City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z21070036

Plan Review Stops For Project Z21070036

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-26-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	08-26-2021	Time	12:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	08-26-2021	Time	12:14	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-26 12:15:43	I SPOKE WITH DAVID MILLAGE AT COTLEUR & HEARING AND
	REVIEWED THE COMMENT WITH PUBLIC ART THIS MORNING.

	PLEASE NOTE THAT THEIR IDENTIFIED LOCATION IS NOT
	APPLICABLE TO SATISFY THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. IF
	THEY CHOOSE TO ADD ART FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSE THEY MAY
	DO SO HOWEVER IT WILL NOT APPLY TO THE CITY?S PUBLIC
	ART REQUIREMENT. MORSELIFE IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART
	REQUIREMENT FOR THE NEW DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE
	OF THEIR CAMPUS.

	I REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING WITH MR. MILLAGE:

	SECTION 78-122 EXTERIOR MEANS ANY PLACE, PUBLIC OR
	PRIVATE, OUTDOOR AND EXTERIOR TO BUILDINGS OR
	STRUCTURES
	AND EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
	TO, BUILDINGS, PARKS, RIGHT-OF-WAY MEDIANS
	AND OPEN SPACES.

	PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT MEANS THE ASSESSMENT OF ONE
	PERCENT OF THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT OF
	THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT THAT
	EQUALS OR EXCEEDS $500,000, WHICH MAY BE
	DISCOUNTED AS PROVIDED IN THIS ARTICLE.

	PUBLIC PLACE MEANS ANY PLACE, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE,
	EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
	LIMITED TO, BUILDINGS, PARKS, RIGHT-OF-WAY MEDIANS AND
	OPEN SPACES. OR ANY PLACE OWNED AND
	OPERATED BY A GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY AND
	WHICH IS ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC.

	SYBILLE WELTER
	ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	09-13-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	09-13-2021	Time	20:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	09-13-2021	Time	20:43	Sent To

Notes

2021-09-13 20:44:58	FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PURPOSES. A FULL BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	09-09-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	09-09-2021	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	09-09-2021	Time	16:37	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-27-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	08-27-2021	Time	16:29	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	08-27-2021	Time	16:29	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-27 16:30:13	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	10-18-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	09-21-2021	Time	11:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	09-21-2021	Time	11:19	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-07-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	09-07-2021	Time	17:08	Rev Time	1.50
Received By	eschneid			Date	09-07-2021	Time	14:26	Sent To

Notes

2021-09-07 17:08:46	CASE NO. PB 1248II
	MORSELIFE DOG PARK ETC.
	4850 RYNA GREENBAUM DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF
	THESE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 7, 2021), THE PLANNING
	DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE
	A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	DOG PARK - NO COMMENTS.

	SCULPTURE - NO COMMENTS.

	SHUFFLEBOARD - NO COMMENTS.

	WALK-IN COOLER:

	1) SHEET L102 AND SHEET A1 SHOW DIFFERENT MEASURE
	POINTS AND POSSIBLY DIMENSIONS FOR THE FREEZER AREA.
	STAFF WAS UNABLE TO VERIFY ANY DIMENSIONS BE SCALING
	THE PLANS SINCE THE PLAN SCALE LISTED DOES NOT MATCH
	THE DIMENSIONS ON EITHER PLAN. NOTE: THE SCALE ON SHEET
	L102 DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS LISTED AS 1:30 - IT APPEARS
	SHRUNK ON THE PAGE. THE FREEZER UNIT DIMENSIONS (WHEN
	SCALED FROM THE ELEVATION AND SECTION DRAWINGS) MATCH
	THE FREEZER PAD DIMENSIONS. THE CANOPY WIDTH ALSO SEEMS
	TO MATCH. THE DEPTH OF THE CANOPY IS NOT CORRECT.

	2) STAFF NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE DRIVE
	AISLE CLEARANCE OF 20 FEET IS MAINTAINED FROM THE
	PROPOSED BOLLARD AND THE CURB ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
	DRIVE AISLE.