Plan Review Details - Project Z21120019
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21120019
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 2 Status N Date 08-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 08-05-2022 Time 11:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 08-05-2022 Time 11:14 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-05 11:13:54THIS PROJECT IS AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT RECEIVING
 TAX CREDIT FUNDS. THE ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES WAIVER
 WOULD APPLY.
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 01-04-2022 Time 11:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 01-04-2022 Time 11:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-04 11:15:32TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER
 $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS
 PER CITY ORDINANCE.
 SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,
 INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR
 IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL
 CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
 OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE
 VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR
 OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF
 ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT
 TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
 A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS
 REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 IF OPTION ONE IS CHOSEN PLEASE IDENTIFY POTENTIAL SITES
 ON YOUR SITE PLAN FOR PUBLIC ART.
  
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &
 CULTURE AT [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT
 APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 18:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 18:29 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-12 18:33:03DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 4. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 5. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By RROSSANO Date 03-28-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-28-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-28 11:16:22Z21120019 - 2112 TAMARIND RESUB 3.24.22
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF
 CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.
 4. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 6. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 1. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW
 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,
 STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND
 OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL
 AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE
 AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 7. PLEASE CLOUD/HIGHLIGHT PLAN REVISIONS OR CHANGES IN
 SCOPE FOR RESUBMITTAL OF DRAWINGS.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP
 UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY
 LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED
 UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL
 BACKFLOWS.
 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO
 NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE
 CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT.
 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT
 OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY
 ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.
 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY
 INFRASTRUCTURE IS PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT
 SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF
 ADJACENT PARCELS.
 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER
 INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT
 PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL
 GC-8.
 20. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -CALLOUT WIDTH OF SIDEWALK ON NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF
 PROPERTY ADJACENT TO 22ND ST AND 21ST ST.
  
 -SURVEY NOTE 1 SAYS THAT OFFICE HAS MADE NO SEARCH OF
 PUBLIC RECORDS. WHEN WILL THAT BE COMPLETED?
  
 -ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO LABEL OF 4 INCH WATER
 METER.
  
 -ADD LARGE ABOVE-GROUND METERED WATER SERVICE STANDARD
 DETAIL.
  
 -IS THERE A FDC CLEARANCE CONFLICT WITH DOMESTIC
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY?
  
 -LABEL PROPOSED MONUMENT AREA AND EXISTING UTILITY
 EASEMENTS ON CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -ON LANDSCAPING PLAN, ADD LEGEND IDENTIFYING THE
 DIFFERENT HATCHED AREAS.
  
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN DOES NOT SHOW UTILITIES. VERIFY NO
 CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES. INCREASE
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE AND ADD ROOT BARRIERS AS NEEDED.
  
 -IF THERE SUFFICIENT CROSSING CLEARANCE DISTANCE
 BETWEEN 18 INCH RCP AND EITHER BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
 PIPING?
  
 -FOOTPRINT OF PROPOSED WATER METER MAY BE LARGER THAN
 SHOWN.
  
 -ENSURE THAT ABOVE-GROUND WATER METER WILL NOT ENCROACH
 ON FIRE HYDRANT CLEARANCE AREA.
  
 -INCREASED PAVEMENT RESTORATION AREA NOT SHOWN FOR
 RELOCATED WATER SERVICE.
  
 -SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF RELOCATED METERED IRRIGATION
 WATER SERVICE AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
  
 -PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE RECOMMENDED ON
 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DUE TO
 BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
  
 -DID NOT SEE WATER SERVICE REMOVALS ON 22ND ST AND CUT
 AND CAP LABELS AS REQUESTED IN PUBLIC UTILITIES REVIEW
 COMMENT NUMBER 2 AND RESPONSE. ONE WATER SERVICE
 REMOVAL IS NOT SHOWN ON 21ST ST EITHER.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 08:28:04COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -GEO REPORT SAYS GFA SHOULD BE REQUESTED TO REVIEW DATA
 TO SEE IF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE VALID. WILL APPLICANT
 FOLLOWUP WITH THEM ONCE BUILDING DETAILS ARE FINALIZED?
  
 -PLEASE VERIFY GRAPHIC SCALE IS CORRECT ON SP-1.
  
 -WILL RETAINING WALL REMAIN AT WEST SOUTHWEST AREA OF
 PROJECT?
  
 -WILL ALL OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND UTILITY POLES REMAIN
 UNDISTURBED?
  
 -SHOW MORE CLEARLY UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE LOCATIONS AND
 ENSURE THEY WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH PROJECT.
  
 -SITE PLAN TALKED ABOUT RELOCATING A MONUMENT. IF IT IS
 SOME KIND OF STATUE OR SIGN PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS
 ABOUT IT.
  
 -TURNAROUND SPOT DOES NOT APPEAR USABLE DUE TO LOCATION
 OF DUMPSTER STRUCTURE. PLEASE VERIFY VEHICLES WILL BE
 ABLE TO MANEUVER PROPERLY.
  
 -WILL THERE BE CURBING AT THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING
 LOT AND ON THE NORTH SIDE NEAR THE BBQ AREA AND TOT
 LOT?
  
 -A FORMAL EASEMENT OR AGREEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE OF PROJECT ADJACENT
 22ND ST.
  
 -PROPOSED METERED WATER SERVICES DO NOT HAVE UTILITY
 EASEMENT SHOWN AND LABELED ON CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -CURRENT FIRE HYDRANT AT 21ST ST. DOES NOT GROSSLY
 IMPEDE SIDEWALK USE. UPDATE CIVIL PLANS TO ENSURE
 SIDEWALK SPACE WILL NOT BE REDUCED. NOT SURE IF SYMBOL
 IS LARGE, OR PROJECT IS ALTERING THE AREA.
  
 -RETAIL AND IRRIGATION METERED WATER SERVICES WOULD
 NEED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON
 PLANS. ALSO ANY METERED WATER SERVICE FEEDING MULTIPLE
 DWELLING UNITS WOULD NEED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AS WELL.
  
 -SITE PLAN SHOWED A GYM AREA. IF IT WILL HAVE WATER,
 WHICH METER WILL IT BE FED FROM?
  
 -HOW WILL THE IRRIGATION UTILITY BILL BE HANDLED? WILL
 THERE BE AN HOA OR PROPERTY MANAGER?
  
 -GREASE TRAP/INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED IF THE RETAIL
 UNIT HAS FOOD SERVICE.
  
 -WATER DESIGN IS NONSTANDARD AND MAY REQUIRE REVISION
 AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 -PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 WATER METER BOX. WOULD NEED TO RELOCATE OR REMOVE BOX
 AND ANY WATER SERVICE THERE.
  
 -SOUTHEAST DRIVEWAY APPROACH CURBING IS EXTENDED PAST
 THE PROPERTY LINE. VERIFY THAT IS ACCEPTABLE.
  
 -ARE MORE SEWER LATERAL CLEANOUTS NEEDED? IF SO, SHOW
 AND LABEL ON CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -SURVEY AND LANDSCAPING PLANS ARE MISSING. PLEASE
 SUBMIT BOTH.
  
 -WILL THE UTILITY POLE IN PARKING LOT ISLAND CONFLICT
 WITH TREES?
  
 -PAVEMENT RESTORATION OF 21ST ST WOULD BE REQUIRED
 BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY WORK.
  
 -SOME SIDEWALKS MAY REQUIRE REPLACEMENT DUE TO
 PROJECT?S UTILITY WORK.
  
 -PLANS DESCRIBED FIRE SPRINKLERS. FIRE SPRINKLERS
 CANNOT BE FED FROM DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES. WOULD NEED
 AT LEAST ONE DEDICATED FIRE SERVICE WITH DETECTOR
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THOSE REQUIRE UTILITY BILLING
 ACCOUNTS.
  
 -PLEASE SHOW STREET SIGN LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST AREA OF
 PROJECT ON PLANS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
  
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 15:18:33FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time 10:09 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-04 10:10:10FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time 11:34 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-04 11:42:10THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL
 BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED
 WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-17 11:33:26FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2212 N TAMARIND AVE. Z21120019
 NOVEMBER 17, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ??? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE
 CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION
 DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER
 MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND
 ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED MUST SHOW THE CANOPY MITIGATION
 DUE. TREES 6 (2826 SQ FT), 7 (2826 SQ FT), AND 8 (300
 SQ FT), 9 (314 SQ FT) MUST BE SHOWN.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 TOTAL IS 6,442 SQ FT DUE. SHOW ON CHART.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 9 PIGEON PLUM- 9 X150 =1350
 14 SIMPSON???S STOPPER- 14 X50 = 700
 8 LIVE OAK- 8 X300 = 2400
 1 CLUSIA- 1X 300 = 300
 6 ORANGE GEIGER (AT 12???)- 6 X150 = 900
 4 LIGUSTRUM (AT 12???)- 4 X100 = 400
 TOTAL MITIGATION PROPOSED= 6,050 SQ FT
 6442-6050= 392 SQ FT DEFICIT.
 SHOW ON TD-1
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
 THE WESTERN BUFFER ALONG TAMARIND HAS MULTIPLE BREAKS
 FOR PAVED AREAS. STAFF WILL DETERMINE IF THE PATIO
 AREAS CANNOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT INTERRUPTION INTENDED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 40%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
  
 THE CENTER INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND DOES NOT CONTAIN A
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE SO PERCENTAGE IS ONLY 67%. STAFF
 SUGGESTS NARROWING THE AREA WITHIN THE EASEMENT AND
 PROVIDING THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA AT 10 SPACES TO
 ALLOW A LARGER TREE.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE
 ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED
 TREES.
 8/8/22 CONFLICTS STILL SHOWN WITH DRAINAGE LINES AND
 SEWER LINES.
  
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND
 VALVES.
  
 15. SATISFIED. ORANGE GEIGER AND LIGUSTRUM NEED TO BE
 SHOWN AT 12 FT HEIGHT SPECIFICATION ON THE PLAN. ANY
 SUPPLY ISSUES MAY BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 11:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 11:14 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-08 11:15:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2212 N TAMARIND AVE. Z21120019
 AUGUST 8, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR
 EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN
 DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED MUST SHOW THE CANOPY MITIGATION
 DUE. TREES 6 (2826 SQ FT), 7 (2826 SQ FT), AND 8 (300
 SQ FT), 9 (314 SQ FT) MUST BE SHOWN.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
 TOTAL IS 6,442 SQ FT DUE. SHOW ON CHART.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 9 PIGEON PLUM- 9 X150 =1350
 14 SIMPSON?S STOPPER- 14 X50 = 700
 8 LIVE OAK- 8 X300 = 2400
 1 CLUSIA- 1X 300 = 300
 6 ORANGE GEIGER (AT 12?)- 6 X150 = 900
 4 LIGUSTRUM (AT 12?)- 4 X100 = 400
 TOTAL MITIGATION PROPOSED= 6,050 SQ FT
 6442-6050= 392 SQ FT DEFICIT.
 SHOW ON TD-1
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
 THE WESTERN BUFFER ALONG TAMARIND HAS MULTIPLE BREAKS
 FOR PAVED AREAS. STAFF WILL DETERMINE IF THE PATIO
 AREAS CANNOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT INTERRUPTION INTENDED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 40%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
  
 THE CENTER INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND DOES NOT CONTAIN A
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE SO PERCENTAGE IS ONLY 67%. STAFF
 SUGGESTS NARROWING THE AREA WITHIN THE EASEMENT AND
 PROVIDING THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA AT 10 SPACES TO
 ALLOW A LARGER TREE.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY
 LINES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE
 ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED
 TREES.
 8/8/22 CONFLICTS STILL SHOWN WITH DRAINAGE LINES AND
 SEWER LINES.
  
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:
  
 14. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES.
  
 15. ORANGE GEIGER AND LIGUSTRUM NEED TO BE SHOWN AT 12
 FT HEIGHT SPECIFICATION ON THE PLAN. ANY SUPPLY ISSUES
 MAY BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 19:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 19:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-05 19:28:02FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2212 N TAMARIND AVE. Z21120019
 MARCH 5, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR
 EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN
 DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL
 THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH
 PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE
 TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST
 BE USED.
 THE WESTERN BUFFER ALONG TAMARIND HAS MULTIPLE BREAKS
 FOR PAVED AREAS. STAFF WILL DETERMINE IF THE PATIO
 AREAS CANNOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT INTERRUPTION INTENDED.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2.,
 PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
  
 THE CENTER INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND DOES NOT CONTAIN A
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE SO PERCENTAGE IS ONLY 67%. STAFF
 SUGGESTS NARROWING THE AREA WITHIN THE EASEMENT AND
 PROVIDING THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA AT 10 SPACES TO
 ALLOW A LARGER TREE.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS WILL REQUIRE
 ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTING LOCATIONS OF SOME REQUIRED
 TREES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:31 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-12 13:31:58FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2212 N TAMARIND AVE. Z21120019
 JANUARY 12, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHOWING THE
 LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE CANOPY
 DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE.
 TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER MUST
 HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND ENTERED
 ON THE CHART.
 ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED
 BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION FOR ALL
 TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE SITE
 BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B.
 PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN SPACE BASED ON
 THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE MULTIFAMILY TREE
 REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
 PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A
 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED
 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE
 THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE
 PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUILDING.
  
 7. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT
 LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF
 PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS
 FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW
 THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM
 OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA
 NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE
 CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT
 EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
 WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL
 PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED
 ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES INCLUDING
 WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 12. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT WILL
 LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE
 GUIDELINES.
  
 13. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL
 IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 01-05-2022 Time 16:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-05 16:52:58-SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES ON TAMARIND.
 -SHOW EXISTING WATER SERVICES OFF OF 22ND ST, ADD NOTE
 TO CUT AND CAP UNUSED SERVICES AT THE MAIN.
 -SHOW PROFILE OF 4? CONNECTION FROM TAP TO POINT OF
 SERVICE.
 -PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS.
 -REPLACE/LINE EXISTING LATERALS AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE
 POST CCTV FOOTAGE.
 -ADD NOTE THAT THIS IS WITHIN LIFT STATION 21 SERVICE
 BOUNDARY.
 -LABEL EASEMENT/S.
 -WE NEED TO SEE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCS TO DETERMINE THE
 IMPACT TO THE EXISTING COLLECTION SYSTEM AND LIFT
 STATION.
 -FOR STORMWATER STRUCTURES CALL OUT STATIONING AND
 HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UTILITIES.
  
 CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-14 09:36:52NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-29-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-29-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-29-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-29 10:52:31PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED SHEET SP-2 TO REFLECT ALL THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCOSURE PER THE LATEST
 REVISION OF GC-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
 THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
 PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
 00).
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 09:17:35PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- REVISED LOCATION/ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE TO MINIMIZE BACKUPS AND SHORT RADUIS TURNS.
 3-AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE'S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
  * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
  * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT
  * TURNING RADIUS:
  - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
  - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
  - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS.
 5- REVIESD ENCLOSURE DETAILS, SHEET SP-2, TO COMPLY
 WITH THE CG-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-7.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 09:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 09:45 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 09:45:16CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. COORDINATE THE CURBING LABELS ON SHEET C2.3 WITH THE
 CROSS SECTIONS.
 2. LIST THE FFE FOR BUILDING A ON THE SECTION B.
 3. IDENTIFY THE FDOT CURB RAMP TYPES FOR THE MIDBLOCK
 CROSS WALK.
 4. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AT THE DRIVEWAY FROM THE
 CENTERLINE OF 21ST ST TO 5 FEET BEYOND THE HIGH POINT
 OF THE DRIVEWAY/PARKING LOT. SHOW SURFACE BREAK POINTS
 AND LABEL THE STREET R/W AND SURFACE FEATURES. PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM THE R/W LINE TO BREAK POINTS. SHOW AND
 DIMENSION WHERE THE SIDEWALK CROSSING WILL BE.
 5. PROVIDE A STORM MANHOLE INSIDE THE WEST PROPERTY
 LINE OF THE SITE WHERE THE OUTFALL PIPE DEFLECTION IS
 SHOWN.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
 EXCLUDED.
  
 6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS UNDER
 NEW COMMENTS BELOW.] PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO CROSS
 SECTIONS FROM EACH R/W CENTERLINE TO THE FACE OF
 BUILDING(S) AND/OR TO PARKING LOT; AND CROSS SECTIONS
 FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDINGS. LABEL
 STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND GENERAL
 SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR CURBS/CURB AND
 GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO
 FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING
 AREAS.
  
 11. [SATISFIED ??? PER NOTE 13 ON SHEET C2.1, ALL
 SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT PROPERTY ARE TO BE
 REPLACED. ] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO
 REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: SIDEWALK WILL BE REPLACED AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 LOCATION AND FOR MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE BUILDINGS
 TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 3 FT+/-
 GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL PROPOSED GRADES FOR SIDEWALKS ON THE EAST
 SIDES OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED ELEVATION OF THE
 WEST END OF THE HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE IS 30.5
 FEET NAVD. THE FFE ELEVATION OF THE BUILDINGS IS
 PROPOSED TO BE 29.5 FT NAVD. NOTE SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT
 INCLUDED ON THE 7/19/22 SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS (3/4/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 20. [SATISFIED] SOME OF THE FFE LEADERS ARE INCOMPLETE
 (STOPPING IN MIDAIR) ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A-2.2A
 AND A-2.2B (SOUTH ELEVATIONS).
  
 21. [NOT SATISFIED] UPDATE FDOT STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS
 ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING SHEETS TO
 CURRENT FDOT STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS.
  
 22. [SATISFIED] SLOPE OF HANDICAP PARKING SPACE IS
 LIMITED TO 2% MAX IN ALL DIRECTIONS.
  
  
 25. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADE ON THE TOP OF CURB AT SOUTH
 END OF THE PARKING LOT AND AT WEST END OF THE HANDICAP
 ACCESS AISLE] CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED SPOT GRADES.
 SOME APPEAR TO BE FOR TOP OF CURB.
  
 26. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE RAISED CURBING LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE.
  
 27. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. [NOT SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT AT NORTH END
 AND AT EAST SIDE OF PARKING LOT. THIS CURBING IS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN OR PGD PLAN. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 SITE PLAN FOR SITE A NOT INCLUDED WITH THE 7-19-2022
 SUBMITTAL (SITE PLAN FOR SITE F WAS PROVIDED).
 D. [SATISFIED SEE NEW COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE STRIPING
 PLAN (INCLUDING BLUE RPM FOR FIRE HYDRANT) FOR MILLED
 AND RESURFACING AREAS.
 H. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SIGN AND STRIPING FOR TURNAROUND
 SPACE. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? IS A NO PARKING SIGN
 NEEDED?
  
 28. [SATISFIED - SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF
 BUILDING.
 C. SHOW PATIOS. PROVIDE TOP OF SLAB ELEVATION AND
 DIMENSION.
 D. ALTHOUGH SECTION IS NTS, THE FFE ELEVATION IS SHOWN
 BETWEEN ELEVATION GRID LINES 30 AND 32 FT NAVD.
 E. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 29. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. [SATISFIED] VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN
 B. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? BUILDING A FFE LISTED AS
 29.5 FT NAVD] SHOW LOCATION OF BUILDING AND PROPOSED
 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. PROVIDE DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.
 C. [SATISFIED] ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 30. [NOT APPLICABLE ??? SECTION C REMOVED FROM PLANS]
 SECTION C (SHEET C3.2)
 A. LABEL PROPERTY LINE.
 B. TYPE 'D' CURB SHOWN ON SECTION BUT NOT ON PGD PLAN.
 C. EXTEND SECTION TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW GRADE
 BREAKS AND DISTANCES TO GRADE BREAKS.
 D. SHOW PROPOSED FENCE.
  
 31. [NOT APPLICABLE ??? SECTION D WAS REMOVED FROM THE
 PLANS. SECTION D (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. MOVE SECTION TO PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION. CALLOUT
 NEW SIDEWALK AND CURBING.
 C. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 32. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF
 21ST STREET TO SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING A. LABEL R/W;
 SHOW GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE,
 ETC.
  
 33. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION FROM NORTH FACE
 OF BUILDING A TO SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING B.
  
 35. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL
 PLAN (THESE CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 A. MOVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS HATCHING OUTSIDE OF THE
 R/W.
 B. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR
 INLET PROTECTION.
 C. CALLOUT WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.
  
 NEW COMMENTS(7/19/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 37. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE 20 LF OF DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING
 ON 21ST ST.
  
 38. [NOT SATISFIED] BIKE LANE STRIPING TO BE PER THE
 CITY STANDARD DETAILS AND THE MUTCD. PROPERLY SHOW THE
 LOCATIONS FOR THESE MARKINGS.
  
 39. [SATISFIED ??? COORDINATE SIGN PLACEMENT WITH
 CITY???S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER ??? VALERIO ORICCHIO]
 SHARE THE ROAD SIGNS APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN THE ROAD.
  
 40. [SATISFIED] LABEL BUILDING A AND BUILDING B ON THE
 CIVIL PLANS.
  
 41. [SATISFIED] VERIFY SPOT GRADE OF 29.4 AT END OF THE
 ADA ACCESS AISLE IN THE PARKING LOT.
  
 42, [SATISFIED] SLOPE OF DRIVEWAY FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK
 TO STRUCTURE S-102 APPEARS TO BE OVER 16%. CHECK WITH
 THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT ON THE ALLOWABLE SLOPES FOR
 THE TRASH TRUCKS TO DRIVE ON.
  
 43. [NOT SATISFIED] CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP NUMBER
 FOR THE MIDBLOCK CROSS WALK (BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND).
  
 44. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE A YARD DRAIN TO COLLECT
 RUNOFF BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS BEFORE IT FLOWS OVER THE
 SIDEWALK.
  
 NEW COMMENT (11/4/22 SUBMITTAL)
 45. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION AT THE DRIVEWAY FROM THE
 CENTERLINE OF 21ST ST TO 5 FEET BEYOND THE HIGH POINT
 OF THE DRIVEWAY/PARKING LOT. SHOW SURFACE BREAK POINTS
 AND LABEL THE STREET R/W AND SURFACE FEATURES. PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM THE R/W LINE TO BREAK POINTS.
 46. THE OUTFALL STORM PIPE CHANGES DIRECTION AT THE
 WEST PROPERTY LINE. INCLUDE A MANHOLE INSIDE THE
 PROPERTY TO MAKE THIS CHANGE OF DIRECTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 14:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 15:23 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 15:12:55Z21120019 SITE A 2212 N. TAMARIND AVE
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/19/2022 SUBMITTAL.
 1. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM PROJECT ADDRESS (2122 VS. 2212
 N. TAMARIND AVE)
  
 2. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] RELOCATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM UNDER
 STAIRS.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF
 SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS
 AROUND ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDINGS AND BETWEEN THE
 BUILDINGS.
  
 6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS UNDER
 NEW COMMENTS BELOW.] PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO CROSS
 SECTIONS FROM EACH R/W CENTERLINE TO THE FACE OF
 BUILDING(S) AND/OR TO PARKING LOT; AND CROSS SECTIONS
 FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDINGS. LABEL
 STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND GENERAL
 SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR CURBS/CURB AND
 GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO
 FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING
 AREAS.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE ADA TRUNCATED MAT ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN
 THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: EXTEND MILL AND
 RESURFACING LIMITS FOR THE EXISTING SEWER LATERALS THAT
 WILL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
 PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE
 ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SHOW IN THE PGD PLAN
 WHERE THIS CURB WILL BE CONSTRUCTED.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE
 STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 11. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR
 SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SIDEWALK WILL BE REPLACED AT
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION AND FOR MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK.
  
 12. [NOT SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE
 BUILDINGS TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 3
 FT+/- GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL PROPOSED GRADES FOR SIDEWALKS ON THE EAST
 SIDES OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED ELEVATION OF THE
 WEST END OF THE HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE IS 30.5
 FEET NAVD. THE FFE ELEVATION OF THE BUILDINGS IS
 PROPOSED TO BE 29.5 FT NAVD. NOTE SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT
 INCLUDED ON THE 7/19/22 SUBMITTAL.
  
 13. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING
 DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE
 PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.
  
 14. [SATISFIUED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH
 END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 16. [SATISFIED - RESPONSE INDICATED NO NEW GUTTERS.]
 LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER ON 21ST ST.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE NEEDED FOR
 22ND ST. SIDEWALK.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 19. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS (3/4/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 20. [NOT SATISFIED] SOME OF THE FFE LEADERS ARE
 INCOMPLETE (STOPPING IN MIDAIR) ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS A-2.2A AND A-2.2B (SOUTH ELEVATIONS).
  
 21. [NOT SATISFIED] UPDATE FDOT STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS
 ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING SHEETS TO
 CURRENT FDOT STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS.
  
 22. [NOT SATISFIED] SLOPE OF HANDICAP PARKING SPACE IS
 LIMITED TO 2% MAX IN ALL DIRECTIONS.
  
 23. [SATISFIED] JUSTIFY SIZE OF 18-INCH DIAMETER
 OUTFALL PIPE.
  
 24. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SOURCE FOR THE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL OF THE 16? DIP STORM PIPE AT EXISTING CURB
 INLET BEING CORED FOR OUTFALL PIPE.
  
 25. [PATIALLY SATISFIED ? SPOT GRADE ON THE TOP OF CURB
 AT SOUTH END OF THE PARKING LOT AND AT WEST END OF THE
 HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE] CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED
 SPOT GRADES. SOME APPEAR TO BE FOR TOP OF CURB.
  
 26. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW THE RAISED CURBING LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE.
  
 27. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. [NOT SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT AT NORTH END
 AND AT EAST SIDE OF PARKING LOT. THIS CURBING IS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN OR PGD PLAN. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 SITE PLAN FOR SITE A NOT INCLUDED WITH THE 7-19-2022
 SUBMITTAL (SITE PLAN FOR SITE F WAS PROVIDED).
 B. [SATISFIED] SHOULD STOP BAR AT PARKING LOT EXIST BE
 MOVED BACK FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK?
 C. [SATISFIED] REMOVE OUTLINED STOP BAR, LANE DIVIDER
 STRIPE AND DIRECTIONAL ARROWS FROM PARKING LOT IF NOT
 APPLICABLE. OTHERWISE PROVIDE CALLOUTS FOR THESE ITEMS.
 D. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SEE NEW COMMENTS BELOW]
 PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN (INCLUDING BLUE RPM FOR FIRE
 HYDRANT) FOR MILLED AND RESURFACING AREAS.
 E. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGN FOR 21ST ST.
 F. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCE TO CITY OF RIVIERA
 BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN NOTES.
 G. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE REFERENCE TO THE CWPB TYPICAL 90
 DEGREE PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET C3.1.
 H. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE SIGN AND STRIPING FOR
 TURNAROUND SPACE. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? IS A NO PARKING
 SIGN NEEDED?
  
 28. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF
 BUILDING.
 C. SHOW PATIOS. PROVIDE TOP OF SLAB ELEVATION AND
 DIMENSION.
 D. ALTHOUGH SECTION IS NTS, THE FFE ELEVATION IS SHOWN
 BETWEEN ELEVATION GRID LINES 30 AND 32 FT NAVD.
 E. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 29. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN
 B. SHOW LOCATION OF BUILDING AND PROPOSED FINISHED
 FLOOR ELEVATION. PROVIDE DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO
 FACE OF BUILDING.
 C. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 30. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] SECTION C (SHEET C3.2)
 A. LABEL PROPERTY LINE.
 B. TYPE 'D' CURB SHOWN ON SECTION BUT NOT ON PGD PLAN.
 C. EXTEND SECTION TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW GRADE
 BREAKS AND DISTANCES TO GRADE BREAKS.
 D. SHOW PROPSOED FENCE.
  
 31. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] SECTION D (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. MOVE SECTION TO PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION. CALLOUT
 NEW SIDEWALK AND CURBING.
 C. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 32. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE A SECTION FROM CENTERLINE
 OF 21ST STREET TO SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING A. LABEL R/W;
 SHOW GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE,
 ETC.
  
 33. [NOT SATISFIED ? SHEET C3.2 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 7-19-2022 SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION FROM NORTH
 FACE OF BUILDING A TO SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING B.
  
 34. [SATISFIED] WHAT IS THE LINE SHOWN ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE
 PROPOSED SANITARY MH#2? IS IT A SEWER LATERAL?
  
 35. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL
 PLAN (THESE CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 A. MOVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS HATCHING OUTSIDE OF THE
 R/W.
 B. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET
 PROTECTION.
 C. CALLOUT WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.
  
 36. [SATISFIED] SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT DETAIL 4
 ON SHEET SP-3 BUT THERE IS NOT A DETAIL 4 ON SHEET
 SP-3.
  
 NEW COMMENTS(7/19/22 SUBMITTAL):
  
 37. PROVIDE 20 LF OF DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING ON 21ST ST.
  
 38. BIKE LANE STRIPING TO BE PER THE CITY STANDARD
 DETAILS AND THE MUTCD. PROPERLY SHOW THE LOCATIONS FOR
 THESE MARKINGS.
  
 39. SHARE THE ROAD SIGNS APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN THE
 ROAD.
  
 40. LABEL BUILDING A AND BUILDING B ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 41. VERIFY SPOT GRADE OF 29.4 AT END OF THE ADA ACCESS
 AISLE IN THE PARKING LOT.
  
 42, SLOPE OF DRIVEWAY FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK TO
 STRUCTURE S-102 APPEARS TO BE OVER 16%. CHECK WITH THE
 SANITATION DEPARTMENT ON THE ALLOWABLE SLOPES FOR THE
 TRASH TRUCKS TO DRIVE ON.
  
 43. CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP NUMBER FOR THE MIDBLOCK
 CROSS WALK (BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND).
  
 44. PROVIDE A YARD DRAIN TO COLLECT RUNOFF BETWEEN THE
 BUILDINGS BEFORE IT FLOWS OVER THE SIDEWALK.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-26-2022 Time 16:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-26-2022 Time 16:19 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-26 16:19:36THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 3/24/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM PROJECT ADDRESS (2122 VS. 2212
 N. TAMARIND AVE)
  
 2. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] RELOCATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM UNDER
 STAIRS.
  
 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING
 DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS AROUND ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDINGS
 AND BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS.
  
 6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS UNDER
 NEW COMMENTS BELOW.] PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO CROSS
 SECTIONS FROM EACH R/W CENTERLINE TO THE FACE OF
 BUILDING(S) AND/OR TO PARKING LOT; AND CROSS SECTIONS
 FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDINGS. LABEL
 STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND GENERAL
 SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR CURBS/CURB AND
 GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO
 FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING
 AREAS.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE ADA TRUNCATED MAT ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING
 LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: EXTEND
 MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR THE EXISTING SEWER
 LATERALS THAT WILL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN.
  
 9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL
 ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND
 GUTTER WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD
 AND PROVIDE ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SHOW IN
 THE PGD PLAN WHERE THIS CURB WILL BE CONSTRUCTED.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE
 STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 11. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR
 SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SIDEWALK WILL BE REPLACED AT
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION AND FOR MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK.
  
 12. [NOT SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE
 BUILDINGS TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 3
 FT+/- GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL PROPOSED GRADES FOR SIDEWALKS ON THE EAST
 SIDES OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED ELEVATION OF THE
 WEST END OF THE HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE IS 30.5
 FEET NAVD. THE FFE ELEVATION OF THE BUILDINGS IS
 PROPOSED TO BE 29.5 FT NAVD.
  
 13. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING
 DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE
 PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.
  
 14. [SATISFIUED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH
 END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 16. [SATISFIED - RESPONSE INDICATED NO NEW GUTTERS.]
 LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER ON 21ST ST.
  
 17. [NOT SATISFIED] SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE NEEDED
 FOR 22ND ST. SIDEWALK.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 19. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 20. SOME OF THE FFE LEADERS ARE INCOMPLETE (STOPPING IN
 MIDAIR) ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A-2.1 AND A-2.2.
  
 21. UPDATE FDOT STANDARD INDEX NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN
 SHEETS AND ENGINEERING SHEETS TO CURRENT FDOT STANDARD
 PLAN NUMBERS.
  
 22. SLOPE OF HANDICAP PARKING SPACE IS LIMITED TO 2%
 MAX IN ALL DIRECTIONS.
  
 23. JUSTIFY SIZE OF 18? DIAMETER OUTFALL PIPE.
  
 24. PROVIDE SOURCE FOR THE SIZE AND MATERIAL OF THE 16?
 DIP STORM PIPE AT EXISTING CURB INLET BEING CORED FOR
 OUTFALL PIPE.
  
 25. CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED SPOT GRADES. SOME
 APPEAR TO BE FOR TOP OF CURB.
  
 26. SHOW THE RAISED CURBING LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE.
  
 27. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. TYPE ?D? CURB CALLED OUT AT NORTH END AND AT EAST
 SIDE OF PARKING LOT. THIS CURBING IS NOT SHOWN ON THE
 SITE PLAN OR PGD PLAN.
 B. SHOULD STOP BAR AT PARKING LOT EXIST BE MOVED BACK
 FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK?
 C. REMOVE OUTLINED STOP BAR, LANE DIVIDER STRIPE AND
 DIRECTIONAL ARROWS FROM PARKING LOT IF NOT APPLICABLE.
 OTHERWISE PROVIDE CALLOUTS FOR THESE ITEMS.
 D. PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN (INCLUDING BLUE RPM FOR FIRE
 HYDRANT) FOR MILLED AND RESURFACING AREAS.
 E. SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGN FOR 21ST ST.
 F. REMOVE REFERENCE TO CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH LAND
 DEVELOPMENT CODE IN NOTES.
 G. PROVIDE REFERENCE TO THE CWPB TYPICAL 90 DEGREE
 PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET C3.1.
 H. PROVIDE SIGN AND STRIPING FOR TURNAROUND SPACE
  
 28. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF
 BUILDING.
 C. SHOW PATIOS. PROVIDE TOP OF SLAB ELEVATION AND
 DIMENSION.
 D. ALTHOUGH SECTION IS NTS, THE FFE ELEVATION IS SHOWN
 BETWEEN ELEVATION GRID LINES 30 AND 32 FT NAVD.
 E. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 29. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN
 B. SHOW LOCATION OF BUILDING AND PROPOSED FINISHED
 FLOOR ELEVATION. PROVIDE DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO
 FACE OF BUILDING.
 C. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 30. SECTION C (SHEET C3.2)
 A. LABEL PROPERTY LINE.
 B. TYPE 'D' CURB SHOWN ON SECTION BUT NOT ON PGD PLAN.
 C. EXTEND SECTION TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW GRADE
 BREAKS AND DISTANCES TO GRADE BREAKS.
 D. SHOW PROPSOED FENCE.
  
 31. SECTION D (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. MOVE SECTION TO PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION. CALLOUT
 NEW SIDEWALK AND CURBING.
 C. ADD THE STREET NAME FOR THE PUBLIC R/W.
  
 32. PROVIDE A SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF 21ST STREET TO
 SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING ?A?. LABEL R/W; SHOW GRADE
 BREAKS, DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, ETC.
  
 33. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION FROM NORTH FACE OF BUILDING
 A TO SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING B.
  
 34. WHAT IS THE LINE SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS
 APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED SANITARY
 MH#2? IS IT A SEWER LATERAL?
  
 35. SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (THESE CAN BE
 ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 A. MOVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS HATCHING OUTSIDE OF THE
 R/W.
 B. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET
 PROTECTION.
 C. CALLOUT WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.
  
 36. SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT DETAIL 4 ON SHEET
 SP-3 BUT THERE IS NOT A DETAIL 4 ON SHEET SP-3.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 12:47:55THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. CONFIRM PROJECT ADDRESS (2122 VS. 2212 N. TAMARIND
 AVE)
 2. REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON?) ON
 COVER.
 3. CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING WITH
 EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
 4. RELOCATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM UNDER STAIRS.
 5. PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF SURFACE
 RUNOFF.
 6. PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO CROSS SECTIONS FROM EACH R/W
 CENTERLINE TO THE FACE OF BUILDING(S) AND/OR TO PARKING
 LOT; AND CROSS SECTIONS FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE
 OF BUILDINGS. LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE
 FEATURES AND GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS
 FOR CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
 7. PROVIDE ADA TRUNCATED MAT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 DRIVEWAY.
 8. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS.
 9. IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE
 THE SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE
 ENGLISH UNITS.
 10. LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE WILL BE
 LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE STRUCTURE. NOTE THE
 CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 11. PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN
 AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
 12. EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE BUILDINGS TO THE
 PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 3?+/- GRADE
 DIFFERENTIAL.
 13. PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING DIMENSIONS IN
 SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
 CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES IS 22 FEET. THE
 SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE PARKING SPACES
 ON TAMARIND AVE.
 14. CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH END OF
 PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE ACCESS
 TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
 15. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929
 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
 16. LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER ON 21ST ST.
 17. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE NEEDED FOR 22ND ST.
 SIDEWALK.
 18. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN
 LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 19. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH DETAILS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-27-2022 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-27 09:28:24PASSED WITH CONDITION OF REPLAT TO DEDICATE ANY
 REQUIRED SIDEWALK/UTILITY EASEMENTS PRIOR TO C.O.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-25-2022 Time 07:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-25 10:31:201. SURVEY AND OTHER PLANS DO NOT SHOW R/W LINE PER
 MAINT. MAP.
 2. WHERE IS METER ON 21ST ST TO BE RELOCATED FOR
 IRRIGATION?
 3. SHOW PROPOSED METER AND FDC ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 4. LABEL POINT OF SERVICE AT SANITARY MANHOLE.
 5. ADD NOTE THAT ALL SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO PROPERTY TO
 BE REPLACED.
 6. SLOPE BETWEEN BALCONY AND SIDEWALK ALONG TAMARIND IS
 TOO SEVERE. SEE DETAIL "A". SIDEWALK ELEVATION IS
 ACTUALLY LOWER THAN SHOWN.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-10-2022 Time 07:54 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-10 08:56:041. REVISE SURVEY AND ALL PLANS TO SHOW MAINTENANCE MAP
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 11/94.
 2. MASTER METER MAY BE REQUIRED. METER BANK CONFLICTS
 WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
 3. CHANGE LINE WEIGHT OF PROPERTY LINE FOR BETTER
 DELINEATION. DIVIDE CONCEPTUAL PLAN INTO SEPARATE P&G
 AND W&S PLANS.
 4. NEED TO SEE CROSS-SECTIONS ON ALL SIDES DUE TO GRADE
 DIFFERENCES.
 5. N-S SANITARY LATERAL WILL BE PRIVATE. ADD POINT OF
 SERVICE/MANHOLE.
 6. SURVEY HAS MISC. LABELS/ELEVATIONS AT SOME PROPERTY
 CORNERS THAT NEED REMOVED. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE
 SIGNED/SEALED.
 7. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO ALL PLANS.
 8. IS EXISTING WALL ALONG TAMARIND TO REMAIN? LABEL
 DISPOSITION ON PLANS.
 9. REPLAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-07 18:01:141) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED. PROVIDE COUNTY
 TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE. LATEST SUBMISSION DID NOT
 HAVE THE LETTER IN THE DOCUMENTATION FOLDER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN WITH
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB,
 DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY
 PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR
 SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES???
 PATH AND MANEUVERING MOVEMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR. IF
 NEEDED, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF
 AN ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. THE PARKING TABLE IS
 NOT COMPLETELY VISIBLE IN SP-1
 7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING, PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN
 8) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE
 DIFFERENT WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION.
 WRONG SITE PLAN SUBMITTED.
 9) SATISFIED. SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE
 AREA WIDTH MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN
 ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
 10) SATISFIED. STOP BAR AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS
 MISPLACED. PLEASE CORRECT. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT
 DEPICT THE CORRECT SITE PLAN
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PATTERNED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
 ACROSS 21ST STREET. PLEASE MATCH EXISTING CROSSWALKS
 PATTERN IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 23:16:251) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED.
 PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE. LATEST
 SUBMISSION DID NOT HAVE THE LETTER IN THE DOCUMENTATION
 FOLDER
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN WITH
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB,
 DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY
 PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR
 SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES?
 PATH AND MANEUVERING MOVEMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR. IF
 NEEDED, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF
 AN ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. THE PARKING TABLE IS
 NOT COMPLETELY VISIBLE IN SP-1
 7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING, PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN
 8) NOT SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE
 DIFFERENT WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION.
 WRONG SITE PLAN SUBMITTED.
 9) SATISFIED. SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE
 AREA WIDTH MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN
 ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
 10) NOT SATISFIED. STOP BAR AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS
 MISPLACED. PLEASE CORRECT. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT
 DEPICT THE CORRECT SITE PLAN
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PATTERNED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
 ACROSS 21ST STREET. PLEASE MATCH EXISTING CROSSWALKS
 PATTERN IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-14 21:22:321) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED.
 PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN WITH
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB,
 DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY
 PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR
 SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES?
 PATH AND MANEUVERING MOVEMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR. IF
 NEEDED, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF
 AN ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE
 SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING
 SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. THE PARKING
 TABLE IS NOT COMPLETELY VISIBLE IN SP-1
 7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING, PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN
 8) DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE DIFFERENT
 WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION
 9) SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE AREA WIDTH
 MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY
 AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
 10) STOP BAR AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS MISPLACED.
 PLEASE CORRECT
 11) PROVIDE A PATTERNED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK ACROSS
 21ST STREET. PLEASE MATCH EXISTING CROSSWALK PATTERNS
 IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-06-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-06 20:20:05TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN WITH TRANSPORTATION
 FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY
 LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE
 INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS
 (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
 OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 6) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 7) THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS SHARED BICYCLE
 LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED OR MISSING,
 PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
 ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK FRONTING
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 11:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 11:41 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-07 10:34:46PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW:12.07.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120019
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-14
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -
 LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 3.1. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL) - THE
 LETTER FROM CONCAST INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
 ENCROACHES INTO THEIR EASEMENT OR INTERFERES WITH THEIR
 PROVISION OF SERVICES. PLEASE PROVIDE INFROMATION ON
 HOW THIS IS BEING ADDRESSED.
  
 3.2. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL) - THE
 LETTER FROM FPL INDICATES THAT NEW EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED; THIS WILL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK
 WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. SATISFIED - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. SATISFIED - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING
 TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP
 UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. SATISFIED - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 11. SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 12. SATISFIED - THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET
 PARKING IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 13. SATISFIED - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PROPERTY LINE
 ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE IS PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS THE
 SURVEY IS SHOWING A PORTION OF THE TAMARIND AVENUE
 SIDEWALK EXTENDING ONTO THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT A
 MAINTENANCE MAP WAS FILED SEVERAL YEARS AGO AND SHOULD
 HAVE CORRECTED THIS.
  
 13.1. SATISFIED - THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN STILL DO NOT
 REFLECT THE PROPERTY LINE AS DETERMINED BY THE
 MAINTENANCE MAP RECORDED IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES
 94-108 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 14. SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 14.1. SATISFIED - THE CONFIGURATION OF THE BIKE RACKS
 APPEARS TO MAKE IT DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCESS
 BOTH SIDE OF THE RACK.
  
 14.2. SATISFIED - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE
 A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 15. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,
 FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 16. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 18. SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 19. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 20. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH
 THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS
 THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 21. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,
 ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 21.1. SATISFIED - SEE COMMENT #27 BELOW.
  
 22. SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 23. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL) - THE
 DESIGN OF THE DOT?S MOTEL MONUMENT LOCATION WILL NEED
 TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE COLEMAN PARK NEIGHBORHOOD
 ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN IT IS PROPOSED TO BE IN A UTILITY
 EASEMENT WITH OVERHEAD POWER LINES, ETC.
  
 23.1. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE PRESENTATION WITH THE
 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
  
 24. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM AVERAGE GRADE OF
 THE LOT - WILL REQUIRE REDUCING THE HEIGHT BY A FEW
 INCHES) - THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO HAVE
 INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY AND EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
 BUILDING HEIGHT. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231, THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT WITHIN THE CP-NC ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET,
 WITH AN ADDITIONAL 10% ALLOWED FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS,
 PARAPETS, ETC.
  
 25. SATISFIED - THE SCALE ON THE SITE PLAN IS
 INCORRECT.
  
 26. SATISFIED - PORTIONS OF THE SITE PLAN, INCLUDING
 THE DATA TABLE, ETC. ARE CUT OFF.
  
 27. SATISFIED - BUILDING A DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 CORNER SIDE SETBACKS ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. STAIRS,
 ETC. THAT ARE 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT OR GREATER ARE
 CONSIDERED A PART OF THE BUILDING AND SHALL MEET THE
 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. STAIRS, ETC. THAT ARE LESS THAN
 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT MAY ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK BUT
 SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 2 FEET TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 28. SATISFIED - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE
 PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS BEING
 PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN THE
 MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 29. SATISFIED - THE RIGHT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM
 19TH STREET.
  
 30. SATISFIED - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH A
 CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-22-2022 Time 13:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 04-22-2022 Time 13:39 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-22 13:39:26PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.22.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120019
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-14
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL) -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY
 COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
 OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 SERVICES.
  
 3.1. NEW COMMENT - THE LETTER FROM CONCAST INDICATES
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT ENCROACHES INTO THEIR
 EASEMENT OR INTERFERES WITH THEIR PROVISION OF
 SERVICES. PLEASE PROVIDE INFROMATION ON HOW THIS IS
 BEING ADDRESSED.
  
 3.2. NEW COMMENT - THE LETTER FROM FPL INDICATES THAT
 NEW EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED; THIS WILL BE A
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH
 THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. NEW COMMENT - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. NEW COMMENT - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS FACING TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ
 AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. NEW COMMENT - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 12. SATISFIED - THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET
 PARKING IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PROPERTY
 LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE IS PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS
 THE SURVEY IS SHOWING A PORTION OF THE TAMARIND AVENUE
 SIDEWALK EXTENDING ONTO THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT A
 MAINTENANCE MAP WAS FILED SEVERAL YEARS AGO AND SHOULD
 HAVE CORRECTED THIS.
  
 13.1. NEW COMMENT - THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN STILL DO
 NOT REFLECT THE PROPERTY LINE AS DETERMINED BY THE
 MAINTENANCE MAP RECORDED IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES
 94-108 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE
 ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 14.1. NEW COMMENT - THE CONFIGURATION OF THE BIKE RACKS
 APPEARS TO MAKE IT DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCESS
 BOTH SIDE OF THE RACK.
  
 14.2. NEW COMMENT - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD
 BE A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 15. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,
 FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 16. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 18. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 19. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 20. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION
 THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE,
 ETC. AS THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF
 OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND
 DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE
 THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 21.1. NEW COMMENT - SEE COMMENT #27 BELOW.
  
 22. SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE DESIGN OF THE DOT?S MOTEL
 MONUMENT LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE
 COLEMAN PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN IT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE IN A UTILITY EASEMENT WITH OVERHEAD
 POWER LINES, ETC.
  
 23.1. NEW COMMENT - PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE
 PRESENTATION WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.
  
 24. NEW COMMENT - THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO
 HAVE INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY AND EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
 BUILDING HEIGHT. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231, THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT WITHIN THE CP-NC ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET,
 WITH AN ADDITIONAL 10% ALLOWED FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS,
 PARAPETS, ETC.
  
 25. NEW COMMENT - THE SCALE ON THE SITE PLAN IS
 INCORRECT.
  
 26. NEW COMMENT - PORTIONS OF THE SITE PLAN, INCLUDING
 THE DATA TABLE, ETC. ARE CUT OFF.
  
 27. NEW COMMENT - BUILDING A DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 CORNER SIDE SETBACKS ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. STAIRS,
 ETC. THAT ARE 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT OR GREATER ARE
 CONSIDERED A PART OF THE BUILDING AND SHALL MEET THE
 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. STAIRS, ETC. THAT ARE LESS THAN
 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT MAY ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK BUT
 SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 2 FEET TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 28. NEW COMMENT - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM
 THE PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS
 BEING PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN
 THE MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 29. NEW COMMENT - THE RIGHT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM
 19TH STREET.
  
 30. NEW COMMENT - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH
 A CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 11:20:00PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120019
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-14
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE
 TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 4. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES
 INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH
 THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
 [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE
 VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS
 INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS EXACTLY THE SAME.
 ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
 ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY ARE SEPARATE SITES
 ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE
 ANOTHER.
  
 5.2. ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED ON THE
 SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING TAMARIND
 AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH
 THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 6. PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT THE PROPERTY
 LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 8. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE
 OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
 9. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 10. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING DOORS ARE
 ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 11. THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 12. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET PARKING IS
 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 13. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG
 TAMARIND AVENUE IS PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS THE SURVEY IS
 SHOWING A PORTION OF THE TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK
 EXTENDING ONTO THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT A MAINTENANCE
 MAP WAS FILED SEVERAL YEARS AGO AND SHOULD HAVE
 CORRECTED THIS.
  
 14. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 15. ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS, FENCES, ETC. IF
 RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED, DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 16. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 17. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, IT
 LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK; SUCH
 MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (AS
 DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF
 THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND
 8 FEET.
  
 19. SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE ENTIRE
 SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS THE
 PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 21. ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, ETC. NEED
 TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN. PURSUANT
 TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL NOT
 EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 22. CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 23. THE DESIGN OF THE DOT?S MOTEL MONUMENT LOCATION
 WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE COLEMAN PARK
 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN IT IS PROPOSED TO BE
 IN A UTILITY EASEMENT WITH OVERHEAD POWER LINES, ETC.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved