 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z22040056
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z22040056 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
Time |
20:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
Time |
20:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-11 20:28:18 | NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-11-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-11-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-09-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-09-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-09-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-09 11:43:04 | Z22040056 - 550 QUADRILLE - MINOR AMEND? 1ST REVIEW | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 | | | [email protected] | | | O INDICATE HOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR | | | THE ONE WEST PALM PROJECT MAY BE IMPACTED BY THE | | | PROPOSED DROPOFF AND REVISIONS. | | | O CLOUD PROPOSED REVISIONS AND DATE REVISED CIVIL | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CUST. SVC. SUPERVISOR, | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, [email protected], 561-822-2262: | | | | | | -ANY CHANGES MAY AFFECT E19010014. | | | | | | -ADD ABOVE GROUND WORDING TO 8 INCH METER LABELS. | | | | | | -RELOCATE TAP FOR EASTERN 8 INCH METER TO THE WEST NEAR | | | THE METER, SO THAT EXTRANEOUS PIPE IS ELIMINATED. | | | | | | -ARE ANY GREASE TRAPS NEEDED AT 4TH ST.? | | | | | | -CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL PROPERTY LINES ON CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | -THERE IS A CLEANOUT IN FRONT OF A DOOR ON 4TH ST. | | | MAINTENANCE MAY IMPEDE USE OF DOOR. | | | | | | -DROP MANHOLE MAY BE NEEDED AT MH2 ON 4TH ST. | | | | | | -PROPOSED SEWER POINT OF SERVICES NEED BE REVIEWED AT | | | FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | -ON 4TH ST, LARGE DIAMETER WATER MAIN CROSSES IN CLOSE | | | PROXIMITY OVER SANITARY PIPING. IS THAT VERTICAL LOAD | | | ALRIGHT? | | | | | | -L1-121 DOES NOT MATCH LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES ON | | | SUBMITTED CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE UPDATE L1-121 AND ENSURE | | | NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND WATER/SEWER UTILITIES. | | | | | | -VERIFY THAT WPB PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AGREES | | | WITH THE PLAN PROPOSAL FOR THEIR METERED WATER SERVICES | | | NEAR THE SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST AREAS OF PROPERTY. | | | | | | -WATER METER ORDERING AND RECEIVING COULD TAKE UPWARDS | | | OF FIVE MONTHS AFTER UTILITY QUOTES ARE PAID AND | | | UTILITY BILLING ACCOUNTS ARE SETUP DUE TO THE SIZING. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-04-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-04-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-04-2022 |
Time |
12:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-04 13:04:51 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-12-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-12-2023 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-12-2023 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-01-12 10:52:02 | NO CHANGES TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-16-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-16-2022 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-16-2022 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-16 16:38:51 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: ONE WEST PALM Z22040056 | | | SEPTEMBER 16, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS IDENTIFIED AS | | | GARDEN COURTYARD HAVE BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE FROM THE | | | LAST APPROVAL. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE | | | AMOUNT OF REDUCTION FOR EACH SPACE. CORRECT THE GARDEN | | | COURTYARD ACTIVE USE ABUTMENT REQUIREMENT TO 2 SIDES OR | | | 75%. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE | | | CANOPY BY SPECIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL OPEN SPACE PER | | | SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING | | | THE VEGETATED AREA WITHIN EACH OPEN SPACE. THE PROVIDED | | | EXHIBITS SHOW ONLY THE OUTLINE AREA. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. THE EXPANDED DROP OFF AREA REMOVES PART | | | OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND REMOVES ONE ROW OF OAK | | | TREE CANOPY FROM THE PAVED AREA. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING | | | THE CANOPY TREES TO THE AREA TO THE EAST TO PROVIDE | | | SHADE TO MINIMIZE THE HEAT ISLAND AFFECT. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. ADD THE STREET TREE BACK ON THE NORTH | | | SIDE OF THE CIRCLE ON THE WEST STREETSCAPE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. AMEND THE STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL TO USE | | | CU STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SIMILAR. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. LOCATIONS FOR | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO STREET | | | TREES MUST BE SHOWN CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS | | | REQUIRED IN SECTION 94-113. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE MEDIAN PLANTINGS ON QUADRILLE BLVD | | | ARE TO REMAIN AS APPROVED AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF WITH | | | PERENNIAL PEANUT GROUND COVER AND BULNESIA TREES TO BE | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE REST OF THE STREETSCAPE. SOME | | | SHEETS ARE SHOWING PALM SYMBOLS. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. WATER, SEWER AND FIRE LINE LOCATIONS ARE | | | IN CONFLICT WITH TREES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON THE EAST | | | SIDE OF THE PROJECT. ADJUST LINE LOCATIONS TO AVOID | | | CONFLICT AND ALLOW ENOUGH SUSTAINABLE ROOT ZONE BETWEEN | | | ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE | | | GREEN WALL AREA, STRUCTURE, OR PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
Time |
16:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-11 16:32:23 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 550 QUADRILLE Z22040056 | | | MAY 11, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS IDENTIFIED AS GARDEN | | | COURTYARD HAVE BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE FROM THE LAST | | | APPROVAL. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT | | | OF REDUCTION FOR EACH SPACE. CORRECT THE GARDEN | | | COURTYARD ACTIVE USE ABUTMENT REQUIREMENT TO 2 SIDES OR | | | 75%. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE CANOPY BY | | | SPECIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL OPEN SPACE PER SECTION | | | 94-109 TABLE IV-8. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING THE | | | VEGETATED AREA WITHIN EACH OPEN SPACE. THE PROVIDED | | | EXHIBITS SHOW ONLY THE OUTLINE AREA. | | | | | | 3. THE EXPANDED DROP OFF AREA REMOVES PART OF THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND REMOVES ONE ROW OF OAK TREE | | | CANOPY FROM THE PAVED AREA. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING THE | | | CANOPY TREES TO THE AREA TO THE EAST TO PROVIDE SHADE | | | TO MINIMIZE THE HEAT ISLAND AFFECT. | | | | | | 4. ADD THE STREET TREE BACK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | CIRCLE ON THE WEST STREETSCAPE. | | | | | | 5. AMEND THE STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL TO USE CU | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SIMILAR. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. LOCATIONS FOR | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO STREET | | | TREES MUST BE SHOWN CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS | | | REQUIRED IN SECTION 94-113. | | | | | | 6. THE MEDIAN PLANTINGS ON QUADRILLE BLVD ARE TO REMAIN | | | AS APPROVED AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF WITH PERENNIAL PEANUT | | | GROUND COVER AND BULNESIA TREES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH | | | THE REST OF THE STREETSCAPE. SOME SHEETS ARE SHOWING | | | PALM SYMBOLS. | | | | | | 7. WATER, SEWER AND FIRE LINE LOCATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT | | | WITH TREES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE | | | PROJECT. ADJUST LINE LOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT AND | | | ALLOW ENOUGH SUSTAINABLE ROOT ZONE BETWEEN ROOT BARRIER | | | LOCATIONS. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 8. EXPLAIN IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE GREEN WALL | | | AREA, STRUCTURE, OR PLANT MATERIAL. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-21-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-21-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
12-21-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-21 15:51:20 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1- SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICE FOR LARGE SIZE | | | CONTAINERS (I.E. FOR 8+ CUB YD COMPACTOR, OR ROLL-OFF | | | CONTAINER) SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH APPROVED VENDORS LISTED AT HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GO | | | VERNMENT/PUBLIC-WORKS/SANITATION/COMMERCIAL-DUMPSTERS-C | | | OMPACTORS. | | | 2- PROVIDE SERVICE AVAILABILITY LETTER FROM THE PRIVATE | | | GARBAGE HAULER. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-02 13:24:52 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE REVISED AUTOTURN EXHIBIT FOR THE | | | SANITATION COLLECTION VEHICLE IDENTIFYING: | | | 1- THE DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE'S WHEEL PATH | | | IDENTIFIED WITH DIFFERENT COLORS AND THE VEHICLE | | | SPECIFICATIONS USED FOR THE ANALYSIS. | | | 2- THE INBOUND DIRECTIONS AND THROUGH THE OUTBOUNDS ( | | | INGRESS AND EGRESS). | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-09-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-09-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-09-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-09 11:05:48 | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S | | | WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE | | | 2- CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF | | | SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER) | | | 3- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RECYCLING CONTAINERS | | | 4- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE | | | GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE | | | TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND | | | NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW. | | | 5- PLEASE NOTE SANITATION SERVICE FOR LARGE SIZE | | | CONTAINERS (I.E. FOR 8+ CUB YD COMPACTOR, OR ROLL-OFF | | | CONTAINER) SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH APPROVED VENDORS FOUND AT HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOV | | | ERNMENT/PUBLIC-WORKS/SANITATION/COMMERCIAL-DUMPSTERS-CO | | | MPACTORS | | | 6- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN | | | THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF | | | THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND | | | COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING | | | MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE | | | CAN(S). | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-27-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-27-2022 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-27-2022 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-27 17:09:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 7-11-22 SUBMITTAL (CIVIL PLANS HAD 6-23-22 IN ITS | | | FILENAME). THESE COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT PLANS REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1. INNER CIRCLE OF ROUNDABOUT ON THE CUL-DE-SAC OF 5TH | | | ST SHOWS 11 FEET RADIUS ON SHEET 5 AND DIAMETER OF 21 | | | FEET 4 INCHES ON SHEET A1.01. | | | | | | 2. CAN STOP BARS ON 4TH STREET BE MOVED CLOSER TO THE | | | CROSSWALK. CURRENTLY THE STOP BARS ARE MORE THAN 10 | | | FEET FROM THE CROSS WALKS. | | | | | | 3. THE CIVIL PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW LEGACY TRAVEL LANE | | | ARROWS. FOR INSTANCE, THERE ARE TWO EAST FACING ARROWS | | | SHOWN IN THE NORTH 11 FT LANE SOUTHWEST OF THE BIKE | | | SHARING STATION NEAR QUADRILLE BLVD AND AN ARROW FACING | | | WEST IN THE ROUNDED SQUARE SEPARAOR EAST OF THE BIKE | | | SHARING STATION. THERE APPEARS TO BE A STOP BAR ALONG | | | THE RIGHT EADE OF THE TRAVEL LANE TO THE GARAGE. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-12-2022 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-12-2022 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-12 13:12:32 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. BACKGROUND ON ENGINEERING PLANS DOES NOT ENTIRELY | | | MATCH THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. ON SECTION A-A, PROVIDE HORIZONTAL DIMENSION FOR THE | | | PLANTER AREA. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A TABLE SUMMARIZING THE CHANGE IN | | | PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA AND RUNOFF VOLUMES/PEAK | | | STAGES. | | | | | | 4. QUADRILLE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ANY | | | IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY ARE TO BE APPROVED | | | BY FDOT. | | | | | | 5. CLOUD THE PROPOSED CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT PLANS. | | | | | | 6. INCLUDE RPMS ON THE SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH | | | THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION, IF | | | APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH THE ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-11-2022 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-11 13:00:57 | 1. CLOUD AREA AND INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS BEING REVISED | | | PER THIS SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | A REPLAT IS STILL REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-10-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-10-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-05-10 23:52:50 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE CHANGE TO ROADWAY GEOMETRY, USE | | | TYPE FOR SOME OF THE PROPOSED FACILITIES, AND | | | CORRESPONDING TRIP GENERATION, PROVIDE A REVISED | | | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY NEEDS TO UPDATE THE GIS DATABASE PER THE CHANGE | | | IN TRIP GENERATION, INDEPENDENTLY IF THERE IS AN | | | INCREASE OR DECREASE. EITHER OBTAIN A NEW TPS LETTER OR | | | PROVIDE PROOF OF COMMUNICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM | | | THE COUNTY. | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS LETTER | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH DRIVEWAY AT THE | | | SIDEWALK INTERFACE. | | | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR EXPLAIN | | | OPERATIONS AT THE MODIFIED HOTEL DROP-OFF. INTEGRATE | | | PAVEMENT MARKINGS INFORMATION IN THE TRANSPORTATION | | | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN | | | 6) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE FOR THE PROPOSED NEW | | | DRIVING AREA BY THE QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING | | | BASIC TRANSPORTATION FEATURES AND THEIR DIMENSIONS, | | | SUCH AS: SIDEWALK, CURB, PARKING STALLS, CROSSINGS, | | | WALKWAY, ROADWAY, DRIVE ISLES, DRIVEWAYS, PAVEMENT | | | MARKINGS, SIGNAGE, ETC. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION | | | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR, SHEET A1.01 IS | | | A GREAT STARTING POINT. PLEASE NAME IT T1.01. SIDEWALK | | | WIDTHS ARE EITHER MISSING, DEFICIENT OR INCORRECT AT | | | SEVERAL LOCATIONS; LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOULD BE COLORED OR | | | PATTERNED IN ORDER TO DISTINGUISH THEM. | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING | | | ON 5TH ST. SPECIFICALLY AT THE WEST END OF THE NORTHERN | | | SIDEWALK | | | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE NARRATIVE PERTAINING THE | | | MODIFICATIONS TO THE SOUTHERN PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA. AS | | | THE PROPOSED DESIGN MAY HAVE SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL | | | ISSUES. THE LATEST NARRATIVE IS NOT SUFFICIENT, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE AN UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PER COMMENT | | | #14. PLEASE SHOWCASE THE FULL PATH OF THE | | | VALET-SERVICED VEHICLES FROM THE PODIUM TO THE GARAGE | | | ENTRANCE AND BACK FOR THE 4TH ST LOCATION. | | | 10) SATISFIED. PER FDOT LETTER, THE QUADRILLE BLVD | | | DRIVEWAY IS LEFT-IN, RIGHT-IN AND RIGHT-OUT ONLY. | | | REVISE PAVEMENT MARKING(S) AND INSTALL CORRESPONDING | | | SIGNAGE FOR THE EXIT MOVEMENT | | | 11) SATISFIED. PER FDOT LETTER, SHOW THE 50 FEET | | | MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO | | | THE FIRST CONFLICT POINT AT THE QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 12) SATISFIED. INSTALL RIGHT-TURN ONLY PAVEMENT | | | MARKING(S) ALONG THE DECELERATION LANE TO THE QUADRILLE | | | DRIVEWAY | | | 13) SATISFIED. PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE THE OPTIMAL | | | PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK MARKINGS??? ORIENTATION ACROSS THE | | | QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 14) SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN USE | | | TYPE, VALET PODIUM LOCATIONS, TRIP GENERATION AND | | | CIRCULATION, PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED PARKING | | | MANAGEMENT PLAN. LATEST ANALYSIS DOES NOT SHOW THE FULL | | | PATH OF A VEHICLE TO/FROM THE VALET PODIUM AND THE | | | DESIGNATED VALET PARKING STALLS | | | 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE UPDATED PARKING | | | MANAGEMENT PLAN, PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF | | | THE ASSUMED PROCESSING TIME IN THE QUEUE ANALYSIS (I.E. | | | TIMINGS FOR VALET CHECK-IN/CHECK-OUT, VALET DRIVE/WALK | | | TO/FROM THE GARAGE) | | | 16) SATISFIED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS OF THE VALET AREA ON | | | 4TH ST ARE MISSING AS SHOWN IN A1.01. MOREOVER, THE | | | FACILITY DOES NOT SEEM COMPLIANT WITH SEC 94-109 FIGURE | | | IV-22. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND REQUEST | | | VARIANCE(S), IF ANY. | | | 17) SATISFIED. GENERAL COMMENT: FOR ANY FEATURE OR SITE | | | PLAN REFERENCE(S) IN EACH OF THE RESPONSE(S), THE | | | SPECIFIC SHEET NAME AND NUMBER MUST BE PROVIDED | | | 18) SATISFIED. RE-ALIGN/CENTER THE PROPOSED INTERNAL | | | TRAFFIC CIRCLE OR PROVIDE NARRATIVE EXPLAINING ITS | | | CURRENT CONFIGURATION | | | 19) SATISFIED. INSTALL FLEXIBLE POLES ALONG THE THROAT | | | OF THE QUADRILLE???S DRIVEWAY SO TO REDUCE THE | | | POTENTIAL CONFLICT POINT CAUSED BY WESTBOUND VEHICLES | | | ATTEMPTING TO LEFT-TURN INTO THE VALET AREA. THIS | | | MITIGATION MEASURE WOULD ALLOW FULFILMENT OF FDOT | | | MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIREMENT | | | 20) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOWCASE ON THE SITE PLAN | | | ANY MISSING ADA RAMP AND/OR CROSSWALK | | | 21) SATISFIED. REMOVE REDUNDANT OR NON-SENSICAL | | | PAVEMENT MARKING(S), SUCH AS THE EXTRA STOP BAR BY THE | | | QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY. ALSO, CLEARLY BOLD ANY PROPOSED | | | PERMANENT DIRECTIONAL PAVEMENT MARKING | | | 22) SATISFIED. COLOR OR PATTERN LANDSCAPE AREAS SO TO | | | PROPERLY IDENTIFY SIDEWALKS??? WIDTH AND WALKABLE AREA | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-02 10:31:06 | 1) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE CHANGE TO ROADWAY GEOMETRY, USE | | | TYPE FOR SOME OF THE PROPOSED FACILITIES, AND | | | CORRESPONDING TRIP GENERATION, PROVIDE A REVISED | | | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY NEEDS TO UPDATE THE GIS DATABASE PER THE | | | CHANGE IN TRIP GENERATION, INDEPENDENTLY IF THERE IS AN | | | INCREASE OR DECREASE. EITHER OBTAIN A NEW TPS LETTER OR | | | PROVIDE PROOF OF COMMUNICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM | | | THE COUNTY. | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS LETTER | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH DRIVEWAY AT THE | | | SIDEWALK INTERFACE. | | | 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS | | | AND/OR EXPLAIN OPERATIONS AT THE MODIFIED HOTEL | | | DROP-OFF. INTEGRATE PAVEMENT MARKINGS INFORMATION IN | | | THE TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN | | | 6) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE FOR THE PROPOSED NEW | | | DRIVING AREA BY THE QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN | | | SHOWCASING BASIC TRANSPORTATION FEATURES AND THEIR | | | DIMENSIONS, SUCH AS: SIDEWALK, CURB, PARKING STALLS, | | | CROSSINGS, WALKWAY, ROADWAY, DRIVE ISLES, DRIVEWAYS, | | | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, SIGNAGE, ETC. PROVIDE A | | | TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR, | | | SHEET A1.01 IS A GREAT STARTING POINT. PLEASE NAME IT | | | T1.01 | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING | | | ON 5TH ST. SPECIFICALLY AT THE WEST END OF THE NORTHERN | | | SIDEWALK | | | 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE NARRATIVE PERTAINING | | | THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SOUTHERN PICK-UP/DROP-OFF | | | AREA. AS THE PROPOSED DESIGN MAY HAVE SAFETY AND | | | OPERATIONAL ISSUES. THE LATEST NARRATIVE IS NOT | | | SUFFICIENT, PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED PARKING | | | MANAGEMENT PLAN PER COMMENT #14 | | | 10) PER FDOT LETTER, THE QUADRILLE BLVD DRIVEWAY IS | | | LEFT-IN, RIGHT-IN AND RIGHT-OUT ONLY. REVISE PAVEMENT | | | MARKING(S) AND INSTALL CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE FOR THE | | | EXIT MOVEMENT | | | 11) PER FDOT LETTER, SHOW THE 50 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE | | | FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE FIRST | | | CONFLICT POINT AT THE QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 12) INSTALL RIGHT-TURN ONLY PAVEMENT MARKING(S) ALONG | | | THE DECELERATION LANE TO THE QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 13) PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK MARKINGS ACROSS THE QUADRILLE | | | DRIVEWAY NEED TO BE PROPERLY ALIGNED, PLEASE CORRECT | | | 14) DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN USE TYPE, VALET | | | PODIUM LOCATIONS, TRIP GENERATION AND CIRCULATION, | | | PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | 15) IN THE UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF THE ASSUMED PROCESSING | | | TIME IN THE QUEUE ANALYSIS (I.E. TIMINGS FOR VALET | | | CHECK-IN/CHECK-OUT, VALET DRIVE/WALK TO/FROM THE | | | GARAGE) | | | 16) SEVERAL DIMENSIONS OF THE VALET AREA ON 4TH ST ARE | | | MISSING AS SHOWN IN A1.01. MOREOVER, THE FACILITY DOES | | | NOT SEEM COMPLIANT WITH SEC 94-109 FIGURE IV-22. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND REQUEST VARIANCE(S), IF ANY. | | | 17) GENERAL COMMENT: FOR ANY FEATURE OR SITE PLAN | | | REFERENCE(S) IN EACH OF THE RESPONSE(S), THE SPECIFIC | | | SHEET NAME AND NUMBER MUST BE PROVIDED. "REFER TO CIVIL | | | DRAWINGS" IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-06-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-06-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-06 15:22:19 | 1) GIVEN THE CHANGE TO ROADWAY GEOMETRY, USE TYPE FOR | | | SOME OF THE PROPOSED FACILITIES, AND CORRESPONDING TRIP | | | GENERATION, PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS LETTER | | | 4) PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH DRIVEWAY AT THE SIDEWALK | | | INTERFACE | | | 5) PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR EXPLAIN OPERATIONS | | | AT THE MODIFIED HOTEL DROP-OFF | | | 6) EXPLAIN THE USE FOR THE PROPOSED NEW DRIVING AREA BY | | | THE QUADRILLE DRIVEWAY | | | 7) PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING BASIC | | | TRANSPORTATION FEATURES AND THEIR DIMENSIONS, SUCH AS: | | | SIDEWALK, CURB, PARKING STALLS, CROSSINGS, WALKWAY, | | | ROADWAY, DRIVE ISLES, DRIVEWAYS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, | | | SIGNAGE, ETC. | | | 8) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON 5TH ST. | | | SPECIFICALLY AT THE WEST END OF THE NORTHERN SIDEWALK | | | 9) PROVIDE NARRATIVE PERTAINING THE MODIFICATIONS TO | | | THE SOUTHERN PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA. AS THE PROPOSED | | | DESIGN MAY HAVE SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-23-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
05-23-2023 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
05-23-2023 |
Time |
13:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-05-23 13:27:26 | SITE PLAN APPROVAL GIVEN ON 5.23.23 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
02-10-2023 |
Time |
14:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
02-10-2023 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-10 14:43:49 | ZONING | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | 561. 822.1426 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 1. COMMENT: PER DAC 15-13 FINAL ORDER ??? CONDITIONS | | | A. CONDITION (B.) TRAFFIC MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS | | | STATES MINIMUM DRIVEWAY LENGTH OF 70 FT. FROM QUADRILLE | | | BLVD. AS MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE | | | TO THE FIRST CONFLICT POINT. | | | A. PROPOSED CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | PROVIDE 70 FT. IN LENGTH BEFORE FIRST CONFLICT POINT. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO UPDATED CIVIL SHEET 5 | | | ???SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS PLAN??? AND NEW T1.01 SHEET | | | WHERE WE MEASURE 85 FEET BASED ON ULTIMATE QUADRILLE | | | ROW. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: SATISFIED] FDOT LETTER AND ALTERED | | | CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | ADJUSTMENT TO CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. B. CONDITION (G.) FINAL LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE DAC FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE NOT | | | CHANGED PER PREVIOUS SUBMISSION. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: [SATISFIED] CONDITION FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS NO LONGER APPLICABLE, AS CONDITION WAS | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT AND PREVIOUS | | | AMENDMENT HAS BROUGHT LANDSCAPE/SITE REVISIONS TO THE | | | BOARD. | | | | | | 3 .C. PROPOSED CHANGES TO OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, | | | STREETSCAPE, LANDSCAPED QUADRILLE MEDIAN, ETC. WILL | | | REQUIRE THE FINAL LANDSCAPING PLANS TO GO FORWARD TO | | | DAC FOR REVIEW. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE NOT | | | CHANGED PER PREVIOUS SUBMISSION. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: [SATISFIED]CONDITION FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS NO LONGER APPLICABLE, AS CONDITION WAS | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT AND PREVIOUS | | | AMENDMENT HAS BROUGHT LANDSCAPE/SITE REVISIONS TO THE | | | BOARD. | | | | | | 4. D.PLEASE REFERENCE FINAL DAC ORDER 15-13 FOR | | | ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED, ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN | | | TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: SATISFIED] FDOT LETTER AND ALTERED | | | CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | ADJUSTMENT TO CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED: FDOT LETTER CHANGED DRIVEWAY | | | LENGTH CONDITIONS TO 50FT. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO UPDATED CIVIL SHEET 5 SIGNAGE | | | AND MARKINGS PLAN??? AND NEW T1.01 SHEET WHERE WE | | | MEASURE 85 FEET BASED ON ULTIMATE QUADRILLE ROW | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: SATISFIED] FDOT LETTER AND ALTERED | | | CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | ADJUSTMENT TO CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 6. FINAL OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO DAC PRIOR TO | | | BUILDING PERMIT. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE NOT | | | CHANGED PER PREVIOUS SUBMISSION. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: [SATISFIED] CONDITION FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS NO LONGER APPLICABLE, AS CONDITION WAS | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT AND PREVIOUS | | | AMENDMENT HAS BROUGHT LANDSCAPE/SITE REVISIONS TO THE | | | BOARD. | | | | | | COMMENT: 8/12/22 | | | 1. A. PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF THAT ALL FDOT CONDITIONS FOR | | | THE ENTRY ON QUADRILLE ARE MET. (DIMENSIONS, LANE | | | MARKINGS, ETC.) | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO COMMENT RESPONSES ABOVE AND | | | UPDATED SHEET CIVIL SHEET 5 ???SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS | | | PLAN??? AND NEW SHEET T1.01 AS PROOF THAT ALL | | | CONDITIONS FOR THE ENTRY ON QUADRILLE HAVE BEEN MET. | | | TRAFFIC LETTER ALSO ATTACHED (TRAFFIC LETTER 06.23.22). | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: SATISFIED] FDOT LETTER AND ALTERED | | | CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. ADMINISTRATIVE | | | ADJUSTMENT TO CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. B. PER OUR PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS AND EMAIL | | | CORRESPONDENCE, PLEASE IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE TWO NEW | | | ENCLOSED ROOMS (ON SHEET A1.01) NEXT TO THE LARGE | | | 60-SPACE BIKE STORAGE ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE RAMP AND | | | ENTRY LOOP ON THE QUADRILLE SIDE. IF THESE ARE NOT | | | MECHANICAL, PLEASE REFLECT ON FAR CALCULATIONS AND | | | GROSS BUILDING AREA, (SHEET A0.07 - DIAGRAM -FAR) | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO UNDATED SHEET A1.01 WITH | | | LABELS UPDATED AS REQUESTED. THE SPACE IS A LAUNDRY | | | ROOM AND FAR SHEET WAS ADJUSTED ON A0.07 AND A0.01. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 3. C. LANDSCAPE PLANS AND CIVIL PLANS STILL SHOW | | | INCORRECT SITE CONDITIONS, SPECIFICALLY WITH | | | HOTEL/OFFICE DROP OFF, PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS TO MATCH | | | THE ARCHITECTURE SET AND GROUND LEVEL SITE PLAN. | | | RESPONSE: COMMENT PREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED, PLEASE REFER TO | | | SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PACKAGE WITH CORRECTED CIVIL | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: [SATISFIED] CONDITION FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS NO LONGER APPLICABLE, AS CONDITION WAS | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT AND PREVIOUS | | | AMENDMENT HAS BROUGHT LANDSCAPE/SITE REVISIONS TO THE | | | BOARD | | | | | | | | | 4. D. REPEAT COMMENT: CONDITION - FINAL OPEN SPACE, | | | LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE | | | PRESENTED TO DAC PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE NOT | | | CHANGED PER PREVIOUS SUBMISSION. | | | | | | ZONING 2/3/23: [SATISFIED] CONDITION FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS NO LONGER APPLICABLE, AS CONDITION WAS | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT AND PREVIOUS | | | AMENDMENT HAS BROUGHT LANDSCAPE/SITE REVISIONS TO THE | | | BOARD | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENT 2/10/23: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF THAT THERE IS AN 8FT. WIDE | | | CLEAR SIDEWALK WIDTH ON THE NORTH-EASTERN CORNER | | | ADJACENT TO THE GARDEN PLAZA AT THE INTERSECTION OF 5TH | | | ST. AND S. DIXIE. HWY. CURRENTLY APPEARS THAT SECTIONS | | | OF THE LANDSCAPING OR GROUND COVER INTERRUPT THE 8FT. | | | CLEAR PATH. PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THE 8FT. CLEAR SIDEWALK | | | WIDTH ALONG THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF 5TH STREET. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-12 10:58:52 | 1. COMMENT: NEED PREDETERMINATION FROM FDOT FOR THE | | | RECONFIGURATION OF ACCESS AND MEDIAN ON THE ENTRANCE | | | ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO TRAFFIC RESPONSES AND SEE | | | ATTACHED DOCUMENT: FDOT LETTER 93020100 MP 0.8 SR 5_ONE | | | WEST PALM.PDF | | | [SATISFIED] LETTER PROVIDED | | | | | | 2. COMMENT: PROPOSED HOTEL CANOPY EXCEEDS PROJECTION | | | STANDARDS. PER. TABLE IV-5 MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL | | | PROJECTION FOR CANOPY IS 20'. ADDITIONALLY, PROPOSED | | | CANOPY SPANS NEARLY 28' WITHOUT VERTICAL SUPPORTS? | | | RESPONSE: CANOPY WILL REMAIN AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. | | | REFER TO UPDATED A1.01 , A1.02 A2.20 AND R0.03 | | | [SATISFIED] CANOPY SAME AS APPROVED | | | | | | 3. COMMENT: PROPOSED CHANGES TO DAYCARE ACTIVE SPACE | | | AND OFFICE LOBBY NOW DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM ACTIVE USE | | | REQUIREMENTS ON GROUND AND 2ND FLOOR AND ABOVE. ACTIVE | | | USES ARE MEASURED AND CALCULATED DIFFERENTLY THAN | | | ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND VARIANCE SHOWED. FRONTAGE VARIES | | | ACROSS PLANS & APPROVALS: 284', 267', AND 245'. | | | A. GROUND FLOOR: ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND DAC 15-13 HAS | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD (AVENUE STREET CLASSIFICATION) AT | | | 284? OF FRONTAGE. WITH THE 60% ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT, | | | THIS WAS 170? OF ACTIVE USE. PROPOSED ACTIVE USE SAYS | | | 153?-2? OR 54%. | | | B. 2ND FLOOR: ORIGINAL APPROVAL, AND THE VARIANCE | | | REQUESTED WITHIN DAC 15-13 HAD 2ND FLOOR FRONTAGE AT | | | 284' AND ACTIVE USE PROVIDED AT 134' (47%). THE | | | VARIANCE REQUEST GRANTED WAS FOR ONLY PROVIDING 47%. | | | PROPOSED ACTIVE USE NOW AT 116' (ONLY PROVIDING 41%). | | | C. CHANGE IN VARIANCE AMOUNT WOULD REQUIRE NEW VARIANCE | | | REQUEST AND DAC APPROVAL. | | | RESPONSE: REFER TO APPROVED PLAN A0.09 DATED 10/22/20 | | | WITH 245 FEET OF FRONTAGE AT QUADRILLE BLVD. REFER TO | | | REVISED A0.09 WITH ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS ALONG N | | | QUADRILLE BLVD. NO CHANGES WERE DONE TO THE 2ND FLOOR | | | ACTIVE USE. ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS MET; NO VARIANCE | | | NECESSARY. | | | [SATISFIED] GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE MEETS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 4. COMMENT: PROPOSED HOTEL DROP-OFF NOT IN COMPLIANCE. | | | PER SEC. 94-111 (N.)(3.) DESIGNATED PASSENGER LOADING | | | AND DROP-OFF AREAS SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 16 | | | FEET FROM THE BACK OF CURB, SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE | | | SIDEWALK BY A 5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SHALL BE | | | SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. | | | DROP-OFF IS ONLY 12 FEET FROM BACK OF CURB AND REQUIRES | | | 5-FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | A. PORTE COCHERES ARE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM STANDARDS | | | DEPENDING ON SUBDISTRICT LOCATION AND ADJACENCY TO A | | | STREET DESIGNATION AND ARE SEPARATED INTO TWO TYPES | | | WHICH ARE ILLUSTRATED IN FIGURE IV-22. TYPE A AND TYPE | | | "B" PORTE COCHERES SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CLASS A OFFICE | | | BUILDINGS AND HOTELS ONLY. | | | B. APPROVED DROP-OFF WAS FOR 2 LANES, WIDENING THE | | | DROP-OFF FOR A 3RD LANE IS EXCESSIVE, AS WELL AS A | | | WIDER CURB CUT AND INGRESS/EGRESS WIDTH THAN PREVIOUSLY | | | APPROVED. NOT CONDUCIVE TO A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY | | | ENVIRONMENT AND ACTIVE STREET FRONTAGE. PER FIGURE | | | IV-22 TYPE A & B PORTE COCHERES ARE LIMITED TO A 25' | | | WIDTH IN DRIVE LANES AND INGRESS/EGRESS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | REQUIRES A 10' SIDEWALK AROUND THE DROP-OFF. PER SEC. | | | 94-111(O.)(3.) CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND | | | DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS MEASURED | | | PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB. | | | C. WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE CURB AND BOLLARDS ON WESTERN | | | PORTION OF HOTEL DROP-OFF? WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS OPEN | | | SPACE BEING UTILIZED FOR STAGING OR PARKING OF CARS, | | | DROP-OFF NOW ENCROACHES INTO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PUBLIC | | | OPEN SPACE. RECOMMEND REPLACING CURB AND BOLLARDS TO | | | PROTECT PEDESTRIANS IN OPEN SPACE AND NARROW DROP-OFF. | | | D. PORTE COCHERES SHALL GENERALLY OCCUR AT THE SAME | | | ELEVATION AS THE ADJACENT STREET AND ARE LIMITED TO ONE | | | OCCURRENCE PER BUILDING FRONTAGE. | | | E. CONCERNED WITH ELEVATION AND GRADE CHANGE ON | | | SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE HOTEL FRONTAGE/DROP-OFF AREA TO | | | 4TH ST. | | | RESPONSE: PORTE COCHERE WAS REVISED TO COMPLY WITH | | | REQUIREMENTS ON IV-22 TYPE B, REFER TO REVISED GROUND | | | LEVEL PLAN, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE. THIS WAS THE | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITION. IT HAS THE CURB ALONG | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADE | | | ELEVATIONS. | | | [SATISFIED] PORTE COCHERE REFLECTS THE APPROVED PLANS | | | AND WITHIN IV-22 TYPE B REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 5. COMMENT: PER DAC 15-13 FINAL ORDER - CONDITIONS | | | A. CONDITION (B.) TRAFFIC MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS | | | STATES MINIMUM DRIVEWAY LENGTH OF 70 FT. FROM QUADRILLE | | | BLVD. AS MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE | | | TO THE FIRST CONFLICT POINT. | | | B. PROPOSED CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | PROVIDE 70 FT. IN LENGTH BEFORE FIRST CONFLICT POINT | | | C. CONDITION (G.) FINAL LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE DAC FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT. | | | D. PROPOSED CHANGES TO OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, | | | STREETSCAPE, LANDSCAPED QUADRILLE MEDIAN, ETC. WILL | | | REQUIRE THE FINAL LANDSCAPING PLANS TO GO FORWARD TO | | | DAC FOR REVIEW. | | | E. PLEASE REFERENCE FINAL DAC ORDER 15-13 FOR | | | ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. | | | RESPONSE: REFER TO UPDATED A1.01 AND CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | THE DESIGN WAS RETRACTED TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED | | | CONDITION. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] FDOT LETTER CHANGED DRIVEWAY | | | LENGTH CONDITIONS TO 50FT. | | | FINAL OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND IRRIGATION | | | PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO DAC PRIOR TO BUILDING | | | PERMIT. | | | | | | 6. COMMENT: PER FSPR 15-06 SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER | | | A. CONDITION (11): THE SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET AT | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED TO CREATE A | | | BULB-OUT TO PROTECT THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND | | | NARROW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. | | | B. PLEASE INCLUDE/SHOW THIS ADDITION ON THE PROPOSED | | | SITE PLANS. | | | C. CONDITION (16): PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR | | | THE LANDSCAPE OR HARDSCAPE ON SITE, THE APPLICANT SHALL | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE LIVING WALL INCLUDING PLANTING | | | DETAIL AND PLANT SPECIES. | | | D. PLEASE REFERENCE FSPR 15-06 SITE PLAN APPROVAL | | | LETTER FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. | | | UPON REVIEW OF PPRC COMMENTS, MAY WANT TO SCHEDULE A | | | SEPARATE MEETING TO FURTHER REVIEW/DISCUSS PROPOSED | | | CHANGES IN REGARDS TO ZONING REQUIREMENTS. | | | RESPONSE: REFER TO UPDATED A1.01, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL | | | DRAWINGS WITH BULB-OUT INCLUDED. THE LIVING WALL IS | | | STILL BEING PROVIDED; NO CHANGES SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | LIVING WALL. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: 8/12/22 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF THAT ALL FDOT CONDITIONS FOR THE | | | ENTRY ON QUADRILLE ARE MET. (DIMENSIONS, LANE MARKINGS, | | | ETC.) | | | | | | - PER OUR PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS AND EMAIL | | | CORRESPONDENCE; PLEASE IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE TWO NEW | | | ENCLOSED ROOMS (ON SHEET A1.01) NEXT TO THE LARGE | | | 60-SPACE BIKE STORAGE ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE RAMP AND | | | ENTRY LOOP ON THE QUADRILLE SIDE. IF THESE ARE NOT | | | MECHANICAL, PLEASE REFLECT ON FAR CALCULATIONS AND | | | GROSS BUILDING AREA, (SHEET A0.07 - DIAGRAM -FAR) | | | | | | - LANDSCAPE PLANS AND CIVIL PLANS STILL SHOW INCORRECT | | | SITE CONDITIONS, SPECIFICALLY WITH HOTEL/OFFICE DROP | | | OFF, PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURE | | | SET AND GROUND LEVEL SITE PLAN. | | | | | | - [REPEAT COMMENT] CONDITION - FINAL OPEN SPACE, | | | LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE | | | PRESENTED TO DAC PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | 822.1426 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
05-12-2022 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
05-12-2022 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-12 11:13:55 | 1. NEED PREDETERMINATION FROM FDOT FOR THE | | | RECONFIGURATION OF ACCESS AND MEDIAN ON THE ENTRANCE | | | ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | | | | 2. PROPOSED HOTEL CANOPY EXCEEDS PROJECTION STANDARDS. | | | PER. TABLE IV-5 MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL PROJECTION FOR | | | CANOPY IS 20'. ADDITIONALLY, PROPOSED CANOPY SPANS | | | NEARLY 28' WITHOUT VERTICAL SUPPORTS? | | | | | | 3. PROPOSED CHANGES TO DAYCARE ACTIVE SPACE AND OFFICE | | | LOBBY NOW DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS | | | ON GROUND AND 2ND FLOOR AND ABOVE. ACTIVE USES ARE | | | MEASURED AND CALCULATED DIFFERENTLY THAN ORIGINAL | | | APPROVAL AND VARIANCE SHOWED. FRONTAGE VARIES ACROSS | | | PLANS & APPROVALS: 284', 267', AND 245'. | | | | | | A. GROUND FLOOR: ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND DAC 15-13 HAS | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD (AVENUE STREET CLASSIFICATION) AT | | | 284? OF FRONTAGE. WITH THE 60% ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT, | | | THIS WAS 170? OF ACTIVE USE. PROPOSED ACTIVE USE SAYS | | | 153?-2? OR 54%. | | | B. 2ND FLOOR: ORIGINAL APPROVAL, AND THE VARIANCE | | | REQUESTED WITHIN DAC 15-13 HAD 2ND FLOOR FRONTAGE AT | | | 284' AND ACTIVE USE PROVIDED AT 134' (47%). THE | | | VARIANCE REQUEST GRANTED WAS FOR ONLY PROVIDING 47%. | | | PROPOSED ACTIVE USE NOW AT 116' (ONLY PROVIDING 41%). | | | C. CHANGE IN VARIANCE AMOUNT WOULD REQUIRE NEW VARIANCE | | | REQUEST AND DAC APPROVAL. | | | | | | 4. PROPOSED HOTEL DROP-OFF NOT IN COMPLIANCE. PER SEC. | | | 94-111 (N.)(3.) DESIGNATED PASSENGER LOADING AND | | | DROP-OFF AREAS SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 16 FEET | | | FROM THE BACK OF CURB, SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE | | | SIDEWALK BY A 5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SHALL BE | | | SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. | | | DROP-OFF IS ONLY 12 FEET FROM BACK OF CURB AND REQUIRES | | | 5-FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | | | | A. PORTE COCHERES ARE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM STANDARDS | | | DEPENDING ON SUBDISTRICT LOCATION AND ADJACENCY TO A | | | STREET DESIGNATION AND ARE SEPARATED INTO TWO TYPES | | | WHICH ARE ILLUSTRATED IN FIGURE IV-22. TYPE A AND TYPE | | | "B" PORTE COCHERES SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CLASS A OFFICE | | | BUILDINGS AND HOTELS ONLY. | | | | | | I. APPROVED DROP-OFF WAS FOR 2 LANES, WIDENING THE | | | DROP-OFF FOR A 3RD LANE IS EXCESSIVE, AS WELL AS A | | | WIDER CURB CUT AND INGRESS/EGRESS WIDTH THAN PREVIOUSLY | | | APPROVED. NOT CONDUCIVE TO A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY | | | ENVIRONMENT AND ACTIVE STREET FRONTAGE. PER FIGURE | | | IV-22 TYPE A & B PORTE COCHERES ARE LIMITED TO A 25' | | | WIDTH IN DRIVE LANES AND INGRESS/EGRESS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | REQUIRES A 10' SIDEWALK AROUND THE DROP-OFF. PER SEC. | | | 94-111(O.)(3.) CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND | | | DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS MEASURED | | | PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB. | | | II. WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE CURB AND BOLLARDS ON WESTERN | | | PORTION OF HOTEL DROP-OFF? WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS OPEN | | | SPACE BEING UTILIZED FOR STAGING OR PARKING OF CARS, | | | DROP-OFF NOW ENCROACHES INTO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PUBLIC | | | OPEN SPACE. RECOMMEND REPLACING CURB AND BOLLARDS TO | | | PROTECT PEDESTRIANS IN OPEN SPACE AND NARROW DROP-OFF. | | | | | | B. PORTE COCHERES SHALL GENERALLY OCCUR AT THE SAME | | | ELEVATION AS THE ADJACENT STREET AND ARE LIMITED TO ONE | | | OCCURRENCE PER BUILDING FRONTAGE. | | | I. CONCERNED WITH ELEVATION AND GRADE CHANGE ON | | | SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE HOTEL FRONTAGE/DROP-OFF AREA TO | | | 4TH ST. | | | | | | 5. PER DAC 15-13 FINAL ORDER - CONDITIONS | | | A. CONDITION (B.) TRAFFIC MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS | | | STATES MINIMUM DRIVEWAY LENGTH OF 70 FT. FROM QUADRILLE | | | BLVD. AS MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE | | | TO THE FIRST CONFLICT POINT. | | | I. PROPOSED CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | PROVIDE 70 FT. IN LENGTH BEFORE FIRST CONFLICT POINT | | | B. CONDITION (G.) FINAL LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE DAC FOR | | | REVIEW PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT. | | | I. PROPOSED CHANGES TO OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, | | | STREETSCAPE, LANDSCAPED QUADRILLE MEDIAN, ETC. WILL | | | REQUIRE THE FINAL LANDSCAPING PLANS TO GO FORWARD TO | | | DAC FOR REVIEW. | | | C. PLEASE REFERENCE FINAL DAC ORDER 15-13 FOR | | | ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 6. PER FSPR 15-06 SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER | | | A. CONDITION (11): THE SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET AT | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED TO CREATE A | | | BULB-OUT TO PROTECT THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND | | | NARROW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. | | | I. PLEASE INCLUDE/SHOW THIS ADDITION ON THE PROPOSED | | | SITE PLANS. | | | B. CONDITION (16): PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR | | | THE LANDSCAPE OR HARDSCAPE ON SITE, THE APPLICANT SHALL | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE LIVING WALL INCLUDING PLANTING | | | DETAIL AND PLANT SPECIES. | | | C. PLEASE REFERENCE FSPR 15-06 SITE PLAN APPROVAL | | | LETTER FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | UPON REVIEW OF PPRC COMMENTS, MAY WANT TO SCHEDULE A | | | SEPARATE MEETING TO FURTHER REVIEW/DISCUSS PROPOSED | | | CHANGES IN REGARDS TO ZONING REQUIREMENTS. | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER 822-1426 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |