Plan Review Details - Project Z21120020
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21120020
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 08-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 08-05-2022 Time 11:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 08-05-2022 Time 11:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 18:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 18:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-12 18:42:16DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 04-01-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 04-01-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-01 13:28:46Z21120020, 0015 - RESUB 3.24.22
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF
 CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.
 4. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 6. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 1. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW
 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,
 STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND
 OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL
 AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE
 AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 7. PLEASE CLOUD/HIGHLIGHT PLAN REVISIONS OR CHANGES IN
 SCOPE FOR RESUBMITTAL OF DRAWINGS.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP
 UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY
 LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED
 UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL
 BACKFLOWS.
 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO
 NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE
 CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT.
 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT
 OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY
 ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.
 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY
 INFRASTRUCTURE IS PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT
 SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF
 ADJACENT PARCELS.
 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER
 INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT
 PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL
 GC-8.
 20. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -RESPONSE LETTER DOES NOT CONTAIN REVIEW COMMENTS FROM
 FIRST SUBMISSION. PLEASE RESUBMIT RESPONSE LETTER WITH
 ALL COMMENTS AND RESPONSES.
  
 -ON CIVIL PLANS, PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE NUMBERED
 STREET NAME WITH TAFT AVENUE. MAPS I AM ACCESSING DO
 NOT REFER TO IT AS TAFT.
  
 -ARE VEHICLES TRAVELING WEST ON 19TH ST ALLOWED TO MAKE
 U TURN AFTER MEDIAN INTO THE DRIVEWAY. IF SO, WILL
 LARGER VEHICLES BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT MANEUVER?
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL LOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION METERED
 WATER SERVICE. ALSO SHOW AND LABEL RP BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
 FOR IT.
  
 -WATER PLAN AND SITE PLAN HAVE RECTANGULAR OBJECT
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICES. VERIFY IF THAT IS
 CORRECT.
  
 -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT IDENTIFY THE DRIVEWAY APPROACH
 CONVERSION TO PARKWAY AND CURB NEAR THE WATER SERVICES.
  
 -PROPOSED WATER METER IS ENCROACHING IN SIDEWALK.
  
 -ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO LABEL OF 4 INCH METER.
  
 -ADD STANDARD DETAIL FOR LARGE ABOVE GROUND WATER METER
 AND FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
  
 -FOOTPRINT OF 4 INCH METER AND PIPING MAY BE LARGER
 THAN SHOWN ON WATER PLAN.
  
 -PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE RECOMMENDED ON
 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING
 BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
  
 -DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD NOT BE INSIDE
 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 -LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW UTILITIES. PLEASE ENSURE
 NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND PROPOSED TREES. ADD
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE AND ROOT BARRIERS AS NEEDED.
  
 -ADD DEMO PLAN IF THERE WILL BE DEMOLITION.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 08:23:39COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -GEO REPORT SAYS GFA SHOULD BE REQUESTED TO REVIEW DATA
 TO SEE IF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE VALID. WILL APPLICANT
 FOLLOWUP WITH THEM ONCE BUILDING DETAILS ARE FINALIZED?
  
 -SUBMIT DEMO PLAN IF THERE WILL BE DEMOLITION.
  
 -PLANS DO NOT SHOW WHAT WILL BE HAPPENING TO EXISTING
 CURB CUT DRIVEWAYS ON TAMARIND AND 19TH ST.
  
 -PLANS SAY THAT THERE IS A COVERED SIDEWALK, BUT COULD
 NOT DETERMINE HOW. IS THERE A PROJECTION OFF THE
 BUILDING OR A STANDALONE COVERING?
  
 -SITE PLAN SHOWS SOMETHING THAT LOOKS LIKE LANDSCAPING
 PLANTS IN MIDDLE OF PARKING LOT DRIVING AREA.
  
 -SIDEWALK EASEMENT OR AGREEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON 19TH ST.
  
 -GREASE TRAPS/INTERCEPTORS MAY BE REQUIRED IF THE
 RETAIL UNIT HAS FOOD SERVICE.
  
 -PLANS DESCRIBED FIRE SPRINKLERS. FIRE SPRINKLERS
 CANNOT BE FED FROM DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES. WOULD NEED
 AT LEAST ONE DEDICATED FIRE SERVICE WITH DETECTOR
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THOSE REQUIRE UTILITY BILLING
 ACCOUNTS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL
 CLEANOUTS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL UTILITY EASEMENT FOR METERED WATER
 SERVICES ON PROPERTY.
  
 -WATER DESIGN IS NONSTANDARD AND MAY REQUIRE REVISION
 AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 -RETAIL AND IRRIGATION METERED WATER SERVICES WOULD
 NEED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON
 PLANS. ALSO ANY METERED WATER SERVICE FEEDING MULTIPLE
 DWELLING UNITS WOULD NEED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AS WELL.
  
 -CIVIL PLANS SHOWS 10 WATER METERS (9 DOMESTIC AND 1
 IRRIGATION), BUT THERE ARE 12 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
 UNITS AND A RETAIL SPACE. PLEASE DETAIL BETTER HOW THE
 METERS ARE GOING TO BE USED.
  
 -PAVEMENT RESTORATION WILL BE NEEDED ON 19TH ST DUE TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WORK.
  
 -SITE PLANS SHOW PROPOSED PARKING ON 19TH ST, BUT NOT
 DEPICTED ON CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLAN SETS
 MATCH AND UPDATE AS NEEDED.
  
 -CIVIL PLANS SHOWS A LARGE UTILITY POLE IN PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON 19TH ST.
  
 -CHECK SIDEWALK DESIGN AND LABELING ON CIVIL PLANS.
 THEY ARE DIFFICULT TO DISTINGUISH AND DO NOT SEEM TO
 MATCH SITE PLANS.
  
 -LANDSCAPE PLAN IS MISSING FROM SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
 PLEASE SUBMIT AND ENSURE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES.
  
 -UNUSED EXISTING WATER SERVICES FOR PROPERTY MAY
 REQUIRE REMOVAL.
  
 -SOME SIDEWALKS MAY REQUIRE REPLACEMENT DUE TO
 PROJECT?S UTILITY WORK.
  
 -SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT ON ENGINEERING
 PLAN.
  
 -19TH ST CURRENTLY HAS ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK ON NORTH
 SIDE OF PROPERTY. PLEASE VERIFY IT WILL STILL REMAIN
 USABLE AFTER PROJECT AND WILL NOT HAVE RAISED CURBING
 AT SIDES OF DRIVEWAY APPROACH.
  
 -NORTHWEST AREA OF DRIVEWAY MAY CONFLICT WITH
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTY DRIVEWAY. IT ALSO EXTENDS PAST
 WESTERN PROPERTY LINE.
  
 -ARE VEHICLES TRAVELING WEST ON 19TH ST ALLOWED TO MAKE
 U TURN AFTER MEDIAN INTO THE DRIVEWAY. IF SO, WILL
 LARGER VEHICLES BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT MANEUVER?
  
 -BBQ AREA LOOKS DIFFERENTLY DESIGNED ON CIVIL PLANS AND
 SITE PLAN. PLEASE MAKE SURE DESIGN MATCHES ON ALL PLANS
 AND UPDATE AS NECESSARY.
  
 -WILL THERE BE CURBING BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND BBQ
 AREA?
  
 -HOW WILL THE IRRIGATION UTILITY BILL BE HANDLED? WILL
 THERE BE AN HOA OR PROPERTY MANAGER?
  
 -THE ROW VACATION APPLICATION DOES NOT HAVE THE WRITTEN
 VERIFICATION FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES THAT THERE ARE
 NO CONFLICTS. PLEASE SUBMIT.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:19 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 15:19:18FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time 10:10 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-04 10:10:58FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time 13:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-04 13:45:09THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL
 BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED
 WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-17 11:44:34FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1004 19TH ST. Z21120020
 NOVEMBER 17, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
  
 ??? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE
 CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION
 DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER
 MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND
 ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ALL TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED MUST SHOW THE CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES 1 (300 SQ FT), 5 (300 SQ FT), 6
 (300 SQ FT), 7 (300 SQ FT), 8 (300 SQ FT), MUST BE
 SHOWN. INCLUDE 2 (707 SQ FT) AND 3 (314 SQ FT)
 SABAL PALM #9 IS IN GOOD CONDITION SO IS REQUIRED TO BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 TOTAL WILL BE 2521 SQ FT.
  
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 8 PIGEON PLUM- 8 X150 =1200
 7 LIVE OAK- 7 X300 = 2100
 5 WILD TAMARIND- 5X 300 = 1500
 7 PINK TAB- 7 X 150= 1050
 TOTAL IS 5850 SQ FT. SHOW ON TD-1.
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 40%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE
 ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED
 TREES.
 8/8/22 CONFLICTS WITH SEWER LINES ALONG TAMARIND.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND
 VALVES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 11:54 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-08 11:54:43FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1004 19TH ST. Z21120020
 AUGUST 8, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
  
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR
 EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN
 DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ALL TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED MUST SHOW THE CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES 1 (300 SQ FT), 5 (300 SQ FT), 6
 (300 SQ FT), 7 (300 SQ FT), 8 (300 SQ FT), MUST BE
 SHOWN. INCLUDE 2 (707 SQ FT) AND 3 (314 SQ FT)
 SABAL PALM #9 IS IN GOOD CONDITION SO IS REQUIRED TO BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
 TOTAL WILL BE 2521 SQ FT.
  
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 8 PIGEON PLUM- 8 X150 =1200
 7 LIVE OAK- 7 X300 = 2100
 5 WILD TAMARIND- 5X 300 = 1500
 7 PINK TAB- 7 X 150= 1050
 TOTAL IS 5850 SQ FT. SHOW ON TD-1.
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 40%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY
 LINES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE
 ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED
 TREES.
 8/8/22 CONFLICTS WITH SEWER LINES ALONG TAMARIND.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:
  
 14. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 18:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 18:33 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-05 18:34:12FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1004 19TH ST. Z21120020
 APRIL 5, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR
 EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN
 DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2.,
 PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE
 ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED
 TREES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-12 13:38:28FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1004 19TH ST. Z21120020
 JANUARY 12, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHOWING THE
 LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE CANOPY
 DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE.
 TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER MUST
 HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND ENTERED
 ON THE CHART.
 ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED
 BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION FOR ALL
 TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE SITE
 BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B.
 PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN SPACE BASED ON
 THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE MULTIFAMILY TREE
 REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
 PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A
 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED
 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE
 THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE
 PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUILDING.
  
 7. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT
 LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF
 PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS
 FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW
 THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM
 OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA
 NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE
 CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT
 EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
 WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL
 PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED
 ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES INCLUDING
 WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 12. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT WILL
 LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE
 GUIDELINES.
  
 13. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL
 IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 01-05-2022 Time 16:56 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-05 16:56:55-PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS.
 - SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES ON TAMARIND.
 - REPLACE/LINE EXISTING LATERALS AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE
 POST CCTV FOOTAGE.
 -ADD NOTE TO CUT AND CAP EXISTING DOUBLE WATER METER AT
 MAIN.
 -CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING 6? LATERAL IS SUFFICIENT FOR
 PROPOSED FLOW. REFERENCE DOUBLE SERVICE DETAIL.
 -TELEVISE AND CONFIRM CONDITION OF EXISTING LATERALS
 AND VERIFY THAT IT IS ADEQUATE.
 -SHOW PROFILE OF 4? CONNECTION FROM TAP TO POINT OF
 SERVICE.
 -SHOW EXISTING VALVES.
 -CUSTOMER SERVICE TO COMMENT ON MASTER METER VS
 INDIVIDUAL METER.
 -TELEVISE EXISTING UTILITY FRONTING PROPERTY FROM
 MANHOLE TO MANHOLE.
 -SHOW PROPERTY LINE ON 19TH ST.
 -PLEASE UPSIZE THE 6? WM TO 8? WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.
 -MISSING LEVEL OF SERVICE CALC SHEET.
 - FOR STORMWATER STRUCTURES CALL OUT STATIONING AND
 HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UTILITIES
  
 CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-14 09:40:16NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-29-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-29 11:16:57PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED SHEET SP-2 TO REFLECT ALL THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCOSURE PER THE LATEST
 REVISION OF GC-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
 THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
 PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
 00).
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 09:53:06PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- REVISED LOCATION/ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE TO MINIMIZE BACKUPS AND SHORT RADUIS TURNS.
 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE'S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
  * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
  * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT
  * TURNING RADIUS:
  - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
  - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
  - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS.
 5- REVIESD ENCLOSURE DETAILS, SHEET SP-2, TO COMPLY
 WITH THE CG-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-7.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 09:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 09:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 09:37:27CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. PROVIDE A REFERENCE ELEVATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE
 SURVEY.
 2. CONFIRM RUNOFF FROM THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST SIDE
 OF THE BUILDING WILL FLOW TO AN ONSITE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURE.
 3. IN ORDER TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN THE SWALE ALONG THE
 SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, THE SIDES SHOULD BE SLOPED 4:1 OR
 FLATTER.
 4. IDENTIFY THE MATERIAL TO BE USED TO CONSTRUCT THE
 PATH FROM THE BUILDING TO THE TOT LOT.
 5. DRIVEWAY APRON WITHIN THE R/W TO BE COMPOSED OF
 CONCRETE.
 6. REMOVE THE CALLOUT OR DEFINE THE LIMITS OF THE
 COLORED STAMPED ASPHALT AS CALLED OUT ON SHEET C2.1.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
 NOT LISTED.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE MORE COMMENTS UNDER NEW
 COMMENTS BELOW.] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 E. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO PARKING LOT
 F. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
 10. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE 13 ON SHEET C2.1 STATES ALL
 SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ARE TO BE REPLACED.]
 PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND
 FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT -
 SHOW CONCRETE FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APRON WITHIN
 THE R/W. SIDEWALKS AT EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS TO BE
 REPLACED IF CROSS SLOPE EXCEEDS 2%.
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS (3/19/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 19. [NOT SATISFIED - PROVIDE ON ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL.] REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT
 STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND
 ENGINEERING SHEETS.
  
  
 25. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. [SATISFIED - STRIPING NEEDED AROUND THE MEDIAN
 ISLAND] PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE
 AREAS.
  
 26. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE
 REVISED SECTION A ON SHEET C3.2 IN 7/19 SUBMITTAL]
 SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)
 A. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK ALONG TAMARIND AVE APPEARS TO
 SHOW THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK.
 B. [SATISFIED] ADJUST HATCH PATTERN TO THE SPOT GRADE
 FOR THE EXISTING PROPERTY WEST OF THE WEST PROPERTY
 LINE.
 C. [SATISFIED] SPOT GRADE OF PARKING LOT DRIVE
 CENTERLINE LOWER THAN THE GRATE ELEVATIONS OF THE CATCH
 BASIN INLETS.
 D. [NOT SATISFIED] TOP OF CURB ELEVATION ALONG EAST
 SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT IS HIGHER THAN THE SIDEWALK
 ELEVATION ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
  
  
 27. {PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE
 REVISED SECTION B ON SHEET C3.2 IN 7/19/SUBMITTAL}
 SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? GRADING PLAN SHOWS NORTH
 SWALE BANK DESIGNED TO HAVE 2:1 (STEEP) SLOPE] PROVIDE
 SWALE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO KEEP RUNOFF FROM
 FLOWING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY.
 B. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK ON 19TH STREET APPEARS TO HAVE
 CURB ALONG THE FRONT OF THE SIDEWALK AND THICKENED EDGE
 ALONG THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. CALL THESE OUT ON THE
 SECTION AND PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK.
  
 31. SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE ADDRESSED
 WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 C. [SATISFIED] MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
 OUT OF THE R/W.
  
 NEW COMMENTS ON 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL:
 32. [SATISFIED] SHEET C2.1 SHOWS FLOW ARROW TOWARD
 ADJACENT PROPERTY. SURFACE RUNOFF MAY NOT FLOW ONTO
 ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  
 33. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW CONCRETE FOR DRIVEWAY WITHIN
 THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 34. [SATISFIED] RIM ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURE S-102
 SHOULD BE LOWER THAN THE BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION OF
 19TH STREET. RIM ELEVATION CALLED OUT AS 21.4 FT NAVD
 BUT PROPOSED SPOT GRADE IS 19.5 FT NAVD AT STRUCTURE.
  
 35. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR BBQ AND TOT LOT
 AREAS. THE EXISTING GRADES ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ARE
 3 FEET +/- LOWER THAN THE PROPOSED TOP OF CURB
 ELEVATION FOR THE PARKING LOT.
  
 36. [SATISFIED] CHECK THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK FROM
 THE HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE TO THE COVER WALKWAY ALONG
 THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THE SLOPE APPEARS TO
 EXCEED 5%.
  
 37. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL (INCLUDING SURFACE TREATMENT)
 THE PATH FROM THE COVERED WALKWAY TO THE TOT LOT.
  
 38. [ NOT APPLICABLE ??? MIDBLOCK CROSS WALK REMOVED
 FROM THE PLANS] CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP NUMBER FOR
 THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK.
  
 39. [NOT SATISFIED] BICYCLE STRIPING TO BE PER CWPB
 STANDARD DETAILS AND THE MUTCD. SHOW THE APPROPRIATE
 LOCATIONS OF THESE MARKINGS ON SHEET C2.3.
  
 40. [NOT APPLICABLE ??? CROSS WALK REMOVED FROM THE
 PLANS.]SHOW STRIPING AND SIGNAGE FOR MIDBLOCK
 CROSSWALK.
 NEW COMMENT (11-4-2022)
 41. SHEET C2.1 CALLS OUT COLORED STAMPED ASPHALT FOR
 THE ON-STREET PARKING ON TAMARIND AVE. SHOW THE EXTENT
 OF THE STAMPED ASPHALT. DEVELOPER MAY BE RESPONSIBLE TO
 MAINTAIN THE STAMPED ASPHALT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 15:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 15:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 15:20:44Z21120020 SITE D 1004 19TH ST.
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/19/2022 SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON) ON COVER.
  
 2. [SATISFIED ? AS BEST AS THEY CAN DO.] PROJECT SITE
 ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF
 TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND
 AVE.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE EXISTING POWER POLE WILL
 BE RELOCATED WHEN THE DRIVEWAY APRON IS CONSTRUCTED.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS AND
 INSTALL CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER. ADDITONAL COMMENT ?
 SPECIFY CURB TYPE FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] CIVIL SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE
 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE MORE COMMENTS UNDER NEW
 COMMENTS BELOW.] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 E. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO PARKING LOT
 F. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN
 THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - MILL AND RESURFACE
 LIMITS TO EXTEND FOR FULL TRAVEL LANE WIDTH.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
 PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE
 ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - SHOW ON THE PGD
 PLAN WHERE THE CURB WILL BE CONSTRUCTED.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHOW LIMITS OF SIDEWALK REMOVAL ON
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] PROVIDE HATCHING
 PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR
 NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - SHOW
 CONCRETE FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APRON WITHIN THE
 R/W. SIDEWALKS AT EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS TO BE
 REPLACED IF CROSS SLOPE EXCEEDS 2%.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING
 DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE
 PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH
 END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER
 WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAYS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - SEE
 COMMENT 5 ABOVE.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS (3/19/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 19. [NOT SATISFIED ? PROVIDE ON ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL.] REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT
 STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND
 ENGINEERING SHEETS.
  
 20. [SATISFIED] SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT A DETAIL NO. 4 ON
 SHEET SP-3. SHEET SP-3 DOES NOT HAVE A DETAIL NO. 4.
  
 21. [SATISFIED] LABEL 19TH STREET ON THE ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
  
 22. [SATISFIED] PRB WALLS MISLABELED FOR STRUCTURES
 S-101 AND S-102.
  
 23. {SATISFIED] CALLOUT COLORED STAMP ASPHALT FOR THE
 CROSSWALK ACROSS 19TH STREET.
  
 24. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST ADDING SPOT GRADES FOR HANDICAP
 PARKING SPACE. MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION FOR
 HANDICAP SPACE IS 2%.
  
 25. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? STRIPING NEEDED AROUND THE
 MEDIAN ISLAND] PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND
 RESURFACE AREAS.
 B. [SATISFIED] ADD RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN TO STOP SIGN IN
 PARKING LOT.
 C. [SATISFIED] STOP BAR MEASURES 12 FEET LONG ON THE 20
 FT WIDE DRIVEWAY. STOP BAR SHOULD EXTEND TO CURB.
 CONFIRM STOP BAR IS SUFFICIENT DISTANCE FROM SIDEWALK.
 D. [SATISFIED] REMOVE THE OUTLINE SYMBOLS FOR STOP BAR,
 LANE DIVIDER, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS IN THE PARKING LOT IF
 THEY ARE NOT NEEDED. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE CALLOUTS FOR
 THESE ITEMS.
 E. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SIGN AND STRIPING FOR TURNAROUND
 SPACE IN THE PARKING LOT.
 F. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGN FOR 19TH STREET.
  
 26. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE
 REVISED SECTION A ON SHEET C3.2 IN 7/19 SUBMITTAL]
 SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)
 A. SIDEWALK ALONG TAMARIND AVE APPEARS TO SHOW
 THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK.
 B. ADJUST HATCH PATTERN TO THE SPOT GRADE FOR THE
 EXISTING PROPERTY WEST OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE.
 C. SPOT GRADE OF PARKING LOT DRIVE CENTERLINE LOWER
 THAN THE GRATE ELEVATIONS OF THE CATCH BASIN INLETS.
 D. TOP OF CURB ELEVATION ALONG EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING
 LOT IS HIGHER THAN THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION ALONG THE
 WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
  
  
 27. {PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE
 REVISED SECTION B ON SHEET C3.2 IN 7/19/SUBMITTAL}
 SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. PROVIDE SWALE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO KEEP
 RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY.
 B. SIDEWALK ON 19TH STREET APPEARS TO HAVE CURB ALONG
 THE FRONT OF THE SIDEWALK AND THICKENED EDGE ALONG THE
 BACK OF SIDEWALK. CALL THESE OUT ON THE SECTION AND
 PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK.
 C. PROVIDE SWALE ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO PREVENT
 RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY.
  
 31. SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE ADDRESSED
 WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 A. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR
 INLET PROTECTION.
 B. [SATISFIED] IDENTIFY WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE
 PROTECTED (ONSITE AND WITHIN R/W)
 C. [NOT SATISFIED] MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION OUT
 OF THE R/W.
 D. [SATISFIED] DO NOT SHOW SIGNING AND STRIPING
 CALLOUTS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS ON 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL:
 32. SHEET C2.1 SHOWS FLOW ARROW TOWARD ADJACENT
 PROPERTY. SURFACE RUNOFF MAY NOT FLOW ONTO ADJACENT
 PROPERTY.
  
 33. SHOW CONCRETE FOR DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 34. RIM ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURE S-102 SHOULD BE LOWER
 THAN THE BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION OF 19TH STREET. RIM
 ELEVATION CALLED OUT AS 21.4 FT NAVD BUT PROPOSED SPOT
 GRADE IS 19.5 FT NAVD AT STRUCTURE.
  
 35. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR BBQ AND TOT LOT AREAS. THE
 EXISTING GRADES ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ARE 3 FEET +/-
 LOWER THAN THE PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION FOR THE
 PARKING LOT.
  
 36. CHECK THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK FROM THE HANDICAP
 ACCESS AISLE TO THE COVER WALKWAY ALONG THE WEST SIDE
 OF THE BUILDING. THE SLOPE APPEARS TO EXCEED 5%.
  
 37. LABEL (INCLUDING SURFACE TREATMENT) THE PATH FROM
 THE COVERED WALKWAY TO THE TOT LOT.
  
 38. CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP NUMBER FOR THE MIDBLOCK
 CROSSWALK.
  
 39. BICYCLE STRIPING TO BE PER CWPB STANDARD DETAILS
 AND THE MUTCD. SHOW THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS OF THESE
 MARKINGS ON SHEET C2.3.
  
 40. SHOW STRIPING AND SIGNAGE FOR MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-26-2022 Time 18:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-26-2022 Time 18:32 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-26 18:29:23THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVISW OF THE
 3/24/2022 SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] PROJECT SITE ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP
 IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS
 ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE EXISTING POWER POLE WILL
 BE RELOCATED WHEN THE DRIVEWAY APRON IS CONSTRUCTED.
  
 5. [NOT SATISFIED] REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS AND
 INSTALL CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] CIVIL SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE
 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE MORE COMMENTS UNDER NEW
 COMMENTS BELOW.] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 E. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO PARKING LOT
 F. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING
 LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - MILL
 AND RESURFACE LIMITS TO EXTEND FOR FULL TRAVEL LANE
 WIDTH.
  
 9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL
 ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND
 GUTTER WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD
 AND PROVIDE ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - SHOW ON
 THE PGD PLAN WHERE THE CURB WILL BE CONSTRUCTED.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR
 SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT - SHOW CONCRETE FOR THE PROPOSED
 DRIVEWAY APRON WITHIN THE R/W. SIDEWALKS AT EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY APRONS TO BE REPLACED IF CROSS SLOPE EXCEEDS
 2%.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING
 DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE
 PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH
 END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 16. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER
 WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAYS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - SEE
 COMMENT 5 ABOVE.
  
 17. [NOT SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 18. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 19. REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT STANDARD
 PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING
 SHEETS.
  
 20. SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT A DETAIL NO. 4 ON SHEET SP-3.
 SHEET SP-3 DOES NOT HAVE A DETAIL NO. 4.
  
 21. LABEL 19TH STREET ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 22. PRB WALLS MISLABELED FOR STRUCTURES S-101 AND
 S-102.
  
 23. CALLOUT COLORED STAMP ASPHALT FOR THE CROSSWALK
 ACROSS 19TH STREET.
  
 24. SUGGEST ADDING SPOT GRADES FOR HANDICAP PARKING
 SPACE. MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION FOR HANDICAP
 SPACE IS 2%.
  
 25. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE AREAS.
 B. ADD RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN TO STOP SIGN IN PARKING
 LOT.
 C. STOP BAR MEASURES 12 FEET LONG ON THE 20 FT WIDE
 DRIVEWAY. STOP BAR SHOULD EXTEND TO CURB. CONFIRM STOP
 BAR IS SUFFICIENT DISTANCE FROM SIDEWALK.
 D. REMOVE THE OUTLINE SYMBOLS FOR STOP BAR, LANE
 DIVIDER, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS IN THE PARKING LOT IF THEY
 ARE NOT NEEDED. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE CALLOUTS FOR THESE
 ITEMS.
 E. PROVIDE SIGN AND STRIPING FOR TURNAROUND SPACE IN
 THE PARKING LOT.
 F. SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGN FOR 19TH STREET.
  
 26. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. SHOW/LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES.
 C. ADD STREET NAME TO THE PUBLIC R/W.
 D. PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF
 BUILDING.
 E. SHOW AND DIMENSION PATIO.
  
 27. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. THIS SECTION DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS OCCURRING ALONG
 THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
  
 28. SECTION C (SHEET C3.2)
 A. SHOW PROPOSED FENCE.
 B. TYPE 'D' CURB SHOWN ON THE SECTION BUT IT IS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE PGD PLAN.
 C. EXTEND SECTION ACROSS THE PARKING LOT TO THE WEST
 FACE OF THE BUILDING. SHOW GRADE BREAKS AND DIMENSIONS.
  
 29. SECTION D (SHEET C3.2)
 A. ADD STREET NAME TO THE PUBLIC R/W.
 B. CALLOUT NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON/SIDEWALK.
 C. SHOW PAVEMENT FOR PARKING LOT.
 D. EXTEND SECTION TO CENTERLINE OF 19TH STREET. SHOW
 CURBED MEDIAN. DIMENSION PAVEMENT.
 E. VERIFY LISTED PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS.
  
 30. PROVIDE SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF 19TH STREET TO
 NORTH FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS,
 ETC.
  
 31. SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE ADDRESSED
 WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 A. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET
 PROTECTION.
 B. IDENTIFY WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED (ONSITE
 AND WITHIN R/W)
 C. MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION OUT OF THE R/W.
 D. DO NOT SHOW SIGNING AND STRIPING CALLOUTS.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 12:50:43THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON?) ON
 COVER.
 2. PROJECT SITE ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP IS SHOWN ON THE
 EAST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS ON THE WEST SIDE
 OF TAMARIND AVE.
 3. CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING WITH
 EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
 4. LABEL WHERE THE EXISTING POWER POLE WILL BE
 RELOCATED WHEN THE DRIVEWAY APRON IS CONSTRUCTED.
 5. REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRONS AND INSTALL CURB OR
 CURB AND GUTTER.
 6. CIVIL SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL
 SITE PLAN.
 7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 E. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO PARKING LOT
 F. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
 8. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS.
 9. IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE
 THE SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE
 ENGLISH UNITS.
 10. PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN
 AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
 11. PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING DIMENSIONS IN
 SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
 CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES IS 22 FEET. THE
 SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE PARKING SPACES
 ON TAMARIND AVE.
 12. CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH END OF
 PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE ACCESS
 TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
 15. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929
 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
 16. LABEL ANY NEW CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER WITHIN THE
 RIGHT OF WAYS.
 17. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN
 LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 18. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH DETAILS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-27-2022 Time 09:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-27 09:39:27PASSED WITH CONDITION OF REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-26-2022 Time 08:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-26 08:13:081. SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 2. WHERE IS RELOCATED IRRIGATION METER GOING?
 3. METER ON TAMARIND NOT SHOWN ON ENG. PLANS.
 4. RELOCATE CLEANOUT OUT OF SIDEWALK.
 5. ADJOINING SIDEWALKS NEED TO BE REPLACED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-10-2022 Time 09:00 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-10 09:18:151. REVISE SURVEY AND ALL PLANS TO SHOW MAINTENANCE MAP
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 11/94.
 2. MASTER METER MAY BE REQUIRED. METER BANK CONFLICTS
 WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
 3. CHANGE LINE WEIGHT OF PROPERTY LINE FOR BETTER
 DELINEATION. DIVIDE CONCEPTUAL PLAN INTO SEPARATE P&G
 AND W&S PLANS.
 4. NEED TO SEE CROSS-SECTIONS ON ALL SIDES DUE TO GRADE
 DIFFERENCES.
 5. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED/SEALED.
 6. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO ALL PLANS. CIVIL PLANS
 ALMOST ILLEGIBLE DUE TO OVER-WRITES.
 7. REPLAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-07 18:38:04APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
 1) PROPERLY ALIGN THE CROSS WALK JUST SOUTH OF 19TH ST
 ACROSS TAMARIND, SO TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO TAMARIND AVE
 AND LANDING WITHIN THE SIDEWALK AREAS ON BOTH SIDES.
 POTENTIAL MODIFICATION TO THE INTERSECTION SOUTH-WEST
 CORNER RAMP, AND TO THE PLANTER AREA ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE ROAD MAY BE REQUIRED
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED. PROVIDE COUNTY
 TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE. THE LATEST SUBMISSION DID
 NOT PROVIDE THE LETTER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND
 DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES???
 PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN
 ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. SP-1 IS PARTIALLY
 CUT-OUT, PLEASE RESUBMIT CORRECTED VERSION
 7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING, CONNECTING TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND PROPER CROSSWALK
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PLEASE REFER TO FDOT STANDARD PLANS
 INDEX 711-001. NOTE: IF A MIDBLOCK CROSSING MAY NOT BE
 PROVED FEASIBLE, DUE TO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO EXISTING
 SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY CONFIGURATION, INSTALL PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING ACROSS TAMARIND JUST SOUTH OF THE 19TH ST AND
 JUST NORTH OF THE GRANT ST INTERSECTIONS. CROSSWALK AT
 19TH ST IS NOT PROPERLY INSTALLED/ALIGNED WITH EXISTING
 SIDEWALK, AS IT CURRENTLY ENDS ON A TRAVEL LANE BY THE
 EASTERN LANDING
 9) SATISFIED. SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE
 AREA WIDTH MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN
 ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 23:28:381) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED.
 PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE. THE LATEST
 SUBMISSION DID NOT PROVIDE THE LETTER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND
 DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES?
 PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN
 ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. SP-1 IS PARTIALLY
 CUT-OUT, PLEASE RESUBMIT CORRECTED VERSION
 7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING,
 CONNECTING TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND PROPER CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS, PLEASE REFER TO FDOT STANDARD PLANS INDEX
 711-001. NOTE: IF A MIDBLOCK CROSSING MAY NOT BE PROVED
 FEASIBLE, DUE TO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO EXISTING
 SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY CONFIGURATION, INSTALL PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING ACROSS TAMARIND JUST SOUTH OF THE 19TH ST AND
 JUST NORTH OF THE GRANT ST INTERSECTIONS
 9) NOT SATISFIED. SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED
 WALKABLE AREA WIDTH MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE
 SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK
 MEASUREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-15-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-15-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-15 16:00:19 
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED.
 PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND
 DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES PATH
 AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN ACCEPTABLE
 ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. SP-1 IS PARTIALLY
 CUT-OUT, PLEASE RESUBMIT CORRECTED VERSION
 7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING, CONNECTING TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND PROPER CROSSWALK
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PLEASE REFER TO FDOT STANDARD PLANS
 INDEX 711-001. NOTE: IF A MIDBLOCK CROSSING MAY NOT BE
 PROVED FEASIBLE, DUE TO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO EXISTING
 SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY CONFIGURATION, INSTALL PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING ACROSS TAMARIND JUST SOUTH OF THE 19TH ST AND
 JUST NORTH OF THE GRANT ST INTERSECTIONS
 9) SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE AREA WIDTH
 MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY
 AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-06-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-06 20:17:29TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND
 DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS
 (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
 OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 6) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 7) THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS SHARED BICYCLE
 LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED OR MISSING,
 PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
 ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK FRONTING
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 8) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, CONNECTING
 TO THE 1980 N TAMARIND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 12:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 12:43 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-07 12:43:51PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 12.07.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120020 AND Z21120015
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-15 AND PB 1906
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY
 COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
 OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 SERVICES.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK
 WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. SATISFIED - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATE DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. SATISFIED - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING
 TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP
 UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. SATISFIED - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE
 ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT
 IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 12. SATISFIED - STAFF HAS CONCERN THAT THE PROPOSED
 RETAIL SPACE IS NOT OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PROVIDE FOR A
 VIABLE/LEASABLE SPACE FOR A TENANT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 INFORMATION INDICATING HOW THIS SPACE IS ENVISIONED TO
 BE UTILIZED AND LEASED SUCCESSFULLY.
  
 13. SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 14. SATISFIED - THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET
 PARKING IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 14.1. SATISFIED - ONLY FIVE (5) OF THE PARKING SPACES
 ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE CAN BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE
 PROJECT'S TOTAL PROVIDED AS ONLY THOSE SPACES THAT ARE
 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE PROJECTS BOUNDARIES CAN BE COUNTED.
  
 15. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 16. SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 16.1. SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE
 PROVIDED IN A LOCATION THAT CAN EASILY BE FOUND AND
 UTILIZED BY THE RETAIL USERS.
  
 16.2. SATISFIED - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE
 A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 17. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,
 FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 18. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 19. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 20. SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 21. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 22. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH
 THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS
 THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 23. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,
 ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 24. SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 25. SATISFIED - IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY FOR
 RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE PETITIONER PAY TO
 THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON OBTAINING THE
 APPRAISAL, ETC.
  
 26. SATISFIED - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH A
 CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
  
 27. SATISFIED - THE RIGHT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE IMPEDES WITH THE EGRESS TRAVEL LANE.
  
 28. SATISFIED - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE
 PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS BEING
 PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN THE
 MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 29. SATISFIED - ONLY FIVE (5) OF THE PARKING SPACES ON
 TAMARIND AVENUE CAN COUNT TOWARD THE PROJECTS "PARKING
 PROVIDED". PURSUANT TO THE ZLDRS, ONLY SPACES THAT ARE
 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
 CAN BE CONSIDERED.
  
 30. SATISFIED - THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING EXCEEDS THE
 MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING IS ALLOWED TO BE 30 FEET, WITH AN ADDITIONAL
 10% FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS, PARAPETS, ETC. AS SUCH,
 THE TOP OF THE PARAPET IS NOT TO EXCEED 33 FEET.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-26-2022 Time 13:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 04-26-2022 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-25 15:54:50PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.25.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120020 AND Z21120015
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-15 AND PB 1906
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY
 COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
 OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 SERVICES.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH
 THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. NEW COMMENT - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATE DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. NEW COMMENT - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS FACING TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ
 AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. NEW COMMENT - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE
 ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT
 IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 12. STAFF HAS CONCERN THAT THE PROPOSED RETAIL SPACE IS
 NOT OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PROVIDE FOR A VIABLE/LEASABLE
 SPACE FOR A TENANT. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION
 INDICATING HOW THIS SPACE IS ENVISIONED TO BE UTILIZED
 AND LEASED SUCCESSFULLY.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW
 ON-STREET PARKING IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
 CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 14.1. NEW COMMENT - ONLY FIVE (5) OF THE PARKING SPACES
 ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE CAN BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE
 PROJECT'S TOTAL PROVIDED AS ONLY THOSE SPACES THAT ARE
 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE PROJECTS BOUNDARIES CAN BE COUNTED.
  
 15. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE
 ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 16.1. NEW COMMENT - BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE
 PROVIDED IN A LOCATION THAT CAN EASILY BE FOUND AND
 UTILIZED BY THE RETAIL USERS.
  
 16.2. NEW COMMENT - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD
 BE A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 17. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,
 FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 18. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 19. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 20. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 21. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 22. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION
 THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE,
 ETC. AS THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 23. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,
 ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 24. NOT SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF
 THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT.
 THE SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN,
 DATA TABLE, ETC.
  
 25. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF APPRAISED VALUE
 UPON APPROVAL BY CITY COMMISSION) - IT IS THE CITY?S
 POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE
 PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON
 OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.
  
 26. NEW COMMENT - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH
 A CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
  
 27. NEW COMMENT - THE RIGHT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE IMPEDES WITH THE EGRESS TRAVEL LANE.
  
 28. NEW COMMENT - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM
 THE PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS
 BEING PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN
 THE MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 29. NEW COMMENT - ONLY FIVE (5) OF THE PARKING SPACES
 ON TAMARIND AVENUE CAN COUNT TOWARD THE PROJECTS
 "PARKING PROVIDED". PURSUANT TO THE ZLDRS, ONLY SPACES
 THAT ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT
 PROPERTY CAN BE CONSIDERED.
  
 30. NEW COMMENT - THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING EXCEEDS
 THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING IS ALLOWED TO BE 30 FEET, WITH AN ADDITIONAL
 10% FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS, PARAPETS, ETC. AS SUCH,
 THE TOP OF THE PARAPET IS NOT TO EXCEED 33 FEET.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:22 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 11:22:56PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120020 AND Z21120015
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-15 AND PB 1906
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE
 TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 4. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES
 INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH
 THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
 [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE
 VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS
 INCLUDE:
  
 6. ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE
 STYLES, OR VARIATIONS, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL
 OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE
 CORRIDOR AND READ INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 7. ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED ON THE
 SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 8. GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING TAMARIND
 AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH
 THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 9. PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT THE PROPERTY
 LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 10. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE ABANDONED
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT IS
 DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 11. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 12. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE
 OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
 13. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 14. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING DOORS ARE
 ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 15. STAFF HAS CONCERN THAT THE PROPOSED RETAIL SPACE IS
 NOT OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PROVIDE FOR A VIABLE/LEASABLE
 SPACE FOR A TENANT. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION
 INDICATING HOW THIS SPACE IS ENVISIONED TO BE UTILIZED
 AND LEASED SUCCESSFULLY.
  
 16. THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 17. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET PARKING IS
 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 18. PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 19. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 20. ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS, FENCES, ETC. IF
 RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED, DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 21. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 22. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, IT
 LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK; SUCH
 MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (AS
 DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF
 THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND
 8 FEET.
  
 24. SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 25. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE ENTIRE
 SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS THE
 PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 26. ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, ETC. NEED
 TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN. PURSUANT
 TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL NOT
 EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 27. CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 28. IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
 ABANDONMENTS THAT THE PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE
 APPRAISED VALUE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE
 WITH VINCE NOEL ON OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved