Plan Review Details - Project Z22040026
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22040026
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 05-12-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-12-2022 Time 11:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-06-2022 Time 19:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-06-2022 Time 18:47 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 19:29:08DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. INFORMATIONAL
 COMMENT. IF ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE
 PROVIDED AT LEAST 1 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT. WHEN SUBMITTED
 FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE
 OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN
 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE.
 INFORMATIONAL COMMENT. THE HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE
 DUE TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE
 TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED
 UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
 USED.
  
 5. GREASE/PETROLEUM INTERCEPTOR. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT.
 A GREASE/PETROLEUM INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR
 INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
 PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
 BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT.
 ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED
 BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND
 FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS,
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE
 SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE
 LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT. EACH
 SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT WITH AN INDEPENDENT
 ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS
 ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT CAROLINE
 PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT (561) 805 6659, OR BY
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-27-2022 Time 17:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 07-27-2022 Time 17:16 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 17:29:27DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 THE INCLUSION OF THE DOCUMENT "RESPONSE TO COMMENTS" IS
 NOTED BUT IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO INCLUDE A NARRATIVE OF
 THE RESPONSE TO THE BUILDING COMMENTS.
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SITE PLAN, SHEET C-100, SITE PLAN,
 STILL DOES NOT SHOW A WHEECHAIR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE SIDEWALK TO BUILDING #1 (SHOWROOM). WHEN SUBMITTED
 FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND
 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY
 ENTRANCES.
  
 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BETWEEN BUILDINGS. SHEET C-100,
 SITE PLAN, STILL DOES NOT SHOW A WHEECHAIR ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE FROM THE BUILDING #4 (GENESIS BUILDING) TO
 BUILDING #1 (SHOWROOM). WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT THE
 PLANS MUST SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
 COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY ENTRANCES WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND
 ELEMENTS WITHIN THE BUILDING OR FACILITY
  
 4. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN,
 SHEET C-100, NOW SHOWS THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 CLOSER TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCES BUT THE LOCATION OF
 THE EAST ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE OUTSIDE BUILDING #1
 WOULD REQUIRE THE USER TO PASS BEHIND SOMEONE ELSE'S
 PARKED VEHICLE TO GET TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. PER
 SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST
 POSSIBLE SAFE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO
 AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. INFORMATIONAL
 COMMENT. IF ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE
 PROVIDED AT LEAST 1 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. BUILDING SIZE. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT. WHEN SUBMITTED
 FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE
 OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN
 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 7. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE.
 INFORMATIONAL COMMENT. THE HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE
 DUE TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE
 TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED
 UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
 USED.
  
 8. GREASE/PETROLEUM INTERCEPTOR. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT.
 A GREASE/PETROLEUM INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR
 INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
 PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
 BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT.
 ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED
 BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND
 FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS,
 FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE
 SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE
 LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 10. BUILDING ADDRESS. INFORMATIONAL COMMENT. EACH
 SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT WITH AN INDEPENDENT
 ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS
 ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT CAROLINE
 PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT (561) 805 6659, OR BY
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 05-11-2022 Time 19:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-11-2022 Time 19:04 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-11 19:15:37DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SITE PLAN, SHEET C-100, DOES NOT
 SHOW A WHEECHAIR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE SIDEWALK TO
 BUILDING #1 (SHOWROOM)WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE
 PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
 COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL
 ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES.
  
 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BETWEEN BUILDINGS. SITE PLAN, SHEET
 C-100, DOES NOT SHOW A WHEECHAIR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE BUILDING #4 (GENESIS BUILDING) TO BUILDING #1
 (SHOWROOM). WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT THE PLANS MUST
 SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH
 SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES
 WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE
 BUILDING OR FACILITY
  
 4. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. 5 ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE PARKING DATA TABLE ON
 SITE PLAN, SHEET C-100, STATES THAT 123 PARKING SPACES
 WILL BE PROVIDED BUT ONLY 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
 THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN,
 SHEET C-100, SHOWS REGULAR PARKING SPACES CLOSER TO THE
 BUILDING ENTRANCE THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
 PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
 SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
 TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. IF ELECTRIC
 VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST 1
 IN 25 MUST COMPLY WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 8. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 9. GREASE/PETROLEUM INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE/PETROLEUM
 INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN
 BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-16-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 09-16-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 09-16-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By RROSSANO Date 07-20-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 07-20-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-20 12:05:50UNABLE TO LOCATE EASEMENTS FOR WATER ON UTIL SHEET.
 PLEASE SHOW AND CLEARLY LABEL ON FORMAL ENGINEERING
 SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-09-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 05-09-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-09 11:49:56COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 O PROVIDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 DATA.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SVC. SUPER.,
 WITH CITY OF WPB PUB. UTIL. 561-822-2262,
 [email protected]
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON
 ENGINEERING PLANS INCLUDING THE ONE ALONG WEST SIDE OF
 PROPERTY.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER MAINS,
 SEWER MAINS, SEWER LATERALS, CLEANOUTS, WATER SERVICES,
 WATER METER BOXES, AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 -FIRELINE TAP AND INSTALLATION WILL LIKELY REQUIRE
 EXCAVATION OF OKEECHOBEE BLVD WITH FDOT PERMITS AND
 PAVEMENT RESTORATION.
  
 -THERE IS A FIRE HYDRANT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY
 THAN HAS TWO BOLLARDS AND SOME BUSHES IMPEDING ITS USE
 FROM THE WEST AND EAST SIDES. PLEASE HAVE THOSE
 BOLLARDS AND BUSHES REMOVED WITH THIS PROJECT.
  
 -IF AN FDC IS NEEDED OR REQUIRED, SHOW AND LABEL ON
 ENGINEERING PLAN AND ENSURE WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FIRE
 HYDRANT.
  
 -WHAT YEAR DOES THE FPL LEASE EXTEND TO?
  
 -ARE THE EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES SUFFICIENT
 FOR ANY INCREASED WATER DEMAND?
  
 -WILL FIRELINE CONFLICT WITH EASEMENT USE?
  
 -STORMWATER DETAILS APPEARS TO BE OLD REVISION. REPLACE
 THEM WITH NEWEST REVISION.
  
 -EAST WATER METER ALONG CONGRESS IS 2 INCH SIZE.
 SOUTHERN WATER METER IS 1 INCH SIZE AND SHOWING AS AN
 IRRIGATION METER IN UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM.
  
 -IS THE BUILDING STRUCTURE ADJACENT THE EASTERN WATER
 METER, BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, AND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED TO
 BE DEMOLISHED AND REBUILT?
  
 -PROVIDE BLOWUP DETAIL AND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT
 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE CHANGES NEAR SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 DURING FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. REVISIONS OR
 UPGRADES MAY BE NEEDED UPON FURTHER REVIEW.
  
 -TITLE EXHIBIT NUMBER 5 TALKS ABOUT WEST PALM BEACH
 WATER COMPANY RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS. PLEASE
 PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THOSE.
  
 -ON LANDSCAPING PLAN, PROVIDE AT LEAST 18 INCHES
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN BUSHES AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES.
  
 -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE SHOWING AS OVERDUE FOR ANNUAL
 TESTING. ANY OF THEM WHICH WILL NOT BE REPLACED THROUGH
 THE PROJECT WILL NEED TESTING BY LICENSED PLUMBER.
  
 -VERIFY WESTERN EASEMENT CONTINUES ALONG ENTIRE WESTERN
 PROPERTY LINE AND DOES NOT STOP SHORT. UPDATE SURVEY AS
 NEEDED.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-22-2022 Time 10:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-22-2022 Time 10:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-22 10:16:47AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
 PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 15:28:43FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-04-2022 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-04-2022 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-04 11:47:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION(S) OF THE FIRE HYDRANT(S) AND
 FDC(S) COULD NOT BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE CIVIL
 SHEETS, BUT SHALL BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND
 CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 CONTACT WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH
 COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER,
 [email protected], 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE
 ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 13. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-21-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-21-2022 Time 09:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-21-2022 Time 09:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-21 09:49:03FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2301 OKEECHOBEE Z22040026
 DECEMBER 21, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR TREES AND PALMS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 THE ARBORISTS REPORT RATINGS ARE IN PERCENTAGES AND IT
 APPEARS THE HIGHEST RATING IS 70% FOR ANY TREE OR PALM
 ON THE LIST. THE BREAKING POINT IS 71% FOR GOOD
 CONDITION WHICH SEEMS TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
 RELOCATING ANY NATIVE TREES OR PALMS. PROVIDE THE
 SOURCE OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR THESE RATINGS ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN.
 9/29/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? ROYAL PALMS ARE NATIVE PALMS AND IF INDICATED IN
 GOOD CONDITION, THEY MUST BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED. IF
 THERE IS A REASON THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED, IT MUST BE
 INCLUDED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ALL REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE INCLUDED FOR 94-443 (C) (4) AND
 THE COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BOTH REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.
 THE PROVIDED INTERIOR AREAS MUST BE WITHIN THE PARKING
 AREA AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE EDGE
 OF THE PARKING/VEHICULAR USE AREA EXCEPT VEHICLE
 OVERHANG.
 9/29/22 ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE VEHICULAR USE
 AREA MAY BE COUNTED. THERE ARE SOME AREAS SHOWN AS
 EXTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT MAY BE INCLUDED AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING
 SPACES AND LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN, THIS NEEDS TO BE
 SHADED AS A SEPARATE AREA AND NOT COUNTED IN THE
 VEHICULAR USE AREA. REQUIRED PARKING SPACE NUMBER TIMES
 10 SQ FT PER SPACE NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED AND ADDED TO
 THE VEHICULAR USE AREA REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO ONE SHADE TREE
 REQUIRED PER 100 SQ FT OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA AS
 THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE CODE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 PLAN INDICATES THIS REQUIREMENT IS NOT MET. MORE
 INFORMATION ON ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND TREE SPECIES
 IS REQUIRED.
  
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE 30% REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR
 LANDSCAPE FOR AROUND EACH BUILDING IN THE CODE
 REQUIREMENT CHART.
 GARAGE ENTRANCES CANNOT BE EXCLUDED. USE THE TOTAL
 PERIMETER OF EACH BUILDING TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED
 30%.
 9/29/22 ONLY TWO BUILDINGS LISTED FOR THIS REQUIREMENT.
 THERE ARE FOUR BUILDINGS. IDENTIFY EACH BUILDING AND
 SHOW THE COMPLIANCE.
 12/9/22 SERVICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 7. SATISFIED. IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA IS BARELY
 WITHIN THE REQUIREMENT OF 15% OF THE SITE. STAFF
 SUGGESTS ADDING AREA TO AVOID ANY NEED FOR A MAJOR
 AMENDMENT FOR ANY MINOR CHANGES IN THE FUTURE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES, FPL TRANSFORMERS, AND OTHER GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND DEDUCT ANY PERVIOUS AREA FROM THE TOTAL
 FOR THE SITE.
  
 THE UTILITY LINES ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS OF LINES AND LANDSCAPING.
 ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES TO AVOID LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 FDC IN FRONT OF GENESIS BUILDING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
 94-443(G).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET L-101.
  
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ITEMS LISTED
 IN COMMENT #8.
 ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS SUBSTITUTING GREEN
 BUTTONWOOD FOR GUMBO LIMBO TO AVOID ROOT RELATED ISSUES
 IN CONFINED AREAS.
  
 THE COMMENT RESPONSE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/27/22:
  
 13. SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
 CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY
 STAFF. REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L-001 TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 FOR EACH TREE OR PALM AND PROVIDE THE CORRECT TOTAL
 MITIGATION DUE.
 9/29/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
  
 ??? SATISFIED. IF ROYAL PALMS ARE QUALIFIED TO BE
 REMOVED, THEY ARE CATEGORY 3 FOR 100 SQ FT CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE. CORRECT ON CHART.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE MITIGATION PROVIDED SUMMARY
 TO GIVE 100 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT FOR CABBAGE PALMS.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL DUE,
 AND ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR PROVIDED BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE DISPOSITION SUMMARY TO MATCH
 CODE LANGUAGE OF TREES WITH 20 FT OR GREATER CANOPY
 SPREAD AND CORRECT THE NUMBER ACCORDINGLY.
  
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART
 ON SHEET L-101.
  
 15. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE IS 40% FOR THIS
 ZONING CATEGORY. CORRECT THIS ON THE CODE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART AND CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES
 AND SHRUBS.
 40 PERCENT OF 239,220 IS 95,688. CORRECT AND
 RECALCULATE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS ON CODE
 REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
  
 16. SATISFIED. THE HEDGE FOR THE DUMPSTER FOR 3 NON
 ACCESS SIDES HAS NOT BEEN FULLY PROVIDED.
 SHOW HEDGE ALONG 3 SIDES FULLY.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/29/22:
 17. SATISFIED. COMMENT RESPONSES FOR LANDSCAPE COMMENTS
 WERE NOT PROVIDED IN THE RESPONSE MEMO SUBMITTED.
 RESUBMITTAL MUST INCLUDE RESPONSES TO ADDRESS COMMENTS
 TO STAFF.
 18. SATISFIED. CANOPY MITIGATION PAYMENT IN LIEU MUST
 BE PAID WITH THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION IN
 ORDER FOR THE PERMIT TO BE ISSUED. CORRECT THE NOTE ON
 THE PLANS.
 12/9/22 REMOVE NOTE #2 FROM SHEET L-001AS NO PAYMENT IN
 LIEU WILL BE DUE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 12-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-09-2022 Time 16:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-09-2022 Time 14:23 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-09 16:56:49FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2301 OKEECHOBEE Z22040026
 DECEMBER 9, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR TREES AND PALMS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 THE ARBORISTS REPORT RATINGS ARE IN PERCENTAGES AND IT
 APPEARS THE HIGHEST RATING IS 70% FOR ANY TREE OR PALM
 ON THE LIST. THE BREAKING POINT IS 71% FOR GOOD
 CONDITION WHICH SEEMS TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
 RELOCATING ANY NATIVE TREES OR PALMS. PROVIDE THE
 SOURCE OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR THESE RATINGS ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN.
 9/29/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? ROYAL PALMS ARE NATIVE PALMS AND IF INDICATED IN
 GOOD CONDITION, THEY MUST BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED. IF
 THERE IS A REASON THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED, IT MUST BE
 INCLUDED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ALL REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE INCLUDED FOR 94-443 (C) (4) AND
 THE COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BOTH REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.
 THE PROVIDED INTERIOR AREAS MUST BE WITHIN THE PARKING
 AREA AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE EDGE
 OF THE PARKING/VEHICULAR USE AREA EXCEPT VEHICLE
 OVERHANG.
 9/29/22 ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE VEHICULAR USE
 AREA MAY BE COUNTED. THERE ARE SOME AREAS SHOWN AS
 EXTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT MAY BE INCLUDED AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING
 SPACES AND LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN, THIS NEEDS TO BE
 SHADED AS A SEPARATE AREA AND NOT COUNTED IN THE
 VEHICULAR USE AREA. REQUIRED PARKING SPACE NUMBER TIMES
 10 SQ FT PER SPACE NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED AND ADDED TO
 THE VEHICULAR USE AREA REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO ONE SHADE TREE
 REQUIRED PER 100 SQ FT OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA AS
 THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE CODE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 PLAN INDICATES THIS REQUIREMENT IS NOT MET. MORE
 INFORMATION ON ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND TREE SPECIES
 IS REQUIRED.
  
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE 30% REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED LINEAR LANDSCAPE FOR AROUND EACH BUILDING IN
 THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 GARAGE ENTRANCES CANNOT BE EXCLUDED. USE THE TOTAL
 PERIMETER OF EACH BUILDING TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED
 30%.
 9/29/22 ONLY TWO BUILDINGS LISTED FOR THIS REQUIREMENT.
 THERE ARE FOUR BUILDINGS. IDENTIFY EACH BUILDING AND
 SHOW THE COMPLIANCE.
 12/9/22 SERVICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 7. SATISFIED. IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA IS BARELY
 WITHIN THE REQUIREMENT OF 15% OF THE SITE. STAFF
 SUGGESTS ADDING AREA TO AVOID ANY NEED FOR A MAJOR
 AMENDMENT FOR ANY MINOR CHANGES IN THE FUTURE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES, FPL TRANSFORMERS, AND OTHER GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND DEDUCT ANY PERVIOUS AREA FROM THE TOTAL
 FOR THE SITE.
  
 THE UTILITY LINES ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS OF LINES AND LANDSCAPING.
 ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES TO AVOID LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 FDC IN FRONT OF GENESIS BUILDING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
 94-443(G).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET L-101.
  
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ITEMS LISTED
 IN COMMENT #8.
 ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS SUBSTITUTING GREEN
 BUTTONWOOD FOR GUMBO LIMBO TO AVOID ROOT RELATED ISSUES
 IN CONFINED AREAS.
  
 THE COMMENT RESPONSE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/27/22:
  
 13. SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
 CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
 ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
 DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY
 STAFF. REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L-001 TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 FOR EACH TREE OR PALM AND PROVIDE THE CORRECT TOTAL
 MITIGATION DUE.
 9/29/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
  
 ??? SATISFIED. IF ROYAL PALMS ARE QUALIFIED TO BE
 REMOVED, THEY ARE CATEGORY 3 FOR 100 SQ FT CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE. CORRECT ON CHART.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE MITIGATION PROVIDED SUMMARY
 TO GIVE 100 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT FOR CABBAGE PALMS.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL DUE,
 AND ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR PROVIDED BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
 ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT THE DISPOSITION SUMMARY TO MATCH
 CODE LANGUAGE OF TREES WITH 20 FT OR GREATER CANOPY
 SPREAD AND CORRECT THE NUMBER ACCORDINGLY.
  
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART
 ON SHEET L-101.
  
 15. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE IS 40% FOR THIS
 ZONING CATEGORY. CORRECT THIS ON THE CODE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART AND CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES
 AND SHRUBS.
 40 PERCENT OF 239,220 IS 95,688. CORRECT AND
 RECALCULATE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS ON CODE
 REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
  
 16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE HEDGE FOR THE DUMPSTER FOR
 3 NON ACCESS SIDES HAS NOT BEEN FULLY PROVIDED.
 SHOW HEDGE ALONG 3 SIDES FULLY.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/29/22:
 17. SATISFIED. COMMENT RESPONSES FOR LANDSCAPE COMMENTS
 WERE NOT PROVIDED IN THE RESPONSE MEMO SUBMITTED.
 RESUBMITTAL MUST INCLUDE RESPONSES TO ADDRESS COMMENTS
 TO STAFF.
 18. NOT SATISFIED. CANOPY MITIGATION PAYMENT IN LIEU
 MUST BE PAID WITH THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE PERMIT TO BE ISSUED.
 CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE PLANS.
 12/9/22 REMOVE NOTE #2 FROM SHEET L-001AS NO PAYMENT IN
 LIEU WILL BE DUE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-29-2022 Time 15:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-29-2022 Time 15:26 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-29 15:26:55FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2301 OKEECHOBEE Z22040026
 SEPTEMBER 29, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR TREES AND PALMS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 THE ARBORISTS REPORT RATINGS ARE IN PERCENTAGES AND IT
 APPEARS THE HIGHEST RATING IS 70% FOR ANY TREE OR PALM
 ON THE LIST. THE BREAKING POINT IS 71% FOR GOOD
 CONDITION WHICH SEEMS TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
 RELOCATING ANY NATIVE TREES OR PALMS. PROVIDE THE
 SOURCE OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR THESE RATINGS ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN.
 9/29/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
 ??? ROYAL PALMS ARE NATIVE PALMS AND IF INDICATED IN
 GOOD CONDITION, THEY MUST BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED. IF
 THERE IS A REASON THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED, IT MUST BE
 INCLUDED ON THE ARBORIST REPORT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ALL REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE INCLUDED FOR 94-443 (C) (4) AND
 THE COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BOTH REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.
 THE PROVIDED INTERIOR AREAS MUST BE WITHIN THE PARKING
 AREA AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE EDGE
 OF THE PARKING/VEHICULAR USE AREA EXCEPT VEHICLE
 OVERHANG.
 9/29/22 ANY LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE VEHICULAR USE
 AREA MAY BE COUNTED. THERE ARE SOME AREAS SHOWN AS
 EXTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT MAY BE INCLUDED AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING
 SPACES AND LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN, THIS NEEDS TO BE
 SHADED AS A SEPARATE AREA AND NOT COUNTED IN THE
 VEHICULAR USE AREA. REQUIRED PARKING SPACE NUMBER TIMES
 10 SQ FT PER SPACE NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED AND ADDED TO
 THE VEHICULAR USE AREA REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO ONE SHADE TREE
 REQUIRED PER 100 SQ FT OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA AS
 THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE CODE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 PLAN INDICATES THIS REQUIREMENT IS NOT MET. MORE
 INFORMATION ON ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND TREE SPECIES
 IS REQUIRED.
  
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE 30% REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED LINEAR LANDSCAPE FOR AROUND EACH BUILDING IN
 THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 GARAGE ENTRANCES CANNOT BE EXCLUDED. USE THE TOTAL
 PERIMETER OF EACH BUILDING TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED
 30%.
 9/29/22 ONLY TWO BUILDINGS LISTED FOR THIS REQUIREMENT.
 THERE ARE FOUR BUILDINGS. IDENTIFY EACH BUILDING AND
 SHOW THE COMPLIANCE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA IS BARELY
 WITHIN THE REQUIREMENT OF 15% OF THE SITE. STAFF
 SUGGESTS ADDING AREA TO AVOID ANY NEED FOR A MAJOR
 AMENDMENT FOR ANY MINOR CHANGES IN THE FUTURE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE LINES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES, FPL TRANSFORMERS, AND OTHER GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND DEDUCT ANY PERVIOUS AREA FROM THE TOTAL
 FOR THE SITE.
  
 THE UTILITY LINES ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS OF LINES AND LANDSCAPING.
 ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES TO AVOID LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 FDC IN FRONT OF GENESIS BUILDING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
 94-443(G).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET L-101.
  
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ITEMS LISTED
 IN COMMENT #8.
 ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS SUBSTITUTING GREEN
 BUTTONWOOD FOR GUMBO LIMBO TO AVOID ROOT RELATED ISSUES
 IN CONFINED AREAS.
  
 THE COMMENT RESPONSE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/27/22:
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE
 SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY
 MITIGATION DUE. THE TREE CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE
 FROM CITY STAFF. REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET
 L-001 TO REFLECT THE CORRECT CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR EACH TREE OR PALM AND PROVIDE THE CORRECT
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
 9/29/22 MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
  
 ??? IF ROYAL PALMS ARE QUALIFIED TO BE REMOVED, THEY
 ARE CATEGORY 3 FOR 100 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION DUE.
 CORRECT ON CHART.
 ??? CORRECT THE MITIGATION PROVIDED SUMMARY TO GIVE 100
 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT FOR CABBAGE PALMS.
 ??? PROVIDE ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL DUE, AND ONE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT
 LIST.
 ??? CORRECT THE DISPOSITION SUMMARY TO MATCH CODE
 LANGUAGE OF TREES WITH 20 FT OR GREATER CANOPY SPREAD
 AND CORRECT THE NUMBER ACCORDINGLY.
  
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART
 ON SHEET L-101.
  
 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE IS 40% FOR
 THIS ZONING CATEGORY. CORRECT THIS ON THE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS CHART AND CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES,
 FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS.
 40 PERCENT OF 239,220 IS 95,688. CORRECT AND
 RECALCULATE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS ON CODE
 REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
  
 16. NOT SATISFIED. THE HEDGE FOR THE DUMPSTER FOR 3
 NON ACCESS SIDES HAS NOT BEEN FULLY PROVIDED.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/29/22:
 17. COMMENT RESPONSES FOR LANDSCAPE COMMENTS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED IN THE RESPONSE MEMO SUBMITTED. RESUBMITTAL
 MUST INCLUDE RESPONSES TO ADDRESS COMMENTS TO STAFF.
  
 18. CANOPY MITIGATION PAYMENT IN LIEU MUST BE PAID WITH
 THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE
 PERMIT TO BE ISSUED. CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE PLANS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-27-2022 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-27-2022 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 16:35:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2301 OKEECHOBEE Z22040026
 JULY 27, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR TREES AND PALMS
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 THE ARBORISTS REPORT RATINGS ARE IN PERCENTAGES AND IT
 APPEARS THE HIGHEST RATING IS 70% FOR ANY TREE OR PALM
 ON THE LIST. THE BREAKING POINT IS 71% FOR GOOD
 CONDITION WHICH SEEMS TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
 RELOCATING ANY NATIVE TREES OR PALMS. PROVIDE THE
 SOURCE OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR THESE RATINGS ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ALL REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE INCLUDED FOR 94-443 (C) (4) AND
 THE COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BOTH REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.
 THE PROVIDED INTERIOR AREAS MUST BE WITHIN THE PARKING
 AREA AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE EDGE
 OF THE PARKING/VEHICULAR USE AREA EXCEPT VEHICLE
 OVERHANG.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO ONE SHADE TREE
 REQUIRED PER 100 SQ FT OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA AS
 THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE CODE.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 PLAN INDICATES THIS REQUIREMENT IS NOT MET. MORE
 INFORMATION ON ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND TREE SPECIES
 IS REQUIRED.
  
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE 30% REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED LINEAR LANDSCAPE FOR AROUND EACH BUILDING IN
 THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 GARAGE ENTRANCES CANNOT BE EXCLUDED. USE THE TOTAL
 PERIMETER OF EACH BUILDING TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED
 30%.
  
 7. SATISFIED. IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA IS BARELY
 WITHIN THE REQUIREMENT OF 15% OF THE SITE. STAFF
 SUGGESTS ADDING AREA TO AVOID ANY NEED FOR A MAJOR
 AMENDMENT FOR ANY MINOR CHANGES IN THE FUTURE.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
 LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED VALVES, FPL TRANSFORMERS, AND OTHER GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND DEDUCT ANY PERVIOUS AREA FROM THE
 TOTAL FOR THE SITE.
  
 THE UTILITY LINES ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE MULTIPLE
 CONFLICTS WITH THE LOCATIONS OF LINES AND LANDSCAPING.
 ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES TO AVOID LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 FDC IN FRONT OF GENESIS BUILDING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
 94-443(G).
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445
 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
 ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET L-101.
  
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
 ITEMS LISTED IN COMMENT #8.
 ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS SUBSTITUTING
 GREEN BUTTONWOOD FOR GUMBO LIMBO TO AVOID ROOT RELATED
 ISSUES IN CONFINED AREAS.
  
 THE COMMENT RESPONSE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/27/22:
  
 13. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY
 DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER.
 TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS
 SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE. THE TREE
 CATEGORY LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM CITY STAFF. REVISE THE
 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L-001 TO REFLECT THE
 CORRECT CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH TREE
 OR PALM AND PROVIDE THE CORRECT TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
  
 14. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA ON
 THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART ON SHEET L-101.
  
 15. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE IS 40% FOR THIS ZONING
 CATEGORY. CORRECT THIS ON THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 AND CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND
 SHRUBS.
  
 16. THE HEDGE FOR THE DUMPSTER FOR 3 NON ACCESS SIDES
 HAS NOT BEEN FULLY PROVIDED.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-11-2022 Time 18:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-11-2022 Time 18:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-11 18:06:07FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2301 OKEECHOBEE Z22040026
 MAY 11, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND
 RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED.
  
  
 2. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT
 LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF
 PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR ALL REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN THE
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1.
 SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
  
 4. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO ONE SHADE TREE REQUIRED PER
 100 SQ FT OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA AS THIS IS NO
 LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE CODE.
  
 5. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS.
  
 6. SHOW THE 30% REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR LANDSCAPE
 FOR AROUND EACH BUILDING IN THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
 7. IMPERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA IS BARELY WITHIN THE
 REQUIREMENT OF 15% OF THE SITE. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING
 AREA TO AVOID ANY NEED FOR A MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR ANY
 MINOR CHANGES IN THE FUTURE.
  
 8. SHOW ALL UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES, FPL TRANSFORMERS, AND OTHER GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND DEDUCT ANY PERVIOUS AREA FROM THE TOTAL
 FOR THE SITE.
  
 9. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G).
  
 10. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
  
 11. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL ITEMS LISTED IN COMMENT
 #8.
  
 12. STAFF SUGGESTS SUBSTITUTING GREEN BUTTONWOOD FOR
 GUMBO LIMBO TO AVOID ROOT RELATED ISSUES IN CONFINED
 AREAS.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 10-11-2022 Time 14:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 08-02-2022 Time 16:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 08-02-2022 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 16:26:22STANDARD COMMENTS:
 -SHOW LOCATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SERVICES TO THE
 EXISTING BUILDINGS.
 -PROVIDE STATIONING W/ HORIZONTAL OFFSET BETWEEN
 PROPOSED AND EXISITING UTILITIES.
 -SHOW ALL FRANCHISE UTILITIES WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY.
 -PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCS AND FIRE FLOW CALCS ON
 PLAN SHEET.
  
 CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW AT [email protected]
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 05-11-2022 Time 15:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-11 15:02:04-SHOW EXISTING 12? CAS WM ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
 -SHOW ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT WOULD
 CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED 6? FIRE LINE TAP.
 -SHOW EXISTING DISTRIBUTION AND COLLECTION SYSTEM
 WITHIN THE CITY ROW AND CALL OUT THE TRANSITION POINT
 FROM PRIVATE TO PUBLIC.
 -SHOW AND CALL OUT EXISTING WATER/SEWER CONNECTIONS.
 -PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS.
 - PROVIDE FIRE FLOW DATA.
  
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 11-18-2022 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-22-2022 Time 09:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-22 09:18:50PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
  
 -MAY HAVE TO CUT BACK EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO WATER
 MAIN. WILL DETERMINE AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 SUBMITTAL.
 -PROPOSED WATER SERVICES NEED TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED AT
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL AND MAY REQUIRE
 DESIGN REVISIONS.
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN L100 SEEMS TO SHOW TREE AND BUSH
 CONFLICTS WITH WATER SERVICES. PLEASE ENSURE TREES AND
 BUSHES ARE APPROPRIATELY SPACED FROM UTILITIES.
  
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
  
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-20-2022 Time 10:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-20 10:06:49COULD NOT FIND RESPONSE LETTER IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR
 THE FOLLOWING PRIOR REVIEW COMMENTS:
 -RESPONSE LETTER HAD NO RESPONSE TO NUMBER 33 AND
 NUMBER 34. PLEASE INCLUDE IN NEXT REPONSE LETTER.
 -PLEASE ADD VISUAL MEASUREMENT SCALE TO ENLARGEMENTS ON
 SHEET C300.
 -MAY NOT BE ABLE TO TEE PROPOSED 1 INCH METER DEPENDING
 ON CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE.
 WILL DETERMINE IF NEW TAP IS NEEDED AT ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
 -PGD PLAN SHOWS LIGHT POLE AND BOLLARDS ENCROACHING IN
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK NEAR SOUTHWEST AREA OF PROPERTY.
 -FIRELINE AND HYDRANT DESIGN NEEDS TO BE REFINED. IF
 FIRE HYDRANT IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVATE, THEN IT NEEDS
 TO BE DOWNSTREAM OF DCDA. IF PROPOSED TO BE CITY
 HYDRANT, THEN NEEDS TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE WITH
 PIPE DISTANCE REDUCED IN A UTILITY EASEMENT. ALSO MAKE
 SURE FIRE HYDRANT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY TREES IN
 LANDSCAPING ISLAND. ALTERNATELY COULD TRY TO EXTEND FDC
 CLOSER TO EXISTING HYDRANT.
 -PIPING BETWEEN TAP AND DCDA NEEDS TO BE DIP.
 -SMALL WATER SERVICES SHOULD BE K COPPER OR POLY.
 -PROPOSED 1 INCH METER WOULD REQUIRE RP BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY. IT WOULD ALSO REQUIRE UTILITY EASEMENT.
 PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THEM ON UTILITY PLAN.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -MAY HAVE TO CUT BACK EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO WATER
 MAIN. WILL DETERMINE AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 SUBMITTAL.
 -PROPOSED WATER SERVICES NEED TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED AT
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL AND MAY REQUIRE
 DESIGN REVISIONS.
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN L100 SEEMS TO SHOW TREE AND BUSH
 CONFLICTS WITH WATER SERVICES. PLEASE ENSURE TREES AND
 BUSHES ARE APPROPRIATELY SPACED FROM UTILITIES.
  
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-18-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 07-18-2022 Time 09:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-18 09:37:56PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
  
 -RESPONSE LETTER HAD NO RESPONSE TO NUMBER 33 AND
 NUMBER 34. PLEASE INCLUDE IN NEXT REPONSE LETTER.
  
 -PLEASE ADD VISUAL MEASUREMENT SCALE TO ENLARGEMENTS ON
 SHEET C300.
  
 -MAY NOT BE ABLE TO TEE PROPOSED 1 INCH METER DEPENDING
 ON CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE.
 WILL DETERMINE IF NEW TAP IS NEEDED AT ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
  
 -PGD PLAN SHOWS LIGHT POLE AND BOLLARDS ENCROACHING IN
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK NEAR SOUTHWEST AREA OF PROPERTY.
  
 -FIRELINE AND HYDRANT DESIGN NEEDS TO BE REFINED. IF
 FIRE HYDRANT IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVATE, THEN IT NEEDS
 TO BE DOWNSTREAM OF DCDA. IF PROPOSED TO BE CITY
 HYDRANT, THEN NEEDS TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE WITH
 PIPE DISTANCE REDUCED IN A UTILITY EASEMENT. ALSO MAKE
 SURE FIRE HYDRANT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY TREES IN
 LANDSCAPING ISLAND. ALTERNATELY COULD TRY TO EXTEND FDC
 CLOSER TO EXISTING HYDRANT.
  
 -PIPING BETWEEN TAP AND DCDA NEEDS TO BE DIP.
  
 -SMALL WATER SERVICES SHOULD BE K COPPER OR POLY.
  
 -PROPOSED 1 INCH METER WOULD REQUIRE RP BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY. IT WOULD ALSO REQUIRE UTILITY EASEMENT.
 PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THEM ON UTILITY PLAN.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-20-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-20-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-20 10:18:28CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 2- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 3- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D.
 LATEST EDITION.
 4- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 07-29-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-29 10:25:42CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
 2- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
 STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
 3- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D.
 LATEST EDITION.
 4- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING
 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-02-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 05-02-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-02 12:51:05 
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. DETAILS FOR SANITATION
 SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION
 LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
 THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
 PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
 00)
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 4- PLEASE ALSO MODIFY THE LOCATION/ORIENTATION OF THE
 PROPOSED ENCLOSURE TO ALLOW OUR SANITATION FRONT LOAD
 COLLECTION VEHICLE SAFELY ACCESS AND SERVICE THE
 CONTAINER(S) WHILE MINIMIZING/AVOIDING ANY BACK UP
 MOVEMENTS AND SHORT RADIUS TURNS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-29-2022 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-29-2022 Time 15:58 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-29 15:57:36THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 11/18/22 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
 NOT INCLUDED.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] SHOWING FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS
 AROUND THE OUTFALL(S) IN THE CANAL TO THE NORTH OF THE
 SITE ON SHEET C-010. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: INCLUDE
 FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAIN AROUND THE OUTFALL PIPE FROM
 STRUCTURE IN THE ALLEY, APPROXIMATELY 125 FEET EAST OF
 THE OUTFALL SHOWN ON THE OUTFALL SWPP PLAN VIEW ON
 SHEET C-010. THERE ARE TWO OUTFALL PIPES INTO THE CANAL
 THAT WILL NEED FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERS AROUND THEM.
 THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE AGREEMENT OR EASEMENT
 FOR THE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST TO
 CONNECT TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT - THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB13408 PG 1500
 COVERS THE AREA EAST OF THE COMMON PARCEL LINE BEING
 USED BY THE WEST PROPERTY OWNER (EASEMENT PARCEL).
 THERE ARE DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON THE WEST PROPERTY
 RECEIVING STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE
 EASEMENT PARCEL THAT CONVEY RUNOFF THROUGH THE EAST
 PROPERTIES DRAINAGE SYSTEM. AS FAR AS STAFF CAN
 DISCERN, THE 1.74 ACRE SITE TO THE WEST DOES NOT HAVE A
 SFWMD ERP. THE DRY DETENTION AREAS AND UNDERDRAINS ON
 THE EAST PROPERTY WERE SIZED FOR THE AREA OF THE EAST
 PROPERTY ONLY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (7/15/22 SUBMITTAL)
 14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? PROVIDE UPDATED REFERENCES
 ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] REVIEW AND UPDATE
 THE NOTES ON THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN SHEET. NOTES
 REFERENCE NGVD 1929, PBC TYPICAL T-P-10-001, FDOT
 STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS, ETC. ALL ELEVATION INFORMATION
 SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO NAVD1988, INCLUDING THE STORM
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL,
 UPDATE THE CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS TO THE LATEST
 VERSION.
  
 16. [SATISFIED - DO NOT INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK AREA IN
 THE HATCH AREA] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON
 OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE EXISTING PIPE CONNECTED ON THE
 NORTH SIDE OF THE CATCH BASIN IN THE ALLEY NORTH OF THE
 DRY DETENTION AREA.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (9/16/22 SUBMITTAL):
 18. [SATISFIED] CHECK THE VERTICAL SCALE FOR THE CROSS
 SECTIONS ON SHEET C-202.
  
 19, [SATISFIED] REVIEW THE EXISTING GRADE LINE FOR
 SECTION E-E. IT APPEARS THERE IS A DIP IN THE EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY.
  
 20. [SATISFIED] ON SHEET C-106, FOR THE 60-DEGREE
 STANDARD PARKING STALL DETAIL, THE 12-INCH LONG STRIPE
 CONNECTING THE PARALLEL STRIPES CAN BE PARALLEL TO THE
 TRAVEL LANE, THUS CREATING 60-DEGREE AND 30-DEGREE
 ANGLES WITH THE PARALLEL STRIPES.
  
 21. [SATISFIED] WILL THERE BE A WHEEL STOP OR CURB AT
 THE BACK OF THE 90-DEGREE SMALL CAR PARKING STALL?
  
 NEW COMMENTS (11/18/2022 SUBMITTAL):
  
 22. ON THE DRIVEWAYS TO CONGRESS AVE, SHOW THE DRAINAGE
 DIVIDE LINE FOR THE PAVEMENT DRAINING TO THE INTERNAL
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND FOR THE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT DRAINING
 TO CONGRESS AVE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 23. ON THE DRIVEWAY TO OKEECHOBEE BLVD., SHOW THE
 DRAINAGE DIVIDE FOR THE PAVEMENT DRAINING TO THE
 INTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND FOR THE DRIVEWAY DRAINING
 TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 24. FOR SECTION A-A, EXTEND THE SECTION TO THE FACE OF
 THE BUILDING. LABEL THE FFE.
  
 25. FOR SECTION B-B, EXTEND THE SECTION TO THE BACK OF
 CURB AROUND THE LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO THE
 BUILDING.
  
 26. FOR SECTION C-C, EXTEND THE SECTION TO THE FACE OF
 BUILDING. MOVE THE SECTION EASTWARD TO AVOID THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
  
 27. THE FLOW ARROWS APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH THE GRADES
 FOR THE PARKING AREA WHERE SECTION C-C IS SHOWN. THE
 SPOT GRADES OF 1869 AND 18.68 APPEAR TO BE LOW SPOTS.
 THE SOUTH EDGE OF THE PARKING AREA IS LOWER THAN THE
 CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS.
  
 28. TRENCH DRAIN CONNECTED TO DS-12 APPEARS TO BE A
 FLOOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITHIN THE BUILDING ADDITION. IF
 THIS TRENCH DRAIN DOES NOT RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF,
 IT SHOULD BE ROUTED TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. IF IT
 DOES RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF AND FLOW FROM THE
 SERVICE BAYS, IT SHOULD BE ROUTED THROUGH AN OIL-WATER
 SEPARATOR.
  
 29. IF THE TRENCH DRAIN CONNECTED TO DS-13 IS NOT
 EXPOSED TO STORMWATER RUNOFF, IT SHOULD BE ROUTED TO
 THE SANITARY SEWER.
  
 30. WHY IS THE PIPE CONNECTED TO DS-14 SO LARGE
 (18-INCH)? WHAT FLOW WILL IT CARRY?
  
 31. CONFIRM RIM ELEVATION (17.17) FOR STRUCTURE DS-11.
 EXISTING RIM ELEVATION IS 17.71 FT NAVD ACCORDING TO
 THE SURVEY.
  
 32. IT APPEARS ADDITIONAL EXISTING PAVEMENT DEMOLITION
 WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA AROUND THE NEW
 DUMPSTER LOCATION.
  
  
 33. UPDATE THE SHEET LIST TABLE ON SHEET C-000.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-29-2022 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-29-2022 Time 17:12 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-29 16:35:56THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 9/16/22 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
 NOT INCLUDED. RESPONSES TO THE 7/15/22 COMMENTS WERE
 NOT FOUND IN THE 9/16/22 SUBMTITAL.
  
 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOWING FLOATING TURBIDITY
 CURTAINS AROUND THE OUTFALL(S) IN THE CANAL TO THE
 NORTH OF THE SITE ON SHEET C-010. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 INCLUDE FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAIN AROUND THE OUTFALL
 PIPE FROM STRUCTURE IN THE ALLEY, APPROXIMATELY 125
 FEET EAST OF THE OUTFALL SHOWN ON THE OUTFALL SWPP PLAN
 VIEW ON SHEET C-010. THERE ARE TWO OUTFALL PIPES INTO
 THE CANAL THAT WILL NEED FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERS
 AROUND THEM. THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION TO
 NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE AGREEMENT OR EASEMENT
 FOR THE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST TO
 CONNECT TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT - THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB13408 PG 1500
 COVERS THE AREA EAST OF THE COMMON PARCEL LINE BEING
 USED BY THE WEST PROPERTY OWNER (EASEMENT PARCEL).
 THERE ARE DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON THE WEST PROPERTY
 RECEIVING STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE
 EASEMENT PARCEL THAT CONVEY RUNOFF THROUGH THE EAST
 PROPERTIES DRAINAGE SYSTEM. AS FAR AS STAFF CAN
 DISCERN, THE 1.74 ACRE SITE TO THE WEST DOES NOT HAVE A
 SFWMD ERP. THE DRY DETENTION AREAS AND UNDERDRAINS ON
 THE EAST PROPERTY WERE SIZED FOR THE AREA OF THE EAST
 PROPERTY ONLY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (7/15/22 SUBMITTAL)
  
 13. [SATISFIED] FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL,
 INCLUDE 'DRAINAGE' IN THE SHEET TITLE OF THE PAVING AND
 GRADING PLAN (SHEET C-200).
  
 14. [SATISFIED] REVIEW AND UPDATE THE NOTES ON THE
 PAVING AND GRADING PLAN SHEET. NOTES REFERENCE NGVD
 1929, PBC TYPICAL T-P-10-001, FDOT STANDARD INDEX
 NUMBERS, ETC. ALL ELEVATION INFORMATION SHOULD BE
 REFERENCED TO NAVD1988, INCLUDING THE STORM DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURE TABLE.
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED] FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL,
 UPDATE THE CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS TO THE LATEST
 VERSION.
  
 16. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - DO NOT INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK
 AREA IN THE HATCH AREA] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING
 LIMITS ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
  
 17. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW THE EXISTING PIPE CONNECTED ON
 THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CATCH BASIN IN THE ALLEY NORTH OF
 THE DRY DETENTION AREA.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (9/16/22 SUBMITTAL):
 18. CHECK THE VERTICAL SCALE FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON
 SHEET C-202.
  
 19, REVIEW THE EXISTING GRADE LINE FOR SECTION E-E. IT
 APPEARS THERE IS A DIP IN THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY.
  
 20. ON SHEET C-106, FOR THE 60-DEGREE STANDARD PARKING
 STALL DETAIL, THE 12-INCH LONG STRIPE CONNECTING THE
 PARALLEL STRIPES CAN BE PARALLEL TO THE TRAVEL LANE,
 THUS CREATING 60-DEGREE AND 30-DEGREE ANGLES WITH THE
 PARALLEL STRIPES.
  
 21. WILL THERE BE A WHEEL STOP OR CURB AT THE BACK OF
 THE 90-DEGREE SMALL CAR PARKING STALL?
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-02-2022 Time 15:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-02-2022 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 15:32:53THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/15/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] ARE THE FDOT STANDARD NOTES ON SHEET
 C-001 CURRENT? THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE STANDARD
 PLANS THAT REPLACED THE STANDARD INDEX AND NOTE 18
 REFERENCES WEST MELBOURNE OPERATIONS OFFICE.
  
 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOWING FLOATING TURBIDITY
 CURTAINS AROUND THE OUTFALL(S) IN THE CANAL TO THE
 NORTH OF THE SITE ON SHEET C-010. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 INCLUDE FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAIN AROUND THE OUTFALL
 PIPE FROM STRUCTURE IN THE ALLEY, APPROXIMATELY 125
 FEET EAST OF THE OUTFALL SHOWN ON THE OUTFALL SWPP PLAN
 VIEW ON SHEET C-010.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] INLET PROTECTION MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITHIN CONGRESS AVE. AND NEXT TO
 AND IN THE ALLEY.
  
 4. [SATISFIED - CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WAS MOVED TO
 ALLEY] PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
 ENTRANCE/EXIT ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY SHEET
 WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD1929.
  
 6. [NOT SATISFIED - SURVEY WAS NOT FOUND IN THE
 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION TO
 NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS FOR
 THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] INDICATE WHERE THE DRAINAGE PICKED UP BY
 STRUCTURES DS-01 THROUGH DS-08 AND DS-15 WILL DISCHARGE
 TO. THERE MAY BE A SOUTH PIPE CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE
 DS-13 THAT CONNECTS TO A MANHOLE UNDER THE CARPORT
 AREA. FROM THIS MANHOLE THERE MAY BE PIPES GOING TO THE
 WEST AND SOUTH. PERHAPS STRUCTURE DS-04 COULD BE
 INSTALLED OVER THE WEST PIPE IF THE MANHOLE UNDER THE
 CARPORT IS TO REMAIN ALONG WITH THE WEST AND NORTH
 PIPES CONNECTED TO THIS MANHOLE.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE AGREEMENT OR EASEMENT
 FOR THE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST TO
 CONNECT TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT - THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB13408 PG 1500
 COVERS THE AREA EAST OF THE COMMON PARCEL LINE BEING
 USED BY THE WEST PROPERTY OWNER (EASEMENT PARCEL).
 THERE ARE DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON THE WEST PROPERTY
 RECEIVING STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM AREAS OUTSIDE THE
 EASEMENT PARCEL THAT CONVEY RUNOFF THROUGH THE EAST
 PROPERTIES DRAINAGE SYSTEM. AS FAR AS STAFF CAN
 DISCERN, THE 1.74 ACRE SITE TO THE WEST DOES NOT HAVE A
 SFWMD ERP. THE DRY DETENTION AREAS AND UNDERDRAINS ON
 THE EAST PROPERTY WERE SIZED FOR THE AREA OF THE EAST
 PROPERTY ONLY.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] OKEECHOBEE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT.
 CONGRESS AVE IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY.
 PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED FROM THE AGENCIES IF WORK IS
 PROPOSED WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 12. SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES AND/OR SHOW FLOW
 ARROWS INDICATING HOW EACH AREA WILL BE SLOPED FOR
 STORMWATER RUNOFF.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (7/15/22 SUBMITTAL)
  
 13. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, INCLUDE
 'DRAINAGE' IN THE SHEET TITLE OF THE PAVING AND GRADING
 PLAN (SHEET C-200).
  
 14. REVIEW AND UPDATE THE NOTES ON THE PAVING AND
 GRADING PLAN SHEET. NOTES REFERENCE NGVD 1929, PBC
 TYPICAL T-P-10-001, FDOT STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS, ETC.
 ALL ELEVATION INFORMATION SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO
 NAVD1988, INCLUDING THE STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE.
  
 15. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, UPDATE THE CITY'S
 STANDARD DETAILS TO THE LATEST VERSION.
  
 16. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON OKEECHOBEE
 BLVD.
  
 17. SHOW THE EXISTING PIPE CONNECTED ON THE NORTH SIDE
 OF THE CATCH BASIN IN THE ALLEY NORTH OF THE DRY
 DETENTION AREA.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-12-2022 Time 12:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-12-2022 Time 12:51 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-12 12:51:02THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. ARE THE FDOT STANDARD NOTES ON SHEET C-001 CURRENT?
 THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE STANDARD PLANS THAT REPLACED
 THE STANDARD INDEX AND NOTE 18 REFERENCES WEST
 MELBOURNE OPERATIONS OFFICE.
  
 2. SHOWING FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS AROUND THE
 OUTFALL(S) IN THE CANAL TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE ON
 SHEET C-010.
  
 3. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES WITHIN CONGRESS AVE. AND NEXT TO AND IN THE
 ALLEY.
  
 4. PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
 ENTRANCE/EXIT ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
  
 5. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY SHEET WITH
 ELEVATION INFORMATION AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD1929.
  
 6. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE
 SURVEY.
  
 7. PROVIDE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS FOR THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS.
  
 8. INDICATE WHERE THE DRAINAGE PICKED UP BY STRUCTURES
 DS-01 THROUGH DS-08 AND DS-15 WILL DISCHARGE TO. THERE
 MAY BE A SOUTH PIPE CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE DS-13 THAT
 CONNECTS TO A MANHOLE UNDER THE CARPORT AREA. FROM THIS
 MANHOLE THERE MAY BE PIPES GOING TO THE WEST AND SOUTH.
 PERHAPS STRUCTURE DS-04 COULD BE INSTALLED OVER THE
 WEST PIPE IF THE MANHOLE UNDER THE CARPORT IS TO REMAIN
 ALONG WITH THE WEST AND NORTH PIPES CONNECTED TO THIS
 MANHOLE.
  
 9. PROVIDE THE AGREEMENT OR EASEMENT FOR THE DRAINAGE
 FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST TO CONNECT TO THE ONSITE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 10. SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. OKEECHOBEE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. CONGRESS AVE
 IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY. PERMITS MAY BE
 REQUIRED FROM THE AGENCIES IF WORK IS PROPOSED WITHIN
 THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 12. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES AND/OR SHOW FLOW ARROWS
 INDICATING HOW EACH AREA WILL BE SLOPED FOR STORMWATER
 RUNOFF.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-01-2022 Time 12:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-10-2022 Time 09:23 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-10 09:23:371. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO SURVEY AND ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
 2. SHOW EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN IN OKEECHOBEE. FDOT
 PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 3. VERIFY THAT WATER METER EXISTS AND NOT IN USE.
 4. PROVIDE COPY OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALONG WEST
 PROPERTY LINE.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-05-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-05 17:08:26APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
 1) PROVIDE A DEDICATED PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE
 PLAN
 2) INSTALL DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND LANE
 STRIPING THAT CLEARLY DIRECT INBOUND/OUTBOUND TRAFFIC
 AT THE NORTH-EASTERN CONGRESS AVE DRIVEWAY AND SAFELY
 MANAGE TURNING-VEHICLES CONFLICT POINTS BY THE SERVICE
 BAY DRIVE AISLES
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 2) SATISFIED. FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS
 INCORRECT. PER THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE EASTERN
 DRIVEWAYS ALONG CONGRESS ARE EXIT ONLY. INBOUND TRAFFIC
 NEEDS TO BE REALLOCATED TO THE OKEECHOBEE DRIVEWAY
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 4) SATISFIED. INSERT STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE AT THE
 NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 5) SATISFIED. STOP BAR MARKING AT THE EASTERN DRIVING
 AISLE BY THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED
 FURTHER BACK
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) SATISFIED. REINSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES AT
 THE NW CORNER OF THE CONGRESS AND OKEECHOBEE
 INTERSECTION. THIS COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE
 DEVELOPER???S EVALUATION IS COMPLETED AND FINAL
 RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 8) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-485 TABLE XV-3,
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 DISABLED SPACES
 9) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE, 1 BICYCLE EVERY 20 PARKING
 SPACES, GIVEN 123 SPACES, MINIMUM NUMBER OF BIKE RACKS
 IS 6
 10) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGNS BY THE
 SOUTHERN-EAST DRIVEWAY
 11) SATISFIED. IN SITE PLAN C-100, THE PROPOSED
 DO-NOT-ENTER SIGN SHOULD BE REMOVED AT THE
 NORTH-EASTERN ACCESS POINT, AS IT IS A TWO-WAY DRIVEWAY
 12) SATISFIED. THE NORTH-EASTERN DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE
 RE-DESIGNED OR RE-STRIPED TO FACILITATE INBOUND
 VEHICLES??? RIGHT-TURN MOVEMENT. PER THE LATEST COMMENT
 RESPONSE: IS THE PROPOSED GATE THE ONE LOCATED WITHIN
 THE DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATING ACCESS TO THE SERVICE
 BAYS INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE? IF SO, SUCH DOES NOT ADDRESS
 THE COMMENT, NOR IMPROVES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AT THE
 CONGRESS AVE DRIVEWAY. PLEASE RE-ADDRESS THIS COMMENT
 AND PROVIDE PROPER MITIGATION MEASURES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-23-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-23-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-23 16:16:47 
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 2) SATISFIED. FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS
 INCORRECT. PER THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE EASTERN
 DRIVEWAYS ALONG CONGRESS ARE EXIT ONLY. INBOUND TRAFFIC
 NEEDS TO BE REALLOCATED TO THE OKEECHOBEE DRIVEWAY
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 4) SATISFIED. INSERT STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE AT THE
 NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 5) SATISFIED. STOP BAR MARKING AT THE EASTERN DRIVING
 AISLE BY THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED
 FURTHER BACK
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) SATISFIED. REINSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES AT
 THE NW CORNER OF THE CONGRESS AND OKEECHOBEE
 INTERSECTION. THIS COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE
 DEVELOPER???S EVALUATION IS COMPLETED AND FINAL
 RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 8) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-485 TABLE XV-3,
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 DISABLED SPACES
 9) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE, 1 BICYCLE EVERY 20 PARKING
 SPACES, GIVEN 123 SPACES, MINIMUM NUMBER OF BIKE RACKS
 IS 6
 10) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGNS BY THE
 SOUTHERN-EAST DRIVEWAY
 11) SATISFIED. IN SITE PLAN C-100, THE PROPOSED
 DO-NOT-ENTER SIGN SHOULD BE REMOVED AT THE
 NORTH-EASTERN ACCESS POINT, AS IT IS A TWO-WAY DRIVEWAY
 12) NOT SATISFIED. THE NORTH-EASTERN DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE
 RE-DESIGNED OR RE-STRIPED TO FACILITATE INBOUND
 VEHICLES??? RIGHT-TURN MOVEMENT. PER THE LATEST COMMENT
 RESPONSE: IS THE PROPOSED GATE THE ONE LOCATED WITHIN
 THE DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATING ACCESS TO THE SERVICE
 BAYS INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE? IF SO, SUCH DOES NOT ADDRESS
 THE COMMENT, NOR IMPROVES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AT THE
 CONGRESS AVE DRIVEWAY. PLEASE RE-ADDRESS THIS COMMENT
 AND PROVIDE PROPER MITIGATION MEASURES
 13) PLEASE PROVIDE A DEDICATED PAVEMENT MARKING AND
 SIGNAGE SITE PLAN. PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER
 14) INSTALL DO-NOT ENTER SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE
 TWO- LANES ONE-WAY DRIVE AISLE BY THE NORTH-EASTERN
 CONGRESS AVE DRIVEWAY
 15) INSTALL DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND
 LANE STRIPING THAT CLEARLY DIRECT INBOUND TRAFFIC FROM
 THE NORTH-EASTERN CONGRESS AVE DRIVEWAY TO THE SERVICE
 BAYS DRIVE AISLE AND SAFELY MANAGE TURNING-VEHICLES
 CONFLICT POINTS
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-05 11:38:47TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 2) SATISFIED. FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS
 INCORRECT. PER THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE EASTERN
 DRIVEWAYS ALONG CONGRESS ARE EXIT ONLY. INBOUND TRAFFIC
 NEEDS TO BE REALLOCATED TO THE OKEECHOBEE DRIVEWAY
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 4) SATISFIED. INSERT STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE AT THE
 NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 5) SATISFIED. STOP BAR MARKING AT THE EASTERN DRIVING
 AISLE BY THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED
 FURTHER BACK
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) NOT SATISFIED. REINSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES
 AT THE NW CORNER OF THE CONGRESS AND OKEECHOBEE
 INTERSECTION. THIS COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE
 DEVELOPER???S EVALUATION IS COMPLETED AND FINAL
 RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 8) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-485 TABLE XV-3,
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 DISABLED SPACES
 9) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE, 1 BICYCLE EVERY 20 PARKING
 SPACES, GIVEN 123 SPACES, MINIMUM NUMBER OF BIKE RACKS
 IS 6
 10) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGNS BY THE
 SOUTHERN-EAST DRIVEWAY
 11) IN SITE PLAN C-100, THE PROPOSED DO-NOT-ENTER SIGN
 SHOULD BE REMOVED AT THE NORTH-EASTERN ACCESS POINT, AS
 IT IS A TWO-WAY DRIVEWAY
 12) THE NORTH-EASTERN DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE RE-DESIGNED OR
 RE-STRIPED TO FACILITATE INBOUND VEHICLES??? RIGHT-TURN
 MOVEMENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-26-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-26 11:55:55TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS
 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 RECEIVED
 2) SATISFIED. FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS
 INCORRECT. PER THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE EASTERN
 DRIVEWAYS ALONG CONGRESS ARE EXIT ONLY. INBOUND TRAFFIC
 NEEDS TO BE REALLOCATED TO THE OKEECHOBEE DRIVEWAY
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 4) SATISFIED. INSERT STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE AT THE
 NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 5) SATISFIED. STOP BAR MARKING AT THE EASTERN DRIVING
 AISLE BY THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED
 FURTHER BACK
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REINSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING
 SURFACES AT THE NW CORNER OF THE CONGRESS AND
 OKEECHOBEE INTERSECTION. THIS COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED
 ONCE DEVELOPER'S EVALUATION IS COMPLETED AND FINAL
 RESPONSE PROVIDED.
 8) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-485 TABLE XV-3,
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 DISABLED SPACES
 9) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE, 1 BICYCLE EVERY 20 PARKING
 SPACES, GIVEN 123 SPACES, MINIMUM NUMBER OF BIKE RACKS
 IS 6
 10) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGNS BY THE
 SOUTHERN-EAST DRIVEWAY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-06-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-06 14:11:281) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS INCORRECT. PER THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN, THE EASTERN DRIVEWAYS ALONG
 CONGRESS ARE EXIT ONLY. INBOUND TRAFFIC NEEDS TO BE
 REALLOCATED TO THE OKEECHOBEE DRIVEWAY
 3) PROVIDE WIDTH OF EACH ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 4) INSERT STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE AT THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY
 5) STOP BAR MARKING AT THE EASTERN DRIVING AISLE BY THE
 SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED FURTHER BACK
 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) REINSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES AT THE NW
 CORNER OF THE CONGRESS AND OKEECHOBEE INTERSECTION
 8) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-485 TABLE XV-3, PROVIDE A
 MINIMUM OF 5 DISABLED SPACES
 9) PER CITY CODE, 1 BICYCLE EVERY 20 PARKING SPACES,
 GIVEN 123 SPACES, MINIMUM NUMBER OF BIKE RACKS IS 6
 10) INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGNS BY THE SOUTHERN-EAST
 DRIVEWAY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 10-12-2022 Time 09:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 10-12-2022 Time 09:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-12 09:36:23PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.12.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22040026
 CASE NO.: PB 1608C
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM
 BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. SATISFIED - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL
 BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
 DO NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
 PREVENT THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 2.1. SATISFIED - LETTERS ARE STILL OUTSTANDING.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS
 TO INCLUDE RESPONSES TO ALL OF THE REQUIRED ?STANDARDS
 FOR CODE COMPLIANCE? AS OUTLINED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 3.1. NOT SATISFIED - RESPONSES TO STANDARDS WAS
 PROVIDED FOR SEC. 94-35(C), WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO SITE
 PLAN REVIEWS. PER THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION,
 RESPONSES ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO THOSE STANDARDS IN SEC.
 94-32(A), WHICH ARE APPLICABLE TO MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENTS.
  
 3.1.1. NEW COMMENT - RESPONSES STILL HAVE NOT BEEN
 PROVIDED FOR THE STANDARDS CONTAINED IN SEC. 94-32(A).
  
 4. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE, WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0
 FOOTCANDLES. IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE A COUPLE
 AREAS ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE WHERE THIS LEVEL MAY BE
 EXCEEDED AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4.1. SATISFIED - REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS WERE NOT
 INCLUDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL.
  
 5. SATISFIED - THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BETTER DELINEATE
 WHICH PARKING SPACES ARE ?STORAGE? AND WHICH SPACES ARE
 PART OF THE REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 5.1. SATISFIED - YOU'RE SHOWING STORAGE SPACES BEING
 BLOCKED BY NON-STORAGE SPACES. IF SOMEONE NEEDS TO GET
 A CAR FROM THE INVENTORY, IT COULDN'T BE ACCESSED IF
 SOMEONE IS PARKED BEHIND IT.
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - YOU HAVE LOCATIONS NORTH OF BUILDING
 #2 IDENTIFIED AS OUTDOOR STORAGE, BUT ALSO AS SERVICE
 PARKING. WHICH IS IT? ARE THE SPACES BEING RESERVED FOR
 INVENTORY, OR ARE THEY A PART OF THE PARKING PROVIDED?
  
 6. SATISFIED - THE LOT COVERAGE AND OPEN SPACE
 PERCENTAGES SHOULD TOTAL 100%; AS PROVIDED ON THE SITE
 PLAN THE TOTAL EQUALS 103.9%. ENSURE ALL CALCULATIONS
 ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT.
  
 6.1. SATISFIED - THE NUMBERS STILL DO NOT ADD UP...THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE LOT COVERAGE PLUS THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE OF THE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL LOT
 AREA.
  
 7. SATISFIED - IN THOSE AREAS WHERE WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT
 BEING USED AND VEHICLES ARE OVERHANGING INTO
 LANDSCAPING, ETC., THE OVERHANG SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 SITE PLAN AND DIMENSIONED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS
 CONFIGURATION (ABSENCE OF WHEEL STOPS AND UTILIZATION
 OF CURBING) IS ENCOURAGED AS IT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF
 PERVIOUS AREA AND REDUCES MAINTENANCE. IT APPEARS THAT
 THERE ARE ADDITIONAL AREAS WHERE THIS CONFIGURATION CAN
 BE IMPLEMENTED.
  
 8. SATISFIED - THE VEHICLE DISPLAY AREAS SHALL BE
 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND
 SHALL NOT BE WITHIN THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE
 INGRESS/EGRESS.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED - DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL NOT CONTAIN
 THE NAME/LOGO OF THE BUSINESS. DOING SO WOULD QUALIFY
 THEM AS ADDITIONAL MONUMENT SIGNS, THEREBY EXCEEDING
 THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF MONUMENT SIGNS PERMITTED.
  
 9.1. NOT SATISFIED - REVISED SIGN PLANS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED. UNLESS A SIGN PLAN IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE
 MAJOR AMENDMENT, ALL SIGNS WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME
 OF PERMITTING AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) SIGN REGULATIONS.
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE MONUMENT SIGN
 PLANS; MULTIPLE SIGNS ARE SHOWN BUT THEN THERE IS ONE
 THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED. ONLY PROVIDE INFORMATION
 PERTAINING TO THE SIGNS THAT ARE ACTUALLY BEING
 PROPOSED.
  
 10.1. NOT SATISFIED - REVISED SIGN PLANS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED. UNLESS A SIGN PLAN IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE
 MAJOR AMENDMENT, ALL SIGNS WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME
 OF PERMITTING AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) SIGN REGULATIONS
  
 11. SATISFIED - THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY
 THE LOCATION OF ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS, SETBACKS FROM
 ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES, ETC. THE LABEL OF THE SIGN
 SHOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND CORRESPOND TO THE SIGNS
 SHOWN ON THE SIGN PLANS.
  
 11.1. SATISFIED - SETBACKS FOR THE MONUMENT SIGNS ARE
 NOT SHOWN. HIGH FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM
 OF 8 FEET FROM UTILITY POLES WHICH SUPPORT ELECTRICAL
 TRANSMISSION LINES, AND IF THERE A MULTIPLE HIGH
 FREESTANDING SIGNS, THEY ARE TO BE A SEPARATED BY AT
 LEAST 75 FEET.
  
 12. SATISFIED - MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED
 WITHIN THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS.
  
 13. SATISFIED - PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS (CONTACT
 ME FOR A COPY).
  
 14. SATISFIED - DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BIKE
 PARKING (PAD, RACK, ETC.).
  
 14.1. SATISFIED - THE BIKE RACK PROVIDED DOES NOT MEET
 THE CITY'S REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS.
  
 15. SATISFIED - THE PLACEMENT OF THE BIKE RACK DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE. PLEASE CONTACT
 ME TO OBTAIN THE DETAIL SHOWING THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE
 AROUND THE RACK.
  
 15.1. SATISFIED - A DETAIL WAS NOT PROVIDED INDICATING
 THE DIMENSIONS/SPACING OF THE RACKS AND THE CLEARANCE
 AROUND THE RACK.
  
 16. SATISFIED - BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
 ACCOMMODATE 7 BICYCLE SPACES (1 PER 20 PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED); ONLY 4 ARE INDICATED IN THE DATA TABLE.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION AND
 OPERATIONS OF UNLOADING VEHICLES UPON DELIVERY.
  
 18. SATISFIED - THE PARKING CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE
 INCORRECT AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE ENCLOSED
 AREA, OUTDOOR STORAGE, ETC.
  
 18.1. SATISFIED - THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT
 THERE ARE 295 OUTDOOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE STORAGE
 SPACES...THIS DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER OF
 SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLAN
  
 19. SATISFIED - THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS WHERE
 EXISTING/PROPOSED LIGHT POLES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO
 CONFLICT WITH DRIVE AISLES, PARKING SPACES, ETC. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW HOW THESE POLES ARE BEING
 INSTALLED IN RELATION TO THE ADJACENT DRIVE AISLES AND
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 20. SATISFIED - THE PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF
 BUILDING #2 ARE TOO SHORT TO ACCOMMODATE TANDEM PARKING
 OF TWO (2) VEHICLES.
  
 21. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE EXISTING, DEMO, AND
 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS FOR THE EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT
 ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMODELED OR EXPANDED. IT APPEARS
 THAT THE OPEN-AIR SERVICE CARPORT ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE
 IS BEING ENCLOSED, ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE FOR SERVICE
 WRITERS, ETC. IS THIS ENCLOSED CARPORT BEING ACCOUNTED
 FOR IN THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS?
  
 22. SATISFIED - THE SITE DATA TABLE DOESN?T ACCOUNT FOR
 ALL OF THE SERVICE BAYS THAT ARE BEING SHOWN. BUILDING
 1 IS TO HAVE 29 BAYS (NOT 28), AND BUILDING 4 HAS 3
 BAYS. ADDITIONALLY, HOW MANY BAYS EXIST IN BUILDING #3?
  
 23. SATISFIED - THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES INDICATED
 IN THE SITE DATA TABLE DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH WHAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND ARE NOT TOTALED CORRECTLY.
  
 24. SATISFIED - THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING
 DESIGNATIONS IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ARE INCORRECT.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 07-27-2022 Time 14:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 07-27-2022 Time 14:45 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 15:13:50PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 07.27.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22040026
 CASE NO.: PB 1608C
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM
 BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS DO NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR
 OTHERWISE PREVENT THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 2.1. NEW COMMENT - LETTERS ARE STILL OUTSTANDING.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS
 TO INCLUDE RESPONSES TO ALL OF THE REQUIRED ?STANDARDS
 FOR CODE COMPLIANCE? AS OUTLINED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 3.1. NEW COMMENT - RESPONSES TO STANDARDS WAS PROVIDED
 FOR SEC. 94-35(C), WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO SITE PLAN
 REVIEWS. PER THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, RESPONSES ARE
 TO BE PROVIDED TO THOSE STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-32(A),
 WHICH ARE APPLICABLE TO MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC
 LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINE, WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0
 FOOTCANDLES. IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE A COUPLE
 AREAS ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE WHERE THIS LEVEL MAY BE
 EXCEEDED AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4.1. NEW COMMENT - REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS WERE NOT
 INCLUDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BETTER
 DELINEATE WHICH PARKING SPACES ARE ?STORAGE? AND WHICH
 SPACES ARE PART OF THE REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 5.1. NEW COMMENT - YOU'RE SHOWING STORAGE SPACES BEING
 BLOCKED BY NON-STORAGE SPACES. IF SOMEONE NEEDS TO GET
 A CAR FROM THE INVENTORY, IT COULDN'T BE ACCESSED IF
 SOMEONE IS PARKED BEHIND IT.
  
 5.2. NEW COMMENT - YOU HAVE LOCATIONS NORTH OF BUILDING
 #2 IDENTIFIED AS OUTDOOR STORAGE, BUT ALSO AS SERVICE
 PARKING. WHICH IS IT? ARE THE SPACES BEING RESERVED FOR
 INVENTORY, OR ARE THEY A PART OF THE PARKING PROVIDED?
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE LOT COVERAGE AND OPEN
 SPACE PERCENTAGES SHOULD TOTAL 100%; AS PROVIDED ON THE
 SITE PLAN THE TOTAL EQUALS 103.9%. ENSURE ALL
 CALCULATIONS ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT.
  
 6.1. NEW COMMENT - THE NUMBERS STILL DO NOT ADD
 UP...THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE LOT COVERAGE PLUS THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT EQUAL THE
 TOTAL LOT AREA.
  
 7. SATISFIED - IN THOSE AREAS WHERE WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT
 BEING USED AND VEHICLES ARE OVERHANGING INTO
 LANDSCAPING, ETC., THE OVERHANG SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 SITE PLAN AND DIMENSIONED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS
 CONFIGURATION (ABSENCE OF WHEEL STOPS AND UTILIZATION
 OF CURBING) IS ENCOURAGED AS IT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF
 PERVIOUS AREA AND REDUCES MAINTENANCE. IT APPEARS THAT
 THERE ARE ADDITIONAL AREAS WHERE THIS CONFIGURATION CAN
 BE IMPLEMENTED.
  
 8. SATISFIED - THE VEHICLE DISPLAY AREAS SHALL BE
 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND
 SHALL NOT BE WITHIN THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE
 INGRESS/EGRESS.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED - DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL NOT CONTAIN
 THE NAME/LOGO OF THE BUSINESS. DOING SO WOULD QUALIFY
 THEM AS ADDITIONAL MONUMENT SIGNS, THEREBY EXCEEDING
 THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF MONUMENT SIGNS PERMITTED.
  
 9.1. NEW COMMENT - REVISED SIGN PLANS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED. UNLESS A SIGN PLAN IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE
 MAJOR AMENDMENT, ALL SIGNS WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME
 OF PERMITTING AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) SIGN REGULATIONS.
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE MONUMENT SIGN
 PLANS; MULTIPLE SIGNS ARE SHOWN BUT THEN THERE IS ONE
 THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED. ONLY PROVIDE INFORMATION
 PERTAINING TO THE SIGNS THAT ARE ACTUALLY BEING
 PROPOSED.
  
 10.1. NEW COMMENT - REVISED SIGN PLANS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED. UNLESS A SIGN PLAN IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE
 MAJOR AMENDMENT, ALL SIGNS WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME
 OF PERMITTING AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) SIGN REGULATIONS
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO
 CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL FREESTANDING
 SIGNS, SETBACKS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES, ETC. THE
 LABEL OF THE SIGN SHOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND
 CORRESPOND TO THE SIGNS SHOWN ON THE SIGN PLANS.
  
 11.1. NEW COMMENT - SETBACKS FOR THE MONUMENT SIGNS ARE
 NOT SHOWN. HIGH FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM
 OF 8 FEET FROM UTILITY POLES WHICH SUPPORT ELECTRICAL
 TRANSMISSION LINES, AND IF THERE A MULTIPLE HIGH
 FREESTANDING SIGNS, THEY ARE TO BE A SEPARATED BY AT
 LEAST 75 FEET.
  
 12. SATISFIED - MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED
 WITHIN THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS.
  
 13. SATISFIED - PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS (CONTACT
 ME FOR A COPY).
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE BIKE PARKING (PAD, RACK, ETC.).
  
 14.1. NEW COMMENT - THE BIKE RACK PROVIDED DOES NOT
 MEET THE CITY'S REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS.
  
 15. NOT SATISFIED - THE PLACEMENT OF THE BIKE RACK DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE. PLEASE
 CONTACT ME TO OBTAIN THE DETAIL SHOWING THE REQUIRED
 CLEARANCE AROUND THE RACK.
  
 15.1. NEW COMMENT - A DETAIL WAS NOT PROVIDED
 INDICATING THE DIMENSIONS/SPACING OF THE RACKS AND THE
 CLEARANCE AROUND THE RACK.
  
 16. SATISFIED - BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
 ACCOMMODATE 7 BICYCLE SPACES (1 PER 20 PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED); ONLY 4 ARE INDICATED IN THE DATA TABLE.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION AND
 OPERATIONS OF UNLOADING VEHICLES UPON DELIVERY.
  
 18. NOT SATISFIED - THE PARKING CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO
 BE INCORRECT AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE ENCLOSED
 AREA, OUTDOOR STORAGE, ETC.
  
 18.1. NEW COMMENT - THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT
 THERE ARE 295 OUTDOOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE STORAGE
 SPACES...THIS DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER OF
 SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLAN
  
 19. SATISFIED - THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS WHERE
 EXISTING/PROPOSED LIGHT POLES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO
 CONFLICT WITH DRIVE AISLES, PARKING SPACES, ETC. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW HOW THESE POLES ARE BEING
 INSTALLED IN RELATION TO THE ADJACENT DRIVE AISLES AND
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 20. SATISFIED - THE PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF
 BUILDING #2 ARE TOO SHORT TO ACCOMMODATE TANDEM PARKING
 OF TWO (2) VEHICLES.
  
 21. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE EXISTING, DEMO, AND
 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS FOR THE EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT
 ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMODELED OR EXPANDED. IT APPEARS
 THAT THE OPEN-AIR SERVICE CARPORT ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE
 IS BEING ENCLOSED, ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE FOR SERVICE
 WRITERS, ETC. IS THIS ENCLOSED CARPORT BEING ACCOUNTED
 FOR IN THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS?
  
 22. SATISFIED - THE SITE DATA TABLE DOESN?T ACCOUNT FOR
 ALL OF THE SERVICE BAYS THAT ARE BEING SHOWN. BUILDING
 1 IS TO HAVE 29 BAYS (NOT 28), AND BUILDING 4 HAS 3
 BAYS. ADDITIONALLY, HOW MANY BAYS EXIST IN BUILDING #3?
  
 23. SATISFIED - THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES INDICATED
 IN THE SITE DATA TABLE DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH WHAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND ARE NOT TOTALED CORRECTLY.
  
 24. SATISFIED - THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING
 DESIGNATIONS IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ARE INCORRECT.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-12-2022 Time 11:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-12-2022 Time 11:26 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-12 11:27:02PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.12.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22040026
 CASE NO.: PB 1608C
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS DO NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE PREVENT
 THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 3. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES
 TO ALL OF THE REQUIRED ?STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE?
 AS OUTLINED IN THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT THE
 PROPERTY LINE, WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES.
 IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE A COUPLE AREAS ALONG
 CONGRESS AVENUE WHERE THIS LEVEL MAY BE EXCEEDED AND
 WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 5. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BETTER DELINEATE WHICH
 PARKING SPACES ARE ?STORAGE? AND WHICH SPACES ARE PART
 OF THE REQUIRED PARKING.
  
 6. THE LOT COVERAGE AND OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGES SHOULD
 TOTAL 100%; AS PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN THE TOTAL
 EQUALS 103.9%. ENSURE ALL CALCULATIONS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 7. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT BEING USED
 AND VEHICLES ARE OVERHANGING INTO LANDSCAPING, ETC.,
 THE OVERHANG SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND
 DIMENSIONED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS CONFIGURATION
 (ABSENCE OF WHEEL STOPS AND UTILIZATION OF CURBING) IS
 ENCOURAGED AS IT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF PERVIOUS AREA
 AND REDUCES MAINTENANCE. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE
 ADDITIONAL AREAS WHERE THIS CONFIGURATION CAN BE
 IMPLEMENTED.
  
 8. THE VEHICLE DISPLAY AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE
 OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND SHALL NOT BE
 WITHIN THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS.
  
 9. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL NOT CONTAIN THE NAME/LOGO OF
 THE BUSINESS. DOING SO WOULD QUALIFY THEM AS ADDITIONAL
 MONUMENT SIGNS, THEREBY EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF
 MONUMENT SIGNS PERMITTED.
  
 10. PLEASE CLARIFY THE MONUMENT SIGN PLANS; MULTIPLE
 SIGNS ARE SHOWN BUT THEN THERE IS ONE THAT IS OUTLINED
 IN RED. ONLY PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE
 SIGNS THAT ARE ACTUALLY BEING PROPOSED.
  
 11. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 LOCATION OF ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS, SETBACKS FROM
 ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES, ETC. THE LABEL OF THE SIGN
 SHOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND CORRESPOND TO THE SIGNS
 SHOWN ON THE SIGN PLANS.
  
 12. MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SAFE
 SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS.
  
 13. PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND CONFORM TO THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS (CONTACT ME FOR A COPY).
  
 14. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BIKE PARKING (PAD,
 RACK, ETC.).
  
 15. THE PLACEMENT OF THE BIKE RACK DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE. PLEASE CONTACT ME TO
 OBTAIN THE DETAIL SHOWING THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE AROUND
 THE RACK.
  
 16. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE 7
 BICYCLE SPACES (1 PER 20 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED); ONLY
 4 ARE INDICATED IN THE DATA TABLE.
  
 17. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION AND OPERATIONS OF
 UNLOADING VEHICLES UPON DELIVERY.
  
 18. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT AND
 DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE ENCLOSED AREA, OUTDOOR
 STORAGE, ETC.
  
 19. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS WHERE
 EXISTING/PROPOSED LIGHT POLES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO
 CONFLICT WITH DRIVE AISLES, PARKING SPACES, ETC. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW HOW THESE POLES ARE BEING
 INSTALLED IN RELATION TO THE ADJACENT DRIVE AISLES AND
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 20. THE PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BUILDING #2
 ARE TOO SHORT TO ACCOMMODATE TANDEM PARKING OF TWO (2)
 VEHICLES.
  
 21. PLEASE PROVIDE EXISTING, DEMO, AND PROPOSED FLOOR
 PLANS FOR THE EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO
 BE REMODELED OR EXPANDED. IT APPEARS THAT THE OPEN-AIR
 SERVICE CARPORT ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE IS BEING
 ENCLOSED, ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE FOR SERVICE WRITERS,
 ETC. IS THIS ENCLOSED CARPORT BEING ACCOUNTED FOR IN
 THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS?
  
 22. THE SITE DATA TABLE DOESN?T ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE
 SERVICE BAYS THAT ARE BEING SHOWN. BUILDING 1 IS TO
 HAVE 29 BAYS (NOT 28), AND BUILDING 4 HAS 3 BAYS.
 ADDITIONALLY, HOW MANY BAYS EXIST IN BUILDING #3?
  
 23. THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES INDICATED IN THE SITE
 DATA TABLE DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH WHAT IS SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN AND ARE NOT TOTALED CORRECTLY.
  
 24. THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS IN
 THE SITE DATA TABLE ARE INCORRECT.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JULY 19, 2022,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 27, 2022.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JULY 19, 2022, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JULY 4, 2022. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND BE
 INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved