City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z22040015

Plan Review Stops For Project Z22040015

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-11-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	05-11-2022	Time	19:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	05-11-2022	Time	19:21	Sent To

Notes

2022-05-11 19:22:29	NO COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP
	AMENDMENT.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	07-18-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	lquinone			Date	07-18-2023	Time	08:57	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lquinone			Date	07-18-2023	Time	08:57	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-09-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	05-09-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	05-09-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-05-09 11:55:58	NO COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
	ENGINEERING SERVICES AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]

	MARK HURLEY ? FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, CITY
	OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262, [email protected]
	-IN 319 BELVEDERE ANALYSIS LETTER, FIGURE 1 SEEMS TO
	SHOW 310 BELVEDERE RD PROPERTY.
	-SURVEY NOTE 2 SAYS NO SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORD WAS
	MADE. WILL A SEARCH BE CONDUCTED?

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-04-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	05-04-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	05-04-2022	Time	11:49	Sent To

Notes

2022-05-04 11:52:22	FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-09-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-09-2022	Time	11:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-09-2022	Time	11:49	Sent To

Notes

2022-05-09 11:50:05	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME

	RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCSAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	07-05-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	07-05-2023	Time	12:56	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-12-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	05-12-2022	Time	12:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	05-12-2022	Time	12:53	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	07-18-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	07-18-2023	Time	13:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-10-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	05-10-2022	Time	09:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-05-10 09:26:58

1. SURVEY NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND OUT OF DATE.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	07-13-2023		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-13-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	07-13-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-07-13 18:41:47	1) TO BE SATISFIED AT SITE PLAN SUBMISSION. PROVIDE A
	COMPREHENSIVE PARKING ANALYSIS. THE CITY HAS RECEIVED
	SEVERAL COMPLAINTS FROM RESIDENTS PERTAINING
	OVERPARKING OF EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS ALONG
	NEIGHBORING STREETS
	2) TO BE SATISFIED AT SITE PLAN SUBMISSION. IN THE
	ANALYSIS, ALSO PROVIDE DETAILS OF CURRENT AND PLANNED
	LOADING ZONE(S) LOCATION AND OPERATION

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-06-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	05-06-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-05-06 14:46:14	1) PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PARKING ANALYSIS. THE CITY
	HAS RECEIVED SEVERAL COMPLAINTS FROM RESIDENTS
	PERTAINING OVERPARKING OF EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS ALONG
	NEIGHBORING STREETS
	2) IN THE ANALYSIS, ALSO PROVIDE DETAILS OF CURRENT AND
	PLANNED LOADING ZONE(S) LOCATION AND OPERATION

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	07-10-2023		Cont ID
Sent By	llouie			Date	07-10-2023	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	llouie			Date	07-10-2023	Time	Sent To

Notes

2023-07-10 16:43:02	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED - THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO INCREASE
	THE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM
	0.75 TO 1.5 F.A.R. HAS THERE BEEN ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH
	WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? IT IS ADVISED THAT THE
	APPLICANT REACH OUT TO THE NEIGHBORING
	PROPERTIES/NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION(S) FOR PUBLIC INPUT
	ON THE PROPOSAL.

	1.1. PER THE 06.13.2023 RESPONSE LETTER TO PPRC'S
	COMMENTS, THE APPLICANT HAS MADE SIGNIFICANT OUTREACH
	EFFORTS TO KEEP EVERYONE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMED
	ABOUT THE PLAN WITH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

	2. SATISFIED - UPDATED SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY IS
	REQUIRED. SURVEY PROVIDED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND
	IT IS OVER 2 YEARS OLD. THE PROVIDED SURVEY IS NOT
	ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 5 OF THE 2022
	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ON
	THE SURVEY.

	3. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE PURPOSE FOR THE PROPOSED
	FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) MAP AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL (C)
	TO COMMERCIAL EAST (CE)? IS THERE A CONCEPTUAL PLAN
	AND/OR MASSING STUDY FOR THE SITE? DOES THE
	CONCEPTUAL/MASSING PLAN FIT WITH THE PROPOSED FLU
	CHANGE TO CE AND THE CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA?
	CAN THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
	OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)?
	ASIDE FROM THE CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, THE
	APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION AND
	JUSTIFY WHY THE CE FLU IS DESIRED AND APPROPRIATE FOR
	THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA (I.E. THERE HAS TO BE A
	PURPOSE FOR THE FLUMA). A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND
	MASSING STUDY DEMONSTRATING THAT THE DESIGN/MAXIMUM
	MASSING OF THE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CAN BE
	ACCOMMODATED AND FITS WITH THE CHARACTER AND CONTEXT OF
	THE SURROUNDING AREA WITH THE PROPOSED FLUMA SHOULD BE
	SUBMITTED TO SUPPLEMENT THE APPLICATION. THIS IS
	CRITICAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF TO ANALYZE IN
	DETERMINING IF THE FLUMA SHOULD BE SUPPORTED.

	3.1. A CONCEPTUAL MASSING PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN THE
	06.13.2023 RESUBMITTAL PACKET ILLUSTRATING THE PROPOSED
	MASSING BASED ON THE CE FLU STANDARDS.

	4. SATISFIED - THE SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO HAVE A
	SPLIT FLU DESIGNATION OF CE AND C. THROUGH DATA AND
	ANALYSIS, THE APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY HOW
	MUCH OF THE OVERALL 1.0-ACRE SUBJECT SITE (IN
	ACRES/SQUARE FEET) IS PROPOSED FOR THE FLU CHANGE TO
	CE. ONLY THE PORTION OF THE SITE THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE
	FLU MAP AMENDMENT WILL BE UTILIZED TO DETERMINE THE
	MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AND ANALYZED FOR
	LEVEL-OF- SERVICE (LOS).

	5. SATSIFIED - IN THE LOS ANALYSIS, THE MAXIMUM
	DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STATES THAT THE ACREAGE FOR THE
	AMENDMENT IS 0.627 ACRES. THERE IS NO
	EXPLANATION/BACK-UP INFORMATION/DOCUMENTATION TO WHERE
	THIS NUMBER CAME FROM (I.E. IT IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, NO SURVEY/ANALYSIS TO SHOW WHY
	THE 0.627 ACRES IS USED IN THE ANALYSIS FOR THE MAXIMUM
	DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL, ETC.). PLEASE CLARIFY IN THE
	APPLICATION.

	6. SATISFIED - THE LOS CALCULATIONS/ANALYSIS IS BASED
	ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE AND MOST INTENSIVE IMPACT
	(BASED ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE) TO THE VARIOUS PUBLIC
	FACILITIES (I.E. IT COULD BE EITHER COMMERCIAL OR
	RESIDENTIAL). THE LOS ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED TO: A)
	CALCULATIONS MUST BE BASED ON THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT
	POTENTIAL FOR ONLY THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE FLUMA. CHECK
	THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE MAXIMUM
	DENSITY/INTENSITY FOR THE CE FLU (32.27 DU/ACRE OR 1.5
	FAR). B) DATA AND LOS CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PUBLIC
	FACILITY MUST BE BASED ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE/IMPACT
	GENERATED. C) FOR SANITARY SEWER: WHERE DID THE 0.20
	GPD STANDARD COME FROM? CONTACT THE ENGINEERING
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR RATE THAT SHOULD BE USED. D)
	FOR POTABLE WATER: WHERE DID THE 0.24 GPD STANDARD COME
	FROM? CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR A
	RATE THAT SHOULD BE USED. E) FIGURE 1 PROVIDED IN THE
	LOS ANALYSIS DEPICTS THE WRONG PARCEL (I.E. IT IS NOT
	THE PARCEL LOCATED AT 319 BELVEDERE ROAD). PLEASE
	ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. F) WHERE DID THE INFORMATION
	FROM ATTACHMENTS 1 AND 2 COME FROM? THE ANALYSIS DOES
	NOT REFERENCE WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAME FROM. G) THE
	LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE AND SUMMARIES WILL NEED TO
	BE REVISED BASED ON THE CORRECTED INFORMATION.

	7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE PROPOSED FLU CHANGE IS
	EXPECTED TO INCREASE THE DEMAND ON PUBLIC FACILITIES.
	ANY INCREASE IN DEMAND ON ANY OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES
	AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED FLU CHANGE SHALL ALSO
	PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE APPLICABLE
	SERVICE AGENCY INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT
	CAPACITY/RESERVE CAPACITY EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE
	BUILD-OUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATION.
	CERTIFICATION LETTERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
	FOLLOWING: DRAINAGE, WATER, WASTEWATER (SEWER) SOLID
	WASTE, SCHOOLS AND TRAFFIC. PLEASE NOTE THAT A GENERAL
	STATEMENT STATING THAT THE CITY HAS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY
	AVAILABLE FOR THE FLUMA IS INSUFFICIENT (AS NOT ALL
	SERVICES ARE PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND CAPACITY MUST BE
	VERIFIED BY THE VARIOUS SERVICE PROVIDERS.).

	7.1. CERTIFICATION LETTERS STILL OUTSTANING FOR:
	POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE.

	7.2. SCAD FLUMA LETTER REFLECTS 32 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
	WHERE DID THIS NUMBER COME FROM? SCAD LETTER SHOULD
	REFLECT MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ONLY (20 UNITS).

	8. SATISFIED - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST BE
	CLEAR ON THE REQUEST. PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION
	STATEMENT TO SPECIFY/EXPAND ON THE RELATED BACKGROUND
	INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT SITE; JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL
	REASONS, OR BASIS FOR THE REQUEST; VISION/CONCEPTUAL
	PROPOSED FOR THE SUBJECT SITE AND MASSING STUDY; AMOUNT
	OF AREA OF THE OVERALL PARCEL SUBJECT TO THE FLUMA,
	ETC.


	INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:

	* PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	* WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) PAPER
	COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS IN
	THE RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	* YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
	ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
	TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
	ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT
	OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00).

	CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ 561.822.1458 OR [email protected] IF
	THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-05-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	llouie			Date	05-05-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	llouie			Date	05-05-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-05-05 16:37:35	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	1.) THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO INCREASE THE
	DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM 0.75
	TO 1.5 F.A.R.. HAS THERE BEEN ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH
	WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? IT IS ADVISED THAT THE
	APPLICANT REACH OUT TO THE NEIGHBORING
	PROPERTIES/NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION(S) FOR PUBLIC INPUT
	ON THE PROPOSAL.

	2.) UPDATED SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY IS REQUIRED.
	SURVEY PROVIDED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND IT IS OVER
	2 YEARS OLD. THE PROVIDED SURVEY IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
	PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 5 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ON THE SURVEY.

	3.) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE FOR THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND
	USE (FLU) MAP AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL (C) TO
	COMMERCIAL EAST (CE)? IS THERE A CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND/OR
	MASSING STUDY FOR THE SITE? DOES THE CONCEPTUAL/MASSING
	PLAN FIT WITH THE PROPOSED FLU CHANGE TO CE AND THE
	CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA? CAN THE CONCEPTUAL
	PLAN MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND
	LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)? ASIDE FROM THE
	CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, THE APPLICANT MUST BE
	ABLE TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION AND JUSTIFY WHY THE CE
	FLU IS DESIRED AND APPROPRIATE FOR THE SITE AND
	SURROUNDING AREA (I.E. THERE HAS TO BE A PURPOSE FOR
	THE FLUMA). A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND MASSING STUDY
	DEMONSTRATING THAT THE DESIGN/MAXIMUM MASSING OF THE OF
	THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CAN BE ACCOMMODATED AND FITS WITH
	THE CHARACTER AND CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA WITH
	THE PROPOSED FLUMA SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO SUPPLEMENT
	THE APPLICATION. THIS IS CRITICAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF
	TO ANALYZE IN DETERMINING IF THE FLUMA SHOULD BE
	SUPPORTED.

	4.) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO HAVE A SPLIT FLU
	DESIGNATION OF CE AND C. THROUGH DATA AND ANALYSIS, THE
	APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY HOW MUCH OF THE
	OVERALL 1.0-ACRE SUBJECT SITE (IN ACRES/SQUARE FEET) IS
	PROPOSED FOR THE FLU CHANGE TO CE. ONLY THE PORTION OF
	THE SITE THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE FLU MAP AMENDMENT WILL
	BE UTILIZED TO DETERMINE THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT
	POTENTIAL AND ANALYZED FOR LEVEL-OF- SERVICE (LOS).

	5.) IN THE LOS ANALYSIS, THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT
	POTENTIAL STATES THAT THE ACREAGE IS 0.6-ACRE. THERE IS
	NO EXPLANATION/BACK-UP INFORMATION/DOCUMENTATION TO
	WHERE THIS NUMBER CAME FROM (I.E. IT IS NOT MENTIONED
	IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, NO SURVEY/ANALYSIS TO
	SHOW WHY 0.6-ACRE IS USED IN THE ANALYSIS FOR THE
	MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL, ETC.). PLEASE CLARIFY IN
	THE APPLICATION.

	6.) THE LOS CALCULATIONS/ANALYSIS IS BASED ON THE MOST
	INTENSIVE USE AND MOST INTENSIVE IMPACT (BASED ON THE
	MOST INTENSIVE USE) TO THE VARIOUS PUBLIC FACILITIES
	(I.E. IT COULD BE EITHER COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL).
	THE LOS ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED TO: A) CALCULATIONS
	MUST BE BASED ON THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR
	ONLY THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE FLUMA. CHECK THE CITY'S
	COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE MAXIMUM DENSITY/INTENSITY
	FOR THE CE FLU (32.27 DU/ACRE OR 1.5 FAR). B) DATA AND
	LOS CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PUBLIC FACILITY MUST BE BASED
	ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE/IMPACT GENERATED. C) FOR
	SANITARY SEWER: WHERE DID THE 0.20 GPD STANDARD COME
	FROM? CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR
	RATE THAT SHOULD BE USED. D) FOR POTABLE WATER: WHERE
	DID THE 0.24 GPD STANDARD COME FROM? CONTACT THE
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR A RATE THAT SHOULD
	BE USED. E) FIGURE 1 PROVIDED IN THE LOS ANALYSIS
	DEPICTS THE WRONG PARCEL (I.E. IT IS NOT THE PARCEL
	LOCATED AT 319 BELVEDERE ROAD). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
	CONSISTENCY. F) WHERE DID THE INFORMATION FROM
	ATTACHMENTS 1 AND 2 COME FROM? THE ANALYSIS DOES NOT
	REFERENCE WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAME FROM. G) THE LOS
	ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE AND SUMMARIES WILL NEED TO BE
	REVISED BASED ON THE CORRECTED INFORMATION.

	7.) THE PROPOSED FLU CHANGE IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE THE
	DEMAND ON PUBLIC FACILITIES. ANY INCREASE IN DEMAND ON
	ANY OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AS A RESULT OF THE
	PROPOSED FLU CHANGE SHALL ALSO PROVIDE WRITTEN
	CONFIRMATION FROM THE APPLICABLE SERVICE AGENCY
	INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT CAPACITY/RESERVE CAPACITY
	EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE BUILD-OUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU
	DESIGNATION. CERTIFICATION LETTERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
	THE FOLLOWING: DRAINAGE, WATER, WASTEWATER (SEWER)
	SOLID WASTE, SCHOOLS AND TRAFFIC. PLEASE NOTE THAT A
	GENERAL STATEMENT STATING THAT THE CITY HAS SUFFICIENT
	CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR THE FLUMA IS INSUFFICIENT (AS
	NOT ALL SERVICES ARE PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND CAPACITY
	MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE VARIOUS SERVICE PROVIDERS.).

	8.) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST BE CLEAR ON THE
	REQUEST. PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO
	SPECIFY/EXPAND ON THE RELATED BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON
	THE PROJECT SITE; JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL REASONS, OR
	BASIS FOR THE REQUEST; VISION/CONCEPTUAL PROPOSED FOR
	THE SUBJECT SITE AND MASSING STUDY; AMOUNT OF AREA OF
	THE OVERALL PARCEL SUBJECT TO THE FLUMA, ETC.



	INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:

	* PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	* WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) PAPER
	COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS IN
	THE RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	* YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO
	ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
	TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
	ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT
	OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00).