Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z21120021 Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 1 Status N Date 08-05-2022 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 08-05-2022 Time 11:22 Rev Time 0.00 Received By scwelter Date 08-05-2022 Time 11:23 Sent To   Notes 2022-08-05 11:23:22 THIS PROJECT IS AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT RECEIVING   TAX CREDIT FUNDS. THE PUBLIC ART WAIVER WOULD APPLY. Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status   Date 07-19-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time 09:29 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 19:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 19:02 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-12 19:19:19 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. LOCATION MAP ON THE COVER SHEET AND SHEET SP-1 DOES   NOT MATCH THE ACTUAL PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE PROJECT   WHICH IS GRANT ST AND N. TAMARIND AVE.       3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY   LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER   APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE   PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE   WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION   DISTANCE.       4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-19-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 03-28-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 03-28-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-03-28 11:52:19 Z21120021, 0016 - 1002 GRANT ST. RESUB 3.24.22   COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :   1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF   CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER ARE REQUIRED.   3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE   PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.   4. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   5. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.   6. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING   PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT   HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   1. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW   PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,   STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING   STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY   SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND   OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH   BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES   SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,   CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND   MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL   AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.   DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,   PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE   AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.   7. PLEASE CLOUD/HIGHLIGHT PLAN REVISIONS OR CHANGES IN   SCOPE FOR RESUBMITTAL OF DRAWINGS.   8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP   UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY   LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.   9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED   UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO   PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.   10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER   METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.   11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT   DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW   PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL   BACKFLOWS.   12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND   NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.   - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:   - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS   THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF   DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND   - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE   STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A   MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).   - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF   CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION   THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL   SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO   NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE   CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT.   13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES   OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT   OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD   RIGHT OF WAY.   16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY   ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.   17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY   INFRASTRUCTURE IS PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT   SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF   ADJACENT PARCELS.   18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER   INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT   PARCEL ADDRESSES.   19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN   IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50   FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL   GC-8.   20. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND   INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER   (Z-XXXXXXXX).       COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR   [email protected]:       -SHOWING 3 INCH TAP AND SERVICE PIPING FOR 4 INCH   METER. INCREASE TO 4.       -RECOMMEND PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO   MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.       -ADD ABOVE-GROUND WORDING TO LABEL OF DOMESTIC WATER   METER.       -FOOTPRINT OF DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ASSOCIATED   PIPING MAY BE LARGER THAN SHOWN ON WATER PLAN.       -4 INCH DCDA SHOULD HAVE 4 INCH TAP AND 4 INCH SERVICE   PIPING.       -IS THERE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN   CROSSING OF SEWER LATERAL AND DRAINAGE PIPING?       -INDICATE RELOCATION OF DRIVEWAY APPROACH AND   CONVERSION OF PRIOR AREA TO SIDEWALK, CURBING, AND   PARKWAY.       -COULD NOT SEE FOLLOWUP TO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMENT   NUMBER 1 AS NOTED IN THE RESPONSE. THAT WORK WOULD   LIKELY ALSO REQUIRE SOME SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT.       -RESPONSE LETTER SAID IRRIGATION WILL BE FED FROM A   SEPARATE METER, BUT DID NOT SEE ON PLANS. PLEASE ADD.       QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:   O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-822-2262 OR [email protected]   O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]   O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]   O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-13 08:21:16 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :   GENERAL:   O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND   INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER   (Z-XXXXXXXX).   O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK   BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP   B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL   L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97   B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF   B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS   C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,   ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,   SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER   SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU   BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL   O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION   ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD   SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.       BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:   O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER   SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING   TO THEM.   O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY   EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO   PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO   STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.   O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION   OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW   PREVENTION.   O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY   OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER   METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO   PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.   O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE   NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.       WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:   O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION   INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).   O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.   O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE   STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.   O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND   DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND   SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH   PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE   AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,   BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO   BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,   DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,   ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT   ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF   SANITARY SEWER LINES.   O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR   SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW.   O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL.   O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER   AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD   DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.   O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY   TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING   AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,   MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS   SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008   FOR WATER.   O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.   O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT   FRONTAGE.   O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL   BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY   PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.   O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER ARE REQUIRED.   O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE   JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.   O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT   STATION NUMBER.   O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.   O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE   TRAPS (IF ANY).   O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN   OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.       FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES   NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.   - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:   - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS   THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF   DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;   - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE   STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A   MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).   - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF   CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION   THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL   SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF   WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES   ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY   LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT   PARCELS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE   BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE   50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER   CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR   PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.       COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR   [email protected]:       -PAVEMENT RESTORATION OF STATE ST. AND GRANT ST. WOULD   BE REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED UTILITY WORK.       -WATER SERVICE DESIGN IS NONSTANDARD. PLEASE USE   STANDARD DESIGN FOR WATER SERVICES.       -LS PLAN DESCRIBED FIRE SPRINKLERS. FIRE SPRINKLERS   CANNOT BE FED FROM DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES. WOULD NEED   AT LEAST ONE DEDICATED FIRE SERVICE WITH DETECTOR   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.       -GEO REPORT SAYS GFA SHOULD BE REQUESTED TO REVIEW DATA   TO SEE IF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE VALID. WILL APPLICANT   FOLLOWUP WITH THEM ONCE BUILDING DETAILS ARE FINALIZED?       -LANDSCAPE PLAN IS MISSING FROM SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.   PLEASE SUBMIT AND ENSURE NO CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES.       -THE ROW VACATION APPLICATION DOES NOT HAVE THE WRITTEN   VERIFICATION FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES THAT THERE ARE   NO CONFLICTS. PLEASE SUBMIT.       -THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING UTILITY BOX   CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED CURBING ON GRANT ST. NEAR THE   MANHOLE.       -TURN AROUND SPACE DOES NOT APPEAR USABLE. SEEMS   VEHICLE WOULD HIT DUMPSTER STRUCTURE.       -SIDEWALK CHANGE ON GRANT ST. MAY REQUIRE EASEMENT.       -NOT SURE IF PARKING IS BEING PROPOSED ON TAMARIND   WHERE THE AIR RELIEF MANHOLE STRUCTURES ARE LOCATED. IF   SO, AND THE INTENT IS TO LOWER THE ELEVATION, THEN   APPLICANT TEAM WOULD NEED TO VERIFY THAT THE STRUCTURE   CAN BE LOWERED. THERE IS A SIMILAR ISSUE WITH A NEARBY   VALVE BOX.       -PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE METERED WATER   SERVICES. THERE ARE ONLY FOUR DOMESTIC, BUT SIX   DWELLING UNITS. IS THE INTENT TO HAVE A METER FOR EACH   UNIT OR EACH FLOOR? IS THERE A SEPARATE METER FOR   COMMON AREAS?       -HOW WILL THE IRRIGATION UTILITY BILL BE HANDLED? WILL   THERE BE AN HOA OR PROPERTY MANAGER?       -SHOW AND LABEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR IRRIGATION   SERVICE AND ALSO ANY WATER SERVICES FEEDING MULTIPLE   DWELLING UNITS.       -SHOW AND LABEL UTILITY EASEMENT FOR METERED WATER   SERVICES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.       -SOME SIDEWALKS MAY REQUIRE REPLACEMENT DUE TO   PROJECT?S UTILITY WORK.       -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON STATE ST.   CRACKED/DAMAGED.       -SEWER LATERAL CLEANOUT NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE   ADD AND LABEL.       -PAVEMENT RESTORATION OF STATE ST. AND GRANT ST. WOULD   BE REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED UTILITY WORK.       -WATER SERVICE DESIGN IS NONSTANDARD. PLEASE USE   STANDARD DESIGN FOR WATER SERVICES.       -LS PLAN DESCRIBED FIRE SPRINKLERS. FIRE SPRINKLERS   CANNOT BE FED FROM DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES. WOULD NEED   AT LEAST ONE DEDICATED FIRE SERVICE WITH DETECTOR   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.       -GEO REPORT SAYS GFA SHOULD BE REQUESTED TO REVIEW DATA   TO SEE IF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE VALID. WILL APPLICANT   FOLLOWUP WITH THEM ONCE BUILDING DETAILS ARE FINALIZED?       -LANDSCAPE PLAN IS MISSING FROM SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.   PLEASE SUBMIT AND ENSURE NO CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES.       -THE ROW VACATION APPLICATION DOES NOT HAVE THE WRITTEN   VERIFICATION FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES THAT THERE ARE   NO CONFLICTS. PLEASE SUBMIT.       -THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING UTILITY BOX   CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED CURBING ON GRANT ST. NEAR THE   MANHOLE.       -TURN AROUND SPACE DOES NOT APPEAR USABLE. SEEMS   VEHICLE WOULD HIT DUMPSTER STRUCTURE.       -SIDEWALK CHANGE ON GRANT ST. MAY REQUIRE EASEMENT.       -NOT SURE IF PARKING IS BEING PROPOSED ON TAMARIND   WHERE THE AIR RELIEF MANHOLE STRUCTURES ARE LOCATED. IF   SO, AND THE INTENT IS TO LOWER THE ELEVATION, THEN   APPLICANT TEAM WOULD NEED TO VERIFY THAT THE STRUCTURE   CAN BE LOWERED. THERE IS A SIMILAR ISSUE WITH A NEARBY   VALVE BOX.       -PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE METERED WATER   SERVICES. THERE ARE ONLY FOUR DOMESTIC, BUT SIX   DWELLING UNITS. IS THE INTENT TO HAVE A METER FOR EACH   UNIT OR EACH FLOOR? IS THERE A SEPARATE METER FOR   COMMON AREAS?       -HOW WILL THE IRRIGATION UTILITY BILL BE HANDLED? WILL   THERE BE AN HOA OR PROPERTY MANAGER?       -SHOW AND LABEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR IRRIGATION   SERVICE AND ALSO ANY WATER SERVICES FEEDING MULTIPLE   DWELLING UNITS.       -SHOW AND LABEL UTILITY EASEMENT FOR METERED WATER   SERVICES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.       -SOME SIDEWALKS MAY REQUIRE REPLACEMENT DUE TO   PROJECT?S UTILITY WORK.       -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON STATE ST.   CRACKED/DAMAGED.       -SEWER LATERAL CLEANOUT NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE   ADD AND LABEL.           FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.               QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:   O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-822-2262 OR [email protected]   O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]   O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]   O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:19 Sent To   Notes 2022-07-27 15:19:56 FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.       FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT   CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE   APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND   STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected] Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-04-2022 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time 10:11 Sent To   Notes 2022-04-04 10:11:53 FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.       FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT   CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE   APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND   STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-04-2022 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time 13:50 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-04 13:50:35 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED   TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY   WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION   CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE   CODES.       6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE   OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.       7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE   LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER   SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.       8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL   BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED   WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.       9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER   THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY   ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,   ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G   AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.       9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE   LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE   REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH   THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS   OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING   AND ZONING OFFICE.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF   TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY   LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE   EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES   AND EQUIPMENT.       11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE   SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY   DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected] Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:59 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:59 Sent To   Notes 2022-11-17 11:59:40 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1002 GRANT ST. Z21120021   NOVEMBER 17, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN   SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE   THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:   ??? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE   PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE   CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION   DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER   MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND   ENTERED ON THE CHART.   ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE DUE.   ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.   PROVIDE TOTAL FOR ALL TREES AFTER CORRECTIONS TO PLANT   LIST.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING   CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR   THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM   REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR   THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION   94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN   SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE   MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.       4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF   SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION   94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR   PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.           5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE   REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY   LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF   THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.   CALCULATIONS FOR BUFFER LENGTHS AND REQUIRED NUMBER OF   TREES ARE NOT CORRECT. NORTH AND SOUTH ARE 90 FEET   REQUIRING 3 TREES EACH. EAST AND WEST ARE 89.66 FEET   REQUIRING 3 TREES EACH. CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS AND   PROVIDE THE THIRD REQUIRED TREE FOR THE NORTH BUFFER.   PREVIOUS PLAN SUBMITTED MET THE REQUIREMENTS.       6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30%   FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   FOR EACH BUILDING.   THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING   PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.   THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.       7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST   HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE   FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA   SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW   OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED   AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   8/8/22 REDESIGN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT NORTH OF   THE ADA SPACE. PROVIDE THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND   AND SHADE TREE.       8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO   BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1   SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.   9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE   REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN   OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.   10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA   CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A   MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE   FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED   FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST   RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT   DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE   THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT   PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.       11. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES   INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH   REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN   AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.       UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND   CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE   ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED   TREES.   8/8/22 SEWER LINE IS STILL IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED   TREE.       12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES   THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT   PLACE GUIDELINES.       13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE   SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL   PROPERTY LINES.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:       1. SATISFIED. ADD EXISTING LIVE OAK TO PLANT LIST.       2. SATISFIED. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND   VALVES.       3. SATISFIED. CRAPE MYRTLES NEED TO BE SHOWN AT 12 FT   HEIGHT SPECIFICATION ON THE PLAN. ANY SUPPLY ISSUES MAY   BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.               CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 12:29 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 12:29 Sent To   Notes 2022-08-08 12:29:45 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1002 GRANT ST. Z21120021   AUGUST 8, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN   SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE   THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:   ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE   PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE   CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION   DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER   MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND   ENTERED ON THE CHART.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   DUE.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.   PROVIDE TOTAL FOR ALL TREES AFTER CORRECTIONS TO PLANT   LIST.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING   CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR   THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM   REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR   THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION   94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN   SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE   MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.       4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF   SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION   94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR   PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.           5. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE   REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY   LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF   THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.   CALCULATIONS FOR BUFFER LENGTHS AND REQUIRED NUMBER OF   TREES ARE NOT CORRECT. NORTH AND SOUTH ARE 90 FEET   REQUIRING 3 TREES EACH. EAST AND WEST ARE 89.66 FEET   REQUIRING 3 TREES EACH. CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS AND   PROVIDE THE THIRD REQUIRED TREE FOR THE NORTH BUFFER.   PREVIOUS PLAN SUBMITTED MET THE REQUIREMENTS.       6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30%   FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   FOR EACH BUILDING.   THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING   PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.   THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.       7. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST   HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE   FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA   SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW   OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED   AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   8/8/22 REDESIGN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT NORTH OF   THE ADA SPACE. PROVIDE THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND   AND SHADE TREE.       8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO   BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1   SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.   9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE   REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN   OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.   10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA   CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A   MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE   FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED   FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST   RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT   DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE   THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT   PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.       11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY   LINES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH   REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN   AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.       UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND   CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE   ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED   TREES.   8/8/22 SEWER LINE IS STILL IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED   TREE.       12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES   THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT   PLACE GUIDELINES.       13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE   SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL   PROPERTY LINES.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:       1. ADD EXISTING LIVE OAK TO PLANT LIST.       2. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES.       3. CRAPE MYRTLES NEED TO BE SHOWN AT 12 FT HEIGHT   SPECIFICATION ON THE PLAN. ANY SUPPLY ISSUES MAY BE   ADDRESSED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.               CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-05-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 18:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 18:48 Sent To   Notes 2022-04-05 18:52:13 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1002 GRANT ST. Z21120021   APRIL 5, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN   SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE   THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:   ? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR   EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY   OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED   MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN   DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED   AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.   ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE DUE.   ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING   CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR   THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM   REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR   THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION   94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN   SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE   MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.       4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF   SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION   94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR   PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.           5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE   REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY   LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF   THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.       6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2.,   PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.   THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING   PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.   THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.       7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST   HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE   FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA   SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW   OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED   AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO   BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1   SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.   9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE   REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN   OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.   10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA   CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A   MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE   FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED   FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST   RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT   DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE   THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT   PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.       11. NOT SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES   INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH   REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN   AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.       UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND   CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE   ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED   TREES.       12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES   THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT   PLACE GUIDELINES.       13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE   SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL   PROPERTY LINES.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:44 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-12 13:45:13 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1002 GRANT ST. Z21120021   JANUARY 12, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHOWING THE   LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE THE   FOLLOWING INFORMATION:   ? ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE PROPOSED   TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE CANOPY   DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE.   TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER MUST   HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND ENTERED   ON THE CHART.   ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.   ? PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED   BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD   CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A   300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY   RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.   PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION FOR ALL   TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.       3. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED   SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE SITE   BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN SPACE BASED ON   THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE MULTIFAMILY TREE   REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.       4. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF   PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A   3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED   1:1 SPECIES.           5. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT   LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE   THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH   BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE   PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.       6. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION   PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH   BUILDING.       7. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL   LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT   LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL   LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL   HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF   PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS   PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       8. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED   WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.   SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.   9. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS   FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW   THE TOTAL PROVIDED.   10. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO   COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM   OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA   NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE   CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT   EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT   WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL   PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED   ON FINAL PLANT LIST.       11. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES INCLUDING   WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED   LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND   LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.       12. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT WILL   LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE   GUIDELINES.       13. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL   IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY   LINES.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By mtechnow Date 01-05-2022 Time 17:00 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-05 17:01:18 CUT/CAP UNUSED SERVICES AT THE MAIN.   -PROFILE OF THE TAP TO POINT OF SERVICE.   -THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW 3? SERVICES. PLEASE UPSIZE TO   4?   -SHOW/LABEL EASEMENT.   -THE PLAN VIEW IS TOUGH TO READ. COULD YOU PLEASE MAKE   IT MORE LEGIBLE?   -PROVIDE POST CCTV OF THE LATERALS.   -FOR THE STORMWATER SYSTEM, PLEASE SHOW THE TRUNK LINE   ON THE PLANS.   - FOR STORMWATER STRUCTURES CALL OUT STATIONING AND   HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UTILITIES       CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]   WITH ANY QUESTIONS. Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-11-14 09:46:58 NO FURTHER COMMENTS.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-22-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 03-22-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-03-29 11:27:17 PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED SHEET SP-2 TO REFLECT ALL THE   REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCOSURE PER THE LATEST   REVISION OF GC-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER   ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST   REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL   CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO   THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W   PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000   00).       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-13 10:29:09 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF   THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE   UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION   SERVICE.   -AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE'S   WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER   TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:   * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT   * TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT   - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS.   - REVIESD ENCLOSURE DETAILS, SHEET SP-2, TO COMPLY WITH   THE CG-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE,   THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE   ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-7. Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 09:14 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 09:20 Sent To   Notes 2022-12-13 09:20:13 CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:   1. REMOVE CURB OR ADJUST CURB CALLOUT FOR THE DRIVEWAY   APRON/SIDEWALK.   2. SHOW CURBS, SIDEWALKS, GUTTERS, ETC. AT THEIR PROPER   WIDTHS/DEPTHS ON THE PLANS AND CROSS SECTIONS.   3. PROVIDE REFERENCE ELEVATION TO NGVD1929 (THE   CITY???S VERTICAL DATUM) ON THE SURVEY.   4. PROVIDE EXISTING INVERT AND BOTTOM ELEVATION FOR THE   EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE CONNECTED TO.   5. PROVIDE INVERT INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED SANITARY   LATERAL, INCLUDING THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING   MAIN AT THE WYE CONNECTION AND THE TOP AND BOP   ELEVATIONS FOR THE CROSSING OF THE PROPOSED 15???   STORM.   6. STORM PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON   STATE STREET TO BE EXCLUSIVE WITHIN ONLY ONE SIDE OF   THE STRUCTURE (I.E. DO NOT REMOVE ANY OF THE CORNER OF   THE STRUCTURE).   7. SHOW AND LABEL THE LANDSCAPING OVERHANG (DASHED   LINE) FOR THE PARKING SPACES ON ALL OF THE CIVIL PLAN   SHEETS.   9. LABEL (SIZE AND MATERIAL) ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN   THE R/W.   10. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR THE DRIVEWAY FROM THE   CENTERLINE OF THE R/W TO 5 FEET PAST THE HIGH POINT OF   THE DRIVEWAY. CALLOUT SURFACE FEATURES AND PROVIDE   DIMENSIONS FROM THE R/W TO THE BACK OF CURB, EDGE OF   PAVEMENT, R/W CENTERLINE, HIGH POINT OF DRIVEWAY AND   OTHER BREAKPINTS OF DRIVEWAY. SHOW AND LABEL LOCATION   OF SIDEWALK CROSSING. LABEL STREET NAME OF THE R/W.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE   NOT LISTED.       5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW   COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:   A. BUILDING TO EACH R/W CENTERLINE   B. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY   C. FROM GRANT ST CENTERLINE TO PARKING LOT   D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.   E. BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS       LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND   GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR   CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM   PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED   PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.       6. {SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN   THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - THE EXISTING WATER   SERVICE ON GRANT STREET MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED AND   PLUGGED AT THE WATER MAIN.           9. [SATISFIED ??? CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE IS NOT TO BE   REMOVED IN ORDER TO CONNECT THE OUTFALL PIPE.] CONFIRM   THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL NOT ENTER THE EXISTING STRUCTURE   AT A CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? THE   ANGLE OF THE PIPE TO THE STRUCTURE MAY REQUIRE THE HOLE   OPENING (42 +/- INCHES) TO BE WIDER THAN THE INSIDE   WALL DIMENSION.       10. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE 13 ON SHEET C2.1 STATES ALL   EXISTING SIDEWALKS TO BE REPLACED.] PROVIDE HATCHING   PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR   NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: ADD   PATTERNS TO LEGEND. ADD DUMPSTER PAD HATCHING TO THE   LEGEND.           13. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL   DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF   NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929   AT THE PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.       14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB   AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT -   SHOW THE LINEWORK FOR THE PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER ON   GRANT ST. LABELED THE PROPOSED CURBING CREATED FOR THE   ON-STREET PARKING. USE DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/WEIGHT   BETWEEN EXISTING CURBING AND PROPOSED CURBING. DRAW THE   VALLEY GUTTER WITH THE CORRECT WIDTH AND LOCATION.           17. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE - SIDEWALK AREA NOT BEING   MODIFIED FOR PARKING ON N. TAMARIND AVE] REVIEW   AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE ARV TO DETERMINE IF THE   STRUCTURE CAN BE MODIFIED TO LOWER THE RIM TO PROPOSED   GRADE.           NEW COMMENTS(3/24/22 SUBMITTAL):       19. [NOT SATISFIED - REVISE FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL] REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT   STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND   ENGINEERING SHEETS.           21. [SATISFIED] REMOVE THE HATCHING FOR THE PROPOSED   R/W ABANDONMENT AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.       22. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE EXISTING INVERT   ELEVATION OF THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE THE OUTFALL PIPE   WILL CONNECT TO.       23.[NOT SATISFIED] LIST THE WEIR ELEVATION WITH THE   INFORMATION FOR STRUCTURE S-102.       24. [NOT SATISFIED] CONFIRM THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT   VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED 15 INCH RCP   OUTFALL PIPE AND 6 INCH SANITARY SEWER LATERAL.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SURVEY LISTS THE BOTTOM ELEVATION   OF THE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NO. 2 AS 15.16 FT NAVD.   THIS BOTTOM (OR MINIMUM INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE   SANITARY LATERAL) IS LESS THAN 2 INCHES LOWER THAN THE   TOP OF THE PROPOSED 6 INCH SANITARY LATERAL (AS LISTED   ON THE WATER AND SEWER PLAN) WHERE THE LATERAL CROSSES   THE PROPOSED 15 INCH RCP STORM PIPE.           26. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW THE 2-FT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG AT   THE END OF THE PARKING SPACES. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ?   OVERHANG WILL BE OVER THE SIDEWALK. SHOW THE DASHED   LINE ON THE SIDEWALK.           28. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET IN   THE CORRECT LOCATION. SHOW THE VALVES FROM THE SURVEY.       29. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:   A. [SATISFIED - EXTEND DOUBLE YELLOW TO 25 LF] PROVIDE   STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE AREAS.   B. [SATISFIED - SIGNS AND STOP BARS TO BE MINIMUM 4   FEET FROM CROSS WALK] SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGNS FOR   STATE STREET AND FOR GRANT STREET.   E. [SATISFIED] REFERENCE THE CWPB TYPICAL 90 DEGREE   PARKING STALL DETAIL.       G. [NOT SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT ACROSS   SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (7/19/22 SUBMITTAL):   H. [NOT SATISFIED] SHARROWS SHOULD BE LOCATED AFTER THE   INTERSECTION AND NOT IN THE INTERSECTION.   I. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE STOP   BAR IN THE PARKING LOT TO HALF THE WIDTH OF THE   DRIVEWAY.   J. [SATISFIED] CALLOUT FOR TYPE D CURB AT BACK OF   PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON GRANT STREET IS LOCATED ON   TOP OF THE VALLEY GUTTER LINE WORK AND IS   INDISCERNIBLE.       30. [SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW WERE MODIFIED FOR THE   LATEST (7/19) SUBMITTAL] SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)   A. [SATISFIED] VALLEY GUTTER NOT SHOWN OR LABELED FOR   GRANT STREET.   B. [SATISFIED] SHOW SLOPE DIRECTION FOR PARKING SPACE.   C. {SATISFIED] VALLEY GUTTER FOR STATE STREET SHOWN AT   CENTERLINE OF R/W.   D. [SATISFIED] IS THICKENED-EDGE SIDEWALK PROPOSED FOR   GRANT STREET? LABEL AS SUCH AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE   SIDEWALK.E. DOES THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON STATE STREET   HAVE CURBING AND THICKENED-EDGE AS SHOWN ON THE CROSS   SECTION?       31. [COMMENTS BELOW WERE MODIFIED FOR THE LATEST (7/19)   SUBMITTAL] SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)   A. [NOT SATISFIED] WILL NEW SIDEWALK HAVE THICKENED   EDGE AT BACK OF WALK? LABEL SIDEWALK AS SUCH AND   PROVIDE DETAIL.               NEW COMMENTS (7/19/2024)   38. [NOT SATISFIED] FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL,   SHOW THE CURBING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF STATE STREET AND   GRANT STREET.       39. [NOT SATISFIED ??? 2015 AS-BUILT DRAWING SHOWS   8-INCH WATER MAIN CONNECTING TO 6??? WATER MAIN ABOUT   10 FEET WEST OF THE WEST R/W OF TAMARIND AVE] CONFIRM   SIZE OF EXISTING WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET IS 8?.       40. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL   EXISTING UTILITIES ON STATE STREET, TAMARIND AVE AND   GRANT STREET.       41. [NOT SATISFIED] SHARROW STRIPING DETAIL TO BE   PROVIDED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. BIKE   STRIPING TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CWPB STANDARD DETAILS   AND MUTCD. PROPERLY SHOW WHERE THE MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE   ARE TO BE PLACED.           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 15:24 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 15:32 Sent To   Notes 2022-08-01 15:32:14 Z21120021 SITE G 1002 GRANT ST, 1001 STATE ST.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   7/19/2022 SUBMITTAL:       1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF   WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.       2. [SATISFIED ? AS BEST AS THEY CAN DO] PROJECT SITE ON   PROJECT LOCATION MAP IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF   TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND   AVE.       3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING   WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.       4. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF   SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - ADD FLOW ARROWS   FOR THE AREAS AROUND THE BUILDING.       5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW   COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:   A. BUILDING TO EACH R/W CENTERLINE   B. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY   C. FROM GRANT ST CENTERLINE TO PARKING LOT   D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.   E. BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS       LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND   GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR   CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM   PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED   PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.       6. {PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING   LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - THE   EXISTING WATER SERVICE ON GRANT STREET MAY NEED TO BE   REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE WATER MAIN.       7. [SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING   PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE   CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE   ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: IF SPECIAL TYPE F   CURB AND GUTTER IS NOT BEING CONSTRUCTED THEN DO NOT   INCLUDE THE DETAIL FOR THE ITEM.       8. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL   STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE   STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF   BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL   NOT ENTER THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AT A CORNER OF THE   STRUCTURE. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? THE ANGLE OF THE PIPE   TO THE STRUCTURE MAY REQUIRE THE HOLE OPENING (42 +/-   INCHES) TO BE WIDER THAN THE INSIDE WALL DIMENSION.       10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR   SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.   ADDITIONAL COMMENT: ADD PATTERNS TO LEGEND. ADD   DUMPSTER PAD HATCHING TO THE LEGEND.       11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING   DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF   ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES   IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE   PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.       12. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH   END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE   ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES. ADDITIONAL COMMENT -   INCREASE THE ANGLE OF THE END CURBING FROM 16 DEGREES   FROM PERPENDICULAR TO 45 DEGREES FROM PERPENDICULAR AT   BOTH ENDS OF THE PARKING AREA ON GRANT STREET.       13. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM   IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988   AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE   PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO   NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.       14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB   AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT -   SHOW THE LINEWORK FOR THE PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER ON   GRANT ST. LABELED THE PROPOSED CURBING CREATED FOR THE   ON-STREET PARKING. USE DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/WEIGHT   BETWEEN EXISTING CURBING AND PROPOSED CURBING. DRAW THE   VALLEY GUTTER WITH THE CORRECT WIDTH AND LOCATION.       15. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT   DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       16. [SATISFIED] EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE SIDEWALK   AND PARKING ON GRANT ST.       17. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE - SIDEWALK AREA NOT BEING   MODIFIED FOR PARKING ON N. TAMARIND AVE] REVIEW   AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE ARV TO DETERMINE IF THE   STRUCTURE CAN BE MODIFIED TO LOWER THE RIM TO PROPOSED   GRADE.       18. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.       NEW COMMENTS(3/24/22 SUBMITTAL):       19. [NOT SATISFIED ? REVISE FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL] REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT   STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND   ENGINEERING SHEETS.       20. [SATISFIED] SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT A DETAIL NO. 4 ON   SHEET SP-3. SHEET SP-3 DOES NOT HAVE A DETAIL NO. 4.       21. [NOT SATISFIED] REMOVE THE HATCHING FOR THE   PROPOSED R/W ABANDONMENT AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN   SHEETS.       22. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE EXISTING INVERT   ELEVATION OF THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE THE OUTFALL PIPE   WILL CONNECT TO.       23.[NOT SATISFIED] LIST THE WEIR ELEVATION WITH THE   INFORMATION FOR STRUCTURE S-102.       24. [NOT SATISFIED] CONFIRM THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT   VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED 15 INCH RCP   OUTFALL PIPE AND 6 INCH SANITARY SEWER LATERAL.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SURVEY LISTS THE BOTTOM ELEVATION   OF THE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NO. 2 AS 15.16 FT NAVD.   THIS BOTTOM (OR MINIMUM INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE   SANITARY LATERAL) IS LESS THAN 2? LOWER THAN THE TOP OF   THE PROPOSED 6? SANITARY LATERAL (AS LISTED ON THE   WATER AND SEWER PLAN) WHERE THE LATERAL CROSSES THE   PROPOSED 15? RCP STORM PIPE.       25. [SATISFIED] CAN S-102 AND S-101 SHIFT TO THE NORTH,   AWAY FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE   ANGLE OF THE OUTFALL PIPE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING   INLET. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? STRUCTURE S-102 WILL NEED   TO SHIFT NORTHWARD ABOUT 6 ? 8 MORE FEET SO THAT THE   PIPE OPENING AT THE EXISTING CURB INLET WILL NOT EXCEED   THE INSIDE HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF THE WALL.       26. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW THE 2-FT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG AT   THE END OF THE PARKING SPACES. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ?   OVERHANG WILL BE OVER THE SIDEWALK. SHOW THE DASHED   LINE ON THE SIDEWALK.       27. [SATISFIED] SHOW CONCRETE FOR THE DRIVEWAY APRON   AND SIDEWALK WITHIN THE R/W.       28. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET IN   THE CORRECT LOCATION. SHOW THE VALVES FROM THE SURVEY.       29. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:   A. [PARTIAL SATISFIED ? EXTEND DOUBLE YELLOW TO 25 LF]   PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE AREAS.   B. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SIGNS AND STOP BARS TO BE   MINIMUM 4 FEET FROM CROSS WALK] SHOW EXISTING STOP   SIGNS FOR STATE STREET AND FOR GRANT STREET.   C. [SATISFIED] MOVE STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN FOR PARKING   LOT TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALK.   D. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCE TO CITY OF RIVIERA   BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM NOTES.   E. REFERENCE THE CWPB TYPICAL 90 DEGREE PARKING STALL   DETAIL.   F. [SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT FOR WEST EDGE OF   PARKING LOT BUT THIS CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PGD PLAN.   G. [NOT SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT ACROSS   SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (7/19/22 SUBMITTAL):   H. SHARROWS SHOULD BE LOCATED AFTER THE INTERSECTION   AND NOT IN THE INTERSECTION.   I. CONSIDER REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE STOP BAR IN THE   PARKING LOT TO HALF THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY.   J. CALLOUT FOR TYPE D CURB AT BACK OF PARALLEL PARKING   SPACES ON GRANT STREET IS LOCATED ON TOP OF THE VALLEY   GUTTER LINE WORK AND IS INDISCERNIBLE.       30. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW WERE MODIFIED   FOR THE LATEST (7/19) SUBMITTAL] SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)   A. VALLEY GUTTER NOT SHOWN OR LABELED FOR GRANT STREET.   B. SHOW SLOPE DIRECTION FOR PARKING SPACE.   C. VALLEY GUTTER FOR STATE STREET SHOWN AT CENTERLINE   OF R/W.   D. IS THICKENED-EDGE SIDEWALK PROPOSED FOR GRANT   STREET? LABEL AS SUCH AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE   SIDEWALK.E. DOES THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON STATE STREET   HAVE CURBING AND THICKENED-EDGE AS SHOWN ON THE CROSS   SECTION?       31. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW WERE MODIFIED   FOR THE LATEST (7/19) SUBMITTAL] SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)   A. WILL NEW SIDEWALK HAVE THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF   WALK? LABEL SIDEWALK AS SUCH AND PROVIDE DETAIL.           36. [SATISFIED] SIZE OF OUTFALL PIPE SHOWN ON THE   CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS CALLED   OUT ON THE PGD PLAN. JUSTIFY ANY OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETER   LARGER THAN 15 INCH.       37. [SATISFIED]SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE   ADDRESSED WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):   A. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET   PROTECTION.   B. IDENTIFY WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED (ONSITE   AND WITHIN R/W)   C. MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUT OF THE   R/W.       NEW COMMENTS (7/19/2024)   38. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, SHOW THE CURBING   ON THE OTHER SIDE OF STATE STREET AND GRANT STREET.       39. CONFIRM SIZE OF EXISTING WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET   IS 8?.       40. LABEL SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES   ON STATE STREET, TAMARIND AVE AND GRANT STREET.       41. SHARROW STRIPING DETAIL TO BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. BIKE STRIPING TO BE IN   ACCORDANCE WITH CWPB STANDARD DETAILS AND MUTCD.   PROPERLY SHOW WHERE THE MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ARE TO BE   PLACED.           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-27-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 04-27-2022 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 04-27-2022 Time 15:36 Sent To   Notes 2022-04-27 15:36:17 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   3/24/2022 SUBMITTAL:       1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF   WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.       2. [NOT SATISFIED] PROJECT SITE ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP   IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS   ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE.       3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING   WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.       4. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING   DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - ADD   FLOW ARROWS FOR THE AREAS AROUND THE BUILDING.       5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW   COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:   A. BUILDING TO EACH R/W CENTERLINE   B. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY   C. FROM GRANT ST CENTERLINE TO PARKING LOT   D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.   E. BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS       LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND   GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR   CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM   PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED   PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.       6. {PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING   LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - THE   EXISTING WATER SERVICE ON GRANT STREET MAY NEED TO BE   REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE WATER MAIN.       7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL   ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND   GUTTER WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD   AND PROVIDE ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: IF   SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER IS NOT BEING   CONSTRUCTED THEN DO NOT INCLUDE THE DETAIL FOR THE   ITEM.       8. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL   STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE   STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF   BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       9. [NOT SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL NOT   ENTER THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AT A CORNER OF THE   STRUCTURE.       10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR   SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.       11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING   DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF   ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES   IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE   PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.       12. [NOT SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT   EACH END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO   FACILITATE ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.   ADDITIONAL COMMENT - INCREASE THE ANGLE OF THE END   CURBING FROM 16 DEGREES FROM PERPENDICULAR TO 45   DEGREES FROM PERPENDICULAR AT BOTH ENDS OF THE PARKING   AREA ON GRANT STREET.       13. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM   IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988   AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE   PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO   NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.       14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB   AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT -   SHOW THE LINEWORK FOR THE PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER ON   GRANT ST. LABELED THE PROPOSED CURBING CREATED FOR THE   ON-STREET PARKING. USE DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/WEIGHT   BETWEEN EXISTING CURBING AND PROPOSED CURBING.       15. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT   DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       16. [SATISFIED] EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE SIDEWALK   AND PARKING ON GRANT ST.       17. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE - SIDEWALK AREA NOT BEING   MODIFIED FOR PARKING ON N. TAMARIND AVE] REVIEW   AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE ARV TO DETERMINE IF THE   STRUCTURE CAN BE MODIFIED TO LOWER THE RIM TO PROPOSED   GRADE.       18. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLANS.       NEW COMMENTS:       19. REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT STANDARD   PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING   SHEETS.       20. SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT A DETAIL NO. 4 ON SHEET SP-3.   SHEET SP-3 DOES NOT HAVE A DETAIL NO. 4.       21. REMOVE THE HATCHING FOR THE PROPOSED R/W   ABANDONMENT AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.       22. PROVIDE THE EXISTING INVERT ELEVATION OF THE   DRAINAGE STRUCTURE THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL CONNECT TO.       23. LIST THE WEIR ELEVATION WITH THE INFORMATION FOR   STRUCTURE S-102.       24. CONFIRM THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT VERTICAL CLEARANCE   BETWEEN THE PROPOSED 15 INCH RCP OUTFALL PIPE AND 6   INCH SANITARY SEWER LATERAL.       25. CAN S-102 AND S-101 SHIFT TO THE NORTH, AWAY FROM   THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE ANGLE OF   THE OUTFALL PIPE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING INLET.       26. SHOW THE 2-FT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG AT THE END OF THE   PARKING SPACES.       27. SHOW CONCRETE FOR THE DRIVEWAY APRON AND SIDEWALK   WITHIN THE R/W.       28. SHOW WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET IN THE CORRECT   LOCATION. SHOW THE VALVES FROM THE SURVEY.       29. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:   A. PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE AREAS.   B. SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGNS FOR STATE STREET AND FOR   GRANT STREET.   C. MOVE STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN FOR PARKING LOT TO   BEHIND THE SIDEWALK.   D. REMOVE REFERENCE TO CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH LAND   DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM NOTES.   E. REFERENCE THE CWPB TYPICAL 90 DEGREE PARKING STALL   DETAIL.   F. TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT FOR WEST EDGE OF PARKING LOT   BUT THIS CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PGD PLAN.   G. TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT ACROSS SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE   OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.       30. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)   A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.   B. ADD STREET NAME TO PUBLIC R/W.   C. SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED R/W ? PROPERTY   LINES AND THE WIDTH BETWEEN THE TWO.   D. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK WIDTH IN THE PUBLIC R/W,   PROVIDE THE DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO THE   PROPOSED R/W LINE, DISTANCE FROM PROPOSED R/W TO FACE   OF BUILDING.   E. SHOW AND DIMENSION PATIO IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING.       31. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)   A. SHOW, CALLOUT AND DIMENSION PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER,   PARKING AREA, CURBING BETWEEN PARKING AND SIDEWALK AND   SIDEWALK.   B. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM GRANT STREET CENTERLINE TO   PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER.   C. ADD STREET NAME TO PUBLIC R/W   D. EXTEND SECTION TO INCLUDE PART OF THE PARKING LOT.       32. SECTION C (SHEET C3.2)   A. PARKING LOT GRADE DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON   THE PGD PLAN.   B. SHOW PROPOSED FENCE   C. TYPE D CURB SHOWN ON THE SECTION BUT NOT SHOWN ON   THE PGD PLAN.   D. EXTEND SECTION TO WEST FACE OF THE BUILDING. SHOW   GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS, ETC.   E. VALLEY GUTTER CALLED OUT FOR PARKING AREA.       33. SECTION D (SHEET C3.2)   A. DETAIL SHOULD MATCH PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.   B. PROVIDE DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO R/W   C. ADD STREET NAME TO PUBLIC R/W.   D. GRADES DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH PGD PLAN.       34. PROVIDE SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF STATE STREET TO   SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW GROUND FEATURES, SURFACE   SLOPE DIRECTIONS, GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS, STREET   NAME, ETC.       35. PROVIDE SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF GRANT STREET TO   NORTH FACE OF THE BUILDING, OUTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED   ON-STREET PARKING. SHOW AND LABEL GROUND FEATURES,   SURFACE SLOPE DIRECTIONS, GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS,   STREET NAME, ETC.       36. SIZE OF OUTFALL PIPE SHOWN ON THE CONTROL STRUCTURE   DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS CALLED OUT ON THE PGD   PLAN. JUSTIFY ANY OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETER LARGER THAN 15   INCH.       37. . SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE ADDRESSED   WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):   A. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET   PROTECTION.   B. IDENTIFY WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED (ONSITE   AND WITHIN R/W)   C. MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUT OF THE   R/W.           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:53 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:54 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-13 12:54:09 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON?) ON   COVER.   2. PROJECT SITE ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP IS SHOWN ON THE   EAST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS ON THE WEST SIDE   OF TAMARIND AVE.   3. CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING WITH   EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.   4. PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF SURFACE   RUNOFF.   5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:   A. BUILDING TO EACH R/W CENTERLINE   B. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY   C. FROM GRANT ST CENTERLINE TO PARKING LOT   D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.   E. BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS       LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND   GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR   CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM   PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED   PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.   6. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS.   7. IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE   THE SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE   CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE   ENGLISH UNITS.   8. LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE WILL BE   LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE STRUCTURE. NOTE THE   CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH   EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.   9. CONFIRM THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL NOT ENTER THE EXISTING   STRUCTURE AT A CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE.   10. PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN   AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.   11. PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING DIMENSIONS IN   SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE   CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES IS 22 FEET. THE   SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE PARKING SPACES   ON TAMARIND AVE.   12. CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH END OF   PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE ACCESS   TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.   13. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE   CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE   CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION   IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929   CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.   14. LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB AND GUTTER IN THE   RIGHT OF WAY.   15. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN   LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.   16. EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE SIDEWALK AND PARKING   ON GRANT ST.   17. REVIEW AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE ARV TO DETERMINE   IF THE STRUCTURE CAN BE MODIFIED TO LOWER THE RIM TO   PROPOSED GRADE.   18. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP   CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH   THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF   CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED.       3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH DETAILS.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-27-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 09-27-2022 Time 09:42 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-09-27 09:42:37 PASSED WITH CONDITION OF REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 04-26-2022 Time 07:04 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-04-26 07:30:39 1. THERE ARE 3 METERS SHOWN ON SURVEY THAT ARE NOT   ADDRESSED.   2. ADD PROPOSED UTILITIES TO LANDSCAPE PLAN.   3. ADJACENT SIDEWALKS WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED.   4. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR   IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING IN THE R/W. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-10-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 01-10-2022 Time 09:50 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-10 09:54:45 1. REVISE SURVEY AND ALL PLANS TO SHOW MAINTENANCE MAP   RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 11/94.   2. MASTER METER MAY BE REQUIRED. METER BANK CONFLICTS   WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.   3. CHANGE LINE WEIGHT OF PROPERTY LINE FOR BETTER   DELINEATION. DIVIDE CONCEPTUAL PLAN INTO SEPARATE P&G   AND W&S PLANS.   4. NEED TO SEE CROSS-SECTIONS ON ALL SIDES DUE TO GRADE   DIFFERENCES.   5. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED/SEALED.   6. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO ALL PLANS.   7. REPLAT MAY BE REQUIRED.   8. CIVIL PLANS ALMOST ILLEGIBLE.     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-12-07 18:36:41 APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:   1) THE NEWLY PROPOSED PARKING STALL AREA ALONG GRANT ST   MUST BE LOCATED 20-FEET FROM THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN   CROSSWALK BY THE TAMARIND INTERSECTION, PER FDOT   REGULATIONS. PLEASE SHOW SUCH MINIMUM DISTANCE ON THE   SITE PLAN   2) PROVIDE BUSH SHELTER DETAILS AND OBTAIN APPROVAL   FROM PALM TRAN BY COORDINATING WITH YASH NAGAL   ([email protected]). PLEASE COPY ENGINEERING SERVICES   IN THE CORRESPONDENCE       PREVIOUS COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. LATEST SUBMISSION   DID NOT CONTAIN A TRAFFIC STUDY   2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. LETTER WAS NOT   PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION   3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING   PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING   STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND   EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE   INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).   4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A   SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS   WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES???   PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED,   ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN   ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS   SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED   OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT   MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK   FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.   8) NOT APPLICABLE. PROVIDE AN UPGRADED BUS STOP,   INCLUSIVE OF A SHELTER. THE PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THE   WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND SHALL BE CONVERTED TO A BUS   PULL-OVER AREA   9) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE ABANDONMENT ALONG TAMARIND AVE   AND CONSIDERING THE PRESENCE OF A BUS STOP, USE PORTION   OF THE AVAILABLE GREEN AREA TO EXPAND THE SIDEWALK TO   10 FEET WIDE. PLEASE ELABORATE THE RESPONSE ON THIS   MATTER, AS LATEST ONE IS UNCLEAR   10) SITE PLANS DO NOT MATCH CIVIL PLANS WITH RESPECT TO   THE ABANDONMENT AREA   11) SATISFIED. IS THE BUS STOP BEING RELOCATED?   12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE   ABANDONED AREA. ARE PARKING STALLS BEING ESTABLISHED?   OR IS IT A BUS PULLOVER BAY?   13) SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET SIDEWALK SHALL BE   ESTABLISHED AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FRONTAGE.   PLEASE INDICATE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER   SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE, PROPERLY DIMENSIONED.   14) SATISFIED. PLACE A SHELTER AT THE BUS STOP       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-08-09 23:46:18 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. LATEST SUBMISSION   DID NOT CONTAIN A TRAFFIC STUDY   2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. LETTER WAS   NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION   3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING   PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING   STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND   EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE   INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).   4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A   SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS   WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES?   PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED,   ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN   ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS   SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED   OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT   MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK   FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.   8) NOT APPLICABLE. PROVIDE AN UPGRADED BUS STOP,   INCLUSIVE OF A SHELTER. THE PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THE   WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND SHALL BE CONVERTED TO A BUS   PULL-OVER AREA   9) NOT SATISFIED. GIVEN THE ABANDONMENT ALONG TAMARIND   AVE AND CONSIDERING THE PRESENCE OF A BUS STOP, USE   PORTION OF THE AVAILABLE GREEN AREA TO EXPAND THE   SIDEWALK TO 10 FEET WIDE. PLEASE ELABORATE THE RESPONSE   ON THIS MATTER, AS LATEST ONE IS UNCLEAR   10) SITE PLANS DO NOT MATCH CIVIL PLANS WITH RESPECT TO   THE ABANDONMENT AREA   11) IS THE BUS STOP BEING RELOCATED?   12) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE ABANDONED AREA. ARE PARKING   STALLS BEING ESTABLISHED? OR IS IT A BUS PULLOVER BAY?   13) A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK SHALL BE   ESTABLISHED AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FRONTAGE.   PLEASE INDICATE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER   SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE, PROPERLY DIMENSIONED       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-15-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 04-15-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-04-15 16:27:16 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. LATEST   SUBMISSION DID NOT CONTAIN A TRAFFIC STUDY   2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING   PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING   STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND   EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE   INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).   4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A   SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS   WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES PATH   AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED, ENGINEERING   SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN ACCEPTABLE   ANALYSIS.   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS   SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED   OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT   MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK   FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.   8) NOT APPLICABLE. PROVIDE AN UPGRADED BUS STOP,   INCLUSIVE OF A SHELTER. THE PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THE   WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND SHALL BE CONVERTED TO A BUS   PULL-OVER AREA   9) GIVEN THE ABANDONMENT ALONG TAMARIND AVE AND   CONSIDERING THE PRESENCE OF A BUS STOP, USE PORTION OF   THE AVAILABLE GREEN AREA TO EXPAND THE SIDEWALK TO 10   FEET WIDE.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-06-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 01-06-2022 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-06 20:16:21 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY   2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   SITE COMMENTS   3) PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING PROPOSED   TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,   SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT   WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE   SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).   4) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS   (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.   PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER   SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   5) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR   SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY   DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE   FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.   6) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA   AND BICYCLE ONES   7) THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS SHARED BICYCLE   LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF MISSING OR NEEDED,   PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS   ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK FRONTING   THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   8) PROVIDE AN UPGRADED BUS STOP, INCLUSIVE OF A   SHELTER. THE PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THE WEST SIDE OF   TAMARIND SHALL BE DEDICATED TO A BUS PULL-OVER AREA       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]                     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 13:00 Sent To   Notes 2022-12-07 13:00:51 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW   ________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 12.07.2022   PROJECT NO.: Z21120021 AND Z21120016   CASE NO.: ISPR 21-16 AND PB 1907   ________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY   SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES   WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC   CONCURRENCY).       2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -   APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION   SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM   BEACH COUNTY.       3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -   EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY   COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE   PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS   OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE   SERVICES.       4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE   RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE   COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].       5. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE   REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK   WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE   ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:       5.1. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE   REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS   EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,   SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY   ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ   INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.       5.1.1 SATISFIED - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT   ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,   LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.       5.1.2. SATISFIED - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND   WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN   (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).       5.2.. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED   ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER   ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL   ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.       5.3. SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING   TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP   UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY.       6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT   THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5   FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT   TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.       7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE   ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT   IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.   ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND   CONSISTENT.       8. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL) - THE   RELOCATION OF THE BUS STOP SHALL BE APPROVED BY PALM   TRAN AND THE CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL   WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.       10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL   WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM   THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A   DETAIL.       11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL   WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A   DETAIL/NOTE.       12. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING   DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.       13. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A) THE   MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK IS 10 FEET; THE PROPOSED BUILDING   ONLY COMPLIES IF THE PROPOSED ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED.       14. SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.       15. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPARTMENT) - THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW   ON-STREET PARKING IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE   CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       16. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF   THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF   ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).       17. SATISFIED - THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE DUMPSTER   ENCLOSURE APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND NOT   PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE AN   AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.       17.1 SATISFIED - TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.   PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH A CROSS-HATCH   INDICATING "NO PARKING".       18. SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN   ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.       18.1 SATISFIED - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE A   MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24   INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE   RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES   BETWEEN THE RACKS.       19. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,   FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,   DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.       20. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT   CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.       21. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE   DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;   SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A   SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.       22. SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY   TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE   INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN   THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF   18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.       23. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG   THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE   ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].       24. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH   THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS   THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.       25. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,   ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.   PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL   NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.       26. SATISFIED - IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY FOR   RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE PETITIONER PAY TO   THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON OBTAINING THE   APPRAISAL, ETC.       27. SATISFIED - THE LEFT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE   IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM STATE STREET.       28. SATISFIED - THE SCALE ON THE SITE PLAN IS   INCORRECT.       29. SATISFIED - THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO   HAVE INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY AND EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM   BUILDING HEIGHT. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231, THE MAXIMUM   HEIGHT WITHIN THE CP-NC ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET,   WITH AN ADDITIONAL 10% ALLOWED FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS,   PARAPETS, ETC.   ________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   TTY: 800.955.8771   E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 04-26-2022 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 04-26-2022 Time 15:33 Sent To   Notes 2022-04-26 15:33:40 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW   ________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 04.26.2022   PROJECT NO.: Z21120021 AND Z21120016   CASE NO.: ISPR 21-16 AND PB 1907   ________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY   SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES   WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC   CONCURRENCY).       2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -   APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION   SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM   BEACH COUNTY.       3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -   EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY   COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE   PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS   OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE   SERVICES.       4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE   RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE   COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].       5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH   THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE   ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:       5.1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS   EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,   SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY   ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ   INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.       5.1.1 NEW COMMENT - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT   ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,   LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.       5.1.2. NEW COMMENT - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND   WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN   (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).       5.2.. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED   ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER   ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL   ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.       5.3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL   UNITS FACING TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ   AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING   THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.       6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT   THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5   FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT   TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.       7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE   ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT   IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.   ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND   CONSISTENT.       8. NO LONGER APPLICABLE - THE RELOCATION OF THE BUS   STOP SHALL BE APPROVED BY PALM TRAN AND THE CITY?S   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL   WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.       10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL   WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM   THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A   DETAIL.       11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL   WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A   DETAIL/NOTE.       12. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING   DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.       13. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE ROW   ABANDONMENT) - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A) THE   MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK IS 10 FEET; THE PROPOSED BUILDING   ONLY COMPLIES IF THE PROPOSED ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED.       14. NOT SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.       15. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPARTMENT) - THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW   ON-STREET PARKING IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE   CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       16. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF   THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF   ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).       17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE   DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER   AND NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE   AN AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.       17.1 NEW COMMENT - TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.   PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH A CROSS-HATCH   INDICATING "NO PARKING".       18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE   PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE   ALL LOCATIONS.       18.1 NEW COMMENT - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE   A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24   INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE   RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES   BETWEEN THE RACKS.       19. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,   FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,   DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.       20. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT   CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.       21. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE   DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;   SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A   SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.       22. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY   TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE   INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN   THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF   18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.       23. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG   THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE   ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].       24. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION   THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE,   ETC. AS THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.       25. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,   ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.   PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL   NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.       26. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF APPRAISED VALUE   UPON APPROVAL BY CITY COMMISSION) - IT IS THE CITY?S   POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE   PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON   OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.       27. NEW COMMENT - THE LEFT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER   ENCLOSURE IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM   STATE STREET.       28. NEW COMMENT - THE SCALE ON THE SITE PLAN IS   INCORRECT.       29. NEW COMMENT - THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO   HAVE INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY AND EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM   BUILDING HEIGHT. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231, THE MAXIMUM   HEIGHT WITHIN THE CP-NC ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET,   WITH AN ADDITIONAL 10% ALLOWED FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS,   PARAPETS, ETC.   ________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:       A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL   DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.       B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE   PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.       C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE   ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE   CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL   REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.   ________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   TTY: 800.955.8771   E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:25 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:25 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-13 11:27:30 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW   ________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2022   PROJECT NO.: Z21120021 AND Z21120016   CASE NO.: ISPR 21-16 AND PB 1907   ________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE   PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE   TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC   CONCURRENCY).       2. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION   SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM   BEACH COUNTY.       3. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED   INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH   INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR   ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.       4. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES   INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH   THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE   [SEC. 94-35(C)].       5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE   VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS   INCLUDE:       6. ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE   STYLES, OR VARIATIONS, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL   OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE   CORRIDOR AND READ INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.       7. ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED ON THE   SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER   ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL   ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.       8. GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING TAMARIND   AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH   THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.       9. PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT THE PROPERTY   LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN   MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL   ZONING DISTRICT.       10. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE ABANDONED   SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT IS   DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.   ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND   CONSISTENT.       11. THE RELOCATION OF THE BUS STOP SHALL BE APPROVED BY   PALM TRAN AND THE CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT.       12. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE   VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.       13. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE   RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE   OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.       14. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE   OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE.       15. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING DOORS ARE   ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.       16. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A) THE MINIMUM FRONT   SETBACK IS 10 FEET; THE PROPOSED BUILDING ONLY COMPLIES   IF THE PROPOSED ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED.       17. THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.       18. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET PARKING IS   SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       19. PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE   PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF   ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).       20. THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE   APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND NOT PROVIDE   SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTO-TURN   ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.       21. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE   WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.       22. ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS, FENCES, ETC. IF   RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED, DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS   NEED TO BE PROVIDED.       23. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE   CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.       24. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, IT   LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK; SUCH   MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A   SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.       25. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (AS   DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF   THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY   TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND   8 FEET.       26. SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE WEST   PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE ADJACENT   RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].       27. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE ENTIRE   SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS THE   PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.       28. ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, ETC. NEED   TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN. PURSUANT   TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL NOT   EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.       29. IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY   ABANDONMENTS THAT THE PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE   APPRAISED VALUE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE   WITH VINCE NOEL ON OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.   ________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:       A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL   DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.       B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE   PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.       C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE   ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE   CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL   REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.   ________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   TTY: 800.955.8771   E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved