Plan Review Details - Project Z22030030
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22030030
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 05-11-2022 Time 19:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-11-2022 Time 19:26 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-11 19:32:00DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SITE PLAN, SHEET SP.1, DOES NOT
 SHOW A WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE SIDEWALK TO
 THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE
 PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
 COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL
 ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. WITH THE PROPOSED USE BEING
 RESTAURANT, A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR
 INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
 PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
 BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-09-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 05-09-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-02-2022 Time 12:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-02-2022 Time 12:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 12:22:08FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
 PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-04-2022 Time 11:56 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-04 12:03:05THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 A PROPOSED NIGHTCLUB, IF APPLICABLE, REQUIRES A FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-06-2022 Time 14:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-06-2022 Time 14:22 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-06 14:22:51FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2649 ELECTRONICS WAY Z22030030
 JULY 6, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE AND OPEN
 SPACE CALCULATIONS ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 MAKE SURE THEY ARE CONSISTENT. INDICATE IF LOT SQUARE
 FOOTAGE IS FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL OR EACH PHASE. IF
 PROPOSING A SEPARATE LOT, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST BE
 PROVIDED ALONG ALL LOT LINES.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE
 TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%.
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A DIFFERENT NUMBER FROM THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 10 FOOT
 AND 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN PER SECTION 94-443(D) FOR THE ENTIRE
 PARCEL. THE CONSTRUCTION MAY NEED TO BE PHASED FOR THE
 FINAL INSTALLATION OF THE BUFFERS.
 EAST BUFFER IS 133 FT REQUIRING 5 TREES
 WEST BUFFER MUST BE INCLUDED, CAN BE OUTSIDE
 MAINTENANCE EASEMENT. 84.83 FEET REQUIRES 3 TREES.
 SOUTH BUFFER IS 369.26 FEET, REQUIRES 13 TREES.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER,
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMER ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 PROVIDE SCREENING.
 TRANSFORMER WAS NOT LOCATED.
  
  
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS NEEDS TO
 BE SHOWN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS TAKEN FOR
 ADDITIONAL TREES IN PARKING AREA, COULD NOT VERIFY.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/30/21:
  
 8. SATISFIED. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE 3 NON
 ACCESS SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-09-2022 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-09-2022 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-09 10:58:59FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2649 ELECTRONICS WAY Z22030030
 MAY 9, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHOW LOCATION OF FPL TRANSFORMER ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. PROVIDE
 SCREENING.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-02-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 05-02-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-02 13:27:56PUBLIC WORKS HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
 AMENDMENT.
  
 MATT HEJZI
 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-02-2022 Time 16:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-02-2022 Time 16:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 16:12:50THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/15/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED - AN EXTRA PIPE WAS ADDED TO THE CATCH
 BASIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 27TH STREET. ADVISE WHERE
 THIS INFORMATION CAME FROM.] REVISE THE LAYOUT OF THE
 EXISTING STORM PIPE CROSSING 27TH STREET BY MOVING THE
 NORTH END OF THE PIPE FROM THE CATCH BASIN (WITH RIM
 ELEVATION 12.28 FT NAVD) TO A MANHOLE THAT IS LOCATED
 IN THE SWALE OF ELECTRONICS WAY EAST OF THE CATCH
 BASIN. THEN ADD AN EXISTING 36 INCH RCP PIPE BETWEEN
 THE MANHOLE AND THE CATCH BASIN TO THE WEST.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] REVIEW THE PROPOSED GRADING OF THE
 INTERIOR SWALE ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER. NEARLY 12.5
 FEET IS NEEDED BETWEEN THE CORNER OF THE SIDEWALK (AT
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING) AND THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE BUT THERE IS ONLY ABOUT 10.5 FEET.
 APPROXIMATELY 12.5 FEET IS NEEDED BETWEEN THE BIKE RACK
 AND NORTH PROPERTY LINE BUT ONLY 10 FEET IS AVAILABLE
 (SECTION B-B).
  
 3. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D - INDICATE HOW THE GROUND
 WILL SLOPE BETWEEN THE FENCE AND BACK OF CURB. PROVIDE
 A SWALE BETWEEN THE FENCE AND THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 TO PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING SPACES
 ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND PROVIDE 2 FEET OF
 OVERHANG. TYPE D CURB COULD REPLACE THE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] MOVE THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY
 CLOSER TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SO THAT A PORTION OR
 ALL OF THE LOADING PARKING SPACE WILL DRAIN TO THE
 INTERIOR OF THE SITE INSTEAD OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] LIST THE TOP OF TRENCH ELEVATION AND
 BOTTOM OF TRENCH ELEVATION ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH
 DETAIL CROSS SECTION.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] ON SHEETS 4 AND 5, WHAT DOES THE HEAVY
 SINGLE SHORT DASH - LONG DASH LINE REPRESENT THAT IS
 SHOWN IN THE INTERIOR OF THE WEST PARCEL?
  
 9. [SATISFIED] SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD
 HAZARD AREA. MINIMUM TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ARE REQUIRED
 ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (06/08/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 10. [SATISFIED] CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS OR LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE CIVIL PLANS
 REMOVED THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
 THIS MAY AFFECT THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] ADD VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO ENGINEERING SHEET 7.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (7/15/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 12. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL,COORDINATE THE
 LISTED PRB'S AND WEIRS ON THE PAVING, GRADING AND
 DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE CORRESPONDING ITEMS' DETAIL NAME
 ON THE DETAIL SHEET. FOR EXAMPLE, THE TYPE E INLET AT
 THE NORTH END OF THE PARKING LOT CALLS OUT PRBS AND AN
 INVERTED WEIR AND THE CS-1 STRUCTURE CALLS OUT A WEIR.
 THE CORRESPONDING DETAILS ON SHEET 7 APPEAR TO BE
 CALLED "POLLUTION CONTROL BAFFLE" AND INVERTED
 POLLUTION CONTROL BAFFLE WEIR". WILL THE INLET AT THE
 NORTH END OF THE PARKING LOT HAVE A WEIR? WHICH WALL
 WILL IT BE LOCATED ON?
  
 13. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, NUMBER THE
 DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES FOR EASE OF REFERENCE,
 INCLUDING EXISTING STRUCTURES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE
 IMPACTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-08-2022 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-08-2022 Time 15:22 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-08 15:22:07THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 6/8/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - AN EXTRA PIPE WAS ADDED TO
 THE CATCH BASIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 27TH STREET.
 ADVISE WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAME FROM.] REVISE THE
 LAYOUT OF THE EXISTING STORM PIPE CROSSING 27TH STREET
 BY MOVING THE NORTH END OF THE PIPE FROM THE CATCH
 BASIN (WITH RIM ELEVATION 12.28 FT NAVD) TO A MANHOLE
 THAT IS LOCATED IN THE SWALE OF ELECTRONICS WAY EAST OF
 THE CATCH BASIN. THEN ADD AN EXISTING 36 INCH RCP PIPE
 BETWEEN THE MANHOLE AND THE CATCH BASIN TO THE WEST.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] REVIEW THE PROPOSED GRADING OF THE
 INTERIOR SWALE ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER. NEARLY 12.5
 FEET IS NEEDED BETWEEN THE CORNER OF THE SIDEWALK (AT
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING) AND THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE BUT THERE IS ONLY ABOUT 10.5 FEET.
 APPROXIMATELY 12.5 FEET IS NEEDED BETWEEN THE BIKE RACK
 AND NORTH PROPERTY LINE BUT ONLY 10 FEET IS AVAILABLE
 (SECTION B-B).
  
 3. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D - INDICATE HOW THE GROUND
 WILL SLOPE BETWEEN THE FENCE AND BACK OF CURB. PROVIDE
 A SWALE BETWEEN THE FENCE AND THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 TO PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING SPACES
 ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND PROVIDE 2 FEET OF
 OVERHANG. TYPE D CURB COULD REPLACE THE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] MOVE THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY
 CLOSER TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SO THAT A PORTION OR
 ALL OF THE LOADING PARKING SPACE WILL DRAIN TO THE
 INTERIOR OF THE SITE INSTEAD OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] LIST THE TOP OF TRENCH ELEVATION AND
 BOTTOM OF TRENCH ELEVATION ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH
 DETAIL CROSS SECTION.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] ON SHEETS 4 AND 5, WHAT DOES THE HEAVY
 SINGLE SHORT DASH - LONG DASH LINE REPRESENT THAT IS
 SHOWN IN THE INTERIOR OF THE WEST PARCEL?
  
 9. [SATISFIED] SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD
 HAZARD AREA. MINIMUM TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ARE REQUIRED
 ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 10. CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS OR
 LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE CIVIL PLANS REMOVED THE SIDEWALK
 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THIS MAY AFFECT THE
 LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 11. ADD VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO ENGINEERING SHEET 7.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-12-2022 Time 12:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-12-2022 Time 12:55 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-12 12:55:17THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. REVISE THE LAYOUT OF THE EXISTING STORM PIPE
 CROSSING 27TH STREET BY MOVING THE NORTH END OF THE
 PIPE FROM THE CATCH BASIN (WITH RIM ELEVATION 12.28 FT
 NAVD) TO A MANHOLE THAT IS LOCATED IN THE SWALE OF
 ELECTRONICS WAY EAST OF THE CATCH BASIN. THEN ADD AN
 EXISTING 36 INCH RCP PIPE BETWEEN THE MANHOLE AND THE
 CATCH BASIN TO THE WEST.
  
 2. REVIEW THE PROPOSED GRADING OF THE INTERIOR SWALE
 ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER. NEARLY 12.5 FEET IS NEEDED
 BETWEEN THE CORNER OF THE SIDEWALK (AT NORTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE BUILDING) AND THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE BUT THERE
 IS ONLY ABOUT 10.5 FEET. APPROXIMATELY 12.5 FEET IS
 NEEDED BETWEEN THE BIKE RACK AND NORTH PROPERTY LINE
 BUT ONLY 10 FEET IS AVAILABLE (SECTION B-B).
  
 3. SECTION D-D - INDICATE HOW THE GROUND WILL SLOPE
 BETWEEN THE FENCE AND BACK OF CURB. PROVIDE A SWALE
 BETWEEN THE FENCE AND THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO
 PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  
 4. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING SPACES ALONG THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE AND PROVIDE 2 FEET OF OVERHANG. TYPE D
 CURB COULD REPLACE THE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 5. MOVE THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY CLOSER TO THE
 EAST PROPERTY LINE SO THAT A PORTION OR ALL OF THE
 LOADING PARKING SPACE WILL DRAIN TO THE INTERIOR OF THE
 SITE INSTEAD OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 6. LIST THE TOP OF TRENCH ELEVATION AND BOTTOM OF
 TRENCH ELEVATION ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL
 CROSS SECTION.
  
 7. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS.
  
 8. ON SHEETS 4 AND 5, WHAT DOES THE HEAVY SINGLE SHORT
 DASH - LONG DASH LINE REPRESENT THAT IS SHOWN IN THE
 INTERIOR OF THE WEST PARCEL?
  
 9. SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA.
 MINIMUM TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ARE REQUIRED ABOVE THE
 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH THE ENGINEEINRG
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-11-2022 Time 08:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-10-2022 Time 09:28 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-10 09:36:341. SURVEY SHOULD BE JUST SUBJECT PARCEL, NOT ENTIRE
 PROPERTY.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-06-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-06 14:54:39NO COMMENTS.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-03-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 08-03-2022 Time 07:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 08-03-2022 Time 07:56 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-03 07:58:188/3/22 ? PASSED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 (FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, COMCAST CABLE
 COMMUNICATIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES)
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE CORRECTLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED USE(S) FOR
 BOTH ?PHASE 1? AND ?PHASE 2? IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-35(C)(9),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A CONNECTION
 BETWEEN THE EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND THE PROPOSED
 ON-SITE PRIVATE SIDEWALK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A
 SINGLE/PEDESTRIAN GATE OR OPENING IN THE PROPOSED ?6?
 HT. BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE? FOR THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION
 ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL
 EQUIVALENTS) WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED
 STRUCTURE(S) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
 IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/
 10? X 15? EASEMENT?. THEREFORE, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/ 10? X 15? EASEMENT? ON ALL
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?TOTAL SITE AREA? CALCULATION (BY
 PROVIDING THE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND
 BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?MAX. IMPERVIOUS AREA? AND
 ?PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING
 THE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE
 AND BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE?
 CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE BUILDING COVERAGE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES
 SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING FAR?
 CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO
 CALCULATION FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES
 SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 SHEET # SP.1. THE PROPOSED 756 SQUARE FOOT ?COVERED
 PATIO? AREA SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FLOOR AREA
 RATIO CALCULATION. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED OPEN SPACE? AND
 ?PROPOSED OPEN SPACE? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING THE
 OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH
 PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE
 PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED PARKING? CALCULATION
 IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET #
 SP.1. THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED
 USE OF ?RESTAURANTS SERVING A LIMITED CLIENTELE
 (PRIVATE CLUBS AND LODGES)? IS 1 SPACE PER 200 GROSS
 SQUARE FEET (THE PROPOSED GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE
 INDICATED IS 3,264 SQUARE FEET). [SATISFIED]
 14. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED VEHICULAR LANDSCAPE
 AREA? CALCULATIONS (FROM ?209.6 SF? TO 209.7 SF AND
 FROM ?499.6 TOTAL SF? TO 499.7 TOTAL SF) IN THE ?SITE
 DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 15. PLEASE ADDRESS STORMWATER REVIEW COMMENTS.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 07-11-2022 Time 10:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 07-11-2022 Time 10:19 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-11 10:20:237/11/22 ? FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 (FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, COMCAST CABLE
 COMMUNICATIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES)
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE CORRECTLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED USE(S) FOR
 BOTH ?PHASE 1? AND ?PHASE 2? IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-35(C)(9),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A CONNECTION
 BETWEEN THE EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND THE PROPOSED
 ON-SITE PRIVATE SIDEWALK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A
 SINGLE/PEDESTRIAN GATE OR OPENING IN THE PROPOSED ?6?
 HT. BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE? FOR THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION
 ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL
 EQUIVALENTS) WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED
 STRUCTURE(S) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
 IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/
 10? X 15? EASEMENT?. THEREFORE, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/ 10? X 15? EASEMENT? ON ALL
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?TOTAL SITE AREA? CALCULATION (BY
 PROVIDING THE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND
 BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?MAX. IMPERVIOUS AREA? AND
 ?PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING
 THE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE
 AND BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE?
 CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE BUILDING COVERAGE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES
 SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING FAR?
 CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO
 CALCULATION FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES
 SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 SHEET # SP.1. THE PROPOSED 756 SQUARE FOOT ?COVERED
 PATIO? AREA SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FLOOR AREA
 RATIO CALCULATION. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED OPEN SPACE? AND
 ?PROPOSED OPEN SPACE? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING THE
 OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH
 PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE
 PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED PARKING? CALCULATION
 IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET #
 SP.1. THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED
 USE OF ?RESTAURANTS SERVING A LIMITED CLIENTELE
 (PRIVATE CLUBS AND LODGES)? IS 1 SPACE PER 200 GROSS
 SQUARE FEET (THE PROPOSED GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE
 INDICATED IS 3,264 SQUARE FEET). [SATISFIED]
 14. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED VEHICULAR LANDSCAPE
 AREA? CALCULATIONS (FROM ?209.6 SF? TO 209.7 SF AND
 FROM ?499.6 TOTAL SF? TO 499.7 TOTAL SF) IN THE ?SITE
 DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 15. PLEASE ADDRESS STORMWATER REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 05-05-2022 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 05-05-2022 Time 11:53 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-05 11:53:575/5/22 - FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES
 (FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, COMCAST CABLE
 COMMUNICATIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES)
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT.
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW.
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE CORRECTLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED USE(S) FOR
 BOTH ?PHASE 1? AND ?PHASE 2? IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-35(C)(9),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A CONNECTION
 BETWEEN THE EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND THE PROPOSED
 ON-SITE PRIVATE SIDEWALK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A
 SINGLE/PEDESTRIAN GATE OR OPENING IN THE PROPOSED ?6?
 HT. BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE? FOR THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION
 ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION,
 HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL
 EQUIVALENTS) WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED
 STRUCTURE(S) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 7. THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
 IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/
 10? X 15? EASEMENT?. THEREFORE, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/ 10? X 15? EASEMENT? ON ALL
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?TOTAL SITE AREA? CALCULATION (BY
 PROVIDING THE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND
 BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?MAX. IMPERVIOUS AREA? AND
 ?PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING
 THE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE
 AND BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE?
 CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE BUILDING COVERAGE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES
 SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 SHEET # SP.1.
 11. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING FAR?
 CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO
 CALCULATION FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES
 SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN,
 SHEET # SP.1. THE PROPOSED 756 SQUARE FOOT ?COVERED
 PATIO? AREA SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FLOOR AREA
 RATIO CALCULATION.
 12. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED OPEN SPACE? AND
 ?PROPOSED OPEN SPACE? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING THE
 OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH
 PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE
 PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
 13. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED PARKING? CALCULATION
 IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET #
 SP.1. THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED
 USE OF ?RESTAURANTS SERVING A LIMITED CLIENTELE
 (PRIVATE CLUBS AND LODGES)? IS 1 SPACE PER 200 GROSS
 SQUARE FEET (THE PROPOSED GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE
 INDICATED IS 3,264 SQUARE FEET).
 14. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED VEHICULAR LANDSCAPE
 AREA? CALCULATIONS (FROM ?209.6 SF? TO 209.7 SF AND
 FROM ?499.6 TOTAL SF? TO 499.7 TOTAL SF) IN THE ?SITE
 DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved