City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z22050020

Plan Review Stops For Project Z22050020

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	06-10-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	06-10-2022	Time	15:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	scwelter			Date	06-10-2022	Time	15:40	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	06-08-2022	Time	19:35	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	06-08-2022	Time	19:35	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-08 19:36:25	NO COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) MAP
	AMENDMENT.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	06-08-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	06-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-02-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	06-02-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	06-02-2022	Time	10:36	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-02 10:37:38	FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.

	IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
	PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
	STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-07-2022	Time	15:41	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-07-2022	Time	15:41	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-07 15:41:47

NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date				Cont ID
Sent By				Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	06-07-2022	Time	15:01	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	06-07-2022	Time	11:26	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date	06-07-2022	Time	11:23	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-07 11:24:34

NO REVIEW COMMENTS.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-02-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	06-02-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	06-02-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-02 11:29:18	PUBLIC WORKS HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
	DESIGNATION MODIFICATION.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-06-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	06-06-2022	Time	13:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	06-06-2022	Time	13:06	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-01-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	06-01-2022	Time	09:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-06-01 09:27:39

NO COMMENTS.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	06-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	06-08-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	06-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-08 17:07:52	NO COMMENTS

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	07-21-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	jroach			Date	07-21-2022	Time	10:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jroach			Date	07-19-2022	Time	16:09	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-21 10:15:15	PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
	________________________________________

	DATE OF REVIEW: 07.21.2022
	PROJECT NO.: Z22050020
	CASE NO.: PB 1105E
	________________________________________

	PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
	REVIEW COMMENTS:

	1. PER THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:

	1.1. SATISFIED - THE SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
	ELECTRONIC FORMAT (PDF).

	1.2. SATISFIED - THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
	SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (WORD).

	1.3. SATISFIED - A $212 ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE IS
	REQUIRED.

	2. SATISFIED - A SCANNED VERSION OF A SCAD APPLICATION
	WAS INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL ? WAS THIS APPLICATION
	EVER SIGNED BY THE CITY? HAS IT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE
	SCHOOL DISTRICT? PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS.

	3. SATISFIED - THE SURVEY INDICATES THAT THE
	WESTERN-MOST PARKING IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES
	OF THE PROPERTY (AS PART OF ?PARCEL TWO?), BUT THIS IS
	SHOWN ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER?S WEBSITE AS BEING A
	PART OF A PARCEL OWNED BY FEC RAILWAY LLC AND IS THE
	RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE CLARIFY. NOTE THAT IF
	THIS PARKING IS BEING INCLUDED, THE MAIL LIST, MAP,
	ETC. ALL NEED TO BE UPDATED.

	4. SATISFIED - SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE SHALL BE
	PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY FOR THE LAND AREA OF EACH
	PARCEL. CONFIRM THAT ALL STUDIES, ETC. UTILIZE THIS
	CORRECT LAND AREA.

	5. SATISFIED, EVALUATION WILL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF
	THE STAFF REPORT - WHILE NO DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED AT
	THIS TIME, CONCEPTUAL MASSING STUDIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
	TO INDICATE VARIOUS BUILD-OUT SCENARIOS UNDER THE
	PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL.

	6. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY ALEX
	HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER, AND SHALL BE
	ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY:

	6.1. SATISFIED - THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
	PREPARED BY KIMLEY HORN DATED MAY 9, 2022, STATES IN
	ITS CONCLUSION THAT, BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC LIMITATIONS,
	THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS WOULD BE IN PLACE FOR THE
	AMENDMENT:

	- RESTRICTED MAXIMUM DAILY NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIPS:
	18,903 DAILY TRIPS
	- RESTRICTED MAXIMUM AM PEAK HOUR NON-RESIDENTIAL
	TRIPS: 567 PEAK HOUR TRIPS
	- RESTRICTED MAXIMUM PM PEAK HOUR NON-RESIDENTIAL
	TRIPS: 1,931 PEAK HOUR TRIPS

	ANY TYPE OF TRAFFIC RESTRICTION PLACED ON THIS FLU
	AMENDMENT SHOULD APPLY TO ALL THE TRIPS GENERATED BY
	THE AMENDMENT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIMITED ONLY TO
	?NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIPS?. RESIDENTIAL USES ARE NOT
	EXEMPT FROM THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS. THE
	TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.

	6.2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE FLU AMENDMENT LOS
	ANALYSIS INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION ONLY INCLUDES THE
	SUMMARY LOS TABLE AND DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FULL LOS
	ANALYSIS AS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICATION DOES
	NOT INCLUDE A WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE APPLICABLE
	SERVICE AGENCIES INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT CAPACITY
	EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE BUILDOUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU
	DESIGNATION. THE LOS ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE REVISED
	ACCORDINGLY.

	6.2.1 NEW COMMENT - ?TABLE 3: CHANGE IN POTABLE WATER
	DEMAND? NEEDS TO BE REVISED. FOR THE EXISTING
	COMMERCIAL (C) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, THE
	APPLICANT SHOULD USE A POTABLE DEMAND RATE OF .20
	GALLONS PER DAY PER SQUARE FEET (GPD/SF). BASED ON MY
	CALCULATIONS THIS SHOULD RESULT ON AN EXISTING TOTAL
	POTENTIAL DEMAND OF 138,822 GPD. FOR THE PROPOSED
	COMMERCIAL EAST (CE) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, THE
	APPLICANT NEEDS TO USE THE POTABLE OF DEMAND RATE OF
	272 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY (GPCPD). SINCE THE MOST
	RECENT CENSUS DATA INDICATES THAT THE CITY?S PERSON PER
	HOUSEHOLD (PPH) RATE IS AROUND 2.5, I CALCULATED THE
	TOTAL POTENTIAL DEMAND FOR THE PROPOSED CE FLU TO BE
	THE FOLLOWING: 685 UNITS X 2.5 PPD = 1,712,5 X 272
	(GPCPD) = 465,800 GPD. AS A RESULT, THE NET CHANGE IN
	POTABLE WATER DEMAND SHOULD BE 326,978 GPD.

	6.2.2 NEW COMMENT - IN ADDITION TO THE ?FULL? LOS
	ANALYSIS, THE APPLICATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE A REVISED
	LOS SUMMARY TABLE THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DATA IN
	THE FULL ANALYSIS. THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A LOS SUMMARY
	TABLE IN THE FIRST SUBMITTAL BUT SOME OF THE DATA TABLE
	IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA IN THE FULL
	ANALYSIS.
	________________________________________

	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:

	A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.

	B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
	DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.

	C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.

	F) TO BE PLACED ON THE AUGUST 16, 2022, PLANNING BOARD
	AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
	THAN AUGUST 1, 2022. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND BE
	INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
	REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
	PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.

	G) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
	DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
	COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
	________________________________________

	QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:

	JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
	401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
	WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402

	P: 561.822.1448
	TTY: 800.955.8771
	E: [email protected]

	W: WPB.ORG

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-09-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	jroach			Date	06-09-2022	Time	09:02	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jroach			Date	06-09-2022	Time	09:02	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-09 09:03:56	PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
	________________________________________

	DATE OF REVIEW: 06.09.2022
	PROJECT NO.: Z22050020
	CASE NO.: PB 1105E
	________________________________________

	PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
	REVIEW COMMENTS:

	1. PER THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:

	1.1. THE SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT
	(PDF).

	1.2. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE
	PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (WORD).

	1.3. A $212 ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE IS REQUIRED.

	2. A SCANNED VERSION OF A SCAD APPLICATION WAS INCLUDED
	IN THE SUBMITTAL ? WAS THIS APPLICATION EVER SIGNED BY
	THE CITY? HAS IT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT?
	PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS.

	3. THE SURVEY INDICATES THAT THE WESTERN-MOST PARKING
	IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY (AS
	PART OF ?PARCEL TWO?), BUT THIS IS SHOWN ON THE
	PROPERTY APPRAISER?S WEBSITE AS BEING A PART OF A
	PARCEL OWNED BY FEC RAILWAY LLC AND IS THE RAILROAD
	RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE CLARIFY. NOTE THAT IF THIS PARKING
	IS BEING INCLUDED, THE MAIL LIST, MAP, ETC. ALL NEED TO
	BE UPDATED.

	4. SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE
	SURVEY FOR THE LAND AREA OF EACH PARCEL. CONFIRM THAT
	ALL STUDIES, ETC. UTILIZE THIS CORRECT LAND AREA.

	5. WHILE NO DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED AT THIS TIME,
	CONCEPTUAL MASSING STUDIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
	INDICATE VARIOUS BUILD-OUT SCENARIOS UNDER THE PROPOSED
	FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL.

	6. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY ALEX
	HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER, AND SHALL BE
	ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY:

	6.1. THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED BY
	KIMLEY HORN DATED MAY 9, 2022, STATES IN ITS CONCLUSION
	THAT, BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC LIMITATIONS, THE FOLLOWING
	RESTRICTIONS WOULD BE IN PLACE FOR THE AMENDMENT:

	- RESTRICTED MAXIMUM DAILY NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIPS:
	18,903 DAILY TRIPS
	- RESTRICTED MAXIMUM AM PEAK HOUR NON-RESIDENTIAL
	TRIPS: 567 PEAK HOUR TRIPS
	- RESTRICTED MAXIMUM PM PEAK HOUR NON-RESIDENTIAL
	TRIPS: 1,931 PEAK HOUR TRIPS

	ANY TYPE OF TRAFFIC RESTRICTION PLACED ON THIS FLU
	AMENDMENT SHOULD APPLY TO ALL THE TRIPS GENERATED BY
	THE AMENDMENT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIMITED ONLY TO
	?NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIPS?. RESIDENTIAL USES ARE NOT
	EXEMPT FROM THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS. THE
	TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.

	6.2. THE FLU AMENDMENT LOS ANALYSIS INCLUDED IN THE
	APPLICATION ONLY INCLUDES THE SUMMARY LOS TABLE AND
	DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FULL LOS ANALYSIS AS REQUIRED. IN
	ADDITION, THE APPLICATION DOES NOT INCLUDE A WRITTEN
	CONFIRMATION FROM THE APPLICABLE SERVICE AGENCIES
	INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT CAPACITY EXISTS TO
	ACCOMMODATE THE BUILD?OUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU
	DESIGNATION. THE LOS ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE REVISED
	ACCORDINGLY.
	________________________________________

	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:

	A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.

	B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
	DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.

	C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.

	F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE AUGUST 16, 2022,
	PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
	SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
	DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, JUNE 24, 2022.

	G) TO BE PLACED ON THE AUGUST 16, 2022, PLANNING BOARD
	AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
	THAN AUGUST 1, 2022. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND BE
	INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
	REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
	PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.

	H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
	DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
	COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
	________________________________________

	QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:

	JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
	401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
	WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402

	P: 561.822.1448
	TTY: 800.955.8771
	E: [email protected]

	W: WPB.ORG