City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z21080015

Plan Review Stops For Project Z21080015

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	10-04-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	09-26-2022	Time	13:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	swelter			Date	10-04-2022	Time	11:43	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-04 11:43:25	PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
	A COMPLETED ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION MUST BE PROVIDED
	BEFORE OR AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES
	EVIDENCE OF ESCROW MUST BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
	BUILDING PERMIT FEES
	IDENTIFIED AREAS FOR ART ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY THE
	ARTLIFE STAFF/COMMITTEE
	ARTIST(S) AND CONCEPT PROPOSALS ARE SUBJECT TO THE
	ARTLIFE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR PUBLIC ART

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	08-08-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	08-08-2022	Time	13:04	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	scwelter			Date	08-08-2022	Time	13:09	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-08 13:09:24	THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST INCLUDE THE ART
	SITE(S) PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE RECENTLY
	SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY POTENTIAL ART SITES.
	SITE DO DO NEED TO BE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE. A FEW
	CONSIDERATIONS: THE GARDEN AREA, 24TH STREET PASEO
	TOWARDS THE RAILROAD, BROADWAY AND NORTHWOOD ROAD. THE
	TYPE OF ART AND/OR ARTIST DOES NOT NEED TO BE INCLUDED
	ONLY PROPOSED SITES.
	THE ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION WAS EMAILED TO JOSH
	HORNING AND GILBERT BENHAMAU PAGE ONE NEEDS TO BE
	COMPLTED AND RETURNED TO MY ATTENTION AT
	[email protected].

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	06-09-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	06-09-2022	Time	11:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	scwelter			Date	06-09-2022	Time	11:49	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-09 11:44:36	SPOKE WITH GILBERT BENHAMOU DISCUSSED ART PROCESS ON
	JUNE 3RD, 2022.
	1. MISSING ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION SENT 6.9.2020 -
	NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED INCLUDING ESCROW OF THE 1% DUE AT
	TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION - PRINTING OF
	PERMIT WILLL BE HELD UNTIL APPLICATION ALONG WITH
	ESCROW IS COMPLETED.
	2. POTENTIAL ART SITES NEED TO BE MARKED ON THE SITE
	PLAN FOR REVIEW. SITES NEED TO HAVE PUBLIC ACCESS.
	IDENTIFIED SITES WIL BE REVIEWED BY ALL DEPARTMENTS FOR
	ACCESSIBILITY, LANDSCAPE, UTILITIES, ETC.

	CONTACT [email protected] WITH ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	11-18-2021	Time	09:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	scwelter			Date	04-12-2022	Time	12:50	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-10 10:59:08	CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER: [email protected] FOR ART
	ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND TO REVIEW ART REQUIREMENTS,
	POTENTIAL ART SITES, ARTISTS, AND ARTWORKS.

	TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER
	$500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS
	PER CITY ORDINANCE.
	SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,
	INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR
	IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL
	CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
	$500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
	OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE
	VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE
	TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR
	OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF
	ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT
	TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
	A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS
	REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND
	CULTURE AT [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT
	APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	10-03-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	10-03-2022	Time	18:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	10-03-2022	Time	18:42	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-03 18:43:11	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. REPLAT/UNITY OF TITLE. COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. FOR
	ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A
	RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL
	INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
	APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
	ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE.

	4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE
	REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	08-11-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	08-11-2022	Time	17:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	08-11-2022	Time	17:02	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-11 17:03:22	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. REPLAT/UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A
	PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR
	SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED
	WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE
	A FIRE WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE
	REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	04-13-2022	Time	19:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	04-13-2022	Time	19:13	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-13 19:36:51	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. REPLAT/UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A
	PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR
	SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED
	WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE
	A FIRE WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE
	REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN BROWN, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-17-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	11-17-2021	Time	21:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	11-17-2021	Time	21:06	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-17 21:08:58	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS
	SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
	REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
	COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
	OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	3. REPLAT/UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A
	PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR
	SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED
	WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE
	A FIRE WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
	DISTANCE.

	4. EXIT TO THE STREET FROM THE EGRESS STAIRS. GROUND
	FLOOR PLAN SHEET A103 DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW THE EXIT
	DISCHARGE POINT FROM EACH OF THE EXIT STAIRS (BUILDING
	A AND BUILDING C IN PARTICULAR). PLEASE NOTE THAT, PER
	SECTION 1028.1 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 50% OF THE
	EXIT CAPACITY SHALL DISCHARGE TO THE RIGHT OF WAY SUCH
	THAT OCCUPANTS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TRAVERSE THE
	BUILDING AFTER LEAVING THE STAIR.

	5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE
	PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
	COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL
	ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES.

	6. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
	THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
	WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	7. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO
	NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING AT THIS TIME. THE
	MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
	SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAIR
	HOUSING ACT AND SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE.

	8. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO
	NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING AT THIS TIME. PER
	SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST
	POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN
	ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	9. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW
	ANY VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AT THIS TIME. PER SECTION
	208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	10. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER
	IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED
	VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL
	ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF
	502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	11. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	12. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
	OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
	CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
	VERIFIED.

	13. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
	DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
	OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
	GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
	GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
	SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
	USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	14. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE
	REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	15. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	16. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	17. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	18. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	19. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	09-22-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	09-22-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	09-22-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	07-19-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	07-19-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	07-19-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-25 07:56:07

PLANS ARE DATED 5/17/22. PLEASE SUBMIT REVISED PLANS.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-08-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	06-08-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	06-08-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-12 12:38:18	COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
	SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :

	PLEASE ADDRESS SECOND PART OF COMMENT 6: VERIFY THAT
	THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	PLEASE LABEL ALL STREETS AND ALLEYS ON ALL CIVIL
	SHEETS.
	DEMO SHEETS:
	UPDATE DEMO NOTE 13 TO REFER TO CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH.
	ADD NOTE TO ALL DEMO SHEETS TO PROTECT STORMWATER
	INLETS USING BMPS.
	PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF SCOPE CHANGE IN THE NEXT
	RESUBMITTAL.


	COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
	SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
	[email protected]:

	-SHEET C3.01. SOME CALLOUTS ARE GOING OFF TOP OF SHEET
	AND UNREADABLE. PLEASE CORRECT.

	-CALLOUT REPLACEMENT OF FIRE HYDRANT AND PIPE LEADING
	TO IT AT FAR NORTH SIDE OF SHEET C3.01. ALSO SHOW GATE
	VALVE AND LABEL THE FITTING AT WATER MAIN.

	-AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL ALL WATER
	SERVICES WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE; ADD GATE
	VALVE AT 25TH ST WHERE PROPOSED 8 INCH DIP RUNNING WEST
	TIES INTO EXISTING NORTH SOUTH DIP; LABEL EXISTING FM
	NORTH OF 25TH ST WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE; SHOW
	ALL WATER MAIN GATE VALVES AT 25TH AND PINEWOOD
	INTERSECTION; ADD INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS TO ALL
	EXISTING AND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES; SHOW ALL
	EXISTING WATER SERVICES AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO
	THEM (ESPECIALLY WATER SERVICE TAPS FOR NEIGHBORS THAT
	MAY RESTRICT PROPOSED TAPS); VERIFY FORCE MAIN
	DIRECTION OF FLOWL;

	-EXISTING 8 INCH DIP IN 25TH ST INTERSECTION SHOWS AS
	1926 8 INCH CAS IN WPB GIS. PLEASE VERIFY AT FORMAL
	ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. IF 1926 MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED
	UPON REVIEW AND DIRECTION OF CITY OR EOR.

	-DCDAS ON 25TH ST ARE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. THEY ARE
	SUPPOSED TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	-VERIFY ALL PROPOSED FDC LOCATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE
	DISTANCE FROM FIRE HYDRANTS. SEE AT LEAST ONE THAT MAY
	NOT BE.

	-EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AND PIPING NORTH OF IT
	AT INTERSECTION OF 25TH AND PINEWOOD SAYS 1926 IN WPB
	GIS MAY NEED TO BE IMPROVED UPON REVIEW OF CITY OR EOR
	AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.

	-METER SIZE IS NOT CLEARLY SHOWN, BUT 3 INCH METERS
	SHOULD HAVE 4 INCH TAPS AND SERVICE LINES PER WPB
	STANDARD DETAILS.

	-THE NE AREA OF BROADWAY AND 25TH INTERSECTION APPEARS
	TO BE FDOT ROW.

	-FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE LOCATED ADJACENT TACTILE PAD
	ON BROADWAY. PLEASE RELOCATE. PREFER ADJACENT FIRE
	HYDRANT IN LANDSCAPING IF POSSIBLE.

	-CHECK POSITION OF FPL MANHOLE AT INTERSECTION OF 25TH
	AND BROADWAY TO CONFIRM WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH
	STORMWATER PIPING NEXT TO IT.

	-FIRELINE BACKFLOW ON 24TH ST EAST OF BROADWAY IS IN
	PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AND ALSO IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
	RELOCATE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND OUT OF PEDESTRIAN
	TRAFFIC.

	-SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON 24TH ST EAST OF BROADWAY.

	-FIRELINE BACKFLOW ON BROADWAY IS IN RIGHT OF WAY.
	RELOCATE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	-PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES ON 23RD ST ARE NOT
	SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY WORK.

	-FOR FAR SOUTHWEST WATER SERVICE, WILL NEED TO GO TO
	THE MAIN. EXISTING WATER SERVICE IS SMALL DIAMETER.

	-EXISTING 24 INCH WATER MAIN ON 23RD ST NEAR AREAS OF
	PROPOSED WATER SERVICE TAPS IS LABELED 1926 AGE IN WPB
	GIS AND A LARGER WATER MAIN. WOULD NEED APPROVAL FROM
	MICHAEL TECHNOW TO CONNECT TO THE WATER MAINS THERE,
	AND EXISTING 24 INCH WATER MAIN MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED
	UPON REVIEW OF CITY OR EOR AT FORMAL ENGINEERING
	SUBMITTAL.

	-SHEET C3.03. PROPOSED WATER SERVICES AND DOMESTIC
	METER EAST OF PINEWOOD APPEAR TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH A
	UTILITY POLE.

	-SHOW AND LABEL UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC METERED
	WATER SERVICES. MANY ARE MISSING.

	-FIRE HYDRANT AND PIPE TO IT WILL NEED REPLACEMENT.
	CONSIDER RELOCATING IT TO DIFFERENT LANDSCAPING AREA
	OUT OF SIDEWALK.

	-CALLOUT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN FM AND WM ON 23RD
	ST.

	-FOOTPRINT OF ABOVE GROUND METERS MAY BE LARGER THAN
	SHOWN ON PLANS. MAY BE NECESSARY TO ROTATE THEM OR
	INCREASE PLANTER WIDTH SO THEY WILL FIT.

	-THERE ARE SOME WATER UTILITY CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING ON BROADWAY. SEE A TREE ON TOP OF A WATER
	PIPE AS WELL AS A FIRELINE BACKFLOW IN CLOSE PROXIMITY
	TO A TREE TRUNK. PLEASE CHECK PLANS FOR UTILITY
	LANDSCAPING CONFLICTS AND RESOLVE.

	-SHOW AND LABEL THE PROPOSED ROAD AREA BETWEEN 23RD AND
	NORTHWOOD THAT IS INTENDED TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY.

	-COULD NOT FIND ANY INFORMATION ON IRRIGATION WATER.
	WILL IRRIGATION BE FED FROM THE DOMESTIC WATER
	SERVICES?

	-CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL ALL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLIES. THEY SHOULD ALL BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY,
	CLOSE TO METERS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDINGS, OUT OF UTILITY
	EASEMENTS, AND AWAY FROM PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. FOR
	IMPORTANT WATER SERVICES CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL
	ASSEMBLIES TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW
	MAINTENANCE.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-09-2022		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	04-09-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	04-09-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-09 14:19:23	Z21080015, 0017 - NORTHWOOD SQUARE, AND ABANDONMENTS
	3.30.22 SUBMITTAL

	PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO MY COMMENTS FROM NOV 2021
	SUBMITTAL:

	COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
	SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :

	GENERAL:
	O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
	INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
	(Z-XXXXXXXX).
	O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
	BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
	B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
	L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
	B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
	B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
	FOUND HERE:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
	MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
	C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
	ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
	CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
	SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
	SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
	BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
	O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
	ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
	SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.

	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:

	O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
	SERVICES AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG
	WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
	O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
	EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
	PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
	STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTION.
	O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
	OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
	METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
	PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
	INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
	O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
	NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.

	WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
	O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL.
	O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
	O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
	FRONTAGE.
	O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER.
	O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
	O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
	TRAPS (IF ANY).
	O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.

	FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
	NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
	- AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
	- 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
	THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
	DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
	- 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
	STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
	MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
	- THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
	CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
	THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
	SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
	WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
	APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
	SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
	SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
	LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
	ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
	LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
	PARCELS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
	BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
	50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
	PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
	PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.

	MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
	CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
	[email protected] :

	-PINEWOOD AVE VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION STATES THAT
	THE LANDS ARE IN MONROE COUNTY FLORIDA. PLEASE VERIFY
	IT IS WORDED CORRECTLY OR UPDATE.

	-A0.02 SAYS 360 UNITS, BUT LOS ANALYSIS SAYS 370 UNITS.
	PLEASE VERIFY BOTH AND UPDATE AS NEEDED.

	-SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED AND EXISTING SIDEWALK
	EASEMENTS ON CIVIL PLANS. SOME ADDITIONAL MAY BE
	REQUIRED.

	-ARE THERE ANY OUTSIDE ADA PARKING SPOTS? IF NOT, ARE
	ANY NEEDED OR REQUIRED?

	-A301 SHOWS GREENSPACE ISLANDS IN SOUTHWEST OUTSIDE
	PARKING LOT BUT PGD PLAN DOES NOT. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL
	PLANS MATCH GENERAL DESIGN LAYOUT.

	-A301 HAS SOME HATCHED 20FT BY 20FT TRIANGLES. PLEASE
	IDENTIFY THEM IN LEGEND. IF THEY ARE SIGHT TRIANGLES,
	IS IT ALRIGHT FOR THE TREES TO BE IN THEM?

	-ON A402 AND A403 PLEASE CALLOUT DIMENSIONS OF PARKING
	GARAGE ENTRANCE.

	-ON A404 PLEASE CALLOUT DIMENSIONS OF BROADWAY AVE
	TUNNELS

	-CIVIL PLANS NOT SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED.

	-ON C1.04 BETWEEN 550 AND 540 NORTHWOOD, DEMO PLAN SAYS
	PARTY WALL. IF THAT IS A SHARED WALL, PLEASE HIGHLIGHT
	BETTER AND ALSO INDICATE IF WALL WILL REMAIN OR BE
	REPLACED.

	-ON C3.01 IS THE INTENT FOR THE PROPOSED 8 INCH PVC
	WATER MAIN TO BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED OR CITY
	OWNED AND MAINTAINED?

	-CITY OWNED WATER MAINS AND WATER SERVICES LARGER THAN
	2 INCHES SHOULD BE DIP.

	-CALLOUT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND WATER METERS. ADD SIZE
	TO LABEL.

	-C3.01 SOUTHWEST BUILDING A FIRE AND WATER SERVICE
	LABELS APPEAR TO BE REVERSED. FIRELINE BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLY ALSO LOOKS CLOSE TO PARKING SPOT TRAFFIC. MAY
	NEED INCREASE DISTANCE TO PREVENT DAMAGE.

	-WATER SERVICE LABELS ARE AMBIGUOUS AS TO WHICH
	PORTIONS ARE PRIVATE. ALSO UNCLEAR AS TO SIZING WHEN
	SAYING 3 INCH BUT THE TAP IS FOUR INCHES AND REQUIRED
	PIPING WOULD BE AT LEAST 4 INCHES.

	-FOR ANY PROPOSED WATER METERS LARGER THAN 2 INCHES,
	ADD WORDING ABOVE GROUND TO LABELS.

	-C3.01: ADD SMALL CIRCULAR OBJECTS IN SIDEWALK TO
	LEGEND AND IDENTIFY THEM.

	-ENSURE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS COMPLY WITH NOTE 21 ON
	UTILITY PLAN REGARDING VERTICAL CLEARANCE DISTANCES.

	-NOTE 20 ON UTILITY PLAN DOES NOT SEEM TO MAKE SENSE. A
	DDCV IS A TYPE OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER.

	-NOTE 14 ON UTILITY PLAN: VERIFY IF THERE WILL BE ANY
	COUNTY UTILITIES IN PROJECT AREA. IF NOT, THEN REVISE
	OR REMOVE.

	-FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOCATIONS WOULD ONLY BE
	ACCEPTABLE IF ROW IS ABANDONED AND AREA IS PRIVATELY
	OWNED.

	-BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR DOMESTIC METERED WATER
	SERVICES APPEAR TO BE MISSING. THEY SHOULD BE OUTSIDE
	OF BUILDING, ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE, ON PRIVATE
	PROPERTY, WITH DISTANCE MINIMIZED TO METER, BUT NOT
	LOCATED IN SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. CLEARLY SHOW
	AND LABEL THEM.

	-FOR FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AT NORTHEAST BUILDING
	OFF BROADWAY, ATTEMPT TO RELOCATE SLIGHTLY NORTH TO
	REDUCE PIPE DISTANCE. IF CANNOT EXPLAIN CONFLICT.

	-C3.02: FDC NEEDS TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND OUT OF
	PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AS WELL AS NOT IMPEDING VEHICLE
	DOORS. IT MUST ALSO BE CLEARLY VISIBLE AND TYPICALLY
	REQUIRES SIGNAGE.

	-C3.02: FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOOKS TO CONFLICT
	WITH CURB OR GUTTER AND IS CLOSE TO VEHICLES.

	-C3.03: PROPOSED 24 INCH WATER MAIN SHOULD BE DIP
	INSTEAD OF PVC; ADD 24 INCH VALVES AT 24 INCH TEES IN
	OFFSET DIRECTIONS;

	-ADD NOTE ON UTILITY PLAN SHEETS THAT LINESTOPS OR
	INSERTION VALVES MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY CITY OF
	WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES OR ENGINEER OF RECORD TO
	MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES.

	-THERE ARE SOME DOORS THAT OPEN TO PLAZA CLOSE TO A
	LANDSCAPING AREA THAT WOULD SEEM TO BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
	MOVEMENT. IS THAT ALRIGHT?

	-BUILDING B EAST FIRELINE LABELED 6 BY 4, BUT SHOULD BE
	8 BY 4; ALSO SHOW AND LABEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY;
	UTILITY EASEMENT FOR METER NOT SHOWN AND LABELED.

	-VERIFY BUILDING B WEST FDC LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH
	WPB PLANNING. ALSO VERIFY BUILDING C SOUTH FDC LOCATION
	WITH THEM.

	-BUILDING C 4 INCH WATER MAIN DOES NOT DEADEND PER WPB
	GIS. PLEASE VERIFY AND UPDATE UTILITY PLAN AS NEEDED.

	-BUILDING CS CANNOT HAVE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES IN RIGHT
	OF WAY. NEEDS TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	-DID NOT SEE FIRELINES WITH DCDAS FOR BUILDING CS.
	VERIFY THEY ARE NOT NEEDED OR REQUIRED FOR THESE
	BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES.

	-ARE ANY WERE LATERALS MISSING FOR BUILDINGS ON WEST
	SIDE OF BROADWAY?

	-APPLICANT MUST FOLLOW ALL RULES REGARDING SUBMETERING
	AND REMETERING

	-THERE ARE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
	REGARDING PLUMBING CROSSING RIGHT OF WAYS AND STREETS.

	-NOTE 16 MENTIONED A LIFT STATION. ARE THERE ANY
	PROPOSED LIFT STATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT?

	-VERIFY ALL REQUIRED PAVEMENT RESTORATION FROM UTILITY
	WORK IS SHOWN. LOOKS LIKE THERE IS AT LEAST SOME
	MISSING ON 25TH ST.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-17-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	11-17-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By	rrossano			Date	11-17-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-17 13:11:07	COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
	SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :

	GENERAL:
	O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND
	INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
	(Z-XXXXXXXX).
	O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
	BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP
	B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL
	L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97
	B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
	B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
	FOUND HERE:
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
	MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
	C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08,
	ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
	CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
	SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
	SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
	A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU
	BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL
	O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
	ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
	SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.

	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS:

	O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER
	SERVICES AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG
	WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
	O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY
	EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
	PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO
	STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT.
	O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTION.
	O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
	OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER
	METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
	PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE
	INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
	O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE
	NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.

	WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN:
	O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
	INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929).
	O SHOW PROJECT ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS.
	O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
	STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
	O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
	DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
	SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH
	PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE
	AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS,
	BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS,
	DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS,
	ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT
	ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF
	SANITARY SEWER LINES.
	O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR
	SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW.
	O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
	VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL.
	O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
	ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
	FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
	O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
	AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD
	DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
	O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY
	TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
	MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
	SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
	FOR WATER.
	O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA.
	O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT
	FRONTAGE.
	O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL
	BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY
	PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET.
	O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
	SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
	O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE
	JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET.
	O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT
	STATION NUMBER.
	O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
	O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE
	TRAPS (IF ANY).
	O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
	OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER.

	FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW:
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES
	NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
	- AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
	- 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
	THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
	DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
	- 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
	STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
	MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
	- THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
	CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
	THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
	SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
	OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF
	WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
	APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
	SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
	SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
	LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
	ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
	LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
	PARCELS.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE
	BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE
	50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
	PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER
	CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
	O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
	CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR
	PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS.

	QUESTIONS AND COORDINATION CONTACTS:
	O MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH
	CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF
	BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT
	561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
	O RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected]
	O MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, PUBLIC UTILITIES
	DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1047 OR [email protected]
	O TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER, ENGINEERING
	SERVICES DEPT. AT 561-494-1120 OR [email protected]


	COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
	SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
	[email protected]:

	-THERE ARE MANY MONITORING WELLS AS SHOWN ON THE
	SURVEY. WILL THEY REMAIN?

	-FOR EASTERN BUILDING NUMBER 4 ON UTILITY PLAN: THE
	LEADER LINES FOR THE WATER SERVICES APPEAR TO BE
	POINTING WRONG; METER BOX SHOULD NOT BE IN
	SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE; BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NOT ALLOWED IN
	PROPOSED LOCATION UNLESS SIDEWALK ENDS IMMEDIATELY EAST
	OF BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND WILL NOT BE CONTINUED;
	UTILITY EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR WATER METER AND UPSTREAM
	PIPING; SEWER LATER IS CLOSE TO TREE PLANTER; DISTANCE
	CALLOUT NEEDED BETWEEN SEWER LATERAL AND WATER SERVICE.

	-UTILITY PLANS SHOW MULTIPLE BUILDINGS LABELED AS
	NUMBER 4.

	-SEWER LATERAL FOR WESTERN BUILDING NUMBER 4 HAS SEWER
	LATERAL RUNNING THROUGH TREE PLANTER.

	-ARE CROSS WALKS NEEDED AT NEW INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY
	AND 23RD? (EITHER EAST-WEST OR NORTH-SOUTH)

	-EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGN AT NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF
	BROADWAY AND 23RD IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED
	STORMWATER UTILITY.

	-PROPOSED TREE PLANTER ON 23RD STREET IS CONFLICTING
	WITH LARGE UTILITY POLE.

	-ALL OF THE SEWER MAINS IN THE AREA ARE OLDER AND MAY
	REQUIRE UPGRADE OR REPLACEMENT AS ADVISED BY ENGINEER
	OF RECORD AND/OR CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.

	-SHEET C3.10, REPLACE STANDARD DETAIL WS-4 WITH WS-3.
	METERS 3 INCHES OR LARGER NEED TO BE ABOVE-GROUND
	INSTALLED.

	-SUBMIT SEPARATE LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWING ALL EXISTING
	AND PROPOSED TREES. ON ONE OF THE PLAN SHEETS HAVE
	LANDSCAPING OVERLOAD ON UTILITIES SO CAN RECOGNIZE ANY
	CONFLICTS.

	-ON NORTH SIDE OF WESTERN BUILDING 4, DO PLANTERS
	PREVENT WALKING ALONG SIDEWALK?

	-SOME CANOPY OVERHANGS ON NORTHWOOD APPEAR TO EXTEND
	INTO ROW. PLEASE VERIFY THAT IS ACCEPTABLE.

	-ADD PRIVATE TO LABEL OF ANY PRIVATELY OWNED AND
	MAINTAINED UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.

	-DID NOT SEE ANY FDC. ARE ANY NEEDED OR REQUIRED?

	-UTILITY PLAN SHOWS STREET SIGN, UTILITY POLE, AND GUY
	WIRES IN SIDEWALK AT NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF PINEWOOD
	AND 23RD.

	-SIDEWALK EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR NORTHSIDE OF
	23RD ST.

	-ADJUST LOCATION OF FIRE HYDRANT AT NORTHWOOD AND
	PINEWOOD INTERSECTION SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT ENCROACH IN
	SIDEWALK AND HAS MORE CLEARANCE DISTANCE FROM
	STORMWATER UTILITY.

	-BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MUST BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE
	PROPERTY. CANNOT BE ONLY IN RIGHT OF WAY.

	-ENSURE FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOCATIONS ARE NFPA
	COMPLIANT.

	-ADD PROPOSED METER SIZING. IF METERS ARE 3 INCHES OR
	LARGER, THE SCALE FOOTPRINT IS LIKELY MUCH SMALLER THAN
	WHEN BUILT OUT AND WOULD CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED
	LOCATIONS.

	-LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS. SEE AT
	LEAST ONE MISSING LABELING.

	-FIRE HYDRANT AT BROADWAY AND 24TH MAY NOT MEET
	STANDARD DETAIL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS IF A TREE IS
	PLANTED NEAR IT.

	-SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINES, METER
	BOXES, METERS, SEWER LATERALS, BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES IN
	THE PROJECT AREA AND LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
	SEE MANY NOT SHOWN AND/OR LABELED.

	-BUILDING 3 FIRELINE CONFLICTS WITH A MONITORING WELL.

	-8 INCH FIRELINE: IS MISSING POINT OF SERVICE GATE
	VALVE; CONFLICTING WITH SOME KIND OF UTILITY BOX; IS IN
	MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK; DOES NOT HAVE PIPE DISTANCE
	MINIMIZED BETWEEN BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND WATER MAIN.

	-UTILITY PLAN SHOWS STREET SIGN IN PROPOSED PARKING
	SPOT AT BUILDING 2.

	-PROPOSE SEWER MANHOLE NEAR BUILDING 2 IS HALF IN
	STREET AND SIDEWALK MAKING MAINTENANCE MORE DIFFICULT.
	ALSO IF PRIVATE ADD TO LABEL.

	-TREE OR BUSH BLOCKING DRIVEWAY OF BUILDING 2 ON
	UTILITY PLAN.

	-THERE ARE SMALL CIRCULAR OBJECTS ON UTILITY PLAN NEAR
	PARKING SPOTS. IF THEY ARE BOLLARDS ADD TO LEGEND OR
	LABEL THEM.

	-WATER MAIN IN PINEWOOD IS OLDER AND MAY REQUIRE
	UPGRADE OR REPLACEMENT AS ADVISED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD
	AND/OR CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.

	-23RD ST IS ONE-WAY GOING WEST UNTIL PINEWOOD. MAKE
	SURE PLANS ACCOUNT FOR THE ONE-WAY DRIVING DIRECTION.

	-SHOW LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PADS WHEREVER
	OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITIES ARE BEING UNDERGROUNDED.

	-SHOW ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACHES AND LABEL ANY
	THAT ARE BEING REMOVED ON THE DEMO PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE,
	CANNOT TELL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE DRIVEWAY APPROACH
	AT 23RD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 701 23RD ST.

	-PLEASE MAKE SURE CURB TYPES ARE LABELED ON ALL SHEETS
	OF THE PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLANS.

	-REMOVAL, RELOCATION, OR ALTERATION OF CITY WPB METERED
	WATER SERVICES AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES IN PROJECT AREA
	WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM ASSOCIATED DEPARTMENT
	REPRESENTATIVES. THEY TYPICALLY REQUIRE PROJECT TO PAY
	ANY ASSOCIATED UTILITY BILLING CHARGES OR FEES.

	-ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY PLAN SHEETS.

	-EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES
	CROSSING RIGHT OF WAY.

	-PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE FOR ANY STRUCTURES
	OVER STREETS, AND ENSURE LARGE UTILITY VEHICLES SUCH AS
	VACUUM TRUCKS WILL HAVE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE.

	-ON DEMO PLAN LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE LARGE
	UTILITY POLES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING 1
	LOADING DRIVEWAY.

	-SOME OF THE VEHICLE MOVEMENTS AND SIGNAGE ARE NOT
	CLEAR FROM THE PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE, HOW WILL DRIVERS
	HEADING EAST ON 25TH KNOW NOT TO PULL INTO LOADING BAY
	FOR BUILDING 1. HOW WILL TRUCKS BACK UP INTO THAT BAY
	WITHOUT CREATING TRAFFIC PROBLEMS?

	-WATER UTILITIES ON 24TH ST BETWEEN PINEWOOD AND
	BROADWAY SHOULD BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED.

	-SHOW ALL GREASE TRAPS/INTERCEPTORS.

	-PROPOSED CURB DESIGN ON EAST SIDE OF PINEWOOD MAKES
	EXCAVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING WATER MAIN
	DIFFICULT.

	-ALLEY BETWEEN 24TH AND NORTHWOOD HAS OVERHEAD
	UTILITIES WITH POLES THAT LOOK TO CONFLICT WITH
	PROPOSED BUILDINGS.

	-BUILDING 6 METERED WATER SERVICE NEEDS UTILITY
	EASEMENT SHOWN AND LABELED. VERIFY AREA AROUND METER
	BOX WILL BE LANDSCAPING AND NOT HARDSCAPE.

	-BUILDING 5 METERED WATER SERVICE NEEDS A UTILITY
	EASEMENT IF ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. METER BOX SHOULD NOT
	BE IN HARDSCAPE. METER BOX AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD
	NOT BE IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK TRAFFIC.

	-THERE IS A LOT OF GAS UTILITIES BUT NOT SHOWING ON
	UTILITY PLANS. PLEASE SHOW ALL FRANCHISE AND DRY
	UTILITIES.

	-SEWER CLEANOUT FOR BUILDING 5 IS IN FRONT OF DOOR
	CREATING MAINTENANCE CONFLICT.

	-DID NOT SEE DEDICATED FIRELINES FOR BUILDINGS ON WEST
	SIDE OF PINEWOOD. ARE ANY NEEDED OR REQUIRED?

	-SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES FOR ALL UTILITY
	WORK INCLUDING 25TH ST AND 23RD ST. MAKE SURE THE
	BOUNDARIES COMPLY WITH DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS ON
	STANDARD DETAILS.

	-IS THE NEW CONNECTING ROAD BETWEEN NORTHWOOD AND 23RD
	INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE? ARE ANY EASEMENTS NEEDED FOR
	IT SINCE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY? VERIFY IT WILL BE
	PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.

	-SEWER MAINS IN ALLEYS MAY NEED RELOCATION AS ADVISED
	BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND/OR CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.

	-SEWER MAIN IS SHOWN ON UTILITY PLANS ON WEST SIDE OF
	BROADWAY IN PROPOSED SIDEWALK. LOCATION WOULD MAKE
	EXCAVATION AND MAINTENANCE DIFFICULT. SOME PROPOSED
	TREE PLANTER LOCATIONS ON TOP OF SEWER MAIN ALSO
	CONFLICT WITH MAINTENANCE AS WELL AS SOME CURBING AT A
	MANHOLE.

	-DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES TYPICALLY ARE NOT 3 INCH. 3
	INCH METERS HAVE 4 INCH DIP SERVICE PIPE SHOWN ON
	STANDARD DETAILS.

	-ADD ELEVATION INFO TO SEWER MANHOLE LABELS.

	COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB
	PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] :

	PLEASE REPLACE 24? WM ON PINEWOOD WITHIN LIMITS OF THE
	PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
	- PROVIDE PROFILE FROM TAP TO POINT OF SERVICE.
	-REVISE UTILITY NOTES TO REFLECT ?CITY OF WEST PALM
	BEACH? NOT PBCWUD/COUNTY.
	- NO 3? SERVICES ALLOWED. USE EITHER 2? OR 4? WITH A
	REDUCER.
	-ADD NOTE TO CUT AND CAP ABANDONED SERVICES AT THE
	MAIN.

	COMMENTS FROM BURT BAIRD, CITY OF WPB UTILITIES O&M
	SUPERINTENDENT, 561-822-2056, [email protected] :
	? PLEASE ENSURE ADDED FLOW CAN BE HANDLED AT LS# 23
	? KIMBERLY HORN MENTIONED AN ADDITIONAL FLOW OF 54000
	GALLONS ? SEE EMAILED DOCUMENT
	? THE COLLECTION SYSTEM AT THIS STATION EXPERIENCES
	HIGH AMOUNTS OF I&I. ANY PLANS ON THIS BEING ADDRESSED?
	? I&I PUTS THE PUMPS AT THIS STATION ON LONG RUN TIMES

	FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
	CONCERNS, THANKS.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-07-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	04-07-2022	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	04-07-2022	Time	13:27	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-07 13:28:19	FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.

	FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
	CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
	APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
	STANDARDS.


	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
	PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
	APPLICABLE.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF EACH BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
	TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
	LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.

	7A. PER NFPA 14

	6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
	NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
	HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.

	7B. PER NFPA 1

	18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
	18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
	THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
	BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
	APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	SECTION 18.4.

	PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
	FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
	POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
	APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
	CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
	AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
	SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
	AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
	PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.

	FOR ANY PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
	PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?

	7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
	COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
	ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
	PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.

	8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
	SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
	DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL ELEVATORS OVER 6 FLOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A
	REGION 7 KEYWAY SYSTEM.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.


	12. HIGH RISE EMERGENCY COMMAND ROOM

	THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
	CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
	THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:

	11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
	DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
	BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
	FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
	HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
	HOUR.

	11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
	10 FT (3050 MM).

	11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
	COMMAND CENTER.
	(1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
	(2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
	FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
	EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
	(4) WORK TABLE.
	(5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
	FOR THE BUILDING.
	11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
	OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
	COMMAND CENTER.
	(1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
	CONTROL UNIT.
	(2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
	(3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
	OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
	(4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
	SYSTEMS.
	(5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
	SIMULTANEOUSLY
	(6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
	PANELS
	(7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
	(8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
	TRANSFER FEATURES.
	(10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
	BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
	(11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL

	NFPA 101

	11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
	11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
	IN A
	LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
	11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
	FOLLOWING:
	(1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
	(2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
	SERVICE
	PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
	OF THIS
	CODE
	(3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
	PANELS
	(4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
	(5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
	(6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
	PROVIDED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
	(7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
	(8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
	SYSTEM
	(10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE
	PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
	11.8.8


	13. EMERGENCY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.

	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
	NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
	SYSTEMS.
	24.9.1 GENERAL.
	24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
	CAPABLE
	OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
	FREQUENCIES
	ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
	INSTALLED
	WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
	AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
	SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
	DEGRADE
	THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
	PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
	24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
	FOR
	APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
	SUCCESSFUL
	ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
	FOR THE
	PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
	BY
	THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
	STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
	PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
	ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
	NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
	PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
	BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
	A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
	PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
	SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
	561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
	DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.


	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.

	ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
	PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	15.HIGH RISE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH
	NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE
	PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:

	THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
	INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
	STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
	RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
	RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
	INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
	APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
	MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
	SYSTEM.

	ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
	INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.

	16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	11-10-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	11-10-2021	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	11-10-2021	Time	15:45	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-10 15:46:26	FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.

	FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT MAY NOT
	CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
	APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES AND
	STANDARDS.


	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
	PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
	APPLICABLE.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF EACH BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
	INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
	TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
	LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.

	7A. PER NFPA 14

	6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
	NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
	HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.

	7B. PER NFPA 1

	18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
	18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
	THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
	BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
	APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	SECTION 18.4.

	PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
	FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
	POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
	APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
	CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
	AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
	SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
	AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
	PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.

	FOR ANY PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
	PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?

	7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
	COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
	ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
	PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.

	8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
	SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
	DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL ELEVATORS OVER 6 FLOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A
	REGION 7 KEYWAY SYSTEM.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.


	12. HIGH RISE EMERGENCY COMMAND ROOM

	THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
	CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
	THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:

	11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
	DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
	BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
	FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
	HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
	HOUR.

	11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 200 FT2 (19 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
	10 FT (3050 MM).

	11.9.4 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE EMERGENCY
	COMMAND CENTER.
	(1) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
	(2) A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(3) SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
	FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
	EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
	(4) WORK TABLE.
	(5) IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
	FOR THE BUILDING.
	11.9.5 WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED, THE FOLLOWING DEVICES
	OR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY
	COMMAND CENTER.
	(1) THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
	CONTROL UNIT.
	(2) FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATOR UNIT.
	(3) ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION
	OF THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
	(4) STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR-HANDLING
	SYSTEMS.
	(5) CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
	SIMULTANEOUSLY
	(6) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
	PANELS
	(7) EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
	(8) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
	TRANSFER FEATURES.
	(10) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
	BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
	(11) CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL

	NFPA 101

	11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
	11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
	IN A
	LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
	11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
	FOLLOWING:
	(1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
	(2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
	SERVICE
	PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
	OF THIS
	CODE
	(3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
	PANELS
	(4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
	(5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
	(6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
	PROVIDED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
	(7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
	(8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
	SYSTEM
	(10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE
	PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
	11.8.8


	13. EMERGENCY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.

	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
	NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT
	SYSTEMS.
	24.9.1 GENERAL.
	24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM
	CAPABLE
	OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON
	FREQUENCIES
	ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE
	INSTALLED
	WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
	AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL
	SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT
	DEGRADE
	THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR
	PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.
	24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
	FOR
	APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF
	SUCCESSFUL
	ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED
	FOR THE
	PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED
	BY
	THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
	STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
	PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
	ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
	NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
	PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
	BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
	A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
	PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
	SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
	561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
	DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.


	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.

	ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
	PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	15.HIGH RISE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH
	NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE
	PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:

	THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
	INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
	STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
	RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
	RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
	INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
	APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
	MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
	SYSTEM.

	ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
	INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.

	16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	09-27-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	09-27-2022	Time	16:08	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	09-27-2022	Time	16:07	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	08-15-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	08-15-2022	Time	14:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	08-15-2022	Time	14:21	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-15 14:24:53	ITEM APPROVED BY HPB, MODIFICATIONS IN LINE WITH
	COMMENTS. HOWEVER, SHIFTING OF STRUCTURE ON NORTHWOOD
	ROAD AND DEMOLITION OF LOT 23 RESULTING IN VACANT
	LAND/THROUGH STREET REQUIRES UPDATED HPB APPROVAL.

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	11-18-2021	Time	09:50	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	11-18-2021	Time	09:49	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-18 09:56:06	TWO BUILDINGS OF OVERALL PROJECT EXTEND INTO NORTHWOOD
	ROAD HISTORIC DISTRICT. DOES NOT MEET DESIGN GUIDLEINES
	OR COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS IN MASSING, SIZE, SCALE OR
	ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. HAVE DISCUSSED WITH ARCHITECT
	AND TEAM AND THEY WILL REVISE ACCORDINGINGLY FOR A
	SMOOTHER TRANSITION AND FACADE TRAETMENT OF URBAN
	RETAIL SPACE AT GROUND FLOOR AND OVERALL. NEW
	CONSTRUCTION WILL NEED TO BE HARD AND APPROVED BY HPB,
	CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR 12/15/21.

	QUESTIONS, CONTACT:
	FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER
	(561) 822-1457 OR [email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	01-05-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	01-05-2023	Time	16:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	01-05-2023	Time	16:22	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-05 16:23:00	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE Z21080015
	JANUARY 5, 2023
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE
	REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
	BE RELOCATED.
	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	??? SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES AND PALMS THAT
	ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	??? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
	CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE.
	SHOW THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR PALMS BY
	CATEGORY (CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ
	FT.)
	??? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST
	HAVE EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION.
	EXAMPLE: TRIPLE ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE DUE.
	PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
	PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, PRIVATE OPEN AREAS AND
	URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEM FOR EACH PARCEL IN THE NMUD
	ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10%
	COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED.
	THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	SURFACE PARKING AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE.
	4/13/22 SHEET A103.0 COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL. SHEET L102 SHOWS SURFACE PARKING AREA
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET,
	INCLUDING 15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AND PROVIDE A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH AREA.

	5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
	PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS ARE
	PROPOSED, THEY MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE
	MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP IN THE TREES
	ADJACENT TO THE WEST OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE
	WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE FEC RAILROAD RIGHT
	OF WAY REQUIRES AT LEAST A 5 FOOT BUFFER STRIP PER
	SECTION 94-209 2. F. 1. E.

	THE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT
	DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED WIDTH.

	8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
	TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
	THEREOF AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH
	STREETSCAPE LENGTH. SHOW THE REQUIRED PLANTING STRIP.

	4/13/22 EACH BLOCK STREET SEGMENT MUST BE LISTED WITH
	THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AND THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED STREET TREES SHOWN. CANNOT
	COMBINE SEGMENTS. THE NUMBER IN SOME SEGMENTS DOES NOT
	MEET CODE. THE OVERALL INTENT IS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
	TREE CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL SEGMENTS.

	6/27/22 THE AREA ALONG 25TH STREET SHOWS A LONG GAP
	BETWEEN TREES WITH UTILITY VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANT.
	THIS NEEDS TO BE SPREAD OUT TO ALLOW TREES TO BE IN
	BETWEEN VALVES.
	STREET TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
	SEGMENT.

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON
	SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 C. 2. B. TO CURRENT
	CODE.


	10. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. CORRECT THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE
	AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 C. 3.
	TO CURRENT CODE. THE TREE PER 100 SQ FT REQUIREMENT WAS
	REMOVED.
	4/13/22 THERE ARE 4 TERMINAL ISLANDS REQUIRED FOR THE
	SURFACE PARKING AREA, CORRECT ON CHART.

	11. SATISFIED. AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN DOES NOT MEET THE
	DEFINITION OF TREE.

	12. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
	LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	TREES AND LANDSCAPING.

	FDC CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE BUILDING AND NOT
	BE IN THE STREETSCAPE.
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	STREETSCAPE AS THEY WILL RESTRICT THE ROOT SPACE
	AVAILABLE FOR THE STREET TREES.

	6/27/22 THERE ARE STILL CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER, FIRE
	AND SEWER LINES IN THE STREETSCAPE AND THE PLAZA IV
	OPEN SPACE.

	13. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
	SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.


	14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G). AFTER MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
	??? 2 INDICATE WHERE THE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED.
	??? 3A AND 3C ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLANT LIST.
	??? 5B AND 5D ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%, MUST REDUCE ONE
	CATEGORY
	??? 6B IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLAN SUBMITTED


	15. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.


	16. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. ALL SURFACE PARKING
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A.
	INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS
	AND SHADE TREES.
	MINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH IS NOT MET.
	17. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT
	SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING
	SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE
	THE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
	REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED
	LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
	SEE THE REFERENCED FIGURE TO PROVIDE THE EXHIBIT AND
	CORRECT CALCULATIONS.

	18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.

	19. SATISFIED. PORTIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY ON BROADWAY
	AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE SUBJECT
	TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHT OF WAY.

	4/13/22 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE RESPONSES
	AS DISCUSSED AT THE PPRC MEETING.
	8/4/22 RESPONSES WERE NOT SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED
	MATERIAL.
	9/30/22 PRELIMINARY LETTER NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/22:
	20. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE
	REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL MUST
	BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES AND
	TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.
	CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS MUST BE LISTED AT 20 FEET MINIMUM.

	21. SATISFIED. STAFF PREFERS THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO
	STREET TREES BE CHANGED TO GREEN BUTTONWOOD DUE TO ROOT
	ISSUES IN CONFINED AREAS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/27/22:
	22. SATISFIED. RESPONSES TO LANDSCAPE COMMENTS WERE NOT
	FOUND IN THE RESPONSE MEMO.

	23. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR
	STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS
	ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14
	FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD
	BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/30/22:

	24. SATISFIED. A CODE AMENDMENT IS PENDING REGARDING
	THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. IF THE
	AMENDMENT IS APPROVED, STAFF WILL NEED TO REVIEW THE
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEW CODE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENT 1/5/23:
	25. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN:
	??? A ROYAL POINCIANA IS MISSING FROM THE SURVEY AND
	THE TREE DISPOSITION. THE TREE IS LOCATED OPPOSITE TREE
	#22 ON THE EAST SIDE OF BROADWAY BETWEEN THE CURB AND
	SIDEWALK. CALCULATE MITIGATION IF TO BE REMOVED AND
	REVISE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. SUBMIT REVISED PLAN
	FOR THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT.

	??? TREE #13 THE MAHOGANY IS SHOWN WEST OF WHERE IT
	ACTUALLY EXISTS. LOCATION IS OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY
	SOUTH OF THE CONCRETE PAD.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.



	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE ROW ABANDONMENT
	Z21100023
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.


	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE VARIANCES Z21080018
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	10-03-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	10-03-2022	Time	09:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	10-03-2022	Time	09:48	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-03 09:49:17	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE DSI Z21080015
	SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE
	REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
	BE RELOCATED.
	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	??? SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES AND PALMS THAT
	ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	??? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
	CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE.
	SHOW THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR PALMS BY
	CATEGORY (CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ
	FT.)
	??? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST
	HAVE EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION.
	EXAMPLE: TRIPLE ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE DUE.
	PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
	PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, PRIVATE OPEN AREAS AND
	URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEM FOR EACH PARCEL IN THE NMUD
	ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10%
	COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED.
	THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	SURFACE PARKING AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE.
	4/13/22 SHEET A103.0 COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL. SHEET L102 SHOWS SURFACE PARKING AREA
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET,
	INCLUDING 15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AND PROVIDE A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH AREA.

	5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
	PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS ARE
	PROPOSED, THEY MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE
	MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP IN THE TREES
	ADJACENT TO THE WEST OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE
	WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE FEC RAILROAD RIGHT
	OF WAY REQUIRES AT LEAST A 5 FOOT BUFFER STRIP PER
	SECTION 94-209 2. F. 1. E.

	THE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT
	DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED WIDTH.

	8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
	TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
	THEREOF AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH
	STREETSCAPE LENGTH. SHOW THE REQUIRED PLANTING STRIP.

	4/13/22 EACH BLOCK STREET SEGMENT MUST BE LISTED WITH
	THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AND THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED STREET TREES SHOWN. CANNOT
	COMBINE SEGMENTS. THE NUMBER IN SOME SEGMENTS DOES NOT
	MEET CODE. THE OVERALL INTENT IS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
	TREE CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL SEGMENTS.

	6/27/22 THE AREA ALONG 25TH STREET SHOWS A LONG GAP
	BETWEEN TREES WITH UTILITY VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANT.
	THIS NEEDS TO BE SPREAD OUT TO ALLOW TREES TO BE IN
	BETWEEN VALVES.
	STREET TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
	SEGMENT.

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON
	SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 C. 2. B. TO CURRENT
	CODE.


	10. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. CORRECT THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE
	AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 C. 3.
	TO CURRENT CODE. THE TREE PER 100 SQ FT REQUIREMENT WAS
	REMOVED.
	4/13/22 THERE ARE 4 TERMINAL ISLANDS REQUIRED FOR THE
	SURFACE PARKING AREA, CORRECT ON CHART.

	11. SATISFIED. AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN DOES NOT MEET THE
	DEFINITION OF TREE.

	12. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
	LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	TREES AND LANDSCAPING.

	FDC CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE BUILDING AND NOT
	BE IN THE STREETSCAPE.
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	STREETSCAPE AS THEY WILL RESTRICT THE ROOT SPACE
	AVAILABLE FOR THE STREET TREES.

	6/27/22 THERE ARE STILL CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER, FIRE
	AND SEWER LINES IN THE STREETSCAPE AND THE PLAZA IV
	OPEN SPACE.

	13. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
	SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.


	14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G). AFTER MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
	??? 2 INDICATE WHERE THE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED.
	??? 3A AND 3C ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLANT LIST.
	??? 5B AND 5D ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%, MUST REDUCE ONE
	CATEGORY
	??? 6B IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLAN SUBMITTED


	15. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.


	16. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. ALL SURFACE PARKING
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A.
	INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS
	AND SHADE TREES.
	MINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH IS NOT MET.
	17. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT
	SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING
	SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE
	THE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
	REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED
	LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
	SEE THE REFERENCED FIGURE TO PROVIDE THE EXHIBIT AND
	CORRECT CALCULATIONS.

	18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.

	19. NOT SATISFIED. PORTIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY ON
	BROADWAY AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE
	SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE
	PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN
	THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	4/13/22 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE RESPONSES
	AS DISCUSSED AT THE PPRC MEETING.
	8/4/22 RESPONSES WERE NOT SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED
	MATERIAL.
	9/30/22 PRELIMINARY LETTER NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/22:
	20. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE
	REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL MUST
	BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES AND
	TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.
	CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS MUST BE LISTED AT 20 FEET MINIMUM.

	21. SATISFIED. STAFF PREFERS THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO
	STREET TREES BE CHANGED TO GREEN BUTTONWOOD DUE TO ROOT
	ISSUES IN CONFINED AREAS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/27/22:
	22. SATISFIED. RESPONSES TO LANDSCAPE COMMENTS WERE NOT
	FOUND IN THE RESPONSE MEMO.

	23. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR
	STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS
	ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14
	FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD
	BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/30/22:

	24. A CODE AMENDMENT IS PENDING REGARDING THE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. IF THE AMENDMENT IS
	APPROVED, STAFF WILL NEED TO REVIEW THE PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEW CODE.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.



	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE ROW ABANDONMENT
	Z21100023
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.


	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE VARIANCES Z21080018
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	08-04-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	08-04-2022	Time	16:00	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	08-04-2022	Time	16:00	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-04 16:01:09	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE DSI Z21080015
	AUGUST 4, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE
	REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
	BE RELOCATED.
	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	? SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES AND PALMS THAT
	ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
	CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE.
	SHOW THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR PALMS BY
	CATEGORY (CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ
	FT.)
	? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE
	EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. EXAMPLE:
	TRIPLE ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.
	? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE DUE.
	PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
	PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, PRIVATE OPEN AREAS AND
	URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEM FOR EACH PARCEL IN THE NMUD
	ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10%
	COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED.
	THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	SURFACE PARKING AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE.
	4/13/22 SHEET A103.0 COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL. SHEET L102 SHOWS SURFACE PARKING AREA
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET,
	INCLUDING 15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AND PROVIDE A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH AREA.

	5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
	PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS ARE
	PROPOSED, THEY MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE
	MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP IN THE TREES
	ADJACENT TO THE WEST OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE
	WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE FEC RAILROAD RIGHT
	OF WAY REQUIRES AT LEAST A 5 FOOT BUFFER STRIP PER
	SECTION 94-209 2. F. 1. E.

	THE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT
	DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED WIDTH.

	8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET
	TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION
	THEREOF AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH
	STREETSCAPE LENGTH. SHOW THE REQUIRED PLANTING STRIP.

	4/13/22 EACH BLOCK STREET SEGMENT MUST BE LISTED WITH
	THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AND THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED STREET TREES SHOWN. CANNOT
	COMBINE SEGMENTS. THE NUMBER IN SOME SEGMENTS DOES NOT
	MEET CODE. THE OVERALL INTENT IS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
	TREE CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL SEGMENTS.

	6/27/22 THE AREA ALONG 25TH STREET SHOWS A LONG GAP
	BETWEEN TREES WITH UTILITY VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANT.
	THIS NEEDS TO BE SPREAD OUT TO ALLOW TREES TO BE IN
	BETWEEN VALVES.
	STREET TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
	SEGMENT.

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON
	SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 C. 2. B. TO CURRENT
	CODE.


	10. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. CORRECT THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE
	AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 C. 3.
	TO CURRENT CODE. THE TREE PER 100 SQ FT REQUIREMENT WAS
	REMOVED.
	4/13/22 THERE ARE 4 TERMINAL ISLANDS REQUIRED FOR THE
	SURFACE PARKING AREA, CORRECT ON CHART.

	11. SATISFIED. AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN DOES NOT MEET THE
	DEFINITION OF TREE.

	12. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND
	SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY
	LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	TREES AND LANDSCAPING.

	FDC CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE BUILDING AND NOT
	BE IN THE STREETSCAPE.
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	STREETSCAPE AS THEY WILL RESTRICT THE ROOT SPACE
	AVAILABLE FOR THE STREET TREES.

	6/27/22 THERE ARE STILL CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER, FIRE
	AND SEWER LINES IN THE STREETSCAPE AND THE PLAZA IV
	OPEN SPACE.

	13. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
	SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.


	14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G). AFTER MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
	? 2 INDICATE WHERE THE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED.
	? 3A AND 3C ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLANT LIST.
	? 5B AND 5D ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%, MUST REDUCE ONE
	CATEGORY
	? 6B IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLAN SUBMITTED


	15. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.


	16. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. ALL SURFACE PARKING
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A.
	INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS
	AND SHADE TREES.
	MINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH IS NOT MET.
	17. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT
	SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING
	SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE
	THE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
	REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED
	LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
	SEE THE REFERENCED FIGURE TO PROVIDE THE EXHIBIT AND
	CORRECT CALCULATIONS.

	18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.

	19. NOT SATISFIED. PORTIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY ON
	BROADWAY AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE
	SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE
	PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN
	THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	4/13/22 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE RESPONSES
	AS DISCUSSED AT THE PPRC MEETING.
	8/4/22 RESPONSES WERE NOT SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED
	MATERIAL.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/22:
	20. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE
	REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL MUST
	BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES AND
	TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.
	CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS MUST BE LISTED AT 20 FEET MINIMUM.

	21. SATISFIED. STAFF PREFERS THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO
	STREET TREES BE CHANGED TO GREEN BUTTONWOOD DUE TO ROOT
	ISSUES IN CONFINED AREAS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/27/22:
	22. NOT SATISFIED. RESPONSES TO LANDSCAPE COMMENTS WERE
	NOT FOUND IN THE RESPONSE MEMO.

	23. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR
	STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS
	ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14
	FT AREA FOR EACH TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD
	BE PLANTING AREA AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.



	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE ROW ABANDONMENT
	Z21100023
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.


	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE VARIANCES Z21080018
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-27-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-27-2022	Time	12:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-27-2022	Time	12:36	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-27 12:37:37	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE DSI Z21080015
	JUNE 27, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE
	REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
	BE RELOCATED.
	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	? SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES AND PALMS THAT
	ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	? SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A
	CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE
	MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE
	ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
	DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION
	DUE.
	SHOW THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR PALMS BY
	CATEGORY (CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ
	FT.)
	? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE
	EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. EXAMPLE:
	TRIPLE ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.
	? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION
	SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
	PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, PRIVATE OPEN AREAS AND
	URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEM FOR EACH PARCEL IN THE NMUD
	ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10%
	COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED.
	THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	SURFACE PARKING AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE.
	4/13/22 SHEET A103.0 COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL. SHEET L102 SHOWS SURFACE PARKING AREA
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET,
	INCLUDING 15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AND PROVIDE A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH AREA.

	5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
	PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS ARE
	PROPOSED, THEY MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE
	MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED
	ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP IN THE TREES
	ADJACENT TO THE WEST OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE
	WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE FEC RAILROAD RIGHT
	OF WAY REQUIRES AT LEAST A 5 FOOT BUFFER STRIP PER
	SECTION 94-209 2. F. 1. E.

	THE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT
	DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED WIDTH.

	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
	REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
	OR PORTION THEREOF AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR
	EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH. SHOW THE REQUIRED PLANTING
	STRIP.

	4/13/22 EACH BLOCK STREET SEGMENT MUST BE LISTED WITH
	THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AND THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED STREET TREES SHOWN. CANNOT
	COMBINE SEGMENTS. THE NUMBER IN SOME SEGMENTS DOES NOT
	MEET CODE. THE OVERALL INTENT IS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
	TREE CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL SEGMENTS.

	6/27/22 THE AREA ALONG 25TH STREET SHOWS A LONG GAP
	BETWEEN TREES WITH UTILITY VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANT.
	THIS NEEDS TO BE SPREAD OUT TO ALLOW TREES TO BE IN
	BETWEEN VALVES.
	STREET TREES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
	SEGMENT.

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON
	SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 C. 2. B. TO CURRENT
	CODE.


	10. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. CORRECT THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE
	AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 C. 3.
	TO CURRENT CODE. THE TREE PER 100 SQ FT REQUIREMENT WAS
	REMOVED.
	4/13/22 THERE ARE 4 TERMINAL ISLANDS REQUIRED FOR THE
	SURFACE PARKING AREA, CORRECT ON CHART.

	11. SATISFIED. AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN DOES NOT MEET THE
	DEFINITION OF TREE.

	12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
	OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.

	FDC CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE BUILDING AND NOT
	BE IN THE STREETSCAPE.
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	STREETSCAPE AS THEY WILL RESTRICT THE ROOT SPACE
	AVAILABLE FOR THE STREET TREES.

	6/27/22 THERE ARE STILL CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER, FIRE
	AND SEWER LINES IN THE STREETSCAPE AND THE PLAZA IV
	OPEN SPACE.

	13. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
	SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.


	14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G). AFTER MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
	? 2 INDICATE WHERE THE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED.
	? 3A AND 3C ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLANT LIST.
	? 5B AND 5D ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%, MUST REDUCE ONE
	CATEGORY
	? 6B IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLAN SUBMITTED


	15. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.


	16. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. ALL SURFACE PARKING
	MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A.
	INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS
	AND SHADE TREES.
	MINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH IS NOT MET.
	17. SATISFIED. REMOVED FROM PLAN. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT
	SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING
	SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE
	THE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
	REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED
	LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
	SEE THE REFERENCED FIGURE TO PROVIDE THE EXHIBIT AND
	CORRECT CALCULATIONS.

	18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.

	19. NOT SATISFIED. PORTIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY ON
	BROADWAY AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE
	SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE
	PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN
	THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	4/13/22 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE RESPONSES
	AS DISCUSSED AT THE PPRC MEETING.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/22:
	20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE
	MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENT OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS,
	BUT ALL MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE
	SIGHTLINES AND TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND
	VEHICLES.
	CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS MUST BE LISTED AT 20 FEET MINIMUM.

	21. SATISFIED. STAFF PREFERS THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO
	STREET TREES BE CHANGED TO GREEN BUTTONWOOD DUE TO ROOT
	ISSUES IN CONFINED AREAS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/27/22:
	22. RESPONSES TO LANDSCAPE COMMENTS WERE NOT FOUND IN
	THE RESPONSE MEMO.

	23. SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR STRUCTURAL
	SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK/HARDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE
	STREET TREES. THIS SHOULD BE A 9 X 14 FT AREA FOR EACH
	TREE ADJACENT TO THE CURB THAT WOULD BE PLANTING AREA
	AND STRUCTURAL SOIL.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.



	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE ROW ABANDONMENT
	Z21100023
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.


	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE VARIANCES Z21080018
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-13-2022	Time	17:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-13-2022	Time	17:40	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-13 17:41:26	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE DSI Z21080015
	APRIL 13, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
	SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS
	SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD,
	MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS
	REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL
	FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS,
	SABAL PALMS, AND ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE
	REMOVED. NON NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO
	BE RELOCATED.
	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	? SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES AND PALMS THAT
	ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE
	REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE
	SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED
	BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
	CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY
	MITIGATION DUE.
	SHOW THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR PALMS BY
	CATEGORY (CATEGORY 3 IS 100 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ
	FT.)
	? SATISFIED. MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE
	EACH SINGLE TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. EXAMPLE:
	TRIPLE ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.
	? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE
	FOOTAGE DUE.
	PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
	PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.

	3. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND
	PROVIDED PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, PRIVATE OPEN AREAS AND
	URBAN GREENWAYS SYSTEM FOR EACH PARCEL IN THE NMUD
	ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10%
	COMMON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED.
	THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	SURFACE PARKING AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE.
	4/13/22 SHEET A103.0 COULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	SUBMITTAL. SHEET L102 SHOWS SURFACE PARKING AREA
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET,
	INCLUDING 15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AND PROVIDE A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH AREA.

	5. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE
	PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.

	6. SATISFIED. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS ARE
	PROPOSED, THEY MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE
	MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A ROAD OR STREET.

	7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE
	PROVIDED ALONG ALL BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP IN THE
	TREES ADJACENT TO THE WEST OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT.
	THE WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE FEC RAILROAD
	RIGHT OF WAY REQUIRES AT LEAST A 5 FOOT BUFFER STRIP
	PER SECTION 94-209 2. F. 1. E.

	THE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT
	DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED WIDTH.

	8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR
	REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET
	OR PORTION THEREOF AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR
	EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH. SHOW THE REQUIRED PLANTING
	STRIP.

	4/13/22 EACH BLOCK STREET SEGMENT MUST BE LISTED WITH
	THE TOTAL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AND THE
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED STREET TREES SHOWN. CANNOT
	COMBINE SEGMENTS. THE NUMBER IN SOME SEGMENTS DOES NOT
	MEET CODE. THE OVERALL INTENT IS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM
	TREE CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL SEGMENTS.

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON
	SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 C. 2. B. TO CURRENT
	CODE.


	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS
	CHART ON SHEET L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING
	TREE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 C. 3. TO CURRENT
	CODE. THE TREE PER 100 SQ FT REQUIREMENT WAS REMOVED.
	4/13/22 THERE ARE 4 TERMINAL ISLANDS REQUIRED FOR THE
	SURFACE PARKING AREA, CORRECT ON CHART.

	11. SATISFIED. AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN DOES NOT MEET THE
	DEFINITION OF TREE.

	12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS
	OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING.

	FDC CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE BUILDING AND NOT
	BE IN THE STREETSCAPE.
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE
	STREETSCAPE AS THEY WILL RESTRICT THE ROOT SPACE
	AVAILABLE FOR THE STREET TREES.

	13. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO
	SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.


	14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION
	94-443(G). AFTER MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
	? 2 INDICATE WHERE THE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED.
	? 3A AND 3C ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLANT LIST.
	? 5B AND 5D ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%, MUST REDUCE ONE
	CATEGORY
	? 6B IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLAN SUBMITTED


	15. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.


	16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING
	TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE
	TREES.
	MINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH IS NOT MET.
	17. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
	PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
	AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
	WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
	CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER
	TO FIGURE XIV-1. SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED LANDSCAPE
	SQUARE FOOTAGE.
	SEE THE REFERENCED FIGURE TO PROVIDE THE EXHIBIT AND
	CORRECT CALCULATIONS.

	18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT
	AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.

	19. NOT SATISFIED. PORTIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY ON
	BROADWAY AND 24TH STREET ARE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND ARE
	SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND PERMITTING BY FDOT. PROVIDE
	PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ANY STREETSCAPE PROPOSED WITHIN
	THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	4/13/22 THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE RESPONSES
	AS DISCUSSED AT THE PPRC MEETING.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/22:
	20. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENT
	OF 20 FEET ALONG MAIN ROADS, BUT ALL MUST BE OF
	SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO PROVIDE SAFE SIGHTLINES AND
	TRAFFIC CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES.

	21. STAFF PREFERS THAT THE GUMBO LIMBO STREET TREES BE
	CHANGED TO GREEN BUTTONWOOD DUE TO ROOT ISSUES IN
	CONFINED AREAS.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.



	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE ROW ABANDONMENT
	Z21100023
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.


	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE VARIANCES Z21080018
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-17-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	11-17-2021	Time	16:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	11-17-2021	Time	16:52	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-17 16:52:54	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE DSI Z21080015
	NOVEMBER 17, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND
	PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
	RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
	EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
	POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT RATING
	THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
	TREES AND PALMS. THERE ARE LIVE OAKS, SABAL PALMS, AND
	ROYAL PALMS THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. NON
	NATIVE TREES AND PALMS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE
	RELOCATED.
	2. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION LIST:
	? THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE
	MISIDENTIFIED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
	? ONLY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY
	DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER.
	TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS
	SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE.
	? MULTIPLE PALMS PLANTED TOGETHER MUST HAVE EACH SINGLE
	TRUNK COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION. EXAMPLE: TRIPLE
	ADONIDIA WOULD BE 3 X 50 SQ FT.
	? PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.
	? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED
	ON THE PLANT LIST.

	3. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
	PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC, PRIVATE OPEN AREAS AND URBAN
	GREENWAYS SYSTEM FOR EACH PARCEL IN THE NMUD ZONING
	DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. 10% COMMON
	PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED.
	THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,
	IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO
	BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE.
	SURFACE PARKING AREAS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED
	OPEN SPACE.

	4. SHOW THE ROOFTOP TERRACES AND INCLUDE HOW THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-210 P. 5. ARE MET, INCLUDING
	15% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AND PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN
	FOR EACH AREA.

	5. IDENTIFY RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS ON THE PLANT LIST
	AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.

	6. IF ANY ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS ARE PROPOSED, THEY MUST
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL
	AREAS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM
	A ROAD OR STREET.



	7. BUFFER TREES AND HEDGES MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL
	BUFFERS. THERE IS A LARGE GAP IN THE TREES ADJACENT TO
	THE WEST OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE WEST PROPERTY
	LINE ADJACENT TO THE FEC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY REQUIRES
	AT LEAST A 5 FOOT BUFFER STRIP PER SECTION 94-209 2. F.
	1. E.

	8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT
	MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF AND
	SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH.
	SHOW THE REQUIRED PLANTING STRIP.

	9. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET L1.01TO
	UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS OF
	SECTION 94-442 C. 2. B. TO CURRENT CODE.


	10. CORRECT THE CODE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET
	L1.01TO UPDATE THE SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 C. 3. TO CURRENT CODE.
	THE TREE PER 100 SQ FT REQUIREMENT WAS REMOVED.

	11. AUSTRALIAN TREE FERN DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION
	OF TREE.

	12. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER AND
	DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF
	BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO
	RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND
	LANDSCAPING.

	13. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE
	REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.


	14. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
	BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G).
	AFTER MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
	? 2 INDICATE WHERE THE AREAS ARE DESIGNATED.
	? 3A AND 3C ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLANT LIST.
	? 5B AND 5D ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%, MUST REDUCE ONE
	CATEGORY
	? 6B IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE PLAN SUBMITTED


	15. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
	SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
	ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
	SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
	SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
	WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
	LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE
	PLANT LIST.


	16. ALL SURFACE PARKING MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
	SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE
	ISLANDS, INTERIOR ISLANDS AND SHADE TREES.
	17. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
	CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
	PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
	(C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN THE
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART. REFER TO FIGURE XIV-1.
	SHOW THE ACTUAL PROVIDED LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE.

	18. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES AND SHOW LOCATIONS FOR ALL
	GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT
	ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.



	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE ROW ABANDONMENT
	Z21100023
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.


	PROJECT: NORTHWOOD ANCHOR SITE VARIANCES Z21080018
	NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	10-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	10-13-2022	Time	16:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	10-13-2022	Time	16:11	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	08-31-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	08-31-2022	Time	15:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	10-13-2022	Time	16:10	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-31 15:39:00
	-ON 24TH ST. EXTEND THE PROPOSED SANITARY SYSTEM TO THE
	WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (THE
	SPRUCE AKA THE PROPER).
	-EXTEND THE FORCE MAIN ON BROADWAY TO THE CONNECTION
	POINT ON 26TH ST. AND TO UPSIZE THE PROPOSED FROM 14?
	TO 20?. THE CITY EXPECTS TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS THIS
	WORK.
	-EXTEND THE SANITARY SEWER ON 23RD STREET WESTWARD 100
	LINEAR FEET TOWARD PINEWOOD AVE.
	-IN THE ALLEY NORTH OF NORTHWOOD RD., REMOVE THE
	SANITARY SEWER FROM UNDER BUILDING OVERHANG AND INSTALL
	A TERMINAL MANHOLE.
	-DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ON 23RD STREET BETWEEN BROADWAY AVE
	AND PINEWOOD AVE AND ON BROADWAY AVE SOUTH OF NORTHWOOD
	ROAD ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER.

	CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW [email protected] WITH ANY
	QUESTIONS

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	06-27-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	06-27-2022	Time	14:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	06-27-2022	Time	14:05	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-27 14:06:54	-SHOW PINEWOOD ROW AS PRIVATE AND THE PROPOSED GRAVITY
	SEWER POINT OF CONNECTION ON 24TH ST.
	-CALL FOR THE GRAVITY MAIN ON 23RD ST TO BE
	BACK-PITCHED AND REVERSE FLOW DIRECTION INTO THE
	EXISTING SYSTEM.
	-THERE IS NO NEED TO EXTEND THE GRAVITY MAIN ON
	BROADWAY/CANNOT CONNECT INTO ALLEY OFF BROADWAY.
	-REMOVE BACKFLOWS FROM THE ROW.
	-NO 3? SERVICES. UPSIZE OR DOWNSIZE.
	-THE EXISTING FPL DUCT BANK NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED TO
	PROVIDE SPACING FOR PROPOSED UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROAD
	ROW. PROPOSED UTILITIES SHOULD NOT BE RUNNING UNDER THE
	CURB.
	-THE CITY IS EVALUATING REQUIRED UPSIZING FOR PROPOSED
	UTILITIES AND WILL NEED TO LOOK AT FLOWS FOR PIPE
	SIZING/LIFT STATION.
	-SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES.


	CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW [email protected] 561-494-1047

Review Stop	PU			PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mtechnow			Date	04-13-2022	Time	15:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mtechnow			Date	04-13-2022	Time	15:15	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-13 15:15:38	-CORRECT PIPE DIMENSIONS ON PINEWOOD. THERE IS AN
	EXISTING 8? WM.
	-UPSIZE THE 6? WM ON 25TH ST. (SMALL STRETCH OF PIPE)
	-THE EXISTING BUSINESSES ON 23RD ST ARE SENDING FLOW TO
	THE SANITARY SYSTEM. THE ONLY WAY THE SANITARY SYSTEM
	CAN BE PRIVATE IS IF FLOW FROM THESE PROPERTIES IS
	DIVERTED.
	-WILL NEED TO UPSIZE THE SANITARY SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM DUE
	TO ADDITIONAL IMPACTS ON THE SYSTEM. THE EXISTING
	SYSTEM HAS THE GRAVITY SEWER BEHIND THE PROPERTIES ON
	25TH, THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE WITHIN THE
	25TH ST ROW.
	-WILL NEED TO SEE ALL THE EXISTING DRY UTILITIES TO
	FINALIZE THE PROPOSED CITY OWNED UTILITIES.
	-SHOW THE EXISTING 14? CAS FM ON PINEWOOD AND PROVIDE A
	PLAN TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR O&M OR PROPOSE THE MAIN BE
	RELOCATED. IT CANNOT HAVE A BUILDING ON TOP OF IT.
	-IS THE WATER MAIN PRIVATE AND ARE YOU PROPOSING A
	MASTER METER?

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	09-26-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	09-26-2022	Time	08:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	07-29-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	07-29-2022	Time	08:26	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-07-29 08:26:38	PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:

	-SEE IF CAN ADJUST NORTHWEST PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL
	SLIGHTLY TO THE EAST TO ELIMINATE EXTRA ROOT BARRIER AT
	TREE TRUNK.
	-AT BOTTOM OF L1.00 THERE IS A LEADER LINE WITH NO
	LABEL. ADD LABEL AND VERIFY OBJECT DOES NOT CONFLICT
	WITH PROPOSED METERED WATER SERVICE THERE.
	-IN PRIOR REVISIONS OF CIVIL PLANS THERE WAS A SEPARATE
	8 INCH FIRELINE WITH DCDA FOR THE NORTHWEST BUILDING,
	BUT CURRENT REVISION DOES NOT SHOW IT ANYMORE. PLEASE
	PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON WHY IT IS NOT THERE
	ANYMORE.
	-METERS 2 INCHES AND SMALLER ARE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND
	IN A METER BOX. CAN UPDATE CIVIL PLANS AT ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
	-AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE PROFILES
	FOR FIRELINES; UPDATE VALVE AND REDUCER ON C3.04 SO NOT
	IN CROSSWALK AND PROPERLY LABELED.
	-LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS PLANTS OVER NORTHEAST FPL VAULT.
	-L2.00 SHOWS AT LEAST A COUPLE PROPOSED BIKE RACKS ON
	TOP OF FPL VAULTS. RECOMMEND SHOWING FPL VAULTS IN
	BACKGROUND OF L2.00.

	RESPECTFULLY,
	MARK HURLEY
	[email protected]

Review Stop	PU-CS			PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	07-27-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	mhurley			Date	07-27-2022	Time	07:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mhurley			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-07-27 07:39:00	CIVIL PLANS DID NOT APPEAR TO BE UPDATED REVISION.
	PLEASE SUBMIT MOST UPDATED REVISION OF CIVIL PLANS WITH
	ANY CHANGES THAT WERE NOTED IN RESPONSE LETTER, SO CAN
	PROPERLY REVIEW.

Review Stop	PU-CS		PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	10-05-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	10-05-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	10-05-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-05 15:44:46	1- PLEASE PROVIDE CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE FOR THE SOLID
	WASTE.
	2- PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER AT THE LOADING
	ZONE, WHERE THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED
	AND THE BULK WASTE GET PICKED UP.


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	07-29-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-29-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	07-29-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-29 10:03:21	1- PLEASE PROVIDE CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE FOR THE SOLID
	WASTE.
	2- PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER AT THE LOADING
	ZONE, WHERE THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED
	AND THE BULK WASTE GET PICKED UP.
	3- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-29-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	06-29-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	06-29-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-29 13:56:13
	1- PLEASE PROVIDE CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE FOR THE SOLID
	WASTE
	2- PLEASE PROVIDE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER AT THE LOADING
	ZONE, WHERE THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED
	AND THE BULK WASTE GET PICKED UP.
	3- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).
	4- ALL THE PARKING STALL PAINTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	CITY`S MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 94-485 AND FLORIDA
	STATUES [553.5041 F.S.].
	5- ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE M.U.T.C.D.
	LATEST EDITION.
	6- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNING DAMAGED DURING
	CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-14-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	04-14-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	04-14-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-14 11:16:49
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. DETAILS FOR SANITATION
	SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION
	LOCATION, ETC.). FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER
	ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST
	REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
	CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. (LINK TO
	THE LATEST REVISION OF THE GC-7 DOCUMENT: HTTPS://WWW.W
	PB.ORG/HOME/SHOWPUBLISHEDDOCUMENT/3690/6376290604221000
	00)
	2- OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE
	GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE
	TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND
	NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW.

	3- IN CASE OF PROPOSING ADDITION OF ANY NEW CAN(S) IN
	THE CITY`S RIGHT-OF-WAY , THE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
	THE CAN(S) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PUBLIC
	WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE CAN(S) SHALL BE TYPE, SIZE AND
	COLOR APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDING
	MAINTENANCE IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND SERVICE THE
	CAN(S).

	4- PLEASE ALSO RELOCATE THE LOCATION/ORIENTATION OF THE
	ENCLOSURES TO ALLOW OUR SANITATION FRONT LOAD
	COLLECTION VEHICLE SAFELY ACCESS AND SERVICE THE
	CONTAINER(S) WHILE MINIMIZING/AVOIDING ANY BACK UP
	MOVEMENTS AND SHORT RADIUS TURNS.

	5- BULK ITEMS WILL BE COLLECTED BY A CLAM TRUCK, FOR
	WHICH THE ENCLOSURE SHOULD NOT HAVE A STOP BAR AND
	GATES SHOULD BE COMPLETELY OPEN TO MITIGATE ANY CHANCES
	OF DAMAGE WHILE BEING SERVICED.

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	11-18-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	11-18-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-18 06:58:52
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND
	QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)
	THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE
	SANITATION SERVICE.
	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).
	3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S
	WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
	TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- DUAL AXLES
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
	4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
	RECYCLING CONTAINERS


	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	10-11-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	10-04-2022	Time	10:46	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	10-11-2022	Time	09:06	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-04 10:55:49	STORM #4 WAS GIVEN A PASS WITH SITE PLAN CONDITIONS
	LISTED AT THE BOTTOM OF THESE NOTES.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	9/22/22 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
	NOT INCLUDED.

	1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ALL THE STREETS ON ALL
	OF THE SHEETS. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET C1.01 ONLY LABELS
	PINEWOOD AVE. NONE OF THE EAST-WEST STREETS ARE
	LABELED. NEW COMMENT - ON SHEET C3.01 LABEL PINEWOOD
	AVE NORTH AND SOUTH OF 25TH ST.

	13. [SATISFIED] REVISE THE PARKING SPACE STRIPING
	DETAIL TO MATCH CITY CODE.

	16. [SATISFIED ??? SEE NEW COMMENTS ON THE 9/22/2022
	SUBMITTAL] RCP PIPE (MINIMUM 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER) TO
	BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. NEW COMMENT: NOT
	ALL PIPES ARE LABELED. PROPOSED STORM PIPES ON 25TH ST
	AT BROADWAY, ON BROADWAY AVE AT 24TH ST., BROADWAY AT
	NORTHWOOD RD LABELED AS 18" HDPE.

	NEW COMMENTS (5/27/2022 SUBMITTAL):

	17. [SATISFIED] INDICATE HOW THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN
	ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD ST EAST OF PINEWOOD DRIVE
	WILL CONNECT TO THE MS4.

	18. [NOT SATISFIED ??? TO BE PROVIDED AND REVIEWED WITH
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE PRE- AND
	POST-DEVELOPMENT HGL CALCULATIONS FOR THE DRAINAGE
	SYSTEM ON BROADWAY AND 23RD STREET WITH THE ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	19. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW DESIGN PLANS IN SFWMD
	PERMITS FOR 24TH ST AND 25TH ST AND OTHER PROJECTS IN
	THE VICINITY FOR STORM PIPE CONNECTIVITY. THE INLET ON
	THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH ST EAST OF BROADWAY MAY BE
	CONNECTED TO A MANHOLE SOUTH OF THE STRUCTURE INSTEAD
	OF THE MANHOLE ON BROADWAY AVE. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
	THE AS-BUILT PICTURE PROVIDED IN THE 7/15/22 RESPONSE
	LETTER SHOWS THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM BEFORE CORNER BULBOUTS
	WERE CONSTRUCTED ON 24TH STREET ABOUT 12 YEARS AGO. THE
	AFOREMENTIONED MH IS VISIBLE IN THE APRIL 2011 AND
	APRIL 2015 GOOGLE MAP STREETVIEWS.

	20. [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
	ADDITIONAL GRADES WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE ENGINEERING
	PERMIT SUBMITTAL. NOTE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES WERE
	REMOVED ON THE 9/22/22 SET.

	21. [NOT SATISFIED ??? PROPOSED SPOT GRADES WERE
	REMOVED FROM THE PGD PLANS BUT THE CROSS SECTIONS
	APPEAR TO SHOW SIDEWALK AND PARKING SPACE CROSS SLOPES
	OF 4% OR STEEPER, WHICH EXCEEDS THE 2% MAX SHOWN ON THE
	CROSS SECTIONS.] THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND SPOT
	GRADES ON THE PGD PLANS PROVIDED WHERE THE CROSS
	SECTION SYMBOLS ARE WILL RESULT IN CROSS SLOPES STEEPER
	THAN THE MAX. 2% SHOWN ON THE CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE
	PARKING AREA AND ALLOWED FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA.

	22. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] WILL THERE BE PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD STREET AT THE PINEWOOD
	AND BROADWAY INTERSECTIONS? SHOW CROSS WALKS AND CURB
	RAMPS. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - SHOW CURB RAMP AND
	PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SIGN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD ST
	EAST OF PINEWOOD AVE SHOW NEW CURB RAMP ON SOUTH SIDE
	OF 23RD STREET AT THE BROADWAY AVE. CROSSWALK. MAKE
	SURE THE CRUB RAMP DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE EXISTING
	DRIVEWAY APRON OR FLARES.

	23. [SATISFIED ??? WILL BE CONFIRMED WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] ALL CURB RAMPS WILL NEED
	TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CURRENT ADA STANDARDS IF THE
	PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO THE CURB RAMP IS DISTURBED OR
	OVERLAID.

	24. [SATISFIED] ADA MATS MAY BE NEEDED WHERE THE
	SIDEWALKS MEET DRIVEWAYS FOR THE GARAGES OR ALLEYS.

	25. SHEET C3.05:
	A. [SATISFIED] BUILDING A (NORTHWEST) SERVICE -
	1. CONFIRM PROPOSED 3" WATER SERVICE WILL CROSS AN 8"
	PVC SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
	2. CONFIRM TAP IS TO A 24" WM.

	B. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE SHEET C2.02 CALLS OUT STORM PIPE
	AS HDPE] BUILDING A (NORTHEAST) SERVICE - SHOW THE
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH.

	C. [SATISFIED] BUILDING A (SOUTHWEST) SERVICE - CONFIRM
	THE WATER SERVICE WILL CROSS 15" RCP STORM AND 8" PVC
	SEWER.

	D. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? SHOW 14??? FM. CONFIRM 8???
	SSWR] BUILDING B SERVICE - SHOW PROPOSED STORM PIPE
	BETWEEN EXISTING INLETS.

	E. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHEET C2.02 LABELS PIPE AS 18
	INCH HDPE] BUILDING A (SOUTHEAST) SERVICE -
	2. CONFIRM RCP STORM VS. HDPE STORM.

	26. [SATISFIED] SHOW BREAKS IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH
	IF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE LINES WILL CROSS IN THE
	ENVELOPE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.

	27. [NOT SATISFIED ??? WILL PROVIDE WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE
	CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
	SUBMITTAL.

	28. [SATISFIED] SECTION B-B - LEFT SIDE OF SECTION IS
	LABELED AS 18.4 FEET LANDSCAPING. WILL THERE BE A
	CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET?

	29. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E - CONFIRM 2.5 FEET
	DIMENSION FOR THE TYPE 'F' CURB. SUM OF DIMENSIONS
	ACROSS RIGHT OF WAY IS LESS THAN 75 FEET.

	30. [SATISFIED] SECTION H-H - CONFIRM 2.5 FEET
	DIMENSION FOR THE TYPE 'F' CURB. SUM OF DIMENSIONS
	ACROSS RIGHT OF WAY IS MORE THAN 55 FEET.

	NEW COMMENTS (9/22/2022 SUBMITTAL)

	31. MOVE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OUT OF THE 25TH ST.
	R/W ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.

	32. CALLOUT AND NUMBER THE NEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON
	THE SW CORNER OF 25TH ST AND PINEWOOD AVE AND THE PIPE
	CONNECTION TO STRUCTURE EX-1.

	33. NUMBER THE MANHOLE STORM STRUCTURE LOCATED BETWEEN
	ST-15 AND ST-14 AND NUMBER THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
	STRUCTURE EAST OF THIS MANHOLE AND LABEL THE STORM PIPE
	BETWEEN THESE UNNUMBERED STRUCTURES ON THE WEST SIDE OF
	BROADWAY AVE NORTH OF 24TH ST.

	34. NUMBER THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO THE
	SOUTHWEST OF MH EX-3 AND LABEL THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN
	THESE TWO STRUCTURES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF 24TH ST
	AND BROADWAY AVE.

	35. NUMBER THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO THE
	NORTHWEST OF MANHOLE EX-4 AND LABEL THE STORM PIPE
	BETWEEN THESE STRUCTURES IN THE INTERSECTION OF
	NORTHWOOD ROAD AND BROADWAY AVE.

	36. NUMBER THE EXISTING MANHOLE TO THE EAST OF MANHOLE
	EX-4 ON NORTHWOOD ROAD.

	37. THE PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
	WERE REVIEWED TO SEE THE ASSUME WIDTH OF 5 FEET FOR THE
	PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH. THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES
	ALONG BROADWAY AVE BETWEEN ST-34 AND ST-35 AND BETWEEN
	ST-36 AND ST-37 ONLY MEASURE 3 FEET IN WIDTH.

	38. STRUCTURE EX-3 ON BROADWAY AT 24TH ST MAY NEED TO
	BE REPLACED WITH A LARGER STRUCTURE IN ORDER TO CONNECT
	NEW STORM PIPES TO THE STRUCTURE.

	39. STORM PIPE SOUTH OF STRUCTURE ST-14 LABELED (TWICE)
	AS 14 LF 18??? HDPE 1 LF EXFILTRATION TRENCH. THIS
	COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
	SUBMITTAL.

	40. ON THE PGD PLANS, SHOW EXISTING DRIVEWAY FOR 940
	NORTHWOOD ROAD AND THE DRIVEWAYS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
	23RD STREET SO THAT THE PROPOSED BULBOUT FOR THE
	ONE-WAY PORTION OF THE STREET WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH
	THE DRIVEWAYS.

	41. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR A VALLEY GUTTER INLET AND HOW
	THE DROP CURB WILL TRANSITION TO THE VALLEY GUTTER TOP.

	*******************************************************
	*****************************
	*******************************************************
	*****************************
	CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL (THESE CAN BE
	ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):

	- LABEL ALL THE STREETS ON ALL OF THE PLANS (COMMENT
	#1)

	- PROVIDE PRE- AND POST-DEVELOPMENT HGL CALCULATIONS
	FOR THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM BROADWAY AVE/26TH ST OR
	BROADWAY AVE/25TH ST TO PINEWOOD AVE/23RD ST. (COMMENT
	#18)

	- REVISE STORM PIPE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE INLET ON THE
	SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH ST EAST OF BROADWAY AVE TO THE
	MANHOLE IN THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AVE AND 24TH
	ST. (COMMENT #19)

	- PROVIDE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ON THE PGD PLANS.
	SIDEWALK AND PARKING SPACE CROSS SLOPES ARE NOT TO
	EXCEED 2%. (COMMENTS #20 AND #21)

	- SHOW EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD
	STREET. SHOW CURB RAMPS THAT DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE
	DRIVEWAY APRONS OR DRIVEWAY FLARES. SHOW THAT THE
	PROPOSED BULBOUT EAST OF THE BROADWAY AVE EXTENSION
	WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE DRIVEWAYS.(COMMENTS #22 AND
	#40)

	- ALL CURB RAMPS WHERE THE ADJACENT PAVEMENT IS
	DISTURBED OR OVERLAID WILL NEED TO BE BROUGHT UP TO
	CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. (COMMENT #23)

	- UTILITY PROFILES (SHEET C3.05) TO SHOW AND LABEL ALL
	EXISTING (THAT WILL REMAIN) AND PROPOSED UTILITIES THAT
	THE WATER SERVICES WILL BE CROSSING. COORDINATE PIPE
	CALLOUTS WITH THE PGD AND UTILITY PLANS. (COMMENT #25)

	- PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURES.
	(COMMENT #27)

	- MOVE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OUT OF THE R/W.
	(COMMENTS #31)

	- CALLOUT AND NUMBER ALL OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND STORM PIPES WITHIN THE
	CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. (COMMENTS #32 TO #36)

	- LABEL THE WIDTH OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON THE
	PDG PLANS (COMMENTS #37 AND #39)

	- CONFIRM EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DO NOT NEED TO
	BE REPLACED FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE
	STRUCTURES (COMMENT #38)

	- PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR A VALLEY GUTTER INLET AND HOW
	THE DROP CURB WILL TRANSITION TO THE VALLEY GUTTER TOP.
	(COMMENT #41)

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	07-01-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	07-01-2022	Time	14:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	07-01-2022	Time	14:14	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-01 14:13:24	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	5/27/2022 SUBMITTAL.

	1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ALL THE STREETS ON ALL
	OF THE SHEETS. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET C1.01 ONLY LABELS
	PINEWOOD AVE. NONE OF THE EAST-WEST STREETS ARE
	LABELED. NEW COMMENT ? ON SHEET C3.01 LABEL PINEWOOD
	AVE NORTH AND SOUTH OF 25TH ST.

	2. [SATISFIED] COMPLETE THE PAVING, GRADING AND
	DRAINAGE NOTES ON THE PGD PLAN SHEETS. SOME OF THE
	NOTES DO NOT AGREE WITH THE VERTICAL DATUM LABEL AT THE
	BOTTOM OF THE SHEETS.

	3. [SATISFIED - EXFILTRATION TRENCH ON THE EAST SIDE OF
	BROADWAY AVE SHOULD BE SET BACK FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY
	TO ENSURE THE TRENCH DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THE RIGHT
	OF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.] EXFILTRATION TRENCH FOR
	TREATING RUNOFF FROM ONSITE AREAS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED
	WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	4. [SATISFIED] ON SHEET C2.03 THERE IS A NEW DRAINAGE
	STRUCTURE ON THE EAST SIDE OF PINEWOOD AVE ABOUT 40
	FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF NORTHWOOD ROAD. THIS
	INLET IS SHOWN NEXT TO AN EXISTING INLET THAT IS BEING
	CONVERTED TO A VALLEY GUTTER INLET. IS THE NEW INLET
	NEEDED?

	5. [SATISFIED] WHAT WILL BE THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF
	THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES?

	6. [SATISFIED - REVIEW SECTION F-F] LABEL THE PARKING
	AREAS ON THE CROSS SECTIONS.

	7. [SATISFIED] ADVISE IF THE WEST DROP CURB ON PINEWOOD
	AVE WILL BE PARALLEL TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY. THE 9.0
	FT DIMENSION ON SECTION B-B DOES NOT APPEAR TO REACH
	THE 2 FEET DROP CURB.

	8. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2
	PERCENT.

	9. [SATISFIED] THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING AREAS ON
	SECTION D-D AND SECTION E-E (FOR BROADWAY AVE) APPEAR
	TO INCLUDE THE TYPE 'D' CURB.

	10. [SATISFIED] EXTEND SECTION F-F TO THE PARKING LOT
	ON THE WEST SIDE OF PINEWOOD AVE. DIMENSION THE
	SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER, TRAVEL LANES AND PARKING
	AREA.

	11. [SATISFIED] DIMENSION MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS ON
	THE CROSS SECTIONS.

	12. [SATISFIED - SHOW CROSS SECTION SYMBOL ON SHEET
	C2.04] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF BROADWAY AVE SOUTH OF
	NORTHWOOD ROAD. EXTEND SECTION FROM FACE OF BUILDING TO
	FACE OF BUILDING. DIMENSION SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER,
	PARKING AREAS, TRAVEL LANES, SETBACKS FROM R/W, ETC.

	13. [NOT SATISFIED - INCLUDE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL
	WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] REVISE THE
	PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL TO MATCH CITY CODE.

	14. [SATISFIED] THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
	BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.

	15. [SATISFIED - CAN HATCHING OR BOLD BORDER BE ADDED
	ON SHEET C1.00 SHOWING THE ROWS TO BE ABANDONED?] LABEL
	RIGHT OF WAYS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED ON THE PLAN
	SHEETS.

	16. [NOT SATISFIED] RCP PIPE (MINIMUM 15 INCHES IN
	DIAMETER) TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. NEW
	COMMENT ? NOT ALL PIPES ARE LABELED. PROPOSED STORM
	PIPES ON 25TH ST AT BROADWAY, ON BROADWAY AVE AT 24TH
	ST., BROADWAY AT NORTHWOOD RD LABELED AS 18" HDPE.

	NEW COMMENTS:

	17. INDICATE HOW THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON THE SOUTH
	SIDE OF 23RD ST EAST OF PINEWOOD DRIVE WILL CONNECT TO
	THE MS4.

	18. PROVIDE PRE- AND POST-DEVELOPMENT HGL CALCULATIONS
	FOR THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON BROADWAY AND 23RD STREET
	WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	19. REVIEW DESIGN PLANS IN SFWMD PERMITS FOR 24TH ST
	AND 25TH ST AND OTHER PROJECTS IN THE VICINITY FOR
	STORM PIPE CONNECTIVITY. THE INLET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
	24TH ST EAST OF BROADWAY MAY BE CONNECTED TO A MANHOLE
	SOUTH OF THE STRUCTURE INSTEAD OF THE MANHOLE ON
	BROADWAY AVE.

	20. ADDITIONAL GRADES WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	21. THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND SPOT GRADES ON
	THE PGD PLANS PROVIDED WHERE THE CROSS SECTION SYMBOLS
	ARE WILL RESULT IN CROSS SLOPES STEEPER THAN THE MAX.
	2% SHOWN ON THE CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE PARKING AREA AND
	ALLOWED FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA.

	22. WILL THERE BE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SOUTH SIDE
	OF 23RD STREET AT THE PINEWOOD AND BROADWAY
	INTERSECTIONS? SHOW CROSS WALKS AND CURB RAMPS.

	23. ALL CURB RAMPS WILL NEED TO BE BROUGHT UP TO
	CURRENT ADA STANDARDS IF THE PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO THE
	CURB RAMP IS DISTURBED OR OVERLAID.

	24. ADA MATS MAY BE NEEDED WHERE THE SIDEWALKS MEET
	DRIVEWAYS FOR THE GARAGES OR ALLEYS.

	25. SHEET C3.05:
	A. BUILDING A (NORTHWEST) SERVICE -
	1. CONFIRM PROPOSED 3" WATER SERVICE WILL CROSS AN 8"
	PVC SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
	2. CONFIRM TAP IS TO A 24" WM.

	B. BUILDING A (NORTHEAST) SERVICE - SHOW THE
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH.

	C. BUILDING A (SOUTHWEST) SERVICE - CONFIRM THE WATER
	SERVICE WILL CROSS 15" RCP STORM AND 8" PVC SEWER.

	D. BUILDING B SERVICE - SHOW PROPOSED STORM PIPE
	BETWEEN EXISTING INLETS.

	E. BUILDING A (SOUTHWEST) SERVICE -
	1. SHOULD BE LABELED SOUTHEAST?
	2. CONFIRM RCP STORM VS. HDPE STORM.

	26. SHOW BREAKS IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH IF WATER OR
	SEWER SERVICE LINES WILL CROSS IN THE ENVELOPE OF THE
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH.

	27. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	28. SECTION B-B - LEFT SIDE OF SECTION IS LABELED AS
	18.4 FEET LANDSCAPING. WILL THERE BE A CONTINUOUS
	SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET?

	29. SECTION E-E - CONFIRM 2.5 FEET DIMENSION FOR THE
	TYPE 'F' CURB. SUM OF DIMENSIONS ACROSS RIGHT OF WAY IS
	LESS THAN 75 FEET.

	30. SECTION H-H - CONFIRM 2.5 FEET DIMENSION FOR THE
	TYPE 'F' CURB. SUM OF DIMENSIONS ACROSS RIGHT OF WAY IS
	MORE THAN 55 FEET.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-14-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	04-14-2022	Time	12:00	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	04-14-2022	Time	12:02	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-14 12:02:10	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:


	1. LABEL ALL THE STREETS ON ALL OF THE SHEETS. FOR
	EXAMPLE, SHEET C1.01 ONLY LABELS PINEWOOD AVE. NONE OF
	THE EAST-WEST STREETS ARE LABELED.

	2. COMPLETE THE PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES ON
	THE PGD PLAN SHEETS. SOME OF THE NOTES DO NOT AGREE
	WITH THE VERTICAL DATUM LABEL AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
	SHEETS.

	3. EXFILTRATION TRENCH FOR TREATING RUNOFF FROM ONSITE
	AREAS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	4. ON SHEET C2.03 THERE IS A NEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON
	THE EAST SIDE OF PINEWOOD AVE ABOUT 40 FEET NORTH OF
	THE CENTERLINE OF NORTHWOOD ROAD. THIS INLET IS SHOWN
	NEXT TO AN EXISTING INLET THAT IS BEING CONVERTED TO A
	VALLEY GUTTER INLET. IS THE NEW INLET NEEDED?

	5. WHAT WILL BE THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF THE
	ON-STREET PARKING SPACES?

	6. LABEL THE PARKING AREAS ON THE CROSS SECTIONS.

	7. ADVISE IF THE WEST DROP CURB ON PINEWOOD AVE WILL BE
	PARALLEL TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY. THE 9.0 FT DIMENSION
	ON SECTION B-B DOES NOT APPEAR TO REACH THE 2 FEET DROP
	CURB.

	8. SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 PERCENT.

	9. THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING AREAS ON SECTION D-D
	AND SECTION E-E (FOR BROADWAY AVE) APPEAR TO INCLUDE
	THE TYPE 'D' CURB.

	10. EXTEND SECTION F-F TO THE PARKING LOT ON THE WEST
	SIDE OF PINEWOOD AVE. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALKS, CURB AND
	GUTTER, TRAVEL LANES AND PARKING AREA.

	11. DIMENSION MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS ON THE CROSS
	SECTIONS.

	12. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF BROADWAY AVE SOUTH OF
	NORTHWOOD ROAD. EXTEND SECTION FROM FACE OF BUILDING TO
	FACE OF BUILDING. DIMENSION SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER,
	PARKING AREAS, TRAVEL LANES, SETBACKS FROM R/W, ETC.

	13. REVISE THE PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL TO MATCH
	CITY CODE.

	14. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.

	15. LABEL RIGHT OF WAYS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED ON THE
	PLAN SHEETS.

	16. RCP PIPE (MINIMUM 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER) TO BE
	INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
	CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH
	THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

	2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
	CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED.

	3. PROVIDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WITH DETAILS.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	11-18-2021	Time	13:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	11-18-2021	Time	13:40	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-18 13:40:31	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:

	1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS
	NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE
	NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN
	NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. LIST THE
	CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY AND ON
	THE ENGINEERING PLANS.

	2. LABEL THE STREET NAMES ON THE CIVIL PLAN SHEETS.

	3. CONFIRM MATERIAL AND LAYOUT OF EXISTING STORMWATER
	SYSTEM ON 25TH ST.

	4. BROADWAY AVE NORTH OF 24TH STREET AND 24TH STREET
	EAST OF BROADWAY ARE MAINTAINED BY FDOT.

	5. MINIMUM 15? RCP TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN CITY R/W.

	6. CONFIRM EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE LARGE
	ENOUGH TO ACCEPT NEW STORM PIPE CONNECTIONS.

	7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF ROAD TO
	FACE OF BUILDING FOR EACH SIDE AND INTERIOR OF
	DEVELOPMENT.


	8. SHOW MILL AND PAVEMENT OVERLAY LIMITS ON THE PGD
	PLAN SHEETS.

	9. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT OVERHEAD CLEARANCE TO MAINTAIN
	UTILITIES WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY INCLUDING THE MAKING
	OF REPAIRS OR REPLACING PIPE AND/OR STRUCTURES WITH
	HEAVY EQUIPMENT.

	10. ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK ON 23RD ST MAY BE
	REQUIRED.

	11. SHOW ADA MATS FOR SIDEWALK RAMPS.

	12. EXFILTRATION TRENCHES NEXT TO BUILDINGS MAY MAKE
	REPLACEMENT OF THE SYSTEM IN THE FUTURE PROBLEMATIC.
	SUGGEST MOVING THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AWAY FROM THE
	BUILDINGS.

	13. IDENTIFY STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURES.

	14. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.

	15. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
	CRITERIA.


	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF
	CONSTRUCTION.

	2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	3. ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK ON 23RD ST MAY BE
	REQUIRED.


	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	10-14-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	10-14-2022	Time	09:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-10-14 09:33:40	PASSED WITH CONDITION THAT PREVIOUS COMMENTS CONCERNING
	REVISIONS TO FORCE MAIN, GRAVITY SEWER, ETC. THAT WAS
	DISCUSSED IN MEETING WITH DEVELOPER/ENGINEER WILL BE
	ADDRESSED IN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-11-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	04-11-2022	Time	10:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2022-04-11 11:02:36	1. NO RESPONSE TO SURVEY COMMENTS FROM 11/17/2021.
	2. HEIGHT OF BUILDING C OVER ALLEY ALSO NEEDS TO BE 25
	FEET AS OVER PINEWOOD.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-17-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	11-17-2021	Time	08:34	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2021-11-17 09:33:12	1. PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE A RE-PLAT.
	2. UTILITIES IS LOOKING INTO ABANDONMENT/RELOCATION OF
	SOME OF ITS FACILITIES.
	3. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 ON SURVEY AND CIVIL PLANS.
	4. AS BUILDING WILL BE SPANNING THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY(S), WILL THERE BE ANY SUPPORTS WITHIN THE
	R/W?
	5. NO METERS OR BACKFLOWS ALLOWED IN SIDEWALKS. NEED
	BLOWUP WITH DIMENSIONS FOR THOSE AREAS.
	6. RELOCATE STORM MANHOLE FROM CURBING IN ROUNDABOUT.
	7. AERIAL ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
	SPANNED RIGHT-OF-WAYS ALONG WITH MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
	FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN R/W.
	8. NEED FDOT APPROVAL/ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ALONG
	BROADWAY.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	10-19-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	10-19-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	10-19-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-19 17:17:01	APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

	1) PROVIDE A CLEAN, DEDICATED TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	DEPICTING ALL RELATED ROADWAY AND TRANSPORTATION
	FEATURES, FULLY DIMENSIONED AND SHOWCASING CURB DETAILS
	ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD FRONTING THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS COMMENT WAS
	PROVIDED AT THE VERY FIRST PPRC REVIEW AND WAS NEVER
	COMPLETELY FULFILLED
	2) PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING
	SERVICE VEHICLES ACCESSING/EXITING THE FACILITY,
	MANEUVERING AT EACH POSSIBLE LOADING OR SANITATION
	ZONE(S), WITH BOTH DYNAMIC AND WHEEL PATHS HIGHLIGHTED
	IN SEPARATE COLORS
	3) PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER DISCUSSION OR
	REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT
	APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY
	4) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG 23RD ST AND
	PINEWOOD AVE
	5) 25TH ST ROADWAY DESIGN SHOULD ACCOMMODATE THE
	PLANNED SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES FROM
	AUSTRALIAN TO BROADWAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY
	BICYCLE MASTERPLAN FOR TYPICAL SECTION(S) AND UPDATE
	THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: CITY MAY NOT REQUIRE
	THE DEVELOPER TO IMPLEMENT SUCH FEATURE ALONG SITE
	FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, ROW MUST BE PRESERVED AND PROVIDED
	TO ACCOMMODATE ITS FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION
	6) THE PROPOSED PINEWOOD AVENUE RE-ALIGNMENT IS NOT
	CONDUCIVE TO A SAFE VEHICULAR STRAIGHT-THROUGH MOVEMENT
	ACROSS THE 25TH AND 23RD INTERSECTIONS. SUCH MOVEMENT
	SHOULD BE EITHER FORBIDDEN OR FACILITATED BY SIGNAGE,
	STRIPING AND ROADWAY FEATURES SUCH AS FLEXIBLE POLES,
	MIDDLE RAISED ISLANDS AND CHANNELIZATION. PLEASE REVISE
	THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY
	7) INSTALL AND SHOWCASE STOP BARS AND SIGNS ON EACH
	GARAGE LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO TREAT THE NORTHERN
	AND SOUTHERN EAST-WEST DRIVE AISLES AS THE MAIN ONES,
	WHILE THE NORTH-SOUTH AS MINOR
	8) DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING.
	PLEASE INSERT THEM IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	THROUGHOUT WERE NEEDED (E.G. RIGHT ARROW FOR THE
	SOUTHBOUND MOVEMENT, LEFT ARROW FOR THE EASTBOUND
	MOVEMENT AT THE 23RD AND PINEWOOD INTERSECTION)

	PAST AND LATEST COMMENTS, FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES

	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE UPDATED COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE
	AVAILABLE
	2) SATISFIED. SUBMITTED TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS REVISION AS
	THE TRIP GENERATION RATES DO NOT REPRESENT THE LATEST
	SITE PLAN
	3) SATISFIED. SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP. PRIOR TO ANY REVISION
	OR RESUBMISSION
	4) SATISFIED. REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY TO ALSO INCLUDE
	RESIDENTIAL TRIPS IN THE SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS. CRCEA
	EXEMPTION ONLY APPLIES TO COUNTY CONCURRENCY. TEST 2
	MAY BE NEEDED
	5) SATISFIED. PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE IMPROVEMENTS
	NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND
	THEIR CAPACITY FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC
	6) SATISFIED. KEEP THE INTERSECTION OF 25TH AND
	PINEWOOD UNDER EXISTING TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL
	CONFIGURATION
	7) SATISFIED. IMPLEMENT A LEFT-TURN LANE, NOT A TWLT
	ONE, ON THE EAST AND WEST APPROACH OF THE 25TH AND
	PINEWOOD INTERSECTION
	SITE COMMENTS
	8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN,
	SHOWCASING ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD,
	CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING,
	SIGNAGE, PATHWAY, WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING
	ZONE, PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING
	DIMENSIONS. SHEET C2.01-C3.04 ARE UNACCEPTABLE, AS THEY
	ARE OVERCROWDED WITH UNRELATED ITEMS AND MISSING
	SEVERAL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES. ALSO, DIMENSIONS FOR
	ALL LISTED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES ARE MISSING. A
	DEDICATED SITE PLAN IS A CRITICAL ITEM FOR A PROPER
	TRANSPORTATION REVIEW CONSIDERING THE SIGNIFICANT
	IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE EXISTING
	NETWORK. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS ARE STILL MISSING IN THE
	LATEST RESUBMISSION (SEPTEMBER 2022)
	9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE
	SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING
	STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME
	AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. DETAILS
	MISSING FOR THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD
	ST, EAST SIDE OF BROADWAY, NORTH SIDE OF 25TH ST.
	SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE STILL MISSING IN THE
	LATEST RESUBMISSION (SEPTEMBER 2022)
	10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED
	IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT
	NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. SHEET
	C4.01 IS INCOMPLETE, GARBAGE VEHICLES SHOULD BE SHOWN
	TURNING-IN/ENTERING AND TURNING-OUT/EXITING THE
	PREMISES OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE COORDINATE
	WITH SANITATION SERVICES REGARDING TYPICAL FUTURE
	ROUTE(S)
	11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO OR MORE
	ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREAS (MINIMUM 8 X 20
	FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR
	THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2???
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
	DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
	12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT
	APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY. COMMENT WILL
	BE SATISFIED ONCE APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED.
	IN THE MEANTIME, PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER
	DISCUSSION OR REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT
	13) SATISFIED. GARAGE RAMP ON 25TH ST NEEDS TO BE
	RELOCATED. FRA REGULATIONS REQUIRE A MINIMUM DISTANCE
	OF 60 FEET FROM RAILROAD CROSSING???S GATE ARM
	14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPER TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS
	TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH DEAD END WITHIN THE GARAGE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER. PROVIDE
	A TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE NORTH-WEST CORNER OF THE
	GARAGE LEVEL 2
	15) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG 23RD ST
	16) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG PINEWOOD
	AVE
	17) 25TH ST ROADWAY DESIGN SHOULD ACCOMMODATE THE
	PLANNED SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES FROM
	AUSTRALIAN TO BROADWAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY
	BICYCLE MASTERPLAN FOR TYPICAL SECTION(S)
	18) DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING.
	PLEASE INSERT THEM THROUGHOUT WERE NEEDED (E.G. RIGHT
	ARROW FOR THE SOUTHBOUND MOVEMENT, LEFT ARROW FOR THE
	EASTBOUND MOVEMENT AT THE 23RD AND PINEWOOD
	INTERSECTION)
	19) PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8-FEET WIDE UN-OBSTRUCTED
	PEDESTRIAN WALKABLE AREA ALONG EACH OF THE ROADS
	TRAVERSING OR FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
	SIDEWALK WIDTH IS INSUFFICIENT ALONG 25TH, OTHER
	STREETS CANNOT BE VERIFIED AS DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING
	20) INSTALL AND SHOWCASE STOP BARS AND SIGNS ON EACH
	GARAGE LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO TREAT THE NORTHERN
	AND SOUTHERN EAST-WEST DRIVE AISLES AS THE MAIN ONES,
	WHILE THE NORTH-SOUTH AS MINOR
	21) PER CITY CODE 94-111(Q)(2) RAMP WITH SLOPES GREATER
	THAN 14% MUST PROVIDE A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION
	22) THE PROPOSED PINEWOOD AVENUE RE-ALIGNMENT IS NOT
	CONDUCIVE TO A SAFE VEHICULAR STRAIGHT-THROUGH MOVEMENT
	ACROSS THE 25TH AND 23RD INTERSECTIONS. SUCH MOVEMENT
	SHOULD BE EITHER FORBIDDEN OR FACILITATED BY SIGNAGE,
	STRIPING AND ROADWAY FEATURES SUCH AS FLEXIBLE POLES,
	MIDDLE RAISED ISLANDS AND CHANNELIZATION. PLEASE REVISE
	THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	07-28-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	07-28-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-28 12:50:15	NONE OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED
	IN THE RESPONSE LETTER.

	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE UPDATED COUNTY TPS
	LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE
	2) SATISFIED. SUBMITTED TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS REVISION AS
	THE TRIP GENERATION RATES DO NOT REPRESENT THE LATEST
	SITE PLAN
	3) NOT SATISFIED. SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH
	THE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP. PRIOR TO ANY
	REVISION OR RESUBMISSION
	4) NOT SATISFIED. REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY TO ALSO
	INCLUDE RESIDENTIAL TRIPS IN THE SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS.
	CRCEA EXEMPTION ONLY APPLIES TO COUNTY CONCURRENCY.
	TEST 2 MAY BE NEEDED
	5) NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE IMPROVEMENTS
	NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND
	THEIR CAPACITY FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC
	6) NOT SATISFIED. KEEP THE INTERSECTION OF 25TH AND
	PINEWOOD UNDER EXISTING TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL
	CONFIGURATION
	7) NOT SATISFIED. IMPLEMENT A LEFT-TURN LANE, NOT A
	TWLT ONE, ON THE EAST AND WEST APPROACH OF THE 25TH AND
	PINEWOOD INTERSECTION

	SITE COMMENTS
	8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING
	ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
	SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
	WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
	PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS.
	SHEET C2.01-C3.04 ARE UNACCEPTABLE, AS THEY ARE
	OVERCROWDED WITH UNRELATED ITEMS AND MISSING SEVERAL
	TRANSPORTATION FEATURES. ALSO, DIMENSIONS FOR ALL
	LISTED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES ARE MISSING. A DEDICATED
	SITE PLAN IS A CRITICAL ITEM FOR A PROPER
	TRANSPORTATION REVIEW CONSIDERING THE SIGNIFICANT
	IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE EXISTING
	NETWORK.
	9) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
	BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS)
	ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
	SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. DETAILS MISSING
	FOR THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD ST, EAST
	SIDE OF BROADWAY, NORTH SIDE OF 25TH ST,
	10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED
	IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT
	NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. SHEET
	C4.01 SHOWS VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENCLOSURE ENCROACHMENTS
	11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO OR
	MORE ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREAS (MINIMUM 8
	X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS.
	FOR THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2?
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
	DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
	12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT
	APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY. COMMENT WILL
	BE SATISFIED ONCE APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED.
	IN THE MEANTIME, PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER
	DISCUSSION OR REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT
	13) SATISFIED. GARAGE RAMP ON 25TH ST NEEDS TO BE
	RELOCATED. FRA REGULATIONS REQUIRE A MINIMUM DISTANCE
	OF 60 FEET FROM RAILROAD CROSSING'S GATE ARM
	14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPER TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS
	TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH DEAD END WITHIN THE GARAGE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER.

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-22-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	06-22-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	06-22-2022	Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-22 23:00:45	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE UPDATED COUNTY TPS
	LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE
	2) SATISFIED. SUBMITTED TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS REVISION AS
	THE TRIP GENERATION RATES DO NOT REPRESENT THE LATEST
	SITE PLAN
	3) NOT SATISFIED. SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH
	THE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP. PRIOR TO ANY
	REVISION OR RESUBMISSION
	4) NOT SATISFIED. REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY TO ALSO
	INCLUDE RESIDENTIAL TRIPS IN THE SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS.
	CRCEA EXEMPTION ONLY APPLIES TO COUNTY CONCURRENCY.
	TEST 2 MAY BE NEEDED
	5) NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE IMPROVEMENTS
	NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND
	THEIR CAPACITY FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC
	6) NOT SATISFIED. KEEP THE INTERSECTION OF 25TH AND
	PINEWOOD UNDER EXISTING TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL
	CONFIGURATION
	7) NOT SATISFIED. IMPLEMENT A LEFT-TURN LANE, NOT A
	TWLT ONE, ON THE EAST AND WEST APPROACH OF THE 25TH AND
	PINEWOOD INTERSECTION

	SITE COMMENTS
	8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING
	ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
	SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
	WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
	PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS.
	SHEET C2.01-C3.04 ARE UNACCEPTABLE, AS THEY ARE
	OVERCROWDED WITH UNRELATED ITEMS AND MISSING SEVERAL
	TRANSPORTATION FEATURES. ALSO, DIMENSIONS FOR ALL
	LISTED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES ARE MISSING. A DEDICATED
	SITE PLAN IS A CRITICAL ITEM FOR A PROPER
	TRANSPORTATION REVIEW CONSIDERING THE SIGNIFICANT
	IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE EXISTING
	NETWORK.
	9) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
	BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS)
	ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
	SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. DETAILS MISSING
	FOR THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD ST, EAST
	SIDE OF BROADWAY, NORTH SIDE OF 25TH ST,
	10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND
	OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC
	ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED
	IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT
	NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. SHEET
	C4.01 SHOWS VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENCLOSURE ENCROACHMENTS
	11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO OR
	MORE ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREAS (MINIMUM 8
	X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS.
	FOR THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2"
	SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
	PULL BOX (240V - 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
	DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
	12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT
	APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY. COMMENT WILL
	BE SATISFIED ONCE APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED.
	IN THE MEANTIME, PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER
	DISCUSSION OR REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT
	13) SATISFIED. GARAGE RAMP ON 25TH ST NEEDS TO BE
	RELOCATED. FRA REGULATIONS REQUIRE A MINIMUM DISTANCE
	OF 60 FEET FROM RAILROAD CROSSING?S GATE ARM
	14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPER TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS
	TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH DEAD END WITHIN THE GARAGE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER.

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-14-2022		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	04-14-2022	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-14 12:22:25	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) SUBMITTED TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS REVISION AS THE TRIP
	GENERATION RATES DO NOT REPRESENT THE LATEST SITE PLAN
	3) SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP. PRIOR TO ANY REVISION
	OR RESUBMISSION.

	SITE COMMENTS
	4) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING ONLY
	TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
	SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
	WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
	PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS
	5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS
	(I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
	OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
	PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
	SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
	6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
	SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
	DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
	FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
	NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
	7) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO OR MORE ACCESSIBLE
	MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREAS (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
	PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR THE LATTER
	ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2? SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
	TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V ?
	10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
	SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
	8) OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT APPROVAL PERTAINING THE
	PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR
	RIGHT OF WAY
	9) GARAGE RAMP ON 25TH ST NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED. FRA
	REGULATIONS REQUIRE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 60 FEET FROM
	RAILROAD CROSSING?S GATE ARM
	10) PROPER TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT
	EACH DEAD END WITHIN THE GARAGE

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	11-18-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-18 12:30:13	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) SUBMITTED TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS REVISION AS THE TRIP
	GENERATION RATES DO NOT REPRESENT THE LATEST SITE PLAN
	3) SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE
	TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP. PRIOR TO ANY REVISION
	OR RESUBMISSION.

	SITE COMMENTS
	4) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING ONLY
	TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER,
	SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY,
	WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE,
	PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS
	5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS
	(I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
	OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
	PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
	SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES.
	6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR
	SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
	DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
	FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET
	NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS.
	7) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO EASILY ACCESSIBLE
	MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREAS (MINIMUM 8 X 30 FEET) AND
	PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR THE LATTER
	ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC)
	TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V
	CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
	SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.
	8) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
	AND BICYCLE ONES
	9) OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT APPROVAL PERTAINING THE
	PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR
	RIGHT OF WAY
	10) PROPER TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT
	EACH DEAD END WITHIN THE GARAGE
	11) NONE OF THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONES ARE CURRENTLY
	FEASIBLE. AS CITY CODE FORBIDS MANEUVERING ON PUBLIC
	ROW

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	10	Status	F	Date	06-13-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2023	Time	13:29	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	05-08-2023	Time	15:07	Sent To

Notes

2023-06-13 13:25:42	FAILED

	REPEAT COMMENT: THE LATEST RESUBMITTED PLANS ARE NOT
	INTERNALLY CONSISTENT (CIVIL, LANDSCAPE, ARCHITECTURAL)
	NOR DO THEY MATCH THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE
	FOUNDATION/SHELL PERMIT FOR BUILDING A (NOR DO THEY
	APPEAR TO FULLY MATCH BUILDINGS B AND C). STAFF HAS
	BEEN TOLD THAT THE FOUNDATION SET IS THE TRUE BUILDING
	LAYOUT.

	ALL PLANS MUST MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN WHEN THE COMMENTS ON
	FOUNDATION PERMIT 22110628 ARE ADDRESSED AND MEET THE
	NMUD REGULATIONS OR THE APPROVED WAIVERS/VARIANCES
	APPROVED AS PART OF THE LEVEL 3 SPECIAL REVIEW.

	PLEASE REVIEW THE COMMENTS WITH PERMIT NUMBER 22110628.

	PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS
	CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	9	Status	F	Date	04-20-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	04-20-2023	Time	11:46	Rev Time	2.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	04-20-2023	Time	11:46	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-20 11:51:40	CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN - APRIL 6, 2023
	RESUBMITTAL
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS
	2501 BROADWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) PAPER
	COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT OF ALL
	PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
	PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS
	THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW, INCLUDING THE VARIANCES,
	WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD ON NOVEMBER 15,
	2022. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS,
	COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, IS NOT APPROVED.
	THE PLANS REVIEWED BY STAFF FOR THE NOVEMBER 15, 2022
	PLANNING BOARD MEETING WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE
	REQUESTED VARIANCES AND WAIVERS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT
	AND TO VERIFY GENERALLY THAT THE PROJECT MET NMUD CODE
	REQUIREMENTS. TWO CONDITIONS OF THE LEVEL III SPECIAL
	REVIEW APPROVAL WERE, "FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
	MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION AND PASS THE
	FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS." AND "THE FINAL
	ELEVATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION DIVISION PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
	FORMAL SITE PLAN."

	THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE HISTORIC REVIEW ON DECEMBER
	5, 2022, INCLUDED CHANGES TO BUILDING C. PLANNING STAFF
	REQUESTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO VERIFY THAT THE
	CHANGES STILL MET BOTH THE NMUD REGULATIONS AND THE
	VARIANCES THAT WERE GRANTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. ON
	JANUARY 3, 2023, PLANNING STAFF WAS PROVIDED WITH
	REVISED PLANS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS A AND C AND INFORMED
	THAT THE ARCHITECT HAD MADE SOME CHANGES. STAFF ISSUED
	COMMENTS AND REVIEWED ADDITIONAL PARTIAL SUBMITTALS
	MADE ON JANUARY 19, 2023 AND FEBRUARY 28, 2023. EACH
	SET OF PLANS INCLUDED SOME CORRECTIONS, BUT ALSO
	INCLUDED NEW CHANGES. NONE OF THE NEW CHANGES WERE
	HIGHLIGHTED AND THE PLANS THAT WERE INCLUDED WERE
	INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT.

	THE APRIL 6, 2023 SUBMITTAL WAS TO INCLUDE ALL THE PLAN
	REVISIONS MADE TO DATE IN ONE SET OF INTERNALLY
	CONSISTENT PLANS SO THAT THE FORMAL SITE PLAN COULD BE
	ISSUED. STAFF BEGAN TO REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN
	SET AND NOTED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PLANS REVERTED
	TO THE OUTDATED NOVEMBER 15, 2022 PLANS. THE SUBMITTAL
	DID INCLUDE A FEW UPDATED PLANS TO ADDRESS THE LATEST
	ROUND OF COMMENTS; HOWEVER, SINCE NOT ALL THE PLANS ARE
	THE MOST RECENT PLANS, THE PLANS REMAIN INTERNALLY
	INCONSISTENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
	SUBMITTED ON APRIL 6, 2023, DO NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE
	AND CIVIL PLANS SUBMITTED ON APRIL 6, 2023.

	THE KIMLEY-HORN CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS APPEAR TO
	MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SUBMITTED TO STAFF ON
	FEBRUARY 28, 2023. STAFF IDENTIFIED ONE COMMENT ON
	THESE PLANS THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.

	HARDSCAPE

	1) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SEATING
	CALCULATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA ON SHEET
	L2.00. THERE IS A 21-FOOT 1-INCH LENGTH OF PLANTER
	SEATING IN THE WESTERN SECTION OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
	THAT DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION
	LOCATION. THIS SEATING AREA MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
	MEETING THE SEATING REQUIREMENT AS IT WILL BE BLOCKED
	BY THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION. THE SEAT WALL MAY
	REMAIN, BUT IT MAY NOT COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE PUBLIC
	OPEN SPACE SEATING REQUIREMENT.

	LIGHTING

	2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LIGHTING PLANS. ANA
	MARIA APONTE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
	AGENCY IS VERIFYING THAT THE FIXTURES BEING USED COMPLY
	WITH THE DISCUSSIONS SHE HAD WITH YOUR TEAM. PLANNING
	HAS VERIFIED THAT THE LOCATIONS FOR THE NEW POLES DO
	NOT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED TREES.

	THE NEXT SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE THE CURRENT VERSIONS
	OF ALL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ALL OF THE
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE INTERNALLY CONSISTENT AND
	COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS AND THE APPROVED WAIVERS
	AND VARIANCES. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY CHANGES THAT STAFF
	HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED TO THE PLANS SHALL BE
	CLOUDED AND PROVIDED IN A NARRATIVE. PLEASE NOTE THAT
	NEW CHANGES WILL DELAY THE REVIEW. ALL PLANS SUBMITTED
	FOR THE FORMAL SITE PLAN SHALL BE INTERNALLY
	CONSISTENT, TO INCLUDE ADDRESSING THE OUTSTANDING
	SEATING COMMENT.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	8	Status	F	Date	03-28-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	03-28-2023	Time	09:49	Rev Time	2.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	03-24-2023	Time	10:47	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-28 10:05:30	CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS
	2501 BROADWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) PAPER
	COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT OF ALL
	PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
	PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS
	THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW WAS APPROVED, INCLUDING
	THE VARIANCES. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
	PLANS, COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, HAS THE
	FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED. PLEASE NOTE
	THAT THERE ARE CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED WITH
	THE FINAL APPROVAL LETTER.

	THE NEXT SUBMITTAL SHALL BE A FULL RESUBMITTAL WITH ALL
	THE CURRENT PLAN VERSIONS. ALL PLANS SHALL BE
	INTERNALLY CONSISTENT AND SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS THE
	REMAINING COMMENTS SO THAT STAFF CAN APPROVE THE FORMAL
	SITE PLAN. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
	THAT STAFF HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED MAY DELAY THE
	REVIEW.

	1) UPDATED COMMENT: SINCE THE APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL III
	SPECIAL REVIEW, STAFF WAS PROVIDED UPDATES TO THE
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDINGS A THERE ARE CHANGES TO
	THE FENESTRATION:

	A. BUILDING A NEW PINEWOOD - THE ACTIVE USE AREA THAT
	IS PROVIDED ON THE FENESTRATION AREA CALCULATIONS TABLE
	ON SHEET A101.1B IS INCORRECT FOR BOTH SIDES OF NEW
	PINEWOOD. THE NEW VALUE OF 6,019 SQUARE FEET OF ACTIVE
	USE AREA SEEMS TO BE THE TOTAL FACADE AREA, NOT THE
	ACTIVE USE AREA. WHEN COMPARING THE SITE PLAN AND
	ELEVATIONS, THE ACTIVE USE AREA HAS MINIMALLY REDUCED
	FROM THE NOVEMBER 14, 2022 LEVEL III SET OF DRAWINGS.
	THE TABLE NEEDS TO REFLECT THE CORRECT ACTIVE USE ARE,
	SINCE THIS IS WHAT THE BASIS FOR THE AMOUNT OF
	FENESTRATION THAT IS REQUIRED. THE ELEVATION DRAWING
	FOR THE WEST SIDE OF NEW PINEWOOD SHOWS FENESTRATION
	ADDED FOR NON-ACTIVE USE AREAS, WHICH MAY NOT COUNT
	TOWARD MEETING THE MINIMUM FENESTRATION FOR REQUIREMENT
	ACTIVE-USE AREAS. NOTE: THE NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PLANS
	EXCEEDED THE MINIMUM FENESTRATION REQUIREMENT BY A
	SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT. INCORRECTLY SHOWING AN INCREASE IN
	THE PROVIDED ACTIVE USE AREA ERRONEOUSLY REQUIRES MORE
	FENESTRATION.

	B. BUILDING A PASEO (NORTH ELEVATION) - THE MINIMUM
	FENESTRATION IS 70% OF THE ACTIVE USE AREA. THE NEW
	PLANS PROVIDE 69% FENESTRATION, WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE
	MINIMUM AMOUNT OF FENESTRATION. ROUNDING UP IS NOT
	PERMITTED. BASED ON THE 4,297 SQUARE FEET OF ACTIVE USE
	AREA, AT LEAST 3,008 SQUARE FEET OF FENESTRATION IS
	REQUIRED. THIS COULD BE ACHIEVED BY ADDING FENESTRATION
	TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF LINER UNIT 13.

	2) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THE DIMENSION LINES WERE NOT
	UPDATED TO REFLECT THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE
	NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE TO THE WALL ON SHEET C1.50.
	SHEETS C1.51, C1.52 AND DETAIL C-C ON SHEET C2.09 WERE
	UPDATED. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT INFORMATION.

	3) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE PLANS
	FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE DOORWAY. THE CITY HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER HAS REVIEWED THE SUBMITTED PLANS
	AND HAS APPROVED THE DESIGN WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE
	ACTUAL DOOR BE REMOVED. THE DOORWAY NEEDS TO REMAIN
	OPEN FOR PASS THROUGH. SHEET HP S-1.0B SHALL BE UPDATED
	TO REFLECT THE DOOR REMOVAL AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN
	PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL.

	HARDSCAPE

	4) UPDATED COMMENT: THE MOST RECENT CIVIL PLANS SHOW 13
	BICYCLE RACKS THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. SHEETS
	L.2.00 AND L2.11 THAT WERE SUBMITTED ON JANUARY 19,
	2023 LIST THAT THERE WILL BE 14 BICYCLE RACKS. THE
	CORRECT NUMBER OF INSTALLED RACKS MUST BE PROVIDED ON
	THESE SHEETS.

	5) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF
	PROVIDED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, 430 LINEAR FEET OF SEATING
	IS REQUIRED (TABLE ON SHEET L1.02). IT WAS STAFF'S
	UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WAS BEING PROVIDED AS SEAT
	WALLS AROUND THE LANDSCAPE PLANTERS. THE UPDATED CIVIL
	SHEETS (C1.53 AND C1.54) SHOW WHAT APPEAR TO BE SEATING
	AREAS AROUND THE PLANTERS THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. NO LINEAR DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED
	ON THESE SHEETS SO THAT STAFF COULD VERIFY COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE MINIMUM 430 LINEAR FEET OF SEATING THAT IS
	REQUIRED. NO HARDSCAPE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE MOST
	RECENT RESUBMITTAL, SO STAFF WAS UNABLE TO USE THE
	HARDSCAPE PLAN TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE AS STATED IN THE
	RESPONSE.

	6) IN ADDITION TO NO NEW HARDSCAPE PLAN BEING
	SUBMITTED, AN UPDATED LANDSCAPE PLAN REFLECTING THE
	CHANGES TO THE PARKING AREAS AND THE SEATING WAS ALSO
	NOT SUBMITTED.

	LIGHTING

	7) PROVIDE THE LIGHTING PLANS THAT COMPLY WITH THE
	DISCUSSIONS THAT HAVE BEEN HAD WITH ANA MARIA APONTE,
	DEPUTY DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	7	Status	F	Date	02-13-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	02-13-2023	Time	16:08	Rev Time	2.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	02-07-2023	Time	16:50	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-13 16:08:56	CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS
	2501 BROADWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW WAS APPROVED, INCLUDING
	THE VARIANCES. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
	PLANS, COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, HAS THE
	FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED. PLEASE NOTE
	THAT INCLUDED ARE THE CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED
	WITH THE FINAL APPROVAL LETTER. IF ANY OF THOSE ITEMS
	CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL (EXAMPLE
	TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS) STAFF WOULD PREFER
	TO SEE IT AT THIS TIME.

	1) UPDATED COMMENT: SINCE THE APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL III
	SITE PLAN REVIEW, STAFF WAS PROVIDED UPDATES TO THE
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDINGS A AND C. STAFF HAS
	REVIEWED THE DRAWINGS AND NOTED THAT THERE ARE NO
	CHANGES TO THE PLANAR BREAKS; HOWEVER, THERE ARE
	CHANGES TO THE FENESTRATION:

	A. BUILDING A - FENESTRATION ALONG BROADWAY, 25TH AND
	THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE COMPLY.
	B. BUILDING A - PROVIDE THE FENESTRATION DRAWINGS AND
	PERCENTAGES FOR NEW PINEWOOD (EAST AND WEST - 50%
	REQUIRED) AND THE PUBLIC PASEO (NORTH AND SOUTH - 70%
	REQUIRED). ***** NEW DRAWINGS WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE
	TABLE FOR THE PINEWOOD FENESTRATION WAS UPDATED, BUT
	SINCE THE PLANS ARE THE SAME, STAFF IS NOT SURE HOW
	THIS IS POSSIBLE.
	C. BUILDING C - FENESTRATION ALONG 24TH STREET COMPLIES

	*** PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA TABLES SHOW THE SAME
	ACCURATE VALUES ACROSS ALL PLAN SHEETS.

	2) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR UPDATING THE KIMLEY
	HORN BASE PLAN TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE BUILDING A
	NORTHERN BUILDING WALL TO MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE
	LATEST ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. HOWEVER, THE DIMENSION
	LINES WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE SETBACK
	DIMENSIONS TO THE WALL (SHEETS C1.50, C1.51 AND C1.52).
	THE DIMENSION LINES MUST SHOW THE SETBACK, NOT A RANDOM
	SPOT IN THE SIDEWALK. SECTION DETAIL C-C ON SHEET C2.09
	WAS NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CORRECT SETBACK. PLEASE
	NOTE THAT THERE IS AN FDC AND BACKFLOW THAT WILL NEED
	TO BE ADJUSTED SO THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF
	THE NEW, WIDER SIDEWALK.

	3) UPDATED COMMENT: THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL
	ORDER REQUIRES THAT THE DOORWAY SECTION OF THE BUILDING
	LOCATED AT 550 NORTHWOOD ROAD BE PRESERVED IN PLACE.
	***** THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MUST INCLUDE DETAILS NOT
	ONLY OF HOW THE DOORWAY IS TO BE PRESERVED DURING THE
	DEMOLITION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING, BUT ALSO
	THE DETAILS OF THE PRESERVED DOORWAY. THE DETAILS SHALL
	INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE HEIGHT, WIDTH AND DEPTH OF
	THE DOORWAY PORTION OF BE PRESERVED. THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER IS REQUIRING THIS TO BE SHOWN IN
	PLAN AND IN ELEVATION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AS
	PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL.

	HARDSCAPE

	4) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THE BOLLARDS MAY NOT BE
	LOCATED AT THE MIDDLE OF THE PARKING SPACE AS THEY WILL
	OBSTRUCT DOOR OPENINGS, REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT
	THEY HAVE BEEN MOVED 2.5 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF THE
	SPACE. THE BOLLARDS SHALL BE PLACES SIMILAR TO HOW THE
	CITY HAS INSTALLED BOLLARDS ALONG CLEMATIS STREET,
	CLOSER TO THE ENDS OF THE PARKING SPACES.

	5) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE DIMENSION BOXES AROUND
	THE BICYCLE PARKING. THE TWO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT
	THE NORTH END OF PINEWOOD DO NOW SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED
	60-INCH CLEAR PATH REQUIRED BY THE NMUD REGULATIONS
	WILL BE MAINTAINED WHILE THE BICYCLE RACK IS IN USE AND
	SHALL BE RELOCATED. THE ONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF
	PINEWOOD COULD BE SHIFTED TO THE SOUTH END OF THE
	LANDSCAPE BED AND BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO THE
	STREET. THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE THAT HAS THE
	DIMENSIONED BOX, SOUTH OF THE PASEO, ALSO DOES NOT HAVE
	THE 60-INCH CLEAR AREA. THIS COULD ALSO BE SHIFTED
	ADJACENT TO THE PLANTER.

	6) BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF PROVIDED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE,
	430 LINEAR FEET OF SEATING IS REQUIRED (TABLE ON SHEET
	L1.02). IT WAS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WAS
	BEING PROVIDED AS SEAT WALLS AROUND THE LANDSCAPE
	PLANTERS. STAFF HAD MEASURED THESE AREAS AND THE 430
	FEET WAS EXCEEDED, HOWEVER, WHEN COMPARING DIFFERENT
	PLANS SOME OF THESE AREAS NO LONGER LOOK TO HAVE
	SEATING AREAS. THE PROVISION OF THE BENCHES AS SEATING
	ONLY PROVIDES 144 LINEAR FEET OF SEATING, WHICH DOES
	NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND
	INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE SEATING AREA THAT ARE BEING
	CLAIMED TO COMPLY WITH THE SEATING REQUIREMENT. NOTE:
	THE LEG ROOM FOR ONE BENCH SEEMS TO BE OBSTRUCTED BY A
	BICYCLE RACK AND ANOTHER BY A BOLLARD. PLEASE REVIEW.

	PARKING

	7) WHILE REVIEWING THE HARDSCAPE DIMENSIONS, STAFF
	NOTED THAT THERE ARE TWO PARKING SPACES ON THE WEST
	SIDE OF PINEWOOD THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM 22-FOOT
	CURB LENGTH FOR PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. THESE SPACES
	ARE APPROXIMATELY 16.5 FEET IN LENGTH AND THUS DO NOT
	MEET THE CODE MINIMUM. THIS WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY NOTED
	SINCE THE ONE SAMPLE SPACE DIMENSION ON SHEET A103.0 IS
	SHOWN FOR A CONFORMING 22-FOOT LONG SPACE. THIS IS A
	PROBLEM SINCE THE SITE IS NOW TWO PARKING SPACES SHORT
	OF MEETING CODE.

	PUBLIC WORKS - SANITATION.

	8) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
	NOTATIONS REGARDING THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE
	AND THE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER THE LOADING ZONE WHERE
	THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED AND THE BULK
	WASTE GETS PICKED UP. ***** THE PLANS SHOW THAT THE
	SOLID WASTE FACILITY WILL OVERLAP WITH THE REQUIRED
	LOADING ZONE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.

	CONDITION: COMPLIANCE WITH THE WASTE MANAGEMENT LETTER
	DATED OCTOBER 25, 2022, WILL BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION
	OF APPROVAL.

	POTENTIAL DRAFT CONDITIONS

	1) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR
	VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS A OR B, THE
	SUBMITTED PLAT NEEDS TO BE RECORDED AND THE
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITHIN THE SITE NEED TO BE ABANDONED.

	2) ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	3) IF AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION/PARKING SPACE STRIPING
	ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE IDENTIFIED AS LESS THAN ONE FOOT
	FROM A WALL, THE SPACES WILL ALSO NEED TO BE MARKED AS
	COMPACT WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN AT THAT
	TIME.

	4) CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	5) PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	6) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	7) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.

	8)THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

	9) THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN IN LOCATIONS IN
	CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. THIS OCCURS AT THE
	NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE ALONG THE FEC RR, ALONG
	23RD STREET, AND THE WEST SIDE OF BROADWAY EXTENSION.
	ANY UTILITIES INSTALLED IN THIS AREA MUST BE AT LEAST
	36 INCHES BELOW GRADE OR OTHERWISE LOCATED TO AVOID THE
	REQUIRED TREE ROOT SYSTEMS.

	10) PRIOR TO THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE
	SITE:

	A. ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, APPROVED BY THE
	CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ARE REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED FOR
	ANY PORTIONS OF SIDEWALKS, ROADWAYS, PARKING SPACES AND
	STREET LIGHTING LOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SITE.
	B. AN AERIAL EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S
	OFFICE, IS REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED.

	11) IN THE EVENT THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
	TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) DOES NOT ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE
	IMPROVEMENTS, TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE, SHOWN WITHIN
	THE BROADWAY ROW, THEN CODE COMPLIANT IMPROVEMENTS MUST
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE AFTER THE APPROVAL OF A SITE
	PLAN AMENDMENT.

	12) THE HARDSCAPE ITEMS WITHIN THE FDOT ROW REQUIRE
	PERMIT APPROVAL BY FDOT. THIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.

	STORMWATER

	CONDITION: REVIEW THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE CITY
	STORMWATER ENGINEER AS THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ITEMS THAT
	NEED TO BE REFLECTED ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
	SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE
	ENGINEERING PLANS THAT AFFECT ABOVE GROUND CONDITIONS
	ARE PROVIDED TO PLANNING AS WELL.

	TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS

	1) PROVIDE A CLEAN, DEDICATED TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	DEPICTING ALL RELATED ROADWAY AND TRANSPORTATION
	FEATURES, FULLY DIMENSIONED AND SHOWCASING CURB DETAILS
	ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD FRONTING THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS COMMENT WAS
	PROVIDED AT THE VERY FIRST PPRC REVIEW AND WAS NEVER
	COMPLETELY FULFILLED
	2) PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING
	SERVICE VEHICLES ACCESSING/EXITING THE FACILITY,
	MANEUVERING AT EACH POSSIBLE LOADING OR SANITATION
	ZONE(S), WITH BOTH DYNAMIC AND WHEEL PATHS HIGHLIGHTED
	IN SEPARATE COLORS
	3) PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER DISCUSSION OR
	REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT
	APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY
	4) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG 23RD ST AND
	PINEWOOD AVE
	5) 25TH ST ROADWAY DESIGN SHOULD ACCOMMODATE THE
	PLANNED SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES FROM
	AUSTRALIAN TO BROADWAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY
	BICYCLE MASTERPLAN FOR TYPICAL SECTION(S) AND UPDATE
	THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: CITY MAY NOT REQUIRE
	THE DEVELOPER TO IMPLEMENT SUCH FEATURE ALONG SITE
	FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, ROW MUST BE PRESERVED AND PROVIDED
	TO ACCOMMODATE ITS FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION
	6) THE PROPOSED PINEWOOD AVENUE RE-ALIGNMENT IS NOT
	CONDUCIVE TO A SAFE VEHICULAR STRAIGHT-THROUGH MOVEMENT
	ACROSS THE 25TH AND 23RD INTERSECTIONS. SUCH MOVEMENT
	SHOULD BE EITHER FORBIDDEN OR FACILITATED BY SIGNAGE,
	STRIPING AND ROADWAY FEATURES SUCH AS FLEXIBLE POLES,
	MIDDLE RAISED ISLANDS AND CHANNELIZATION. PLEASE REVISE
	THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY
	7) INSTALL AND SHOWCASE STOP BARS AND SIGNS ON EACH
	GARAGE LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO TREAT THE NORTHERN
	AND SOUTHERN EAST-WEST DRIVE AISLES AS THE MAIN ONES,
	WHILE THE NORTH-SOUTH AS MINOR
	8) DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING.
	PLEASE INSERT THEM IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	THROUGHOUT WERE NEEDED (E.G. RIGHT ARROW FOR THE
	SOUTHBOUND MOVEMENT, LEFT ARROW FOR THE EASTBOUND
	MOVEMENT AT THE 23RD AND PINEWOOD INTERSECTION)

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	01-09-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	01-06-2023	Time	16:59	Rev Time	2.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-25-2022	Time	10:31	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-06 17:00:12	CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS
	2501 BROADWAY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW WAS APPROVED, INCLUDING
	THE VARIANCES. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
	PLANS, COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, HAS THE
	FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED. PLEASE NOTE
	THAT INCLUDED ARE THE CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED
	WITH THE FINAL APPROVAL LETTER. IF ANY OF THOSE ITEMS
	CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL (EXAMPLE
	TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS) STAFF WOULD PREFER
	TO SEE IT AT THIS TIME.

	1) THERE IS AN OUTSTANDING FEE BALANCE OF $2,568. THIS
	NEEDS TO BE PAID PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FORMAL
	SITE PLAN APPROVAL. IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT
	THIS SOON TO BE PAID.

	2) SINCE THE APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN
	REVIEW, STAFF WAS PROVIDED UPDATES TO THE ELEVATION
	DRAWINGS FOR BUILDINGS A AND C. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
	DRAWINGS AND NOTED THAT THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO THE
	PLANAR BREAKS; HOWEVER, THERE ARE CHANGES TO THE
	FENESTRATION:

	A. BUILDING A - FENESTRATION ALONG BROADWAY, 25TH AND
	THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE COMPLY.
	B. BUILDING A - PROVIDE THE FENESTRATION DRAWINGS AND
	PERCENTAGES FOR NEW PINEWOOD (EAST AND WEST - 50%
	REQUIRED) AND THE PUBLIC PASEO (NORTH AND SOUTH - 70%
	REQUIRED).
	C. BUILDING C - FENESTRATION ALONG 24TH STREET COMPLIES

	*** PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA TABLES SHOW THE SAME
	ACCURATE VALUES ACROSS ALL PLAN SHEETS.

	3) THE BASE PLANS USED BY KIMLEY HORN WERE NOT UPDATED
	TO SHOW THE NEW NORTHERN BUILDING WALL OF BUILDING A
	THAT IS SHOWN ON THE LATEST ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE
	NEW WALL IS LOCATED 1.3 FEET FURTHER SOUTH THAN THE
	CURRENT KIMLEY HORN PLANS SHOW. THIS OCCURS ON THE
	PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE ENGINEERING REVIEW AS WELL AS
	THE LATEST PLANNING FORMAL SITE PLAN. THESE PLANS MUST
	BE CORRECTED TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE
	NOTE THAT THERE IS AN FDC AND BACKFLOW THAT WILL NEED
	TO BE ADJUSTED SO THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF
	THE NEW, WIDER SIDEWALK.

	4) THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL ORDER REQUIRES THAT
	THE DOORWAY SECTION OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 550
	NORTHWOOD ROAD BE PRESERVED IN PLACE. THE DEMOLITION
	PLAN SHOWS THE DOORWAY BEING REMOVED, WHICH IS NOT
	PERMITTED. THE DEMOLITION PLANS MUST CLEARLY CALL OUT
	THE PRESERVATION OF THE DOORWAY AND INCLUDE DETAILS NOT
	ONLY OF HOW THE DOORWAY IS TO BE PRESERVED DURING THE
	DEMOLITION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING, BUT ALSO
	THE DETAILS OF THE PRESERVED DOORWAY. THE DETAILS SHALL
	INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE HEIGHT, WIDTH AND DEPTH OF
	THE DOORWAY PORTION OF BE PRESERVED. THIS SHALL BE
	SHOWN IN PLAN AND IN ELEVATION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND
	CIVIL PLANS.
	LANDSCAPE

	5) REVIEW AND ADDRESS THE COMMENTS THAT WERE ENTERED BY
	THE CITY LANDSCAPE PLANNER ON JANUARY 6, 2023.

	6) A BACKFLOW METER ALONG 23RD STREET (AT MATCH LINE
	BETWEEN SHEETS C2.03 AND C2.04) CONFLICTS WITH A
	REQUIRED TREE AND NEEDS TO BE SHIFTED. THIS SHALL BE
	CORRECTLY SHOWN ON ALL PLANS.

	7) ROOT BARRIERS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLANS WHERE TREES AND PALMS ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO
	STORM, SEWER AND WATER LINES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.
	THIS ONLY OCCURS IN A FEW LOCATIONS.

	HARDSCAPE

	8) THE FINAL LOCATION OF THE NEW CROSSWALK ACROSS 23RD
	STREET AT THE BROADWAY EXTENSION MAY NOT ANGLE ACROSS
	23RD STREET AS SHOWN. IT NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED TO THE
	WEST SIDE OF THE BROADWAY EXTENSION AND BE
	PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK. THE OBSOLETE CURB CUT ON
	THE SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD STREET (IN FRONT OF THE CRA
	OWNED PARCEL) WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED TO FACILITATE A
	SAFE CROSSING LOCATION.

	9) THE HARDSCAPE AND CONTROL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE
	BOX, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR THE BICYCLE RACK OFFSETS ON
	THE PLANS, NOT JUST ON THE DETAIL PAGE. SCALING THE
	PLANS SHOWS THE OFFSETS NOT MET IN SOME INSTANCES.

	10) BOLLARDS MAY NOT BE LOCATED AT THE MIDDLE OF THE
	PARKING SPACE AS THEY WILL OBSTRUCT DOOR OPENINGS.

	11) BICYCLE RACKS MAY NOT BE ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES
	(ONE AT NORTH END OF NEW PINEWOOD).

	12) ALL ABOVEGROUND HARDSCAPE FEATURES NEED TO BE SHOWN
	ON THE CONTROL PLAN, WITH DIMENSIONS.

	STORMWATER

	13) REVIEW THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE CITY STORMWATER
	ENGINEER AS THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE
	REFLECTED ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE
	ENSURE THAT ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS
	THAT AFFECT ABOVE GROUND CONDITIONS ARE PROVIDED TO
	PLANNING AS WELL.

	PUBLIC WORKS - SANITATION.

	14) PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN THAT INCLUDES THE
	CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE FOR THE SOLID WASTE.

	15) PROVIDE THE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER THE LOADING ZONE
	WHERE THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED AND THE
	BULK WASTE GETS PICKED UP.

	THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN COMMENT #S 14 AND 15 ABOVE
	SHALL COMPLY WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE WASTE
	MANAGEMENT LETTER DATED OCTOBER 25, 2022. THE LETTER
	WILL BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.

	POTENTIAL DRAFT CONDITIONS

	1) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR
	VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS A OR B, THE
	SUBMITTED PLAT NEEDS TO BE RECORDED AND THE
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITHIN THE SITE NEED TO BE ABANDONED.

	2) ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	3) IF AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION/PARKING SPACE STRIPING
	ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE IDENTIFIED AS LESS THAN ONE FOOT
	FROM A WALL, THE SPACES WILL ALSO NEED TO BE MARKED AS
	COMPACT WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN AT THAT
	TIME.

	4) CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	5) PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	6) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	7) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.

	8)THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

	9) THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN IN LOCATIONS IN
	CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. THIS OCCURS AT THE
	NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE ALONG THE FEC RR, ALONG
	23RD STREET, AND THE WEST SIDE OF BROADWAY EXTENSION.
	ANY UTILITIES INSTALLED IN THIS AREA MUST BE AT LEAST
	36 INCHES BELOW GRADE OR OTHERWISE LOCATED TO AVOID THE
	REQUIRED TREE ROOT SYSTEMS.

	10) PRIOR TO THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE
	SITE:

	A. ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, APPROVED BY THE
	CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ARE REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED FOR
	ANY PORTIONS OF SIDEWALKS, ROADWAYS, PARKING SPACES AND
	STREET LIGHTING LOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SITE.
	B. AN AERIAL EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S
	OFFICE, IS REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED.

	11) IN THE EVENT THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
	TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) DOES NOT ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE
	IMPROVEMENTS, TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE, SHOWN WITHIN
	THE BROADWAY ROW, THEN CODE COMPLIANT IMPROVEMENTS MUST
	BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE AFTER THE APPROVAL OF A SITE
	PLAN AMENDMENT.

	12) THE HARDSCAPE ITEMS WITHIN THE FDOT ROW REQUIRE
	PERMIT APPROVAL BY FDOT. THIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.

	TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS

	1) PROVIDE A CLEAN, DEDICATED TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	DEPICTING ALL RELATED ROADWAY AND TRANSPORTATION
	FEATURES, FULLY DIMENSIONED AND SHOWCASING CURB DETAILS
	ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD FRONTING THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS COMMENT WAS
	PROVIDED AT THE VERY FIRST PPRC REVIEW AND WAS NEVER
	COMPLETELY FULFILLED
	2) PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING
	SERVICE VEHICLES ACCESSING/EXITING THE FACILITY,
	MANEUVERING AT EACH POSSIBLE LOADING OR SANITATION
	ZONE(S), WITH BOTH DYNAMIC AND WHEEL PATHS HIGHLIGHTED
	IN SEPARATE COLORS
	3) PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER DISCUSSION OR
	REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT
	APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY
	4) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG 23RD ST AND
	PINEWOOD AVE
	5) 25TH ST ROADWAY DESIGN SHOULD ACCOMMODATE THE
	PLANNED SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES FROM
	AUSTRALIAN TO BROADWAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY
	BICYCLE MASTERPLAN FOR TYPICAL SECTION(S) AND UPDATE
	THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: CITY MAY NOT REQUIRE
	THE DEVELOPER TO IMPLEMENT SUCH FEATURE ALONG SITE
	FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, ROW MUST BE PRESERVED AND PROVIDED
	TO ACCOMMODATE ITS FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION
	6) THE PROPOSED PINEWOOD AVENUE RE-ALIGNMENT IS NOT
	CONDUCIVE TO A SAFE VEHICULAR STRAIGHT-THROUGH MOVEMENT
	ACROSS THE 25TH AND 23RD INTERSECTIONS. SUCH MOVEMENT
	SHOULD BE EITHER FORBIDDEN OR FACILITATED BY SIGNAGE,
	STRIPING AND ROADWAY FEATURES SUCH AS FLEXIBLE POLES,
	MIDDLE RAISED ISLANDS AND CHANNELIZATION. PLEASE REVISE
	THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY
	7) INSTALL AND SHOWCASE STOP BARS AND SIGNS ON EACH
	GARAGE LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO TREAT THE NORTHERN
	AND SOUTHERN EAST-WEST DRIVE AISLES AS THE MAIN ONES,
	WHILE THE NORTH-SOUTH AS MINOR
	8) DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING.
	PLEASE INSERT THEM IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN
	THROUGHOUT WERE NEEDED (E.G. RIGHT ARROW FOR THE
	SOUTHBOUND MOVEMENT, LEFT ARROW FOR THE EASTBOUND
	MOVEMENT AT THE 23RD AND PINEWOOD INTERSECTION)

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	10-13-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	10-13-2022	Time	17:05	Rev Time	16.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-04-2022	Time	12:17	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-13 17:06:05	CASE NO. 1895 - SEPTEMBER 21, 2022 RESUBMITTAL
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS - NMUD ANCHOR SITE
	BROADWAY & 24TH STREET

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE THREE (3) PAPER
	COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF AND .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- ONCE THE COMMENTS ARE RESUBMITTED AND DEEMED
	SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE CASE WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR
	THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 12, 2022), THE
	PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
	WERE NOT ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICANT IS ASSESSED A
	RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
	APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	THIS APPLICATION WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING BOARD
	AS A SPECIAL REVIEW, WHICH INCLUDES THEIR ABILITY TO
	GRANT WAIVERS AND VARIANCES. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
	HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD AN UPDATED
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST BE PROVIDE FOR EACH WAIVER
	AND VARIANCE REQUESTED/REQUIRED. ONCE THE FINAL NUMBER
	OF VARIANCES/WAIVERS IS DETERMINED, THE FEES WILL BE
	ADJUSTED BASED ON WHAT HAS BEEN PAID TO DATE VS WHAT IS
	STILL OWED. STAFF ANTICIPATES THAT BASED ON THE NUMBER
	OF VARIANCES/WAIVERS IDENTIFIED THERE WILL BE
	ADDITIONAL MONEY OWED TO THE CITY.

	1) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC
	IMPACT STUDY, DATED AUGUST 24, 2022, THAT IS REFERENCED
	IN THE TPS LETTER ISSUED BY PBC ENGINEERING ON
	SEPTEMBER 12, 2022. THE LETTER HAS SCALED BACK THE
	RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS, SPECIFICALLY THE LEFT TURN ON
	25TH STREET, THAT WERE IN THE PREVIOUS LETTER AND THE
	PRIOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT
	CHANGED. STAFF HAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE PROJECT HAS
	SCALED BACK FROM WHAT IS APPROVED ON THE TPS LETTER -
	TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE
	PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION 66,200 SF RETAIL AND
	382 DU VS ACTUAL 64,200 SF & 381 DU.

	2) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THE
	RECONFIGURATION OF 23RD STREET TO TWO-WAY WEST OF THE
	BROADWAY EXTENSION. PLEASE CHECK THE LOCATION OF THE
	NEW CROSSWALK OF 23RD STREET ON THE EAST END OF THE
	PROJECT. WHEN COMPARING THE PLANS TO THE AERIAL, THE
	CROSSWALK IS DIRECTLY INTO THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVEWAY
	APRON FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
	23RD STREET, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.

	3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER
	FROM FDOT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF BROADWAY AND 24TH AND 25TH STREETS
	ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
	SCHEDULING A PLANNING BOARD HEARING.

	4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE UNIT COUNT HAS INCREASED, SO AN
	UPDATED SCAD IS REQUIRED.

	5) BUILDING C: THE CIVIL PLANS INDICATE THAT THERE WILL
	BE AN ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHERE THE CURRENT
	ALLEY EXISTS. THIS HAS NEVER BEEN DISCUSSED AS BEING
	ABANDONED. THIS IS ALSO NOT REFLECTED ON THE OTHER
	DISCIPLINE'S PLANS.

	6) UPDATED COMMENT: ELEMENTS OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
	BUILDING B ENCROACHES INTO THE REQUIRED 10-FOOT PRIMARY
	A SETBACK FROM BROADWAY. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED OR
	A VARIANCE REQUESTED. SHEET A301 STILL SHOWS THE CORNER
	OF THE BUILDING ON THE 1ST FLOOR ENCROACHING. PLEASE
	CLARIFY.

	7) THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING B IS SHOWN
	DIFFERENTLY WITH DIFFERING WALL LOCATION AND COLORS
	HIGHLIGHTING ON THE VARIOUS GROUND FLOOR SHEETS. PLEASE
	PROVIDE CONSISTENT PLANS AND UPDATED ANY TABLES
	ACCORDINGLY.

	8) UPDATED COMMENT: ZONING INFORMATION TABLE ON SHEET
	A0.02 BASES THE AVERAGE TOWER FLOOR PLATE ON THE TOTAL
	SELLABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE, INSTEAD OF ON THE GROSS SQUARE
	FOOTAGE AS REQUIRED. PLEASE UPDATE THE NUMBERS
	ACCORDINGLY. SECTION 94-210.I.2.C OF THE NMUD
	REGULATIONS LIMIT THE TOWER FLOOR PLATE TO 30,000
	SQUARE FEET FOR ANY SINGLE FLOORPLATE WITH AND AVERAGE
	FLOORPLATE OF UP TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAXIMUM
	TOWER FLOORPLATES ARE SHOWN AT 48,335 SQUARE FEET. THE
	NMUD FLOOR PLATE AVERAGE ONLY APPLIES TO THE TOWER
	LEVELS OF BUILDING A. PLEASE PROVIDE THE GROSS SQUARE
	FOOTAGE FOR EACH LEVEL INDIVIDUALLY FOR LEVELS 3-9. THE
	TABLE ON SHEET A0.03 COMBINES THE INFORMATION FOR
	LEVELS 3 AND 3.5, WHICH DOES NOT PERMIT STAFF TO
	CALCULATE THE AVERAGE TOWER FLOOR PLATE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
	THE INFORMATION ON THE TABLE ON SHEET A0.02 IS
	INCORRECT.

	TOWER FLOOR PLATE: 48,335 SQUARE FEET = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED
	AVERAGE TOWER FLOOR PLATE: UNABLE TO DETERMINE EXACT
	AVERAGE; HOWEVER, WILL EXCEED 20,000 SQUARE FEET =
	VARIANCE REQUIRED

	9) THE FLOOR PLAN SHEETS THAT SHOW LEVEL 1.5 FOR
	BUILDING B ARE NOT ACCURATE (SHEETS A103.1, A104.1,
	A305.1) WHEN COMPARED TO THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
	BUILDING B HAS NO LEVEL 1.5. THE LEVEL 1.5 PLANS
	INACCURATELY SHOW THE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUTS FROM LEVEL 2,
	INCLUDING THE LANDING POINT OF THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE.
	THE AREA FOR LEVEL 1.5 IS THE DOUBLE HIGH CEILING OF
	LEVEL 1 FOR THE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND THE 2ND FLOOR OF
	THE TOWNHOUSES. THE INCORRECT LOCATION OF THE
	PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE RESULTS IN THE LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN
	BEING SHOWN INCORRECTLY.

	10) THE FLOOR PLAN SHEETS THAT SHOW LEVEL 1.5 FOR
	BUILDING C ARE NOT ACCURATE (SHEETS A103.1, A104.1,
	A305.1) WHEN COMPARED TO THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
	BUILDING B IS NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE A LEVEL 1.5 AS THIS
	WOULD EXCEED THE ALLOWED NUMBER OF STORIES. THE AREA
	FOR LEVEL 1.5 IS THE DOUBLE HIGH CEILING OF LEVEL 1 FOR
	THE NON-RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING. AS
	DISCUSSED IN THE LAST MEETING WITH STAFF, THIS ARE IS
	PERMITTED TO BE A MEZZANINE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
	BUT MAY NOT BE A 2ND FLOOR FOR A TOWNHOUSE PRODUCT. THE
	INFORMATION TO VERIFY THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE
	MEZZANINE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED.

	11) THE BUILDING INFORMATION TABLE ON SHEET A0.02
	INCORRECTLY LISTS THE STUDIO UNITS AS 500 SQUARE FEET,
	WHICH WOULD NOT COMPLY WITH NMUD MINIMUM UNIT SIZE.

	12) SHEET A200 IS MISSING THE TITLE BLOCK INFORMATION.

	13) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW A
	SUPPORT COLUMN ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF NEW PINEWOOD THAT
	IS NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE
	REVIEW AND CORRECT AS NECESSARY.

	DESIGN STANDARDS

	14) UPDATED COMMENT: ACTIVE USE STANDARDS, INCLUDING
	TRANSPARENCY. THE PROPOSED NMUD CORE CODE AMENDMENT HAS
	UPDATED THE REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
	BUILDINGS IN LIGHT OF THE NEW REQUIREMENTS AND
	COMMENTED BELOW. THE STAFF CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON
	WHAT COULD BE DETERMINED FROM THE PLAN SHEETS. ACCURATE
	TABLES MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE PLANS. *** PLEASE NOTE
	THAT THE TRANSPARENCY/FENESTRATION IS BASED ON THE
	ACTIVE USES PROVIDED, NOT THE FACADE AREA. THIS WILL
	NOT HAVE AREAS SUCH AS THE TRASH ROOMS/BOH COUNT
	AGAINST YOUR TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER, THE
	FULL HEIGHT OF THE GROUND FLOOR IS COUNTED INTO BOTH
	CALCULATIONS, SO THE DOUBLE HEIGHT PORTIONS OF
	BUILDINGS B AND C WHERE THERE IS ACTIVE USE, BUT NO
	FENESTRATION WILL COUNT AGAINST THE PERCENTAGE
	PROVIDED. RECOMMENDATION: YOU SHOULD ELABORATE IN YOUR
	VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION ON THIS AS IT RELATES TO THE
	ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THESE BUILDINGS.

	ACTIVE USE: REQUIRED ALONG 23RD STREET, BROADWAY
	(CORE), 25TH STREET - GROUND FLOOR - 80%, UPPER FLOORS
	100%
	REQUIRED ALONG NEW PINEWOOD - GROUND FLOOR - 30%,
	UPPER FLOORS - N/A
	REQUIRED ALONG BROADWAY EXTENSION - GROUND FLOOR -
	80%, UPPER FLOORS - N/A
	REQUIRED ALONG PUBLIC OPEN SPACE - GROUND FLOOR -
	75%, UPPER FLOORS - 75%
	REQUIRED ALONG PUBLIC PASEO - GROUND FLOOR - 80%,
	UPPER FLOORS - N/A
	REQUIRED ALONG 24TH STREET, BROADWAY (TRANSITION),
	NORTHWOOD ROAD - ALL FLOORS 100%

	BUILDING A ACTIVE USE

	BROADWAY GROUND FLOOR: 90% COMPLIES
	BROADWAY UPPER FLOORS: ALL LEVELS 100% COMPLIES
	25TH STREET GROUND FLOOR: 94% COMPLIES
	25TH STREET LEVELS 1.5 & 2: 11% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-209.2.E.2.B.I.
	25TH STREET LEVEL 3 & ABOVE: 100% COMPLIES
	NEW PINEWOOD EAST: 64% COMPLIES
	NEW PINEWOOD WEST: 37% COMPLIES
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GROUND FLOOR: 92% COMPLIES
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE UPPER FLOORS: 100% COMPLIES
	PUBLIC PASEO: 100% COMPLIES

	BUILDING B ACTIVE USE

	BROADWAY EXTENSION: 100% COMPLIES
	23RD STREET GROUND FLOOR: 85% COMPLIES
	23RD STREET UPPER FLOORS: 100% COMPLIES
	NEW PINEWOOD: 100% COMPLIES
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GROUND FLOOR: 97% COMPLIES
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE UPPER FLOORS: 100% COMPLIES

	BUILDING C ACTIVE USE

	BROADWAY ALL FLOORS: 100% COMPLIES
	24TH STREET ALL FLOORS: 100% COMPLIES
	NORTHWOOD GROUND FLOOR: 92% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-209.2.J.H.I.1
	NORTHWOOD UPPER FLOOR: 100% COMPLIES

	TRANSPARENCY: REQUIRED ALONG 23RD STREET, BROADWAY
	(CORE), 25TH STREET - GROUND FLOOR NON-RESIDENTIAL -
	70%, GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL - 30%, UPPER FLOORS - N/A
	FOR ALL ACTIVE USE AREAS
	REQUIRED ALONG NEW PINEWOOD - 50% OF GROUND FLOOR
	ACTIVE USE AREAS
	REQUIRED ALONG BROADWAY EXTENSION - 70% OF GROUND
	FLOOR ACTIVE USE AREAS
	REQUIRED ALONG PUBLIC OPEN SPACE - 70% OF ALL ACTIVE
	USE AREAS
	REQUIRED ALONG PUBLIC PASEO - 70% OF ALL ACTIVE USE
	AREAS
	REQUIRED ALONG 24TH STREET, BROADWAY (TRANSITION),
	NORTHWOOD ROAD - GROUND FLOOR NON-RESIDENTIAL - 70%,
	UPPER FLOORS - N/A FOR ALL ACTIVE USE AREAS

	BUILDING A TRANSPARENCY

	BROADWAY GROUND FLOOR: 100% COMPLIES
	25TH STREET GROUND FLOOR: 100% COMPLIES
	NEW PINEWOOD EAST: APPEARS TO EXCEED 50%, BUT NO
	TABULAR/GRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED
	NEW PINEWOOD WEST: APPEARS TO EXCEED 50%, BUT NO
	TABULAR/GRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GROUND FLOOR: 100% COMPLIES
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE UPPER FLOORS: TABULAR/GRAPHIC
	INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR LEVELS 1.5 AND 2 ONLY
	PUBLIC PASEO: APPEARS TO EXCEED 70%, BUT NO
	TABULAR/GRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED

	THE NON-ACTIVE USE AREAS ON THE BUILDING A FENESTRATION
	DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SHOWN EXCLUDED FROM THE TABLE AND
	DRAWINGS.

	THE FENESTRATION TABLE INCORRECTLY LISTS THE NORTH
	ELEVATION OF BUILDING A AS HAVING NO FENESTRATION. THE
	100% IS SHOWN UNDER THE SOLID COLUMN.

	BUILDING B TRANSPARENCY

	BROADWAY EXTENSION GROUND FLOOR: SEE COMMENTS BELOW
	VARIANCE REQUIRED SECTION 94-210.M.5
	23RD STREET GROUND FLOOR: SEE COMMENTS BELOW VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTIONS 94-210.P.1.II & III
	NEW PINEWOOD GROUND FLOOR: 46% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-210.M.4
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE GROUND FLOOR: 47% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-210.K.1.N
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE UPPER FLOORS: 28% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-210.K.1.N

	BUILDING B COMMENTS
	I. BROADWAY EXTENSION (EAST ELEVATION). THE EAST
	ELEVATION FRONTS ON BROADWAY EXTENSION, WHICH REQUIRES
	A MINIMUM OF 70% OF THE ACTIVE USE TO BE HAVE
	TRANSPARENCY. THE TABLE LISTS 48% GROUND FLOOR
	TRANSPARENCY, YET THE ELEVATION DRAWING DOES NOT MATCH
	THE SITE PLAN AND DOES NOT SHOW THE FULL EXTENT OF THE
	OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. *** VARIANCE
	REQUIRED
	II. 23RD STREET GROUND FLOOR (SOUTH ELEVATION). THE NEW
	REGULATIONS SEPARATE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
	NON-RESIDENTIAL (MIN 70%) AND RESIDENTIAL (30%). SINCE
	THIS FACADE HAS BOTH, PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABLE
	ACCORDINGLY. IT APPEARS THAT THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF
	THE BUILDING WILL MEET CODE; HOWEVER, THE
	NON-RESIDENTIAL LOOKS LOW (DUE TO THE DOUBLE HEIGHT
	FLOOR) AND WOULD REQUIRE A VARIANCE. STAFF NEEDS THE
	FINAL NUMBER TO PROCEED TO THE PLANNING BOARD. PLEASE
	REMEMBER THAT THE TRANSPARENCY IS A PERCENTAGE OF THE
	ACTIVE USE, SO THE BOH AND TRASH ROOMS WOULD NOT BE
	INCLUDED AS THE BASE ACTIVE USE AREA. *** VARIANCE
	REQUIRED

	BUILDING C TRANSPARENCY

	BROADWAY GROUND FLOOR: 49% PROVIDED = VARIANCE REQUIRED
	SECTION-209.2.J.1.H.I.4
	24TH STREET GROUND FLOOR: 52% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION-209.2.J.1.H.I.4
	NORTHWOOD GROUND FLOOR: 43% PROVIDED = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION-209.2.J.1.H.I.4

	15) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION
	PROVIDED FOR THE PLANAR BREAKS AND HAD THE FOLLOWING
	COMMENTS.

	BUILDING A PLANAR BREAKS

	BROADWAY GROUND FLOOR: 21% COMPLIES
	BROADWAY LEVEL 1.5: 13% THAT IS A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET IN
	DEPTH (PASEO) *** ADDITIONAL 35% OF THE FRONTAGE HAS A
	PLANAR BREAK THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
	3-FOOT DEPTH = VARIANCE REQUIRED SECTION 94-209.2.J.1.A
	BROADWAY LEVEL 2: 42% COMPLIES *** DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	THE MINIMUM 3-FOOT DEPTH = VARIANCE REQUIRED SECTION
	94-209.2.J.1.A
	BROADWAY LEVELS 3 & ABOVE: ALL LEVELS 43% COMPLIES
	25TH STREET GROUND FLOOR: 21% COMPLIES
	25TH STREET LEVELS 1.5 & 2: 52% COMPLIES *** DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM 3-FOOT DEPTH = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-209.2.J.1.A
	25TH STREET LEVEL 3 & ABOVE: 50% COMPLIES

	BUILDING B PLANAR BREAKS

	23RD STREET GROUND FLOOR: 24% COMPLIES
	23RD STREET UPPER FLOORS: 43% COMPLIES

	BUILDING C PLANAR BREAKS

	BROADWAY GROUND FLOOR: ** THIS IS INCORRECTLY
	CALCULATED; HOWEVER, SINCE THE ALLEY GAP IS 28% OF THE
	FRONTAGE, THE PLANAR BREAK COMPLIES.
	BROADWAY LEVELS 2 & 3: ** THIS IS INCORRECTLY
	CALCULATED, BOTH THE LENGTH OF THE BUILDING AND WHAT IS
	A PLANAR BREAK. THE ONLY PLANAR BREAK IS AT THE SOUTH
	END AT THE ANGLE AND RESULTS IN AN APPROXIMATELY 3%
	PLANAR BREAK. SECTION 94-209.2.J.1.A

	16) UPDATED COMMENT: PLANAR BREAKS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A
	MINIMUM OF THREE FEET IN DEPTH. THE DEPTH SHOWN FOR THE
	PLANAR BREAKS ON LEVELS 1.5 AND 2 OF BUILDING A ALONG
	25TH STREET AND BROADWAY ARE ONLY 1.6 FEET IN DEPTH,
	WHICH REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE. STAFF IS NOT
	PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE NEEDED VARIANCE REQUEST ALONG
	25TH STREET. THE SUGGESTIONS MADE BY ANA MARIA APONTE,
	CRA DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TO LESSEN THE VARIANCES THAT WOULD
	BE NEEDED WERE NOT IMPLEMENTED, SO THE STANDARD THAT
	THE, "VARIANCE GRANTED IS THE MINIMUM VARIANCE THAT
	WILL MAKE POSSIBLE THE REASONABLE USE OF THE LAND,
	BUILDING, OR STRUCTURE", HAS NOT BEEN MET.

	STREETSCAPE

	17) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LIGHT
	POLE LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN; HOWEVER, THERE IS ONE
	THAT IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE AND MULTIPLE
	THAT ARE SHOWN IN PARKING SPACES AND THE TRAVEL LANE
	(ON ALL PLANS). THE POLES NEED TO BE SHOWN IN THE
	CORRECT LOCATION.

	18) THE POLE TYPE ALONG 25TH STREET NEEDS TO BE THE "S"
	TYPE TO MATCH THE POLES ON 25TH STREET EAST OF
	BROADWAY.

	19) THE CRA MUST APPROVE THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT POLE
	STYLES ALONG BROADWAY BETWEEN 25TH STREET AND 23RD
	STREET. THEY ARE CURRENTLY "T" TYPE.

	PARKING/LOADING

	20) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VEHICLE TURNING RADIUS
	DRAWING FOR MOVING TRUCKS INTO/OUT OF THE LOADING
	AREAS. **** SHEET C4.02 ONLY SHOWS A MOVING TRUCK
	ACCESSING PINEWOOD, BUT NOT THE ACTUAL LOADING AREAS.

	21) THE PARKING REQUIRED AND PROVIDED TABLES AND THE
	TOTAL PARKING SPACES LINE BOTH CONTAIN ERRORS.

	A. SHEETS A103.1 AND SHEET A301.5 - THERE ARE ONLY 233
	PARKING SPACES, NOT 235 ON THIS LEVEL. ALSO ON SHEET
	A301.5 THE PARKING SPACE TYPE BREAKDOWN IS INCORRECT.
	B. THE L1.5 CRA LINE STATES THAT THERE ARE SPACES, BUT
	ONE OF THEM IS A DOUBLE COUNTED ADA SPACE THAT IS SHOWN
	IN THE ADA LINE.
	C. THE L1.5 PUBLIC PARKING LINE STATES THAT THERE ARE
	108 PARKING SPACES, WHEN THERE ARE 109 LABELED.
	D. SHEET A302 LISTS AN INCORRECT NUMBER OF PARKING
	SPACES.
	E. THE PARKING REQUIRED TABLE INCORRECTLY LISTS 384
	SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL, WHEN 403 ARE
	PROVIDED AND 181 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE COMMERCIAL,
	WHEN ONLY 128 ARE PROVIDED.
	F. ENSURE ALL TABLES AND INFORMATION ON ALL SHEETS
	SHOWS CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION.

	22) THERE ARE SEVEN PARKING SPACES ON LEVEL 2 THAT SHOW
	COLUMN ENCROACHMENTS, WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED.

	23) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE
	PARKING SPACES ALONG WALLS. THERE IS ONE PP SPACE AT
	THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LEVEL 1.5 THAT DOES NOT HAVE
	THE EXTRA ROOM. THIS SPACE NEEDS TO BE MARKED AS
	COMPACT AND THE PARKING TABLE UPDATED WITH IT AS A LINE
	ITEM. NOTE: IF AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION/PARKING SPACE
	STRIPING ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE IDENTIFIED AS LESS THAN
	A FOOT FROM THE WALL, THEY WILL ALSO NEED TO BE MARKED
	AS COMPACT WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN AT THAT
	TIME.

	24) THERE ARE 19 PARKING SPACES (18 PP & 1 ADA) LOCATED
	OUTSIDE OF THE GATES ON LEVEL 1.5 THAT APPEAR TO BE THE
	GUEST PARKING SPACES. PLEASE LABEL THESE AS THE GUEST
	SPACES ON THE PLANS. NOTE: THE NON-ADA SPACES WILL NEED
	TO BE MARKED AS GUEST WHEN CONSTRUCTED.

	25) SHEETS A103.1 AND A301.5 SHOW DIFFERING LOCATIONS
	FOR THE ADA VAN SPACES. ALL SHEETS NEED TO SHOW THE
	SAME CONDITION. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THE ADA GUEST
	SPACE IS AN ADA VAN SPACE SO THAT THERE IS ONE ADA VAN
	SPACE AVAILABLE OUTSIDE THE GATED AREA.

	26) THE PARKING SPACES TYP DETAIL SHOWS COLUMNS IN THE
	PARKING SPACES, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. THE DETAIL
	NEEDS TO BE CORRECTLY SHOWN.

	27) THE ADA PARKING SPACE DETAIL CONTAINS A BLOW UP OF
	THE SPACE BETWEEN THE STRIPING THAT DOES NOT CONFORM TO
	CITY CODE. THE CITY REQUIRES 12 INCHES BETWEEN THE
	STRIPES. A DETAIL CAN BE PROVIDED IF NEEDED.

	28) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE
	RACK MODEL DETAIL AND DIMENSIONS THAT WILL BE USED IN
	THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS. THIS MODEL NEEDS TO BE SHOWN
	IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS TO INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS
	OF THE ROOM AND THE RACKS IN THE ROOM. **** THE BICYCLE
	ROOM DETAILS DO NOT SHOW THE SAME RACK OR THE
	DIMENSIONS THAT ARE ON THE DETAIL. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF
	ATTEMPTED TO CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF BICYCLES THAT
	COULD BE STORED, AND THEY DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBER OF
	RACKS IN EITHER THE RESIDENTIAL OR THE COMMERCIAL
	ROOMS.

	29) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR SHOWING BICYCLE
	FACILITIES AT 13 LOCATIONS (MOSTLY IN GROUPS OF THREE
	RACKS FOR SIX BICYCLES AT EACH LOCATION) THROUGHOUT THE
	SITE AS WELL AS THE POST AND HITCH MODEL. PLEASE
	PROVIDE THE PAD DETAIL SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS BASED ON
	THE NUMBER OF POSTS THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. THE PAD
	DETAIL MUST INCLUDE THE RACK(S) AND THE DIMENSIONS FROM
	THE RACKS TO THE EDGE OF THE PAD. ADDITIONALLY,
	DIMENSIONED PAD BOX NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED ON THE PLAN SO
	THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT PARKED BICYCLES WILL NOT
	IMPEDE THE PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL PATHS OR BE WITHIN A
	LANDSCAPE ISLAND OR OTHERWISE HAVE NONFUNCTIONING
	BICYCLE PARKING. FOR CLARITY THIS DETAIL SHALL BE
	PROVIDED AT A BIGGER SCALE. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE
	HARDSCAPE DETAIL PLAN CALLS OUT A QUANTITY OF 10 POSTS,
	WHICH WOULD NOT PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF BICYCLE
	PARKING AT ALL THE LOCATION SHOWN NOR AT THE QUANTITY
	OF BICYCLE PARKING SHOWN.

	LANDSCAPE

	30) THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS ARE NOT CORRECTLY
	DEPICTED AND DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. STAFF WILL PROVIDE A
	MARK-UP UNDER SEPARATE COVER HIGHLIGHTING WHAT NEEDS TO
	BE SHOWN.

	31) THE MINIMUM 10% PERVIOUS REQUIREMENT IS NOT SHOWN
	AS BEING MET ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR BOTH THE
	BUILDING A & B PARCEL AND THE BUILDING C PARCEL. WHILE
	BUILDING C IS A CONSTRAINED SITE, THE PROVISION OF THE
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, THE BUFFER ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACK
	AND THE AREA ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BROADWAY EXTENSION
	SEEM TO OFFER SUFFICIENT AREA TO MEET THE 10% MINIMUM.
	IF THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DIRECT PERVIOUS AREA DUE TO
	LANDSCAPE, YOU WILL NEED TO INSTALL A PERVIOUS PAVER
	SYSTEM TO GET TO THE MINIMUM 10%. BUILDING C = VARIANCE
	REQUIRED SECTION 94-210.I.3. PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT
	SUPPORT WAIVING THE MINIMUM PERVIOUS SURFACE
	REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDING A & C.

	WAIVERS/VARIANCES

	32) SECTION 94-209.2.J.1.A - THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL
	DIMENSION OF A BUILDING WITHIN THE MIXED-USE DISTRICTS
	IS 250 FEET. BUILDING A EXCEEDS THIS ON ALL FRONTAGES.
	STAFF IS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE FULL NORTH/SOUTH
	DIMENSION FOR LEVEL 2 AS THIS IS THE LARGEST
	FLOORPLATE. PLEASE CLEARLY PROVIDE ON ONE OF THE LEVEL
	2 SITE PLANS. **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	33) SECTION 94-210.I.3.A - THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR
	FLEX BUILDINGS IS 200 FEET AND TOWER BUILDINGS IS 250
	FEET.

	BROADWAY LOT WIDTH: 554.75 FEET = VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	34) SECTION 94-209.2.K.1 - THE MAXIMUM BLOCK LENGTH IS
	600 FEET. THE CURRENT BLOCK LENGTH IS 810 FEET (SPRUCE
	TO PINEWOOD) WITH THE ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD EXTENDING
	THIS TO 965 FEET AT ITS FURTHEST POINT WEST AT 25TH
	STREET AND THE FEC RR.

	EAST/WEST BLOCK LENGTH: 965 FEET = VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	35) SECTION 94-209.2.K.2 - THE MAXIMUM BLOCK PERIMETER
	LENGTH IS 1,900 FEET. THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY RESULT IN A BLOCK WITH A PERIMETER OF
	SPRUCE, 23RD, FEC RR, 25TH, BROADWAY AND NORTHWOOD THAT
	IS 2,192 FEET IN LENGTH.

	36) SECTION 94-210.I.2.B - A SETBACK OF 15 FEET FROM
	THE ALLEY IS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING C. THIS IS MET ON
	THE GROUND FLOOR BUT NOT ON THE UPPER FLOORS WHERE THE
	PLANS SHOW THE BUILDING STRADDLING THE ALLEY.

	37) CONDITION: ACCESS EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR ANY
	PORTIONS OF SIDEWALKS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE
	ROADWAYS TRAVERSING THE SITE AND THE PARKING SPACES ON
	PRIVATE PROPERTY.

	38) CONDITION: AREAL EASEMENT REQUIRED WHERE BUILDING C
	STRADDLES THE ALLEY.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	08-17-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	08-17-2022	Time	15:33	Rev Time	16.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	08-08-2022	Time	11:14	Sent To

Notes

2022-08-17 15:33:49	CASE NO. 1895 ? JULY 19, 2022 RESUBMITTAL
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS - NMUD ANCHOR SITE
	BROADWAY & 24TH STREET

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE THREE (3) PAPER
	COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF AND .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- ONCE THE COMMENTS ARE RESUBMITTED AND DEEMED
	SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE CASE WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR
	THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 17, 2022), THE
	PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
	WERE NOT ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICANT IS ASSESSED A
	RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
	APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES AMENDMENTS TO THE
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, WHICH MUST BE
	ADOPTED PRIOR TO THE FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE
	RECENTLY ADOPTED CHANGE TO THE NMUD APPROVAL PROCESS
	WILL SEE THIS APPLICATION BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING
	BOARD AS A SPECIAL REVIEW, WHICH INCLUDES THEIR ABILITY
	TO GRANT WAIVERS AND VARIANCES. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED
	MORE THAN THE THREE LISTED ON SHEET A0.02. NO
	JUSTIFICATION WAS PROVIDED FOR EACH WAIVER AND VARIANCE
	REQUESTED/REQUIRED. UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED,
	STAFF IS WITHHOLDING DETERMINATION ON SUPPORT/NOT
	SUPPORT OF EACH INDIVIDUAL WAIVER AND VARIANCE.

	1) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC
	PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE PALM
	BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SCOPE OF THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE UPDATED PLANS AND
	TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (66,200 SF RETAIL AND 381 DU).
	THE TRAFFIC LETTER NEEDS TO REFLECT THAT THE ANCHOR
	SITE PROJECT BOUNDARIES ARE NOT VACANT, BUT THAT THE
	CONTAIN BUILDINGS (3) AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. *** THE
	LATEST TIA SHOWS THE NEW USE MIX HAVING LESS IMPACT
	THAN WHAT THE CURRENT TPS LETTER, DATED MAY 13, 2022,
	SHOWS; HOWEVER, THAT UNDER THE NEW SPECIAL REVIEW
	PROCESS, THE PLANNING BOARD IS THE APPROVING AUTHORITY,
	SO THE TPS LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE
	CASE BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD.

	2) THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ARE
	LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS:

	A. ADDITION OF 80-FOOT EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND LEFT
	TURN LANES ON 25TH STREET, AT THE INTERSECTION OF 25TH
	STREET AND PINEWOOD AVENUE.
	B. CONVERSION OF 23RD STREET FROM ONE-WAY FLOW TO
	TWO-WAY FLOW BETWEEN PINEWOOD AVENUE AND THE PROPOSED
	BROADWAY EXTENSION.

	3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER
	FROM FDOT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF BROADWAY AND 24TH AND 25TH STREETS
	ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
	SCHEDULING A PLANNING BOARD HEARING.

	4) THE UNIT COUNT HAS INCREASED, SO AN UPDATED SCAD IS
	REQUIRED.

	5) BUILDING C: PLANNING STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE
	COMMENT BY THE CITY SURVEYOR REQUIRING 25-FOOT
	CLEARANCE OVER THE ALLEY HAS NOT BEEN MET. THIS
	CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED SO THAT THERE IS ADEQUATE
	CLEARANCE FOR ANY UTILITY MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE ALLEY.
	PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE MAXIMUM FIRST STORY HEIGHT IS
	20 FEET.

	6) ELEMENTS OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING B
	ENCROACHES INTO THE REQUIRED 10-FOOT PRIMARY A SETBACK
	FROM BROADWAY. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED OR A VARIANCE
	REQUESTED.

	7) THE WAIVER/VARIANCE TABLE ON SHEET A0.02 NEEDS TO
	CORRECTLY SHOW THAT THE MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOORPLATE IS
	DEPENDENT ON THE TOWER'S PRIMARY USE, WHICH IS
	RESIDENTIAL - 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ANY SINGLE
	FLOORPLATE WITH AND AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF UP TO 20,000
	SQUARE FEET.

	8) THE BUILDING B ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW THE
	PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WITH A BASE ELEVATION OF 20 FEET IN
	LINE WITH LEVEL 2; HOWEVER, THE BUILDING A ELEVATION
	DRAWINGS SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WITH A BASE
	ELEVATION OF 27 FEET. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CROSS SLOPES
	SO THAT ADA COMPLIANCE CAN BE VERIFIED.

	DESIGN STANDARDS

	9) UPDATED COMMENT: ACTIVE USE STANDARDS -

	A. BUILDING B - THE ELEVATION LABELS AND THE SCALE ARE
	INCORRECT ON SHEET A101.2. BY DEFINITION, THE ENTIRE
	GROUND FLOOR IS DEFINED AS STOREFRONT, REGARDLESS OF
	THE USE; THEREFORE, THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE
	BUILDING MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE STOREFRONT GLAZING
	CALCULATIONS.
	B. BUILDING C - THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING
	MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE STOREFRONT GLAZING
	CALCULATIONS. THE NORTHWEST CORNER NEEDS TO BE
	INCLUDED. THE EAST ELEVATION TABLE INFORMATION IS
	BACKWARDS (NOT 100% FENESTRATION).
	C. CODE TEXT WILL INCLUDE CLARIFICATION THAT ACTIVE
	USES ARE NOT REQUIRED ALONG THE RR.

	10) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.J.A. REQUIRES THE
	PROVISION OF PLANAR BREAKS FOR FRONTAGES EXCEEDING 150
	FEET IN LENGTH. THE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATIONS FOR THE
	FRONTAGES OF BUILDINGS B AND C THAT EXCEED 150 FEET
	WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATIONS WERE
	NOT PROVIDED FOR THE GROUND FLOOR OF BUILDING A. PLANAR
	BREAKS ARE REQUIRED, REGARDLESS OF THIS BEING
	STOREFRONT.

	11) PLANAR BREAKS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	FEET IN DEPTH. THE DEPTH SHOWN FOR THE PLANAR BREAKS ON
	LEVELS 1.5 AND 2 OF BUILDING A ALONG 25TH STREET AND
	BROADWAY ARE ONLY 1.6 FEET IN DEPTH, WHICH REQUIRES THE
	APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO
	SUPPORT THIS VARIANCE REQUEST AS NO JUSTIFICATION HAS
	BEEN PROVIDED FOR WHY THESE CANNOT MEET THE MINIMUM
	REQUIREMENT. IF THE PLAN IS TO PROCEED WITH A VARIANCE
	REQUEST, THEN YOU MUST PROVIDE NOT ONLY THE
	JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VARIANCE, BUT ALSO BETTER DETAILS
	AS TO WHAT THE ELEVATIONS WILL LOOK LIKE IF THE
	VARIANCE IS APPROVED, TO INCLUDE THE SPECIFIC
	ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT THAT WILL OFFSET THE REDUCED
	DEPTH DIMENSION.

	12) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
	PROJECTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS (EX. BALCONIES AND OTHER
	ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES) ON THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SO
	THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
	REGULATIONS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR ALL THE
	FACADES ON ALL THE BUILDINGS. **** THE FOLLOWING ARE
	FEATURES THAT DID NOT HAVE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED. ANY
	FEATURES THAT DO NOT MEET MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM
	ENCROACHMENT ALLOWANCE WILL REQUIRE A VARIANCE.

	A. THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING A
	CALL OUT AN ALUMINUM CANOPY ON THE UPPER PORTION OF THE
	GROUND LEVEL; HOWEVER, NO DETAILS OF THIS CANOPY, TO
	INCLUDE DIMENSIONS, ARE PROVIDED SO THAT STAFF CAN
	VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE. ADDITIONALLY, THE CANOPY IS NOT
	SHOWN ON THE SIDES OF THESE ELEVATION DRAWINGS
	EXTENDING FROM THE BUILDING.
	B. THE BALCONY THAT WRAPS BUILDING B.
	C. THE CANOPY ON BUILDING C. NOTE: THE CANOPY IS SHOWN
	ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS, BUT NOT THE SITE/FLOOR
	PLANS. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS SHOWN ENCROACHING INTO THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	13) THE AREA WITH THE UNITS SUPPORTED OVER THE
	ABANDONED PORTION OF NORTHWOOD ROAD IS LABELED AS A
	COLONNADE. PLEASE REMOVE THIS NOMENCLATURE AS BY THE
	NMUD REGULATIONS THIS DOES NOT MEET THE COLONNADE
	ALLOWANCES, SPECIFICALLY, THE DEPTH EXCEEDS THE HEIGHT
	AND COLONNADES ARE NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE ENCLOSED USED
	ABOVE.

	14) SECTION 94-209.2.J.1.H REQUIRES ARCHITECTURAL
	FEATURES OR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON ALL FACADE
	ELEVATIONS. THE BLANK WALL SHOWN ON THE EAST ELEVATION
	OF BUILDING C IS NOT PERMITTED.

	15) AS PART OF THE REALIGNMENT OF PINEWOOD AS A PRIVATE
	DRIVE, STAFF WILL BE ADDING THE FOLLOWING PROVISION TO
	THE NMUD REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT ACTIVE USES AND
	TRANSPARENCY ARE MAINTAINED ALONG THE DRIVE. PLEASE
	PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF NEW
	PINEWOOD TO VERIFY THAT THE LANGUAGE MATCHES THE
	PROPOSED BUILDING DESIGN.

	"THE REALIGNED PORTION OF PINEWOOD AVENUE SHALL HAVE A
	MINIMUM OF 60 FEET BETWEEN BUILDING FACADES AND THE
	TRAVEL LANES SHALL NOT TOTAL MORE THAN 20 FEET IN
	WIDTH. SIDEWALKS AND ON-STREET PARKING SHALL BE
	PROVIDED. A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING
	FRONTAGES ALONG EACH SIDE THE REALIGNED PORTION OF
	PINEWOOD AVENUE SHALL CONFORM TO THE GROUND FLOOR
	ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS."

	16) ACCESS EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR ANY PORTIONS OF
	SIDEWALKS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE ROADWAYS
	TRAVERSING THE SITE AND THE PARKING SPACES ON PRIVATE
	PROPERTY.

	17) SHEET A400 CUTS OFF THE ELEVATION HEIGHT DIMENSIONS
	UNDER THE TITLE BLOCK. PLEASE REVISE.

	18) THE BUILDING A ELEVATION DRAWINGS FAIL TO SHOW THE
	COLUMNS/BALCONY SEPARATORS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE FLOOR
	PLANS RUNNING THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. NOTE:
	THE RENDERINGS AND THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING
	A SHOW A NUMBER OF DIFFERENCES.

	STREETSCAPE

	19) UPDATED COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW THE
	ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SUCH AS THE
	FIRE HYDRANTS, LIGHT POLES, VERIZON POLE, BOLLARDS,
	ETC. TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SITE CONDITIONS.

	20) REPEAT COMMENT: NO DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ON THE
	SITE LIGHTING TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
	REGULATIONS. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
	PLANNING BOARD HEARING SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT
	THERE IS NO INCONSISTENCY WITH THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
	THE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT
	STREETLIGHTS BE PROVIDED ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
	ADJACENT TO THE SITE. CLEARLY SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN
	ORIENTED LIGHTING FOR THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE SITE AND
	WITHIN THE PASEO ON THE PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
	PLANS INDICATE THAT SOME EXISTING LIGHTS WILL REMAIN,
	BUT NOT ALL OF THE SITE IS COVERED.

	21) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR INCLUDING A NOTE
	STATING WHERE THE SIDEWALKS OR WALKWAYS CROSS THE
	DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO THE PARKING FACILITIES, LOADING
	AREAS, OR STREETS (BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC), THE
	SIDEWALK OR WALKWAY IS CONTINUOUS AND REMAINS AT A
	CONSTANT LEVEL; HOWEVER, THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN IN
	CROSS-SECTION (OR OTHER GRAPHIC METHOD) ON THE PLANS,
	PREFERABLY THE CIVIL PLANS. **** STAFF IS UNABLE TO
	LOCATE THE CROSS-SECTION DEMONSTRATING THE CONTINUOUS
	SIDEWALK AT A CONSTANT LEVEL ON SHEET C2.05 AS STATED
	IN THE KIMLEY HORN RESPONSE LETTER.

	22) UPDATED COMMENT: THE LANE WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON
	EITHER SIDE OF THE MEDIANS IN BROADWAY NEED TO BE
	PROVIDED. NEITHER THE CIVIL PLANS NOR THE ARCHITECTURAL
	PLANS INCLUDE THIS DIMENSION. NOTE: THE LINE WEIGHT ON
	SOME OF THE LAYERS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE SO
	FAINT THAT THEY ARE UNREADABLE ? AN EXAMPLE IS THE
	CURBS ALONG BROADWAY.

	23) UPDATED COMMENT: ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS.

	A. SECTION A-A ON SHEET C2.05 SHOWS 9.5-FOOT WIDE
	SIDEWALKS, WHILE THE SAME LOCATION ON SHEET A-301 SHOWS
	10-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME,
	ACCURATE CONDITIONS.
	B. SECTION E-E ON SHEET A2.05 SHOWS A 16.5-FOOT SETBACK
	FOR BUILDING A, WHILE SHEET A301 SHOWS A 16-FOOT
	SETBACK. A 5.2-FOOT SETBACK IS SHOWN TO BUILDING B IN
	SECTION E-E, WHILE SHEET A200 SHOWS THE BUILDING AT THE
	5-FOOT SETBACK LINE. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME,
	ACCURATE CONDITIONS.
	C. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE EDGE OF THE PARKING
	SPACES TO BUILDING B THAT IS SHOWN ON SECTION F-F ON
	SHEET A2.05 ON A301. NOTE: SOME OF THE DIMENSION LINES
	THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ON SHEET A301 ARE NO LONGER
	INCLUDED.
	D. SECTION E-E ON SHEET A2.05 SHOWS A 16.6-FOOT SETBACK
	FOR BUILDING A, WHILE SHEET A301 SHOWS A 16-FOOT
	SETBACK. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE
	CONDITIONS.

	24) REPEAT COMMENT: THE EXTENSION OF BROADWAY AND
	CONCURRENT CLOSING OF THE VEHICULAR CONNECTIONS BETWEEN
	BROADWAY AND PINEWOOD RESULTS IN MORE TRAFFIC BEING
	ROUTED TO 23RD STREET SOUTH OF THE PROJECT. CURRENTLY
	23RD STREET WEST OF THE BROADWAY EXTENSION IS ONE-WAY
	WEST WITH A BULB OUT TO RESTRICT THE EASTWARD FLOW OF
	TRAFFIC. THIS WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED AND THIS SECTION
	OF 23RD STREET REOPENED TO TWO-WAY TRAFFIC, WITH
	APPROPRIATE TRAFFIC MARKINGS. **** THE COMMENT RESPONSE
	STATES THAT THIS IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS, YET IT IS
	NOT DEFINED IN THIS AREA. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
	LISTS THIS A REQUIREMENT.

	25) CHECK THE CLEARANCES BETWEEN THE BOLLARDS AND PASEO
	COLUMNS WHERE THE PASEO CROSSES PINEWOOD. YOU MAY WANT
	TO ADJUST THE SPACING TO ALLOW A MORE COMFORTABLE
	PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE WALKING NORTH/SOUTH.

	PARKING/LOADING

	26) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VEHICLE TURNING RADIUS
	DRAWING FOR MOVING TRUCKS INTO/OUT OF THE LOADING
	AREAS. **** SHEET C4.01 IS THE GARBAGE TRUCK PLAN, NOT
	THE MOVING TRUCK PLAN.

	27) THERE ARE A FEW PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ADJACENT TO
	WALLS THAT DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL ONE FOOT
	TO ALLOW FOR THE OPENING OF DOORS. EITHER PROVIDE THAT
	THESE SPACES HAVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE, OR THEY WILL NEED
	TO BE DESIGNATED AS COMPACT PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING
	TABLE WILL NEED TO BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.

	28) UPDATED COMMENT: THERE ARE TWO SPACE LABELS IN THE
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF LEVEL 2 THAT ARE SHOWN IN CONFLICT
	WITH THE ELEVATOR/STAIRS. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTLY
	SHOWN.

	29) UPDATED COMMENT: DEAD END PARKING ROWS FOR CRA
	PARKING IS NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A TURNAROUND SPACE.
	THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW ON LEVEL 1.5 THAT IS LABELED
	AS CRA MUST CONTAIN A TURNAROUND SPACE, DUE TO THE
	GATE. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE OPEN AREA ADJACENT TO
	THE GATE OPPOSITE THE LAST PARKING SPACE HAS SUFFICIENT
	AREA TO ACT AS A TURN AROUND.

	30) THE NEWLY SHOWN CRA PARKING AREA ON LEVEL 1.5 IS
	GATED AND DOES NOT HAVE AN ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SPACE
	AND ACCESSIBLE ACCESS TO THE GROUND LEVEL. PROVIDE AN
	ADA SPACE AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ELEVATOR THAT
	DOES NOT REQUIRE THE USER TO TRAVEL BEHIND PARKED CARS.
	THIS WILL REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF TWO PARKING SPACES
	(ONE CRA AND ONE DP). NOTE: THE ADA PARKING SPACE AND
	AISLE BETWEEN THE CRA AND PP ON THE NORTH HALF OF THE
	GARAGE MAY BE REPLACED WITH THE OTHER REMOVED CRA
	SPACES.

	31) THE RETAIL REQUIRES 132 PARKING SPACES. THE PLAN
	DOES NOT SHOW SUFFICIENT PP SPACES (CRA SPACES MAY NOT
	BE USED) TO ACCOMMODATE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. NOTE:
	THIS WOULD BE FURTHER REDUCED IF FDOT DOES NOT APPROVE
	THE DESIGN FOR BROADWAY.

	REGULAR PP SPACES LEVEL 1.5: 89
	ADA PP SPACES LEVEL 1.5: 5
	ON-STREET PP SPACES: 34
	TOTAL PP SPACES: 128

	32) WHERE ARE THE 19 GUEST SPACES LOCATED WITHIN THE
	GARAGE AND HOW ARE THEY ACCESSED BY GUESTS? THERE IS NO
	CALL BOX SHOWN ON THE PLANS THAT WOULD ALLOW THE GUESTS
	TO CONTACT A UNIT OWNER TO BE GRANTED ACCESS TO THE
	GATE-CONTROLLED AREA. ANY CALL BOX NEEDS TO BE LOCATED
	SUCH THAT TRAFFIC FLOW AND PARKING IS NOT INHIBITED
	WHILE GUESTS ARE AWAITING ENTRANCE.

	33) THE PARKING TABLE ON SHEET A103.3 DOES NOT MATCH
	THE PARKING TABLE ON SHEET A103.1, WHICH SEEMS TO
	CORRECTLY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL PAGES
	MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE, CODE COMPLIANT
	INFORMATION.

	34) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PARKING REQUIREMENT MULTIPLIER
	FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROJECT IS
	INCORRECTLY SHOWN AS 1 PER 20 INSTEAD OF 1 PER 10 ON
	THE PARKING REQUIRED TABLE. THE PROJECT REQUIRES 14
	BICYCLE SPACES FOR THE COMMERCIAL PORTION (ROUND UP
	PARTIAL SPACES).

	35) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
	BICYCLE RACK MODEL DETAIL AND DIMENSIONS THAT WILL BE
	USED IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS. THIS MODEL NEEDS TO
	BE SHOWN IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS TO INCLUDE THE
	DIMENSIONS OF THE ROOM AND THE RACKS IN THE ROOM.

	36) UPDATED COMMENT: ON-STREET BICYCLE FACILITIES ARE
	REQUIRED. THE DEVELOPMENT COVERS A LARGE AREA AND WHILE
	EMPLOYEES AND RESIDENTIAL VISITORS CAN BE EXPECTED TO
	USE THE BICYCLE PARKING ROOM AT THE NORTHWEST PORTION
	OF THE SIDE, STORE CUSTOMERS ARRIVING VIA BICYCLE WILL
	LOOK FOR BICYCLE PARKING CLOSE TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE
	STORE THEY ARE VISITING. IF NOT BICYCLE FACILITY IS
	IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE, THE USER WILL CHAIN THEIR
	BICYCLE TO LIGHT POLES, TREES, ETC., AND OFTEN BLOCK
	THE PEDESTRIAN NETWORK. ON-STREET BICYCLE PAD
	DIMENSIONS MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS SO THAT
	STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM AND THAT
	SIDEWALKS ARE NOT BLOCKED. THE PADS MUST INCLUDE THE
	RACK(S) AND THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE RACKS TO THE EDGE
	OF THE PAD. FOR CLARITY THIS DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED
	AT A BIGGER SCALE. NOTE: THE HARDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS
	ON-STREET BICYCLE RACKS; HOWEVER, NO DIMENSIONS ARE
	PROVIDED TO VERIFY THE COMMENTS ABOVE.

	37) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE
	MICRO MOBILITY STATIONS TO THE PROPOSED PLAZA LANDSCAPE
	AREAS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCES.
	**** THE DIMENSIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED SO STAFF IS
	UNABLE TO VERIFY THE PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCE.

	LANDSCAPE

	38) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND
	CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE SAME BASE PLANTING
	CONDITIONS FOR THE COLUMNS ALONG PINEWOOD. ALL OF THE
	COLUMNS NEED TO HAVE THE BASE PLANTINGS.

	39) PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION ON SHEET A102.0
	COUNTS MORE AREA THAN IS DEFINED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
	THE BREAKDOWN ON SHEET L1.02 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON
	SHEET A102.0 SO THAT IT IS CLEAR THAT THERE IS 10,000+
	SF OF COMPLIANT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.

	WAIVERS/VARIANCES

	40) THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
	WITHIN THE MIXED USE DISTRICTS IS 250 FEET. BUILDING A
	EXCEEDS THIS ON ALL FRONTAGES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FULL
	DIMENSION OF LEVEL 2 ON ALL ELEVATIONS AS THIS IS THE
	LARGEST FLOORPLATE. **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	41) THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR FLEX BUILDINGS IS 200
	FEET AND TOWER BUILDINGS IS 250 FEET. THE LOT
	CONTAINING BUILDINGS A AND B EXCEEDS THIS BASED ON THE
	ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD AND NORTHWOOD ROAD AND THE
	BLOCK NO LONGER BOUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY STREETS OR RR.
	**** VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	42) THE ADDITIONAL ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD AND
	NORTHWOOD ROAD RESULTS IN EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM BLOCK
	LENGTH AND PERIMETER DIMENSION. PROVIDE THE PERIMETER
	DIMENSION OF THE PARCEL THAT CONTAINS BUILDINGS A AND
	B. **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	43) THE NMUD REGULATIONS LIMIT THE TOWER FLOOR PLATE TO
	30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ANY SINGLE FLOORPLATE WITH AND
	AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF UP TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET. THE
	MAXIMUM TOWER FLOORPLATES ARE SHOWN AT 45,450 SQUARE
	FEET. THE NMUD FLOOR PLATE AVERAGE ONLY APPLIES TO THE
	TOWER PORTION OF BUILDINGS WITHIN THE CORE SUBDISTRICT.
	**** VARIANCE REQUIRED.

	44)THE ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIRED BY SECTION
	94-209.J.1.G.II. REQUIRED FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
	GROUND FLOOR IS NOT ACHIEVED FOR THE AREAS LISTED
	BELOW. **** VARIANCES REQUIRED.

	A. BUILDING A ALONG 25TH STREET AT THE FIRE COMMAND
	ROOM. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THIS AREA ALONG 25TH
	STREET.
	B. BUILDING A ALONG THE GARDEN PLAZA AT THE STAIRS.
	PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THIS AREA ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE
	OF THE STAIRS AS WELL AS THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ADJACENT
	RETAIL AREA.
	C. BUILDING B ALONG 23RD STREET AT THE BOH AND TRASH
	ROOM. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THIS AREA ALONG 23RD
	STREET.

	45) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.E.2.B.I. REQUIRES
	THAT ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING GARAGE MUST BE SCREENED
	BY A LINER BUILDING CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20
	FEET OF HABITABLE SPACE. THIS IS NOT MET ALONG THE FULL
	LENGTH OF 25TH STREET. **** A VARIANCE FROM THIS CODE
	REQUIREMENT IS NEEDED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FOR
	PARKING LEVELS 1.5 AND 2, MEASURED FROM THE WEST SIDE
	OF THE CORRIDOR TO THE WESTERN BUILDING WALL. ALSO
	PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FORM THE WEST SIDE OF THE
	CORRIDOR TO THE WEST WALL OF UNIT 18. THE REMAINDER IS
	THE UNSCREENED PORTION OF THE GARAGE AND WILL BE THE
	WAIVER THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING FROM THE 100% SCREENING
	REQUIREMENT. PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF UNIT 18
	FROM 25TH STREET SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT YOU ARE
	MEETING THE 20 FOOT OF HABITABLE SPACE AND THAT ANOTHER
	WAIVER IS NOT REQUIRED.

	46) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.2.A.IV. REQUIRES
	THAT ALL PARKING GARAGES MUST HAVE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. NONE OF THE PARKING SPACES
	APPEAR TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. THE
	PP AND CRA SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE GARAGE LEVEL
	1.5 USE AN ELEVATOR THAT THE FUTURE PUBLIC ACCESS
	EASEMENT ALONG THE NEW PINEWOOD. THE CRA SPACE ON THE
	SOUTH SIDE OF THE GARAGE LEVEL 1.5 HAVE EMERGENCY
	ACCESS TO THE RAILROAD, WHICH IS NOT A PUBLIC WALKWAY.
	EVEN UPON MODIFICATION TO ACCOMMODATE ADA, THESE USERS
	WILL GO THROUGH THE LOBBY PRIOR TO GETTING TO A PUBLIC
	ACCESS EASEMENT AREA (PASEO OR PINEWOOD). WHILE THE
	RESIDENTS THAT HAVE ACCESS TO THE LINER UNIT CORRIDOR
	WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE JUMP LOBBIES, WHICH ARE
	DIRECTLY ON A PUBLIC WALKWAY, IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE
	RESIDENTS OF THE TOWER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE AREAS
	AS WELL. THE RESIDENT ONLY, LIMITED ACCESS TO THE JUMP
	LOBBIES DOES NOT QUALIFY AS THE GARAGES HAVING DIRECT
	ACCESS. **** A WAIVER OF THIS CODE PROVISION IS
	REQUIRED. AS PART OF THE WAIVER, ALL UNIT OWNERS WOULD
	NEED TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE ELEVATORS AND STAIRS
	THAT ACCESS THE JUMP LOBBIES.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-28-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-28-2022	Time	16:38	Rev Time	20.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	06-23-2022	Time	08:27	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-28 16:39:13	CASE NO. 1895 - MAY 27, 2022 RESUBMITTAL
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS - NMUD ANCHOR SITE
	BROADWAY & 24TH STREET

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	(3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- ONCE THE COMMENTS ARE RESUBMITTED AND DEEMED
	SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE CASE WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR
	THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
	THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY SEPTEMBER 28, 2022), THE
	PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
	WERE NOT ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICANT IS ASSESSED A
	RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
	APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	THE DSI RESUBMITTAL ORIGINALLY COINCIDED WITH A CODE
	TEXT CHANGE TO THE NMUD DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT IS
	ANTICIPATED THAT A CODE AMENDMENT FOR THE
	VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS WILL BE ADOPTED BY THE CITY
	COMMISSION IN JULY. STAFF HAS NOTED AREAS WHERE THE NEW
	VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS IS PREFERABLE TO AN NMUD TEXT
	CHANGE. THERE ARE SOME AREAS WHERE THE NMUD TEXT WILL
	NEED TO BE AMENDED REGARDLESS SUCH AS TO THE REGULATING
	MAPS.

	1) THE PLANS SHOW DISCREPANCIES FOR THE ULTIMATE
	OWNERSHIP AND BOUNDARY STATUS OF THE BROADWAY
	EXTENSION. THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW A
	DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHILE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS IT AS
	PRIVATE PROPERTY. THERE ARE CONFLICTING CODE
	IMPLICATIONS FOR HOW THE BROADWAY EXTENSION IS
	CLASSIFIED. THE PLANNING COMMENTS ARE BASED ON THE
	BROADWAY EXTENSION BEING PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH AN
	ACCESS EASEMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS STILL
	DETERMINING THE MOST APPROPRIATE OPTION.

	2) THE DEMOLITION PLAN SHOWS THAT THE "LOT 23" BUILDING
	AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WILL STILL BE
	REMOVED AS PART OF THE PROJECT. THE PLANS SHOW A NEW
	BUILDING IN THIS LOCATION; HOWEVER, THE DETAILS OF THIS
	BUILDING, TO INCLUDE DIMENSIONS, SETBACKS, HEIGHT, FULL
	ELEVATIONS, ETC. HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THIS WOULD BE
	BUILDING D ON THE PLANS. SINCE IT IS IN THE NORTHWOOD
	ROAD HISTORIC DISTRICT, IT NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE
	HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.

	3) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC
	PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE PALM
	BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SCOPE OF THE
	PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE UPDATED PLANS AND
	TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (73,990 SF RETAIL AND 364 DU).
	THE TRAFFIC LETTER NEEDS TO REFLECT THAT THE ANCHOR
	SITE PROJECT BOUNDARIES ARE NOT VACANT, BUT THAT THE
	CONTAIN BUILDINGS (3) AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. *** THE
	LATEST TIA SHOWS THE NEW USE MIX HAVING LESS IMPACT
	THAN WHAT THE CURRENT TPS LETTER SHOWS; THEREFORE, THE
	UPDATED TPS LETTER IS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING OF THE
	CITY COMMISSION HEARING.

	4) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER
	FROM FDOT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF BROADWAY AND 24TH AND 25TH STREETS
	ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
	SCHEDULING A PLANNING BOARD HEARING.

	5) REPEAT COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.J.1.C REQUIRES THAT
	PROJECTS WITH THREE OR MORE DISTINCTLY SEPARATE
	BUILDINGS HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT
	ELEVATIONS. SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT ELEVATIONS
	SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO VARIATIONS IN
	FENESTRATION, MATERIAL, MASSING AND COLOR. BUILDINGS B
	AND C DO NOT HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT
	ELEVATIONS FROM EACH OTHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS. BUILDING D WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH THIS
	REQUIREMENT AS WELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BUILDING C
	ELEVATIONS HAVE CHANGED FROM THOSE PRESENTED TO THE
	HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD AND WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL
	FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION.

	6) BUILDING B: SHEET A0.03 PROJECT DATA AND SHEET A405
	SHOW DIFFERING HEIGHTS FOR THE BUILDING LEVELS. ALL
	PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION. WHAT
	IS LEVEL 1.5 LISTED ON THE DATA TABLE?

	7) BUILDING C: SHEET A0.03 PROJECT DATA AND SHEET A406
	SHOW DIFFERING HEIGHTS FOR THE BUILDING LEVELS. ALL
	PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION.

	8) THE MINIMUM UNIT SIZE IN NMUD IS 550 SF. BUILDING A
	LEVEL 3 UNITS 5 AND 19, LEVEL 4 UNITS 9 AND 23, AND
	LEVELS 5 THROUGH 9 UNITS 10 AND 24 DO NOT MEET THIS
	MINIMUM.

	9) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHTS OF THE ROOFTOP
	MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
	SCREENING HEIGHTS FOR ALL BUILDINGS SO THAT STAFF CAN
	VERIFY THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
	WITH THE NMUD REQUIREMENTS. THE PARAPET HEIGHTS SHOWN
	(STAFF HAD TO SCALE THE DRAWINGS) FOR BUILDINGS B AND C
	WILL NOT SCREEN THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE A/C UNITS WHERE
	THEY ARE LOCATED ON THE ROOF PLANS.

	10) UPDATED COMMENT: THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
	INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR THE INTERSECTION OF
	THE BROADWAY EXTENSION AND NORTHWOOD ROAD. IT APPEARS
	THAT THERE MAY BE A CONFLICT HERE WITH PROPOSED
	BUILDING D. NOTE: THE CITY?S TRAFFIC ENGINEER IS
	PERMITTED TO REVIEW THE SPECIFIC INTERSECTION
	CONFIGURATION, SPECIFICALLY THE EXISTING BULB OUTS AND
	DETERMINE IF THE PROPOSED BUILDING D PLACEMENT DOES NOT
	PRESENT A VISIBILITY HAZARD.

	11) UPDATED COMMENT: THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR FLEX
	BUILDINGS IS 200 FEET AND TOWER BUILDINGS IS 250 FEET.
	THE LOT CONTAINING BUILDINGS A AND B EXCEEDS THIS BASED
	ON THE ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD AND NORTHWOOD ROAD AND
	THE BLOCK NO LONGER BOUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY STREETS OR
	RR. **** POSSIBLE NEW VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS INSTEAD
	OF CODE CHANGE.
	12) THE ADDITIONAL ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD AND
	NORTHWOOD ROAD RESULTS IN EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM BLOCK
	LENGTH AND PERIMETER DIMENSION. **** POSSIBLE NEW
	VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS INSTEAD OF CODE CHANGE.

	13) THE PROPOSAL IS NOW TO ABANDON THE REMAINDER OF
	PINEWOOD AND NORTHWOOD ROAD, WEST OF BROADWAY. THE
	PROPERTY AND SETBACK LINES SHOWN ON THE PLANS NEED TO
	BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE NEW PROPERTY BOUNDARIES.

	14) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF IS HAVING DIFFICULTY
	VERIFYING THAT THE TOWER AND THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
	ARE NOT ENCROACHING ON THE BROADWAY SETBACK. THE PLAN,
	SECTION AND ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW DIFFERENCES
	INCLUDING THAT THE TOWER BOTH IS AND IS NOT SET BACK 15
	FEET FROM THE EDGE OF THE PODIUM. BETTER, DIMENSIONED
	GRAPHICS AT A LARGER SCALE NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO
	VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO SETBACK ENCROACHMENT.

	15) UPDATED COMMENT: SHEET A0.02 CONTINUES TO LIST THE
	GROSS LAND AREA AS 144,250 SQUARE FEET. SHEET L1.01 NOW
	LISTS THE SITE AS HAVING 128,027.

	A. THE SITE NOW HAS TWO DEVELOPMENT PARCELS (ONE
	INCLUDING BUILDINGS A, B AND D AND ONE WITH BUILDING
	C), EACH MUST INDEPENDENTLY MEET THE LANDSCAPE, OPEN
	SPACE, STREETSCAPE, PERVIOUS, ETC. REQUIREMENTS OF
	NMUD.
	B. THE LAND AREA FOR EACH PARCEL NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE
	ABANDONED RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NOTE THAT THE BROADWAY
	EXTENSION AND NEW PINEWOOD WILL NOT BE SEPARATE
	PARCELS, BUT RATHER ACCESS EASEMENTS.

	16) BUILDING FRONTAGE (NOTE: THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE
	BASED ON ALL OF THE STREETS WITHIN THE PARCEL
	CONTAINING BUILDINGS A, B AND D REMAINING PRIVATE
	EASEMENTS):

	A.THE NMUD REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT A MINIMUM OF 50%
	BUILDING FRONTAGE IS PROVIDED ALONG 23RD STREET WITHIN
	THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK. THE LINEAR DIMENSION
	ALONG 23RD STREET IS 360 FEET, SO A MINIMUM BUILDING
	FRONTAGE OF 180 FEET IS REQUIRED. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION
	OF BUILDING B EXCEEDS THE 20-FOOT MAXIMUM SETBACK,
	WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED TO COUNT TOWARD THE BUILDING
	FRONTAGE. STAFF CALCULATES THE TOTAL BUILDING FRONTAGE
	ALONG 23RD STREET AS ONLY 117 FEET, WHICH CONSISTS OF
	THE PORTION OF BUILDING A FRONTING PLAZA 4, THE
	PORTIONS OF BUILDING B THAT MEET THE MAXIMUM SETBACK
	AND BUILDING D. THIS COULD BE SOLVED BY MOVING THE
	BUILDING B TO THE SOUTH.
	B. BUILDING A FRONTAGE COMPLIES ON 25TH STREET AND
	BROADWAY.
	C. THE NMUD REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT A MINIMUM OF 90%
	BUILDING FRONTAGE IS PROVIDED ALONG NORTHWOOD ROAD
	WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK. THE EXISTING
	BUILDING D DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH FRONTAGE. SINCE THIS
	AREA IS NOT WITHIN THE CORE SUBDISTRICT, A VARIANCE
	WOULD BE REQUIRED.
	D. BUILDING C FRONTAGE COMPLIES ON NORTHWOOD ROAD, 24TH
	STREET AND BROADWAY.

	17) UPDATED COMMENT: THE NMUD REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT
	THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO THE UPPER LEVELS OF A MIXED-USE
	BUILDING SHALL BE FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE
	PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO THE UPPER LEVELS OF BUILDING B IS
	SHOWN FROM NEW PINEWOOD, WHICH IS NOT A PUBLIC
	RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT RATHER AN EASEMENT. THIS CAN BE
	SOLVED BY HAVING A DOORWAY TO THE LOBBY FACING 23RD
	STREET.

	18) UPDATED COMMENT: THE NMUD REGULATIONS CURRENTLY
	LIMIT THE TOWER FLOOR PLATE TO 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR
	ANY SINGLE FLOORPLATE WITH AND AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF UP
	TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAXIMUM TOWER FLOORPLATES
	ARE SHOWN AT 36,475 SQUARE FEET, THE MAXIMUM FLOORPLATE
	WILL BE NO GREATER THAN 40,000 SQUARE FEET. THE NMUD
	FLOOR PLATE AVERAGE ONLY APPLIES TO THE TOWER PORTION
	OF BUILDINGS WITHIN THE CORE SUBDISTRICT. PROVIDE THE
	AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF FLOORS L-4 THROUGH L-9 AS THESE
	ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT APPLY. **** POSSIBLE NEW
	VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS INSTEAD OF CODE CHANGE.

	DESIGN STANDARDS

	19) UPDATED COMMENT: ACTIVE USE STANDARDS

	A. THE STOREFRONT GLAZING CALCULATIONS WERE NOT
	ACCURATELY PROVIDED. SECTION 94-209.J.1.G.I.4. REQUIRES
	THAT STOREFRONTS HAVE A TRANSPARENT GLAZED AREA OF NOT
	LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF THE GROUND LEVEL FACADE AREA.
	THE TABLE AND DRAWINGS PROVIDED FOR BUILDING A DO NOT
	PROVIDE THE FACADE AREA FOR ONLY THE GROUND FLOOR THAT
	CAN THEN BE USED TO DETERMINE IF THE PROVIDED GROUND
	GLAZING LEVEL SQUARE FOOTAGE COMPLIES WITH THE 70%
	MINIMUM.
	B. THE REQUIRED STOREFRONT GLAZING CALCULATIONS FOR
	BUILDINGS B, C AND D WAS NOT PROVIDED.
	C. THE ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIRED BY SECTION
	94-209.J.1.G.II. IS REQUIRED TO BE ON EACH LEVEL OF
	EACH BUILDING FRONTAGE ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR.
	ADDITIONALLY, SECTION 94-209.E.2.B.I. REQUIRES A 20
	FOOT DEEP LINER ALONG 24TH STREET. **** POSSIBLE NEW
	VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS INSTEAD OF CODE CHANGE.

	20) UPDATED COMMENT: NO FENESTRATION WAS PROVIDED ALONG
	THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE BUILDING ALONG THE RR AS
	REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-209.J.I. **** POSSIBLE NEW
	VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS INSTEAD OF CODE CHANGE.

	21) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.J.A. REQUIRES THE
	PROVISION OF PLANAR BREAKS. WHILE THE PLANS APPEAR TO
	SHOW ARTICULATION ON THE FACADES THAT REFLECT PLANAR
	BREAKS, THE PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE DEPTH DIMENSIONS FOR
	THE VARIOUS FEATURES, NOR IS A TABLE PROVIDED TO SHOW
	THAT THE CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF ALL PLANAR
	BREAKS SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 20% OF EACH
	BUILDING FRONTAGE EXCEEDING 150 FEET FOR BUILDINGS A, B
	AND C HAVE BEEN MET.

	22) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
	PROJECTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS (EX. BALCONIES AND OTHER
	ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES) ON THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SO
	THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
	REGULATIONS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR ALL OF THE
	FACADES ON ALL THE BUILDINGS.

	23) THE SITE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ALL THE UTILITIES - EX.
	FIRE HYDRANT MISSING AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING C.
	ALL PLANS MUST SHOW ACCURATE CONDITIONS.

	STREETSCAPE

	24) REPEAT COMMENT: NO DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ON THE
	SITE LIGHTING TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
	REGULATIONS. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
	PLANNING BOARD HEARING SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT
	THERE IS NO INCONSISTENCY WITH THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
	THE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT
	STREETLIGHTS BE PROVIDED ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
	ADJACENT TO THE SITE. CLEARLY SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN
	ORIENTED LIGHTING FOR THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE SITE ON
	THE PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS INDICATE THAT
	SOME EXISTING LIGHTS WILL REMAIN, BUT NOT ALL OF THE
	SITE IS COVERED.

	25) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR INCLUDING A NOTE
	STATING WHERE THE SIDEWALKS OR WALKWAYS CROSS THE
	DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO THE PARKING FACILITIES, LOADING
	AREAS, OR STREETS (BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC), THE
	SIDEWALK OR WALKWAY IS CONTINUOUS AND REMAINS AT A
	CONSTANT LEVEL; HOWEVER, THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN IN
	CROSS-SECTION (OR OTHER GRAPHIC METHOD) ON THE PLANS,
	PREFERABLY THE CIVIL PLANS.

	26) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MUST SHOW
	THE MEDIANS IN BROADWAY THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE CIVIL AND
	LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE LANE WIDTH DIMENSIONS NEED TO BE
	PROVIDED AT THESE LOCATIONS.

	27) UPDATED COMMENT: ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS.

	A. THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SECTION A-A ON SHEET
	C2.05 AND THE SAME LOCATION ON SHEET A-301. SHEET A-301
	SHOWS THE 10-FOOT SIDEWALK DIMENSION EXTENDING INTO THE
	PARKING SPACE. THE SECTION A-A DOES NOT MATCH AND
	EXCEEDS THE 60 FEET BETWEEN BUILDINGS.
	B. SECTION B-B ON SHEET C2.05 EXCEEDS THE 60 FEET
	BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND CALLS OUT LANDSCAPING WHERE IT IS
	ACTUALLY PAVED AREA.
	C. THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON SECTION C-C ON SHEET
	A2.05 DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET
	A-301. THERE IS ONE FOOT LESS WIDTH SHOWN ON SECTION
	C-C. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE
	CONDITIONS. ADDITIONALLY, SECTION C-C DOES NOT DEPICT
	WHAT IS OCCURRING IN THE ROW BETWEEN THE CURB AND
	PROPERTY LINE TO VERIFY THAT THE MINIMUM 5-FOOT WIDE
	UNOBSTRUCTED SIDEWALK HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
	D. THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON SECTION D-D ON SHEET
	A2.05 DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET
	A-301. THERE IS ONE FOOT LESS WIDTH SHOWN ON SECTION
	D-D. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE
	CONDITIONS.
	E. SECTION E-E ON SHEET A2.05 DOES NOT ACCURATELY
	DEPICT WHAT IS OCCURRING AT THIS LOCATION. EX. TREE
	GRATE NOT SHOWN.
	F. THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON SECTION F-F ON SHEET
	A2.05 DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET
	A-301. THERE IS ONE FOOT MORE WIDTH SHOWN ON SECTION
	F-F.
	G. SECTION G-G ON SHEET A2.05 DOES NOT ACCURATELY
	DEPICT WHAT IS OCCURRING AT THIS LOCATION. EX.
	LANDSCAPE STRIP NOT SHOWN.
	H. SECTION H-H ON SHEET A2.05 DOES NOT ACCURATELY
	REFLECT THE SITE PLAN OR OTHER CIVIL PLANS.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE STATUS OF THE BROADWAY EXTENSION HAS
	NOT BEEN DETERMINED BY THE CITY, SO THE PROPERTY LINES
	WILL BE INCORRECT. BUILDING D DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ANY
	STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, TO INCLUDE THE ROADWAY
	CROSS-SECTION REQUIREMENTS.

	28) THE EXTENSION OF BROADWAY AND CONCURRENT CLOSING OF
	THE VEHICULAR CONNECTIONS BETWEEN BROADWAY AND PINEWOOD
	RESULTS IN MORE TRAFFIC BEING ROUTED TO 23RD STREET
	SOUTH OF THE PROJECT. CURRENTLY 23RD STREET WEST OF THE
	BROADWAY EXTENSION IS ONE-WAY WEST WITH A BULB OUT TO
	RESTRICT THE EASTWARD FLOW OF TRAFFIC. THIS WILL NEED
	TO BE REMOVED AND THIS SECTION OF 23RD STREET REOPENED
	TO TWO-WAY TRAFFIC, WITH APPROPRIATE TRAFFIC MARKINGS.

	PARKING/LOADING

	29) PROVIDE VEHICLE TURNING RADIUS DRAWING FOR MOVING
	TRUCKS INTO/OUT OF THE LOADING AREAS.

	30) UPDATED COMMENT: ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING GARAGE
	MUST BE SCREENED BY A LINER BUILDING CONTAINING A
	MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE SPACE. THIS IS
	NOT MET ALONG THE FULL LENGTH OF 25TH STREET. ****
	POSSIBLE NEW VARIANCE/WAIVER PROCESS INSTEAD OF CODE
	CHANGE. IF DONE AS A CODE TEXT CHANGE, THE SPECIFIC
	CODE LANGUAGE MUST INCLUDE THE PROVISION OF
	ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND PLANAR BREAKS TO VARY THE
	FACADE IN ORDER TO CONCEAL THE NON-HABITABLE PARKING.

	31) THERE ARE FOUR PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTHEAST
	CORNER OF LEVEL 1.5 THAT DO NOT CONTAIN A COLOR OR
	LABELS AND ONE SPACE IN THE SOUTH PORTION THAT DOES NOT
	CONTAIN A LABEL.

	32) UPDATED COMMENT: DEAD END PARKING ROWS FOR
	UNASSIGNED, TO INCLUDE PUBLIC, PARKING ARE NOT
	PERMITTED WITHOUT A TURNAROUND SPACE. THE DEAD-END
	PARKING ROW ON LEVEL 1.5 MUST CONTAIN A TURNAROUND
	SPACE. THIS REMOVED SPACE MUST BE REFLECTED ON ALL THE
	PARKING TABLES.

	33) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.2.A.IV. REQUIRES
	THAT ALL PARKING GARAGES MUST HAVE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. THE PUBLIC ELEVATORS THAT
	ARE NOW DESIGNATED ON THE PLAN DO NOT PROVIDE ACCESS TO
	A PUBLIC WALKWAY, BUT RATHER THE INTERNAL PRIVATE
	ROADWAY NETWORK. **** POSSIBLE NEW VARIANCE/WAIVER
	PROCESS INSTEAD OF CODE CHANGE.

	34) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE COLUMN
	LOCATIONS ON THE GARAGE LEVELS:

	A. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING HOW THE ?FINS?
	SHOWN ON EACH SIDE OF EACH COLUMN INTERACT WITH THE
	PARKING SPACES THAT THEY ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO. IN
	MANY INSTANCES THESE FINS EXTEND INTO THE PARKING
	SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES MAKING THEM NO LONGER COMPLIANT
	WITH CODE MINIMUMS.
	B. THE COLUMNS ARE SHOWN EXTENDING ON LEVELS 3 AND
	ABOVE. SOME OF THE COLUMNS ARE NO LONGER WITHIN THE
	BUILDING AND VIOLATE THE TOWER SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT
	PERMITTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE EXTERIOR COLUMNS, EVEN
	WHERE THE SETBACK IS NOT VIOLATED, ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND RENDERINGS.

	35) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PARKING STALL DETAIL WAS
	REMOVED FROM THE PLANS AND NOT REPLACED. PROVIDED A
	CITY CODE COMPLIANT PARKING DETAIL FOR ALL CONDITIONS.

	36) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING PROVIDED TABLES SHALL
	CLEARLY SEPARATE THE PROVIDE ADA SPACES FROM THE TOTAL
	PROVIDED SPACES FOR EACH CATEGORY. THE CURRENT LINE
	ITEM FOR L2 PARKING GARAGE MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THERE ARE
	ADA SPACES IN ADDITION TO THE REGULAR SPACES, WHICH
	OVERSTATES THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING SPACES.

	37) THERE ARE 26 PARKING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES, NOT
	25 AS LISTED.

	38) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PLANS AND DATA TABLES DO NOT
	CLEARLY SHOW THE PUBLIC PARKING SPACES REQUIRED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT WITH CRA. THESE NEED TO
	BE A SEPARATE LINE ITEM ON THE TABLES AND A SHOWN WITH
	A SEPARATE MARKING FROM THE REQUIRED RETAIL SPACES.
	STAFF HAS COUNTED THE NUMBER OF SPACES MARKED AS PUBLIC
	PARKING AND IT IS DEFICIENT FOR RETAIL PLUS PUBLIC
	PARKING SINCE ONLY 2 PARKING SPACES IN EXCESS OF THE
	RETAIL REQUIREMENT ARE PROVIDED.

	39) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CRA AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT THE
	DEVELOPER CONSTRUCT PUBLIC PARKING SPACES IN AN AMOUNT
	TO EQUAL 10% OF THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.
	WHILE THE PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE WHERE THE
	CRA REQUIRED PARKING SPACES ARE LOCATED, IT APPEARS
	THAT SOME OF THEM ARE INTENDED TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	ON-STREET PARKING SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SINCE THE
	LANGUAGE REQUIRES THAT NEW PARKING SPACES BE
	CONSTRUCTED TO MEET THE CRA REQUIREMENT, PROVIDE AN
	EXISTING PARKING INVENTORY OF THE ON-STREET PARKING
	SPACES. EXISTING PARKING SPACES MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS
	NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SPACES, AND ANY SPACES BEING REMOVED,
	WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AND MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS
	NEWLY CREATED PARKING SPACES.

	40) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROJECT REQUIRES 15 BICYCLE
	SPACES FOR THE COMMERCIAL PORTION AND 38 BICYCLE SPACES
	FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION. THERE ARE 53 TOTAL
	REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THIS SHALL BE
	CORRECTLY REFLECTED ON THE PARKING TABLES AND SHOWN ON
	THE PLANS. THE CURRENT PLAN ONLY LISTS 44 REQUIRED
	BICYCLE PARKING SPACES.

	41) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL
	FOR THE BICYCLE RACKS, INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF SPACES,
	LOCATED IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM AS WELL AS THE
	DIMENSIONS OF THE ROOM AND THE RACKS IN THE ROOM. THIS
	SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ITS OWN BICYCLE ROOM DETAIL SHEET
	THAT THIS AT A LEGIBLE SCALE.

	42) UPDATED COMMENT: ON-STREET BICYCLE FACILITIES ARE
	REQUIRED. THE HARDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS ON-STREET BICYCLE
	RACKS, YET THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS
	DO NOT. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CODE COMPLIANT
	CONDITIONS. ON-STREET BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS MUST BE
	CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
	THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM AND THAT SIDEWALKS ARE
	NOT BLOCKED. THE PADS MUST INCLUDE THE RACKS AND THE
	DIMENSIONS FROM THE RACKS TO THE EDGE OF THE PAD. FOR
	CLARITY THIS DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A BIGGER
	SCALE.

	43) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE
	MICRO MOBILITY STATIONS TO THE PROPOSED PLAZA LANDSCAPE
	AREAS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCES.

	LANDSCAPE

	44) THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AROUND BUILDING D HAS NOT
	BEEN PROVIDED. THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ADEQUATE
	ROOM TO INSTALL THIS ALONG THE BROADWAY EXTENSION.

	45) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ALL OF THE PINEWOOD
	AND PASEO SUPPORT COLUMNS. ALL OF THE COLUMNS ALONG
	PINEWOOD NEED TO HAVE THE BASE PLANTINGS.

	46) ALL BACK FLOW PREVENTORS MUST BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE
	PROPERTY AND NOT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE
	STRIP. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
	WHERE THESE WILL NO LONGER EXIST IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	47) THE WATER AND FIRE LINES IN PLAZA IV ARE SHOWN IN
	DIRECT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES.

	48) THE COLUMNS FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING A ARE
	NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHIN PLAZA III AND
	DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH SOME OF THE PROPOSED TREES.
	ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE REVIEW THE COLUMN ORIENTATION
	DETAILS AS THEY PROGRESS UP THE LEVELS AT THIS LOCATION
	AS THEY CHANGE.

	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE

	49) THE PROPOSAL TO REDEFINE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS
	THE PASEO WAS BASED ON THE DESIGNS WITH NO PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE THAT MET THE CODE DEFINITION OF OPEN TO THE SKY.
	THE NEW DESIGN THAT INCORPORATES CLOSURE OF NORTHWOOD
	ROAD AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE AS PUBLIC
	OPEN SPACE SEEMS TO MEET THE 10,000 SQUARE FOOT
	REQUIREMENT. STAFF DID SOME ROUGH CALCULATIONS AND IT
	SEEMS TO BE CLOSE. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF THIS AREA
	(PLAZA III AND IV) THAT MEET THE DEFINITION OF OPEN
	SPACE - OPEN TO THE SKY AND NOT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
	OR REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACK. THE AMOUNT OF AREA FOR
	PLAZA III WILL BE REDUCED ON THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH
	AS WELL AS WHERE THE OVERHEAD PASSAGE IS. PLAZA IV WILL
	BE REDUCED ON THE NORTH SIDE DUE TO THE OVERHANG PLUS
	THE REQUIRED 10-FOOT SETBACK. IF THIS AREA IS LESS THAN
	10,000 SQUARE FEET STAFF CAN REVIEW THE MERITS OF THE
	PASEO TEXT CHANGE VS. A VARIANCE TO THE AMOUNT OF
	REQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE VS. OPEN SPACE CODE CHANGE
	SIMILAR TO THE DMP TO PERMIT CERTAIN COVERED AREAS TO
	APPLY AS OPEN SPACE. IT MAY STILL BE NECESSARY TO ADD
	PUBLIC PASEO AS A FEATURE, BUT STAFF PREFERS THAT THIS
	NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR TRUE OPEN SPACE.

	PRIVATE OPEN SPACE

	50) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING A TABLE
	AND PLAN THAT DESCRIBE THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	A. THE TABLE DOES NOT CONTAIN THE SAME SITE AREA THAT
	IS LISTED ON THE DATA COVER SHEET. NOTE: THIS WILL
	CHANGE WHEN COMMENT NUMBER 15 IS ADDRESSED.
	B. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS BASED ON THE SITE AREA WHERE
	THE BUILDING(S) IS LOCATED. BUILDINGS A, B AND D ARE
	ALL LOCATED ON ONE SITE, SO 10% OF THIS SITE AREA SHALL
	BE PROVIDED AS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THIS MAY ALL BE
	CONTAINED ON THE BUILDING A AMENITY DECK. PLEASE NOTE
	THAT THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TABLE LISTS PRIVATE OPEN
	SPACE ON LEVEL 2 OF BUILDING B, WHICH HAS NOT OPEN
	SPACE AT THIS LOCATION.
	C. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE BUILDING C PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-210.K.3.C. PRIVATE OPEN SPACES SHALL PROVIDE SHADED
	AREAS, AND THEIR GROUND SURFACE SHALL BE A COMBINATION
	OF PAVING MATERIALS, LAWN, OR GROUND COVER. NOTE:
	ROOFTOP STRUCTURES MUST CLEARLY SHOW THAT THEY ARE NOT
	EXCEEDING THE HEIGHT ALLOWANCE.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-14-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	04-14-2022	Time	11:05	Rev Time	12.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	04-14-2022	Time	11:05	Sent To

Notes

2022-04-14 11:06:18	CASE NO. 1895 - FEBRUARY 2022 RESUBMITTAL
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS - NMUD ANCHOR SITE
	BROADWAY & 24TH STREET

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
	(4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	APRIL 29, 2022, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
	JUNE 21, 2022 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JUNE 14, 2022),
	THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	THE DSI RESUBMITTAL COINCIDES WITH A CODE TEXT CHANGE
	TO THE NMUD DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED
	THE SUBMITTED PLANS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH BOTH THE
	EXISTING REGULATIONS AND THE PROPOSED TEXT CHANGES,
	WHERE APPLICABLE. THE APPLICANT?S STATED GOAL WAS TO
	AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO REFLECT THE DESIGN
	OF THE PLAN WHERE IT COULD NOT COMPLY WITH THE
	REGULATIONS AND THUS AVOID VARIANCES/WAIVERS AT THE
	ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. THE SUBMITTED CODE REVISIONS
	DO NOT COVER ALL OF THE AREAS WHERE THE PLAN DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE CODE. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THESE
	DISCREPANCIES. FOR BOTH THE APPLICANT PROPOSED AND THE
	STAFF IDENTIFIED DISCREPANCIES, STAFF HAS INCLUDED IF
	STAFF WILL SUPPORT A CODE CHANGE OR NOT. NOTE: THE CODE
	REVISION CASE INCLUDES COMMENTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED
	CODE CHANGES THAT DO NOT DIRECTLY IMPACT THE SITE PLAN.

	1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
	STANDARDS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE FULL SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
	PLANNING BOARD HEARING.

	2) UPDATED COMMENT: THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
	LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DOES NOT MATCH
	THE SITE DATA ON THE PLANS. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
	MUST REFLECT THE FULL SCOPE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

	3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER
	FROM FDOT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE FDOT
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF BROADWAY AND 24TH AND 25TH STREETS
	ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
	SCHEDULING A PLANNING BOARD HEARING.

	4) REPEAT COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.J.1.C REQUIRES THAT
	PROJECTS WITH THREE OR MORE DISTINCTLY SEPARATE
	BUILDINGS HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT
	ELEVATIONS. SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT ELEVATIONS
	SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO VARIATIONS IN
	FENESTRATION, MATERIAL, MASSING AND COLOR. BUILDINGS B
	AND C DO NOT HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT
	ELEVATIONS FROM EACH OTHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	5) THE MAXIMUM GROUND FLOOR STORY HEIGHT IN NMUD IS 20
	FEET. THE RETAIL AREAS ON THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF
	BUILDING A ARE SHOWN AT 26 FEET, WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY.
	THE STORY HEIGHT LIMITATION WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED AS
	AN NMUD CORE SUBAREA REQUIREMENT. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT
	TO THIS ADDED CHANGE.

	6) THE MAXIMUM STORY HEIGHT ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR IN
	NMUD IS 12 FEET. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE 13-FOOT 4-INCH
	LEVEL SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS (LEVEL 3.5) FOR BUILDING
	A. IF IT IS IN EXCESS OF 12 FEET, IT DOES NOT COMPLY.
	THE STORY HEIGHT LIMITATION WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED AS
	AN NMUD CORE SUBAREA REQUIREMENT. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT
	TO THIS ADDED CHANGE.

	7) BUILDING A: THE BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE
	AREA SOUTH OF CORE PARCEL B IS 56 FEET. THE UNITS ON
	THE SOUTH END OF THE BUILDING, EAST OF PINEWOOD,
	STARTING AT RESIDENCE LEVEL 4 EXCEED THE PERMITTED.
	STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A CODE
	CHANGE TO MOVE THIS LINE; HOWEVER, STAFF DOES NOT
	SUPPORT THIS PROPOSED CHANGE. A SOLUTION IS TO MOVE
	THIS LEG OF THE TOWER NORTH, PREFERABLY TO ALIGN WITH
	24TH STREET TO PROVIDE A TERMINAL VISTA. THE SOUTH
	BOUNDARY OF CORE PARCEL B WAS SPECIFICALLY SET AT THIS
	LOCATION TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
	HISTORIC DISTRICT. NOTE: SINCE PINEWOOD IS BEING
	ABANDONED, THE AREA OF THE ABANDONED ROADWAY NEEDS TO
	BE ASSIGNED A BUILDING HEIGHT DESIGNATION. STAFF DOES
	NOT OBJECT TO THE PARCEL A HEIGHT LINE MOVING EAST TO
	COVER THE ABANDONED PORTION OF PINEWOOD.

	8) BUILDING B: THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING WITHIN THE
	NORTHWOOD ROAD HISTORIC DISTRICT CONTINUES TO BE SHOWN
	IN PLAN AND ELEVATION (SHEET A404) EXCEEDING THE
	PERMITTED NUMBER OF STORIES AND BUILDING HEIGHT (3
	STORIES/44 FEET). NOTE: THE BUILDING IS CORRECTLY SHOWN
	ON SHEET A113. ALL DRAWINGS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE
	COMPLIANT CONDITIONS.

	9) BUILDING C: THERE IS A DISCREPANCY WITH BUILDING C
	IN PLAN AND IN ELEVATION. THE PLAN VIEW SHOWS THAT THE
	4TH STORY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY AND
	THUS OUTSIDE OF THE NORTHWOOD ROAD HISTORIC DISTRICT
	BOUNDARY. HOWEVER, THE ELEVATION VIEW ON SHEET A405
	SHOWS THE 4TH STORY EXTENDING INTO THE NORTHWOOD ROAD
	HISTORIC DISTRICT, WHERE ONLY A 3-STORY BUILDING IS
	PERMITTED. ALL DRAWINGS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE
	COMPLIANT CONDITIONS.

	10) PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE UNITS IN
	BUILDING B SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE MINIMUM
	UNIT SIZE IS ACHIEVED.

	11) BUILDING B SHOWS FOUR 1,200 SF TOWNHOUSES. THIS
	UNIT'S SIZE/TYPE IS NOT LISTED ON THE UNIT MATRIX
	BREAKDOWN.

	12) BUILDING B IS NOT SHOWN IN THE SAME LOCATION IN
	RELATIONSHIP TO THE WEST PROPERTY LINE ON SHEETS A113
	(ZERO FEET), A404 (5 FEET) AND A301 (10 FEET). ALL
	DRAWINGS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE COMPLIANT
	CONDITIONS.

	13) THE WEST PROPERTY LINES DO NOT OVERLY THE SAME ON
	SHEET A301. THIS LEADS TO INCORRECT SETBACK DIMENSIONS.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE DIMENSION MUST BE FROM THE FURTHEST
	PROJECTION. THE SUPPORT COLUMNS ARE SHOWN ENCROACHING
	INTO THE REQUIRED 5-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

	14) PROVIDE THE ROOF PLAN FOR THE TOWER PORTION OF
	BUILDING A.

	15) PROVIDE THE HEIGHTS OF THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL
	EQUIPMENT AND THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
	HEIGHTS FOR ALL THREE BUILDINGS SO THAT STAFF CAN
	VERIFY THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
	WITH THE NMUD REQUIREMENTS.

	16) PROVIDE THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE INFORMATION SO
	STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH CODE FOR ALL CORNERS,
	INCLUDING THE BROADWAY EXTENSION, THE ALLEY BETWEEN
	BUILDING C, THE GARAGE RAMP AT 25TH STREET, AND THE NW
	CORNER OF PINEWOOD AND NORTHWOOD ROAD.

	17) THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR FLEX BUILDINGS IS 200
	FEET. THE LOT CONTAINING BUILDING B IS 231 FEET LONG.

	18) THE TOWER IS SHOWN ENCROACHING THE BROADWAY TOWER
	SETBACK FROM THE PODIUM. THE 15-FOOT SETBACK LINE
	DIMENSION TAG DOES NOT MATCH BLUE SETBACK LINE NOR DOES
	IT SCALE TO 15 FEET. THE LINE SCALES TO 15 FEET.

	19) SHEET A0.02 LISTS THE GROSS LAND AREA AS 144,250
	SQUARE FEET. SHEET L1.01 LISTS THE SITE AS HAVING
	88,595 SQUARE FEET, WHICH IS NOT THE AREA COVERED BY
	BUILDING A. ALL PLANS MUST INCLUDE THE CORRECT AMOUNT
	OF AREA. EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, BUILDING A, B AND C,
	MUST BE BROKEN DOWN SEPARATELY (INCLUDING THE ABANDONED
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY) AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERVIOUS
	AND IMPERVIOUS REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: THE LISTED 12,630
	SQUARE FEET OF PERVIOUS AREA WOULD NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
	PERVIOUS AREA REQUIRED BY THE NMUD REGULATIONS, EITHER
	INDIVIDUALLY OR COLLECTIVELY.

	20) THE SETBACKS AND BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG 23RD
	STREET AND THE REMAINING SECTION OF PINEWOOD FOR
	BUILDING A ARE NOT MET.

	21) THE NMUD REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT THE PRIMARY
	ENTRANCE TO THE UPPER LEVELS OF A MIXED-USE BUILDING
	SHALL BE FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHERE IS THE
	PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO THE UPPER LEVELS OF BUILDING A? IT
	APPEARS THAT IT IS EITHER THE NORTH OR SOUTH LOBBY,
	NEITHER OF WHICH ACCESS A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. PUTTING
	THESE LOBBY ENTRANCES ADJACENT TO THE LOADING DOCKS AND
	INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING DOES NOT PROVIDE AN
	ATTRACTIVE, ACTIVE STREET PRESENCE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
	TOWER. THE MAIN ENTRANCE SHOULD BE PROMINENTLY ON
	BROADWAY OR NORTHWOOD ROAD.

	22) THE NMUD REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT THE PRIMARY
	ENTRANCE TO THE UPPER LEVELS OF A MIXED-USE BUILDING
	SHALL BE FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PRIMARY
	ENTRANCE TO THE UPPER LEVELS OF BUILDING B IS SHOWN
	FROM THE PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY EXTENSION OF BROADWAY.

	23) BUILDING C IS A FLEX BUILDING. TABLE VII-7 REQUIRES
	THAT FLEX BUILDING THAT ABUTS A 15-FOOT WIDE ALLEY HAVE
	A 15-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE EDGE OF THE ALLEY. BUILDING
	C DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED
	TO SUPPORT CHANGES TO THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OUTSIDE
	OF THE CORE SUB-DISTRICT SINCE THIS WILL AFFECT
	PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT NMUD.

	24) THE NMUD REGULATIONS CURRENTLY LIMIT THE TOWER
	FLOOR PLATE TO 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ANY SINGLE
	FLOORPLATE WITH AND AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF UP TO 20,000
	SQUARE FEET. THE TEXT AMENDMENT IS REQUESTING THAT THE
	MAXIMUM FLOORPLATE CAN BE UP TO 50,000 SQUARE FEET.
	PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE AVERAGE TOWER
	FLOORPLATE IS 20,000 SQUARE FEET OR LESS.

	DESIGN STANDARDS

	25) REPEAT COMMENT: NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO
	VERIFY THE ACTIVE USE STANDARDS, THE FACADE
	ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS, THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
	STANDARDS OR THE FENESTRATION STANDARDS THAT ARE
	REQUIRED BY THE NMUD REGULATIONS. THIS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED IN TABULAR FORM AND SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION
	DRAWINGS.

	26) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE AMENDMENT THAT WILL
	PERMIT THE BUILDING THAT IS ALMOST 400 FEET IN LENGTH
	ALONG BROADWAY AND 350 FEET IN LENGTH ALONG 25TH STREET
	WITHOUT THE INCLUSION OF PLANAR BREAKS.

	27) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROJECTIONS AND
	ENCROACHMENTS (EX. BALCONIES AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL
	FEATURES) ON THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN
	VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD REGULATIONS.

	28) THE ROOF OF THE PASEO IS NOT RENDERED CORRECTLY.
	THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW HOLES IN THE
	PARKING DECK THAT ARE ACCENTUATED WITH LANDSCAPE.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE GRADE LEVEL LANDSCAPE THAT HAS BEEN
	ADDED DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. YOU MAY NOT
	PROVIDE INACCURATE RENDERINGS THAT MAKE THE FINAL
	PRODUCT LOOK DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU ARE SHOWING IN THE
	PLANS.

	STREETSCAPE

	29) REPEAT COMMENT: NO DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ON THE
	SITE LIGHTING TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
	REGULATIONS. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
	PLANNING BOARD HEARING SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT
	THERE IS NO INCONSISTENCY WITH THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
	THE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT
	STREETLIGHTS BE PROVIDED ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
	ADJACENT TO THE SITE. CLEARLY SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN
	ORIENTED LIGHTING FOR THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE SITE ON
	THE PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS INDICATE THAT
	SOME EXISTING LIGHTS WILL REMAIN, BUT NOT ALL OF THE
	SITE IS COVERED. ADDITIONALLY, IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT
	ALL OF THE EXISTING STREETLIGHT ORIENTATIONS ARE
	ACCURATELY DEPICTED. STAFF MUST BE ABLE TO VERIFY THAT
	THE LIGHTS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH PROPOSED TREE
	CANOPIES.

	30) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT WHERE THE SIDEWALKS OR
	WALKWAYS CROSS THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO THE PARKING
	FACILITIES, LOADING AREAS, OR STREETS (BOTH PRIVATE AND
	PUBLIC), THE SIDEWALK OR WALKWAY IS CONTINUOUS AND
	REMAINS AT A CONSTANT LEVEL.

	31) VERIZON HAS APPROVAL TO INSTALL A WIRELESS
	COMMUNICATION FACILITY POLE WITHIN THE BROADWAY
	RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE SITE. SHOW THE POLE ON THE
	PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT YOUR PLANS ARE
	DESIGNED TO NOT HAVE CONFLICTS (EX. PROPOSED PARKING
	SPACES, TREES, ETC.).

	32) THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MUST SHOW THE MEDIANS IN
	BROADWAY THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE
	PLANS. THE LANE WIDTH DIMENSIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT
	THESE LOCATIONS.

	33) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED ROADWAY CROSS
	SECTIONS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE FIGURES VII-16 AND
	VII-18 STREET SECTIONS. THE STREET SECTIONS, COMBINED
	WITH THE BUILDING SETBACKS ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE FOR
	WIDE, PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY SIDEWALKS. THIS DOES NOT
	OCCUR ALONG PINEWOOD AND 25TH STREET. NO CROSS SECTION
	WAS PROVIDED FOR NORTHWOOD ROAD, 23RD STREET, THE
	BROADWAY EXTENSION AND THE PORTION OF PINEWOOD THAT IS
	REMAINING. ADDITIONALLY, PINEWOOD EXCEEDS THE NMUD
	MAXIMUM LANE WIDTH OF 10 FEET, WHICH UNLESS THE WIDER
	WIDTH IS REQUIRED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER, REQUIRES A
	WAIVER.

	34) BENCHES NEED TO BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT SLEEPING.

	35) THERE ARE MULTIPLE LOCATIONS WHERE SHEET 301 SHOWS
	THE LANDSCAPE PATTERN OVERLAID ON PAVEMENT. THE SITE
	PLAN NEEDS TO ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	36) THE DESIGN OF THE PASEO NEEDS TO BE REEXAMINED:

	A. THE 4.33-FOOT DIMENSION BETWEEN THE PLANTERS AND THE
	STOREFRONTS IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR PEDESTRIANS TO
	COMFORTABLY WINDOW SHOP.
	B. THE PROPOSED TEXT HAD CONTEMPLATED RESTAURANT
	OUTDOOR SEATING IN THE PASEO, YET BASED ON THE PLANTER
	LOCATIONS, THERE IS NO ROOM FOR ANY OUTDOOR SEATING.
	C. THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION IS LOCATED DIRECTLY IN
	FRONT OF A DOORWAY. WHILE STAFF AGREES THAT A MICRO
	MOBILITY STATION NEEDS TO BE LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY
	TO THE PASEO, THE SPECIFIC LOCATION IS NOT AN
	APPROPRIATE LOCATION. PROVIDE THE MICRO MOBILITY
	STATION DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS.

	PARKING/LOADING

	38) NMUD ONLY PERMITS SURFACE PARKING LOTS TO THE SIDE
	OR THE REAR OF A PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT
	FRONTING ON 23RD STREET DOES NOT MEET THIS STANDARD.
	PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT A CODE AMENDMENT TO
	PERMIT PARKING LOTS WITHIN THE BUILDING?S FRONT SETBACK
	AREA.

	39) THE SURFACE LOT, WHICH WHILE NOT PERMITTED BY THE
	REGULATIONS, ALSO FAILS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED DIRECT
	PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY, NOR DOES IT
	PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

	40) THE ENTRANCE TO THE SURFACE AND GARAGE PARKING AREA
	FROM PINEWOOD EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED 24 FEET IN
	WIDTH DUE TO THE RADIUS STARTING INSIDE THE PROPERTY
	LINE. THE RADIUS/FLAIR MAY NOT WIDEN UNTIL IT IS WITHIN
	THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	41) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE LOADING ZONES ON THE
	PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE. 70K SF
	OF COMMERCIAL USE REQUIRES TWO 10 X 50 FOOT SPACES. THE
	SPACES PROVIDED ON THE PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE 50
	FEET IN LENGTH.

	42) ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING GARAGE MUST BE SCREENED
	BY A LINER BUILDING CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20
	FEET IF HABITABLE SPACE. THIS IS NOT MET ALONG THE FULL
	LENGTH OF 25TH STREET, NORTHWOOD ROAD AND 23RD STREET
	AND PARTIALLY ALONG BROADWAY. THE PROPOSED CODE CHANGE
	DID NOT ADDRESS THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE SCREENING. STAFF
	WILL NOT SUPPORT BROADWAY NOT HAVING THE 20-FOOT DEPTH
	OF HABITABLE SPACE. IF THE CODE IS AMENDED ON THE OTHER
	FRONTAGES, THEN THERE NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE
	DEALING WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND THE PROVISION
	OF PLANAR BREAKS TO VARY THE FA?ADE IN ORDER TO CONCEAL
	THE NON-HABITABLE PARKING.

	43) REPEAT COMMENT: DEAD END PARKING ROWS FOR
	UNASSIGNED PARKING ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A
	TURNAROUND SPACE. THE PUBLIC PARKING SPACES ON THE
	LOWER PARKING LEVEL MAY NOT BE LOCATED ON A DEAD-END
	AISLE WITHOUT A TURNAROUND SPACE. FIVE PARKING SPACES
	ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE GARAGE WILL NEED TO BE
	CONVERTED INTO TURN AROUND SPACES.

	44) UPDATED COMMENT: ALL PARKING GARAGES MUST HAVE
	DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. PROVIDE
	WHICH ELEVATORS ARE FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC TO ACCESS THE
	GROUND FLOOR. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE ALL OF THE ELEVATOR
	ACCESS IS THROUGH SOME SORT OF LOBBY ON THE GROUND
	FLOOR, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE PUBLIC WILL BE
	ABLE TO ACCESS THE LOBBY. THE SOUTH LOBBY, WHICH
	PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE SOUTHERN, LOWER PARKING LEVEL
	SEEMS TO BE A RESIDENT LOBBY.

	45) COLUMNS ARE SHOWN IN DRIVE AISLES ON NORTH PORTION
	OF THE LOWER LEVEL GARAGE.

	46) MOST OF THE ADA ACCESS AISLES ON THE BOTH PARKING
	LEVELS APPEAR TO HAVE A PORTION OF THE COLUMN
	ENCROACHING. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, YOU NEED TO CLEAN
	UP THE DRAWINGS TO SHOW NO ENCROACHMENTS.

	47) ADA SPACE NEXT TO STAIRS ON THE EASTERN WALL OF
	UPPER PARKING LEVEL HAS A COLUMN BLOCKING THE 5-FOOT
	WIDE ACCESS AISLE AND NEEDS TO HAVE AN EXTRA FOOT ALONG
	THE STAIRWELL WALL TO PERMIT ADEQUATE DOOR OPENING.

	48) ALL PARKING SPACES NEXT TO A WALL NEED TO PROVIDE
	AN EXTRA FOOT TO PERMIT ADEQUATE DOOR OPENING.

	49) THE PARKING SPACES THAT HEAD AGAINST WALLS NEED
	MORE CLARITY THAT THEY MEET THE REQUIRED 18-FOOT DEPTH.
	THE SPACES WITH DIMENSION TAGS SHOW THE END OF THE
	SPACE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LINE SHOWING THE WALL, WHICH
	MAKES THEM TOO SHORT. IF THIS IS A LINE WEIGHT ISSUE ON
	THE PLAN VERSION, PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THAT CLEARLY
	DEMONSTRATES THAT THE PARKING STALLS AND DRIVE AISLES
	HAVE SUFFICIENT DEPTH. THERE ARE SOME SPACES THAT THE
	PARKING SPACE BOX IS SHOWN IN THE WALL (EX OVERLOOKING
	THE RAMP ON THE LOWER PARKING LEVEL.

	50) 20 SPACES ALONG THE NORTH WALL AND 10 SPACES ALONG
	THE SOUTH WALL OF THE UPPER PARKING LEVEL AND 15 SPACES
	ALONG THE NORTH WALL AND 8 SPACES ALONG THE SOUTH WALL
	ON THE LOWER PARKING LEVEL DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
	18-FOOT STALL DEPTH. THIS IS 53 NON-COMPLIANT PARKING
	SPACES.

	51) THE PARKING RAMPS MAY NOT BE SHOWN ENCROACHING THE
	COLUMNS AND WALLS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING.

	52) THE STAIRWELLS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING
	ENCROACH INTO THE DRIVE AISLES RESULTING IN THE CODE
	REQUIRED 24-FOOT WIDTH NOT IN COMPLIANCE.

	53) PROVIDE THE DETAILS ON HOW PEOPLE ARE PROTECTED
	FROM THE EDGES OF THE PARKING RAMPS. THIS MAY AFFECT
	THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO THE RAMPS.

	54) THE PARKING STALL DETAIL PROVIDED ON THE CIVIL PLAN
	DOES NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS. PROVIDE THE ACCURATE
	DETAIL.

	55) THE RESPONSE STATES THAT THE TANDEM SPACES ARE FOR
	RESIDENTS, WHICH DOES NOT PERMIT THE INSIDE SPACE TO BE
	COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS
	SINCE THE NMUD REQUIRES ONE PARKING SPACE PER UNIT. THE
	INSIDE SPACE CANNOT BE ASSIGNED TO A UNIT THAT IS
	DIFFERENT FROM THE OUTSIDE SPACE, SO IT MAY NOT COUNT.

	56) THE PARKING PROVIDED TABLES SHALL CLEARLY SEPARATE
	THE PROVIDE ADA SPACES FROM THE TOTAL PROVIDED SPACES
	FOR EACH CATEGORY. THE CURRENT LINE ITEMS MAKE IT LOOK
	LIKE THERE ARE ADA SPACES IN ADDITION TO THE REGULAR
	SPACES.

	57) 77,820 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL REQUIRES 156
	PARKING SPACES, NOT 152 OR 153 AS SHOWN ON DIFFERING
	PARKING TABLES. THE TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING IS 534
	SPACES.

	58) 53 PUBLIC PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE
	WITH THE AGREEMENT WITH CRA AND NEED TO BE REFLECTED ON
	THE PARKING TABLE AND THE PLANS.

	59) EVEN WHEN NOT REMOVING THE PARKING SPACES THAT DO
	NOT COMPLY WITH CODE DEPTH, WALL ADJACENCY OR DEAD-END
	ROWS, THE PROJECT DOES NOT PROVIDE CODE MINIMUM
	PARKING. THERE ARE 592 SPACES LISTED AS PROVIDED.
	REMOVING THE 18 TANDEM AND 53 REQUIRED PUBLIC CRA
	SPACES, RESULTS IN ONLY 521 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED,
	WHICH IS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 534 SPACES.

	60) THE CRA AGREEMENT REQUIRES THAT THE DEVELOPER
	CONSTRUCT PUBLIC PARKING SPACES IN AN AMOUNT TO EQUAL
	10% OF THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT (53 PARKING
	SPACES). WHILE THE PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE
	WHERE THE 53 CRA REQUIRED PARKING SPACES ARE LOCATED,
	IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THEM ARE INTENDED TO BE LOCATED
	WITHIN THE ON-STREET PARKING SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SINCE
	THE LANGUAGE REQUIRES THAT NEW PARKING SPACES BE
	CONSTRUCTED TO MEET THE CRA REQUIREMENT, PROVIDE AN
	EXISTING PARKING INVENTORY OF THE ON-STREET PARKING
	SPACES. EXISTING PARKING SPACES MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS
	NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SPACES, AND ANY SPACES BEING REMOVED,
	WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AND MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS
	NEWLY CREATED PARKING SPACES.

	61) THE PROJECT REQUIRES 16 BICYCLE SPACES FOR THE
	COMMERCIAL PORTION AND 38 BICYCLE SPACES FOR THE
	RESIDENTIAL PORTION. THERE ARE 54 TOTAL REQUIRED
	BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THIS SHALL BE CORRECTLY
	REFLECTED ON THE PARKING TABLE.

	62) WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE BICYCLE STORAGE AREA ON THE
	UPPER PARKING LEVEL OF BUILDING A?

	63) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE RACKS,
	INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF SPACES, LOCATED IN THE BICYCLE
	STORAGE ROOM AS WELL AS THE DIMENSIONS OF THE ROOM AND
	THE RACKS IN THE ROOM. THIS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ITS
	OWN BICYCLE ROOM DETAIL SHEET THAT THIS AT A LEGIBLE
	SCALE.

	64) WHERE IS THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY
	FOR THE COMMERCIAL TENANTS OF BUILDING A?

	65) ALL ON-STREET BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS MUST BE
	CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
	THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM AND THAT SIDEWALKS ARE
	NOT BLOCKED. NUMEROUS BICYCLES RACKS ARE CURRENTLY
	SHOWN BLOCKING SIDEWALKS. THE BICYCLE RACK DETAILS FOR
	THESE SPACES NEED TO BE PROVIDED.

	66) THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION NORTH OF BUILDING B MUST
	BE RELOCATED. IT INTERFERES WITH A PROPOSED BICYCLE
	RACK.

	LANDSCAPE

	67) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
	REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP ALONG THE RAILROAD
	RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE SITE PLAN SEEMS TO SHOW COLUMNS
	ENCROACHING INTO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, WHICH IS NOT
	PERMITTED. PLEASE REVIEW THE DRAWINGS FOR CLARITY SINCE
	THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW AN
	ENCROACHMENT.

	68) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS TO VERIFY THAT
	A LANDSCAPE STRIP, A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET IN WIDTH, IS
	PROVIDED ALONG THE CURBSIDE ALONG THE STREET EDGE. IF
	TREE GRATES ARE USED INSTEAD OF A LANDSCAPE STRIP, THEN
	THE REQUIRED DIMENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE
	PLAN. NOTE: THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE FAILS TO
	MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO
	THE PASEO ON BROADWAY ALSO FAILS TO MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT.

	69) THE CODE STATES THAT A LANDSCAPE STRIP, NOT TREE
	GRATES IS THE PREFERRED OPTION WHEN NO ON-STREET
	PARKING IS PROVIDED. 23RD STREET AND 25TH STREET HAVE
	NOT ON-STREET PARKING, SO A LANDSCAPE STRIP IS
	REQUIRED.

	70) THE CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED 60-INCH
	AREA FOR THE SIDEWALK. THE SITE PLAN FAILS TO SHOW THE
	EXISTING UTILITY POLES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ALONG 23RD
	STREET ADJACENT TO BUILDING B. THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN ? ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK
	WIDTH, OVERLAPPING THE TREE PITS AND IN CONFLICT WITH
	PROPOSED STREET TREE CANOPIES.

	71) THERE IS A TREE SHOWN WHERE THE EXISTING FIRE
	HYDRANT TO REMAIN IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLAN IN FRONT
	OF BUILDING C.

	72) THERE ARE OAK TREES BEING SHOWN PLANTED ON TOP OF A
	GAS LINE ALONG NORTHWOOD ROAD. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DEPTH
	OF THE GAS LINE SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS
	NO CONFLICT.

	HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND

	73) THIS PROJECT IS UTILIZING THE CORE SUBDISTRICT
	HISTORIC PRESERVATION HEIGHT BONUS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
	AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING PROVIDED ABOVE THE
	80-FOOT BASE ZONING HEIGHT.

	PRIVATE OPEN SPACE

	74) PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS ? NO CALCULATIONS
	WERE PROVIDED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACES SHALL PROVIDE SHADED
	AREAS, AND THEIR GROUND SURFACE SHALL BE A COMBINATION
	OF PAVING MATERIALS, LAWN, OR GROUND COVER.

	75) BUILDING A IS A MIXED-USE TOWER BUILDING, SO IT IS
	REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10% COMMON, PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE ON SITE. IT APPEARS THAT THE INTENT IS TO
	PROVIDE THE COMMON, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON THE ROOF OF
	THE PARKING DECK. PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE MINIMUM
	AREA IS PROVIDED.

	76) BUILDING B IS A MIXED-USE FLEX BUILDING, SO IT IS
	REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10% COMMON, PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE ON SITE. THE PLANS SHOW NO COMMON, PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE PROVIDED FOR THIS BUILDING.

	77) BUILDING C IS A MIXED-USE FLEX BUILDING, SO IT IS
	REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10% COMMON, PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE ON SITE. THE PLANS SHOW NO COMMON, PRIVATE
	OPEN SPACE PROVIDED FOR THIS BUILDING.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	11-18-2021	Time	09:24	Rev Time	12.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	11-17-2021	Time	20:33	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-17 20:39:37	CASE NO. 1895
	NORTHWOOD COMMONS - NMUD ANCHOR SITE
	BROADWAY & 24TH STREET

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
	(4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	DECEMBER 3, 2021, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
	THE JANUARY 18, 2022 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JANUARY 18,
	2022), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
	THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
	ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	PLANNING STAFF BEGAN A REVIEW OF THE PLANS AND BEGAN TO
	LIST DISCREPANCIES WITH THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS AND GENERAL ISSUES WITH THE QUALITY OF THE
	INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THE PLANS. AFTER IDENTIFYING
	OVER 30 COMMENTS, MANY WHICH WILL REQUIRE A REDESIGN OF
	THE PLANS, PLANNING STOPPED THE REVIEW. THE PLANS NEED
	TO BE CORRECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE CODE AND THE
	INTERNAL INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THE PLAN SHEETS. STAFF
	DID NOT FULLY VET OPEN SPACE, SETBACKS, STREETSCAPE,
	MECHANICAL SCREENING AND LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE TO NAME A
	FEW, SO JUST BECAUSE COMMENTS WERE NOT ISSUED ABOUT A
	PARTICULAR ASPECT OF THE PLAN, DO NOT ASSUME IT
	COMPLIES. BASED ON WHAT STAFF HAS LISTED BELOW, STAFF
	IS CONFIDENT THAT THERE ARE ADDITIONAL CODE
	REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE NOT MET.

	1) THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT BEING MEASURED CORRECTLY.
	IT DOES NOT START AT THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.

	2) BUILDING A DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM NUMBER
	OF STORIES AND BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED.

	A. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES PERMITTED WITHIN CORE
	PARCELS A & B IS 8 STORIES (WITH THE HEIGHT BONUS). THE
	BUILDING HAS 9 STORIES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
	94-209.B.5., EACH PARKING GARAGE LEVEL AT THE FRONTAGE
	LINE(S) SHALL EQUAL ONE STORY FOR THE PURPOSES OF
	MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT. THE PARKING GARAGE LEVEL
	THAT YOU ARE DESIGNATING AS A MEZZANINE IS NOT A
	MEZZANINE, IT IS A STORY SINCE IT IS ALONG MULTIPLE
	FRONTAGE LINES.
	B. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES/BUILDING HEIGHT
	PERMITTED WITHIN THE AREA SOUTH OF CORE PARCEL B IS 4
	STORIES/56 FEET. THE ENTIRE ROW OF UNITS ON THE SOUTH
	END OF THE BUILDING STARTING AT RESIDENCE LEVEL 4
	EXCEED THE PERMITTED NUMBER OF STORIES AND HEIGHT
	PERMITTED.

	3) BUILDING B DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE NUMBER OF
	STORIES AND BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED.

	A. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES/BUILDING HEIGHT
	PERMITTED WITHIN THE HISTORICALLY DESIGNATED PORTION OF
	THE TRANSITION SUBDISTRICT IS 3 STORIES/44 FEET. THE
	BUILDING IN THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED NUMBER OF
	STORIES AND HEIGHT. IF THE GROUND LEVEL IS INTENDED TO
	CONTAIN A MEZZANINE THAT WOULD NOT COUNT AS A STORY,
	THEN COMPLETE FLOOR PLANS SHOWING HOW THIS IS IN
	REALITY A MEZZANINE MUST BE PROVIDED. THE CURRENT PLANS
	SHOW THIS AS A FULL FLOOR.
	B. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES PERMITTED WITHIN THE
	AREA SOUTH OF CORE PARCEL B IS 4 STORIES FEET. THE
	BUILDING IN THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED NUMBER OF
	STORIES. IF THE GROUND LEVEL IS INTENDED TO CONTAIN A
	MEZZANINE THAT WOULD NOT COUNT AS A STORY, THEN
	COMPLETE FLOOR PLANS SHOWING HOW THIS IS IN REALITY A
	MEZZANINE MUST BE PROVIDED. THE CURRENT PLANS SHOW THIS
	AS A FULL FLOOR.

	4) BUILDING C DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE NUMBER OF
	STORIES AND BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED.

	A. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES/BUILDING HEIGHT
	PERMITTED WITHIN THE HISTORICALLY DESIGNATED PORTION OF
	THE TRANSITION SUBDISTRICT IS 3 STORIES/44 FEET. THE
	BUILDING IN THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED NUMBER OF
	STORIES AND HEIGHT. THE PLANS CLEARLY CALL OUT A
	2-STORY GROUND LEVEL.
	B. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES PERMITTED WITHIN THE
	AREA SOUTH OF CORE PARCEL B IS 4 STORIES FEET. THE
	BUILDING IN THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED NUMBER OF
	STORIES. THE PLANS CLEARLY CALL OUT A 2-STORY GROUND
	LEVEL.

	5) THERE ARE PLAN SHEETS THAT CONTINUE TO SHOW BUILDING
	C ENCROACHING INTO THE BROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS
	NOT PERMITTED.

	6) THE GROUND FLOOR UNIT THAT WAS "CUT" TO AVOID
	ENCROACHING INTO THE BROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS NOT
	UPDATED TO SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR THAT IT EVEN
	FUNCTIONS.

	7) THE BUILDING A UNIT PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE. THERE ARE
	UNITS THAT HAVE NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED.

	8) THE ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDINGS B AND C DO NOT MATCH
	THE FLOOR PLANS.

	9) FULL FLOOR PLANS FOR BUILDINGS B AND C ARE REQUIRED
	FOR STAFF TO SEE HOW THE BUILDINGS FUNCTION AS SHOWN.

	10) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPROVAL
	LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR
	THE FULL SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

	11) THE NUMBER OF UNITS AND THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE
	FOOTAGE LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DO NOT
	MATCH THE SITE DATA ON THE PLANS. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT
	ANALYSIS MUST REFLECT THE FULL SCOPE OF THE
	DEVELOPMENT.

	12) PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT FOR THE
	IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF BROADWAY
	AND 25TH STREET ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT.

	13) PROVIDE THE LETTER FROM COMCAST CONFIRMING THAT THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS
	OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR
	SERVICES.

	14) SECTION 94-209.J.1.C REQUIRES THAT PROJECTS WITH
	THREE OR MORE DISTINCTLY SEPARATE BUILDINGS HAVE
	SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FRONT ELEVATIONS. SUBSTANTIALLY
	DIFFERENT FRONT ELEVATIONS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE
	LIMITED TO VARIATIONS IN FENESTRATION, MATERIAL,
	MASSING AND COLOR. THE PLANS AND NARRATIVE MUST VERIFY
	THAT THE BUILDINGS COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.

	15) SHEET A404 SHOWS BUILDING C AS HAVING 4 EAST
	ELEVATIONS. WHAT SHOULD BE LABELED AS THE NORTH AND
	SOUTH ELEVATIONS DO NOT ALIGN WITH THE KEY PLAN.

	16) SHEET A405 SHOWS BUILDING B AS HAVING 4 SOUTH
	ELEVATIONS.

	17) THE CITY'S MIXED USE DISTRICT DEFINES OPEN SPACE AS
	AN IMPROVED OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. FIGURE VII-3
	DESIGNATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES AND GREENWAY REGULATING
	PLAN REQUIRES PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WHERE 24TH STREET IS
	PROPOSED FOR ABANDONMENT. THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT
	DOES NOT HAVE THIS AREA COMPLY WITH THE OPEN SPACE
	DEFINITION; THEREFORE, THIS AREA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	THE CODE REQUIREMENT.

	18) THE ENTRANCES TO THE SURFACE AND GARAGE PARKING
	AREAS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED 24 FEET IN WIDTH.

	19) ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING GARAGE MUST BE SCREENED
	BY A LINER BUILDING CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF
	HABITABLE SPACE. STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT A VARIANCE TO
	THIS PROVISION HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT STAFF DOES NOT
	SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUEST.

	20) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE PARKING GARAGE HAS
	DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY.

	21) SECTION 94-209.F.1.E REQUIRES A LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	STRIP OF AT LEAST FIVE FEET WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED
	ALONG THE ENTIRE EDGE OF A PROPERTY ABUTTING A RAILROAD
	RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE REQUIRED BUFFER HAS NOT BEEN
	PROVIDED. PLANNING STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT A WAIVER OF
	THIS REQUIREMENT.

	22) NO DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ON THE SITE LIGHTING TO
	VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD REGULATIONS.

	23) PROVIDE HOW THE STOREFRONTS AT THE ABANDONED
	PORTION OF 24TH STREET ARE BE DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM
	A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR PUBLIC,
	SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, GIVEN THAT THE
	ABANDONED PORTION OF 24TH STREET DOES NOT MEET ANY OF
	THESE DEFINITIONS.

	24) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY THE ACTIVE
	USE STANDARDS, THE FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS,
	THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT STANDARDS OR THE
	FENESTRATION STANDARDS.

	25) NMUD DOES NOT PERMIT DWELLING UNITS CONTAINING LESS
	THAN 550 SQUARE FEET, YET THE UNIT MATRIX SHOWS AT
	LEAST 36 UNITS FAILING TO MEET THIS STANDARD.

	26) DEAD END PARKING ROWS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A
	TURNAROUND SPACE. THERE ARE NUMEROUS THROUGHOUT THE
	GARAGE.

	27) THE PARKING SPACES AT THE TOP OF THE RAMPS ARE
	UNSAFE GIVEN THE SLOPE OF THE RAMPS.

	28) DESCRIBE WHO WILL USE THE TANDEM SPACES.

	29) THERE ARE MISLABELED DIMENSION TAGS IN THE GARAGE.

	30) THERE ARE STAIRS THAT DIRECTLY ENCROACH PARKING
	SPACES AND DOORWAYS THAT CANNOT BE ACCESSED IF A CAR IS
	PARKED IN THE SPACE IN FRONT OF THE DOOR.

	31) NO DETAILS ON THE BICYCLE PARKING WAS PROVIDED,
	BOTH FOR THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM AND THE STREET
	BICYCLE PARKING.

	32) THE VEHICLE LOADING/SERVICE AREAS MAY NOT USE CITY
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR MANEUVERING.

	33) THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW SUPPORT COLUMNS
	LOCATED WITHIN PINEWOOD AVENUE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
	PROVIDE PLANS THAT SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL
	COLUMNS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE SPANS ACROSS
	PINEWOOD AVENUE AND THE ABANDONED PORTION OF 25TH
	STREET SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE IMPACTS ON THE AT
	GRADE LAYOUT.

	34) THE INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE FOR THIS PROJECT
	INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE, "TRIRAIL COASTAL LINK
	THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (SFRTA),
	ALONG WITH STATE, REGIONAL AND LOCAL PARTNERS, IS
	PLANNING THE CREATION OF A TRIRAIL COASTAL LINK RAIL
	CONNECTION ALONG THE FEC RAILWAY FROM MIAMI TO JUPITER.
	IN PREVIOUS PLANS THE ANCHOR SITE WAS CONSIDERED AS ONE
	OF THE POTENTIAL LOCATIONS FOR A FUTURE TRI-RAIL STOP.
	CURRENT PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE THE ANCHOR SITE IN "PHASE
	1"? OF THE RAIL CONNECTION; HOWEVER, DEVELOPMENT ON
	THIS SITE SHOULD CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A FUTURE
	STOP AND DEVELOPERS WOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO SUPPORT THE
	RAIL CONNECTION AT THIS LOCATION. THE CRA'S NORTH END
	VISION CONSIDERS THE ANCHOR SITE AS A PRIME RAIL STOP
	LOCATION. CURRENT LOCATIONS AND STUDIES CAN BE LOCATED
	AT HTTP://TRI-RAILCOASTALLINK.COM/." EXPLAIN HOW THE
	PLANS PROVIDE A CONNECTION AT THIS LOCATION.