Plan Review Details - Project Z22030025
Plan Review Stops For Project Z22030025
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 04-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 04-12-2022 Time 12:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 04-12-2022 Time 12:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-12 12:44:28PROJECT MIGHT NOT HIT THE THRESHOLD FOR THE PUBLIC ART
 REQUIREMENT.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 04-13-2022 Time 18:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 04-13-2022 Time 18:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-13 18:54:19DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 3. INTERCEPTOR. AN INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED. FOR
 INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION,
 PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR,
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR
 BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-08-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-08-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-27-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-27 07:33:55COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORD.
 [email protected], 561-494-1098:
 FOR ENG SUBMITTAL, SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR
 STORMWATER AND SEWER.
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]:
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS PROPOSED TREE DIRECTLY OVER
 STORMWATER PIPE NEAR ALLEY CONTRARY TO SUBMITTED
 RESPONSE.
 -PROPOSED WATER SERVICE DESIGN MAY NEED REVISION AT
 FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
 -REMOVAL OF A CITY IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AND
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL OF THE
 ASSOCIATED DEPARTMENT.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 04-05-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 04-05-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-05 07:38:49Z22030025 - CAR WASH, 1890 PB LAKES 3.30.22 SUBMITTAL
  
 O COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098
 [email protected] :
  
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]:
 -SURVEY SHOWS WELL ADJACENT THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY
 LINE. WHO OWNS THE WELL AND WHAT IS THE WATER USED FOR?
  
 -IS APPLICANT AWARE ANOTHER CARWASH IS PLANNED ON
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR?
  
 -IF THERE IS AN EXISTING SEWER LATERAL, SHOW ON CIVIL
 PLAN AND LABEL WITH WHAT HAPPENING TO IT.
  
 -DOES CATCH BASIN ADJACENT PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD HAVE
 PIPING WHICH RUNS ONTO THE PROPERTY?
  
 -IS ANOTHER DO NOT ENTER SIGN NEEDED AT ALLEY EXIT?
  
 -ARE ALL OF THE EXISTING TALL LIGHT POLES BEING
 REMOVED, OR JUST THE ONES LABELED TO BE REMOVED?
  
 -DOES ANY FPL UTILITY RUN THROUGH THE PROPERTY TO THE
 NEIGHBOR?S FPL PAD?
  
 -DOES THE ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLAN
 CONTINUE THROUGH EACH PROPERTY ALL THE WAY TO PALM
 BEACH LAKES BLVD?
  
 -NEIGHBOR HAS LARGE OUTDOOR BARBEQUE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY
 TO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
  
 -CIVIL PLAN AND LANDSCAPING PLAN DO NOT MATCH ON EAST
 SIDE OF PROPERTY AT ALLEY. CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT SHOW
 REMOVAL OF DRIVEWAY AND ADDITIONAL PORTIONS OF CURBING
 THAT LANDSCAPING PLAN HAS. PLEASE UPDATE.
  
 -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD NOT BE IN UTILITY EASEMENT.
 COULD MAKE UTILITY EASEMENT SMALLER TO CORRECT.
  
 -EXISTING WATER SERVICE FOR THE PROPERTY IS NOT SHOWN
 ON CIVIL PLAN. IT IS LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICE.
  
 -CATCH BASIN IN ALLEY SEEMS TO CONTINUE TO CANAL
 OUTFALL, BUT NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLAN.
  
 -WPB GIS SHOWS FORCE MAIN RUNNING THROUGH ALLEY, BUT
 NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE ADD.
  
 -CANNOT FIND INFORMATION ON THE TWO PROPOSED MONUMENTS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THEM AND INDICATE HOW
 TALL PROPOSING THE NORTHEAST ONE.
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-07-2022 Time 13:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-07 13:10:35THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING OR NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE CIVIL PLAN AND, IF APPLICABLE, CLOSELY
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY
 PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT
 ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, EXIT
 SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END
 CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS
 LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS,
 AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 10. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS
 FOR LOCKS FOR THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR, ELECTRIC ROOM,
 CHEMICAL ROOM, STORAGE RROM, ETC. BE PROVIDED FOR 24
 HOUR FD EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 11. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 12. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-02-2022 Time 16:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-02-2022 Time 16:23 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-02 16:23:34FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1890 PALM BEACH LAKES Z22030025
 DECEMBER 2, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE
 ROYAL PALM #21 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE
 TREES. BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE
 TREES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A
 LIMITATION THAT CAN BE CITED, SHADE TREES MUST BE
 PROVIDED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. THE
 APPLICANT IS AVOIDING THIS REQUIREMENT BY NOT TREATING
 THE PAVED VACUUM SPACES AS PARKING SPACES. THE INTENT
 OF THE CODE IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY FOR PAVED AREAS
 TO REDUCE HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE CODE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SHADE TREES NEED
 BE ADDED TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE SHADE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
  
 REVISE THE GREEN SPACE EXHIBIT TO SEPARATE THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS INTO A SEPARATE AREA AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR THE
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE IN THE PARKING AREA.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/7/22:
  
 5. SATISFIED. CHANGE THE FOXTAIL PALMS TO A MORE
 SUSTAINABLE SPECIES.
  
 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 FOR THE BUFFER TREE COUNTS FOR THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 AND THE TOTALS TO 35.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN IF THE GUMBO LIMBO WEST OF
 THE DUMPSTER IS BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE 13 TREES
 REQUIRED IN THE SOUTH BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/28/22:
 8. SATISFIED. THE CHANGE IN CONFIGURATION OF THE GREASE
 TRAPS AND THE SEWER LINE CREATE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED
 TREE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE IS
 ALSO AN ADDITIONAL GREASE TRAP SHOWN CONFLICTING WITH A
 TREE. ADJUST THE LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS AND THE NEED FOR ROOT BARRIERS AND PROVIDE
 UPDATED CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 10-28-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-28-2022 Time 13:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-28-2022 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-28 14:14:56FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1890 PALM BEACH LAKES Z22030025
 OCTOBER 28, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE
 ROYAL PALM #21 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE
 TREES. BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE
 TREES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A
 LIMITATION THAT CAN BE CITED, SHADE TREES MUST BE
 PROVIDED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. THE
 APPLICANT IS AVOIDING THIS REQUIREMENT BY NOT TREATING
 THE PAVED VACUUM SPACES AS PARKING SPACES. THE INTENT
 OF THE CODE IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY FOR PAVED AREAS
 TO REDUCE HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE CODE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SHADE TREES NEED
 BE ADDED TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE SHADE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
  
 REVISE THE GREEN SPACE EXHIBIT TO SEPARATE THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS INTO A SEPARATE AREA AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR THE
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE IN THE PARKING AREA.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/7/22:
  
 5. SATISFIED. CHANGE THE FOXTAIL PALMS TO A MORE
 SUSTAINABLE SPECIES.
  
 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 FOR THE BUFFER TREE COUNTS FOR THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 AND THE TOTALS TO 35.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN IF THE GUMBO LIMBO WEST OF
 THE DUMPSTER IS BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE 13 TREES
 REQUIRED IN THE SOUTH BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/28/22:
 8. THE CHANGE IN CONFIGURATION OF THE GREASE TRAPS AND
 THE SEWER LINE CREATE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREE
 LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE IS ALSO AN
 ADDITIONAL GREASE TRAP SHOWN CONFLICTING WITH A TREE.
 ADJUST THE LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS AND THE NEED FOR ROOT BARRIERS AND PROVIDE
 UPDATED CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-24-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-24-2022 Time 15:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-24-2022 Time 15:11 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-24 15:11:54FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1890 PALM BEACH LAKES Z22030025
 AUGUST 24, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE
 ROYAL PALM #21 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE
 TREES. BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE
 TREES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A
 LIMITATION THAT CAN BE CITED, SHADE TREES MUST BE
 PROVIDED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. THE
 APPLICANT IS AVOIDING THIS REQUIREMENT BY NOT TREATING
 THE PAVED VACUUM SPACES AS PARKING SPACES. THE INTENT
 OF THE CODE IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY FOR PAVED AREAS
 TO REDUCE HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE CODE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SHADE TREES NEED
 BE ADDED TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE SHADE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
  
 REVISE THE GREEN SPACE EXHIBIT TO SEPARATE THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS INTO A SEPARATE AREA AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR THE
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE IN THE PARKING AREA.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/7/22:
  
 5. SATISFIED. CHANGE THE FOXTAIL PALMS TO A MORE
 SUSTAINABLE SPECIES.
  
 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART
 FOR THE BUFFER TREE COUNTS FOR THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 AND THE TOTALS TO 35.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN IF THE GUMBO LIMBO WEST OF
 THE DUMPSTER IS BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE 13 TREES
 REQUIRED IN THE SOUTH BUFFER.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-07-2022 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-07-2022 Time 12:33 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-07 12:34:04FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1890 PALM BEACH LAKES Z22030025
 JUNE 7, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE
 ROYAL PALM #21 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE
 TREES. BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE
 TREES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A
 LIMITATION THAT CAN BE CITED, SHADE TREES MUST BE
 PROVIDED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. THE
 APPLICANT IS AVOIDING THIS REQUIREMENT BY NOT TREATING
 THE PAVED VACUUM SPACES AS PARKING SPACES. THE INTENT
 OF THE CODE IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY FOR PAVED AREAS
 TO REDUCE HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE CODE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SHADE TREES NEED
 BE ADDED TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE SHADE.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
 TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
  
 REVISE THE GREEN SPACE EXHIBIT TO SEPARATE THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS INTO A SEPARATE AREA AND PROVIDE THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR THE
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE IN THE PARKING AREA.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/7/22:
  
 5. CHANGE THE FOXTAIL PALMS TO A MORE SUSTAINABLE
 SPECIES.
  
 6. CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART FOR THE
 BUFFER TREE COUNTS FOR THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE
 TOTALS TO 35.
  
  
 7. PLEASE EXPLAIN IF THE GUMBO LIMBO WEST OF THE
 DUMPSTER IS BEING COUNTED TOWARD THE 13 TREES REQUIRED
 IN THE SOUTH BUFFER.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-13-2022 Time 18:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-13-2022 Time 18:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-13 18:29:03FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1890 PALM BEACH LAKES Z22030025
 APRIL 13, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND
 RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE FOR THE ROYAL PALM #21
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. PER SECTION 94-443 (C) (2) REQUIRES SHADE TREES.
 BUFFER TREES ARE PROPOSED THAT ARE NOT SHADE TREES AS
 DEFINED IN SECTION 94-611. UNLESS THERE IS A LIMITATION
 THAT CAN BE CITED, SHADE TREES MUST BE PROVIDED IN ALL
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.
  
 3. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT
 LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF
 PARKING AND AN INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED SO
 THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. THE
 APPLICANT IS AVOIDING THIS REQUIREMENT BY NOT TREATING
 THE PAVED VACUUM SPACES AS PARKING SPACES. THE INTENT
 OF THE CODE IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY FOR PAVED AREAS
 TO REDUCE HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS. THE PROPOSED PALMS AND
 SMALL TREES IN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF THE CODE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SHADE TREES NEED
 BE ADDED TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE SHADE.
  
 4. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN THE
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1.
 SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 07-08-2022 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 06-24-2022 Time 15:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mtechnow Date 04-13-2022 Time 14:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 04-13-2022 Time 14:41 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-13 14:41:04-PLAN ON CONNECTING TO THE 16" WM IN THE REAR OF THE
 PROPERTY. THE CITY HAS NO RECORD OF THE 3" LINE AND IT
 APPEARS TO BE FOR IRRIGATION.
 -SHOW THE EXISTING 8" CAS FORCE MAIN. CONTACT JANICE
 TARBILL [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT/RECORD
 INFORMATION.
 -ADD NOTE THIS IS WITHIN LS 73 SERVICE BOUNDARY.
 -SHOW ALL EXISITING VALVES ON THE 16" WM.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 08-08-2022 Time 13:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-08 13:24:20NO FURTHER REVIEW COMMENTS UNTIL ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-26-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-26-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-26 09:28:16NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 04-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-13 08:21:14PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- CONTAINER(S) SIZE, TYPE AND QUANTITY OF THE
 CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. DETAILS FOR SANITATION
 SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION
 LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
 THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
 PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
 00)
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 4-PLEASE ALSO RELOCATE THE LOCATION/ORIENTATION OF THE
 ENCLOSURE TO ALLOW OUR SANITATION FRONT LOAD COLLECTION
 VEHICLE SAFELY ACCESS AND SERVICE THE CONTAINER(S)
 WHILE MINIMIZING/AVOIDING ANY BACK UP MOVEMENTS AND
 SHORT RADIUS TURNS.
 5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
 THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
 THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
 COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
 MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
 CAN(S).
  
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status   Date 10-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-25-2022 Time 17:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-25-2022 Time 17:20 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-25 17:20:26THE FOLLOWIONG COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/7/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. REVISE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL TO INCLUDE:CROSS SECTIONS SHOWING GRADE
 BREAKS, SURFACE SLOPES, SURFACE FEATURES, RIGHT OF WAY
 LABELS, DISTANCES FROM PROPERTY LINE TO GRADE BREAKS:
 A. DRIVEAY CONNECTIONS AT THE PROPERTY LINE. FOR THE
 DRIVEAY AT THE CUL-DE-SAC, EXTEND THE SECTION TO THE
 FACE OF THE BUILDING AND TO 5 FEET IN THE CUL-DE-SAC.
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO THE CHAIN LINK FENCE ON THE
 OUTSIDE OF THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY LINE
 C. EDGE OF PAVEMENT OF PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD TO
 INTERIOR OF VEHICLE STACKING AREA
 D. FACE OF BUILDING TO THE BUILDING TO THE SOUTHWEST OF
 THE SITE.
  
 2. INDICATE 15" RCP PIPE INSTEAD OF 15" HDPE PIPE
 BETWEEN STRUCTURE A1 AND THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN IN
 THE CUL DE SAC. (THERE IS INSUFFICIENT COVER DEPTH NEAR
 THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN FOR THE HDPE PIPE.)
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-08-2022 Time 11:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-08-2022 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-08 12:11:44THE FOLLOWIONG COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 8/8/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. REVISE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL TO INCLUDE:CROSS SECTIONS SHOWING GRADE
 BREAKS, SURFACE SLOPES, SURFACE FEATURES, RIGHT OF WAY
 LABELS, DISTANCES FROM PROPERTY LINE TO GRADE BREAKS:
 A. DRIVEAY CONNECTIONS AT THE PROPERTY LINE. FOR THE
 DRIVEAY AT THE CUL-DE-SAC, EXTEND THE SECTION TO THE
 FACE OF THE BUILDING AND TO 5 FEET IN THE CUL-DE-SAC.
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO THE CHAIN LINK FENCE ON THE
 OUTSIDE OF THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY LINE
 C. EDGE OF PAVEMENT OF PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD TO
 INTERIOR OF VEHICLE STACKING AREA
 D. FACE OF BUILDING TO THE BUILDING TO THE SOUTHWEST OF
 THE SITE
  
 2. POSITION DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SO THAT THE GATES DO NOT
 OPEN UP INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 3. ADJUST THE PROPOSED CURB BETWEEN THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE AND THE UTILITY POLE TO BE WITHIN THE RIGHT
 OF WAY. CURB CAN TURN TO THE DUMPSTER PAD AS SHOWN FOR
 THE NORTH CURB TO THE DUMPSTER PAD.
  
 4. IDENTIFY WHERE THE DECORATIVE PAVERS WILL BE
 LOCATED. HATCH PATTERN OF HANDICAP CROSS WALK IS NOT
 IDENTIFIED IN THE LEGEND.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-30-2022 Time 17:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-30-2022 Time 17:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-30 17:38:30THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 5-13-2022 SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL IF NO OTHER SUBMITTALS OF
 THE ENGNEERING PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE CONVERSION TO
 NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY AND EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION
 INFORMATION.
  
 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL PIPE AND PIPE MATERIAL]
 SHOW AND LABEL STORM PIPE BETWEEN CATCH BASIN IN THE
 CUL-DE-SAC AND THE CANAL.
  
 3. [NOT SATISFIED - PROVIDE WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT THE DRIVEWAY
 CONNECTIONS AT THE PROPERTY LINES. LABEL PROPERTY LINE
 AND SHOW GENERAL SURFACES ARE SLOPING AND WHERE THE
 HIGH POINT WILL BE WITHIN THE SITE.
  
 4. [NOT SATISFIED - PROVIDE WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM PALM BEACH LAKES
 BLVD TO INTERIOR OF VEHICLE STACKING AREA.
  
 5. [NOT SATISFIED - PROVIDE WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM OUTSIDE NORTHEAST
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. DIMENSION DRIVE
 AISLE, PARKING, LANDSCAPING, ETC.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] CAR WASH WASTEWATER IS NOT TO ENTER THE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 ORIFICES WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] INCLUDE PRBS IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] AVOID PLANTING TREES OVER UTILITY PIPES.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 10. MOVE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH AWAY FROM THE SANITARY
 SEWER LATERAL CROSSING. WHY IS THE EXFILTRATION SPLIT?
 CAN PORTION OF THE EXFILTRATION BE MOVED CLOSER TO THE
 CONTROL STRUCTURE AND/OR NORTHEAST OF THE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE SO THAT THE EASTERN STORM SYSTEM HAS
 TREATMENT BEFORE FLOWING OVER THE WEIR.
  
 11. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED MOVING THE INVERTED CROWN OF
 THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE 13 FT DRIVE
 LANE TO THE SOUTHWEST EDGE OF THE DRIVE LANE (BETWEEN
 DRIVE LANE AND PARKING STALLS)?
  
 12. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED MOVING THE INVERTED CROWN OF
 THE NORTHERN DRIVEL LANES FROM THE CENTER OF THE DRIVE
 LANES TO AGAINST THE CURB LINE.
  
 13. SAFETY CURB MAY NOT BE NEEDED FOR THE SIDEWALK
 CONNECTION TO THE PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD SIDEWALK.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-14-2022 Time 10:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-14-2022 Time 10:06 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-14 10:05:53THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE
 SURVEY AND EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.
  
 2. SHOW AND LABEL STORM PIPE BETWEEN CATCH BASIN IN THE
 CUL-DE-SAC AND THE CANAL.
  
 3. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS
 AT THE PROPERTY LINES. LABEL PROPERTY LINE AND SHOW
 GENERAL SURFACES ARE SLOPING AND WHERE THE HIGH POINT
 WILL BE WITHIN THE SITE.
  
 4. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD TO
 INTERIOR OF VEHICLE STACKING AREA.
  
 5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM OUTSIDE NORTHEAST
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. DIMENSION DRIVE
 AISLE, PARKING, LANDSCAPING, ETC.
  
 6. CAR WASH WASTEWATER IS NOT TO ENTER THE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM.
  
 7. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF ORIFICES WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 8. INCLUDE PRBS IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES.
  
 9. AVOID PLANTING TREES OVER UTILITY PIPES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH DETAILS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-15-2022 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-11 10:02:591. REVISE GENERIC LOCATION MAP ON SURVEY.
 2. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD ON SURVEY AND ENG. PLANS.
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF ORB 1218 P 124 REFERENCED ON PLAT.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-26-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 08-26-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-06 11:25:37NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 1.1SATISFIED. INCLUDE A THOROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS.
 PERFORM DATA COLLECTION AT THE EXISTING CAR WASH AT
 SOUTHERN BLVD, INCLUSIVE OF VEHICLE VOLUMES AND MAXIMUM
 QUEUE LENGTHS
 1.2SATISFIED. INCLUDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE APPENDIX
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE CONTINGENCY PLAN IN THE CASE
 QUEUE SPILLS BEYOND PROPERTY ROW
 4) SATISFIED. CONVERT ALLEYWAY ENTRANCE TO FULL ACCESS
 AND CONVERT THE WESTERLY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AS EXIT ONLY
 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO INTERNAL CIRCULATION.
 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ALL VACUUM STALLS ARE OCCUPIED AND A
 CUSTOMER DRIVES TO THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY AISLE WHILE
 SEARCHING FOR AN AVAILABLE STALL?
 8) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK DEDICATED EMPLOYEE PARKING
 STALLS
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL DIAGRAM OF THE
 FACILITY, SIMILAR TO THE ONE PRESENTED AT THE CITY,
 SHOWCASING PROCESSING TIMES AND CAPACITIES (I.E.
 STACKING, GREETING, LOADING, TUNNEL, INTERIORS/VACUUM)
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
2022-08-26 17:27:27NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 1.1SATISFIED. INCLUDE A THOROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS.
 PERFORM DATA COLLECTION AT THE EXISTING CAR WASH AT
 SOUTHERN BLVD, INCLUSIVE OF VEHICLE VOLUMES AND MAXIMUM
 QUEUE LENGTHS
 1.2SATISFIED. INCLUDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE APPENDIX
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE CONTINGENCY PLAN IN THE CASE
 QUEUE SPILLS BEYOND PROPERTY ROW
 4) SATISFIED. CONVERT ALLEYWAY ENTRANCE TO FULL ACCESS
 AND CONVERT THE WESTERLY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AS EXIT ONLY
 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO INTERNAL CIRCULATION.
 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ALL VACUUM STALLS ARE OCCUPIED AND A
 CUSTOMER DRIVES TO THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY AISLE WHILE
 SEARCHING FOR AN AVAILABLE STALL?
 8) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK DEDICATED EMPLOYEE PARKING
 STALLS
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL DIAGRAM OF THE
 FACILITY, SIMILAR TO THE ONE PRESENTED AT THE CITY,
 SHOWCASING PROCESSING TIMES AND CAPACITIES (I.E.
 STACKING, GREETING, LOADING, TUNNEL, INTERIORS/VACUUM)
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-13-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-13 11:24:371) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS
 1.1 SATISFIED. INCLUDE A THOROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS.
 PERFORM DATA COLLECTION AT THE EXISTING CAR WASH AT
 SOUTHERN BLVD, INCLUSIVE OF VEHICLE VOLUMES AND MAXIMUM
 QUEUE LENGTHS
 1.2 NOT SATISFIED. INCLUDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE
 APPENDIX
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE CONTINGENCY PLAN IN THE CASE
 QUEUE SPILLS BEYOND PROPERTY ROW
 4) SATISFIED. CONVERT ALLEYWAY ENTRANCE TO FULL ACCESS
 AND CONVERT THE WESTERLY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AS EXIT ONLY
 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 7) NOT SATISFIED. WITH RESPECT TO INTERNAL CIRCULATION,
 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ALL VACUUM STALLS ARE OCCUPIED AND A
 CUSTOMER DRIVES TO THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY AISLE WHILE
 SEARCHING FOR AN AVAILABLE STALL?
 8) NOT SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK DEDICATED EMPLOYEE
 PARKING STALLS
 9) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL DIAGRAM OF THE
 FACILITY, SIMILAR TO THE ONE PRESENTED AT THE CITY
 MEETING FOR THE SOUTHERN BLVD FACILITY, SHOWCASING
 PROCESSING TIMES AND CAPACITIES (I.E. STACKING,
 GREETING, LOADING, TUNNEL, INTERIORS/VACUUM)
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-13 17:32:211) PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 1.1) INCLUDE A THOROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS. PERFORM DATA
 COLLECTION AT THE EXISTING CAR WASH AT SOUTHERN BLVD,
 INCLUSIVE OF VEHICLE VOLUMES AND MAXIMUM QUEUE LENGTHS
 1.2) INCLUDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE APPENDIX
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 3) PROVIDE CONTINGENCY PLAN IN THE CASE QUEUE SPILLS
 BEYOND PROPERTY ROW
 4) CONVERT ALLEYWAY ENTRANCE TO FULL ACCESS AND CONVERT
 THE WESTERLY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AS EXIT ONLY
 5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS
 (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) OF ADJACENT
 PROPERTIES
 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS
 7) CIRCULATION. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ALL VACUUM STALLS ARE
 OCCUPIED AND A CUSTOMER DRIVES TO THE END OF THE
 DRIVEWAY WHILE SEARCHING FOR AN AVAILABLE STALL?
 8) CLEARLY MARK DEDICATED EMPLOYEE PARKING STALLS
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 12-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 12-02-2022 Time 16:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 12-02-2022 Time 16:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-02 16:58:2612/2/22 - PASSED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE
 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE HAVE YOUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROVIDE A CAR
 STACKING (QUEUE SPILLBACK) ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE STACKING (QUEUING) OF
 CARS WILL NOT CAUSE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE WAYS AND ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH
 BUILDING SEVERAL FEET CLOSER TO THE EXISTING ALLEY ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE
 (ADJACENT TO I-95) IN THE GRAPHIC AND IN THE
 ???PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS??? TABLE ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES
 ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(C)(5),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED VEHICLE PARKING SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. PLEASE REALIGN THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
 (THAT VEERS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ADJACENT TO ONE OF
 THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES) TO PROVIDE MORE
 DEPTH FOR THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACE SIMILAR TO
 ALL THE OTHER PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 9. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
 ???SITE TABULAR DATA??? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET
 SP-1. IT IS ENCOURAGED TO PROPOSE A NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 EXPECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES. [SATISFIED]
 11. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) LOADING SPACE(S) AND DIMENSIONS ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF LOADING SPACE(S) IN THE ???SITE
 TABULAR DATA??? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE WHEEL STOPS
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PROPOSED ROWS OF VEHICLE
 VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A WIDER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING
 ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-273(D)(46)(B)(3)(IV), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGNS AND PHASE II CANOPY MEETING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 REQUIREMENT OF 25 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-408(D)(3)(F)(1), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGN A MEETING THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 24
 FEET FROM THE LOT LINE OF THE ADJACENT SOUTHWESTERLY
 LOT ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGNS ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406 AND
 SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(3), PLEASE REVISE THE LANGUAGE IN
 THE ???NOTES??? SECTION OF THE ???PROPOSED SIGN A & B
 DETAILS??? ON THE REGULATING PLAN, SHEET RP-1 TO STATE
 THE FOLLOWING:
 ---???MAX. HT. 30??????
 ---???MAX. 1 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD)???
 ---???MAX. 0.50 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (I-95)???
 ---???ILLUMINATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406??? [SATISFIED]
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(1)(A),
 PLEASE ADD THE ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET
 A-3. [SATISFIED]
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-409, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 FA??ADE SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS LOCATED AND THE (PERMITTED AND
 PROPOSED) WALL MOUNTED SIGN SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) ON
 THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A-3, AND/OR REGULATING
 PLAN, SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD
 FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE REVISE THE BIKE RACK DETAIL TO REFLECT THE
 PROPER ALIGNMENT FOR BOTH THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AND
 BIKE RACK, INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A MINIMUM DEPTH
 DIMENSION OF SIX (6) FEET FOR THE PROPOSED CONCRETE
 PAD, AND DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED BIKE RACK MODEL TYPE ON THE REGULATING PLAN,
 SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 FPL EASEMENT ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 25. PLEASE ADDRESS LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 10-31-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 10-31-2022 Time 12:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 10-31-2022 Time 12:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-31 12:14:1110/31/22 - FAILED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE
 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE HAVE YOUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROVIDE A CAR
 STACKING (QUEUE SPILLBACK) ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE STACKING (QUEUING) OF
 CARS WILL NOT CAUSE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE WAYS AND ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH
 BUILDING SEVERAL FEET CLOSER TO THE EXISTING ALLEY ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE
 (ADJACENT TO I-95) IN THE GRAPHIC AND IN THE
 ???PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS??? TABLE ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES
 ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(C)(5),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED VEHICLE PARKING SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. PLEASE REALIGN THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
 (THAT VEERS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ADJACENT TO ONE OF
 THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES) TO PROVIDE MORE
 DEPTH FOR THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACE SIMILAR TO
 ALL THE OTHER PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 9. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
 ???SITE TABULAR DATA??? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET
 SP-1. IT IS ENCOURAGED TO PROPOSE A NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 EXPECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES. [SATISFIED]
 11. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) LOADING SPACE(S) AND DIMENSIONS ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF LOADING SPACE(S) IN THE ???SITE
 TABULAR DATA??? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE WHEEL STOPS
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PROPOSED ROWS OF VEHICLE
 VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A WIDER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING
 ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-273(D)(46)(B)(3)(IV), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGNS AND PHASE II CANOPY MEETING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 REQUIREMENT OF 25 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-408(D)(3)(F)(1), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGN A MEETING THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 24
 FEET FROM THE LOT LINE OF THE ADJACENT SOUTHWESTERLY
 LOT ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGNS ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406 AND
 SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(3), PLEASE REVISE THE LANGUAGE IN
 THE ???NOTES??? SECTION OF THE ???PROPOSED SIGN A & B
 DETAILS??? ON THE REGULATING PLAN, SHEET RP-1 TO STATE
 THE FOLLOWING:
 ---???MAX. HT. 30??????
 ---???MAX. 1 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD)???
 ---???MAX. 0.50 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (I-95)???
 ---???ILLUMINATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406??? [SATISFIED]
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(1)(A),
 PLEASE ADD THE ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET
 A-3. [SATISFIED]
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-409, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 FA??ADE SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS LOCATED AND THE (PERMITTED AND
 PROPOSED) WALL MOUNTED SIGN SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) ON
 THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A-3, AND/OR REGULATING
 PLAN, SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD
 FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE REVISE THE BIKE RACK DETAIL TO REFLECT THE
 PROPER ALIGNMENT FOR BOTH THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AND
 BIKE RACK, INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A MINIMUM DEPTH
 DIMENSION OF SIX (6) FEET FOR THE PROPOSED CONCRETE
 PAD, AND DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED BIKE RACK MODEL TYPE ON THE REGULATING PLAN,
 SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 FPL EASEMENT ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 25. PLEASE ADDRESS LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 08-29-2022 Time 08:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 08-29-2022 Time 08:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-29 08:10:558/29/22 - FAILED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE
 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE HAVE YOUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROVIDE A CAR
 STACKING (QUEUE SPILLBACK) ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE STACKING (QUEUING) OF
 CARS WILL NOT CAUSE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE WAYS AND ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH
 BUILDING SEVERAL FEET CLOSER TO THE EXISTING ALLEY ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE
 (ADJACENT TO I-95) IN THE GRAPHIC AND IN THE ?PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET
 SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES
 ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(C)(5),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED VEHICLE PARKING SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. PLEASE REALIGN THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
 (THAT VEERS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ADJACENT TO ONE OF
 THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES) TO PROVIDE MORE
 DEPTH FOR THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACE SIMILAR TO
 ALL THE OTHER PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 9. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE ?SITE
 TABULAR DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. IT IS
 ENCOURAGED TO PROPOSE A NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 EXPECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES. [SATISFIED]
 11. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) LOADING SPACE(S) AND DIMENSIONS ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF LOADING SPACE(S) IN THE ?SITE
 TABULAR DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE WHEEL STOPS
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PROPOSED ROWS OF VEHICLE
 VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A WIDER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING
 ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-273(D)(46)(B)(3)(IV), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGNS AND PHASE II CANOPY MEETING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 REQUIREMENT OF 25 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-408(D)(3)(F)(1), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGN A MEETING THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 24
 FEET FROM THE LOT LINE OF THE ADJACENT SOUTHWESTERLY
 LOT ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGNS ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406 AND
 SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(3), PLEASE REVISE THE LANGUAGE IN
 THE ?NOTES? SECTION OF THE ?PROPOSED SIGN A & B
 DETAILS? ON THE REGULATING PLAN, SHEET RP-1 TO STATE
 THE FOLLOWING:
 ---?MAX. HT. 30??
 ---?MAX. 1 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD)?
 ---?MAX. 0.50 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (I-95)?
 ---?ILLUMINATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406? [SATISFIED]
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(1)(A),
 PLEASE ADD THE ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET
 A-3. [SATISFIED]
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-409, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 FA?ADE SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS LOCATED AND THE (PERMITTED AND
 PROPOSED) WALL MOUNTED SIGN SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) ON
 THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A-3, AND/OR REGULATING
 PLAN, SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD
 FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE REVISE THE BIKE RACK DETAIL TO REFLECT THE
 PROPER ALIGNMENT FOR BOTH THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AND
 BIKE RACK, INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A MINIMUM DEPTH
 DIMENSION OF SIX (6) FEET FOR THE PROPOSED CONCRETE
 PAD, AND DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED BIKE RACK MODEL TYPE ON THE REGULATING PLAN,
 SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 05-19-2022 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 05-19-2022 Time 15:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-19 15:50:125/19/22 - FAILED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE
 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE HAVE YOUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROVIDE A CAR
 STACKING (QUEUE SPILLBACK) ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE STACKING (QUEUING) OF
 CARS WILL NOT CAUSE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE WAYS AND ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH
 BUILDING SEVERAL FEET CLOSER TO THE EXISTING ALLEY ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE
 (ADJACENT TO I-95) IN THE GRAPHIC AND IN THE ?PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET
 SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES
 ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(C)(5),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED VEHICLE PARKING SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. PLEASE REALIGN THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
 (THAT VEERS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ADJACENT TO ONE OF
 THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES) TO PROVIDE MORE
 DEPTH FOR THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACE SIMILAR TO
 ALL THE OTHER PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 9. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE ?SITE
 TABULAR DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. IT IS
 ENCOURAGED TO PROPOSE A NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 EXPECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES. [SATISFIED]
 11. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) LOADING SPACE(S) AND DIMENSIONS ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF LOADING SPACE(S) IN THE ?SITE
 TABULAR DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE WHEEL STOPS
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PROPOSED ROWS OF VEHICLE
 VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A WIDER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING
 ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-273(D)(46)(B)(3)(IV), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGNS AND PHASE II CANOPY MEETING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 REQUIREMENT OF 25 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-408(D)(3)(F)(1), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGN A MEETING THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 24
 FEET FROM THE LOT LINE OF THE ADJACENT SOUTHWESTERLY
 LOT ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGNS ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406 AND
 SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(3), PLEASE REVISE THE LANGUAGE IN
 THE ?NOTES? SECTION OF THE ?PROPOSED SIGN A & B
 DETAILS? ON THE REGULATING PLAN, SHEET RP-1 TO STATE
 THE FOLLOWING:
 ---?MAX. HT. 30??
 ---?MAX. 1 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD)?
 ---?MAX. 0.50 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (I-95)?
 ---?ILLUMINATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406? [SATISFIED]
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(1)(A),
 PLEASE ADD THE ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET
 A-3. [SATISFIED]
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-409, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 FA?ADE SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS LOCATED AND THE (PERMITTED AND
 PROPOSED) WALL MOUNTED SIGN SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) ON
 THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A-3, AND/OR REGULATING
 PLAN, SHEET RP-1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD
 FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY.
 23. PLEASE REVISE THE BIKE RACK DETAIL TO REFLECT THE
 PROPER ALIGNMENT FOR BOTH THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AND
 BIKE RACK, INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A MINIMUM DEPTH
 DIMENSION OF SIX (6) FEET FOR THE PROPOSED CONCRETE
 PAD, AND DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED BIKE RACK MODEL TYPE ON THE REGULATING PLAN,
 SHEET RP-1.
  
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 03-29-2022 Time 12:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 03-29-2022 Time 12:00 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-29 12:01:003/29/22 - FAILED
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE
 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES.
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT.
 H. PLEASE HAVE YOUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROVIDE A CAR
 STACKING (QUEUE SPILLBACK) ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE STACKING (QUEUING) OF
 CARS WILL NOT CAUSE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE WAYS AND ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW.
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH
 BUILDING SEVERAL FEET CLOSER TO THE EXISTING ALLEY ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE
 (ADJACENT TO I-95) IN THE GRAPHIC AND IN THE ?PROPERTY
 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET
 SP-1.
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES
 ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(C)(5),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED VEHICLE PARKING SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 8. PLEASE REALIGN THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
 (THAT VEERS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ADJACENT TO ONE OF
 THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES) TO PROVIDE MORE
 DEPTH FOR THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACE SIMILAR TO
 ALL THE OTHER PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 9. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE ?SITE
 TABULAR DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. IT IS
 ENCOURAGED TO PROPOSE A NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 EXPECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES.
 11. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) LOADING SPACE(S) AND DIMENSIONS ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF LOADING SPACE(S) IN THE ?SITE
 TABULAR DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE WHEEL STOPS
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PROPOSED ROWS OF VEHICLE
 VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A WIDER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING
 ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-273(D)(46)(B)(3)(IV), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGNS AND PHASE II CANOPY MEETING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 REQUIREMENT OF 25 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-408(D)(3)(F)(1), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGN A MEETING THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 24
 FEET FROM THE LOT LINE OF THE ADJACENT SOUTHWESTERLY
 LOT ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGNS ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406 AND
 SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(3), PLEASE REVISE THE LANGUAGE IN
 THE ?NOTES? SECTION OF THE ?PROPOSED SIGN A & B
 DETAILS? ON THE REGULATING PLAN, SHEET RP-1 TO STATE
 THE FOLLOWING:
 ---?MAX. HT. 30??
 ---?MAX. 1 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD)?
 ---?MAX. 0.50 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (I-95)?
 ---?ILLUMINATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406?
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(1)(A),
 PLEASE ADD THE ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET
 A-3.
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-409, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 FA?ADE SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS LOCATED AND THE (PERMITTED AND
 PROPOSED) WALL MOUNTED SIGN SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) ON
 THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A-3, AND/OR REGULATING
 PLAN, SHEET RP-1.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved