 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21080014
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21080014 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-11-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
04-11-2023 |
Time |
18:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
04-11-2023 |
Time |
18:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-04-11 18:27:32 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.1 FT NAVD. | | | THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
Time |
22:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
Time |
21:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-17 22:14:31 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. SPOT LEVELS HAVE BEEN CHANGED. PROPOSED SIDEWALK | | | FROM CLARE AVE TO PARKING LOT IS LABELED AS SIDEWALK, | | | BUT IT IS ACTUALLY A RAMP WITH A SLOPE STEEPER THAN | | | 1:20. HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF A RAMP, AND A | | | LANDING IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE RAMP AND THE GATE. | | | SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ACCESSIBILITY. | | | ALSO, IF THE GATE IS MOVED FURTHER INTO THE PARKING LOT | | | IT WILL RESTRICT WHEELCHAIR ACCESS TO THE ACCESSIBLE | | | RESTROOM. | | | | | | 3. ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM. THE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM HAS | | | BEEN MOVED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE ENTRY GATE AT THE | | | END OF THE SIDEWALK/RAMP. THE CHANGE IN LEVEL AT THE | | | THRESHOLD FOR THE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM SHALL NOT BE | | | GREATER THAN 0.5 INCH PER SECTION 303.3 OF FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, ACCESSIBILITY. | | | | | | 4. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.1 FT NAVD. | | | THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-13-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-13-2021 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-13 16:33:33 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.1 FT NAVD. | | | THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-10-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-10-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-10-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
failed |
Date |
07-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-02 15:05:26 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : | | | | | | O PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING | | | SANITARY SEWER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG | | | ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. (NOTE: THIS IS A CONDITION OF | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL.) | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR, 561-822-2262, [email protected] | | | DID NOT RECEIVE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO PRIOR REVIEW | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NEAR WATER METER NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL. MAKE SURE LOCATION COMPLIES WITH | | | SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY STANDARD DETAIL. | | | | | | -CANNOT FIND RECORD OF WATER METER CURRENTLY INSTALLED | | | AT 1156 CLARE AVE. NEW WATER METER WOULD BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | -FOR A 1 INCH METER, THE WATER SERVICE LINE AND TAP | | | SHOULD BE 1 INCH SIZING. | | | | | | -CANNOT USE SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPING BETWEEN METER AND | | | TAP. MUST USE APPROVED MATERIAL TYPE. PLEASE UPDATE. | | | | | | -PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON CLARE AVE MUST COMPLY WITH WPB | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WOULD BE LARGER THAN VISUALLY | | | REPRESENTED ON PLANS. | | | | | | -SEWER LATERAL CLOSE TO PROPERTY LINE IS NOT SHOWN ON | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN. PLEASE UPDATE AND VERIFY NO CONFLICTS | | | WITH TREES. | | | | | | -WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS MISSING FROM WATER PLAN. IF | | | ANY IRRIGATION IS PLANNED TO RUN OFF METERED WATER | | | SERVICE, THEN ALSO INCLUDE IN CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | -0.75 INCH METER SHOULD HAVE 1 INCH SERVICE LINE AND | | | TAP. IF 2 INCH SERVICE LINE IS REQUIRED, THEN INCREASE | | | METER SIZE TO 1.5 OR 2 INCH. | | | | | | -AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: CALLOUT WATER SERVICE | | | PIPE MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -PAVEMENT RESTORATION AREA OF CLARE AVE ON PGD PLAN | | | LOOKS SMALLER THAN REQUIRED. SEE NOTE 1 ON SD GC8. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ldeloren |
Date |
02-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ldeloren |
Date |
02-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-01 13:31:06 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : | | | | | | GENERAL: | | | O PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING, AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z21080014). | | | O THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WP | | | B_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FUL | | | L-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97 | | | B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | B. THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | C. ALSO SEE: CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH, FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, | | | ADOPTED SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | O AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | A. HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PU | | | BLICATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION- CONTROL-MANUAL | | | O PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METERS: | | | O SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER | | | SERVICES AND WATER METERS, ALONG WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING | | | TO THEM. | | | O SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEDICATED UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO | | | STRUCTURES WITHIN EASEMENT. | | | O PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION | | | OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTION. | | | O BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY | | | OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER | | | METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO | | | PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY. | | | O CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA (MAKE | | | NOTE USC APPROVED) AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | | | | WATER/WASTEWATER PLAN: | | | O PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | O PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE | | | STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. | | | O PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND | | | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND | | | SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH | | | PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE | | | AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND IRRIGATION METERS, | | | BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, AND OTHER DEVICES TO | | | BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, | | | DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, | | | ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT | | | ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES. | | | O GATE VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR | | | SIDEWALK. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. | | | O DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | O SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. | | | O PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | O PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM LINES PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD | | | DETAIL GN-2 SERIES, AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | O SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE DIRECTLY | | | TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. | | | O PROVIDE FIRE FLOW TEST DATA. | | | O PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT | | | FRONTAGE. | | | O CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | O WHEN PROPOSED, WATER MAINS IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL | | | BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (NOT PVC) AND SPECIFY | | | PROPOSED LENGTH IN FEET. | | | O CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | O PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE ONSITE | | | JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY 75 FEET. | | | O ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S DOWNSTREAM LIFT | | | STATION NUMBER. | | | O PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | O LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | O PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GREASE | | | TRAPS (IF ANY). | | | O PER CITY STANDARDS MAINTAIN MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN | | | OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CITY PIPE AND ROOT BARRIER. | | | | | | FORMAL ENGINEERING REVIEW: | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND NPDES | | | NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. | | | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: | | | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS | | | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF | | | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; | | | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE | | | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A | | | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). | | | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF | | | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION | | | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF | | | WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES ARE | | | BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE | | | 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS PER | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | O FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS FOR | | | PROPOSED IMPROVED AREAS. | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR, 561-822-2262, [email protected] | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NEAR WATER METER NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL. MAKE SURE LOCATION COMPLIES WITH | | | SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY STANDARD DETAIL. | | | | | | -CANNOT FIND RECORD OF WATER METER CURRENTLY INSTALLED | | | AT 1156 CLARE AVE. NEW WATER METER WOULD BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | -FOR A 1 INCH METER, THE WATER SERVICE LINE AND TAP | | | SHOULD BE 1 INCH SIZING. | | | | | | -CANNOT USE SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPING BETWEEN METER AND | | | TAP. MUST USE APPROVED MATERIAL TYPE. PLEASE UPDATE. | | | | | | -PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON CLARE AVE MUST COMPLY WITH WPB | | | STANDARD DETAILS. WOULD BE LARGER THAN VISUALLY | | | REPRESENTED ON PLANS. | | | | | | -SEWER LATERAL CLOSE TO PROPERTY LINE IS NOT SHOWN ON | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN. PLEASE UPDATE AND VERIFY NO CONFLICTS | | | WITH TREES. | | | | | | -WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS MISSING FROM WATER PLAN. IF | | | ANY IRRIGATION IS PLANNED TO RUN OFF METERED WATER | | | SERVICE, THEN ALSO INCLUDE IN CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MIKE TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, | | | 561-494-1047, [email protected] | | | -SHEET C1 ON THE CALL OUT FOR THE EX WATER METER REVISE | | | CALL OUT TO INCLUDE ?CUT AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN? OR | | | SOMETHING SIMILAR. | | | -ADD A ?LEVEL OF SERVICE? TABLE SHOWING THE PROPOSED | | | IMPACTS TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM. | | | -ADD NOTE THAT THIS IS WITHIN LS 14 SERVICE BOUNDARY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-02 08:57:33 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. | | | SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR | | | [email protected]: | | | | | | -SUBMITTED SURVEY LOOKS PROBLEMATIC AS FOLLOWS: SURVEY | | | SAID FROM 2018 ? NOT SURE IF ANY CHANGES SINCE THEN; | | | WORDING THAT SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION; | | | NOTATION ON SURVEY SAYING THERE ME BE ADDITIONAL | | | RESTRICTIONS IN COUNTY RECORDS ? NOT SURE IF TITLE | | | SEARCH DONE OR RECORDS CHECKED. | | | | | | -DID NOT SEE FIRELINES OR FIRE HYDRANTS ON PLANS. WILL | | | FIRE SPRINKLERS BE IN BUILDINGS, AND WILL FIRE HYDRANT | | | INSTALLATION BE REQUIRED? | | | | | | -WILL THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND APPROACH BE REMOVED AND | | | REPLACED WITH CURBED SIDEWALK? | | | | | | -SUBMIT CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS SHOWING THE UTILITY | | | WORK AND RIGHT OF WAY RESTORATION. | | | | | | -ADD VISUAL MEASUREMENT ICONS TO PLAN SHEETS. | | | | | | -EXISTING OR PROPOSED METER BOXES MAY NOT BE IN | | | DRIVEWAYS OR DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. | | | | | | -SHOW BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ON PLANS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-07-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-07-2021 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-07 10:04:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED | | | TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED, AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ANY PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC | | | SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE | | | PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 9A. THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE | | | LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND | | | SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, | | | THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. RADIO | | | | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | | | | NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT | | | SYSTEMS. | | | | | | THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL | | | STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | | | | TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD | | | DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO | | | TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. | | | | | | IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL | | | AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM | | | 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC | | | SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected], | | | 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR | | | DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-21-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-21-2023 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-21-2023 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-21 11:22:29 | LANDSCAPE PLAN SAME AS PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-08-2022 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-08-2022 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-08 16:55:26 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1156 CLARE AVE (Z18040013) Z21080014 | | | JULY 8, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED, SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AUTHORIZED BY | | | F.S.CH. 481 PT. 2, PER SECTION 94-442(B)(1). | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL PROPERTY LINES AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER | | | CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(B). REVISE | | | TABLE TO SHOW NORTH-46? REQUIRES 2 TREES, EAST- 52.73? | | | REQUIRES 2 TREES, SOUTH-125?REQUIRES 5 TREES, WEST ? | | | 50? REQUIRES 2 TREES. REVISE CHART AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED BUFFER TREES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. CORRECT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO 40%, 2568 | | | SQ FT, REQUIRES 2 TREES, 1 FLOWERING TREE, AND 6 | | | SHRUBS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. REVISE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT MINIMUM | | | TREE SIZES REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS, | | | BAHIA (PASPALUM NOTATUM) IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING TEMPORARY | | | IRRIGATION FOR NATIVE PLANTS. SOME OF THE PLANTS ARE | | | NOT NATIVE AND DO NOT QUALIFY FOR AN EXEMPTION. SUPPLY | | | A PLAN SHOWING LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH WATER USAGE | | | ZONES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/7/22: | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. CIVIL PLANS SHOW D CURB ALONG SOUTH EDGE | | | OF PAVEMENT, CURB NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SITE AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 10. SATISFIED. WATER AND SEWER LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | DO NOT MATCH THE CIVIL DRAWINGS AND THERE ARE CONFLICTS | | | WITH TREES. THE DRAINAGE AND EXFILTRATION ARE TOO CLOSE | | | TO THE TREES ON THE SOUTH SIDE. CIVIL DRAWINGS MUST BE | | | COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2022 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2022 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-08 15:23:55 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1156 CLARE AVE (Z18040013) Z21080014 | | | FEBRUARY 7, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED, SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AUTHORIZED BY | | | F.S.CH. 481 PT. 2, PER SECTION 94-442(B)(1). | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL PROPERTY LINES AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER | | | CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(B). REVISE | | | TABLE TO SHOW NORTH-46? REQUIRES 2 TREES, EAST- 52.73? | | | REQUIRES 2 TREES, SOUTH-125?REQUIRES 5 TREES, WEST ? | | | 50? REQUIRES 2 TREES. REVISE CHART AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED BUFFER TREES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. CORRECT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO 40%, 2568 | | | SQ FT, REQUIRES 2 TREES, 1 FLOWERING TREE, AND 6 | | | SHRUBS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. REVISE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT MINIMUM | | | TREE SIZES REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS, | | | BAHIA (PASPALUM NOTATUM) IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING TEMPORARY | | | IRRIGATION FOR NATIVE PLANTS. SOME OF THE PLANTS ARE | | | NOT NATIVE AND DO NOT QUALIFY FOR AN EXEMPTION. SUPPLY | | | A PLAN SHOWING LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH WATER USAGE | | | ZONES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/7/22: | | | | | | 9. CIVIL PLANS SHOW D CURB ALONG SOUTH EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT, CURB NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | 10. WATER AND SEWER LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT | | | MATCH THE CIVIL DRAWINGS AND THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. THE DRAINAGE AND EXFILTRATION ARE TOO CLOSE TO | | | THE TREES ON THE SOUTH SIDE. CIVIL DRAWINGS MUST BE | | | COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-03-2021 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-03-2021 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-03 16:50:36 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 1156 CLARE AVE (Z18040013) Z20180014 | | | SEPTEMBER 3, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AUTHORIZED BY F.S.CH. 481 PT. | | | 2, PER SECTION 94-442(B)(1). | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR BUFFER REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL | | | PROPERTY LINES AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER | | | OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(B). REVISE TABLE TO SHOW NORTH-46? | | | REQUIRES 2 TREES, EAST- 52.73? REQUIRES 2 TREES, | | | SOUTH-125?REQUIRES 5 TREES, WEST ? 50? REQUIRES 2 | | | TREES. REVISE CHART AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES. | | | | | | 3. CORRECT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TO 40%, 2568 SQ FT, | | | REQUIRES 2 TREES, 1 FLOWERING TREE, AND 6 SHRUBS. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. REVISE PLANT LIST TO SHOW 12 FOOT MINIMUM TREE SIZES | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS, BAHIA (PASPALUM | | | NOTATUM) IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. | | | | | | 7. REMOVE NOTE REGARDING TEMPORARY IRRIGATION FOR | | | NATIVE PLANTS. SOME OF THE PLANTS ARE NOT NATIVE AND DO | | | NOT QUALIFY FOR AN EXEMPTION. SUPPLY A PLAN SHOWING | | | LOW, MODERATE AND HIGH WATER USAGE ZONES. | | | 8. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mtechnow |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mtechnow |
Date |
02-01-2022 |
Time |
10:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
02-14-2022 |
Time |
17:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-01 10:04:43 | COMMENTS FOR THE REFERENCED PROJECT: | | | SHEET C-1: | | | -ADD A NOTE OR CALL OUT FOR EXISTING SERVICE TO BE CUT | | | AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN IF BEING ABANDONED/RELOCATED. | | | SHEET C-2 | | | -SHOW PROFILE VIEW OF TIE-INS FROM TAP TO POINT OF | | | SERVICE (PROPERTY LINE) SHOWING VERTICAL CLEARANCES AND | | | ANY CONFLICTS. | | | -CALL OUT CLARE AVE ROW LINES. | | | | | | CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW [email protected] OR 561-494-1047 | | | WITH ANY QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
02-13-2023 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-13 08:09:39 | ALL INSTALLED CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MUST BE | | | RP TYPE, LEAD FREE, AND USC APPROVED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-11-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-11-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-11 09:23:41 | NO FURHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-08 14:14:32 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION | | | SERVICE. | | | - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER | | | TRUCK | | | * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT | | | * TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RECYCLING CONTAINERS. | | | - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE | | | ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
Time |
17:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-17 17:15:16 | THESE COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE 2/10/2023 | | | SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1. SIDEWALK RAMP BETWEEN STREET SIDEWALK AND THE | | | PARKING LOT WILL NEED HANDRAILS PER THE FBC | | | ACCESSIBILITY CHAPTER (SLOPE IS IN EXCESS OF 5% AND | | | MORE THAN 6 INCHES HIGH). THE HANDRAILS CANNOT EXTEND | | | INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY. A LEVEL LANDING MAY BE REQUIRED | | | AT THE TOP OF THE RAMP. THE SLOPE MAY BE RESTRICTED TO | | | LESS THAN 5% IF A PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK RUNS N-S | | | ALONG THE BUILDING ANF THEN TURNS TO THE WEST TO THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 2. 5-YEAR RUNOFF DEPTH WILL BE 4.22 INCHES (=0.35 FT) | | | (SCS FORMULA. P = 6 INCHES; AVG S = 1.88 INCHES). 5-YR | | | RUNOFF VOLUME WILL BE 2247 C.F. (0.35 FT X 6420 S.F.). | | | | | | 3. IF THE PAVEMENT CUT FOR THE SEWER LATERAL EXTENDS | | | PAST THE ROAD CENTERLINE, THEN THE MILL AND RESUFACE | | | LIMITS WILL NEED TO EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE | | | SOUTHBOUND TRAVEL LANE (EDGE OF PARKING SPACE) AND 50 | | | FEET NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SEWER LATERAL. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-12-2022 |
Time |
16:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-12 16:43:04 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 6-13-2022 SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN ALL BE LISTED AS | | | CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. SHEET C-3: DRAINAGE CALCS. | | | A. 5-YEAR RUNOFF VOLUME SHOULD INCLUDE PERVIOUS AREA. | | | SCS EQUATION CAN BE USED TO CALCULATE THE VOLUME OF | | | RUNOFF. | | | B. MINIMUM REQUIRED LENGTH OF TRENCH WOULD BE AROUND 40 | | | LINEAR FEET. | | | | | | 2. SHEET C-3 DETAIL 4 ? PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CONNECTION | | | DETAIL ? | | | A. SUGGEST ADDING SLOPE ARROW ON SIDEWALK AND LISTING | | | SLOPE AS 2% MAXIMUM. | | | B. REMOVE DROP CURB AND SHOW DRIVEWAY APRON TO THE EDGE | | | OF PAVEMENT AND CONTROL JOINT WHERE THE BACK OF CURB | | | WOULD BE. | | | C. SPECIFY SP ASPHALT INSTEAD OF TYPE S-III ASPHALT | | | WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 3. SHEET C-3 PROPOSED PGD PLAN ? LIST CONTOUR INTERVAL | | | OR SPOT GRADE LOWER THAN THE BACK OF SIDEWALK TO | | | INDICATE SWALE. | | | | | | 4. SHEET C-5 DETAIL 3 PROPOSED SIDEWALK SECTION | | | A. SUGGEST ADDING SLOPE ARROW ON SIDEWALK AND LISTING | | | SLOPE AS 2% MAXIMUM. | | | B. SHOW SWALE SECTION BEHIND THE SIDEWALK. | | | C. SPECIFY SP ASPHALT INSTEAD OF TYPE S-III ASPHALT | | | WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 5. WHAT IS THE ROCK TRENCH BETWEEN CB-2 AND BU-1 FOR? | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-11-2022 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-11-2022 |
Time |
11:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-11 11:48:03 | THE FOLLOWING OMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 1/28/22 PLAN SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1. VERIFY THE VERTICAL DATUM USED ON THE CIVIL PLANS. | | | NAVD1988 IS NOTED TWICE ON SHEET C-1. THE SURVEY IS | | | SHOWN TO BE IN NAVD1988 AND ITS ELEVATIONS ARE ~ 1.47' | | | LOWER THAN THE SPOT GRADES SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS. | | | THE VERTICAL DATUM SHOULD BE CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE | | | SURVEY, CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPING PLANS. | | | | | | 2. CONFIRM FEMA BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (12.7' NAVD) | | | LISTED ON SHEET C-1. | | | | | | 3. PARKING LOT STRIPING DETAIL TO BE CONSISTENT WITH | | | STALL PAINTING DETAIL IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | | | | 4. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION TO | | | NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION. | | | THIS INCLUDES SHEETS C-2 AND C-3, | | | | | | 5. REMOVE THE BUBBLE UP STRUCTURE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | THE ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE DESIGNED | | | FOR THE 5-YEAR DESIGN STORM EVENT BEFORE SPILLING OVER | | | INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 6. IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION, H2 IS EQUAL TO | | | THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CONTROL ELEVATION AND | | | THE HIGHER OF THE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH OR WATER TABLE ELEVATION. | | | | | | 7. THE SLOPE OF SIDEWALK ALONG CLARE AVE, INCLUDING | | | ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY, TO MEET ADA CRITERIA. | | | | | | 8. IN SECTION 03 ON SHEET C-3, WILL THE BACK OF CURB BE | | | EXPOSED OR WILL THE LANDSCAPING AREA MEET THE TOP OF | | | CURB? | | | | | | 9. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE LOCATED | | | OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE MINIMUM BEARING STRENGTH FOR SUBGRADE. | | | | | | 11. INCLUDE PRB'S IN DRAINAGE STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES TO EXTEND THE USEFUL LIFE OF THE | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCH. | | | | | | 12. DIMENSION THE THICKENED EDGE OF THE PROPOSED | | | SIDEWALK SECTION 03 ON SHEET C-5 INCLUDING CALLING OUT | | | THE TOOL JOINT. | | | | | | 13. CREATE A DEPRESSED AREAS IN THE GREEN AREA BETWEEN | | | THE BACK OF SIDEWALK/PROPERTY LINE AND THE BUILDING AND | | | IN THE AREA BETWEEN THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES | | | AND DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 14. THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND THE PARKING LOT DOESN'T APPEAR TO | | | MEET ADA. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-01-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-01-2021 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-01-2021 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-01 09:10:13 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS | | | NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE | | | NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN | | | NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. TTHE VERTICAL | | | DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 SHOULD BE | | | LISTED ON ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS WITH ELEVATION | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 2. THE SITE IS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA WITH | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (BFE) OF 12.1 FT NAVD. | | | STRUCTURES/MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ARE TO HAVE MINIMUM TWO | | | FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BFE. | | | | | | 3. THE SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG THE SITE | | | FRONTAGE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED ? 6-INCH THICK AT THE | | | PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE; REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY | | | ENTRANCE WITH RAISED CURB AND SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-11-2022 |
Time |
07:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
Time |
13:25 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-08 13:32:33 | 1. NO ENGINEERING PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | 2. EXISTING WATER METER NEEDS TO BE MOVED OUT OF | | | PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. | | | 3. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE UPDATED. | | | 4. NEED LEGEND OF CORNER MONUMENTATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-14-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-14-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-04-14 10:20:11 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LETTER BY A PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER VALIDATING THE BI-DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAY | | | 3) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUT, AND PARKING | | | STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHEET C-4, PER LATEST | | | RESPONSE, DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE CLEAR EXPLANATION | | | ON GARBAGE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS. ARE THE 96-GALLON | | | CONTAINERS BEING PICKED UP INSIDE THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT OR MOVED AND RETRIEVED BY THE ROADSIDE | | | CURB? | | | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. | | | 6) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE | | | EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY FLARE. A | | | MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR ZONE HAS TO BE MAINTAINED. | | | PLEASE DRAW A CIRCLE WITH A 3 FEET RADIUS AROUND THE | | | POLE TO VALIDATE SUCH DISTANCE, PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME | | | AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. | | | 7) SATISFIED. HOW DOES A VEHICLE TURN AROUND WHEN ALL | | | PARKING STALLS ARE OCCUPIED? PROVIDE AUTOTURN | | | SHOWCASING THE MANEUVER, ASSUMING ALL STALLS ARE | | | OCCUPIED. PER CITY CODE 93-485(M): ALL PARKING & | | | LOADING MANEUVERS SHOULD BE CONTAINED ON-SITE. NO | | | MANEUVERING OFF-STREET. GIVEN THE LANDUSE TYPE, PLEASE | | | REVISE THE ANALYSIS SO TO MODEL A BOX TRUCK U-TURN | | | MANEUVER; THE ANALYSIS MUST DISTINCTIVELY SHOW THE | | | DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE WHEEL PATH OF THE VEHICLE | | | (I.E. DIFFERENT COLORS) | | | 8) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE RESULT OF THE REVISED | | | AUTOTURN ANALYSIS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE | | | FURTHER MANEUVERING SPACE BY REDUCING OR REPLACING THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE PARKING | | | STALLS WITH ASPHALT | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-17-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-17-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-17-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-17 11:51:05 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LETTER BY A PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER VALIDATING THE BI-DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAY | | | 3) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUT, AND PARKING | | | STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHEET C-4, PER LATEST | | | RESPONSE, DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE CLEAR EXPLANATION | | | ON GARBAGE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS. ARE THE 96-GALLON | | | CONTAINERS BEING PICKED UP INSIDE THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT OR MOVED AND RETRIEVED BY THE ROADSIDE | | | CURB? | | | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. | | | 6) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE | | | EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY FLARE. A | | | MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR ZONE HAS TO BE MAINTAINED. | | | PLEASE DRAW A CIRCLE WITH A 3 FEET RADIUS AROUND THE | | | POLE TO VALIDATE SUCH DISTANCE, PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME | | | AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. | | | 7) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. HOW DOES A VEHICLE TURN AROUND | | | WHEN ALL PARKING STALLS ARE OCCUPIED? PROVIDE AUTOTURN | | | SHOWCASING THE MANEUVER, ASSUMING ALL STALLS ARE | | | OCCUPIED. PER CITY CODE 93-485(M): ALL PARKING & | | | LOADING MANEUVERS SHOULD BE CONTAINED ON-SITE. NO | | | MANEUVERING OFF-STREET. GIVEN THE LANDUSE TYPE, PLEASE | | | REVISE THE ANALYSIS SO TO MODEL A BOX TRUCK U-TURN | | | MANEUVER; THE ANALYSIS MUST DISTINCTIVELY SHOW THE | | | DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE WHEEL PATH OF THE VEHICLE | | | (I.E. DIFFERENT COLORS) | | | 8) DEPENDING ON THE RESULT OF THE REVISED AUTOTURN | | | ANALYSIS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FURTHER | | | MANEUVERING SPACE BY REDUCING OR REPLACING THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE PARKING | | | STALLS WITH ASPHALT | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-29-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-29 01:04:58 | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LETTER BY A PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER VALIDATING THE BI-DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAY | | | 3) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUT, AND PARKING | | | STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHEET C-4, PER LATEST | | | RESPONSE, DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE CLEAR EXPLANATION | | | ON GARBAGE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS. ARE THE 96-GALLON | | | CONTAINERS BEING PICKED UP INSIDE THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT OR MOVED AND RETRIEVED BY THE ROADSIDE | | | CURB? | | | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. | | | 6) NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE | | | EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY FLARE. A | | | MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR ZONE HAS TO BE MAINTAINED. | | | PLEASE DRAW A CIRCLE WITH A 3 FEET RADIUS AROUND THE | | | POLE TO VALIDATE SUCH DISTANCE, PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME | | | AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. | | | 7) NOT SATISFIED. HOW DOES A VEHICLE TURN AROUND WHEN | | | ALL PARKING STALLS ARE OCCUPIED? PROVIDE AUTOTURN | | | SHOWCASING THE MANEUVER, ASSUMING ALL STALLS ARE | | | OCCUPIED. PER CITY CODE 93-485(M): ALL PARKING & | | | LOADING MANEUVERS SHOULD BE CONTAINED ON-SITE. NO | | | MANEUVERING OFF-STREET | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-04-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-04-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-04 17:50:01 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LETTER BY A PROFESSIONAL | | | ENGINEER VALIDATING THE BI-DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAY | | | 3) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE | | | BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) | | | ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHEET C-4, PER LATEST RESPONSE, | | | DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT | | | 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR | | | GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND | | | OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC | | | ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED | | | IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE CLEAR | | | EXPLANATION ON GARBAGE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS. ARE THE | | | 96-GALLON CONTAINERS BEING PICKED UP INSIDE THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OR MOVED AND RETRIEVED BY THE | | | ROADSIDE CURB? | | | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 6) NOT SATISIFED. SHOWCASE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE | | | EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY FLARE. A | | | MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR ZONE HAS TO BE MAINTAINED | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-08 19:51:28 | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) PROVIDE A LETTER BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER | | | VALIDATING THE BI-DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAY | | | 3) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS | | | (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE | | | OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 4) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR | | | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING | | | 5) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA | | | AND BICYCLE ONES | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-19-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
04-19-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
04-19-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-04-19 10:49:17 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1.) PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | MINIMUM STRIPING REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF SEC. | | | 94-485 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | (ZLDRS). | | | | | | 2.) THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT TIME | | | OF ENGINEERING PERMIT: | | | | | | 2.1) SIDEWALK RAMP BETWEEN STREET SIDEWALK AND THE | | | PARKING LOT WILL NEED HANDRAILS PER FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | CHAPTER (SLOPE IS IN EXCESS OF 5% AND MORE THAN 6 | | | INCHES HIGH). THE HANDRAILS CANNOT EXTEND INTO THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. A LEVEL LANDING MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE | | | TOP OF THE RAMP. THE SLOPE MAY BE RESTRICTED TO LESS | | | THAN 5% IF A PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK RUNS NORTH-SOUTH | | | ALONG THE BUILDING AND THEN TURNS TO THE WEST TO THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 2.2) 5-YEAR RUNOFF DEPTH WILL BE 4.22 INCHES. | | | | | | 2.3) IF THE PAVEMENT CUT FOR THE SEWER LATERAL EXTENDS | | | PAST THE ROAD CENTERLINE, THEN THE MILL AND RESURFACE | | | LIMITS WILL NEED TO EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE | | | SOUTHBOUND TRAVEL LANE (EDGE OF THE PARKING SPACE) AND | | | 50 FEET NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SEWER LATERAL. | | | | | | 2.4) ALL INSTALLED CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MUST | | | BE RP TYPE, LEAD FREE AND USC APPROVED. | | | | | | 3.) A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THIS SITE PLAN APPROVAL SHALL | | | BE REQUIRED FOR THE AS-BUILT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.). ALL PLAN SETS SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED AS PART OF THIS MINOR AMENDMENT (INCLUDING | | | THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS | | | AND CIVIL PLANS), AND ALL PLANS SHALL MATCH THE | | | AS-BUILT FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-22-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
02-22-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
02-22-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-22 14:25:59 | SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): | | | | | | 1.) PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | MINIMUM STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-485 OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
07-13-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-13 13:02:14 | SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): | | | | | | 1.) PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | MINIMUM STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-485 OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-07 14:46:37 | *** THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED IN 2018 | | | (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 18-08). DUE TO INACTIVITY | | | OVER A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME WITH THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL, ISPR CASE N. 18-08 WAS WITHDRAWN BY STAFF. | | | THE SAME PROJECT IS NOW SUBMITTED UNDER A NEW | | | APPLICATION NUMBER (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 21-11). | | | ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THIS NEW SUBMITTAL MUST BE | | | UPDATED. *** | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A RESPONSE TO EACH STANDARD IN SEC. 94-35(C), SITE | | | DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED. THE APPLICANT MUST EXPLAIN HOW EACH | | | STANDARD (IN WORDS) IS MET THROUGH IN SITE DESIGN. | | | [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NO DOCUMENT ADDRESSING THE | | | STANDARDS WAS FOUND IN THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. | | | APPLICANT'S 1/26/22 RESPONSE TO STAFF'S COMMENT IS THAT | | | THE STANDARDS ARE ADDRESSED IN THE PLANS. THIS IS | | | INSUFFICIENT, AS A WRITE-UP OF THE STANDARDS IS A | | | REQUIRED COMPONENT OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS AND IT IS | | | NECESSARY TO ASSIST STAFF WITH UNDERSTANDING THE SITE | | | DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 28 OF THE | | | 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.] | | | | | | 2.) THE PROPERTY IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL (I); HOWEVER, | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE APPLICATION (PLANS | | | AND DOCUMENTS, I.E. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, PROJECT | | | FACT SHEET, SITE PLAN, ETC.) INDICATE THAT THE SITE IS | | | ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI), WHICH IS INCORRECT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT | | | ADDRESSED. NO REVISED/CORRECTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT | | | AND PROJECT FACT SHEET PROVIDED WITH THE 1/28/22 | | | RESUBMITTAL PACKET. ALSO, THE PROJECT DATA TABULAR ON | | | SHEET A1.0 HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED.] | | | | | | 3.) THE UPDATED PUBLIC FACILITIES LETTER FROM AT&T WAS | | | NOT PROVIDED IN THE 1/28/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET. | | | | | | 4.) THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT | | | IS A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY; HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT'S | | | 1/28/22 RESPONSE TO STAFF'S COMMENTS STATES THAT "A USE | | | IS NOT PROPOSED OR ANTICIPATED AT THIS TIME." A USE | | | MUST BE DETERMINED AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE. IF THIS | | | PROJECT IS A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY IT MUST BE CLEARLY | | | STATED AS SUCH IN THE PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, | | | ETC. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE GENERAL NOTES | | | ON SHEET A1.0: A) #8 (NEW SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION) IS | | | NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE PLAN. REMOVE THE NOTE IF NOT | | | APPLICABLE; OTHERWISE PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF | | | THE NEW SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION IN THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PROJECT DATA | | | TABULAR ON SHEET A1.0: A) ZONING IS INDUSTRIAL (I). B) | | | THE INFORMATION ON THE FLOOR AREA RATIO IS | | | CUT-OFF/INCOMPLETE. C) PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT | | | INFORMATION IS MISSING AND MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | PROJECT DATA. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR ON SHEET A1.0: A) THE GROSS SITE AREA IS NOT | | | 1,475 ACRES. B) GROSS FLOOR AREA AND BUILDING COVERAGE | | | IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE | | | PROJECT DATA TABULAR AND IN THE SITE PLAN. NEEDS TO BE | | | CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY. C) PERCENTAGE PROVIDED FOR | | | THE BUILDING COVERAGE SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT. D) THE | | | PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT AND NEEDS TO BE | | | REFERENCED AS "WAREHOUSING FACILITIES FOR FAMILIES AND | | | SMALL BUSINESSES" (I.E. THE PARKING CALCULATION FOR | | | WAREHOUSING FACILITIES FOR FAMILIES AND SMLL BUSINESSES | | | IS NOT 1 PARKING SPACE/1,000 SQ. FT.). | | | | | | 4.) PLEASE ADD THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL NOTES TO THE | | | SITE PLAN (AS NOTED IN THE APPLICANT'S 1/26/22 RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SITE | | | LIGHTING): A) THESE BUILDINGS ARE INTENDED FOR | | | UNOCCUPIED STORAGE AND WILL NOT BE EQUIPPED WITH AIR | | | CONDITIONING OR HEATING. B) BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTS | | | ONLY. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE | | | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE | | | AWAY FROM ALL PUBLIC THROUGHFARES. | | | | | | 5.) ALL BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES (I.E. FENCES, TRASH | | | ENCLOSURE, ETC.) WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST BE | | | LABELED WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY | | | LINE(S). [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: SETBACK DISTANCE | | | FROM THE TRASH ENCLOSURE TO THE FRONT (WEST/CLARE | | | AVENUE) PROPERTY LINE (A CRITICAL DIMENSION) HAS NOT | | | BEEN PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN.] | | | | | | 6.) HOW TALL IS THE LOCKING SWING GATE AND THE ADA WALK | | | GATE? THE HEIGHT OF THE GATE/FENCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN | | | THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 7.) ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, AWNINGS | | | WILL BE PROVIDED ABOVE THE DOORS OF EACH UNIT. THE | | | AWNINGS AND DIMENSIONS SHALL BE OUTLINED IN THE SITE | | | PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 8.) THE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET C-2 | | | IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STANDARDS. PARKING | | | STRIPING STANDARDS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ZLDR | | | S.94-485. | | | | | | 9.) THE AREA IDENTIFIED TO MANAGE TRASH GENERATED FROM | | | THE PROJECT SHALL BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC WORKS | | | DEPARTMENT. SCREENING OF TRASH/RECEPTACLE ENCLOSURE | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-315. | | | [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: SCREENING REQUIREMENT NOT | | | ADDRESSED. THE ENCLOSURE MUST BE LINED WITH LANDSCAPING | | | ON ALL THREE SIDES PER ZLDR S.94-315. PLACEMENT AND | | | ADEQUACY OF THE ENCLOSURE MUST ALSO BE APPROVED BY THE | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.] | | | | | | 10.) LANDSCAPE AREA AND PLANT MATERIAL ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY (I.E. THE 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER) SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT | | | WITH A NON-MOUNTABLE CURB. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(5)] | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN | | | THE FLOOR PLAN(S) OF BOTH BUILDINGS DOES NOT MATCH THE | | | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. [9/2/2021 MODIFIED/REPEAT COMMENT: | | | CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING #2 IS STILL NOT CONSISTENT ON | | | BOTH THE SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN. THERE IS A | | | DISCREPANCY OF 71 SQ. FT. IF THE 71 SQ. FT. IS THE | | | FLOOR AREA CALCULATION OF THE ADA RESTROOM IN UNIT #5, | | | IT MUST BE ALSO INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL BUILDING SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE CALCULATION. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.] | | | | | | 2.) WEST ELEVATION NOTES/INFORMATION SEEMS TO BE | | | CUT-OFF/INCOMPLETE. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR | | | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, | | | AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL ($200.00 DUE AT THE TIME OF | | | THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL ? FOR CYCLE 3). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
09-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
09-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-02 14:30:48 | *** THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED IN 2018 | | | (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 18-08). DUE TO INACTIVITY | | | OVER A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME WITH THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL, ISPR CASE NO. 18-08 WAS WITHDRAWN BY STAFF. | | | THE SAME PROJECT IS NOW SUBMITTED UNDER A NEW | | | APPLICATION NUMBER (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 21-11). | | | ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THIS NEW SUBMITTAL MUST BE | | | UPDATED. *** | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THE APPLICANT TO SCHEDULE | | | A MEETING WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS ALTERNATIVES WITH THE | | | SITE DESIGN TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 2.) CIVIL PLANS ARE MISSING FROM THE SUBMITTAL PACKET. | | | THE CIVIL DRAWINGS ARE A REQUIRED COMPONENT OF THE | | | APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 18 OF THE | | | 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE ENGINEERING PLANS | | | CHECKLIST. | | | | | | 3.) AN UPDATED, ABSTRACTED ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | SURVEY IS REQUIRED. THE SURVEY MUST BE LESS THAN A YEAR | | | OLD. THE SURVEY PROVIDED IS OUTDATED (FROM 2018) AND IS | | | NOT ABSTRACTED. A DIGITAL SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY IS | | | ALSO REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 4.) THE SIGNED OWNER'S CONSENT FORM PROVIDED WITH THE | | | APPLICATION IS NO LONGER VALID. PLEASE EXECUTE A NEW | | | OWNER'S CONSENT FORM. | | | | | | 5.) PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT | | | THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE | | | PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE | | | AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING | | | PUBLIC FACILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE | | | INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, | | | FPU, FPL AND COMCAST. | | | | | | 7.) THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PREPARED BY JFO GROUP, INC., IS | | | OUTDATED (FROM 2018). A NEW STUDY IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 8.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT HAS MET THE TPS STANDARDS FOR THE COUNTY IS | | | REQUIRED. THIS LETTER IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION | | | PACKET. | | | | | | 9.) THE PROPERTY IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL (I); HOWEVER, | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE APPLICATION (PLANS | | | AND DOCUMENTS, I.E. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, PROJECT | | | FACT SHEET, SITE PLAN, ETC.) INDICATE THAT THE SITE IS | | | ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI), WHICH IS INCORRECT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 10.) A RESPONSE TO EACH STANDARD IN SECTION 94-3(C), | | | SITE DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF | | | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE APPLICANT MUST EXPLAIN HOW EACH | | | STANDARD IS MET THROUGH THE SITE DESIGN. | | | | | | 11.) IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE PARKING | | | REQUIREMENT FOR A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY (WAREHOUSING | | | FOR FAMILIES AND SMALL BUSINESSES) IS DIFFERENT FROM A | | | BUSINESS OPERATION WITHIN A WAREHOUSE BUILDING/UNIT. | | | ANY CHANGE IN USE FROM WAREHOUSING FOR FAMILIES AND | | | SMALL BUSINESSES (SELF-STORAGE) WILL REQUIRE THE NEW | | | USE TO MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-481(D)] | | | | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) CONSIDER JOINING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH THE | | | ADJACENT PARCEL TO THE NORTH (SAME PROPERTY OWNER). | | | JOINING THE PARCELS WOULD ALLOW FOR GREATER FLEXIBILITY | | | IN DESIGN (PARKING, LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, | | | INGRESS/EGRESS) AND INCREASE THE OVERALL FUNCTIONALITY | | | OF THE SITE. | | | | | | 2.) PER THE SUBMITTED OUTDATED SURVEY, THERE SEEMS TO | | | BE AN EXISTING WATER METER AND VALVE IN CONFLICT WITH | | | THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON HOW THE | | | PROPOSED "LOCKING SWING GATE" WILL FUNCTION (I.E. | | | MANUAL OR MECHANICAL ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESS FOR | | | EMERGENCY AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES, ETC.). IS THE GATE | | | ALSO CHAIN LINK? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | BY THE CITY?S FIRE AND SANITATION DEPARTMENTS. | | | | | | 4.) DETAIL OF THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL IS | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY. PLEASE | | | REVISE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)] | | | | | | 5.) ALL BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES (I.E. FENCES, ETC.) WITHIN | | | THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST BE LABELED WITH SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). | | | | | | 6.) THE AREA IDENTIFIED TO MANAGE TRASH GENERATED FROM | | | THE PROJECT SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS | | | DEPARTMENT. SCREENING OF TRASH/GARBAGE RECEPTACLES | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-315. | | | | | | 7.) SHOW LOCATION FOR ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PROVIDED | | | FOR THE PROPERTY (INCLUDING A/C IF APPLICABLE). SETBACK | | | AND SCREENING MEASURES APPLY. [ZLDR S.94-305(4)] | | | | | | 8.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR, AS REQUIRED IN THE SITE DATA CHECKLIST OF THE | | | 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: A) ZONING DESIGNATION IS | | | NOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI); B) PARCEL SIZE IS | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THE PARCEL SIZE INFORMATION PROVIDED | | | IN THE SURVEY; C) MAXIMUM AND PROPOSED CALCULATIONS | | | REQUIRED FOR: LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING, LOT COVERAGE BY | | | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, BUILDING HEIGHT, OPEN SPACE, | | | LANDSCAPED AREA AND FLOOR AREA RATIO. | | | | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) CONSIDER ADDITION FENESTRATION/ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT TO THE BUILDING FACADES (ESPECIALLY ON THE | | | FACADES VISIBLE FROM THE STREET (I.E. ABUTTING THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY). | | | | | | 2.) BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN | | | THE FLOOR PLAN(S) OF BOTH BUILDINGS DOES NOT MATCH THE | | | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) IS ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT | | | SITE? IF SO, LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF ANY POLE FIXTURES | | | AND A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ILLUSTRATING INTENSITY SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 ? INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |