 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21110003
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21110003 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
12-09-2021 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
12-09-2021 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-09 11:48:07 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 4. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 5. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-04-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-04-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-04-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-08 16:31:23 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 | | | [email protected] : | | | | | | GENERAL: | | | O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP | | | B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL | | | L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97 | | | B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, | | | ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU | | | BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL | | | O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS (IF ANY): | | | O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER | | | SERVICES AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG | | | WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. | | | O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO | | | STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT. | | | O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION | | | OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTION. | | | O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY | | | OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER | | | METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO | | | PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY. | | | O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE | | | NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | | | | WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN: | | | O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS. | | | O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE | | | STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. | | | O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND | | | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND | | | SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE | | | AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS, | | | BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO | | | BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, | | | DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, | | | ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT | | | ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES. | | | O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR | | | SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. | | | O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. | | | O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY | | | TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. | | | O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA. | | | O PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE PROPOSED UTILITY CONNECTIONS | | | (WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER). | | | O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE | | | IF CONNECTIONS ARE PROPOSED. | | | O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL | | | BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY | | | PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET. | | | O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE | | | JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET. | | | O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT | | | STATION NUMBER. | | | O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE | | | TRAPS (IF ANY). | | | O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN | | | OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER. | | | | | | | | | QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS: | | | O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH | | | CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF | | | BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT | | | 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected] | | | O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected] | | | O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-25-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ldeloren |
Date |
02-25-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ldeloren |
Date |
02-25-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-25 09:25:20 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 | | | [email protected] : | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 OR | | | [email protected]: | | | | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LISTED ON IRRIGATION PLAN SAYS | | | INDOOR INSTALLATION. INDOOR INSTALLATION IS NOT | | | APPROVED IF IT IS A CONTAINMENT ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | -IF THE IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS A CONTAINMENT | | | DEVICE, THEN IT MUST BE RP TYPE INSTEAD OF PVB AND THE | | | UPSTREAM PIPING MUST BE COMPLIANT TYPE INSTEAD OF PVC. | | | | | | -SURVEY SAYS THE BUILDING IS ENCROACHING IN 30 FOOT | | | UTILITY EASEMENT. IF THE PROPOSED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION | | | AREA WOULD ALSO ENCROACH IN THE EASEMENT, THEN | | | IDENTIFY: UTILITIES IN EASEMENT, PURPOSE OF EASEMENT, | | | AND APPROVAL OBTAINED TO BUILD IN EASEMENT. | | | | | | -VERIFY THAT TREE LOCATIONS ARE DISTANCED SUFFICIENTLY | | | SO ROOTS WILL NOT DAMAGE METERED WATER SERVICES. CAN | | | ALSO ADD ROOT BARRIERS AS NECESSARY. | | | | | | -WPB GIS INDICATES WATER MAIN IN ROAD IS NOT 2 INCH | | | PVC. PLEASE UPDATE PLANS. | | | | | | -DID NOT RECEIVE WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR PRIOR REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. ALSO SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE IS MISSING PROJECT NARRATIVE, | | | JUSTIFICATION, AND SURVEY. | | | | | | PLANS DO NOT SHOW BLACK METAL FENCE AND GATES THAT ARE | | | INSTALLED ALONG EASTERN SIDES OF PROPERTY. PLEASE | | | UPDATE PLANS. | | | | | | METERED WATER SERVICE FOR PROPERTY DOES NOT HAVE AN | | | ACTIVE USAGE ACCOUNT SETUP WITH CITY WPB UTILITY | | | BILLING. APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO SET ONE UP AND PAY ALL | | | APPLICABLE CHARGES, FEES, AND DEPOSITS BEFORE USING | | | WATER SERVICE. | | | | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE INSTALLED FOR | | | WATER SERVICE. APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO HAVE LICENSED | | | PLUMBER INSTALL BEFORE WATER CAN BE USED. SHOW PROPOSED | | | LOCATION ON PLANS. | | | | | | VERIFY EXISTING WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IS | | | SUFFICIENT FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF SERVICE | | | UPGRADES ARE NEEDED, SUBMIT ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWING | | | PROPOSED CHANGES. | | | | | | SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING TREES APPEAR TO BE PROPOSED IN | | | LOCATIONS THAT ARE CURRENTLY HARDSCAPE. | | | | | | THERE ARE A FEW UTILITY POLES AT EAST PROPERTY LINE NOT | | | SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. THE ONES AT TOWARD THE SOUTHEAST | | | CORNER OF PROPERTY MAY CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS. | | | | | | ARE THERE ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED FIRE SPRINKLERS FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS? | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-02 20:17:48 | Z21110003 - 2617 DIVISION AVE, SECOND FLOOR ADDITION | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. | | | SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : | | | | | | GENERAL: | | | O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP | | | B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL | | | L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97 | | | B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, | | | ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU | | | BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL | | | O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | O PLEASE PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR REVIEW. | | | | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS (IF ANY): | | | O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER | | | SERVICES AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG | | | WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. | | | O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO | | | STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT. | | | O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION | | | OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTION. | | | O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY | | | OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER | | | METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO | | | PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY. | | | O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE | | | NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | | | | WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN: | | | O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS. | | | O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE | | | STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. | | | O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND | | | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND | | | SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE | | | AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS, | | | BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO | | | BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, | | | DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, | | | ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT | | | ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES. | | | O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR | | | SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. | | | O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. | | | O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY | | | TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. | | | O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA. | | | O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE | | | IF CONNECTIONS ARE PROPOSED. | | | O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL | | | BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY | | | PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET. | | | O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE | | | JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET. | | | O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT | | | STATION NUMBER. | | | O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE | | | TRAPS (IF ANY). | | | O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN | | | OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER. | | | | | | FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW: | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES | | | NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. | | | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: | | | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS | | | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF | | | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; | | | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE | | | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A | | | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). | | | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF | | | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION | | | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF | | | WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE | | | BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE | | | 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | ANY PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS | | | PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR | | | PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS. | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR | | | [email protected]: | | | | | | -SUBMITTAL PACKAGE IS MISSING PROJECT NARRATIVE, | | | JUSTIFICATION, AND SURVEY. | | | -PLANS DO NOT SHOW BLACK METAL FENCE AND GATES THAT ARE | | | INSTALLED ALONG EASTERN SIDES OF PROPERTY. PLEASE | | | UPDATE PLANS. | | | -METERED WATER SERVICE FOR PROPERTY DOES NOT HAVE AN | | | ACTIVE USAGE ACCOUNT SETUP WITH CITY WPB UTILITY | | | BILLING. APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO SET ONE UP AND PAY ALL | | | APPLICABLE CHARGES, FEES, AND DEPOSITS BEFORE USING | | | WATER SERVICE. | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE INSTALLED FOR | | | WATER SERVICE. APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO HAVE LICENSED | | | PLUMBER INSTALL BEFORE WATER CAN BE USED. SHOW PROPOSED | | | LOCATION ON PLANS. | | | -VERIFY EXISTING WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IS | | | SUFFICIENT FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF SERVICE | | | UPGRADES ARE NEEDED, SUBMIT ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWING | | | PROPOSED CHANGES. | | | -SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING TREES APPEAR TO BE PROPOSED IN | | | LOCATIONS THAT ARE CURRENTLY HARDSCAPE. | | | -THERE ARE A FEW UTILITY POLES AT EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | NOT SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. THE ONES AT TOWARD THE | | | SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY MAY CONFLICT WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS. | | | -ARE THERE ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED FIRE SPRINKLERS FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS? | | | | | | NO COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS: | | | O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH | | | CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF | | | BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT | | | 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected] | | | O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected] | | | O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-02-2022 |
Time |
12:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-02-2022 |
Time |
12:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-02 12:30:51 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THERE IS A CONCERN REGARDING THE NORTH EXIT | | | PATH BEYOND THE CONCRETE PAD. | | | | | | PLEASE ENSURE THE NORTH EXIT LEADS TO A PUBLIC WAY AND | | | IS ACCESSIBLE PER NFPA AND BUILDING CODES WHEN BUILDING | | | PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-06-2021 |
Time |
09:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-06 09:59:20 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE | | | APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-10-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-10-2022 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-10-2022 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-10 15:15:14 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2617 DIVISION AVE. Z21110003 | | | MARCH 8, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. FOR PERMIT 21100050, THE VALUE FOR THE | | | ADDITION IS $250,000.00, AND THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURES IS $440,284 FOR 2021 PER THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER. THIS TRIGGERS COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR THE PROPERTY PER SECTION | | | 94-441(C)(2) AS THE EXEMPTION UP TO 50% HAS BEEN | | | EXCEEDED. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. ANY NEW PARKING CREATED SHOULD HAVE | | | LANDSCAPING PROVIDED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(C). | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442(B). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR | | | THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION | | | 94-442(C)(2)B. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(B) PROVIDE | | | THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE, AND THE 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ADJACENT TO THE DIVISION AVE. PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE FOR | | | THE PORTIONS OF THE BUFFER THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE | | | BUILDING AT ZERO SETBACK TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE | | | SITE. | | | | | | THE SITE PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT MATCH. IF | | | THE SITE PLAN LAYOUT FOR THE PARKING IS CORRECT, THERE | | | IS ADEQUATE SPACE TO PROVIDE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 20% | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED | | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN | | | OPTIONS LIST. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA | | | CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A | | | MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE | | | FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED | | | FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST | | | RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT | | | DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE | | | THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION | | | 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR | | | PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES | | | INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE AND RESOLVE | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | SHOW WATER LINE AND BACKFLOW AND SEWER LINE ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-08-2022 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-08-2022 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-08 14:34:37 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2617 DIVISION AVE. Z21110003 | | | MARCH 8, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. FOR PERMIT 21100050, THE VALUE FOR THE | | | ADDITION IS $250,000.00, AND THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURES IS $440,284 FOR 2021 PER THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER. THIS TRIGGERS COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE FOR THE PROPERTY PER SECTION | | | 94-441(C)(2) AS THE EXEMPTION UP TO 50% HAS BEEN | | | EXCEEDED. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. ANY NEW PARKING CREATED SHOULD HAVE | | | LANDSCAPING PROVIDED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(C). | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442(B). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR | | | THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION | | | 94-442(C)(2)B. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(B) PROVIDE | | | THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE, AND THE 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | ADJACENT TO THE DIVISION AVE. PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE FOR | | | THE PORTIONS OF THE BUFFER THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE | | | BUILDING AT ZERO SETBACK TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE | | | SITE. | | | | | | THE SITE PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT MATCH. IF | | | THE SITE PLAN LAYOUT FOR THE PARKING IS CORRECT, THERE | | | IS ADEQUATE SPACE TO PROVIDE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 20% | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED | | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN | | | OPTIONS LIST. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA | | | CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A | | | MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE | | | FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED | | | FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST | | | RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT | | | DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE | | | THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION | | | 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR | | | PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY | | | LINES INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE AND RESOLVE | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | SHOW WATER LINE AND BACKFLOW AND SEWER LINE ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-03-2021 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-03-2021 |
Time |
09:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-03 09:42:08 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2617 DIVISION AVE. Z21110003 | | | DECEMBER 1, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. FOR PERMIT 21100050, THE VALUE FOR THE ADDITION IS | | | $250,000.00, AND THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURES IS | | | $440,284 FOR 2021 PER THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER. THIS TRIGGERS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE FOR THE PROPERTY PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2) AS THE | | | EXEMPTION UP TO 50% HAS BEEN EXCEEDED. | | | | | | 2. ANY NEW PARKING CREATED SHOULD HAVE LANDSCAPING | | | PROVIDED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C). | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-442(B). | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED | | | SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE SITE | | | BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. | | | | | | 5. PER SECTION 94-443(B) PROVIDE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, AND THE | | | 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE DIVISION AVE. | | | PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE FOR THE PORTIONS OF THE BUFFER THAT | | | ARE NOT COVERED BY THE BUILDING AT ZERO SETBACK TO THE | | | EXTENT POSSIBLE ON THE SITE. | | | | | | 6. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 20% FOUNDATION | | | PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE | | | ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | 7. PER SECTION 94-442(G) PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS | | | FROM THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS LIST. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE A SECTION IN A LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM | | | OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA | | | NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE | | | CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT | | | EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT | | | WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL | | | PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED | | | ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF | | | PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A | | | 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED | | | 1:1 SPECIES. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES INCLUDING WATER, | | | SEWER AND DRAINAGE AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-15-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
08-15-2022 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-15 16:17:56 | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | ALL INSTALLED CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WILL BE | | | RP TYPE AND LEAD-FREE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-02 11:28:50 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA | | | STATUES [553.5041 F.S.]. | | | 2- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D. | | | LATEST EDITION. | | | 3- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING | | | CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-01 12:14:50 | PLEASE PROVIDE: | | | 1- DUMPSTER(S) SOTORAGE AND STAGING AREA FOR SERVICE. | | | 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, IF APPLICBLE. DETAILS FOR | | | SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, | | | COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A FREESTANDING SITE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO | | | THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W | | | PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000 | | | 00). | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
12-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-08 16:34:51 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND | | | QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) | | | THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE | | | SANITATION SERVICE. | | | 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE | | | CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.). | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-09-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-09-2022 |
Time |
13:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-07-2022 |
Time |
08:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-07 08:46:13 | 30 FOOT EASEMENT IN REAR WAS PARTIALLY ABANDONED PER | | | RESOLUTION 144-61. REDUCED FROM 30 FEET TO 6 FEET. COPY | | | WAS PROVIDED TO PLANNER KEVIE DEFRANC. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-03-2021 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-03 09:04:41 | 1. NO SURVEY PROVIDED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-09-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-09-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-09 15:51:20 | **NO FURTHER COMMENTS** | | | | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY/STATEMENT | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET | | | NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. | | | 4) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25 | | | FEET. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. LATEST | | | SITE PLAN SHOWCASES A 22?6? DRIVEWAY. | | | 5) SATISFIED. CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND SHOWCASE DIMENSIONS | | | OF THE DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND | | | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. | | | 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF EXISTING, REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING | | | SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 8) SATISFIED. THE CURB CUT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY MUST BE CLOSED. PER CITY CODE SEC | | | 914-312(1)(A), NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH LESS | | | THAN 300 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES CAN ONLY HAVE ONE | | | ACCESS POINT INTO PUBLIC ROW | | | 9) SATISFIED. PARKING MANEUVERING ISSUE: STALLS #5 AND | | | #6 ARE IN CONFLICT, AS VEHICLES MANEUVERING IN/OUT OF | | | THE FORMER MAY BE OBSTRUCTED BY ANOTHER PARKED IN THE | | | LATTER. PARKING STALLS #8 AND #9 SEEM TO HAVE SIMILAR | | | MANEUVERABILITY ISSUES. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN TO | | | SOLVE SUCH ISSUES ACCORDINGLY. OTHERWISE PROVIDE | | | AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PROOFING SUCH PARKING STALLS | | | CONFIGURATION FEASIBILITY. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-10-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-10 15:28:41 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY/STATEMENT | | | 2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE | | | BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) | | | ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND | | | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. | | | 4) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25 | | | FEET. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. LATEST | | | SITE PLAN SHOWCASES A 22?6? DRIVEWAY. | | | 5) NOT SATISFIED. CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND SHOWCASE | | | DIMENSIONS OF THE DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE | | | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND | | | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. | | | 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF EXISTING, REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING | | | SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 8) THE CURB CUT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY MUST | | | BE CLOSED. PER CITY CODE SEC 914-312(1)(A), | | | NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH LESS THAN 300 REQUIRED | | | PARKING SPACES CAN ONLY HAVE ONE ACCESS POINT INTO | | | PUBLIC ROW | | | 9) PARKING MANEUVERING ISSUE: STALLS #5 AND #6 ARE IN | | | CONFLICT, AS VEHICLES MANEUVERING IN/OUT OF THE FORMER | | | MAY BE OBSTRUCTED BY ANOTHER PARKED IN THE LATTER. | | | PARKING STALLS #8 AND #9 SEEM TO HAVE SIMILAR | | | MANEUVERABILITY ISSUES. PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN TO | | | SOLVE SUCH ISSUES ACCORDINGLY. OTHERWISE PROVIDE | | | AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PROOFING SUCH PARKING STALLS | | | CONFIGURATION FEASIBILITY. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-09 12:27:41 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY/STATEMENT | | | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS | | | (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE | | | OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER | | | SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. | | | 4) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25 FEET. PLEASE | | | REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. | | | 5) CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND SHOWCASE DIMENSIONS OF THE | | | DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE | | | 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR | | | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET | | | NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. | | | 7) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF | | | EXISTING, REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
08-11-2022 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
08-11-2022 |
Time |
10:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-11 10:56:21 | 8/11/22 ? PASSED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE RESUBMITTAL FEE PAYMENT TO THE CITY. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION PACKET SUBMITTAL MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE LAST RECORDED WARRANTY | | | DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LETTER, | | | WHICH INCLUDES A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST, | | | RELATED BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT AND SITE, | | | AND JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL REASONS, OR BASIS FOR THE | | | REQUEST. [SATISFIED] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT, AS STATED IN | | | THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS. [SATISFIED PER | | | TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS] | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED/UPDATED/CURRENT SURVEY, | | | ACCORDINGLY, AS STATED IN THE SURVEYING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. [SATISFIED] | | | J. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED SITE PLAN ADDRESSING THE | | | REVIEW COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | K. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENGINEERING PLAN, AS STATED IN THE | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS. [SATISFIED PER ENGINEERING | | | REVIEW] | | | L. PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (ELEVATIONS, | | | FLOOR PLANS, AND/OR PERSPECTIVES) OF THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING, SIGNS, FENCES/WALLS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES FOR | | | THE PROJECT. [SATISFIED] | | | M. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PLANS AND | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET | | | RESUBMITTAL. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 2. THE SITE PLAN STATES, ?WAREHOUSE USE?. WHAT IS THE | | | DEFINED/SPECIFIC USE OF THE BUSINESS GOING INTO THIS | | | SPACE? [SATISFIED] | | | 3. THE ADDED SQUARE FOOTAGE WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL | | | PARKING. (FOR WAREHOUSING - ONE SPACE PER 1000 SQ/FT ? | | | 2 ADDITIONAL SPACES) [SATISFIED] | | | 4. SHOW CURRENT AND PROPOSED PARKING ON SITE PLAN, WITH | | | THE CITY?S APPROVED TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. [SATISFIED] | | | 5. THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT TRIGGERS | | | LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SET BY CODE. PLEASE SEE THE | | | COMMENTS GENERATED BY LANDSCAPING. [SATISFIED PER | | | LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS] | | | | | | SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEFINE THE SPECIFIC | | | (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) USE(S) FOR THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) HEIGHTS AND NUMBER OF STORIES FOR THE | | | PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT, AND SIZE OF THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | FREESTANDING SIGNS AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | DIMENSIONS, AND NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ON THE | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION | | | AND SCREENING OF THE GARBAGE RECEPTACLES ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF PARKING | | | (ADA, STANDARD, AND BICYCLE), ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, | | | DUMPSTERS, AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED] | | | 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | FENCES, WALLS, AND SIDEWALKS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 16. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION | | | OF ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND | | | APPURTENANCES ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 18. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF OPEN | | | SPACE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 19. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | LANDSCAPING IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 20. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | BUILDING COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 21. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | IMPERMEABLE SURFACE COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ACRES | | | AND PERCENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED STANDARD AND | | | BICYCLE PARKING COMPUTATION AND PROPOSED BICYCLE | | | PARKING COMPUTATION IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED) FLOOR AREA RATIOS (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) | | | IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED | | | AND PROPOSED) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHEET L-1. [SATISFIED PER | | | LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS] | | | 26. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE IS NOT MEETING THE | | | MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PER THE | | | CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | SUBSECTION 94-485(P), SO PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 27. PLEASE ROTATE/REPOSITION THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE | | | TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO DIVISION AVENUE OR RELOCATE TO | | | AN AREA ON THE SITE WHERE IT WILL MEET THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIRED LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND | | | HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACT TO VEHICULAR | | | MOVEMENT/MANEUVERING ON AND OFF SITE. [SATISFIED PER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, ANGELLA JONES-VANN?S | | | DIRECTION] | | | | | | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION | | | INCLUDING BUILDING PERMITS, PROVIDE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION REGARDING THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATION ON THE | | | SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE MASTER BUILDING | | | PERMIT AND LANDSCAPE SUB-PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-14-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
06-14-2022 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
06-14-2022 |
Time |
10:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-14 10:20:45 | 6/14/22 ? FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE RESUBMITTAL FEE PAYMENT TO THE CITY. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION PACKET SUBMITTAL MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE LAST RECORDED WARRANTY | | | DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED] | | | G. PLEASE PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LETTER, | | | WHICH INCLUDES A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST, | | | RELATED BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT AND SITE, | | | AND JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL REASONS, OR BASIS FOR THE | | | REQUEST. [SATISFIED] | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT, AS STATED IN | | | THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS. [NOT | | | SATISFIED] | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED/UPDATED/CURRENT SURVEY, | | | ACCORDINGLY, AS STATED IN THE SURVEYING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. [SATISFIED] | | | J. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED SITE PLAN ADDRESSING THE | | | REVIEW COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | K. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENGINEERING PLAN, AS STATED IN THE | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | L. PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (ELEVATIONS, | | | FLOOR PLANS, AND/OR PERSPECTIVES) OF THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING, SIGNS, FENCES/WALLS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES FOR | | | THE PROJECT. [SATISFIED] | | | M. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PLANS AND | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET | | | RESUBMITTAL. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 2. THE SITE PLAN STATES, ?WAREHOUSE USE?. WHAT IS THE | | | DEFINED/SPECIFIC USE OF THE BUSINESS GOING INTO THIS | | | SPACE? [SATISFIED] | | | 3. THE ADDED SQUARE FOOTAGE WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL | | | PARKING. (FOR WAREHOUSING - ONE SPACE PER 1000 SQ/FT ? | | | 2 ADDITIONAL SPACES) [SATISFIED] | | | 4. SHOW CURRENT AND PROPOSED PARKING ON SITE PLAN, WITH | | | THE CITY?S APPROVED TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. [SATISFIED] | | | 5. THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT TRIGGERS | | | LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SET BY CODE. PLEASE SEE THE | | | COMMENTS GENERATED BY LANDSCAPING. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | | | | SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEFINE THE SPECIFIC | | | (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) USE(S) FOR THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) HEIGHTS AND NUMBER OF STORIES FOR THE | | | PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT, AND SIZE OF THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | FREESTANDING SIGNS AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | DIMENSIONS, AND NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ON THE | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION | | | AND SCREENING OF THE GARBAGE RECEPTACLES ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF PARKING | | | (ADA, STANDARD, AND BICYCLE), ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, | | | DUMPSTERS, AND SIGNS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | FENCES, WALLS, AND SIDEWALKS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 16. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION | | | OF ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND | | | APPURTENANCES ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 18. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF OPEN | | | SPACE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 19. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | LANDSCAPING IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 20. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | BUILDING COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 21. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | IMPERMEABLE SURFACE COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ACRES | | | AND PERCENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED STANDARD AND | | | BICYCLE PARKING COMPUTATION AND PROPOSED BICYCLE | | | PARKING COMPUTATION IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED) FLOOR AREA RATIOS (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) | | | IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED | | | AND PROPOSED) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHEET L-1. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | 26. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE IS NOT MEETING THE | | | MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PER THE | | | CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | SUBSECTION 94-485(P), SO PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 27. PLEASE ROTATE/REPOSITION THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE | | | TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO DIVISION AVENUE OR RELOCATE TO | | | AN AREA ON THE SITE WHERE IT WILL MEET THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIRED LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND | | | HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACT TO VEHICULAR | | | MOVEMENT/MANEUVERING ON AND OFF SITE. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
03-11-2022 |
Time |
12:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
03-11-2022 |
Time |
12:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-11 12:05:27 | 3/11/22 - FAILED | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING: | | | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED | | | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG | | | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). | | | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED | | | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE RESUBMITTAL FEE PAYMENT TO THE CITY. | | | | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION PACKET SUBMITTAL MUST BE PROVIDED: | | | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE LAST RECORDED WARRANTY | | | DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. | | | G. PLEASE PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LETTER, | | | WHICH INCLUDES A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST, | | | RELATED BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT AND SITE, | | | AND JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL REASONS, OR BASIS FOR THE | | | REQUEST. | | | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT, AS STATED IN | | | THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED/UPDATED/CURRENT SURVEY, | | | ACCORDINGLY, AS STATED IN THE SURVEYING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. | | | J. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED SITE PLAN ADDRESSING THE | | | REVIEW COMMENTS BELOW. | | | K. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENGINEERING PLAN, AS STATED IN THE | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | L. PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (ELEVATIONS, | | | FLOOR PLANS, AND/OR PERSPECTIVES) OF THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING, SIGNS, FENCES/WALLS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES FOR | | | THE PROJECT. | | | M. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT | | | INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PLANS AND | | | REQUIRED MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | 2. THE SITE PLAN STATES, ?WAREHOUSE USE?. WHAT IS THE | | | DEFINED/SPECIFIC USE OF THE BUSINESS GOING INTO THIS | | | SPACE? [NOT SATISFIED] | | | 3. THE ADDED SQUARE FOOTAGE WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL | | | PARKING. (FOR WAREHOUSING - ONE SPACE PER 1000 SQ/FT ? | | | 2 ADDITIONAL SPACES) [SATISFIED] | | | 4. SHOW CURRENT AND PROPOSED PARKING ON SITE PLAN, WITH | | | THE CITY?S APPROVED TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | 5. THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT TRIGGERS | | | LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SET BY CODE. PLEASE SEE THE | | | COMMENTS GENERATED BY LANDSCAPING. [PARTIALLY | | | SATISFIED] | | | | | | SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: | | | 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEFINE THE SPECIFIC | | | (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) USE(S) FOR THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1. | | | 8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) HEIGHTS AND NUMBER OF STORIES FOR THE | | | PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT, AND SIZE OF THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | FREESTANDING SIGNS AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | DIMENSIONS, AND NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ON THE | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION | | | AND SCREENING OF THE GARBAGE RECEPTACLES ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF PARKING | | | (ADA, STANDARD, AND BICYCLE), ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, | | | DUMPSTERS, AND SIGNS. | | | 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, | | | HEIGHT, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) | | | FENCES, WALLS, AND SIDEWALKS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1. | | | 16. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION | | | OF ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND | | | APPURTENANCES ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 18. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF OPEN | | | SPACE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1. | | | 19. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | LANDSCAPING IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1. | | | 20. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | BUILDING COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 21. PLEASE INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED) PERCENT (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) OF | | | IMPERMEABLE SURFACE COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ACRES | | | AND PERCENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE REQUIRED STANDARD AND | | | BICYCLE PARKING COMPUTATION AND PROPOSED BICYCLE | | | PARKING COMPUTATION IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED) FLOOR AREA RATIOS (WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE) | | | IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED | | | AND PROPOSED) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHEET L-1. | | | 26. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE IS NOT MEETING THE | | | MINIMUM LOADING SPACE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PER THE | | | CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | SUBSECTION 94-485(P), SO PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY ON | | | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
awooten |
Date |
12-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
awooten |
Date |
12-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-06 11:54:43 | 2617 DIVISION AVENUE PPRC DECEMBER 9, 2021 | | | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | THE SITE PLAN STATES, WAREHOUSE USE. WHAT IS THE | | | DEFINED/SPECIFIC USE OF THE BUSINESS GOING INTO THIS | | | SPACE? | | | | | | THE ADDED SQUARE FOOTAGE WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL | | | PARKING. (FOR WAREHOUSING - ONE SPACE PER 1000 SQ/FT ? | | | 2 ADDITIONAL SPACES) | | | SHOW CURRENT AND PROPOSED PARKING ON SITE PLAN, WITH | | | THE CITY?S APPROVED TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT TRIGGERS | | | LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SET BY CODE. PLEASE SEE THE | | | COMMENTS GENERATED BY LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | ALANA WOOTEN | | | PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | 561-822-1449 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |