| 2022-05-26 16:41:55 | 1. THERE IS AN INCREASE IN NUMBER OF SIGNS BEYOND WHAT |
| | IS PERMITTED VIA RESOLUTION 177-13, HENCE MAJOR PD |
| | AMENDMENT TO MASTER SIGN PLAN. |
| | A. STANDALONE PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL (SHEET 5) ON SOUTH |
| | ELEVATION. IS THIS THE PERMITTED 1 MONUMENT DIRECTIONAL |
| | SIGN PER BLOCK? IF SO IT DOES NOT MEET THE 4? HEIGHT |
| | AND 6? WIDTH CONSTRAINTS. IS THIS SIGN REPLACING THE |
| | DIRECTIONAL MONUMENT SIGN THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE |
| | SOUTH ELEVATION? |
| | B. RELATED PLAQUE SIGNS ON (SHEET 17) NOT MENTIONED IN |
| | RESOLUTION. |
| | |
| | 2. PRIMARY TENANT SIGN EXCEEDS PERMITTED SIZE IN |
| | RESOLUTION - 168 SF WITH (SHEET 4) SHOWING 280 SF |
| | PROPOSED. |
| | A. EXISTING SIGNAGE EXCEEDS 4FT. MAXIMUM HEIGHT |
| | (NONCONFORMING) |
| | I. OPTION A & OPTION B CHANGES STRUCTURE OF EXISTING |
| | SIGNAGE, PROPOSED SIGN EXCEEDS 4 FT. MAX. HEIGHT |
| | II. OPTION A SPEAKS TO REMOVING AN EXISTING ID SIGN ON |
| | WEST TOWER, WHICH SIGN/FA?ADE WOULD BE REMOVED WITH |
| | THIS OPTION? |
| | |
| | 3. SHEET 03 AND SHEET 18 (THE BUILDING ID SIGNS PER |
| | TOWER EAST/WEST) WITH THE PHILLIPS POINT ID SIGNS |
| | EXCEED LIMIT OF 2 PER TOWER AND ARE NOT THE SAME |
| | IDENTITY PER BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4. WEST TOWER HAS 3 BUILDING ID SIGNS (2 ON THE WEST |
| | ELEVATION AND 1 ON SOUTH ELEVATION), ONLY PERMITTED 2. |
| | |
| | 5. ON (SHEET 17) AND (SHEET 03) ARE THE PROPOSED |
| | DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, WILL THESE SIGNS INCLUDE TENANT |
| | NAMES? |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF TENANT SIGN BANDS, WILL |
| | THESE BE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED OR JUST LETTERING/LOGOS |
| | MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE FA?ADE? |
| | |
| | CHRIS KIMMERLY |
| | [email protected] 822-1426 |
