Plan Review Details - Project Z21120018
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21120018
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 18:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-12-2022 Time 18:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-12 18:50:11DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 4. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 5. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 07-19-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-28-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-28-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-28 09:27:48Z21120018, 0017 - NEIGHBORHOOD RENAISSANCE, 1980 N
 TAMARIND RESUB 3.24.22
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF
 CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.
 4. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 6. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 1. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW
 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,
 STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND
 OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL
 AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE
 AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 7. PLEASE CLOUD/HIGHLIGHT PLAN REVISIONS OR CHANGES IN
 SCOPE FOR RESUBMITTAL OF DRAWINGS.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP
 UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY
 LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED
 UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL
 BACKFLOWS.
 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO
 NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE
 CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT.
 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT
 OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY LABEL ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY
 INFRASTRUCTURE IS PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT
 SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF
 ADJACENT PARCELS.
 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER
 INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT
 PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL
 GC-8.
 19. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -RESPONSE LETTER DID NOT CONTAIN THE REVIEW COMMENTS
 FOR 1980 N TAMARIND. LOOKS TO BE THE REVIEW COMMENTS
 FOR ANOTHER PROJECT. PLEASE RESUBMIT RESPONSE LETTER
 WITH CORRECT REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES.
 -ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO LABEL OF 4 INCH DOMESTIC
 METER.
 -FOOTPRINT OF DOMESTIC METER MAY BE LARGER THAN SHOWN
 ON WATER PLAN.
 -DOMESTIC METER LOOKS TO BE CONFLICTING WITH FIRE
 HYDRANT CLEARANCE AREA.
 -DRAINAGE PIPING SEEMS TO RUN UNDER STAIRWAY, WATER
 METER WITH CONCRETE PAD, BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, AND CLOSE
 TO FIRE HYDRANT. OTHER THAN DIFFICULT MAINTENANCE, ARE
 THE CROSSING CLEARANCE DISTANCES SUFFICIENT?
 -CATCH BASINS AND EXFILTRATION TRENCH SEEM TO CONFLICT
 WITH A WALL. EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS EXTENDING PAST
 PROPERTY LINE.
 -ON CIVIL PLANS CALLOUT WIDTH OF SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH
 SIDE OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO 19TH ST.
 -LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND
 RETAINING WALLS ON CIVIL PLANS. (SEE SOME NOT LABELED)
 -ON LANDSCAPING PLAN, PLEASE ADD LEGEND FOR
 IDENTIFICATION OF THE DIFFERENT HATCHED AREAS.
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN DOES NOT SHOW UTILITIES. PLEASE
 VERIFY NO CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND TREES. IF ANY
 FOUND, PLEASE INCREASE CLEARANCE DISTANCE AND ADD ROOT
 BARRIER.
 -ADD STANDARD DETAIL FOR LARGE ABOVE GROUND WATER
 METER.
 -LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS BUSH IN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOT.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 08:26:15COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING
 TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR FIRE HYDRANT NEAR SOUTH
 SIDE OF PROJECT.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL UTILITY EASEMENT FOR METERED WATER
 SERVICES ON PROPERTY.
  
 -WILL GUY WIRES AT NEAR SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING B
 REMAIN?
  
 -WILL ABOVE-GROUND CATV RISER AND TRAFFIC CONTROL BOXES
 REMAIN?
  
 -WILL RETAINING WALLS REMAIN AT EAST SIDE OF LOTS 11
 AND 10?
  
 -TURN AROUND SPACE DOES NOT APPEAR USABLE DUE TO
 DUMPSTER AREA STRUCTURE.
  
 -18 INCH RCP LOOKS TO CONFLICT WITH EXISTING FIRE
 HYDRANT.
  
 -PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APPROACH WOULD PUT EXISTING METER
 BOX IN VEHICLE TRAFFIC. METER BOX AND SERVICE WOULD
 NEED TO BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED.
  
 -PAVEMENT RESTORATION OF GRANT ST WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR
 PROPOSED UTILITY WORK. OTHER STREET RESTORATION MAY BE
 NEEDED IF UTILITY WORK ENCROACHES INTO THEM.
  
 -PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE WATER METERS. 12 ARE
 SHOWN AND THAT INCLUDES 1 IRRIGATION METER, BUT THERE
 ARE ONLY 10 UNITS. WHAT IS THE EXTRA METER USED FOR?
  
 -WATER DESIGN IS NONSTANDARD AND MAY REQUIRE REVISION
 AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 -ARE MORE SEWER LATERAL CLEANOUTS NEEDED? IF SO, SHOW
 AND LABEL ON CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -SOME WATER METER LOCATIONS LOOKS TO CONFLICT WITH
 STAIR STRUCTURE.
  
 -CURRENTLY THERE IS A SIDEWALK AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF
 PROPERTY. VERIFY THAT SIDEWALK WILL STILL BE USABLE AND
 EAST SIDE OF DRIVEWAY APPROACH WILL NOT HAVE RAISED
 CURBING.
  
 -DID NOT SEE DOCUMENTATION OF FORMAL REQUEST FOR 10
 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ABANDONMENT. PLEASE SUBMIT,
 VERIFY IF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE EASEMENT, AND
 SHOW BETTER THE BOUNDARIES OF PROPOSED ABANDONMENT
 AREA.
  
 -PLANS DESCRIBED FIRE SPRINKLERS. FIRE SPRINKLERS
 CANNOT BE FED FROM DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES. WOULD NEED
 AT LEAST ONE DEDICATED FIRE SERVICE WITH DETECTOR
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THOSE REQUIRE UTILITY BILLING
 ACCOUNTS.
  
 -RETAIL AND IRRIGATION METERED WATER SERVICES WOULD
 NEED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON
 PLANS. ALSO ANY METERED WATER SERVICE FEEDING MULTIPLE
 DWELLING UNITS WOULD NEED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AS WELL.
  
 -EASEMENTS OR AGREEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK
 ON TAMARIND.
  
 -GREASE TRAPS/INTERCEPTORS MAY BE REQUIRED IF THE
 RETAIL UNITS HAVE FOOD SERVICE.
  
 -GEO REPORT SAYS GFA SHOULD BE REQUESTED TO REVIEW DATA
 TO SEE IF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE VALID. WILL APPLICANT
 FOLLOWUP WITH THEM ONCE BUILDING DETAILS ARE FINALIZED?
  
 -LANDSCAPING TREES APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES.
 PLEASE REVISE PLANS SO NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND
 UTILITIES.
  
 -THE ROW VACATION APPLICATION DOES NOT HAVE THE WRITTEN
 VERIFICATION FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES THAT THERE ARE
 NO CONFLICTS. PLEASE SUBMIT.
  
 -HOW WILL THE IRRIGATION UTILITY BILL BE HANDLED? WILL
 THERE BE AN HOA OR PROPERTY MANAGER?
  
 -SOME SIDEWALKS MAY REQUIRE REPLACEMENT DUE TO
 PROJECT?S UTILITY WORK.
  
 -PLANS SAY THAT EASTERN SIDEWALK IS COVERED, BUT COULD
 NOT DETERMINE HOW. IS THERE A PROJECTION OFF THE
 BUILDING OR A STANDALONE COVERING?
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-27-2022 Time 15:16 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-27 15:17:07FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-04-2022 Time 10:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-04 10:09:15FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-04-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time 11:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-04-2022 Time 11:47 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-04 11:47:53THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING(S) SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
 CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC SHALL
 BE WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED
 WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. 61G
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET AND BE INSTALLED PER THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
 THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S ENGINEERS
 OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S PLANNING
 AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF
 TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY
 LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-17-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-17-2022 Time 11:51 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-17 11:52:12FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1980 N TAMARIND Z21120018
 NOVEMBER 17, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ??? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION
 SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE
 CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION
 DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER
 MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND
 ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 MANGO AND TAMARIND ARE LESS THAN 20 FT CANOPY DIAMETER,
 AND BOTH ARE CATEGORY 1, SO EACH 300 SQ FT MITIGATION
 DUE. CORRECT ON TD-1.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 TOTAL IS 600 SQ FT. CORRECT ON TD-1.
 ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 7 SIMPSONS STOPPER, CATEGORY 3, EACH 100 SQ FT CREDIT,
 FOR 700 SQ FT
 6 LIVE OAKS, CATEGORY 3, EACH 300 SQ FT CREDIT, FOR 900
 SQ FT
 8 ORANGE GEIGER, CATEGORY 2, EACH 150 SQ FT, FOR 1200
 SQ FT
 3 PIGEON PLUM, CATEGORY 2, EACH 150 SQ FT, FOR 450 SQ
 FT
 6 THATCH PALM, CATEGORY 4, EACH 50 SQ FT, FOR 300 SQ FT
 TOTAL MITIGATION PROVIDED- 3,550 SQ FT
 SHOW ON TD-1
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
 THE WESTERN BUFFER ALONG TAMARIND HAS MULTIPLE BREAKS
 FOR PAVED AREAS. STAFF WILL DETERMINE IF THE PATIO
 AREAS CANNOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT INTERRUPTION INTENDED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS AND EXFILTRATION
 LOCATION WILL PROHIBIT PLANTING OF SEVERAL REQUIRED
 TREES.
 8/8/22 CONFLICTS STILL SHOWN WITH DRAINAGE LINES AND
 SEWER LINES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:
  
 14. SATISFIED. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND
 VALVES.
  
 15. SATISFIED. ORANGE GEIGER AND LIGUSTRUM NEED TO BE
 SHOWN AT 12 FT HEIGHT SPECIFICATION ON THE PLAN. ANY
 SUPPLY ISSUES MAY BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-08-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 10:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-08-2022 Time 10:14 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-08 10:15:16FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1980 N TAMARIND Z21120018
 AUGUST 8, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR
 EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN
 DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 MANGO AND TAMARIND ARE LESS THAN 20 FT CANOPY DIAMETER,
 AND BOTH ARE CATEGORY 1, SO EACH 300 SQ FT MITIGATION
 DUE. CORRECT ON TD-1.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 TOTAL IS 600 SQ FT. CORRECT ON TD-1.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 7 SIMPSONS STOPPER, CATEGORY 3, EACH 100 SQ FT CREDIT,
 FOR 700 SQ FT
 6 LIVE OAKS, CATEGORY 3, EACH 300 SQ FT CREDIT, FOR 900
 SQ FT
 8 ORANGE GEIGER, CATEGORY 2, EACH 150 SQ FT, FOR 1200
 SQ FT
 3 PIGEON PLUM, CATEGORY 2, EACH 150 SQ FT, FOR 450 SQ
 FT
 6 THATCH PALM, CATEGORY 4, EACH 50 SQ FT, FOR 300 SQ FT
 TOTAL MITIGATION PROVIDED- 3,550 SQ FT
 SHOW ON TD-1
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY
 LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
 THE WESTERN BUFFER ALONG TAMARIND HAS MULTIPLE BREAKS
 FOR PAVED AREAS. STAFF WILL DETERMINE IF THE PATIO
 AREAS CANNOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT INTERRUPTION INTENDED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30%
 FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY
 LINES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS AND EXFILTRATION
 LOCATION WILL PROHIBIT PLANTING OF SEVERAL REQUIRED
 TREES.
 8/8/22 CONFLICTS STILL SHOWN WITH DRAINAGE LINES AND
 SEWER LINES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/8/22:
  
 14. MUST SHOW SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 18:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-05-2022 Time 18:06 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-05 18:07:47FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1980 N TAMARIND Z21120018
 APRIL 5, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE
 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR
 EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 OR TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN
 DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
 AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING
 CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR
 THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR
 THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION
 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN
 SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL
 THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH
 PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE
 TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST
 BE USED.
 THE WESTERN BUFFER ALONG TAMARIND HAS MULTIPLE BREAKS
 FOR PAVED AREAS. STAFF WILL DETERMINE IF THE PATIO
 AREAS CANNOT EXCEED 20 PERCENT INTERRUPTION INTENDED.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2.,
 PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
 THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING
 PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED.
 THE REQUIREMENT IS 40% PER SECTION 94-443(D)2.A.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B.,
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST
 HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA
 SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW
 OF PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED
 AS PART OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES
 INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 UTILITIES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 CONFLICTS RESOLVED. UTILITY POSITIONS AND EXFILTRATION
 LOCATION WILL PROHIBIT PLANTING OF SEVERAL REQUIRED
 TREES.
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES
 THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT
 PLACE GUIDELINES.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE
 SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY LINES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-12-2022 Time 13:42 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-12 13:43:11FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1980 N TAMARIND Z21120018
 JANUARY 12, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHOWING THE
 LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES AND INCLUDE THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 ? ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION SQUARE
 FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED BASED ON THE CATEGORY OR TREE CANOPY
 DIAMETER. COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE.
 TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN DIAMETER MUST
 HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED AND ENTERED
 ON THE CHART.
 ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
 ? PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED
 BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION FOR ALL
 TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND
 PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE SITE
 BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B.
 PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN SPACE BASED ON
 THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ADD THE MULTIFAMILY TREE
 REQUIREMENT TO THIS TOTAL.
  
 4. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
 PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A
 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED
 1:1 SPECIES.
  
  
 5. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE
 THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE
 PER THE SURVEY MUST BE USED.
  
 6. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30% FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUILDING.
  
 7. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST HAVE AT
 LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA SHALL
 HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW OF
 PARKING. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS
 PART OF
 THE TERMINAL ISLAND. SHOW DIMENSIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 8. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE PROVIDED.
 9. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS
 FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS LIST AND SHOW
 THE TOTAL PROVIDED.
 10. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM
 OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA
 NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE
 CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT
 EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
 WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL
 PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED
 ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 11. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES INCLUDING
 WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT.
  
 12. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT WILL
 LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE
 GUIDELINES.
  
 13. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL
 IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
 LINES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 01-05-2022 Time 16:59 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-05 16:59:42-CUT/CAP EXISTING WATER SERVICES AT THE MAIN.
 - REPLACE/LINE EXISTING LATERALS AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE
 POST CCTV FOOTAGE.
 -SHOW/LABEL EASEMENT.
 -SHOW PROFILE WITH UNDERGROUND CONFLICTS.
 -SHOW PROFILE OF 4? CONNECTION FROM TAP TO POINT OF
 SERVICE.
 -SHOW UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
 -SHOW STATIONING AND OFFSETS FROM UTILITIES.
 -PROVIDE SOFT DIG REPORT.
 -TELEVISE EXISTING GRAVITY MAIN SYSTEM ON PROPERTY/CUT
 AND CAP ANY UNUSED LATERALS.
 - FOR STORMWATER STRUCTURES CALL OUT STATIONING AND
 HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UTILITIES
  
 CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 11-14-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-14 09:35:06NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-28-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-28-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-28 13:43:04PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED SHEET SP-2 TO REFLECT ALL THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCOSURE PER THE LATEST
 REVISION OF GC-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
 THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
 PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
 00).
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 01-13-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 10:13:26PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- REVISED LOCATION/ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE TO MINIMIZE BACKUPS AND SHORT RADUIS TURNS.
 3-AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE'S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
  * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
  * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT
  * TURNING RADIUS:
  - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
  - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
  - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS.
 5- REVIESD ENCLOSURE DETAILS, SHEET SP-2, TO COMPLY
 WITH THE CG-7. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-7.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 10:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-13-2022 Time 10:46 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-13 10:46:28CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. SHOW OUTLINE OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONFIRM THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING WILL
 NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 2. CONFIRM THE CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE 6 FEET WIDE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH EAST OF BUILDING A BETWEEN THE
 EXISTING RETAINING WALL AND THE FOOTER FOR THE
 BUILDING. FUTURE MAINTENANCE (I.E. REPLACEMENT) OF THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED IF THE
 TRENCH WILL BE LOCATED UNDER ANY BUILDING OVERHANGS.
 3. SHOW AND LABEL (SIZE AND MATERIAL) ALL EXISTING
 UTILITIES IN THE R/W.
 4. CONFIRM THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO BE
 CONNECTED TO IS NOT A BUBBLE-UP STRUCTURE. SHOW
 EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE CONNECTIONS. PROVIDE PROPOSED
 INVERT ELEVATION FOR PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING INLET.
 PROVIDE THE BOTTOM ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE
 EXISTING PIPE(S) CONNECTED TO THE INLET.
 5. CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE FOR THE MIDBLOCK
 CROSS WALK ON BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND AVE.
 6. COORDINATE CURBING CALLOUTS ON SHEET C2.3 WITH THE
 CROSS SECTIONS AND THE GRADES ON SHEET C2.1.
 7. COORDINATE THE EAST-WEST LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES IN THE PARKING LOT WITH THE SECTION A.
 8. PROVIDE SIGNING AND STRIPING FOR THE MIDBLOCK CROSS
 WALK. LABEL THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE.
 9. COORDINATE DETAILS FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH
 THE DRAINAGE PLAN.
 10. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 FROM THE CNETERLINE OF THE R/W TO 5 FEET PAST THE HIGH
 POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY. SHOW BREAK POINTS, SURFACE
 FEATURES, R/W LINE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM THE R/W TO
 THE DRIVEWAY HIGH POINT AND OTHER BREAK POINTS, TO THE
 BACK OF CURB/EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TO THE R/W CENTERLINE.
 SHOW AND DIMENSION WHERE THE SIDEWALK WILL CROSS THE
 DRIVEWAY.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
 NOT INCLUDED.
  
 5. [SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW COMMENTS BELOW]
 PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. FACE OF BUILDING TO 19TH ST CENTERLINE
 D. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 E. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?A?
 F. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?B?
  
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
  
  
  
 9. [SATISFIED - NO NEW SIDEWALKS PER PREVIOUS RESPONSE]
 PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND
 FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 SECTION A ON SHEET C3.2 CALLS OUT NEW SIDEWALK ALONG
 19TH ST AND ALONG GRANT AVE. REVISE SECTION OR ADD
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK HATCH PATTERN ON SHEETS C2.1 AND C2.3
 AND HATCH THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE BUILDINGS
 TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 4 FT+/-
 GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT (REVISED FOR
 7/19 SUBMITTAL): PARKING LOT ELEVATION AT EAST END OF
 HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE IS APPROX.. 27.7 FT NAVD. THE
 LANDING AT THE BOTTOM OF 19.0 FT LONG RAMP IS AT
 ELEVATION 26.0 FT NAVD. RAMP SLOPE CALCULATES TO 8.9%,
 WHICH IS STEEPER THAN THE 1:12 ALLOWED FOR NEW
 CONSTRUCTION. THE SOUTH END OF THE 10 FT LONG RAMP IS
 47.5 FEET FROM THE NORTH CORNER OF THE BUILDING B. THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE DOOR FRAME OF THE APARTMENT ADJACENT
 TO THE RETAIL SPACE IS 47.08 FEET FROM THE NORTH CORNER
 OF BUILDING B SO THAT THE RAMP WILL BE IN FRONT OF THE
 DOOR.
  
  
 20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? SHOW OUTLINE OF
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 26. [NOT SATISFIED ??? ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAY NOT
 CONNECT TO THE STRUCTURE IF THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IS
 NOT CONNECTED TO A POSITIVE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.] SHOW ALL
 EXISTING PIPE CONNECTIONS (WITH PIPE SIZES) TO THE
 EXISTING CURB INLET AND THE STRUCTURES THESE PIPES ARE
 CONNECTED TO.
  
 30. - 33 [NOT SATISFIED ? NOTE PREVIOUS SECTIONS WERE
 REPLACED WITH NEW SECTIONS ON THE 7/19 SUBMITTAL. THE
 COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE NEW SECTIONS.
  
 30. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
 A. SECTION APPEARS TO CORRESPOND TO SECTION B SYMBOL ON
 SHEET C2.1.
 B. CHANGE LABEL OF GRANT AVE TO GRANT ST.
 C. SIDEWALKS ON GRANT ST AND 19TH ST APPEAR TO HAVE
 THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK. PROVIDE A DETAIL
 FOR THE SIDEWALK.
 D. DOOR AND WINDOW LAYOUT FOR BUILDINGS A AND B DO NOT
 MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
 E. CONFIRM THE GRADES PROVIDED FOR GRANT ST. THE EP IS
 SHOWN HIGHER THAN THE CENTERLINE.
  
 31. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2):
 A. [SATISFIED] SECTION APPEARS TO CORRESPOND TO SECTION
 A SYMBOL ON SHEET C2.1.
 B. [SATISFIED] VERIFY ELEVATION FOR EAST SIDE OF DRIVE
 AISLE (29.7).
 C. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK ALONG TAMARIND AVE APPEARS TO
 HAVE A THICKENED EDGE.
 D. [NOT SATISFIED] CENTER OF DRIVE AISLE APPEARS TO BE
 LOW SPOT (INVERTED CROWN) BUT THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
 ON SHEET C2.1 ARE 14+ FEET FROM THE EAST EDGE OF THE
 PARKING LOT.
  
 32.[SATISFIED] SECTION C (SHEET C3.2):
 A. THIS SECTION DOESN???T APPEAR TO BE FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING A WIDTH IS CALLED OUT AS 132 FEET
 WHEREAS IN SECTION A THE BUILDING A WIDTH IS 88 FEET.
 B. PROVIDE A SECTION CORRESPONDING TO THE SECTION C
 SYMBOL ON SHEET C2.1.
  
 36. [NOT SATISFIED] ARCHITECTURAL NORTH AND SOUTH
 ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE MISLABELED ON SHEETS
 A-2.1/A2.2B AND SHEETS A-2.1A/A-2.2A.
  
 NEW COMMENTS ON 7/19/22 SUBMITTAL:
  
 37. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE CENTER
 OF THE PARKING LOT TO THE EAST FACE OF BUILDING,
 CENTERED ON THE RAMP FROM THE PARKING LOT TO THE FIRST
 FLOOR SIDEWALK. PROVIDE HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND
 ELEVATIONS AT EACH GRADE BREAK.
  
 38.[SATISFIED[ LABEL BUILDING A AND BUILDING B ON THE
 CIVIL DRAWINGS.
  
 39. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL THE EXISTING UTILITIES (PIPE
 SIZE AND MATERIAL) IN THE RIGHTS OF WAYS.
  
 40. [SATISFIED] HOW DOES ONE ACCESS BUILDING A FROM THE
 PARKING LOT? THERE DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE A SIDEWALK
 CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS ON THE EAST SIDE
 OF THE BUILDINGS.
  
 41. [NOT SATISFIED] CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE
 FOR THE MIDBLOCK CROSS WALK ON BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND
 AVE.
  
 42. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATION
 FOR PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING INLET. PROVIDE THE
 BOTTOM ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE EXISTING
 PIPE(S) CONNECTED TO THE INLET.
  
 43. [SATISFIED] SOUTH STAIRWELL OF BUILDING B APPEARS
 TO CONFLICT WITH THE WEST RETAINING WALL OF THE PARKING
 LOT.
  
 44. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A YARD DRAIN AT WEST END OF THE
 AREA BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS TO COLLECT RUNOFF BEFORE
 IT FLOWS OVER THE SIDEWALK.
  
 45. [SATISFIED ??? SUGGEST MOVING STRUCTURES S-101 AND
 S-102 SOUTHWARD] SLOPE OF PARKING LOT BETWEEN S-101 AND
 BACK OF SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE CLOSE TO 9%.
  
 46. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? DOUBLE PROPOSED SPOT
 GRADES PROVIDED FOR EAST EDGE OF PARKING LOT.] SHOW
 CURBING ALONG SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF PARKING LOT ON
 THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. SHEET C2.3 CALLS OUT TYPE D CURB.
  
 46. [NOT SATISFIED] BIKE LANE STRIPING SHALL FOLLOW THE
 CITY STANDARD DETAILS AND THE MUTCD.
  
 47. [NOT SATISFIED] SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NEEDED FOR THE
 MID-BLOCK CROSS WALK.
  
 48. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW PIPE SIZES AND INVERT
 ELEVATIONS LISTED ON THE CONTROL STRUCTURE S-104
 DETAILS.
  
 49. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW PIPE MATERIAL LISTED ON THE
 CONTROL STRUCTURE S-102 DETAILS.
  
 50. [SATISFIED] MOVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AREA OUTSIDE
 OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 NEW COMMENT (11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL)
 51. CONFIRM THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE 6-FOOT
 WIDE EXFILTRATION TRENCH BETWEEN THE EXISTING RETAINING
 WALL AND THE BUILDING A FOOTER AS WELL AS INSTALL THE
 PERIMETER LANDSCAPING.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 14:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-01-2022 Time 14:58 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 14:58:09THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/19/2022 SUBMITTAL.
 1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON) ON COVER.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] RELOCATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM UNDER
 STAIRS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - OUTFALL PIPE IS UNDER THE
 SOUTH STAIRS OF BUILDING A. THIS PIPE IS WILL BE
 MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. STAFF IS NOTIFYING
 ENGINEER TO SEE IF THE PIPE CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANOTHER
 LOCATION TO AVOID IMPACTING THE STAIRS IF THE PIPE
 NEEDS TO BE REPLACED/REPAIRED IN THE FUTURE.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF
 SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - PROVIDE FLOW AREAS
 FOR THE AREAS AROUND THE BUILDING. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES
 ARE ONLY PROVIDED IN THE PARKING LOT.
  
 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW
 COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. FACE OF BUILDING TO 19TH ST CENTERLINE
 D. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 E. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?A?
 F. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?B?
  
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN
 THE STREETS.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
 PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE
 ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - THE LOCATION FOR
 THIS CURB IS NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PGD PLAN.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE
 STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED - NO NEW SIDEWALKS PER PREVIOUS
 RESPONSE] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO
 REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: SECTION A ON SHEET C3.2 CALLS OUT NEW SIDEWALK
 ALONG 19TH ST AND ALONG GRANT AVE. REVISE SECTION OR
 ADD PROPOSED SIDEWALK HATCH PATTERN ON SHEETS C2.1 AND
 C2.3 AND HATCH THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE
 BUILDINGS TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 4
 FT+/- GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT (REVISED
 FOR 7/19 SUBMITTAL): PARKING LOT ELEVATION AT EAST END
 OF HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE IS APPROX.. 27.7 FT NAVD. THE
 LANDING AT THE BOTTOM OF 19.0 FT LONG RAMP IS AT
 ELEVATION 26.0 FT NAVD. RAMP SLOPE CALCULATES TO 8.9%,
 WHICH IS STEEPER THAN THE 1:12 ALLOWED FOR NEW
 CONSTRUCTION. THE SOUTH END OF THE 10 FT LONG RAMP IS
 47.5 FEET FROM THE NORTH CORNER OF THE BUILDING B. THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE DOOR FRAME OF THE APARTMENT ADJACENT
 TO THE RETAIL SPACE IS 47.08 FEET FROM THE NORTH CORNER
 OF BUILDING B SO THAT THE RAMP WILL BE IN FRONT OF THE
 DOOR.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING
 DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE
 PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 SP-1 STILL SHOWS 25? DIMENSION AND DOES NOT DIMENSION
 THE NEW PARKING SPACE LAYOUT.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH
 END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
  
 13. [SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 14. [SAITISFIED - NO NEW CURBING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY]
 LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF
 WAY.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING GUTTER BETWEEN PLANTER AT
 NORTH END OF N. TAMARIND AVE AND THE CURB ALONG THE
 SIDEWALK.
  
 17. [SATISFIED - POLE WILL NEED TO BE SUPPORTED DURING
 PIPE INSTALLATION] STORM OUTFALL PIPE IS LESS THAN 2
 FEET FROM FPL CONCRETE POLE.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] INDICATE IF TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX IS TO
 REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED.
  
 19. [SATISFIED] UTILITY EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT.
  
 20. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 21. [SATISFIED] EXFILTRATION TRENCH APPEARS TO CROSS
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AND ALSO BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 EXISTING RETAINING WALL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: NOTE
 BOTTOM OF TRENCH WILL BE ABOUT 1 FOOT HORIZONTALLY FROM
 FACE OF WALL AND 5.5 FEET BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL.
  
 22. [SATISFIED ? RETAINING WALL IS PROPOSED.] 2.5 FT
 GRADE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EAST PROPERTY LINE AND
 PARKING LOT.
  
 23. [SATISFIED] LABEL GRANT ST. CORRECTLY.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 24. [SATISFIED] ON SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING
 PLAN SHEETS UPDATE REFERENCES TO FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO
 LATEST FDOT STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS.
  
 25.[SATISFIED] JUSTIFY 18-INCH DIAMETER PIPE SIZE FOR
 OUTFALL PIPE BETWEEN S-104 AND EXISTING CURB INLET.
  
 26. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW ALL EXISTING PIPE CONNECTIONS
 (WITH PIPE SIZES) TO THE EXISTING CURB INLET AND THE
 STRUCTURES THESE PIPES ARE CONNECTED TO.
  
 27. [SATISFIED] PIPE BETWEEN S-102 AND S-103 CROSSES
 THE PROPERTY CORNER.
  
 28. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST MOVING THE MILL AND RESURFACING
 LIMITS ON GRANT AVE TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE STAMPED
 ASPHALT CROSS WALK.
  
 29. [SATISFIED] PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF 28.2 FT NAVD AT
 EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY TO 19TH STREET IS LOWER
 THAN THE EXISTING SPOT GRADE OF 29.13 FT NAVD. SHOW HOW
 THE ROAD WILL TRANSITION TO THE PROPOSED GRADE.
  
 30. - 33 [NOT SATISFIED ? NOTE PREVIOUS SECTIONS WERE
 REPLACED WITH NEW SECTIONS ON THE 7/19 SUBMITTAL. THE
 COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE NEW SECTIONS.
  
 30. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
 A. SECTION APPEARS TO CORRESPOND TO SECTION B SYMBOL ON
 SHEET C2.1.
 B. CHANGE LABEL OF GRANT AVE TO GRANT ST.
 C. SIDEWALKS ON GRANT ST AND 19TH ST APPEAR TO HAVE
 THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK. PROVIDE A DETAIL
 FOR THE SIDEWALK.
 D. DOOR AND WINDOW LAYOUT FOR BUILDINGS A AND B DO NOT
 MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
 E. CONFIRM THE GRADES PROVIDED FOR GRANT ST. THE EP IS
 SHOWN HIGHER THAN THE CENTERLINE.
  
 31. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2):
 A. SECTION APPEARS TO CORRESPOND TO SECTION A SYMBOL ON
 SHEET C2.1.
 B. VERIFY ELEVATION FOR EAST SIDE OF DRIVE AISLE
 (29.7).
 C. SIDEWALK ALONG TAMARIND AVE APPEARS TO HAVE A
 THICKENED EDGE.
 D. CENTER OF DRIVE AISLE APPEARS TO BE LOW SPOT
 (INVERTED CROWN) BUT THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON SHEET
 C2.1 ARE 14+ FEET FROM THE EAST EDGE OF THE PARKING
 LOT.
  
 32. SECTION C (SHEET C3.2):
 A. THIS SECTION DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING A WIDTH IS CALLED OUT AS 132 FEET
 WHEREAS IN SECTION A THE BUILDING A WIDTH IS 88 FEET.
 B. PROVIDE A SECTION CORRESPONDING TO THE SECTION C
 SYMBOL ON SHEET C2.1.
  
 36. [NOT SATISFIED] ARCHITECTURAL NORTH AND SOUTH
 ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE MISLABELED ON SHEETS
 A-2.1/A2.2B AND SHEETS A-2.1A/A-2.2A.
  
 NEW COMMENTS ON 7/19/22 SUBMITTAL:
  
 37. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE
 PARKING LOT TO THE EAST FACE OF BUILDING, CENTERED ON
 THE RAMP FROM THE PARKING LOT TO THE FIRST FLOOR
 SIDEWALK. PROVIDE HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS
 AT EACH GRADE BREAK.
  
 38. LABEL BUILDING A AND BUILDING B ON THE CIVIL
 DRAWINGS.
  
 39. LABEL THE EXISTING UTILITIES (PIPE SIZE AND
 MATERIAL) IN THE RIGHTS OF WAYS.
  
 40. HOW DOES ONE ACCESS BUILDING A FROM THE PARKING
 LOT? THERE DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE A SIDEWALK CONNECTION
 BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDINGS.
  
 41. CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE FOR THE MIDBLOCK
 CROSS WALK ON BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND AVE.
  
 42. PROVIDE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATION FOR PIPE
 CONNECTION TO EXISTING INLET. PROVIDE THE BOTTOM
 ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE EXISTING PIPE(S)
 CONNECTED TO THE INLET.
  
 43. SOUTH STAIRWELL OF BUILDING B APPEARS TO CONFLICT
 WITH THE WEST RETAINING WALL OF THE PARKING LOT.
  
 44. PROVIDE A YARD DRAIN AT WEST END OF THE AREA
 BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS TO COLLECT RUNOFF BEFORE IT
 FLOWS OVER THE SIDEWALK.
  
 45. SLOPE OF PARKING LOT BETWEEN S-101 AND BACK OF
 SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE CLOSE TO 9%.
  
 46. SHOW CURBING ALONG SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF PARKING
 LOT ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. SHEET C2.3 CALLS OUT TYPE D
 CURB.
  
 46. BIKE LANE STRIPING SHALL FOLLOW THE CITY STANDARD
 DETAILS AND THE MUTCD.
  
 47. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NEEDED FOR THE MID-BLOCK CROSS
 WALK.
  
 48. REVIEW PIPE SIZES AND INVERT ELEVATIONS LISTED ON
 THE CONTROL STRUCTURE S-104 DETAILS.
  
 49. REVIEW PIPE MATERIAL LISTED ON THE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE S-102 DETAILS.
  
 50. MOVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AREA OUTSIDE OF THE ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-26-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-26-2022 Time 13:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-26-2022 Time 13:12 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-26 13:12:39THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 3/24/2022 RESUBMITTAL:
  
 Z21120017 GRANT STREET AT TAMARIND AVE (NE CORNER)
 1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] RELOCATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM
 UNDER STAIRS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? OUTFALL PIPE IS
 UNDER THE SOUTH STAIRS OF BUILDING A. THIS PIPE IS WILL
 BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. STAFF IS NOTIFYING
 ENGINEER TO SEE IF THE PIPE CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANOTHER
 LOCATION TO AVOID IMPACTING THE STAIRS IF THE PIPE
 NEEDS TO BE REPLACED/REPAIRED IN THE FUTURE.
  
 4. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING
 DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ?
 PROVIDE FLOW AREAS FOR THE AREAS AROUND THE BUILDING.
 PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE ONLY PROVIDED IN THE PARKING
 LOT.
  
 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW
 COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. FACE OF BUILDING TO 19TH ST CENTERLINE
 D. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 E. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?A?
 F. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?B?
  
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN
 THE STREETS.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL
 ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND
 GUTTER WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD
 AND PROVIDE ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? THE
 LOCATION FOR THIS CURB IS NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PGD
 PLAN.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE
 STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 9. [SATISFIED ? NO NEW SIDEWALKS PER RESPONSE] PROVIDE
 HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR
 NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE
 BUILDINGS TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 4
 FT+/- GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PARKING
 LOT ELEVATION AT EAST END OF HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE IS
 APPROX.. 27.7 FT NAVD. 17.6 FT LONG RAMP AT 1:12 SLOPE
 WOULD PUT LANDING ELEVATION AT 26.23 FT NAVD. THE 30 FT
 LONG RAMP FROM LANDING TO SIDEWALK AT BUILDING LEVEL
 WOULD HAVE BOTTOM OF RAMP ELEVATION OF 23.73 FT NAVD.
 THIS IS NEARLY 3 INCHES HIGHER THAN FFE OF 23.5 FT NAVD
 FOR BUILDING ?B?. THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING
 WILL NEED TO SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING.
  
 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL
 PARKING DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY?S CODE
 OF ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING
 SPACES IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS
 IN THE PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE. ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: SP-1 STILL SHOWS 25? DIMENSION AND DOES NOT
 DIMENSION THE NEW PARKING SPACE LAYOUT.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH
 END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
  
 13. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 14. [SAITISFIED ? NO NEW CURBING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY]
 LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF
 WAY.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING GUTTER BETWEEN PLANTER AT
 NORTH END OF N. TAMARIND AVE AND THE CURB ALONG THE
 SIDEWALK.
  
 17. [SATISFIED ? POLE WILL NEED TO BE SUPPORTED DURING
 PIPE INSTALLATION] STORM OUTFALL PIPE IS LESS THAN 2
 FEET FROM FPL CONCRETE POLE.
  
 18. [SATISFIED] INDICATE IS TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX IS TO
 REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED.
  
 19. [SATISFIED] UTILITY EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT.
  
 20. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 21. [NOT SATISFIED] EXFILTRATION TRENCH APPEARS TO
 CROSS THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AND ALSO BE IN CONFLICT
 WITH EXISTING RETAINING WALL.
  
 22. [NOT SATISFIED] 2.5 FT GRADE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN
 EAST PROPERTY LINE AND PARKING LOT.
  
 23. [SATISFIED] LABEL GRANT ST. CORRECTLY.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 24. ON SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS
 UPDATE REFERENCES TO FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO LATEST FDOT
 STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS.
  
 25. JUSTIFY 18? DIAMETER PIPE SIZE FOR OUTFALL PIPE
 BETWEEN S-104 AND EXISTING CURB INLET.
  
 26. SHOW ALL EXISTING PIPE CONNECTIONS (WITH PIPE
 SIZES) TO THE EXISTING CURB INLET AND THE STRUCTURES
 THESE PIPES ARE CONNECTED TO.
  
 27. PIPE BETWEEN S-102 AND S-103 CROSSES THE PROPERTY
 CORNER.
  
 28. SUGGEST MOVING THE MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON
 GRANT AVE TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE STAMPED ASPHALT CROSS
 WALK.
  
 29. PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF 28.2 FT NAVD AT EAST SIDE OF
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY TO 19TH STREET IS LOWER THAN THE
 EXISTING SPOT GRADE OF 29.13 FT NAVD. SHOW HOW THE ROAD
 WILL TRANSITION TO THE PROPOSED GRADE.
  
 30. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
 A. VALLEY GUTTER APPEARS TO BE SHOWN.
 B. PROVIDE SWALE BETWEEN BACK OF SIDEWALK AND BUILDING.
 C. PROVIDE DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF
 BUILDING.
 D. LABEL BUILDING AS BUILDING ?B? DUE TO LISTED FFE.
 E. SHOW AND DIMENSION PATIO.
  
 31. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2):
 A. VALLEY GUTTER APPEARS TO BE SHOWN.
 B. SHOW BUILDING AND DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPERTY LINE AND
 BUILDING FACE.
 C. SHOW GROUND SLOPE TO BUILDING FACE.
  
 32. SECTION C (SHEET C3.2):
 A. TYPE ?D? CURB SHOWN BUT THIS CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
 B. SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED FENCE.
 C. MOVE LOCATION OF THE SECTION TO THE CENTER OF THE
 RAMP NEXT TO THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE AND EXTEND
 SECTION TO THE FACE OF BUILDING ?B?. SHOW ALL GRADE
 BREAKS AND DIMENSIONS.
  
 33. SECTION D (SHEET C3.2):
 A. ELEVATION GRID NUMBERING OFF.
 B. VALLEY GUTTER APPEARS TO BE SHOWN. SHOW THIS ON THE
 PGD PLAN.
 C. CONFIRM EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION AT THE LOCATION
 OF THE CROSS SECTION.
 D. CALLOUT NEW SIDEWALK FOR DRIVEWAY APRON.
  
 34. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF 19TH
 STREET TO FACE OF BUILDING ?B?. SHOW GRADE BREAKS AND
 DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE. (REPEAT COMMENT)
  
 35. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM 3 FEET EAST OF THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF BUILDING ?A?. SHOW GRADE
 BREAKS AND DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE. (REPEAT
 COMMENT)
  
 36. ARCHITECTURAL NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO
 BE MISLABELED ON SHEET A-2.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-13-2022 Time 12:53 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 12:52:48THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON?) ON
 COVER.
 2. CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING WITH
 EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
 3. RELOCATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM UNDER STAIRS.
 4. PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF SURFACE
 RUNOFF.
 5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
 B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
 C. FACE OF BUILDING TO 19TH ST CENTERLINE
 D. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 E. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?A?
 F. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?B?
  
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
 6. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS.
 7. IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE
 THE SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE
 ENGLISH UNITS.
 8. LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE WILL BE
 LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE STRUCTURE. NOTE THE
 CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 9. PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN
 AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
 10. EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE BUILDINGS TO THE
 PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 4?+/- GRADE
 DIFFERENTIAL.
 11. PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING DIMENSIONS IN
 SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE
 CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES IS 22 FEET. THE
 SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE PARKING SPACES
 ON TAMARIND AVE.
 12. CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH END OF
 PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE ACCESS
 TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
 13. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE
 CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION
 IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929
 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
 14. LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB AND GUTTER IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 15. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN
 LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 16. SHOW EXISTING GUTTER BETWEEN PLANTER AT NORTH END
 OF N. TAMARIND AVE AND THE CURB ALONG THE SIDEWALK.
 17. STORM OUTFALL PIPE IS LESS THAN 2 FEET FROM FPL
 CONCRETE POLE.
 18. INDICATE IS TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX IS TO REMAIN OR BE
 RELOCATED.
 19. UTILITY EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE EXISTING
 FIRE HYDRANT.
 20. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 21. EXFILTRATION TRENCH APPEARS TO CROSS THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE AND ALSO BE IN CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 RETAINING WALL.
 22. 2.5? GRADE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN EAST PROPERTY LINE
 AND PARKING LOT.
 23. LABEL GRANT ST. CORRECTLY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH DETAILS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-20-2022 Time 07:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-20 07:54:131. NO WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS PROVIDED.
 2. SP-1 AND L-1 DO NOT MATCH ENGINEERING PLANS.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-11-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-11-2022 Time 07:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-11 09:44:071. SURVEY NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
 2. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD ON SURVEY.
 3. PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE CLIPS NE CORNER OF LOT 12.
 4. DRAINAGE ALSO CLIPS CORNER OF BUILDING/STAIRS. MAY
 CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED METER AND BACKFLOW.
 5. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW 10' UE TO BE ABANDONED?
 6. LANDSCAPING CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED
 METER/BACKFLOW/FIRE LINE/HYDRANT ASSEMBLY.
 7. ADD POINT OF SERVICE FOR SANITARY LATERALS.
  
 ADDED 4.26.22
 NEED TO KNOW OWNERSHIP OF LESSED OUT WEST 15' OF LOT
 10.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-10-2022 Time 09:26 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-10 09:31:271. REVISE SURVEY AND ALL PLANS TO SHOW MAINTENANCE MAP
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 11/94.
 2. MASTER METER MAY BE REQUIRED. METER BANK CONFLICTS
 WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
 3. CHANGE LINE WEIGHT OF PROPERTY LINE FOR BETTER
 DELINEATION. DIVIDE CONCEPTUAL PLAN INTO SEPARATE P&G
 AND W&S PLANS.
 4. NEED TO SEE CROSS-SECTIONS ON ALL SIDES DUE TO GRADE
 DIFFERENCES.
 5. N-S SANITARY LATERAL WILL BE PRIVATE. ADD POINT OF
 SERVICE/MANHOLE.
 6. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED/SEALED.
 7. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO ALL PLANS.
 8. CIVIL PLANS ALMOST ILLEGIBLE DUE TO OVER-WRITE.
 9. REPLAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-07-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-07 18:29:15APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
 1) PROPERLY ALIGN THE CROSS WALK JUST SOUTH OF 19TH ST
 ACROSS TAMARIND, SO TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO TAMARIND AVE
 AND LANDING WITHIN THE SIDEWALK AREAS ON BOTH SIDES.
 POTENTIAL MODIFICATION TO THE INTERSECTION SOUTH-WEST
 CORNER RAMP, AND TO THE PLANTER AREA ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE ROAD MAY BE REQUIRED
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED. PROVIDE COUNTY
 TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE.
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT
 WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES???
 PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN
 ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING, CONNECTING TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND PROPER CROSSWALK
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PLEASE REFER TO FDOT STANDARD PLANS
 INDEX 711-001
 9) DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE DIFFERENT
 WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION
 10) SATISFIED. SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE
 AREA WIDTH MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN
 ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
 11) SATISFIED. LATEST SUBMISSION DID NOT PROVIDE A
 RESPONSE LETTER
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-09-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-09-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-09 22:50:27TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED.
 PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT
 WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES?
 PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN
 ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING, CONNECTING TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND PROPER CROSSWALK
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PLEASE REFER TO FDOT STANDARD PLANS
 INDEX 711-001
 9) DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE DIFFERENT
 WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION
 10) SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE AREA WIDTH
 MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY
 AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
 11) LATEST SUBMISSION DID NOT PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-14 20:39:39TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED.
 PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT
 WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC
 CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS
 WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES PATH
 AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN ACCEPTABLE
 ANALYSIS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS
 SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED
 OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING, CONNECTING TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND PROPER CROSSWALK
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PLEASE REFER TO FDOT STANDARD PLANS
 INDEX 711-001
 9) DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE DIFFERENT
 WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION
 10) SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE AREA WIDTH
 MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY
 AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-06-2022 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-06 20:18:49TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING STALLS,
 SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT
 WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE
 SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S).
 4) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS
 (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
 OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
 5) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 6) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
 7) THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS SHARED BICYCLE
 LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED OR MISSING
 PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
 ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK FRONTING
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 8) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, CONNECTING
 TO THE 1004 19TH ST PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-07-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-07-2022 Time 10:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-07 10:30:39PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 12.07.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120018 AND Z21120017
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-13 AND PB 1908
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 NO WRITTEN RESPONSES WERE PROVIDED WITH THE JULY 18,
 2022, RESUBMITTAL.
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY
 COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
 OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 SERVICES.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK
 WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. SATISFIED - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. SATISFIED - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING
 TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP
 UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. SATISFIED - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE
 ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT
 IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 12. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(B) THE
 MINIMUM CORNER SETBACK IS 5 FEET; BUILDING B DOES NOT
 COMPLY.
  
 12.1 SATISFIED - WHILE BUILDING B APPEARS TO MEET THE 5
 FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT, THE NEW STAIRS ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DIMENSIONS.
 STAIRS THAT ARE LESS THAN 3 FEET IN HEIGHT ARE ALLOWED
 TO ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK (UP TO 2 FEET FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE) BUT THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWING THE
 STAIRS AS BEING OVER 4 FEET IN HEIGHT AND THEREFORE ARE
 REQUIRED TO MEETING THE BUILDING SETBACKS.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE CIVIL PLANS ARE SHOWING DIFFERENT
 DIMENSIONS THAT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS.
  
 13. SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 14. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A) THE
 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK IS 10 FEET; BUILDING A DOES NOT
 COMPLY. SETBACK IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST POINT
 (EXTERIOR STAIRCASE).
  
 14.1 SATISFIED - WHILE THE DIMENSION IS NOW BEING SHOWN
 CORRECTLY, THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 10 FEET.
  
 15. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 16. SATISFIED - THE PROPERTY LINE ON TAMARIND AVENUE
 DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING COVERAGE NEEDS
 TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 18. SATISFIED - PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
 CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 18.1 SATISFIED - WHILE THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS AREA
 CALCULATION APPEARS TO BE CORRECT, THE PERCENTAGE SHOWN
 FOR "PARKING, WALKWAY & MISC. IMPERVIOUS AREAS" IS
 IINCORRECT.
  
 19. SATISFIED - THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND NOT
 PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE AN
 AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.
  
 19.1 SATISFIED - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH
 A CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
  
 20. SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 20.1 SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING IS ONLY BEING SHOWN
 FOR "BUILDING B". BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE
 PROVIDED FOR "BUILDING A" IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE
 RETAIL SPACE.
  
 20.2 SATISFIED - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE A
 MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 21. SATISFIED - SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED; HAS THIS
 APPLICATION BEEN SUBMITTED?
  
 22. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,
 FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 22.1 SATISFIED - THE EXISTING RETAINING WALL IS SHOWN
 TO REMAIN TO THE EAST OF "BUILDING A" BUT APPEARS TO BE
 IN POOR CONDITION. REPAIR/REPLACEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 23. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 24. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 25. SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 26. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 27. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH
 THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS
 THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 28. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,
 ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 29. SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 30. SATISFIED - IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY FOR
 RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE PETITIONER PAY TO
 THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON OBTAINING THE
 APPRAISAL, ETC.
  
 31. SATISFIED - THE LEFT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM 19TH STREET.
  
 32. SATISFIED - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE
 PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS BEING
 PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN THE
 MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 33. SATISFIED - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT PROVIDED DOES
 NOT MATCH UP WITH THE COMMENTS ISSUED ON 1/13/2022.
  
 34. SATISFIED - THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE
 INCORRECT. ONLY 1 SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR THE RETAIL
 (ROUND TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER). AS SUCH, ONLY 11
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, 11 SPACES SHOULD BE
 INDICATED AS PROVIDED AS ONLY 11 SPACES ARE SHOWN ON
 THE PLAN (THE TURNAROUND SPACE DOES NOT COUNT).
  
 35. SATISFIED - THE LANDSCAPE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE
 EAST/WEST UTILITY EASEMENT IS BEING ABANDONED, WHILE
 THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT IT IS TO REMAIN. WHICH IS
 CORRECT? IF PROPOSED TO REMAIN, WHY? IF PROPOSED TO
 REMAIN, THERE IS LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PROPOSED TO BE
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE EASEMENT THAT WILL REQUIRE
 EASEMENT CONSENT FROM THE APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-25-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 08-25-2022 Time 12:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 08-25-2022 Time 12:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-25 12:27:40PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 08.25.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120018 AND Z21120017
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-13 AND PB 1908
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 NO WRITTEN RESPONSES WERE PROVIDED WITH THE JULY 18,
 2022, RESUBMITTAL.
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY
 COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
 OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 SERVICES.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK
 WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. SATISFIED (CONCERNS STILL EXIST BUT ALL CODE
 REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET) - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. SATISFIED - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. SATISFIED - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING
 TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP
 UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. SATISFIED - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE
 ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT
 IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-231(C)(6)(B) THE MINIMUM CORNER SETBACK IS 5 FEET;
 BUILDING B DOES NOT COMPLY.
  
 12.1 NEW COMMENT ? WHILE BUILDING B APPEARS TO MEET THE
 5 FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT, THE NEW STAIRS ONTO
 TAMARIND AVENUE DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK
 DIMENSIONS. STAIRS THAT ARE LESS THAN 3 FEET IN HEIGHT
 ARE ALLOWED TO ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK (UP TO 2 FEET
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE) BUT THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWING
 THE STAIRS AS BEING OVER 4 FEET IN HEIGHT AND THEREFORE
 ARE REQUIRED TO MEETING THE BUILDING SETBACKS.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE CIVIL PLANS ARE SHOWING DIFFERENT
 DIMENSIONS THAT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 14. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A) THE
 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK IS 10 FEET; BUILDING A DOES NOT
 COMPLY. SETBACK IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST POINT
 (EXTERIOR STAIRCASE).
  
 14.1 SATISFIED - WHILE THE DIMENSION IS NOW BEING SHOWN
 CORRECTLY, THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 10 FEET.
  
 15. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 16. SATISFIED - THE PROPERTY LINE ON TAMARIND AVENUE
 DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING COVERAGE NEEDS
 TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 18. SATISFIED - PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
 CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 18.1 SATISFIED - WHILE THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS AREA
 CALCULATION APPEARS TO BE CORRECT, THE PERCENTAGE SHOWN
 FOR "PARKING, WALKWAY & MISC. IMPERVIOUS AREAS" IS
 IINCORRECT.
  
 19. SATISFIED - THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND NOT
 PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE AN
 AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.
  
 19.1 SATISFIED - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE WITH
 A CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
  
 20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE
 ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 20.1 NOT SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING IS ONLY BEING
 SHOWN FOR "BUILDING B". BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE
 PROVIDED FOR "BUILDING A" IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE
 RETAIL SPACE.
  
 20.2 NOT SATISFIED - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD
 BE A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 21. SATISFIED - SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED; HAS THIS
 APPLICATION BEEN SUBMITTED?
  
 22. SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS,
 FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 22.1 SATISFIED - THE EXISTING RETAINING WALL IS SHOWN
 TO REMAIN TO THE EAST OF "BUILDING A" BUT APPEARS TO BE
 IN POOR CONDITION. REPAIR/REPLACEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 23. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 24. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 25. SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 26. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 27. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH
 THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS
 THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 28. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,
 ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 29. SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 30. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF APPRAISED VALUE
 UPON APPROVAL BY CITY COMMISSION) - IT IS THE CITY?S
 POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE
 PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON
 OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.
  
 31. SATISFIED - THE LEFT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM 19TH STREET.
  
 32. SATISFIED - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE
 PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS BEING
 PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN THE
 MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 33. SATISFIED - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT PROVIDED DOES
 NOT MATCH UP WITH THE COMMENTS ISSUED ON 1/13/2022.
  
 34. SATISFIED - THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE
 INCORRECT. ONLY 1 SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR THE RETAIL
 (ROUND TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER). AS SUCH, ONLY 11
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, 11 SPACES SHOULD BE
 INDICATED AS PROVIDED AS ONLY 11 SPACES ARE SHOWN ON
 THE PLAN (THE TURNAROUND SPACE DOES NOT COUNT).
  
 35. NOT SATISFIED - THE LANDSCAPE PLANS INDICATE THAT
 THE EAST/WEST UTILITY EASEMENT IS BEING ABANDONED,
 WHILE THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT IT IS TO REMAIN.
 WHICH IS CORRECT? IF PROPOSED TO REMAIN, WHY? IF
 PROPOSED TO REMAIN, THERE IS LANDSCAPE MATERIAL
 PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE EASEMENT THAT WILL
 REQUIRE EASEMENT CONSENT FROM THE APPLICABLE UTILITY
 COMPANIES.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-19-2022 Time 09:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 04-19-2022 Time 09:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-19 11:27:49PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.19.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120018 AND Z21120017
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-13 AND PB 1908
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES
 WITH THE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. SATISFIED (NOTE THEIR CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL -
 EASEMENTS REQUIRED) - LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY
 COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
 OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 SERVICES.
  
 4. SATISFIED - JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE
 RESPONSES INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 COMPLIES WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH
 THE ARCHITECT ON THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS
 EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS,
 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY
 ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ
 INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 5.1.1. NEW COMMENT - THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT
 ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE ELEVATIONS,
 LANDSCAPE PLANS, ETC.
  
 5.1.2. NEW COMMENT - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
 WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN
 (WINDOW/DOOR/STOREFRONT CONFIGURATIONS).
  
 5.2. SATISFIED - ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED
 ON THE SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS FACING TAMARIND AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ
 AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.3.1. NEW COMMENT - ARE YOU SURE THAT IT IS DESIREABLE
 TO HAVE DOOR EXITING THE MASTER BEDROOM ONTO TAMARIND
 AVENUE? SHOULDN'T THE WALKWAY CONNECT DIRECTLY FROM THE
 TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK TO THE DOORWAY LEADING TO THE
 LIVING AREA, WITH A SMALL PATIO OFF TO THE SIDE? IT
 SEEMS THAT SOME OF THE WALKWAYS LEAD UP TO THE BEDROOM.
  
 6. SATISFIED - PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. SATISFIED - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE
 ABANDONED SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT
 IS DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 8. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 9. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM
 THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL.
  
 10. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL
 WINDOWS ARE TO BE OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 11. SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING
 DOORS ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(B)
 THE MINIMUM CORNER SETBACK IS 5 FEET; BUILDING B DOES
 NOT COMPLY.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED - THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 14. NOT SATISFIED - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A)
 THE MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK IS 10 FEET; BUILDING A DOES
 NOT COMPLY. SETBACK IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST
 POINT (EXTERIOR STAIRCASE).
  
 14.1 NEW COMMENT - WHILE THE DIMENSION IS NOW BEING
 SHOWN CORRECTLY, THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 10 FEET.
  
 15. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 16. SATISFIED - THE PROPERTY LINE ON TAMARIND AVENUE
 DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY.
  
 17. SATISFIED - PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING COVERAGE NEEDS
 TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS
 SURFACE AREA CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 18.1 NEW COMMENT - WHILE THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS AREA
 CALCULATION APPEARS TO BE CORRECT, THE PERCENTAGE SHOWN
 FOR "PARKING, WALKWAY & MISC. IMPERVIOUS AREAS" IS
 IINCORRECT.
  
 19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER
 AND NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE
 AN AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.
  
 19.1 NEW COMMENT - PLEASE MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE
 WITH A CROSS-HATCH INDICATING "NO PARKING".
  
 20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE
 ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 20.1 NEW COMMENT - BICYCLE PARKING IS ONLY BEING SHOWN
 FOR "BUILDING B". BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD ALSO BE
 PROVIDED FOR "BUILDING A" IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE
 RETAIL SPACE.
  
 20.2 NEW COMMENT - THE PAD FOR THE BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE
 A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES IN LENGTH AND AT AT LEAST 24
 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RACK. IF MORE THAN ONE
 RACK IS PROVIDED, THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 30 INCHES
 BETWEEN THE RACKS.
  
 21. SATISFIED - SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED; HAS THIS
 APPLICATION BEEN SUBMITTED?
  
 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL
 WALLS, FENCES, ETC. IF RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED,
 DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 22.1 NEW COMMENT - THE EXISTING RETAINING WALL IS SHOWN
 TO REMAIN TO THE EAST OF "BUILDING A" BUT APPEARS TO BE
 IN POOR CONDITION. REPAIR/REPLACEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 23. SATISFIED - PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 24. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 DETAIL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK;
 SUCH MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 25. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN
 THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF
 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET.
  
 26. SATISFIED - SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 27. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION
 THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE,
 ETC. AS THE PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 28. SATISFIED - ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS,
 ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL
 NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 29. NOT SATISFIED - CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF
 THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT.
 THE SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN,
 DATA TABLE, ETC.
  
 30. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF APPRAISED VALUE
 UPON APPROVAL BY CITY COMMISSION) - IT IS THE CITY?S
 POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENTS THAT THE
 PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL ON
 OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.
  
 31. NEW COMMENT - THE LEFT GATE OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE IMPEDES WITH THE INGRESS TRAVEL LANE FROM
 19TH STREET.
  
 32. NEW COMMENT - WHY ARE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM
 THE PARKING LOT DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS? IF A STRIPE IS
 BEING PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO, SHOULDN'T IT BE PLACED IN
 THE MIDDLE OF THE 20-FOOT DRIVE AISLE?
  
 33. NEW COMMENT - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT PROVIDED DOES
 NOT MATCH UP WITH THE COMMENTS ISSUED ON 1/13/2022.
  
 34. NEW COMMENT - THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE
 INCORRECT. ONLY 1 SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR THE RETAIL
 (ROUND TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER). AS SUCH, ONLY 11
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, 11 SPACES SHOULD BE
 INDICATED AS PROVIDED AS ONLY 11 SPACES ARE SHOWN ON
 THE PLAN (THE TURNAROUND SPACE DOES NOT COUNT).
  
 35. NEW COMMENT - THE LANDSCAPE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE
 EAST/WEST UTILITY EASEMENT IS BEING ABANDONED, WHILE
 THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT IT IS TO REMAIN. WHICH IS
 CORRECT? IF PROPOSED TO REMAIN, WHY? IF PROPOSED TO
 REMAIN, THERE IS LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PROPOSED TO BE
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE EASEMENT THAT WILL REQUIRE
 EASEMENT CONSENT FROM THE APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-13-2022 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-13 11:25:10PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120018 AND Z21120017
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-13 AND PB 1908
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE
 TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 4. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES
 INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH
 THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
 [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE
 VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS
 INCLUDE:
  
 6. ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS EXACTLY THE SAME. ALTERNATIVE
 STYLES, OR VARIATIONS, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS ALL
 OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY ARE SEPARATE SITES ALONG THE
 CORRIDOR AND READ INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.
  
 7. ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED ON THE
 SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 8. GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING TAMARIND
 AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH
 THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 9. PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT THE PROPERTY
 LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 10. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA TO BE ABANDONED
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WHAT IS
 DESCRIBED IN THE SKETCH/LEGAL OF THE ABANDONMENT.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT.
  
 11. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 12. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE
 OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
 13. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 14. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING DOORS ARE
 ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 15. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(B) THE MINIMUM CORNER
 SETBACK IS 5 FEET; BUILDING B DOES NOT COMPLY.
  
 16. THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 17. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-231(C)(6)(A) THE MINIMUM FRONT
 SETBACK IS 10 FEET; BUILDING A DOES NOT COMPLY. SETBACK
 IS TO BE MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST POINT (EXTERIOR
 STAIRCASE).
  
 18. PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (IF
 ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED).
  
 19. THE PROPERTY LINE ON TAMARIND AVENUE DOES NOT MATCH
 THE SURVEY.
  
 20. PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING COVERAGE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 21. PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA CALCULATION
 IS INCORRECT.
  
 22. THE TURNAROUND SPACE AND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
 APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND NOT PROVIDE
 SUFFICIENT MANEUVERING. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTO-TURN
 ANALYSIS OR MODIFY ACCORDINGLY.
  
 23. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 24. SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT A UTILITY EASEMENT IS
 PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED; HAS THIS APPLICATION BEEN
 SUBMITTED?
  
 25. ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS, FENCES, ETC. IF
 RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED, DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 26. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 27. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, IT
 LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK; SUCH
 MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 28. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (AS
 DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF
 THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND
 8 FEET.
  
 29. SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 30. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE ENTIRE
 SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS THE
 PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 31. ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, ETC. NEED
 TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN. PURSUANT
 TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL NOT
 EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 32. CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 33. IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
 ABANDONMENTS THAT THE PETITIONER PAY TO THE CITY THE
 APPRAISED VALUE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE
 WITH VINCE NOEL ON OBTAINING THE APPRAISAL, ETC.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved