Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z21100021 Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-29-2022 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 11-10-2021 Time 10:34 Rev Time 0.00 Received By swelter Date 11-29-2022 Time 11:27 Sent To   Notes 2022-11-29 11:27:11 SITE PLAN SHOWED POSSIBLE ART LOCATIONS.   AT TIME OF BUDILING PERMIT FEES DEVELOPER MUST SUBMIT   AN ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION ALONG WITH EVIDENCE OF   THE 1% ESCROW.     2021-11-10 10:38:54 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER   $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS   PER CITY ORDINANCE.   SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,   INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR   IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL   CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN   $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.   OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE   VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR   OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF   ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT   TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.   A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS   REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       CONTACT SYBILLE WELTE, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &   CULTURE AT [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT   APPLICATION AND TO REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS.     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-17-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 11-17-2021 Time 19:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 11-17-2021 Time 19:48 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-17 20:06:19 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. EGRESS FROM NEW OFFICE BUILDING. PLAN SHEET A0.05,   PROJECT SITE PLAN, SHOWS BOTH STAIRS DISCHARGING WITHIN   THE BUILDING. PER SECTION 1028.1 OF FLORIDA BUILDING   CODE, AT LEAST 50% OF THE EXIT CAPACITY OF THE STAIRS   MUST DISCHARGED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING WITHOUT   OCCUPANTS HAVING TO TRAVERSE THROUGH THE BUILIDING   AFTER LEAVING THE STAIR.       3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO   NOT CURRENTLY SHOW WHERE THE PROPOSED 22 ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES WILL BE LOCATED. PER SECTION 208.3 OF   FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF   TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE.   THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY   WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO NOT   CURRENTLY SHOW ANY VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER   SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN   EVERY SIX REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN   A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND   DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98   INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)       5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. THE PLANS DO NOT   CURRENTLY SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND   ACCESSAISLES. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES   SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO   WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE   TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH   THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       8. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY   CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE   HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED   ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT   AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE   PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE   FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.       9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       10. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       11. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-22-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 04-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 04-22-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-04-22 13:21:45 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL / PROVISO COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS:       -PROPOSED WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOCATIONS   FOR 25 STORY BUILDING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE   RELOCATED TO LOCATION REQUESTED BY CITY DURING FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -WATER SERVICE TAPS AND PIPE DESIGN TO BE REVISED AS   REQUESTED BY CITY DURING FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -NO UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE VACATED WITHOUT APPROVAL   OF WPB ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.       MARK HURLEY   FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES   561-822-2262         Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-25-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 03-25-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 03-25-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-03-25 07:40:17 NO COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected]           COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR, [email protected]; 561-822-2262       -THE TURN LANE ADDITION AND SIDEWALK RELOCATION ON   OKEECHOBEE HAS SOME UNRESOLVED ISSUES: CIVIL PLAN SHOWS   A COUPLE EXISTING LIGHT POLES IN THE TURN LANE PAVEMENT   AND SOME EXISTING TREES IN THE PROPOSED CURBING; THE   SIDEWALK RELOCATION WENT FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO PRIVATE   PROPERTY SO A SIDEWALK EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED; THERE IS   CURRENTLY AN ELEVATION CHANGE BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND   PROPERTY MAY CONFLICT WITH TURN LANE; EXISTING DOWNWARD   STAIRS STILL SHOWING IN TURN LANE; SOUTH PROPERTY LINE   IN MIDDLE OF TURN LANE ? WILL IT REMAIN LIKE THAT OR IS   ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY BEING DEDICATED AS MENTIONED IN   OKEECHOBEE BLVD IMPROVEMENT LETTER - IF SO, SHOW   PROPOSED BOUNDARIES; TWO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES   ARE LISTED TO REMAIN IN PROPOSED SIDEWALK; CALLOUT   WIDTH OF PROPOSED PARKWAY BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND RIGHT   TURN LANE AND MAKE SURE WIDTH MATCHES LANDSCAPING PLAN.       -COULD NOT FIND UP-TO-DATE RESPONSE LETTER OR SUMMARY   OF CHANGES IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE. PLEASE SUBMIT.       -WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES HAD MEETING WITH APPLICANT?S   CIVIL ENGINEERS WHERE CONCERNS WITH THE WATER SERVICES   WERE DISCUSSED. CIVIL ENGINEERS TO EVALUATE FURTHER AND   LIKELY REVISE WATER PLAN BEFORE PPRC CONCLUSION.       -CIVIL PLAN SHOWS PROPOSED CURBING OVER EXISTING   CONFLICT STRUCTURE NUMBER 19 NEAR SOUTH END OF NORTH   ENTRANCE ISLAND.       -CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT SHOW SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH SIDE OF   NORTHWEST PROPOSED BUILDING THAT IS SHOWN ON HARDSCAPE   AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLAN SETS SHOULD MATCH.       -WHY DOES THE SIDEWALK EXTEND ALMOST THE FULL LENGTH OF   THE NORTHWEST BUILDING ON THE NORTH SIDE. IS THERE A   DOOR NOT SHOWN NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING?       -LANDSCAPE PLAN CONFLICTS WITH HARDSCAPE PLAN ON   NORTHERN SIDE OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS. THERE ARE SOME   BUSHES BLOCKING DOORS AND BUSHES PLANTED MIDDLE OF   SIDEWALKS.             Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-10-2022 Cont ID   Sent By ldeloren Date 02-10-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By ldeloren Date 02-10-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-02-10 08:43:47 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.   SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :       PLEASE SEND CCTV FILES AND REPORTS TO ME AT RICK   ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 401   CLEMATIS ST., 4TH FL., 561-494-1098 [email protected].   FLASH DRIVE, DISC OR D/L LINK ARE ALL OK.       COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR, [email protected]; 561-822-2262       -EXISTING FIRELINE LOCATED NORTH OF RESTAURANT SHOWING   AS 8 INCH IN OUR COMPUTER SYSTEM. SECTION OF WATER   PIPING RUNNING SOUTH FROM NORTH ENTRANCE CANNOT   ACCOMMODATE TWO ADDITIONAL FIRELINES SINCE THE WATER   MAIN BRANCH IS ONLY 8 INCH. UPGRADES OR REVISIONS ARE   NEEDED.       -ON WATER PLAN, PLEASE LABEL ABOVE-GROUND CATV UTILITY   BOX SOUTHEAST OF FIRE HYDRANT NEAR NORTH ENTRANCE.       -PER WPB SANITARY COLLECTIONS DEPARTMENT, CITY   INFRASTRUCTURE RUNS FROM EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE   NUMBER 8 NORTHWARD. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER PIPES AND MANHOLES RUNNING SOUTHWEST AND   SOUTHEAST FROM SANITARY MANHOLE NUMBER 8 WOULD BE   PRIVATELY-OWNED.       -UTILITY EASEMENTS NOT REQUIRED FOR PRIVATELY-OWNED   SANITARY SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE ON SITE.       -ARE THERE ANY SEWER LATERALS BETWEEN EXISTING BUILDING   AND EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE NUMBER 10?       -IS THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE FOR OBJECTS OR FOR   STORMWATER?       -CIVIL PLANS SHOW FOUR LARGE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS IN   THE ROUNDABOUT NEAR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY.       -CONTRACTORS ARE CURRENTLY REPLACING THE LARGE UTILITY   POLES NEAR EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY WITH BIGGER POLES.   SHOW THE POLES ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND ENSURE NO   CONFLICTS. ENSURE THAT ANY TREES PLANTED NEAR THEM WILL   NOT TOUCH THE OVERHEAD WIRES.       -PLANS SHOW CAF? IN PROPOSED CONFERENCE BUILDING.   VERIFY IF GREASE TRAP NEEDED AND SHOW ON PLANS IF   OUTDOORS.       -PRIOR SUBMITTED REVIEW COMMENT ABOUT CONCRETE PAD.   STILL DO NOT SEE IT ON PLANS. IT?S LOCATED AT THE FAR   NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY NORTH OF CHILLER.       -SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FDC. THERE ARE SOME   NEAR THE NORTHWEST AREA OF EXISTING BUILDING NOT SHOWN   ON WATER PLAN. CANNOT SEE ANY FOR GARAGE BUILDING OR 25   STORY BUILDING.       -LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW IMPROVEMENTS ON CITY PROPERTY AT   EAST SIDE. DID APPLICANT GET APPROVAL FROM CITY WPB AND   LESSEE?       -PROPOSED LANDSCAPING APPEARS TO ENCROACH ONTO FDOT   PROPERTY AT NORTHEAST AREA OF PROPERTY. DOES FDOT   APPROVE OF THAT?       -SOME ASPECTS OF CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH LANDSCAPING   PLANS. PLEASE ENSURE THEY ARE BOTH UPDATED. CIVIL PLANS   DO NOT SHOW CROSSWALK GOING TO GARAGE BUILDING FROM THE   EAST OR THE LONG SIDEWALK ON CITY PARCEL.       -CROSSWALK NEAR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GARAGE BUILDING   SEEMS TO DEADEND DUE TO LANDSCAPING BUSHES.       -ENSURE NO TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED ABOVE 36   INCH WATER MAIN.       -LANDSCAPING APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED METERS   AND BACKFLOWS FOR 25 STORY BUILDING.       -DOES THE GARAGE BUILDING NEED A METERED WATER SERVICE   FOR DOMESTIC WATER?       -IS A METERED WATER SERVICE FOR IRRIGATION NEEDED?       -PLEASE PROVIDE THE VEHICLE CLEARANCE HEIGHT OF THE   PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND THE GARAGE CROSSING.       -WILL 25 STORY BUILDING HAVE RESTAURANT OR FOOD SERVICE   REQUIRING GREASE TRAP? IF ONE REQUIRED AND WILL BE   INSTALLED OUTDOORS, SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS.       -SITE PLANS INDICATE WATER FEATURES IN ROUNDABOUT   ISLANDS NEAR SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY, BUT LANDSCAPING   PLANS SHOW TREES THERE. ARE THEY INCORRECT, OR ARE   THERE BOTH TREES AND WATER FEATURES IN THE ISLANDS?       -RECEIVED REVIEW COMMENT RESPONSE THAT EXISTING   FIRELINE HAS A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. VISITED SITE AND   COULD ONLY LOCATE SWING CHECK IN SIDEWALK VAULT. IT IS   NOT A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND DOES NOT OFFER THAT LEVEL   OF WATER SYSTEM PROTECTION. UPON FURTHER REVIEW MAY   NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO ABOVE-GROUND DCDA BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY. RECOMMEND PLANNING AHEAD OF TIME ESPECIALLY   BECAUSE RELOCATION OUT OF SIDEWALK WOULD BE LIKELY.       -SOME ASPECTS OF PROPOSED WATER SERVICES FOR 25 STORY   BUILDING AND CONFERENCE BUILDING SEEM PROBLEMATIC AND   SUBOPTIMAL. WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW IN MORE DETAIL WITH   ENGINEER OF RECORD NOW TO PREVENT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES   AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CONTACT   [email protected].     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-17-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 11-17-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 11-17-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-11-17 13:08:34 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.   SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :       PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE SHEETS FOR UTILITIES.       GENERAL:   O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND   INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER   (Z-XXXXXXXX).   O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK   BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP   B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL   L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97   B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF   B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS   C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,   ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,   SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER   SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU   BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL   O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION   ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD   SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.       BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:       O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER   SERVICES AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG   WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.   O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY   EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO   PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO   STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.   O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION   OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW   PREVENTION.   O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY   OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER   METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO   PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.   O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE   NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.               WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:   O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION   INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).   O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.   O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE   STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.   O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND   DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND   SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH   PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE   AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,   BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO   BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,   DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,   ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT   ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF   SANITARY SEWER LINES.   O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR   SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW.   O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL.   O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER   AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD   DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.   O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY   TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING   AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,   MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS   SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008   FOR WATER.   O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.   O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT   FRONTAGE.   O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL   BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY   PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.   O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER ARE REQUIRED.   O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE   JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.   O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT   STATION NUMBER.   O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.   O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE   TRAPS (IF ANY).   O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN   OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.       FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES   NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.   - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:   - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS   THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF   DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;   - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE   STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A   MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).   - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF   CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION   THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL   SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF   WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES   ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY   LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT   PARCELS.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE   BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE   50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER   CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.   O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR   PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.       QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:   O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]   O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]   O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING   SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]   COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR   [email protected]:       PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING:       -PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE   TRAPS/INTERCEPTORS ON CIVIL PLANS.       -PROPOSED WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO   BE ADJACENT THE PROPERTY LINE. LOCATION SHOULD BE   OUTSIDE OF ANY FENCES OR GATES AND EASILY ACCESSIBLE   FROM THE ROW AND STREET. SMALL METER BOXES SHOULD NOT   BE IN HARDSCAPE.       -WATER METERS SIZED 3 INCH OR GREATER MUST BE INSTALLED   ABOVE-GROUND AND ACCESSIBLE FROM THE STREET WITH CRANE   TRUCK.       -ENSURE THAT FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOCATIONS MEET   NFPA REQUIREMENTS.       -IF THERE WILL BE DEMOLITION, ADD DEMOLITION PLAN TO   CIVIL PLAN SET.       -SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES ON SITE   INCLUDING WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. PROVIDE   ENLARGED DETAILS IN CIVIL PLANS OF AREAS AROUND METERS   AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.       -THERE IS A CONCRETE PAD IN NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE   PROPERTY THAT IS NOT SHOWN IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE   INCLUDING SURVEY. PLANS SHOULD ADDRESS IT.       -PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ON EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY   APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH MULTIPLE EXISTING ELECTRIC   UTILITIES AND ENCROACHES ON UTILITY EASEMENT.       -IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE DETAIL ON THE CIVIL PLAN.   PLEASE ADD MORE SHEETS AND SEPARATE TYPES SUCH AS   WATER/SEWER AND PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE.       -PLEASE VERIFY IF ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS ON SITE   ARE FED FROM THE EXISTING PRIVATE FIRELINE. UTILITY   PLAN MAY NOT BE ACCURATELY DEPICTED.       -ADD PRIVATE TO LABEL OF SEWER MANHOLES THAT ARE   PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.       -WATER MAIN SIZING AT CLEARWATER PARK RD MAY NOT BE   ACCURATE AND LIMIT WATER SERVICE SIZING. RECOMMEND   VERIFYING ALL PIPE SECTIONS NEAR THERE.       -VERIFY EXISTING SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE (INCLUDING SEWER   MAINS AND LIFT STATIONS) ARE SUFFICIENT FOR THE   ADDITIONAL PROPOSED USAGE ON SITE.       -SURVEY SHOWS CHILLER ENCROACHING ON UTILITY EASEMENT.   PLEASE VERIFY THERE ARE NO CITY-OWNED UTILITIES   UNDERNEATH CHILLER.       -PLEASE VERIFY: IF THERE IS AN EXISTING FIRELINE   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ON SITE; IF THE FIRELINE SYSTEM USES   CHEMICAL ADDITIVES OR IS CONNECTED TO AN AUXILIARY   WATER SYSTEM; WHEN THE EXISTING FIRE SYSTEM WAS LAST   ALTERED.       -FOR THE 10 FOOT UE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED   NEAR THE NORTH ENTRANCE, WHICH TYPE OF UTILITY IS IT   FOR?       -ARE ANY OUTSIDE GATES OR RESTRICTED AREAS PROPOSED ON   SITE?       -ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN.       -WPB GIS SHOWS LARGE DIAMETER SEWER PIPE RUNNING NEAR   NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY. PLEASE SHOW ON SEWER   PLAN.       -VERIFY THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND   UTILITIES AND ADD SHEET IN LANDSCAPING PLANS THAT SHOW   LOCATIONS OF TREES RELATIVE TO UTILITIES.       -ARE THERE ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WELLS. IF SO, SHOW   AND LABEL ON PLANS.       COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB   PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] :   PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PLAN SHEETS WITH A SEPARATE   UTILITY PLAN SHOWING EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES.   COMMENTS FROM BURT BAIRD, CITY OF WPB UTILITIES O&M   SUPERINTENDENT, 561-822-2056, [email protected] :       ? PLEASE ENSURE ADDED FLOW CAN BE HANDLED BY LS# 41 AND   LS# 43 - SEE EMAILED DOCUMENTS OF LS# 43 FLOW NUMBERS.   ? LS# 43 IS ALREADY AT MAX FLOW NUMBERS ? SEE EMAILED   BROWN AND CALDWELL STUDY   ? LS# 41 AND LS# 43 NEED EXTENSIVE REPAIRS TO THE LIFT   STATION BASED ON CONDITION ASSESSMENTS BY CDM SMITH   ? REDESIGN THE WATER PLANTS BACK WASH SYSTEM FROM BEING   DUMPED INTO THE WET WELL OF LS# 43   ? LS# 43 OFTEN REQUIRES TWO PUMPS TO PUMP THE STATION   DOWN- SEE EMAILED ?PUMP RUNS?           FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 11-10-2021 Time 15:29 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-15 10:09:03 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE   PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE   APPLICABLE.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)       7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED   TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE   PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.       IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC   LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.       7A. PER NFPA 14   6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.       7B. PER NFPA 1       18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.   18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.       PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.       FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?       7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.       8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM   SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP   DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND   APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY   INSTALLATION.       9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM FOR BUILDINGS OVER 6 FLOORS.       ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.       ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND   FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET   OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER   ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.       12.HIGH RISE EMERGENCY COMMAND ROOM       THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,   CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN   THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:       11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE   DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL   BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.   11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED   FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER   HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1   HOUR.   11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A   MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF   10 FT (3050 MM).   11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY   COMMAND CENTER.   (1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.   (2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL   FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF   EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING   EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS   (4) WORK TABLE.   (5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE BUILDING.   11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES   OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY   COMMAND CENTER.   (1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM   CONTROL UNIT.   (2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.   (3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION   OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL   (4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING   SYSTEMS.   (5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS   SIMULTANEOUSLY   (6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY   PANELS   (7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS   (8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND   TRANSFER FEATURES.   (10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED   BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE   (11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL       NFPA 101       11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.   11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED   IN A   LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.   11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE   FOLLOWING:   (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS   (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION   SERVICE   PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION   OF THIS   CODE   (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION   PANELS   (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS   (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS   (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE   PROVIDED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44   (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS   (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS   (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING   SYSTEM   (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE   PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY   11.8.8       13. EMERGENCY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS       NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.   11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.       NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT   SYSTEMS.   24.9.1 GENERAL.   24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM   CAPABLE   OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON   FREQUENCIES   ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE   INSTALLED   WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE   AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL   SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT   DEGRADE   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.   24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED   FOR   APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF   SUCCESSFUL   ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED   FOR THE   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED   BY   THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST   PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN   ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES   NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE   PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A   BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH   A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.   PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC   SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],   561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR   DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.           14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.       ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       15. THE HIGH RISE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY   WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE   PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:       THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,   INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,   STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY   RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR   RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE   APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED   MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE   SYSTEM.       ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL   INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.       16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 5 Status P Date 05-16-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 05-16-2022 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 05-16-2022 Time 16:18 Sent To   Notes 2022-05-16 16:19:47 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1001 OKEECHOBEE Z21100021   MAY 16, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,   SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT   ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS   ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.   DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN   APPROVAL TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE.   THIS INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PROCEED FORWARD,   AS IT WILL SUBSTANTIALLY ALTER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.   FICUS TREES ARE NOT REQUIRED OR RECOMMENDED TO BE   RELOCATED.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE.   ? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE   EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. TRIPLE   ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CLD 25   ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS   ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION   94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN   SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. DIAGRAM ON SHEET A0.07 DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE OPEN   SPACE TYPE OR CALL OUT HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT   TYPE ARE MET.   THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. FOR OPEN SPACE SHOW   THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE TYPE PROVIDED.   50% OF THE SPACE IS REQUIRED TO BE VEGETATED AND 50% OF   THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN TREE CANOPY STANDARDS MUST BE   DEMONSTRATED.       3/25/22 GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, BUT BREAKDOWN   OF REQUIREMENTS WAS NOT SHOWN ON SHEETS A0.07 OR A0.08   OR ON SHEET L-402. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TYPE IS INCORRECT   ON SHEET L-402.       SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE HAS BEEN   INDICATED, BUT THE SPECIFIC TYPES HAVE NOT BEEN   IDENTIFIED SO REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE VERIFIED.   ALL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET FOR OPEN SPACE BEING OPEN   TO THE SKY, NO COVERED AREAS MAY BE COUNTED AS OPEN   SPACE UNLESS THERE IS AN OVERHEAD COVER       3/25/22 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPES IDENTIFIED, BUT   BREAKDOWN OF REQUIREMENTS MET WAS NOT COMPLETE FOR ALL   TYPES. TERRACE AREAS WERE NOT DEFINED ON L-402.       4. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   RELOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AND CANNOT BE DETERMINED   UNTIL ARBORIST?S REPORT IS RECEIVED.       5. SATISFIED. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING MUST BE SHOWN ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN SHOWING   COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.   ALL LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       6. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET   THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.   REMOVED FROM PLANS.       7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED   ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   WEST PARKING GARAGE.       8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR THE OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW   THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET.   13 STREET TREES REQUIRED, PLAN NOW SHOWS ONLY 11   PROVIDED.       9. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND   SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW   LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY   LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED   TREES AND LANDSCAPING.   ONCE LOCATIONS ARE FINALIZED, MUST BE SHOWN ON   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES IN   MANY LOCATIONS, AND THE SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND FIRE   VALVES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN.       10. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO   SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.   PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA.           11. SATISFIED. NATAL PLUM IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE   PLANT.       12. SATISFIED. SEAGRAPE IS SHOWN ON SHEET L-450, BUT NO   SEAGRAPE IS PROPOSED ON PLANT LIST.       13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY   POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION   94-443(G).   ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.       3/25/22 ADJUST POINTS FOR CHANGES TO PLANT LIST.   4/18/22 ALL POINTS ARE INDICATED AS TAKEN. THIS IS   INCORRECT.       14. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES. CALCULATIONS   ARE TO BE BASED ON THE ENTIRE PLANT LIST, NOT JUST   TREES.       3/25/22 FORMAT IS AWKWARD, CHANGE HEADING TO ?DROUGHT   TOLERANCE? AND ONLY PROVIDE THE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES.           15. SATISFIED. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE   TREES.   ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN.   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT THE ENDS   OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST BE   PROVIDED SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.   EACH LANDSCAPE ISLAND REQUIRES A TREE, AND AT LEAST 75%   MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.       3/25/22 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT   THE ENDS OF EACH ROW OF PARKING.   16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING   AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND   LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH   SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE   CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER   TO FIGURE XIV-1.   PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT COMPLETE AND   EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.   3/25/22 PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT   COMPLETE AND EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.   4/18/22 CALCULATIONS AND EXHIBIT ARE INCORRECT. PARKING   SPACES TIMES 10 SQ FT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND ALL OTHER   PAVED AREA MUST BE SHOWN AND SQUARE FOOTAGE DIVIDED BY   100 TIMES 4 SQ FT.   SHOW THE PARKING SPACES AS ONE AREA, THE DRIVE AISLE AS   ONE AREA AND ONLY THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AS ONE   AREA. BUFFERS CANNOT BE COUNTED.       17. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/23/22:   18. SATISFIED. THE EAST LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT ON THE   PROPERTY, IT IS OUTSIDE THE SITE ON A CITY OWNED   PARCEL. THIS MUST BE ADDRESSED AS TO HOW THE AREA IS TO   BE APPROVED AND MAINTAINED.   OWNERSHIP MUST BE RESOLVED. IF THE BUFFER IS TO BE   PROVIDED OFFSITE, A VARIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED. IF THERE   IS SEPARATE OWNERSHIP, THE OFF SITE PLAN AND PLANT LIST   MUST BE SEPARATED.       19. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-113   IS DIFFERENT AND SEPARATE FROM THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE   AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND SHEET L-401 NEEDS TO BE   CORRECTED TO REFLECT THIS.       20. SATISFIED. C. WEST BUFFER REQUIRES 26 TREES. SOUTH   BUFFER SHOULD BE 13 TREES REQUIRED.       21. SATISFIED. STREET TREES SHOULD BE 13 REQUIRED.       22. SATISFIED. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT NEEDS   TO SHOW TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING AND SHOW   THAT AT LEAST 30% OF THAT IS LANDSCAPED AREA.   INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT PART OF THE CODE   REQUIREMENT. ONLY SUPPLY THE TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR   EACH BUILDING, SHOW THE REQUIRED 30% AND SHOW THE   PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/25/22:   23. SATISFIED. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FT   HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. SIMPSON?S STOPPERS SHOWN AT 10 FT.       24. SATISFIED. CHANGE STREET TREES TO LIVE OAKS TO   MATCH DESIGN EAST OF TAMARIND.       25. SATISFIED. AREAS BENEATH THE BUILDING AND PARKING   STRUCTURE APPEAR TO HAVE FULL SIZE OAK TREES. PLEASE   EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE   THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.         Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status F Date 04-18-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 04-18-2022 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 04-18-2022 Time 14:42 Sent To   Notes 2022-04-18 14:45:08 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1001 OKEECHOBEE Z21100021   APRIL 18, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,   SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT   ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS   ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.   DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN   APPROVAL TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE.   THIS INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PROCEED FORWARD,   AS IT WILL SUBSTANTIALLY ALTER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.   FICUS TREES ARE NOT REQUIRED OR RECOMMENDED TO BE   RELOCATED.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE.   ? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE   EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. TRIPLE   ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CLD 25   ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS   ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION   94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN   SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. DIAGRAM ON SHEET A0.07 DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE OPEN   SPACE TYPE OR CALL OUT HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT   TYPE ARE MET.   THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. FOR OPEN SPACE SHOW   THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE TYPE PROVIDED.   50% OF THE SPACE IS REQUIRED TO BE VEGETATED AND 50% OF   THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN TREE CANOPY STANDARDS MUST BE   DEMONSTRATED.       3/25/22 GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, BUT BREAKDOWN   OF REQUIREMENTS WAS NOT SHOWN ON SHEETS A0.07 OR A0.08   OR ON SHEET L-402. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TYPE IS INCORRECT   ON SHEET L-402.       SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE HAS BEEN   INDICATED, BUT THE SPECIFIC TYPES HAVE NOT BEEN   IDENTIFIED SO REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE VERIFIED.   ALL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET FOR OPEN SPACE BEING OPEN   TO THE SKY, NO COVERED AREAS MAY BE COUNTED AS OPEN   SPACE UNLESS THERE IS AN OVERHEAD COVER       3/25/22 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPES IDENTIFIED, BUT   BREAKDOWN OF REQUIREMENTS MET WAS NOT COMPLETE FOR ALL   TYPES. TERRACE AREAS WERE NOT DEFINED ON L-402.       4. NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON   THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED   TREES.   RELOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AND CANNOT BE DETERMINED   UNTIL ARBORIST?S REPORT IS RECEIVED.       5. NOT SATISFIED. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING MUST BE   SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN   SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.   ALL LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       6. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET   THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.   REMOVED FROM PLANS.       7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED   ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   WEST PARKING GARAGE.       8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR   REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET   OR PORTION THEREOF FOR THE OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPE   LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113   AND 94-116.   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET.   13 STREET TREES REQUIRED, PLAN NOW SHOWS ONLY 11   PROVIDED.       9. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND   SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW   LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY   LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED   TREES AND LANDSCAPING.   ONCE LOCATIONS ARE FINALIZED, MUST BE SHOWN ON   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES IN   MANY LOCATIONS, AND THE SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND FIRE   VALVES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN.       10. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO   SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.   PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA.           11. SATISFIED. NATAL PLUM IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE   PLANT.       12. SATISFIED. SEAGRAPE IS SHOWN ON SHEET L-450, BUT NO   SEAGRAPE IS PROPOSED ON PLANT LIST.       13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED   FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST   PER SECTION 94-443(G).   ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.       3/25/22 ADJUST POINTS FOR CHANGES TO PLANT LIST.   4/18/22 ALL POINTS ARE INDICATED AS TAKEN. THIS IS   INCORRECT.       14. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES. CALCULATIONS   ARE TO BE BASED ON THE ENTIRE PLANT LIST, NOT JUST   TREES.       3/25/22 FORMAT IS AWKWARD, CHANGE HEADING TO ?DROUGHT   TOLERANCE? AND ONLY PROVIDE THE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES.           15. SATISFIED. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE   TREES.   ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN.   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT THE ENDS   OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST BE   PROVIDED SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.   EACH LANDSCAPE ISLAND REQUIRES A TREE, AND AT LEAST 75%   MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.       3/25/22 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT   THE ENDS OF EACH ROW OF PARKING.   16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE   PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS   AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE   WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE   CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER   TO FIGURE XIV-1.   PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT COMPLETE AND   EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.   3/25/22 PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT   COMPLETE AND EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.   4/18/22 CALCULATIONS AND EXHIBIT ARE INCORRECT. PARKING   SPACES TIMES 10 SQ FT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND ALL OTHER   PAVED AREA MUST BE SHOWN AND SQUARE FOOTAGE DIVIDED BY   100 TIMES 4 SQ FT.   SHOW THE PARKING SPACES AS ONE AREA, THE DRIVE AISLE AS   ONE AREA AND ONLY THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AS ONE   AREA. BUFFERS CANNOT BE COUNTED.       17. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/23/22:   18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE EAST LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS   NOT ON THE PROPERTY, IT IS OUTSIDE THE SITE ON A CITY   OWNED PARCEL. THIS MUST BE ADDRESSED AS TO HOW THE AREA   IS TO BE APPROVED AND MAINTAINED.   OWNERSHIP MUST BE RESOLVED. IF THE BUFFER IS TO BE   PROVIDED OFFSITE, A VARIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED. IF THERE   IS SEPARATE OWNERSHIP, THE OFF SITE PLAN AND PLANT LIST   MUST BE SEPARATED.       19. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-113   IS DIFFERENT AND SEPARATE FROM THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE   AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND SHEET L-401 NEEDS TO BE   CORRECTED TO REFLECT THIS.       20. SATISFIED. C. WEST BUFFER REQUIRES 26 TREES. SOUTH   BUFFER SHOULD BE 13 TREES REQUIRED.       21. SATISFIED. STREET TREES SHOULD BE 13 REQUIRED.       22. SATISFIED. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT NEEDS   TO SHOW TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING AND SHOW   THAT AT LEAST 30% OF THAT IS LANDSCAPED AREA.   INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT PART OF THE CODE   REQUIREMENT. ONLY SUPPLY THE TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR   EACH BUILDING, SHOW THE REQUIRED 30% AND SHOW THE   PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/25/22:   23. SATISFIED. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FT   HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. SIMPSON?S STOPPERS SHOWN AT 10 FT.       24. SATISFIED. CHANGE STREET TREES TO LIVE OAKS TO   MATCH DESIGN EAST OF TAMARIND.       25. SATISFIED. AREAS BENEATH THE BUILDING AND PARKING   STRUCTURE APPEAR TO HAVE FULL SIZE OAK TREES. PLEASE   EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.           2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE   THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.         Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-25-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 03-25-2022 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 03-25-2022 Time 16:33 Sent To   Notes 2022-03-25 16:36:49 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1001 OKEECHOBEE Z21100021   MARCH 25, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,   SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT   ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS   ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.   DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN   APPROVAL TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE.   THIS INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PROCEED FORWARD,   AS IT WILL SUBSTANTIALLY ALTER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.       2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE.   ? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE   EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. TRIPLE   ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREAS FOR CLD 25 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF   OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN   SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF   OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. DIAGRAM ON SHEET A0.07 DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE OPEN   SPACE TYPE OR CALL OUT HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT   TYPE ARE MET.   THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. FOR OPEN SPACE SHOW   THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE TYPE PROVIDED.   50% OF THE SPACE IS REQUIRED TO BE VEGETATED AND 50% OF   THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN TREE CANOPY STANDARDS MUST BE   DEMONSTRATED.       3/25/22 GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, BUT BREAKDOWN   OF REQUIREMENTS WAS NOT SHOWN ON SHEETS A0.07 OR A0.08   OR ON SHEET L-402. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TYPE IS INCORRECT   ON SHEET L-402.       SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE HAS BEEN   INDICATED, BUT THE SPECIFIC TYPES HAVE NOT BEEN   IDENTIFIED SO REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE VERIFIED.   ALL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET FOR OPEN SPACE BEING OPEN   TO THE SKY, NO COVERED AREAS MAY BE COUNTED AS OPEN   SPACE UNLESS THERE IS AN OVERHEAD COVER       3/25/22 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPES IDENTIFIED, BUT   BREAKDOWN OF REQUIREMENTS MET WAS NOT COMPLETE FOR ALL   TYPES. TERRACE AREAS WERE NOT DEFINED ON L-402.       4. NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON   THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED   TREES.   RELOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AND CANNOT BE DETERMINED   UNTIL ARBORIST?S REPORT IS RECEIVED.       5. NOT SATISFIED. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING MUST BE   SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN   SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.   ALL LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       6. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET   THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.   REMOVED FROM PLANS.       7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED   ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   WEST PARKING GARAGE.       8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR THE OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW   THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET.       9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS   OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND   PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.   ONCE LOCATIONS ARE FINALIZED, MUST BE SHOWN ON   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES IN   MANY LOCATIONS, AND THE SCREENING OF ABOVE GROUND FIRE   VALVES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN.       10. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO   SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.   PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA.           11. SATISFIED. NATAL PLUM IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE   PLANT.       12. SATISFIED. SEAGRAPE IS SHOWN ON SHEET L-450, BUT NO   SEAGRAPE IS PROPOSED ON PLANT LIST.       13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED   FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST   PER SECTION 94-443(G).   ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.       3/25/22 ADJUST POINTS FOR CHANGES TO PLANT LIST.       14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES. CALCULATIONS   ARE TO BE BASED ON THE ENTIRE PLANT LIST, NOT JUST   TREES.       3/25/22 FORMAT IS AWKWARD, CHANGE HEADING TO ?DROUGHT   TOLERANCE? AND ONLY PROVIDE THE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES.           15. NOT SATISFIED. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE   TREES.   ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN.   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT THE ENDS   OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST BE   PROVIDED SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.   EACH LANDSCAPE ISLAND REQUIRES A TREE, AND AT LEAST 75%   MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.       3/25/22 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT   THE ENDS OF EACH ROW OF PARKING.   16. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE   PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS   AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE   WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE   CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER   TO FIGURE XIV-1.   PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT COMPLETE AND   EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.   3/25/22 PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT   COMPLETE AND EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.           17. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/23/22:   18. NOT SATISFIED. THE EAST LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT ON   THE PROPERTY, IT IS OUTSIDE THE SITE ON A CITY OWNED   PARCEL. THIS MUST BE ADDRESSED AS TO HOW THE AREA IS TO   BE APPROVED AND MAINTAINED.   OWNERSHIP MUST BE RESOLVED. IF THE BUFFER IS TO BE   PROVIDED OFFSITE, A VARIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED. IF THERE   IS SEPARATE OWNERSHIP, THE OFF SITE PLAN AND PLANT LIST   MUST BE SEPARATED.       19. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-113   IS DIFFERENT AND SEPARATE FROM THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE   REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE   AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND SHEET L-401 NEEDS TO BE   CORRECTED TO REFLECT THIS.       20. SATISFIED. C. WEST BUFFER REQUIRES 26 TREES. SOUTH   BUFFER SHOULD BE 13 TREES REQUIRED.       21. SATISFIED. STREET TREES SHOULD BE 13 REQUIRED.       22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE   REQUIREMENT NEEDS TO SHOW TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR EACH   BUILDING AND SHOW THAT AT LEAST 30% OF THAT IS   LANDSCAPED AREA.   INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT PART OF THE CODE   REQUIREMENT. ONLY SUPPLY THE TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR   EACH BUILDING, SHOW THE REQUIRED 30% AND SHOW THE   PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/25/22:   23. ALL TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FT HEIGHT   REQUIREMENT. SIMPSON?S STOPPERS SHOWN AT 10 FT.       24. CHANGE STREET TREES TO LIVE OAKS TO MATCH DESIGN   EAST OF TAMARIND.       25. AREAS BENEATH THE BUILDING AND PARKING STRUCTURE   APPEAR TO HAVE FULL SIZE OAK TREES. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW   THIS IS POSSIBLE.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-23-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 02-23-2022 Time 16:41 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 02-23-2022 Time 16:41 Sent To   Notes 2022-02-23 16:41:30 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1001 OKEECHOBEE Z21100021   FEBRUARY 23, 2022   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS   SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,   MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS   REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL   FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,   SABAL PALMS, FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT   ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS   ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.   DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN   APPROVAL TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE.   2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A   CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE   ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY   DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION   DUE.   ? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE   EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. TRIPLE   ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREAS FOR CLD 25 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF   OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN   SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF   OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. DIAGRAM ON SHEET A0.07 DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE OPEN   SPACE TYPE OR CALL OUT HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT   TYPE ARE MET.   THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. FOR OPEN SPACE SHOW   THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   GARDEN PLAZA HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE TYPE PROVIDED.   50% OF THE SPACE IS REQUIRED TO BE VEGETATED AND 50% OF   THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN TREE CANOPY STANDARDS MUST BE   DEMONSTRATED.   SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE HAS BEEN   INDICATED, BUT THE SPECIFIC TYPES HAVE NOT BEEN   IDENTIFIED SO REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE VERIFIED.   ALL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET FOR OPEN SPACE BEING OPEN   TO THE SKY, NO COVERED AREAS MAY BE COUNTED AS OPEN   SPACE UNLESS THERE IS AN OVERHEAD COVER       4. NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON   THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED   TREES.   RELOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AND CANNOT BE DETERMINED   UNTIL ARBORIST?S REPORT IS RECEIVED.       5. NOT SATISFIED. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING MUST BE   SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN   SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.   ALL LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       6. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET   THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.   REMOVED FROM PLANS.       7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED   ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   WEST PARKING GARAGE.       8. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED   STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR   PORTION THEREOF FOR THE OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPE LENGTH,   AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND   94-116.   STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET.       9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS   OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND   PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.   ONCE LOCATIONS ARE FINALIZED, MUST BE SHOWN ON   LANDSCAPE PLAN.       10. NOT SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO   SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.   PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA.           11. SATISFIED. NATAL PLUM IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE   PLANT.       12. SATISFIED. SEAGRAPE IS SHOWN ON SHEET L-450, BUT NO   SEAGRAPE IS PROPOSED ON PLANT LIST.       13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED   FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST   PER SECTION 94-443(G).   ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES.       14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.       ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE TO THE PLANT LIST SO   THAT IT CAN BE VERIFIED FOR EACH SPECIES. CALCULATIONS   ARE TO BE BASED ON THE ENTIRE PLANT LIST, NOT JUST   TREES.           15. NOT SATISFIED. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE   TREES.   ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN.   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE CREATED AT THE ENDS   OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST BE   PROVIDED SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW.   EACH LANDSCAPE ISLAND REQUIRES A TREE, AND AT LEAST 75%   MUST BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.   16. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE   PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS   AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE   WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE   CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER   TO FIGURE XIV-1.   PARTIAL CALCULATIONS WERE SHOWN, BUT NOT COMPLETE AND   EXHIBIT WAS NOT PROVIDED.       17. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/23/22:   18. THE EAST LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT ON THE PROPERTY,   IT IS OUTSIDE THE SITE ON A CITY OWNED PARCEL. THIS   MUST BE ADDRESSED AS TO HOW THE AREA IS TO BE APPROVED   AND MAINTAINED.       19. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER SECTION 94-113 IS DIFFERENT   AND SEPARATE FROM THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS   FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS ON THE   LANDSCAPE LEGEND SHEET L-401 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO   REFLECT THIS.       20. C. WEST BUFFER REQUIRES 26 TREES. SOUTH BUFFER   SHOULD BE 13 TREES REQUIRED.       21. STREET TREES SHOULD BE 13 REQUIRED.       22. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT NEEDS TO SHOW   TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING AND SHOW THAT AT   LEAST 30% OF THAT IS LANDSCAPED AREA.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-15-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 11-15-2021 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 11-15-2021 Time 16:57 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-15 16:57:37 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 1001 OKEECHOBEE Z21100021   NOVEMBER 15, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING   THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS, SABAL PALMS,   FLORIDA THATCH PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE   INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE   NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED.   2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION LIST:   ? ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY   DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER.   TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS   SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE.   ? MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE EACH SINGLE   TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. TRIPLE ADONIDIA WOULD   BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.       3. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CLD 25 ZONING   DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY   TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW   THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR   VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON   TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. DIAGRAM ON SHEET   A0.07 DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPE OR CALL OUT   HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT TYPE ARE MET.   THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. FOR OPEN SPACE SHOW   THE TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.       4. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST   AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   5. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING MUST BE SHOWN ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN SHOWING   COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.       6. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS   THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A   ROAD OR STREET.               7. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL   BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE WEST   PARKING GARAGE.       8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT   MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   THE OKEECHOBEE STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER   PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.           9. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND   DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF   BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO   RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND   LANDSCAPING.       10. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.       11. NATAL PLUM IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT.       12. SEAGRAPE IS SHOWN ON SHEET L-450, BUT NO SEAGRAPE   IS PROPOSED ON PLANT LIST.       13. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS   BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G).       14. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT   SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE   PLANT LIST.           15. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF   SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE   ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE TREES.   16. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE   CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS   PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443   (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN THE   LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1.       17. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED   VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT   WILL BE SCREENED.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By mtechnow Date 02-07-2022 Time 14:55 Sent To   Notes 2022-02-07 14:54:51 -SPLIT PLAN SHEETS. AT A MINIMUM, THE WATER AND   WASTEWATER PLAN SHOULD BE ON A SEPARATE SHEET.   -PROVIDE A REFERENCE/CALL OUT/NUMBER ON SHEET TO LINK   THE EXISTING MH?S AND LINE SEGMENTS TO THE CCTV VIDEOS.   -CALL OUT FOR VCP SEWER MAIN ON CLEARWATER PARK RD TO   BE LINED FROM MH TO MH.   -PROPOSED CONNECTIONS/ IMPROVEMENTS SEEM TO BE IN LINE   WITH CITY STANDARDS. A MORE THOROUGH REVIEW WILL BE   DONE WHEN PLANS MOVE FROM CONCEPTUAL.         Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-28-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 04-28-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 04-28-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-04-27 15:01:38 CONDITION OF APPROVAL:   EXCACT GARBAGE CONTAINER(S) LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED   BY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-14-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-14-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 03-14-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-03-14 12:24:57 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E.   SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION,   ETC.).           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045         Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-11-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 02-11-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 02-11-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-02-11 09:43:51     PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF   THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE   UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.       2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE   CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).       3- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR   THE SANITATION SERVICE, COLLECTION TRUCK (FRON OR REAR   LOADER?).       4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP.       5- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN   THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF   THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC   WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND   COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING   MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE   CAN(S).       6- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE   GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE   TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND   NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected] Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-17-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 11-17-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 11-17-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-11-17 14:33:30     PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF   THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE   UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.       2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE   CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).       3- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR   THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE   FOLLOWING SPECS:   - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT   - TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-28-2022 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 11-28-2022 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 11-28-2022 Time 11:39 Sent To   Notes 2022-11-28 11:38:56 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   4-12-2022 SUBMITTAL:       1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER   CITY CODE IS NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND   PLANS TO USE NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION   BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. LIST   THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY AND   ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN.       2. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED STORM   CHAMBERS OUTSIDE OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT.       3. [SATISFIED] ARE THE OVERHEAD LINES WITHIN AN   EASEMENT?       4. [SATISFIED] OKEECHOBEE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT.   PROVIDE PERMIT FROM FDOT PRIOR TO ENGINEERING PERMIT   ISSUANCE FOR WORK WITHIN THE R/W.       5. [SATISFIED] AUSTRALIAN AVE IS MAINTAINED BY PALM   BEACH COUNTY. PROVIDE PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY PRIOR TO   ENGINEERING PERMIT ISSUANCE FOR WORK WITHIN THE R/W.       6. [SATISFIED - FLOW ARROWS WERE REMOVED FROM THE   CONCEPTUAL P&D PLAN. THE AMOUNT OF RUNOIFF FLOWING TO   OKEECHOBEE BLVD SHALL BE MINIMIZED.] ARE FLOW ARROWS   SHOWN CORRECTLY FOR DRIVE LANES GOING TOWARD OKEECHOBEE   BLVD?       7. INDICATE IF ALL OF THE STORAGE CHAMBERS WILL BE   INTERCONNECTED TO BALANCE OUT THE RUNOFF TO THE SYSTEM   AND, IF NOT ALL INTERCONNECTED, THE INDIVIDUAL STORAGE   CHAMBER AREAS ARE APPROPRIATELY SIZED FOR THE RUNOFF   EXPECTED TO DRAIN TO THEM.       8. [SATISFIED] CONDITION ASSESSMENT PERFORMED ON THE   EXISTING CMP STORM PIPE TO REMAIN TO DETERMINE IF THE   STORM PIPES SHOULD BE REPLACED OR LINED.           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-18-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 11-18-2021 Time 12:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 11-18-2021 Time 12:50 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-18 12:50:19 1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS   NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE   NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN   NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. LIST THE   CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY AND ON   THE ENGINEERING PLAN.       2. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED STORM CHAMBERS   OUTSIDE OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT.       3. ARE THE OVERHEAD LINES WITHIN AN EASEMENT?       4. OKEECHOBEE BLVD IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. PROVIDE   PERMIT FROM FDOT PRIOR TO ENGINEERING PERMIT ISSUANCE   FOR WORK WITHIN THE R/W.       5. AUSTRALIAN AVE IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY.   PROVIDE PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY PRIOR TO ENGINEERING   PERMIT ISSUANCE FOR WORK WITHIN THE R/W.       6. ARE FLOW ARROWS SHOWN CORRECTLY FOR DRIVE LANES   GOING TOWARD OKEECHOBEE BLVD?       7. INDICATE IF ALL OF THE STORAGE CHAMBERS WILL BE   INTERCONNECTED TO BALANCE OUT THE RUNOFF TO THE SYSTEM   AND, IF NOT ALL INTERCONNECTED, THE INDIVIDUAL STORAGE   CHAMBER AREAS ARE APPROPRIATELY SIZED FOR THE RUNOFF   EXPECTED TO DRAIN TO THEM.       8. CONDITION ASSESSMENT PERFORMED ON THE EXISTING CMP   STORM PIPE TO REMAIN TO DETERMINE IF THE STORM PIPES   SHOULD BE REPLACED OR LINED.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION BEFORE   START OF CONSTRUCTION.       2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3. SWPPP REQUIRED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPLICATION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-27-2022 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 04-27-2022 Time 07:16 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-04-27 07:17:56 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:       REPLAT PRIOR TO CO.   EASEMENT ABANDONMENT PRIOR TO CO Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 11-09-2021 Time 12:35 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-11-09 13:48:15 1. SURVEY INCLUDED CLEARWATER PARK ROAD. ARE THERE ANY   PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS?   2. PROVIDE COPY OF TITLE SEARCH AND PROVIDE THE   DATE/COMPANY/REPORT NUMBER ON SURVEY.   3. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29.   4. THERE IS A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR THE   ADJACENT GATEWAY PARK. WHAT ARE THE PLANS FOR THIS?   5. SHOW IMPROVEMENTS IN CITY PARCEL ADJACENT TO EAST   PROPERTY LINE.   6. SEPARATE ENGINEERING PLANS INTO WATER & SEWER,   PAVING & DRAINAGE.   7. EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED WILL REQUIRE APPLICATION   THROUGH ENGINEERING.   8. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED AND CAN BE A CONDITION OF   C.O.     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-02-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 05-02-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-03-25 16:56:18 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE.   2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDING TO   ARTICLE 12. EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY CONCURRENCY DOES NOT   PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUIRE AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS.   MAJOR INTERSECTIONS WITHIN THE RDI SHALL BE INCLUDED IN   THE ANALYSIS   A. SATISFIED. PLEASE CAPTION EACH FIGURE. FIGURE 1   SHOWCASING THE RDI SEEMS MISSING   B. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLEARLY DENOMINATE AND ANALYZE   EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SCENARIO IN THE ANALYSIS:   EXISTING, FUTURE, FUTURE PLUS PROJECT   C. SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL   DIVISION PERTAINING THE VALIDITY AND FEASIBILITY OF THE   ADOPTED TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE   PROOF OF APPROVAL/ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM THE COUNTY   TRAFFIC SIGNAL DIVISION.   D. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE FUTURE SCENARIO FOR   THE AUSTRALIAN/CLEARWATER INTERSECTION INCLUSIVE OF THE   FERN ST EXTENSION. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED.   E. SATISFIED. THE FERN STREET EXTENSION SHALL BE   CAPTURED AND ANALYZED. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED.   F. SATISFIED. PER THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD EASTBOUND LEFT   TURN LANE EXTENSION. PROVIDE MORE DETAILED ENGINEERING   DRAWINGS. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED.   G. SATISFIED. PER THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD EASTBOUND LEFT   TURN LANE EXTENSION. PROVIDE A MORE IN-DEPTH QUEUE   ANALYSIS, SHOWCASING RESULTS (I.E. BACK OF THE QUEUE)   IN TABULAR AND GRAPHICAL FORM   3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS   GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS, WHICH MAY   SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM. IN   THAT CASE, PROVIDE TDM STRATEGIES AND ROADWAY   IMPROVEMENTS TO MITIGATE SUCH IMPACTS. FURTHER TDM   MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE DISCUSSED AND ADOPTED. TO BE   FURTHER DISCUSSED. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE A DRAFT TDM   DOCUMENT PRIOR TO CONDITIONAL APPROVAL.   4) SATISFIED. A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED   PRIOR TO THE TRAFFIC STUDY REVISION AND TDM STRATEGIES   PROPOSAL.   SITE COMMENTS   5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING   ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,   SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,   WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,   PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS.   LATEST SUBMISSION (2/21/2022) DOES NOT SHOW STOP OR   YIELD PAVEMENT MARKINGS, NOR THE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE.   LATEST SUBMISSION (3/11/2022) DOES NOT HAVE ALL THE   REQUESTED FEATURES OR THEY ARE NOT CLEARLY LEGIBLE &   IDENTIFIABLE, PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN WITHIN THE   TRANSPORTATION FOLDER, WITHOUT NON-RELEVANT ITEMS (E.G.   DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, ETC.)   6) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A   SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.   8) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY   ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20   FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR   THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2?   SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL   PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME   AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. THE PROPOSED   PAD IS NOT EASILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC, IT MUST BE   RELOCATED NEARBY THE HOTEL OR CONFERENCE CENTER   ENTRANCES BY THE ROUNDABOUT. CONSIDERING THE EXTENT OF   THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A LARGER AREA SHOULD BE   DEDICATED (E.G. 15 X 30)   9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. JUSTIFICATION   STATEMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ADA NOR BICYCLE PARKING   BREAKDOWN. PLEASE REVISE AND PROPERLY MARK THE LOCATION   OF BICYCLE STALLS AND CORRESPONDING DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER. PERTAINING ADA PARKING REQUIREMENTS,   PLEASE PROVIDE EXACT TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES, AS "OVER   1,000" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE CONSIDERING THE ADA CRITERIA   (ONE FOR EACH 100 OVER 1,000). NOTE: THE ADA PARKING   SPACES FOR GATEWAY PARK SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE   REQUIRED TOTAL FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHEET   A0.02 DOES NOT CONTAIN THE REQUESTED INFORMATION.   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DECELERATION LANE FOR THE   OKEECHOBEE BLVD DRIVEWAY   11) SATISFIED. PLEASE INSTALL A FULL ROUNDABOUT SO TO   ALLOW ALL MOVEMENTS   12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MULTIUSE PATH ALONG OKEECHOBEE   BLVD SIMILAR, IF NOT EXACTLY AS THE ONE EAST OF   TAMARIND AVE. COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE THE   MULTIUSE PATH IS SHOWN ON SITE PLANS AND A DETAILED   PROFILE DRAWING PROVIDED. COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED   ONCE PACKAGE IS PROVIDED OR WILL BE CONVERTED AS A   CONDITIONAL APPROVAL   13) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE DETAILS OF SIGNAGE AND   WAYFINDING FOR PARK PATRONS NEARBY SITE ENTRANCE AND BY   THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE   PACKAGE IS PROVIDED OR WILL BE CONVERTED AS A   CONDITIONAL APPROVAL   14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INSTALL SIGNAGE RESTRICTING   USAGE OF CITY STALLS TO PARK PATRONS ONLY AND   PROHIBITING OVERNIGHT PARKING. COMMENT WILL BE   SATISFIED ONCE PACKAGE IS PROVIDED OR WILL BE CONVERTED   AS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL   15) SATISFIED. DESIGNATE TWO OF THE CITY STALLS NEARBY   THE PARK ENTRANCE AS HANDICAP, DESIGN THEM PER ADA   STANDARDS ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE MOVE SUCH SPACES CLOSER   OR IN FRONT OF PARK ENTRANCE   16) SATISFIED. ON SHEET A0.06 THE PARKING STALLS ON THE   NORTH-EAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE SEEMS IN CONFLICT,   PLEASE REVISE AND CLEARLY INDICATE THE PEDESTRIAN-ONLY   AREA SURROUNDING THE STAIRCASE ACCESS   17) SATISFIED. INSERT VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL MARKINGS IN   SHEET A0.08, SIMILAR TO SHEET A0.05   18) SATISFIED. THE TURNING RADIUS AND VEHICLE   MANEUVERING ON AND OFF THE GARAGE RAMP SEEMS EXTREMELY   TIGHT AND DANGEROUS. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS   DEPICTING A VEHICLE ACCESSING THE GARAGE, DRIVING UP   AND THROUGH THE SECOND FLOOR AND BACK OUT. PLEASE   PROVIDE GARAGE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS AS MENTIONED IN THE   COMMENT RESPONSE OR INDICATE SHEET NUMBER IF ALREADY   PROVIDED       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-16-2022 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 02-16-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-02-16 23:53:58 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE   AVAILABLE.   2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY   ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 12. EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY   CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUIRE AN   IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. MAJOR INTERSECTIONS WITHIN THE RDI   SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS   A. PLEASE CAPTION EACH FIGURE. FIGURE 1 SHOWCASING THE   RDI SEEMS MISSING   B. PLEASE CLEARLY DENOMINATE AND ANALYZE EACH OF THE   FOLLOWING SCENARIO IN THE ANALYSIS: EXISTING, FUTURE,   FUTURE PLUS PROJECT   C. COORDINATE WITH COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL DIVISION   PERTAINING THE VALIDITY AND FEASIBILITY OF THE ADOPTED   TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATIONS   D. PROVIDE A SEPARATE FUTURE SCENARIO FOR THE   AUSTRALIAN/CLEARWATER INTERSECTION INCLUSIVE OF THE   FERN ST EXTENSION   E. THE FERN STREET EXTENSION SHALL BE CAPTURED AND   ANALYZED FOR THE   F. PER THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE   EXTENSION. PROVIDE MORE DETAILED ENGINEERING DRAWINGS   G. PER THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE   EXTENSION. PROVIDE A MORE IN-DEPTH QUEUE ANALYSIS,   SHOWCASING RESULTS (I.E. BACK OF THE QUEUE) IN TABULAR   AND GRAPHICAL FORM   3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS   GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS, WHICH MAY   SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM. IN   THAT CASE, PROVIDE TDM STRATEGIES AND ROADWAY   IMPROVEMENTS TO MITIGATE SUCH IMPACTS. FURTHER TDM   MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE DISCUSSED AND ADOPTED.   4) SATISFIED. A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED   PRIOR TO THE TRAFFIC STUDY REVISION AND TDM STRATEGIES   PROPOSAL   SITE COMMENTS   5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN,   SHOWCASING ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD,   CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING,   SIGNAGE, PATHWAY, WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING   ZONE, PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING   DIMENSIONS. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT SHOW STOP OR   YIELD PAVEMENT MARKINGS, NOR THE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE   6) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A   SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.   8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN   EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM   8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION   READINESS. FOR THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A   CONDUIT (2' SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH   AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE   DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.   THE PROPOSED PAD IS NOT EASILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE   PUBLIC, IT MUST BE RELOCATED NEARBY THE HOTEL OR   CONFERENCE CENTER ENTRANCES BY THE ROUNDABOUT.   CONSIDERING THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A   LARGER AREA SHOULD BE DEDICATED (E.G. 15 X 30)   9) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. JUSTIFICATION   STATEMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ADA NOR BICYCLE PARKING   BREAKDOWN. PLEASE REVISE AND PROPERLY MARK THE LOCATION   OF BICYCLE STALLS AND CORRESPONDING DOCUMENT NAME AND   SHEET NUMBER   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DECELERATION LANE FOR THE   OKEECHOBEE BLVD DRIVEWAY   11) SATISFIED. PLEASE INSTALL A FULL ROUNDABOUT SO TO   ALLOW ALL MOVEMENTS   12) PROVIDE A MULTIUSE PATH ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD   SIMILAR, IF NOT EXACTLY AS THE ONE EAST OF TAMARIND AVE   13) PROVIDE DETAILS OF SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING FOR PARK   PATRONS NEARBY SITE ENTRANCE AND BY THE SURFACE PARKING   LOT   14) INSTALL SIGNAGE RESTRICTING USAGE OF CITY STALLS TO   PARK PATRONS ONLY AND PROHIBITING OVERNIGHT PARKING   15) DESIGNATE TWO OF THE CITY STALLS NEARBY THE PARK   ENTRANCE AS HANDICAP, DESIGN THEM PER ADA STANDARDS   ACCORDINGLY   16) ON SHEET A0.06 THE PARKING STALLS ON THE NORTH-EAST   CORNER OF THE GARAGE SEEMS IN CONFLICT, PLEASE REVISE   AND CLEARLY INDICATE THE PEDESTRIAN-ONLY AREA   SURROUNDING THE STAIRCASE ACCESS   17) INSERT VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL MARKINGS IN SHEET   A0.08, SIMILAR TO SHEET A0.05   18) THE TURNING RADIUS AND VEHICLE MANEUVERING ON AND   OFF THE GARAGE RAMP SEEMS EXTREMELY TIGHT AND   DANGEROUS. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEPICTING A   VEHICLE ACCESSING THE GARAGE, DRIVING UP AND THROUGH   THE SECOND FLOOR AND BACK OUT.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-18-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 11-18-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-11-18 12:21:08 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   2) PROVIDE A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDING TO ARTICLE   12. EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE   THE CITY TO REQUIRE AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. MAJOR   INTERSECTIONS WITHIN THE RDI SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE   ANALYSIS   3) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT   NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS, WHICH MAY SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE   EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM. IN THAT CASE, PROVIDE TDM   STRATEGIES AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO MITIGATE SUCH   IMPACTS.   4) A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED PRIOR TO   THE TRAFFIC STUDY REVISION AND TDM STRATEGIES PROPOSAL       SITE COMMENTS   5) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING ONLY   TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,   SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,   WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,   PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS   6) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS   (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.   PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER   SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.   7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR   SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY   DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE   FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET   NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.   8) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE   MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND   PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR THE LATTER   ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2? SCHEDULE 40 PVC)   TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V   CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER   SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.   9) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA   AND BICYCLE ONES   10) PROVIDE A DECELERATION LANE FOR THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD   DRIVEWAY   11) PLEASE INSTALL A FULL ROUNDABOUT SO TO ALLOW ALL   MOVEMENTS       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]         Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-31-2022 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 03-31-2022 Time 15:26 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 03-08-2022 Time 14:19 Sent To   Notes 2022-03-31 15:26:19 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE CONFIRM THE LISTED   356,864SF INCLUDES TRACK A AND B, AND LOT 7 AND 8.   PREVIOUS COMMENT - PLEASE UPDATE SURVEY TO INCLUDE   TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PARCEL (TRACK A + B) .   -PREVIOUS COMMENT (PC)- PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPERTY   LINE INDICATED IN DRAWINGS ACCURATELY REFLECT THE   LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE ACCORDING TO SURVEY.   2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE CONFIRM THE CORE OF THE   OFFICE TOWER IN FLOORS 3 TO 7 ARE INCLUDED. SCHEMATICS   FOR THOSE FLOORS WERE NOT INCLUDED. -PREVIOUS COMMENT-   PLEASE CONFIRM THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE EXISTING   BUILDING REFLECTS THE GBA DEFINITION IN CURRENT CODE -   PC -PLEASE PROVIDE A GBA TABLE WITH THE INFORMATION OF   EXISTING ALLOWABLE GBA FOR SITE, EXISTING GBA FOR   MARRIOTT, AND PROPOSED GBA.   3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED -PLEASE CONFIRM THE CORE OF THE   OFFICE TOWER IN FLOORS 3 TO 7 ARE INCLUDED. SCHEMATICS   FOR THOSE FLOORS WERE NOT INCLUDED. -PREVIOUS COMMENTS-   VERTICAL CIRCULATION THROUGH THE GARAGE LEVELS SHALL BE   COUNTED IN THE GBA NUMBERS. PLEASE IDENTIFY IF THE CORE   (NOT COLORED IN GROSS FLOOR PLAN SHEETS) IS ALL   INCLUDED IN THE GBA. MECHANICAL ROOMS CAN BE EXCLUDED.   PLEASE LABEL EACH OF THE SPACES THAT ARE NOT CLEARLY   IDENTIFIABLE- PC- PLEASE PROVIDE A FLOOR BY FLOOR PLAN   AND TABLE INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THE   GBA CALCULATION ACCORDING TO THE GBA DEFINITION IN   SECTION 94-109. CALL OUT THE USE IN EACH OF THE AREAS.   GBA IN SHEETS A0.14, A0.15 AND A0.16 DO NOT MATCH THE   GBA DEFINITION BY CODE.   4. NOT SATISFIED ? SEE COMMENTS BELOW UNDER NO. 28.-   PREVIOUS COMMENT -PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT COMPLY   WITH THE REQUIREMENTS ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-109 OR   TABLE IV-7. PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT ABUT AN   ACTIVE USE OR COMPLIES WITH MINIMUM PROPORTIONS.   5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? INFORMATION TO CONFIRM   COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. SEE LANDSCAPE REVIEW   COMMENTS. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE WEST OF THE NEW POOL   BUILDING IS LOCATED ALONG LOT FRONTAGE THEREFORE IT   SHALL BE DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE POS STANDARDS   AND BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. PLEASE VERIFY   COMPLIANCE ? PREVIOUS COMMENT - PLEASE CLASSIFY THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE PROPOSED ACCORDING TO TABLE   IV-7. GREEN/ LANDSCAPE BUFFERS DO NOT QUALIFY AS   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. LANDSCAPE EDGE SOUTH OF THE NEW   HOTEL POOL BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE EAST OF THE EXISTING   HOTEL ENTRANCE ARE REALLY LEFT OVER AREAS NOT PRIVATE   OPEN SPACES. - PC- PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE EXPLAIN   THE HARDSHIPS JUSTIFYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST.   6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? FOR DAC SUBMITTAL PLEASE   PROVIDE BLOW OUT DETAILS OF THE MOST IMPORTANT GROUND   FLOOR AREAS AND MOST IMPORTANT FEATURES OF BUILDING   DESIGN SUCH AS METAL TRIM LOUVERS AND CURTAIN WALL,   TERRACE PLANTERS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: COLORED ELEVATIONS   NOT PROVIDED. - PC- PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS   WITH CALL OUT MATERIALS FOR ALL ELEVATIONS. PLEASE   INCLUDE PHOTOS OF PROPOSED MATERIALS.   7. SATISFIED - PLEASE STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THE   GARAGE LAYOUT FOR POSSIBLE REDUCTION ON TOTAL NUMBER OF   FLOORS. NORTHERN GARAGE LAYOUT DOES NOT SEEM TO   FUNCTION.   8. NOT SATISFIED- VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION SHALL BE   PROVIDED AND DAC APPROVAL NEEDED - GARAGE STRUCTURE   EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT LENGTH OF 350 FEET   ALLOWED AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MINIMUM 60 FEET   SEPARATION. A BREAK IS RECOMMENDED AND A VARIANCE WILL   BE NEEDED - PC- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM   THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE MAXIMUM 350 FEET   FOOTPRINT LENGTH ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT.   9. NOT SATISFIED ? VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION SHALL BE   PROVIDED AND DAC APPROVAL NEEDED- PC - PROJECT EXCEEDS   THE MAXIMUM SETBACK ALLOWED ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD,   CREATING A SUBURBAN CONFIGURATION DUE TO THE LOCATION   OF THE VEHICULAR ACCESS DRIVES IN FRONT OF THE   BUILDING.   10. SATISFIED - PC - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO   CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS   ALLOWED.   11. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE THE OVERALL BUILDING   HEIGHT TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM VERTICAL   PROJECTIONS- PC - ON FA?ADE, PLEASE INDICATE THE   ELEVATION OF EACH FLOOR LEVEL.   12. SATISFIED - PC - PROPOSED PROJECT REMOVED THE TURN   AROUND SPACE AT THE END OF CLEARWATER PARK ROAD. IF A   GATE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE PROPERTY IS INSTALLED,   VEHICLES DO NOT HAVE SPACE TO TURN AROUND.   13. NOT SATISFIED ? VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION SHALL BE   PROVIDED, AND DAC APPROVAL NEEDED ? PC-PLEASE PROVIDE   INFORMATION TO CONFIRM THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE   MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIRED ALONG THE AVENUE   DESIGNATION AND THE CSX FRONTAGE.   14. NOT SATISFIED ? OKEECHOBEE FRONTAGE LISTED AS 552   LINEAR FEET THEREFORE 19 TREES REQUIRED ALONG THE   FRONTAGE NEXT TO THE CURB WITHIN A PLANTING AREA. ONLY   13 TREES PROVIDED. A 12 FOOT WIDE MULTIPURPOSE PATH   SHALL BE PROVIDED. - PREVIOUS COMMENT- IMPROVEMENTS   NEED TO BE INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE   PLAN FOR REVIEW DRUING THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS.-   PC- STREETSCAPE ALONG OKEECHOBEE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   CONTINUE THE RECENT DESIGN IMPLEMENTED BETWEEN TAMARIND   AND ROSEMARY. STREET TREES PLANTED EVERY 30 FEET, A   CONTINUOUS HEDGE OR GROUND COVER ALONG OKEECHOBEE AND A   MULTIPURPOSE PATH OF 12 FEET IN WIDTH.   15. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE BUILDING SECTION.   16. SATISFIED - PC-PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION   TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANAR BREAK   REQUIREMENTS.   17. SATISFIED - PLEASE NOTE THAT MINIMUM SETBACKS ARE   ALSO APPLICABLE TO GARAGE STRUCTURES. CHECK INFORMATION   PROVIDED IN SHEET A0.01 REGARDING INTERIOR SETBACK.   18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? THE 552 LINEAR FEET OF   FRONTAGE ALONG OKEECHOBEE REQUIRES 6 PUBLIC BIKE   PARKING SPACES. THESE SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO   THE OFFICE AND CONVENTION CENTER ENTRANCE. THE FINAL   LOCATION OF THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION SHALL BE   DISCUSSED WITH THE PROVIDER. PREVIOUS COMMENT -PLEASE   INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC BIKE   PARKING SPACES 1/100? FEET OF FRONTAGE.   19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMPLIANCE TABLE IS SHEET   A0.01 INDICATE THAT 71 BIKE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED   FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION   OF THE SECURE BIKE ROOM. ONLY SPACE FOR 46 BIKES   IDENTIFIED IN SHEET A0.05. PREVIOUS COMMENT- PLEASE   INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED SECURED BIKE   PARKING FOR THE OFFICE USE AT A RATIO OF 1/15 PARKING   SPACES PROVIDED (74 BIKE SPACES REQUIRED).   20. SATISFIED - FOR THE PARKING CALCULATIONS, PLEASE   LIST EACH OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED USES (WITH NET   SQUARE FOOTAGE OR NUMBER OF ROOMS) AND THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED PARKING.   21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? PLEASE INCLUDE A CONNECTION   ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ACCESS ROAD FROM THE GARAGE   ALONG THE LOADING AS IT IS THE FASTEST ROUTE. PREVIOUS   COMMENT - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE ROUTE OF PEDESTRIAN   ACCESS TO THE HOTEL AND OFFICE FROM CLEARWATER PARK   ROAD.   22. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE JUSTIFYING   THE REQUESTED VARIANCES. DETAILED COMPLIANCE WITH   VARIANCE STANDARDS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR DAC REVIEW.   NEW COMMENTS FOR 2-1-22   23. SATISFIED - MONUMENT SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE   DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AREA.   24. SATISFIED - PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE   OF THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN CITY-OWNED PROPERTY THAT IS   CURRENTLY USED BY THE TRI-RAIL MAINTENANCE YARD.   25. NOT SATISFIED- EXISTING CHILLER SHALL BE SCREENED   AND A LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR 3-8-22 RESUBMITTAL   26. PLEASE REMOVE THE SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE FROM THE   OPEN SPACE TABLE AS IT IS NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS   PROJECT.   27. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED PLANTER   ALONG THE EDGE OF THE TERRACES AND PARKING GARAGE.   DETAILS NEEDED ON PROPOSED INSTALLATION SYSTEM,   IRRIGATION AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.   28. COMPLIANCE WITH POS: STAFF SUGGESTS APPLICANT TO   UTILIZE THE SPACE NEXT TO THE ROW TO COMPLY WITH THE   POS REQUIREMENT AND ASK FOR NECESSARY VARIANCES (ACTIVE   USE ABUTMENT). ALL OTHER STANDARDS CAN BE MET.   IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DONE TO PEDESTRIAN AREA IN FRONT   OF BUILDINGS, THE DROP-OFF AREA AND ACCESS ROAD TO   MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE POS. FOR EXAMPLE:   TREATMENT OF BLANK WALL AT SOUTH END OF HOTEL BUILDING;   IDENTIFY THE TREATMENT OF THE WEST CONFERENCE CENTER   WALL; PROVISION OF TREES ALONG THE ACCESS ROAD. IN   ADDITION, POS NEXT TO OKEECHOBEE WEST OF ACCESS DRIVE   SHALL BE INTEGRATED TO THE EXISTING CITY PARK ON WEST   SIDE.   29. ADA ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE OKEECHOBEE   SIDEWALK TO THE OFFICE ENTRANCE.   30. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALSO ALONG THE   WEST SIDE OF THE ACCESS ROAD. SCREENING OF LOADING   RECOMMENDED, POSSIBLY REMOVAL OF CURB CUT EAST OF   LOADING. RENDERING SHOW SOME ENCLOSURE BUT DRAWINGS DO   NOT INDICATE ANYTHING.   31. RENDERINGS SHOW THAT THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE   GARAGE ABOVE THE CONFERENCE CENTER IS VISIBLE FROM THE   STREET. ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO   SCREEN THE NON-ACTIVE USES.   32. RENDERINGS SHALL BE UPDATED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT   PROJECT AND SURROUNDING CONDITIONS (LEFT TURN MOVEMENT   ON OKEECHOBEE SHOWN, VIEW FROM AMENITY DECK DOES NOT   ACCURATELY REFLECT SURROUNDINGS.   33. ALL LANDSCAPE INDICATED WITHIN THE CITY PROPERTY   (EAST OF THE SITE) SHALL BE CALLED OUT AS SUBJECT TO   SEPARATE AGREEMENT. IN ADDITION, NOT ALL THE PROPOSED   LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS POSSIBLE DUE TO THE EXISTING TRAIN   FACILITY. IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INDICATED AS TWO PHASES   IN CASE THE TRAIN FACILITY IS NOT MOVED OUT BY THE TIME   THE BUILDING IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.   FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE SHEET   ADDRESSING ALL COMMENTS. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE IN THE   DRAWINGS THE UPDATED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IF   POSSIBLE. SUBMIT ONE LARGE COLORED PRINTED SET AND ONE   CD WITH THE ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DRAWING AND ALL   SUPPORT INFORMATION (INCLUDING RESPONSE LETTER).   BEFORE THE PROJECT CAN BE SCHEDULED FOR DAC ALL   COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED. REVISED DRAWINGS SHALL BE   SUBMITTED BY APRIL 12 ADDRESSING ALL OUTSTANDING   COMMENTS FOR THE PROJECT TO BE SCHEDULED FOR MAY 11   DAC.   FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA   APONTE AT 561-822-1439.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-23-2022 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 02-23-2022 Time 17:06 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 02-23-2022 Time 11:16 Sent To   Notes 2022-02-23 11:29:01 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE UPDATE SURVEY TO INCLUDE   TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PARCEL (TRACK A + B) .   -PREVIOUS COMMENT (PC)- PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPERTY   LINE INDICATED IN DRAWINGS ACCURATELY REFLECT THE   LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE ACCORDING TO SURVEY.   2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE CONFIRM THE SQUARE   FOOTAGE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING REFLECTS THE GBA   DEFINITION IN CURRENT CODE - PC -PLEASE PROVIDE A GBA   TABLE WITH THE INFORMATION OF EXISTING ALLOWABLE GBA   FOR SITE, EXISTING GBA FOR MARRIOTT, AND PROPOSED GBA.   3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED -VERTICAL CIRCULATION THROUGH   THE GARAGE LEVELS SHALL BE COUNTED IN THE GBA   NUMBERS.PLEASE IDENTIFY IF THE CORE (NOT COLORED IN   GROSS FLOOR PLAN SHEETS) IS ALL INCLUDED IN THE GBA.   MECHANICAL ROOMS CAN BE EXCLUDED. PLEASE LABEL EACH OF   THE SPACES THAT ARE NOT CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE- PC-   PLEASE PROVIDE A FLOOR BY FLOOR PLAN AND TABLE   INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THE GBA   CALCULATION ACCORDING TO THE GBA DEFINITION IN SECTION   94-109. CALL OUT THE USE IN EACH OF THE AREAS. GBA IN   SHEETS A0.14, A0.15 AND A0.16 DO NOT MATCH THE GBA   DEFINITION BY CODE.   4. NOT SATISFIED - PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT COMPLY   WITH THE REQUIREMENTS ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-109 OR   TABLE IV-7. PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT ABUT AN   ACTIVE USE OR COMPLIES WITH MINIMUM PROPORTIONS.   5. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CLASIFY THE PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE TYPE PROPOSED ACCORDING TO TABLE IV-7. GREEN/   LANDSCAPE BUFFERS DO NOT QUALIFY AS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.   LANDSCAPE EDGE SOUTH OF THE NEW HOTEL POOL BUILDING OR   LANDSCAPE EAST OF THE EXISTING HOTEL ENTRANCE ARE   REALLY LEFT OVER AREAS NOT PRIVATE OPEN SPACES. - PC-   PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE HARDSHIPS   JUSTIFYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST.   6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - COLORED ELEVATIONS NOT   PROVIDED. - PC- PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH   CALL OUT MATERIALS FOR ALL ELEVATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE   PHOTOS OF PROPOSED MATERIALS.   7. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THE   GARAGE LAYOUT FOR POSSIBLE REDUCTION ON TOTAL NUMBER OF   FLOORS. NORTHERN GARAGE LAYOUT DOES NOT SEEM TO   FUNCTION.   8. NOT SATISFIED- GARAGE STRUCTURE EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM   FOOTPRINT LENGHT OF 350 FEET ALLOWED AND DOES NOT   COMPLY WITH MINIMUM 60 FEET SEPARATION.A BREAK IS   RECOMMENDED AND A VARIANCE WILL BE NEEDED - PC- PLEASE   PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM THE PROJECT COMPLIES   WITH THE MAXIMUM 350 FEET FOOTPRINT LENGTH ALLOWED IN   THE DISTRICT.   9. NOT SATISFIED - PC - PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM   SETBACK ALLOWED ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD, CREATING A   SUBURBAN CONFIGURATION DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE   VEHICULAR ACCESS DRIVES IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING.   10. NOT SATISFIED - PC - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO   CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS   ALLOWED.   11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE THE OVERALL   BUILDING HEIGHT TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM   VERTICAL PROJECTIONS- PC - ON FA?ADE, PLEASE INDICATE   THE ELEVATION OF EACH FLOOR LEVEL.   12. SATISFIED - PC - PROPOSED PROJECT REMOVED THE TURN   AROUND SPACE AT THE END OF CLEARWATER PARK ROAD. IF A   GATE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE PROPERTY IS INSTALLED,   VEHICLES DO NOT HAVE SPACE TO TURN AROUND.   13. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM   THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE   REQUIRED ALONG THE AVENUE DESIGNATION AND THE CSX   FRONTAGE.   14. NOT SATISFIED - IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE INDICATED   IN THE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLAN FOR REVIEW DRUING   THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS.- PC- STREETSCAPE ALONG   OKEECHOBEE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CONTINUE THE RECENT   DESIGN IMPLEMENTED BETWEEN TAMARIND AND ROSEMARY.   STREET TREES PLANTED EVERY 30 FEET, A CONTINUOUS HEDGE   OR GROUND COVER ALONG OKEECHOBEE AND A MULTIPURPOSE   PATH OF 12 FEET IN WIDTH.   15. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE BUILDING SECTION.   16. NOT SATISFIED - PC-PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC   INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANAR BREAK   REQUIREMENTS.   17. SATISFIED - PLEASE NOTE THAT MINIMUM SETBACKS ARE   ALSO APPLICABLE TO GARAGE STRUCTURES. CHECK INFORMATION   PROVIDED IN SHEET A0.01 REGARDING INTERIOR SETBACK.   18. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE   REQUIRED PUBLIC BIKE PARKING SPACES 1/100? FEET OF   FRONTAGE.   19. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE   REQUIRED SECURED BIKE PARKING FOR THE OFFICE USE AT A   RATIO OF 1/15 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (74 BIKE SPACES   REQUIRED).   20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - FOR THE PARKING CALCULATIONS,   PLEASE LIST EACH OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED USES   (WITH NET SQUARE FOOTAGE OR NUMBER OF ROOMS) AND THE   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING.   21. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE IDENTIFY THE ROUTE OF   PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE HOTEL AND OFFICE FROM   CLEARWATER PARK ROAD.   22. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE JSUTIFYING   THE REQUESTED VARIANCES. DETAILED COMPLIANCE WITH   VARIANCE STANDARDS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR DAC REVIEW.   NEW COMMENTSFOR 2-1-22   23. MONUMENT SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE DOWNTOWN   MASTER PLAN AREA.   24. PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE   PROPERTY IS WITHIN CITY-OWNED PROPERTY THAT IS   CURRENTLY USED BY THE TRI-RAIL MAINTENANCE YARD.   25. EXISTING CHILLER SHALL BE SCREEN AND A LANDSCAPE   BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND.       FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE SHEET   ADDRESSING ALL COMMENTS. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE IN THE   DRAWINGS THE UPDATED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IF   POSSIBLE. SUBMIT ONE LARGE COLORED PRINTED SET AND ONE   CD WITH THE ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DRAWING AND ALL   SUPPORT INFORMATION (INCLUDING RESPONSE LETTER).   BEFORE THE PROJECT CAN BE SCHEDULED FOR DAC ALL   COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED.   FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA   APONTE AT 561-822-1439. Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-18-2021 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 11-18-2021 Time 12:35 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 10-12-2021 Time 12:35 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-18 12:36:08 1. PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPERTY LINE INDICATED IN   DRAWINGS ACCURATELY REFLECT THE LOCATION OF THE   PROPERTY LINE ACCORDING TO SURVEY.   2. PLEASE PROVIDE A GBA TABLE WITH THE INFORMATION OF   EXISTING ALLOWABLE GBA FOR SITE, EXISTING GBA FOR   MARRIOTT, AND PROPOSED GBA.   3. PLEASE PROVIDE A FLOOR BY FLOOR PLAN AND TABLE   INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THE GBA   CALCULATION ACCORDING TO THE GBA DEFINITION IN SECTION   94-109. CALL OUT THE USE IN EACH OF THE AREAS. GBA IN   SHEETS A0.14, A0.15 AND A0.16 DO NOT MATCH THE GBA   DEFINITION BY CODE.   4. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-109 OR TABLE IV-7.   PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT ABUT AN ACTIVE USE   OR COMPLIES WITH MINIMUM PROPORTIONS.   5. PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE HARDSHIPS   JUSTIFYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST.   6. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT   MATERIALS FOR ALL ELEVATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE PHOTOS OF   PROPOSED MATERIALS.   7. PLEASE STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THE GARAGE LAYOUT FOR   POSSIBLE REDUCTION ON TOTAL NUMBER OF FLOORS. NORTHERN   GARAGE LAYOUT DOES NOT SEEM TO FUNCTION.   8. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM THE PROJECT   COMPLIES WITH THE MAXIMUM 350 FEET FOOTPRINT LENGTH   ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT.   9. PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SETBACK ALLOWED ALONG   OKEECHOBEE BLVD, CREATING A SUBURBAN CONFIGURATION DUE   TO THE LOCATION OF THE VEHICULAR ACCESS DRIVES IN FRONT   OF THE BUILDING.   10. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE   WITH MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ALLOWED.   11. ON FA?ADE, PLEASE INDICATE THE ELEVATION OF EACH   FLOOR LEVEL.   12. PROPOSED PROJECT REMOVED THE TURN AROUND SPACE AT   THE END OF CLEARWATER PARK ROAD. IF A GATE AT THE   ENTRANCE OF THE PROPERTY IS INSTALLED, VEHICLES DO NOT   HAVE SPACE TO TURN AROUND.   13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM THE PROJECT   COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIRED ALONG THE   AVENUE DESIGNATION AND THE CSX FRONTAGE.   14. STREETSCAPE ALONG OKEECHOBEE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   CONTINUE THE RECENT DESIGN IMPLEMENTED BETWEEN TAMARIND   AND ROSEMARY. STREET TREES PLANTED EVERY 30 FEET, A   CONTINUOUS HEDGE OR GROUND COVER ALONG OKEECHOBEE AND A   MULTIPURPOSE PATH OF 12 FEET IN WIDTH.   15. PLEASE PROVIDE BUILDING SECTION.   16. PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO CONFIRM   COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS.   17. PLEASE NOTE THAT MINIMUM SETBACKS ARE ALSO   APPLICABLE TO GARAGE STRUCTURES. CHECK INFORMATION   PROVIDED IN SHEET A0.01 REGARDING INTERIOR SETBACK.   18. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC   BIKE PARKING SPACES 1/100? FEET OF FRONTAGE.   19. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED   SECURED BIKE PARKING FOR THE OFFICE USE AT A RATIO OF   1/15 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (74 BIKE SPACES REQUIRED).   20. FOR THE PARKING CALCULATIONS, PLEASE LIST EACH OF   THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED USES (WITH NET SQUARE FOOTAGE   OR NUMBER OF ROOMS) AND THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   PARKING.   21. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE ROUTE OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO   THE HOTEL AND OFFICE FROM CLEARWATER PARK ROAD.   22. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE JSUTIFYING THE REQUESTED   VARIANCES. DETAILED COMPLIANCE WITH VARIANCE STANDARDS   WILL BE REQUIRED FOR DAC REVIEW.   FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE SHEET   ADDRESSING ALL COMMENTS. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE IN THE   DRAWINGS THE UPDATED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IF   POSSIBLE. SUBMIT ONE LARGE PRINTED SET AND ONE CD WITH   THE ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DRAWING AND ALL SUPPORT   INFORMATION (INCLUDING RESPONSE LETTER).   FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA   APONTE AT 561-822-1439.       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved