| 2022-05-26 10:39:20 | 1. THERE IS AN INCREASE IN NUMBER OF SIGNS BEYOND WHAT |
| | IS PERMITTED VIA RESOLUTION 176-16, HENCE MAJOR PD |
| | AMENDMENT TO MASTER SIGN PLAN. |
| | |
| | A. TENANT SIGN BAND IN (SHEET 7) ? SOUTH ELEVATION |
| | SHOWS 2 SIGNS ON THE LOWER WALL NOT ILLUSTRATED OR |
| | DESCRIBED IN APPROVED DRAWINGS FOR RES. 176-16. THESE |
| | EXCEED THE 4 PERMITTED PER FA?ADE. |
| | |
| | B. TENANT SIGN BAND IN (SHEET 11) ? GARAGE NORTH |
| | ELEVATION SHOWS A TOTAL OF 5 SIGNS, RES. 176-16 PERMITS |
| | UP TO 4 PER FA?ADE, PROPOSED DRAWING EXCEEDS BY 1 SIGN. |
| | |
| | C. MONUMENT SIGNS ON SITE EXCEED NUMBER PERMITTED AND |
| | SIZES PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | D. ON (SHEET 4), (SHEET7), (SHEET 8), (SHEET 9) AND |
| | (SHEET 11) THE SECONDARY BUILDING ID SIGNS AND TERTIARY |
| | SIGNS ARE NOT MENTIONED WITHIN THE RESOLUTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED TENANT |
| | SIGN BANDS. 40 SF IS PERMITTED VIA RESOLUTION, BUT |
| | ADDITIONALLY RESOLUTION STATES SIGN BANDS CANNOT EXCEED |
| | 36? IN HEIGHT, PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSION. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE GENERAL DIMENSIONS OF ALL PROPOSED |
| | SIGNS BEYOND THEIR INDIVIDUAL SQUARE FOOTAGES. |
| | |
| | 4. EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN WITH PROPOSED CHANGES (SHEET |
| | 10) NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MASTER SIGN PLAN IN RES. |
| | 176-16. |
| | |
| | A. RESOLUTION CALLS FOR ?LOW FREESTANDING? SIGNAGE, |
| | SIGN IS NEARLY 18? TALL. |
| | B. MAXIMUM MONUMENT SIGN SF PERMITTED IS 48 SF. |
| | EXISTING SIGN IS NEARLY DOUBLE. |
| | C. WHAT MONUMENT SIGNS ARE COUNTING TOWARD THE 2 LIMIT |
| | FOR THE PROPERTY? |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF TENANT SIGN BANDS, WILL |
| | THESE BE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED OR JUST LETTERING/LOGOS |
| | MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE FA?ADE? |
| | |
| | 6. CLARIFY SIGNAGE ON (SHEET 12) THE EXISTING CONDITION |
| | IMAGE DOES NOT SEEM TO RELATE TO THE LOADING DOCK |
| | ELEVATION DRAWING. DRAWING SEEMS TO SHOW SIGNAGE ON |
| | EITHER SIDE OF THE DOCK WITH A SIGN ON THE ROUNDED |
| | COLUMN AND A SIGN ON THE OFFICE WALL. PICTURE SEEMS |
| | SUGGESTS SIGNAGE IN THE LANDSCAPE BED IN LINE WITH |
| | ROUNDED COLUMN, AND A SIGN ON SQUARE COLUMN ON OPPOSITE |
| | SIDE OF DRIVEWAY/LOADING ACCESS. WHICH LOCATION IS |
| | RECEIVING THE NEW SIGNAGE? |
| | |
| | 7. WITHIN (SHEET 3) AND (SHEET 5) THE FREE STANDING |
| | GROUND SIGN IS A MONUMENT SIGN, NOT BUILDING ID. TENANT |
| | ID SIGNS ARE AT THE BASE OF THE BUILDING AND LIMITED TO |
| | (4) SIGNS TOTAL AND 10 SF EACH. |
| | |
| | 8. ON (SHEET 5) AND (SHEET 6) THE FREE STANDING |
| | BUILDING ID SIGN WOULD FALL UNDER A MONUMENT SIGN, |
| | EXCEEDING MAXIMUM PERMITTED ON THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | CHRIS KIMMERLY |
| | [email protected] 822-1426 |
