)   REQUIREMENTS, BUT STAFF WILL NEED THE INFORMATION ON   HOW THE PROJECT WILL ?EARN? THE ADDITIONAL PARKING   SPACES (ABOVE THE SOFT MAX). IT APPEARS THAT THE   PROJECT EXCEEDS THE SOFT MAXIMUM BY 60 PARKING SPACES   (PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS). THERE MUST BE A CLEAR   UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THIS WILL BE ACHIEVED BY DAC.               STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:       1.) A SIDEWALK WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 FT. CLEAR WIDTH   SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PRIVATE   SIDEWALK WHICH SERVE AS AN EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STREETSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS, SHALL MATCH THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IN DESIGN   AND MATERIAL, AND SHALL PROVIDE A SEAMLESS TRANSITION   BETWEEN THE TWO. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE IN THE PLANS AND   PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE   ZLDRS.       [STAFF RESPONSE: DIMENSIONS ARE NOW PROVIDED IN THE   SITE PLAN (SHEET C-103); HOWEVER, THE 8 FT. CLEAR   SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN MET   ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A LANDSCAPE PLANTER SEEMS TO   INTERRUPT THE 8 FT. CLEARANCE. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF   THE PLANTER ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY? CAN THIS BE   SHIFTED OR ELIMINATED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE?   ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE CHECK DIMENSIONS, THE SIDEWALK   DIMENSIONS ALSO CONFLICT WITH THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED   IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (WHICH SHOWS THE 8 FT. CLEARANCE   HAS BEEN MET).).           2.) REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IS NOW PROVIDED ALONG THE   STREET FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, THE CALCULATIONS, THE   DEPICTION IN THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL ARE ALL   INCONSISTENT. PLEASE ADDRESS.       [STAFF RESPONSE: THERE ARE STILL ISSUES WITH THE   BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS. STAFF WOULD NEED TO SEE A   BREAKDOWN OF PARKING PROVIDED FOR COMMERCIAL (INCLUDING   HOTEL) AND RESIDENTIAL USES SEPARATELY TO DETERMINE IF   THE CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENT CORRECTLY AND   INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS FOR BICYCLE PARKING IN   S.94-111 OF THE ZLDRS. ADDITIONALLY, WHERE IS THE   BICYCLE RACK DETAIL(S) FOR THE PROJECT? THE DETAIL MUST   BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET, AS THE CITY HAS DESIGN   STANDARDS FOR BICYCLE PARKING. PLEASE PROVIDE TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.]           3.) DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT IN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF   TRAVEL. DRIVEWAYS SHALL MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALK   ELEVATION. PLEASE PROVIDE A SECTION PARALLEL TO THE   STREET TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR   S.94-113(D)(10)]       [STAFF RESPONSE: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. ALL PLANS SHALL   MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. CURBS ARE STILL SHOWN ALONG   LAKEVIEW AVENUE WHERE THE DRIVEWAY MEETS THE SIDEWALK   ELEVATION.]           4.) CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS AND DRIVEWAYS   SHALL BE SEPARATED AT LEAST 10 FT. TO MINIMIZE THE   IMPACT OF A CONTIGUOUS CURB CUTS ON THE PEDESTRIAN   ENVIRONMENT. THE DIMENSION FOR THE CURB CUT SEPARATION   AT THE SOUTH INGRESS/EGRESS POINT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED   TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-111(O)]       [STAFF RESPONSE: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. CURB CUT   SEPARATION MUST EXTEND INTO THE DRIVEWAY APRON TO   PROVIDE ADEQUATE SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS (PURPOSE OF THE   SEPARATION)].           ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:       1.) THE MATERIAL USED ON THE BUILDING IS NOW NOTED IN   THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER   TABLE IV-4, TINTED OR REFLECTIVE GLASS IS NOT   PERMITTED. THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE THAT REFLECTIVE   GLASS WILL BE USED. PLEASE ADDRESS.       2.) STAFF IS REQUESTING A PHONE CONVERSATION TO DISCUSS   THE PROPOSED WALL TREATMENT ON THE BLANK FA?ADE ALONG   THE INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK. THE PROPOSED TREATMENT DOES   NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DMP CODE FOR BLANK   WALL FA?ADE TREATMENT. PLEASE WORK WITH STAFF TO   ADDRESS THIS CONCERN.       3.) PER HISTORIC'S EMAIL DATED 8/9/22, PLEASE SHOW   DETAIL AND/OR LOCATION OF THE PILASTERS AND WOOD BEANS   IN THE PROJECT.           INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:       * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR   (4) PAPER COPIES - 2 SETS IN FULL COLOR, ONE REDUCED   COPY IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY   OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS.       * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. [STAFF   NOTE: NO FEE IS REQUIRED FOR THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL ? THE   7/5/22 PLANS SHOW THE APPLICANT IS WORKING WITH STAFF   TO ADDRESS OUTSTANDING COMMENTS.]       * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE   QUESTIONS.           CONDITIONS:       * THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN LEED CERTIFICATION FROM THE   LEADERSHIP ON ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED) OR A SIMILAR   NATIONALLY ACCREDITED ORGANIZATION. ALL REQUIREMENTS   AND TIMEFRAMES SHALL BE MET PURSUANT TO SEC.   94135(E.)(2.)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS (ZLDRS).       * THE PROJECT EXCEEDS THE SOFT MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR   PARKING (BUT NOT OVER 50%). A CONTRIBUTION TO THE   TRANSIT OPERATION FUND WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR   S.94-111]       * A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, OUTLINING THE OPERATION OF   THE PROPOSED MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL BE EXECUTED ON   CITY APPROVED FORMS AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.       * THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE DELIVERY/SERVICE   VEHICLES OPERATION, OVERALL CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT AND   VALET OPERATIONS ONSITE PER THE ?320 LAKEVIEW -   DELIVERY MANAGEMENT AND VALET OPERATIONS SUMMARY, WEST   PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, KIMLEY-HORN #140998000,? PREPARED   ON AUGUST 12, 2022, BY CHRISTOPHER W. HEGGEN, P.E., OF   KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-20-2022 Cont ID   Sent By llouie Date 07-20-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By llouie Date 07-20-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-07-20 15:43:08 GENERAL COMMENTS:       1.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT HOLD OUTREACH   MEETINGS WITH THE RESIDENTS OF ONE CITY PLAZA   CONDOMINIUM, AS THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE A DIRECT   IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL CONDO BUILDING.       [STAFF RESPONSE: IN PROGRESS. ACCORDING TO THE   APPLICANT?S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER (7/5/22), THE   APPLICANT IS AWARE THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO ENGAGE WITH   THE NEIGHBORS PRIOR TO THE PROJECT PROCEEDING TO A DAC   MEETING.]       2.) ALTHOUGH THE PROJECT IS WITHIN THE TRAFFIC   CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA (TCEA), A LETTER FROM THE   PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS STILL REQUIRED.   PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION   AT (561) 684-4030 FOR INFORMATION ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE   REQUIRED TRAFFIC LETTER.       [STAFF RESPONSE: IN PROGRESS. ACCORDING TO THE   APPLICANT'S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER (7/5/22), THE TPS   ANALYSIS IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW AT PALM BEACH   COUNTY. THIS LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE PROJECT   PROCEEDING TO A DAC MEETING.)       3.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) SHALL BE REQUIRED   FOR THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS AND/OR STREETSCAPE   IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HWY, LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND   OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (FDOT CONTROLLED ROWS). THIS   PREDETERMINATION LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE   SCHEDULING OF THIS APPLICATION FOR THE DOWNTOWN ACTION   COMMITTEE (DAC) TO ENSURE THE ACCESS POINTS AND   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE FEASIBLE.       [STAFF RESPONSE: IN PROGRESS. ACCORDING TO THE   APPLICANT'S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER (7/5/22), A   PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH FDOT WAS HELD ON 5/19/22   AND A LETTER WILL BE PROVIDED TO STAFF UPON RECEIPT. A   LETTER FROM FDOT STATING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS   ALONG THE FDOT CONTROLLED ROWS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE   PROJECT PROCEEDING TO A DAC MEETING.]       4.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY   (I.E. SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, CIVIL PLANS, ETC.)       [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. THE ARCHITECT IS AWARE   THAT THERE ARE STILL INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PLANS   WITHIN THE PLAN SET. THESE INCONSISTENCIES WILL BE   ADDRESSED.]       5.) ALL BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SHEET   A0.04 (BUILDING SETBACKS) TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY   WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. SOME   BUILDING SETBACKS APPEAR TO BE REMOVED/NOT INCLUDED IN   THE LATEST PLAN SET.       6.) IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN PACKET, ON THE COVER   SHEET/TABLE OF CONTENTS: A) SHEETS FOR ARCHITECTURAL   RENDERINGS ARE MISLABELED. B) CORRECT PLAN SHEET PAGES   FOR LEVELS 19 THROUGH ROOFTOP LEVEL PLAN.       7.) AS DISCUSSED WITH THE ARCHITECT ON 7/19/2022, THE   PROJECT CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED/CORRECTED   THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SHEETS FOR ACCURACY. THE ARCHITECT   ACKNOWLEDGES THESE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PROJECT   NUMBERS AND WILL ADDRESS (THE ARCHITECT SHOULD ALSO   SCHEDULE A TIME TO DISCUSS THE SPECIFIC INCONSISTENCIES   WITH STAFF): A) BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS. B) FAR   CALCULATIONS AND DIAGRAMS. C) ACTIVE USE CALCULATIONS.   D) LANDSCAPE PLAN OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS AND DEPICTION   VS. SITE PLANS. E) PARKING CALCULATIONS VS. SITE PLAN.       8.) AS DISCUSSED WITH THE ARCHITECT ON 7/19/22, STAFF   WILL NEED TO VERIFY WITH URBAN DESIGN IF THE DOG RUN   AREA MEETS THE FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE DAC   CODE. STAFF WILL LET THE APPLICANT KNOW AS SOON AS   FEEDBACK IS PROVIDED.           SITE PLAN COMMENTS:       1.) THE BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD   WHERE THERE IS A PLANAR BREAK APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE OF   THE SETBACK RANGE. PLEASE ADDRESS OR REQUEST A VARIANCE   FROM THE REQUIREMENT.       2.) GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT ALONG   OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD HAS NOT BEEN MET. A MINIMUM OF   131.8 LINEAR FEET (65%) OF ACTIVE USE IS REQUIRED. ONLY   121.75 LINEAR FEET HAS BEEN PROVIDED ALONG OKEECHOBEE   BLVD. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]       3.) PROVIDE THE ROOFTOP STORAGE AREA CALCULATIONS   (HURRICANE EMERGENCY STORAGE SPACE FOR ROOFTOP   AMENITIES AS NOTED IN THE APPLICANT'S PPRC RESPONSE   LETTER - 7/5/22). PER S.94-109, THE STORAGE AREA IS   PERMITTED AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT EXCEED 30%. PLEASE   DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.           PARKING REQUIREMENTS:       1.) PLEASE CHECK THE PARKING CALCULATIONS. THERE SEEMS   TO BE ERRORS IN THE CALCULATIONS (I.E. PARKING COUNT   DOES NOT MATCH THE PARKING PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN).   PLEASE CORRECT ANY ERRORS FOR CONSISTENCY.       [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. INCONSISTENCIES WITH   THE PARKING CALCULATIONS AND PARKING DEPICTED IN THE   PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. THE ARCHITECT IS   REQUESTED TO CONTACT STAFF TO GO OVER THE SPECIFIC   INCONSISTENCIES TO ENSURE THE ERRORS ARE ADDRESSED   CORRECTLY.]       2.) THE APPLICANT'S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER (7/5/22)   STATES THAT A DELIVERY MANAGEMENT, CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT   AND VALET QUEUING /OPERATIONS EVALUATION HAS BEEN   PREPARED AND IS INCLUDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET;   HOWEVER, THIS DOCUMENT CANNOT BE FOUND. PLEASE CLARIFY   AND/OR PROVIDE AS THIS IS A REQUIRED DOCUMENT FOR THE   PROJECT.       3.) THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM LOADING   REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-485. PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.       [STAFF RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. LOADING ZONE   CALCULATIONS AND DIMENSION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED IN   THE PLANS. BASED ON STAFF?S CALCULATIONS, A MINIMUM OF   THREE 10 FT. X 50 FT. LOADING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR   THE PROJECT. IF THE APPLICANT BELIEVES LESS ARE   REQUIRED, THE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO   DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.]           STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:       1.) A SIDEWALK WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 FT. CLEAR WIDTH   SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PRIVATE   SIDEWALK WHICH SERVE AS AN EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STREETSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS, SHALL MATCH THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IN DESIGN   AND MATERIAL, AND SHALL PROVIDE A SEAMLESS TRANSITION   BETWEEN THE TWO. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE IN THE PLANS AND   PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE   ZLDRS.       [STAFF RESPONSE: ALTHOUGH DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED   IN SHEET C-100 OF THE CIVIL PLANS, STAFF IS REQUESTING   THAT THE DIMENSIONS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE SITE   PLAN.]       2.) REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IS NOW PROVIDED ALONG THE   STREET FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, THE CALCULATIONS, THE   DEPICTION IN THE PLANS AND THE DETAIL ARE ALL   INCONSISTENT. PLEASE ADDRESS.       3.) DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT IN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF   TRAVEL. DRIVEWAYS SHALL MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALK   ELEVATION. PLEASE PROVIDE A SECTION PARALLEL TO THE   STREET TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR   S.94-113(D)(10)]       [STAFF RESPONSE: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. ALTHOUGH THE   CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION AT THE   DRIVEWAY IS CURBLESS, STAFF IS REQUESTING THE SAME   CONSISTENCY IN THE SITE PLAN. ALSO, THE REQUESTED   SECTION DETAIL WAS NOT PROVIDED.]       4.) CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS AND DRIVEWAYS   SHALL BE SEPARATED AT LEAST 10 FT. TO MINIMIZE THE   IMPACT OF A CONTIGUOUS CURB CUTS ON THE PEDESTRIAN   ENVIRONMENT. THE DIMENSION FOR THE CURB CUT SEPARATION   AT THE SOUTH INGRESS/EGRESS POINT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED   TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-111(O)]           ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:       1.) IT IS NOTED IN THE APPLICANT'S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER   (7/5/22) THAT A "GREEN WALL TREATMENT" IS PROPOSED ON   THE EAST WALLS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THIS MEANS AND NOTE   IN THE PLANS.       2.) IT IS NOT CLEAR TO WHAT THE REQUESTED ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT WILL BE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE   NEIGHBORING ONE CITY PLAZA. THE PROJECT NOW PROPOSES A   7 FT. SETBACK BETWEEN BUILDINGS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD   AND LAKEVIEW AVENUE (MIDDLE INTERIOR PROPOSES A 0 FT.   SETBACK). STAFF HAD SPOKE TO THE ARCHITECT AND   SUGGESTED A FAUX FACADE/WALL THE HEIGHT OF THE ENTIRE   PODIUM TO PROVIDE SOME CONTINUITY BETWEEN BUILDINGS.           SIGNAGE:       1.) WILL THERE BE ANY SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THIS   PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE   PROPOSED SIGNAGE. IF THE PROJECT SIGNAGE HAS YET TO BE   DETERMINED, A NOTE STATING THAT ALL PROJECT SIGNAGE   SHALL COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-110, OF THE ZONING AND LAND   DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE   PLANS.       [STAFF RESPONSE: THE APPLICANT'S PPRC RESPONSE LETTER   (7/5/22) STATES THAT A COMPLIANCE NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED   IN THE PLANS; HOWEVER, THIS NOTE COULD NOT BE FOUND.   THE RESPONSE LETTER ALSO STATES THAT THE NOTE COULD BE   FOUND ON SHEET C-100 (ENGINEERING PLANS) ? THE NOTE IS   MORE APPROPRIATE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.]               INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:       * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR   (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X 17   INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND   DOCUMENTS.       * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. [STAFF   NOTE: NO FEE IS REQUIRED FOR THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL ? THE   7/5/22 PLANS SHOW THE APPLICANT IS WORKING WITH STAFF   TO ADDRESS OUTSTANDING COMMENTS.]       * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE   QUESTIONS.           CONDITIONS:       * THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN LEED CERTIFICATION FROM THE   LEADERSHIP ON ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED) OR A SIMILAR   NATIONALLY ACCREDITED ORGANIZATION. ALL REQUIREMENTS   AND TIMEFRAMES SHALL BE MET PURSUANT TO SEC.   94135(E.)(2.)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS (ZLDRS).       * THE PROJECT EXCEEDS THE SOFT MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR   PARKING (BUT NOT OVER 50%). A CONTRIBUTION TO THE   TRANSIT OPERATION FUND WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR   S.94-111]       * A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, OUTLINING THE OPERATION OF   THE PROPOSED MECHANICAL PARKING SHALL BE EXECUTED ON   CITY APPROVED FORMS AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS.             Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By llouie Date 06-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By llouie Date 06-08-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-06-08 08:22:40 GENERAL COMMENTS:       1.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT HOLD OUTREACH   MEETINGS WITH THE RESIDENTS OF ONE CITY PLAZA   CONDOMINIUM, AS THE PROPOSE PROJECT WILL HAVE A DIRECT   IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL CONDO BUILDING.       2.) ALTHOUGH THE PROJECT IS WITHIN THE TRAFFIC   CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA (TCEA), A LETTER FROM THE   PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, IS STILL REQUIRED.   PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION   AT (561) 684-4030 FOR INFORMATION ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE   REQUIRED TRAFFIC LETTER.       3.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) SHALL BE REQUIRED   FOR THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS AND/OR STREETSCAPE   IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HWY, LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND   OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (FDOT CONTROLLED ROWS). THIS   PREDETERMINATION LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE   SCHEDULING OF THIS APPLICATION FOR THE DOWNTOWN ACTION   COMMITTEE (DAC) TO ENSURE THE ACCESS POINTS AND   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE FEASIBLE.       4.) ACCORDING TO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN   THE PLAN SHEETS, THE SOFT MAXIMUM HAS BEEN EXCEEDED   (BUT NOT OVER 50%), AND THEREFORE, A CONTRIBUTION TO   THE TRANSIT OPERATION FUND WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR   S.94-111]       5.) ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE OBD SHALL OBTAIN   LEED CERTIFICATION FROM THE LEADERSHIP ON ENVIRONMENTAL   DESIGN (LEED) OR A SIMILAR NATIONALLY ACCREDITED   ORGANIZATION. ALL REQUIREMENTS AND TIMEFRAMES SHALL BE   MET PURSUANT TO SEC. 941-35(E.)(2.)(5.).       6.) ALL BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE   BACK OF CURB. PLAN SHEETS SHOWS THAT THE SETBACK   DIMENSIONS WERE TAKEN FROM THE FRONT OF THE CURB, WHICH   IS INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.       7.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY   (I.E. SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, CIVIL PLANS, ETC.).       8.) AT LEAST ONE HARD COPY SET OF FULL COLORED   PLANS/DRAWINGS (I.E. ELEVATIONS, FAR CALCULATIONS   SHEETS, ETC.) SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ALL FUTURE   RESUBMITTALS.           SITE PLAN COMMENTS:       1.) THE ENTIRE BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG SOUTH DIXIE   HIGHWAY, INCLUDING THE GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE PROVIDED   WITHIN THE MINIMUM (16 FEET) AND MAXIMUM (30 FEET)   BUILDING SETBACK RANGE. THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGE   ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY (A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREET)   APPEARS TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THIS SETBACK RANGE.   THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED BY RECONFIGURING THE HOTEL LOBBY   SPACE TO MEET THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS. [ZLDR   S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]       2.) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (PLAZA) AREA SHALL   ABUT ACTIVE USES ON A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) SIDES. THIS   REQUIREMENT IS CURRENTLY NOT MET; THE PLAZA AREA   CURRENTLY ABUTS ACTIVE USE ONLY ON ONE (1) SIDE. [ZLDR   S.94-108, TABLE IV-7]       3.) THE STAIRWELL LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING ALONG   LAKEVIEW AVENUE, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE GROUND   LEVEL CAFE SHALL BE RELOCATED AWAY FROM THE CORNER.   EFFORT SHALL BE MADE TO CONCEAL THE STAIRWELL FROM THE   BUILDING FRONTAGE BY ACTIVE USES ALONG THIS PROMINENT   PEDESTRIAN STREET FRONTAGE (I.E. PUSH THE STAIRWELL   BACK INTO THE SPACE).       4.) THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK (MINIMUM OF 31 FT.) SHALL   APPLY TO ALL STORIES ABOVE THE 5TH STORY TO CONCEAL ALL   PARKING AND/OR NON-ACTIVE USE LINERS. THIS REQUIREMENT   HAS NOT BEEN MET ALONG LAKEVIEW AVENUE. [ZLDR S.94-135,   TABLE IV-70]       5.) THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT CANNOT EXCEED 60% AT THE 6TH   AND 7TH LEVELS, UNLESS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE   CONDITIONAL SETBACK. THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK   REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET TO ALLOW FOR A GREATER   BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR PARKING BEYOND THE MAXIMUM 60%   FOR THESE LEVELS. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]       6.) MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE STREET   FRONTAGES CANNOT BE VERIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS   (I.E. LF) FOR ALL ACTIVE USE AREAS SO THAT STAFF CAN   VERIFY THE CALCULATIONS. ALSO, PLEASE NOTE THAT   NON-ACTIVE USES, SUCH AS MAILROOMS, STORAGE, ETC.,   SHALL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE   REQUIREMENT; SOME OF THESE USES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED   TOWARDS THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS WHICH   IS INCORRECT. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]       7.) THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH FOR COMMERCIAL   USES IS 20 FT. ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL. THERE ARE   EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM HOTEL OFFICES ALONG THE   LAKEVIEW FRONTAGE THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS   MINIMUM REQUIREMENT (PROVIDED IS 15 FT.). [ZLDR   S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]       8.) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL AREAS IN THE   ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE   COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]       9.) THERE ARE SOME ABBREVIATED NOTES THAT STAFF IS   UNFAMILIAR WITH (I.E. FCC, BOH, T, RVG, FO, PR, HK, L,   ETC.) TO DEFINE SPACES IN THE PLAN SHEETS. PLEASE   CLARIFY WHAT THESE SPACES ARE IN THE PLANS SO THAT   STAFF CAN DETERMINE IF THESE SPACES QUALIFY IN THE   ACTIVE USE, FAR, ETC. CALCULATIONS.       10.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT ROOM.   STAFF NEEDS TO DETERMINE IF THIS SPACE IS CONSIDERED AN   ACTIVE OR NON-ACTIVE USE. THIS SPACE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN   INCLUDED IN THE ACTIVE USE CALCULATIONS ALONG LAKEVIEW   AVE. (LEVEL 3).       11.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE "DOG RUN" AREA. IT WOULD BE   HELPFUL TO DESIGN THE SPACE WITH FURNISHINGS TO CONFIRM   THAT THE SPACE IS NOT AN EMPTY SPACE WITHIN THE   PROJECT.       12.) WHAT TYPE OF STORAGE IS PROVIDED ON LEVELS 2   THROUGH 7? PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION/CLARIFY IN   THE PLANS.       13.) THE STORAGE AREA SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED ON THE   ROOFTOP OF THE BUILDING. ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, AN   ENCLOSED STORAGE AREA IS PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOP.   PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-109, TABLE IV-5]       14.) PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL/DEFINE ALL SPACES IN THE   PLANS (I.E. BICYCLE STORAGE AREA).       15.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE BREAKDOWN OF BUILDING SQUARE   FOOTAGE FOR RETAIL + RESTAURANT = 15,720 SQ. FT. THE   CALCULATIONS DO NOT ADD UP.       16.) FAR CALCULATIONS SHALL INCLUDE ALL FULLY ENCLOSED   STORAGE SPACES (AIR CONDITIONED AND NON-AIR   CONDITIONED), STAIRS AND ELEVATORS, ENCLOSED AREAS ON   THE ROOFTOP, EXTERNAL UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS,   ETC. (PLEASE REFER TO THE DEFINITION FOR "GROSS   BUILDING AREA"). THERE ARE SOME SPACES IN THE PLANS   THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS   BUT HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE CALCULATIONS. PLEASE   NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR IN OBD-25   SUBDISTRICT IS 7.0. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70]           PARKING REQUIREMENTS:       1.) PLEASE CHECK THE PARKING CALCULATIONS. THERE SEEMS   TO BE ERRORS IN THE CALCULATIONS (I.E. PARKING COUNT   DOES NOT MATCH THE PARKING PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN).   PLEASE CORRECT ANY ERRORS FOR CONSISTENCY.       2.) PARKING SPACES FOR THE DISABLED SHALL BE PROVIDED   ACCORDING TO SUBSECTION 94-485(O) OF THE ZLDRS.   ACCORDING TO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROJECT,   THE DISABLE PARKING REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET. THE   ZLDRS REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 2% OF PARKING PROVIDED FOR   THE DISABLED. [ZLDR S.94-111 AND S94-485(O)].       3.) PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE   PLANS. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE   GENERAL PARKING STANDARDS ACCORDING TO ZLDR   S.94-111(C).       4.) THE PLANS IMPLY THAT THERE WILL BE COMPACT PARKING   SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPACT PARKING SPACE   CALCULATIONS AND IDENTIFY WHERE THE COMPACT PARKING   SPACES WILL BE LOCATED IN THE PROJECT. PROVIDED COMPACT   PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR   S.94-485.       5.) THE PROJECT PROPOSES MECHANICAL PARKING. MECHANICAL   PARKING SHALL REQUIRE A COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT AT ALL   HOURS (24/7/365). SUCH OPERATION SHALL BE ENFORCED   THROUGH A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC   RECORDS. ALL RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS   REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY-APPROVED FORMS   AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS. [ZLDR S.94-111]       6.) THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM LOADING   REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-485. PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.   [ZLDR S.94-111 AND S.94-485]       7.) WHY IS THE INGRESS AND EGRESS POINTS SO WIDE ALONG   OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD? PLEASE JUSTIFY AND PROVIDE   SUPPORT/BACKUP MATERIAL (I.E. AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM), AS   STAFF RECOMMENDS THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT IS REDUCED TO   24 FT. WIDE.       8.) PARKING ENTRANCE/EXIT/DRIVEWAY SHALL NOT BE WIDER   THAN 25 FT. AS MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE   CURB. THE DRIVEWAY SEEMS TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM   ALLOWABLE WIDTH ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. [ZLDR   S.94-111(O)]       9.) ALL NEW PROJECTS SHALL PROVIDE A FREIGHT DELIVERY   PLAN AND ROUTES TO ENSURE DELIVERIES DO NOT IMPACT   TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A FREIGHT   DELIVERY PLAN WITH THE PROJECT APPLICATION. [ZLDR   S.94-135(E)(2)(4)(C.)]       10.) ALL NEW PROJECTS SHALL PROVIDE A CURB SIDE   MANAGEMENT PLAN TO PRIORITIZE MULTIMODAL TRAVEL. THERE   DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN [ZLDR   S.94-135(E)(2)(4)(D.)]       11.) HOW IS THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING MET FOR THE   PROJECT? BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SEC. 94-111 OF THE ZLDRS.   ADDITIONALLY, BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS, PROPOSED   RACK AND STORAGE/CHANGE ROOM/SHOWER FACILITY LOCATION   SHALL BE CLEAR IN THE PLANS.           STREETSCAPE COMMENTS:       1.) A SIDEWALK WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 FT. CLEAR WIDTH   SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PRIVATE   SIDEWALKS WHICH SERVE AS AN EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STREETSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS, SHALL MATCH THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IN DESIGN   AND MATERIAL, AND SHALL PROVIDE A SEAMLESS TRANSITION   BETWEEN THE TWO. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE IN THE PLANS AND   PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE   ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-113(D.)(1)]       2.) BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF   ONE (1) SPACE PER EVERY 100 FT. OF STREET FRONTAGE.   SPECIFICATIONS SHALL MEET CITY APPROVED STANDARDS.   PLEASE INCLUDE A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. [ZLDR   S.94-113(D)(9)]       3.) DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT IN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF   TRAVEL. DRIVEWAYS SHALL MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALK   ELEVATION. PLEASE PROVIDE A SECTION PARALLEL TO THE   STREET TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR   S.94-113(D.)(10.)]       4.) EXISTING SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO ONE CITY PLAZA SEEMS   TO BE INCONSISTENT. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY AND   ALSO SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR   THE PROJECT WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE OF   THE ADJACENT PROJECT(S).           ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:       1.) PLANAR BREAKS AT THE GROUND LEVEL AND PODIUM: FOR   BUILDING FRONTAGES GREATER THAN 150 FT., NO FACADE   SHALL EXCEED 60% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE WITHOUT   PROVIDING A PLANAR BREAK OR MULTIPLE PLANAR BREAKS A   MINIMUM OF 3 FT. IN DEPTH. THE CUMULATIVE HORIZONAL   LENGTH OF ALL PLANAR BREAKS SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR   EQUAL TO 20% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE; BLANK WALLS ARE   NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS, DIMENSIONS,   ETC., IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS   REQUIREMENT. THE PLANS PROVIDED   DOES NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [TABLE   IV-4]       2.) PER THE ZLDRS, "TRANSPARENCY" IS DEFINED AS   "BUILDING FENESTRATION ON NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WHICH   ALLOWS GROUND FLOOR VISUAL ACCESS BETWEEN A BUILDING   AND ITS ACTIVE USES FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK." THE   TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS APPEARS TO BE   INCONSISTENT/INCORRECT WITH THE ELEVATIONS/RENDERINGS   PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET (I.E. STAIRWELL WITHIN THE   NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE   DEFINITION OF TRANSPARENCY AND DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS   THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS AS PROVIDED IN THE   TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS IN THE PLAN SET). PLEASE   CHECK TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS AND CORRECT AS   NECESSARY FOR CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-109 AND S.94-135,   TABLE IV-70]       3.) FOR THE EAST ELEVATION (SHEET A2.03), PLEASE   PROVIDE A PROFILE OF THE ADJACENT ONE CITY PLAZA CONDO   BUILDING TO SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL IMPACT   THE ADJACENT USE. ADDITIONAL SECTION DRAWINGS MAY BE   REQUIRED TO ILLUSTRATE IMPACT. PLEASE CONTACT CRAIG   MCPHERSON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT-CSD CUSTOMER   SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE @ (561) 805-6684, TO OBTAIN THE   ACCURATE DRAWINGS FOR ONE CITY PLAZA TO ASSIST WITH THE   EXERCISE.           SIGNAGE:       1.) WILL THERE BE ANY SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THIS   PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE   PROPOSED SIGNAGE. IF PROJECT SIGNAGE HAS YET TO BE   DETERMINED, A NOTE STATING THAT ALL PROJECT SIGNAGE   SHALL COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-110, OF THE ZONING AND LAND   DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE   PLANS.           INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:       * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR   (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X 17   INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND   DOCUMENTS.       *ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE   ($500.00).       * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @@ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE   QUESTIONS.       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved