Plan Review Details - Project Z21100018
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21100018
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-16-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By swelter Date 05-16-2023 Time 13:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By swelter Date 05-16-2023 Time 13:10 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-16 13:09:04PASSED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
  
 1.) LABEL IN THE PLAN SHEETS AND KEY PLAN SHEETS THE
 LOCATION OF THE INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE/PUBLIC ART
  
  
  
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-18-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 11-18-2021 Time 10:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 11-18-2021 Time 11:03 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-18 11:03:15PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. CAFE AND
 THE COMMUNITY EVENT BUILDINGS WILL BE OVER $500,000 IN
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS THEREFORE BY ORDINANCE 1% OF
 THAT COST MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC ART
 ACCOUNT. PUBLIC ART ON THE SITE WILL BE MANAGED THROUGH
 THE ARTLIFE WPB (PUBLIC ART) PROGRAM.
  
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &
 CULTURE AT [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-17-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-17-2021 Time 13:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-17-2021 Time 19:16 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-17 19:30:49DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN CURRENT
 FLOOD ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 6 FT NAVD
 BUT, ALTHOUGH THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS SUBMITTED
 AN APPEAL TO FEMA, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FEMA PROPOSED
 FLOOD ZONE IS VE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 9 FT
 NAVD. IF THE APPEAL IS DENIED, THEN THE FEMA PROPOSED
 FLOOD ELEVATION WILL BE APPLICABLE. IF THE PERMIT IS
 ISSUED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF APPEAL RESOLUTION (AS YET
 UNKNOWN), THE CURRENT BASE FLOOD ELEVATION WILL BE
 APPLICABLE. THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL
 ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS
 ETC.) SHALL BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE
 FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-12-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 05-12-2023 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 05-12-2023 Time 15:02 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 09-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 09-22-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-22 13:54:25COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
 SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE. *CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL*
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-16-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-16-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 11-16-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-16 06:49:27COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
 SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 INDEX SHEET NUMBERING ON COVER DOES NOT MATCH PLAN
 SHEET NUMBERING.
  
 GENERAL:
 O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
 O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
 B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
 L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
 B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
 ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
 BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
 O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:
 O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG
 WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
 O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
 EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
 STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
 O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION.
 O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
 METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
 NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
  
 WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
 O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
 O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
 O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
 PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
 AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
 BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
 BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
 DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
 ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
 SANITARY SEWER LINES.
 O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
 SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW.
 O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL.
 O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
 DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
 TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
 O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE.
 O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
 BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
 PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
 O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
 JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
 O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
 STATION NUMBER.
 O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
 TRAPS (IF ANY).
 O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
 NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
 WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
 BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
 PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.
 QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
 O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
 CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
 BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
 O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
 DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
 O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES
 INCLUDING WATER MAINS, WATER SERVICES, WATER METER
 BOXES, WATER SERVICE PIPING, SEWER MAINS, SEWER
 LATERALS, STORMWATER PIPES, AND FORCE MAINS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN THE
 CONSTRUCTION AREAS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER PADS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE TRAPS
 OR GREASE INTERCEPTORS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE
 HYDRANTS.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER MAIN
 GATE VALVES.
  
 -UTILITIES ON PLANS DO NOT MATCH UTILITIES SHOWN ON WPB
 GIS. THERE ARE FORCE MAINS AND STORMWATER PIPES NOT
 SHOWN ON PLANS. SOME GRAVITY SEWER MAINS ON GIS ARE
 LABELED AS FORCE MAINS ON PLANS. PLEASE VERIFY AND
 UPDATE AS NEEDED.
  
 -ARE THE BUILDINGS WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE?
  
 -WILL THERE BE DESIGNATED PARKING SPOTS FOR UTILITY
 VEHICLES AT LIFT STATION?
  
 -THERE ARE SEVERAL ART STATUES OVER UTILITIES CREATING
 MAINTENANCE CONFLICTS BASED ON PLANS, OR BY COMPARING
 PLANS TO WPB GIS. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE DISTANCE
 SO THAT LARGE DIAMETER UNDERGROUND PIPING CAN BE
 EXCAVATED WITH HEAVY MACHINERY.
  
 -SOME WATER FOUNTAIN PLUMBING PIPE IS RUNNING UNDER AN
 ART STATUE. THAT MAY MAKE PLUMBING REPAIRS MORE
 DIFFICULT.
  
 -USE DIP INSTEAD OF PVC FOR LARGE WATER MAINS.
  
 -ON SHEET C6.05 ADD THE WESTERN SIDESTREEET NAME.
  
 -THERE LOOKS TO BE PROPOSED TREES IN A UTILITY EASEMENT
 WHICH IS TYPICALLY A CONFLICT. PLEASE VERIFY IF THERE
 ARE CURRENTLY ANY UTILITIES IN THE EASEMENT AND WHAT
 UTILITIES THE EASEMENT IS FOR. RELOCATE TREES IF
 POSSIBLE.
  
 -VERIFY THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES
 AND UTILITIES.
  
 -IF PUTTING TREES IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, MAKE SURE THEY
 HAVE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE DISTANCE FROM UTILITIES AND
 ALSO ADD ROOT BARRIERS AS NECESSARY.
  
 -PROPOSED WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO
 BE ADJACENT THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE AND NOT FAR ON
 INTERIOR OF PROPERTY. ANY INTERIOR LOOPED SYSTEM WOULD
 BE PLUMBING AND CAN BE MASTER-METERED AS NEEDED.
  
 -METERS 3 INCHES OR LARGER NEED TO BE INSTALLED
 ABOVE-GROUND AND ACCESSIBLE VIA CRANE TRUCK.
  
 -REMOVAL, RELOCATION, OR ALTERATION OF EXISTING METERED
 WATER SERVICES AT PARK WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL OF
 ASSOCIATED CITY DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES. THEY
 TYPICALLY REQUIRE PROJECT PAY FOR ANY RELATED UTILITY
 BILLING FEES OR CHARGES.
  
 -ON WATER METER LABELS, ADD WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE
 USED FOR.
  
 -ARE ANY DEDICATED METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES
 NEEDED?
  
 -SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES FROM UTILITY WORK
 AT 26TH AND FLAGLER.
  
 COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB
 PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] :
 1) -SHEET C6.03 SHOW SERVICE LINE (FLOATING VALVE)
 -CALL OUT UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 -CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE.
 -SHOW PROFILE FROM TAP TO POINT OF SERVICE (WATER MAIN
 & SANITARY SEWER)
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING DRY UTILITIES.
 -NOTE MINIMUM REQUIRED DISTANCE BETWEEN ROOT BARRIER
 AND PIPE PER CITY STANDARDS.
 COMMENTS FROM BURT BAIRD, CITY OF WPB UTILITIES O&M
 SUPERINTENDENT, 561-822-2056, [email protected] :
 ? PLEASE ENSURE ADDED FLOW CAN BE HANDLED BY LS# 23
 ? REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED WOODEN FENCE WITH CHAIN LINK
 AND DECORATED SCREEN FOR FACE OF THE CITY- SEE EMAILED
 DOCUMENT FOR FENCE ENCLOSURE LAYOUT
 ? ADD OR ENSURE PROPER DUMPING RECEPTACLES AROUND THE
 STATION FOR THE BOATERS. GARBAGE OFTEN GETS THROWN OVER
 THE FENCE INTO THE LIFT STATION
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-02-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-02-2023 Time 07:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-02-2023 Time 07:25 Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-02 07:26:06FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IF APPLICABLE, FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED PROJECT
 PLANS AT THE APPLICABLE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-22-2022 Time 09:59 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-22 10:01:06AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE PACKET FOR THIS
 PROJECT, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED
 PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR
 APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 11-10-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 11-10-2021 Time 15:26 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-10 15:27:37FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-01-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-01-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 06-01-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-01 16:08:15FROM: LINDA LOUIE, SENIOR PLANNER, 561.822.1458/SMITH
 AMISIAL, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, 561.822.1562
 PROJECT: FSPR 21-05 (Z21100018): CURRIE PARK
 REDEVELOPMENT
 DATE: JUNE 1, 2022
 _______________________________________________________
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
  
 1.1 SATISFIED. X SYMBOL ON TREE DISPOSITION PLANS
 REPRESENTS REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS. USE THE X SYMBOL
 FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE A DIFFERENT SYMBOL FOR
 RELOCATIONS.
  
 1.2 SATISFIED. PLACE HEADINGS FOR COLUMNS ON ALL
 DISPOSITION LIST SHEETS.
  
 1.3 SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR TREE CATEGORY TO THE
 DISPOSITION LIST SHEETS.
  
 1.4 NOT SATISFIED. FOR TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE
 MITIGATED IS BASED ON CATEGORY. LIVE OAK CATEGORY 1 IS
 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100
 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT. COUNT NUMBER OF TRUNKS
 TIMES CATEGORY VALUE. APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE
 PROVIDED IN A LATER SUPPLEMENT.
  
 1.5 NOT SATISFIED.CORRECTIONS MUST BE MADE TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART: CHINESE FAN PALM AND COCONUT PALMS
 ARE NOT INVASIVES. PLEASE PROVIDE THEIR CANOPY SQ
 FOOTAGE. PALM SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE PROVIDED THROUGH
 CATEGORY 3 OR CATEGORY 4 (SEE CATEGORY LIST FOR
 DETAILS). IT CANNOT BE SHOWN AS 1 FOR 1. PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE THEREAFTER.
  
 1.6 NOT SATISFIED. JAVA BISHOPWOOD AND INDIAN LAUREL
 FIG ARE NOT INVASIVES. PLEASE PROVIDE THEIR CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE AND INCLUDE IT IN MITIGATION
 CALCULATIONS.
  
 1.7 NOT SATISFIED. CATEGORY 2 TREES REPRESENT 150
 SQUARE FT OF CREDIT. HOW IS THE TOTAL 1801?
  
 1.8 NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED ONCE CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. APPLICANT HAS
 STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED AFTER
 CORRECTIONS.
  
 1.9. SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY AREA MEASUREMENT CHART ON
 SHEET L3.13 IS NOT CORRECT, VALUES SHOWN ARE FOR THE
 DMP OPEN SPACE CANOPY CREDITS. SEE CATEGORY LIST AND
 VALUES ABOVE.
  
 1.10 SATISFIED. TOTAL REPLACEMENT CANOPY CREDITS BY
 CATEGORY WILL NEED TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE FINAL
 PLANT LIST TO SHOW THAT MITIGATION IS MET.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES (AND PALMS) IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT FOR THE
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
 DUE TO CONDITION OR UNABLE TO RELOCATE.
  
 3. SATISFIED. LIGNUM VITAE IS A SMALL TREE AT THE NORTH
 EDGE OF ITS VIABLE RANGE, AND ORANGE GEIGER MAY NOT DO
 WELL IN THIS LOCATION. IT IS BETTER TO CHOOSE A MEDIUM
 NATIVE TREE SUCH AS SILVER BUTTONWOOD THAT WILL THRIVE
 AT THIS LOCATION.
 REDUCTION OF QUANTITIES IS NOTED. THIS LOCATION IS
 ADJACENT TO SALT WATER AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO HIGH WIND
 AND SALT SPRAY DURING WIND EVENTS SO IS NOT COMPARABLE
 TO PROTECTED LOCATIONS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. FINAL SPECIES TREE COUNTS WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED AND SUBSTITUTIONS CAN BE MADE LATER.
  
 5. SATISFIED. IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART, PROVIDE
 THE PERCENTAGE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS FOR:
  
 5.1 TOTAL NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE, MUST BE AT LEAST 50%
  
 5.2 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, CANNOT EXCEED 75%
  
 6. SATISFIED. USING THE 50% OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE,
 CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND
 SHRUBS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE
 INFORMATION IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
 7. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF-STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF SOME EXISTING UTILITIES ARE
 IN QUESTION. ONCE FINALIZED ON PLANS, TREE CONFLICTS
 MUST BE ADDRESSED.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT 6. 50% OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON
 THE ENTIRE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. CONSIDER SHIFTING TREES TO LOCATIONS TO
 ELIMINATE THE USE OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES. THIS IS BETTER FOR THE TREES AND
 SAVES ON COST.
  
 12. SATISFIED. COMPLETE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTION LIST TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF IS LIMITED TO THE
 LOCATIONS AS LISTED IN SECTION 94-451. THE CODE DOES
 NOT ALLOW FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF FOR CITY OWNED LOCATIONS.
 IF PARKS AND RECREATION DESIRES TO ALLOW IT IN PARK
 SETTINGS AND DESIRES TO AMEND THE CODE, STAFF NEEDS TO
 BE NOTIFIED OF THIS. ANY PROPOSED LOCATION NEEDS TO BE
 CLARIFIED, AS IT APPEARS THAT THE ARTIFICIAL TURF IN
 THE EXERCISE AREA HAS BEEN CHANGED TO RUBBERIZED
 SURFACE ON SHEET C-3.02.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHEET L2.11 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS IS
 BLANK.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PARKING AREA LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE LACKS THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND SHADE
 TREES AT THE ENDS OF THE ROW OF 7 PARKING SPACES.
 SCREENING HEDGE IS ALSO LACKING ALONG THE WESTERNMOST
 SPACE.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/20/22:
  
 17. SATISFIED. TERMINAL ISLAND TREE MISSING AT SOUTH
 END OF ROW OF PARKING FOR THE SOUTH PARKING LOT. IF THE
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS INTENDED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT
 A LARGER SHADE TREE WOULD BE BETTER PLACED TO PROVIDE
 SHADE FOR THE PARKING.
  
 18. SATISFIED ??? BOAT TRAILER PARKING ALONG NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE EXEMPTED, AS ONLY MODIFICATIONS MADE TO
 EXISTING CONFIGURATION. THERE ARE MORE THAN 10 SPACES
 IN A ROW OF THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTH
 PARKING LOT. SECTION 94-443(C)(3)B. REQUIRES AN
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND FOR EVERY 10 SPACES IN A ROW.
 AN ALTERNATIVE OPTION IS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 94-443(C)(6) TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY IN THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 19. SATISFIED. EXISTING PODOCARPUS HEDGE NEEDS TO BE
 SHOWN FOR THE EXISTING LIFT STATION SCREENING.
  
 20. SATISFIED. ALL PROPOSED TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 12 FT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT.
  
  
  
  
 *** CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ***
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-20-2022 Time 16:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-20-2022 Time 16:14 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-20 16:14:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CURRIE PARK Z21100018
 SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ??? SATISFIED. X SYMBOL ON TREE DISPOSITION PLANS
 REPRESENTS REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS. USE THE X SYMBOL
 FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE A DIFFERENT SYMBOL FOR
 RELOCATIONS.
 ??? SATISFIED. PLACE HEADINGS FOR COLUMNS ON ALL
 DISPOSITION LIST SHEETS.
 ??? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR TREE CATEGORY TO
 THE DISPOSITION LIST SHEETS.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
 NOT SATISFIED. FOR TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE
 MITIGATED IS BASED ON CATEGORY. LIVE OAK CATEGORY 1 IS
 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100
 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT. COUNT NUMBER OF TRUNKS
 TIMES CATEGORY VALUE. APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE
 PROVIDED IN A LATER SUPPLEMENT.
  
 NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED ONCE CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. APPLICANT HAS
 STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER SUPPLEMENT.
  
 ??? SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY AREA MEASUREMENT CHART ON
 SHEET L3.13 IS NOT CORRECT, VALUES SHOWN ARE FOR THE
 DMP OPEN SPACE CANOPY CREDITS. SEE CATEGORY LIST AND
 VALUES ABOVE.
 ??? SATISFIED. TOTAL REPLACEMENT CANOPY CREDITS BY
 CATEGORY WILL NEED TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE FINAL
 PLANT LIST TO SHOW THAT MITIGATION IS MET.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES (AND PALMS) IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT FOR THE
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
 DUE TO CONDITION OR UNABLE TO RELOCATE.
 3. SATISFIED. LIGNUM VITAE IS A SMALL TREE AT THE NORTH
 EDGE OF ITS VIABLE RANGE, AND ORANGE GEIGER MAY NOT DO
 WELL IN THIS LOCATION. IT IS BETTER TO CHOOSE A MEDIUM
 NATIVE TREE SUCH AS SILVER BUTTONWOOD THAT WILL THRIVE
 AT THIS LOCATION.
 REDUCTION OF QUANTITIES IS NOTED. THIS LOCATION IS
 ADJACENT TO SALT WATER AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO HIGH WIND
 AND SALT SPRAY DURING WIND EVENTS SO IS NOT COMPARABLE
 TO PROTECTED LOCATIONS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. FINAL SPECIES TREE COUNTS WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED AND SUBSTITUTIONS CAN BE MADE LATER.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART,
 PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS
 FOR:
 ??? TOTAL NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE, MUST BE AT LEAST 50%
 ??? TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, CANNOT EXCEED 75%
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. USING THE 50% OPEN SPACE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE, CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES
 AND SHRUBS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE
 THE INFORMATION IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT
 CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF SOME EXISTING UTILITIES ARE
 IN QUESTION. ONCE FINALIZED ON PLANS, TREE CONFLICTS
 MUST BE ADDRESSED.
  
 10. ONGOING. SEE COMMENT 6. 50% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE IS TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ENTIRE
 SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. CONSIDER SHIFTING TREES TO LOCATIONS TO
 ELIMINATE THE USE OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES. THIS IS BETTER FOR THE TREES AND
 SAVES ON COST.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. COMPLETE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTION LIST TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF IS LIMITED TO THE
 LOCATIONS AS LISTED IN SECTION 94-451.
 THE CODE DOES NOT ALLOW FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF FOR CITY
 OWNED LOCATIONS. IF PARKS AND RECREATION DESIRES TO
 ALLOW IT IN PARK SETTINGS AND DESIRES TO AMEND THE
 CODE, STAFF NEEDS TO BE NOTIFIED OF THIS. ANY PROPOSED
 LOCATION NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED, AS IT APPEARS THAT THE
 ARTIFICIAL TURF IN THE EXERCISE AREA HAS BEEN CHANGED
 TO RUBBERIZED SURFACE ON SHEET C-3.02.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHEET L2.11 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS IS
 BLANK.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PARKING AREA LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE LACKS THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND SHADE
 TREES AT THE ENDS OF THE ROW OF 7 PARKING SPACES.
 SCREENING HEDGE IS ALSO LACKING ALONG THE WESTERNMOST
 SPACE.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/20/22:
  
 17. TERMINAL ISLAND TREE MISSING AT SOUTH END OF ROW OF
 PARKING FOR THE SOUTH PARKING LOT. IF THE SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD IS INTENDED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT A
 LARGER SHADE TREE WOULD BE BETTER PLACED TO PROVIDE
 SHADE FOR THE PARKING.
  
 18. THERE ARE MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW OF THE
 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTH PARKING LOT.
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND FOR EVERY 10 SPACES IN A ROW. AN ALTERNATIVE
 OPTION IS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 94-443(C)(6) TO
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 19. EXISTING PODOCARPUS HEDGE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN FOR THE
 EXISTING LIFT STATION SCREENING.
  
 20. ALL PROPOSED TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FT
 HEIGHT REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-12-2021 Time 15:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-12-2021 Time 15:25 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-12 15:25:27FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CURRIE PARK Z21100018
 NOVEMBER 12, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ? X SYMBOL ON TREE DISPOSITION PLANS REPRESENTS
 REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS. USE THE X SYMBOL FOR REMOVALS
 ONLY AND PROVIDE A DIFFERENT SYMBOL FOR RELOCATIONS.
 ? PLACE HEADINGS FOR COLUMNS ON ALL DISPOSITION LIST
 SHEETS.
 ? ADD A COLUMN FOR TREE CATEGORY TO THE DISPOSITION
 LIST SHEETS.
 ? FOR TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS
 THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED IS BASED ON
 CATEGORY. LIVE OAK CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2
 IS 150 SQ FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50
 SQ FT. COUNT NUMBER OF TRUNKS TIMES CATEGORY VALUE.
 ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE
 FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED ONCE
 CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE.
 ? TREE CANOPY AREA MEASUREMENT CHART ON SHEET L3.13 IS
 NOT CORRECT, VALUES SHOWN ARE FOR THE DMP OPEN SPACE
 CANOPY CREDITS. SEE CATEGORY LIST AND VALUES ABOVE.
 ? TOTAL REPLACEMENT CANOPY CREDITS BY CATEGORY WILL
 NEED TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST TO
 SHOW THAT MITIGATION IS MET.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES (AND
 PALMS) IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED DUE TO
 CONDITION OR UNABLE TO RELOCATE.
 3. LIGNUM VITAE IS A SMALL TREE AT THE NORTH EDGE OF
 ITS VIABLE RANGE, AND ORANGE GEIGER MAY NOT DO WELL IN
 THIS LOCATION. IT IS BETTER TO CHOOSE A MEDIUM NATIVE
 TREE SUCH AS SILVER BUTTONWOOD THAT WILL THRIVE AT THIS
 LOCATION.
  
 4. FINAL SPECIES TREE COUNTS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED
 AND SUBSTITUTIONS CAN BE MADE LATER.
  
 5. IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART, PROVIDE THE
 PERCENTAGE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS FOR:
 ? TOTAL NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE, MUST BE AT LEAST 50%
 ? TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, CANNOT EXCEED 75%
  
 6. USING THE 50% OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE, CALCULATE
 THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED
 PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION IN
 THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
 7. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN
 A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
 8. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENT CHART.
  
 9. LOCATIONS OF SOME EXISTING UTILITIES ARE IN
 QUESTION. ONCE FINALIZED ON PLANS, TREE CONFLICTS MUST
 BE ADDRESSED.
  
 10. 50% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS TO BE
 CALCULATED BASED ON THE ENTIRE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 11. CONSIDER SHIFTING TREES TO LOCATIONS TO ELIMINATE
 THE USE OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO PROTECT
 UTILITY LINES. THIS IS BETTER FOR THE TREES AND SAVES
 ON COST.
  
 12. COMPLETE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTION LIST TO
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
  
 13. ARTIFICIAL TURF IS LIMITED TO THE LOCATIONS AS
 LISTED IN SECTION 94-451.
  
 14. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND
 RESOLVE CONFLICTS.
  
 15. SHEET L2.11 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS IS BLANK.
  
 16. PARKING AREA LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE
 LACKS THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND SHADE TREES AT THE
 ENDS OF THE ROW OF 7 PARKING SPACES. SCREENING HEDGE IS
 ALSO LACKING ALONG THE WESTERNMOST SPACE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-15-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 05-15-2023 Time 10:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-15 10:38:53PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -SHEET C6.04: ADD ADDRESSES TO THE PROPERTIES ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF FLAGLER AS IT IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE
 THE LOCATION. ALSO ADD THE CURRENT STREET NAMES.
 -SHEET C6.04: THERE APPEARS TO BE A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
 PROPOSED IN THE MIDDLE OF A SIDEWALK. ENSURE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY DOES NOT IMPEDE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.
 -SHEET C6.04: CLEARLY LABEL PROPERTY LINE. ALSO CANNOT
 CLEARLY DISTINGUISH WHAT THE DASHED AND DOTTED LINES
 JUST EAST OF THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ARE ??? PLEASE
 LABEL.
 -SHEET C6.06: THERE APPEARS TO BE MULTIPLE RIGHT OF WAY
 LINES. IS THAT AN ERROR, OR IS THE RIGHT OF WAY
 BOUNDARIES CHANGING?
 -SHEET C6.06: ON THE LABEL OF 3 INCH MASTER WATER
 METER, ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND AND REFERENCE WATER
 SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS3. THE RPPA CALLOUT SHOULD
 ALSO HAVE SIZE AND REFERENCE WS7.
 -SHEET C6.06: WPB UTILITIES RECOMMENDS DUAL/PARALLEL
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON IMPORTANT DOMESTIC WATER
 SERVICES TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW
 MAINTENANCE AND TESTING. CONSIDER ADDING ANOTHER RPPA
 FOR THE 3 INCH METER IF WATER OUTAGE WOULD BE
 PROBLEMATIC.
 -SHEET C6.06: WHY IS 3 INCH METER NOT PROPOSED IN 10
 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT?
 -SHEET C6.06: THERE SHOULD BE A CONTAINMENT FIRELINE
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FURTHER UPSTREAM OF THE FIRELINE
 PIPING NEAR THE PROPERTY LINE, BUT SHOULD NOT BE IN AN
 EASEMENT. IF ADDING ADDITIONAL DCDA, BE AWARE OF THE
 ADDITIONAL PRESSURE REDUCTION.
 -SHEET C6.06: ADDITION DOWNSTREAM ISOLATION BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES MAY BE REQUIRED. RECOMMEND VERIFYING AHEAD
 OF TIME IF REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING.
 -SHEET C6.010: ADD WPB WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS
 FOR LARGE DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, LARGE
 ABOVE-GROUND METER, AND DOMESTIC SERVICE LOCATION. ADD
 ADDITIONAL SHEET IF NEEDED.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 09-23-2022 Time 13:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-23 13:40:10PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING.
 -PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT: PROPOSED WATER METERS AND
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE ADJACENT THE WESTERN
 PROPERTY LINE AND NOT FAR ON INTERIOR OF PROPERTY. ANY
 INTERIOR LOOPED SYSTEM WOULD BE PLUMBING AND CAN BE
 MASTER METERED AS NEEDED. RESPONSE LETTER STATED NOTED,
 BUT UTILITY PLANS SUCH AS SHEET C5.06 HAVE NOT BEEN
 REVISED. THIS WOULD ALSO AFFECT FIRE SERVICES AND
 HYDRANTS. IF NEED CLARIFICATION CAN CONTACT
 [email protected].
 -C5.01: INVERTS SAY PVC BUT CALLOUT HAS VCP.
 -C3.05 AND C3.09: LABEL ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 -C3.01: CALLOUT SAYS FORCEMAIN BUT SEEMS TO BE GRAVITY
 SEWER.
 -C3.01: THERE IS A STREETLIGHT IN DRIVEWAY EXIT.
 -C3.01: IS A DO NOT ENTER SIGN NEEDED AT DRIVEWAY EXIT?
 -C3.03: 10 FOOT CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEEMS TO ABRUPTLY
 END. CANNOT TELL WHAT MATERIAL THE GRAY SHADED AREA IS.
 PLEASE LABEL BETTER, ADD TO LEGEND, OR ADD REFERENCE TO
 OTHER SHEET SHOWING MORE DETAIL.
 -C3.03: IS A BUILDING STRUCTURE PROPOSED OVER SANITARY
 SEWER MAIN?
 -C3.03: SHOULD FORCEMAIN CALLOUTS BE GRAVITY INSTEAD?
 -C3.03: SHOWS SOME WATER MAINS, BUT THOUGHT THEY WERE
 BEING REMOVED.
 -PLEASE SHOW MORE CLEARLY ON DEMO PLANS THE LIMITS OF
 THE WATER MAIN REMOVAL.
 -C3.04: THERE IS A STORM STRUCTURE IN A SEATWALL.
 -C3.05: FORCE MAIN SHOWING GOING INTO WATERWAY. PLEASE
 VERIFY IF THAT IS CORRECT.
 -C3.05: THERE ARE SOME LIGHTS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO
 WATER AND SEWER MAINS. PLEASE MAKE SURE ANY PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ARE AT LEAST 5 HORIZONTAL FEET AWAY FROM
 WATER AND SEWER MAINS.
 -C3.06: TENNIS COURT IS ENCROACHING INTO UTILITY
 EASEMENT.
 -C5.02: CALLOUT UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 -C5.01 AND C5.03: UTILITIES ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE GREY
 AREA. WHY?
 -C5.04: CANNOT INSTALL A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IN A
 SIDEWALK.
 -C5.04: RPPA LEADER LINE IS POINTED TO VALVE SYMBOL.
 PLEASE UPDATE.
 -SHOW METER BOXES ON UTILITY PLANS AND MAKE SURE METER
 SIZE IS LABELED.
 -C5.05: WHAT TYPE OF 20 FOOT EASEMENT IS RUNNING ACROSS
 THE WATERWAY?
 -CITY SEWER LATERALS ARE TYPICALLY MINIMUM 6 INCH SIZE.
 -C5.07: SANITARY DRAIN SEEMS TO BE LOCATED IN A
 DUMPSTER AREA. THIS IS NOT BE ALLOWED IF STORMWATER
 WOULD GO INTO IT, AND MAY ALSO NOT BE ALLOWED
 OTHERWISE.
 -ON LANDSCAPING PLANS SUCH AS L3.02, PLEASE LABEL
 STREETS AND SIDE STREETS.
 -WILL ANY AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLIES BE CONNECTED TO
 PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEMS?
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-01-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-01-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-01-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-01 18:18:42CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
  
 THE TRASH RECEPTACLES SHALL HAVE RAIN BONNET LID TO
 KEEP THE RAIN OUT.
  
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-19-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-19-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-19-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-19 11:44:33NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-17-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-17-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-17-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-17 14:24:01 
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
 QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 SANITATION SERVICE.
 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7.
 3- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
 CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
 4- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
 WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 07-31-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-31-2023 Time 11:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-31-2023 Time 12:21 Sent To  
Notes
2023-07-31 12:03:08THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 5/11/2023 SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. VERIFY THE CONSTANT TO CONVERT ELEVATIONS FROM
 NAVD1988 TO NGVD1929. DIFFERENT CONSTANTS ARE LISTED ON
 THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 2. CALLOUT ON SHEET C2.03 IF THE WATER MAIN NEAR THE
 SEAWALL IS TO BE REMOVED OR IS TO REMAIN.
  
 3. ON DEMO PLANS NOTE WHETHER EACH EXISTING UTILITY
 LINE IS TO BE REMOVED, TO BE ABANDONED OR IS TO REMAIN.
 USING CROSS-HATCHING FOR THE UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED
 WILL MAKE THE INFORMATION MORE DISTINCT.
  
 4. LABEL ALL UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (FOR STORMWATER)
 ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS.
  
 5. BRING UTILITY LINE WORK TO THE TOP LAYER SO THE
 LINES DO NOT DISAPPEAR BEHIND SOLID OR OTHER HATCHING
 PATTERNS.
  
 6. INCLUDE PRB'S IN THE FIRST INLETS UPSTREAM AND
 DOWNSTREAM OF ALL EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. ADJUST
 STRUCTURE SUMP ELEVATIONS FOR INLETS THAT WILL HAVE
 PRB???S.
  
 7. CONFIRM THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT COVER DEPTH OVER
 THE PROPOSED STORM PIPES. INDICATE WHAT THE MINIMUM
 COVER DEPTH SHOULD BE IN THE RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT.
  
 8. PROVIDE HIGH POINT SPOT GRADES AT ALL DRIVEWAYS.
 LOCATE THESE HIGH POINTS AS CLOSE TO THE ROAD OR BACK
 OF SIDEWALK AS POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF AREA
 CONTRIBUTING STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE ROAD.
  
 9. EXISTING INLET ON 36-IN STORM PIPE NORTH OF PROPOSED
 CATCH BASIN #6 MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED IF THE PROPOSED
 24-IN STORM PIPE IS TOO BIG FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 STRUCTURE.
  
 10. THE PROPOSED WEIR ELEVATION (5.20) AT THE EXISTING
 INLET NORTH OF THE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN #6 IS HIGHER
 THAN THE RIM ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING INLET AND CATCH
 BASIN #6.
  
 11. LABELS OVERLAP ON PGD PLANS AROUND PROPOSED
 STRUCTURES #5 AND #18.
  
 12. PROVIDE OUTSIDE TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS FOR THE
 PROPOSED STORM PIPES AND EXISTING UTILITIES THAT ARE
 CROSSED AND THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE TWO
 PIPES.
  
 13. RECOMMEND MINIMUM 15-IN DIAMETER PIPE FOR STORM
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.
  
 14. REPLACE THE EXISTING STORM OUTFALL PIPE FROM LAKE
 WORTH LAGOON TO THE PROPOSED END OF THE PIPE AS SHOWN
 ON THE 26TH ST STORMWATER AND ITILITY IMPROVEMENT
 PLANS. (REPEAT COMMENT)
 15. WHERE DID THE WEST CURB LINE FOR N. FLAGLER DR
 SHOWN ON SHEET C4.06 COME FROM? THE EXISTING INLETS ARE
 SHOWN BEHIND THE EAST CURB.
  
 16. PROVIDE A GRADING PLAN (CONTOURS) OR CROSS SECTION
 FOR THE AREA SOUTH OF THE BOAT RAMP. UP TO 2.5 FEET OF
 FILL IS BEING ADDED FOR THE PATHWAY AROUND THE PUBLIC
 DINING AREA.
  
 17. LABEL EXISTING STORM PIPES (SIZE AND MATERIAL) ON
 THE PGD PLANS.
  
 18. STRUCTURE 19 MAY NEED A WEIR.
  
 19. CAN THE PIPE(S) DRAINING STRUCTURE 46 BE LOCATED
 EAST AND SOUTH OF THE LIFT STATION INSTEAD OF NORTH OF
 THE LIFT STATION. THERE ARE SEVERAL SANITARY LINES
 NORTH OF THE LIFT STATION.
  
 20. CONFIRM WITH THE BUILDING DEPT. WHETHER AN ADA SAFE
 PATH IS NEEDED TO GET TO AND FROM THE HANDICAP PARKING
 SPACES NORTH OF THE PROPOSED TENNIS COURTS. SIDEWALK
 CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE HANDICAP ACCESS AISLES AND THE
 SIDEWALK WEST OF THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES MAY BE
 NEEDED.
  
 21. SHEET C5.09: TWO -WAY TRAFFIC APPROACHING ONE-WAY
 DRIVE AISLE. SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS MAY BE
 NEEDED TO DIRECT THE EB 2-WAY TRAFFIC.
  
 22. STOP BARS SHOULD BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE TRAVEL
 LANE.
  
 23. PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL SHOULD BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
  
 24. CONFIRM 8' 4" DIMENSION (VS. 8' 6") FOR THE
 ON-STREET PARKING NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON SHEET C3.01.
  
 25. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL:
  A. PROVIDE TOP OF TRENCH AND BOTTOM OF TRENCH
 ELEVATIONS ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL.
  B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE STORMWATER UNDERGROUND
 STORAGE STRUCTURES.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-18-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-18-2021 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-18-2021 Time 12:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-18 12:46:48THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. SITE IS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA)
 WITH BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (BFES) OF 6 FT NAVD AND 7 FT
 NAVD. PRELIMINARY COASTAL FLOOD MAPS MAY SHOW HIGHER
 BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS. STRUCTURES WITHIN SFHA SHALL
 HAVE MINIMUM 2 FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BFE.
  
 2. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE
 NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN
 NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. THE SURVEY AND
 THE CIVIL PLANS USE DIFFERENT CONVERSION FACTORS
 BETWEEN THE VERTICAL DATUMS NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929.
  
 3. SUGGEST RESERVING SHEET NUMBERS ENDING WITH .00 FOR
 OVERALL PLAN VIEWS.
  
 4. SHOWING ALL EXISTING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE
 SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PARK. THERE IS AN EXISTING FM NEAR
 N. FLAGLER DRIVE THAT IS NOT SHOWN. THERE ARE OFFSITE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS THAT FLOW THROUGH THE PARK. SHOW THE
 FORCEMAIN FROM THE LIFT STATION AT THE NORTH END OF THE
 PARK.
  
 5. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN IS MISLABELED AS A
 FORCE MAIN.
  
 6. LABEL THE STREETS ON ALL OF THE PLAN SHEETS.
  
 7. PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR N. FLAGLER DRIVE / BUTLER
 STREET INTERSECTION.
  
 8. C1.XX STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEETS
 A. SHOW FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERS AROUND THE OUTFALL
 PIPES TO LAKE WORTH LAGOON AND AROUND ANY CONSTRUCTION
 WITHIN THE LAKE WORTH LAGOON.
 B. SHOW INLET PROTECTION FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON N.
 FLAGLER DRIVE INCLUDING FIRST INLET NORTH OF THE NEW
 DRIVEWAY TO 26TH STREET.
  
 9. C2.XX DEMOLITION PLAN SHEETS
 A. IDENTIFY WHAT IS TO HAPPEN TO THE STORM SEWER
 SYSTEMS
 B. ADD NOTE TO PLANS THAT THE FORCEMAIN ALONG THE
 EXTENSION OF 23RD STREET IS TO REMAIN.
 C. ADD NOTE TO PLANS THAT THE LIFT STATION FORCEMAIN
 AND THE TWO GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEMS ALONG THE EXTENSION
 OF 26TH STREET ARE TO REMAIN.
 D. INCLUDE DEMOLITION NOTES, EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES
 AND DEMOLITION SCHEDULE ON ALL SHEETS.
  
 5. C5.XX PGD PLAN SHEETS
 A. NUMBER DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR EASE OF REFERENCE.
 B. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 REQUIREMENTS.
 C. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE.
 D. HOW WILL ROCK RIPRAP REVETMENT AFFECT EXISTING
 DRAINAGE OUTFALLS?
 E. REPLACE ENDS OF OUTFALL PIPES WHERE THE SEAWALL IS
 BEING REPLACED. NEW PIPE SHOULD EXTEND BEYOND TIE BACK
 AREA OF SEAWALL. MANATEE GRATES MAY BE REQUIRED.
 F. REPLACE STORM PIPE FROM SEAWALL TO LIMITS OF WHERE
 THE PIPE IS REPLACED BY THE 26TH STREET UTILITY AND
 ROADWAY PROJECT.
 G. CHECK MATCHLINE SHEET REFERENCES.
 H. HOW IS THE RUNOFF FROM THE PARKING LOT ON SHEET
 C5.01 TREATED/MANAGED?
 I. AVOID PUTTING MANHOLES WITHIN PAVED WALKING AREAS.
 J. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN
 PROPOSED STORM AND EXISTING SANITARY SEWER.
 K. LABEL ELEVATIONS OF ALL CONTOUR LINES ON EVERY
 SHEET.
 L. WILL PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ALONG SEAWALL
 INTERFERED WITH THE SEAWALL ANCHOR SYSTEM?
 M. UTILITY SYMBOLS ON SHEET C5.08 APPEAR TO BE
 DUPLICATED AND NOT ALIGNED. FOR EXAMPLE THERE ARE
 MULTIPLE MANHOLE SYMBOLS IN OR NEAR THE DRIVEWAY TO
 26TH ST.
 N. THE CB SHOWN IN THE DRIVE FOR 26TH STREET DOES NOT
 SHOW UP ON THE SURVEY. IS THIS A NEW STRUCTURE? SUGGEST
 PUTTING THE STRUCTURE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AND
 CONNECTING TO PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO THE SOUTH.
 O. EXISTING CB OVER EXISTING 60? RCP ON SHEET C5.09 IS
 SHOWN AS MANHOLE ON THE SURVEY. NOTE ON THE SHEET
 INDICATES CATCH BASIN BY OTHERS. WHO IS ?BY OTHERS??
 SUGGEST LEAVING MANHOLE TOP AND INSTALLING A SEPARATE
 CATCH BASIN WITH PRB TO PREVENT FLOATABLES FROM LEAVING
 THE SITE. PERHAPS MOVE THE WEIR CONTROL TO THIS
 STRUCTURE.
 P. SHOW IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LAKE WORTH LAGOON AND REFER
 TO OTHER SHEETS FOR DESIGN INFORMATION.
 Q. LABEL THE CYAN SQUIGGLY LINES ON THE SHEETS.
 R. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS OF EACH DRIVEWAY TO N.
 FLAGLER DRIVE.
 S. HOW IS THE FITNESS LAWN AREA GRADED. THE CONTOUR
 LINES STOP OF THE PERIMETER OF THE LAWN.
 T. FIVE FEET OF FILL PROPOSED IN SOME AREAS OVER THE
 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE. WHAT IS THE CONDITION OF
 THE SEWER PIPE AND WILL IT NEED TO BE REPLACED/LINED
 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION?
 U. BETHESDA TERRACE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED WITH THIS
 PROJECT? DRAINAGE STRUCTURES NOT CORRECTLY SHOWN.
 V. ADD HERRINGBONE HATCH PATTERN TO LEGEND.
 W. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT WATER QUALITY
 TREATMENT DESIGN INSTEAD OF OR IN ADDITION TO
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
 X. INCLUDE CITY DETAILS FOR PRB?S AND DRIVEWAYS.
  
 6. SHOW AND LABEL CONTOURS ON THE UTILITY PLAN SHEETS.
  
 7. INCORPORATE THE CITY?S 26TH STREET UTILITY AND
 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESIGN.
  
 8. AVOID PLANTING TREES OVER OR NEAR UTILITY LINES AND
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-27-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-27-2023 Time 06:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-27 06:59:55PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 A UTILITY STUDY HAS BEEN COMPLETED FOR THE CMUD /LS 23
 AREA AND THE 12" SANITARY SEWER THRU THE PARK IS TO BE
 ABANDONED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-22-2022 Time 13:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-22 13:49:481. PREVIOUS COMMENTS 1-6 "NOT YET PROVIDED" WAITING ON
 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGE.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-09-2021 Time 10:01 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-09 12:09:411. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE BASED ON A TITLE SEARCH.
 2. FORCE MAIN ALONG FLAGLER NEEDS TO BE SHOWN TOGETHER
 WITH ITS PROPOSED EASEMENT AND THE PROPOSED EASEMENT
 FOR THE EXISTING EAST-WEST FORCE MAIN.
 3. NOT ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE SHOWN AS FOUND OR SET.
 4. LABEL EAST AND WEST LIMITS OF ORB 803/137 ON ALL
 SHEETS.
 5. NEED CCTV OF EXISTING N-S SANITARY LINE.
 6. SHOW PROPOSED NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.
 7. IT APPEARS THAT LANDSCAPING WILL CONFLICT WITH THE
 EXISTING SANITARY AND FORCE MAIN. NEED 10' CLEARANCE.
 8. PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE RE-PLATTED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-22-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-22-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-22-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-06-22 02:40:52TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY
 WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING
 WITH THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING GROUP, PRIOR TO REVISING
 OR RESUBMITTING THE TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE ADDRESS
 3) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRIP GENERATION TABLE ADD THE
 CAF?? PAVILION AS A TRIP GENERATOR. EMAIL EXCHANGE DID
 NOT WAVE THIS ITEM
 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING
 DRIVEWAY(S) VOLUMES AND DIRECTIONAL SPLIT, BOTH INBOUND
 AND OUTBOUND. EMAIL EXCHANGE DID NOT WAVE THIS ITEM
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE EXISTING WEEKEND TRAFFIC COUNTS.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN IN
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 7) NOT SATISFIED. A DETAILED INTERNAL CIRCULATION
 ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY OR AS
 A SEPARATE DOCUMENT
 SITE COMMENTS
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING
 ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
 WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS. A
 SPECIFIC AND SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHEET SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED TO FULFILL THIS COMMENT, AS SEVERAL DIMENSIONS
 ARE MISSING FOR KEY TRANSPORTATION ITEMS. PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 TRAVEL LANES; THE LATEST PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE
 PLANS ARE DEFICIENT.
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS
 AND TYPOLOGY (I.E. NORMAL, COMPACT, TRAILER). MARK OR
 PROPERLY LABEL EACH OF THEM ON THE SITE PLAN
 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING
 STALLS IF ANY) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PARKING STALL
 MARKINGS ARE MISSING. PLEASE INCLUDE THEM IN THE
 PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLANS
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ALSO PROVIDE ANALYSIS FOR TYPICAL
 TRUCK WITH BOAT TRAILER. INSERT DESIGN VEHICLES DETAILS
 IN THE DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
 NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS IS NOT
 PROPER, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE
 ANALYSIS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES
 12) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR
 THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2???
 SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
 PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT).
 13) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF DESIGNATED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA,
 SPECIALTY OR RESTRICTED SUCH AS TRAILERS, AND BICYCLE
 ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH TABLE
 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND INDICATE FREIGHT
 DELIVERY LOADING ZONE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE DESIGNATED
 AREA SHOULD BE STRICTLY FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND
 SHOULD BE MARKED AND SIGNED ACCORDINGLY
 15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIDEWALK WITH 10 FEET MINIMUM
 WIDTH ALONG SITE FRONTAGE. IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTIUSE
 PATHWAY, WITH DISTINCT BICYCLE LANES IS STRONGLY
 ENCOURAGED, MINIMUM WIDTH SHOULD BE 15-FEET
 16) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY DESIGNATED
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OR VALET AREAS? IF SO CLEARLY INDICATE
 THEM ON THE SITE PLAN. COMMENT IS REFERRING TO
 PASSENGER PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OPERATIONS, NOT COMMERCIAL
 LOADING/UNLOADING. IN CASE OF THE FORMER, A VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED
 17) SATISFIED. THERE IS A CONCEPT TO EXTEND NORTHWOOD
 RD TO FLAGLER, AND POTENTIALLY INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT IN
 LIEU OF AN INTERSECTION. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PLANNING AND CRA ON THIS ITEM, AS IT MAY AFFECT THE
 LAYOUT OF THE PARKING AREA AND THE ALIGNMENT OF THE
 DRIVEWAYS.
 18) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MARKING AND
 SIGNAGE PLAN. THIS SHOULD BE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHEET
 OR INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN.
 LATEST PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL MARKINGS AND
 DIMENSIONS
 19) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATED AND PROTECTED
 TWO-WAY BIKE LANE ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER DR
 ACCORDING TO THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. THIS IS A
 MAJOR ITEM, PLEASE CONTACT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
 FURTHER DISCUSSION OR CLARIFICATIONS. DUE TO FULL
 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PARK, THERE ARE NO REASONS THAT
 PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A 14-FEET WIDE SHARED USE PATHWAY
 THROUGHOUT. PER FDOT SHARED USE PATHWAY GUIDELINES
 SECTION 224.7: PROVIDE A 4-FOOT CLEAR AREA ADJACENT TO
 BOTH SIDES OF THE PATH, INCLUDING PLACEMENT OF SIGNS.
 FOR RESTRICTED CONDITIONS, BRIDGE ABUTMENTS, SIGNPOSTS,
 FENCING AND RAILING MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN 4 FEET OF THE
 EDGE OF PAVEMENT, BUT NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET. PLEASE
 REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 20) SHEET C5.00. BASED ON THE PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES,
 SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, THE OVERALL INTERNAL
 CIRCULATION ESPECIALLY NEARBY THE BOAT LAUNCH AREA DOES
 NOT SEEM OPTIMAL NOR CONDUCIVE TO SAFE OPERATIONS.
 GENERAL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS MIXED WITH THE
 BOAT-TRAILING ONE. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO
 REDESIGN THE PARKING LOT LAYOUT AND VALIDATE ITS
 CONFIGURATION WITH A PROPER INTERNAL CIRCULATION
 ANALYSIS
 21) SHEET C5.01. SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND
 DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, PROVIDE A 14-FEET WIDE MULTIUSE
 PATHWAY. THE INTERSECTION OF BUTLER AND FLAGLER MUST BE
 PROPERLY AND ENTIRELY DEPICTED, INCLUSIVE OF ALL
 PERTINENT TRANSPORTATION FEATURES; THAT IS NECESSARY TO
 VALIDATE THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY LOCATION AND
 CONFIGURATION
 22) SHEET C5.02. SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND
 DIMENSIONS FOR KEY TRANSPORTATION ITEMS (I.E. TRAVEL
 LANES, OPPOSITE SIDE MARKINGS) ARE MISSING
 23) SHEET C.5.03. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS 14-FEET SHARED
 USE PATHWAY
 24) SHEET C5.04. TRANSPORTATION FEATURES SUCH AS RAMPS
 AND CROSSWALKS FOR THE INTERSECTION OF 23RD AND FLAGLER
 ARE EITHER MISSING OR GROSSLY DEPICTED. SEVERAL OTHER
 MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING
 25) SHEET C5.06. DRAFT ROADWAY CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE
 PLANNED NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION SHOULD BE AVAILABLE
 FOR INTEGRATION AND PROPER CONFIGURATION OF THE
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY; PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. SEVERAL
 DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING (I.E. TRAVEL LANES, DRIVE
 AISLES). THE CROSSWALK BY THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE
 SHOULD BE BETTER DEPICTED AND CONFIGURED AS A RAISED
 ONE. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ARE NOT PERTINENT,
 PLEASE DO NOT SHOW THAT LAYER
 26) SHEET C5.08. PROPERLY RE-ALIGN THE DRIVEWAY
 CROSSWALK, SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS
 MISSING
 27) SHEET C5.09. A FEW DIMENSIONS MISSING. INSTALL
 DO-NOT-ENTER AND/OR DIRECTIONAL ARROW SIGNAGE AT THE
 INTERNAL INTERSECTION ALONG THE NORTHERN ONE-WAY DRIVE
 AISLE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-23-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 09-23-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-27 08:54:26Z21100018 - CURRIE PARK - R1- 2022-09-22
  
 TRAFFIC COMMENTS
  
 1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
  
 2) NOT SATISFIED. A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH
 THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING GROUP, PRIOR TO REVISING OR
 RESUBMITTING THE TRAFFIC STUDY
  
 3) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRIP GENERATION TABLE ADD THE
 CAF?? PAVILION AS A TRIP GENERATOR
  
 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING
 DRIVEWAY(S) VOLUMES AND DIRECTIONAL SPLIT, BOTH INBOUND
 AND OUTBOUND
  
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE EXISTING WEEKEND TRAFFIC
 COUNTS
  
 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE
 PLAN IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
  
 7) A DETAILED INTERNAL CIRCULATION ANALYSIS SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
  
  
  
 SITE COMMENTS
  
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING
 ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
 WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS. A
 SPECIFIC AND SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHEET SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED TO FULFILL THIS COMMENT
  
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS
 AND TYPOLOGY (I.E. NORMAL, COMPACT, TRAILER). MARK OR
 PROPERLY LABEL EACH OF THEM ON THE SITE PLAN
  
 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING
 STALLS IF ANY) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS
 SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PARKING STALL
 MARKINGS ARE MISSING. PLEASE INCLUDE THEM IN THE
 PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN.
  
 11) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
 GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
 OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
 ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ALSO PROVIDE ANALYSIS FOR
 TYPICAL TRUCK WITH BOAT TRAILER. INSERT DESIGN VEHICLES
 DETAILS IN THE DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME
 AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST
 ANALYSIS IS NOT PROPER, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN
 PROVIDE A SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES
  
 12) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR
 THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2???
 SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
 PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT).
  
 13) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF DESIGNATED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA,
 SPECIALTY OR RESTRICTED SUCH AS TRAILERS, AND BICYCLE
 ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH TABLE
  
 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND INDICATE FREIGHT
 DELIVERY LOADING ZONE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE DESIGNATED
 AREA SHOULD BE STRICTLY FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND
 SHOULD BE MARKED AND SIGNED ACCORDINGLY
  
 15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIDEWALK WITH 10 FEET MINIMUM
 WIDTH ALONG SITE FRONTAGE. IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTIUSE
 PATHWAY, WITH DISTINCT BICYCLE LANES IS STRONGLY
 ENCOURAGED. PLEASE
  
 16) NOT SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY DESIGNATED
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OR VALET AREAS? IF SO CLEARLY INDICATE
 THEM ON THE SITE PLAN. COMMENT IS REFERRING TO
 PASSENGER PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OPERATIONS, NOT COMMERCIAL
 LOADING/UNLOADING. IN CASE OF THE FORMER, A VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED
  
 17) SATISFIED. THERE IS A CONCEPT TO EXTEND NORTHWOOD
 RD TO FLAGLER, AND POTENTIALLY INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT IN
 LIEU OF AN INTERSECTION. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PLANNING AND CRA ON THIS ITEM, AS IT MAY AFFECT THE
 LAYOUT OF THE PARKING AREA AND THE ALIGNMENT OF THE
 DRIVEWAYS.
  
 18) PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN. THIS
 SHOULD BE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHEET OR INCLUDED IN THE
 TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN
  
 19) PROVIDE A SEPARATED AND PROTECTED TWO-WAY BIKE LANE
 ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER DR ACCORDING TO THE
 CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. THIS IS A MAJOR ITEM, PLEASE
 CONTACT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION OR
 CLARIFICATIONS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-16-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 11-16-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-16 11:17:31TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED.
 PLEASE SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING GROUP, PRIOR TO REVISING OR RESUBMITTING
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 3) IN THE TRIP GENERATION TABLE ADD THE CAF? PAVILION
 AS A TRIP GENERATOR
 4) PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING DRIVEWAY(S) VOLUMES AND
 DIRECTIONAL SPLIT, BOTH INBOUND AND OUTBOUND
 5) PROVIDE EXISTING WEEKEND TRAFFIC COUNTS
 6) PROVIDE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN IN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY
 7) A DETAILED INTERNAL CIRCULATION ANALYSIS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 8) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING ONLY
 TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
 WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
 PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS
 9) PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS AND
 TYPOLOGY (I.E. NORMAL, COMPACT, TRAILER). MARK OR
 PROPERLY LABEL EACH OF THEM ON THE SITE PLAN
 10) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB
 DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS IF ANY) ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 11) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ALSO PROVIDE ANALYSIS FOR TYPICAL TRUCK WITH
 BOAT TRAILER. INSERT DESIGN VEHICLES DETAILS IN THE
 DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
 12) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR THE LATTER
 ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
 TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V
 CIRCUIT).
 13) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 DESIGNATED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA, SPECIALTY
 OR RESTRICTED SUCH AS TRAILERS, AND BICYCLE ONES.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH TABLE
 14) PROVIDE AND INDICATE FREIGHT DELIVERY LOADING ZONE
 15) PROVIDE A SIDEWALK WITH 10 FEET MINIMUM WIDTH ALONG
 SITE FRONTAGE. IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTIUSE PATHWAY,
 WITH DISTINCT BICYCLE LANES IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED
 16) ARE THERE ANY DESIGNATED PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OR VALET
 AREAS? IF SO CLEARLY INDICATE THEM ON THE SITE PLAN
 17) THERE IS A CONCEPT TO EXTEND NORTHWOOD RD TO
 FLAGLER, AND POTENTIALLY INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT IN LIEU
 OF AN INTERSECTION. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PLANNING AND
 CRA ON THIS ITEM, AS IT MAY AFFECT THE LAYOUT OF THE
 PARKING AREA AND THE ALIGNMENT OF THE DRIVEWAYS.
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-17-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-17-2023 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-17-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-17 14:03:04GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) SATISFIED - PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL
 FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040.
  
 2.) SATISFIED - PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING
 PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
 DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR UTILITY EASEMENTS OR
 OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR
 SERVICES: AT&T, FPL, FPU AND COMCAST.
  
 3.) SATISFIED - IS THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC
 DIVISION AWARE THAT THE PROPOSED PARK REDEVELOPMENT
 PROJECT INCLUDES A NEW 8,795 SQ. FT. RESILIENCY HUB AND
 A 9,387 SQ. FT. CAFE/RESTAURANT? THE TPS LETTER
 PROVIDED (DATED 11/18/2021) TO STAFF DOES NOT
 ACKNOWLEDGE THESE IMPROVEMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE EMAIL
 DOCUMENTATION WITH THE COUNTY'S TRAFFIC DIVISION THAT
 THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THESE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE 11/18/2021
 TPS LETTER OR OBTAIN A REVISED TPS LETTER WITH THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARK CLEARLY NOTED.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PARTIALLY SATTISFIED - A NOTE STATING: "MAIN PARK
 ENTRANCE SHALL ALIGN WITH FUTURE NORTHWOOD ROAD
 EXTENSION" ADDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET C3.06). THE
 APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CITY STAFF ON THE
 ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE ROADWAY
 EXTENSION ONCE THE DETAILS ON THE ROADWAY EXTENSION HAS
 BEEN FINALIZED (CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS). AT THAT TIME,
 THE SITE PLAN SHALL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE FINAL
 PARK ENTRANCE CONFIGURATION AT THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
 EXTENSION. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL WILL BE ADDED. THE
 APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF ON THE
 ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE FUTURE
 NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION. A NOTE STATING
  
 2.) SATISFIED - EMAIL CONFORMATION FROM SAMANTHA BROWNE
 OF FDEP ON 01.12.2023, CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED
 SUNTRAIL REROUTE DOES NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE FLORIDA
 GREENWAYS AND TRAILS (FGTS) PLANNING CORRIDOR. THE FGTS
 PLANNING COORIDOR IS MAPPED BY FDEP. THE NOTED
 "PROPOSED SUN TRAIL" (SEE SHEET C0.01) APPEARS TO BE
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE LINKAGE TO THE ACTUAL SUN TRAIL
 NETWORK AS PROVIDED ON THE FDOT WEBSITE. PLEASE ADDRESS
 IN THE PLANS. THE PROPOSED TRAIL SHOULD LINK TO THE
 ACTUAL NETWORK. IF THE INTENT IS TO REROUTE THE SUN
 TRAIL, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION, STEPS TO MODIFY
 AND COORDINATION WITH FDOT TO ACHIEVE THE REROUTE.
  
 3.) PARTIALLY SATISFIED - CHANGES FROM LAST REVIEW
 CYCLE HAVE BEEN DETECTED IN THE REVISED PLAN SHEETS.
 ALL KEY PLANS AND DETAIL SHEETS SHALL BE CONSISTENT AND
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
  
 3.1) THE PROPOSED "OUTDOOR DINING PLAZA" (#13 IN THE
 KEY PLAN) SHOULD ALSO REFERENCE THE CAFE BUILDING.
  
 3.2) #15 IN THE KEY PLAN REFERENCES A PUMP STATION;
 HOWEVER, THIS SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO LIFT STATION FOR
 ACCURACY.
  
 3.3) THE PROPOSED MICROMOBILITY STATION (#16 IN THE KEY
 PLAN) IS NOT PROVIDED IN THE DETAIL SHEETS. AT MINIMUM,
 A PLACEHOLDER SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS.
  
 3.4) PER DISCUSSION WITH THE ADMINSTATOR OF PUBLIC ART
 AND CULTURE, THE KEY PLAN AND DETAILS SHALL REFERENCE
 THE LOCATION OF THE INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE/PUBLIC ART.
  
 4.) SATISFIED - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE
 (SHEET C3.00) APPEARS TO BE MISSING INFORMATION ON THE:
 A) PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS B) PROVIDED LOT
 COVERAGE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE C) PROVIDED MAXIMUM
 BUILDING HEIGHT D) PROVIDED FAR.
  
 5.) PARTIALLY SATIFISFIED - STORAGE BUILDING/KIOSK
 BUILDING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED BUT ARE INCONSISTENT
 WITH THE ARCHITECTURL DRAWINGS. IS THE BUILDING SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR THE PROPOSED 15 FT. X 30 FT. STORAGE
 BUILDING/KIOSK LOCATED IN THE AREA OF THE FITNESS LAWN
 INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS?
  
 6.) SATISFIED - ARTIFICIAL TURF REMOVED FROM THE PLANS.
 PLANS STILL SHOWS THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL BE USED IN
 THE FITNESS LAWN AREA. AS DISCUSSED AT PREVIOUS
 MEETINGS WITH STAFF, ARTIFICIAL TURF IS NOT A PERMITTED
 MATERIAL. [ZLDR S.94-451]
  
 7.) PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LOCATION OF ART BETWEEN THE
 SPLASH PAD AND RESILIENCY HUB APPROVED BY THE
 ADMINSTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE ON 05.16.2023.
 PLEASE LABEL IN ALL PLAN SHEETS AND KEY PLAN SHEETS THE
 LOCATION OF THE "INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE/PUBLIC ART." THE
 PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM IS CURRENTLY LOCATED
 BETWEEN THE SPORTS COURTS AND RESILIENCY HUB. CONSIDER
 RELOCATING THE PLATFORM TO AN AREA THAT COULD GENERATE
 BETTER INTERACTION WITH PARK USERS OR CREATE SPACE
 AROUND THE PLATFORM THAT WOULD GENERATE PEDESTRIAN
 ACTIVITY.
  
 8.) SATISFIED - PLANS NOW SHOWS A BUILDING SEPARATION
 OF 69.33 FT. BETWEEN THE RESILIANCY HUB AND CAF??
 BUILDING. WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN THE
 PROPOSED RESILIENCY HUB AND CAFE PLEASE PROVIDE
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE MINIMUM 25 FT. BUILDING SEPARATION.
  
 9.) SATISFIED - 05.09.2023 EMAIL FROM KEVIN VOLBRECHT,
 DIRECTOR OF EGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, STATING
 THAT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS (FOUR (4) IN TOTAL) ARE
 APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 CURRIE PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO
 S.94-312(3) OF THE ZLDRS. PER ZLDR S.94-312(1), ONLY
 ONE (1) ACCESS POINT IS PERMITTED UNLESS APPROVED BY
 THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED
 NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS INTO THE SITE. [ZLDR
 S.94-312(3)]
  
 10.) SATISFIED - PLAN SHOWS 122.58 FT. FROM THE
 STORAGE/KIOSK TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THERE IS A PROPOSED
 STORAGE/KIOSK BUILDING LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE
 FITNESS LAWN. THE BUILDING SETBACK DISTANCE HAS NOT
 BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT A MINIMUM BUILDING
 SETBACK OF 25 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S) IS
 REQUIRED. [ZLDR S.94-204]
  
 11.) SATISFIED - THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 26TH STREET IS
 NEAR COMPLETION AND THE NEW LAYOUT OF 26TH STREET SHALL
 BE REFLECTED ACCURATELY IN THE PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE HOW
 THE IMPROVEMENT WILL IMPACT THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT
 INTO THE PARKS NORTH ENTRANCE.
  
 12.) SATISFIED - STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED AS A "SMALL CRAFT
 SELF LAUNCH" IN THE PLANS. THERE APPEARS TO BE A NEW
 STRUCTURE ATTACHED TO THE NORTHERN MOST EXISTING DOCK
 TO REMAIN. WHAT IS THIS STRUCTURE? PLEASE IDENTIFY IN
 THE PLANS.
  
 13.) SATISFIED - AUTOTURN DIAGRAM PROVIDED. PLEASE
 CLARIFY HOW BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC WILL ENTER AND
 CIRCULATE THROUGH THE PARK SITE. PER THE CHANGES TO THE
 CMUD REGULATIONS AND VISION, THE INTENT IS TO KEEP BOAT
 TRAILER TRAFFIC OFF THE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.
  
 14.) SATSIFIED - CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF
 ALL STRUCTURES. ALL STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH THE
 MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 15.) SATISFIED - AUTOTURN DIAGRAM PROVIDED. AN
 AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LARGER VEHICLES/BOAT TRAILERS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE SAFE MANEUVERING
 OF LARGER VEHICLES/TRAILERS THROUGH THE PARK SITE.
  
 16.) SATISFIED - BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE EVENLY
 DISTRIBUTED THROUGH THE PARK. CONSIDER ADDING
 ADDITIONAL RACKS NEAR THE SPORTS COURTS.
  
 17.) SATISFIED - DETAILS PROVIDED IN SHEET C3.10.
 BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE RACK DETAIL SHALL
 BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S BICYCLE
 PARKING GUIDELINES. CONTACT PLANNING STAFF FOR THE
 BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL.
  
  
 PARKING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PARTIALLY SATISFIED - INCONSISTENCIES STILL
 DETECTED IN THE BOAT TRAILER PARKING NUMBERS AND ON
 STREET/OFFSITE PARKING. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS STILL
 DOES NOT ADD UP IN THE PLAN SET. CALCULATIONS PROVIDED
 MUST MATCH THE PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE PARKING
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: A) ON SITE BOAT AND
 TRAILER PARKING; B) ON SITE SINGLE VEHICLE PARKING C)
 ON STREET PARKING D) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS.
  
 2.) NOT SATISFIED - STALL STRIPING DETAIL PROVIDED IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STRIPING STANDARDS FOR
 PARKING. A PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. THE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH
 THE STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) SATISFIED - ALL SIGNAGE PLACE HOLDERS REMOVED IN
 ELEVATIONS. A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS STATING
 THAT "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE
 XIII, SIGN REGULATIONS, OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)" SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
  
 2.) PARTIALLY SATISIFED - BUILDING HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF
 THE PARAPET FOR THE EVENT PAVILION PROVIDED; HOWEVER,
 THE BUILDING HEIGHT (TOP OF PARAPET) NOT PROVIDED FOR
 THE CAF?? BUILDING. BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS MUST BE
 PROVIDED TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. THIS WAS
 NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST SET OF ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS.
  
 3.) NOT SATISFIED. THE KEY PLAN AND BUILDING SQUARE
 FOOTAGES PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (EVENT
 PAVILION, CAFE BUILDING AND KIOSK) ARE STILL
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE DATA
 TABULARS. THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE
 STILL INCONSISTENT BETWEEN THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY.
 PLEASE ADDRESS
  
 4.) NOT SATISFIED - ALTHOUGH THE PLANS ARE STILL A WORK
 IN PROGRESS, SIGNED AND SEALED FINAL PLANS WILL BE
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A SITE PLAN APPROVAL
 LETTER. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED AND
 SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT. THE LATEST
 PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT.
  
 6.) NEW COMMENT - HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 MEASURED FROM THE GROUND ELEVATION FROM THE OUTSIDE OF
 THE WALL (NOT THE FFE) TO THE TOP OF THE PARPAPET OF
 EACH BUILDING.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY PRIOR TO
 RESUBMITTING.
  
 * PLEASE INCLUDE ALL REVISION DATES IN THE PLAN SHEETS.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2)
 FULL COLORED PAPER COPIES, AND ONE COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 * ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
 NOTES AND CONDITIONS:
  
 * PRIVATE USES OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THIS DISTRICT ARE
 PROHIBITED UNLESS A CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SUCH
 ACTIVITIES IS GRANTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. [ZLDR
 S.94-204 - APPLICANT HAS ALSO NOTED AND ACKNOWLEGED
 STANDARD IN THE PLANS.]
  
 * ADDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER
 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SFWMD) SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY.
 SUCH APPROVAL SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE
 OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
 WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-22-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 09-22-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 09-22-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-22 12:58:14GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE REQUIRED
 LETTER FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS NOT
 BEEN PROVIDED. THE LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
 THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER.]
  
  
 2.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR UTILITY EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPL, FPU
 AND COMCAST.
  
 [11/15/2021 REAPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE
 REQUIRED LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES HAVE NOT
 BEEN PROVIDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL. THE LETTERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL LETTER.]
  
  
 3.) IS THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION AWARE
 THAT THE PROPOSED PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INCLUDES A
 NEW 8,795 SQ. FT. RESILIENCY HUB AND A 9,387 SQ. FT.
 CAFE/RESTAURANT? THE TPS LETTER PROVIDED (DATED
 11/18/2021) TO STAFF DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THESE
 IMPROVEMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE EMAIL DOCUMENTATION WITH
 THE COUNTY'S TRAFFIC DIVISION THAT THEY ACKNOWLEDGE
 THESE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE 11/18/2021 TPS LETTER OR
 OBTAIN A REVISED TPS LETTER WITH THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARK CLEARLY NOTED.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF ON THE
 ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE FUTURE
 NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: ALTHOUGH THE DETAILS ON THE
 EXACT ALIGNMENT WITH THE FUTURE NORTHWOOD ROAD
 EXTENSION IS STILL BEING WORKED OUT, A NOTE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE PLANS THAT STATES THAT THE MAIN PARK
 ENTRANCE (SOUTHERN ENTRANCE) INTO THE PARK SHALL ALIGN
 WITH FUTURE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.]
  
  
 2.) THE NOTED "PROPOSED SUN TRAIL" (SEE SHEET C0.01)
 APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LINKAGE TO THE
 ACTUAL SUN TRAIL NETWORK AS PROVIDED ON THE FDOT
 WEBSITE. PLEASE ADDRESS IN THE PLANS. THE PROPOSED
 TRAIL SHOULD LINK TO THE ACTUAL NETWORK. IF THE INTENT
 IS TO REROUTE THE SUN TRAIL, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION, STEPS TO MODIFY AND COORDINATION WITH FDOT
 TO ACHIEVE THE REROUTE.
  
  
 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES IN THE
 KEY PLAN (SHEET C0.01) AND THE OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET
 3.00). PLEASE ENSURE ALL ENLARGEMENT/DETAILS SHEETS
 ALSO MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY: A) PROPOSED GAME
 COURT/FITNESS LAWN OR JUST FITNESS LAWN? B) LOCATION OF
 THE KAYAK LAUNCH C) PROPOSED OUTDOOR CLASSROOMS OR
 PLAZA WITH SEATING.
  
  
 4.) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE (SHEET C3.00)
 APPEARS TO BE MISSING INFORMATION ON THE: A) PROVIDED
 LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS B) PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE OF
 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE C) PROVIDED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
 D) PROVIDED FAR.
  
  
 5.) IS THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE PROPOSED 15
 FT. X 30 FT. STORAGE BUILDING/KIOSK LOCATED IN THE AREA
 OF THE FITNESS LAWN INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING
 CALCULATIONS? IT IS NOT CLEAR IN THE ZONING INFORMATION
 PROVIDED ON SHEET C3.00 (OVERALL SITE PLAN).
  
  
 6.) PLANS STILL SHOWS THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL BE USED
 IN THE FITNESS LAWN AREA. AS DISCUSSED AT PREVIOUS
 MEETINGS WITH STAFF, ARTIFICIAL TURF IS NOT A PERMITTED
 MATERIAL. [ZLDR S.94-451]
  
  
 7.) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM IS CURRENTLY
 LOCATED BETWEEN THE SPORTS COURTS AND RESILIENCY HUB.
 CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PLATFORM TO AN AREA THAT COULD
 GENERATE BETTER INTERACTION WITH PARK USERS OR CREATE
 SPACE AROUND THE PLATFORM THAT WOULD GENERATE
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THE PUBLIC ART PLATFORM HAS BEEN REMOVED
 FROM THE PROJECT. THE RESPONSE COMMENTS TO PPRC STATES
 THAT THE COMMENT HAS BEEN "ACKNOWLEDGED"; HOWEVER, THE
 ART PLATFORM HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE LATEST REVISIONS
 TO THE PLANS. IF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM HAS
 BEEN REMOVED, COORDINATION ON HOW TO ADDRESS THE ART IN
 PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE
 CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND
 CULTURE, (561) 822-1521.]
  
  
 8.) WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN THE
 PROPOSED RESILIENCY HUB AND CAFE PLEASE PROVIDE
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE MINIMUM 25 FT. BUILDING SEPARATION.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED.
 ALTHOUGH THE DIMENSION IS REFERENCED IN THE RESPONSE TO
 PPRC'S COMMENTS, STAFF HAD SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED THAT
 THE DIMENSION IS PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.]
  
  
 9.) PER ZLDR S.94-312(1), ONLY ONE (1) ACCESS POINT IS
 PERMITTED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN
 CONFIRMATION THAT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS
 INTO THE SITE. [ZLDR S.94-312(3)]
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE COMMENT
 HAS BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT THE DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
 PROVIDED TO STAFF TO SATISFY THE COMMENT.]
  
  
 10.) THERE IS A PROPOSED STORAGE/KIOSK BUILDING LOCATED
 IN THE VICINITY OF THE FITNESS LAWN. THE BUILDING
 SETBACK DISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT A MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK OF 25 FT. FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE(S) IS REQUIRED. [ZLDR S.94-204]
  
  
 11.) THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 26TH STREET IS NEAR
 COMPLETION AND THE NEW LAYOUT OF 26TH STREET SHALL BE
 REFLECTED ACCURATELY IN THE PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE
 IMPROVEMENT WILL IMPACT THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT INTO
 THE PARK???S NORTH ENTRANCE.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: ALIGNMENT/IMPROVEMENTS OF
 26TH STREET NOT PROVIDED CONSISTENTLY IN ALL PLAN
 SHEETS. TO ENSURE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY TO
 THE PARK, CROSSWALKS SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED AT THE NEW
 SIDEWALK TO CONNECT TO THE PARK ON FLAGLER DRIVE.
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY. PROVIDE ANY
 DOCUMENTATION NECESSARY.]
  
  
 12.) THERE APPEARS TO BE A NEW STRUCTURE ATTACHED TO
 THE NORTHERN MOST EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN. WHAT IS THIS
 STRUCTURE? PLEASE IDENTIFY IN THE PLANS.
  
  
 13.) PLEASE CLARIFY HOW BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC WILL ENTER
 AND CIRCULATE THROUGH THE PARK SITE. PER THE CHANGES TO
 THE CMUD REGULATIONS AND VISION, THE INTENT IS TO KEEP
 BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC OFF THE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NO DETAILED INFORMATION
 PROVIDED. INFORMATION MUST BE CLEAR AND DOCUMENTED.
 ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE LETTER, IT IS
 STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS WITH CITY STAFF AND THE
 CONCERNS OF PLANNING STAFF HAVE BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED.]
  
  
 14.) CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL
 STRUCTURES. ALL STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 [11/15/2021 MODIFIED COMMENT: ALL STRUCTURES INCLUDING
 THE TENNIS COURT, FENCE, ETC. MUST COMPLY WITH THE
 MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROS ZONING
 DISTRICT. ALSO, PLEASE NOTATE THE HEIGHT OF THE TENNIS
 COURT FENCE AND FENCE AROUND THE PICKLEBALL COURTS. THE
 HEIGHT OF THE FENCES SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 HEIGHT AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR FENCES IN THE
 ZLDRS.]
  
  
 15.) AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LARGER VEHICLES/BOAT
 TRAILERS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE SAFE
 MANEUVERING OF LARGER VEHICLES/TRAILERS THROUGH THE
 PARK SITE.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: AN AUTO TURN DIAGRAM WAS
 PROVIDED FOR A SANITATION TRUCK; HOWEVER, MODIFICATIONS
 HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE PARKING AREA FOR BOAT TRAILERS
 AND IT IS IMPORTANT TO DEMONSTRATE HOW BOAT TRAILERS
 CAN MANEUVER THE SITE SAFELY AND WITHOUT DAMAGE TO THE
 SITE (I.E. LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, CURBS, ETC.).
  
  
 16.) BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGH
 THE PARK. CONSIDER ADDING ADDITIONAL RACKS NEAR THE
 SPORTS COURTS.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: ALTHOUGH THE APPLICANT HAS
 ACKNOWLEDGED STAFF'S COMMENT, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO
 PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET (GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF DETAIL
 FOR THE PROJECT) SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE
 RACKS PLANNED FOR THE PROJECT TO CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE
 THE EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF RACKS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT
 SITE. ALSO, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NUMBER OF RACKS
 PROVIDED IN THE PLANS MUST MATCH THE BICYCLE PARKING
 CALCULATIONS.]
  
  
 17.) A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE RACK DETAIL
 SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S
 BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. CONTACT PLANNING STAFF FOR
 THE BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL.
  
 [11/15/2021 MODIFIED COMMENT: ALTHOUGH A DETAIL HAS
 BEEN PROVIDED, MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE RACK
 DETAIL, INCLUDING REQUIRED SPACING BETWEEN EACH POST.]
  
  
  
 PARKING COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PARKING CALCULATIONS STILL DOES NOT ADD UP IN
 THE PLAN SET. CALCULATIONS PROVIDED MUST MATCH THE
 PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING: A) ON SITE BOAT AND TRAILER PARKING; B) ON
 SITE SINGLE VEHICLE PARKING C) ON STREET PARKING D)
 BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS.
  
 2.) A PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 THE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE DETAIL
 MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET TO DEMONSTRATE
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS.
 ALSO, WILL THE PARKING STALLS HAVE WHEEL STOPS? IF SO,
 THE WHEEL STOPS MUST BE ILLUSTRATED IN THE PLAN SHEETS
 AND STALL STRIPING DETAIL.]
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS STATING THAT
 "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE XIII,
 SIGN REGULATIONS, OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)" SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE PLANS DO
 NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NOTE. THE NOTE IS NECESSARY TO
 ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS FOR ANY PROJECT
 SIGNAGE.]
  
  
 2.) BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE
 HIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. THIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN
 THE LATEST SET OF ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
  
 3.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE STILL
 INCONSISTENT BETWEEN THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED
 IN THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THE
 BUILDING CALCULATIONS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY.
 PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 4.) FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED AND
 SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT. THE LATEST
 PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY PRIOR TO
 RESUBMITTING.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) FULL COLORED PAPER COPIES, AND ONE COPY IN 11
 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS
 AND DOCUMENTS.
  
 * ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
 NOTES AND CONDITIONS:
  
 * PRIVATE USES OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THIS DISTRICT ARE
 PROHIBITED UNLESS A CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SUCH
 ACTIVITIES IS GRANTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. [ZLDR
 S.94-204 ??? APPLICANT HAS ALSO NOTED AND ACKNOWLEGED
 STANDARD IN THE PLANS.]
  
 * ADDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER
 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SFWMD) SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY.
 SUCH APPROVAL SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE
 OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
 WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 11-15-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 11-15-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-15 16:16:45GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ON THE COVER SHEET (SHEET C0.00), COMMISSIONER
 KELLY SHOAF'S NAME IS INCORRECTLY SPELLED. PLEASE
 CORRECT AS THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS
 LOCATED WITHIN COMMISSIONER SHOAF'S DISTRICT (DISTRICT
 1).
  
 2.) A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 (TPS LETTER) IS REQUIRED.
  
 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040.
  
 4.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR UTILITY EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPL, FPL
 AND COMCAST.
  
 5.) ADDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER
 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SFWMD) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY.
 SUCH APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY
 BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
 IMPROVEMENTS.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE
 OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET C0.01): A) THE EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION IS COMMUNITY SERVICE
 (CS) - NOT FOREST/PARK/RECREATION. B) PLEASE CLARIFY
 THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGES (RESILIENCY HUB AND CAFE)
 IN THE DATA TABULAR (DOES NOT SEEM TO MATCH NUMBERS
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS). C)
 INCLUDE BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS IN THE PARKING
 DATA TABULAR.
  
 2.) THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF ON THE
 ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE NORTHWOOD
 ROAD EXTENSION.
  
 3.) PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT ALL
 INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS TO PROVIDE LINKAGES TO THE
 EXISTING SIDEWALK SYSTEM ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THE
 CROSSWALKS WILL ALSO ENCOURAGE WALKABILITY AND PROMOTE
 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
  
 4.) THERE IS A LACK OF PEDESTRIAN INTEGRATION AND FLOW
 BETWEEN THE SPORTS COURTS TO THE SOUTHERN HALF OF THE
 PARK (I.E. RESILIENCY HUB, CAFE, ETC.). BETTER
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS/CROSSOVER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 (I.E. ADDITION OF DECORATIVE CROSSWALKS, ETC.).
  
 5.) WHY DOES THE HARDSCAPE HAVE DIFFERENT VARIATIONS OF
 SHADING? IS THERE A COLOR COORDINATED PLAN THAT SHOWS
 THE TYPE OF HARDSCAPE MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT?
  
 6.) PLEASE CLARIFY HOW BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC WILL ENTER
 AND CIRCULATE THROUGH THE PARK SITE. PER THE CHANGES TO
 THE CURRIE MIXED USE DISTRICT (CMUD) REGULATIONS AND
 VISION, THE INTENT IS TO KEEP BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC OFF
 THE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.
  
 7.) AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LARGER VEHICLES/BOAT
 TRAILERS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE SAFE
 MANEUVERING OF LARGER VEHICLES/TRAILERS THROUGH THE
 PARK SITE.
  
 8.) THE NORTH PARKING AREA IS DESIGNED WITH A MIX OF
 REGULAR AND BOAT TRAILER PARKING SPACES. STAFF HAS
 CONCERNS WITH THE INTERMINGLING OF REGULAR VEHICLES
 WITH BOAT TRAILERS FOR SAFE AND EFFICIENT TRAFFIC
 CIRCULATION THROUGH THE AREA. CAN THE PARKING FOR THE
 DIFFERENT TYPES OF USES (I.E. REGULAR VEHICLES AND BOAT
 TRAILERS) BE SEPARATED TO PREVENT ANY CONFLICT WITH
 TRAFFIC AND SITE CIRCULATION?
  
 9.) THE PARKING AREA NORTH OF THE PROPOSED BASKETBALL
 COURT REQUIRES A T-TURNAROUND/ADEQUATE
 TURNAROUND/CIRCULATION DESIGNED FOR THE END STALLS.
  
 10.) PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 THE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 11.) THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 26TH STREET IS NEAR
 COMPLETION AND THE NEW LAYOUT OF 26TH STREET SHALL BE
 REFLECTED ACCURATELY IN THE PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE
 IMPROVEMENT WILL IMPACT THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT INTO
 THE NORTH PARKING LOT.
  
 12.) BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGH
 THE PARK. CONSIDER ADDING ADDITIONAL RACKS NEAR THE
 SPORTS COURTS.
  
 13.) A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE RACK DETAIL
 SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S
 BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. CONTACT PLANNING STAFF FOR
 THE BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL.
  
 14.) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM IS CURRENTLY
 LOCATED BETWEEN THE SPORTS COURTS AND RESILIENCY HUB.
 CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PLATFORM TO AN AREA THAT COULD
 GENERATE BETTER INTERACTION WITH PARK USERS OR CREATE
 SPACE AROUND THE PLATFORM THAT WOULD GENERATE
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY.
  
 15.) ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, BISTRO/CAFE SEATING
 WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE EVENT
 LAWN. THE SEATING IS NOT LOCATED NEAR THE CAFE/BISTRO
 AND SEEMS TO BE ISOLATED. IT WOULD BE LOGICAL TO LOCATE
 THE SEATING NEAR THE CAFE/BISTRO USE.
  
 16.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE RESILIENCY HUB. IS
 IT ONLY OPEN TO PRIVATE EVENTS?
  
 17.) CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF STRUCTURES,
 PARKING FACILITIES, ETC. TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S). PER
 ZLDR S.94-204(2)(F), THE REQUIRED SETBACKS SHALL NOT BE
 USED FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AND DRIVEWAYS TO SERVE
 PARKING FACILITIES CONTAINING FIVE (5) OR MORE PARKING
 SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE
 COMPLIANCE. ALSO, THE SOUTHERN MOST PARKING LOT DOES
 NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THIS ZONING REQUIREMENT.
  
 18.) WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN THE
 PROPOSED RESILIENCY HUB AND CAFE? PLEASE PROVIDE
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE MINIMUM 25 FT. BUILDING SEPARATION. [ZLDR
 S.94-204(2)(E)]
  
 19.) BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM GRADE. PER
 ZLDR S.94-204(5), THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT
 IN THE ROS ZONING DISTRICT IS 35 FT. OR 1 FT. OF HEIGHT
 FOR EACH 1.5 FT. OF SETBACK, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
 CLEARLY PROVIDE THE BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE ELEVATIONS
 AND BUILDING SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINES
 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 20.) IS THE "RESILIENCY HUB" REFERENCED ON SHEETS C0.01
 AND IN THE SITE PLAN THE SAME AS THE "EVENT PAVILION"
 IN THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS? PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 21.) PER ZLDR S.94-312(1), ONLY ONE (1) ACCESS POINT IS
 PERMITTED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN
 CONFIRMATION THAT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS
 INTO THE SITE. [ZLDR S.94-312(3)]
  
 22.) A ONE-WAY DRIVE AISLE/ACCESS POINT CANNOT EXCEED
 12 FT. IN WIDTH; A TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE/ACCESS POINT
 CANNOT EXCEED 24 FT. IN WIDTH, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR AN ALTERNATIVE
 DESIGN. BASED ON STAFF'S REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF THE
 PROPOSED PLAN, THE ONE-WAY INGRESS/EGRESS FOR THE SOUTH
 PARKING LOT CAN BE REDUCED (~38 FT. WIDE). REDUCING THE
 WIDTH OF THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS WILL ALSO IMPROVE
 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY/WALKABILITY. [ZLDR S.94-312(3) AND
 S.94-485]
  
 23.) PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL DRIVE AISLES
 (NOT ALL SHEETS PROVIDE INFORMATION).
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) CLARIFICATION IS NEEDED ON THE BUILDING SQUARE
 FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED RESILIENCY HUB
 AND CAFE. THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGES DO NOT ADD UP
 BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 2.) A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS STATING THAT
 "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE XIII,
 SIGN REGULATIONS, OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)," SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($300.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved